| 2010-03-31 17:27:59 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | 2007 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2009 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- SHEET A-1: |
| | A) DIMENSION SHOWN ON FOUNDATION PLANS FOR REAR |
| | CONCRETE PATIO DOESN'T MATCH DIMENSION SHOWN ON SURVEY. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | B) STAIRS DETAILS: * PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS FOR |
| | STAIRWAY ATTACHMENT AT TOP AND BOTTOM. SPECIFY METAL |
| | HANGER AND FASTENING OF STAIRWAY TO CONCRETE SLAB. ** |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS AND SPECS FOR STAIR LANDING. *** |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS AND SPECS FOR HANDRAILS TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN CRITERIA OF TABLE R301.5, |
| | SEC. R311 AND SEC. R312 OF 2007 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL |
| | CODE. |
| | C) UPDATE FIREBLOCKING NOTE. REFERENCE CORRECT CODE |
| | SEC. R602.1.2 OF THE 2007 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE NOT |
| | THE SFBC. |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET A-2: |
| | A) SPECIFY SIZE OF ATTIC ACCESS. SEC. R807. |
| | B) SHOW LOCATION OF HANDRAILS. SEC. R312.5 |
| | C) CLARIFY TYPE OF RAILING ON FRONT LOGGIA. IS IT |
| | ALUMINUM OR WOOD RAILING. COORDINATE WITH EXTERIOR |
| | ELEVATION ON SHEET A-4. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET A-3: |
| | A) REVISE DESIGN PARAMETERS INFORMATION. ACCORDING TO |
| | SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2009 REVISIONS TO THE 2007 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE, THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED ON EXPOSURE |
| | "C". NOT "B". REVISE ALL DOORS/WINDOWS DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | B) UPDATE ALL INFORMATION SHOWN ON DESIGN PARAMETERS TO |
| | REFLECT THE 2007 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2009 |
| | REVISIONS. REVISE THE FBC CODE SECTIONS CITED AND THE |
| | YEAR FOR ASCE 7. |
| | C) REVISE PLYWOOD SHEATHING NAILING SCHEDULE FOR ROOF. |
| | NEED TO USE 8D RING SHANK NAILS AND SPACING IS 4"O.C. |
| | IN ROOF ZONE #3. SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET A-5. TWO STORY WALL SECTION: A) REVISE THE |
| | ATTIC INSULATION TO MATCH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | B) SPECIFY HOW MUCH EMBEDEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | ANCHOR BOLTS IN THE (2)2X10 LEDGER SUPPORTING THE |
| | SECOND FLOOR TRUSSES TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | DESIGN LOADS OF SEC. R301 AND STRUCTURUAL NOTES ON |
| | SHEET A-7. |
| | |
| | 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) SHUTTERS AS SHOWN ON ELEVATIONS. AND PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| | B) PRECAST LINTELS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | C) ENTRY DOOR. |
| | D) FRENCH DOORS THAT MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | CALCULATED BY THE ARCHITECT. DESIGN PRESSURES ON |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL-7630.4 SUBMITTED DON'T MEET |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ARCHITECT. ALSO, |
| | CLARIFY WHICH FRENCH DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL IS GOING TO |
| | BE USED. THERE ARE DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | SUBMITTED INCLUDING AN NOA 08-0409.04. PROVIDE ONLY THE |
| | ONE THAT IS GOING TO BE USED AND MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | 6- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | |
| | 7- REVISE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE CORRECT |
| | BUILDER'S NAME AND COMPLETE THE REST OF THE INFORMATION |
| | ON TOP OF THE FORM. |
| | |
| | 8- SURVEYS NEED TO HAVE SURVEYOR'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE |
| | (NOT COPY) AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 OF FLORIDA |
| | STATUTES. |
| | |
| | 9- TRUSS PACKAGE: |
| | A) TOTAL DESIGN LOAD TO MATCH DESIGN LOAD SPECIFIED BY |
| | THE ARCHITECT ON STRUCTURAL NOTES ON SHEET A-7. |
| | B) ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | COMPLETE TRUSS PACKAGE PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS |
| | OFFICE. |
| | C) TRUSS ENGINEER TO PROVIDE ALL HIS INFORMATION AND |
| | PROVIDE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE ON TRUSS LAYOUT AND |
| | INDIVIDUAL TRUSSES AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 AND SEC. |
| | 61G15-23.002 OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | 10 BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) |
| | TO VERIFY IF IMPACT FEES ARE DUE. BRING BACK STAMPED |
| | PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT. |
| | |
| | 11- PERMIT VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | IS TOO LOW. OWES $1762.01 FOR UPDATED PERMIT VALUATION |
| | AND RADON FEES. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | |