Plan Review Details - Permit 09100222
Plan Review Stops For Permit 09100222
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2010-03-11 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 2010-03-11 Time 10:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 2010-03-11 Time 10:31 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2010-01-12 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2010-01-12 Time 10:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2010-01-12 Time 10:57 Sent To  
Notes
2010-01-12 11:36:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 WITH 2009 SUPPLEMENTS
 FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004
 FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FS FLORIDA STATUTE
  
 1. PROVIDE THE SHUTTER PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET.
 ONLY AN EVALUATION REPORT WAS PROVIDED. THIS MAY BE
 AVAILABLE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.
  
 2. NOTHING IS SHOWN IN THE CORNERS FOR STRUCTURAL
 SUPPORT, ONLY WHAT APPEARS TO BE A BLOCK WALL. SOME
 WOOD POSTS AND SOME PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THAT
 THIS PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL RESIST WIND AND OTHER
 FORCES FBC R301. AS THERE ARE NO COLUMNS IN THE CORNERS
 IT APPEARS THAT THE CONERS ARE CANTALEVERED FROM THE
 NEAREST COLUMN, BUT NO DIMENSION SHOWN BETWEEN NEW
 FILLED CELLS AND CORNERS.
  
 3. SHEET 1, WALL LEGEND, GRAPHIC IS THE SAME FOR BOTH
 WALL TYPES. SCOPE NOT CLEAR FBC R301, FBC*106.
  
 4. SHEET 1, TOP LEFT CORNER STATES THIS IS DESIGNED
 UNDER FBC2004 AND 140MPH EXPOSURE B. PLEASE REVISE
 BUILDING CODE AND EXPLAIN RATIONALE FOR EXPOSURE B OR
 REVISE TO EXPOSURE C, SEE FBC R301. NOTE THAT THE CODE
 CHANGED EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2009.
  
 5. PLEASE SHOW HOW THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL BE
 STRUCTURALLY CONTINUOUS WITH THE EXISTING. STRAPS ARE
 SHOWN, BUT NO REINFORCEMENT INTO FOOTING OR WOOD POSTS.
 ON THE PLAN IT APPEARS THAT ONE WALL WAS "EXISTING CMU"
 BASED ON GRAPHICS, THEN HOW DID THIS TIE INTO THE WOOD
 FRAME PORTION? EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED NEW IS
 NOT CLEAR.
  
 6. PLANS SHOW FILLED CELLS WITH NO STEEL REINFORCEMENT,
 BLOCK SITS ON A SLAB, WHAT WILL PREVENT MOVEMENT AT THE
 BOTTOM OF THE WALL? SEE FBC R 606.1, MASONRY
 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530.
  
 7. PLAN SHOWS SIMPSON STRAPS, PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS
 FAC9B72. ALSO PROVIDE INFORMATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER
 TO SHOW THAT THE INTEGRITY OF STRAPS WILL BE MAINTAINED
 INSTALLED IN THIS MANNER (OVER STUCCO, EXPOSED TO THE
 WEATHER.
  
 8. INSTALLATION LOCATIONS FOR THE STRAPS IS NOT CLEAR.
 ARE THEY TO BE INSTALLED IN HOLLOW BLOCK? PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS - PROVIDE LOAD INFORMATION AND
 CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THAT THE PROPOSED STRAPS INSTALLED
 IN THIS MANNER WILL BE ADEQUATE TO RESIST WIND LOADS.
  
 9. THE STRAP SPECIFIED IS NOT RATED FOR LATERAL LOADS.
 HOW HAS THIS BEEN ADDRESSED?
  
 9. FOUNDATION DESIGN IS NOT CLEAR. NOTHING ON THE
 DETAIL TYPICAL WALL SECTION INDICATES HOW THIS WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED OR HOW THE EXISTING WILL BE STRUCTURALLY
 CONTINUOUS WITH THE PROPOSED NEW. IT IS DRAWN AS IF IT
 IS POURED AT ONE TIME, BUT TEXT INDICATES THAT A
 PORTION IS EXISTING AND A PORTION IS PROPOSED NEW.
  
 10. FROM PREVIOUS LIST: FOR THE SHUTTERS, PLEASE
 COMPLETE THE SAMPLE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE OR PROVIDE
 ALL INFORMATION TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE IN ANOTHER
 FORMAT, FBC*106, FBC R301, FBC1609. TWO SETS REQUIRED.
 THIS FORM IS AVAILABLE IN THE LOBBY OR ON THE INTERNET
 AT
 HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/PDF/SCHEDULE_FOR_
 INSTALLATION.PDF
  
 IF THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED, THIS PERMIT WILL
 BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO THAT A SEPARATE PERMIT OR
 REVISION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR SHUTTERS.
  
 11. PROVIDE DETAILS FOR TRANSITIONS - EXISTING HOUSE TO
 GARAGE, POSTS TO "CMU BUILT AROUND." PLANS GRAPHICALLY
 SHOW 4X4 POSTS WITH A BLOCK WALL LINE ON THE INSIDE,
 HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? PROVIDE A DETAIL, INCLUDING
 ATTACHMENTS FOR EXISTING TO NEW.
  
