Plan Review Details - Permit 09050002
Plan Review Stops For Permit 09050002
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2009-09-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-09-17 Time 14:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-09-17 Time 14:16 Sent To  
Notes
2009-09-17 14:16:55REVISION, S1, B100, B900

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2009-06-29 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-06-29 Time 08:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-06-29 Time 08:38 Sent To  
Notes
2009-07-31 08:42:28PROVISO - SUBMITCOMPLETE REPAIR DETAIL PRIOR TO
 INSPECTION
  

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-05-08 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-05-08 Time 15:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-05-08 Time 15:29 Sent To  
Notes
2009-05-08 16:55:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007
 FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2007
 FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FS FLORIDA STATUTE
  
 1. PROVIDE PLANS/SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY A DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL, FS471, FS481.
  
 2. PLANS ARE TO BE ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY, TO SCALE,
 MINIMUM 1/8". PLANS APPEAR TO BE A REDUCED VERSION OF
 FULL SIZE DRAWINGS. THEY ARE TOO SMALL AND DIFFICULT TO
 READ, SOME TEXT IS ENTIRELY ILLEGIBLE, WILL NOT
 DIGITIZE PROPERLY AND DO NOT MEET THE STANDARD FOR
 PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FBC*106).
  
 3. IS FIRE RESISTANCE REQUIRED ON ANY AFFECTED WALLS
 FBC CHAPTER 5, FBC CHAPTER 6, FBC CHAPTER 7? HOW HAS
 THIS BEEN DETERMINED? NO INFORMATION REGARDING BUILDING
 TYPE, SIZE, DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE (OR ASSUMED
 PROPERTY LINE) WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE
 INFORMATION REGARDING REQUIREMENTS OR EXCEPTION TO FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS.
  
 4. PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF REPAIRS TO
 CORRELATE WITH THE PLANS AND DETAILS.
  
 5. PLANS SHOW A NEW "TUBE COLUMN," MATERIAL NOT
 SPECIFIED.
  
 6. PROVIDE SPECIFICATION FOR RAILINGS INCLUDING DESIGN
 STRENGTH CRITERIA FBC1607, FBC1013.
  
 7. PROVIDE A CODE SUMMARY; BUILDING TYPE, SIZE, HEIGHT,
 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (FBC 5, FBC 3).
  
 8. PLANS STATE THAT SHORING DESIGN WILL BE THE
 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR CANNOT
 DO THIS DESIGN; THIS MUST BE DONE BY A STRUCTURAL
 ENGINEER OR OTHER LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
 QUALIFIED TO DO THIS WORK.
  
 9. IT APPEARS THAT THE "RAILING" IS A KNEE WALL. IF THE
 RAILING IS A SOLID WALL, WHAT PROVISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE
 FOR DRAINAGE? NO SLOPE WAS SHOWN ON THE BALCONY.
 FBC*106.
  
 10. CLARIFY HOW THE POST WILL BE ANCHORED.
  
 11. SPEC WELDS, IF APPLICABLE.
  
 12. TWO COAT STUCCO SPECIFIED THROUGHOUT PLAN; THIS
 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ASTM 926, FBC2512.1.
  
 13. REVISE GOVERNING CODE; INCORRECT CODE DECLARED.
  
 14. ALL CONNECTORS ARE TO BE SPECIFIED CONTINUOUS FROM
 FOUNDATION THROUGH THE ROOF. FOR INSTANCE, SHEET S3
 SPECIFIES A "LNG. BENT PLATE," WHAT KIND OF PLATE? SPEC
 MATERIAL AND THICKNESS, LENGTH AND DIAMETER OF ALL
 FASTENERS.
  
  

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2009-06-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-06-17 Time 15:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-06-17 Time 15:14 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-17 15:15:09TO SH DESK

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2009-05-11 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-05-11 Time 09:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-06-29 Time 08:38 Sent To  
Notes
2009-05-01 15:51:24MISC 2


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved