Plan Review Details - Permit 08110182
Plan Review Stops For Permit 08110182
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-12-08 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2008-12-08 Time 13:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2008-12-08 Time 13:42 Sent To M
Notes
2008-12-05 16:58:222004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS
 LEVEL 2 ALTERATION AND ADDITION
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
  
 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL
 BE REQUIRED. FS 713
  
 2) THE ADDRESS IN THE TITLE BLOCK FOR THE PROJECT OF
 340 CROTON WAY IS INCORRECT. THE CORRECT ADDRESS IS 324
 CROTON WAY. FAC 61G1-16.004
  
 3) THE PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION ON A-4 HAS A TYPO THAT
 APPEARS TO INDICATE WINDOWS BEING RELOCATED PLEASE
 CORRECT. FBC 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS
  
 4) ON SHEET A-2 THE EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN SHOWS
 THREE WINDOWS IN THE KITCHEN AND THE EXISTING SOUTH
 ELEVATION ON A-3 SHOWS TWO WINDOWS AT THE SAME
 LOCATION. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS
  
 5) THE EXISTING SITE PLAN ON A-1 DOES NOT SHOW THE
 EXISTING TWO STORY DECK AT THE REAR. FBC 106.1.1* CITY
 AMENDMENTS
  
 6) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION R320 PROTECTION AGAINST
 TERMITES. R320.1 TERMITE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED
 BY REGISTERED TERMITICIDES, INCLUDING SOIL APPLIED
 PESTICIDES, BAITING SYSTEMS, AND PESTICIDES APPLIED TO
 WOOD, OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF TERMITE PROTECTION
 LABELED FOR USE AS A PREVENTATIVE TREATMENT TO NEW
 CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 202, REGISTERED TERMITICIDE).
 UPON COMPLETION OF THE APPLICATION OF THE TERMITE
 PROTECTIVE TREATMENT, A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE SHALL
 BE ISSUED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT BY THE LICENSED
 PEST CONTROL COMPANY THAT CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING
 STATEMENT: ?THE BUILDING HAS RECEIVED A COMPLETE
 TREATMENT FOR THE PREVENTION OF SUBTERRANEAN TERMITES.
 TREATMENT IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULES AND LAWS
 ESTABLISHED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 AND CONSUMER SERVICES.?
  
 7) THE DESIGN LOADS DATA ON S-1 AND S-2 LISTS THE WRONG
 EDITION OF ASCE 7 AND THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS
 INCORRECT. ASCE 7-02 AND MEAN ROOF HEIGHT FOR THE
 STRUCTURE IS THE DISTANCE FROM GRADE TO THE AVERAGE OF
 THE ROOF EAVE HEIGHT AND THE HEIGHT TO THE HIGHEST
 POINT ON THE ROOF SURFACE. SEE FBC CHAPTER 43 AND R202.
  
 8) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R803.2.3.1 SHEATHING
 FASTENINGS.
 WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING SHALL BE FASTENED TO
 ROOF FRAMING WITH 8D RING-SHANK NAILS AT 6 INCHES ON
 CENTER AT EDGES AND 6 INCHES ON CENTER AT INTERMEDIATE
 FRAMING. RING-SHANK NAILS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING
 MINIMUM DIMENSIONS:
 1. 0.113-INCH NOMINAL SHANK DIAMETER
 2. RING DIAMETER OF 0.012 OVER SHANK DIAMETER
 3. 16 TO 20 RINGS PER INCH
 4. 0.280 INCH FULL ROUND HEAD DIAMETER
 5. 2-INCH NAIL LENGTH
 WHERE ROOF FRAMING WITH A SPECIFIC GRAVITY, 0.42 < G <
 0.49 IS USED, SPACING OF RING-SHANK FASTENERS SHALL BE
 4 INCHES ON CENTER IN NAILING ZONE 3 FOR 130 MPH OR
 GREATER DESIGN WIND SPEEDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIGURE
 R803.2.3.1.
  
 9) THE TYP. FTG. DETAIL ON S-1 SPECIFIES A 6 X 6 WOOD
 COLUMN WITH ABA66 CONNECTOR. THE OTHER DETAILS SPECIFY
 8 X 8 COLUMNS. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 106.1.1* CITY
 AMENDMENTS
  
 10) PROVIDE A FRAMING DETAIL FOR THE LOWER ROOF THAT
 WRAPS AROUND THE SECOND FLOOR DECK. SPECIFY ALL
 CONNECTORS. R301.1
  
 11) PROVIDE A GABLE END DETAIL FOR A WOOD BEAM BELOW
 SPECIFIC TO THIS PROJECT. SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS.
 R301.1
  
 12) SPECIFY HOW THE SECOND FLOOR LEDGERS WILL BE
 ATTACHED TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. R301.1
  
 13) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS THAT WILL BE USED TO ATTACH
 THE 2- 2 X 12 BEAMS SUPPORTING THE UPPER ROOF TO THE
 EXISTING STRUCTURE. R301.1
  
 14) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS THAT WILL BE USED TO ATTACH
 THE 2- 2 X 12 BEAMS SUPPORTING THE UPPER ROOF TO THE
 WOOD COLUMNS. THE WALL SECTION ON S-2 HAS A QUESTION
 MARK. R301.1
  
 15) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE
 FOLLOWING ITEMS: EXTERIOR DOUBLE OUTSWING DOORS, SINGLE
 INSWING DOOR, WINDOWS, ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES AND HOT
 MOP SYSTEM ON SECOND FLOOR DECK. FAC RULE 9B-72
  
 16) FBC 106.3* CITY AMENDMENTS PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE
 PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
  
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL
 BLDG. PLAN REVIEW
 (561)805-6714
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-12-01 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2008-12-01 Time 16:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2008-12-01 Time 16:21 Sent To M
Notes
2008-12-01 16:38:17 
  
 THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES:
  
 THE 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2007
 REVISIONS, 2005 NEC, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND
 FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING:
  
 1} THE PLAN WAS STAMPED PRIOR TO DISCOVERING THE "NEW
 A/C" ON SHEET A-2, THEREFORE THE REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN
 THE FAILED STATUS UNTIL A LOAD CALCULATON PER 220.83(B)
 IS PROVIDED. INDICATE THE SIZE AND RATING OF THE
 EXISTING SERVICE. LOCATE THE NEW EQUIPMENT (AHU) ON THE
 PLAN
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL.
  
 BILL TROBAUGH
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561/805-6718
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2008-11-21 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2008-12-15 Time 14:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2008-11-21 Time 09:45 Sent To  
Notes
2008-11-21 09:45:57TO "SFR" "E"
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2008-12-17 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2008-12-15 Time 11:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2008-11-12 Time 15:18 Sent To  
Notes
2008-11-12 15:18:55TO "SFR" "Z"
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-12-15 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2008-12-15 Time 13:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2008-12-15 Time 13:50 Sent To  
Notes
2008-12-15 13:58:4012/15/08
 DENIED NO PLANS.PAGE A-2 SHOWS NEW CONDENSER ONLY ,NO
 DUCT WORK OR AIR HANDLER .
 PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER 561-805-6732 .
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2008-12-04 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2008-12-04 Time 11:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2008-12-04 Time 11:41 Sent To  
Notes
2008-12-04 11:41:48NEW GAS RANGE INDICATED. SEPARATE GAS PERMIT REQUIRED
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-12-15 Cont ID  
Sent By adavila Date 2008-11-20 Time 13:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adavila Date 2008-11-19 Time 17:01 Sent To I
Notes
2008-11-20 13:46:26PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
  
 ***FAILED***
  
 1. PROVIDE RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN
 FORMAT. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT
 TO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 2. PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF A SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY
 SHOWING ALL EXISTING SETBACK DIMENSIONS AND THE LEGAL
 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY. SURVEY SHALL BE LESS THAN
 A YEAR OLD.
  
 3. THE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN SHOWS "PROPOSED
 COVERED BALCONY" THAT WILL REPLACE THE EXISTING ROOF
 DECK. THIS IS NOT INCLUDED AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK
 FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT. THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
 SHALL BE REVISED TO INCLUDE THE PROPOSED SECOND STORY
 COVERED BALCONY.
  
 4. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-77(A)(2)(D) OF THE ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS), THE REQUIRED SIDE
 SETBACKS IN THE MULTIFAMILY HIGH DENSITY (MF32)
 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT IS 15 FEET. THE PROPOSED
 COVERED DECK SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET FROM
 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE.
  
 5. THE HEIGHT ELEVATIONS PROVIDED ARE MEASURED FROM THE
 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION. PROVIDE OVERALL BUILDING
 HEIGHT DIMENSIONS FROM GRADE ON ALL ELEVATIONS. IN
 ADDITION, PLEASE NOTE THAT PER SECTION 94-611 OF THE
 ZLDRS, BUILDING HEIGHT MEANS THE VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM
 THE MEAN GRADE OF A LOT AT THE FRONTAGE OF THE BUILDING
 TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE TOP OF THE STRUCTURE OF A
 FLAT ROOF, OR TO THE DECK LINE OF A MANSARD ROOF, OR TO
 THE MID-HEIGHT LEVEL BETWEEN EAVES AND RIDGE FOR GABLE,
 HIP, AND GAMBREL ROOFS.
  
 6. PROVIDE ROOF OVERHANG PROJECTIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 PER SECTION 94-305(B)(2) OF THE ZLDRS, STRUCTURAL
 OVERHANGS, INCLUDING ROOF OVERHANG PROJECTIONS SHALL
 NOT EXTEND FARTHER THAN THREE FEET INTO ANY SETBACK.
  
 7. THERE APPEARS TO BE A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE
 EXISTING SITE PLAN AND THE EXISTING FLOOR PLANS. THE
 EXISTING SITE PLAN ONLY SHOWS THE KITCHEN EXTENSION OF
 THE HOUSE; HOWEVER, THE FLOOR PLANS SHOW A COVERED DECK
 WITH COLUMNS, AND A SECOND STORY ROOF DECK, ON THE EAST
 SIDE OF THE KITCHEN. IF THIS IS THE CASE, THE EXISTING
 DECK SHALL ALSO BE SHOWN ON THE EXISTING SITE PLAN WITH
 ALL SETBACK DIMENSIONS.
  
 8. THE "EXISTING ROOF BELOW" SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED ROOF
 FRAMING PLAN AND ON THE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN, DO
 NOT MATCH THE EXISTING ROOF SHOWN ON THE EXISTING
 SECOND FLOOR PLAN. IN ADDITION, THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN
 DOES NOT SHOW THE ROOF PROJECTIONS OF THE KITCHEN, AND
 THE PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION STATES "NEW ASPHALT
 SHINGLE ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING." PLEASE REVISE.
  
 9. PLEASE NOTE THAT PER SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE
 ZLDRS, WORK VALUE EXCEEDING 50 PERCENT OF THE VALUE OF
 THE STRUCTURE SHALL REQUIRE PROPERTIES TO BE BROUGHT
 INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV, LANDSCAPING, LAND
 CLEAR AND TREE PROTECTION, OF THE ZLDRS. IF THE WORK
 VALUE EVER EXCEEDS 50 PERCENT OF THE VALUE OF THE
 STRUCTURE (EXCEEDS $72,964.5), A LANDSCAPE PLAN OF THE
 SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC
 SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435.
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved