| Plan Review Stops For Permit 09060420 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-19 11:33:20 | ***PROVISO*** | | | 1. VALUE TO BE ADJUSTED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE | | | 2. REVISION REQUIRED - PLANS TO INCLUDE WIND DESIGN | | | CRITERIA FBC1603.1.4. | | | AN INSPECTION HOLD HAS BEEN PLACED ON THIS PERMIT | | | SUBJECT TO REVISION OF PLANS. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-07-16 |
Time |
17:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-07-16 |
Time |
17:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-16 17:26:44 | ***PROVISO*** | | | 1. VALUE TO BE ADJUSTED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE | | | 2. REVISION REQUIRED - PLANS TO INCLUDE WIND DESIGN | | | CRITERIA FBC1603.1.4. | | | AN INSPECTION HOLD HAS BEEN PLACED ON THIS PERMIT | | | SUBJECT TO REVISION OF PLANS. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
Time |
15:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
Time |
15:11 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-18 |
Time |
13:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-18 |
Time |
13:13 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-18 13:14:09 | ** DENIED PLANS REVIEW ** | | | NOTE FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW STILL THE SAME. NO | | | INFORMATION PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: THE VALUE FOR THE APPLIED SCOPE OF WORK NEEDS | | | TO BE UPDATED. THE APPLIED VALUE FOR THE SIGN IS | | | EXTREMELY LOW. IF AN APPROPRIATE VALUE IS NOT ADJUSTED | | | ONE WILL BE ADJUSTED USING THE ADOPTED GUIDES UNDER FBC | | | 108.3. | | | LED LIGHTING KITS FOR SIGNS IS SUBSTANTIAL. | | | IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DESIGN, BUILD, INSTALL AND WIRE | | | THE SIGNS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR THE APPLIED VALUE OF | | | $1500.00. THE VALUE IS TO INCLUDE ANY ITEMS EVEN IF | | | OWNER SUPPLIED. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-07-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-07-04 |
Time |
14:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-07-04 |
Time |
15:05 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-04 15:05:25 | | | | ** DENIED PLANS REVIEW ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLANS SUBMITTED NEED TO SHOW MINIMUM | | | SUFFICIENT CODES AND ELECTRICAL DETAILS PER FBC 2007 | | | AND NEC 2005. | | | PLANS SUBMITTED ARE NOT SUFFICIENT FOR CLARITY, | | | INFORMATION OR MINIMUM DESIGNS. | | | PLEASE SEE NEC 250,600 FOR SOME OF THE MINIMUMS. FBC | | | 106.1.1,106.1.2,106.5 FOR CLARITY, COORDINATION, | | | DETAILS OF RECORD PLANS. | | | PLANS NEED TO STATE THE FOLLOWING CODES FOR THE | | | RELEVANT SCOPE OF WORK. | | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | | ** PLANS STATE THE 2008 NEC, HOWEVER THE STATE OF | | | FLORIDA TO DATE HAS NOT ADOPTED THE NEW VERSION OF THE | | | NEC. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: THE VALUE FOR THE APPLIED SCOPE OF WORK NEEDS | | | TO BE UPDATED. THE APPLIED VALUE FOR THE SIGN IS | | | EXTREMELY LOW. IF AN APPROPRIATE VALUE IS NOT ADJUSTED | | | ONE WILL BE ADJUSTED USING THE ADOPTED GUIDES UNDER FBC | | | 108.3. | | | LED LIGHTING KITS FOR SIGNS IS SUBSTANTIAL. | | | IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DESIGN, BUILD, INSTALL AND WIRE | | | THE SIGNS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR THE APPLIED VALUE OF | | | $1500.00. THE VALUE IS TO INCLUDE ANY ITEMS EVEN IF | | | OWNER SUPPLIED. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW DISCONNECTS PER 600.5. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
Time |
11:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
Time |
11:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-01 11:06:24 | SENT TO DVPALMER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-08-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-08-04 |
Time |
10:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-08-04 |
Time |
10:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-04 10:01:02 | SENT TO ZONING |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-07-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-07-16 |
Time |
17:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-06-17 |
Time |
14:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-17 14:51:27 | TO ZONING | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-08-11 |
Time |
10:33 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-08-11 |
Time |
10:33 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-06-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-06-22 |
Time |
14:24 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-06-22 |
Time |
14:24 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-22 14:25:31 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE CITYPLACE MANAGEMENT APPROVAL STAMP IS REQUIRED | | | ON THE DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 2) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN LIMITS FACADE SIGN | | | TEXT TO BE SIZED BETWEEN 8 AND 12 INCHES IN HEIGHT. | | | PROVIDE THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE LETTERS | | | FOR THE FACADE SIGNS. | | | | | | 3) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN ALLOWS ONE SQUARE | | | FOOT OF FACADE SIGNAGE PER ONE LINEAR FOOT OF STORE | | | FRONTAGE. PROVIDE THE LINEAR FRONTAGE OF THE ROSEMARY | | | FACADE AND THE SIDE FACADE. NOTE: THE ARCADE DOES NOT | | | COUNT AS FACADE ON THE SIDE, JUST THE SPACE THE STORE | | | OCCUPIES. ALSO PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE FACADE | | | SIGNS. | | | | | | 4) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN REQUIRES THAT SIGNS | | | BE INSTALLED WITHIN SPECIFIC SIGN ZONES. THE SIDE | | | FACADE SIGN IS NOT IN A DESIGNATED SIGN ZONE. | | | | | | 5) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN REQUIRES THAT BLADE | | | SIGNS BE A MAXIMUM OF 18 INCHES BY 18 INCHES. PROVIDE | | | THE SIZE OF THE BLADE SIGN. | | | | | | 6) THE SUBMITTED PLANS STATE THE BLADE SIGN IS A CHANGE | | | OUT ON AN EXISTING BRACKET. THE RENDERING PROVIDED | | | SHOWS THE SIGN IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION THAN THE CURRENT | | | SIGN FRAME. | | | | | | 7) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN REQUIRES THAT BLADE | | | SIGNS (INCLUDING MOUNTING FRAMES) PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF | | | 8 FEET OF CLEARANCE. PROVIDE THE BLADE SIGN CLEARANCE. | | | | | | 8) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN ALLOWS CITYPLACE TO | | | GRANT VARIANCES FROM THE NUMERICAL AND LOCATIONAL | | | PROVISIONS OF 2 THROUGH 5 ABOVE. PROVIDE A NOTARIZED | | | LETTER FROM CITYPLACE THAT THEY HAVE GRANTED THE | | | SPECIFIC VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED FOR THE PROPOSED | | | SIGNS. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
