| Plan Review Stops For Permit 09020319 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
09:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
JNGUYEN |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
12:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-03 09:24:06 | FOR PERMIT# 09020319 (EMERGENCY ROOM PROJECT), I HAVE | | | TAKEN A LOOK AT THE SITE PLANS FROM COMMUNITY BOARD #59 | | | & TALKED TO THE CONTRACTOR, NAT HEALY TO VERIFY THE | | | RIGHT ADDRESS. THE AREA OF ALTERATION SHOWS IT TAKING | | | PLACE ON THE FRONT HALF OF COLUMBIA HOSPITAL & THE | | | ADDRESS IS ALREADY CORRECT. ABOUT A MONTH AGO, I WENT | | | OUT ON SITE TO THE PHYSICAL LOCATION TO VERIFY THE | | | ADDRESSES BECAUSE WE HAD THEM WRONG IN THIS AREA FOR | | | OUR DATABASES INITIALLY (I.E., INCORRECTLY HAD THE | | | COLUMBIA HOSPITAL AS 4631 N CONGRESS AVE). I WORKED | | | WITH ADRIANNA & ANGASH TO FIX THE CORRESPONDING RECORDS | | | IN OUR GIS & COMMUNITYPLUS DATABASES. PERMIT# 09020319 | | | DOES INDEED TAKE PLACE AT COLUMBIA HOSPITAL ON PCN# | | | 74434306000001030 WITH THE CORRECT PRIMARY ADDRESS OF | | | 2201 45TH ST. ON THE OTHER HAND, 4631 N CONGRESS AVE ON | | | PCN# 74434306000001210 APPLIES TO THE BUILDING TO THE | | | SOUTHEAST (COLUMBIA MEDICAL ARTS PREMIER RESEARCH | | | INSTITUTE). THE SITE PLANS HAVE BEEN RETURNED TO THE | | | BOX. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-22 |
Time |
12:58 |
Rev Time |
1.50 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-22 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-22 12:59:30 | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS REVISION# 3. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
10:30 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
09:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-07 10:20:05 | | | | | | | PERMIT # 09020319 | | | 2201 45TH STREET | | | COLUMBIA HOSPITAL/ 1ST FLOOR EMERGENCY DEPART | | | ALTERATIONS | | | 2007 FBC | | | 07/07/09 | | | | | | BUILDING PROVISO: | | | SHEET A3.51 | | | 1)ALTERNATE EFIS SYSTEM 08-0709.05 THIS PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL WAS TESTED WITH | | | PLYWOOD BACKING PROVIDING HIGHER PRESSURES. TYPE I, | | | TYPE II BUILDINGS ARE NOT ALLOWED | | | TO HAVE PLYWOOD SHEATHING UNLESS FIRE RESISTANT TREATED | | | PLYWOOD WAS INSTALLED.SECTION | | | 603.1(1)(1.2). SHEET A3.51INDICATES 1/2 INCH SHEATHING | | | IS TO BE INSTALLED OR DENSEGLASS GOLD. | | | THIS PARTICULAR NOA WAS TESTED USING A 5/8 INCH | | | EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD, NOT 1/2 INCH. | | | | | | 08-0709.05 ALTERNATE EFIS NOA TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | 07-0108.01 EFIS NOA TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE INSPECTION. | | | | | | | | | 2) WINDOW NOA 07-0817.04 TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | 3) LINTEL PRODUCT APPROVAL TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | SURVEY: | | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR | | | FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC | | | RECORD, AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON | | | REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE THEREFORE | | | SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
Time |
10:04 |
Rev Time |
10.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-06-10 |
Time |
10:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-11 10:29:14 | PERMIT # 09020319 | | | 2201 45TH STREET | | | COLUMBIA HOSPITAL/ 1ST FLOOR EMERGENCY DEPART | | | ALTERATIONS | | | 2007 FBC | | | | | | BUILDING PROVISO: | | | 1) PLEASE SUBMIT NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REVIEW THIS | | | PARTICULAR PRODUCT WAS TESTED WITH | | | PLYWOOD BACKING PROVIDING HIGHER PRESSURES. TYPE I, | | | TYPE II BUILDINGS ARE NOT ALLOWED | | | TO HAVE PLYWOOD SHEATHING UNLESS FIRE RESISTANT TREATED | | | PLYWOOD WAS INSTALLED.SECTION | | | 603.1(1)(1.2). PLANS A4.55 DO NOT PROVIDE WHAT TYPE OF | | | SHEATHING IS INSTALLED ON THE | | | EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. EITHER PROVIDE TYPE OF | | | EXISTING SHEATHING OR PROVIDE NEW PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL WITH AN APPROVED SHEATHING BEFORE INSPECTIONS. | | | | | | 2) WINDOW NOA 07-0817.04 TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | 3) LINTEL PRODUCT APPROVAL TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | SURVEY: | | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR | | | FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC | | | RECORD, AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON | | | REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE THEREFORE | | | SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-03-16 |
Time |
15:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-03-16 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-16 15:50:54 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 WITH 2009 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1. THIS IS A PLAN CHECK ONLY. THIS REVIEW WILL REMAIN | | | IN FAILED STATUS UNTIL PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 2. GOVERNING CODE EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2009 IS FBC 2007 | | | WITH 2009 SUPPLEMENTS, FS553. PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE INDICATE WHICH METHOD OF COMPLIANCE UNDER | | | WHICH THIS PROPOSED ALTERATION HAS BEEN DESIGNED, FBC | | | EB 101.5. | | | | | | 4. FBC TABLE 601, SHEET A0.00, BUILDING TYPE 1A | | | DECLARED, I2 OCCUPANCY. 3 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE REQUIRED | | | FOR TYPE 1A, I2 OCCUPANCY; 2 HOUR SPECIFIED ON PLAN | | | (PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FOOTNOTE RE: 1 HOUR REDUCTION IS | | | NOT APPLICABLE IN THIS CASE). | | | | | | 5. REVISE BUILDING INFORMATION TO INCLUDE BUILDING | | | HEIGHT, FBC 6. | | | | | | 6. A0.0, UL ASSEMBLY DETAILS, SPECIFY FLOOR AND CEILING | | | RUNNER TRACKS AND FASTENING, FBC706.5. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE A HEAD OF WALL DETAIL, FBC706.5. | | | | | | 8. SHEET A0.01 IS NOT SEALED AND DATED, FS481. WHEN | | | SUBMITTING FOR PERMIT, PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ALL SHEETS | | | ARE SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED. | | | | | | 9. ARCHITECT???S TITLE BLOCK TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FAC61G1-16.004. | | | | | | 10. FBC1004.1.1, SHEET A0.10, PLEASE CLARIFY USE OF | | | TREATMENT AREAS. OCCUPANT LOAD WAS DETERMINED BASED ON | | | 240SF PER OCCUPANT; THIS IS THE MINIMUM FOR INPATIENT | | | TREATMENT AREAS. ISN???T AN EMERGENCY ROOM AREA OFTEN | | | AN OUTPATIENT TREATMENT AREA? PLEASE CLARIFY USE OF | | | SPACE AND RATIONALE FOR USE OF 240SF FOR OCCUPANT LOAD. | | | TABLE 1004.1.1 REQUIRES 100SF FOR OUTPATIENT. | | | | | | 11. FBC407.3, CORRIDOR WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS | | | SMOKE PARTITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC710. CORRIDORS | | | 1-101, 1-105, ETC. DO NOT NOTE SMOKE PARTITION | | | REQUIRED. THE WALL BETWEEN 1 208 AND CORRIDOR E 103 IS | | | NOT NOTED AS A SMOKE PARTITION. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 12. FBC407.2, EXAM 9 THROUGH 11 ARE OPEN TO CORRIDOR | | | 1-105; IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH EXCEPTION APPLIES, SEE | | | FBC407.2.1(1). | | | | | | 13. MANEUVERING CLEARANCE, PULL SIDE FBC FIGURE 11-25 | | | REQUIRED FOR ALL DOORS REQUIRED TO BE ACCESSIBLE. | | | PLEASE NOTE DIMENSION TO SHOW COMPLIANCE: | | | | | | 1053, 1055, 1020, 1022 | | | DOOR FROM ROOM 1-217 TO LAB, 1044, NOTED AS EXISTING | | | | | | PLEASE CHECK ALL AND CONFIRM COMPLIANCE FOR ALL DOORS | | | IN THE RENOVATED AREA FBC11-4.1.6(1)(B). ONLY DOORS | | | WHICH APPEAR NONCOMPLIANT ARE REFERENCED BUT OTHER | | | DOORS MAY BE AFFECTED. | | | | | | 14. FBC407.2, CORRIDORS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS TO EXIT | | | UNLESS ONE OF THE EXCEPTIONS NOTED. | | | | | | 15. A1.02, A NOTE STATES THAT TOILET ROOM WALLS WILL BE | | | UPGRADED TO 2HR SMOKE/FIRE PARTITIONS. IT IS NOT CLEAR | | | WHY THE SMOKE PARTITION IS NOT ALONG THE CORRIDOR WALL | | | FBC407.2; PLEASE CLARIFY DESIGN INTENT. | | | | | | 16. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED | | | FOR COMPONENTS & CLADDING; EIFS, WINDOWS. | | | | | | 17. A6 01 WINDOW A STATES THAT THIS WINDOW IS EXISTING | | | (WITH AN EXPIRED NOA REFERENCE), SHEET A3.51 STATES | | | THIS IS A NEW WINDOW, A1.02 STATES THIS IS NEW | | | EXISTING. PLEASE CLARIFY SCOPE. | | | | | | 18. A1.02, I AM UNABLE TO LOCATE COILING SECURITY DOORS | | | 1045 THROUGH 1050. MY APOLOGIES; PLEASE ADVISE. | | | | | | 19. FOR FIRE RATED WALLS, PLEASE NOTE METHOD OF | | | COMPLIANCE FBC703.3. THE DETAILS DO NOT REFER TO AN | | | ASSEMBLY NUMBER OR TIME FOR BUILDING ELEMENTS. | | | | | | 20. PLEASE NOTE CONCEALED SPACE SIGNAGE REQUIREMENT ON | | | PLAN, FBC 419.3.9.7. | | | | | | 21. FBC407.2.2, NURSE???S AREA (AND SIMILAR SPACES) TO | | | BE CONSTRUCTED AS REQUIRED FOR CORRIDORS. | | | | | | 22. FBC419.1.1, PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH STATE | | | REVIEW REQUIREMENTS (LETTER OR STAMPED PLAN). THIS ITEM | | | MAY BE DONE PRIOR TO FIRST INSPECTION AS A REVISION, AT | | | CONTRACTOR???S/OWNER???S RISK. | | | | | | 23. FBC11 4.13.7, DOORS AT ROOM 1 106, RECEPT/TRIAGE, | | | REQUIREMENT FOR DOORS IN A SERIES. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-21 |
Time |
20:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-21 |
Time |
19:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-21 20:53:52 | STAMPED ELECTRICAL SHEETS. IF OK WITH FIRE REVIEW ONE | | | SET TO BE RETAINED FOR FILE. | | | FILED COORDINATION STUDY | | | | | | ** SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS | | | SUCH AS CATV, PHONE, CAMERAS. | | | THE ABOVE MAY REFERENCE BACK TO THIS PLAN FOR TURN | | | AROUND PERMITS. | | | | | | ** FIRE ALARM, ANY ACCESS CONTROLS, ARE UNDER SEPARATE | | | PLANS AND PERMIT APPLICATIONS. | | 2009-08-21 20:15:18 | *** REVIEW SKIPPED REVIEW #4 STOP AS NOTES WERE PLACED | | | IN ERROR. STOP HAD TO BE DELETED. THIS IS ACTUALLY THE | | | FORTH REVIEW STOP. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
11:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
11:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-07 11:54:24 | 2ND SET OF CALCS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | SECTION TITLE II OF THE SELECTIVE COORDINATION STUDY | | | SHEETS DATED FROM APRIL 2009 ARE STAPLED TOGETHER AS | | | N/A. ONLY REPORT FOR NORMAL AND EMERGENCY DATED 6/2009 | | | ARE PART OF THE CURRENT STUDY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
Time |
16:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
Time |
16:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-11 16:24:44 | | | | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW** | | | | | | ** THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | ** THERE ARE STILL COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH | | | ARE IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. THERE ARE ALSO SEVERAL NEW | | | COMMENTS BASED ON INFORMATION ONLY NOW SUBMITTED FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13 2007 EDITION WITH | | | 2009 GLITCH AMENDMENTS. THIS CHAPTER WAS COMPLETELY | | | REVISED FROM THE FIRST PRINTING OF THE 2007 FBC. THERE | | | ARE SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES WHICH WILL AFFECT THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER | | | 13-415.AB.5. THIS IS NOT A WHOLE BUILDING AS DEFINED IN | | | SECTION 202. THE METHOD WHICH MUST BE USED IS METHOD | | | *B* FOR SPACE BY SPACE. THE SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS AND | | | THE INPUT DATA REPORT IS NOT CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | THIS REQUIRES THE SPACES TO BE LISTED AND CHOSEN FOR | | | THE USE AND LOCATION. THERE ARE NUMEROUS EXAMPLES WHERE | | | THE SPACE DESIGNATION GIVEN WAS FOR AN EMERGENCY ROOM | | | WHEN THE SPACE OR LOCATION IS SOMETHING OTHER LIKE A | | | JANITOR CLOSET, EXAM ROOM, NURSE STATION, TOILET ETC. | | | THE DESIGNATION AND ALLOWANCE IS BASED ON THE LOCATION | | | AND USE. THE TOILET MAY NO BE CALLED AN EMERGENCY ROOM | | | TO USE THE ALLOWANCE OF 2.7 WHEN THE CODE HAS AN | | | ALLOWANCE OF .09. ANOTHER EXAMPLE WOULD BE THE CORRIDOR | | | WHICH IS SHOWN FOR A 2.7 ALLOWANCE AND WHEN HOSPITAL | | | CORRIDOR HAS AN ALLOWANCE OF 1.0. | | | THERE ARE MANY DESIGNATIONS WHICH MAY NOT BE USED. | | | PLEASE ALSO CHECK THE CONTROL TYPE. THERE ARE SEVERAL | | | LISTED AS * EXCEPTION FOR AREA USED AS A WHOLE*. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE WHERE IN THE CODE THESE AREAS ARE LISTED. | | | | | | | | | 2) NOTE: ALL WORKING CLEARANCE SHALL MEET 110.26. BASED | | | ON THE NURSE STATION ELEVATION ALONE THERE ARE SEVERAL | | | ITEMS WHICH REQUIRE CLEARANCE HOWEVER DO NOT MEET THE | | | SECTIONS. | | | THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THE EXCEPTION IN 110.26. PLEASE | | | EXPLAIN HOW THIS MEETS THE EXCEPTION. IT DOES NOT MEET | | | THE EXCEPTION. IT IS CLEAR AN ELECTRICIAN COULD VERY | | | WELL NEED TO CHECK FOR VOLTAGE, CIRCUIT TRACING AND | | | NUMEROUS OTHER TASKS IN WHICH POWER WOULD BE PRESENT | | | FOR TROUBLE SHOOTING. THESE PANELS MUST MEET | | | CLEARANCES. THE EXCEPTION MAY NOT BE USED. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 240.12,700.27, 701.18. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE SELECTIVE COORDINATION FOR SYSTEMS | | | INCLUDING NEW EQUIPMENT BEING INSTALLED. THIS STUDY | | | NEEDS TO INCLUDE TIME CURVES. SOME INFORMATION SHOWN | | | AND SUBMITTED HOWEVER BASED ON E7.01 NOT MATCHING RISER | | | COMPLETELY AND NOT TIME CURVES SUBMITTED IT IS NOT | | | KNOWN IF MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE IS MET. SEE COMMENT #8 | | | ALSO. | | | ** THIS IS A REPEATED COMMENT. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS TO | | | SEE THE ATTACHED STUDY WHICH WAS SUBMITTED TO ACHA. | | | THERE ARE NO STAMPS ON THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTATION. IT | | | IS ALSO NOT CLEAR HOW THE STUDY SUBMITTED ALONG WITH | | | THE TIME CURVES WOULD PASS THE REVIEW FROM ACHA WHEN | | | THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES FROM THE RISER AND PLANS. | | | ONE EXAMPLE OF THIS IS THE FACT THE CONDUCTORS ON STUDY | | | RISER TO BOTH TRANSFORMERS T-EDCRL AND T-EDNL ARE 1/0 | | | ON SELECTIVE COORDINATION RISER AND #1 ON THE LISTED | | | FEEDERS. SEE NOTES BELOW ALSO FOR THE COORDINATION OF | | | ALL RISER EQUIPMENT. | | | PLEASE SEE THE TIME CURVES SUBMITTED ARE INDICATING A | | | VERY CLOSE AND ALSO OVER-LAPPING ON SEVERAL ITEMS. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE REVIEWED AND STAMPED SETS FROM ACHA. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 517.17. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE | | | BY SHOWING THE PROTECTION OF SYSTEM. THE RESPONSE | | | MENTIONS THIS IS REVISED ON RISER HOWEVER THE RISER | | | ONLY INDICATES TWO ITEMS WITH THE GFCI PROTECTION. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SECTION OF THE CODE GIVEN ABOVE WHICH | | | REQUIRES THE PROTECTION OF OTHER LOCATIONS. | | | ** THE INTENT IS NOT TO HAVE A SINGLE SITUATION CAUSE A | | | SHUT DOWN OF A MAIN. IT WOULD BE BETTER TO LOSE ONE | | | PANEL THAN THE ENTIRE RISER FEED. THE FOLLOWING IS THE | | | EXACT WORDING TAKEN FROM THE NEC. | | | | | | ****WHEREVER GROUND-FAULT PROTECTION OF EQUIPMENT IS | | | APPLIED TO THE SERVICE PROVIDING POWER TO A HEALTH CARE | | | FACILITY, WHETHER BY DESIGN OR BY REASON OF THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF 215.10 OR 230.95, AN ADDITIONAL LEVEL | | | OF GROUND-FAULT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED DOWNSTREAM. | | | UNDER THIS RULE, GROUND-FAULT PROTECTION MUST BE | | | APPLIED TO EVERY FEEDER, AND ADDITIONAL GROUND-FAULT | | | PROTECTIVE DEVICES MAY BE APPLIED FARTHER DOWNSTREAM AT | | | THE OPTION OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE HEALTH CARE | | | FACILITY. UNLIKE THE REQUIREMENTS OF 215.10 AND 230.95 | | | WHERE MANDATORY GFPE PROTECTION IS PREDICATED ON THE | | | RATING OF THE DISCONNECTING MEANS (1000 AMPERES OR | | | MORE), THE SECOND LEVEL OF GFPE IS NOT BASED ON THE | | | RATING OF THE FEEDER DISCONNECTING MEANS, BECAUSE THE | | | FUNCTION OF THE SECOND LEVEL OF GFPE IS TO PROVIDE THE | | | DESIRED SELECTIVITY BETWEEN THE FEEDER PROTECTIVE | | | DEVICES AND THE SERVICE OR BUILDING SUPPLY PROTECTIVE | | | DEVICES. | | | WITH PROPER COORDINATION, THIS ADDITIONAL GROUND-FAULT | | | PROTECTION IS INTENDED TO LIMIT A GROUND FAULT TO A | | | SINGLE FEEDER AND THEREBY PREVENT A TOTAL POWER OUTAGE | | | OF THE ENTIRE HEALTH FACILITY. COORDINATION INCLUDES | | | CONSIDERATION OF THE TRIP SETTING, THE TIME SETTING, | | | AND THE TIME REQUIRED FOR OPERATION (OPENING TIME) OF | | | EACH LEVEL OF THE GROUND-FAULT PROTECTION SYSTEM. | | | *** PLEASE PROVIDE THE INFORMATION. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE GO THROUGH RISER, CONDUCTORS AND ALL | | | OVER CURRENT PROTECTION DEVICES. THERE ARE ITEMS WHICH | | | DO NOT COORDINATE. | | | 215.5, 110.9, 240.4, 310.16, 240.12 ETC THESE CODE | | | SECTIONS ARE GIVEN IN GENERAL AS COORDINATION OF | | | CONDUCTORS, OVER CURRENT PROTECTION, PANELS ETC EFFECT | | | ALL SECTIONS. | | | THIS IS A REPEAT COMMENT ARE THERE ARE ITEMS STILL NOT | | | PROVIDED. | | | AN EXAMPLE ABOVE WAS GIVEN FOR THE DIFFERENCES IN THE | | | FEEDERS TO EACH TRANSFORMER. | | | ANOTHER EXAMPLE WOULD BE THE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR EDEQH | | | WHICH DOES NOT LIST ANY BRANCH BREAKER FOR THE FEEDERS | | | TO THE TRANSFORMER. | | | **THESE ARE TWO ITEMS GIVEN AS EXAMPLES ONLY. | | | | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-26 |
Time |
08:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-26 |
Time |
08:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-26 08:54:00 | ** DENIED REVIEW ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT PLANS WERE ONLY | | | SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW ONLY. THIS DOES NOT *LOCK* A | | | PROJECT UNDER ANY SPECIFIC CODE EDITIONS UNLESS PERMIT | | | APPLICATION IS MADE. AS THE PROJECT WAS ONLY SUBMITTED | | | FOR PLAN REVIEW AND IS DESIGNED UNDER THE 2004 FBC AS | | | OF MARCH 1, 2009 THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER FS 553.73 | | | HAS ADOPTED THE 2007 FBC WITH 2009 REVISIONS. | | | PLEASE ALSO KNOW SOME OTHER CODES SUCH AS THE LIFE | | | SAFETY CODE AND STATE FIRE CODE WERE ALSO REVISED PER | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 69A-60.003 AND .004 BY THE | | | STATE FIRE MARSHAL. | | | THE FOLLOWING CODES NEED TO BE ON PLANS. PLEASE BE SURE | | | THE FOLLOWING ARE ON ELECTRICAL AS WELL. SOME CODES | | | STATED ON PLANS ARE OK AND IN EFFECT. PLEASE BE SURE | | | THE FOLLOWING ARE UPDATED ON ALL RELEVANT SHEETS. | | | | | | 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS. | | | 2006 NFPA-101 | | | 2006 NFPA-1 | | | 2005 NFPA-70 (ALREADY ON COVER) | | | 2002 NFPA-72 (ALREADY ON BOTH) | | | 2002 NFPA-110 ( ALREADY ON BOTH) | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FAC 61G1-16.004 AND FLORIDA | | | STATUTES 481.219 AS THE ARCHITECTURAL TITLE BLOCKS ARE | | | MISSING REQUIRED INFORMATION AS WELL AS STATE REQUIRED | | | LICENSING. | | | MISSING PRINTED NAME OF ARCHITECT | | | MISSING PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER OF ARCHITECT | | | MISSING CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. | | | | | | ** THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY | | | OTHER TRADES. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13 2007 EDITION WITH | | | 2009 GLITCH AMENDMENTS. THIS CHAPTER WAS COMPLETELY | | | REVISED FROM THE FIRST PRINTING OF THE 2007 FBC. THERE | | | ARE SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES WHICH WILL AFFECT THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | ** THERE ARE LOCATIONS WHICH REQUIRE AUTOMATED LIGHTING | | | CONTROLS HOWEVER NOT SHOWN ON PLANS PER FBC | | | 13-415.AB.1,.1.1,.1.2, .1.3. | | | ONE EXAMPLE ONLY IS 1-125. THIS IS ONE LOCATION ONLY | | | GIVEN AS A BENEFIT. PLEASE BE AWARE THERE ARE MANY | | | OTHERS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SUBMIT LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER | | | 13-415.2, 13-415.AB.5, 13-415.AB.5.1, 13-415.B | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT THE LIGHTNING PROTECTION | | | SYSTEM/ADDITION/REWORK WILL BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT | | | AND PLANS. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: ALL WORKING CLEARANCE SHALL MEET 110.26. BASED | | | ON THE NURSE STATION ELEVATION ALONE THERE ARE SEVERAL | | | ITEMS WHICH REQUIRE CLEARANCE HOWEVER DO NOT MEET THE | | | SECTIONS. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 240.12,700.27, 701.18. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE SELECTIVE COORDINATION FOR SYSTEMS | | | INCLUDING NEW EQUIPMENT BEING INSTALLED. THIS STUDY | | | NEEDS TO INCLUDE TIME CURVES. SOME INFORMATION SHOWN | | | AND SUBMITTED HOWEVER BASED ON E7.01 NOT MATCHING RISER | | | COMPLETELY AND NOT TIME CURVES SUBMITTED IT IS NOT | | | KNOWN IF MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE IS MET. SEE COMMENT #8 | | | ALSO. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 517.17. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE | | | BY SHOWING THE PROTECTION OF SYSTEM. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE GO THROUGH RISER, CONDUCTORS AND ALL | | | OVER CURRENT PROTECTION DEVICES. THERE ARE ITEMS WHICH | | | DO NOT COORDINATE. | | | 215.5, 110.9, 240.4, 310.16, 240.12 ETC THESE CODE | | | SECTIONS ARE GIVEN IN GENERAL AS COORDINATION OF | | | CONDUCTORS, OVER CURRENT PROTECTION, PANELS ETC EFFECT | | | ALL SECTIONS. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE RISER LINE DIAGRAM, MAIN NDB | | | INDICATES A NEW BREAKER TO FEED EDNH. THIS IS SHOWN | | | WITH A 125AMP OCP ON THE LINE DIAGRAM YET THE | | | COORDINATION STUDY RISER SHOWS THIS BEING A 300AMP | | | BREAKER TO THE NEW 300AMP MLO. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: THE RISER INDICATES THE PANEL BEING FED AS | | | NOTED ABOVE AS EDNH, HOWEVER BASED ON THE PANEL | | | DESIGNATION ON E7.03 THE PANEL IS MARKED AS EDHN. ONE | | | COULD ASSUME THIS IS ONLY A MISPRINT HOWEVER ALL OF | | | THESE ITEMS NEED TO COORDINATE. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: THE LOAD IN EDHN/EDNH EXCEEDS THE 125AMP | | | BREAKER FEEDING THIS PANEL BASED ON RISER. | | | | | | ** THESE ARE TWO EXAMPLES ONLY GIVEN AS A BENEFIT. | | | THERE ARE OTHERS. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW THE TRANSFORMER GROUNDING | | | LOCATIONS. PLEASE INCLUDE ON RISER THE SIZE OF THE GEC | | | AND CONNECTION POINT. | | | 250.66,250.20,250.30. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 408.4. THE PANEL SCHEDULES NEED TO | | | BE SPECIFIC TO ROOMS AND AREAS IN WHICH THEY FEED. | | | STATING, RECEPTACLES, OR CONSOLE OR OTHER GENERIC TERMS | | | IS NOT PERMITTED. THESE NEED TO BE CLEAR TO THE ROOMS | | | AND AREAS. FOR EXAMPLE: * RECEPTACLES RM 101, ETC. | | | THESE MAY BE ALPHA OR NUMERIC DESIGNATIONS BASED ON | | | PLANS. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT: AS NOTED ABOVE THE PROJECT WAS NOT | | | SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT UNDER THE 2004 FBC. PLEASE REVISE | | | ALL DESIGNS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT ** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-08-27 |
Time |
15:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-08-27 |
Time |
15:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
Time |
12:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
Time |
12:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-11 12:56:36 | COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST REVIEW APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED AND THE PLANS HAVE BEEN APPROVED AND STAMPED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1) FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS TO BE TESTED FOR CLOSURE IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH UL 555 PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | | | 2) FIRE DEPARTMENT VALVES TO BE 2 1/2" CONNECTIONS TO 1 | | | 1/2" REDUCER WITH CHAIN AND CAP. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-02 |
Time |
13:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-02 |
Time |
13:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-02 13:55:18 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | | | | 1. THE ACTUAL PROJECT SITE ADDRESS SHALL BE IN THE | | | TITLE BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET. | | | | | | 2. STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241 - 2004 | | | EDITION. | | | | | | 3. THE 2007 EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE | | | BASED ON NFPA 101 - LIFE SAFETY CODE - 2006 EDITION AND | | | NFPA 1 - UNIFORM FIRE CODE 2006 EDITION) SHALL BE | | | REFERENCED. | | | | | | 4. SPECIFY THE INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS FOR THE WALLS | | | AND CEILINGS IN THE PROJECT AREAS IN TERMS OF CLASS A, | | | CLASS B, OR CLASS C. | | | | | | 5. WILL THE SCOPE WORK HAVE CAUSE FOR THE FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM AND/OR DEVICES TO BE REMODELED? IF SO, SEPARATE | | | FIRE ALARM PERMIT AND SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6. SEPARATE PLANS AND SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE REQUIRED | | | FOR ANY SPRINKLER INSTALLATION AND/OR REMADEL. | | | | | | 7. FIRE DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 80. | | | | | | 8. BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF THEREOF SHALL BE PERMITTED | | | TO BE OCCUPIED DURING THE PROJECTED SCOPE OF WORK ONLY | | | WHERE REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS AND REQUIRED FIRE | | | PROTECTION FEATURES ARE IN PLACE AND CONTINUOUSLY | | | MAINTAINED FOR THE PORTION OCCUPIED OR WHERE | | | ALTERNATIVE LIFE SAFETY MEASURES ARE ACCEPTABLE TO THE | | | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION ARE IN PLACE. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
16:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
16:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-05-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-05-22 |
Time |
14:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-05-22 |
Time |
14:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-22 14:52:34 | PLANS REMOVED FROM BOXES TO DW OFFICE FOR EXPEDITED | | | REVIEWS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2009-05-19 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-05-19 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-19 10:12:41 | TO COMMERCIAL BOX #29. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-02 |
Time |
13:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-18 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-18 11:27:21 | TO "COMM" BD#59 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-26 |
Time |
18:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-26 |
Time |
18:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-26 18:30:35 | REVISED M0.11 THRU M0.17 AND M1.50 DELTA 3 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-07-09 |
Time |
14:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-07-09 |
Time |
13:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-09 13:46:50 | PROVISO: | | | PROVIDE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF MUNTERS RTU FOR WIND | | | RESISTANCE FOR PLAN REVIEW PRIOR TO INSPECTION OF RTU. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-06-12 |
Time |
14:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-06-12 |
Time |
14:11 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-12 14:21:15 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2007 CODE FAMILY W/ 2009 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 1. PLANS HAVE BEEN CHANGED TO SHOW THE CONDENSATE | | | DISCHARGING INTO A FUNNEL INTO STORM WATER RISER. THIS | | | IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AS THIS CREATES AN OPENING OF THE | | | STORMWATER SYSTEM INTO THE BUILDING. IF THE STORMWATER | | | DRAIN WERE TO BECOME OBSTRUCTED IT WOULD LEAD TO A | | | BACKUP OF RAIN WATER INTO THE BUILDING. CONDENSATE | | | SHALL DISCHARGE OUTDOORS AT AN APPROVED LOCATION OR TIE | | | INTO STORMWATER OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. PLEASE CONTACT | | | PLUMBING OR MECHANICAL REVIEWER TO DISCUSS OPTIONS. | | | FBC-M 307.2.1. | | | | | | 2. PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR FANS AND AHU. NO DATA | | | PROVIDED FOR RTU. MAY BE A PROVISO ITEM ONCE ALL OTHER | | | ISSUES ARE ADDRESSED. FBC-M 301.12. | | | | | | 3. PLAN SHOWS AUXILIARY DRAIN DISCHARGING ONTO ROOF. | | | ROOFTOP UNITS NOT LIKELY DESIGNED WITH AUX. DRAIN | | | OUTLET. ALSO, WOULD NOT BE DISCHARGING TO A CONSPICUOUS | | | LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY FBC-M 307.2.3. ON DOWN-FLOW | | | UNITS AND ALL OTHER COILS THAT DO NOT HAVE A SECONDARY | | | DRAIN AND DO NOT HAVE A MEANS TO INSTALL AN AUXILIARY | | | DRAIN PAN, A WATER-LEVEL MONITORING DEVICE SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED INSIDE THE PRIMARY DRAIN PAN. THIS DEVICE | | | SHALL SHUT OFF THE EQUIPMENT SERVED IN THE EVENT THAT | | | THE PRIMARY DRAIN BECOMES RESTRICTED. EXTERNALLY | | | INSTALLED DEVICES AND DEVICES INSTALLED IN THE DRAIN | | | LINE SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M | | | 307.2.3.1. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-26 |
Time |
20:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-26 |
Time |
19:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-26 20:45:13 | REVIEW #: 1ST **PLAN CHECK ONLY** | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2007 CODE FAMILY W/ 2009 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING NOTES HAVE BEEN ADDED TO ONE SET OF | | | SUBMITTED PLANS TO ASSIST IN MAKING CORRECTIONS. | | | | | | 1. PAGE M2.01 AND M4.03: PLANS SHOW CONDENSATE FROM FCU | | | DISCHARGING INTO SANITARY SEWER VIA HUB DRAIN ABOVE | | | CEILING. CONDENSATE SHALL NOT DISCHARGE INTO SANITARY | | | SEWER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCE. | | | CONDENSATE SHALL DISCHARGE INTO STORMWATER SYSTEM OR | | | DIRECTLY TO THE OUTDOORS. SHOW CONDENSATE DISCHARGE | | | LOCATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M 307.2.1. | | | | | | 2. PAGES M4.02, M4.03 AND M4.04: ALL APPLIANCES, | | | EQUIPMENT AND SUPPORTS WHICH ARE EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL | | | BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED FOR WIND RESISTANCE IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M 301.12. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S | | | DATA FOR FANS AND ROOFTOP UNITS SHOWING THESE | | | APPLIANCES ARE DESIGNED FOR WIND RESISTANCE. ALSO, SHOW | | | HOW FANS, DUCTWORK AND SUPPORTS ARE TO BE SECURED TO | | | STRUCTURE FOR WIND RESISTANCE. | | | | | | 3. PAGE M4.03: SHOW HOW FAN-COIL AND ROOFTOP UNITS ARE | | | TO BE PROVIDED WITH AUXILIARY DRAIN PROTECTION IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M 307.2.3. | | | | | | NOTE: THIS PLAN WAS SUBMITTED WITHOUT APPLICATION FOR | | | PERMIT. THE 2007 FBC IS IN EFFECT AS OF MARCH 1, 2009. | | | PLANS WILL REMAIN IN FAIL STAUS PENDING APPLICATION FOR | | | PERMIT. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
MEDGAS |
MEDICAL GAS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-26 |
Time |
17:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-25 |
Time |
17:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-26 17:31:47 | REVISIONS OK -- SHT P2.01, P2.02, P2.03, P2.04, P2.05, | | | P2.06 (NEW SHEET), P2.07 (NEW SHEET). |
|
|
| Review Stop |
MEDGAS |
MEDICAL GAS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-06-12 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-06-12 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
MEDGAS |
MEDICAL GAS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-27 |
Time |
11:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-26 |
Time |
17:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-27 11:48:31 | PLANS ARE CODE COMPLIANT - REFERENCE NFPA 99C 2002 TO | | | BE ADDED ON SHT AO.OO |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-26 |
Time |
17:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-25 |
Time |
17:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-26 17:33:38 | REVISIONS OK -- SHTS P1.00, P1.01, P1.02, P1.03, P1.04, | | | P1.05, P1.06 (NEW SHEET). |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-09 |
Time |
14:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-09 |
Time |
14:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-06-12 |
Time |
15:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-06-12 |
Time |
15:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-12 16:03:07 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2007 W/2009 SUPPLEMENTS | | | NFPA 99C 2002 | | | CITY OF WPB MUNICIPAL CODE | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. SHTS P1.01 & P3.01 WASTE & VENT PIPING. THE 2 INCH | | | HUB DRAIN FOR THE FCU IS NOT APPROVED. CONDENSATE SHALL | | | NO DRAIN INTO THE SANITARY DRAINAGE SYSTEM PER ARTICLE | | | III SECTION 90-125(5). CONDENSATE SHALL BE CONNECTED TO | | | A DEDICATED CONDENSATE LINE, TO THE STORM SYSTEM | | | OUTSIDE THE BUILDING, TO A DRYWELL OR TO A PLANTED AREA | | | MINIMUM 1 FOOT AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURAL WALL. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE 2" HUB DRAIN CONNECTING TO | | | THE STORM ABOVE THE CEILINGON SHT P1.01 IS NOT AN | | | APPROVED PLACE OF DISPOSAL. CONDENSATE SHALL BE DRAINED | | | SEPARATELY FROM THE BUILDING AS INDICATED IN COMMENT. A | | | RELIEF VENT, (GOOSENECK) IS REQUIRED ON THE CONDENSATE | | | PIPING AS IT EXITS THE BUILDING IF THE CONDENSATE WILL | | | BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM LINE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. | | | SECTION 314.2.1. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-27 |
Time |
11:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-26 |
Time |
17:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-27 11:56:07 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2007 W/2009 SUPPLEMENTS | | | NFPA 99C 2002 | | | CITY OF WPB MUNICIPAL CODE | | | | | | 1. SHT A0.00 CODE CRITERIA SHALL BE UPDATED TO FBC-2007 | | | W/2009 SUPPLEMENTS AS THE PERMIT WILL BE APPLIED FOR | | | AFTER MARCH 1 2009. ALSO ADD NFPA 99C 2002 FOR THE | | | MED-GAS CODE CRITERIA. | | | | | | 2. SHTS P1.01 & P3.01 WASTE & VENT PIPING. THE 2 INCH | | | HUB DRAIN FOR THE FCU IS NOT APPROVED. CONDENSATE SHALL | | | NO DRAIN INTO THE SANITARY DRAINAGE SYSTEM PER ARTICLE | | | III SECTION 90-125(5). CONDENSATE SHALL BE CONNECTED TO | | | A DEDICATED CONDENSATE LINE, TO THE STORM SYSTEM | | | OUTSIDE THE BUILDING, TO A DRYWELL OR TO A PLANTED AREA | | | MINIMUM 1 FOOT AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURAL WALL. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-06-02 |
Time |
09:48 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-06-02 |
Time |
09:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-02 10:31:38 | PASSED | | | | | | NOTE: IF PERMITS WITHIN A ONE YEAR PERIOD ON THE | | | BUILDING AT 2201 45TH STREET EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF | | | THE BUILDING, THEN A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE CODE IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | PERMIT NO. 09020635 $495,000 | | | PERMIT NO. 09020319 $2,150,000 | | | | | | TOTAL $2,645,000 | | | | | | BUILDING VALUE $12,685,641 = CURRENTLY LESS THAN 50%. | | | | | | ANY EXTERIOR SIGNAGE REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
14:57 |
Rev Time |
1.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
14:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-02 14:59:28 | FAILED PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | 1) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ADDRESS AND PCN ARE INCORRECT. | | | THE LIMITS OF WORK ARE IN THE BUILDING LOCATED AT 4631 | | | N. CONGRESS WITH PCN 74434306000001030. | | | | | | 2) NOTE THAT IF THE VALUE OF THIS PERMIT, WHEN ADDED TO | | | OTHER PERMITS WITHIN THE LAST YEAR TOTAL 50% OF THE | | | VALUE OF THE BUILDING, THEN A LANDSCAPE PLAN VERIFYING | | | THAT THE SITE CONFORMS TO THE LANDSCAPE CODE IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3) IT APPEARS THAT THE DECONTAMINATION AREA IS ADDED | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE/STRUCTURE OUTSIDE OF THE EXISTING WALL. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY. IF THIS IS AN ADDITION, THEN IT | | | REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | AMENDMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | | | 4) IF DECONTAMINATION AREA HAS NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE, THEN WORK SHOWN COMPLIES WITH ZONING. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435. | | | |
|
|