| Plan Review Stops For Permit 09110060 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2009-12-03 |
Time |
13:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
Time |
15:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-03 12:59:21 | I CONTACTED CHERYL HORTON OF PAPA ABOUT THE PROSPECTIVE | | | MERGER OF PARCELS & THE PCN# TO REMAIN AS A RESULT OF | | | IT. EVENTUALLY, SHE GOT BACK TO ME TO INFORM ME THAT A | | | UNITY OF TITLE DEED RECORDED IN OR23532P1598 WILL | | | COMBINE PCN#S 74434321010220040 (528 EVERNIA ST), | | | 74434321010220051 (538 EVERNIA ST) & 74434321010220052 | | | (534 EVERNIA ST - STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED) INTO ONE | | | PARCEL FOR THE 2010 TAX ROLL. PCN# 74434321010220040 | | | WILL REMAIN FOR THIS NEWLY DESIGNATED PARCEL BOUNDARY | | | (WITH A NEW PRIMARY ADDRESS OF 360 S ROSEMARY AVE). | | | APPARENTLY, PCN# 74434321010220031 (522 EVERNIA ST) TO | | | THE WEST WILL NOT BE A PART OF THIS MERGER FOR THE NEW | | | NORTH CITYPLACE PARKING LOT, AS IT HAS A DIFFERENT | | | OWNER (CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CRA). FROM MY | | | UNDERSTANDING, THE CITY OF WPB IS JUST LEASING PCN# | | | 74434321010220031 TO CITYPLACE NORTH II LLC, WITH OUR | | | PERMISSION TO BE UTILIZED AS A PART OF THIS NEW PARKING | | | LOT. SINCE A CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP WILL NOT TAKE PLACE & | | | DUE TO THE FACT THAT PCN# 74434321010220031 IS NOT A | | | PART OF THIS MERGER, IT WILL RETAIN ITS UNIQUE IDENTITY | | | THROUGH ITS ORIGINAL PRIMARY ADDRESS OF 522 EVERNIA ST. | | | THEREFORE, NO ADJUSTMENTS NEED TO BE MADE ON THE | | | ORIGINAL PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | | | | JOHN NGUYEN | | | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | MIS DEPARTMENT | | | OFFICE: (561) 822-1239 | | | FAX: (561) 822-1249 | | | [email protected] | | 2009-11-03 12:51:01 | NEED TO BE GIVEN AN ADDRESS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-12-04 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-12-04 |
Time |
10:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-11-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-11-04 |
Time |
07:59 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-11-04 |
Time |
07:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-04 07:34:03 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 09110060 | | | ADD: 522 EVERNIA ST. | | | CONT: TO BE DETERMINED | | | TEL: (561)856-6655 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2007 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2009 FBC SUPPLEMENTS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) A LICENSED CONTRACTOR IN THE SCOPE OF WORK TO BE | | | COMPLETED WILL NEED TO SIGNED ONTO THE PERMIT, BEFORE | | | ISSUANCE, FL S S 489. | | | | | | 2) NOTE THE PLANS CURRENTLY HAVE THE ADDRESS OF 300 S | | | ROSEMARY FOR ALL PLANS, THE NEW ADDRESS IS ASSIGNED THE | | | NEW ADDRESS WILL NEED TO READ ON THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO COMPLETE OUR ANONYMOUS ON-LINE | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY AT: | | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE | | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | | | MEMBER OF BOAF: BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF | | | FLORIDA SAVING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-11-05 |
Time |
17:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-11-05 |
Time |
17:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dlauderm |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
Time |
14:35 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
dlauderm |
Date |
2009-11-23 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-23 11:29:55 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS. | | | RESPOND TO; | | | DEAN S. LAUDERMILK, PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | W-494-1083, F-494-1116, [email protected] | | | 4TH FLOOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | GENERAL: | | | G.1. IT IS UNKNOWN IF ALL COMMENTS FROM PPRC CASE | | | #Z09060010 HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT | | | ALLOW YOU TO BYPASS THAT PROCESS. THESE PLANS WILL NEED | | | TO MEET ALL ZONING COMMENTS. SECOND COMMENT. | | | G.2. COMMENTS BY PALNNING AND ZONING AND REVIEWERS IN | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES MUST BE MET PRIOR TO SUBMISSION | | | TO ENGINEERING SERVICES. | | | G.3. APPROVAL FROM PLANNING HAS TO BE GIVEN PRIOR TO | | | FINAL APPROVAL FROM ENGINEERING SERVICES. PLANS WILL | | | NEED TO BE REDRAWN