| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08080678 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
14:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
14:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-02 14:47:42 | REVISED FRONT DOOR FROM OUTSWING TO INSWING. SUBMITTED | | | NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR INSWING FIBERGLASS DOOR | | | FL11321.7. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
16:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-26 16:50:55 | THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR NOA 06-0410.06 WERE | | | SUBMITTED AND ARE OK. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-01-14 |
Time |
12:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-01-14 |
Time |
12:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-14 12:28:33 | SUBMITTED POLYGLASS ROOFING NOA 06-0410.06 IS OK. | | | HOWEVER, SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FROM AN | | | ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT AS | | | STATED IN THE PROVISO IS REQUIRED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-12-31 |
Time |
11:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-12-31 |
Time |
11:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-31 11:29:21 | RESTAMPED PLANS AND PRINTED DUPLICATE PERMIT CARD. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-10-30 |
Time |
14:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-10-30 |
Time |
14:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-30 14:37:02 | IMPACT FEE RECEIPT AND STAMPED PLANS SUBMITTED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
Time |
16:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-29 16:49:36 | STATUS WILL BE CHANGED TO 'P' WHEN IMPACT FEES HAVE | | | BEEN PAID AND STAMPED PLANS AND PAID RECEIPT RETURNED | | | TO THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | BUILDING PROVISO | | | | | | SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 ENHANCED FASTENING | | | CALCULATIONS FROM AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER | | | FOR THE POLYGLASS MODIFIED FLAT ROOF SYSTEM (NOA | | | 06-0410.06) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
11:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
11:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-16 11:44:02 | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS | | | NEW SFD | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL | | | BE REQUIRED. FS 713 | | | | | | 2) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE | | | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE PLANS MUST BE | | | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE | | | APPLICATION. 233-5025 | | | | | | 3) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS THAT WILL BE USED TO ATTACH | | | THE 2 X 10 BEAMS AT THE FRONT ENTRY TO THE CMU WALLS. | | | FBC R301.1 | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL OF THE PIERS AT THE REAR | | | SECOND FLOOR BALCONY THAT THE GUARDRAILS ATTACH TO. FBC | | | TABLE R 301.5. | | | | | | 5) FBC 106.3* CITY AMENDMENTS PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 6) THE PLANS SPECIFY A STEEL DOOR AT THE ENTRY AND SIDE | | | DOOR TO GARAGE, NOT A FIBERGLASS ONES. PLEASE | | | COORDINATE PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH THE PLANS, DCA RULE | | | 9B-72. | | | | | | 7) SUBMIT DRAINAGE PLANS WITH ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND | | | EMBOSSED SEAL OF THE ENGINEER. FS 471 | | | | | | 8) INDICATE ON THE PLANS HOW THE REAR BALCONIES WILL BE | | | WATERPROOFED. FAC RULE 9B-72 | | | | | | 9) SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FROM A | | | FLORIDA LICENSED ARCHITECT, ENGINEER OR REGISTERED ROOF | | | CONSULTANT FOR ENHANCED FASTENING OF THE BASE SHEET FOR | | | THE POLYGLASS MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING SYSTEM. R301.2.1 | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
Time |
16:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
Time |
16:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-18 16:17:49 | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS | | | NEW SFD | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL | | | BE REQUIRED. FS 713 | | | | | | 2) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE | | | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE PLANS MUST BE | | | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE | | | APPLICATION. 233-5025 | | | | | | 3) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R502.1.2 DRAFTSTOPPING | | | REQUIRED. | | | WHEN THERE IS USABLE SPACE BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW THE | | | CONCEALED SPACE OF A FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY, DRAFTSTOPS | | | SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE AREA OF THE CONCEALED | | | SPACE DOES NOT EXCEED 1,000 SQUARE FEET. DRAFTSTOPPING | | | SHALL DIVIDE THE CONCEALED SPACE INTO APPROXIMATELY | | | EQUAL AREAS. WHERE THE ASSEMBLY IS ENCLOSED BY A FLOOR | | | MEMBRANE ABOVE AND A CEILING MEMBRANE BELOW | | | DRAFTSTOPPING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN FLOOR/CEILING | | | ASSEMBLIES UNDER THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES: | | | 1. CEILING IS SUSPENDED UNDER THE FLOOR FRAMING. | | | 2. FLOOR FRAMING IS CONSTRUCTED OF TRUSS-TYPE OPEN-WEB | | | OR PERFORATED MEMBERS. | | | | | | 4) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS THAT WILL BE USED TO ATTACH | | | THE 2 X 12 BEAMS AT THE REAR COVERED PORCH AND THE 2 X | | | 10 BEAMS AT THE FRONT ENTRY TO THE CMU WALLS. FBC | | | R301.1 | | | | | | 5) PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL OF THE PIERS AT THE REAR | | | SECOND FLOOR BALCONY THAT THE GUARDRAILS ATTACH TO. FBC | | | TABLE R 301.5. | | | | | | 6) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS THAT WILL BE USED AT THE BASE | | | OF THE 6 X 6 WOOD COLUMNS AT THE COVERED BALCONY ABOVE | | | THE ENTRY. SEE THE WALL SECTION ON SHEET 6. FBC R 301.1 | | | | | | 7) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FAC RULE 9B-3.0472 CARBON | | | MONOXIDE PROTECTION. | | | | | | 8) THE OWNER/AGENT IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATION FORM. FBC 13-600. | | | | | | 9) THE ENERGY CALCS. ARE INCORRECT. THE EXTERIOR WOOD | | | FRAME WALLS ON THE SECOND FLOOR ARE NOT LISTED. THE CMU | | | WALL ADJACENT TO THE GARAGE IS NOT LISTED. THE WALL | | | SECTIONS ON SHEET 4 SPECIFY R-5 INSULATION AT THE | | | MASONRY WALLS AND THE FORM LISTS R-4.2. THE CONDITIONED | | | SPACE IS SPECIFIED AS 3790 SQFT ON SHEET 2 OF THE PLANS | | | AND 3684 SQFT IS ON THE FORM. PLEASE CORRECT THE FORM. | | | | | | 10) FBC 106.3* CITY AMENDMENTS PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 11) SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE METAL | | | ROOFING (SLOPED) AND THE BUILT UP ROOFING (FLAT). DCA | | | RULE 9B-72 | | | | | | 12) SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE STEEL | | | OUTSWING DOOR AT THE GARAGE AND THE INSWING DOOR AT THE | | | POOL BATH. DCA RULE 9B-72 | | | | | | 13) THE NAN YA PLASTICS CORP. FIBERGLASS DOOR DOES NOT | | | HAVE THE STATE OF FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL OR A | | | MIAMI-DADE NOA. SUBMIT A FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | | MIAMI-DADE NOA FOR ANOTHER DOOR OR APPLY FOR LOCAL | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEE DCA RULE 9B-72. | | | | | | 14) THE PLANS SPECIFY A STEEL DOOR AT THE ENTRY, NOT A | | | FIBERGLASS ONE. PLEASE COORDINATE PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | WITH THE PLANS, DCA RULE 9B-72. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-10-07 |
Time |
15:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-10-07 |
Time |
14:35 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
14:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
10:52 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-04 14:00:06 | | | | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, 2004 FBC CHAPTER 1 | | | AS AMENDED AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | ALL COMMENTS RELATE TO SHEET #7, UNLESS OTHERWISE | | | NOTED. ALL CODE ARTICLES REFERENCED ARE 2005 NEC UNLESS | | | OTHERWISE NOTED. | | | | | | 1} NOTE #1 REFERENCES THE WRONG CODE CYCLE FOR NFPA-72, | | | CURRENTLY THE 2002 CYCLE IS REFERENCED BY THE FBC.106.5 | | | FBC, | | | | | | 2} INDICATE THE SIZE AND NUMBER OF CONDUCTORS FEEDING | | | THE MAIN DISCONNECT FROM THE METER. 215.5. | | | | | | 3} 210.11 (C) (1)DWELLING UNITS | | | (1) SMALL-APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS IN ADDITION TO THE | | | NUMBER OF BRANCH CIRCUITS REQUIRED BY OTHER PARTS OF | | | THIS SECTION, TWO OR MORE 20-AMPERE SMALL-APPLIANCE | | | BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL RECEPTACLE | | | OUTLETS SPECIFIED BY 210.52(B).*** ONLY ONE IS LISTED | | | IN THE PANEL SCHEDULE.ALSO SEE 210.52(B)(1) FOR DINING | | | ROOM AND BREAKFAST ROOM REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 4} THERE IS ONE WATER HEATER ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE AND | | | TWO TANKLESS SHOWN ON THE PLAN, CORRELATE SAME. ALSO | | | CHECK THE MANUFACTURERS SPEC'S FOR KW RATINGS AND OCP. | | | MOST TANKLESS MODELS HAVE A MUCH HIGHER RATING THAN 30 | | | AMPS. ADJUST THE LOAD CALCULATIONS ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 5} BATH CIRCUIT REQUIRED TO HAVE A 20 AMP RECEPTACLE | | | PER 210.11(C) (3), LOCATED PER 210.52(D), AND BE GFI | | | PROTECTED PER 210.8(A) (1). THE MASTER BATH NEEDS | | | ANOTHER RECEPTACLE TO MEET COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 6} THE "GREAT ROOM" NEEDS ANOTHER RECEPTACLE TO MEET | | | SPACING REQUIREMENTS OF 210.52(A)(1) | | | | | | 7} KITCHEN RECEPTACLE SPACING MUST COMPLY WITH | | | 210.52(A), 210.52(C), AND 210.8(A)(6) GFI.*** THE | | | ISLAND RECEPTACLES MUST BE GFI AND THE COUNTERTOP | | | SPACING IS NOT COMPLIANT. | | | | | | | | | 8} 9B-3.0472 CARBON MONOXIDE PROTECTION. | | | (1) EVERY BUILDING FOR WHICH A PERMIT FOR NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION IS ISSUED ON OR AFTER 7/1/08 AND HAVING A | | | FOSSIL-FUEL-BURNING HEATER OR APPLIANCE, A FIREPLACE, | | | OR AN ATTACHED GARAGE SHALL HAVE AN OPERATIONAL CARBON | | | MONOXIDE ALARM INSTALLED WITHIN 10 FEET OF EACH ROOM | | | USED FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES. | | | (2) IN NEW CONSTRUCTION, ALARMS SHALL RECEIVE THEIR | | | PRIMARY POWER FROM THE BUILDING WIRING WHEN SUCH WIRING | | | IS SERVED FROM THE LOCAL POWER UTILITY. SUCH ALARMS | | | SHALL HAVE BATTERY BACK UP. | | | (3) COMBINATION SMOKE/CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE | | | LISTED OR LABELED BY A NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING | | | LABORATORY. | | | SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 553.885(2) FS. LAW IMPLEMENTED | | | 553.72, 553.73(2), (3), (7), (9), 553.885(2) FS. | | | HISTORY-NEW 11-18-07 LOCATE DETECTORS ON THE PLAN. | | | NOTE: MAY BE COMBINATION SMOKE/CARBON MONOXIDE. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE | | | SCOPE OF WORK PURPOSED. 105.1 FBC AS AMENDED. | | | | | | PLEASE REMOVE OLD SHEETS, INSERT NEW ONES, SUBMIT OLD | | | SHEETS TO EXPEDITE REVIEW AND SUBMIT WRITTEN RESPONSE | | | TO THE COMMENTS MADE IN THIS REVIEW. | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-05-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2010-05-12 |
Time |
11:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2010-05-12 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2010-05-12 11:55:48 | LANDSCAPE REVISION SENT TO ZONING BOX. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
Time |
13:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
Time |
13:04 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-17 13:04:48 | TO "M" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
15:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
15:18 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-26 15:19:19 | TO "RMCDOUGAL" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-21 |
Time |
14:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-21 |
Time |
14:22 |
Sent To |
L |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-21 14:23:09 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB--LANDSCAPING REVIEW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-07 |
Time |
08:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-07 |
Time |
08:39 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-07 08:41:57 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
08:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
08:38 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-10 08:39:20 | TO "SFR" "P" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
Time |
16:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-09-03 |
Time |
08:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-03 08:40:36 | TO "SFR" "Z" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
17:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
17:22 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
11:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
11:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-16 12:14:19 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE IRRIGATION IN RIGHT-OF-WAY. WATER CANNOT BE | | | DIRECTED OVER SIDEWALK. SHOW THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND | | | STREET ON PLAN. | | | | | | 2. SCREEN AIR CONDITIONING UNITS. | | | | | | 3. THE WIDTH OF THE LANDSCAPE STIRP SHOWN ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN IS WIDER THAN WHAT WAS SHOWN ON THE | | | IRRIGATION PLAN. ALL PLANS SHALL BE CONSISTENT. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS NECESSARY | | | TO COMPLY WITH THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED IN | | | ARTICLE XIV OF THE WEST PALM BEACH ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. PROVIDE THE OPEN SPACE, TREE | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED, SHRUBS REQUIRED AND PROVIDED, | | | ETC. | | | | | | 5. NOTES SUCH AS DEPTH OF MULCH, REMOVAL OF PROHIBITED | | | PLANT SPECIES AND SO ON SHALL APPEAR ON PLAN. | | | | | | 6. SHOW ALL TREE CANOPIES THAT PROTRUDE OVER PROPERTY | | | LINE FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES TO AVOID CONFLICTS | | | WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. ALSO SHOW ALL OVERHEAD POWER | | | LINES AND OTHER UTILITIES, EASEMENTS AND ANYTHING ELSE | | | THAT MAY INTERFERE WITH THE LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH THE | | | NAMES OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL, QUANTITY, SIZE AND | | | SPACING. | | | | | | | | | * IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME, ROBERT | | | KUSSNER, AT (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
Time |
08:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
Time |
08:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-10-23 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-10-23 |
Time |
09:53 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
09:10 |
Rev Time |
1.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
08:38 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-08 09:09:53 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | | | | 1) THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR SYSTEM 1 ARE | | | CALLING FOR 34,662 TOTAL COOLING BTU'S, THE MECHANICAL | | | PLAN EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE FOR SYSTEM 1 IS SHOWING 47,500 | | | TOTAL COOLING BTU'S, THE PLANS CAN ONLY CALL FOR 15% | | | MORE TOTAL COOLING BTU'S THAN THE COOLING LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC 13-607.1.ABC.1.1. (A THREE | | | TON SYSTEM WOULD MEET THIS REQUIREMENT SEE ATTACHED ARI | | | PRINT OUT). PLEASE CHECK AND CORRECT. | | | | | | 2) THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR SYSTEM 2 IS | | | CALCULATING THE CEILING HEIGHT AT 12 FEET, THE BUILDING | | | PLANS STATE THE CEILING HEIGHT IS 10 FEET. PLEASE | | | CORRECT COOLING LOAD CALCULATION PER 2004 FBC/R | | | 13-607.1.ABC.1 AND 13-103.3. | | | | | | 3) THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR SYSTEM 2 ARE | | | CALLING FOR 43,173 TOTAL COOLING BTU'S, THE MECHANICAL | | | PLAN EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE FOR SYSTEM 2 IS SHOWING 59,00 | | | TOTAL COOLING BTU'S, THE PLANS CAN ONLY CALL FOR 15% | | | MORE TOTAL COOLING BTU'S THAN THE COOLING LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC 13-607.1.ABC.1.1. (A FOUR | | | TON SYSTEM WOULD MEET THIS REQUIREMENT SEE ATTACHED ARI | | | PRINT OUT, BE ADVISED THIS MAY CHANGE AFTER THE COOLING | | | LOAD CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED FOR CEILING | | | HEIGHT). PLEASE CHECK AND CORRECT. | | | | | | 4) PLEASE SIZE THE SUPPLY AIR DUCTS TO BATHROOM #4 AND | | | WATER CLOSET #4 ON MECHANICAL PLAN, PER 2004 FBC/R | | | M1601.1. | | | | | | 5) ADD TO THE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON THE MECHANICAL | | | PLANS THE SEER OF THE SYSTEMS, PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-607.1.ABC.3.2.1. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-09-05 |
Time |
10:59 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-09-05 |
Time |
10:59 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-05 11:02:44 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | | | | 1) NO MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SUBMIT | | | MECHANICAL (A/C) PLANS FOR REVIEW, PER 2004 WPB AMEND. | | | 106.3.5.4 (10). | | | | | | 2) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SIGNED BY OWNER/AGENT | | | ALSO, PER 2004 FBC 13-103.3. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
Time |
15:19 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
Time |
15:19 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
11:09 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
11:09 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-10 11:19:30 | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | DENIED **2ND TIME: | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES WITH | | | 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO | | | CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.). | | | | | | **THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND | | | WITH THE PREVIOUS PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL | | | AS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSE'S FOR THE PURPOSE OF | | | CONTINUITY. NEW COMMENTS WILL BE SO NOTED FOLLOWING THE | | | PREVIOUSE REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1. SHEET 4, FOUNDATION PLAN: PLEASE CORRECT THE | | | FOLLOWING MISIDENTIFIED 2" AND 3" VENTS FOR BATH 2, | | | BATH 3 AND BATH 4, TO BE THE FOLLOWING. PER FBC-2004 | | | PLUMBING SECTION 701.1 SCOPE. | | | | | | A} BATH 3, THE 2" VENT SHOULD BE INDICATED AS A 2" | | | WASTE STACK. | | | | | | B} BATH 3, THE 3" VENT SHOULD BE INDICATED AS A 3" SOIL | | | STACK. | | | | | | C} BATH 4, THE 2" VENT SHOULD BE INDICATED AS A 2" | | | WASTE STACK. | | | | | | D} BATH 4, THE 3" VENT SHOULD BE INDICATED AS A 3" SOIL | | | STACK. | | | | | | **NO COMMENT RESPONSE FROM THE DESIGNER AND COMMENTS | | | 1A, B, C, AND D HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED ON THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2. SHEET 4, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM AND FOUNDATION PLAN | | | UNDERGROUND PLUMBING PLAN: AT A MINIMUM THE SANITARY | | | RISER DIAGRAM SHOULD REFLECT THE FOUNDATION PLAN | | | UNDERGROUND PLUMBING PLAN. PLEASE CORRELATE THE | | | FOLLOWING BATHROOMS PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION 701.1 | | | SCOPE. | | | | | | A} MASTER BATH WHIRPOOL TUB AND WATER CLOSET. | | | | | | B} BATH 2. | | | | | | **NO COMMENT RESPONSE FROM THE DESIGNER AND COMMENTS 2A | | | AND B HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 3. SHEET 4, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: THE MASTER BATH 1, | | | SHOWER REQUIRES A VENT. PLEASE KNOW THAT ONE IS | | | INDICATED ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN, HOWEVER IT IS NOT | | | BEING INDICATED ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. PER FBC-2004 | | | PLUMBING SECTION 901.2.1 VENTING REQUIRED. | | | | | | **NO COMMENT RESPONSE FROM THE DESIGNER. THE | | | RESUBMITTED MASTER BATH 1 DOES INDICATE A VENT HOWEVER | | | AND THE RESUBMITTED MASTER BATH 1, SHOWER DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE FOUNDATION PLAN. AT A MINIMUM THE RISER | | | DIAGRAM AND THE FOUNDATION PLAN INDICATING THE | | | UNDERGROUND PLUMBING SHOULD BE CORRELATED. | | | | | | 4. SHEET 4, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM POWDER ROOM BATH: | | | ONLY FIXTURES WITHIN TWO BATHROOM GROUPS LOCATED ON THE | | | SAME FLOOR ARE PERMITTED TO BE VENTED BY A WET VENT. | | | ANY ADDITIONAL FIXTURES (KITCHEN SINK, LAUNDRY SINK, | | | WASHER, AND BATH #3) SHALL DISCHARGE DOWNSTREAM OF THE | | | WET VENT. EPR FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION 909.1 WET VENT | | | PERMITTED. | | | | | | **NO COMMENT RESPONSE FROM THE DESIGNER AND THE COMMENT | | | HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 5. SHEET 2, GROUND FLOOR PLAN, POWDER ROOM: CLEARLY | | | INDICATE THE WATER CLOSET AND LAVATORY SPACING FROM THE | | | SIDE WALLS. A WATER CLOSET AND LAVATORY SHALL NOT BE | | | SET CLOSER THAN 15 INCHES FROM ITS CENTER TO ANY SIDE | | | WALL. PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION 405.3.1 WATER | | | CLOSETS, URINALS, LAVATORIES AND BIDETS. | | | | | | **NO COMMENT RESPONSE FROM THE DESIGNER AND THE | | | RESUMMITED PLAN SHEET INDICATES THE REQUESTED SPACING | | | FOR THE FRONT OF THE WATER CLOSET, HOWEVER WITH THE | | | WATER CLOSET BEING SET AT 45 DEGREES THE BACK OF THE | | | WATER CLOSET IS NOT COMPLIANT. THE RESUBMITTED PLAN | | | SHEET IS NOT INDICATING THE REQUESTED SPACING FOR THE | | | LAVATORY. | | | | | | 6. "OK" COMMENT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 7. "OK" COMMENT ADDRESSED.. | | | | | | 8. "OK" COMMENT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 9. "OK" COMMENT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 10. "OK" COMMENT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 11. "OK" COMMENT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | **THE FOLLOWING IS A NEW COMMENT DUE THE RESUBMITTED | | | SANITARY RISER. | | | | | | 12. SHEET 4 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: DELETE SOIL AND | | | WASTE STACK IN THE FOLLOWING BATHROOM VENT LOCATIONS. | | | MASTER BATH, POOL BATH, BATH 3, AND BATH 4. PER | | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTON 701.1 SCOPE. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE | | | OLD PLANS, CLEARLY INDICATE THE REVISION ON THE NEW | | | PLANS, REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | PHONE= (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX= (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL= [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-10 11:59:44 | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | DENIED: | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES WITH | | | 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO | | | CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.). | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 1. SHEET 4, FOUNDATION PLAN: PLEASE CORRECT THE | | | FOLLOWING MISIDENTIFIED 2" AND 3" VENTS FOR BATH 2, AND | | | BATH 3, TO BE THE FOLLOWING. PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | SECTION 701.1 SCOPE. | | | | | | A} BATH 3, THE 2" VENT SHOULD BE INDICATED AS A 2" | | | WASTE STACK. | | | | | | B} BATH 3, THE 3" VENT SHOULD BE INDICATED AS A 3" SOIL | | | STACK. | | | | | | C} BATH 4, THE 2" VENT SHOULD BE INDICATED AS A 2" | | | WASTE STACK. | | | | | | D} BATH 4, THE 3" VENT SHOULD BE INDICATED AS A 3" SOIL | | | STACK. | | | | | | 2. SHEET 4, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM AND FOUNDATION PLAN | | | UNDERGROUND PLUMBING PLAN: AT A MINIMUM THE SANITARY | | | RISER DIAGRAM SHOULD REFLECT THE FOUNDATION PLAN | | | UNDERGROUND PLUMBING PLAN. PLEASE CORRELATE THE | | | FOLLOWING BATHROOMS PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION 701.1 | | | SCOPE. | | | | | | A} MASTER BATH WHIRPOOL TUB AND WATER CLOSET. | | | | | | B} BATH 2. | | | | | | 3. SHEET 4, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: THE MASTER BATH 1, | | | SHOWER REQUIRES A VENT. PLEASE KNOW THAT ONE IS | | | INDICATED ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN, HOWEVER IT IS NOT | | | BEING INDICATED ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. PER FBC-2004 | | | PLUMBING SECTION 901.2.1 VENTING REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4. SHEET 4, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM POWDER ROOM BATH: | | | ONLY FIXTURES WITHIN TWO BATHROOM GROUPS LOCATED ON THE | | | SAME FLOOR ARE PERMITTED TO BE VENTED BY A WET VENT. | | | ANY ADDITIONAL FIXTURES (KITCHEN SINK, LAUNDRY SINK, | | | WASHER, AND BATH #3) SHALL DISCHARGE DOWNSTREAM OF THE | | | WET VENT. EPR FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION 909.1 WET VENT | | | PERMITTED. | | | | | | 5. SHEET 2, GROUND FLOOR PLAN, POWDER ROOM: CLEARLY | | | INDICATE THE WATER CLOSET AND LAVATORY SPACING FROM THE | | | SIDE WALLS. A WATER CLOSET AND LAVATORY SHALL NOT BE | | | SET CLOSER THAN 15 INCHES FROM ITS CENTER TO ANY SIDE | | | WALL. PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION 405.3.1 WATER | | | CLOSETS, URINALS, LAVATORIES AND BIDETS. | | | | | | 6. SHEET 4, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: CLEARLY INDICATE | | | THE REQUIRED CLEANOUTS AT THE BASE OF THE FOLLOWING | | | STACKS. PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING SCTION 708.3.4. | | | | | | A} BATH 3, 3" SOIL AND 2" WASTE STACKS. | | | | | | B} BATH 4, 3" SOIL AND 2" WASTE STACK. | | | | | | 7. SHEET 4, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: CLEARLY INDICATE | | | THE REQUIRED CLEANOUT FOR THE WASHING MACHINE WASTE | | | STACK A FOUR FEET ABOVE FINISH FLOOR (4' A.F.F.). PRE | | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION 708.9 ACCESS. | | | | | | 8. SHEET 4, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: CLEARLY INDICATE | | | THE CLEANOUT AT THE JUNCTION OF THE BUILDING DRAIN AND | | | BUILDING SEWER AS BEING A TWO-WAY CLEANOUT. PER | | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION 708.3.5. | | | | | | 9. SHEET 4, FOUNDATION PLAN PLUMBING UNDERGROUND: | | | CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE CLEANOUT OUTSIDE OF THE LAUNDRY | | | ROOM BY THE DRYER VENT. PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION | | | 701.1 SCOPE. | | | | | | 10. SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE INDICATING A 50 | | | GAL. ELECTRIC WATER HEATER, HOWEVER SUBMITTED PLAN | | | SHEET 2, ARE INDICATING TWO TANKLESS WATER HEATERS. | | | PLEASE CORRELATE THIS ON THE RESUBMITTAL. PER FBC-2004 | | | BUILDING CHAPTER 13, SECTION 13-100.2 INTENT. | | | | | | 11. SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATION NEED TO BE SIGNED BY | | | OWNER/AGENT. PER FBC-2004 BUILDING CHAPTER 13, SECTION | | | 13-103.3 BUILDING PERMITS. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE | | | OLD PLANS, CLEARLY INDICATE THE REVISION ON THE NEW | | | PLANS, REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | PHONE= (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX= (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL= [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
Time |
14:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
Time |
14:56 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-09-09 |
Time |
11:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-09-09 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-09 11:34:22 | ***ZONING FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL RESPONSES IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS): AS THE VALUE OF | | | THE PROPOSED WORK EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE | | | (LISTED AS "IMPROVEMENT VALUE" WITH THE P.B.C. PROPERTY | | | APPRAISER'S OFFICE), LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF | | | THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445 OF | | | THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | 3. INDICATE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM PROPOSED A/C | | | EQUIPMENT TO ALL PROPERTY LINES. AS PER SECTION | | | 94-305(B)(4) OF THE ZLDRS: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY NOT | | | PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | | | | NOTE: THE SUBMITTAL OF THE REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY | | | GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT ME. | | | | | | MAGGIE CRUZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | TEL: (561) 822-1444 OR (561) 805-6720 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|