| Plan Review Stops For Permit 09090281 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-03-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2010-03-24 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2010-03-24 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-03-24 15:58:58 | QUALITY ASSURANCE LETTER SUBMITTED AS REVISION 10030548 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2010-01-11 |
Time |
16:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2010-01-11 |
Time |
16:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-01-11 16:43:01 | AT TIME OF PERMIT ISSUANCE, CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | REVISED SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH CORRECT | | | INFORMATION | | | | | | | | | (LETTER OF INTENT SUBMITTED 1/12/10) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2010-01-11 |
Time |
09:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2010-01-11 |
Time |
09:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-01-11 09:24:48 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2007 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1. SEE PREVIOUS LISTS, QUALITY ASSURANCE NOT ADDRESSED. | | | NOTE THAT THIS IS A 10' HIGH DOOR, AND THE NAMI | | | CERTIFICATION ON FILE DOES NOT INCLUDE A DOOR OF THIS | | | HEIGHT. PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF A CURRENT QUALITY ASSURANCE | | | PROGRAM AS DEFINED BY FAC9B72 OR PROVIDE A LETTER OF | | | INTENT FROM THE ENGINEER STATING THAT THEY WILL PERFORM | | | THE QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR THIS PRODUCT, OR SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE IN ANOTHER MANNER WHICH COMPLIES WITH | | | FAC9B72. | | | | | | A TELEPHONE CALL HAS BEEN PLACED TO BOTH CONTRACTOR AND | | | EOR IN AN ATTEMPT TO GET THIS RESOLVED. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-12-10 |
Time |
09:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-12-10 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-10 10:24:43 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. PLEASE CLARIFY, APPLICATION AND LETTER FROM ENGINEER | | | STATES THAT THIS IS FOR AN OPAQUE DOOR, SPEC SHEETS | | | SHOW A GLAZED DOOR. | | | | | | 2. IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE ENGINEER IS | | | COMPARING THE PROPOSED DOOR TO AN APPROVED DOOR. A NOA | | | FOR A DOOR WAS PROVIDED, BUT THE ENGINEER'S EVALUATION | | | REPORT DOES NOT REFER TO THE NOA WHICH WAS PROVIDED. | | | | | | 3. THE EVALUATION REPORT REFERS TO "CATEGORY 5 | | | ENGINEERS REPORT DATED 9/9/9." THE SPEC SHEETS PROVIDED | | | HAVE A DATE OF 7/14/9. PLEASE INCLUDE DRAWING NUMBER AS | | | WELL AS DATE. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SPEC SHEETS PROVIDED HAVE NOT | | | BEEN REVIEWED TO CONFIRM THAT IT IS THE SAME PRODUCT AS | | | THE ONE TESTED (NOA) AS THE DOOR ENGINEERING IS NOT | | | CONFIRMED (SEE COMMENT 3) AND THE NOA IS NOT REFERENCED | | | IN THE ENGINEER'S EVALUATION REPORT (SEE ITEM 2). | | | PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE PRODUCTS | | | | | | 5. CATEGORY 5 ENGINEERING SERVICES IS LISTED AS THE | | | THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY. PLEASE SEE | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG, THIS COMPANY IS NOT AN | | | APPROVED THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY. PLEASE | | | REVISE APPLICATION TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIRD PARTY | | | QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY REQUIREMENTS FAC9B72. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE COMPLETE THE APPLICATION (ITEM1, 8,). AT THIS | | | POINT THERE ARE MANY DOCUMENTS INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGE | | | (DENIED FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL, PHOTOCOPY | | | ENGINEERING AND NAMI CERTIFICATION WHICH IS NOT ON THE | | | DCA WEBSITE, OTHER PRODUCT'S NOA) BUT NOT SPECIFICALLY | | | REFERENCED IN THE APPLICATION OR ENGINEERING. PLEASE | | | REVISE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-10-27 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-10-27 |
Time |
16:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-27 16:51:50 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS | | | "PENDING," FAC9B72. SEE WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG, IT IS | | | NOT CLEAR WHEN A PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE ISSUED. | | | PLEASE EITHER PROVIDE A VALID PRODUCT APPROVAL OR APPLY | | | FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-09-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-21 |
Time |
10:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-21 |
Time |
10:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-21 10:43:41 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. THE ENGINEERING STATES THAT THE DOOR IS 6', BUT THE | | | FLOOR PLAN SHOWS A 67" DOOR. THE DOOR IS TO COMPLY WITH | | | FBC11-4.13.4, 11-4.13.5 (DOORWAY CLEAR WIDTH MINIMUM | | | 32"). | | | | | | 2. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR | | | THE DOOR, FAC9B72. A PHOTOCOPY OF AN EVALUATION REPORT | | | WAS PROVIDED. IS THIS ASSOCIATED WITH A PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL (NOA OR FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL)? IF IT | | | IS, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMPLETE DOCUMENT. IF IT IS NOT, | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ORIGINAL ENGINEERING AND A COMPLETED | | | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL APPLICATION WITH ALL REQUIRED | | | INFORMATION (INCLUDING EVIDENCE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE OR | | | HOW QUALITY ASSURANCE WILL BE ADDRESSED). | | | HTTP://WWW.DCA.STATE.FL.US/FBC/COMMITTEES/PRODUCT_APPRO | | | VAL/LOCAL%20PRODUCT%20APPROVAL%20APPL%20080103.PDF | | | | | | 3. FBC1603.4, PLEASE DECLARE BUILDING HEIGHT AND | | | EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS A | | | LARGE OPEN AREA TO THE NORTHEAST OF THIS PARCEL AND | | | THIS APPEARS TO BE IN EXPOSURE C. NOTE ALSO THAT THE | | | CODE HAS CHANGED, DEFINITION OF EXPOSURE C, FBC1609, | | | ASCE7-05. | | | | | | 4. TWO COMPLETE, COLLATED, IDENTICAL SETS OF ORIGINAL | | | PERMIT DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE, FBC*106. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-12-21 |
Time |
16:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-12-21 |
Time |
16:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-21 16:16:38 | TO SH DESK | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-11-17 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-11-17 |
Time |
16:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-17 16:37:28 | TO SAMANTHA./WRT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-10-22 |
Time |
11:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-10-22 |
Time |
11:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-22 11:18:52 | GAVE TO SAMANTHA |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-09-21 |
Time |
11:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-09-16 |
Time |
09:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-16 09:18:07 | SENT TO MISC. 1. |
|
|
