Plan Review Details - Permit 08090571
Plan Review Stops For Permit 08090571
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2009-02-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2009-02-19 Time 17:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2009-02-19 Time 17:28 Sent To  
Notes
2009-02-19 17:30:05****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004
 FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004
 FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FS FLORIDA STATUTE
  
 1. THESE DOCUMENTS HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED UNDER
 PERMIT 08050665. THIS WORK HAS BEEN INCORPORATED INTO
 THIS ISSUED PERMIT.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-10-01 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2008-10-01 Time 07:36 Rev Time 4.44
Received By jwitmer Date 2008-10-01 Time 07:36 Sent To Z
Notes
2008-10-01 13:24:28BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 08090571
 ADD: 1600 FLORIDA MANGO RD
 CONT: SOUTHEAST CERTIFIED CONST. INC.
 TEL: (561)635-6935 NAT HEALY
  
 FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 REVIEW
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1A) INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE
 INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS
 NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL
 REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE
 REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO
 EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
  
 1B) INFORMATIONAL FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT,
 TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE:
 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF
 COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS
 AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL &
 VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF
 COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST
 INSPECTION.
  
 1C) PLEASE PROVIDE THE MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE TABLE 503,
 / 1407.10, / 1407.11.
  
 1D) PLEASE PROVIDE IF THIS BUILDING IS FIRE SPRINKLERED
 AND OR HAS TAKEN AREA INCREASES FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS?
 TABLE 503.
  
 1E)
 2) SHEET S-14 WEST ELEVATION:
  
 2A) WEST ELEVATION, UPPER WINDOWS 5'-0" X 12'-0" THERE
 ARE NO WINDOW DETAILS INDICATING IF THIS IS TO BE A
 SINGLE PAINE OF GLASS OR MULTIPLE WINDOW LIGHTS WITH
 MULLIONS? THIS WILL EFFECT THE DESIGN LOAD CAPACITY AND
 THE DESIGN WIDTH AND LENGTH OF THE WINDOW UNIT.
 1609.6.2.2.
  
 2B) THESE SAME WINDOWS INDICATE THE USE OF A BAHAMA
 TYPE SHUTTER WITH NOA TOP SHEET IS MISSING THE NOA
 NUMBER?, ALSO MISSING THE E1 SHEET, TECHNICAL SHEETS
 1-4. MISSING PAGE 1 INDICATES SINGLE SPAN SHUTTER IS
 28", AND THE MAXIMUM LENGTH IS 76INCHES NOT THE 12'-0"
 AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. SHEET 9 OF THE NOA NOTE 1
 ALSO INDICATES THERE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 2.25 DISTANCE
 FROM THE GLASS TO SHUTTER, PLEASE PROVIDE A CUT SECTION
 OF THIS WINDOW WITHIN THE WALL AND THE USE OF THIS
 SHUTTER ATTACHMENT WITH PROPER SPACING.1609.6.2.2, RULE
 9B-72 (31) (B), RULE 9B-72(31)(E).
  
 2C) WEST ELEVATION DIRECTLY OVER THE FRONT DOOR WHAT
 APPEARS TO BE EITHER A CANOPY OR WINDOWS. THE ELEVATION
 DOES SHOW SHADING MAKING IT APPEAR THIS AREA PROJECTS
 OUT FROM THE WALL LINE.
 SHEET S.06 THE UPPER VIEW INDICATES THIS TO BE OPENINGS
 AND DIRECTLY BENEATH THE DETAIL IT READS NEW RECESSED
 ENTRY, BUT THE HEIGHT IS NOT PROVIDED NOR IS THERE A
 CUT SECTION THROUGH THIS AREA
 TO INDICATE WHAT AREA IS ACTUALLY RECESSED, THE DOORS
 OR THE DOORS AND WINDOWS ABOVE. DETAIL "F" SHEET S1.0
 IT APPEARS TO BE 1/2 OF THE WINDOWS THE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS A NOA 07-0423.08 SMALL MISSLE
 IMPACT AND THE WINDOW HEIGHT LOCATION IS LESS THAN
 30'-0" REQUIRING LARGE MISSLE IMPACT WINDOWS OR
 APPROVED STORM COVERINGS OF SOME FORM SHUTTERS, PANELS,
 ETC. PLEASE CORRDINATE THIS AREA .106.1.2 ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION REQUIRED. 1609.1.4.
  
 2D) WEST ELEVATION GLAZED FRONT DOORS: SUBMITTED NOA
 04-1208.01 ARCH OUTSWING DOORS THE MAXIMUM DOOR HEIGHT
 IS 96" AND WIDTH OF 72" MAXIMUM, S.06 THE LOCATION ON
 THIS PLAN INDICATES THE OPENINGS TO BE 8'-0" WIDE AND
 11'-0" TALL. SHEET S.06 DOES ALSO INDICATE OPENINGS OF
 6'-6" ON EITHER SIDE OF THE 8'-0" OPENINGS IS THIS A
 DISCREPANCY IN THE PLANS AND IF SO WHAT IS TO ENFILL
 THE 8'-0"X 11'-0" OPENINGS.
 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.
  
 EAST ELEVATION:
  
 2E) PLANS INDICATE 2 DOUBLE DOORS THE PRDODUCT
 APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR COMMERCIAL STEEL DOORS INDICATE
 DOOR NUMBERS 28, 33,34,35 & 36. NOWHERE ON THE
 STRUCTURAL PLANS ARE THESE OPENINGS PROVIDEED, ARE
 THERE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS THAT DO INDICATE WHERE THESE
 DOORS ARE LOCATED IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS? 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.
  
 2F) THE INGERSOLL-RAND NOA'S SUBMITTED 02-0712.01 &
 02-0712.03 ARE EXPIRED AS OF MARCH 13, 2008. PLEASE
 PROVIDE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVALS. 1609.1.4, RULE
 9B-72-31.
  
 2G) EAST ELEVATION, UPPER WINDOWS 5'-0" X 12'-0" THERE
 ARE NO WINDOW DETAILS INDICATING IF THIS IS TO BE A
 SINGLE PAINE OF GLASS OR MULTIPLE WINDOW LIGHTS WITH
 MULLIONS? THIS WILL EFFECT THE DESIGN LOAD CAPACITY AND
 THE DESIGN WIDTH AND LENGTH OF THE WINDOW UNIT.
 1609.6.2.2.
  
 2H) THESE SAME WINDOWS INDICATE THE USE OF A BAHAMA
 TYPE SHUTTER WITH NOA TOP SHEET IS MISSING THE NOA
 NUMBER?, ALSO MISSING THE E1 SHEET, TECHNICAL SHEETS
 1-4. MISSING PAGE 1 INDICATES SINGLE SPAN SHUTTER IS
 28", AND THE MAXIMUM LENGTH IS 76INCHES NOT THE 12'-0"
 AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. SHEET 9 OF THE NOA NOTE 1
 ALSO INDICATES THERE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 2.25 DISTANCE
 FROM THE GLASS TO SHUTTER, PLEASE PROVIDE A CUT SECTION
 OF THIS WINDOW WITHIN THE WALL AND THE USE OF THIS
 SHUTTER ATTACHMENT WITH PROPER SPACING.1609.6.2.2, RULE
 9B-72 (31) (B), RULE 9B-72(31)(E).
  
  
  
 NORTH ELEVATION :
 2I) 20 WINDOWS LOCATED BETWEEN 16' TO 22' FROM GRADE DO
 NOT INDICATE ANY TYPE OF STORM SHUTTERS OR PANELS AND
 THE ONLY PRODUCT APROVAL PROVIDED IS NOA 07-0423.08
 SMALL MISSILE IMPACT.
 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS
 REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE
 PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS
 SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF
 GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE
 ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES
 POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH
 AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE
 TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1.
 GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE
 SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST.
 2. GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M)
 ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL
 MISSILE TEST. PLEASE PROVIDE EITHER LARGE MISSILE
 IMPACT RATED GLAZING OR APPROVED STORM SHUTTERS OR
 PANELS.
  
 PLEASE NOTE: PLEASE NOTE: 104.6*/ 1609.1.4/ 1714.5
 STANDARDS FOR WIND-BORNE DEBRIS IMPACT PROTECTION
 QUESTION# 13 RECOGNIZING SUCH CONCERNS AS ABSENTEE
 OWNERS, OR CASES WHERE LONGER TIME & EFFORT IS
 NECESSARY TO SECURE SHUTTERS ON LARGE OR MULTI-STORY
 BUILDINGS, WHAT MEASURES ARE BEING RECOMMENDED OR
 IMPLEMENTED TO ENSURE THAT COMPLETE INSTALLATION OR
 SECURING IS DONE SUFFICIENTLY IN ADVANCE OF THE
 HURRICANE?
  
 IN MATTERS CONCERNING PUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH, AND THE
 GENERAL WELFARE NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN THE CODE,
 SECTION 104.6 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING,
 CHAPTER 1,
 ADMINISTRATIVE CODE2004 EDITION AS AMENDED BY THE CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH, PROVIDES THE ABILITY FOR THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL TO IMPLEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR
 ENSURING STABILITY, STRENGTH, AND THE PROPER OPERATION
 OF EXISTING BUILDINGS.
  
 IN ORDER TO ASSURE THE SECURING OF SHUTTERS ON LARGE OR
 MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS, OR MULTIPLE
 ON THE SAME PROPERTY, PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLANS MUST
 BE SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS OR MANAGING AGENTS
 FOR REVIEW BY THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ANY
 SUCH PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, ON SITE LOCATION
 OF THE SHUTTERS, PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING THE
 SHUTTERS ( SAID PARTY MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN PALM BEACH
 COUNTY), TOTAL NUMBER OF OPENINGS TO BE PROTECTED AND
 THE TOTAL TIME REQUIRED TO SECURE ALL OPENINGS.
 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHIN
 TWELVE (12) HOURS OR LESS OF THE
 OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICES
 OF A HURRICANE WATCH.
  
 PROVISIONS IN THE BUILDING CODES (AND THIS STANDARD)
 ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF ALTERNATE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS, AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO
 REVIEW AND APPROVE ANY ALTERNATE DEEMED EQUIVALENT IN
 QUALITY, STRENGTH, EFFECTIVENESS, FIRE RESISTANCE,
 DURABILITY AND SAFETY PRESCRIBED BY THIS CODE. BASED
 UPON THIS CODE PROVISION, ACCEPTANCE OF ALTERNATE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS MAY BE APPROVED ON A CASE-BY-CASE
 BASIS AND SHALL REQUIRE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OR PROOF TO
 SUBSTANTIATE ANY CLAIM MADE REGARDING THE ALTERNATE.
  
 IN LEAU OF LARGE MISSLE IMPACT RATED WINDOWS, STORM
 SHUTTERS MAY BE USED ON THE FIRST FLOOR IF: 104.6*/
 1609.1.4/ 1714.5 STANDARDS FOR WIND-BORNE DEBRIS IMPACT
 PROTECTION.
  
 3) FL BLD CODE 1609.6.2.2 COMPONENTS & CLADDING,
 PROVIDE 2 COPIES, OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS, MISSING
 REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
 3A) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES. RULE 9B-72(31)(D).
  
 4) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE
 PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
  
 5) PLEASE COORDINATE THE ADDRESS ON THE PLANS 1590 TO
 THAT OF THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND THE PROPERTY CONTROL
 NUMBER TO 1600 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD.
  
 A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A
 RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF
 THIS REVIEW.
  
 JIM WITMER C. B. O.
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II
  
 TEL: (561)805-6715
 FAX: (561)659-8026
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS
 LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS
 REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO
 THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE
 THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2009-02-10 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2009-02-10 Time 10:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2009-02-10 Time 10:46 Sent To Z
Notes
2009-02-10 10:46:22TO "Z" BOX/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2008-10-01 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2008-10-01 Time 16:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2008-10-01 Time 16:20 Sent To Z
Notes
2008-10-01 16:23:05TO "Z" BOX--FOR "JROACH"
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2009-02-10 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2008-11-07 Time 10:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2008-09-24 Time 09:02 Sent To  
Notes
2008-09-30 09:03:15TO "COMM" BD#56
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2009-02-17 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2009-02-17 Time 09:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2009-02-17 Time 09:16 Sent To  
Notes
2009-02-17 09:17:59RESUB OF PRODUCT APPROVALS ONLY...NO ZONING REVIEW
 REQUIRED.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-10-07 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2008-10-07 Time 17:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2008-10-07 Time 17:55 Sent To  
Notes
2008-10-07 18:02:40***FAILED***
  
 1) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441 OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS), RENOVATIONS,
 REPAIRS, AND ALTERATIONS WHICH EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE
 OF THE STRUCTURE ARE REQUIRED TO BRING THE ENTIRE SITE
 INTO CONFORMITY WITH THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMIT, A
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF
 THE ZLDRS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER,
 AT (561) 822-1435.
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved