| 2009-04-03 11:11:26 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 |
| | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2007 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FS FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1. DECLARE GOVERNING CODE. |
| | |
| | 2. DECLARE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 3. INCLUDE THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE INDIVIDUAL |
| | TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS DESIGN. |
| | |
| | 4. NO FOOTINGS ARE SHOWN. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| | TO SHOW THAT THE CONCRETE SLAB IS SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT |
| | DEAD LOADS AND RESIST WIND LOADS. FBC R301. |
| | |
| | 5. SPECIFY NAILING FOR EACH CONNECTOR OR PROVIDE SPEC |
| | SHEETS FOR EACH CONNECTOR (AVAILABLE ON INTERNET). |
| | |
| | 6. SEVERAL SHEETS SUBMITTED WITH NO WAY TO IDENTIFY THE |
| | SHEETS (PAGE NUMBERS, DETAIL LABELS). THIS MAKES IT |
| | VERY DIFFICULT TO REFER TO SPECIFIC SHEETS OR DETAILS |
| | FOR PLAN REVIEW. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 7. SEE FBC*109, ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY PLANS REQUIRED. |
| | PLANS ARE TO BE TO SCALE, DIMENSIONED, AND SUFFICIENT |
| | CLARITY TO SHOW SCOPE OF WORK. |
| | |
| | 8. DETAIL SHOWS BOTTOM OF 4X4 AT THE TOP OF A 2" |
| | TOPPING, BUT MANUFACTURER INFORMATION SHOWS THE POST |
| | RAISED. IS THE ANCHOR EMBEDDED IN THE CONCRETE? PLEASE |
| | REVISE DRAWING TO CORRECTLY DEPICT PROPOSED WORK OR |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER WHICH ALLOWS |
| | THE ANCHOR TO BE EMBEDDED AND THE RAISED POST AT |
| | FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL. |
| | |
| | 9. PROVIDE A DETAIL, FOUNDATION THROUGH THE ROOF, TO |
| | SHOW HOW THIS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT WILL BE STRUCTURALLY |
| | CONTINUOUS FBC R301. |
| | |
| | 10. THE ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS AN |
| | UNDERLAYMENT WHICH CANNOT BE EXPOSED LONGER THAN 180 |
| | DAYS. HOW LONG AGO WAS THIS PRODUCT INSTALLED? |
| | |
| | 11. IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT IS |
| | ATTACHED TO FASCIA BOARD. FASCIA IS NOT A STRUCTURAL |
| | COMPONENT; THIS CANNOT BE USED TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED |
| | IMPROVEMENT. PLEASE SHOW HOW THIS WILL RESIST LOADS, |
| | FBC R301. |
| | |
| | 12. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS HAS BEEN DESIGNED; SEE FBC |
| | R301.1. IF WFCM WAS USED, PLEASE PROVIDE COPIES OF THE |
| | PERTINENT CHARTS AND DETAILS TO SHOW THAT THIS PROPOSED |
| | IMPROVEMENT CAN WITHSTAND DESIGN LOADS. IF ASCE7 WAS |
| | USED, PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL STRUCTURAL |
| | ELEMENTS. FOR INSTANCE, 7 4X4 POSTS WERE SHOWN TO |
| | SUPPORT A 176 SF STRUCTURE. 2X4 RAFTERS, WITH NO |
| | SPACING SHOWN, ARE PROPOSED WITH A 9'7" SPAN. PROVIDE |
| | ALL STRUCTURAL DETAILS, SIZE, SPACING, AND CALCULATIONS |
| | IF PRESCRIPTIVE DESIGN HAS NOT BEEN IMPLEMENTED FBC |
| | R301. |
| | |
| | 13. ROOF FRAMING PLAN, SPECIFY ROOF FRAMING SPACING. IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THERE MAY BE AN INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTING |
| | MEMBER IN THE MIDDLE OF THE 9'7" SPAN; THIS SHOULD BE |
| | SHOWN ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN IF IT EXISTS. IF THERE |
| | IS AN INTERMEDIATE SUPPORT, IT APPEARS THAT IT SPANS |
| | 14'2"; PROVIDE EVIDENCE (CALCULATIONS OR PRESCRIPTIVE |
| | DESIGN FROM WFCM) THAT THIS COMPLIES WITH DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA, SEE OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 14. SPECIFY NAILING PATTERN FOR ROOF SHEATHING. |
| | |
| | 15. A ROOF PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. FOR FLAT DECKS, |
| | CONTRACTOR IS TO INDICATE WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY WILL |
| | BE USED AND SPECIFY ENHANCED FASTENING FOR CORNER AND |
| | PERIMETER ZONES IF REQUIRED. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED FAC9B72 FOR ROOF COVERING. |
| | |
| | 16. SPECIFY ROOF SLOPE; NONE SHOWN FBC R CHAPTER 9. AS |
| | ROOF TYPE AND PRODUCT HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED, A |
| | SPECIFIC CODE SECTION CANNOT BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 17. THIS PROPERTY RECEIVED A STOP WORK ORDER FOR |
| | ELECTRIC WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT A PERMIT. PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS THIS ISSUE AT THIS TIME OR ADVISE AS TO STATUS |
| | OF THIS ISSUE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
