City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Permit 08100243

Plan Review Stops For Permit 08100243

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	N	Date	2008-10-10			Cont ID
Sent By	swurafti			Date	2008-10-10	Time	11:21	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	swurafti			Date	2008-10-10	Time	11:21	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG			ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	2009-01-06			Cont ID
Sent By	dlauderm			Date	2009-01-06	Time	12:10	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	dlauderm			Date	2009-01-06	Time	12:09	Sent To

Notes

2009-01-06 12:10:31	PROVIO:
	SUBMIT PLAN TO ENGINEERING SERVICES

Review Stop	I		INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	1	Status	Date				Cont ID
Sent By			Date		Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	adarroug		Date	2008-10-17	Time	16:05	Sent To

Notes

2008-10-17 16:05:37

TO "ENG" BOX/REV

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2009-01-23			Cont ID
Sent By	lfranco			Date	2009-01-23	Time	18:03	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	lfranco			Date	2009-01-23	Time	18:03	Sent To

Notes

2009-01-23 18:42:40
	1. RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING.

	2. STAFF HAS MET WITH SIMMONS AND WHITE, ENGINEER AND
	JOHN SCHMIDT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, IN THE PAST TO
	ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MADE REGARDING CONFLICTS BETWEEN
	THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES AND THE LANDSCAPING
	PLANS. THERE ARE LINES THAT RUN RIGHT INTO REQUIRED
	TREES (LANDSCAPE BUFFERS). SEE MASTER PERMITS 06111067
	AND 06111071 FOR LANDSCAPE COMMENTS (I.E. 10/21/08)
	REGARDING THESE ISSUES AND CONFLICTS.

	THE CIVIL DRAWINGS DO NOT REFLECT THE CHANGES/REVISIONS
	THAT NEED TO HAPPEN TO AVOID THESE CONFLICTS. WITHOUT
	THE REVISED PLANS THAT CORRELATE FOR ALL DISCIPLINES,
	INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPING AND CIVIL, STAFF
	CANNOT APPROVE PERMIT(S), THIS GENERAL NOTE IS THE SAME
	FOR PERMITS 08100243, 08090320, 08090319,08060613


	THE COMMENTS BELOW REFLECT COMMENTS FROM THE MASTER
	PERMIT 06111067 AND 06111071


	2. SUBMITTAL INDICATES NEW SIDEWALKS WERE ADDED TO BOTH
	HOTELS (SPRINGHILL AND HOMEWOOD). ADD A BUBBLE ON WHAT
	HAS BEEN REVISED. ON HOTEL 1 ("HOMEWOOD SUITES"), A NEW
	SIDEWALK IS REFLECTED BY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, BUT
	THE SIDEWALK IS GOING INTO THE SIDE OF A PARKING STALL?

	RE-SUBMITTAL - BASED ON SHEET LP-1 SHOWING ONE BUBBLE
	ON HOTEL 1 (HOMEWOOD), THE SIDEWALK LOCATION GOING INTO
	A PARKING STALL IS NOT THE MOST CONDUCIVE AREA, IF THE
	PURPOSE IS FOR ACCESSIBILITY TO MAINTENANCE AND/OR
	PEDESTRIANS. IF A CAR HAPPENS TO BE PARKED IN THAT
	STALL, ACCESS WILL BE PROHIBITED. ALSO, CONSIDERATION
	SHALL BE MADE REGARDING THE LOCATION OF SAID SIDEWALK,
	SINCE IT HAS LEFT LESS SPACE FOR THE LANDSCAPING TO
	GROW ADEQUATELY. SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS.

	3. SHEET E-602 SITE LIGHTING CALCULATIONS DOES NOT
	CORRELATE WITH THE SITE PLANS. SPECIFICALLY, BUT NOT
	LIMITED TO THE NORTHEAST AREA OF HOMEWOOD SUITES, HOTEL
	1, WHICH DEPICTS PARKING STALLS WHERE A LOADING AREA
	SHOULD BE AND DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS DEPICTED IN THE
	LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLAND. REVISE DRAWING ACCORDINGLY.

	IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME AT THE
	NUMBER BELOW.

	LINDA MIA FRANCO
	SENIOR PLANNER
	PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT.
	TEL: (561) 822-1443
	EMAIL: [email protected]