| 2011-05-06 16:53:07 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | |
| | 1. OK. |
| | |
| | 2. OPENING 10, 139" SPAN, REQUIRES USE OF 12' ROW, 10" |
| | SPACING DOES NOT COMPLY. CHECK ALL. |
| | |
| | 3. SUBSTRATE SPECIFIED ON INSTALLATION SCHEDULE IS |
| | CONCRETE BLOCK, BUT CONNECTION TYPE A REQUIRES A |
| | CONCRETE SUBSTRATE. PLEASE REVISE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, INSTALLATION SCHEDULE SUBSTRATE STATES: |
| | "CONC BLOCK." DOES THIS MEAN THAT ALL OPENINGS HAVE A |
| | CONCRETE BLOCK SUBSTRATE, OR THAT THIS IS CONCRETE AT |
| | THE TOP, BLOCK ON THE BOTTOM? |
| | |
| | 4. THE REVISED INSTALLATION SCHEDULE HAS CHANGED EDGE |
| | DISTANCE FROM 3" TO 2". ANCHOR SPACING, 10", NO LONGER |
| | COMPLIES. PLEASE APPLY FACTOR .35 PER CHART ON SHEET |
| | 14. |
| | |
| | ALSO PLEASE NOTE, I RECEIVED CLARIFICATION FROM WALTER |
| | TILLET, PE. A 3" EDGE DISTANCE ALSO REQUIRES A .35 |
| | FACTOR. ONLY 3 1/2" EDGE DISTANCE FOR TAPCONS CAN |
| | UTILIZE THE SPACING IN THE CHARTS WITHOUT A .35 FACTOR. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5. SEE ANCHOR CHART FOR CONNECTION TYPE D. SOMEONE |
| | CIRCLED 10" ON THE PRODUCCT APPROVAL, BUT THAT IS THE |
| | ROW FOR ALL POINTS SOLID SET. THE TAPCON ROW REQUIRES |
| | 4" SPACING. PLEASE SEE THE LEGEND AT TOP LEFT CORNER OF |
| | SHEET 13. |
| | |
| | 6. AS DISCUSSED, I PULLED TWO PLANS AT RANDOM TO |
| | RE-REVIEW INSTALLATION SCHEDULES ON ISSUED PERMITS IN |
| | ORDER TO DETERMINE WHY CONTRACTOR WAS ABLE TO OBTAIN |
| | PERMITS IN THE PAST BUT IS HAVING DIFFICULTIES AT THIS |
| | TIME. I FOUND THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 10050282 WAS SUBMITTED INCORRECTLY BY CONTRACTOR. I HAD |
| | A DISCUSSION WITH THE CONTRACTOR, EXPLAINED ERRORS, AND |
| | REDLINED. |
| | |
| | 08030066 WAS SUBMITTED WITHOUT AN INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE, BUT ALL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED IN AN |
| | ALTERNATE FORMAT. THE WOMAN WHO DID THE PAPERWORK AT |
| | THAT TIME DEVELOPED A FORM WHICH SHE TITLED "DRILLING |
| | REQUIREMENT" AFTER SHE AND I HAD NUMEROUS DISCUSSIONS |
| | REGARDING THE INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING. |
| | |
| | PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT IN THE FUTURE PERMITS WITH |
| | INCORRECT INFORMATION SUBMITTED MAY BE ISSUED WITH |
| | PROVISO THAT CORRECTED (CODE COMPLIANT) PLANS BE |
| | SUBMITTED AS A REVISION (WITH REVISION FEES). |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PAY PLAN REVIEW FEE. THIS |
| | PROJECT WAS PULLED FROM REVIEW BECAUSE PLAN REVIEW FEES |
| | WERE NOT PAID AT TIME OF SUBMITTAL AS REQUIRED. DUE TO |
| | THE EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES WITH THE PERMIT RUNNER, |
| | REVIEW HAS BEEN PERFORMED (CONTRARY TO DEPARTMENT |
| | POLICY) AS A COURTESY TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO APPEARS TO |
| | BE A VICTIM. HOWEVER, PLEASE PAY PLAN REVIEW FEE WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING PLAN IN ORDER TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
