Plan Review Details - Permit 10010398
Plan Review Stops For Permit 10010398
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2010-03-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2010-03-22 Time 16:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2010-03-18 Time 14:00 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2010-01-26 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2010-01-26 Time 10:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2010-01-26 Time 10:40 Sent To  
Notes
2010-01-26 11:13:39****CORRECTIONS****
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL
  
 1. SEE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE
 FLORIDA BUIDLING CODE SECTION 106.1, DOCUMENTS WILL BE
 ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY, TO SCALE, SUFFICIENT TO SHOW
 SCOPE AND COMPLIANCE. THIS APPLICATION PROPOSES TO
 INSTALL NEW PARTITION WALLS, COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION,
 WITH NO INFORMATION REGARDING OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION
 FBC CHAPTER 3, BUILDING TYPE FBC CHAPTER 5, LIFE SAFETY
 PLAN FBC CHAPTER 10 (INCLUDING OCCUPANT LOAD),
 ACCESSIBILITY FBC CHAPTER 11. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE
 NEW PROPOSED WALL WILL AFFECT EXITING. PLANS USE SOME
 NON-STANDARD TERMINOLOGY; FOR EXAMPLE, "INSTALL NEW
 SLATWALL ON THESE WALLS" AND "RECEPTICAL IN QUESTION."
 THERE ARE DASHED LINES, SINGLE LINES, AND DOUBLE LINES
 ON THE PLAN BUT NO LEGEND PROVIDED. NO DIMENSIONS WERE
 PROVIDED OTHER THAN DOOR WIDTH. DETAILS SHOULD INCLUDE
 DETAIL NUMBERS WITH CORRELATING DETAIL MARKERS ON THE
 PLAN TO SHOW LOCATION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. AN
 "EXISTING FLOOR PLAN" AND "PROPOSED NEW FLOOR PLAN" MAY
 BE HELPFUL. PROVIDE A CODE SUMMARY AND ARCHITECTURAL
 QUALITY PLANS, DRAWN TO SCALE. APPLICATION STATES THAT
 A 2' PARTITION WALL IS TO BE INSTALLED, IS THIS THE
 SOFFIT? SOFFIT DETAIL IS NOT CLEAR; OTHER DETAILS MAY
 BE NECESSARY (SUCH AS ELEVATION, SECTION, PLAN, TO
 SCALE WITH ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO SHOW PROPOSED
 CONSTRUCTION). PROVIDE PLANS WHICH CLEARLY SHOW SCOPE
 OF WORK AND WHICH DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE.
  
 2. DECLARE LEVEL OF ALTERATION, FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 401.4.
  
 3. AN AREA WAS CREATED WITH THE TEXT "3 CHILD RIDES."
 PROVIDE INFORMATION - NOT CLEAR AS TO SIZE, ACCESS
 (LINES ARE SHOWN ON FOUR SIDES, TWO ARE DASHED, NO DOOR
 SHOWN), INFORMATION ABOUT "RIDES," ETC. SEE FBC CHAPTER
 10 AND FBC CHAPTER 11.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2010-03-16 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2010-03-16 Time 13:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2010-03-16 Time 13:33 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2010-02-08 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2010-02-08 Time 11:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2010-02-08 Time 11:24 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2010-03-18 Cont ID  
Sent By mawillia Date 2010-03-18 Time 13:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mawillia Date 2010-03-18 Time 12:30 Sent To  
Notes
2010-03-18 13:03:55*****APPROVED*****
  
 THE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW HAVE BEEN
 ADDRESSED; PLAN SHEET 1 OF 1 STAMPED, INITIALED, AND
 DATED.
  
  
 CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6722
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2010-02-06 Cont ID  
Sent By mawillia Date 2010-02-05 Time 12:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mawillia Date 2010-02-06 Time 11:58 Sent To  
Notes
2010-02-06 12:47:34*****DENIED*****
  
  
 1. STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR
 DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241 - 2004
 EDITION.
  
 2. THE PROJECT SITE ADDRESS, NAME OF OWNER AND OCCUPANT
 SHALL BE IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN
 SHEET. A POINT OF COMPASS (DIRECTIONAL INDICATOR) IS
 RECOMMENDED TO BETTER DETAIL LAYOUT OF THE FLOOR PLAN.
  
 3. PLANS FAIL TO INDICATE THE TYPE OF OCCUPANCY,
 OCCUPANT LOADS, WHETHER BUILDING HAS FIRE SPRINKLER
 AND/OR FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, ETC.
  
 4. NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE, 2006 EDITION SHALL BE
 REFERENCED.
  
 5. SPECIFY THE INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS FOR THE NEW
 WALLS AND/OR CEILING IN TERMS OF CLASS A, CLASS B, OR
 CLASS C.
  
 6. HOW DOES THE SCOPE OF WORK IMPACT TRAVEL DISTANCE TO
 EXITS?
  
 7. IF EQUIPPED, DOES THE SCOPE OF WORK HAVE CAUSE FOR
 THE FIRE ALARM AND/OR FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM(S) TO BE
 REMODELED?
  
 8. ON SHEET 3, PLEASE EXPLAIN 3 CHILD RIDES THIS AREA.
  
  
 TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS INCLUDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER INDICATING WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED
  
 CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6722
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2010-03-08 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2010-03-08 Time 14:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2010-03-08 Time 14:05 Sent To  
Notes
2010-03-08 14:08:23B4
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2010-02-12 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 2010-02-12 Time 09:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 2010-01-26 Time 11:23 Sent To  
Notes
2010-01-26 10:40:29B 8
  
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2010-01-26 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2010-01-26 Time 11:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2010-01-21 Time 10:58 Sent To  
Notes
2010-01-26 11:17:38INTERIOR RENOVATION/REPAIR
  
  
2010-01-25 11:05:05UNDER 5K BUILDING
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2010-02-12 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 2010-02-12 Time 09:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 2010-02-12 Time 09:51 Sent To  
Notes
2010-02-12 09:54:11MINIMAL INTERIOR WORK, ZONING REVIEW NOT REQUIRED.
 LM


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved