| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08070618 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2009-03-10 |
Time |
09:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-10 09:12:53 | NOW REALIZING THAT THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTS | | | DEFINED TOWNHOMES DIFFERENTLY, AND CONSIDERING THE FACT | | | THAT THESE UNITS WERE NOT FEE SIMPLE. I CORRECTED THE | | | ADDRESSES ON THIS PARCEL TO RETAIN THE NEWLY ADJUSTED | | | PRIMARY ADDRESS OF 1301 HENRIETTA AVE (EAST STRUCTURE) | | | & THE SECONDARY ADDRESS OF 1307 HENRIETTA AVE (WEST | | | STRUCTURE). I SENT OUT A NOTIFICATION E-MAIL TO ALL OF | | | THE RELEVANT PARTIES INFORMING THEM THAT 1303, 1305 & | | | 1311-1325 HENRIETTA AVE WERE NO LONGER VALID (THEIR | | | CORRESPONDING RECORDS WERE DELETED IN THE GIS & | | | COMMUNITYPLUS DATABASES). I ALSO E-MAILED PAPA TO | | | CHANGE THEIR PRIMARY ADDRESS ON THEIR WEB SITE. I HAVE | | | CORRECTED THE ADDRESS FROM 1325 TO 1301 HENRIETTA AVE | | | ON THE ORIGINAL PERMIT APPLICATION. THE DEVELOPER WILL | | | EVENTUALLY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSIGNING INDIVIDUAL | | | DESIGNATORS TO ALL UNITS INSIDE THE STRUCTURE(S), ONCE | | | THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED (I.E., | | | #100-199 OFF THE MAIN ADDRESS OF THE BUILDING - 1301 | | | HENRIETTA AVE # 105). |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2008-12-12 |
Time |
17:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2008-12-12 |
Time |
08:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-12 17:24:16 | I HAVE REVIEWED THE SITE & FLOOR PLANS FOR THIS PERMIT | | | ON PCN# 74434316020300080. THE FORMER PRIMARY SITE | | | ADDRESS FOR THIS PARCEL WAS 605 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD | | | (WHICH IS NOW INVALID & NO LONGER IN USE). AFTER | | | THOROUGHLY ANALYZING THE SITE & PLANS, I NOTICED THAT | | | THE MAIN ENTRANCE TAKES ACCESS FROM A ONE-WAY ALLEY | | | THAT RUNS EAST TO WEST STARTING FROM HENRIETTA AVE TO N | | | SAPODILLA AVE. I TALKED TO THE CONTRACTOR DWAYNE | | | RANDOLPH & CONFIRMED THAT THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT & | | | THE FRONT OF BUILDING B EXCLUSIVELY FACES THIS ONE-WAY | | | ALLEY (NOT PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD). IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | OUR ADDRESSING POLICIES, I HAVE CHANGED THE PRIMARY | | | SITE ADDRESS FOR PCN# 74434316020300080 TO 1325 | | | HENRIETTA AVE IN THE GIS & COMMUNITYPLUS DATABASES. I | | | ALSO INFORMED ALL OF THE RELEVANT PARTIES (PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY, USPS, FPL, ETC.) OF THE CHANGE FOR THIS PRIMARY | | | SITE ADDRESS IN A NOTIFICATION E-MAIL. FOR BUILDING B | | | ON THE SITE PLAN, WHICH IS TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED | | | PARKING LOT & CONSISTS OF SIX TWO-STORY UNITS, I HAVE | | | ASSIGNED THEM THE FOLLOWING UNIQUE SECONDARY ADDRESSES | | | (FROM WEST TO EAST): 1301 HENRIETTA AVE, 1303 HENRIETTA | | | AVE, 1305 HENRIETTA AVE, 1307 HENRIETTA AVE, 1309 | | | HENRIETTA AVE & 1311 HENRIETTA AVE (SHOWN IN | | | COMMUNITYPLUS UNDER PCN# 74434316020300080 AS UNIT | | | RECORDS 0001 TO 0006). FOR THE "OPEN YARD" ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, WHICH IS BETWEEN BUILDINGS B & A, I HAVE ASSIGNED | | | IT THE SECONDARY ADDRESS OF 1313 HENRIETTA AVE, SO JUST | | | IN CASE ANOTHER STRUCTURE OR PLAYGROUND EVENTUALLY GETS | | | BUILT DOWN THE LINE IN THIS VACANT LOT (SHOWN IN | | | COMMUNITYPLUS UNDER PCN# 74434316020300080 AS UNIT | | | RECORD 0007). FOR BUILDING A ON THE SITE PLAN, WHICH IS | | | TO THE EAST OF THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT & CONSISTS OF | | | FIVE TWO-STORY UNITS, I HAVE ASSIGNED THEM THE | | | FOLLOWING UNIQUE SECONDARY ADDRESSES (FROM BOTTOM TO | | | TOP): 1315 HENRIETTA AVE, 1317 HENRIETTA AVE, 1319 | | | HENRIETTA AVE, 1321 HENRIETTA AVE & 323 HENRIETTA AVE | | | (SHOWN IN COMMUNITYPLUS UNDER PCN# 74434316020300080 AS | | | UNIT RECORDS 0008TO 0012). I HAVE ALSO NOTIFIED THE | | | APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL OF ALL OF THESE NEWLY ISSUED | | | SECONDARY ADDRESSES FROM 1301 TO 1323 HENRIETTA AVE. | | | PLEASE CHANGE THE ADDRESS ON THE ORIGINAL PERMIT | | | APPLICATION FROM 605 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD (NO LONGER | | | GOOD) TO 1325 HENRIETTA AVE SINCE I ONLY HAVE A COPY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-11-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-11-03 |
Time |
13:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-11-03 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-03 14:07:29 | REVIEWED TRUSS DRAWINGS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | CORRECTIONS TO THE TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-10 | | | ARE REQUIRED. ANCHOR MARK 05 SHOULD BE USC 63 BECAUSE | | | THE ROOF PITCH IS 6:12. ANCHOR MARK 6.1 SHOULD ALSO BE | | | USC 63 WITH AN UPLIFT CAPACITY OF 11,150 #. A SIGNED | | | AND SEALED LETTER OF CLARIFICATION FROM THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD AS DISCUSSED WITH THE ARCHITECT WILL BE | | | ACCEPTABLE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-10-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-10-20 |
Time |
09:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-10-20 |
Time |
09:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-20 09:23:00 | TRUSS DRAWINGS ARE DENIED | | | CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 1) THE FLOOR TRUSS AND LOWER ROOF LAYOUT SPECIFIES THE | | | DESIGN CRITERIA AS FBC 07 / ASCE 7-05 AND EXPOSURE B. | | | THE TRUSS DRAWING COVERSHEET SPECIFIES EXPOSURE C. THE | | | LOWER ROOF TRUSS DRAWINGS IN THIS PACKAGE SPECIFY ASCE | | | 7-02 AND EXPOSURE B WITH TCDL OF 5 PSF AND BCDL OF 5 | | | PSF. PLEASE COORDINATE THE DESIGN CRITERIA AND LOADS | | | WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. THE PLANS WERE PERMITTED UNDER | | | THE 2004 FBC / ASCE 7-02 AND EXPOSURE B. | | | | | | NOTE YOU CAN DESIGN THE TRUSSES USING FBC 2007 AND ASCE | | | 7-05, HOWEVER, BECAUSE OF THE CHANGES TO THE EXPOSURE | | | CATEGORY DETERMINATIONS IN THE 2009 REVISIONS TO FBC | | | 07, THE STRUCTURE IS IN EXPOSURE CATEGORY C USING THIS | | | DESIGN CRITERIA. | | | | | | 2) ON THE UPPER ROOF TRUSS DRAWINGS THE UPLIFT FOR ROOF | | | GIRDER TRUSS C2 OF 1915# EXCEEDS THE CAPACITY OF THE | | | ANCHOR SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS OF 1115#. SEE ANCHOR 6.1 | | | ON SHEET S-10. ALSO IF USING FBC 2007 AND ASCE 7-05, | | | THE EXPOSURE CATEGORY IS C, NOT B. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 3) THE TRUSS LAYOUT DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED | | | AND SEALED BY THE TRUSS ENGINEER. THE SIGNATURE ON THE | | | TRUSS DRAWING COVER SHEET IS REQUIRED TO BE AN ORIGINAL | | | WET SIGNATURE, PHOTO-COPIES, STAMPS, ETC. ARE NOT | | | ALLOWED. FAC 61G-15-23.002 AND FS 471. ELECTRONIC | | | SIGNATURES OR DIGITAL SIGNATURES ARE ONLY USED FOR | | | PLANS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS ARE TRANSMITTED | | | ELECTRONICALLY. SEE SS 668.002 AND FAC 61G15-23.003. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
13:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
13:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-17 14:59:48 | NEED TO INDICATE CORRECT ADDRESS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2008-08-20 |
Time |
11:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
07:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-20 07:52:11 | 2ND REVIEW 8-18-08 | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08070618 | | | ADD: 605-609 PBL BLVD. | | | CONT: D. STEPHENSON CONSTRUCTION | | | TEL: (954)315-7020 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 / 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVIEW: 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | ALL PLANS SUBMITTED AFTER OCTOBER, 1, 2004 SHALL BE | | | DESIGNED TO THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH THE | | | 2007 REVISIONS. THE PERMIT APPLICATION STILL DESCRIBES | | | THE PROJECT AS TOWNHOUSES. THESE ARE NOT TOWNHOUSES AND | | | WILL BE REVIEWED AS R-2 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS. | | | 1) OK | | | 2) OK | | | 3) OK | | | 4) OK | | | 5) OK | | | | | | NOTED: SUBMIT THE BLUE RECEIT FOR THE IMPACT FEES FROM | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. | | | 6) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | ******************************************************* | | | ******************************************************* | | | ****************** | | | | | | 7) NOTED: HOWEVER, THE REPORT MAKES REFERENCE TO FBC | | | 2001. ALL PLANS SUBMITTED AFTER OCTOBER, 1, 2004 SHALL | | | BE DESIGNED TO THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE SOIL | | | INVESTIGATION REPORT SHALL CONTAIN THE ORIGINAL RAISED | | | SEAL OF THE ENGINEER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPORT. FAC | | | 61G15-23.002. A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL SIGN HIS | | | NAME AND AFFIX HIS SEAL TO ALL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, | | | REPORTS, FINAL BID DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO THE OWNER OR | | | THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE, OR OTHER DOCUMENTS PREPARED | | | OR ISSUED BY SAID REGISTRANT AND BEING FILED FOR PUBLIC | | | RECORD. THE DATE THAT THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL IS AFFIXED | | | AS PROVIDED HEREIN SHALL BE ENTERED ON SAID PLANS, | | | SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS IMMEDIATELY | | | UNDER THE SIGNATURE OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. | | | | | | A) FBC 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE BEARING | | | CAPACITY OF THE SOIL IS NOT DEFINITELY KNOWN OR IS IN | | | QUESTION, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE | | | NECESSARY INVESTIGATION BE MADE. THE INVESTIGATION | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 | | | THROUGH 1802.6 OF THE FBC. THE INVESTIGATION SHALL BE | | | CERTIFIED BY A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FROM A DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL PROPERLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF | | | FLORIDA. | | | | | | 8) FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: 713.13(2). IF THE | | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | | ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6). | | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 9) OK | | | 10) OK | | | 11) OK | | | | | | 12) FBC 2303.4.1 TRUSS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL | | | CONFORM TO THIS SECTION OF THE FBC AND SHALL BE | | | PREPARED BY A REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL PRIOR TO | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 13) OK | | | | | | 14) NOTED: HOWEVER, SOME OF THE INFORMATION INDICATED | | | ON THE FORMS FOR THE BUILDING ENVELOPE DOES NOT | | | CORRESPOND WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. EXAMPLE, | | | SLAB-ON-GRADE SHOWS R-13 INSULATION, ALL EXTERIOR WALLS | | | ARE SHOWN AS CONCRETE, BUT WALL TYPES ?F? AND ?I? | | | INDICATE 2?X6? STUD PARTITION. THE LEGEND NEEDS TO | | | INDICATE THE TYPE OF STUDS ALONG WITH THE STUD SPACING | | | AND THE THICKNESS OF THE EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING. THE | | | INSULATION FOR THE EXTERIOR WALLS IS SHOWN AS R-11 | | | HOWEVER, THE LEGEND SHOWS IT AS ?? RIGID INSULATION. | | | THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORMS NEED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. THERE IS NO CONCRETE ROOF | | | DECK SHOWN ON THE PLANS. | | | A) FL ENERGY EFFICIENCY CODE 400.ABCD. THE PERSON | | | PREPARING THE COMPLIANCE CALCULATION SHALL CERTIFY THAT | | | THE CALCULATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE & DEMONSTRATES | | | THAT THE BUILDING IS IN COMPLIANCE. SEE SUBCHAPTER 13-6 | | | OF THE FBC. | | | | | | 15) OK | | | 16) OK | | | 17) OK | | | | | | **NO RESPONSE NOT ADDRESSED** | | | NOTE: THE ABBREVIATION LEGEND ON SHEET SP - 1 IS NOT | | | LEGIBLE. | | | | | | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A | | | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF | | | THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | MYRON JACOBS | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER | | | (561)805-6726 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-30 |
Time |
09:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-29 |
Time |
17:15 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-30 09:29:10 | PROCESSED PLANS. | | | STAMPED ALL SHEETS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH WERE COMPLETED | | | BY OTHER TRADES. | | | | | | THE NEW PERMIT NUMBER 09040579 WAS GENERATED BASED ON | | | PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRED BY THE BUILDIGN OFFICIAL | | | FOR THE SECOND BUILDING. THIS IS1307 HENRIETTA AVE. | | | EVEN AS THE PERMIT NUMBER IS AFTER MARCH 1ST, 2009 THE | | | PLANS ARE UNDER 2004 FBC. APPLICATION WOULD HAVE BEEN | | | MADE UNDER THE PREVIOUS CODE IF THE CONTRACTOR HAD | | | KNOWN HE NEEDED A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | THE SITE DATA REPORTS FOR RAIN WATER CALCULAITONS WERE | | | SIGNED BY ENGINEER HOWEVER NOT SEALED. FS 471.025, FAC | | | 61G15-23.002. | | | THIS WAS NOTED TO MANUAL GONZALES FROM ENGINEERING. | | | BOTH REPORTS ARE BEING SENT BACK OUT. THEY NEED TO BE | | | SEALED CORRECTLY AND SUBMITTED AS A SUBMITTAL FOR | | | ENGINEERING REVIEW AND STAMPS. | | | | | | CIVIL SHEETS NOT STAMPED AS REVIEWED BY ENGINEERING | | | DEPT. EMAIL WAS FORWARDED TO ENGINEERING STAFF. MAIN | | | SET ON FILE AT THEIR OFFICE. THE REVIEWS ARE PASSED IN | | | THE COMPUTER. | | | | | | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR UNITS A, B, AND C WERE NOT | | | STAMPED BY ANY OTHER TRADES WHICH REVIEWED ALTHOUGH | | | REVIEWS FOR BUILDING, MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING ARE | | | PASSED IN COMPUTER. | | | THE DATE STAMP AND PERMIT NUMBER STAMP WAS ADDED TO | | | REPORTS. NO REVIEW OF REPROTSFOR OTHER TRADEAS WAS DONE | | | BY THIS REVIEWER. | | | THE ADDRESSED WAS CHANGED BY THIS REVIEWER TO LIST BOTH | | | NEW ADDRESSES AS 1301 AND 1307 HENRIETTA AVE ON THE | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS. COPIES WERE MADE FOR QUARTERLY | | | REPORTING TO THE DCA. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
Time |
16:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-09 09:54:15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ** PROVISO ITEMS ** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS WILL BE NEEDED ALONG WITH ANY | | | OTHER REVISIONS BEFORE ROUGH ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: LOAD CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE REVISED. THE ONE | | | OR MORE SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS SHALL BE 1500VA FOR | | | EACH. AS THERE ARE THREE PER 210.52B1, 210.11C1 EACH | | | SHALL BE THE 1500VA PER 220.52. | | | ONLY TWO ARE SHOWN FOR A TOTAL OF 3000VA. THE DEDICATED | | | DINING ROOM CIRCUIT IS NOT FIGURED INTO CALCULATIONS. | | | THIS WOULD BE A TOTAL OF 4500VA. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: THE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR THE HOUSE LOADS STILL | | | SHOW THE DEDICATED CIRCUITS FOR THE OUTSIDE LIGHTING OF | | | EACH BUILDING. HOWEVER THE LIGHTING ON THE OUTSIDE OF | | | EACH UNIT IS NOT FED FROM THE HOUSE PANEL. EACH FIXTURE | | | IS ON EACH OF THE UNITS. | | | PLEASE REVISE THE PANELS AND LOADS. 408.4, 220 | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | 2009-03-06 16:36:35 | ELECTRICAL REVIEW WILL BE A PROVISO HOWEVER ON HOLD FOR | | | ADDRESSING CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE. | | | | | | ** TEMPORARY FAILED STATUS FOR THE ADDRESSING TO BE | | | REVIEWED. | | | BOTH BUILDINGS ARE APPLIED UNDER ONE PERMIT AND ONE | | | ADDRESS ALTHOUGH EACH BUILDING IS COMPLETELY SEPARATE. | | | THE ADDRESSING REVIEWER HAS ADDED ADDRESSES FOR EACH | | | UNIT AS A SEPARATE OWN LOCATION. THIS NEEDS TO BE GONE | | | OVER BEFORE ISSUANCE. | | | EACH BUILDING SHALL CONTAIN ITS OWN ADDRESS. HOWEVER | | | THERE IS ONLY ONE PERMIT APPLICATION AT THIS TIME FOR | | | BOTH BUILDINGS. THE CONTRACTOR NEEDS TO BE AWARE THAT | | | BOTH BUILDINGS MUST BE COMPLETE BEFORE C OF O CAN BE | | | GRANTED FOR EITHER OF THE BUILDINGS. | | | ALSO THESE ARE NOT FEE SIMPLE UNITS. THE ADDRESSING IS | | | BASED ON THE BUILDING WITH EACH UNIT BEING A | | | SUITE/UNIT/OR APARTMENT NUMBER. EACH BUILDING HAS ONLY | | | ONE ELECTRICAL SERVICE AS THIS IS A MULTI-FAMILY | | | BUILDING. | | | THE REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN A FAILED STATUS UNTIL | | | APPLICATION/ADDRESSING IS CLEARED UP. THE INFORMATION | | | WAS ROUTED TO THE ADDRESSING REVIEWER AND WILL BE GONE | | | OVER. | | | | | | REVIEW WILL GO INTO A PASSED STATUS WITH PROVISO AFTER | | | ADDRESSING IS CORRECTED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
Time |
16:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
Time |
16:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-08 16:54:24 | | | | **DENIEDREVIEW** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS FROM PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED | | | *PLAN REVIEW * WHICH IS EXPIRED ARE STILL IN NEED OF | | | ADDRESSING. PREVIOUS # WAS 07080639 | | | THERE ARE ALSO SOME NEW COMMENTS FROM CHANGES ON PLANS | | | AND INFORMATION NOW SHOWN. | | | THERE IS ALSO A NEW COMMENT | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE ADJUST CODES ON PLANS FOR THE FBC AS | | | PERMIT APPLICATION IS NOW MADE OVER ONE YEAR AFTER | | | PREVIOUS *PLAN REVIEW ONLY* SOME CODES HAVE CHANGED. | | | PLEASE LIST THE 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH REQUESTED ALL | | | CIRCUITING TO BE SHOWN ON PLANS AND COORDINATED WITH | | | THE PANEL SCHEDULES SUBMITTED. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS | | | CIRCUITS ON PANEL SCHEDULES ARE SHOWN. THE CIRCUITS | | | REQUIRED ON PLANS ARE STILL MISSING. | | | THE CIRCUITS ON PANEL SCHEDULES ARE NOT COMPLETE FOR | | | BEING SPECIFIC. PLEASE SEE THE 2005 AS THE CODE WAS | | | REVISED TO STATE ALL CIRCUITS SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO | | | ROOMS AND AREAS IN WHICH THEY FEED. AN EXAMPLE OF THIS | | | IS THE PANEL SCHEDULE WHICH INDICATE CIRCUITS 13-20 AS | | | *GENERAL LIGHTING* THE CODE WHICH WILL BE QUOTED BELOW | | | STATES THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. | | | | | | *** | | | SECTION 408.4 WAS REVISED FOR THE 2005 CODE TO REQUIRE | | | THAT THE IDENTIFICATION FOR EVERY CIRCUIT SUPPLIED BY A | | | PANEL-BOARD OR SWITCHBOARD BE LEGIBLE AND CLEARLY STATE | | | THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE CIRCUIT IS USED. | | | CIRCUITS USED FOR THE SAME PURPOSE MUST BE IDENTIFIED | | | AS TO THEIR LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, SMALL APPLIANCE | | | BRANCH CIRCUITS CAN SUPPLY OUTLETS IN THE KITCHEN, | | | DINING ROOM, AND KITCHEN COUNTERTOPS. IDENTIFYING THE | | | CIRCUITS AS SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS IS NOT | | | ACCEPTABLE; INSTEAD, THEY SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AS | | | ``KITCHEN WALL RECEPTACLES,'' ``DINING ROOM FLOOR | | | RECEPTACLE,'' OR ``KITCHEN COUNTERTOP RECEPTACLES LEFT | | | OF SINK.'' CIRCUIT DIRECTORIES CONTAINING MULTIPLE | | | ENTRIES WITH ONLY ``LIGHTS'' OR ``OUTLETS'' DO NOT | | | PROVIDE THE SUFFICIENT DETAIL REQUIRED BY THIS | | | SECTION. | | | | | | ** | | | PLEASE REVISE PANEL SCHEDULES. THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS | | | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE WHICH NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED FOR | | | ITEMS SUCH AS DINING ROOMS/AREAS FOR COMPLIANCE PER | | | 210.52B1, 210.11C1, 220.53 ETC | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING LIGHTING REQUIRED IN AHU | | | CLOSETS PER 210.70 | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SOME UNITS ARE STILL MISSING | | | REQUIRED RECEPTACLES PER 210.52. | | | PLEASE SEE UNIT A WHICH IS ON SHEET E-1 ON THE LEFT | | | HAND SIDE. PLEASE SEE THE WALL BETWEEN THE KITCHEN AND | | | LIVING ROOM. MANY OF THE LOCATIONS WERE REVISED HOWEVER | | | NOT ALL. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE WALL SPACE IN KITCHENS IN UNITS B, C AS | | | THERE ARE WALL SPACES GREATER THAN 2 FT. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING LIGHTING CONTROLS REQUIRED | | | WHEN ENTERING INTO THE UNITS SUCH AS UNIT *A*. PLEASE | | | SEE 210.70 FOR REQUIRED HALLWAY LIGHTING AND CONTROLS | | | FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND ENTRANCES. | | | ** ( THIS NOTE IS NOT FOR OUTSIDE WHEN AUTOMATIC | | | OUTSIDE LIGHTING IS BEING PROVIDED. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY THE AIC RATINGS ON PLANS. PLANS | | | STATE 30,000 AIC RATING FOR ALL EQUIPMENT. THIS MAY | | | WANT TO BE CONFIRMED. IF PLANS INDICATE 30K FOR ALL | | | THEN THIS WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | THE LET THROUGH CURRENT ON THE LOAD SIDE OF MAINS | | | SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE MANUFACTURE ETC | | | 110.9. | | | RESPONSE CONTAINS QUESTION MARKS. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW NOTES HAVE BEEN ROUTED TO | | | *ADDRESSING* AS ADDRESSING OF THE BUILDINGS IS NEEDED. | | | THE PERMIT APPLICATION STATES *ELEVEN NEW TOWNHOUSES * | | | HOWEVER BY DEFINITION THESE ARE NOT FEE SIMPLE | | | TOWNHOUSE UNITS. THESE ARE SHOWN AS MULTI-FAMILY | | | BUILDINGS. EACH BUILDING WOULD NEED A SEPARATE | | | ADDRESS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONCE THE FINAL ADDRESSES FOR EACH ARE | | | DETERMINED PLEASE REVISE TITLE BLOCKS ACCORDINGLY. | | | FAC 61G16-1.004, 61G15-23.002, FBC 106.5 | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEC 90.8. THE SERVICE AS SHOWN IS A | | | 400AMP SERVICE WITH A LOAD OF 399.6 AMPS. THIS DOES NOT | | | ALLOW FOR ANY FUTURE LOADS NOT EVEN FOR ONE CIRCUIT AS | | | SHOWN. | | | THE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING *A* STATES A TOTAL | | | OF FOUR (4) UNITS HOWEVER BASED ON THE PLANS AND THE | | | LOAD CALCULATIONS WHICH INDICATE 5 UNITS PLEASE | | | REVISE. | | | PLEASE REVISE SERVICE FOR BUILDING *B*. | | | NEC 220, 240.4,310.16 ETC | | | | | | ** AS SOME ITEMS ARE NOT SHOWN, FINAL DETERMINATIONF | | | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
08:08 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
08:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-10 08:11:38 | " APPROVED WITH PROVISO " | | | | | | WATER SERVICES WILL BE COORDINATED AT PRE-CONSTRUCTION | | | MEETING | | | EOR HAS BEEN ADVISED THAT SERVICE LINES, WATER METERS | | | AND BACKFLOWS | | | SHALL BE LOCATED TO THE CLOSEST SOURCE AS POSSIBLE. | | | | | | [email protected] | | | | | | EMERY FABIAN IS THE ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT. | | | A PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH SUCH ENTITIY MUST ME | | | SET BEFORE SETTING | | | METER BOXES AND OR NEW WATER SERVICES. (561) 494-1040 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
Time |
14:48 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
Time |
14:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-06 14:47:59 | **** NOT APPROVED ***** | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT ENGINEERING SERVICES - PLANS ARE OVER 1 | | | YEAR OLD. | | | WATER SERVICE LINES MUST BE RUN INSIDE OF THE PROPERTY | | | AND NOT UNDER THE CITY SIDEWALK. | | | | | | [email protected] (561) 494-1085 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
Time |
14:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
Time |
14:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-25 14:37:12 | FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI). | | | PLEASE APPLY AT FDEP, NPDES STORMWATER SECTION FOR | | | NOI. | | | YOU CAN GET NOI INFO FROM | | | WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/ | | | NOTICE OF INTENT DEP FORM 62-621.300(4)(B), | | | EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2003 | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE SILT FENCE DETAILS & | | | TURBIDITY DETAILS OFPOLLUTION PREVENTION . PLEASE | | | SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE TURBIDITY AROUND EACH CATCH BASIN. | | | HEIGHT OF FENCE SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP TO STOP | | | DUST PARTICLES. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF BOND FOR ORDINANCE NO. | | | 4060-07: | | | | | | ALL DEMOLITION AND NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, WITH | | | EXCEPTION OF SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX AND ACCESSORY | | | APARTMENT, SHALL POST BONDS OR DEPOSITS FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1. EROSION CONTROL, AND | | | 2. LAND STABILIZATION | | | | | | THE AMOUNT OF THE EROSION CONTROL AND LAND | | | STABILIZATION BONDS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER | | | OF RECORD USING THE CURRENT CITY COST SCHEDULE AND | | | VERIFIED BY THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT. | | | PLEASE CONTACT BRIAN MOREE, ENG SERVICES CONSTRUCTION | | | SUPERVISOR, AT 561- 494 -1040 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | | | UPON VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEMENT, PAYMENT IN | | | FULL OF ALL APPLICABLE FEES, AND COMPLIANCE WITH ALL | | | TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY POSTED BOND, THE PERMITTEE | | | MAY REQUEST RELEASE OF THE BONDS OR DEPOSITS. | | | | | | A COPY OF ORDINANCE NO. 4060-07 MAY BE OBTAINED FROM | | | THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE LOCATED ON THE FIRST FLOOR. | | | | | | 4.PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT DUMPSTER LOCATION MUST BE | | | ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE SHOW ON CALCULATION THAT YOU HAVE CONSIDERED | | | FLOOD ZONE AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIA | | | AND CROWN OF THE ROAD WHEN YOU DETERMINE THE FIRST | | | FLOOR ELEVATION. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION SHOULD BE | | | ATLEAST 1 FOOT HIGHER THAN HIGHEST CROWN OF THE ROAD. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGTHE SITE AREA, | | | GREEN, LAKE,PARKING AREA, IMPERVIOUS,PERVIOUS AREAYOU | | | ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS PROJECT . PLEASEMAKE SURE | | | THESE AREAS SHOWN ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH | | | AND USED IN STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A COPY OF THESE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES AROUND YOUR SITE | | | SO, WE CANSEE THE LAYOUT OF STORM WATER PIPES FROM | | | ALL OTHER STORM WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE | | | CONTROL STRUCTURESWITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING | | | ELEVATION, ETC ON DRAWINGS, CALCULATION FOR | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, PLEASE SHOW DRY DETENTION/WET | | | DETENTION AREAS IN STORM WATER CALS IF YOU HAVE ALL | | | THESE. PLEASE RESUBMIT GEO-TECH REPORT AND ALL | | | ENVRONMENTAL REPORT. | | | | | | 8. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND | | | YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN SO YOUR SITE DO NOT GET | | | FLOODED AND HAVE ENOUGH DRAINS. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,, GEO-TECH | | | REPORT&STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS TO 1000 | | | 45TH STREET FOR THEIR APPROVAL BEFORE WE APPROVE. | | | | | | 10. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM MANNY G. | | | OF 1000 45TH STREET BEFORE WE ISSUE A PERMIT. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
Time |
10:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
Time |
10:38 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
Time |
12:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
Time |
12:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-09 13:04:07 | ***DENIED*** | | | | | | THIS COMMENT IS TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM THE FIRST FIRE PLAN | | | REVIEW: | | | | | | 1) 2ND REQUEST: ILLUSTRATE THE LOCATIONS OF NEW AND | | | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS RELEVANT TO THIS PROJECT. PLEASE | | | INDICATE THE DISTANCE FROM THE CLOSEST FIRE HYDRANT TO | | | REFERENCED PROPERTY. | | | | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASST. FIRE MARSHAL | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-08-21 |
Time |
13:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-08-21 |
Time |
13:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-21 13:17:25 | ***DENIED*** | | | | | | MOST OF THE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | UNDER THE NOW EXPIRED PERMIT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT FROM THE LAST REVIEW | | | AND NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) ILLUSTRATE THE LOCATIONS OF NEW AND EXISTING FIRE | | | HYDRANTS. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ON C- SHEETS. | | | | | | 2) NEW COMMENT- EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AND WATER | | | SUPPLY SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1, 2003. | | | | | | 3) NEW COMMENT- SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE MINIMUM OF THREE | | | (3) FEET FROM AC DIFFUSERS AND COMPLY WITH 101, SEC. | | | 9.6.2.10 SO THAT THE OPERATION OF ONE (1) SMOKE ALARM | | | ACTIVATES ALL SMOKE ALARMS IN THE UNIT. | | | | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-19 12:37:43 | OK PER G JUDGE 8-21-07 NO FEE CHGD, OK PER J PAPA FOR | | | RESUB 1-26-09 CHARGED $10 FEE, OK PER J PAPA TO RESUB | | | ON 2-19-09 NO FEE CHARGED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-10-28 |
Time |
13:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-10-28 |
Time |
13:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-28 13:28:46 | INCOMING TO: R. MC DOUGAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-09 |
Time |
13:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-09-09 |
Time |
13:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-09 13:42:34 | TO LM DESK (TRUSS ENGINEERING) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-24 |
Time |
10:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-24 |
Time |
10:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-05 19:57:41 | EXPEDITE REVIEW - AFFORDABLE HOUSING - SEE HCD STAMP ON | | | SHEET SP-1 | | | | | | | | 2009-02-24 10:55:00 | TO "COMM" BD#8/PLANS ON RACK/LARGE FOLDED PLANS | | | W/PAPERWORK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-28 |
Time |
09:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-28 |
Time |
09:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-28 09:52:51 | TO "COMM" BD#59 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2008-08-21 |
Time |
08:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
Time |
13:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-23 13:11:58 | TO "COMM" BD#40 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
Time |
15:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-09 |
Time |
15:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-09 15:47:09 | ****PROVISO**** | | | PAGES M-1 THROUGH M-4: NOTE #1 CALLS FOR 1" COPPER PIPE | | | TO BE TRANSITIONED TO 3/4 PVC PIPE. CONDENSATE PIPE | | | SHALL NOT DECREASE IN SIZE FROM THE DRAIN PAN | | | CONNECTION TO THE PLACE OF CONDENSATE DISPOSAL IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M 307.2.2. IF PIPE STARTS AS 1" IT | | | MUST STAY AT 1". PIPE MAY ALSO START AT 3/4" AS LONG AS | | | IT DOES NOT REDUCE IN SIZE. REVISE PLANS PRIOR TO | | | INSPECTION TO ADDRESS THIS CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBC-B 106.4. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
Time |
13:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
Time |
10:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-11 13:28:02 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | REVIEWED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CODES: | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | NOTE: THESE COMMENTS ARE BASED AND NUMBERED ON COMMENTS | | | UNDER EXPIRED PERMIT #07080639 DATED 10/31/07. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ARE POSSIBLE. THIS IS A NEW PERMIT | | | APPLICATION AND WILL BE REVIEWED ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 1. THE JOB DESCRIPTION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS | | | STILL DESCRIBING THIS WORK AS TOWNHOUSES. BY DEFINITION | | | IN FBCB SECTION 202, THESE ARE NOT TOWNHOUSES AND WILL | | | CONTINUE TO BE REVIEWED UNDER THE FBC AS R-2 | | | MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS. | | | | | | 2. ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. | | | HOWEVER, THE BUILDING ENVELOPE COMPONENTS SHOWN ON THE | | | COMPLIANCE FORM BARE NO RESEMBLANCE TO THE COMPONENTS | | | SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE SEE BUILDING | | | PLAN REVIEW FOR MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION. ALSO, A | | | COOLING AND HEATING LOAD CALCULATION SHALL BE PERFORMED | | | ON THE BUILDING AND SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE FORM 600 | | | SUBMITTED WHEN APPLICATION IS MADE FOR A BUILDING | | | PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-607.1.ABC.1. COOLING | | | EQUIPMENT CAPACITY SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH 13-607.1.ABC.1.1. | | | | | | 3. OK | | | | | | 4. OK | | | | | | 5. OK | | | | | | 6. PAGE M-5 SHOWS A PRESCRIPTIVE TIE-DOWN METHOD PER | | | FBCB 301.13.1. PLEASE NOTE THAT 301.13.1 IS ONLY | | | APPLICABLE TO R-3 OCCUPANCIES. AS STATED IN COMMENT #1 | | | ABOVE, THESE BUILDINGS ARE CLASSIFIED AS R-2 | | | OCCUPANCIES. THEREFORE, AN ENGINEERED DESIGN OF | | | ATTACHMENT WITH SUPPORTING WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS IS | | | REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | THE REQUESTED INFORMATION AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | 7. PAGE M-1 THROUGH M-4 CALL FOR 1 INCH CPVC PIPE TO BE | | | USED FOR CONDENSATE. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION WAS | | | REQUESTED SHOWING THAT THE SPECIFIED SIZE OF CPVC WOULD | | | MEET THE 25/50 RATING WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | ASTM E84 PER FBCM 602.2.1. NO SUCH DOCUMENTATION WAS | | | PROVIDED. THE ONLINE DOCUMENTATION WHICH WAS RESEARCHED | | | DURING THIS REVIEW INDICATES THAT ONLY 1/2 INCH AND 3/4 | | | INCH CPVC HAS MET THE 25/50 REQUIREMENT WHEN NOT FILLED | | | WITH WATER. CONDENSATE DRAIN PIPES ARE NOT FILLED WITH | | | WATER AND THEREFORE 1 INCH CPVC IS NOT ACCEPTABLE IN | | | THE PLENUM SPACES PER FBCM 602.2.1. PLEASE BE REMINDED | | | THAT 3/4 INCH CPVC DOES NOT MEET THE INTERNAL DIAMETER | | | REQUIREMENTS OF FBCM 307.2.2. PLEASE SHOW A CONDENSATE | | | DRAIN MATERIAL WITHIN THE PLENUM SPACE WHICH MEETS THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF BOTH CODE SECTIONS REFERENCED ABOVE. | | | | | | 8. OK | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 9. PAGES M-1 THROUGH M-4 SHOW PLAN NOTE #3 WHICH CALLS | | | FOR BATHROOM AND DRYER EXHAUST TO TERMINATE ON THE ROOF | | | AT A GOOSENECK WITH BACK DRAFT DAMPER AND BIRD SCREEN. | | | DRYER EXHAUST DUCTS FOR CLOTHES DRYERS SHALL TERMINATE | | | ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING AND SHALL BE EQUIPPED | | | WITH A BACKDRAFT DAMPER. SCREENS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED | | | AT THE DUCT TERMINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 504.4. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
Time |
14:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-08-05 |
Time |
08:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-08-05 |
Time |
08:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-05 09:47:41 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | | | | 1. SHT P-1 SHOWS VENTS AT THE CURB OF THE SHOWER IN | | | UNITS "A". PLEASE CLARIFY. WILL THIS BE A SOLID WALL | | | WITH A DOOR? 106.1.2. | | | | | | 2. SHT P-2 TUBS INDICATED AS SHOWERS IN THE MASTER | | | BATHROOMS OF "A" & "B" UNITS ARE NOT VENTED. SECTION | | | 901.2.1. | | | | | | 3. SHT P-3 THE WASH MACHINES IN THE "B" UNITS AND ONE | | | "C" UNIT SHALL DISCHARGE DOWNSTREAM OF THE HORIZONTAL | | | WET VENT FOR THE BATHROOM FIXTURES. SECTION 909.1. | | | | | | 4. SHT P-3 THE FLOOR PLANS FOR THE WASH MACHINES AND | | | WATER HEATERS ARE DIFFERENT IN BOTH "C" UNITS. AS SUCH | | | SEPARATE RISER DIAGRAMS REFLECTING THE DIFFERENT FLOOR | | | PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE SANITARY AND WATER | | | ISOMETRICS. SECTION 106.3.5.1.3. | | | | | | 5. SHT P-4 TUBS INDICATED AS SHOWERS IN THE MASTER | | | BATHROOMS OF THE "B" UNITS ARE NOT VENTED. SECTION | | | 901.2.1. | | | | | | 6. SHT P-5 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM UNIT "A"DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR. THE VENT AT THE | | | SHOWER IS NOT SHOWN AND AS SUCH IS NOT VENTED. THE | | | "SHOWER" FOR THE MASTER BATH IS NOT VENTED. (THIS IS | | | SHOWN AS A TUB ON THE FLOOR PLAN). SECTIONS 106.1.1 & | | | 901.2.1. | | | | | | 7. SHT P-5 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM UNIT "B"DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR. THE WASH MACHINE IS | | | SHOWN CONNECTING DOWNSTREAM OF THE WATER CLOSET ON THE | | | FLOOR PLAN, BUT BETWEEN THE WATER CLOSET AND LAV ON THE | | | RISER DIAGRAM. (SEE SECTION 909.1). THE MASTER BATH | | | SHOWER, (SHOWN AS A TUB ON THE FLOOR PLAN), IS NOT | | | VENTED. SECTIONS 106.1.1 & 901.2.1. | | | | | | 8. SHT P-5 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM UNIT "C" DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR. THE STACK FOR THE | | | SECOND FLOOR BATHROOM IS SHOWN CONNECTING TO THE BRANCH | | | LINE TO THE POWDER ROOM ON THE FLOOR PLAN, BUT ON THE | | | BRANCH LINE TO THE WASH MACHINE ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. | | | ALSO THE WASH MACHINE IS SHOWN UPSTREAM OF THE KITCHEN | | | SINK ON THE FLOOR PLAN BUT DOWNSTREAM OF THE KITCHEN | | | SINK ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTIONS | | | 106.1.1 & 710.1. | | | | | | 9. SHT P-6 WATER RISER DIAGRAM UNIT "A" DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN AT THE WATER HEATER. FLOOR PLAN | | | SHOWS THE WATER HEATER BETWEEN THE BATHROOM FIXTURES | | | AND THE WASH MACHINE BUT THE RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS THE | | | WATER HEATER PAST THE KITCHEN SINK BRANCH LINE. PLEASE | | | CORRELATE. SECTIONS 106.1.1 & 604.1. | | | | | | 10. SHT P-6 WATER RISER DIAGRAM UNIT "C" DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN AT THE WATER HEATER. FLOOR PLAN | | | SHOWS THE WATER HEATER BETWEEN THE BATHROOM FIXTURES | | | AND THE WASH MACHINE BUT THE RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS THE | | | WATER HEATER PAST THE KITCHEN SINK AND THE WASH MACHINE | | | BRANCH LINES. PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTIONS 106.1.1 & | | | 604.1. | | | | | | 11. SHT P-6 ALL WATER RISER DIAGRAMS. WATER HAMMER | | | ARRESTORS ARE REQUIRED AT THE WASH MACHINES, DISH | | | WASHERS & ICE MAKERS (REF) PER SECTION 604.9. THE WATER | | | HAMMER ARRESTORS SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE FIXTURES IN | | | AN "EFFECTIVE RANGE" (NOT IN THE CEILING). PDI-WH 201. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
Time |
16:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
Time |
16:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
13:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-30 14:42:31 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. THE PLANS TO NOT BEAR THE REVIEW STAMP OF THE | | | HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION, THEY MUST REVIEW AND | | | STAMP THE PLANS BEFORE SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION THAT THE BOND RELATING | | | TO THE REDESIGNATION OF THE ALLEY TO THE NORTH AS | | | ONE-WAY HAS BEEN PAID. | | | | | | 3. ADDRESS CHARACTERS MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES IN | | | HEIGHT. | | | | | | 4. CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK TO THE | | | INSIDE OF THE FENCE. THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS LEAVES THE | | | BICYCLES MORE PRONE TO THEFT. | | | | | | 5. CONSIDER ADDING A SECOND HEAD TO THE | | | SOUTHEASTERN-MOST POLE LIGHT TO ILLUMINATE THE | | | RECREATION/OPEN SPACE AS A MEANS TO DETER LOITERING IN | | | THAT SPACE AFTER DARK. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, PLANNER, AT 822-1458 OR | | | [email protected] WITH QUESTIONS. |
|
|