| 2009-05-28 15:47:30 | 2007 FBC |
| | ADDITION |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) THE FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET 5.0 SPECIFIES A 4" |
| | CONCRETE SLAB. THE ELEVATION AND SECTIONS SHOW A 6" |
| | SLAB. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 2) THE DETAIL TAG FOR (1 ON 8.0) ON SHEET 5.0 LISTS THE |
| | WRONG SHEET. IT SHOULD BE 1 ON 7.0. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 3) ON SHEET 6.0 THE FRAMING NOTES SPECIFY 19/32" (5/8") |
| | PLYWOOD FOR ROOF SHEATHING AND THE NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS |
| | ON 6.0 AND 7.0 SPECIFIES 3/4" PLYWOOD. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 4) THE WINDLOAD PRESSURES SPECIFIED FOR THE EXTERIOR |
| | DOOR TO THE LAUNDRY ROOM ON SHEET 3.1 ARE TOO LOW FOR |
| | AN ENCLOSED STRUCTURE LOCATED IN EXPOSURE CATEGORY C |
| | AND AN IMPORTANCE FACTOR OF 1.00. FBC R TABLE R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) THE WINDLOAD SCHEDULE FOR THE OPEN ATTACHED PATIO IS |
| | INCORRECT. THE PATIO AND LAUNDRY ROOM ARE ATTACHED TO |
| | THE DWELLING AND ARE NOT STRUCTURALLY INDEPENDENT. THE |
| | SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING IS A CATEGORY II OCCUPANCY, AS |
| | WELL AS, THE ATTACHED COVERED PATIO AND LAUNDRY ROOM. |
| | THEREFORE, THE IMPORTANCE FACTOR IS 1.00 AND NOT 0.77. |
| | PLEASE CORRECT AND REVISE THE ROOF WINDLOADS. FBC |
| | R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 6) SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE FOR THE |
| | EXTERIOR DOORS TO THE LAUNDRY ROOM AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | RULE 9B-72. |
| | |
| | 7) THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET 3.1 INDICATES STORM |
| | PANELS FOR THE EXTERIOR DOORS TO THE LAUNDRY ROOM. |
| | STORM PANELS ONLY PROVIDE IMPACT PROTECTION FOR GLAZED |
| | AREAS. THEY ARE DO NOT PREVENT WIND PRESSURES FROM |
| | AFFECTING THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. THAT IS PROVIDED BY |
| | THE WINDOW OR DOOR THAT IS INSTALLED IN THE EXTERIOR |
| | OPENING. R301.2.1.2 |
| | |
| | 8) SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF AN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND KEY |
| | PLAN SPECIFYING THE OPENINGS THAT WILL BE SHUTTERED. |
| | SPECIFY THE MOUNT TYPE, FASTENER TYPE AND SPACING, |
| | SPAN, ETC. |
| | |
| | 9) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | STORM PANELS ARE MISSING SOME OF THE PAGES. SUBMIT 2 |
| | COMPLETE COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | 10) THE SYSTEM SELECTED FROM THE MODIFIED ROOF COVERING |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE OF -52 |
| | PSF, WHICH WILL REQUIRE ENHANCED FASTENING AT THE |
| | CORNER AND PERIMETER AREAS FOR EXPOSURE C AND 140 MPH |
| | WINDSPEED. SUBMIT 2 SETS OF SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LIMITATION #7 OF THE NOA. |
| | |
| | 11) THE VALUATION THAT IS INDICATED ON THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION IS TOO LOW FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON |
| | THE PLANS. THE VALUE HAS BEEN INCREASED TO $17,111.00 |
| | BASED ON ICC VALUATION DATA. ADDITIONAL PERMIT AND |
| | RADON FEES ARE DUE. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |