Plan Review Details - Permit 09010024
Plan Review Stops For Permit 09010024
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2009-01-30 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-01-30 Time 16:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-01-30 Time 16:30 Sent To  
Notes
2009-01-30 16:30:32ROOF NOA 05-0620.03, 06-0613.06
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2009-01-26 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-01-26 Time 14:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-01-26 Time 14:49 Sent To  
Notes
2009-01-26 15:25:05****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004
 FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004
 FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FS FLORIDA STATUTE
  
 1. SPECIFY DESIGN UPLIFT, DESIGN LATERAL PARALLEL TO
 PLATE, AND DESIGN LATERAL PERPENDICULAR TO PLATE. SEE
 SIMPSON CATALOG, GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO THE DESIGNER,
 ITEM E, REGARDING THE UNITY EQUATION. COMPLIANCE CANNOT
 BE DETERMINED AS DESIGN LOADS NOT SPECIFIED ON THE
 PLAN. FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE, THIS PAGE HAS BEEN PRINTED
 AND ATTACHED. IT IS ALSO AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.STRONG
 TIE.COM/FTP/CATALOGS/C-2009/C-2009-P014-P015.PDF.
  
 2ND REVIEW, THIS INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE
 CATALOG DESIGN LIMITS FOR THE CONNECTORS WERE PROVIDED.
 THAT MEANS THAT EACH STRAP/CONNECTOR WAS DESIGNED TO
 MAXIMUM CAPACITY, NOT ACCEPTABLE PER CATALOG. PLEASE
 PROVIDE REQUESTED INFORMATION.
  
 2C. SHEET 1 OF THE PLAN SPECIFIES 25PSF ATTIC LIVE
 LOAD; IT APPEARS THAT THIS ATTIC SPACE WILL BE USED FOR
 STORAGE. 10PSF NONCONCURRENT LIVE LOAD INCLUDED ON THE
 TRUSS, PLEASE REVISE TO BE 25PSF CONCURRENT AS PER
 ARCHITECT'S PLAN. IF PLAN IS REVISED, PLEASE SPECIFY
 THAT THE ATTIC WILL NOT BE USED FOR ANY STORAGE.
  
 2ND REVIEW, THE ENGINEER (YURASEK, PE) HAS CHANGED THE
 BCLL FROM 25PSF TO 0. BOTTOM CHORD LIVE LOAD REQUIRED
 MINIMUM 20PSF WITH STORAGE, 10PSF WITHOUT STORAGE FBC
 TABLE 1607.1. BCLL CANNOT BE 0, MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH
 THE TRUSS ENGINEERING, AND THE STATEMENT REGARDING
 STORAGE WAS NOT PUT ON THE PLAN.
  
 3-4. ADDRESSED.
  
 5. PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE FLAT ROOF,
 PITCHED ROOF FAC9B72. FOR THE FLAT DECK, CONTRACTOR
 MUST SELECT AN APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND SPECIFY ENHANCED
 FASTENING IF NECESSARY. THIS MAY BE DONE WITH THE ROOF
 PERMIT APPLICATION; THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED BEFORE
 A ROOF PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED. PLEASE PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS. THEY
 ARE AVAILABLE AT WWW.MIAMIDADE.GOV OR
 WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. THE INFORMATION REGARDING THE
 ASSEMBLY CAN BE PROVIDED WITH ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION,
 BUT THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME.
 NOTE COMMENT 7, PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY
 DESIGNER OF RECORD.
  
 6. SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT REQUIRED. INFORMATIONAL ONLY.
  
 7. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF
 RECORD, FBC*106.3.3.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 8. THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES FOR THE ROOF
 ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA,
 FBC1603.1.4.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 9. THE PLAN PROPOSES TO LEAVE PORTIONS OF THE ROOF AND
 ROOF FRAMING IN PLACE. AS THIS STRUCTURE IS ON THE
 DEMOLITION LIST, PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER CERTIFY THE
 CONDITION OF THE EXISTING ROOF FRAMING, CONNECTIONS,
 AND ROOF ASSEMBLY. SEE ALSO FBC EB 507.2.2 AND ADDRESS
 ON THE PLAN.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED. ENGINEER TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT
 REGARDING THE EXISTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN. PLANS STILL
 SHOW ONLY PORTIONS TO BE REPLACED.
  
 10. PROVIDE A REASONABLE VALUE FOR THIS JOB. THIS IS TO
 INCLUDE COST OF ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED. NEXT REVIEW WILL NOT BE DONE UNLESS
 VALUE IS ADJUSTED AND FEES ARE PAID.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 11. SEE FS553.80, A 4X PLAN REVIEW FEE WILL BE CHARGED
 IF COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED A THIRD TIME.
  
 12. TWO COMPLETE COLLATED SETS OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS
 REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. ONLY ONE SET OF TRUSS
 ENGINEERING.
  
 13. CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE TO BE INDICATED WITH CLOUDS
 AND REVISION NUMBERS. FBC*106.
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-01-06 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-01-06 Time 17:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-01-06 Time 17:20 Sent To  
Notes
2009-01-06 17:45:07****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004
 FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004
 FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FS FLORIDA STATUTE
  
 1. SPECIFY DESIGN UPLIFT, DESIGN LATERAL PARALLEL TO
 PLATE, AND DESIGN LATERAL PERPENDICULAR TO PLATE. SEE
 SIMPSON CATALOG, GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO THE DESIGNER,
 ITEM E, REGARDING THE UNITY EQUATION. COMPLIANCE CANNOT
 BE DETERMINED AS DESIGN LOADS NOT SPECIFIED ON THE
 PLAN. FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE, THIS PAGE HAS BEEN PRINTED
 AND ATTACHED. IT IS ALSO AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.STRONG
 TIE.COM/FTP/CATALOGS/C-2009/C-2009-P014-P015.PDF.
  
 2. REGARDING THE TRUSS DRAWINGS, PLEASE NOTE THE
 FOLLOWING:
  
 A. SIGNATURE TO BE AN ORIGINAL AND TO INCLUDE A DATE,
 FAC61G15-23.002.
  
 B. AN INDEX SHEET WAS PROVIDED, BUT NOT SIGNED AND
 SEALED.
  
 C. SHEET 1 OF THE PLAN SPECIFIES 25PSF ATTIC LIVE LOAD;
 IT APPEARS THAT THIS ATTIC SPACE WILL BE USED FOR
 STORAGE. 10PSF NONCONCURRENT LIVE LOAD INCLUDED ON THE
 TRUSS, PLEASE REVISE TO BE 25PSF CONCURRENT AS PER
 ARCHITECT'S PLAN. IF PLAN IS REVISED, PLEASE SPECIFY
 THAT THE ATTIC WILL NOT BE USED FOR ANY STORAGE.
  
 D. SHEET 1 OF THE PLAN SPECIFIES 27PSF DL; PLEASE
 REVISE TRUSS ENGINEERING.
  
 E. TRUSS INDEX SHEET REFERS TO ANSI/TPI 1-95, INCORRECT
 VERSION, SEE FBC R43.
  
 F. HIB 91 SUMMARY SHEET INCLUDED; SEE FBC R 802.1.6.3,
 THIS STANDARD IS OUTDATED. PLEASE REFER ONLY TO CURRENT
 STANDARDS, FBC R43.
  
 G. THE SIMPSON AND USP SPEC SHEETS ARE OUTDATED (1997,
 VARIOUS YEARS). PLEASE SEE THE WEBSITE; A NEW 2009
 CATALOG IS AVAILABLE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SPEC SHEETS
 SUBMITTED REFER TO OUTDATED STANDARDS.
  
 H. GIRDER CONNECTION INFORMATION, AND OTHER SHEETS
 PROVIDED WHICH DO NOT APPEAR TO BE PERTINENT TO THIS
 JOB.
  
 I. ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G15-23.002 IS
 REQUIRED ON EACH SIGNED AND SEALED SHEET. THIS WAS
 INCLUDED ON THE INDEX SHEET, WHICH WAS NOT SIGNED AND
 SEALED, BUT NOT ON THE TWO TRUSS ENGINEERING SHEETS
 WHICH WERE SIGNED AND SEALED.
  
 J. A PIGGYBACK TRUSS DETAIL AS WELL AS OTHER DETAILS
 WERE PROVIDED, PREPARED BY ROBBINS ENGINEERING, BUT ARE
 PHOTOCOPIES. ALL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND
 SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED,
 DATED ORIGINALS FS471 AND INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION
 REQUIRED BY FAC61G15-23.002 AND BE SEALED WITH A SEAL
 ACCEPTABLE TO FBPE, FAC61G15-23.001. THE DETAILS DO NOT
 ADDRESS THE 10# BCLL REQUIREMENT, AND INCLUDE NOTES
 MADE AFTER THE DATE OF THE ENGINEERS' SEALS; TRUSS
 DESIGN LOAD NOT CONSISTENT WITH PLAN.
  
 3. PLEASE HAVE THE DESIGNER OF RECORD (ARCHITECT OR
 ENGINEER) REVIEW THE TRUSS DRAWINGS, ENGINEERING, AND
 LAYOUT PLAN, FAC61G15-31.003.
  
 4. SEE FAC61G15-31.003 REGARDING SUBMITTAL OF TRUSS
 DRAWINGS. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE INTENT IS TO SIGN AND
 SEAL EACH SHEET, OR TO USE AN INDEX SHEET. EITHER
 METHOD IS ACCEPTABLE; HOWEVER, MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE RULE. SEE OTHER COMMENTS.
  
 5. PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE FLAT ROOF,
 PITCHED ROOF FAC9B72. FOR THE FLAT DECK, CONTRACTOR
 MUST SELECT AN APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND SPECIFY ENHANCED
 FASTENING IF NECESSARY. THIS MAY BE DONE WITH THE ROOF
 PERMIT APPLICATION; THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED BEFORE
 A ROOF PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.
  
 6. SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT REQUIRED. INFORMATIONAL ONLY.
  
 7. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF
 RECORD, FBC*106.3.3.
  
 8. THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES FOR THE ROOF
 ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA,
 FBC1603.1.4.
  
 9. THE PLAN PROPOSES TO LEAVE PORTIONS OF THE ROOF AND
 ROOF FRAMING IN PLACE. AS THIS STRUCTURE IS ON THE
 DEMOLITION LIST, PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER CERTIFY THE
 CONDITION OF THE EXISTING ROOF FRAMING, CONNECTIONS,
 AND ROOF ASSEMBLY. SEE ALSO FBC EB 507.2.2 AND ADDRESS
 ON THE PLAN.
  
 10. PROVIDE A REASONABLE VALUE FOR THIS JOB. THIS IS TO
 INCLUDE COST OF ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2009-01-05 Cont ID  
Sent By ssherman Date 2009-01-05 Time 15:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ssherman Date 2009-01-05 Time 15:10 Sent To  
Notes
2009-01-05 15:11:01HISTORICAL APPROVAL PER JILLIAN PAPA
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2009-01-23 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2009-01-23 Time 08:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2009-01-23 Time 08:23 Sent To B
Notes
2009-01-23 08:24:02TO "SHILL" DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2009-01-07 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-01-07 Time 10:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-01-07 Time 10:05 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved