| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08120242 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2010-03-23 |
Time |
10:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2010-03-23 |
Time |
09:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-03-23 10:14:38 | AS BUILT PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
Time |
16:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
Time |
16:17 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-23 16:20:06 | REVISION #3 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-07 14:50:13 | FOOTING REVISION AND APARTMENT LAYOUT REVISION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
Time |
08:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
Time |
07:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-24 08:06:54 | BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO: | | | | | | 1- REVISE WINDOW MULLION SIZE TO MEET DESIGN PRESSURES. | | | SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | 2- CREDIT FOR CEILING FANS ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | NEED TO SPECIFY SPECIFIC FAN SIZE ON EACH ROOM AS | | | REQUIRED BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 FBC 2004. | | | 3- ITEM #7 ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS REQUIRES LABEL ON | | | GLASS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFIED U-FACTOR AND | | | SHGC FACTOR. | | | 4- BEDROOMS EGRESS WINDOWS TO HAVE 24" MIN. CLEAR | | | HEIGHT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R310.1.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | 5- SPECIFY ROOF SHEATHING NAIL SPACING. NEED 8D RING | | | SHANK NAILS AND NEED TO BE 4"O.C. AT ROOF ZONE 3# AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-02-27 |
Time |
17:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-02-27 |
Time |
17:13 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-27 17:24:40 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION, BUILDING REVIEW | | | SECOND CHECKLIST. | | | REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2007 | | | REVISIONS. | | | | | | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | ***NOTE: THIS MAY BE RECORDED AT TIME OF PERMIT PICK | | | UP. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY | | | DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED. | | | ***NOTE: CLEARLY IDENTIFY ON PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFIC | | | APPROVED ASSEMBLY TO BE USED AND SPECIFIC BASE SHEET | | | FASTENING OPTION. ALSO, PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS | | | REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7. IF THOSE | | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED, THEN | | | PROVIDE THEM SIGNED AND SEALED. SEE GENERAL LIMITATION | | | #7 ON LAST PAGE OF PRODUCT APPROVAL. ( NOTE: APPROVED | | | ASSEMBLY WITH GENERAL LIMITATION #9 MAY NOT BE USED IN | | | THIS PROJECT. CHECK THE UPLIFT PRESSURES). | | | | | | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION PROVIDED: | | | (A) NOA 07-0111.03 SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER WAS NOT | | | SUBMITTED. NEVERTHELESS, ACCORDING TO MIAMI-DADE COUNTY | | | WEBSITE THIS NOA WAS SUPERSEDED (SEE ATTACHED COPY). | | | NEED TO REVISE NOA AND PROVIDE ONE THAT IS CURRENT. | | | | | | (B) ENGINEER TO SPECIFY WHICH SPECIFIC APPROVED | | | ASSEMBLY FROM THE NOA SUBMITTED IS GOING TO BE USED AND | | | SPECIFY BASE SHEET FASTENING OPTION ALSO TO VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES (REPEAT | | | COMMENT). | | | | | | (C) REVISE INFORMATION ON LETTER SUBMITTED: ADDRESS OF | | | JOB IS NOT PALM BEACH GARDENS. REVISE NAME OF OWNER | | | ALSO. | | | | | | (D) UPDATE CODE INFORMATION. REFER TO FBC 2004 WITH | | | 2007 REVISIONS, NOT 2006. | | | | | | B) OK. | | | C) OK. | | | D) WINDOW MULLIONS. AND CLEARLY MARK ON DRAWINGS | | | SPECIFIC MULLION SIZE AND ANCHOR TO BE USED TO VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH PRODUCT APPROVAL AND CALCULATED DESIGN | | | PRESSURES OF SEC. R301. | | | | | | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION PROVIDED: | | | (A) NOA 06-1212.05 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON JANUARY 2, | | | 2008. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT ONE. | | | | | | (B) MULLION SIZE AND ANCHORS WERE NOT SPECIFIED (REPEAT | | | COMMENT). | | | | | | E) FRENCH DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | FL11146 SUBMITTED IS FOR 2007 CODE VERSION. NEED 2004 | | | CODE VERSION. | | | ALSO, NOA 08-0506.01 SUBMITTED IS FOR SMALL MISSILE | | | IMPACT. NEED LARGE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.2.1.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE. | | | | | | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION PROVIDED: | | | (A) NOA 05-0729.01 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON OCTOBER 16, | | | 2008. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT ONE. | | | | | | (B) NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR FRENCH DOORS | | | WITH SIDELITES AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NONE SUBMITTED AT | | | THIS TIME. | | | | | | F) OK. | | | | | | G) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. FL11633 SUBMITTED IS FOR 2007 | | | CODE VERSION. NEED TO PROVIDE 2004 CODE VERSION. | | | ALSO, NOA 08-0527.14 SUBMITTED IS FOR SMALL MISSILE | | | IMPACT. NEED TO PROVIDE ONE FOR LARGE MISSILE IMPACT AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.2.1.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE. | | | | | | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION PROVIDED: | | | (A) NOA 05-0930.03 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON MARCH 17, 2008. | | | NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT ONE. | | | | | | 3- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING (NOT | | | SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED | | | BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | ***COMMENTS: | | | THIS APPLIES TO PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT NEED TO BE | | | RE-SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 4- AFTER DRAWINGS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO HISTORIC | | | DISTRICT PLANNER TO GET APPROVAL STAMP. | | | | | | ***COMMENTS: | | | THIS APPLIES FOR ANY DRAWING THAT IS REVISED AND | | | REQUIRES APPROVAL STAMP. | | | | | | 5- SPECIFY SLOPE FOR FLAT ROOF TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE | | | WITH SEC. R905.11.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION PROVIDED: | | | (A) DRAWINGS SUBMITTED SHOW 1/8" PER FOOT SLOPE. MIN. | | | SLOPE REQUIRED IS 1/4" PER FOOT. SEC. R905.11.1. REVISE | | | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET A-1, A-3 AND DT-1. | | | | | | 6 PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 13-600.0 FBC 2004. | | | ***NOTE: MAKE SURE CORRECT REVISED FORM IS USED AND ALL | | | INFORMATION IS PROVIDED. ALSO, MAKE SURE OWNER/AGENT | | | ALSO SIGNS AND DATES BOTTOM OF FORM. | | | | | | *** COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: | | | (A) REVISE NAME OF BUILDER. | | | | | | (B) SPECIFY LINEAR FT ON ITEM #8A. | | | | | | (C) MISSING INFORMATION FOR FLAT ROOF AREA ON ITEM #10. | | | | | | (D) IF TAKEN CREDIT FOR CEILING FANS, THEN NEED TO | | | SPECIFY ON FLOOR PLANS SPECIFIC FAN SIZE ON EACH ROOM | | | AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 FBC 2004. | | | | | | (E) OWNER/AGENT TO SIGN AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM. | | | | | | (F) TOTAL GLASS AREA AND CARDINAL ORIENTATION SHOWN ON | | | SUMMER AND WINTER CALCULATION PAGES DON'T MATCH FLOOR | | | PLANS. | | | ***ALSO, THEY ARE MISSING THE INFORMATION FOR THE | | | DOORS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | (G) NEED TO PROVIDE SEPARATE CALCULATIONS FOR MAIN | | | HOUSE AND GUEST HOUSE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 13-101.2.5.1 | | | OF FBC 2004. | | | | | | (H) ITEM #7 WILL REQUIRE LABEL ON GLASS TO VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFIED U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR WHEN | | | DEFAULT FACTOR IS NOT TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. (THIS | | | WILL BE DONE AT TIME OF BUILDING INSPECTION). | | | | | | 7- OK. | | | | | | 8- SINGLE HUNG 24 WINDOWS SPECIFIED ON PLANS DON'T | | | COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.1.2 OF | | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: | | | (A) INFORMATION SUBMITTED DON'T PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. WHAT'S "EH24" EGRESS WINDOW. | | | PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CUT SHEETS SHOWING COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. CHECK SIZE OF WINDOWS | | | PROVIDED ON PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 9- SPECIFY THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL OPENINGS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: | | | (A) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW THE DESIGN | | | PRESSURES WERE DETERMINED. KEEP IN MIND LOCATION OF | | | OPENING: END OR INTERIOR ZONE. DESIGN PRESSURES | | | PROVIDED ARE LOW COMPARED TO THE DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN | | | ON TABLE R301.2(2) OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE | | | ACCORDING TO END OR INTERIOR WALL LOCATION. REVISE | | | INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 10- OK. | | | | | | 11- SHEET A-1: | | | A) ROOF FRAMING PLAN: *SPECIFY NEW GIRDER TO CARRY THE | | | ROOF JOISTS. AND SPECIFY POSTS TO SUPPORT IT AT BOTH | | | ENDS. SEE FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A-2 BY NEW KITCHEN AREA. | | | IT CALLS FOR "NEW GIRDER FOR NEW 12" RAISED ROOF". | | | ** PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING HOW CONNECTING THE NEW ROOF | | | JOISTS TO THE NEW GIRDER. CONNECTOR B1 IS A STRAP. NEED | | | TO PROVIDE JOIST HANGER. SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS. | | | | | | *** COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: | | | (A) SIZE OF GIRDER TO CARRY THE ROOF JOIST IS STILL NOT | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | B) OK. | | | | | | C) REVISE ROOF FRAMING NOTES. ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T | | | SPECIFY ROOF TRUSSES. | | | | | | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: | | | (A) NOTES NOT CHANGED. NEW FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T INCLUDE | | | PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSSES. | | | | | | 12- SHEET A-2: | | | A) OK. | | | | | | 13- SHEET DT-1: | | | A) OK. | | | | | | B) OK. | | | | | | C) SECTION 5: REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAIL SPACING. NEED | | | TO BE 4"O.C. AT ROOF ZONE 3# AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: | | | (A) SPECIFY SIZE OF WOOD SCREWS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE | | | WITH UPLIFT DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301 OF 2004 | | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | (B) CLARIFY WHAT'S TYPE II INSULATED DECK. IS THERE ANY | | | ADDITIONAL INSULATION ON THE DECK BESIDES THE R-19 BUTT | | | INSULATION SHOWN. SPECIFY R-VALUE AND TYPE OF | | | INSULATION ON THE DECK. COORDINATE WITH PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FOR FLAT DECK ASSEMBLY. ALSO, THIS INFORMATION | | | NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | D) OK. | | | | | | E) OK. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-12-31 |
Time |
14:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-12-31 |
Time |
13:45 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-31 15:04:49 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION, BUILDING REVIEW | | | CHECKLIST. | | | REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2007 | | | REVISIONS. | | | | | | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | ***NOTE: THIS MAY BE RECORDED AT TIME OF PERMIT PICK | | | UP. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY | | | DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED. | | | ***NOTE: CLEARLY IDENTIFY ON PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFIC | | | APPROVED ASSEMBLY TO BE USED AND SPECIFIC BASE SHEET | | | FASTENING OPTION. ALSO, PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS | | | REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7. IF THOSE | | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED, THEN | | | PROVIDE THEM SIGNED AND SEALED. SEE GENERAL LIMITATION | | | #7 ON LAST PAGE OF PRODUCT APPROVAL. ( NOTE: APPROVED | | | ASSEMBLY WITH GENERAL LIMITATION #9 MAY NOT BE USED IN | | | THIS PROJECT. CHECK THE UPLIFT PRESSURES). | | | | | | B) SHUTTERS AND COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE | | | ATTACHED SAMPLE. | | | ALSO, MARK ON SHUTTERS DRAWINGS SPECIFIC MOUNTING | | | CONDITIONS (EG: WALL MOUNT, BUILD OUT, ETC) AND ANCHOR | | | TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED). | | | | | | C) SOLID SWING DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | | | | D) WINDOW MULLIONS. AND CLEARLY MARK ON DRAWINGS | | | SPECIFIC MULLION SIZE AND ANCHOR TO BE USED TO VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH PRODUCT APPROVAL AND CALCULATED DESIGN | | | PRESSURES OF SEC. R301. | | | | | | E) FRENCH DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | FL11146 SUBMITTED IS FOR 2007 CODE VERSION. NEED 2004 | | | CODE VERSION. | | | ALSO, NOA 08-0506.01 SUBMITTED IS FOR SMALL MISSILE | | | IMPACT. NEED LARGE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.2.1.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE. | | | | | | F) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS | | | AND DETAILS. FL10456 SUBMITTED IS FOR 2007 CODE | | | VERSION. NEED TO PROVIDE ONE FOR CURRENT 2004 CODE | | | VERSION. | | | | | | G) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. FL11633 SUBMITTED IS FOR 2007 | | | CODE VERSION. NEED TO PROVIDE 2004 CODE VERSION. | | | ALSO, NOA 08-0527.14 SUBMITTED IS FOR SMALL MISSILE | | | IMPACT. NEED TO PROVIDE ONE FOR LARGE MISSILE IMPACT AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.2.1.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE. | | | | | | 3- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING (NOT | | | SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED | | | BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 4- AFTER DRAWINGS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO HISTORIC | | | DISTRICT PLANNER TO GET APPROVAL STAMP. | | | | | | 5- SPECIFY SLOPE FOR FLAT ROOF TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE | | | WITH SEC. R905.9.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 6 PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 13-600.0 FBC 2004. | | | ***NOTE: MAKE SURE CORRECT REVISED FORM IS USED AND ALL | | | INFORMATION IS PROVIDED. ALSO, MAKE SURE OWNER/AGENT | | | ALSO SIGNS AND DATES BOTTOM OF FORM. | | | | | | 7- OWES $0.38 FOR RADON FEES. | | | | | | 8- SINGLE HUNG 24 WINDOWS SPECIFIED ON PLANS DON'T | | | COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.1.2 OF | | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 9- SPECIFY THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL OPENINGS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 10- PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS IN PLANS AND WALL SECTIONS | | | TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2 LAYERS OF WATER VAPOR | | | BARRIER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R703.6.3 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 11- SHEET A-1: | | | A) ROOF FRAMING PLAN: *SPECIFY NEW GIRDER TO CARRY THE | | | ROOF JOISTS. AND SPECIFY POSTS TO SUPPORT IT AT BOTH | | | ENDS. SEE FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A-2 BY NEW KITCHEN AREA. | | | IT CALLS FOR "NEW GIRDER FOR NEW 12" RAISED ROOF". | | | ** PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING HOW CONNECTING THE NEW ROOF | | | JOISTS TO THE NEW GIRDER. CONNECTOR B1 IS A STRAP. NEED | | | TO PROVIDE JOIST HANGER. SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS. | | | | | | B) UPDATE GENERAL NOTES AND FOUNDATION NOTES TO REFER | | | TO THE 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2007 | | | REVISIONS, NOT 2006. | | | | | | C) REVISE ROOF FRAMING NOTES. ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T | | | SPECIFY ROOF TRUSSES. | | | | | | 12- SHEET A-2: | | | A) REVISE LOCATION OF NEW ATTIC ACCESS FOR ACCESSORY | | | BUILDING AND MAIN BUILDING TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | HEADROOM REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R807 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 13- SHEET DT-1: | | | A) TYP. INTERIOR WALL SECTION 7: CLARIFY IF FRAMING IS | | | WOOD STUDS OR METAL STUDS. IT CALLS FOR 2X4 STUDS, BUT | | | METAL CHANEL BOTTOM SILL. | | | | | | B) NEW WALL DETAIL 3 AND STEM WALL DETAIL CALL FOR | | | ATTACHMENT OF 2X8 SILL TO CONCRETE SLAB. DRAWINGS DON'T | | | SHOW CONCRETE SLAB, BUT CONCRETE BLOCK. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED TO CLARIFY. | | | | | | C) SECTION 5: REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAIL SPACING. NEED | | | TO BE 4"O.C. AT ROOF ZONE 3# AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | D) SPECIFY HEADER SIZE FOR WINDOW OPENING ON DETAIL A. | | | PLANS DON'T SPECIFY HEADER. | | | | | | E) WINDOW SILL SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON DETAIL A DON'T | | | MATCH THOSE SHOWN ON DETAIL B. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-10-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-10-13 |
Time |
09:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-10-13 |
Time |
09:27 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-06-23 |
Time |
11:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-06-23 |
Time |
10:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-23 11:01:36 | | | | | | | REVISION DENIED/INCOMPLETE INFORMATION | | | | | | SHEET E-1 MUST BE REVISED IN IT'S ENTIRETY. | | | | | | 1} THE PARTIAL SHEET SUBMITTED DOES NOT REFLECT THE | | | CHANGES IN THE RATING OF PANEL "B" DISCONNECT PER | | | ARTICLE 408.36 NEC (100 AMP PANEL FED FROM A 125 AMP | | | DISCONNECT) | | | | | | 2} THE RISER DIAGRAM TO A 100 AMP PANEL 215.5 NEC. | | | | | | 3} THE LOAD CALCULATIONS (REMOVING THE KITCHEN AND ?) | | | 220. | | | | | | 4} ANY CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR CHANGES.215.5 | | | | | | SHEET A-1 DOES NOT INDICATE THE KITCHEN REMOVAL AND | | | RECONFIGURATION OF SPACE. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
Time |
10:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
Time |
10:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
09:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
16:16 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-02 16:37:45 | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2007 | | | REVISIONS, 2005 NEC, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND | | | FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | ALL COMRNENTS FROM SHEET E-1, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE | | | AND ARE GENERATED BY PLAN CHANGES FROM THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | 1} THE 100 AMP DISCONNECTS AND THE #4 | | | CONDUCTORS(310.15(B)(6) FOR THE GUEST HOUSE DO NOT MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF 225.39 RATING OF DISCONNECT: | | | THE FEEDER OR BRANCH-CIRCUIT DISCONNECTING MEANS SHALL | | | HAVE A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN THE LOAD TO BE SUPPLIED, | | | DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARTS I AND II OF ARTICLE | | | 220 FOR BRANCH CIRCUITS, PARTS III OR IV OF ARTICLE 220 | | | FOR FEEDERS, OR PART V OF ARTICLE 220 FOR FARM LOADS. | | | IN NO CASE SHALL THE RATING BE LOWER THAN SPECIFIED IN | | | 225.39(A), (B), (C), OR (D).*** THE LOAD FOR PANEL "B" | | | IS CALCULATED AT 103 AMPS. | | | | | | 2} LOCATE THE DISCONNECT FOR THE GUEST HOUSE ON THE | | | PLAN AT THE UNIT. 225.31 | | | | | | 3} THE DISCONNECTS SHOWN ON THE RISER DIAGRAM ARE NOT | | | LOCATED ON THE PLAN. 225.31 | | | | | | 4} COMMENT #7 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW "7} CIRCUIT # 7, | | | 9 IN PANEL "A" INDICATES LAUNDRY @ 1500 VA ON A SINGLE | | | POLE BREAKER. CLARIFY WHAT THIS FEEDS"***THIS CIRCUIT | | | NOW SAYS "WASHER" BUT STILL HAS TWO CIRCUITS ON A | | | SINGLE POLE BREAKER.. | | | | | | 5} THE INSTA HOTS DO NOT HAVE THE OCP AMPERAGE PER | | | MANUFACTURERS SPECS.110.26(B). | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
12:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
09:05 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-18 12:54:19 | | | | | | | APPLICATION #08120242 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | 302 WILDEMERE ROAD 12/18/08 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005 | | | NEC, NFPA-72 2002, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1, AND | | | FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | ALL COMMENTS RELATE TO SHEET E-1, UNLESS OTHERWISE | | | NOTED | | | | | | 1} INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE ?EXISTING? SERVICE ENTRANCE | | | CONDUCTORS SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH 230.31 CAN BE | | | DETERMINED. | | | | | | 2} 230.70 GENERAL. | | | MEANS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DISCONNECT ALL CONDUCTORS IN | | | A BUILDING OR OTHER STRUCTURE FROM THE SERVICE-ENTRANCE | | | CONDUCTORS. THE AHJ HAS DETERMINED THAT ?NEAREST POINT | | | OF ENTRANCE? SHALL BE NO FARTHER THAN 8? OF UNPROTECTED | | | CONDUCTORS. INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE ON | | | THE PLAN. A DISCONNECTING MEANS IS REQUIRED FOR PANEL | | | ?B?, WHICH IS INCORRECTLY LABELED ?SUB PANEL?, AS IT | | | DOES NOT FEED FROM A PANEL BUT RATHER THE METER. | | | | | | 3} INDICATE THE FEEDER AND GROUND CONDUCTOR SIZE NUMBER | | | AND TYPE FOR THE 100 AMP PANEL SHOWN ON THE RISER. | | | | | | 4} INDICATE THE FEEDER INFORMATION FROM THE METER TO | | | THE 150 AMP DISCONNECT ON THE RISER. | | | | | | 5} AN EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR MUST BE INSTALLED | | | FROM THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT TO THE PANEL PER | | | 250.118, SIZED PER 250.122. | | | | | | 6} PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE GEC SYSTEM SHOWN ON THE | | | RISER AND COMPLIANCE WITH 250.52 AND 250.6, AS WITH TWO | | | GROUNDS FROM THE SAME SERVICE WOULD APPEAR TO PROVIDE A | | | PARALLEL PATH VIOLATING THOSE ARTICLES. | | | | | | 7} CIRCUIT # 7, 9 IN PANEL ?A? INDICATES ?LAUNDRY @ | | | 1500 VA ON A SINGLE POLE BREAKER. CLARIFY WHAT THIS | | | FEEDS. | | | | | | 8} CIRCUITS 13 THROUGH 23 INDICATE #14 CONDUCTORS ON A | | | 12 AMP BREAKER, PANEL ?A?, AND THE SAME ON CIRCUITS | | | 7THROUGH 15, PANEL ?B?. SEE 240.6 STANDARD AMPERE | | | RATINGS, AND 310.16, 210.11(C)(1), 210.11(C)(3). | | | | | | 9} CIRCUITS 24, 25 AND 31 PANEL ?A? AND 16 AND 17, | | | PANEL ?B?, MUST HAVE #12 CONDUCTORS. 310.16, | | | 210.11(C)(3), 210.11(C)(1). | | | | | | 10} PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTA | | | HOT WATER HEATERS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WHICH SHALL INCLUDE | | | NRTL LISTING AND LABELING, WATTAGE AND AMPERAGE. | | | | | | 11} THE INSTA HOT LOCATIONS IN BOTH UNITS ARE IN | | | VIOLATION OF 110.26 CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS AND | | | 240.24(D) LOCATION PROHIBITION. | | | | | | 12} LOCATE THE AIR HANDLERS ON THE PLAN, BOTH UNITS. | | | | | | 13} A RECEPTACLE MUST BE ADDED IN THE ?KITCHENETTE? FOR | | | SPACING REQUIREMENTS OF 210.52(A)(1) AND A GFI ON THE | | | COUNTERTOP PER 210.8(A)(6). | | | | | | 14} THE ISLAND IN THE NEW KITCHEN IS REQUIRED TO HAVE | | | RECEPTACLES PER 210.52(C)(2). | | | | | | 15} THE COUNTER TOP SPACE IN THE KITCHEN BETWEEN THE | | | SINK AND OVEN IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A RECEPTACLE PER | | | 210.52(C)(1), AND BE GFI PER 210.8(A)(6). | | | | | | NOTE: SEE THE DEFINITION OF "SMOKE DETECTORS" 11.8.2.1 | | | NFPA-72, CLARIFY IF USING DETECTORS OR ALARMS, TO AVOID | | | CONFUSION IN THE FIELD. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-09-17 |
Time |
11:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-09-17 |
Time |
11:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-22 11:15:26 | GAVE TO KEN S., ROUTED ON 9/22 LM |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-06-17 |
Time |
08:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-06-17 |
Time |
08:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
swurafti |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
Time |
11:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
swurafti |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
Time |
11:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-17 11:55:11 | TO "R11" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
15:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
15:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-10 15:59:28 | WAITING FOR "RESIDENTIAL" RACK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-12 |
Time |
10:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-12 |
Time |
10:23 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-12 10:23:31 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
Time |
09:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-16 09:04:45 | TO "SFR" "E" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-12-31 |
Time |
15:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-12-11 |
Time |
11:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-11 11:19:25 | TO "SFR" 'Z" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-05-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dwise |
Date |
2009-05-08 |
Time |
17:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dwise |
Date |
2009-05-08 |
Time |
17:49 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-08 17:50:20 | PURSUANT TO DISCUSSION WITH CITY LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR, | | | WILL PERMIT LANDSCAPE SEPERATELY IN ORDER TO ALLOW | | | PROJECT TO MOVE FORWARD PENDING RESOLUTION OF | | | OUTSTANDING ISSUES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-05-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-05-08 |
Time |
15:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-05-08 |
Time |
15:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-08 15:27:58 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | | | | 1. THE OPEN SPACE FOR WHICH ALL LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS | | | ARE BASED IS CALCULATED BY TAKING THE TOTAL LOT AREA | | | AND SUBTRACTING THE BUILDING FOOT PRINT. THE AREA LEFT | | | IS THE OPEN SPACE. PLEASE CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS AND | | | BASE THEM ON OPEN SPACE INSTEAD OF PERVIOUS AREA. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE IRRIGATION IN THE RIGHT--OF-WAY. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE BREAK DOWN THE LANDSCAPE COST ESTIMATE TO | | | SHOW HOW YOU ARRIVED AT THE TOTAL COST. | | | | | | 4. GROUND LEVEL AIR CONDITIONING UNITS, MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT AND GARBAGE CONTAINERS SHALL BE SCREENED. | | | PLEASE IDENTIFY THIS EUIPMENT AND INDICATED HOW IT WILL | | | BE SCREENED. | | | | | | 5. IF YOU TAKE CREDIT FOR A MOISTURE SENSING | | | CONTROLLER, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE EQUIPMENT TO BE USED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
Time |
17:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
Time |
16:59 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-23 17:30:07 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C), UNLESS THE | | | RENOVATIONS, REPAIR, ALTERATION OR REDEVELOPMENT OF | | | THIS SITE DOES NOT EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE | | | STRUCTURE, A LANDCAPE PLAN SHALL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 2. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL ADHERE TO THE GUIDELINES | | | SETFORTH IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. A PLANT LIST WITH ALL PROPOSED | | | PLANT NAMES, SIZES, QUANTITIES AND SPACING SHALL BE ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLANT | | | MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. SHOW ALL UTILITIES, EASEMENTS, OVERHANGING TREE | | | LIMBS FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTY AND ANYTHING ELSE THAT | | | MAY INTERFERE WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE TABULATION NECESSARY FOR THE | | | EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING | | | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE DESIGN | | | OPTIONS. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A COST ESTIMATE THAT INCLUDES THE | | | TOTAL COST OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND LABOR. | | | | | | 5. AN IRRIGATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED. IRRIGATION SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED TO ALL LANDCAPED AREAS THROUGHOUT THE SITE, | | | INCLUDING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
18:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
18:28 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-22 18:30:26 | PLANS SHOW NEW A/C UNITS BUT NO INFORMATION WAS | | | PROVIDED. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT APPLICATION | | | REQUIRED FOR MECHANICAL WITH CALCS AND EQUIPMENT | | | SCHEDULE. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
Time |
10:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
Time |
10:55 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-23 10:58:00 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. SHT A-1 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT MEET CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR SECTION 909.1. THE KITCHEN SINK SHALL | | | NOT DISCHARGE INTO THE HORIZONTAL WET VENT FOR THE | | | BATHROOM FIXTURES. THE KITCHEN SINK SHALL DISCHARGE | | | DOWNSTREAM OF THE BATHROOM GROUP. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
16:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
16:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-07 16:46:26 | REVISION DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. SHT A-1 REVISION INDEX SIGNED, SEALED & DATED | | | 04-08-09 IN OUR FILE FOR PUBLIC RECORD SHOWS REVISION 2 | | | AS THE LAST REVISION. NEW SHEET A-1 SUBMITTED AS A | | | REVISION STILL ONLY SHOWS REVISION 2 IN THE REVISION | | | INDEX. PLEASE INDICATE WHAT THE NEW REVISION NUMBER | | | WILL BE IN THE INDEX. ALSO THERE ARE CHANGES TO THE | | | FLOOR PLAN THAT HAVE NO CLOUD OR REVISION NUMBER | | | INDICATING THE REVISION. PLEASE CLOUD AND NUMBER ALL | | | REVISIONS SUBMITTED. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | 2. THE 8X11 SHEETS SUBMITTED AS REV. E1 DO NOT REFLECT | | | SHEET A-1. PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 3. SHT A-1 THE SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT REFLECT | | | THE FLOOR PLAN. THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS A SHOWER AND | | | DIFFERENT LOCATIONS FOR THE FIXTURES. ALSO THE NEW | | | FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE A KITCHEN SINK. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY & CORRELATE. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-30 |
Time |
10:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-30 |
Time |
10:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-13 |
Time |
14:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-13 |
Time |
14:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-13 15:18:01 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 EXISING BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. OK | | | 2. OK | | | 2. OK | | | | | | ********NEW COMMENT******** | | | | | | 1B. ONLY THE FIXTURES WITHIN THE BATHROOM SHALL CONNECT | | | TO THE WET-VENTED HORIZONTAL BRANCH DRAIN. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL FIXTURES SHALL DISCHARGE DOWNSTREAM OF THE | | | WET VENT. SECTION 909.1. THE KITCHEN SINK IN THE GUEST | | | HOUSE SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY VENTED AND CONNECT | | | DOWNSTREAM OF THE WATER CLOSET. | | | | | | 2B. THE ENERGENCY EFFICIENCY SUBMITTAL INDICATES A 50 | | | GAL. WATER HEATER BUT THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS A 24 KW | | | INSTA-HOT WATER HEATER FOR THE MAIN HOURS AND A 14.4 KW | | | FOR THE GUEST HOUSE. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE 50 | | | GALLON WATER HEATER, AND UPDATE THE ENERGY EFFICINECY | | | SUBMITTAL TO SHOW ALL WATER HEATERS. ALSO PER SECTION | | | 13-101.2.3 RENOVATED BUILDINGS SHALL MEET THE | | | PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN METHOD C OF | | | SUBCHAPTER 13-6 FOR RESIDENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF THE | | | CODE. METHOD A WAS SUBMITTED. - PER SECTION | | | 12-101.2.5.1 THE GUEST HOUSE IS CONSIDERED A SEPARATE | | | RESIDENCE AND SEPARATE ENERGY EFFICIENCY CODE SUBMITTAL | | | IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
Time |
10:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
Time |
09:49 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-24 10:14:29 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 EXISING BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. SHT A-1 CODE CRITERIA IN THE GENERAL NOTES AND | | | FOUNDATION NOTES SHALL INCLUDE THE 2007 AMENDMENTS. | | | SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 2. SHT A-1 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE FLOOR NOR MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE NEW | | | TOILET BY THE PARLOR SHOWS THE LAV ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF | | | THE ROOM BUT THE RISER SHOWS THE LAV ON THE LEFT SIDE | | | OF THE ROOM AND THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS A SHOWER BUT THE | | | RISER INDICATES A TUB. -- THE BATHROOM BY THE UTILITY | | | ROOM SHOWS A SHOWER ON THE RISER DIAGRAM BUT SHOWS A | | | TUB ON THE FLOOR PLAN. -- THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS A WASH | | | MACHINE CONNECTION BUT THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE RISER | | | DIAGRAM. PLEASE CORRELATE THE FLOOR PLAN AND RISER | | | DIAGRAM SO THEY REFLECT WHAT WILL BE INSTALLED. | | | SECTIONS 106.1.1 AND 701.1. | | | | | | 2. SHT A-1 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS THE SEWER | | | CONNECTION FROM THE GUEST HOUSE RUNNING THROUGH THE | | | MAIN HOUSE BUILDING DRAIN. PER SECTION 701.3, EVERY | | | BUILDING HAVING PLUMBING FIXTURES INSTALLED AND | | | INTENDED FOR HUMAN HABITATION, OCCUPANCY OR USE ON | | | PREMISES ABUTTING ON A STREET, ALLEY OR EASEMENT IN | | | WHICH THERE IS A PUBLIC SEWER SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE | | | CONNECTION WITH THE SEWER. WHERE LOCATED ON THE SAME | | | LOT, MULTIPLE BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE PROHIBITED FROM | | | CONNECTING TO A COMMON BUILDING SEWER THAT CONNECTS TO | | | THE PUBLIC SEWER. -- THE GUEST HOUSE SHALL CONNECT TO | | | THE SEWER, NOT THE BUILDING DRAIN FOR ANOTHER BUILDING. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcruz |
Date |
2009-05-07 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcruz |
Date |
2009-05-07 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
L |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-07 10:53:26 | PASSED W/PROVISO: LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS SHALL | | | BE APPROVED PRIOR TO FINAL C.O. | | | | | | MAGGIE CRUZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | TEL: (561) 822-1444 OR (561) 805-6720 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | ROUTED TO RAK FOR L REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcruz |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
Time |
13:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcruz |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
Time |
11:59 |
Sent To |
L |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-23 12:21:15 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT: ***ZONING FAILED-- 1ST | | | RESUB*** | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL RESPONSES IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. THE PROPOSED REAR ATTACHED DECK EXCEEDS THE SETBACK | | | DIMENSIONS ALLOWABLE BY CODE. | | | PURSUANT TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), SECTION 94-305(C)(1): | | | ADDITIONAL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. MULTIFRONTAGE LOTS. | | | UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY THIS CHAPTER, THE REQUIRED | | | FRONT SETBACK SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL LOTS HAVING | | | FRONTAGE ON MORE THAN ONE STREET. | | | | | | PURSUANT TO THE ZLDR, SECTION 94-77(A)(2): MINIMUM | | | SETBACKS FOR PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | A. FRONT: 25 FEET; | | | | | | B. CORNER: 15 FEET OR TEN FEET IF LOT IS LESS THAN 60 | | | FEET WIDE; | | | | | | C. REAR: 15 FEET; | | | | | | D. SIDE: 15 FEET; OR FIVE FEET, MINIMUM OF 15 FEET | | | TOTAL IF LOT IS LESS THAN 50 FEET WIDE. | | | | | | 3. INDICATE THE SETBACK DIMENSION OF THE PROPOSED FRONT | | | ENTRY MEASURED FROM THE FRONT BUILDING FA??ADE TO | | | FURTHEST POINT OF THE FRONT STRUCTURE. | | | | | | NOTE: THE SUBMITTAL OF THE REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY | | | GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS MAY BE VIEWED ONLINE AT | | | WWW.MUNICODE.COM OR VISIT THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING DEPARTMENT WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/PLAN/INDEX.HTM. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT ME. | | | | | | MAGGIE CRUZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | TEL: (561) 822-1444 OR (561) 805-6720 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
Time |
11:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
Time |
10:49 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-15 11:42:16 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT: ***ZONING FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL RESPONSES IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. PURSUANT TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), SECTION | | | 94-441(C)(2) OF: AS THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK | | | EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE (LISTED AS | | | "IMPROVEMENT VALUE" WITH THE P.B.C. PROPERTY | | | APPRAISER'S OFFICE), LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF | | | THE ZLDR. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445 OF | | | THE ZLDR. | | | | | | 3. INDICATE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM PROPOSED A/C | | | EQUIPMENT TO ALL PROPERTY LINES. PURSUANT THE ZLDR, | | | SECTION 94-305(B)(4): MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY NOT | | | PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | | | | 4. INDICATE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM PROPOSED FRONT | | | CONCRETE ENTRY ADDITION. PURSUANT TO THE ZLDR, SECTION | | | 94-305(B): STRUCTURAL INTRUSIONS. STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS, | | | INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BALCONIES, CORNICES, | | | GUTTERS, EAVES, AND ROOF OVERHANG PROJECTIONS SHALL NOT | | | EXTEND FARTHER THAN THREE FEET INTO ANY SETBACK. | | | | | | 5. INDICATE THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED REAR | | | CONCRETE DECK ADDITION TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | THE DEPTH OF THE PROPOSED REAR CONCRETE DECK SHOWN ON | | | SHEET SP-1 IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE DIMENSION SHOWN ON | | | SHEET A-1. PLEASE CORRELATE ALL PLANS. | | | | | | 6. INDICATE OVERHANG DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED REAR | | | DECK ADDITION. PURSUANT TO THE ZLDR, SECTION 94-305(B): | | | OVERHANGS SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE THAN THREE (3) FEET | | | INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | | | | 7. THE PROPOSED CLOSET ADDITION ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE EXCEEDS THE DISTRICT?S SETBACK | | | REGULATIONS. PURSUANT TO THE ZLDR, SECTION 94-77(2): | | | MINIMUM SETBACKS FOR PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | A. FRONT: 25 FEET; | | | B. CORNER: 15 FEET OR TEN FEET IF LOT IS LESS THAN 60 | | | FEET WIDE; | | | C. REAR: 15 FEET; | | | D. SIDE: 15 FEET; OR FIVE FEET, MINIMUM OF 15 FEET | | | TOTAL IF LOT IS LESS THAN 50 FEET WIDE. | | | | | | NOTE: PURSUANT TO THE ZLDR, SECTION 94-513(A)(2): | | | REGULATION OF NONCONFORMING USES. NONCONFORMING | | | STRUCTURES OR BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE IMPROVED, | | | CONSTRUCTED, ENLARGED, OR ALTERED IN ANY MANNER TO | | | CREATE A NEW NONCONFORMITY OR TO INCREASE AN EXISTING | | | NONCONFORMITY, BUT MAY BE IMPROVED, CONSTRUCTED, | | | ENLARGED, OR ALTERED AS LONG AS NO NEW NONCONFORMITY IS | | | CREATED OR AN EXISTING NONCONFORMITY INCREASED. | | | | | | NOTE: THE SUBMITTAL OF THE REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY | | | GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS MAY BE VIEWED ONLINE AT | | | WWW.MUNICODE.COM OR VISIT THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING DEPARTMENT WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/PLAN/INDEX.HTM. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT ME. | | | | | | MAGGIE CRUZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | TEL: (561) 822-1444 OR (561) 805-6720 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | 2008-12-15 11:00:16 | | | | |
|
|