 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 08090611
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08090611 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
Time |
09:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
Time |
07:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-26 09:12:43 | UPDATE 12-26-2008: I CHECKED OUT THE SITE PLANS & | | | REALIZED THAT THE PROSPECTIVE ICE RINK WAS INDEED | | | TAKING PLACE AT THE TENANT SPACE DESIGNATED AS 1590 N | | | FLORIDA MANGO RD (NOT 1600 N FLORIDA MANGO RD). I ALSO | | | CALLED & TALKED TO THE CONTRACTOR, NAT HEALY. WE BOTH | | | REALIZED THAT BACK IN MID-OCTOBER THAT WE ERRED IN | | | CONFIRMING 1600 N FLORIDA MANGO RD AS THE OFFICIAL | | | ADDRESS. I SAW THAT THE NOW CONFIRMED ADDRESS OF 1590 N | | | FLORIDA MANGO RD WAS CORRECTED ON THE ORIGINAL PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. HOWEVER, IT STILL NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED IN | | | THE COMMUNITYPLUS DATABASE. SINCE I DO NOT HAVE | | | AUTHORIZATION, PLEASE ATTACH THIS PERMIT IN TO ITS | | | CORRECT LOCATION, PCN# 74434329000001120 FOR SEQUENTIAL | | | UNIT RECORD 0001 - 1590 N FLORIDA MANGO RD. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
CBC058291 |
| Sent By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
Time |
9:01 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-26 09:00:27 | UPDATE 12-26-2008: I CHECKED OUT THE SITE PLANS & | | | REALIZED THAT THE PROSPECTIVE ICE RINK WAS INDEED | | | TAKING PLACE AT THE TENANT SPACE DESIGNATED AS 1590 N | | | FLORIDA MANGO RD (NOT 1600 N FLORIDA MANGO RD). I ALSO | | | CALLED & TALKED TO THE CONTRACTOR, NAT HEALY. WE BOTH | | | REALIZED THAT BACK IN MID-OCTOBER THAT WE ERRED IN | | | CONFIRMING 1600 N FLORIDA MANGO RD AS THE OFFICIAL | | | ADDRESS. I SAW THAT THE NOW CONFIRMED ADDRESS OF 1590 N | | | FLORIDA MANGO RD WAS CORRECTED ON THE ORIGINAL PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. HOWEVER, IT STILL NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED IN | | | THE COMMUNITYPLUS DATABASE. SINCE I DO NOT HAVE | | | AUTHORIZATION, PLEASE ATTACH THIS PERMIT IN TO ITS | | | CORRECT LOCATION, PCN# 74434329000001120 FOR SEQUENTIAL | | | UNIT RECORD 0001 - 1590 N FLORIDA MANGO RD. | | 2008-10-17 10:00:38 | 10-17-2008: VERIFIED 1600 N FLORIDA MANGO AS THE | | | PRIMARY ADDRESS FOR PCN# 74434329000001120 IN GIS & | | | PAPA; WAS TOLD ON THE PHONE BY THE CONTRACTOR THAT THIS | | | SPECIFIC LOCATION WAS GOING TO BE UTILIZED AS THE ICE | | | RINK (NOT THE UNIT BLDG) & WAS THEIR MAILING ADDRESS | | | TOO. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
16 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-12-02 |
Time |
12:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-11-30 |
Time |
07:42 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-02 12:33:28 | ****PROVISO ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS LISTS***** | | | ***REVISION, SHEETS T, 001, 212, 222, DOCS FROM DCA*** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 4. ADDRESSED - FBC1024.12, PER BUILDING OFFICIAL, SEATS | | | CANNOT BE REMOVABLE. THIS WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, | | | ALL SEATS FIXED, REMOVE SEATS AT ACCESSIBLE AREA. | | | | | | 8. ADDRESSED - (VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY AND ACCESSIBLE | | | SEATING IS REQUIRED TO EAST MEZZANINE AND FIRST FLOOR | | | RAISED SEATING. EITHER PROVIDE A WAIVER OR REVISE PLAN | | | TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE HAVE EOR REVIEW THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING ON | | | THIS JOB, FAC61G15-31. THIS MAY BE DONE BY LETTER. | | | | | | ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE THAT TAVARES IS PHASE 2 EOR, ALI | | | IS THRESHOLD INSPECTOR IS ACKNOWLEDGED. ALL "PHASES" | | | WERE COMPLETED UNDER ONE PERMIT, ONE STRUCTURE. PLEASE | | | HAVE ENGINEERS SEE FAC61G15-31, RESPONSIBILITY RULES | | | FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS CONCERNING THE DESIGN OF | | | STRUCTURES. THERE IS TO BE ONE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR | | | THE STRUCTURE. THAT ENGINEER SPECIFIES DESIGN CRITERIA, | | | AND REVIEWS THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING TO COMFIRM | | | CONFORMANCE WITH EOR'S DESIGN CRITERIA. THROUGHOUT THIS | | | PROJECT, REVISIONS HAVE BEEN PROCESSED WITH PROVISO | | | THAT EOR REVIEW THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING. FOUNDATIONS | | | WERE DESIGNED BY ONE ENGINEER, EXTERIOR, MEZZANINES, | | | STAIRS, ETC. DESIGNED BY ANOTHER ENGINEER. IT IS NOT | | | CLEAR WHICH ENGINEER IS ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE | | | STRUCTURE, WHICH ENGINEER HAS DELEGATED, WHICH ENGINEER | | | IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OVERALL DESIGN. PLEASE HAVE THE | | | ENGINEERS REVIEW FAC61G15-31 AND CONFIRM THAT EOR HAS | | | REVIEWED DELEGATED ENGINEERING (MAY BE DONE BY LETTER). | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS. | | | | | | 10. ADDRESSED - FBC1023.6, EITHER PROVIDE SAFE | | | DISPERSAL AREA OR ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE PUBLIC WAY | | | (EXIT DISCHARGE). | | | | | | 11. FBC1019.1.4, SEE PROVISO ON PLAN, STAIRS TO COMPLY | | | WITH FBC1019.1.4. | | | | | | SHEET 722 ON HOLD PENDING RECEIPT OF SPRINKLER HEAD | | | SPEC SHEETS; UPON RECEIPT THE REQUEST FOR ALTERNATE | | | MATERIALS & METHODS TO BE FORWARDED TO BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL. PLEASE NOTE THAT SHEET 722 REFERS TO FP3 & | | | FP4 WHICH HAVE NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED AND WHICH WERE NOT | | | SUBMITTED WITH THIS REVISION. I HAVE TAKEN ONE SET FROM | | | THE MECHANICAL/FIRE/ELEC REVISION FOR REFERENCE. | | | | | | 13. ADDRESSED - COMPLY WITH FBC1006.1, MEANS OF EGRESS | | | ILLUMINATION, INCLUDING BLEACHER STAIRS. | | | | | | 14. ADDRESSED FOR ARCHITECT; STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE | | | FOR THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRED, FS553.79(7)(D). | | | | | | IS THE ARCHITECT MAKING THIS STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE | | | ENGINEERS AS WELL, OR WILL THEY PROVIDE THEIR OWN | | | STATEMENT IF THIS WAS NOT INCLUDED ON THEIR PLANS? | | | PLEASE ADVISE | | | | | | 15. ADDRESSED - EXIT FROM DOOR (FIRST FLOOR) TO PUBLIC | | | WAY IS BLOCKED BY LANDSCAPING AND ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT. | | | CONTINUOUS PATH REQUIRED FBC10. SITE PLAN 001 REVISED | | | TO SHOW BLDG CODE COMPLIANCE | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
15 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-10-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-10-13 |
Time |
12:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-10-06 |
Time |
07:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-13 12:19:36 | ****PROVISOS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 4. FBC1024.12, PER BUILDING OFFICIAL, SEATS CANNOT BE | | | REMOVABLE. THIS WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, ALL SEATS | | | FIXED, REMOVE SEATS AT ACCESSIBLE AREA. | | | | | | 8. VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY AND ACCESSIBLE SEATING IS | | | REQUIRED TO EAST MEZZANINE AND FIRST FLOOR RAISED | | | SEATING. EITHER PROVIDE A WAIVER OR REVISE PLAN TO SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE HAVE EOR REVIEW THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING ON | | | THIS JOB, FAC61G15-31. THIS MAY BE DONE BY LETTER. | | | | | | 10. FBC1023.6, EITHER PROVIDE SAFE DISPERSAL AREA OR | | | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE PUBLIC WAY (EXIT DISCHARGE). | | | | | | 11. FBC1019.1.4, SEE PROVISO ON PLAN, STAIRS TO COMPLY | | | WITH FBC1019.1.4. | | | | | | 13. PROVISO - COMPLY WITH FBC1006.1, MEANS OF EGRESS | | | ILLUMINATION, INCLUDING BLEACHER STAIRS. | | | | | | 14. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE FOR THRESHOLD BUILDING | | | REQUIRED, FS553.79(7)(D). | | | | | | 15. REVISE SHEET LP1 AS DISCUSSED - EXIT FROM DOOR | | | (FIRST FLOOR) TO PUBLIC WAY IS BLOCKED BY LANDSCAPING | | | AND ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT. CONTINUOUS PATH REQUIRED FBC10 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
14 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-30 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-30 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-30 15:55:45 | REVISION, S8 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-29 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-29 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-29 16:42:01 | ****PROVISOS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | NUMBERING FROM PREVIOUS BUILDING REVIEW #11 | | | | | | 4. FBC1024.12, PER BUILDING OFFICIAL, SEATS CANNOT BE | | | REMOVABLE. THIS WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, ALL SEATS | | | FIXED, REMOVE SEATS AT ACCESSIBLE AREA. | | | | | | 8. VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY AND ACCESSIBLE SEATING IS | | | REQUIRED TO EAST MEZZANINE AND FIRST FLOOR RAISED | | | SEATING. EITHER PROVIDE A WAIVER OR REVISE PLAN TO SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE HAVE EOR REVIEW THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING ON | | | THIS JOB, FAC61G15-31. THIS MAY BE DONE BY LETTER. | | | | | | 10. FBC1023.6, EITHER PROVIDE SAFE DISPERSAL AREA OR | | | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE PUBLIC WAY (EXIT DISCHARGE). | | | | | | 11. FBC1019.1.4, SEE PROVISO ON PLAN. EAST STAIR HAS | | | OPENINGS WITHIN 10FT; REVISE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FBC1019.1.4. | | | | | | 13. PROVISO - COMPLY WITH FBC1006.1, MEANS OF EGRESS | | | ILLUMINATION, INCLUDING BLEACHER STAIRS. | | | | | | 14. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE FOR THRESHOLD BUILDING | | | REQUIRED, FS553.79(7)(D). | | | | | | 15. REVISE SHEET LP1 AS DISCUSSED - EXIT FROM DOOR | | | (FIRST FLOOR) TO PUBLIC WAY IS BLOCKED BY LANDSCAPING | | | AND ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT. CONTINUOUS PATH REQUIRED FBC10 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-08-06 |
Time |
17:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-08-03 |
Time |
19:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-06 17:38:10 | ****PROVISOS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | NUMBERING FROM PREVIOUS BUILDING REVIEW #11 | | | | | | 4. FBC1024.12, PER BUILDING OFFICIAL, SEATS CANNOT BE | | | REMOVABLE. THIS WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, ALL SEATS | | | FIXED, REMOVE SEATS AT ACCESSIBLE AREA. | | | | | | 8. VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY AND ACCESSIBLE SEATING IS | | | REQUIRED TO EAST MEZZANINE AND FIRST FLOOR RAISED | | | SEATING. EITHER PROVIDE A WAIVER OR REVISE PLAN TO SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE HAVE EOR REVIEW THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING ON | | | THIS JOB, FAC61G15-31. THIS MAY BE DONE BY LETTER. | | | | | | 10. FBC1023.6, EITHER PROVIDE SAFE DISPERSAL AREA OR | | | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE PUBLIC WAY (EXIT DISCHARGE). | | | | | | 11. FBC1019.1.4, SEE PROVISO ON PLAN. EAST STAIR HAS | | | OPENINGS WITHIN 10FT; REVISE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FBC1019.1.4. | | | | | | 13. PROVISO - COMPLY WITH FBC1006.1, MEANS OF EGRESS | | | ILLUMINATION, INCLUDING BLEACHER STAIRS. | | | | | | 14. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE FOR THRESHOLD BUILDING | | | REQUIRED, FS553.79(7)(D). | | | | | | 15. IMPACT FEES REQUIRED FOR NEW MEZZANINES, 233-5025. | | | THIS REVISION IS SUBJECT TO RECEIPT OF STAMPED PLANS | | | AND RECEIPT. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-27 |
Time |
07:52 |
Rev Time |
2.75 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-25 |
Time |
14:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-27 07:52:01 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08090611 | | | ADD: 1590 FLORIDA MANGO | | | CONT: SOUTHEAST CERTIFIED | | | TEL: (561)635-6935 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC SUPPLEMENTS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | PHASE II REVIEW | | | ACTION: | | | BUILDING PROVISO: | | | 7-28-09 | | | | | | 1-10) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 11) A NEW EXTERIOR STAIR ON THE EAST END OF THE | | | BUILDING APPEARED TO HAVE UNPROTECTED OPENINGS WITHIN | | | 10 FT OF THE STAIR AND LANDINGS, INDICATING REVIEWING | | | 1019.1.4. | | | | | | 1019.1.4 VERTICAL ENCLOSURE EXTERIOR WALLS. | | | EXTERIOR WALLS OF A VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 704 FOR | | | EXTERIOR WALLS. WHERE NONRATED WALLS OR UNPROTECTED | | | OPENINGS ENCLOSE THE EXTERIOR OF THE STAIRWAY AND THE | | | WALLS OR OPENINGS ARE EXPOSED BY OTHER PARTS OF THE | | | BUILDING AT AN ANGLE OF LESS THAN 180 DEGREES (3.14 | | | RAD), THE BUILDING EXTERIOR WALLS WITHIN 10 FEET (3048 | | | MM) HORIZONTALLY OF A NONRATED WALL OR UNPROTECTED | | | OPENING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS REQUIRED FOR A MINIMUM | | | 1-HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING WITH ??-HOUR OPENING | | | PROTECTIVES. THIS CONSTRUCTION SHALL EXTEND VERTICALLY | | | FROM THE GROUND TO A POINT 10 FEET (3048 MM) ABOVE THE | | | TOPMOST LANDING OF THE STAIRWAY OR TO THE ROOF LINE, | | | WHICHEVER IS LOWER. | | | | | | SHEET 722 THE NEW ELEVATION CLEARLY INDICATES BENEATH | | | THE STAIR LANDING OF THE MEZZANINE, A ROLL UP DOOR, THE | | | MEZZANINE LEVEL THE EXTERIOR EXIT DOOR, NEITHER DOOR IS | | | INDICATED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE NOR DOES THE ELEVATION | | | INDICATE ANY FIRE RATING. THE PLANS ALSO FAIL TO | | | INDICATE FIRE RATINGS ON THE WINDOWS DIRECTLY NEXT TO | | | THE EXIT DOOR OF THE MEZZANINE LEVEL. IN BOTH CASES THE | | | OPENING PROTECTIVES WILL NEED TO BE ONE HOUR RATING. | | | THE OTHER WINDOWS THAT ARE ADJACENT (WITHIN 10 FT OF | | | THE LANDING) WILL NEED TO BE 45 MINUTE RATED OPENINGS, | | | THE LOUVER TO THE RIGHT OF THE LANDING. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | THE VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE WINDOWS DIRECTLY OVER | | | THE LANDING AND LEFT OF THE LANDING, ONCE THIS | | | DIMENSION IS KNOWN THEY ALSO MAY NEED TO BE FIRE RATED | | | OPENINGS. | | | | | | I SPOKE WITH BOTH ERIC ANDERSON AN CHRIS HAIR ABOURT | | | THE UNPROTECTED OPENING REQUIREMENTS. THEY WILL BE | | | WORKING ON THESE REQUIREMENTS AND WILL SUBMIT REVISIONS | | | TO THIS OFFICE BEFORE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL | | | BE ISSUED FOR THIS PHASE OF WORK. | | | | | | 11-15 COMPLIED. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | SURVEY: | | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-07-22 |
Time |
10:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-07-20 |
Time |
20:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-22 10:46:34 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | | | | 1. EACH PORTION OF A STRUCTURE IS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS | | | TO USE, FBC302.1. SHEET T, A4 IS DECLARED, BUT PLAN | | | SHOWS STORAGE, ARCADE (FBC302.2.1), CONCESSION | | | W/DINING. PLEASE CLARIFY SQUARE FOOT AREA PER OCCUPANCY | | | CLASSIFICATION. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC CHAPTER 5. PLAN | | | STATES THAT FBC507.2 ALLOWS UNLIMITED AREA; PLEASE SEE | | | COMMENT 1. PLEASE DECLARE BUILDING AS SEPARATED OR NON | | | SEPARATED USE, FBC302. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE NOTE THAT COMPLIANCE FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING | | | IS TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. SHEET T ACCOUNTS FOR THE | | | RINK AREAS ONLY, BUT THIS IS ONLY A PORTION OF THE | | | BUILDING. PLEASE REVISE AREA CALCULATIONS TO INCLUDE | | | ALL PARTS OF THE BUILDING, UNLESS SEPARATED BY A FIRE | | | WALL, FBC502. | | | | | | 4. FBC1024.12, SEATS SHALL BE SECURELY FASTENED TO THE | | | FLOOR. THE PLANS NOTE THAT SOME SEATS SHALL BE | | | REMOVABLE TO ACCOMMODATE ACCESSIBLE SEATING, SHEET 212. | | | PLEASE ADDRESS. ALSO NOTE THAT THIS PAGE IS LABELED | | | SECOND FLOOR SEATING PLAN; ISN???T THIS THE FIRST | | | FLOOR? | | | | | | 5. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW OCCUPANT LOAD HAS BEEN | | | CALCULATED. FOR INSTANCE, FIRST FLOOR STATES THAT | | | OCCUPANT LOAD HAS BEEN DETERMINED BY 36,225 SF, 50 SF | | | PER OCCUPANT, TOTAL OF 725. THE FIRST FLOOR CONSISTS OF | | | THE SKATING RINK (50 SF GROSS), FIXED SEATING (SEE | | | FBC1004.7), ARCADE (11 GROSS PER FBC TABLE 1004.1.2), | | | ETC. IT APPEARS THAT THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD MAY BE | | | CONSERVATIVE, BUT PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF | | | OCCUPANTS PER AREA TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FBC1004.1. | | | | | | SHEET T DECLARES 271 OCCUPANTS, SHEET 120 SHOWS 268 | | | TOTAL. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT LIFE SAFETY PLAN CORRELATES | | | WITH OTHER SHEETS. | | | | | | 6. AS THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD HAS CHANGED, PLEASE | | | EITHER PROVIDE EITHER A LETTER TO CONFIRM THAT | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FAC61G1-18.002 HAS BEEN MET IF REUSING | | | THE PREVIOUS ARCHITECT???S PLANS, OR PROVIDE NEW SIGNED | | | AND SEALED SHEETS FOR ALL SHEETS REQUIRED TO SHOW CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 7. FBC1004.3, OCCUPANT LOAD FOR EVERY ROOM OR SPACE | | | SHALL BE POSTED. THIS WILL BE A PROVISO ITEM. | | | | | | 8. FBC11-4.33.3, ACCESSIBLE SEATING CAPACITY IS OVER | | | 300; WHEELCHAIR SPACES TO BE PROVIDED IN MORE THAN ONE | | | LOCATION. ALL ACCESSIBLE SEATING IS SHOWN IN ONE | | | MEZZANINE. ARCHITECT ADVISED THAT HE WILL APPLY FOR A | | | WAIVER FOR THE EAST MEZZANINE, BUT WHEELCHAIR SEATING | | | IS TO BE PROVIDED AT THE FIRST FLOOR ALSO. VERTICAL | | | ACCESSIBILITY IS REQUIRED TO THE EAST MEZZANINE, | | | FBC11-4.1.3(5), AND ACCESSIBLE SEATING IS REQUIRED IN | | | THE EAST MEZZANINE, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY | | | WAIVER. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE HAVE EOR REVIEW THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING ON | | | THIS JOB, FAC61G15-31. | | | | | | 10. FBC1023.6, IT APPEARS THAT THE EXCEPTION APPLIES TO | | | THIS PROJECT (SAFE DISPERSAL AREA). THIS WILL BE A | | | PROVISO ITEM. | | | | | | 11. SEE FBC106, MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE ELEVATIONS OF BUILDING EXTERIOR. IT APPEARS | | | THAT THE PROPOSED NEW STAIRS ARE WITHIN 10FT OF | | | UNPROTECTED OPENINGS, SEE FBC1019.1.4. | | | | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE UPDATED VALUE FOR INCREASED SCOPE OF | | | WORK. | | | | | | 13. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC1006.1, MEANS OF | | | EGRESS ILLUMINATION. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE STAIRS | | | (INCLUDING THE FIXED SEATING) WILL COMPLY. | | | | | | 14. ENERGY CALCS GIVE A SF AREA OF 9600, PLANS STATE | | | 36,225. PLEASE REVISE OR EXPLAIN. | | | | | | 15. PLEASE CONTACT ME WHEN ALL REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE IF | | | ISSUANCE OF THIS REVISION WITH PROVISOS IS DESIRED. THE | | | PREFERENCE IS THAT ALL ITEMS BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE; HOWEVER, TO AVOID FIELD DELAYS, IT IS | | | POSSIBLE THAT THIS REVISION MAY BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO. | | | PLEASE CONTACT ME WHEN ALL REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE TO | | | DISCUSS HOW YOU WISH TO PROCEED. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-06-15 |
Time |
08:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-06-15 |
Time |
08:09 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-15 08:16:05 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1. AS THIS HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AS A REVISION, FBC2004 IS | | | GOVERNING CODE, ASCE7-02 IS CORRECT ASCE STANDARD, | | | FBC35. EITHER REVISE THE PLAN OR PROVIDE A LETTER | | | STATING THAT THE DESIGN COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF ASCE7-02. | | | | | | 2. FS553.79(7)(D), AS THIS IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING, | | | THIS STATEMENT IS REQUIRED. IF THE STATEMENT IS NOT | | | INCLUDED ON EACH SHEET, THE STATEMENT SHOULD BE | | | INCLUDED ON THE INDEX SHEET SO THAT IT IS CLEAR WHICH | | | "PLANS" THE STATEMENT REFERS TO. | | | | | | (D) ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF | | | RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE | | | ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND | | | SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM | | | BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY STANDARDS | | | AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER 633. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE THE VALUE FOR THE ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 4. IT APPEARS THAT THIS AREA IS TO BE A CHANGE OF | | | OCCUPANCY, FROM S1 TO A4. IMPACT FEES MAY BE DUE; | | | PLEASE CONTACT PALM BEACH COUNTY, 561-233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. THE PLANS ARE TO BE STAMPED AND THE | | | RECEIPT, IF FEES ARE DUE, INCLUDED AT TIME OF | | | RESUBMITTAL. IMPACT FEES ARE DUE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A | | | FOUNDATION PERMIT. | | | | | | 5. SHEET S5 REFERS TO FBC2007 AND HVZ. GOVERNING CODE | | | (DUE TO APPLICATION DATE) IS FBC2004 WITH 2007 | | | SUPPLEMENTS, AND PALM BEACH COUNTY IS NOT WITHIN THE | | | HVHZ. PLEASE NOTE THAT IN SOME INSTANCES, HVHZ IS LESS | | | STRINGENT THAN NON-HVHZ. PLEASE REVISE OR CLARIFY | | | INTENT. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dwise |
Date |
2009-06-01 |
Time |
21:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dwise |
Date |
2009-06-01 |
Time |
21:53 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-01 21:55:12 | APPROVED AS NOTED ON PLANS. MUST REVISE MEP PLANS TO | | | REFLECT RELOCATION OF STAIRS, MOST IMPORTANTLY SHEETS | | | E-2B AND E-4 TO REFLECT NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS OF | | | EGRESS LIGHTING OVER RELOCATED STAIR AND EXISTING MEANS | | | OF EGRESS CORRIDOR. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-05-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dwise |
Date |
2009-05-22 |
Time |
19:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dwise |
Date |
2009-05-22 |
Time |
19:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-27 19:42:33 | 1. STAIRWAY IS BLOCKING PRIMARY MEANS OF EGRESS FOR | | | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY. | | | CONTACTED ARCHITECT REQUESTING CORRECTIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
Time |
18:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
Time |
18:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-30 18:02:59 | REVISION #3 DATED 3/20/9 | | | SHEETS A.01, A01.1,A.02,A.06,A.07,A.10.1 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
17:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
17:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-04 17:12:46 | ****PROVISOS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | PROVISO - SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE FIRE RATED GLAZING WILL | | | BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. | | | | | | PROVISO - E3, E4, LS01 MISSING STROBES IN SOME | | | BATHROOMS - REVISE ACCORDINGLY PRIOR TO FIRE ALARM | | | INSTALLATION | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
17:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
17:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-04 17:07:56 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | | | | 37. SEE ENERGY CALCS; NO DOORS SHOWN, ICE RINK FLOOR IS | | | SHOWN AS CARPET. PLEASE REVISE THESE ITEMS AND CHECK | | | ALL INFORMATION ON THE ENERGY CALC INPUT DATA REPORT. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, THIS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. HOWEVER, PLEASE | | | EXPLAIN THE ROOF R VALUE; R19 BATT INSULATION IS SHOWN | | | (MULTIPLIED BY BTU) THAT IT HAS AN R VALUE OF 30. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY HOW R30.3 WILL BE ACHIEVED. | | | 3RD REVIEW, THIS HAS NOT BEEN REVISED OR EXPLAINED. | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME VIA EMAIL OR TELEPHONE TO | | | CLARIFY THIS NUMBER (R30). ALSO PLEASE NOTE THAT DOORS | | | AND WINDOWS HAVE NOW BEEN REMOVED FROM THE ENERGY | | | CALCS. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ALL BUILDING DATA IS CORRECT | | | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING. | | | | | | CALLED ENGINEER; WILL BRING NEW CALCS | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
Time |
17:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
Time |
17:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-10 17:16:09 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM FIRST REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED | | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD. PLEASE CALL | | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. THE PLANS MUST BE | | | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT IS TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | NOT COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ITEM | | | MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, BUT MAY BE DONE | | | AFTER ALL PLAN REVIEWS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED (NO RESUB | | | FEE IF SUBMITTAL IS FOR IMPACT FEE ONLY, AND HAS PASSED | | | ALL TRADES). | | | | | | 2-25. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 27. FBC13-101.3, BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH FBC13-4. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, TOTAL SF AREA TOTAL 46709, BUT THE PLANS | | | STATE THE RENOVATED AREA IS 44714. PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | 28. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 29. PROVISO - SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE FIRE RATED GLAZING | | | WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 30-35. ADDRESSED (SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR | | | AWNINGS). | | | | | | 36. SOILS REPORT, ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY | | | FAC61G15-23.002(2) REQUIRED (CERTIFICATE OF | | | AUTHORIZATION). PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REQUIREMENT HAS | | | RECENTLY BEEN REVISED. | | | | | | 37. SEE ENERGY CALCS; NO DOORS SHOWN, ICE RINK FLOOR IS | | | SHOWN AS CARPET. PLEASE REVISE THESE ITEMS AND CHECK | | | ALL INFORMATION ON THE ENERGY CALC INPUT DATA REPORT. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, THIS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. HOWEVER, PLEASE | | | EXPLAIN THE ROOF R VALUE; R19 BATT INSULATION IS SHOWN | | | (MULTIPLIED BY BTU) THAT IT HAS AN R VALUE OF 30. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY HOW R30.3 WILL BE ACHIEVED. | | | 3RD REVIEW, THIS HAS NOT BEEN REVISED OR EXPLAINED. | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME VIA EMAIL OR TELEPHONE TO | | | CLARIFY THIS NUMBER (R30). ALSO PLEASE NOTE THAT DOORS | | | AND WINDOWS HAVE NOW BEEN REMOVED FROM THE ENERGY | | | CALCS. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ALL BUILDING DATA IS CORRECT | | | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING. | | | | | | 38. PLEASE HAVE THE ARCHITECT SIGN THE ENERGY CALC, | | | FBC103.1.1.1. IF A TYPED NAME IS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF A | | | SIGNATURE, PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION | | | (INCLUDE THE EXISTING COMPONENTS, SUCH AS EXISTING | | | INSULATION) IS INCLUDED. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE LETTER | | | STATES HE WILL COMPLY. PLEASE REVISE ENERGY CALCS PER | | | REVIEW COMMENTS AND, WHEN RESUBMITTING, CONFIRM THAT | | | ARCHITECT HAS SIGNED THE APPROPRIATE LINE. | | | 3RD REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. SIGNATURE NOT INCLUDED, | | | PRINTED NAME NOT INCLUDED. | | | | | | 39-40. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 41. PROVISO - AT RISK (EXTERIOR PERMIT NOT YET ISSUED) | | | | | | 42-44. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 45. PROVISO - LOUVER PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED, | | | REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | | | | 46. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 47. PROVISO - E3, E4, LS01 MISSING STROBES IN SOME | | | BATHROOMS - REVISE ACCORDINGLY PRIOR TO FIRE ALARM | | | INSTALLATION | | | | | | 48. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 49. INFORMATIONAL ONLY; LEVEL III ALTERATION DECLARED. | | | SEE DEFINITION OF LEVEL III; THIS IS DEFINED AS HAVING | | | A WORK AREA OVER 50% OF BUILDING AREA, BUT THE NEW | | | INFORMATION REGARDING BUILDING AREA SHOWS THIS IS LESS | | | THAN 50%. PLEASE NOTE THAT IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO EXCEED | | | CODE COMPLIANCE; HOWEVER, IF LEVEL III IS DECLARED, IT | | | SHALL BE ENFORCED BOTH IN PLAN REVIEW AND IN THE FIELD | | | (INSPECTIONS). | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-30 |
Time |
09:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-27 |
Time |
14:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-30 09:00:16 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM FIRST REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED | | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD. PLEASE CALL | | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. THE PLANS MUST BE | | | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT IS TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | NOT COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ITEM | | | MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | | | 2-5. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 6. A01 SPECIFIES WP1200 WALL; PROVIDE A DETAIL FBC 7, | | | FBC*106. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, DETAIL W6 WAS ADDED TO A.10.1 BUT IS NOT | | | COMPLETE WITH ALL DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. FOR | | | INSTANCE, DETAIL STATES THAT METAL STUD IS TO BE ?AS | | | REQUIRED?. UL U497 HAS A MINIMUM GAUGE FOR METAL STUD. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE ALL SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF | | | THIS WALL, AND CHECK ALL OTHER UL ASSEMBLY DETAILS. | | | | | | 7. CV01 STATES THAT OFFICES, STORAGE, AND MERCANTILE | | | AREAS ARE ACCESSORY. DECLARE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA FOR | | | EACH FBC 5. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, ACCESSORY AREAS ARE NOT TO EXCEED 10%, | | | FBC302.2. THE STORAGE AREA SHOULD BE DECLARED S1, AND | | | THE BUILDING AS A MIXED OCCUPANCY, SEE FBC302.1, | | | FBC302.2. AS THE STORAGE AREAS EXCEED 20%, THEY CANNOT | | | BE DECLARED AS ACCESSORY USE. PLEASE SEE ALSO | | | FBC302.3.1. | | | | | | 8. THIS ITEM WAS ADDRESSED, BUT PLEASE SEE OTHER | | | COMMENTS REGARDING ISSUES WITH THE BUILDING CODE | | | SUMMARY. | | | | | | 9. NOTE ALL REQUIRED FIRE RATED WALLS ON THE PLAN. | | | OPENING AND PENETRATION PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, ETC. | | | ARE NOT READILY APPARENT WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION FBC7. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE INCLUDE FIRE RATING REQUIREMENT FOR | | | WALL TYPE W11. PLEASE SEE MECHANICAL COMMENTS REGARDING | | | MISSING FIRE DAMPERS (M SHEETS). | | | | | | IT APPEARS THAT THE ARCHITECT IS SPECIFYING A 2 HOUR | | | OCCUPANCY SEPARATION (HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL) AS WELL | | | AS A 1 HOUR CORRIDOR. SEE SHEET A13, FBC712.4.1.2, | | | SPECIFY LOCATIONS OF PENETRATIONS WITH A T RATING OF 0 | | | OR 1, OR OTHERWISE NOTE LIMITATION OF USE OF THESE | | | DETAILS. | | | | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE FBC706.1 AND FBC708.1, OCCUPANCY | | | SEPARATIONS ARE TO BE FIRE BARRIERS, NOT FIRE | | | PARTITIONS AS NOTED ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 10. DECLARE OCCUPANT LOAD FBC 1004. | | | | | | THIS ITEM WAS ADDRESSED, BUT SEE SHEETS E4 AND A01. THE | | | BREAK ROOM (A01) IS SHOWN AS A VIEWING ROOM (E4). IT IS | | | UNCLEAR AS TO HOW THIS AREA HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED ON | | | CV01. ALTHOUGH THE AREA IS SMALL, THIS MAY AFFECT | | | OCCUPANT LOAD; IT APPEARS THAT 100SF PER OCCUPANT HAS | | | BEEN USED, BUT POSSIBLY OCCUPANT LOAD AS HIGH AS 7SF | | | PER OCCUPANT MAY BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 11. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 12. SP01 SHOWS THREE DIFFERENT BUILDINGS. PLEASE SEE | | | FBC TABLE 503, FBC TABLE 601, FBC TABLE 602. DO FIRE | | | WALLS EXIST SEPARATING THESE BUILDINGS OR ARE THEY ONE | | | BUILDING FOR PURPOSES OF FBC CHAPTERS 5 AND 6? AN | | | OPENING IS SHOWN BETWEEN THE NORTH AND CENTER | | | BUILDINGS; SEE FBC TABLE 704.8, NO OPENINGS PERMITTED | | | WITH A SEPARATION OF 0 TO 3 FEET. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE SEE ROCAMAR ENGINEERING RESPONSES TO | | | ELECTRIC COMMENTS. HE STATES THAT THESE ARE THREE | | | SEPARATE BUILDINGS, YET THE ARCHITECT ON THE PLAN AND | | | IN THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THEY ARE ONE | | | BUILDING. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH OTHER DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONALS. THIS REVIEW HAS BEEN DONE ON THE | | | ASSUMPTION THAT THE ARCHITECT IS CORRECT, AND THE THREE | | | BUILDING AREAS ARE TO BE TREATED AS ONE BUILDING. IF | | | THE THREE BUILDING AREAS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED THREE | | | SEPARATE BUILDINGS, THEY MUST BE SEPARATED WITH FIRE | | | WALLS FBC705. | | | | | | 13. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 14. CV01, DECLARE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA FOR THE | | | BUILDING OR BUILDINGS (SEE OTHER COMMENTS), FBC5, FBC6, | | | FBC EB8. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE EXPLAIN BUILDING AREA DECLARED ON | | | CV01. THE ICE RINK AREA APPEARS TO BE APPROXIMATELY | | | 42,250, TOTAL SF AREA DECLARED ON CV1 IS 43,310. THIS | | | APPEARS TO BE LESS THAN HALF THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING. | | | SEE DEFINITION OF AREA, BUILDING, FBC502. IT APPEARS | | | THAT ONLY THE ICE RINK AREA WAS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT, YET | | | BY DEFINITION THIS IS NOT THE ENTIRE BUILDING. | | | INFORMATION REGARDING THE ENTIRE BUILDING, ALL THREE | | | SPACES, MUST BE SHOWN AS WELL AS COMPLIANCE WITH FBC | | | CHAPTER 5, BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLAN SHOWS A 2 HR DEMISING WALL, | | | NOT A 3 HOUR FIRE WALL SEPARATING BUILDINGS, SEE | | | DEFINITION FBC705, FBC TABLE 705. UNLIMITED AREA | | | BUILDING REQUIREMENT IS OPEN SPACE AROUND THE | | | PERIMETER, BUT IF THIS IS DESIGNED AS A ?SEPARATE | | | BUILDING?, ONE SIDE LACKS THE OPEN SPACE (THE SIDE | | | AGAINST THE OTHER BUILDING). IF THE ENTIRE BUILDING | | | AREA IS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT, INFORMATION REGARDING THE | | | OTHER PORTION(S) OF THE BUILDING MUST BE SHOWN TO | | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 5, FBC 6. | | | | | | CV.01 STATES THAT TWO STORIES ARE ALLOWED PER FBC503. | | | ONLY ONE STORY PERMITTED FOR UNLIMITED AREA BUILDINGS | | | FBC507.2; IF YOU CHOOSE TO DESIGN USING FBC TABLE 503 | | | PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE TABLE ALONG WITH | | | CALCULATIONS FOR ALLOWABLE INCREASES (SPRINKLER, OPEN | | | SPACE). | | | | | | INFORMATIONAL ONLY; PLEASE NOTE THAT S2 OCCUPANCY IS | | | FOR NON COMBUSTIBLE STORAGE AS DEFINED IN FBC311.3. IF | | | THIS OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION IS DECLARED FOR THE OTHER | | | SPACES, SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION WILL BE REQUIRED. S1 | | | IS THE MORE TYPICAL CLASSIFICATION FBC311.2. | | | | | | 15. CV01, PROVIDE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREAS FOR THE | | | PROPOSED MEZZANINES AS WELL AS OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION | | | FOR THE USE OF THESE SPACES, FBC 3, FBC10, FBC11. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE SEE ELECTRIC COMMENTS, MEP AND | | | STRUCTURAL SHEETS. STAIRS ARE STILL SHOWN ON THE PLAN | | | TO A MEZZANINE AREA, YET THE ARCHITECT STATES THAT | | | THERE IS NO MEZZANINE AT THIS TIME AND HAS REMOVED THE | | | MEZZANINE FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LIFE SAFETY | | | SHEETS. PLEASE COORDINATE. ALL PLANS SHOULD REFLECT THE | | | SAME FLOOR PLAN. | | | | | | S2 STILL REFERS TO THE EQUIPMENT PLATFORM AS A | | | MEZZANINE. SEE PREVIOUS COMMENT LIST REGARDING CODE | | | ISSUES FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IN A MEZZANINE. PLEASE | | | COORDINATE ALL TRADES; A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE DONE | | | DUE TO CONFLICTING INFORMATION. | | | | | | ALSO PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING THIS AREA. | | | | | | 16. THE MEZZANINE AREAS MUST MEET THE DEFINITION | | | FBC502. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, SEE COMMENT 15. PLANS SUBMITTED ARE NOT | | | CONSISTENT AND CODE COMPLIANCE FBC502 HAS NOT BEEN | | | SHOWN. | | | | | | 17-19. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 20. SEE FBC*109.3.6.4.4, FS553.79(7)(D) AND INCLUDE THE | | | STATEMENT ATTESTING TO COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT?S PLAN SHOWS CODE | | | COMPLIANCE FOR BUILDING AREA, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING, ETC. THIS SHEET SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE | | | THE STATEMENT REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE, OR HAVE | | | OTHER DESIGN PROFESSIONALS TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR | | | THESE ITEMS. | | | | | | 22. PLANS ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED FS481. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE A DATE ON THE SEAL. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, PLANS ARE NOW SIGNED AND DATED BUT ONE SET | | | IS NOT SEALED, FS481. | | | | | | 23-24. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 25. FP SHEETS DO NOT HAVE A FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN FOR THE | | | MEZZANINE AREAS. | | | | | | THIS WAS PROVIDED FOR THE MECHANICAL PLATFORM, BUT NOT | | | FOR THE STRUCTURAL DECK (FUTURE MEZZANINE). PLEASE | | | REVISE OR SHOW WHERE IN NFPA13 THIS AREA IS EXEMPTED. | | | THE SAME SPACE IS BEING CREATED, BUT WITHOUT ACCESS | | | STAIRS, IT SEEMS THAT THE FIRE RISK REMAINS. | | | | | | 26. A01 SPECIFY FIRE RATING (TIME) REQUIRED FOR THE | | | WP1200 WALL, SOUTH SIDE. | | | | | | ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS WAS ADDED. | | | SEE A01, UNABLE TO FIND INFORMATION REGARDING FIRE | | | RATING FOR THE EXISTING DEMISING WALL. | | | | | | 27. FBC13-101.3, BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH FBC13-4. | | | | | | ENERGY CALCS WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | A. THE ENERGY CALCS DO NOT APPEAR TO INCLUDE THE SHELL | | | FOR UNIT B. PLEASE REVISE. SQUARE FOOT AREA AND | | | COMPONENTS ARE TO CORRELATE WITH THE PLANS. SEE | | | FBC13-101.1.6. | | | | | | 28. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 29. ADDRESSED; PLEASE NOTE THAT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE | | | FIRE RATED GLAZING WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | INSTALLATION (PROVISO ITEM). | | | | | | 30-32. PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING THE | | | MEZZANINE. IF MEZZANINES ARE INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT, | | | PLEASE ADDRESS COMMENTS. | | | | | | 33. A03, AS CANOPY INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED, A | | | SEPARATE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED (INFORMATIONAL ONLY). | | | | | | 34. PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE UPPER LEVEL | | | AREAS. SEE FBC505.5, INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT PLATFORMS ARE | | | NOT TO BE A PART OF ANY MEZZANINE. ALSO DECLARE | | | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FOR THESE AREAS, FBC CHAPTER | | | 3. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, SEE FBC 502DEFINITIONS, INDUSTRIAL | | | EQUIPMENT PLATFORMS ARE LIMITED TO USE IN INDUSTRIAL | | | OCCUPANCIES. PLEASE RECLASSIFY THIS AREA OR REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED IN FBC CHAPTER 5. NOTE THAT THE ENTIRE SPACE | | | WAS CLASSIFIED AS A4, SEE SHEET CV.01. SEE ALSO OTHER | | | COMMENTS REGARDING OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. | | | | | | MEP AND STRUCTURAL SHEETS SHOW STAIRS TO THE WEST | | | MEZZANINE AREA, ARCHITECTURALS HAVE REMOVED ACCESS. | | | EQUIPMENT PLATFORM SHOWN AS MEZZANINE ON STRUCTURAL | | | DRAWINGS. PLEASE COORDINATE. | | | | | | 35. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 36. SOILS REPORT, ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY | | | FAC61G15-23.002(2) REQUIRED (CERTIFICATE OF | | | AUTHORIZATION). PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REQUIREMENT HAS | | | RECENTLY BEEN REVISED. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 37. SEE ENERGY CALCS; NO DOORS SHOWN, ICE RINK FLOOR IS | | | SHOWN AS CARPET. PLEASE REVISE THESE ITEMS AND CHECK | | | ALL INFORMATION ON THE ENERGY CALC INPUT DATA REPORT. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, THIS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. HOWEVER, PLEASE | | | EXPLAIN THE ROOF R VALUE; R19 BATT INSULATION IS SHOWN | | | (MULTIPLIED BY BTU) THAT IT HAS AN R VALUE OF 30. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY HOW R30.3 WILL BE ACHIEVED. | | | | | | SEE SHEET A06, WALL SECTION DOES NOT SPECIFY BATT | | | INSULATION. IT SPECIFIES NEW INSULATED EXTERIOR WALL | | | AND ROOF PANELS, BUT R VALUE HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED OR | | | SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. FBC*106, FBC13. | | | | | | 38. PLEASE HAVE THE ARCHITECT SIGN THE ENERGY CALC, | | | FBC103.1.1.1. IF A TYPED NAME IS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF A | | | SIGNATURE, PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION | | | (INCLUDE THE EXISTING COMPONENTS, SUCH AS EXISTING | | | INSULATION) IS INCLUDED. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE LETTER | | | STATES HE WILL COMPLY. PLEASE REVISE ENERGY CALCS PER | | | REVIEW COMMENTS AND, WHEN RESUBMITTING, CONFIRM THAT | | | ARCHITECT HAS SIGNED THE APPROPRIATE LINE. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 39. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE | | | EXISTING ASPHALT ENTRY ROAD. IS THIS ENTIRELY ASPHALT | | | OR IS THERE AN EXISTING SIDEWALK? SEE FBC11-1.2, | | | FBC11-4.1.2(1), FBC11-4.1.6(1)(K), SHEET SP1. IT | | | APPEARS THAT A SIDEWALK IS TO BE REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE | | | BERMS. ALSO IT APPEARS THAT THE SLIDING GATE (TO BE | | | RELOCATED) BLOCKS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE PUBLIC | | | WAY TO THE BUILDING. PLEASE REVISE SITE PLAN TO CLARIFY | | | SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 40. REGARDING THE PROPOSED BERMS, PLEASE SEE | | | FBC*109.3.10, IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE SHOW HOW | | | THE DRAINAGE FOR THE ADJACENT PARCEL WILL BE AFFECTED | | | BY THE PROPOSED BERM CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 41. THE PLANS STATE THAT THE EXTERIOR IS ON A SEPARATE | | | PERMIT, VARIOUS SHEETS INCLUDING SHEET CV01 WHICH | | | REFERS TO 08090571. AT THIS TIME, ONLY DEMO FOR THE | | | EXTERIOR HAS BEEN ISSUED. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE EXTERIOR | | | RENOVATION PLANS UNDER PERMIT 08090571, OR PROVIDE ALL | | | INFORMATION FOR THE BUILDING EXTERIOR WITH THIS | | | RESUBMITTAL, OR AS A REVISION TO THE DEMO PERMIT. THIS | | | MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT; | | | INFORMATION AND COMPLIANCE FOR 140MPH MUST BE | | | DEMONSTRATED FBC1609. | | | | | | 42. THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ICE RINK | | | AREA IN THE TRAVEL DISTANCE. THIS MUST BE INCLUDED, | | | FROM WORST CASE (DISTANCE FARTHEST FROM RINK EGRESS). | | | | | | SEE SHEET LS01. IT STATES LIFE SAFETY IS PER TABLE 1004 | | | AND 704. TABLE 1004 IS TO DETERMINE OCCUPANT LOAD, 704 | | | SPECIFIES FIRE RATING REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR WALL. | | | SHEET CV01 CORRECTLY STATES THAT EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL | | | DISTANCE LIMITATION IS 200FEET. IT ALSO STATES THAT | | | MAXIMUM IS 168FEET. SHEET LS01 STATES THAT REQUIRED | | | TRAVEL DISTANCE IS 325FEET, 179 FEET PROVIDED. SEE FBC | | | TABLE 1015.1. 200 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED (NOT | | | REQUIRED). WHY WOULD CV01 STATE 168 FEET, WHICH IS LESS | | | THAN 179 FEET? IT APPEARS THAT THE TRAVEL DISTANCE OF | | | 179 FEET DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ICE ARENA, PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | THE SAME TABLE STATES THAT ? HR FIRE RATING IS REQUIRED | | | FOR CORRIDORS, BUT 1 HOUR IS REQUIRED. IT STATES THAT | | | 25FT DEAD END CORRIDOR IS REQUIRED, BUT ONLY 20FEET IS | | | PERMITTED FBC1016. PLEASE CHECK ALL INFORMATION ON THE | | | LIFE SAFETY PLAN AND CONFIRM COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 43. FBC717.2.3, A02, FIREBLOCKING REQUIRED, SOFFIT | | | DETAIL (INTERIOR WALLS). | | | | | | 44. FBC11-4.13.11, DOORS IN THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO | | | COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT (PULLING FORCE). THIS | | | WOULD NORMALLY BE A REDLINE ITEM; HOWEVER, AS PLANS | | | NEED TO BE REVISED, PLEASE ADDRESS AT THIS TIME. IMPACT | | | DOORS ARE SPECIFIED; DO THEY MEET THIS REQUIREMENT? | | | | | | 45. LOUVER PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE INCOMPLETE. PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, FBC*106. PLANS DO NOT SPECIFY | | | DESIGN PRESSURES, SEE A05. | | | | | | 46. PLEASE SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS, FIRST REVIEW. THE | | | EXECUTIVE OFFICE PRIVATE BATH IS TO BE ADAPTABLE, | | | FBC11-4.1.3(11). THE ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES | | | THAT THIS WILL BE "EASILY CONVERTIBLE". THIS REQUIRES | | | THAT NO STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS BE NECESSARY TO BE MADE | | | FROM ADAPTABLE TO ACCESSIBLE, INCLUDING TURNING RADIUS, | | | FIXTURE DISTANCES AND CLEARANCES, AND BACKING IN THE | | | WALL FOR FUTURE GRAB BAR INSTALLATION. PLEASE SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 47. E4 AND LS01, SEE FBC11-4.28.1, VISUAL SIGNAL | | | APPLIANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN RESTROOMS AND ANY | | | GENERAL USAGE AREA. THIS IS NOT SHOWN IN THE MEN AND | | | WOMEN RESTROOM ADJACENT TO THE LOCKER ROOMS #1 AND #2, | | | ALARMS NOT SHOWN IN UNIT B. PLEASE CHECK ALL AREAS FOR | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 48. PLEASE CLARIFY, DOES THE GATE AT THE RINK SWING IN | | | BOTH DIRECTIONS? PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE | | | ?DASHER BOARD?. SEE FBC1003.6, PATH OF EGRESS IS NOT TO | | | BE INTERRUPTED BY ELEMENT OTHER THAN A MEANS OF EGRESS | | | COMPONENT. OCCUPANT LOAD IS GREATER THAN 50, SO DOORS | | | SHOULD SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL FBC1008.1.2, | | | FBC1008. | | | | | | 49. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B). A 4X PLAN | | | REVIEW FEE IS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE TO BE CHARGED | | | IF ANY CODE COMMENT IS MADE A THIRD TIME. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-27 |
Time |
09:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-27 |
Time |
09:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-27 09:38:25 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1. IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED | | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD. PLEASE CALL | | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. THE PLANS MUST BE | | | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT IS TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. FBC EB301.5, A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL MUST ELECT ONE OR | | | A COMBINATION OF LEVELS OF ALTERATION. | | | | | | 3. NOTE ANY CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY ON THE PLAN IF | | | APPLICABLE, FBC EB CHAPTER 8. DECLARE CURRENT | | | (EXISTING) AND PROPOSED OCCUPANCY AND HAZARD CATEGORY | | | FOR LIFE SAFETY AND EXITS, HEIGHT AND AREA, EXPOSURE OF | | | EXTERIOR WALLS FBC EB TABLES 812.4.1, 812.4.2, 812.4.3. | | | REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE DETERMINED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT | | | INFORMATION PROVIDED. | | | | | | 4. ADDITIONS ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC EB 9. PLEASE NOTE | | | ON PLAN CV01. | | | | | | 5. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE | | | BUILDING(S), FBC 507, FBC 6, FBC EB 8. PLEASE REVISE | | | THE SITE PLAN SP01 TO INCLUDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. | | | | | | 6. A01 SPECIFIES WP1200 WALL; PROVIDE A DETAIL FBC 7, | | | FBC*106. | | | | | | 7. CV01 STATES THAT OFFICES, STORAGE, AND MERCANTILE | | | AREAS ARE ACCESSORY. DECLARE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA FOR | | | EACH FBC 5. | | | | | | 8. CV01 STATES THAT THIS BUILDING IS TYPE IIIB, 1 HOUR | | | FOR EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS. SEE FBC TABLE 601, 2 HOUR | | | REQUIRED FOR EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS TYPE IIIB. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY BUILDING TYPE. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE | | | EXISTING EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS TO CLARIFY BUILDING | | | TYPE. | | | | | | 9. NOTE ALL REQUIRED FIRE RATED WALLS ON THE PLAN. | | | OPENING AND PENETRATION PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, ETC. | | | ARE NOT READILY APPARENT WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION FBC7. | | | | | | 10. DECLARE OCCUPANT LOAD FBC 1004. | | | | | | 11. FBC1004.3, OCCUPANT LOAD TO BE POSTED. PROVIDE A | | | DETAIL AND LOCATION ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 12. SP01 SHOWS THREE DIFFERENT BUILDINGS. PLEASE SEE | | | FBC TABLE 503, FBC TABLE 601, FBC TABLE 602. DO FIRE | | | WALLS EXIST SEPARATING THESE BUILDINGS OR ARE THEY ONE | | | BUILDING FOR PURPOSES OF FBC CHAPTERS 5 AND 6? AN | | | OPENING IS SHOWN BETWEEN THE NORTH AND CENTER | | | BUILDINGS; SEE FBC TABLE 704.8, NO OPENINGS PERMITTED | | | WITH A SEPARATION OF 0 TO 3 FEET. | | | | | | 13. A.01 SHOWS A NEW DEMISING WALL ADJACENT TO AN | | | EXISTING WALL. DOESN?T THIS CREATE A LARGE CONCEALED | | | SPACE? | | | | | | 14. CV01, DECLARE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA FOR THE | | | BUILDING OR BUILDINGS (SEE OTHER COMMENTS), FBC5, FBC6, | | | FBC EB8. | | | | | | 15. CV01, PROVIDE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREAS FOR THE | | | PROPOSED MEZZANINES AS WELL AS OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION | | | FOR THE USE OF THESE SPACES, FBC 3, FBC10, FBC11. | | | | | | 16. THE MEZZANINE AREAS MUST MEET THE DEFINITION | | | FBC502. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 17. THERE IS A STATEMENT, UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, A.03, | | | TOP LEFT, ?COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH FIRST FLOOR PLAN.? | | | WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? WHAT ARE EXTENTS? | | | | | | 18. AS THIS IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING AS DEFINED IN | | | FS553.71(7), PLEASE ARRANGE WITH KEN CONRAD, CHIEF | | | BUILDING INSPECTOR, 561-805-6666, A MEETING INVOLVING | | | THE OWNER, SPECIAL INSPECTOR, JOB INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR | | | AND ENGINEER. THIS MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE. THREE ORIGINAL SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS ARE | | | REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING AND FOR ALL SUBSEQUENT | | | SUBMITTALS. SEE FBC*109.3.6, FS553.79(5)(A). | | | | | | 19. PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN FOR THIS | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING, FBC*109.3.6, FS553.79(5)(A). | | | | | | 20. SEE FBC*109.3.6.4.4, FS553.79(7)(D) AND INCLUDE THE | | | STATEMENT ATTESTING TO COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 21. FBC*109.3.6.4, THRESHOLD INSPECTOR IS TO BE | | | APPROVED BY KEN CONRAD, CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR. A | | | COPY OF THE CONTRACT IS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PERMIT | | | PACKAGE. THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, | | | FS553.79. | | | | | | 22. PLANS ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED FS481. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE A DATE ON THE SEAL. | | | | | | 23. SEE FP1, FBC 35, INCORRECT NFPA13 VERSION | | | REFERENCED; PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | 24. SEE FP1, INCORRECT BUILDING CODE DECLARED. PLEASE | | | REVISE. | | | | | | 25. FP SHEETS DO NOT HAVE A FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN FOR THE | | | MEZZANINE AREAS. | | | | | | 26. A01. SPECIFY FIRE RATING (TIME) REQUIRED FOR THE | | | WP1200 WALL, SOUTH SIDE. | | | | | | 27. FBC13-101.3, BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH FBC13-4. | | | | | | 28. WALL TYPE W4B IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE LEGEND A01. | | | SEE FBC TABLE 1016.1, MINIMUM OF 1 HOUR REQUIRED FOR | | | THIS CORRIDOR. | | | | | | 29. WALL TYPE NOT SPECIFIED FOR THE WALL AT DOORS 3A | | | AND 3B. | | | | | | 30. A03, EGRESS NOT CLEAR FOR THE UPPER LEVEL, WEST | | | SIDE. PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN. | | | | | | 31. SHOW VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY, UPPER LEVEL. IF AN | | | EXCEPTION APPLIES, COMPLIANCE MUST BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 32. C A08, EXTENSION SHOWN AT THE BOTTOM OF THE STAIR | | | WHICH IS NOT SHOWN ON THE DETAIL 5 A08. PLEASE REVISE 5 | | | A08, FBC 11 4.9.4(2). | | | | | | 33. A03, AS CANOPY INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED, A | | | SEPARATE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED (INFORMATIONAL ONLY). | | | | | | 34. PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE UPPER LEVEL | | | AREAS. SEE FBC505.5, INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT PLATFORMS ARE | | | NOT TO BE A PART OF ANY MEZZANINE. ALSO DECLARE | | | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FOR THESE AREAS, FBC CHAPTER | | | 3. | | | | | | 35. A10, THE SPECIFY FIRE DOOR RATING IN TIME RATHER | | | THAN LETTER, FBC TABLE 715.3. | | | | | | 36. SOILS REPORT, ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY | | | FAC61G15-23.002(2) REQUIRED (CERTIFICATE OF | | | AUTHORIZATION). PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REQUIREMENT HAS | | | RECENTLY BEEN REVISED. | | | | | | 37. SEE ENERGY CALCS; NO DOORS SHOWN, ICE RINK FLOOR IS | | | SHOWN AS CARPET. PLEASE REVISE THESE ITEMS AND CHECK | | | ALL INFORMATION ON THE ENERGY CALC INPUT DATA REPORT. | | | | | | 38. PLEASE HAVE THE ARCHITECT SIGN THE ENERGY CALC, | | | FBC103.1.1.1. IF A TYPED NAME IS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF A | | | SIGNATURE, PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION | | | (INCLUDE THE EXISTING COMPONENTS, SUCH AS EXISTING | | | INSULATION) IS INCLUDED. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
14 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-12-03 |
Time |
14:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-12-03 |
Time |
14:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-03 14:00:55 | OK ONCE ZONING HAS REVIEWED AND PASSED ES SHEETS. | | | STAMPED ELECTRICAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-10-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-10-09 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-10-09 |
Time |
14:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-09 14:38:56 | | | | ** DENIED REVISION ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL SETS ARE COMPLETE WITH ALL | | | REVISED SHEETS. ONE SET WAS MISSING A REVISED SHEET | | | ES-1 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SECOND FLOOR CORRIDOR WHERE | | | OCCUPANCY SENSORS HAVE BEEN REMOVED AS THE METHOD OF | | | CONTROLS. WHERE ARE THE REQUIRED OVER RIDES IF LIGHTING | | | IS NOW GOING TO BE CONTROLLED BY TIMED SCHEDULING? | | | PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT ROOM 222, 223, WHERE ARE LIGHTING | | | CONTROLS? | | | WHAT ABOUT ROOM 125? WHAT TYPE OF CONTROL DEVICE IS | | | THIS? | | | CONTROLS IN MAIN ENTRANCE/LOBBY AREAS HAVE HAD CONTROLS | | | REVISED HOWEVER IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE ALL LIGHTING IS | | | BEING CONTROLLED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ENLARGED LAYOUT FOR | | | THE COMMON AREAS. PLANS CONTAIN MANY ITEMS AND IT IS | | | NOT CLEAR WHERE CONTROLS AND OVER RIDES ARE ALL | | | LOCATED. | | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2, .1.3 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE AN ENLARGED LAYOUT FOR NEW | | | ELECTRICAL IN WAREHOUSE *B* AREA. | | | PLANS INDICATE AN EXISTING FIRE PUMP HOWEVER IT IS NOT | | | CLEAR IF THIS IS A LEGALLY REQUIRED FIRE PUMP. IT IS NO | | | CLEAR OF THE LOCATION IN THE BUILDING IN WHICH THIS | | | FIRE PUMP IS LOCATED. PLEASE SEE NFPA-70 695 AND | | | NFPA-20 FOR LOCATIONS AND RATINGS OF WALLS ETC. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW PANEL RWB HAS NOW HAD LOAD | | | INCREASED BY THE EXISTING PANELS AND LOADS BEING ADDED | | | HOWEVER THE MAIN SERVICE LOAD CALCULATIONS HAVE NOT | | | BEEN UPDATED. THE LOADS ARE THE SAME AS ON PREVIOUS E-6 | | | PLANS. | | | THE SAME COMMENT IS FOR PANEL R1B WHICH NOW HAS REVISED | | | LOAD FOR NEW PANEL R1BA, YET THE SERVICE LOADS HAVE NOT | | | CHANGED? | | | PLEASE SEE NEC 220 IN GENERAL AND UPDATE LOADS. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: NO INFORMATION HAS YET BEEN SUBMITTED WITH | | | RESPECT TO TWO SEPARATE PROPERTIES. NO ELECTRICAL SUCH | | | AS SITE LIGHTING MAY CROSS PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: AS NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED ON THE | | | EXISTING FIRE PUMP AND JOCKEY PUMP THE NEW UNDER | | | SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS ETC COULD NOT BE VERIFIED | | | AS BEING CODE COMPLIANT. | | | ALSO COULD NOT VERIFY BONDING OF SERVICES AS NO | | | INFORMATION WAS SHOWN. NEW SERVICE FOR FIRE PUMP AND | | | THE EXISTING/NEW SERVICE NEEDS TO BE BONDED. 250.92,94 | | | ETC, 250.66 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | **IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-26 |
Time |
18:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-26 |
Time |
18:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-26 18:51:09 | ** PROVISO/REDLINED PLANS** | | | | | | *** THE FOLLOWING ARE SET FORTH AS A PROVISO. SOME | | | ITEMS *MUST BE COMPLETED FOR PHASE #1. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PHASE #1, EM-1 FIXTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT | | | TEMPORARY EXIT, ENTRANCE ON THE EAST SIDE OF BUILDING | | | FOR OCCUPANCY. EM-1 FIXTURES SHALL ALSO BE INSTALLED AT | | | THIS TIME ON SOUTH SIDE OF BUILDING WHERE EGRESS FROM | | | ICE RINK AREA TO PARKING LOT IS TAKING PLACE. THIS WAS | | | CONFIRMED WITH FIRE MARSHAL. | | | THIS WAS REVISED ON TCO TO BE DONE AT THIS TIME AS A | | | CONDITION. | | | NFPA- 101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.1.2, .2.2. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: THE ELECTRICAL LIGHTING AND ANY OTHER POWER | | | CROSSING PROPERTY LINE SHALL NOT BE DONE UNTIL | | | RE-PLAT/UNITY OF TITLE HAS TAKEN PLACE. THIS WAS NOTED | | | ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AND REVIEW BACK ON DECEMBER 25TH | | | 2008. | | | THIS IS FOR PCN 74434329000001230. | | | INFORMATION HAS BEEN GIVEN TO ATTORNEY FOR OWNER. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: INFORMATION ON UPS TO PROVIDE BACK UP POWER | | | FOR THE *D* TYPE FIXTURES IS STILL NEEDED. PLEASE SEE | | | NEC 700.12 FOR ACCEPTABLE MEANS OF BACK UP POWER. THE | | | GENERATOR MAY NOT BE USED AS IT IS AN OPTIONAL STAND-BY | | | SYSTEM UNDER NEC 702. | | | | | | ** FIRE ALARM, LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS ARE UNDER SEPARATE | | | PERMITS. | | | | | | **** IMPORTANT: | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-21 |
Time |
19:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-21 |
Time |
19:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-21 19:50:35 | | | | | | | | | | ** DENIED REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** THE ELECTRICAL NOTES BELOW WERE GONE OVER WITH | | | ENGINEER???S OFFICE ON 8/21/09. CHANGES ARE TO BE MADE | | | AND SHEETS REVISED. | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: ELECTRICAL SITE PLANS NOW ONCE AGAIN INCLUDE | | | LIGHTING BEING FED FROM THIS BUILDING ACROSS PROPERTY | | | LINE TO PCN 74434329000001230. SPOKE TO ZONING, | | | ADDRESSING, ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER???S OFFICE. | | | RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE OR RE-PLAT OF PROPERTY NEEDS TO | | | BE PROVIDED. | | | IF THIS IS NOT DONE, NO LIGHTING, GATES OR OTHER | | | ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS MAY CROSS THE PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: ALL PREVIOUS SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | WERE UNDER METHOD *B*. THE NEW SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS | | | ARE NOW SUBMITTED UNDER METHOD *A* FOR WHOLE BUILDING | | | COMPLIANCE. THIS IS NOT A WHOLE BUILDING PER | | | DEFINITIONS UNDER CHAPTER 2 AND SECTION 202 OF CHAPTER | | | 13. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE METHOD B PER 13-400.B.0.4 | | | SEE DEFINITION OF RENOVATION. | | | | | | ** IDR MISSING P-5 FOR EXTERIOR. THIS ALONG WITH FRONT | | | ENTRANCE IS NOT CONSIDERED A GROSS ERROR PER 13-103.3, | | | PLEASE UPDATE METHOD. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE ADJUST LIGHTING CONTROLS TO MEET | | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. ALL LIGHTING WITH THE | | | EXCEPTION OF THE DESIGNATED NIGHT LIGHTS AS GONE OVER | | | IN MEETING AND ON PHONE ARE REQUIRED TO TURN OFF | | | AUTOMATICALLY WHEN BUILDING IS NOT OCCUPIED. | | | | | | A) RIBBON LIGHTING CONTROLS TO MEET .1.3 OF SECTION | | | NOTED ABOVE. | | | | | | B) G FIXTURES NEED TO HAVE SEPARATE WITH AUTOMATIC SHUT | | | OFFS. | | | | | | C) CONTROLS FOR SECOND FLOOR EAST CORRIDOR LIGHTS NEED | | | TO MEET SECTION .1.1, .1.2 ABOVE. THE DLT SWITCHES | | | LOCATED ON FIRST FLOOR NEEDS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF | | | THE OCCUPANT SEEING THE LIGHTING WHICH IS BEING | | | CONTROLLED OR MEET EXCEPTIONS. | | | PER CONVERSATION WITH DESIGNER THESE MAY BE CHANGED TO | | | OCCUPANCY SENSORS ON FAIL-SAFE OPERATION. | | | | | | D) SEE NOTES BELOW WITH RESPECT TO CIRCUITING OF OTHER | | | EMERGENCY LIGHTING BEING CONTROLLED. FOR EXAMPLE: | | | CIRCUITS SUCH AS HPA-9, EH1A-16, WHICH ARE THROUGH THE | | | LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL NEED TO BE * HOT* ALL THE TIME. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE *D* FIXTURES WILL MEET | | | LIFE SAFETY FOR BACK UP POWER. THE PLANS INDICATE THESE | | | FIXTURES WILL BE ON TRANSFORMERS HOWEVER THERE ARE NO | | | UPS SYSTEM(S)/ UNITS ON PLANS FOR THE BACK UP OF THESE | | | FIXTURES. | | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9,.1.2, .2.2 AND NFPA-70 | | | 700.12A, 700.12C, 700.12F ETC | | | THIS WAS GONE OVER WITH THE DESIGNER. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT EXIT AREAS LOCATED OUTSIDE | | | WHERE STEPS ARE PRESENT NEED TO CONTAIN LIGHTING FOR | | | EGRESS. PLEASE SEE ES-1 AND E2-B, THE SOUTHEAST FIRST | | | FLOOR EXIT AND THE SOUTH EXIT. THIS WAS GONE OVER ON | | | PREVIOUS MEETINGS AND WITH DESIGNER ON PHONE. THESE ARE | | | ALSO TO BE CIRCUITED PER 700.12F. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: THE NIGHT-LIGHT CIRCUITS ON PLANS INDICATE | | | CIRCUITING THROUGH *EH1B-7*, HOWEVER THERE IS NO EH1B | | | PANEL. THESE WERE GONE OVER WITH DESIGNER AND SHOULD BE | | | EH1A-15; ALSO PANEL SCHEDULE DESIGNATION STATES ICE | | | RINK WHEN ACTUALLY THIS IS FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR NIGHT | | | LIGHTS WEST. | | | THIS WAS GONE OVER WITH DESIGNER. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE CIRCUIT H1B-7 FOR *D* FIXTURES ABOVE IN | | | NOTE #4 WHICH ARE ACTUALLY BLANK ON PANEL SCHEDULE. | | | THIS WAS GONE OVER WITH DESIGNER. | | | | | | | | | ** NOTES WERE GONE OVER WITH DESIGNER AND CORRECTIONS | | | WILL BE BROUGHT IN THE WEEK OF 8/24. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-08-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-09 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-09 |
Time |
9:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-09 11:35:38 | | | | | | | | | | | | | ** DENIED REVIEW OF REVISIONS** | | | | | | ** AT PREVIOUS MEETING HELD WITH ARCHITECT, OWNER | | | REPRESENTATIVE, CONTRACTOR, PERMIT EXPEDITOR AND OTHER | | | CITY STAFF IT WAS NOTED THAT NO MEP DESIGN TEAM MEMBERS | | | WERE PRESENT. AT THIS TIME IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED | | | THAT A MEETING BE HELD BEFORE PLANS ARE RESUBMITTED | | | ONCE AGAIN. | | | SOME OF THE NOTES BELOW WILL HAVE AN AFFECT ON PHASE I | | | TCO. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: THE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED A VALUE UPDATE | | | FOR THE PROJECT AS THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK HAS | | | SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASED. THE NEW VALUE STATED ON | | | RESPONSE IS ACTUALLY LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL APPLIED | | | VALUE. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK | | | VALUE IS REQUIRED TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, | | | EQUIPMENT, DESIGN COSTS. THIS INCLUDES ALL EQUIPMENT | | | WHICH MAY BE OWNER PURCHASED OR SUPPLIED. | | | FBC 108.3 | | | COMPLETE CONTRACTS WITH ALL RELEVANT PARTIES INCLUDING | | | DETAILED LISTS OF ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS CAN BE | | | REQUESTED. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 13-415.AB.2.2, .5 AS THE SUBMITTED | | | LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT COORDINATING | | | WITH THE SUBMITTED PLANS FOR THIS PROJECT. THE SEPARATE | | | PERMIT SUBMITTED FOR SITE LIGHTING DOES NOT HAVE *ANY* | | | LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS MEETING MINIMUMS. THE | | | NEW SUBMITTED REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS DO NOT SHOW | | | ANY EXTERIOR LIGHTS. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE WHEN THE SITE | | | AS WELL AS THE BUILDING CONTAINS NUMEROUS LIGHT | | | FIXTURES AND NONE ARE SHOWN IN THE CALCULATIONS. IN | | | FACT THE INPUT DATA REPORT IS ACTUALLY BLANK. THIS IS | | | NOT POSSIBLE. | | | | | | A) THE INTERIOR LIGHTING DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH THE | | | SUBMITTED PLANS. THERE ARE MANY MORE FIXTURES ON PLANS | | | THAN IN THE IDR. | | | 13-415.B.1 | | | | | | B) FOR INFORMATION, THE WATTAGE USE ON PLANS IS | | | SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER ON E-1 FOR EXAMPLE. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS FOR ALL | | | LIGHTING FOR EGRESS AREAS UNDER NORMAL AND EMERGENCY | | | CONDITIONS AS NOTED PREVIOUSLY. | | | | | | A) SPECIFICALLY SHEET EP-1, THE STAIRS CHANGED AND | | | REVISED PHOTO-METRICS MEETING MINIMUM FOR LIFE SAFETY | | | AND NORMAL OR EMERGENCY WAS SUBMITTED IN THE REVISIONS | | | FOR PHASE 1. THE REVIEW WAS NOT COMPLETED BY THIS | | | REVIEWER HOWEVER AS OF THE REVIEW PREVIOUSLY DONE UNDER | | | PHASE II THIS WAS NOTED AS NEEDING TO BE REVISED. | | | NFPA- 101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.1.2, .2.2. | | | | | | B) NO LEVELS SUBMITTED OR SHOWN FOR LEVELS FOR NORMAL | | | EXTERIOR STAIRS (EAST). ONE EXAMPLE WOULD BE THESES | | | STAIRS. THE SECTIONS OF THE CODES NOTED ABOVE FOR | | | MINIMUM LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED 10FT CANDLES, | | | PLEASE SUBMITTED ONLY SHOW LEVELS UNDER EMERGENCY. THE | | | LEVELS ARE REQUIRED AT EACH STAIR TREAD, NOT ONE, TWO, | | | OR THREE POINTS. | | | | | | C) PLEASE INDICATE WHAT HAPPENED TO LEVELS OF LIGHTS | | | DURING PERFORMANCES? PREVIOUS NOTES GAVE INFORMATION AS | | | TO THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF THE LIFE SAFETY CODE. | | | MANY OF THESE LIGHTING LEVELS ARE SHOWN UNDER NORMAL | | | CONDITIONS HOWEVER LIGHTING IS ON *DIMMING PANELS* | | | | | | D) PLACE INFORMATION ON PLANS ON ACTIVATION OF | | | EMERGENCY CONDITIONS/FIRE ALARM ACTIVATION AS PLANS ARE | | | BEING CORRECTED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | E) ANOTHER EXAMPLE: UNDER EMERGENCY CONDITIONS, ONLY | | | FIXTURES WHICH CONTAIN THE EMERGENCY BATTERY BACK UP | | | MAY BE USED FOR LEVELS. PLEASE SEE FUTURE FRONT | | | ENTRANCE FOR EXAMPLE. HOW IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THE | | | LIGHTING IN AREAS TO CONTAIN A HIGHER LEVEL OF LIGHT | | | WHEN PER THE LIGHTING PLANS THOSE AREAS DO NO CONTAIN | | | FIXTURES WHICH ARE BATTERY BACK UP. | | | | | | F) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE KE FIXTURE LOCATED OUTSIDE. THIS | | | IS A FIXTURE NOTED INSIDE HOWEVER THIS IS LOCATED | | | OUTSIDE ON FIRST FLOOR IN AREA WHICH WOULD BE A WET | | | LOCATION. MANUFACTURE SPECS ON SITE DOES NOT INDICATE | | | THIS AS A WET LOCATION FIXTURE. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.2.2 , FBC 1006.1.2, FOR | | | OCCUPANCY SENSORS ON EGRESS LIGHTING AND ALSO LIGHTING | | | CONTROLS ON NORMAL LIGHTING FOR EGRESS AREAS. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES WERE GIVEN WITH RESPECT | | | TOP ASME-17 2004 FOR MINIMUM ELEVATOR CODES. HOWEVER | | | THERE ARE AREAS IN WHICH MINIMUM LEVELS FOR THE | | | REFERENCED CODE WOULD NOT BE MET. | | | ** THIS IS ONLY NOTED. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: THE GENERATOR ON THE SUBMITTED RISER IS STILL | | | SHOWING GROUND FAULT PROTECTION ON THE GENERATOR | | | BREAKER. THE BACK UP SYSTEM WHICH IS AN OPTIONAL | | | STAND-BY SYSTEM WILL NOT WORK BASED ON THE SYSTEM | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE 3-POLE ATS. | | | ** THIS WAS REVISED ON THE GENERATOR SUB PERMIT HOWEVER | | | NOT ON THIS RISER. PLEASE CORRECT AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: AS NOTED AND GONE OVER IN MEETING HELD BEFORE | | | PLANS WERE RESUBMITTED. THE EGRESS PATH ON THE FIRST | | | FLOOR WEST AREAS STILL INDICATES THE CONDENSING UNITS | | | AND OTHER A/C EQUIPMENT NOT PERMITTED IN EGRESS PATH | | | ALONE SIDE WALK. | | | THIS WAS NOTED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL YET STILL SHOWN IN | | | PATH. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: NO INFORMATION SHOWN FOR LOAD BANK ON | | | GENERATOR. THE FRESH AIR MAKE UP IS LOCATED IN REAR OF | | | BUILDING. THIS IS A 500KW DIESEL GENERATOR WITH NO LOAD | | | BANK INFORMATION. PLEASE PROVIDE THE MANUFACTURE | | | RECOMMENDED LOAD TO PREVENT WET STACKING. THIS | | | INFORMATION WILL BE FORWARDED TO MECHANICAL AND FIRE | | | MARSHAL. ** THIS IS NOTED ONLY BY THIS REVIEWER. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT INSTALLATION OF GENERATOR SHALL BE PER | | | MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS PER LISTING. | | | 110.3, 90.7 | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE RISER. THE LOAD CALCULATION | | | FOR TWB STATES MINIMUM SERVICE REQUIRED 200AMPS YET THE | | | RISER INDICATES 150AMP. | | | THIS COULD HAVE REDLINED HOWEVER COMMENTS FOR OTHER | | | ITEMS ON REVIEW. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: REVISIONS TO FUNCTION OF LIGHTING CONTROL | | | SYSTEM UNDER PHASE 1 NOT SUBMITTED. SYSTEM FUNCTION | | | BEFORE TCO OF PHASE I SYSTEM LIGHTING WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2, .1.3 AND .1.4. | | | | | | | | | ** PLANS ARE NO LONGER RELEASED PER BUILDING DIRECTOR. | | | A TIME WILL NEED TO BE SET UP TO BRING IN NEW REVISIONS | | | AND CHANGE OUT SHEETS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-07-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-07-19 |
Time |
10:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-07-19 |
Time |
08:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-19 10:58:33 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ** DENIED REVISION ** | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COPIES OF DOCUMENTS FOR | | | SUCCESSOR ARCHITECT. THERE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN | | | PREVIOUS REVISIONS WITH NEW ARCHITECT ALSO HOWEVER NOT | | | LETTERS FOR NEW ARCHITECT COULD BE LOCATED. | | | FS 481, FAC 61G1-18.002 | | | | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLANS ARE CONFUSING FOR WHICH CODE THE PROJECT | | | WILL BE UNDER. THE COVER SHEET SPECIFICALLY STATES THE | | | LIFE SAFETY CODE AND THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODES | | | AS THE 2007 EDITIONS. PLEASE KNOW THERE IS NO 2007 | | | EDITION OF NFPA-101. AS OF DECEMBER 31ST,2008 THE NEW | | | ADOPTED EDITION OF NFPA-101 IS THE 2006 EDITION. | | | AS OF THE SAME DATE THE 2007 FFPC IS ACCURATE. HOWEVER | | | THIS CONFUSING BASED ON THE FACT THE PLANS ARE | | | SUBMITTED REVISIONS WITH THE 2004 FBC STATED AT SEVERAL | | | LOCATIONS. | | | PHASE ONE NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED AND/OR HAVE NO AFFECT | | | ON THE PHASE TWO PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK. BASED ON THE | | | SUBMITTED FLA COM REPORT ALONE THIS IS NOT PERMITTED AT | | | THIS TIME. IT WAS THE UNDERSTANDING OF THIS REVIEWER | | | BASED ON INFORMATION GIVEN THAT PHASE II WOULD BE UNDER | | | SEPARATE PERMIT AND NOT A PHASED REVISION TO THE BASE | | | PERMIT. | | | THE REVIEW IS BEING DONE UNDER THE CODES STATED ON | | | PLANS BASED ON REVISIONS SUBMITTED TO BASE PERMIT. | | | ** THIS IS BEING NOTED AS THE INTENT AND SEQUENCE OF | | | PERMITTING AND PHASING IS NOT CLEAR AT THIS TIME. | | | ** IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW IF THE APPLIED SCOPE OF WORK | | | IS TO BE UNDER NEW PERMIT AS IT IS UNDERSTOOD THIS | | | WOULD PLACE PROJECT UNDER THE 2007 FBC WITH 2009 | | | REVISIONS ALONG WITH OTHER NEW ADOPTED CODES. THIS | | | WOULD AFFECT CALCULATIONS AND SOME OTHER ITEMS ON | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE NEW LIGHTING | | | PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER 13-415.AB.5 (2007) OR | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3 FOR 2004 | | | THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED ON THE IDR, SUMMARY SHEETS, | | | AND COVER SHEETS OF THE FLA COM DOES NOT COORDINATE | | | WITH THE SUBMITTED PLANS. PLANS. SQ FT FOR THE ENTIRE | | | REVISED PLAN NEEDS TO BE UPDATED. | | | ONE EXAMPLE BESIDES THE ITEMS ABOVE IS THE PRO-SHOP | | | ROOM. THE IDR DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH PLANS. | | | ** KEEP IN MIND ALL FIXTURES SHALL BE SPECIFIC AT THIS | | | TIME WITH ALL DETAILS. IF A FIXTURE HAS NOT YET BEEN | | | DETERMINED THEN PLEASE FIND A FIXTURE WHICH MEET CODE | | | COMPLIANCE AT THIS TIME. THE FIXTURE LEGEND MAY ALWAYS | | | BE UPDATED AT A LATER DATE ALONG WITH THE CALCULATIONS. | | | AS LONG AS PLANS AND CALCULATIONS MEET MINIMUM CODES | | | FOR ISSUANCE ( IF UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT). | | | | | | 4) NOTE: IF THE PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK IS GOING TO BE A | | | REVISION TO THE BASE PERMIT THE COMPLETE VALUE FOR THE | | | COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK IN PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO NEEDS | | | TO BE UPDATED. FBC 108.3. THE BASE VALUE HAS NOT BEEN | | | INCREASED TO DATE. | | | VALUE SHALL INCLUDE DESIGN COSTS, ALL LABOR, MATERIALS | | | AND EQUIPMENT (PERMANENT) EVEN IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS | | | ARE OWNER SUPPLIED. THE ORIGINAL APPLIED VALUE IS | | | EXTREMELY LOW BASED ON THE SCOPE, EQUIPMENT ETC AND | | | NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTES FROM ELECTRICAL REVIEW DATED | | | 4/17/2009. PLEASE COORDINATE ALL PLANS INCLUDING SITE | | | LIGHTING, SITE PLANS ETC. PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM | | | OTHER TRADES WHICH WILL AFFECT THE ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | ONE EXAMPLE ALONG IS THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED | | | GENERATOR WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE NEW PHOTO-METRICS FOR | | | ALL EGRESS PATHS MEETING NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.1.1, | | | .1.2. PLEASE SEE 7.8.1.2.2 FOR ANY OCCUPANCY DEVICES | | | USED FOR EGRESS LIGHTING. THERE ARE SEVERAL NEW | | | INTERIOR STAIRS WHICH NEED TO BE UPDATED. | | | **IMPORTANT, THE EXTERIOR EGRESS STAIRS SHALL ALSO | | | COMPLY AS THIS IS ALSO REQUIRED TO THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | THE LANDING IS NOT THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | ** IMPORTANT, IF MEETING ANY EXCEPTIONS TO STAIR AREAS | | | DURING PERFORMANCES THEN PLANS NEED TO PROVIDE MORE | | | INFORMATION ON ALL LEVELS. NORMAL, EMERGENCY, | | | PERFORMANCE ETC. | | | ** KEEP IN MIND STAIR AREAS IN ELEVATED SEATING AREAS | | | SHALL ALSO BE CONSIDERED. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ASME-17 UNDER THE 2004 EDITION FOR | | | STATE ELEVATOR CODE REQUIREMENTS. THIS DEPARTMENT DOES | | | NOT REVIEW FOR THESE ITEMS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. HOWEVER | | | THERE ARE ITEMS ON THE PLANS WHICH DO NOT APPEAR TO | | | MEET SOME CHANGES IN THE ELEVATOR CODE. SEE NEW | | | LIGHTING LEVELS REQUIRED FOR PITS, MACHINE ROOMS, SILLS | | | ETC. | | | ** THIS IS ONLY NOTED FOR INFORMATION. THIS IS NOT | | | SOMETHING THAT WOULD WANT TO COME UP AT THE FINAL | | | INSPECTION BY THE STATE ELEVATOR INSPECTOR. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SECTIONS 620.21-620.25. DEDICATE | | | BRANCH CIRCUITS ARE REQUIRED FOR SEVERAL AREAS. ONE OF | | | THE ITEMS SHOWN ON PLANS IS THE LIGHTING IN THE | | | ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM WHICH IS NOT SHOWN ON A | | | DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUIT AS REQUIRED BY 620.23. KEEP IN | | | MIND THE NOTE ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE ASME-17 CHANGES | | | IN THE 2004 CODE. THE LIGHTING SHOWN WOULD NOT MEET NEW | | | MINIMUMS. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND .1.3 FOR | | | INTERIOR LIGHTING CONTROLS. INTERIOR LIGHTING FOR ITEMS | | | SUCH AS ACCENT LIGHTING SHALL HAVE SEPARATE CONTROLS. | | | SEE SECTION .1.3. | | | PLEASE SEE 2007 FBC IF PROJECT IS GOING TO BE UNDER | | | SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | NEED TO PROVIDE UPDATED ZONE PLANS FOR ALL LIGHTING | | | CONTROLS AND SYSTEM. AS PHASE I IS NOT YET COMPLETED | | | AND PHASE II WILL DIRECTLY AFFECT THE EXISTING SYSTEM | | | ALL OF THESE ITEMS NEED TO BE UPDATED. THE ENTIRE BUILD | | | OUT LCP SCHEDULE WITH ZONES NEEDS TO BE UPDATED. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 240.21C. A NOTE #1 ON THE | | | TRANSFORMER SCHEDULE MENTIONS ALL PANEL BOARDS ON THE | | | SECONDARY SIDE SHALL CONTAIN MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKERS. | | | HOWEVER PLEASE SEE PANELS SW AND SE AS BOTH OF THESE | | | INDICATE THESE PANELS A MAIN LUG ONLY. BOTH OF THESE | | | PANELS NEED TO BE UPDATED. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE UPDATE FEEDERS ON THE SBA SWITCHBOARD | | | FOR *H1B*. | | | 215.5,310.16 ETC | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE ADJUST NOTE FOR TRANSFORMER GROUNDING | | | ELECTRODE ATTACHMENT FOR ACTUAL ATTACHMENT LOCATION. | | | 250.20,250.30,250.50. | | | PLEASE ADD NOTE TO PLANS FOR FRAMING BONDS PER FBC | | | 2704.1 | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE ADD NOTE FOR LIGHTING DISCONNECT | | | REQUIRED PER 410.73G. THIS IS AT THE REQUEST OF | | | INSPECTORS TO BE SHOWN ON PLANS AS THIS HAS BECOME A | | | COMMON FAILURE ITEM IN THE FIELD. | | | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE LIGHTING AS NOTED ABOVE | | | FOR ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM IS UPDATED TO MEET 700.16 | | | ALSO. THE SINGLE FIXTURE AS SHOWN ONCE BURNT OUT OR NOT | | | WORKING WOULD LEAVE THIS AREA IN TOTAL DARKNESS. | | | PLEASE BE SURE OTHER AREAS ONCE UPDATED FOR EGRESS | | | NOTES ABOVE ARE ALSO UPDATED. | | | | | | 15) NOTE: PHASE I PLANS WOULD NEED TO BE UPDATED. | | | | | | ** AS THERE IS INFORMATION NOT YET SUBMITTED, | | | DETERMINED OR COMPLETE, THERE MAY VERY WELL BE NEW | | | COMMENTS WHICH CAN NOT YET BE MADE. | | | | | | ** PLANS ARE NO LONGER RELEASED PER NEW BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL. | | | | | | 16) NOTE: IT IS TO BE NOTED ONCE AGAIN PLANS STILL | | | INDICATE A 3POLE ATS. THERE MAY BE A LOSS OF | | | COORDINATION FROM NORMAL AND GENERATOR POWER TRANSFER. | | | THIS IS NOTED ONLY AND DOES NOT VIOLATE CODE AS BACK UP | | | IS STRICTLY OPTIONAL STAND-BY. THIS WILL REMAIN IN | | | NOTES UNTIL COMPLETION OF PROJECT. THERE IS NO NEED FOR | | | A RESPONSE BY DESIGNER. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-05-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dwise |
Date |
2009-05-22 |
Time |
19:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dwise |
Date |
2009-05-22 |
Time |
19:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-27 19:47:45 | APPROVED AS NOTED ON PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
Time |
08:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
Time |
08:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-17 09:25:39 | | | | | | | *** DENIED SITE PLANS**** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: ALL ES, ESP SHEETS HAVE BEEN STAMPED WITH A | | | VOID STAMP. BASED ON TEH ZONING AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW | | | COMMENTS THERE ARE DIRECT CONFLICTS IN THE SITE AND | | | SITE PLANS. INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICAL AS SHOWN ON SITE | | | COULD CAUSE CONFLICT WIHT INSTALLATIONS OF OTHER | | | SYSTEMS SUCH AS LANDSCAPING, ETC. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER II/ ELECTRICAL | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-12 |
Time |
11:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-12 |
Time |
11:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-12 11:28:38 | ** TEMPORARY FAILED** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: WHEN PLANS WERE BEING SUBMITTED THERE WAS A | | | THIRD SET OF ESP-1, E5 AND ES-1 MISSING. THIS WAS | | | CONFIRMED WITH THE PERMIT EXPEDITOR WHEN PLANS WERE | | | BEING SUBMITTED. A THIRD SET WAS GOING TO BE BROUGHT IN | | | BEFORE REVIEWS COMMENCED. HOWEVER TO THIS DATE OF | | | REVIEW THE THIRD SET WAS NOT SUBMITTED. CALLED AND LEFT | | | MESSAGE FOR THIRD SET TO BE BROUGHT IN. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-24 |
Time |
21:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-24 |
Time |
21:21 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-24 21:21:52 | ** PROVISO ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: SHEET E-6 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH NOTES FROM | | | 3/3/09 WAS NOT REVISED. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SHEET E-4 WHICH INDICATES TWO | | | 1600AMP MAINS. THERE IS ONE LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF | | | THE PARKING LOT AND ONE ON THE REAR WALL OF THE | | | BUILDING. THE ONE IN THE PARKING LOT AREA WAS CROSSED | | | OUT BY REVIEW AS AN OVERLAY MIS-PRINT. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: ALL ADDITIONS OF LIGHTING FIXTURES WILL | | | REQUIRE UPDATED ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
20:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
20:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-03 20:58:31 | *** PROVISO/ REDLINED PLANS*** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT REVISED SHEET E-6. THE | | | NEW LOAD CALCULATIONS WHICH WERE REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW ARE NOW ADDED TO PLANS. HOWEVER THE 1600AMP LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS STATES THE SERVICE IS GOING TO BE | | | 1200AMPS. THE NOTES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SAME 1600AMP | | | LOAD CALCULATIONS STATES THE SERVICE ENTRANCE | | | CONDUCTORS BASED ON THE 1200AMP SERVICE NOT THE 1600AMP | | | MAIN SERVICE. | | | THE RISER CLEARLY INDICATES 4- SETS OF 600MCM FROM FPL | | | TO MAIN AND FROM MAIN TO GUTTER YET THE NOTES ON THE | | | BOTTOM OF THE CALCULATIONS STATE 3-SETS OF 600MCM WHICH | | | ARE ONLY RATED FOR 1260AMPS. PER 310.16 AND 110.14. | | | THIS WOULD ALSO BE IN VIOLATION OF 240.4.C AS DEVICES | | | RATED OVER 800AMPS SHALL HAVE CONDUCTORS RATED AT THE | | | OVER CURRENT PROTECTION PROVIDED OR ABOVE. THE 4-SETS | | | OF CONDUCTORS ON THE RISER AT 420AMPS FOR EACH PARALLEL | | | RUN IS ABOVE THE 1600AMPS PER 310.16, 110.14 AND | | | 240.4C. THE CONDUCTORS ON RISER NOT IN NOTES MUST BE | | | INSTALLED. | | | AS THE RISER DOES INDICATE THE CORRECT CONDUCTORS THIS | | | MUST BE A MISPRINT AND A NEED OF REVISED PLANS AND | | | COORDINATION IS REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE REVISE PLANS BEFORE ROUGH ELECTRICAL INSPECTION. | | | THIS NOTE WILL BE E-MAILED TO THE ENGINEERING FIRM. | | | | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-08 |
Time |
12:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-08 |
Time |
10:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-08 12:57:21 | ** DENIED 3RD REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** THERE ARE ITEMS WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF | | | ADDRESSING FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: THE ARCHITECT'S TITLE BLOCKS HAVE STILL NOT | | | BEEN REVISED. AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW PLEASE SEE | | | FAC 61G1-16.004. THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT | | | COMMENT IS MADE BY ANY OTHER TRADES. THIS COMMENT IS | | | FOR THE ARCHITECT. | | | PLEASE SEE SECTION ABOVE AS THE PRINTED NAME AND | | | PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER IS REQUIRED ON EACH AND EVERY | | | SHEET WHICH CONTAINS THE ARCHITECTS INFORMATION | | | THE OTHER OPTION IS TO REMOVE ARCHITECT'S INFORMATION | | | FROM TRADE SHEETS. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEWS AS THE MANUFACTURE | | | SPECS/CUT SHEETS WERE REQUESTED FOR THE NEW PROPOSED | | | ATS. THE PREVIOUS PLANS CONTAINED THE INFORMATION | | | HOWEVER AS THE PRINTING WAS NOT CLEAR IT WAS ASKED FOR | | | THE SHEETS TO BE SUBMITTED OR TO CLEAR UP THE | | | INFORMATION NOTED ON PLANS. THE PLANS NOW DO NOT SHOW | | | THE INFORMATION AND COULD NOT LOCATE THIS IN THE | | | PACKAGE. | | | 110.3, 702.6, 90.7 | | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.1.1 FOR INFORMATION, CLARITY ETC | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH | | | RESPECT TO SYSTEMS SUCH AS LIGHTING AND GATES WHICH ARE | | | STILL BEING SHOWN ON PLANS BEING FED FROM THIS | | | PROPERTY. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. THESE PROPERTIES WOULD | | | BE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN A UNITY OF TITLE. PLEASE SEE | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS AND BE SURE ALL PLANS COORDINATE. | | | NEC 230.2 ETC | | | FBC TABLE 601 | | | THIS NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH ALL TRADES SUCH AS | | | ZONING, BUILDING ETC. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ALL NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH | | | RESPECT TO FBC CHAPTER 13. COMPLIANCE FOR MINIMUM HAS | | | NOT BEEN MET. | | | | | | THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ON PLANS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED | | | DO NOT COORDINATE. | | | | | | THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE SPACES DOES NOT COORDINATE. | | | FOR ONE IS THE METHOD *C* SUBMITTED FOR WAREHOUSE | | | STATES UNIT *A* HOWEVER UNIT *A* BASED ON THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS IS THE ICE RINK AREA. | | | | | | THE PLANS CONTAINS A METHOD *B* TABLE CALCULATION FOR | | | SPACE BY SPACE. IT IS NOT PERMISSIBLE TO MIX METHODS OF | | | CALCULATIONS. PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1 | | | | | | PLEASE SEE THE INFORMATION ON THE INPUT DATA REPORT | | | ALSO NEEDS TO COORDINATE WITH THE SUBMITTED PLANS. THE | | | INPUT DATA REPORT WILL BE NOTED AS IDR ON THE REMAINDER | | | OF THIS COMMENT. | | | THERE ARE STILL LIGHTING FIXTURES ON PLANS WHICH ARE | | | NOT IN THE IDR OR FIXTURE WATTAGES WHICH DO NOT | | | COORDINATE. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE INTERIOR LIGHTING OF THE IDR. | | | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS WHICH INDICATE THE *A* FIXTURES | | | ALONG WITH OTHERS AS 648 WATTS. THE IDR INDICATES 324. | | | BASED ON THE WATTAGE OF THE ACTUAL FIXTURE THE DOES NOT | | | SEEM TO BE POSSIBLE. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE OTHER FIXTURES SUCH AS AE1, AND | | | H. | | | THIS IS ONLY TWO BEING NOTED WHICH ARE NOT IN THE IDR | | | AT ALL. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING SUBMITTED | | | ON THE IDR. THE ONLY FIXTURE WATTAGE LISTED IS THE 250W | | | FIXTURES. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE WHEN FIXTURES ON THE | | | PLANS SUCH AS SHEET ESP-1 STATES 250W AND 400WATT | | | FIXTURES. | | | WHAT ABOUT OTHER FIXTURES SUCH AS EXTERIOR LIGHTING | | | FIXTURE *H* WHICH IS SHOWN ON PLANS ON SHEET E-2B YET | | | THESE ARE NOT ON THE IDR. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: INTERIOR LIGHTING ON PLANS IS GREATER THAN | | | THE AMOUNT AND TYPE OF FIXTURES ON THE IDR. SEE LOCKERS | | | AS ONE LOCATION FOR MEN, WOMEN, AT ALL LOCATIONS. | | | | | | | | | *** THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES ONLY GIVEN AS A BENEFIT TO | | | HELP. THESE MAY NOT BE ALL ITEMS. | | | PLEAS BE SURE TO GO OVER AND CALL WITH ANY COMMENTS OR | | | QUESTIONS FOR COORDINATION. | | | 13-415.2,13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND .1.3. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE SHEET E-4 AND E-6. ALL MAINS | | | SEEM TO COME FROM THE SAME GUTTER, HOWEVER BASED ON | | | SHEET E-4 THE OTHER METER AND MAIN FOR THE HOUSE PANEL | | | IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE OPENING FOR THE ICE PT | | | DOOR. | | | THIS CONFLICTS WITH THE REVISED RISER. | | | THIS IS A NEW COMMENT AS THE RISER HAS BEEN COMPLETELY | | | REVISED. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: WHERE IS THE LOAD CALCULATIONS ON THE NEW | | | 1600AMP MAIN? | | | NEC 220 | | | FBC 106.1.1, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND | | | CLARITY. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLANS MAKE NOTE FOR FLOATING NEUTRAL AS GONE | | | OVER IN MEETING HOWEVER THIS IF FOR THE METERS ON THE | | | SECONDARY SIDE OF THE 1600AMP MAIN. THIS COULD BE | | | REDLINED TO INDICATE THIS FOR THE METERS. IT SEEMS TO | | | BE PART OF THE FEEDERS SHOWN ON RISER. | | | 250.6, 250.24 ETC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT ** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-25 |
Time |
11:25 |
Rev Time |
3.25 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-25 |
Time |
08:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-25 11:26:08 | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE | | | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | THERE ARE ALSO SOME NEW COMMENTS AS THERE ARE SEVERAL | | | ASPECTS OF DESIGN CHANGING ALONG WITH NEW ITEMS WHICH | | | WERE NOT PART OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SUBMITTED CONTAIN A | | | SIGNATURE AND DATE HOWEVER NONE OF THE SHEETS CONTAIN | | | THE RAISED SEAL AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTES | | | 481.221. | | | THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TRADES AND ALL REVIEWERS | | | WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER TRADES. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE MISSING | | | INFORMATION REQUIRED ON THE TITLE BLOCKS. PLEASE SEE | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G1-16.004 AND FLORIDA | | | STATUTES 481.219. | | | MISSING CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. | | | MISSING PRINTED NAME OF SAID DESIGNER. | | | MISSING PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER OF ARCHITECT. | | | | | | ** THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE ANY | | | OTHER TRADE OR THE LANDSCAPE REVIEWER. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: IN PREVIOUS MEETINGS HELD IT WAS DISCUSSED | | | WHETHER OR NOT THE BUILDING WAS GOING TO BE ADJUSTED TO | | | SEPARATE INTO MORE THAN ONE BUILDING BY DEFINITION. BY | | | THE RESPONSE FROM THE ARCHITECT THE INTENT AS SHOWN AND | | | NOTED IS THIS IS A SEPARATE BUILDING. HOWEVER BY | | | DEFINITION IN CHAPTER 2 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | WHICH WILL DIRECT YOU TO 702.1 FOR FIRE RESISTIVE | | | CONSTRUCTION DEFINITIONS. THIS IS ALSO IN THE | | | DEFINITIONS IN CHAPTER 13 SECTION 202 OF THE SAME CODE. | | | THIS WOULD REQUIRE A ** RATED FIRE WALL*. PLEASE SEE | | | THE DEFINITION OF A FIRE WALL. THE FOLLOWING TEXT IS | | | EXTRACTED DIRECTLY FROM THE CODE. | | | | | | **** | | | FIRE WALL. FIRE-RESISTANT WALL, HAVING PROTECTIVE | | | OPENINGS, WHICH RESTRICTS THE SPREAD OF FIRE AND | | | EXTENDS CONTINUOUSLY FROM THE FOUNDATION TO OR THROUGH | | | THE ROOF, WITH SUFFICIENT STRUCTURAL STABILITY UNDER | | | FIRE CONDITIONS TO ALLOW COLLAPSE OF CONSTRUCTION ON | | | EITHER SIDE WITHOUT COLLAPSE OF THE WALL.**** | | | | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE THE SECOND PART OF THE SENTENCE | | | WHICH THE CONSTRUCTION WILL ALLOW THE COLLAPSE OF THE | | | CONSTRUCTION ON EITHER SIDE WITHOUT THE COLLAPSE OF THE | | | WALL. | | | A 2HR RATED DEMISING WALL DOES NOT MEET THIS | | | REQUIREMENT. THIS WILL AFFECT OTHER ASPECTS OF THE | | | STRUCTURE AND BUILDING. SEE OTHER COMMENTS BELOW. | | | THIS COMMENT IS ENTIRELY BASED ON THE DECLARED SQ FT ON | | | PLANS AND CALCULATIONS WHICH DO NOT COORDINATE WITH THE | | | ACTUAL BUILDING. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE SHEET SP-1 WHICH ALSO DECLARES THREE | | | SEPARATE BUILDINGS WHICH BASED ON STRUCTURAL AND | | | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS IS NOT THE CASE. | | | WHAT IS THE INTENT OF DESIGN? ELECTRICAL PLANS HAVE | | | BEEN REVISED HOWEVER NOW SHOWING THREE SEPARATE | | | SERVICES BEING PROPOSED, ONE FOR EACH TENANT SPACE. SEE | | | ELECTRICAL COMMENTS BELOW AS THREE SERVICES ARE NOT | | | PERMITTED TO THIS ONE BUILDING AS SHOWN. | | | COORDINATION OF UNITS NEEDS TO BE DONE ON PLANS. | | | WHERE A SHEETS INDICATE WAREHOUSE *B*, THE ELECTRICAL | | | SHEETS INDICATE WAREHOUSE *A*> ETC | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NEW SUBMITTED METHOD *C* FLA | | | COM FORM DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE | | | SQ FT FOR BUILDING AREA ON PLANS IS SUBSTANTIALLY | | | GREATER THAN THAT ON THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE FOLLOWING TEXT FOR BUILDING WITH | | | MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY USE IN AREAS. ONLY WHEN THE | | | ADDITIONAL AREAS ARE LESS THAN 5% MAY THE MAJORITY AREA | | | USE BE PERMITTED. | | | METHOD *C* IS FOR BUILDING AREA, YET THERE ARE SEVERAL | | | AREAS WHICH THE OCCUPANCY IS GREATER THAN 5% OF THE | | | MAIN USE. | | | PLEASE ADJUST. THE FOLLOWING TEXT IS TAKEN DIRECTLY | | | FROM THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | **** | | | 13-101.1.4 BUILDINGS WITH MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY TYPES. | | | WHEN A BUILDING CONTAINS MORE THAN ONE OCCUPANCY TYPE, | | | EACH PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL CONFORM TO THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OCCUPANCY HOUSED THEREIN. | | | EXCEPTIONS: | | | 1. WHERE MINOR OCCUPANCY USE DOES NOT OCCUPY MORE THAN | | | 5 PERCENT OF THE FLOOR AREA OF THE BUILDING, THE MAJOR | | | USE SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE BUILDING OCCUPANCY. **** | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL INFORMATION ON PLANS WITH | | | RESPECT TO BUILDING COMPONENTS AND LIGHTING CORRELATE | | | WITH THE PLANS. ONE EXAMPLE GIVEN IS THE EXTERIOR | | | LIGHTING WHICH DOES NOT CORRELATE. | | | ** ONE EXAMPLE IS THE INFORMATION ON THE LIGHTING | | | FIXTURE LEGEND IS NOT CLEAR. WATTAGES, TYPES ETC SHOWN. | | | NO DETERMINATION FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND COORDINATION | | | OF THE IDR CAN BE DONE. | | | ** ANOTHER EXAMPLE: | | | THE SUBMITTED PLANS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING NOTE 100W | | | FIXTURES, THE IDR INDICATES 250WATT FIXTURES AND THE | | | FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT INDICATE ANY SPECIFIC TYPE OF | | | EXTERIOR FIXTURES DETERMINATION FOR CODE COMPLIANCE CAN | | | NOT BE ACHIEVED. | | | 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.3, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO | | | REQUIRED LIGHTING CONTROLS PER FBC 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, | | | .1.2 AND .1.3. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE LIGHTING CONTROL | | | PANEL. THE SYMBOL LEGEND STATES THE OVER RIDE SHALL BE | | | HIGH BAY OCCUPANCY SENSORS WITH AN OVER RIDE TIME OF | | | 4HRS. | | | THIS IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS IS POSSIBLE WHEN EVERY KNOWN | | | OCCUPANCY SENSOR DEVICE TO THIS OFFICE FROM MOST | | | MANUFACTURES IS MAXIMUM 30MINS AFTER THE LAST SENSING | | | OF THE OCCUPANT. PLEASE SEE SECTION 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 OF | | | THE FBC WHICH DOES NOT PERMIT AN OVER RIDE OF MORE THAN | | | 30MINS WITH THE USE OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS AS OVERRIDES. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE PLANS WHICH INDICATE A *S* WHICH BY THE | | | SYMBOL LEGEND IS A SINGLE POLE SINGLE THROW SWITCH. | | | THIS TYPE OF DEVICE WILL NOT MEET THE MINIMUM | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE FBC SECTIONS GIVEN NOR WILL IT | | | PROVIDE AUTOMATIC SHUT OFF DURING AN OVER RIDE. | | | THERE MAY BE SOME SORT OF MISPRINT WITH THE WORDING ON | | | SYMBOL LEGEND. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ROOMS AND AREAS WHICH ARE MISSING | | | LIGHTS AND CONTROLS PER SECTIONS GIVEN. ARCHITECTURAL | | | PLANS INDICATE LIGHTS NEXT TO AHU ROOM YET NO | | | INFORMATION ON ELECTRICAL PLANS IN FACT THIS ROOM IS | | | BLANK. | | | IN MEETING HELD BEFORE PLANS WERE SUBMITTED IT WAS | | | REQUESTED TO SUPPLY THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS | | | ON THE PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL(S) AND ALL | | | EQUIPMENT. THE SHEETS SUBMITTED DO NOT PROVIDE | | | INFORMATION ON REQUIRED LIGHTING CONTROLS PER SECTIONS | | | OF THE CODE GIVEN ABOVE. IN FACT THE SHEETS EXPAND ON | | | THE DIMMING POSSIBILITIES WHICH IS OK HOWEVER DOES NOT | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION ON CONTROLS OF LIGHTS TO MEET | | | MINIMUM SHUT OFF REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY. | | | ALSO AS GONE OVER IN MEETING PLEASE BE SURE DOCUMENTS | | | CONTAIN A LISTING FROM ONE OF THE ADOPTED NATIONALLY | | | RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORIES. ( NRTL) PER 110.3. | | | IE: UL, ETL< MET< TUV< TUV AMERICA< CSA ETC. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: THE PLANS NOW SHOW NEW ELECTRICAL GATE AND | | | LIGHT POLE OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY LING BASED ON SURVEY | | | AND SITE PLANS. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. THE MAY BE FED | | | FROM A SEPARATE OFF THE PROPERTY HOWEVER IT MAY NOT | | | CROSS THE PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED GATE IS ALSO NOT PART | | | OF THE SHOWN PROPERTY AND IS NOT INCLUDED. | | | PLEASE KNOW THIS INFORMATION WILL BE ROUTED TO FIRE | | | MARSHAL, ZONING AND BUILDING REVIEWERS. | | | 230, FBC SEE NOTES FROM OTHER TRADES. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEC 230.2. THE RISER NOW SHOWS A | | | PROPOSED THREE SEPARATE SERVICES WHICH CAN NOT BE | | | GRANTED BASE ON 230.2. THE SERVICE SIZE, VOLTAGE, | | | OCCUPANCY ETC DOES NOT MEET ALLOWANCE FOR OTHER TWO | | | ADDITIONAL SERVICES. THIS IS ONE BUILDING BY ALL | | | DEFINITIONS LISTED ABOVE IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 2005 NEC HANDBOOK DIAGRAM. BY | | | ILLUSTRATIONS THIS IS ONE BUILDING AND BY RISER THESE | | | ARE THREE SEPARATE SERVICES. | | | PLEASE REVISE RISER. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES AND IN MEETING HELD | | | BEFORE PLANS WERE RESUBMITTED IT WAS DISCUSSED THAT ANY | | | CONTROLS FOR EGRESS LIGHTING SHALL BE FAIL SAFE ON PER | | | NFPA-101 7.8.1.2.2, FBC 1006.1.2 | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THERE MAY ALSO BE NEW COMMENTS | | | WITH RESPECT TO AREA ABOVE OFFICES. THIS AREA IS SHOWN | | | TO CONTAIN A NEW 42 INCH HIGH WALL HOWEVER CLEAR STAIRS | | | ARE SHOWN TO AREA YET NO OTHER INFORMATION IS SHOWN. IN | | | FACT THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DO NOT SHOW OR NOTE ANY | | | STAIRS THEY IN FACT INDICATE THIS SAME ROOM AS *STORAGE | | | AREA*. THE ELECTRICAL PLANS CLEARLY NOTE THIS SAME ROOM | | | AS STAIR WITH LIGHTING TO ABOVE. HOWEVER THEY DO NOT | | | SHOW THE ACTUAL STAIRS. | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS ALSO INDICATE FUTURE ELEVATOR YET | | | INFORMATION ON OTHER PLANS AND SHEETS DO NOT SHOW ANY | | | OF THESE ITEMS. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS FOR EGRESS AREAS. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2 WITH RESPECT TO MORE | | | THAN ONE FLOOR. SEE FBC FOR FLOOR DEFINITIONS. | | | AS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW TO PROVIDE | | | EGRESS LIGHTING FOR STAIRS THE RESPONSE FROM DESIGNER | | | WAS THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. THE PHOTO-METRICS | | | SUBMITTED TO NOT SHOW LEVELS FOR EITHER STAIRS. | | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.1, .2.2. | | | SEE SHEET E-2B WHICH INDICATES TO LIGHTS ABOVE FOR | | | CONTROLS ETC HOWEVER THERE IS NO 2ND FLOOR LIGHTING OR | | | POWER PLANS FOR THIS END OF THE BUILDING. | | | SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES AND BE AWARE OF NOTED | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR EGRESS, LIGHTING CONTROLS ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC13-415.1.ABC.1, FOR AREAS CONSIDERED | | | SEPARATE FLOORS. | | | | | | ** ONE SET OF THE PLANS WILL BE RETAINED. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE | | | SYSTEMS AS SHOWN. RISER INDICATES ALL GOING TO FOOTER | | | STEEL. THIS IS AN EXISTING BUILDING AND IF THERE IS NOT | | | CURRENTLY A BOND TO FOOTER STEEL NEW ONES WILL NOT BE | | | REQUIRED INTO EXISTING FOOTING STEEL. THIS IS ONLY | | | NOTED AS ALL NEW FOOTER STEEL IS REQUIRED TO BE BONDED. | | | ** NOTED FOR INFORMATION ONLY. | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO | | | MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF DEVICES FOR FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. | | | RESPONSE MENTIONS CANDELA LEVELS AND HEIGHTS ARE ON ICE | | | RINK PLANS HOWEVER BASED ON THE PLANS SUBMITTED ONLY | | | THE CD LEVELS AND HEIGHTS IN RINK ARE SHOWN. PLEASE SEE | | | SECTIONS 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3. ALL LOCATIONS FOR ADA | | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET; ALL PULL STATION HEIGHTS, | | | STROBE HEIGHTS, ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE MORE THAN THE ICE RINK AREAS | | | WHICH REQUIRE DEVICES. | | | SEE COMMENTS FROM FIRE REVIEW FOR MINIMUM NFPA-72 | | | REQUIREMENTS AS FULL PROTECTION OF ANY FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM MAY NOT ONLY BE RINK AREA. | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.70 FOR MISSING LIGHTING | | | REQUIRED IN AHU ROOM. | | | PLEASE SEE 210.63, 210.8 FOR SERVICE RECEPTACLE. | | | | | | 14) NOTE: THE AIC RATINGS AND FAULT CURRENTS ARE SHOWN | | | HOWEVER THE RATINGS AT MAINS NEED TO BE SHOWN. | | | 110.9 | | | THE ANALYSIS SUBMITTED IS FOR MAINS AT EACH UNIT. IF 42 | | | K IS THE RATING FOR SBA, THE RATING FOR THE MAIN WILL | | | BE SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER AND NO INFORMATION FOR ANY OF | | | THE MAINS IS SHOWN. | | | | | | 15) NOTE: PLANS INDICATE HWB WHICH IS NOTED FOR HOUSE | | | ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING ETC YET THIS PANEL IS IN ONE | | | OF THE TENANT SPACES. | | | THE WAREHOUSE SPACE *B* IS CURRENTLY OCCUPIED HOW CAN | | | IT POSSIBLE THE PANELS ARE BLANK WITH NO CIRCUITING? | | | HOUSE POWER/SITE LIGHTING MAY NOT BE FED FROM PANEL IN | | | TENANT SPACE. | | | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE ADJUST DESIGNATIONS OF FUTURE BACK UP | | | POWER PANELS. THESE ARE NOT *EMERGENCY* BACK UP | | | SYSTEMS. PLEASE SEE DEFINITIONS IN NEC 700, 701 AND | | | 702. | | | THESE PANELS ARE OPTIONAL STAND-BY. | | | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE THE LOADS FOR THE WATER | | | HEATERS ON THE LOAD CALCULATIONS WITH THAT OF THE LOADS | | | ON THE PANELS. THE LOADS ON PANELS FAR EXCEED THAT OF | | | THE LOAD ON CALCULATIONS. ONE WATER HEATER ALONE | | | EXCEEDS LOAD SHOWN FOR ALL THREE. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 422.13 FOR THE 2005 NEC AS THE LOAD IS | | | A CONTINUOUS LOAD AND SHALL BE FIGURED AT 125%. | | | | | | 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 3006.2 FOR FUTURE ELEVATOR | | | LIFT. | | | | | | 19) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 620.22,23 AND 24 FOR FUTURE | | | ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM. THIS IS NOTED AS COMMENTS FROM | | | OTHER REVIEWS AND USE OF SECOND FLOOR AREA HAS NOT BEEN | | | DETERMINED AT THIS TIME AS VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY MAY | | | BE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 20) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW AS IT WAS | | | REQUESTED TO SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS | | | FOR THE PROPOSED ATS. THIS WAS GONE OVER IN MEETING | | | ALSO. THE PLANS NOW SHOW THIS PROPOSED ATS ON SHEET E-6 | | | HOWEVER THE INFORMATION IS NOT CLEAR AND VERY FAINT AND | | | BLURRY. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT SEPARATE SHEETS OR IMPROVE ON PRINTED | | | SHEET. | | | 110.3, 90.7 | | | FBC 106.1.1, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, | | | CLARITY ETC. | | | | | | 21) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT/SHOW SCHEDULE FOR SBA AS OTHER | | | PANELS ARE SHOWN GIVING THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | 408.4, 110.9, 90.7 ETC | | | FBC 106.1.1, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, | | | CLARITY AND COORDINATION. | | | | | | 22) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS FOR | | | FEEDERS/BRANCH CIRCUITS PER 13-413.1ABC.1. | | | VOLTAGE DROP. | | | 13-413.1.ABC.1.1 FEEDERS. | | | FEEDER CONDUCTORS SHALL BE SIZED FOR A MAXIMUM VOLTAGE | | | DROP OF 2 PERCENT AT DESIGN LOAD. | | | 13-413.1.ABC.1.2 BRANCH CIRCUITS. | | | BRANCH CIRCUIT CONDUCTORS SHALL BE SIZED FOR A MAXIMUM | | | VOLTAGE DROP OF 3 PERCENT AT DESIGN LOAD. | | | | | | ** SUBMITTED FOR WAREHOUSE A AND B, HOWEVER NEED SITE | | | BRANCH CIRCUIT(S) | | | | | | 23) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE FOLLOWING IS LISTED ON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS. THIS IS TAKEN FROM THE FBC SECTIONS. | | | **13-413.1.ABC.2.1 DRAWINGS. | | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL REQUIRE THAT WITHIN 30 | | | DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE, RECORD | | | DRAWINGS OF THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | TO THE BUILDING OWNER, INCLUDING: | | | 1. A SINGLE-LINE DIAGRAM OF THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL | | | DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND | | | 2. FLOOR PLANS INDICATING LOCATION AND AREA SERVED FOR | | | ALL DISTRIBUTION. | | | 13-413.1.ABC.2.2 MANUALS. | | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL REQUIRE THAT AN OPERATING | | | MANUAL AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL BE PROVIDED TO THE | | | BUILDING OWNER. THE MANUALS SHALL INCLUDE, AT A | | | MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING: | | | 1. SUBMITTAL DATA STATING EQUIPMENT RATING AND SELECTED | | | OPTIONS FOR EACH PIECE OF EQUIPMENT REQUIRING | | | MAINTENANCE. | | | 2. OPERATION MANUALS AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS FOR EACH | | | PIECE OF EQUIPMENT REQUIRING MAINTENANCE. REQUIRED | | | ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ACTIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED. | | | 3. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF AT LEAST ONE QUALIFIED | | | SERVICE AGENCY. | | | | | | 24) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE PANEL SCHEDULES ARE COMPLETE | | | WITH LOADS AND SPECIFIC APPLIANCES. FOR EXAMPLE: R1B8 | | | WHICH BY THE PANEL SCHEDULE ONLY LIST VIEWING ROOM | | | RECEPTACLES LOOKS TO BE A HALF SWITCH RECEPTACLE UNDER | | | THE SINK WHICH WOULD LEND TO A DISPOSAL. DISPOAL WOULD | | | BE REQUIRED TO BE ON A SEPARATE CIRCUIT WITH LOADS | | | FIGURED. | | | PLEASE ALSO VERIFY LOAD SHOWN FOR WASHER AS THIS IS | | | NOTED A 1KVA. | | | THE PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW A REFRIGERATOR FOR CIRCUIT | | | R1B20 YET THE PANEL SCHEDULE DOES NOT INDICATE ANY | | | CIRCUIT. IN FACT THE SCHEDULE IS BLANK FOR THIS | | | LOCATION. | | | | | | PLEASE COORDINATE ALL, THESE ARE A FEW EXAMPLES AND ARE | | | NOT ALL. | | | PLEASE SEE 408.4,240.4,310.16, AND 220. | | | | | | | | | 25) NOTE: ** IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT AS THERE IS A | | | SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF INFORMATION NOT YET CLEAR FOR | | | USE, OCCUPANCY, FLOORS, LIGHTING ETC THERE MAY VERY | | | WELL BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEW WHICH CAN | | | NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME. | | | PLEASE ALSO BE AWARE OF FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO | | | REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS IS ONLY NOTED | | | AT THIS TIME AS THERE WERE SOME CODE SECTIONS REPEATED | | | FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH WAS NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ** ONE COMPLETE SET OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED BY THIS | | | OFFICE ALONG WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
Time |
17:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
Time |
17:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-15 17:08:18 | | | | ** DENIED REVIEW** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE APPLIED ADDRESS IS AT 1600 N. | | | FLORIDA MANGO HOWEVER THE PLANS INDICATE 1590 SAME | | | ROAD. THE PACKAGE WILL BE ROUTED TO ADDRESSING FOR AN | | | EXTENSION FOR THIS TENANT SPACE. AS THE APPLIED SCOPE | | | OF WORK IS BEING SHOWN WHAT APPEARS TO BE IN MULTIPLE | | | TENANT SPACES THE APPLIED ADDRESS IS UNCLEAR AND THERE | | | ARE SEVERAL UNANSWERED QUESTIONS. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE PLANS CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING | | | DESIGN CODES AT A MINIMUM. THE FLORIDA STATUTES 553.73 | | | GIVES THE ADOPTION OF THE LATEST CODES THROUGH THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. IN ANY CASE SEE THE FP SHEETS AS | | | THESE CLEARLY STATE THE SOUTH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | WHICH HAS NOT BEEN AN ADOPTED CODE IN THE STATE OF | | | FLORIDA FOR MANY YEARS. | | | THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE LISTED AT A MINIMUM FOR THIS | | | REVIEWER. PLEASE BE AWARE OF OTHER CODES FROM OTHER | | | TRADES. | | | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS. | | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | | 2002 NFPA-110 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: THE PLANS ARE UNCLEAR FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK. | | | IS THIS ONE BUILDING WITH THREE TENANT SPACES OR ARE | | | THESE THREE SEPARATE BUILDINGS? PLEASE KNOW THE SERVICE | | | FOR INSTANCE FOR THE NUMBER OF SERVICES, GROUPING OF | | | MAINS ETC CAN NOT BE DETERMINED AS CODE COMPLIANT AT | | | THIS TIME. 230.2, 230.70, 230.70, 230.72, 230.76, | | | 230.79 ETC | | | PLEASE SEE THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR DEFINITIONS OF | | | A BUILDING INCLUDING THE DEFINITIONS FOR THE NEXT | | | COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | ARE NOT CODE COMPLIANT. PLEASE SEE THERE WILL BE SOME | | | EXAMPLES NOTED HOWEVER IT IS NOT A COMPLETE LIST OF ALL | | | INCONSISTENCIES. IT IS ALSO IMPORTANT TO SEE COMMENTS | | | FROM OTHER TRADES WITH RESPECT TO ALL BUILDING | | | COMPONENTS. SOME WILL BE NOTED IN THIS REVIEW FOR | | | EXAMPLES. | | | THE SUBMITTED VERSION IS METHOD *A* FOR WHOLE BUILDING | | | COMPLIANCE. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? BASED ON PLANS THIS | | | IS A RENOVATION TOT AN EXISTING BUILDING WHICH MEETS | | | THE DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 202 OF CHAPTER 13. WHOLE | | | BUILDING COMPLIANCE MAY ONLY BE USED *IF* ALL SYSTEMS | | | FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING IS BEING USED AND KNOWN. PLEASE | | | SEE 13-101.1.3 RENOVATIONS. | | | RENOVATED COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS SHALL, WHEN APPLICABLE | | | (SEE SECTION 202), COMPLY WITH THE PRESCRIPTIVE | | | REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN FORM 400C OR WITH METHOD B OF | | | SUBCHAPTER 13-4 FOR INSULATION, HVAC SYSTEMS, LIGHTING, | | | WATER HEATING SYSTEMS AND EXTERIOR ENVELOPE COMPONENTS | | | BEING RETROFITTED OR REPLACED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE INPUT DATA REPORT WHICH DOES NOT | | | COORDINATE WITH THE SUBMITTED PLANS. SOME EXAMPLES WILL | | | BE GIVEN AND THE INPUT DATA REPORT WILL BE NOTED AS IDR | | | IN COMMENTS. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THE METHOD OF | | | CONTROL FOR ALL LIGHTING BE SHOWN AS MANUAL ON/OFF WHEN | | | THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW AUTOMATED SYSTEMS AS REQUIRED | | | PER 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3 | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL INTERIOR LIGHTS ARE THE | | | SAME ON THE IDR AS ON THE PLANS FOR THE SAME WATTAGE, | | | NUMBER OF FIXTURES AND TYPES. PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE | | | 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. PLEASE SEE | | | TABLE 13-415.2.B, 13-415.2.C. PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE | | | NOTE ABOVE FOR METHOD OF CALCULATIONS TO BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: SEE OTHER COMPONENTS SUCH AS THE FLOOR OF | | | THE ICE RINK ITSELF BEING SHOWN WITH *CARPET AND RUBBER | | | PADDING*. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: THE IDR SHOWS *NO* EXTERIOR DOORS FROM | | | CONDITIONED SPACE WHEN THE PLANS CLEARLY CONTAINS | | | SEVERAL. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL ROOMS SHOWING*CARPET | | | AND RUBBING PADDING* WHEN THE ELECTRICAL ROOMS ARE NOT | | | PERMITTED TO CONTAIN COMBUSTIBLES. SEE COMMENTS FROM | | | OTHER TRADES ON THIS. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: BASED ON THE PLANS SUBMITTED THIS GENERATOR | | | WILL BE A LIFE SAFETY REQUIRED NEC 700 SYSTEM YET THERE | | | ARE OTHER WIRING ITEMS ON THIS SAME PANEL, EQUIPMENT | | | AND ATS WHICH ARE NOT LEGALLY REQUIRED AND ARE OPTIONAL | | | STAND-BY. PLEASE SEE NEC 700.9 FOR WIRING REQUIRED AS | | | OTHER SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE PART OF THE EMERGENCY/LIFE | | | SAFETY REQUIRED SYSTEMS. NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED | | | FOR THE ON-SITE REQUIRED FUEL PER 700.12B3 AND | | | 701.11B3. THERE ARE MANY OTHER SECTIONS INCLUDING | | | SECTIONS OF NFPA-110 WHICH ALSO APPLY HOWEVER NOT EVERY | | | POSSIBLE CODE SECTION IS LISTED. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE WAS NO INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR | | | MANUFACTURE SPECS/CUT SHEETS OF THE ATS, GENERATOR AND | | | FUEL TANKS. PLEASE SUBMIT. PLEASE SEE NFPA-110 2002, | | | NEC 110.3,90.7 ETC | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE NFPA-110 CHAPTER 7 FOR | | | INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. | | | ** THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS NOT SUBMITTED. AS THIS UNIT | | | IS BEING SHOWN AS A 700,701 SYSTEM ALL THE ABOVE AND | | | CODE MUST BE MET. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: IT IS BEING NOTED WITH RELEVANCE TO THE NOTE | | | #56 ABOVE; IF THE INTENT IS FOR THE BUILDING TO BE | | | OCCUPIED UNDER EMERGENCY POWER THEN BATTERY BACK UP | | | LIGHTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL EGRESS PATHS. THE | | | OCCUPIED BUILDING WOULD BE THEN UNDER EMERGENCY POWER | | | FOR A *NORMAL OCCUPANCY*. IF THE EMERGENCY GENERATOR IS | | | THEN LOST THERE WOULD BE NOT EGRESS LIGHTING FOR ANY | | | OCCUPANCY PUBLIC OR OTHER WISE TO FIND THEIR WAY OUT OF | | | THE BUILDING. IF THE BUILDING IS NOT GOING TO BE | | | OCCUPIED UNDER GENERATOR POWER THIS OFFICE WILL | | | REQUIRED AN ORIGINAL LETTER SIGNED, NOTARIZED FROM THE | | | NEW BUILDING OWNER STATING THE BUILDING WILL NOT BE | | | OCCUPIED UNDER EMERGENCY POWER. THIS WILL BE | | | ENFORCEMENT FROM THIS OFFICE AS WELL AS THE FIRE | | | MARSHAL OFFICE. | | | NFPA-101 7.8.1, 7.9.1ETC | | | THE OTHER OPTION WOULD BE TO INSTALL THE BATTERY BACK | | | UP LIGHTS FOR MINIMUM EGRESS UNDER AN EMERGENCY | | | CONDITION AND THE GENERATOR WOULD BECOME AN OPTIONAL | | | STAND-BY SYSTEM. SEE THE FOLLOWING TWO COMMENTS AS | | | THESE WILL ALSO AFFECT THE DESIGN. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE THE SELECTIVE COORDINATION | | | STUDY FOR ALL EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT ON BOTH THE NORMAL | | | AND EMERGENCY SIDE OF THE EMERGENCY SYSTEM AS SHOWN. | | | PLEASE SEE 240.12,700.27, 701.18, NFPA-110 CHAPTER 6, | | | 6.5. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT PHOTO-METRICS FOR STAIRS TO | | | INDICATE THE MINIMUM LEVELS UNDER NORMAL AND EMERGENCY | | | CONDITIONS. THE NORMAL LEVELS REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 10FT | | | CANDLES AND IS PERMITTED TO 1 FT CANDLE UNDER EMERGENCY | | | CONDITIONS. | | | NFPA-101 7.8.1.3 , 709.2.1, .2.2 | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 106.1.3 AS THE SUBMITTED PLANS | | | SHALL MEET A MINIMUM OF 1/8INCH SCALE. MAY SHOW A | | | LARGER VIEW OF THE ENTIRE LAYOUT AS LONG AS ALL AREAS | | | ARE SHOWN ON A SEPARATE SHEET IN A LARGER VIEW MEETING | | | THE MINIMUM SCALE. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 240.13, 230.95 FOR THE REQUIRED | | | GROUND FAULT PROTECTION. PLEASE ALSO BE AWARE AS THE | | | CODE REQUIRES GROUND FAULT SENSING IN 700.7D, 700.26 | | | AND NFPA-110 IN CHAPTER 6, 6.2.15 | | | THE ATS WOULD BE A 4-POLE UNIT OTHER WISE THERE WOULD | | | BE A LACK OF COORDINATION. | | | THIS WOULD BE A SEPARATELY DERIVED SYSTEM. | | | ** NOTE #6 ABOVE AND WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS A LIFE | | | SAFETY GENERATOR WILL HAVE AN AFFECT ON THIS COMMENT. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE TRANSFORMER TWA WHICH IS SHOWING A | | | NEUTRAL BEING INSTALLED ON THE LINE SIDE? | | | PLEASE SEE 250.20,250.30 ETC | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE A GROUNDING ELECTRODE RISER | | | FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF ALL TRANSFORMERS. | | | 250.66,250.58,250.56. AS THE SERVICE AND INFORMATION ON | | | THE ACTUAL BUILDING IS NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME THIS MAY | | | AFFECT THE SERVICE AS SHOWN. | | | | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND | | | .1.3. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED | | | LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM. TIMES OF OVER RIDES, LOCATIONS | | | OF OVER RIDES, ETC. PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE THESE | | | SECTIONS AS THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS REQUIRED NOT SHOWN. | | | OCCUPANT MUST SEE ALL LIGHTING BEING OVER RIDDEN. | | | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 700.12F FOR CIRCUITING OF | | | EMERGENCY LIGHTING. THIS IS BASED ON NOTES ABOVE FOR | | | REQUIRE BATTERY BACK UP FIXTURES. | | | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 11-4.28.1,.2 AND .3. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE ALL MINIMUM LEVELS FOR ADA COMPLIANCE INCLUDING | | | HEIGHTS, LEVELS OF DEVICES ETC. | | | | | | 16) NOTE: ELECTRICAL SITE PLANS ARE MISSING MINIMUM | | | DESIGN FOR FBC 140MPH 3 SECOND GUST/120 MPH SUSTAINED. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT. THIS WILL BE UNDER THE STRUCTURAL REVIEW | | | ONCE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 225.31-225.39 FOR DISCONNECTING | | | MEANS REQUIRED FOR THE FEEDERS FROM THE GENERATOR. AS | | | THE DISCONNECTING MEANS WILL NOT BE READILY ACCESSIBLE | | | BASED ON POSSIBLE ZONING COMMENTS; A DISCONNECTING | | | MEANS (NOT WITH OVER CURRENT PROTECTION) WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | ** AS THERE ARE SEVERAL UNANSWERED COMMENTS AND | | | INFORMATION NOT YET SHOWN, SUBMITTED OR IN DESIGN THERE | | | MAY VERY WELL BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEW | | | WHICH CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
efabian |
Date |
2009-12-11 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
efabian |
Date |
2009-12-11 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dlauderm |
Date |
2009-10-02 |
Time |
10:47 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
dlauderm |
Date |
2009-10-02 |
Time |
10:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
Time |
11:43 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
Time |
11:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-23 11:42:59 | PASSED WITH PROVISO | | | ENGINEERING WILL WAIT FOR CORRECT SIDEWALK ALIGNMENT | | | REVISION AS PER PLANNING TO SIGN PLANS. | | | MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | | ENGINEERING REVIEW | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
efabian |
Date |
2009-08-31 |
Time |
09:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
efabian |
Date |
2009-08-31 |
Time |
09:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-12-10 |
Time |
12:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-12-10 |
Time |
10:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-10 12:04:38 | *****REVISION, W/E.S. DATE 11/10/2009, APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEETS FP-1, FP-2, FP-3, FP-4, AND E-2C | | | WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-10-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2009-10-08 |
Time |
12:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2009-10-08 |
Time |
12:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-08 12:33:50 | PHASE TWO | | | | | | 1. THE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS LOCATED ON THE SITE HAVE | | | NOT BEEN REPLACED. THE NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR | | | INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH UTILITY AND FIRE RESCUE | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | 2. ADEQUATE PROVISIONS ARE TO BE MADE FOR FIRE RESCUE | | | PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT TO PASS THROUGH ANY SECURITY | | | GATES. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR ANY | | | ELECTRONIC GATES. IF ELECTRIC, PROVISIONS ARE TO BE | | | MADE FOR WHEN LOSS OF POWER OCCURS. | | | | | | 3. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK TO COMPLY WITH NFPA 70, THE | | | NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. | | | | | | 4. ALL SYSTEMS AND DEVICE INSTALLATION TO COMPLY WITH | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION | | | CODE, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND FUEL GAS CODES WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | | | | | | | APPROVED SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTION AND APPROVAL. | | | | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION | | | 500 NORTH DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 | | | 804-4709 PHONE | | | 804-4774 FAX | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-09-28 |
Time |
12:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-09-28 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-28 13:31:44 | *****REVISION PROVISO***** | | | | | | | | | PROVISO TO LANDSCAPING SHEET SHOWING PROPER EXIT | | | CLEARANCE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
Time |
12:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
Time |
11:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-01 12:26:13 | *****APPROVED (PHASE 2)***** | | | | | | BASED UPON PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW CONDUCTED AND APPROVED | | | BY FIRE MARSHAL MIKE CARSILLO, PLAN SHEETS A210, A211, | | | A212, A222, LS110, LS120, AND ES-1 WERE STAMPED, | | | INITIALED, AND DATED. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2009-08-07 |
Time |
16:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2009-08-07 |
Time |
14:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-07 16:14:05 | 1590 NORTH FLORIDA MANGO | | | INTERIOR RENOVATION FOR PALM BEACH ICE WORKS ( PHASE II | | | ) | | | | | | 1. CROWD MANAGEMENT TRAINING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | FACILITY. ONE CROWD MANAGER IS REQUIRED FOR EVERY 250 | | | OCCUPANTS. PLEASE GO THE MARYLAND STATE FIRE MARSHALS | | | WEB SITE AND CLICK ON THE ICON FOR THE ON-LINE CROWD | | | MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. AFTER COMPLETING THE PROGRAM A TEST | | | NEEDS TO BE TAKEN AND CERTIFICATES SUBMITTED TO THIS | | | OFFICE. | | | | | | 2. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION IS TO | | | COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 3. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR ANY FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM RENOVATION. | | | | | | 4. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR ANY FIRE | | | ALARM SYSTEM REMODEL. | | | | | | 5. THE DOUBLE PAIRS OF DOORS LEADING FROM ICE RINK INTO | | | LOBBY 116 SWING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION. THESE DOORS | | | SHOULD SWING INTO LOBBY 116. DOORS 117 AND DOORS 118. | | | | | | 6. ADDITIONAL EXIT SIGNS APPEAR TO BE NEEDED IN THE | | | CORRIDORS TO LEADS PERSONS THROUGH DOORWAYS. | | | | | | 7. TACTILE SIGNAGE REQUIRED AT ALL EXIT DOOR LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 8. ADDITIONAL EXIT SIGNS APPEAR TO BE NEEDED ON THE | | | SECOND FLOOR TO DIRECT PERSONS THROUGH DOORWAYS. | | | | | | 9. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR ANY HOOD, | | | DUCTS, AND FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS. THESE SYSTEMS ARE | | | REQUIRED FOR ANY COOKING THAT PRODUCES SMOKE OR GREASE | | | LADEN VAPORS. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE SUBMIT AN "ALL HAZARDS" EMERGENCY PLAN TO | | | THIS OFFICE FOR THE FACILITY. | | | | | | 11. ALL HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS SHALL MEET THE | | | PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS OF THE FBC AND THE | | | FFPC. | | | | | | 12. THE EXTERIOR STAIR DISPLAYED ON PAGE 722 SHALL HAVE | | | A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST 10' FROM ANY OPENINGS VERTICALLY | | | OR HORIZONTALLY OF THE STAIRS. | | | | | | 13. DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS WHEN ACTIVATED SHALL CAUSE A | | | GENERAL ALARM. NOTE 11 ON PAGE E-1 IS INCORRECT. | | | | | | 14. STORAGE AREAS UNDER BLEACHERS SHALL BE FIRE | | | SPRINKLER PROTECTED. | | | | | | 15. PLEASE ENSURE THAT PROPER EXIT DISCHARGE IS | | | PROVIDED TO ALL EXITS SERVING THE FACILITY. | | | | | | 16. INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR WALLS AND | | | CEILINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FBC AND THE FFPC. | | | | | | 17. PLEASE REEVALUATE THE EXIT DISCHARGE DISPLAYED ON | | | PAGE 110. NEAR THE TEMPORARY PARTITION A DOUBLE DOOR | | | EXITS INTO A SINGLE DOOR. BOTH LOCATIONS HAVE SEPARATE | | | OCCUPANT LOADS WHEREBY THE DOUBLE DOORS HAVE A MUCH | | | HIGHER EXIT CAPACITY THAN THE SINGLE DOOR. | | | | | | ON AUGUST 7, 2009, A LETTER IS TO BE PROVIDED REGARDING | | | THESE COMMENTS EXCEPT # 17 WHICH WAS THE LAST ONE | | | DOCUMENTED. | | | | | | | | | APPROVED PROVISO | | | | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION | | | 804-4709 PHONE | | | 804-4774 FAX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-06-01 |
Time |
15:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-06-01 |
Time |
13:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-01 13:04:06 | REVISIONS, DATED 5/7,8,27/2009, APPROVED | | | | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEET E2B, E-4, FP-1 & FP-2, 010 (OF 7 A), | | | 010 (OF 2-LS), AND 020 (OF 2-LS) WERE STAMPED, | | | INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-16 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-16 |
Time |
15:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-16 15:55:20 | *****REVISION #5, DATED 3/18/2009, APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEET E-4 STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
Time |
11:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
Time |
10:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-06 11:20:09 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | PLAN SHEETS E-1, E-3, E-4, FP-1, FP-2 WERE RESTAMPED | | | FOR APPROVAL ALONG WITH NEWLY STAMPED A.04, AND LS-1 | | | WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY STAMPED ON 2/13/09. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-02-13 |
Time |
12:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-02-13 |
Time |
12:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-13 12:36:28 | FIRE PROVISOS | | | | | | 1) NFPA 13, 2002 EDITION SHALL BE REFERENCED. | | | | | | 2) DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS TO INITIATE A GENERAL FIRE | | | ALARM. | | | | | | 3) SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS/PERMITS FOR FIRE SPRINKLER | | | AND FIRE ALARM. | | | | | | STAMPED SHEETS LS-1, E-1, E-3, E-4, FP-1 AND FP-2. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-01-03 |
Time |
14:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-01-03 |
Time |
13:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-03 14:56:26 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | *THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST REVIEW STILL | | | NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 01. THE ADDRESS NUMBER (1590) SHOWN IN THE THE TILE | | | BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET DOES NOT CORRELATE | | | WITH THE ADDRESS NUMBER (1600) AS LISTED IN OUR | | | COMMUNITYPLUS DATABASE SYSTEM. | | | | | | 04. ONLY ONE FIRE HYDRANT IS SHOWN ON SHEET SP-1, ARE | | | ANY ADDITIONAL FIRE HYDRANTS PROPOSED ON THIS | | | CAMPUS/SITE? IF NOT, EXPLAIN RATIONALE. | | | | | | 06. IT APPEARS THAT THE BUILDING IS SET OFF OF THE | | | ADDRESSED NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD. HOW WILL EMERGENCY | | | RESPONDERS AND/OR THE PUBLIC LOCATE THIS STRUCTURE? | | | | | | 12. NFPA 13 2002 EDITION SHALL BE REFERENCED. REVISE | | | NOTE 21 ON SHEET FP-1 TO REFLECT AS SUCH. | | | | | | * THE FOLLOWING NEW COMMENTS ARE TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | A.) SOME SHEETS IN ONE OF THE PLAN SETS ARE NOT SEALED | | | AS PER FLORIDA STATUTE 481. | | | | | | B.) PLEASE ADDRESS BUILING EXAMINER'S COMMENT #42 IN | | | REFERENCE TO TRAVEL DISTANCES AND OTHER ASSOCIATED | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | C.) A DICREPANCY STILL EXISTS AS TO WHETHER THERE IS A | | | MEZZANINE AREA OR NOT. ALL PLANS SHOULD REFLECT THE | | | SAME FLOOR LAYOUT. | | | | | | D.) IF THERE IS A MEZZANINE AREA FOR THIS PROJECT, | | | PROVIDE A LAYOUT OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER DEVICES FOR THIS | | | AREA. | | | | | | E.) IF THE PROPERTY IS TO BE EQUIPPED WITH AN ACCESS | | | GATE, FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY ACCESS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED THROUGH THE USE OF AN APPROVED DEVICE OR | | | SYSTEM. FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT WEST PALM BEACH | | | FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU AT 561-804-4724. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
Time |
19:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
Time |
19:09 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-28 19:47:34 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | 01. THE ADDRESS NUMBER (1590) SHOWN IN THE THE TILE | | | BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET DOES NOT CORRELATE | | | WITH THE ADDRESS NUMBER (1600) AS LISTED ON YOUR | | | APPLICATION OR IN OUR SYSTEM. | | | | | | 02. STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 03. THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL NOT HINDER OR INTERFERE | | | WITH EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE SAID PROPERTY OR THE | | | VIOCINITY THEREOF INCLUDING STREETS, ALLEYS, FIRE | | | LANES, ETC. | | | | | | 04. ONLY ONE FIRE HYDRANT IS SHOWN ON SHEET LP-1, SRE | | | ANY ADDITIONAL FIRE HYDRANTS PROPOSED ON THIS | | | CAMPUS/SITE? IF NOT, EXPLAIN RATIONALE. | | | | | | 05. IS THIS PROPOSED STRUCTURE A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY? | | | | | | 06. IT APPEARS THAT THE BUILDING IS SET OFF OF THE | | | ADDRESSED NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD. HOW WILL EMERGENCY | | | RESPONDERS AND/OR THE PUBLIC LOCATE THIS STRUCTURE? | | | | | | 07. SHOW/DISPLAY THE APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION THE | | | NUMERICAL ADDRESS ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE BUILDING. AS | | | PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THE NUMBERS SHALL BE NO LESS | | | THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS THAN 1" IN WIDTH/STROKE. | | | | | | 08. PROVIDE THE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGHTS FOR THE STAIRS' | | | HANDRAILS/GUARDRAILS. | | | | | | 09. SPECIFY THE INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH | | | MATERIAL IN TERMS OF CLASS A, CLASS B, OR CLASS C. | | | | | | 10. FIRE DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 80. | | | | | | 11. WHAT IS THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE PROPOSED | | | STRUCTURE? | | | | | | 12. NFPA 13 2002 EDITION SHALL BE REFERENCED. REVISE | | | NOTE 21 ON SHEET FP-1 TO REFLECT AS SUCH. | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
16:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
16:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-03 16:01:41 | REVISION FOR GAS OK -- SHT P-5 (NEW SHEET). |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
Time |
10:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-07 |
Time |
18:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-11 10:44:51 | REVISION -DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2007 FUEL GAS | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVISION REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. SHT P-5 GAS PIPING SYSTEM (F) INDICATES 20 FEET | | | DELVELOPED LENGHT. REVISION ON RISER DIAGRAM INDICATES | | | 33 FEET TO 35 FEET FROM THE METER TO MOST REMOTE. | | | PLEASE CORRLEATE. SECTION 402.4.1. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
Time |
18:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
Time |
18:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-30 18:24:52 | REVISION DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2007 FUEL GAS | | | | | | 1. SHT P-5 GAS PIPING SYSTEM (F) INDICATES 20 FEET | | | DELVELOPED LENGHT. REVISION ON RISER DIAGRAM INDICATES | | | 33 FEET TO 35 FEET FROM THE METER TO MOST REMOTE. | | | PLEASE CORRLEATE. SECTION 402.4.1. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-06 |
Time |
18:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
Time |
17:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
14:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-01 14:22:54 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | 1. ALL SHEETS WITH ROCAMAR ENGINEERING SERVICES INC. | | | TITLE BLOCK. THE ADDRESS ON THE TITLE BLOCK DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE ADDRESS OF RECORD ON THE STATE OF FLORIDA | | | DBPR WEBSITE. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET). PLEASE UPDATE THE | | | TITLE BLOCKS OR THE DBPR WEBSITE PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING | | | FOR REVIEW SO THE ADDRESS CORRELATES. FAC | | | 61G15-23.002(2) & FS 471.025. | | | | | | 2. SHT P-1 SHOWS THE GAS LINE TO THE EMERGENCY | | | GENERATOR. THE NOTE INDICATES 20 PSI REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICATION SHEETS AS WELL AS | | | INSTALLATION SHEETS FOR THE GENERATOR SHOWING A LISTING | | | FOR THE GENERATOR, INLET PRESSURE & BTU LOAD FOR THE | | | GENERATOR. SEPARATE GENERATOR PERMIT REQUIRED. FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS DOES NOT HAVE A TABLE FOR 20 PSI. PLEASE | | | SUBMIT AN APPROVED GAS PIPE SIZING TABLE FOR 20 PSI. | | | SECTION 402. | | | | | | 3. SHT P-5 THE GAS PIPING, (1-1/2") TO THE GENERATOR | | | DOES NOT REFLECT THE GAS PIPING SIZE INDICATED ON SHT | | | P-1, (1"). PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTION 402. | | | | | | 4. SHT P-5 SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FOR EACH GAS SYSTEM: | | | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE. (PIPE LENGTHS NOT INDICATED). | | | | | | B. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH | | | NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL | | | TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE IF BEING USED. | | | | | | C. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). | | | | | | D. INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | | PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. (20 PSI ON SHT P-1 | | | BUT .5 PSI ON SHT P-5) CLARIFY EACH SYSTEM. | | | | | | E. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. | | | | | | **PLEASE SHOW "GAS PIPING SIZED ON FOLLOWING" FOR EACH | | | METER/SYSTEM. | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
18 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-11-17 |
Time |
15:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-11-17 |
Time |
15:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
17 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-10-05 |
Time |
15:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-10-05 |
Time |
15:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
16 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-21 |
Time |
11:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-21 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-21 11:55:55 | REVISION TO C8 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
15 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-16 |
Time |
14:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-16 |
Time |
14:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-16 14:48:03 | STRUCTURAL REVISION, SHEET S8, ROUTED TO ZONING (JR) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
14 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-09-03 |
Time |
08:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-09-03 |
Time |
08:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-14 08:57:08 | C-29 | | 2009-09-14 08:52:25 | C-30 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
11:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
11:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
Time |
17:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
Time |
17:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-31 11:21:08 | *********MOVED TO C-25****************** | | 2009-08-19 17:44:18 | C-12********EXPEDITED*************** |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-08-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-14 |
Time |
09:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-14 |
Time |
09:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-14 09:50:40 | IN PLUMBING BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-08-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-03 |
Time |
13:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-03 |
Time |
13:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-07-20 |
Time |
11:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-07-20 |
Time |
11:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-06-04 |
Time |
13:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-06-04 |
Time |
13:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-05 13:12:05 | PASE 3 STRUCTURAL REVISIONS, PUT IN PLAN REVIEW ROOM | | | FOR DOUG LM |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2009-05-22 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dwise |
Date |
2009-05-11 |
Time |
19:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-09 10:51:51 | TO "C50" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-24 |
Time |
14:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-24 |
Time |
14:00 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-24 14:01:11 | SENT TO DVP DESK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
09:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-03 09:37:19 | TO "COMM" BD#43 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-06 |
Time |
10:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-06 |
Time |
10:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-06 10:54:57 | TO "COMM" BD#19/PLANS ON RACK/3 ROLLS AND PAPERWORK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-23 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-23 |
Time |
15:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-23 15:59:20 | TO "COMM" BD#63 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
Time |
15:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-26 10:59:32 | TO "COMM" BD#56 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
12:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
12:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-08 12:10:34 | PLANS RETURNED FROM IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT | | | 8178 SF, $0 DUE PER W SWOPE (PLANS STAMPED, NOTE FROM | | | IMPACT FEES INCLUED) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-08-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-08-06 |
Time |
12:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-08-06 |
Time |
12:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-09-29 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
Time |
10:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-04-16 |
Time |
10:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-04-16 |
Time |
10:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-16 10:10:49 | ***REVISION DATED 4/12/2009 FAILED LANDSCAPE REVIEW*** | | | | | | 1. CHANGES TO THE SITE LAYOUT SHOWN ON THE PHOTOMETRIC | | | PLAN ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. | | | ALL PLANS MUST BE CONSISTENT. | | | | | | 2, THERE ARE CONFLICTS BETWEEN SITE LIGHTING AND | | | PROPOSED TREES. ALL SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS SHALL BE | | | SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID SUCH CONFLICTS. | | | LIGHT POLES SHALL BE CENTERED BETWEEN TREES AROUND THE | | | PERIMETER OF THE SITE. WALL MOUNTED LIGHTING SHALL BE | | | UNOBSTRUCTED. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
Time |
15:25 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-02-18 |
Time |
14:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-02-18 |
Time |
09:15 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-18 15:01:07 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS FOR THE FEBRUARY 11TH PPRC | | | MEETING HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO | | | ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462, |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-01-05 |
Time |
15:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-01-05 |
Time |
15:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-05 15:50:37 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-442 (B)(4), ALL LANDSCAPED | | | AREAS AND PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO | | | VEHICULAR USE AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR | | | ENCROACHMENT BY WHEEL STOPS, CURBS OR OTHER SIMILAR | | | DEVICES. THOUGH CURBING WAS SHOWN IN CERTAIN AREAS OF | | | THE SITE, OTHER AREAS ARE UNPROTECTED. | | | | | | 2. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (B)(4), AT LEAST ONE | | | SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED IN A REQUIRED | | | BUFFER STRIP FOR EACH 30 LINEAR FEET OR PORTION | | | THEREOF. IN AT LEAST ONE LOCATION ALONG THE SOUTH | | | PERIMETER OF THE SITE, AN EXISTING TREE IS BEING | | | REMOVED AND THE GAP LEFT BETWEEN TREES WILL BE GREATER | | | THAN 30 FEET. PLEASE ADD TREES WHERE NECESSARY ON ALL | | | SIDES OF THE SITE TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT A. | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2008-10-20 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
2008-10-20 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-20 13:08:55 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(B), THE LANDSCAPING, TREE | | | PROTECTION, AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV | | | SHALL APPLY TO ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY. BECAUSE | | | THIS ALTERATION EXCEEDS 50 PERCENT OF THE VALUE OF THE | | | STRUCTURE, THE ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE UPGRADED TO MEET | | | ALL MINIUM LANDSCAPE STANDARDS. | | | | | | 2. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A | | | REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, THAT SHOWS THE ENTIRE | | | SITE, AS WELL AS, THE ACCESS WAYS. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A XERISCAPE TABLE AND ALL LANDSCAPE | | | CALCULATIONS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ARTICLE XIV. THE | | | PLAN SHALL INCLUDE A PLANT LIST THAT IDENITIFIES ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER. | | | IT SHALL PROVIDE THE QUANTITY, SIZE AND SPACING OF ALL | | | PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL. | | | | | | 4. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-444(B), OUTDOOR INCINERATORS, | | | GARBAGE OR TRASH RECEPTALCES, FUEL OIL OR PROPANE | | | TANKS, AND STORAGE RACKS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED UNLESS | | | APPROPRIATE SCREENING IS PROVIDED. PLEASE INDICATE HOW | | | TRASH AND GARBAGE WILL BE COLLECTED AND SHOW HOW IT | | | WILL BE SCREENED. THE PROPOSED GENERATOR SHALL ALSO BE | | | SCREENED. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS, | | | PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-12-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-12-17 |
Time |
20:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-12-17 |
Time |
20:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-17 20:31:21 | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | WIND CALCULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT SUBMITTED, | | | PROVIDE AT LEAST TWO ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED SETS | | | FOR BUILDING PLAN REVIEW TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FBC-M 301.13. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-12-17 |
Time |
20:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-12-17 |
Time |
20:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-17 20:29:13 | REVISED PLANS AS FOLLOWS: | | | M-1A DELTA 7 | | | M-1B DELTA 7 | | | M-2A DELTA 6 | | | M-2B DELTA 7 | | | M-2C DELTA 5 | | | M-3 DELTA 7 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-10-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-10-09 |
Time |
09:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-10-09 |
Time |
09:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-09 09:48:50 | REVISED AS FOLLOWS: | | | M1A, M2B, M3 DELTA 7 | | | M1B DELTA 8 | | | M2A DELTA 6 | | | M2C DELTA 3 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-27 |
Time |
17:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-26 |
Time |
19:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-27 18:00:22 | REVISED FOR PHASE 2 "PERFORMANCE REVISION" | | 2009-08-26 19:45:06 | IN PROGRESS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
Time |
19:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
Time |
18:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-10 19:17:44 | REVIEW #: 2ND (PHASE 2) | | | ACTION: **PASSED WITH PROVISO** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 2. SUBMITTAL FOR RECIRCULATING SYSTEMS WAS RECEIVED. | | | HOWEVER, THE COMMERCIAL KITCHEN AREA STILL REQUIRES AN | | | OVERALL EXHAUST RATE OF 0.7 CFM PER SQ FT IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH ASHRAE 62.1-2004 TABLE 6-4. REVISE PLANS | | | ACCORDINGLY AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | 6. WRITTEN RESPONSE INDICATES WIND RESISTANCE FOR | | | MECHANICAL APPLIANCES IS A 2007 CODE REQUIREMENT. THIS | | | IS INCORRECT. THE SAME REQUIREMENTS ARE IN PLACE UNDER | | | THE 2004 FBC. PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS WIND RESISTANCE | | | DATA FOR ALL OUTDOOR APPLIANCES IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBC-M 2004 EDITION SECTION 301.13. | | | | | | NOTE: PREVIOUS MECHANICAL PLANS (PAGE M-1 AIR BALANCE | | | SCHEDULE) SHOWED A MODULATING 100% OUTSIDE AIR | | | DEHUMIDIFACTION UNIT PROVIDING 9000 CFM OUTSIDE AIR IN | | | THE SKATING RINK AREA VIA DUCT SOCK. THIS UNIT SHALL | | | NOT BE CONSIDERED AS ELIMINATED BASED ON THESE | | | REVISIONS. ELIMINATION OF THIS UNIT WOULD LEAVE THE | | | RINK AND SPECTATOR AREAS WITHOUT VENTILATION AS | | | REQUIRED UNDER ASHRAE 62.1-2004. THIS UNIT IS STILL | | | SHOWN ON PERMIT PLANS ON PAGE M-2-IRB. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-07-20 |
Time |
20:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-07-20 |
Time |
17:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-20 20:06:00 | REVIEW #: 1ST | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | 1. 100% OUTSIDE AIR UNIT AHU-3 SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A | | | MOTORIZED VOLUME DAMPER IN THE OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE DUCT | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-B 13-409.AB 3.3. | | | | | | 2. CONCESSION AREA REQUIRES COMMERCIAL KITCHEN EXHAUST | | | HOOD IF COMMERCIAL COOKING IS TO OCCUR IN THIS AREA IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M 507.2. PROVIDE SEPARATE PLANS AND | | | PERMIT APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL HOOD AND HOOD | | | SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 3. EF-2 IN ZAMBONI ROOM IS NOT SERVING AS AN EXHAUST | | | FAN, BUT AS A SUPPLY FAN. SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED IN SUPPLY AIR SYSTEMS WITH A DESIGN CAPACITY | | | GREATER THAN 2,000 CFM IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M | | | 606.2.1. | | | | | | 4. SHOW HOW MINIMUM CONTINUOUS VENTILATION RATE OF 0.05 | | | CFM PER SQ. FT. IS TO BE PROVIDED IN ZAMBONI STORAGE | | | ROOM PER FBC-M 404.2. | | | | | | 5. PAGE M-2B SHOWS A 4 INCH VENT TO WALL CAP AND | | | REFERENCES A DETAIL ON PAGE M-4. NO SUCH DETAIL COULD | | | BE FOUND ON PAGE M-4. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 6. ALL OUTDOOR APPLIANCES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND | | | INSTALLED FOR WIND RESISTANCE. PROVIDE DATA FROM | | | OUTDOOR APPLIANCE MANUFACTURER(S) SHOWING THE OUTDOOR | | | APPLIANCES ARE DESIGNED FOR WIND RESISTANCE IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M 301.13. | | | | | | NOTE: THE PHASING ASPECT OF THIS PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK | | | IS NOT CLEAR. SOME AREAS INDICATE THEY ARE EXISTING | | | UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT BUT THIS SCOPE IS SUBMITTED AS A | | | REVISION TO EXISTING PERMIT WHICH IS STILL OPEN. ANY | | | DUPLICATIVE REVIEW OF EXISTING SYSTEMS IS A RESULT OF | | | THIS LACK OF CLARITY. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2009-05-22 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dwise |
Date |
2009-05-22 |
Time |
19:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-27 19:44:55 | APPROVED AS NOTED ON PLANS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
11:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
11:56 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-06 11:57:26 | SENT TO LMARTINEZ FOR PROCESSING |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-13 |
Time |
08:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-12 |
Time |
20:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-13 08:00:32 | REVIEW #: 3RD | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND | | | STAMPED. HOWEVER, REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN FAIL STATUS | | | PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS: A SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY HAS BEEN | | | PROVIDED IN LIEU OF COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS. THIS IS | | | ACCEPTABLE BUT THE SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY MUST BE SIGNED | | | AND SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-407.1.ABC.1. | | | | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS: PLEASE SEE BUILDING AND ELECTRICAL | | | COMMENTS. THIS REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN FAIL STATUS UNTIL | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS PASS ALL REVIEWS. | | | | | | DRYER EXHAUST: DRYER MODEL NUMBER HAS BEEN SHOWN ON | | | PLANS AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. | | | DRYER INSTALLATION IS CODE COMPLIANT. HOWEVER, PLEASE | | | RPOVIDE THREE COPIES OF THE DRYER SPECS AND | | | INSTRUCTIONS TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE THREE PERMIT SETS | | | OF PLANS AND SUBMITTALS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-28 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-28 |
Time |
11:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-28 11:54:21 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | NOTE: WHILE THIS IS THE SECOND PLAN REVIEW FOR PERMIT, | | | THE EXTENT OF DESIGN CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | (AREAS IDENTIFIED ON PLANS WITH CLOUDS AS HAVING BEEN | | | CHANGED) MAKES IT NECESSARY TO REVIEW ALL SYSTEMS AND | | | DESIGNS COMPLETELY. | | | | | | 1. ONE SET OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LIFE SAFETY PLAN WERE | | | NOT SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT. PLEASE PROVIDE PROPER | | | SEAL, SIGNATURE, DATE AND TITLE BLOCK INFORMATION AS | | | REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 106.1 AND FS 481. | | | | | | 2. PAGE M-4: DETAIL FOR DUCT SMOKE DETECTOR SHOWS THE | | | DETECTOR BEING INSTALLED IN THE RETURN AIR SYSTEM. DUCT | | | SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SUPPLY AIR | | | SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 606.2.1. | | | | | | 3. PAGE M-2: THERE ARE MULTIPLE UNPROTECTED DUCT | | | PENETRATIONS AND AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS SHOWN ON FLOOR | | | PLANS AT FIRE RATED WALL PENETRATIONS. EXAMPLES ARE IN | | | AREAS SUCH AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES, RESTROOMS AND | | | ZAMBONI STORAGE ROOM. ONE SET OF PLANS HAS BEEN | | | MARKED-UP TO IDENTIFY THESE LOCATIONS. SHOW HOW ALL | | | DUCT PENETRATIONS AND AIR TRANSFER OPENING AT RATED | | | WALL ASSEMBLIES ARE TO BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBCM 607.5. | | | | | | 4. PAGES M-1 AND M-2: FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR RUSKIN MODEL | | | #DFSDR1 ROUND FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER AT SEVERAL WALL | | | PENETRATIONS. THIS DAMPER IS DESIGNED AND LISTED FOR | | | USE AS A CEILING DAMPER AT PENETRATIONS OF HORIZONTAL | | | ASSEMBLES SUCH AS TUNNEL CORRIDOR CEILINGS OR AT | | | MEMBRANE PENETRATIONS OF FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES. THEY | | | ARE NOT DESIGNED OR INTENDED TO BE INSTALLED AT | | | VERTICAL WALL ASSEMBLIES. THERE ARE NO INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUCH AN APPLICATION. FIRE DAMPERS, | | | COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS AND CEILING DAMPERS | | | LOCATED WITHIN AIR DISTRIBUTION SHALL BE INSTALLED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION, AND | | | THE MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND | | | LISTING PER FBCM 607.2. PLEASE INDICATE ON PLANS THE | | | PROPER DAMPER FOR THE PROPER APPLICATION IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THEIR LISTING AND THIS SECTION. | | | | | | 5. PAGE M-2: FLOOR PLAN SHOWS AT LEAST ONE DUCT | | | PENETRATION BEING PROTECTED BY A FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER | | | WHERE NO RATED WALL ASSEMBLY IS SHOWN. AN EXAMPLE WOULD | | | BE A 4 INCH ROUND FLEX DUCT PENETRATING A WALL NEAR THE | | | LAUNDRY ROOM AT THE ADJACENT CLOSET. PLEASE CONFIRM | | | THAT DAMPERS ARE ONLY SHOWN AT RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR LISTING PER FBCM 607.2. | | | | | | 6. PAGE M-2: FLOOR PLAN SHOWS A 4 INCH ROUND DRYER | | | EXHAUST DUCT PENETRATING A RATED WALL ASSEMBLY WITH A | | | FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER AT THE PENETRATION. FIRE DAMPERS, | | | COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS AND ANY SIMILAR DEVICES | | | THAT WILL OBSTRUCT THE EXHAUST FLOW, SHALL BE | | | PROHIBITED IN CLOTHES DRYER EXHAUST DUCTS IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBCM 504.2. THIS DUCT PENETRATION CAN BE PROTECTED | | | WITH THE THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOP DETAIL WHICH IS | | | ALREADY SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PLEASE REMOVE THE DAMPER | | | FROM THE PLANS AT THIS LOCATION AND CALL FOR THE | | | THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOP SYSTEM TO BE USED AT THIS | | | LOCATION. | | | | | | 7. PAGE M-2: FLOOR PLAN SHOWS SEVERAL FLEX DUCTS | | | ATTACHING DIRECTLY TO THE FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS. ACCESS | | | DOORS ARE REQUIRED AT THESE LOCATIONS. PLEASE SHOW HOW | | | DUCT ACCESS TO THESE DAMPERS IS TO BE PROVIDED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.4. | | | | | | 8. PAGE M-2 SHOWS DRYER EXHAUST DUCT EXCEEDING 25 FEET | | | IN LENGTH. SHOW HOW EXHAUST DUCT IS TO BE ROUTED AND | | | TERMINATED WITH A DEVELOPED LENGTH OF 25 FEET OR LESS | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 504.6.1. | | | NOTE: THE EXCEPTION TO THIS SYSTEM ALLOWS THE USE OF | | | DRYER MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS TO ALLOW | | | LENGTHS IN EXCESS OF 25 FEET. DRYER MANUFACTURER?S | | | INSTRUCTIONS MAY BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | | | 9. PAGE M-2 INDICATES THAT EXHAUST FANS IN THE | | | REFRIGERATION MACHINERY ROOM WILL ONLY OPERATE AT FULL | | | SPEED UNDER EMERGENCY CONDITIONS. MECHANICAL | | | VENTILATION SHALL BE CAPABLE OF EXHAUSTING THE MINIMUM | | | QUANTITY OF AIR BOTH AT NORMAL OPERATING AND EMERGENCY | | | CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 1105.6. PLEASE SHOW | | | HOW THE REQUIRED MINIMUM VENTILATION RATE OF NOT LESS | | | THAN 0.5 CFM PER SQUARE FOOT IS TO BE ACHIEVED IN THE | | | REFRIGERATION MACHINERY ROOM IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | | 1105.6.3. | | | | | | 10. PAGE M-1: AIR BALANCE SCHEDULE CALLS FOR 9000 CFM | | | MAKEUP AIR UNIT. NO INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND ON | | | PLANS, EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE OR ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR | | | THIS UNIT. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATION, INSTALLATION | | | DETAIL, INFORMATION ON EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE AND ALL | | | RELEVANT INFORMATION ON PLANS AND IN ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 106.1.1, FBCM | | | 304.1 AND FBCB 13-100.2. | | | | | | 11. PAGE M-5: NOTE 3B.3 AND 3B.4 CALL FOR EXTERIOR | | | DUCTWORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE ABOVE MENTIONED MAKEUP AIR | | | UNIT. NO SUCH DUCTWORK OR AIR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IS | | | SHOWN ON PLANS. PLEASE SHOW ALL AIR DISTRIBUTION | | | SYSTEMS ON THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FBCM 603.1. ALSO, PROVIDE INSTALLATION DETAIL AS | | | INDICATED IN THE NOTE WITH WIND RESISTANCE INFORMATION | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. ALSO, THIS SECTION | | | REQUIRES ALL APPLIANCES AND EQUIPMENT EXPOSED TO WIND | | | BE DESIGNED TO RESIST WIND PRESSURES. PROVIDE | | | MANUFACTURER?S DATA SHOWING ALL OUTDOOR APPLIANCES ARE | | | DESIGNED TO RESIST WIND PRESSURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THIS SECTION. | | | | | | 12. PAGE M-3: CONDENSATE TRAP DETAIL SHOWS A SECONDARY | | | DRAIN FROM AN AUXILIARY DRAIN PAN. THIS DETAIL CALLS | | | FOR THE SECONDARY DRAIN TO BE ROUTED TO THE ?NEAREST | | | WET COLUMN.? IF A SECONDARY DRAIN IS USED, IT SHALL | | | DISCHARGE TO A CONSPICUOUS POINT OF DISPOSAL TO ALERT | | | OCCUPANTS IN THE EVENT OF A STOPPAGE OF THE PRIMARY | | | DRAIN IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 307.2.3(1). THE DETAIL | | | ALSO SHOWS A FLOAT SWITCH IN THE AUXILIARY DRAIN PAN. | | | THE USE OF A WATER LEVEL DETECTION DEVICE IN THE | | | AUXILIARY PAN MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF THE SECONDARY | | | DRAIN PER FBCM 307.2.3(3), MAKING THE SECONDARY DRAIN | | | LINE UNNECESSARY. PLEASE CLARIFY THE TYPE OF AUXILIARY | | | DRAIN PROTECTION TO BE USED AT THE AHUS. | | | | | | 13. THE AREA OF THE SCOPE OF WORK ON PLANS INCLUDES AN | | | UNFINISHED SHELL SPACE. THIS SPACE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN | | | THE METHOD C ENERGY CALCULATIONS. ALL ASSUMPTIONS MADE | | | ABOUT FEATURES NOT INSTALLED UNTIL LATER THAT ARE NOT | | | ON THE BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE LISTED AND APPENDED TO | | | THE COMPLIANCE FORM SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING | | | DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-101.1.6. ALSO, | | | COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS OR A SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY | | | SHALL BE APPENDED TO THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-407.1.ABC.1. | | | NOTE: IF A SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY IS PROVIDED, IT SHALL | | | BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
14:32 |
Rev Time |
5.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
11:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-22 12:26:39 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | | | | 1) MECHANICAL PLANS M-1 AND M-2 ARE SHOWING DUCTS | | | PENETRATING THE 1-HR RATED EGRESS CORRIDOR (SEE PLAN | | | LS.01), AT THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. PER 2004 FBC | | | 607.5.4 CORRIDORS/SMOKE BARRIERS. A LISTED SMOKE DAMPER | | | DESIGNED TO RESIST THE PASSAGE OF SMOKE SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED AT EACH POINT A DUCT OR AIR TRANSFER OPENING | | | PENETRATES A SMOKE BARRIER WALL OR A CORRIDOR ENCLOSURE | | | REQUIRED TO HAVE SMOKE AND DRAFT CONTROL DOORS IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | SMOKE DAMPERS AND SMOKE DAMPER ACTUATION METHODS SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 607.5.4.1. ALSO SEE 2004 FBC | | | 715.3.3. | | | | | | 2) PLANS SHOW THE DUCTS ALSO PENETRATE FIRE PARTITIONS, | | | PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS HOW THE PENETRATIONS ARE BEING | | | PROTECTED, PER 2004 FBC/M 607.5.3. | | | | | | 3) PLEASE PROVIDE FOR RETURN AIR TO THE FIRST AID ROOM | | | AND BRAKE ROOM ON PLAN M-2, PER 2004 FBC/M 601.4. | | | | | | 4) PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS HOW THE ZAMBONI STORAGE ROOM | | | WILL COMPLY WITH 2004 FBC/M 404 ENCLOSED PARKING | | | GARAGES. | | | | | | 5) SHOW ON PLANS FOR EQUIPMENT ROOM, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | 2004 FBC/M 1104.2, 1105 MACHINERY ROOM AND 1106. | | | | | | 6) THE TWO CARRIER A/C SYSTEM MODEL NUMBERS LISTED ON | | | THE A/C EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE COULD NOT BE FOUND ON THE | | | ARI DIRECTORY WEB-SITE, PLEASE CORRECT, SUBMIT AN ARI | | | CERTIFICATE OR MANUFACTURE SPEC. SHEETS, PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-407.1.ABC.3.1.1 OR 13-607.1.ABC.3.1.1. | | | | | | 7) ONLY ONE OF THE CARRIER A/C SPLIT SYSTEMS ARE LISTED | | | ON THE ENERGY CAL'S. PLEASE CORRECT PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-103.3. | | | | | | 8) THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD NEED TO REVIEW | | | AND APPROVE THE SHOP DRAWINGS FROM BRR TECHNOLOGIES (A | | | SHOP REVIEW STAMP AND SIGNATURE WILL MEET THIS | | | REQUIREMENT), SEE 2004 WPB AMEND. 106.3. | | | | | | 9) PLEASE SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL OR AN NOA FOR RUSKIN | | | LOUVERS, SEE FS 553.842(1) AND FAC RULE 9B-72, | | | 9B-72.005, AND FAC 9B-72.010(31)(H). | | | | | | **PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION | | | AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE | | | SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | | PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT | | | IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT | | | HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR | | | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE | | | 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | | | | | *** PRODUCT APPROVALS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN | | | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL (A SHOP REVIEW STAMP AND | | | SIGNATURE WILL MEET THIS REQUIREMENT). SEE W.P.B. | | | AMEND. 106.3. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-08-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-29 |
Time |
17:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-29 |
Time |
17:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-29 17:10:49 | REVISIONS DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. SHT P-1 HAS BEEN SUPERCEDED BY A REVISION WITH NEW | | | UP TO DATE INFORMATION. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | 2. SHT P-1A IS A SHEET THAT HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY | | | SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED AND IS ON FILE. NO CHANGES | | | INDICATED. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | 3. SHT P-1C IS A SHEET THAT HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY | | | SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED AND IS ON FILE. NO CHANGES | | | INDICATED. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | 4. SHT P-2B INDICATES A NEW REVISION #6. NO REVISION #6 | | | WAS FOUND AND NO CHANGES/REVISION WERE LOCATED. SECTION | | | 106.1.3. | | | | | | 5. SHT P-3A IS A SHEET THAT HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY | | | SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED AND IS ON FILE. NO CHANGES | | | INDICATED. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
17:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
17:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-20 17:36:38 | REVISIONS OK -- SHTS P-1, P-1A, P-1B, P-1C, P-2B, P-3A | | | & P5 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
Time |
17:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-08-07 |
Time |
18:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-10 17:49:28 | REVISION DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2007 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2007 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2007 CAHPTER 11 | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVISION REVIEW:+ | | | | | | 1. OK | | | 2. OK | | | 3. OK (DELETED) | | | | | | 4. SHT P-1 3 INCH SANITARY FROM 2ND FLOOR TO DRYWELL IS | | | PROHIBITED. SECTION 301.3. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE PIPING STILL IS INDICATED | | | AS SANITARY, NOT CONDENSATE ON SHT P-1. | | | | | | 5. OK | | | 6. OK | | | 7. OK | | | | | | 8. SHT P-2B INDICATE WHERE THE WATER HEATER PAN DRAIN | | | LINE TERMINATES. SECTION 504.7.2. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 9. SHT P-3A THE SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM DOES | | | NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES IT MEET CODE. | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: | | | - THE CLEANOUTS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 708.3.2 & 708.3.5 | | | SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN ARE MISSING ON THE RISER. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | - OK | | | - OK | | | - OK | | | - OK | | | PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
Time |
18:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-23 |
Time |
18:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-30 18:45:32 | REVISION DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2007 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2007 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2007 CAHPTER 11 | | | | | | 1. SHTS P-1 & P-1B INDICATE WHERE THE SANITARY BUILDING | | | DRAIN CONNECTS TO THE BUILDING SEWER FOR THE FIXTURES | | | AT THE EQUIPMENT SANITARY. SECTION 701.3. | | | | | | 2. SHTS P-1 & P-1B FITTING FOR FLOOR DRAIN DOWS NOT | | | ALLOW THE SEWAGE/WASTE TO BE GUIDED IN THE DIRECTION OF | | | FLOW. SECTION 706.3. | | | | | | 3. SHTS P-1 & P-1A GREASE EATING BACTERIA. PLEASE | | | SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICATION ON SYSTEM. SECTION 106.1.2, | | | (MORE INFORMATION REQUIRED). | | | | | | 4. SHT P-1 3 INCH SANITARY FROM 2ND FLOOR TO DRYWELL IS | | | PROHIBITED. SECTION 301.3. | | | | | | 5. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM FACILITIES PER | | | TABLES 1004.1.1, (BLDG) & 403.1, (PLMG). INDICATE THE | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE & OCCUPANCY LOAD FOR ALL OCCUPANCIES, | | | ASSEMBLY, BUSINESS, STORAGE ETC. INDICATE THE TOTAL | | | OCCUPANCY INCLUDING ALL NEW SEATING. ALSO SHOW POTTY | | | PARITY AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 403.1.1. | | | | | | 6. SHT 310 DETAIL #6 BATHROOM TO BE ADAPTABLE. SUBMIT | | | INFORMATION ON DETAIL SHOWING ALL BACKING FOR REQUIRED | | | GRAB BARS IN THE SHOWER AND AT THE WATER CLOSET | | | SECTIONS 11-4.16.4 & 11-4.21.4. INDICATE THE W/C TO BE | | | 18" OFF THE WALL TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE FIXTURE. (FIG | | | 28). SHOW THE REQUIRED TURNING AREA IN THE BATHROOM. | | | 11-4.23.3. | | | | | | 7. SHT P-1A DETAIL 3. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION ON THE | | | LEFT SIDE OF DETAIL. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTIONS 106.1.1 & | | | 106.1.2. | | | | | | 8. SHT P-2B INDICATE WHERE THE WATER HEATER PAN DRAIN | | | LINE TERMINATES. SECTION 504.7.2. | | | | | | 9. SHT P-3A THE SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM DOES | | | NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES IT MEET CODE. | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: | | | - THE CLEANOUTS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 708.3.2 & 708.3.5 | | | SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN ARE MISSING ON THE RISER. | | | - THE FITTING AT THE JUNCTION OF THE BUILDING DRAIN & | | | THE BUILDING SEWER AT THE N.W. CORNER OF THE BUILDING | | | DOES NOT GUIDE THE SEWAGE/WASTE IN THE DIRECTION OF | | | FLOW. SECTION 706.3. | | | - PIPING TO THE W/C & LAV IN THE MEN'S LOCKER ROOM DOES | | | NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. SECTION 701.1. | | | - THE VENT IS MISSING IN ONE GANG SHOWER BUT IS SHOWN | | | ON THE FLOOR PLAN. SECTION 901.1. | | | - FLOOR DRAINS IN THE GANG BATH ON THE SECOND FLOOR ARE | | | SHOWN BETWEEN THE LAST W/C & THE NEXT TO LAST W/C ON | | | THE FLOOR PLAN, BUT AFTER ALL W/C'S ON THE RISER | | | DIAGRAM. SECTION 701.1. PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2009-05-22 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dwise |
Date |
2009-05-22 |
Time |
19:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-27 19:43:42 | REVIEWED BY DOUG WISE. APPROVED AS NOTED ON PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
19:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
19:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-10 19:11:39 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. SHTS P-2B & P-8 INDICATES REVISION NUMBER 4 IN THE | | | REVISION INDEX, BUT NO REVISION NUMBER 4 WAS FOUND ON | | | EITHER SHEET. PLEASE CLOUD AND INDICATE THE NEW | | | REVISION WITH A REVISION NUMBER. ALSO TO HELP EXPEDITE | | | FUTURE REVISION REVIEWS, PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CLOUDS AND | | | REVISION NUMBERS FROM PREVIOUSLY APPROVED REVISION. | | | (EXAMPLE: REVISION 4 SUBMITTED SO REVISIONS 1, 2 & 3 | | | CLOUDS AND REVISIONS NUMBERS SHOULD BE TURNED OFF. | | | SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
19:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
19:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-10 19:07:47 | REVISION OK -- SHT P-6 REVISION #4. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
Time |
15:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-09 15:54:36 | COMMENTS FROM #3 REVIEW HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, SEE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
17:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
17:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-04 18:02:19 | PLANS APPROVED. PERMIT TO STAY IN FAILED STATUS UNTIL | | | THE COMMENT ABOUT THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-02-07 |
Time |
17:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-02-07 |
Time |
17:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-07 17:01:40 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBIING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | CITY WPB MUNICIPAL CODE | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | 2. OK | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT ASKS FOR GROSS SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE AND WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS A CHANGE OF | | | OCCUPANCY. PLEASE INDICATE BOTH ON THE APPLICATION. | | | SECTION 105.1. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 4. OK | | | 5. OK | | | 6. OK | | | 7. OK | | | 8. OK | | | 9. OK | | | 10. OK | | | 11. OK | | | 12. OK | | | 13. OK | | | 14. OK | | | 15. OK | | | 16. OK | | | 17. OK | | | 18. OK | | | 19. OK | | | 20. OK | | | 21. OK | | | 22. OK | | | 23. OK | | | 24. OK | | | | | | ***********NEW COMMENTS*********** | | | 1B. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS ARE NOT SEALED ONE SET OF | | | PLANS. SECTION 106.1. | | | | | | 2B. OK | | | 3B. OK | | | 4B. OK | | | | | | 5B. SHT P-7 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN AT THE SHOWER IN THE PRIVATE | | | BATH, AT THE TOILET ROOM BY COL. LINE F/1 AND CLEANOUTS | | | ADDED TO THE FLOOR PLAN IN THE SEWER LINES ARE NOT | | | SHOWN ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTION | | | 106.1.1 AND TABLE 710.1.1. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE PIPING IN THE PRIVATE BATH | | | SHOW THE PIPING TO THE LAV INDICATED AT THE WATER | | | CLOSET, AND THE PIPING TO THE WATER CLOSET AT THE LAV | | | LOCATION. -- THE CLEANOUTS SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN OF | | | SHT P-1 ARE STILL NOT SHOWN ON THE SANITARY ISOMETRIC | | | RISER DIAGRAM. STILL MISSING ARE THE CLEANOUT ON THE | | | NORTH SEWER 100 FEET DOWNSTREAM OF THE TWO WAY CLEANOUT | | | NEAR THE JUNCTION OF THE BUILDING DRAIN AND THE | | | BUILDING SEWER. THE CLEANOUTS NEAR THE JUNCTIONS OF THE | | | BUILDING DRAINS AND THE BUILDING SEWERS, (SECTION | | | 708.3.5), FOR THE GREASE LINE, THE SANITARY LINE FOR | | | THE MECHANICAL FLOOR DRAINS ON THE WEST SIDE, & THE | | | SANITARY DRAIN FOR THE MEN'S AND WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOMS. | | | ALSO THE CLEANOUTS FOR THE BUILDING SEWER ON THE SOUTH | | | SIDE OF THE BUILDING ARE NOT SHOWN, (3). -- NOTE: THE | | | CLEANOUT FOR THE NORTH SEWER ON THE FLOOR PLAN SCALES | | | OUT OVER 100 FEET ON SHT P-1. PER SECTION 708.3.2 | | | MAXIMUM 100 FEET BETWEEN CLEANOUTS ON THE BUILDING | | | SEWERS. | | | | | | 6B. OK | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT NOTE:********** | | | | | | 1C. PLEASE SUBMIT ONE SET OF PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS | | | AS ALL SHEETS HAVE BEEN REPLACED WITH NEW SHEETS AND IF | | | THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS ARE NOT SUBMITTED FOR | | | COMPARISON THEN EACH SHEET WILL HAVE TO BE REVIEWED AS | | | A NEW SHEET AND MORE/DIFFERENT COMMENTS MAY BE | | | FORTHCOMING. PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE INDICATING THE | | | REQUIREMENT FOR ONE SET OF VOIDED SHEETS. | | | | | | ******************************************* | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-06 |
Time |
18:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-23 |
Time |
17:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-06 18:55:07 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBIING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | CITY WPB MUNICIPAL CODE | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | 2. OK | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT ASKS FOR GROSS SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE AND WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS A CHANGE OF | | | OCCUPANCY. PLEASE INDICATE BOTH ON THE APPLICATION. | | | SECTION 105.1. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 4. OK | | | | | | 5. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM FACILITIES PER | | | TABLES 1004.1.2 & 403.1. PER TABLE 1004.1.2 THE RINK IS | | | 50 GROSS. (SHOW GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE RINK. | | | PLEASE INDICATE CALCULATIONS FOR OTHER OCCUPANCIES SUCH | | | AS BUSINESS & STORAGE. INDICATE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | EACH AREA ON THE FLOOR PLAN AS WELL AS THE DECK AREA | | | AROUND THE RINK. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE NUMBER OF W/C'S FOR THE | | | WOMEN SHALL BE CHANGED TO 9. (347 DIVIDED BY 40 EQUALS | | | 8.675 WHICH SHALL BE ROUNDED UP TO 9). PLEASE CORRECT | | | SHT CV.01. | | | | | | 6. OK | | | 7. OK | | | 8. OK | | | | | | 9. SHT A.01.1 & A.09 (DETAILS A/A.09, E/A.09, 1/A.09, | | | 2/A.09, 3/A.09 & 4/A.09). SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | | | | ___FOR W/C'S: | | | A. OK | | | B. OK | | | C. 11-4.16.5 FLUSH CONTROLS | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT DETAIL 9 ON SHT A.09.1 SHOWS | | | THE FLUSH CONTROLS ON THE WALL SIDE. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | ___FOR LAVS: | | | A. OK | | | B. OK | | | C. OK | | | D. OK | | | | | | 10. SHT A.01.1 & A.09 (DETAILS D/A.09, 8/A.09 & | | | 9/A.09). THE BATHROOM SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE. PLEASE SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT PLANS MUST SHOW THE BACKING FOR | | | THE GRAB BARS IN THE SHOWER & W/C, A 5 FOOT TURNING | | | AREA, W/C TO BE 18" OFF THE WALL TO THE CENTERLINE OF | | | THE FIXTURE, SHOWER CONTROLS AT THE REQUIRED LOCATION & | | | A DETAIL FOR THE SHOWER CURB IF INSTALLED TO BE | | | ADAPTABLE. NO RESPONSE FOR DETAILS 8/A.09 & 9/A.09. | | | | | | 11. OK | | | 12. OK | | | 13. OK | | | 14. OK | | | 15. OK | | | 16. OK | | | 17. OK | | | 18. OK | | | 19. OK | | | 20. OK | | | 21. OK | | | 22. OK | | | 23. OK | | | 24. OK | | | | | | ***********NEW COMMENTS*********** | | | 1B. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS ARE NOT SEALED ONE SET OF | | | PLANS. SECTION 106.1. | | | | | | 2B. SHT A.01 STALL TO BE ACCESSIBLE IN TOILET ROOM AT | | | JUNCTION OF COL. LINES B & 2. SECTION 11-4.17.3 & FIG | | | 30E. | | | | | | 3B. SHT A.09 NOT SUBMITTED BUT STILL SHOWN ON THE INDEX | | | OF DRAWINGS. PLEASE CORRELATE. (SHT A.01 REFERENCES | | | DETAILS FROM SHT A.09) PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTIONS 106.1.1 | | | & 106.1.3. | | | | | | 4B. SHT P-1 FITTING ON SEWER LINE FROM TOILET ROOM ON | | | THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING IS SHOWN AGAINST THE | | | FLOW. PLEASE CORRECT. SECTION 706.3. | | | | | | 5B. SHT P-7 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN AT THE SHOWER IN THE PRIVATE | | | BATH, AT THE TOILET ROOM BY COL. LINE F/1 AND CLEANOUTS | | | ADDED TO THE FLOOR PLAN IN THE SEWER LINES ARE NOT | | | SHOWN ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTION | | | 106.1.1 AND TABLE 710.1.1. | | | | | | 6. SHT P-7 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM. THE VENT | | | FOR THE WASH MACHINE SHALL VENT OFF THE TOP OF THE | | | STACK, NOT OUT OF THE LAUNDRY BOX AT THE TOP OF THE | | | STANDPIPE AS SHOWN. SECTION 901.1. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
Time |
16:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-01 14:16:35 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBIING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | CITY WPB MUNICIPAL CODE | | | | | | 1. ALL SHEETS WITH ARCHITECTURAL TITLE BLOCK SHALL | | | INCLUDE THE ADDRESS AND FIRM LICENSE NUMBER, | | | (CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER), AS REQUIRED IN | | | FAC 61G1-16.004(1)(2) & FS 481.219, 481.2055. (SEE | | | ATTACHED SHEET). | | | | | | 2. SHT CV.01 STATES "INTENDED TO BE USED AS A PRIVATE | | | ENTERTAINMENT FACILITY". PLEASE CLARIFY. ENTERTAINMENT | | | FOR WHO? IS THIS A SELECT GROUP OF PEOPLE? IS THIS TO | | | BE A TRAINING FACILITY? SECTION 106.1.2 & TABLES | | | 1004.1.2 & 403.1. | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT ASKS FOR GROSS SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE AND WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS A CHANGE OF | | | OCCUPANCY. PLEASE INDICATE BOTH ON THE APPLICATION. | | | SECTION 105.1. | | | | | | 4. THE ADDRESS ON THE APPLICATION & IN THE CITY WEBSITE | | | IS SHOWN AS 1600 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD, BUT THE PLANS SHOW | | | THE ADDRESS AS 1590 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD. THE CORRECT | | | ADDRESS SHALL BE INDICATED ON EACH SHEET PER SECTIONS | | | 106.1.1 & 106.1.3. | | | | | | 5. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM FACILITIES PER | | | TABLES 1004.1.2 & 403.1. PER TABLE 1004.1.2 THE RINK IS | | | 50 GROSS. (SHOW GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE RINK. | | | PLEASE INDICATE CALCULATIONS FOR OTHER OCCUPANCIES SUCH | | | AS BUSINESS & STORAGE. INDICATE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | EACH AREA ON THE FLOOR PLAN AS WELL AS THE DECK AREA | | | AROUND THE RINK. | | | | | | 6. SHT LP-1 IS NOT SIGNED, SEALED & DATED AS REQUIRED | | | IN SECTION 106.1 & FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | | | | 7. SHT A.01 NOTE STATES "DEMO PLAN SUBMITTED UNDER | | | SEPARATE PERMIT". DEMO PERMIT NOT FOUND. PLEASE | | | INDICATE THE DEMO PERMIT NUMBER FOR REFERENCE. SECTION | | | 106.1.2 & SECTION 704.5. | | | | | | 8. SHTS A.01.1 & A.09 (DETAILS B/A.09 & C/A.09). SHOW | | | THE 5 FOOT TURNING AREA, BACKING FOR THE GRAB BARS AT | | | THE W/C AND SHOWER, INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE | | | CONTROLS IN THE SHOWER & SUBMIT A DETAIL FOR THE SHOWER | | | CURB, (MAX 1/2" IF INSTALLED, NO CURB REQUIRED). | | | SECTIONS 11-4.1.3(11), 11-4.16.4, 11-4.21.4, 11-4.21.5 | | | & 11-4.21.7. | | | | | | 9. SHT A.01.1 & A.09 (DETAILS A/A.09, E/A.09, 1/A.09, | | | 2/A.09, 3/A.09 & 4/A.09). SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | | | | ___FOR W/C'S: | | | A. 11-4.16.2 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | B. 11-4.16.4 GRAB BARS (INDICATED AS 3'6" AFF IN | | | DETAILS 2 & 4. | | | C. 11-4.16.5 FLUSH CONTROLS | | | | | | ___FOR LAVS: | | | A. 11-4.19.2 CLEARANCES | | | B. 11-4.19.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | C. 11-4.19.4 EXPOSED PIPES & SURFACES | | | D. 11-4.19.5 FAUCETS | | | | | | 10. SHT A.01.1 & A.09 (DETAILS D/A.09, 8/A.09 & | | | 9/A.09). THE BATHROOM SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE. PLEASE SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | ___FOR W/C: | | | A. 11-4.16.2 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | B. 11-4.16.3 HEIGHT | | | C. 11-4.16.4 GRAB BARS | | | D. 11-4.16.5 FLUSH CONTROLS | | | E. 11-4.16.6 DISPENSERS | | | | | | ___FOR LAV: | | | A. 11-4.19.2 HEIGHT & CLEARANCES | | | B. 11-4.19.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE - FORWARD APPROACH | | | REQUIRED (FIG 32) | | | C. 11-4.19.4 EXPOSED PIPES & SURFACES | | | D. 11-4.19.5 FAUCETS | | | E. 11-4.19.6 MIRRORS | | | | | | ___FOR SHOWER: | | | A. 11-4.21.2 SIZE & CLEARANCES | | | B. 11-4.21.3 SEAT | | | C. 11-4.21.4 GRAB BARS | | | D. 11-4.21.5 CONTROLS | | | E. 11-4.21.6 SHOWER UNIT | | | F. 11-4.21.7 CURBS | | | | | | 11. SHTS A.01 & P.11 (DETAILS 3/A.11 & A/A.11). TOILET | | | ROOM SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | A. 11-4.24.4 SINK DEPTH | | | B. 11-4.24.5 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE (FORWARD APPROACH | | | REQUIRED - CABINET DOORS NOT APPROVED) | | | C. 11-4.24.7 FAUCET | | | | | | 12. ALL SHEETS WITH ROCAMAR ENGINEERING SERVICES INC. | | | TITLE BLOCK. THE ADDRESS ON THE TITLE BLOCK DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE ADDRESS OF RECORD ON THE STATE OF FLORIDA | | | DBPR WEBSITE. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET). PLEASE UPDATE THE | | | TITLE BLOCKS OR THE DBPR WEBSITE PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING | | | FOR REVIEW SO THE ADDRESS CORRELATES. FAC | | | 61G15-23.002(2) & FS 471.025. | | | | | | 13. SHT P-1 MACERATING UNIT. SUBMIT MANUF | | | SPECIFICATIONS & INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. NOTE | | | INDICATES SEE DETAIL ON SHEET P-3, BUT THE DETAIL JUST | | | SHOWS A WEBSITE AND THE WEBSITE WILL NOT OPEN. SECTIONS | | | 106.1.2 & 712.4.1. | | | | | | 14. SHT P-1 SHOWS AN OIL INTERCEPTOR. THE OIL | | | INTERCEPTOR SHALL BE SIZED BY THE UTILITY DEPT. | | | INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT. PLEASE CONTACT HOLLY MCGRATH | | | LABORATORY SUPERVISOR BY PHONE, (561) 822-2271 - OR | | | FAX, (561) 822-2279 - OR E-MAIL, [email protected]. | | | ARTICLE III SECTION 90-124(7). | | | | | | 15. SHT P-1 SHOWS THE GAS LINE TO THE EMERGENCY | | | GENERATOR. THE NOTE INDICATES 20 PSI REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICATION SHEETS AS WELL AS | | | INSTALLATION SHEETS FOR THE GENERATOR SHOWING A LISTING | | | FOR THE GENERATOR, INLET PRESSURE & BTU LOAD FOR THE | | | GENERATOR. SEPARATE GENERATOR PERMIT REQUIRED. FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS DOES NOT HAVE A TABLE FOR 20 PSI. PLEASE | | | SUBMIT AN APPROVED GAS PIPE SIZING TABLE FOR 20 PSI. | | | SECTION 402. | | | | | | 16. SHT P-1 CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED PER SECTION 708.3.2, | | | NOT MORE THAN 100 FEET IN BUILDING SEWERS AND PER | | | SECTION 708.3.5 NEAR THE JUNCTION OF THE BUILDING DRAIN | | | AND THE BUILDING SEWER. PLEASE SHOW ON THE FLOOR PLAN | | | AND ON THE SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. | | | | | | 17. SHT P-1 SHOWS 1-1/2" MAKE UP WATER TO THE 2ND FLOOR | | | MECHANICAL, 1-1/2" MAKE UP WATER FOR SYSTEM FILLING & | | | 1" HOT WATER FOR ICE MELTING. PLEASE INDICATE THE | | | METHOD OF BACKFLOW PROTECTION OF EACH SUPPLY LINE PER | | | SECTIONS 608.1 & 608.3. ALSO AN RPZV BACKFLOW IS | | | REQUIRED ON THE WATER SERVICE TO THE BUILDING PER | | | SECTION 608.13.2. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLANS AND ON | | | THE WATER ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM SHEET P-7. | | | | | | 18. SHT P-2 PIPING ARRANGEMENT AT THE WATER HEATER. | | | PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE T&P RELIEF VALVE TERMINATES. | | | SECTION 504.6.1 -- INDICATE THE MANUFACTURE AND MODEL | | | NUMBER FOR THE EXPANSION TANK. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS OR | | | MANUF. CHART FOR SIZING THE EXPANSION TANK. SECTION | | | 607.3.2. | | | | | | 19. SHT P-3 ICE MELTING PIT DRAINAGE DETAIL. PER | | | SECTION 712.2 A FULL OPEN VALVE IS REQUIRED ON THE | | | DISCHARGE SIDE OF THE CHECK VALVE. -- THE DETAIL | | | APPEARS TO SHOW A REDUCTION IN PIPE SIZE IN THE | | | DIRECTION OF FLOW. THIS IS NOT APPROVED PER SECTION | | | 704.2. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 20. SHT P-5 INDICATE THE MANUFACTURE AND MODEL NUMBER | | | FOR THE EXPANSION TANK. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS OR MANUF. | | | CHART FOR SIZING THE EXPANSION TANK. SECTION 607.3.2. | | | | | | 21. SHT P-5 THE GAS PIPING, (1-1/2") TO THE GENERATOR | | | DOES NOT REFLECT THE GAS PIPING SIZE INDICATED ON SHT | | | P-1, (1"). PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTION 402. | | | | | | 22. SHT P-5 SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FOR EACH GAS SYSTEM: | | | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE. (PIPE LENGTHS NOT INDICATED). | | | | | | B. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH | | | NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL | | | TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE IF BEING USED. | | | | | | C. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). | | | | | | D. INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | | PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. (20 PSI ON SHT P-1 | | | BUT .5 PSI ON SHT P-5) CLARIFY EACH SYSTEM. | | | | | | E. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. | | | | | | **PLEASE SHOW "GAS PIPING SIZED ON FOLLOWING" FOR EACH | | | METER/SYSTEM. | | | | | | 23. SHT P-7 PLUMBING WATER ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM DOES | | | NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. THE WATER SUPPLY PIPING TO | | | W/C & LAV IN THE TOILET ROOM BY THE ICE PIT ARE NOT | | | SHOWN ON THE ISOMETRIC. PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTIONS | | | 106.1.1 & 604. -- A SHUT OFF VALVE IS REQUIRED ON THE | | | SUPPLY LINE TO THE HOSE BIBB BY THE EQUIPMENT ROOM. | | | SECTION 606.2(2). | | | | | | 24. SHT P-7 PLUMBING SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM. | | | THE FLOOR DRAIN IN THE ROOM ADJACENT TO THE MOP SINK | | | ROOM SHALL HAVE A TRAP PRIMER. SECTION 1002.4. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-12-09 |
Time |
09:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-12-09 |
Time |
09:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-09 09:40:40 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08090611 | | | ADDRESS: 1590 N. FLORIDA MANGO | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: STYLE BUILT CONSTRUCTION | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.635.6935 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: REVISIONS TO THE FOLLOWING SHEETS: | | | M-1A, M-1B, M-2A, M-2B, M-2C, M-3, FP-1, FP-2, FP-3, | | | FP-4, E-1, E-2C, E-2D, E-6, ES-1, ES-2 | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: PASSED WITH PROVISOS | | | | | | THIS REVIEW HAS BEEN PASSED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING | | | PROVISOS: | | | | | | 1) THE INSTALLATION OF THE IRRIGATION PUMP SHALL NOT | | | IMPEDE WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THE PROPOSED | | | LANDSCAPING. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-12-08 |
Time |
17:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-12-08 |
Time |
17:41 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-08 18:41:55 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08090611 | | | ADDRESS: 1590 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: CHRIS HAIR | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.362.0220 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: REVISIONS TO SHEETS: T, 001, 010, 212, | | | 222, 722 (SUBMITTED 11/19/2009) | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: ALL REVISED PLANS PASSED. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL SITE PLANS, LANDSCAPE PLANS, CIVIL | | | PLANS, ETC. WILL NEED TO BE REVISED TO REFLECT THE | | | NEWLY-MODIFIED SITE PLAN CONFIGURATION. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-10-15 |
Time |
09:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-10-15 |
Time |
09:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-15 09:23:50 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08090611 | | | ADDRESS: 1590 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: NAT HEALY | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.635.6935 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: REVISIONS TO SHEETS: T, 210, 211, 220, | | | 221, 320, 710, 820, 910, 920, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, | | | 940, 941, M-1A, M-1B, M-2A, M-2B, M-2C, M-3, E-2A, | | | E-2B, E-2C, E-4B, E-5A, E-5B, ES-1 | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: ALL REVISED PLANS PASSED, WITH THE | | | EXCEPTION TO SHEET ES-1. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REVIEW IS PASSED SUBJECT TO THE | | | FOLLOWING PROVISOS: | | | | | | 1) PARKING AREA TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | | | 2) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY | | | (CO), THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL BE REPLATTED. | | | | | | 3) PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION, SHEETS SP1 AND LP1 SHALL | | | BE AMENDED TO REFLECT THE LOCATION OF ALL A/C | | | CONDENSING UNITS (I.E. NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS | | | OF THE BLDG). | | | | | | 4) PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION, SHEET LP1 SHALL BE | | | AMENDED TO PROVIDE LANDSCAPE SCREENING AROUND ALL A/C | | | CONDENSING UNITS (I.E. NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS | | | OF THE BLDG). | | | | | | SHEET ES-1 HAS BEEN FAILED AS THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF | | | THE IRRIGATION PUMP DISCONNECT APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH | | | THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF TREES/LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-09-22 |
Time |
18:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-09-22 |
Time |
18:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-22 18:50:25 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08090611 | | | ADDRESS: 1590 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: NAT HEALY | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.635.6935 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: RETAINING WALL DETAILS. | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: PASSED | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-09-22 |
Time |
18:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-09-22 |
Time |
18:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-22 18:44:32 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08090611 | | | ADDRESS: 1590 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: NAT HEALY | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.635.6935 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: PHASE II | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: PASSED WITH PROVISOS | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REVIEW IS PASSED SUBJECT TO THE | | | FOLLOWING PROVISOS: | | | | | | 1) PARKING AREA TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | | | 2) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY | | | (CO), THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL BE REPLATTED. | | | | | | 3) PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION, SHEETS SP1 AND LP1 SHALL | | | BE AMENDED TO REFLECT THE LOCATION OF ALL A/C | | | CONDENSING UNITS (I.E. NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS | | | OF THE BLDG). | | | | | | 4) PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION, SHEET LP1 SHALL BE | | | AMENDED TO PROVIDE LANDSCAPE SCREENING AROUND ALL A/C | | | CONDENSING UNITS (I.E. NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS | | | OF THE BLDG). | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-08-17 |
Time |
13:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-08-17 |
Time |
13:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-17 14:59:58 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08090611 | | | ADDRESS: 1590 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: NAT HEALY | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 5613.635.6935 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: PHASE II | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) IT IS STAFF'S UNDERSTANDING THAT THE UPDATED SITE | | | AND LANDSCAPE PLANS, SHOWING THE EXPANDED PARKING LOT, | | | ETC., WERE TO BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF PHASE II. NO SUCH | | | PLANS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2) THE PHASE II ARCHITECTURAL PLANS INDICATE 8,178 | | | SQUARE FEET OF MEZZANINE SPACE, WHILE THE SITE PLAN | | | SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING | | | DEPARTMENT AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SIGNIFICANT | | | IMPACT (DSI) WAS ONLY APPROVED FOR 7,864 SQUARE FEET. A | | | MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE DSI SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND | | | APPROVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT. | | | | | | 3) ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PHASE II INDICATE THAT THE | | | PARKING AREA IS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT.....IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THE EXISTING BUILDING PERMIT, AS WELL AS STAFF'S | | | UNDERSTANDING OF PHASE II, THE PARKING AREA IS TO BE | | | INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS PERMIT AND IS TO BE COMPLETE | | | PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FINAL C.O. PLEASE ADJUST PLANS | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 4) AS SEATING IS NOW BEING PROVIDED WITHIN THE RINK, | | | PLEASE ADJUST ALL PARKING COUNTS ACCORDINGLY. BE SURE | | | THIS IS INCLUDED AS PART OF THE MINOR DSI AMENDMENT | | | DESCRIBED ABOVE. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-06-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-06-21 |
Time |
14:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-06-21 |
Time |
14:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-21 14:20:52 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08090611 | | | ADDRESS: 1590 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: NAT HEALY | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 635.6935 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: PHASE III STRUCTURAL REVISIONS. | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) AS THE PROPOSED ICE RINK USE IS BEING EXPANDED, A | | | MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SIGNIFICANT | | | IMPACT (DSI) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO, AND APPROVED BY, | | | THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO FURTHER | | | REVIEW OF THE PHASE III PLANS. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE VERIFY WITH THE BULDING PLAN REVIEWER WHETHER | | | OR NOT A HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE WILL BE | | | REQUIRED AT THE ENTRANCE INTO THE NEW SPACE. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | | FAX: 561.822.1459 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-04-15 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-04-15 |
Time |
10:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-15 11:00:20 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08090611 | | | ADDRESS: 1590 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: NAT HEALY | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 635.6935 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: REVISION TO THE FOLLOWING SHEETS: E-4, | | | E-6, ES-1, E-5, ESP-1, P-2B, P-6, P-8 | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) THE ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE | | | SITE LIGHTING DOES NOT MATCH THAT APPROVED BY | | | RESOLUTION NO. 105-09, NOR DOES IT MATCH THE SITE PLAN | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE OVERALL BUILDING PERMIT. IF THE SITE | | | PLAN IS BEING MODIFIED, A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE | | | DEVELOPMENT OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (DSI) SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED TO, AND APPROVED BY, THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING | | | PERMIT. ONCE THE MINOR AMENDMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE | | | OVERALL BUILDING PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE REVISED TO | | | REFLECT THE NEW SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 2) SEE LANDSCAPE PLANNER'S COMMENTS REGARDING POTENTIAL | | | CONFLICTS BETWEEN SITE LIGHTING AND PROPOSED | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
Time |
08:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
Time |
08:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-01 08:42:07 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08090611 | | | ADDRESS: 1590 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: NAT HEALY | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.635.6935 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: REVISION #3 DATED 03/20/09 - SHEETS | | | A.01, A01.1,A.02,A.06,A.07,A.10.1 | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: PASSED | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
Time |
15:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
Time |
18:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
Time |
18:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
Time |
13:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
Time |
13:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-02 15:26:20 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08090611 | | | ADDRESS: 1590 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: NAT HEALY | | | TELEPHONE NO.: (561) 635-6935 | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED AS PART OF | | | THE RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | 1) TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT/ACCURATE SURVEY SHALL BE | | | INCLUDED. | | | | | | 2) AN EASEMENT CONSENT FORM SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND | | | APPROVED BY THE CITY'S PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, AND | | | THEN INCLUDED IN THE PERMIT PACKAGE, FOR THE | | | CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW FENCE. IF THE FENCE WILL BE | | | LOCATED WITHIN AN EASEMENT, AN EASEMENT CONSENT FORM | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. | | | | | | 3) PLEASE CORRECT AND PROVIDE AN ACCURATE BUILDING | | | FOOTPRINT ON THE SITE PLAN. BE SURE TO SHOW THE | | | OUTLINES OF AWNINGS, SHUTTERS, CANOPIES, ETC. ON THE | | | EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF | | | SUCH. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NEW AND HAVE BEEN GENERATED | | | DUE TO CHANGES TO THE PLAN UPON RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | 1) ON SHEET SP-1 THE TRANSFORMER ON THE EAST SIDE OF | | | THE BUILDING IS LABELED, BUT NOTHING IS SHOWN. | | | | | | 2) ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICLE | | | ENCROACHMENT BY A TYPE D CURB AND/OR WHEEL STOPS. THE | | | SITE PLAN IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHICH AREAS ARE CURBED, | | | WHICH ARE NOT, ETC. PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY THOSE AREAS | | | THAT ARE CURBED, ETC. | | | | | | 3) IN THE SITE DATA TABLE, PLEASE INDICATED UNDER | | | "ADDITIONAL PARKING REQUIRED" WHAT THE ADDITIONAL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE IS AND WHAT PARKING RATIO IS BEING USED | | | TO DETERMINED THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF SPACES (1 PER 250 | | | SQ. FT.). | | | | | | 4) PARKING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED (SEE ATTACHED). | | | | | | 5) A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED. BE SURE TO DIMENSION THE ENCLOSURE ON THE | | | SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 6) THE ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH SHEET SP-1 | | | (I.E. PARKING AREAS DON'T MATCH, ETC.). ADDITIONALLY, | | | SHEET ES-1 SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF A GATE ON THE EAST | | | ACCESS ROAD. THIS IS A SEPARATE PROPERTY AND | | | IMPROVEMENTS SHALL NOT CROSS PROPERTY LINES. IF A GATE | | | IS TO BE INSTALLED, A UNITY OF TITLE SHALL BE RECORDED | | | FOR BOTH PROPERTIES. IF THIS GATE IS PROPOSED TO BE | | | MOTORIZED AND OPEN-ON-DEMAND DURING BUSINESS HOURS, | | | THEN AT LEAST 100 FEET OF STACKING SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 7) PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY ON SHEET SP-1 WHAT IS | | | EXISTING, WHAT IS PROPOSED, ETC (I.E. IS THE 6 FOOT | | | WOOD FENCE TO THE SOUTH OF THE DRIVEWAY EXISTING? IS | | | THE 6 FOOT FENCE ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE EXISTING? | | | IS THE 8 FOOT BLOCK WALL ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE | | | EXISTING?) SOME THINGS ARE UNCLEAR AS TO WHETHER OR NOT | | | THEY ARE EXISTING OR PROPOSED. PLEASE CLARIFY | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | IMPORTANT: THE SITE PLAN SHOULD CLEARLY SHOW WHAT THE | | | FINAL PRODUCT WILL LOOK LIKE. SHEET SP-1 CURRENTLY | | | SHOWS EXISTING CURBING AND ASHPALT IN AREAS WHERE | | | LANDSCAPING IS TO BE PLACED, YET DOES NOT INDICATE | | | THEIR REMOVAL, ETC. IDEALLY, THE SITE PLAN WILL SHOW | | | THE FINAL PRODUCT WHILE A DEMOLITION PLAN WOULD SHOW | | | WHAT IS BEING REMOVED. AS PROVIDED IN THE COMMENT | | | ABOVE, BE SURE THE SITE PLAN CLEARLY IDENTIFIES WHAT IS | | | EXISTING, PROPOSED, ETC. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-10-07 |
Time |
18:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-10-07 |
Time |
18:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-07 19:25:53 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441 OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS), RENOVATIONS, | | | REPAIRS, AND ALTERATIONS WHICH EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE | | | OF THE STRUCTURE ARE REQUIRED TO BRING THE ENTIRE SITE | | | INTO CONFORMITY WITH THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMIT, A | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF | | | THE ZLDRS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED. | | | | | | 2) TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT/ACCURATE SURVEY SHALL BE | | | INCLUDED. | | | | | | 3) AN EASEMENT CONSENT FORM SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND | | | APPROVED BY THE CITY'S PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, AND | | | THEN INCLUDED IN THE PERMIT PACKAGE, FOR THE | | | CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW FENCE. IF THE FENCE WILL BE | | | LOCATED WITHIN AN EASEMENT, AN EASEMENT CONSENT FORM | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. | | | | | | 4) WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW GATES, THERE SHALL | | | BE AT LEAST 100 FEET OF STACKING FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT | | | OF WAY. | | | | | | 5) PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINE | | | TO THE NEW GENERATOR. | | | | | | 6) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-444(B) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, | | | GENERATORS SHALL BE SCREENED. SCREENING SHALL CONSIST | | | OF BRICK, DECORATIVE CONCRETE, OTHER DECORATIVE | | | MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY DURABLE WOOD AND STEEL. | | | SCREENING SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH SHRUBS AND HEDGES | | | PLANTED AT 2-FOOT INTERVALS. | | | | | | 7) PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED FENCE, | | | INCLUDING THE PROPOSED HEIGHT. FENCES LOCATED WITHIN | | | THE FRONT LANDSCAPE BUFFER (FIRST 5 FEET OF THE | | | PROPERTY) SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FEET IN HEIGHT. | | | | | | 8) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN | | | (I.E. GENERATOR, FENCING, BUILDING FOOTPRINT, ETC.). | | | | | | 9) THE ADDITION OF THE STAIR AND MEZZANINE INSIDE THE | | | BUILDING RESULTS IN THE ADDITION OF BUILDING SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE. ADDITIONAL PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO | | | ACCOMMODATE THE ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | | | | 10) PLEASE CORRECT AND PROVIDE AN ACCURATE BUILDING | | | FOOTPRINT ON THE SITE PLAN. BE SURE TO SHOW THE | | | OUTLINES OF AWNINGS, SHUTTERS, CANOPIES, ETC. ON THE | | | EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF | | | SUCH. | | | | | | 11) PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE SHUTTERS AND | | | DIMENION THE PROJECTION OF SUCH FROM THE EXTERIOR OF | | | THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 12) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A | | | REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. | | | | | | 13) ARE THE PLANTERS AROUND THE BUILDING EXISTING? | | | THESE SHALL BE CURBED (TYPE "D" CURBING) TO PREVENT | | | VEHICLE ENCROACHMENT INTO THE PLANTING BEDS. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |