| Plan Review Stops For Permit 10030453 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2010-05-04 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2010-05-04 |
Time |
10:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-04-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2010-04-05 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2010-04-05 |
Time |
16:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-04-05 16:08:24 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING PROPOSED LOCATION. | | | | | | 2. TWO COMPLETE ORIGINAL SETS OF PLANS REQUIRED FOR | | | PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-06-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-06-21 |
Time |
14:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-06-21 |
Time |
13:58 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-05-04 |
Time |
09:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-06-21 |
Time |
13:58 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2010-05-04 09:50:31 | TO SAMANTHA./WRT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-03-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-03-25 |
Time |
14:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-03-25 |
Time |
14:44 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2010-03-25 14:57:07 | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | THE 2007 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2009 | | | REVISIONS, 2008 NEC, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND | | | FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1} PROVIDE A SITE PLAN INDICATING THE INTENDED LOCATION | | | OF THE POLES TO BE INSTALLED UNDER THIS PERMIT. 106.1.1 | | | FBC. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-06-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vmolina |
Date |
2010-06-10 |
Time |
13:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vmolina |
Date |
2010-06-10 |
Time |
13:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-06-10 13:08:14 | IN ZONING BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-04-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-04-27 |
Time |
08:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-04-28 08:51:20 | TO ZONING BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-04-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2010-04-05 |
Time |
16:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2010-03-18 |
Time |
10:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-03-18 10:06:33 | INCOMING SENT TO ZONING |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-06-17 |
Time |
17:51 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-06-11 |
Time |
11:51 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2010-06-17 17:53:00 | PASSED W/PROVISO | | | | | | POSTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE CORNER WHERE 4 PARKING | | | SPACES MEET AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-05-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-05-03 |
Time |
14:59 |
Rev Time |
0.55 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-04-28 |
Time |
09:59 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2010-05-03 16:32:12 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) PARTIAL REPEAT COMMENT: THE LIGHT POSTS SHALL NOT | | | CONFLICT WITH TREES. THE LOCATION AND ORIENTATION OF | | | THE PROPOSED LIGHT POSTS CONFLICTS WITH THE THE LONG | | | TERM GROWTH OF THE EXISTING OAK TREES. THE LIGHT POSTS | | | SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET FROM THE TREES. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ADDITION OF THE LIGHT POLE BASES | | | MAY NOT REDUCE THE LANDSCAPE BELOW 15%. THIS | | | CALCULATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. NO | | | INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO VERIFY THAT THERE WILL BE | | | NO REDUCTION IN LANDSCAPE AREA, BUT THE LACK OF | | | LANDSCAPE ON THE SITE INDICATES THAT THE SITE CONTAINS | | | LESS THAN 15% LANDSCAPE. | | | | | | 3) SUGGESTION: COMMENTS 1 & 2 ABOVE WOULD NOT APPLY IF | | | THE NEW LIGHT POSTS WERE INSTALLED WITHIN THE ASPHALT | | | OF THE PARKING ROW TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE PROPOSED | | | LOCATIONS. THE POSTS COULD BE INSTALLED IN THE CORNER | | | WHERE 4 PARKING SPACES MEET AND NEITHER TREES NOR | | | LANDSCAPE WOULD BE AFFECTED. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-03-23 |
Time |
16:11 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-03-23 |
Time |
16:11 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2010-03-23 16:29:36 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE A CURRENT SURVEY AND SITE PLAN SHOWING THE | | | PROPOSED LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE | | | LIGHT POLES SHLL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET | | | FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | 2) IF THE LIGHT POLES ARE PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED AT THE | | | EXTERIOR OF THE PARKING LOT, THEN PLEASE PROVIDE | | | PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATIONS AT THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 3) IF THE LIGHT POLES ARE PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED IN OR | | | ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS, THEN PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE LIGHT POLES IN | | | RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING TREES. THE LIGHT POSTS SHALL | | | NOT CONFLICT WITH TREES. NOTE: IT APPEARS FROM THE | | | AERIAL OF THE SITE THAT A NUMBER OF TERMINAL AND | | | INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ARE MISSING TREES. THESE | | | TREES SHALL BE REPLACED AND THE LIGHT POLES MAY NOT | | | CONFLICT WITH THEM. | | | | | | 4) THE ADDITION OF THE LIGHT POLE BASES MAY NOT REDUCE | | | THE LANDSCAPE BELOW 15%. THIS CALCULATION SHALL BE | | | SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | | | | | |
|
|