AND THEN SUBMITTED TO ENGINEERING. | | | STORM WATER CALCULATIONS, WITH PRE-VERSUS POST FLOWS | | | ARE REQUIRED. | | | G.4. WHEN PLAN IS APPROVED ADDITIONAL PERMITS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR WORK IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE ALLEY AND | | | S. ROSEMARY. PERMITS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES/TRAFFIC DIVISION. | | | SITE: | | | S.1. THIS IS THREE SEPARATE SITES, THE OTHER RELATED | | | PERMIT NUMBERS ARE; | | | 09110057 (NORTH), 09110060 (CDD), 09110055 (SOUTH). | | | SHEET LP-1. LANDSCAPING PLAN: | | | LP.1. SWALES CAN NOT HAVE HEDGES AND MULCH IN THEM. | | | RUN-OFF WILL TAKE THE MULCH AND FILL THE STORM WATER | | | SYSTEM, HEDGES WILL SLOW THE FLOW OF WATER AND | | | EVENTUALLY FILL THE SWALE. EITHER REMOVE ALL | | | LANDSCAPING FROM THE SWALES, OR REROUTE THE STORM WATER | | | FLOW. THE PAVED PARKING LOT MUST BE REDESIGNED TO SHOW | | | THERE IS A ROUTE FOR THE WATER TO FLOW TO THE CATCH | | | BASINS. SECOND COMMENT. | | | 2. SITE LINES ARE IN THE WRONG LOCATION AND THE HEDGES | | | AND TREES ARE WITHIN THE AREA, THEY WILL NEED TO BE | | | MOVED. | | | SP-1.0 SITE PLAN: | | | SP.1. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE SITE TRIANGLE AT THE | | | PROPERTY LINE, NOT THE BACK OF SIDEWALK AS IT IS | | | SUPPOSED TO BE. RELOCATE THE SITE TRIANGLE EAST TO THE | | | BACK OF THE SIDEWALK (THIS AREA IS BEING GIVEN TO THE | | | CITY AS A SIDEWALK EASEMENT), THEN, REDO THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | SHEET C-1 PAVING AND DRAINGE PLAN: | | | C-1.1. THE SWALES CAN NOT BE USED TO DIRECT THE FLOW OF | | | WATER, NOT WHEN THE SWALES ARE FULL OF HEDGES AND | | | MULCH, REDESIGN. SECOND COMMENT. | | | C-1.2. PER EMAIL FROM [email protected], DATED | | | 11-17-09, ADD SECOND STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR TO THE | | | ALLEY WHERE THE PARKING LOT EMPTIES INTO ROSEMARY. | | | C-1.3. THERE ARE NO DETAIL SHEETS FOR THE DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM. THE PLAN CAN NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THEM. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-11-23 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-11-23 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-24 10:51:18 | ***************EXPEDITED***************** | | | IN ZONING BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-11-13 |
Time |
10:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-11-03 |
Time |
15:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-04 15:33:17 | ******************** EXPEDITED ********************* | | | C--25 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
Time |
16:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-24 16:36:38 | ***LANDSCAPE APPROVED WITH PROVISO*** | | | | | | APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE APPLICATION AND | | | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE THAT INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST OF | | | ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND LABOR, BROKEN DOWN INTO | | | UNIT COST. AN IRRIGATION APPLICATION SHALL ALSO BE | | | SUBMITTED IF IT HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462, |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-11-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-11-13 |
Time |
15:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-11-13 |
Time |
15:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-13 15:39:57 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN | | | FORMAT. | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE XERISCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS IN TABULAR | | | FORM. | | | | | | 2. IN KEEPING WITH XERISCAPE GUIDELINES AND TO REDUCE | | | MAINTENANCE, THE PALM GROUPINGS SHOULD BE UNDER PLANTED | | | AND INCORPORATED WITHIN A PLANT BED. | | | | | | 3. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-444 (B), THE METER/PANEL AND | | | ANY OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED. THE | | | METER SHALL BE KEPT OUT OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER. | | | | | | 4. THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAY INTERFERE WITH THE | | | LANDSCAPING. ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHALL BE SHOWN ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE CHECK THE PLAN FOR POTENTIAL | | | CONFLICTS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462, |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-12-04 |
Time |
10:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-12-04 |
Time |
10:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-04 11:02:07 | -------------PROVISO-------------- | | | | | | | | | | | | SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE RPZV BACKFLOW AND | | | THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. | | | | | | | | | | | | L.MARTINEZ FOR; K.STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6710 & 805-6721 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
Time |
16:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
Time |
16:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-01 16:04:50 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2007 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. SHT LI-1 PLEASE INDICATE THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS | | | PERMIT. BOTH LOTS ARE HATCHED OUT AND STATE SEPARATE | | | PERMIT. THIS IS ALSO INDICATED ON OTHER SHEETS. -- THE | | | CORRECT ADDRESS SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. -- A | | | SEPARATE IRRIGATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED AS WELL AS A | | | SEPARATE PLUMBING PERMIT FOR THE RPZV BACKFLOW AS A | | | LICENSED PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE | | | BACKFLOW. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-11-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-11-10 |
Time |
18:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-11-10 |
Time |
18:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-10 18:15:01 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2007 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. SHT LI-1 PLEASE INDICATE THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS | | | PERMIT. BOTH LOTS ARE HATCHED OUT AND STATE SEPARATE | | | PERMIT. THIS IS ALSO INDICATED ON OTHER SHEETS. -- THE | | | CORRECT ADDRESS SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. -- A | | | SEPARATE IRRIGATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED AS WELL AS A | | | SEPARATE PLUMBING PERMIT FOR THE RPZV BACKFLOW AS A | | | LICENSED PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE | | | BACKFLOW. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
Time |
14:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
Time |
14:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-24 14:34:57 | PROVISO: | | | 1.STAFF APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR DETAIL AND TREATMENT OF | | | THE PARKING ENTRANCE AT ROAD/SIDEWALK. | | | 2. ALLEY IS A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. NO SIGNS SHALL BE | | | POSTED INDICATING OTHERWISE. | | | 3. TREES LOCATES IN THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL BE | | | MOVED. VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM BACK | | | OF SIDEWALK. | | | 4. ELECTRICAL PANEL ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY | | | SHALL BE MOVED TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH THE REQUIRED | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | 5. BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | CODE REQUIREMENTS BEFORE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION CAN | | | BE ISSUED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-11-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-11-13 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-11-13 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-13 11:32:52 | 1. NUMBER OF COMPACT SPACES EXCEEDS MAXIMUM ALLOWED BY | | | THE CODE. | | | 2. ELECTRICAL PANELS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE | | | REQUIRED MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | 3. AN ADDTIONAL PEDESTRIAN EXIT IS REQUIRED TO AVOID | | | CONFLICTS BETWEEN PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES. | | | 4. CHANGES AT PARKING ENTRANCE/ALLEY SHALL MATCH | | | EXISTING PATTERN. PLEASE SUBMIT A DETAIL DRAWINGS | | | INDICATING THE CHANGES AT THE BULB-OUT AND THE PROPOSED | | | MATERIALS. | | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE REQUIRED | | | BIKE PARKING. IF NOT PROVIDED IN SITE PLEASE PROVIDE | | | DRAWINGS WITH PROPOSED LOCATION. | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE ONE STOP SIGN AND ONE STOP BAR BEFORE | | | THE SIDEWALK, AND OTHER BEFORE THE ROAD. | | | 7. PLEASE INSTALL A SIGN WITH TEXT "CROSS TRAFFIC DOES | | | NOT STOP" AT EXIT POINT. | | | 8. LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS SHALL INDICATE ALL UTILITY LINES | | | AND MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT THAT MAY HAVE A | | | CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. |
|
|