 12. SEE ACI530, A BLOCK WALL HAS A POURED AND
 REINFORCED TOP CAP TO MAINTAIN THE WALL'S INTEGRITY.
 NONE IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. HOW WILL YOU PREVENT
 FAILURE OF THE PORTIONS OF THE MASONRY WALL WHICH ARE
 NOT STRAPPED TO THE WOOD BEAM? NOTHING TIES THE WALL
 TOGETHER TO ACT AS ONE UNIT, NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WILL
 RESIST WIND/LATERAL LOADS.
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-10-14 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-10-14 Time 10:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-10-14 Time 10:24 Sent To  
Notes
2009-10-14 10:39:43****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 WITH 2009 SUPPLEMENTS
 FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004
 FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FS FLORIDA STATUTE
  
 1. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY PLANS CLEARLY SHOWING
 SCOPE OF WORK. FBC*106.1.1. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE DIMENSIONED AND TO SCALE AND SHALL BE OF
 SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND
 EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT
 WILL CONFIRM TO THE PROVISOINS OF THIS CODE AND
 RELEVANT LASW, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS. THE
 DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DO NOT CLEARLY SHOW SCOPE OF WORK;
 THIS SHOWS A NEW WALL, BUT NOTHING IN THE PLAN TO
 INDICATE SUCH. THE DRAWINGS DO NOT HAVE ANY STRUCTURAL
 INFORMATION AND DO NOT STATE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC
 R301. PLEASE SUBMIT DRAWINGS WHICH CLEARLY SHOW SCOPE
 AND CODE COMPLIANCE. CERTIFICATION BY A DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL OR CALCULATIONS JUSTIFYING DESIGN MAY BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 2. TWO COMPLETE LEGIBLE IDENTICAL SETS OF PERMIT
 DOCUMENTS REQUIRED. ONLY ONE SET OF PRODUCT APPROVALS
 WERE SUBMITTED, AND MOST OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE
 ILLEGIBLE. THEY MAY BE AVAILABLE AT WWW.MIAMIDADE.GOV
 OR WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. 10/21/9 COMMENT REVISED -
 TOLD OWNER/BUILDER THAT LEGIBLE PRODUCT APPROVALS WOULD
 BE PROVIDED FOR HER DUE TO HER HARDSHIP (NO INTERNET
 ACCESS)
  
 3. A MULLION PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED, BUT NO
 MULLIONS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATION. PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE
 THIS WILL BE INSTALLED. SOMEONE HAS HAND WRITTEN "NON
 IMPACT" ON THE MULLION PRODUCT APPROVAL. THIS IS AN
 IMPACT PRODUCT.
  
 4. PLANS STATE THAT DOORS AND WINDOWS WILL BE INSTALLED
 WITH TAPCONS. COMPONENTS AND CLADDING ARE TO BE
 INSTALLED AS PER PRODUCT APPROVAL OR MAY BE REVISED
 USING AN ENGINEER.
  
 5. THE SHUTTER DOCUMENT IS ILLEGIBLE. FLORIDA STATE OR
 LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED, FAC9B72. TWO
 DIFFERENT DOCUMENTS WERE SUBMITTED. IF A MIAMIDADE NOA
 IS USED, THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET
 IS NOT REQUIRED. IF THE OTHER DOCUMENT IS USED, IT
 APPEARS THAT MAY BE A FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL,
 AND THEN THE COVER SHEET IS REQUIRED AS IT GIVES THE
 PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER AND DOCUMENTS UNDER WHICH CODE
 THE PRODUCT HAS BEEN APPROVED. PLEASE PROVIDE. PLEASE
 SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE SAME PRODUCT APPROVAL, AND
 REMOVE THE EXTRA DOCUMENT.
  
 6. FOR THE SHUTTERS, PLEASE COMPLETE THE SAMPLE
 INSTALLATION SCHEDULE OR PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION TO
 SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE IN ANOTHER FORMAT, FBC*106, FBC
 R301, FBC1609. TWO SETS REQUIRED. THIS FORM IS
 AVAILABLE IN THE LOBBY OR ON THE INTERNET AT
 HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/PDF/SCHEDULE_FOR_
 INSTALLATION.PDF
  
 7. THE APPLICATION STATES THAT THE WALLS WILL BE BUILT
 ON EXISTING FOOTERS AND THAT THE WORK IS NON
 STRUCTURAL. HOW HAVE YOU DETERMINED THIS? TYPICALLY
 EXTERIOR FRAMED WOOD WALLS ARE BEARING WALLS. NO
 INFORMATION REGARDING THE "EXISTING FOOTING" WAS
 PROVIDED. HOW HAS IT BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE EXISTING
 FOOTING IS ADEQUATE TO SUPPORT THE BLOCK WALL? HOW DOES
 THE PROPOSED NEW WALL TIE INTO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE?
 HOW WILL THE PROPOSED NEW BLOCK WALL RESIST WIND AND
 OTHER LOADS FBC R301?
  
 8. ONE SHEET SHOWS A GARAGE DOOR WITH A DRIVEWAY. IT IS
 NOT CLEAR IF THIS IS A PLAN OR AN ELEVATION. IS THE
 GARAGE DOOR PROPOSED OR EXISTING? THE PURPOSE OF THIS
 PAGE IS NOT CLEAR.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2009-12-23 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2009-12-23 Time 15:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2009-12-23 Time 15:29 Sent To B
Notes
2009-12-23 15:29:34SENT TO S. HILL'S DESK.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2009-10-14 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-10-14 Time 11:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-10-13 Time 08:28 Sent To  
Notes
2009-10-14 08:29:35TO BLG. UNDER $5000 BOX


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved