| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08070708 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-07-25 |
Time |
11:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-07-25 |
Time |
11:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-25 11:46:38 | REVISION #4 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2009-02-25 |
Time |
11:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2009-02-25 |
Time |
10:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
15:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
15:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-22 15:26:46 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08070708 | | | ADD: 480 HIBISCUS ST. #105 | | | CONT: THE TOWER GROUP | | | TEL: (954)476-3200 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 1-22-09 | | | REVIEW: 3RD | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION | | | & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2) OK | | | | | | **IS THIS A MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY ONLY; IF BUSINESS | | | OFFICES ARE LOCATED IN THIS SPACE THEN, THE OCCUPANCY | | | MAY CHANGE. CLARIFY. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF | | | SUFFICENT CLARITY. 106.1.1** | | | 3) INDICATE THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE SPACE PER TABLE | | | 1004.1.2. THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE MEZZANINE SHALL ALSO | | | BE INDICATED; STATE THE USE OF THE MEZZANINE AND THE | | | LIVE LOAD OF THE FLOOR PER FBC 1603.3 AND 1603.4. | | | PLEASE SEE TABLE 1607.1 FOR ADDITIONAL LOAD INFORMATION | | | FOR THE UNIFORM AND CONCENTRATED LOAD. **NOTE THE | | | SPIRAL STAIRS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC | | | 1009.9.2. SO PLEASE INDICATE THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE | | | MEZZANINE. THE PLANS NEED TO CLEARLY STATE THE USE OF | | | THE MEZZANINE. THE MEZZANINE SPACE CANNOT BE INCLUDED | | | WHEN CALCULATING THE OCCUPANT LOAD. | | | | | | **NO RESPONSE NOT ADDRESSED** | | | 4) FBC 505.1 MEZZANINES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A CEILING | | | HEIGHT OF NOT LESS THAN 7 FEET AND THE CEILING BELOW | | | MUST ALSO BE AT LEAST 7 FEET. PROVIDE A FRONT ELEVATION | | | OF THE MEZZANINE SHOWING THESE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 5) OK | | | 6) OK | | | 7) OK | | | | | | **THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH | | | DEPARTMENTAL POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND | | | SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CONFORMITY TO ITS | | | RECORD RETENTION PROGRAM. HANDWRITING AND WHITE-OUT ON | | | THE PLANS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THE ARCHITECT IS NOT AWARE | | | OF THE INFORMATION WRITTEN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE REVIEW | | | STAMP IS SUFFICIENT INFORMATION. THE HANDWRITING | | | INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE DRAWINGS. | | | PLEASE SEE EACH SHEET. | | | | | | MYRON JACOBS | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER | | | PHONE (561) 805-6726 | | | FAX (561)805-6676 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
Time |
08:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
Time |
08:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-18 16:40:31 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08070708 | | | ADD: 480 HIBISCUS ST. #105 | | | CONT: THE TOWER GROUP | | | TEL: (954)476-3200 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 11-18-08 | | | REVIEW: 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION | | | & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | **IS THIS A MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY ONLY; IF BUSINESS | | | OFFICES ARE LOCATED IN THIS SPACE THEN, THE OCCUPANCY | | | MAY CHANGE. CLARIFY. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF | | | SUFFICENT CLARITY. 106.1.1** | | | 3) INDICATE THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE SPACE PER TABLE | | | 1004.1.2. THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE MEZZANINE SHALL ALSO | | | BE INDICATED; STATE THE USE OF THE MEZZANINE AND THE | | | LIVE LOAD OF THE FLOOR PER FBC 1603.3 AND 1603.4. | | | PLEASE SEE TABLE 1607.1 FOR ADDITIONAL LOAD INFORMATION | | | FOR THE UNIFORM AND CONCENTRATED LOAD. **NOTE THE | | | SPIRAL STAIRS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC | | | 1009.9.2. SO PLEASE INDICATE THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE | | | MEZZANINE. THE PLANS NEED TO CLEARLY STATE THE USE OF | | | THE MEZZANINE. THE MEZZANINE SPACE CANNOT BE INCLUDED | | | WHEN CALCULATING THE OCCUPANT LOAD. | | | | | | **NO RESPONSE NOT ADDRESSED** | | | 4) FBC 505.1 MEZZANINES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A CEILING | | | HEIGHT OF NOT LESS THAN 7 FEET AND THE CEILING BELOW | | | MUST ALSO BE AT LEAST 7 FEET. PROVIDE A FRONT ELEVATION | | | OF THE MEZZANINE SHOWING THESE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | **NO RESPONSE NOT ADDRESSED** | | | 5) DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE BASE BUILDING DOES NOT HAVE | | | A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, ALL PROJECTS FOR TENANT | | | BUILD OUT PERMITTED BEFORE THE CO OF THE BASE BUILDING | | | SHALL HAVE A REVIEW STAMP AND THE SIGNATURE FROM THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD OF THE BASE BUILDING ON EACH SHEET. | | | THE BASE BUILDING DESIGNERS IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE | | | BUILDING UNTIL IT IS CO. FLORIDA STATUTES 471 AND 481. | | | | | | **AFTER FURTHER INVESTIGATION, I FOUND OUT THIS IS A | | | NEW BUILDING THAT HAS NOT BEING OCCUPIED. THEREFORE, NO | | | ALTERATION LEVEL IS REQUIRED.** | | | 6) THE DRAWING INDICATES ALTERATION LEVEL 3 WHICH MEANS | | | THE WORK IN THE AREA EXCEEDS 50 PERCENT OF THE | | | AGGREGATE AREA OF THE BUILDING AND IS MADE WITHIN A | | | TWELVE MONTH PERIOD; FBC(EXISTING) 305.1. IS THIS THE | | | CASE FOR THIS PROJECT? IF NOT PLEASE SEE SECTION 304 OF | | | THE FBC (EXISTING) ALTERATION LEVEL 2. | | | | | | 7) OK | | | | | | NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE TYPE AND MAKE OF THE | | | MECHANICAL ROOM DOOR. IS THE DOOR A NON-COMBUSTIBLE | | | DOOR? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED 106.1.2. | | | | | | MYRON JACOBS | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER | | | PHONE (561) 805-6726 | | | FAX (561)805-6676 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2008-08-15 |
Time |
16:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2008-08-15 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-15 16:33:42 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08070708 | | | ADD: 480 HIBISCUS ST. #105 | | | CONT: THE TOWER GROUP | | | TEL: (954)476-3200 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 8-15-08 | | | REVIEW: 1ST | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION | | | & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2) FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | | ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 3) INDICATE THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE SPACE PER TABLE | | | 1004.1.2. THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE MEZZANINE SHALL ALSO | | | BE INDICATED; STATE THE USE OF THE MEZZANINE AND THE | | | LIVE LOAD OF THE FLOOR PER FBC 1603.3 AND 1603.4. | | | PLEASE SEE TABLE 1607.1 FOR ADDITIONAL LOAD INFORMATION | | | FOR THE UNIFORM AND CONCENTRATED LOAD. | | | | | | 4) DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE BASE BUILDING DOES NOT HAVE | | | A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, ALL PROJECTS FOR TENANT | | | BUILD OUT PERMITTED BEFORE THE CO OF THE BASE BUILDING | | | SHALL HAVE A REVIEW STAMP AND THE SIGNATURE FROM THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD OF THE BASE BUILDING ON EACH SHEET. | | | THE BASE BUILDING DESIGNERS IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE | | | BUILDING UNTIL IT IS CO. FLORIDA STATUTES 471 AND 481. | | | | | | 5) THE DRAWING INDICATES ALTERATION LEVEL 3 WHICH MEANS | | | THE WORK IN THE AREA EXCEEDS 50 PERCENT OF THE | | | AGGREGATE AREA OF THE BUILDING AND IS MADE WITHIN A | | | TWELVE MONTH PERIOD; FBC(EXISTING) 305.1. IS THIS THE | | | CASE FOR THIS PROJECT? IF NOT PLEASE SEE SECTION 304 OF | | | THE FBC (EXISTING) ALTERATION LEVEL 2. | | | | | | 7) FBC 1013.3 (EXCEPTION #5) SHOW THE COMMON PATH OF | | | EGRESS TRAVEL WHICH SHALL BE 100 FEET IN BUILDINGS WITH | | | AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED THROUGHOUT. | | | | | | MYRON JACOBS | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER | | | (561)805-6726 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-07-08 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-07-08 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
14:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
14:02 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
Time |
10:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
Time |
07:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-23 10:12:50 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005 | | | NEC, NFPA-72 2002, NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, | | | CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1} NOTE THAT HAND DRAWN CHANGES/NOTES TO THE PLAN ARE | | | NOT ACCEPTABLE AS THEY CANNOT BE VERIFIED AS BEING MADE | | | BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY FS 471 OR 481, | | | AS APPLICABLE.SHEET A.0 | | | | | | ALL COMMENTS ARE FOR SHEET E.1 | | | | | | 2} THE FEED FROM THE DISCONNECT AT THE METER AND THE | | | TRANSFORMER DISCONNECT DOES NOT INCLUDE AN EQUIPMENT | | | GROUND. INDICATE IF THIS IS A METAL CONDUIT IF NOT | | | INSTALL THE EQUIPMENT GROUND PER 250.122. ALSO INDICATE | | | CONDUIT AND WIRE SIZE,TYPE AND NUMBER OF CONDUCTORS | | | FROM THE 70 AMP TRANSFORMER DISCONNECT TO THE | | | TRANSFORMER. | | | | | | 3} INDICATE THE NUMBER OF CONDUCTORS FROM THE PANEL TO | | | THE AIR HANDLER DISCONNECT AND IF GROUNDED.215.5 NEC. | | | | | | 4} INDICATE THE NUMBER OF CONDUCTORS FROM THE PANEL TO | | | THE CONDENSER DISCONNECT AND IF GROUNDED.215.5 NEC. | | | | | | 5} THE 80 AMP BREAKER FEEDING A 63 AMP LOAD FOR CIRCUIT | | | #7,9 AIR HANDLER IS IN VIOLATION OF 240.6 (70 AMP | | | MAXIMUM) AND IN VIOLATION OF 424.22 (PROTECTION OF MORE | | | THAN 60 AMPS). | | | | | | 6} THE LIGHTING POWER CALCULATION INCORRECTLY STATES | | | THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AT 1542 AND CONFLICTS WITH SHEET | | | A.0. CORRELATE SAME. | | | | | | 7} THE LPD PER SQUARE FT IS SHOWN AS 2.1. THE CORRECT | | | LPD FOR RETAIL IS 1.5 PER13-415.2.C.1 FBC. | | | | | | 8} THERE IS NO WATTS IN THE CALCULATION FOR TL | | | TRANSFORMER #3 IN THE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 9} BECAUSE OF THE ERRORS IN THE DENSITY CALCULATIONS | | | LISTED IN COMMENTS 6,7 AND 8 THE CALCULATION EXCEED THE | | | MAXIMUM WATTS PERMITTED AS STATED IN 13-415.2.ABC.1. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-11-17 |
Time |
11:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-11-17 |
Time |
11:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-17 11:16:58 | | | | | | | | | | ** FAILED 2ND REVIEW ** | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: SAME NOTE AS ON PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | THE BASE BUILDING DOES NOT HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF | | | OCCUPANCY. ALL PROJECTS FOR TENANT BUILD OUT PERMITTED | | | BEFORE THE C OF O OF BASE BUILDING ARE TO CONTAIN A | | | *SHOP DRAWING* REVIEW STAMP AND SIGNATURE FROM THE BASE | | | BUILDING DESIGNERS OF RECORD ON EACH RELEVANT SHEET. | | | THE BASE BUILDING DESIGN TEAM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE | | | BUILDING UNTIL SUCH TIME A C OF O IS ISSUED. | | | FS 471,481 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: SAME NOTE AS ON PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY PERMITTED PROJECTS FOR BUILD OUT | | | BEFORE THE C OF O IS ISSUED ON BASE BUILDING WILL | | | REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING TO BE REVISED. | | | THE BASE BUILDING LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | REVISED TO INDICATE AND SHOW ALL NEW KNOWN LOADS. | | | 220 | | | THE BASE BUILDING ENERGY CALCULATIONS SHALL BE REVISED | | | FROM WHAT WAS ENTERED AS *ASSUMPTIONS* ON CALCULATIONS | | | TO NEW KNOWN ENERGY USE. | | | THIS INCLUDES ALL NEW LIGHTING. | | | FBC CHAPTER 13. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: SAME AS PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | THE PLANS STILL INDICATE EXISTING RETAIL HOWEVER THIS | | | IS NOT POSSIBLE AS THE BUILDING CONTAINS *SHELL* SPACES | | | FOR FUTURE. THE PLANS NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. | | | FBC 301.1 | | | FBC 106.1.1,106.5 FOR CLARITY, COORDINATION OF RECORD | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: SAME AS PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED LIGHTING AND LIGHTING | | | CALCULATIONS FOR PERFORMANCE LEVELS STILL NEED TO BE | | | ADDRESSED AND DESIGNED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THE | | | LIGHTING SHOWN ON SHEET A.2 IS DIFFERENT FROM THE | | | LIGHTING SHOWN ON ELECTRICAL PLANS. THE LENGTH OF TRACK | | | THE NUMBER OF TRACK FIXTURES ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT THE LIGHTING ON PLAN NEED TO BE | | | IDENTIFIED WITH SOME SORT OF DESIGNATION SO LIGHTING | | | DESIGN WATTAGE CANE BE REVIEWED AND CONFIRMED. PLEASE | | | BE SURE TO SEE THE SECTIONS OF THE CODE BELOW WITH | | | INFORMATION AND DESIGN FOR TRACK LIGHTING. | | | | | | PLEASE COORDINATE ALL ITEMS. | | | **NOT ALL AREAS ARE RETAIL. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2. | | | 13-415.2.B | | | | | | 5) NOTE: THE RISER INDICATES A DISCONNECT AND | | | TRANSFORMER WHICH WOULD BE LOCATED IN THE STORAGE | | | CLOSET ON MEZZANINE LEVEL WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | THE ELECTRICAL PLANS DO NOT SHOW EITHER OF THESE TWO ON | | | MEZZANINE LEVEL AND ONLY SHOWS THE PANEL. | | | PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL EQUIPMENT, LABEL | | | ACCORDINGLY TO RISER AND PANEL IDENTIFICATION. | | | PLEASE SEE 240.21,450.9,450.13,450.21, 240.24 ETC | | | THIS AS SHOWN ON PLANS IS CLEARLY A STORAGE CLOSET | | | WHICH WILL CONTAIN COMBUSTIBLES AND EASILY IGNITABLE | | | MATERIALS. THIS IS A FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HAZARD. | | | PLEASE ADJUST, RE-LOCATE ETC. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | PLEASE INCLUDE THE DEVICE LOCATIONS, LEVELS, AND | | | HEIGHTS FOR ALL FIRE ALARM DEVICES FOR ADA COMPLIANCE. | | | FBC 11-4.28.1,.2 AND .3. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PANEL SCHEDULE NEEDS TO BE | | | SPECIFIC TO ROOMS AND AREAS IN WHICH THEY FEED. USING | | | *RECEPTACLES* OR *LIGHTING* IS NOT SPECIFIC. PLEASE SEE | | | THE 2005 NEC CHANGE IN THE HANDBOOK UNDER 408.4 AS THIS | | | WAS SPECIFICALLY REVISED. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTICE TOT FS 553.80(2)(B) IS GIVEN | | | AT THIS TIME DUE TO SOME COMMENTS BEING REPEATED . THIS | | | ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
Time |
09:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
Time |
09:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-08 09:19:27 | | | | **DENIEDREVIEW** | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE:THE BASE BUILDING DOES NOT HAVE A CERTIFICATE | | | OF OCCUPANCY. ALL PROJECTS FOR TENANT BUILD OUT | | | PERMITTED BEFORE THE C OF O OF BASE BUILDING ARE TO | | | CONTAIN A *SHOP DRAWING* REVIEW STAMP AND SIGNATURE | | | FROM THE BASE BUILDING DESIGNERS OF RECORD ON EACH | | | RELEVANT SHEET. | | | THE BASE BUILDING DESIGN TEAM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE | | | BUILDING UNTIL SUCH TIME A C OF O IS ISSUED. | | | FS 471,481 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY PERMITTED PROJECTS FOR | | | BUILD OUT BEFORE THE C OF O IS ISSUED ON BASE BUILDING | | | WILL REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING TO BE REVISED. | | | THE BASE BUILDING LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | REVISED TO INDICATE AND SHOW ALL NEW KNOWN LOADS. | | | 220 | | | THE BASE BUILDING ENERGY CALCULATIONS SHALL BE REVISED | | | FROM WHAT WAS ENTERED AS *ASSUMPTIONS* ON CALCULATIONS | | | TO NEW KNOWN ENERGY USE. | | | THIS INCLUDES ALL NEW LIGHTING. | | | FBC CHAPTER 13. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT AND SHOW THE LIGHTING LEVELS IN | | | PHOTO-METRICS ON STAIRS PER NFPA-101 2003, 7.8.1.3, | | | 7.9.2.1, .2.2. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE ALL LIGHTING CONTROLS REQUIRED | | | PER FBC 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND .1.3. | | | THE SYMBOL LEGEND DOES INDICATE SOME OCCUPANCY SENSOR | | | TYPE DEVICES HOWEVER NONE OF THIS DEVICE S IS ON PLANS. | | | IN FACT THE PLANS ONLY INDICATE STANDARD SWITCHING | | | DEVICES WHICH ARE NOT PERMITTED. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ALL MAXIMUM TIMES ON ALL DEVICES. | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.2.2 AND FBC | | | 1006.1.2 AS ANY OCCUPANCY SENSOR FOR ANY EGRESS | | | LIGHTING SHALL BE * FAIL SAFE ON*. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT LIGHTING PERFORMANCE | | | CALCULATIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 13-415.2, | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE FIXTURE SCHEDULE/LEGEND. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SECTIONS OF THE CODE ABOVE. THE WATTAGE | | | TO BE USED IS BASED ON THE FIXTURE WATTAGE NOT THE LAMP | | | WATTAGE AS STATED ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE KNOW AS THE PLANS ARE NOT COMPLETE WITH A | | | FIXTURE LEGEND ETC SOME OF THESE ITEMS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE CAN NOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE VOLTAGE DROP PER | | | 13-413.1.ABC.1.2 FOR CU. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR ALL | | | CIRCUITS TO SPECIFIC AREAS AND LOCATIONS. | | | 408.4 | | | | | | 8) NOTE: | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY RISER AS THE GUTTER IS INDICATED | | | AS RAIN TIGHT? PLEASE ALSO INDICATE THE SIZE/AMPERAGE | | | OF THE GUTTER PROVIDED. | | | PLEASE INDICATE A FLOATING NEUTRAL ON THE NEW METER AS | | | THE MAIN FOR TENANT SHOWN WILL BE AFTER A MEANS OF | | | DISCONNECT FOR SERVICE. | | | 250.24, 250.6 | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 600.5 AS THE LOAD FOR A SIGN | | | CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED TO BE FIGURED AT 1200VA. THIS WOULD | | | BE 10AMPS ON THE CIRCUIT. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.62 FOR MISSING SHOW WINDOW | | | RECEPTACLES. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 220.43 | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE INCLUDE LOADS FOR TRACK LIGHTING PER | | | 220.43 | | | | | | 13) NOTE: BASE BUILD OUT PLANS SHALL INCLUDE DEVICES TO | | | COMPLY WITH THE FIRE CODES, SUCH AS NFPA-1, NFPA-72 AND | | | FBC 2004 W/2007 REVISIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 11-4.28 (ALL) AND INDICATE REQUIRED | | | DEVICES ACCORDINGLY | | | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS THERE ARE SOME ITEMS NOT YET ON | | | DESIGN SHEETS THERE MAY VERY WELL BE NEW COMMENTS ON | | | THE FOLLOWING REVIEW WHICH CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-07-24 |
Time |
15:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-07-24 |
Time |
15:33 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-24 15:41:43 | ***** REVISION, DATED MAY 09, APPROVED***** | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEETS A.1, A.2, A.3, AND E1 WERE STAMPED, | | | INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-26 |
Time |
12:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-26 |
Time |
12:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-26 12:14:35 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | PLAN SHEETS A.1, A.2, A.3, AND E.1 WERE STAMPED, | | | INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
Time |
13:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
Time |
13:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-23 13:15:05 | ***DENIED*** | | | | | | 1) OK | | | | | | 2) SHOW A LAYOUT OF SPRINKLER HEADS FOR THE FLOOR SPACE | | | WHICH MAY BE SHOWN ON THE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN. NO | | | ATTACHED SPRINKLER DRAWINGS WERE FOUND WITH THIS | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 3) HANDWRITTEN NOTES ON THE PLANS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. | | | SEE OTHER REVIEW COMMENTS. SHEET A.0 | | | | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASST. FIRE MARSHAL | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-11-17 |
Time |
15:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-11-17 |
Time |
15:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-17 15:32:38 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE BASE BUILDING DOES NOT HAVE | | | A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY | | | | | | 1. ON SHEET A-0 - CAPTION 2 - INDICATES THAT THE SCOPE | | | OF WORK IS INTERIOR BUILDOUT OF AN EXISTING RETAIL | | | SPACE. HOW CAN THIS BE BASED UPON THE ABOVE CAPITALIZED | | | ADVISEMENT? | | | | | | 2. SHOW A LAYOUT OF THE SPRINKLER HEADS FOR THE FLOOR | | | SPACE. THESE HEADS MAY BE SHOWN ON THE REFLECTED | | | CEILING PLAN. THIS COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED FROM THE | | | PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-08-13 |
Time |
13:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-08-13 |
Time |
13:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-13 13:28:45 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THEBASE BUILDING DOES NOT HAVE A | | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY | | | | | | 1. ON SHEET A.3 - CAPTION 3, CLARIFY AS TO WHETHER THE | | | ADDRESS VERBAGE IS FOR THE BUILDING OR THE SUITE. WHY | | | IS "106" SHOWN IN THE VERBAGE INSTEAD OF 105. | | | | | | 2. SHOW A LAYOUT OF THE SPRINKLER HEADS FOR THE FLOOR | | | SPACE. THESE HEADS MAY BE SHOWN ON THE REFLECTED | | | CEILING PLAN. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-06-19 |
Time |
14:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-06-19 |
Time |
14:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-24 |
Time |
10:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-24 |
Time |
10:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-24 10:32:45 | TO "BOB"#10 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-20 |
Time |
10:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-20 |
Time |
10:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-20 10:33:18 | TO "BOB"#2 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-12 |
Time |
09:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-12 |
Time |
09:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-12 09:12:20 | TO "BOB"#11 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
09:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-07 16:50:51 | TO "BOB"#13 | | 2008-08-07 16:50:09 | WAITING FOR "BOB" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-07-20 |
Time |
14:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-07-20 |
Time |
13:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-20 14:17:18 | REVISED M1 DELTA 5 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
14:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-03 14:39:24 | PAGE M-1 REVISED SINCE LAST SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-29 |
Time |
18:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-29 |
Time |
18:50 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-11-15 |
Time |
16:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-11-15 |
Time |
16:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-15 16:16:21 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 1. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A TENANT IMPROVEMENT IN A | | | BUILDING WHICH IS NOT YET COMPLETED. IF THIS PERMIT IS | | | TO BE ISSUED PRIOR TO C.O. OF THE BASE BUILDING, THE | | | DESIGNERS F THE BASE BUILDING SHALL PERFORM A SHOP | | | DRAWING REVIEW OF THESE PLANS AND APPROVE THEM IN | | | WRITING (SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP). THIS IS TO ENSURE | | | THAT THE BASE BUILDING DESIGNERS ARE AWARE OF ANY | | | CHANGES WHICH MAY BE MADE THAT WILL ALTER THE BASE | | | BUILDING DESIGN OR PLANS PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTIONS. IN | | | ADDITION, ANY NEW INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDING ENERGY | | | UTILIZING SYSTEMS IN THIS SPACE WILL NEED TO BE | | | INCLUDED IN THE BASE BUILDING ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND | | | SUBMITTED AS A REVISION PRIOR TO C.O. OF THE BASE | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 2. OK | | | | | | 3. **PARTIALLY ADDRESSED** PAGE M1 DUCT TAKEOFF DETAIL: | | | IN NO CASE SHALL THE MATERIAL SUPPORTING FLEXIBLE DUCT | | | THAT IS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH IT BE LESS THAN 1.5 | | | INCHES WIDE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 603.5.6.6. | | | | | | 4. OK | | | | | | 5. OK | | | | | | 6. **NOT ADDRESSED** PAGE M1 PLUMBING NOTE #18: THIS | | | NOTE CALLS FOR PVC O BE USED FOR THE CONDENSATE DRAIN | | | LINE. PVC MAY NOT BE USED IN THE MECHANICAL ROOM WHICH | | | ALSO SERVES AS A RETURN AIR PLENUM. MATERIALS EXPOSED | | | WITHIN PLENUMS SHALL BE NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR SHALL HAVE A | | | FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 25 AND A | | | SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 50 WHEN TESTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 PER FBCM 602.2.1. | | | | | | 7. OK | | | | | | 8. **NOT ADDRESSED** NO INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND | | | REGARDING THE TYPE OF DOOR TO BE USED ON MECHANICAL | | | ROOM 104. IS THIS DOOR WOOD OR OF NON-COMBUSTIBLE | | | MATERIAL? SEE COMMENT #6 ABOVE FOR THE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | MATERIALS EXPOSED IN PLENUMS. PROVIDE THE MISSING | | | INFORMATION ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 9. SEE ABOVE. | | | | | | 10. OK | | | | | | 11. OK | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
16:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
16:32 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-18 16:39:15 | REVIEW #: 1ST | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | REVIEWED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CODES: | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | 1. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A TENANT IMPROVEMENT IN A | | | BUILDING WHICH IS NOT YET COMPLETED. IF THIS PERMIT IS | | | TO BE ISSUED PRIOR TO C.O. OF THE BASE BUILDING, THE | | | DESIGNERS F THE BASE BUILDING SHALL PERFORM A SHOP | | | DRAWING REVIEW OF THESE PLANS AND APPROVE THEM IN | | | WRITING (SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP). THIS IS TO ENSURE | | | THAT THE BASE BUILDING DESIGNERS ARE AWARE OF ANY | | | CHANGES WHICH MAY BE MADE THAT WILL ALTER THE BASE | | | BUILDING DESIGN OR PLANS PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTIONS. IN | | | ADDITION, ANY NEW INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDING ENERGY | | | UTILIZING SYSTEMS IN THIS SPACE WILL NEED TO BE | | | INCLUDED IN THE BASE BUILDING ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND | | | SUBMITTED AS A REVISION PRIOR TO C.O. OF THE BASE | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THIS SPACE IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-407.1.ABC.1. | | | | | | 3. PAGE M1 DUCT TAKEOFF DETAIL: HORIZONTAL DUCT SHALL | | | BE SUPPORTED AT INTERVALS NOT GREATER THAN 5 FEET AND | | | HANGERS, SADDLES AND OTHER SUPPORTS SHALL MEET THE DUCT | | | MANUFACTURER?S RECOMMENDATIONS AND SHALL BE OF | | | SUFFICIENT WIDTH TO PREVENT RESTRICTION OF THE INTERNAL | | | DUCT DIAMETER. IN NO CASE SHALL THE MATERIAL SUPPORTING | | | FLEXIBLE DUCT THAT IS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH IT BE LESS | | | THAN 1? INCHES WIDE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 603.5.6.6. | | | | | | 4. LOCATION OF CONDENSATE DISPOSAL NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | CONDENSATE FROM ALL COOLING COILS AND EVAPORATORS SHALL | | | BE CONVEYED FROM THE DRAIN PAN OUTLET TO AN APPROVED | | | PLACE OF DISPOSAL. CONDENSATE SHALL NOT DISCHARGE INTO | | | A STREET, ALLEY OR OTHER AREAS SO AS TO CAUSE A | | | NUISANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 307.2.1. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE AUXILIARY OR SECONDARY DRAIN PROTECTION IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 307.2.3. | | | | | | 6. PAGE M1 PLUMBING NOTE #18: THIS NOTE CALLS FOR PVC O | | | BE USED FOR THE CONDENSATE DRAIN LINE. PVC MAY NOT BE | | | USED IN THE MECHANICAL ROOM WHICH ALSO SERVES AS A | | | RETURN AIR PLENUM. MATERIALS EXPOSED WITHIN PLENUMS | | | SHALL BE NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR SHALL HAVE A FLAME SPREAD | | | INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 25 AND A SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX | | | OF NOT MORE THAN 50 WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM | | | E 84 PER FBCM 602.2.1. | | | | | | 7. PAGE M1: NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON PLANS | | | REGARDING THE CFM OF THE TOILET ROOM EXHAUST FAN. | | | PROVIDE A FAN SCHEDULE WITH MAKE, MODEL, VOLTS, AMPS | | | AND EXHAUST RATE EXPRESSED IN CFM. EXHAUST RATE SHALL | | | BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM 403.4 AND ASHRAE 62.1-2004 | | | TABLE 6-4. | | | | | | 8. NO INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND REGARDING THE TYPE OF | | | DOOR TO BE USED ON MECHANICAL ROOM 104. IS THIS DOOR | | | WOOD OR OF NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL? SEE COMMENT #6 | | | ABOVE FOR THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MATERIALS EXPOSED IN | | | PLENUMS. PROVIDE THE MISSING INFORMATION ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 9. MECHANICAL ROOM 104 IS SHOWN BEING USED AS A RETURN | | | AIR PLENUM. NO INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND ON PLANS | | | REGARDING HOW RETURN AIR IS TO FLOW INTO THE MECHANICAL | | | ROOM. BALANCED RETURN AIR IS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBCM 601.4. PLEASE SHOW ON MECHANICAL FLOOR PLANS | | | HOW THIS IS TO BE ACHIEVED. | | | | | | 10. THE OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE DUCT SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH | | | AUTOMATIC SHUTOFF DAMPER CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBCB 13-409.1.ACB 3.3. | | | | | | 11. THE OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH | | | ASHRAE 62.1-2004 SECTION 6.2. EXAMPLE: THE OCCUPANCY | | | SHOULD BE BASED ON A RETAIL OCCUPANCY ON TABLE 6-1. | | | BASED ON THIS OCCUPANCY AND THE SIZE OF THE SPACE GIVEN | | | ON THE PLANS, A MINIMUM VENTILATION RATE OF 227 CFM IS | | | REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 403.4 AND ASHRAE | | | 62.1-2004 SECTION 6.2. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-13 |
Time |
15:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-13 |
Time |
15:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-13 15:06:25 | REVISION OK -- SHT M-1. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
15:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
15:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
Time |
11:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
Time |
11:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
Time |
11:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
Time |
11:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-21 15:57:52 | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | DENIED: | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES WITH | | | 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO | | | CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.). | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 1. SHEET A.3 KEY NOTES #8, #9 AND SHEET M1 PLUMBING | | | FIXTURE SCHEDULE MARK 1, 2 ARE INDICATING DIFFERENT | | | MODEL FIXTURES FOR THE WATER CLOSET, LAVATORIES AND THE | | | LAVATORY FAUCETS. PLEASE KNOW THAT AN ONLINE SEARCH FOR | | | THE INDICATED AMERICAN STANDARD FIXTURE MODELS CAME UP | | | "NO RECORDS TO DISPLAY FOR THOSE FIXTURES". PLEASE | | | CORRECT, CORRELATE, AND PROVIDE MANUFACTURE SPEC SHEETS | | | FOR FIXTURES. PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION 401.1 | | | SCOPE. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. (LEVER | | | OPERATED FAUCETS ARE SPECIFIED) ? | | | | | | 2. SHEET M1 SANITARY ISOMETRIC: PLEASE CORRECT THE | | | FOLLLOWING PER THE FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTIONS. | | | | | | A} OK | | | | | | 3. OK | | | | | | 4. THE PROPOSED BUILD-OUT OF SUITE 106 IS IN A BASE | | | BUILDING THAT DOES NOT YET HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF | | | OCCUPANCY. SO THE BUILDING DESIGN PROFESSIONALS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP ON ANY | | | BUILD-OUT PLANS THAT ARE PREPARED BY DIFFERENT | | | DESIGNERS. PER SS 481. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
Time |
15:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-08 15:25:56 | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | DENIED: | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES WITH | | | 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO | | | CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.). | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 1. SHEET A.3 KEY NOTES #8, #9 AND SHEET M1 PLUMBING | | | FIXTURE SCHEDULE MARK 1, 2 ARE INDICATING DIFFERENT | | | MODEL FIXTURES FOR THE WATER CLOSET, LAVATORIES AND THE | | | LAVATORY FAUCETS. PLEASE KNOW THAT AN ONLINE SEARCH FOR | | | THE INDICATED AMERICAN STANDARD FIXTURE MODELS CAME UP | | | "NO RECORDS TO DISPLAY FOR THOSE FIXTURES. PLEASE | | | CORRECT, CORRELATE, AND PROVIDE MANUFACTURER SPEC | | | SHEETS FOR FIXTURES. PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION | | | 401.1 SCOPE. | | | | | | 2. SHEET M1 SANITARY ISOMETRIC: PLEASE CORRECT THE | | | FOLLOWING PER THE FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTIONS. | | | | | | A} CLEARLY INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE LAVATORY AND | | | DRINKING FOUNTAIN WATER-SEAL TRAPS. PLEASE KNOW THAT IF | | | TRAPS ARE 1-1/4"CLEANOUTS WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE | | | BASE OF THEIR STACKS. PER SECTION 701.1 SCOPE AND | | | SECTION 708.3.4. BASE OF STACK. | | | | | | 3. SHEET M1 HVAC & PLUMBING: CLEARLY INDICATE ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS WHERE THE CONDENSATE TIE-IN DRAIN | | | PIPING TERMINATION POINT IS. DOES IT TIE INTO AN | | | EXISTING SYSTEM? PLEASE KNOW THAT THE CONDENSATE SHALL | | | NOT DISCHARGE INTO A STREET, ALLEY OR OTHER AREAS SO AS | | | TO CAUSE A NUISANCE. PER SECTION 314.2.1 CONDENSATE | | | DISPOSAL. | | | | | | 4. THE PROPOSED BUILD-OUT OF SUITE 106 IS IN A BASE | | | BUILDING THAT DOES NOT YET HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF | | | OCCUPANCY, SO THE BASE BUILDING DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | | WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP | | | ON ANY BUILD-OUT PLANS THAT ARE PREPARED BY DIFFERENT | | | DESIGNERS. PER FS 481, 481. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE | | | OLD PLANS, CLEARLY INDICATE THE REVISION ON THE NEW | | | PLANS, REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | PHONE= (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX= (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL= [email protected] |
|
|