Plan Review Details - Permit 08120284
Plan Review Stops For Permit 08120284
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2009-10-15 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2009-10-15 Time 10:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2009-10-15 Time 10:08 Sent To PC
Notes
2009-10-15 10:16:09BUILDING REVISION CHECKLIST.
  
 1- ENGINEER'S STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL IS INCORRECT. 1X2
 BUCK SIZE IS NOT ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE FULL DOOR/WINDOW
 FRAME SUPPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R613.6 OF 2004
 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE SIZE AS REQUIRED.
 ALSO, ENGINEER TO LOOK AT THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR
 REQUIRED BUCK SIZE.
  
 ***NOTE: EXTERIOR DOOR AND IMPACT SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS
 AS WELL AS THE REVISED ENERGY CALCUATIONS WERE APPROVED
 ON THIS SUBMITTAL.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2009-07-15 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2009-07-15 Time 14:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2009-07-15 Time 14:28 Sent To  
Notes
2009-07-15 14:33:19BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO:
 1- PROVIDE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR EXTERIOR DOORS.
  
 2- PROVIDE COMPLETE SHUTTERS INSTALLATION SCHEDULE (SEE
 ATTACHED SAMPLE) AND CLEARLY MARK SHUTTERS DRAWINGS
 WITH PROPOSED SHUTTERS INSTALLATION (EG: WALL MOUNTED,
 BUILT OUT, ETC) AND SPECIFIC TYPE OF ANCHOR AND SPACING
 TO BE USED.
  
 3- SPECIFY STRUCTURAL DOOR BUCK SIZE AND FASTENERS. SEE
 PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REQUIRED BUCK SIZE.
  
 4- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. REVISE OVERHANG HEIGHT
 SHOWN ON 2ND PAGE OF CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2009-06-10 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2009-06-22 Time 08:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2009-06-10 Time 11:16 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-10 11:27:10NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), BUILDING REVIEW THIRD
 CHECKLIST.
 REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2007
 REVISIONS.
  
 ***NOTE: ONLY ONE SET OF ENGINEER'S PLANS WERE
 SUBMITTED THIS TIME.
  
 1- PLANS TO SPECIFY ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. R301.1 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE. NOTE: ATTIC LIVE LOADS NEED TO BE
 INCLUDED ALSO. (REPEAT COMMENT- THREE TIMES).
 STRUCTURAL LOADS SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED ON SHEET A3
 ARE VERY CONFUSING AND STILL ARE NOT ADDRESSING THE
 REQUIRED ATTIC LIVE LOADS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF
 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. (THIS IS THE THIRD TIME
 THAT THIS ISSUE IS NOT ADDRESSED. ENGINEER TO PAY FOUR
 TIMES THE FEE FOR PLAN REVIEW AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA
 STATUTE SEC. 553.80(2)(B). SEE ATTACHED COPY. ENGINEER
 OWES $3,705.63 FOR MULTIPLE PLAN REVIEW REJECTIONS).
  
 2- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR:
 A) ENTRY DOOR AND KITCHEN AND BEDROOM EXTERIOR DOORS.
 ACCORDING TO MIAMI-DADE COUNTY WEBSITE NOA 07-0731.04
 SUBMITTED IS NO GOOD. FILE FOR THIS NOA WAS CLOSED BY
 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. SEE ATTACHED COPY FROM MIAMI-DADE
 COUNTY. PROVIDE CURRENT NOA AND ENGINEER TO REVIEW
 PRODUCT APPROVAL PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.
  
 B) HURRICANE SHUTTERS: PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE. COMPLETE ALL THE
 INFORMATION AND CLEARLY MARK ON SHUTTERS DRAWINGS
 SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS (EG: WALL MOUNTED, BUILD
 OUT, ETC) AND SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE
 USED. (REPEAT COMMENT- THREE TIMES).
 THIS ITEM WAS NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. PROVIDE COMPLETE
 INFORMATION.
  
 3- SINCE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKEN THE CEILING
 FAN CREDIT, THEN THE ELECTRICAL PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW SIZE
 OF CEILING FANS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 OF
 FBC 2004. AND, THEY NEED TO BE INSTALLED FOR
 INSPECTION. NEED TO REVISE SIZE OF CEILING FAN ON
 LIVING ROOM.
 REPEAT COMMENT. SIZE WAS NOT CHANGED
  
 4- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC.
 R401.3 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 REVISE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWN ON SITE PLAN ON SHEET A1.
 ARROWS SHOW WATER TO BE DIVERTED TO THE ADJACENT
 NEIGHBORS. WATER CAN'T RUN INTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
 (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 5- SHEET A1:
 A) SPECIFY ATTIC SIZE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807
 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 22" X 22" SIZE SHOWN DOESN'T COMPLY. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 B) COORDINATE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR WINDOWS. INFORMATION
 SHOWN ON THE OPENINGS ON BUILDING INFORMATION CHART
 DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 C) ENTRY DOOR TO BE MIN. 3'-0" WIDE BY 6'-8" HEIGHT AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R311.4.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL
 CODE.
 FOUNDATION PLAN SHOWS ENTRY DOOR OPENING TO BE 3'-2" .
 THIS MASONRY OPENING WON'T ALLOW TO INSTALL 3'-0" WIDE
 DOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. NOTE: KEEP IN MIND REQUIRED
 BUCK SIZE. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL. (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 D) MASTER BATHROOM TYPE OF DOOR SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN
 DOESN'T MATCH TYPE OF DOOR SHOWN ON DOOR SCHEDULE.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 NOT ADDRESSED. (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 E) SIZE OF WINDOW SPECIFIED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T
 MATCH SIZE OF WINDOW SHOWN ON BUILDING INFORMATION
 CHART. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 NOT ADDRESSED. WINDOW SCHEDULE SHOWS H32, WHILE
 BUILDING INFORMATION CHART SHOWS H33. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH. (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 F) NOTE INSIDE FOUNDATION PLAN CALLS FOR 48" MAX.
 SPACING FOR VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT BETWEEN FILLED
 CELLS. FOUNDATION PLAN AND FLOOR PLANS SHOW SOME AREAS
 WHERE THE THE MAX. VERTICAL SPACING OF FILLED CELLS
 EXCEED THE 48". REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 PLANS NOW DON'T SPECIFY THE SPACING OF VERTICAL
 REINFORCEMENT. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS OR PROVIDE
 DIMENSIONS ON FOUNDATION PLAN. (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 G) REVISE BUILDING WIDTH AND BUILDING LENGTH DIMENSIONS
 SHOWN ON BUILDING INFORMATION CHART. SEE FLOOR PLANS
 FOR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS.
 REVISE BUILDING LENGTH. (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 H) REVISE BUILDING SIDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON
 SITE PLAN. 122'? (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 6- SHEET A2:
 A) WHERE IS BEAM B-2 SPECIFIED ON EXTERIOR CMU WALL
 SECTION A/A2?. (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 7- SHEET A3:
 A) REVISE NUMBER/SIZE OF NAILS AND UPLIFT LOADS SHOWN
 ON TRUSS CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN. SEE
 CONNECTOR PRODUCT APPROVAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 NOT ADDRESSED. (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 B) REVISE SIZE OF STRUCTURAL BUCK SHOWN ON BUCK DETAIL
 FOR DOOR. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REQUIRED SIZE. ALSO,
 DOOR FRAME NEEDS TO BE FULLY SUPPORTED ON BUCK AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R613.6 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL
 CODE. PROVIDE BUCK SIZE THAT PROVIDES FULL SUPPORT TO
 DOOR FRAME. (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2009-03-13 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2009-03-13 Time 14:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2009-03-13 Time 14:12 Sent To  
Notes
2009-03-13 15:15:38NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), BUILDING REVIEW
 SECOND CHECKLIST.
 REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2007
 REVISIONS.
  
 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. SEC. 713.13
 FLORIDA STATUTE.
 NOTE: THIS MAY BE RECORDED AT TIME OF PERMIT PICK UP.
  
 ***RESPONSE: NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SUBMITTED WAS
 RECORDED ON 12/12/2008. IT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS WHEN
 WORK IS NOT STARTED. SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. NEED
 TO PROVIDE RE-RECORDED ONE.
  
 2- PLANS TO SPECIFY ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. R301.1 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE. NOTE: ATTIC LIVE LOADS NEED TO BE
 INCLUDED ALSO.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 STRUCTURAL LOADS SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED ON SHEET A3
 ARE VERY CONFUSING AND STILL ARE NOT ADDRESSING THE
 REQUIRED ATTIC LIVE LOADS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF
 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 NOTE: ONE SET OF PLANS WAS RETAINED IN THIS OFFICE TO
 SEND TO BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW.
  
 3- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR:
 A) PRECAST LINTELS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 NOA #03-0605.04 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON 09/11/2008 AND IS
 FOR 4", 6" AND 12" PRECAST LINTELS. NONE OF THESE SIZES
 ARE USED ON PLANS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR 8"
 LINTELS. ALSO, ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE
 IN WRITING NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 B) ENTRY DOOR AND KITCHEN AND BEDROOM EXTERIOR DOORS.
 CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS FOR THE
 ENTRY AND ALL OTHER OPENINGS.
 ***NOTE: NOA 02-1211.10 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON JULY 17,
 2008. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 (1) NOA 04-1022.04 SUBMITTED IS FOR "INSWING" DOORS.
 PLANS SHOW "OUTSWING" DOORS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 (2) MISSING BEDROOM EXTERIOR DOOR.
  
 (3) PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED DOESN'T MATCH TYPE OF
 DOOR SHOWN ON DOOR SCHEDULE AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 (4) GLASS DON'T HAVE IMPACT PROTECTION. SHUTTERS ARE
 REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITH STORM SHUTTERS INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE.
  
 (5) PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR 8'-0" HIGH DOORS.
 SEE PLANS FOR SIZE SPECIFIED.
  
 (6) PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
 PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ENGINEER. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 C) HURRICANE SHUTTERS: PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE. COMPLETE ALL THE
 INFORMATION AND CLEARLY MARK ON SHUTTERS DRAWINGS
 SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS (EG: WALL MOUNTED, BUILD
 OUT, ETC) AND SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE
 USED.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 THIS ITEM WAS NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. PROVIDE COMPLETE
 INFORMATION AND CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING TWO DIFFERENT
 PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR TWO DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER'S.
 ALSO, PLEASE MAKE SURE TO PROVIDE TWO COPIES FOR EITHER
 SELECTION. EG: ONLY ONE COPY OF NOA 06-0706.17 WAS
 PROVIDED. AND, PRODUCT APPROVAL NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED
 AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.
  
 4- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 ***RESPONSE: SOME PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WERE NOT
 APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
  
 5- SINCE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKEN THE CEILING
 FAN CREDIT, THEN THE ELECTRICAL PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW SIZE
 OF CEILING FANS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 OF
 FBC 2004. AND, THEY NEED TO BE INSTALLED FOR
 INSPECTION.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 REVISE SIZE OF CEILING FAN SPECIFIED FOR LIVING ROOM.
 SEE SIZE OF ROOM ON SHEET A1 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 6- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC.
 R401.3 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 REVISE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWN ON SITE PLAN ON SHEET A1.
 ARROWS SHOW WATER TO BE DIVERTED TO THE ADJACENT
 NEIGHBORS. WATER CAN'T RUN INTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
  
 7- SHEET A1:
 A) SPECIFY ATTIC SIZE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807
 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 22" X 22" SIZE SHOWN DOESN'T COMPLY. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 B) DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED FOR DOOR AND WINDOWS
 DON'T CORRESPOND TO EXPOSURE "C" AS SHOWN ON BUILDING
 INFORMATION CHART. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 ALSO, DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON WINDOW/ DOOR SCHEDULES
 AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ON SHEETS A2 AND A3 DON'T MATCH
 DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON BUILDING INFORMATION CHART.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 ***RESPONSE: COORDINATE INFORMATION SHOWN ON OPENING
 TABLES AND INFORMATION SHOWN ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS.
  
 C) ENTRY DOOR TO BE MIN. 3'-0" WIDE BY 6'-8" HEIGHT AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R311.4.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL
 CODE.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 FLOOR PLAN SHOWS ENTRY DOOR OPENING TO BE 3'-2" . THIS
 MASONRY OPENING WON'T ALLOW TO INSTALL 3'-0" WIDE DOOR.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. NOTE: KEEP IN MIND REQUIRED BUCK
 SIZE. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 D) MASTER BATHROOM TYPE OF DOOR SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN
 DOESN'T MATCH TYPE OF DOOR SHOWN ON DOOR SCHEDULE.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 E) SIZE OF WINDOW SPECIFIED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T
 MATCH SIZE OF WINDOW SHOWN ON BUILDING INFORMATION
 CHART. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED. WINDOW SCHEDULE SHOWS H32, WHILE
 BUILDING INFORMATION CHART SHOWS H33. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH.
  
 F) NOTE INSIDE FOUNDATION PLAN CALLS FOR 48" MAX.
 SPACING FOR VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT BETWEEN FILLED
 CELLS. FOUNDATION PLAN AND FLOOR PLANS SHOW SOME AREAS
 WHERE THE THE MAX. VERTICAL SPACING OF FILLED CELLS
 EXCEED THE 48". REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 PLANS NOW DON'T SPECIFY THE SPACING OF VERTICAL
 REINFORCEMENT. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS OR PROVIDE
 DIMENSIONS ON FOUNDATION PLAN.
  
 G) REVISE BUILDING WIDTH AND BUILDING LENGTH DIMENSIONS
 SHOWN ON BUILDING INFORMATION CHART. SEE FLOOR PLANS
 FOR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 REVISE BUILDING LENGTH.
  
 H) REVISE BUILDING SIDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON
 SITE PLAN. 122'?
  
 8- SHEET A2:
 A) WHERE IS BEAM B-2 SPECIFIED ON EXTERIOR CMU WALL
 SECTION A/A2?.
  
 9- SHEET A3:
 A) REVISE NUMBER/SIZE OF NAILS AND UPLIFT LOADS SHOWN
 ON TRUSS CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN. SEE
 CONNECTOR PRODUCT APPROVAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 ***RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 B) REVISE SIZE OF STRUCTURAL BUCK SHOWN ON BUCK DETAIL
 FOR DOOR. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REQUIRED SIZE. ALSO,
 DOOR FRAME NEEDS TO BE FULLY SUPPORTED ON BUCK AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R613.6 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL
 CODE. PROVIDE BUCK SIZE THAT PROVIDES FULL SUPPORT TO
 DOOR FRAME.
  
 10- PLEASE, RETURN REVIEWED SET OF DRAWINGS AFTER
 CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO ORIGINAL DRAWINGS TO EXPEDITE
 THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 11- FOR INFORMATION ONLY: ENGINEER TO SEE ATTACHED COPY
 OF FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING FEES FOR
 MULTIPLE PLAN REVIEWS.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-01-09 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2009-01-09 Time 13:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2009-01-09 Time 16:33 Sent To PC
Notes
2009-01-09 16:56:30NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST.
 REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2007
 REVISIONS.
  
 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. SEC. 713.13
 FLORIDA STATUTE.
 NOTE: THIS MAY BE RECORDED AT TIME OF PERMIT PICK UP.
  
 2- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH
 COUNTY TO VERIFY IF IMPACT FEES ARE DUE AND HOW MUCH
 CREDIT IS GIVEN FOR THE EXISTING HOUSE. BRING BACK
 STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE.
  
 3- NEED TO OBTAIN A SEPARATE PERMIT FOR THE DEMOLITION
 OF THE EXISTING HOUSE.
  
 4- PERMIT VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION
 IS TOO LOW. VALUATION WAS UPDATED AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 108.3 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 TO $128,668.
 THEREFORE, OWES $2161.79 FOR UPDATED VALUATION AND
 RADON FEES.
  
 5- PLANS TO SPECIFY ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. R301.1 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE. NOTE: ATTIC LIVE LOADS NEED TO BE
 INCLUDED ALSO.
  
 6- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR:
 A) PRECAST LINTELS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 B) ENTRY DOOR AND KITCHEN AND BEDROOM EXTERIOR DOORS.
 CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS FOR THE
 ENTRY AND ALL OTHER OPENINGS.
 ***NOTE: NOA 02-1211.10 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON JULY 17,
 2008. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 C) HURRICANE SHUTTERS: PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE. COMPLETE ALL THE
 INFORMATION AND CLEARLY MARK ON SHUTTERS DRAWINGS
 SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS (EG: WALL MOUNTED, BUILD
 OUT, ETC) AND SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE
 USED.
  
 7- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 8- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: OWNER/AGENT TO SIGN AND DATE
 BOTTOM OF FORM.
  
 9- SINCE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKEN THE CEILING
 FAN CREDIT, THEN THE ELECTRICAL PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW SIZE
 OF CEILING FANS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 OF
 FBC 2004. AND, THEY NEED TO BE INSTALLED FOR
 INSPECTION.
  
 10- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC.
 R401.3 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 11- SHEET A1:
 A) BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOWS SH-24 DON'T COMPLY WITH MIN.
 OPENING HEIGHT OF SEC. R310.1.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE WINDOW SIZE AND WINDOW OPENING
 DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON WINDOW SCHEDULE.
  
 B) SPECIFY ATTIC SIZE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807
 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 C) WINDOW BY TUB AREA ON BOTH BATHROOMS TO HAVE SAFETY
 GLASS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R308.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 D) DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED FOR DOOR AND WINDOWS
 DON'T CORRESPOND TO EXPOSURE "C" AS SHOWN ON BUILDING
 INFORMATION CHART. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 ALSO, DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON WINDOW/ DOOR SCHEDULES
 AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ON SHEETS A2 AND A3 DON'T MATCH
 DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON BUILDING INFORMATION CHART.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 E) CLARIFY DOOR HEIGHT OF DOORS SHOWN ON THE DOOR
 SCHEDULE. ENTRY DOOR TO BE MIN. 3'-0" WIDE BY 6'-8"
 HEIGHT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R311.4.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 F) MASTER BATHROOM TYPE OF DOOR SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN
 DOESN'T MATCH TYPE OF DOOR SHOWN ON DOOR SCHEDULE.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 G) SIZE OF WINDOW SPECIFIED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T
 MATCH SIZE OF WINDOW SHOWN ON BUILDING INFORMATION
 CHART. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 H) NOTE INSIDE FOUNDATION PLAN CALLS FOR 48" MAX.
 SPACING FOR VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT BETWEEN FILLED
 CELLS. FOUNDATION PLAN AND FLOOR PLANS SHOW SOME AREAS
 WHERE THE THE MAX. VERTICAL SPACING OF FILLED CELLS
 EXCEED THE 48". REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 I) FOUNDATION NOTE #4 CALLS FOR 2,000 PSF SOIL BEARING
 CAPACITY, WHILE NOTE INSIDE FOUNDATION PLAN CALLS FOR
 2500 SOIL BEARING CAPACITY. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 J) REVISE BUILDING WIDTH AND BUILDING LENGTH DIMENSIONS
 SHOWN ON BUILDING INFORMATION CHART. SEE FLOOR PLANS
 FOR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS.
  
 K) REVISE WIDTH OF END ZONE SHOWN ON BUILDING
 INFORMATION CHART. SEE NOTE A ON FIGURE R301.2(8) OF
 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 12- SHEET A2:
 A) EXTERIOR C.M.U. WALL SECTION A/A2:
 * WHERE IS THE ROOF SHEATHING THICKNESS TAKEN FROM?.
 PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT SPECIFIED
 ROOF SHEATHING THICKNESS WILL RESIST ALL THE DESIGN
 LOADS OF SEC. R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 ** FOOTING SPECIFICATIONS DON'T MATCH FOOTING
 SPECIFICATION SHOWN ON FOOTING SCHEDULE ON SHEET A1.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 *** SPECIFY MIN. FOOTING DEPTH AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R3403.1.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 B) REVISE OPENINGS DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON THE
 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM 11D ABOVE.
  
 C) INTERIOR WALL SECTION B/A2: THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT
 WALL FINISHES SHOWN N THE SAME DETAIL. REVISE/CLARIFY
 AS REQUIRED.
  
 13- SHEET A3:
 A) REVISE NUMBER/SIZE OF NAILS AND UPLIFT LOADS SHOWN
 ON TRUSS CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN. SEE
 CONNECTOR PRODUCT APPROVAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) ROOF SHEATHING:
 * COORDINATE TYPE AND SIZE OF NAIL SHOWN ON PLYWOOD
 SHEATHING FASTENER SCHEDULE AND THREE DIMENSIONAL ROOF
 PLAN.
 NOTE: MIN. NAIL TYPE TO BE USED IS 8D RING SHANK NAILS.
 SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 ** IDENTIFY ROOF ZONE #3 ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND
 SPECIFY MIN. NAILING TYPE AND SPACING USED AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 *** ZONE 3 IS 4'-0" MIN. SEE FIGURE 301.2(8) OF 2004
 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE GABLE NOTE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 14- PLEASE, RETURN REVIEWED SET OF DRAWINGS AFTER
 CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO ORIGINAL DRAWINGS TO EXPEDITE
 THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2009-07-16 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2009-07-16 Time 09:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2009-07-16 Time 09:56 Sent To B
Notes
2009-07-16 09:56:59 
  
 TO LUIS ./WRT.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2009-06-19 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2009-06-19 Time 09:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2009-06-19 Time 08:28 Sent To M
Notes
2009-06-19 09:24:11 
 THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES:
  
 THE 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2007
 REVISIONS, 2005 NEC, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND
 FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING:
  
 THESE COMMENTS ARE FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW AND WERE
 NOT RESPONDED TO.SHEET A2***THESE COMMENTS ARE STILL
 NOT ADRESSED AS OF THE JUNE 2ND RESUBMITTAL..
  
 9} CIRCUIT #12 IS FOR A DISPOSAL, NOT IN THE LOAD
 CALCULATION.220.83(B)(3).
  
 THESE COMMENTS ARE GENERATED BY CHANGES MADE TO THE
 PLANS:
  
 1} THE PLAN INDICATES A MAIN DISCONNECT (TWO ACTUALLY)
 AT THE METER, THERE IS NO DISCONNECT ON THE RISER
 DIAGRAM RISER DIAGRAM, CORRELATE AND INDICATE THE
 INTENT OF THE DESIGNER.DUE TO THE METER LOCATION, A
 DISCONNECT IS REQUIRED PER 230.70
  
 2}THE PANEL SHOWN ON THE RISER IS RATED AT 200 AMPS
 WITH A225 AMP MAIN IN VIOLATION OF 408.36(A) LIGHTING
 AND APPLIANCE BRANCH-CIRCUIT PANELBOARD INDIVIDUALLY
 PROTECTED EACH LIGHTING AND APPLIANCE BRANCH-CIRCUIT
 PANELBOARD SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY PROTECTED ON THE
 SUPPLY SIDE BY NOT MORE THAN TWO MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKERS
 OR TWO SETS OF FUSES HAVING A COMBINED RATING NOT
 GREATER THAN THAT OF THE PANELBOARD. ALSO THE
 CONDUCTORS ARE RATED FOR 200 AMPS, 3/0 WOULD BE
 REQUIRED FOR 225 AMPS.
  
 3} THE PANEL SCHEDULE CIRCUITS 2&4 FOR THE AHU SHOWS A
 60 AMP BREAKER FOR A 47 AMP LOAD IN VIOLATION OF 240.4.
 THE HEAT LOAD IS STATED TO BE 7500 WATTS IN THE LOAD
 CALCULATIONS. 7500/240X125%=39 AMPS THEREFORE A 40 AMP
 BREAKER WOULD BE USED. 240.4(B).
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE IN REGARD TO THE PANEL
 SCHEDULE:
  
 4} CIRCUITS #1 & 3 HAVE NO OVERCURRENT RATING FOR THE
 OCP.A/C CIRCUIT.
  
 5} THERE IS A GARAGE GFI CIRCUIT #15 LISTED, BUT NO
 GARAGE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 408.4
  
 6} CIRCUIT #18 LISTS THE "UTIL" ON WITH THE BATH
 CIRCUIT IN VIOLATION OF 210.11(C)(3) " BATHROOM BRANCH
 CIRCUITS IN ADDITION TO THE NUMBER OF BRANCH CIRCUITS
 REQUIRED BY OTHER PARTS OF THIS SECTION, AT LEAST ONE
 20-AMPERE BRANCH CIRCUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO SUPPLY
 BATHROOM RECEPTACLE OUTLET(S). SUCH CIRCUITS SHALL HAVE
 NO OTHER OUTLETS."
  
 PLEASE REMOVE OLD SHEETS, INSERT NEW ONES, SUBMIT OLD
 SHEETS TO EXPEDITE AND SUBMIT WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE
 COMMENTS MADE IN THIS REVIEW.
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL.
  
 BILL TROBAUGH
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561/805-6718
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2009-02-26 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2009-02-26 Time 15:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2009-02-26 Time 14:12 Sent To M
Notes
2009-02-26 14:37:44 
 THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES:
  
 THE 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2007
 REVISIONS, 2005 NEC, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND
 FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING:
  
 THESE COMMENTS ARE FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW AND WERE
 NOT RESPONDED TO.SHEET A2..
  
 9} CIRCUIT #12 IS FOR A DISPOSAL, NOT IN THE LOAD
 CALCULATION.220.83(B)(3).
  
 THESE COMMENTS ARE GENERATED BY CHANGES MADE TO THE
 PLANS:
  
 1} THE PLAN INDICATES A MAIN DISCONNECT (TWO ACTUALLY)
 AT THE METER, THERE IS NO DISCONNECT ON THE RISER
 DIAGRAM RISER DIAGRAM, CORRELATE AND INDICATE THE
 INTENT OF THE DESIGNER.DUE TO THE METER LOCATION, A
 DISCONNECT IS REQUIRED PER 230.70
  
 2}THE PANEL SHOWN ON THE RISER IS RATED AT 200 AMPS
 WITH A225 AMP MAIN IN VIOLATION OF 408.36(A) LIGHTING
 AND APPLIANCE BRANCH-CIRCUIT PANELBOARD INDIVIDUALLY
 PROTECTED EACH LIGHTING AND APPLIANCE BRANCH-CIRCUIT
 PANELBOARD SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY PROTECTED ON THE
 SUPPLY SIDE BY NOT MORE THAN TWO MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKERS
 OR TWO SETS OF FUSES HAVING A COMBINED RATING NOT
 GREATER THAN THAT OF THE PANELBOARD. ALSO THE
 CONDUCTORS ARE RATED FOR 200 AMPS, 3/0 WOULD BE
 REQUIRED FOR 225 AMPS.
  
 3} THE PANEL SCHEDULE CIRCUITS 2&4 FOR THE AHU SHOWS A
 60 AMP BREAKER FOR A 47 AMP LOAD IN VIOLATION OF 240.4.
 THE HEAT LOAD IS STATED TO BE 7500 WATTS IN THE LOAD
 CALCULATIONS. 7500/240X125%=39 AMPS THEREFORE A 40 AMP
 BREAKER WOULD BE USED. 240.4(B).
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE IN REGARD TO THE PANEL
 SCHEDULE:
  
 4} CIRCUITS #1 & 3 HAVE NO OVERCURRENT RATING FOR THE
 OCP.A/C CIRCUIT.
  
 5} THERE IS A GARAGE GFI CIRCUIT #15 LISTED, BUT NO
 GARAGE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 408.4
  
 6} CIRCUIT #18 LISTS THE "UTIL" ON WITH THE BATH
 CIRCUIT IN VIOLATION OF 210.11(C)(3) " BATHROOM BRANCH
 CIRCUITS IN ADDITION TO THE NUMBER OF BRANCH CIRCUITS
 REQUIRED BY OTHER PARTS OF THIS SECTION, AT LEAST ONE
 20-AMPERE BRANCH CIRCUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO SUPPLY
 BATHROOM RECEPTACLE OUTLET(S). SUCH CIRCUITS SHALL HAVE
 NO OTHER OUTLETS."
  
 PLEASE REMOVE OLD SHEETS, INSERT NEW ONES, SUBMIT OLD
 SHEETS TO EXPEDITE AND SUBMIT WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE
 COMMENTS MADE IN THIS REVIEW.
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL.
  
 BILL TROBAUGH
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561/805-6718
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-12-19 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2008-12-19 Time 09:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2008-12-19 Time 06:36 Sent To M
Notes
2008-12-19 08:07:37 
  
 THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES:
  
 THE 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2007
 REVISIONS, 2005 NEC, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND
 FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING:
  
 ALL COMMENTS RELATE TO SHEET2, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
 ALL CODE ARTICLES REFERENCED ARE 2005 NEC UNLESS
 OTHERWISE NOTED.
  
 1} THE VALUE ON THE APPLICATION MUST INCLUDE THE TOTAL
 COST OF LABOR AND MATERIAL. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY
 INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL
 CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES PER 108.3 FBC AS
 AMENDED.
  
 A PERMIT SHALL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL FEES AUTHORIZED
 UNDER SECTION 553.80, FLORIDA STATUTES, HAVE BEEN PAID.
 108.1 FBC.
  
 ADJUST THE VALUE AT THE PERMIT CLERK?S DESK, AND PAY
 THE DIFFERENCE IN FEES PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING.
  
 2} INDICATE THE USE FOR THE 2#2 CU CONDUCTORS RAN WITH
 THE SERVICE CONDUCTORS TO THE MAIN DISCONNECT, IF SOME
 SORT OF GROUNDS THEY ARE IN VIOLATION OF 250.6.
  
 3} THE 2/0 CU GROUND TO THE PANEL FROM THE DISCONNECT
 IS NOT A VIOLATION BUT ONLY NEEDS TO BE #6. IF NOT
 CHANGED PRIOR TO PERMITTING A REVISION WILL BE REQUIRED
 LATER..
  
 4} THE NUMBER OF CONDUCTORS FROM THE DISCONNECT TO THE
 PANEL IS IN VIOLATION OF 362.22 FOR CONDUCTOR FILL.
  
 5} THE RISER INDICATES BREAKERS FOR TWO A/C UNITS, BUT
 ONLY ONE IS LISTED IN THE PANEL SCHEDULE AND ON THE
 CALC'S. CORRELATE SAME.
  
 6} 250.52(A)(3) CONCRETE-ENCASED ELECTRODE AN ELECTRODE
 ENCASED BY AT LEAST 50 MM (2 IN.) OF CONCRETE, LOCATED
 WITHIN AND NEAR THE BOTTOM OF A CONCRETE FOUNDATION OR
 FOOTING THAT IS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE EARTH,
 CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 6.0 M (20 FT) OF ONE OR MORE
 BARE OR ZINC GALVANIZED OR OTHER ELECTRICALLY
 CONDUCTIVE COATED STEEL REINFORCING BARS OR RODS OF NOT
 LESS THAN 13 MM ( 1/ 2 IN.) IN DIAMETER, OR CONSISTING
 OF AT LEAST 6.0 M (20 FT) OF BARE COPPER CONDUCTOR NOT
 SMALLER THAN 4 AWG. REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE PERMITTED
 TO BE BONDED TOGETHER BY THE USUAL STEEL TIE WIRES OR
 OTHER EFFECTIVE MEANS. INDICATE THIS ON THE RISER
 DIAGRAM.
  
 7} THE CONDUCTORS FOR CIRCUIT # 1,3 A/C ARE DIFFERENT
 SIZES,? THE #10 IS IN VIOLATION OF 310.16 FOR A 32 AMP
 LOAD THATS LISTED.
  
 8} CIRCUITS 5&7 FOR THE WATER HEATER LISTS #6 CU
 CONDUCTORS ON A 30 AMP BREAKER, NO CODE ARTICLE BUT
 PHYSICALLY WON'T FIT. #10CU IS ALL THATS REQUIRED FOR A
 30 AMP BREAKER. THE LOAD AT 19 AMPS IS ALSO INCORRECT
 FOR A 4500 WATT LOAD.422.13 -4500/240=18.45X1.25%=23
 AMPS.
  
 9} CIRCUIT #12 IS FOR A DISPOSAL, NOT IN THE LOAD
 CALCULATION.220.83(B)(3).
  
 10} THERE ARE NO SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS LISTED IN THE
 PANEL SCHEDULE (ONE KITCHEN GFI?). 210.11(C)(3)
  
 11} ONE WALL SWITCH?CONTROLLED LIGHTING OUTLET SHALL BE
 INSTALLED TO PROVIDE ILLUMINATION ON THE EXTERIOR SIDE
 OF OUTDOOR ENTRANCES OR EXITS WITH GRADE LEVEL ACCESS.
 210.70(A)(2)((B).BACK DOOR.
  
 12} THE DISCONNECT LOCATION SHOWN FOR THE CONDENING
 UNIT IS IN VIOLATION OF 110.26 CLEARANCE.
  
 13} A RECEPTACLE IS REQUIRED IN THE MASTER AND THE
 ADJOINING (UNLABELED) BEDROOM PER 210.52(A)(1)&(2).
  
 14} A RECEPTACLE IS REQUIRED IN THE HALL PER 210.52(H).
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL.
  
 BILL TROBAUGH
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561/805-6718
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2009-10-08 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2009-10-08 Time 09:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2009-10-08 Time 09:14 Sent To  
Notes
2009-10-08 09:16:17SENT TO PLUMBING (KS).
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2009-07-15 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 2009-07-15 Time 10:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 2009-07-15 Time 10:28 Sent To  
Notes
2009-07-15 10:29:04GAVE TO JULIO, PLANS ARE TO BE HAND ROUTED BY ME LM
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2009-06-03 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2009-06-03 Time 11:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2009-06-03 Time 11:36 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-03 11:38:33SENT TO BOX R7.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2009-02-20 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2009-02-20 Time 10:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2009-02-20 Time 10:26 Sent To Z
Notes
2009-02-20 10:26:25TO "Z" BOX/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2009-01-09 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2009-01-09 Time 16:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2008-12-15 Time 16:32 Sent To  
Notes
2008-12-15 16:32:37TO "SFR" "Z"
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2009-07-23 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 2009-07-23 Time 14:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 2009-07-23 Time 14:40 Sent To  
Notes
2009-07-23 14:44:24SEE OLD SHEET A-1, SIGNED BY WILLIE ON 2/9/09, $0.00
 FEES.
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2009-06-09 Cont ID  
Sent By rkussner Date 2009-06-09 Time 17:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rkussner Date 2009-06-09 Time 17:03 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-09 17:05:08***LANDSCAPE REVIEW PASSED WITH PROVISO***
  
 PROVIDE SCREENING FOR AIR CONDITIONING UNIT.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
 KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462,
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-02-24 Cont ID  
Sent By rkussner Date 2009-02-24 Time 09:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rkussner Date 2009-02-24 Time 09:18 Sent To Z
Notes
2009-02-24 09:30:36***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED***
  
 1. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
 STREET. A PLANT LIST SHALL APPEAR ON THE PLAN WITH THE
 PLANT NAMES, SIZES, QUANTITY AND SPACING. A NORTH ARROW
 SHALL BE ON PLAN. SHOW ALL EXISTING TREES, UTILITIES,
 OVERHANGING TREE LIMBS FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTY AND
 ANYTHING ELSE THAT COULD INTERFERE WITH THE PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE THE TABULATION NECESSARY FOR THE
 EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE
 XERISCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COST ESTIMATE THAT INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST
 OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIRALS AND LABOR.
  
 4. AN IRRIGATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE IRRIGATION
 SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE 100% COVERAGE TO ALL LANDSCAPED
 AREAS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-444(B), GARBAGE CONTAINERS,
 GROUND LEVEL AIR CONDITIONING UNITS AND ALL OTHER
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
 KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462.
  
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2009-07-16 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2009-07-16 Time 15:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2009-07-16 Time 15:05 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2009-06-22 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2009-06-22 Time 14:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2009-06-22 Time 14:13 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-22 14:19:45SAME COMMENTS AS 3/24/2009 REVIEW
 PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER 561-805-6732
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2009-03-24 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2009-03-24 Time 10:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2009-03-24 Time 10:04 Sent To P
Notes
2009-03-24 10:15:36PLAN DENIED
 1) PLEASE PROVIDE GRILL SIZE ON PLANS .
 2) PLEASE PROVIDE RETURN AIR SIZE ON PLANS .
 3) PLEASE SHOW BATHROOM EXHAUEST AND TERMINATION ON
 MECHANICAL PLANS .
 4) PLEASE SHOW DRYER EXHAUST AND SIZE ON PLANS .
 PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER 561-805-6732
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-12-22 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2008-12-22 Time 19:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2008-12-22 Time 18:58 Sent To P
Notes
2008-12-22 19:07:49REVIEW #: 1ST
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS
 FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
  
 1. ENERGY CALCULATIONS SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE
 PREPARER/OWNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-103.1.2.
  
 2. PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE SIZE OF RETURN AIR TRANSFER
 DUCTS. SHOW SIZE OF TRANSFER DUCTS AND 1" UNDERCUT ON
 BEDROOM DOORS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 EXCEPTION UNDER FBCR M1602.4.
  
 3. PLEASE SHOW SIZE AND LOCATION OF DRYER AND BATHRROM
 EXHAUST DUCTS, INCLUDING TERMINATION LOCATIONS FBCR
 M1501.1 AND FBCR M1506.1.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT:
 RONALD J. REGUEIRO
 561.805.6719
 [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2009-10-14 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2009-10-14 Time 12:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2009-10-14 Time 12:28 Sent To B
Notes
2009-10-14 12:29:10REVISION OK -- SHT A3 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2009-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2009-07-17 Time 16:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2009-07-17 Time 16:20 Sent To  
Notes
2009-07-17 16:21:59PASSED/PROVISO: A REVISION IS REQUIRED FOR THE SANITARY
 RISER DIAGRAM DELETING THE 3RD BATHROOM AND SHOWING THE
 LAV ARM IN BATHROOM.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2009-06-15 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2009-06-15 Time 16:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2009-06-15 Time 16:09 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-15 16:19:03DENIED
 REFERENCE:
 FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
 FBC-2004 RESIDENTIAL
  
 ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW:
  
 ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS:
  
 1. OK
  
 2. SHT A3 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT
 REFLECT THE FIXTURE LAYOUT ON THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES
 IT MEET CODE. MOST PIPE SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN. SHOW ALL
 PIPE SIZES TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH TABLES 709.1,
 710.1(1), 710.1(2) & 916.1.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE RISER DIAGRAM STILL DOES
 NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. THE BUILDING DRAIN ENTERS
 FROM THE SOUTH AND TURNS EAST TO PICK UP THE WASH
 MACHINE, TURNS EAST TO PICK UP THE KITCHEN SINK AND
 THEN TURNS EAST TO PICK UP EACH BATHROOM GROUP. THE
 RISER SHOWS THE BATHROOM GROUPS EITHER GOING TO THE
 WEST OR STRAIGHT TO THE SOUTH. PLEASE CORRELATE. ALSO
 AS SHOWN THE TUBS ARE NOT VENTED. SECTION 901.2.1.
 ******NO RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. (SAME SHEET
 RESUBMITTED).
  
 2A. OK
 2B. OK
  
 2C. SUBMIT A SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM THAT REFLECTS THE
 RED-LINE PIPING INDICATED ON SHT A3 OF ONE SET OF PLAN
 SHOWING ALL PIPE SIZES, TRAPS & VENTS AS REQUIRED IN
 CHAPTERS 7, 9 & 10.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE RED-LINE DRAWING WAS
 DISREGARDED. SEE NEW RED-LINE EXAMPLE OF CODE COMPLIANT
 RISER SECTION THAT REFLECTS THE FLOOR PLAN.
 ******NO RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. (SAME SHEET
 RESUBMITTED).
  
  
 ********NEW COMMENT********
  
 1B. MINIMUM 2 SETS OF PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH
 EACH APPLICATION FOR PERMIT. SECTION 106.1. ONLY ONE
 SET OF PLANS WAS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. SOME SAME SHEETS
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER,
 WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE,
 IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE
 ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE
 ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE
 COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED.
 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2009-03-27 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2009-03-27 Time 14:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2009-03-27 Time 14:47 Sent To  
Notes
2009-03-27 15:05:49DENIED
 REFERENCE:
 FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
 FBC-2004 RESIDENTIAL
  
 ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW:
  
 1. OK
  
 2. SHT A3 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT
 REFLECT THE FIXTURE LAYOUT ON THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES
 IT MEET CODE. MOST PIPE SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN. SHOW ALL
 PIPE SIZES TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH TABLES 709.1,
 710.1(1), 710.1(2) & 916.1.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE RISER DIAGRAM STILL DOES
 NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. THE BUILDING DRAIN ENTERS
 FROM THE SOUTH AND TURNS EAST TO PICK UP THE WASH
 MACHINE, TURNS EAST TO PICK UP THE KITCHEN SINK AND
 THEN TURNS EAST TO PICK UP EACH BATHROOM GROUP. THE
 RISER SHOWS THE BATHROOM GROUPS EITHER GOING TO THE
 WEST OR STRAIGHT TO THE SOUTH. PLEASE CORRELATE. ALSO
 AS SHOWN THE TUBS ARE NOT VENTED. SECTION 901.2.1.
  
 2A. OK
 2B. OK
  
 2C. SUBMIT A SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM THAT REFLECTS THE
 RED-LINE PIPING INDICATED ON SHT A3 OF ONE SET OF PLAN
 SHOWING ALL PIPE SIZES, TRAPS & VENTS AS REQUIRED IN
 CHAPTERS 7, 9 & 10.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE RED-LINE DRAWING WAS
 DISREGARDED. SEE NEW RED-LINE EXAMPLE OF CODE COMPLIANT
 RISER SECTION THAT REFLECTS THE FLOOR PLAN.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER,
 WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE,
 IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE
 ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE
 ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE
 COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED.
 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-12-24 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2008-12-24 Time 13:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2008-12-24 Time 13:13 Sent To B
Notes
2008-12-24 13:46:59DENIED
 REFERENCE:
 FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
 FBC-2004 RESIDENTIAL
  
 1. SHT A1 BUILDING CODE/DESIGN CRITERIA SHALL ALSO
 INCLUDE THE 2007 AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC-2004.
  
 2. SHT A3 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT
 REFLECT THE FIXTURE LAYOUT ON THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES
 IT MEET CODE. MOST PIPE SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN. SHOW ALL
 PIPE SIZES TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH TABLES 709.1,
 710.1(1), 710.1(2) & 916.1.
  
 2A. THE WASH MACHINE, KITCHEN SINK & BOTH LAVS ARE NOT
 VENTED AS SHOWN. SECTION 901.2.
  
 2B. THE WASH MACHINE REQUIRES A STANDPIPE PER SECTIONS
 1002.1 THAT COMPLIES WITH SECTION 802.4. (MINIMUM 18" &
 MAXIMUM 42") & ALSO REQUIRES A CLEANOUT MINIMUM 4 FEET
 ABOVE THE FLOOR PER SECTION 708.9.
  
 2C. SUBMIT A SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM THAT REFLECTS THE
 RED-LINE PIPING INDICATED ON SHT A3 OF ONE SET OF PLAN
 SHOWING ALL PIPE SIZES, TRAPS & VENTS AS REQUIRED IN
 CHAPTERS 7, 9 & 10.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER,
 WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE,
 IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE
 ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE
 ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE
 COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED.
 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2009-07-23 Cont ID  
Sent By mcruz Date 2009-07-23 Time 11:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcruz Date 2009-07-23 Time 10:48 Sent To B
Notes
2009-07-23 11:01:08PASSED WITH PROVISO:
  
 APPLICANT SHALL OBTAIN A RIGHT-OFWAY PERMIT AND
 DRIVEWAY PERMIT PRIOR TO FRAMING INSPECTION.
  
 MAGGIE CRUZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
 TEL: (561) 822-1444 OR (561) 805-6720
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROUTED BACK TO LM
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2009-06-09 Cont ID  
Sent By mcruz Date 2009-06-09 Time 17:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcruz Date 2009-06-09 Time 17:39 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-09 17:46:55PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT: ***ZONING FAILED - 2ND
 RESUB***
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL RESPONSES IN WRITING.
  
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT 2 SETS OF PLANS. ONLY ONE SET WAS
 PROVIDED.
  
 REPEAT COMMENTS (2ND NOTICE):
  
 3. PLEASE INDICATE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL IMPERMEABLE
 SURFACES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) LOCATED WITHIN THE
 FRONT YARD (FROM FRONT PROPERTY LINE TO THE FRONT
 BUILDING FACADE).
  
 THE CALCULATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET A-1 ARE FOR THE ENTIRE
 LOT. THE CALCULATIONS REQUESTED ARE FOR THE FRONT YARD
 AREA. PLEASE SUBMIT FOR A DRIVEWAY UNDER SEPARATE
 PERMIT.
  
 IS THE DRIVEWAY APPROACH BEING WIDENED? IF YES, A
 RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE ACQUIRED FROM THE
 CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (561.494.1040), FOR THE
 PROPOSED WIDENING OF THE APPROACH EXTENSION AS
 PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. NOTE, IF APPLICABLE, **DO NOT
 SUBMIT FOR THE DRIVEWAY PERMIT WITHOUT THIS APPROVAL***
  
 4. THE SIDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON SHEET A-1 ARE
 NOT CLEAR. PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 5. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED IS FOR ANOTHER
 PROPERTY. PLEASE SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE
 SUBJECT SITE.
  
 PLEASE REFER TO PREVIOUS COMMENTS
  
 NOTE: THE SUBMITTAL OF THE REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY
 GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS MAY BE VIEWED ONLINE AT
 WWW.MUNICODE.COM OR VISIT THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WEBSITE AT
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/PLAN/INDEX.HTM.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO
 CONTACT ME.
  
 MAGGIE CRUZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
 TEL: (561) 822-1444 OR (561) 805-6720
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 PLACED BACK IN R7
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2009-02-26 Cont ID  
Sent By mcruz Date 2009-02-26 Time 11:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcruz Date 2009-02-26 Time 10:53 Sent To E
Notes
2009-02-26 11:07:46PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT: ***ZONING FAILED - 1ST
 RESUB***
  
 REPEAT COMMENTS:
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL RESPONSES IN WRITING.
  
 2. PLEASE INDICATE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL IMPERMEABLE
 SURFACES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) LOCATED WITHIN THE
 FRONT YARD (FROM FRONT PROPERTY LINE TO THE FRONT
 BUILDING FACADE).
  
 THE CALCULATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET A-1 ARE FOR THE ENTIRE
 LOT. THE CALCULATIONS REQUESTED ARE FOR THE FRONT YARD
 AREA. PLEASE SUBMIT FOR A DRIVEWAY UNDER SEPARATE
 PERMIT.
  
 IS THE DRIVEWAY APPROACH BEING WIDENED? IF YES, A
 RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE ACQUIRED FROM THE
 CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (561.494.1040), FOR THE
 PROPOSED WIDENING OF THE APPROACH EXTENSION AS
 PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. NOTE, IF APPLICABLE, **DO NOT
 SUBMIT FOR THE DRIVEWAY PERMIT WITHOUT THIS APPROVAL***
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
 3. THE SIDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON SHEET A-1 ARE
 NOT CLEAR. PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 4. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED IS FOR ANOTHER
 PROPERTY. PLEASE SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE
 SUBJECT SITE.
  
 NOTE: THE SUBMITTAL OF THE REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY
 GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS MAY BE VIEWED ONLINE AT
 WWW.MUNICODE.COM OR VISIT THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WEBSITE AT
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/PLAN/INDEX.HTM.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO
 CONTACT ME.
  
 MAGGIE CRUZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
 TEL: (561) 822-1444 OR (561) 805-6720
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-12-16 Cont ID  
Sent By mcruz Date 2008-12-16 Time 13:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcruz Date 2008-12-16 Time 11:54 Sent To I
Notes
2008-12-16 13:29:00PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT: ***ZONING FAILED***
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL RESPONSES IN WRITING.
  
 2. PURSUANT TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), SECTION
 94-441(C)(2) OF: AS THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK
 EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE (LISTED AS
 "IMPROVEMENT VALUE" WITH THE P.B.C. PROPERTY
 APPRAISER'S OFFICE), LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF
 THE ZLDR.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN
 SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445 OF
 THE ZLDR.
  
 3. PURSUANT TO THE ZLDR, SECTION 94-482: REQUIRED
 OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES FOR LESS THAN FOUR
 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE
 PROPERTY ON WHICH THE UNITS ARE CONSTRUCTED. REQUIRED
 PARKING MAY BE LOCATED IN A FRONT YARD; HOWEVER, THE
 LESSER OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR 75 PERCENT OF THE FRONT
 YARD AREA MUST BE LANDSCAPED. PARKING AREAS LOCATED IN
 THE FRONT YARD SHALL BE SURFACED WITH A SMOOTH,
 NONDUSTING SURFACE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SUBSECTION
 33-485(E). IT SHALL BE A VIOLATION OF THIS CHAPTER TO
 PARK ON ANY UNPAVED AREAS AS DESCRIBED IN THIS ARTICLE.
  
 PLEASE INDICATE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL IMPERMEABLE
 SURFACES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) LOCATED WITHIN THE
 FRONT YARD (FROM FRONT PROPERTY LINE TO THE FRONT
 BUILDING FACADE).
  
 ADDITIONALLY, A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE
 ACQUIRED FROM THE CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
 (561.494.1040), FOR THE PROPOSED APPROACH EXTENSION.
 ***IMPORTANT - DO NOT RESUBMIT WITHOUT THIS APPROVAL***
  
 4. INDICATE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM PROPOSED A/C
 EQUIPMENT TO ALL PROPERTY LINES. PURSUANT THE ZLDR,
 SECTION 94-305(B)(4): MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY NOT
 PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
 WINDOW AIR-CONDITIONING UNITS MAY NOT PROJECT MORE THAN
 18 INCHES INTO A REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK.
  
 NOTE: THE SUBMITTAL OF THE REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY
 GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS MAY BE VIEWED ONLINE AT
 WWW.MUNICODE.COM OR VISIT THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WEBSITE AT
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/PLAN/INDEX.HTM.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO
 CONTACT ME.
  
 MAGGIE CRUZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
 TEL: (561) 822-1444 OR (561) 805-6720
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved