 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 08070215
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08070215 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-01-08 |
Time |
18:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
Time |
11:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-08 18:02:26 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | ****PLAN REVIEW**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST: | | | | | | 1. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 2. IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE | | | PLANS MUST BE STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE | | | APPLICATION. 561-233-5025. THIS MAY BE DONE AS A PART | | | OF THE STRUCTURAL PERMIT, AS IT IS LIKELY THAT THE | | | STRUCTURAL PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED FIRST. | | | | | | 3. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 4. INFORMATIONAL, A PERMIT MUST BE APPLIED FOR PRIOR TO | | | MARCH 1, 2009 TO BE ISSUED UNDER FBC2004 W/2007 | | | REVISIONS AS GOVERNING CODE. THIS IS A PLAN CHECK ONLY. | | | THE PLAN REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN FAILED STATUS UNTIL A | | | PERMIT APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 5-6. PLEASE INCLUDE A COPY OF THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION | | | PLAN AND THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR AGREEMENT IN THE | | | RESUBMITTAL OR ADVISE IF IT IS A PART OF THE STRUCTURE | | | SHELL PERMIT. | | | | | | 7-12. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 13. SEE FBC1009.11.5, PLEASE SHOW HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS | | | WITH DIMENSIONS ON THE PLAN. NOTE THAT EXTENSIONS ARE | | | NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN A3, OTHER PLACES, BUT ARE SHOWN | | | ON THE SECTION, A6. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS NOT SHOWN AT TOP OF | | | STAIR 2, LS1; TOP OF STAIR 1, LS1; FRONT STAIR, | | | REMODELED STAIR ENCLOSURE (A2), FIRST FLOOR (A1). IT | | | APPEARS THAT THE REQUIRED STAIR EXTENSION AT STAIR 2 | | | MAY INTERFERE WITH DOOR SWING. REMODELED SECOND FLOOR | | | PLAN A2 SHOWS HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE ONLY (CENTER). | | | PLEASE CHECK ALL STAIR PLANS. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED. ARCHITECT?S | | | RESPONSE WAS: ?ALL STAIR PLANS HAVE BEEN CHECKED AND | | | UPDATED TO SHOW THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH BY SECTION | | | 1009.11.5. SEE SHEET LS-1 FOR COMPLIANCE NOTES.? | | | | | | PLEASE SEE FBC1009.11.5: HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS. HANDRAILS | | | SHALL RETURN TO A WALL, GUARD OR THE WALKING SURFACE OR | | | SHALL BE CONTINUOUS TO THE HANDRAIL OF AN ADJACENT | | | STAIR FLIGHT. WHERE HANDRAILS ARE NOT CONTINUOUS | | | BETWEEN FLIGHTS, THE HANDRAILS SHALL EXTEND | | | HORIZONTALLY AT LEAST 12 INCHES BEYOND THE TOP RISER | | | AND CONTINUE TO SLOPE FOR THE DEPTH OF ONE TREAD BEYOND | | | THE BOTTOM RISER.? | | | | | | I HAVE HIGHLIGHTED THE AREAS WHERE THE HANDRAIL | | | EXTENSIONS ARE MISSING ON THE PLAN (SAME LOCATIONS AS | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW). PLEASE REVISE HANDRAILS AT THE | | | FOLLOWING LOCATIONS (AND CHECK ALL FOR COMPLIANCE): | | | | | | A. LS1, PROPOSED STAIR CORRIDOR, TOP LEFT OF FLOOR | | | PLAN, ONE HANDRAIL IS MISSING THE EXTENSION AT THE TOP. | | | | | | B. LS1, PROPOSED ROOF TOP LIFE SAFETY PLAN, TOP LEFT, | | | NO EXTENSION ON ONE SIDE OF THE HAND RAIL, TOP. THIS | | | EXTENSION WILL BLOCK THE DOOR. | | | | | | C. LS1, PROPOSED STAIR CORRIDOR, MIDDLE SECTION OF | | | STAIR AT LANDING, BY THE 48? DOOR, NO EXTENSION AT | | | BOTTOM OF STAIR RUN WHERE THE STAIR CHANGES DIRECTION; | | | AS DRAWN, HANDRAIL TO THE INSIDE ENDS BEFORE THE END OF | | | THE LAST TREAD. | | | | | | D. LS1, PROPOSED ROOF TOP LIFE SAFETY PLAN, TOP STAIR | | | #2, NO EXTENSION AT THE TOP OF THE STAIR (BY THE DOOR). | | | IT APPEARS THAT THIS EXTENSION WILL BLOCK THE DOOR | | | (SAME STAIR AREA AS ITEM B). | | | | | | E. A2, PROPOSED STAIR CIRCULATION PLAN, TOP STAIR #2, | | | NO EXTENSION AT THE TOP OF THE STAIR (SAME AS B AND D). | | | | | | F. SAME STAIR AS (E), A2, PROPOSED STAIR CIRCULATION | | | PLAN, INTERMEDIATE LANDING NEAR DOOR 201 MISSING | | | HANDRAIL WHERE STAIRS CHANGE DIRECTIONS; ALSO PROPOSED | | | STAIR CORRIDOR LIFE SAFETY PLAN LS1. | | | | | | G. A3 AND LS1, LABELED SOUTH EGRESS STAIR, TOP, BOTH | | | SIDES, EXTENSIONS APPEAR LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 12 | | | INCHES. | | | | | | 14-23. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 24. CODE COMPLIANCE FOR THIS ITEM (BUILDING TYPE) | | | SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL PERMIT, BUT SHOULD BE | | | INCLUDED ON THIS PLAN AS WELL. THE NEW PLAN HAS BEEN | | | REVISED TO DECLARE TYPE IIIA, RESPONSE LETTER STATES | | | THIS IS TYPE IIIB. PLEASE CONFIRM BUILDING TYPE. | | | | | | 25-32. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 33. PREVIOUS COMMENTS STATED THAT FIRE RESISTANCE IS TO | | | BE CONTINUOUS TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE DECK ABOVE, | | | FBC707.4, 707.5. ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE STATED THAT FIRE | | | RESISTANCE CONTINUITY REQUIREMENTS WERE STATED ON NTS. | | | SEE M2, DUCTWORK SHOWN ABOVE THE STAIRS AND DUCTWORK | | | SHOWN IN THE ELEVATOR LOBBY AREA. THE EXIT TERMINATES | | | AT THE EXIT DISCHARGE, WHICH WOULD BE THE EXTERIOR | | | DOOR, DUCT IS SHOWN AT THE STAIRWAY DOOR. | | | | | | SHEET A2 SPECIFIES FIRE RATED PARTITIONS FOR THE | | | STAIRS. SEE FBC1019.1, FIRE BARRIERS REQUIRED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC706, NOT FIRE PARTITIONS FBC708. THE | | | CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS DIFFER, AND PARTITIONS ARE | | | LESS STRINGENT THAN BARRIERS. PLEASE CLARIFY COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AS A FIRE BARRIER. | | | | | | FOR INSTANCE, SEE B A12. WALLS W1, W6 SHOW THE WALL | | | TERMINATING AT THE CEILING ABOVE RATHER THAN AT THE | | | ROOF DECK ABOVE. A A12 ALSO SHOWS THE RATED WALL W6 | | | ENDING AT A CEILING, RATHER THAN EXTENDING UP TO THE | | | BOTTOM OF THE ROOF DECK. IT ALSO SHOWS A 1 HOUR FIRE | | | RATED CEILING ABOVE THE STAIR, NOT CLEAR HOW THIS | | | COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENT FOR FIRE RATING TO BE | | | CONTINUOUS TO THE ROOF DECK OR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY | | | ABOVE. SEE ALSO A14. | | | | | | AS STRUCTURALS ARE NOT A PART OF THIS PERMIT, AND THE | | | RENOVATION IS SOMEWHAT COMPLEX, IT IS DIFFICULT TO | | | DETERMINE EXACT CONSTRUCTION BASED ON THE INFORMATION | | | PROVIDED. THE WALLS ARE SPECIFIED AS RATED WALLS, | | | STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS RATED, BUT NOTE THE REQUIREMENT FOR | | | THE SUPPORTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE RATED AS WELL, | | | INCLUDING EXISTING CONSTRUCTION (VERTICAL EXITS). | | | ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE STATES THAT THE WALLS ARE | | | CONTINUOUS, THE PLANS STATE THEY ARE CONTINUOUS, BUT | | | THE DETAILS PROVIDED DO NOT SHOW CONTINUOUS WALLS. | | | PLEASE REVISE DETAILS TO CLEARLY SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FBC707.4, 707.5, AND REVISE NOTES WHICH SPECIFY FIRE | | | PARTITIONS TO SPECIFY FIRE BARRIERS AS REQUIRED BY | | | FBC1019.1. ALSO COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL ENGINEER; | | | CLARIFY DUCTS IN THE OPEN SPACE ABOVE STAIRS, WHEN | | | STAIR WALLS SHOULD EXTEND TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF | | | DECK; THERE SHOULD NOT BE AN OPEN SPACE. IF NECESSARY, | | | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SECTION DETAILS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 35-36. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 37. THE STAIR LABELED "FRONT EGRESS STAIR" SHOWS AN | | | ELEVATOR LOBBY IN THE STAIR ENCLOSURE ON THE FIRST | | | FLOOR. SEE A1. PLEASE SEE FBC1019.1. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT NO MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT IS IN THE STAIR ENCLOSURE. SEE SHEET A1, | | | BOTTOM LEFT. THIS PLAN SHOWS THE STAIR AND THE ELEVATOR | | | IN THE SAME ENCLOSURE. THIS STAIR IS LABELED A "MEANS | | | OF EGRESS STAIR". TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS | | | SPACE, FBC1018.1, NOT MEANS OF EGRESS. EXITS SHALL BE | | | CONTINUOUS, FBC1018.3. VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE SHALL | | | NOT BE USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN MEANS OF EGRESS, | | | FBC1019.1. SEE ALSO DEFINITION OF EXIT, FBC1002. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 38. FP SHEETS, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND | | | SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, | | | DATED ORIGINALS FS471. SHEETS SUBMITTED DO NOT INCLUDE | | | A SIGNATURE, DATE, AND SEAL AND THE PRINTED NAME AND | | | LICENSE NUMBER OF THE PERSON WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE | | | DOCUMENT. | | | | | | 39. SEE M2, DUCTS SHOWN THROUGH THE WALL, BUT ISN?T | | | THIS WALL ON THE PROPERTY LINE? SEE FBC TABLE 602, | | | FBC704.8, NO OPENINGS ALLOWED FOR A. PREVIOUS COMMENTS | | | REQUESTED THAT ALL FIRE RATED WALLS AND OTHER ELEMENTS | | | BE NOTED ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-06 |
Time |
08:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-10 11:45:47 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | ****PLAN REVIEW**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 2. IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE | | | PLANS MUST BE STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE | | | APPLICATION. 561-233-5025. THIS MAY BE DONE AS A PART | | | OF THE STRUCTURAL PERMIT, AS IT IS LIKELY THAT THE | | | STRUCTURAL PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED FIRST. | | | | | | 3. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 4. INFORMATIONAL, A PERMIT MUST BE APPLIED FOR PRIOR TO | | | MARCH 1, 2009 TO BE ISSUED UNDER FBC2004 W/2007 | | | REVISIONS AS GOVERNING CODE. THIS IS A PLAN CHECK ONLY. | | | THE PLAN REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN FAILED STATUS UNTIL A | | | PERMIT APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 5-6. PLEASE INCLUDE A COPY OF THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION | | | PLAN AND THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR AGREEMENT IN THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 7-12. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 13. SEE FBC1009.11.5, PLEASE SHOW HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS | | | WITH DIMENSIONS ON THE PLAN. NOTE THAT EXTENSIONS ARE | | | NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN A3, OTHER PLACES, BUT ARE SHOWN | | | ON THE SECTION, A6. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS NOT SHOWN AT TOP OF | | | STAIR 2, LS1; TOP OF STAIR 1, LS1; FRONT STAIR, | | | REMODELED STAIR ENCLOSURE (A2), FIRST FLOOR (A1). IT | | | APPEARS THAT THE REQUIRED STAIR EXTENSION AT STAIR 2 | | | MAY INTERFERE WITH DOOR SWING. REMODELED SECOND FLOOR | | | PLAN A2 SHOWS HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE ONLY (CENTER). | | | PLEASE CHECK ALL STAIR PLANS. | | | | | | 14-19. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 24. LS1, BUILDING TYPE 5A DECLARED. PLEASE NOTE ALL | | | REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE ON THE PLAN, BOTH VERTICAL AND | | | HORIZONTAL, INCLUDING THE VENTILATION SHAFT. SEE FBC | | | TABLE 601 AND 602, ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE A MINIMUM | | | OF 1 HOUR. ONE WALL IS SHOWN AS HAVING A 1 HOUR RATING, | | | BUT THE OTHER THREE DO NOT. THERE ARE GENERAL NOTES, | | | BUT THE PLAN IS TO BE SPECIFIC AS TO REQUIREMENTS | | | FBC*106. | | | | | | SEE OTHER COMMENTS. FOR INSTANCE, SEEA9. RATING NOT | | | SHOWN FOR THE ROOFTOP DECK, UL ASSEMBLIES NOTED ON | | | ANOTHER PAGE BUT UL ASSEMBLIES NOT NOTED FOR THESE | | | DETAILS. PLEASE REVISE TO CLEARLY SHOW WHICH ELEMENTS | | | ARE TO FIRE RESISTANCE RATED, AND HOW THEY WILL COMPLY | | | WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS. THIS APPLIES TO ALL EXTERIOR | | | WALLS (1 HOUR), ALL BEARING WALLS, FLOOR AND ROOF. ANY | | | EXCEPTIONS, IF ANY ARE APPLICABLE, SHOULD BE NOTED ON | | | THE PLAN. | | | | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT FIRE RATING FOR BEAMS | | | IS NOTED. PLEASE INCLUDE OTHER REQUIRED ELEMENTS. | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF NECESSARY TO DISCUSS. | | | | | | 25-28. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 29. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE HARDIPANEL AND | | | EXTERIOR DOORS, FAC9B72. | | | | | | 30-31. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 32. SEE A10, UL ASSEMBLIES ARE SPECIFIED. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL OF EACH UL ASSEMBLY ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | THIS COMMENT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RESPONSE LETTER. | | | X629, N609, D784, D935 ARE LISTED BUT SHEET A3 SHOWS | | | ONLY TWO UL ASSEMBLIES. ALL FIRE RESISTIVE RATED | | | DETAILS SHOULD BE INCLUDED AND DEMONSTRATE EITHER | | | CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE, PRESCRIPTIVE OR TESTED | | | ASSEMBLY FBC703.2. FOR INSTANCE, W4 ON SHEET A3. THIS | | | EXTERIOR WALL SHOULD BE RATED FROM BOTH SIDES, | | | FBC704.5, BUT THE DETAIL DOES NOT SPECIFY ANY FIRE | | | RESISTANCE RATING. FOR EACH WALL TYPE, FIRE RESISTANCE | | | SHOULD BE STATED. THERE ARE NOTES REGARDING FIRE | | | RESISTANCE RATED WALLS, BUT I WAS UNABLE TO EASILY | | | DETERMINE WHICH WALLS AND OTHER COMPONENTS ARE TO BE | | | RATED. | | | | | | 33. SEE A10 AND FBC TABLE 601. TYPE 5A REQUIRES THAT | | | ALL STRUCTURAL FRAME AND FLOOR BE 1 HOUR RATED, BUT NOT | | | ALL STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ARE SHOWN AS FIRE RESISTIVE | | | RATED. PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | SHEET A10 WAS ADDED AND SHOWS FIRE RATING FOR BEAMS. | | | SEE FBC TABLE 601. 1 HOUR IS REQUIRED FOR BEARING | | | WALLS, FLOORS, AND ROOF. THE REQUIRED RATING, INCLUDING | | | EXISTING ELEMENTS, SHOULD BE NOTED ON THE PLAN. DETAILS | | | FOR EXISTING ELEMENTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY REQUIRED (BUT | | | PLEASE CLARIFY HOW 1 HOUR FOR THE EXISTING ROOF WAS | | | ACCOMPLISHED), BUT SHOULD BE NOTED ON THE PLAN IN THE | | | CASE THAT THESE WALLS ARE PENETRATED BY VARIOUS TRADES. | | | | | | THE SHAFT ENCLOSURE DETAIL WAS ADDED ON A3; STAIR | | | DETAILS ON A12 AND OTHER SHEETS; FIRE RESISTANCE IS TO | | | BE CONTINUOUS TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE DECK. FBC707.4, | | | FBC707.5. | | | | | | 34. PROVIDE INFORMATION (SPEC SHEETS) FOR THE | | | INTUMESCENT PAINT, FBC7, FBC*106. | | | | | | 35. ENERGY CALCS REQUIRED, FBC13-101.1.2. | | | | | | 36. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 37. THE STAIR LABELED ?FRONT EGRESS STAIR? SHOWS AN | | | ELEVATOR LOBBY IN THE STAIR ENCLOSURE ON THE FIRST | | | FLOOR. SEE A1. PLEASE SEE FBC1019.1. ALSO SEE | | | MECHANICAL COMMENTS REGARDING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IN | | | THE STAIR ENCLOSURE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-07-28 |
Time |
15:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
Time |
09:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-28 15:19:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | ****PLAN REVIEW**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1.THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION IS TO BE PRINTED | | | ON EACH SHEET, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC., | | | FAC61G15-23.002. | | | | | | 2.IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY.THE | | | PLANS MUST BE STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE | | | APPLICATION.561-233-5025.THIS MAY BE DONE AS A PART | | | OF THE STRUCTURAL PERMIT, AS IT IS LIKELY THAT THE | | | STRUCTURAL PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED FIRST. | | | | | | 3.DECLARE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA, PER FLOOR, EXISTING | | | BUILDING.DECLARE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA PER FLOOR, | | | PROPOSED NEW.PLEASE INCLUDE THE AREA CALCULATIONS | | | PRIOR TO IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.FOR THE THIRD FLOOR, | | | PLEASE NOTE AREA UNDER ROOF, UNDER AIR AND | | | UNCONDITIONED, FBC CHAPTER 5 AND IMPACT FEE | | | ASSESSMENT. | | | | | | | | | 4. INFORMATIONAL, A PERMIT MUST BE APPLIED FOR PRIOR TO | | | DECEMBER 31, 2007 TO BE ISSUED UNDER FBC2004 W/2007 | | | REVISIONS AS GOVERNING CODE.THIS IS A PLAN CHECK | | | ONLY. | | | | | | 5.THREE SETS OF PLANS REQUIRED FOR A THRESHOLD | | | BUILDING, FS553.71(7), TWO SETS IF IT IS NOT A | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING.ALTHOUGH THIS IS A PLAN REVIEW, | | | ALL SETS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AS ALL CITY | | | STAMPS ARE PLACED ON EACH SHEET WITH THE EXCEPTION OF | | | THE DATE STAMP WHEN EACH TRADE PASSES REVIEW.REVIEWS | | | REMAIN IN FAILED STATUS. AFTER A PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR, | | | THE REVIEWS ARE CHANGED TO PASS AND, AS ALL STAMPS ARE | | | ALREADY ON EACH SHEET, NO ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEWS ARE | | | REQUIRED.FAILURE TO INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED SETS WILL | | | RESULT IN A DELAY OF ISSUANCE. | | | | | | 6. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR, FBC*105.13.6 AND FS 553.79(5); | | | PLEASE CONTACT KEN CONRAD, 561-805-6666.A | | | PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING BETWEEN THE CITY, OWNER, | | | CONTRACTOR, SPECIAL INSPECTOR, AND DESIGNER IS | | | REQUIRED.APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AND THE | | | PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE. | | | | | | 7.SEE FBC105.13.4.4 AND FS553.79, THE STATEMENT | | | REGARDING CODE COMPLIANCE IS REQUIRED ON THE PLAN FOR | | | THRESHOLD BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 8.CS, DECLARE LEVEL OF ALTERATION, FBC EB CHAPTER 3. | | | | | | | | | 9.PLANS SHOW REMODELED RESTROOM ON 2ND FLOOR.IT IS | | | NOT CLEAR; IS THIS PART OF THIS PERMIT?SPECIFICATIONS | | | NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | 10. A8 SHOWS CABANA TBD, OTHER PLACES SHOW CANVAS | | | AWNING.PLEASE CLARIFY.NOTE THAT SEPARATE PERMITS | | | WILL BE REQUIRED FOR CANVAS AWNINGS. | | | | | | 11.CS, GOVERNING CODE IS TO INCLUDE 2007 | | | REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | | | 12. SEE FBC TABLE 503, 50 FEET MAXIMUM FOR A2, TYPE VA | | | (NOT 55 FEET AS STATED ON PLAN). | | | | | | 13.SEE FBC1009.11.5, PLEASE SHOW HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS | | | WITH DIMENSIONS ON THE PLAN.NOTE THAT EXTENSIONS ARE | | | NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN A3, OTHER PLACES, BUT ARE SHOWN | | | ON THE SECTION, A6. | | | | | | 14.SEE FBC11-4.10, ACCESSIBLE ELEVATORS, PLEASE NOTE | | | REQUIREMENTS ON THE PLAN.ALSO SEE FBC11-4.10.6, A | | | SWING DOOR IS SHOWN A1, BUT ELEVATOR DOOR IS REQUIRED | | | TO OPEN AUTOMATICALLY. | | | | | | 15.A1, BOTTOM LEFT, DOES THE NEW DOOR LEAD TO THE | | | OUTSIDE?THIS AREA, BETWEEN THE DOOR AND THE OUTSIDE, | | | SHOULD HAVE THE SAME LEVEL OF FIRE RESISTANCE AS THE | | | STAIRS, FBC1002, FBC1018.3.PLEASE NOTE ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 16.FBC1003.6, FBC1005.2, THE NEW DOOR (SHEET A1, | | | BOTTOM LEFT) ALONG WITH THE DOOR FOR THE EMPLOYEE | | | LOCKERS BLOCKS THE EGRESS FOR THE EXISTING EXIT AT THE | | | END OF THE CORRIDOR. | | | | | | 17.A DOOR HARDWARE SCHEDULE WAS NOT PROVIDED.PLEASE | | | SEE FBC1008.1.8.7 AND NOTE ALL PROPOSED LOCKS AND EXIT | | | HARDWARE FBC1008.1.9. | | | | | | 18.A2, PLEASE PROVIDE STAIR DIMENSIONS; WIDTH, TREAD, | | | RISER, AND LANDING DIMENSIONS FBC1009.3, FBC1009.4. | | | NOTE THAT LANDINGS DO NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH | | | FBC1009.4, WIDTH OF LANDINGS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE | | | WIDTH OF THE STAIRWAYS THEY SERVE. | | | | | | 19. A1, SEE FBC1008.1.8.8, DOOR SHOULD NOT PROJECT MORE | | | THAN 7 INCHES INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF A CORRIDOR | | | WHEN FULLY OPEN.THE NEW PLANTER OBSTRUCTS THE DOOR | | | SWING.SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FNC1008.1.8.8. | | | | | | 20.A1, DECLARE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR EXISTING FIRST | | | FLOOR; REQUIRED TO DETERMINE REQUIRED EGRESS WIDTH, SEE | | | OTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | 21. A2, PROPOSED STAIR CIRCULATION PLAN, SEE DOUBLE | | | DOORS ON LEFT SIDE.SHOW THE DIMENSION OF CLEAR FLOOR | | | SPACE ON THE LANDING WITH THE DOORS IN THE OPEN | | | POSITION FBC1005.2.SHOW THE REQUIRED WIDTH; APPEARS | | | TO BE | | | | | | 22.A2 SHOWS LIQUOR STORAGE.PLEASE SEE TABLE | | | FBC307.7(1), AND NOTE MAXIMUMS WHICH WILL BE STORED ON | | | THE PLAN. PLEASE ALSO SEE FOOTNOTES. | | | | | | 23. INFORMATIONAL, AS THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS PREPARED BY | | | CUTCHER AND GINSBURG WERE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY, THERE | | | MAY BE SOME DUPLICATION REQUIRED FOR INFORMATION.BOTH | | | PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE | | | INDEPENDENTLY. | | | | | | 24.LS1, BUILDING TYPE 5A DECLARED.PLEASE NOTE ALL | | | REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE ON THE PLAN, BOTH VERTICAL AND | | | HORIZONTAL, INCLUDING THE VENTILATION SHAFT.SEE FBC | | | TABLE 601 AND 602, ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE A MINIMUM | | | OF 1 HOUR.ONE WALL IS SHOWN AS HAVING A 1 HOUR | | | RATING, BUT THE OTHER THREE DO NOT.THERE ARE GENERAL | | | NOTES, BUT THE PLAN IS TO BE SPECIFIC AS TO | | | REQUIREMENTS FBC*106. | | | | | | 25.FBC903.2.1.2, 903.3.1.1, PLEASE CLARIFY SHEET FP3, | | | ROOF FIRE PROTECTION PLAN; IS THIS THE OLD ROOF AREA? | | | FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED IN THIS CONCEALED SPACE, AND | | | IT APPEARS THAT A SPRINKLER PLAN WAS SUBMITTED BUT THE | | | TITLE OF THE PLAN IS CONFUSING AS THIS AREA IS NO | | | LONGER A ROOF. | | | | | | 26. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS FOR PENETRATIONS THROUGH | | | FIRE RESISTIVE RATED ASSEMBLIES, FBC712. | | | | | | 27.PLANS SHOW FIRE RATED DOORS.SEE FBC TABLE 715.3, | | | SPECIFY REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 28. THERE IS A DOOR BETWEEN THE GAZEBO AND STAIR 2 AT | | | THE TABLE SEATING AREA.HOW MANY OCCUPANTS DOES THAT | | | DOOR SERVE?IT IS CLOSEST TO STAIR 2, SEE FBC1008.1.2 | | | REGARDING DOOR SWING. | | | | | | 29.PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE HARDIPANEL AND | | | EXTERIOR DOORS, FAC9B72. | | | | | | 30. A2 SHOWS A RAISED PLATFORM NOTING THAT THIS WILL BE | | | ADJUSTED.IS THIS NEW OR EXISTING?STAIRS APPEAR TO | | | BE SHOWN BUT NO RAMP, FBC11-4.3.2(3), FBC11-5.7. | | | | | | 31. SHOW ACCESSIBLE SEATING AT FIXED TABLES, FBC11-5.1, | | | FBC 11 FIGURE 45. | | | | | | 32. SEE A10, UL ASSEMBLIES ARE SPECIFIED.PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL OF EACH UL ASSEMBLY ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 33. SEE A10 AND FBC TABLE 601.TYPE 5A REQUIRES THAT | | | ALL STRUCTURAL FRAME AND FLOOR BE 1 HOUR RATED, BUT NOT | | | ALL STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ARE SHOWN AS FIRE RESISTIVE | | | RATED.PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | 34.PROVIDE INFORMATION (SPEC SHEETS) FOR THE | | | INTUMESCENT PAINT, FBC7, FBC*106. | | | | | | 35.ENERGY CALCS REQUIRED, FBC13-101.1.2. | | | | | | 36.PROVIDE DETAILS, INCLUDING ALL DIMENSIONS, FOR | | | ACCESSIBLE BATHROOMS; TOILET, LAVATORY, GRAB BARS, | | | TURNING RADIUS, CLEAR FLOOR SPACE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-12-19 |
Time |
16:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-18 16:35:00 | | | | | | | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005 | | | NEC, NFPA-72 2002, NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, | | | CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | THE SAME COMMENT AS THE PREVIOUS TWO REVIEWS | | | | | | 3} INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH LIGHTING POWER | | | DENSITIES.13-415.2B OR 13-415.2.C.1. FIXTURE TYPES AND | | | WATTAGES ON THE PLAN TO CORRELATE WITH THE ONES IN THE | | | CALCULATIONS.***THE WATTAGES FOR THE FIXTURES WAS ON | | | SHEET E-4, BUT NO COUNTS, TOTAL WATTAGES, ALLOWED | | | WATTAGES ETC***FORM A CANNOT BE USED FOR AN EXISTING | | | BUILDING, SEE REFERENCED SECTIONS GIVEN IN THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEWS. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | 61G15-23.002 SEAL, SIGNATURE AND DATE SHALL BE AFFIXED. | | | (1) A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL SIGN HIS NAME AND | | | AFFIX HIS SEAL TO ALL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS, | | | FINAL BID DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO THE OWNER OR THE | | | OWNER?S REPRESENTATIVE, OR OTHER DOCUMENTS PREPARED OR | | | ISSUED BY SAID REGISTRANT AND BEING FILED FOR PUBLIC | | | RECORD. THE DATE THAT THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL IS AFFIXED | | | AS PROVIDED HEREIN SHALL BE ENTERED ON SAID PLANS, | | | SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS, OR OTHER DOCUMENTS IMMEDIATELY | | | UNDER THE SIGNATURE OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.*** | | | THE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER USED A RUBBER STAMP INSTEAD OF | | | HIS SIGNATURE IN VIOLATION OF THE FAC. THE ELECTRICAL | | | PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED TO SEND TO THE BOARD OF | | | ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-09-19 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-09-19 |
Time |
15:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-19 16:06:21 | | | | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005 | | | NEC, NFPA-72 2002, NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, | | | CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | THE SAME COMMENT AS THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | | | | 3} INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH LIGHTING POWER | | | DENSITIES.13-415.2B OR 13-415.2.C.1. FIXTURE TYPES AND | | | WATTAGES ON THE PLAN TO CORRELATE WITH THE ONES IN THE | | | CALCULATIONS.***THE WATTAGES FOR THE FIXTURES WAS ON | | | SHEET E-4, BUT NO COUNTS, TOTAL WATTAGES, ALLOWED | | | WATTAGES ETC. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
Time |
09:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-07-18 |
Time |
14:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-18 14:35:29 | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005 | | | NEC, NFPA-72 2002, NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, | | | CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1} THE ADDRESS OF THE PROJECT IS INCORRECT ON THE | | | ELECTRICAL SHEETS 106.1.1 FBC AS AMENDED. | | | | | | 2} SUBMIT THREE SETS OF PLANS FOR REVIEW PER 106 FBC AS | | | AMENDED. | | | | | | 3} INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH LIGHING POWER | | | DENSITIES.13-415.2B OR 13-415.2.C.1. FIXTURE TYPES AND | | | WATTAGES ON THE PLAN TO CORRELATE WITH THE ONES IN THE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2009-04-20 |
Time |
16:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2009-04-20 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-20 16:47:36 | PER THE REQUEST OF ROBERT BROWN, ASSISTANT BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL, REVIEWED ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ROXY'S, 309 | | | CLEMATIS STREET. | | | | | | ELECTRICAL SHEETS APPEARED TO BE SATISFACTORY. | | | | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
16:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
16:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-26 16:12:40 | 1. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR FIRE | | | SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REMODEL. | | | | | | 2. COULD NOT LOCATE ANY ELECTRICAL SHEETS EXCEPT FOR | | | EP-1. | | | | | | 3. LIFE SAFETY PLAN ONLY INDICATES TWO ILLUMINATED EXIT | | | SIGNS WHICH CANNOT BE SEEN FROM ALL AREAS OF THE | | | ROOFTOP. THE TWO SIGNS ARE BLOCKED BY ARCHITECTURAL | | | FEATURES. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE SET OF PLANS FOR APPROVAL. | | | | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION | | | 804-4709 PHONE | | | 804-4774 FAX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2008-09-15 |
Time |
15:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2008-09-15 |
Time |
14:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-15 15:02:33 | 1. ANY REQUIRED FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS WHICH | | | INCLUDES THE FIRE SPRINKLER OR FIRE ALARM SYSTEM THAT | | | IS SHUT DOWN FOR MORE THAN 4 HOURS IN A TWENTY FOUR | | | HOUR PERIOD WILL REQUIRE A FIRE WATCH. ALL FIRE WATCH | | | ACTIVITIES SHALL BE REQUESTED IN WRITING TO THE | | | BATTALION CHIEF OF FIRE PREVENTION OR HIS DESIGNEE. | | | PERSONNEL PERFORMING FIRE WATCH ACTIVITIES SHALL HAVE | | | NO OTHER DUTIES EXCEPT TO PATROL ALL AREAS OF THE | | | BUILDING. THESE PERSONNEL ARE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A | | | LOG OF ACTIVITIES AND BE ABLE TO REPORT EMERGENCIES | | | IMMEDIATELY. | | | | | | 2. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR FIRE | | | SPRINKLER OR FIRE ALARM REMODELING ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. TACTILE SIGNAGE REQUIRED AT EXIT DOOR LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL EXISTING EMERGENCY LIGHTING | | | EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE STAIRWELLS AND IN OTHER LOCATIONS | | | ARE OPERATING CORRECTLY. | | | | | | 5. ON PAGE FP-3 STANDPIPE CONNECTIONS ARE SHOWN. THE | | | BUILDING DOES NOT HAVE A STANDPIPE SYSTEM SO THE | | | STANDPIPE SYSTEM ILLUSTRATED ON THE ROOF ARE NOT | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6. FIRE LINE BACKFLOW DEVICE SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH | | | TAMPER SWITCHES, CHAIN AND LOCK. | | | | | | 7. COULD NOT LOCATE NOTES ON ON NOTES PAGE RELATING TO | | | CUTTING OR WELDING OPERATIONS OR TO THE FIRE CODE, NFPA | | | 51B, THAT RELATES TO THIS ACTIVITY. | | | | | | 8. ON PAGE M-2 AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT APPEARS TO BE | | | LOCATED IN STAIRWELLS. NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE, | | | SECTION 7.1.3.2.1 (6) STIPULATES EQUIPMENT THAT CAN BE | | | CONTAINED IN STAIRWELLS. PLEASE REVIEW. | | | | | | 9. EMERGENCY PLAN FOR THE BUILDING NEEDS TO BE PREPARED | | | AND SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE NON RATED DOOR FOR THE PROPOSED | | | DRY STORAGE GOODS AREA DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE TWO | | | RATED FIRE DOORS. IT APPEARS THAT PERSONS WILL HAVE TO | | | PASS THIS NON RATED DOOR IN AN EXIT ACCESS AREA TO | | | REACH THE RATED FIRE DOORS. | | | | | | | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION | | | 804-4709 PHONE | | | 804-4774 FAX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
11:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
11:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-14 12:21:37 | 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, AND DEMOLITION WORK | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241, THE STANDARD FOR THE | | | SAFEGUARDING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, AND DEMOLITION | | | OPERATIONS. | | | | | | 2. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR FIRE ALARM | | | AND FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM ADDITIONS. NO FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PLANS SUBMITTED WITH DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 3. NO INFORMATION PROVIDED THAT INDICATES THE FACILITY | | | WILL BE OPEN OR CLOSED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION WORK | | | REQUIRED FOR THE ROOFTOP AREA. PROPER SEPARATION | | | BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND NONCONSTRUCTION AREAS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED. ALL EXITS ARE TO REMAIN CLEAR AND UNBSTRUCTED | | | DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 4. THE EXIT SIGN DIRECTING PERSONS TO STAIR # 2 MAY NOT | | | BE READILY VISIBLE. AN ADDITIONAL EXIT SIGN MAY BE | | | NEEDED TO DIRECT PERSONS TO STAIR # 2. | | | | | | 5. ANY CANVAS MATERIAL PLANNED TO BE USED SHALL BE FIRE | | | RETARDANT SINCE THE CANVAS WILL BE OVER PERSONS HEADS. | | | | | | 6. THE PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION DOES NOT DISPLAY THE | | | BUILDING ADDRESS. THE ADDRESS IS REQUIRED TO BE | | | INSTALLED ON THE PROPER ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING. THE | | | ADDRESS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST 6" HIGH AND AT | | | LEAST 1" WIDE NUMBERS. | | | | | | 7. ALL ELECTRICAL SHEETS DSIPLAY THE WRONG ADDRESS, 311 | | | CLEMATIS STREET. THE OTHER SHEETS OF THE DRAWINGS | | | DISPLAY 309 CLEMATIS STREET. | | | | | | 8. MORE DETAILS NEEDED ON THE GAS LIGHT FIXTURES | | | DISPLAYED ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 9. TACTILE SIGNAGE REQUIRED AT EXIT DOOR LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 10. THE PROPOSED THRID FLOOR ROOFTOP DECK PLANS DOES | | | NOT ILLUSTRATE PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUIHSER LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 11. NO DOOR SCHEDULE PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE A DOOR | | | SCHEDULE LISTING THE APPROPRIATE FIRE RATINGS AND DOOR | | | HARDWARE. ALL FIRE RATED DOORS TO COMPLY WITH NFPA 80, | | | THE STANDARD FOR FIRE DOORS AND WINDOWS AND SHALL BE | | | EQUIPPED WITH SELF-CLOSING DEVICES TO CAUSE THE DOORS | | | TO POSITIVELY LATCH WHEN CLOSED. | | | | | | 12. SOME MODIFICATIONS MAY BE NECESSARY TO THE SECOND | | | FLOOR AREA DUE TO THE PROPOSED REMODEL AREA. | | | | | | 13. PLEASE PROVIDE STAIR DETAILS FOR THE NEW STAIRS | | | THAT ARE BEING PROVIDED. THESE DETAILS SHALL INCLUDE | | | STAIR RISE, RUN, AND TREAD DIMENSIONS. | | | | | | 14. PLEASE INDICATE HANDICAP SEATING LOCATIONS ON THE | | | PROPOSED ROOF TOP FLOOR PLAN. | | | | | | 15. PLEASE PROVIDE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR ALL HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS. | | | | | | 16. PLEASE PROVIDE PRODUCT INFORMATION FOR THE | | | INTUMESCENT PAINT DESCRIBED ON SHEET A-10. | | | | | | 17. ALL PROPOSED WALKING SURFACES SHALL BE SLIP | | | RESISTANT. | | | | | | 18. THE STORAGE ROOMS AND THE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL | | | ROOM ON THE ROOF MAY NEED TO BE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED | | | DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF STORAGE AND EQUIPMENT | | | CONTAINED WITHIN THEM. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. | | | | | | 19. NO MECHANICAL OR PLUMBING SHEETS PROVIDED WITH | | | DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 20. ANY CUTTING AND WELDING ACTIVITIES SHALL CONFORM TO | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF 51B, THE STANDARD FOR CUTTING AND | | | WELDING OPERATIONS. A SEPARATION DISTANCE OF AT LEAST | | | THIRTY FIVE (35) FEET SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THESE | | | OPERATIONS TO ANY COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. IF THIS | | | DISTANCE CANNOT BE ACHEIVED, FIRE RATED TARPS ARE TO BE | | | USED TO COVER THESE MATERIALS AND A FIRE WATCH BE | | | IMPLEMENTED. | | | | | | 21. PLEASE IDENTIFY EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS AND | | | IDENTIFY THE MAIN INGRESS/EGRESS ARE FOR THE FACILITY. | | | | | | | | | 22. NO INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDING THE STANDPIPE | | | SYSTEM. | | | | | | 23. NO INFORMATION RELATED TO ELEVATOR WARNING SIGNS | | | FOR THE ROOFTOP AREA. | | | | | | 24. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON EMERGENCY PLANNING | | | SHOULD AN EMERGENCY DEVELOP WHILE THE ROOFTOP AREA IS | | | IN OPERATION. | | | | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION | | | 804-4709 PHONE | | | 804-4774 FAX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
Time |
10:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
12:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-08 10:14:58 | GAS DELETED |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
10:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-08 10:14:27 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | | | | 1. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. (SEE SHT A-5 KEY | | | NOTE 6). SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FOR PERMIT: | | | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE. | | | | | | B. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH | | | NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL | | | TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE IF BEING USED. | | | | | | C. TYPE OF GAS, (LP OR NATURAL). | | | | | | D. BTU LOAD OF EACH APPLIANCE AND THE | | | TOTAL BTU LOAD ON THE SYSTEM. REFER TO | | | THE FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SECS. 401.8 | | | THRU 402.6.1 AND TABLES 402.4(1) THRU | | | 402.4(33). | | | | | | E. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). | | | | | | F. INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | | PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. | | | | | | G. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-01 |
Time |
08:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-01 |
Time |
08:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-01 08:54:13 | TO "COMM" BD#34/PLANS ON RACK--1 ROLL, AND PAPERWORK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
11:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
11:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-04 11:53:12 | TO "COMM" BD#32 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-08-04 |
Time |
11:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-07-09 |
Time |
15:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-09 15:16:07 | TO "COMM" BD#51 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-06-01 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-06-01 |
Time |
10:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-01 10:17:39 | **TEMP FAIL** | | | REVIEW IS IN TEMPORARY FAIL STATUS PENDING RECEIPT OF | | | SIGNED PERMIT APPLICATION FROM THE CONTRACTOR. | | | | | | NOTE: EXTENSION AND RELOCATION OF EXISTING KITCHEN | | | EXHAUST SHALL BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT AND EXCLUDED | | | FROM THIS SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | NOTE FOR YOUR INFORMATION: MECHANICAL PLAN SHOWS THE | | | KITCHEN EXHAUST FAN AT A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 40" ABOVE | | | THE ROOD SURFACE. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOW THE FAN | | | SURROUNDED ON 3 SIDES BY A 42" HIGH PARAPET. IF FAN IS | | | TO BE LOCATED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO PARAPET (MIN. 2' | | | SEPARATION) THE DISCHARGE OPENING OF THE FAN MUST BE | | | HIGHER THAN THE PARAPET IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M | | | 506.5.5. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-11 |
Time |
09:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-11 |
Time |
08:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-11 08:44:30 | REVIEW #: 3RD **PLAN CHECK ONLY** | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE ONLY OUTSTANDING COMMENT LEFT FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | IS COMMENT #2. ALL OTHER COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY | | | ADDRESSED. PLEASE SEE THE HISTORY OF COMMENT #2 | | | PROVIDED BELOW, FOLLOWED BY A DESCRIPTION OF WHICH | | | ASPECTS OF THIS COMMENT REMAIN UNADDRESSED. | | | | | | **FROM FIRST REVIEW** | | | 2. PG M-1 AND M-2: PLAN CALLS FOR EXTENSION OF KITCHEN | | | EXHAUST DUCT FROM EXISTING ROOF TO NEW ROOF. THERE IS | | | NO DETAIL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF (ASSUMED TO BE) | | | GREASE EXHAUST DUCT AND EXHAUST FAN ON NEW ROOF SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | - FBCM 301.13 FOR WIND RESISTANCE. | | | - FBCM 506.3.12.1, 506.3.12.3 AND ALL PORTIONS OF 506.5 | | | FOR CLEARANCES, LOCATION AND HEIGHT ABOVE ROOF. | | | - FBCM 401.5 FOR INTAKE AND EXHAUST LOCATIONS. | | | - FBCM 304.10 IF LESS THAN 10 FEET FROM THE ROOF EDGE. | | | - FBCM 306.5 FOR SERVICE ACCESS. | | | - FBCM 301.4.4 EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND DEVICES SHALL | | | NOT BE REUSED UNLESS SUCH ELEMENTS HAVE BEEN | | | RECONDITIONED, TESTED AND PLACED IN GOOD AND PROPER | | | WORKING CONDITION AND APPROVED. | | | NOTE: ONCE THE EXISTING KITCHEN EXHAUST SYSTEM IS | | | MODIFIED IN ANY WAY, THE SYSTEM WILL NEED TO BE TESTED, | | | BALANCED AND RE-CERTIFIED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE KITCHEN HOOD LISTING | | | AND/OR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBCM 506 AND 507. | | | | | | **FROM 2ND REVIEW** | | | 2. NOT FULLY ADDRESSED. NO INFORMATION IS SHOWN ON | | | PLANS REGARDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE KITCHEN HOOD | | | EXHAUST FAN SUCH AS WIND RESISTANCE, CLEARANCES, | | | HEIGHTS, SERVICE ACCESS, GUARDS, ETC. SEE PREVIOUS | | | COMMENT #2 FOR ALL CODE REQUIREMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE | | | ADDRESSED. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO DEMONSTRATE | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL OF THESE REQUIREMENTS. ONE OR MORE | | | ELEVATION VIEWS MAY BE HELPFUL. | | | | | | **3RD REVIEW** PLEASE ADDREESS EACH OF THESE SPECIFIC | | | CODE REQUIREMENTS AS LISTED BELOW: | | | A. FBCM 301.13 FOR WIND RESISTANCE. AN INSTALLATION | | | DETAIL HAS BEEN ADDED TO PAGE M2 FOR THE ROOFTOP | | | EXHAUST FAN. HOWEVER, THE EF SCHEDULE ON M1 LISTS A FAN | | | WITH A MIAMI-DADE NOA TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THIS SECTION. THIS INSTALLATION OF THE EXHAUST FAN AND | | | ASSOCIATED ROOF CURB SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REFERENCED NOA. PLEASE PROVIDE 3 COPIES OF THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FOR THIS SYSTEM APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 106.3.3. | | | | | | B. FBCM 506.3.12.1 TERMINATION ABOVE THE ROOF. EXHAUST | | | OUTLETS THAT TERMINATE ABOVE THE ROOF SHALL HAVE THE | | | DISCHARGE OPENING LOCATED NOT LESS THAN 40 INCHES ABOVE | | | THE ROOF SURFACE. | | | | | | C. FBCM 506.3.12.3 TERMINATION LOCATION. EXHAUST | | | OUTLETS SHALL BE LOCATED NOT LESS THAN 10 FEET | | | HORIZONTALLY FROM PARTS OF THE SAME OR CONTIGUOUS | | | BUILDINGS, ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES AND AIR INTAKE | | | OPENINGS INTO ANY BUILDING. PLEASE SHOW DISTANCES FROM | | | PARTS OF THE SAME OR CONTIGUOUS BUILDINGS. WILL THERE | | | BE PARAPETS AROUND THIS FAN? IF SO, WHAT IS THE HEIGHT | | | OF THE PARAPETS AROUND THE FAN? THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL | | | DISTANCE BETWEEN VERTICAL DISCHARGE FANS AND | | | PARAPET-TYPE BUILDING STRUCTURES MAY BE 2 FEET PROVIDED | | | THAT SUCH STRUCTURES ARE NOT HIGHER THAN THE TOP OF THE | | | FAN DISCHARGE OPENING IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 506.5.5. | | | SEE ALSO FBCM 401.5 OPENING LOCATION. OUTDOOR AIR | | | EXHAUST OPENINGS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET | | | FROM LOT LINES OR BUILDINGS ON THE SAME LOT. PLEASE | | | SHOW THE MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | D. FBCM 506.5.3 EXHAUST FAN MOUNTING.AN UPBLAST FAN | | | SHALL BE HINGED AND SUPPLIED WITH A FLEXIBLE | | | WEATHERPROOF ELECTRICAL CABLE TO PERMIT INSPECTION AND | | | CLEANING. THE DUCTWORK SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 18 | | | INCHES ABOVE THE ROOF SURFACE. NONE OF THIS INFORMATION | | | IS SHOWN ON THE INSTALLATION DETAIL ON PLANS. THIS | | | INFORMATION MIGHT BE PROVIDED WITH THE NOA REFERENCED | | | IN COMMENT A ABOVE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | AND REMOVE ANY INSTALLATION DETAIL WHICH MAY BE IN | | | CONFLICT WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVAL'S INSTALLTION | | | INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | | | E. FBCM 304.10 GUARDS. GUARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE | | | APPLIANCES, EQUIPMENT, FANS OR OTHER COMPONENTS THAT | | | REQUIRE SERVICE ARE LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET (3048 MM) OF | | | A ROOF EDGE OR OPEN SIDE OF A WALKING SURFACE AND SUCH | | | EDGE OR OPEN SIDE IS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 INCHES ABOVE | | | THE FLOOR, ROOF OR GRADE BELOW. PAGE A-8 SHOWS A DETAIL | | | FOR A "ROOF MAINTENANCE ANCHOR." IS THIS INTENDED TO BE | | | AN ALTERNATE TO THE GUARD REQUIREMENTS? IF SO, THIS | | | MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN WRITING | | | AS A REQUEST FOR ALTERNATE MATERIALS OR METHODS UNDER | | | THE PROVISIONS OF FBCB 104.11. | | | | | | F. FBCM 306.5 EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES ON ROOFS OR | | | ELEVATED STRUCTURES. WHERE EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES | | | REQUIRING ACCESS ARE INSTALLED ON ROOFS OR ELEVATED | | | STRUCTURES AT A HEIGHT EXCEEDING 16 FEET, SUCH ACCESS | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED BY A PERMANENT APPROVED MEANS OF | | | ACCESS, THE EXTENT OF WHICH SHALL BE FROM GRADE OR | | | FLOOR LEVEL TO THE EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES? LEVEL | | | SERVICE SPACE. SUCH ACCESS SHALL NOT REQUIRE CLIMBING | | | OVER OBSTRUCTIONS GREATER THAN 30 INCHES HIGH. PLEASE | | | SHOW ON PLANS HOW THIS APPLIANCE IS TO BE ACCESSED FOR | | | SERVICE, CLEANING, MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT. | | | | | | G. FBCM 301.4.4 EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND DEVICES SHALL | | | NOT BE REUSED UNLESS SUCH ELEMENTS HAVE BEEN | | | RECONDITIONED, TESTED AND PLACED IN GOOD AND PROPER | | | WORKING CONDITION AND APPROVED. | | | NOTE: ONCE THE EXISTING KITCHEN EXHAUST SYSTEM IS | | | MODIFIED IN ANY WAY, THE SYSTEM WILL NEED TO BE TESTED, | | | BALANCED AND RE-CERTIFIED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE KITCHEN HOOD LISTING | | | AND/OR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBCM 506 AND 507. PLEASE | | | PLACE A NOTE ON PLANS REQUIRING A TEST AND BALANCE OF | | | THE KITCHEN HOOD SYSTEM WITH A T & B REPORT TO BE | | | PROVIDED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
10:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-10 16:27:24 | REVIEW #: 2ND **PLAN CHECK ONLY** | | | ACTION: | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. NOT FULLY ADDRESSED. NO INFORMATION IS SHOWN ON | | | PLANS REGARDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE KITCHEN HOOD | | | EXHAUST FAN SUCH AS WIND RESISTANCE, CLEARANCES, | | | HEIGHTS, SERVICE ACCESS, GUARDS, ETC. SEE PREVIOUS | | | COMMENT #2 FOR ALL CODE REQUIREMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE | | | ADDRESSED. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO DEMONSTRATE | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL OF THESE REQUIREMENTS. ONE OR MORE | | | ELEVATION VIEWS MAY BE HELPFUL. | | | | | | 3. OK | | | | | | 4. OK | | | | | | 5. OK | | | | | | 6. THE WRITTEN RESPONSE FROM SEC STATES THAT A | | | SPECIFICATION SHEET FOR THE EXHAUST FAN IS ATTACHED. NO | | | SUCH DOCUMENTATION COULD BE FOUND WITH THIS SUBMISSION. | | | PLEASE ENSURE ALL REFERENCED DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED | | | WHEN THIS INFORMATION IS BEING USED TO DEMONSTRATE CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 7. OK | | | | | | 8. THE WRITTEN RESPONSE FROM SEC STATES THAT A | | | SPECIFICATION SHEET FOR THE REMOTE CONDENSING UNIT IS | | | ATTACHED. NO SUCH DOCUMENTATION COULD BE FOUND WITH | | | THIS SUBMISSION. PLEASE ENSURE ALL REFERENCED | | | DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED WHEN THIS INFORMATION IS | | | BEING USED TO DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | | | | 9. OK. PLEASE FOLLOW-UP WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATIONS. | | | | | | 10. THE WRITTEN RESPONSE FROM SEC STATES THAT ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS AND COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE | | | ATTACHED. NO SUCH DOCUMENTATION COULD BE FOUND WITH | | | THIS SUBMISSION. PLEASE ENSURE ALL REFERENCED | | | DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED WHEN THIS INFORMATION IS USED | | | TO DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE. CODE COMPLIANCE FOR ALL | | | BUILDINGS SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY USE OF APPROVED FORMS | | | FOR THE COMPLIANCE METHOD CHOSEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBCB 13-103.0. ADDITIONS TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL | | | BUILDINGS ARE CONSIDERED NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH FBCB SUBCHAPTER 13-4 OF THIS CODE AS | | | ALLOWED IN SECTION 101.1.1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB | | | 13-101.1.2. COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS SHALL BE APPENDED | | | TO THE ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBCB 13-407.1.ABC.1. | | | | | | NEW: DURING THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, I WAS NOT AWARE OF THE | | | FACT THAT THE MINI-SPLIT UNITS WERE IN A FIRE-RATED | | | STAIR ENCLOSURE. PLEASE SHOW HOW THESE A/C UNITS CAN BE | | | INSTALLED IN AN EXIT ENCLOSURE AND BE IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE PENETRATION REQUIREMENTS OF FBCB 1019.1.2. | | | PENETRATIONS INTO AND OPENINGS THROUGH AN EXIT | | | ENCLOSURE ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR REQUIRED EXIT | | | DOORS, EQUIPMENT AND DUCTWORK NECESSARY FOR INDEPENDENT | | | PRESSURIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION. IT | | | WOULD APPEAR THE PENETRATIONS FOR ELECTRICAL, | | | REFRIGERANT AND CONDENSATE LINES WOULD BE NECESSARY FOR | | | THESE UNITS. ALL OF THESE PENETRATIONS WOULD BE | | | PROHIBITED PER 1019.1.2. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-04 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-04 |
Time |
08:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-04 14:58:18 | REVIEW #: 1ST **PLAN CHECK ONLY** | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | 1. PG A-3: PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR/ROOFTOP DECK PLAN CALLS | | | FOR ONE OR POSSIBLY MORE MECHANICAL VENTILATION SHAFTS | | | WITH A NOTE TO ?SEE MECHANICAL PLANS.? NO INFORMATION | | | COULD BE FOUND ON MECHANICAL PLANS REGARDING SIZE, | | | ROUTING OR DESIGN OF THE DUCTS IN THESE SHAFTS. PROVIDE | | | MISSING INFORMATION AS TO THE FUNCTION AND DESIGN OF | | | THESE SHAFTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 501.1 AND FBCB | | | 106.1.1. THE ROOFTOP UNITS BEING SERVED BY THESE SHAFTS | | | ARE DESIGNED FOR OUTDOOR INSTALLATION AND FREE AIRFLOW. | | | PROVIDE DATA FROM THE MANUFACTURER SHOWING THAT THESE | | | MODIFICATIONS (ADDITION OF DUCTWORK TO THE DISCHARGE | | | SIDE OF THE CONDENSING FANS FOR THE PURPOSE OF | | | AIR-COOLING THE CONDENSING COILS) TO THE DESIGN AND | | | LISTING OF THESE APPLIANCES WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT | | | THE FUNCTIONALITY OR THE EFFICIENCY OF THESE APPLIANCES | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 304.1 AND FBCM 301.2. | | | | | | 2. PG M-1 AND M-2: PLAN CALLS FOR EXTENSION OF KITCHEN | | | EXHAUST DUCT FROM EXISTING ROOF TO NEW ROOF. THERE IS | | | NO DETAIL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF (ASSUMED TO BE) | | | GREASE EXHAUST DUCT AND EXHAUST FAN ON NEW ROOF SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | - FBCM 301.13 FOR WIND RESISTANCE. | | | - FBCM 506.3.12.1, 506.3.12.3 AND ALL PORTIONS OF 506.5 | | | FOR CLEARANCES, LOCATION AND HEIGHT ABOVE ROOF. | | | - FBCM 401.5 FOR INTAKE AND EXHAUST LOCATIONS. | | | - FBCM 304.10 IF LESS THAN 10 FEET FROM THE ROOF EDGE. | | | - FBCM 306.5 FOR SERVICE ACCESS. | | | - FBCM 301.4.4 EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND DEVICES SHALL | | | NOT BE REUSED UNLESS SUCH ELEMENTS HAVE BEEN | | | RECONDITIONED, TESTED AND PLACED IN GOOD AND PROPER | | | WORKING CONDITION AND APPROVED. | | | NOTE: ONCE THE EXISTING KITCHEN EXHAUST SYSTEM IS | | | MODIFIED IN ANY WAY, THE SYSTEM WILL NEED TO BE TESTED, | | | BALANCED AND RE-CERTIFIED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE KITCHEN HOOD LISTING | | | AND/OR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBCM 506 AND 507. | | | | | | 3. PG M-1: PLAN INDICATES OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS ARE | | | BASED ON ASHRAE 62-1999. THIS IS NOT THE CURRENT | | | STANDARD ADOPTED UNDER THE 2004 FBCM. SHOW OUTSIDE AIR | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE INDOOR CONDITIONED SPACE TO BE | | | CALCULATED BASED ON FBCM TABLE 403.3 OR ASHRAE | | | 62.1-2004. PROVIDE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, OCCUPANT | | | LOAD, OUTSIDE AIR REQUIRED AND OUTSIDE AIR PROVIDED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE METHOD TO BE DECLARED ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | | | | 4. PG M-1: THE O.A. INTAKE FOR THE NEW AHU #1 SHALL BE | | | EQUIPPED WITH A MOTORIZED DAMPER THAT WILL | | | AUTOMATICALLY SHUT WHEN THE SYSTEM OR SPACE SERVED IS | | | NOT IN USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-409.1.ABC.3.3 FOR | | | SHUTOFF DAMPER CONTROLS. | | | | | | 5. PG M-1: AHU-1 APPEARS TO BE LOCATED ABOVE A GYPSUM | | | BOARD CEILING. APPLIANCES SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE TO ALLOW | | | INSPECTIONS, SERVICE, REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT WITHOUT | | | REMOVING ELEMENTS OF PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 306.1. SHOW HOW THIS APPLIANCE IS | | | TO BE ACCESSED FOR SERVICE OR REPLACEMENT IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | | | 6. PG M-1: BATHROOM EXHAUST DUCTS ARE SHOWN ON PLANS TO | | | BE 3? X 10. THE FAN FOR THIS SYSTEM IS CALLING FOR 300 | | | CFM OF EXHAUST. IS THIS DUCT PROPERLY SIZED TO MOVE 300 | | | CFM OF EXHAUST? PLEASE VERIFY, VIA DUCT SIZING | | | CALCULATOR OR SOME STANDARD ENGINEERING PRACTICE. DUCT | | | SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED | | | VOLUME OF AIR IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 603.1. | | | | | | 7. PG M-2: THE EXISTING ROOFTOP PACKAGE UNITS HAVE | | | OUTSIDE AIR INTAKES TO PROVIDE VENTILATION FOR THE | | | SPACES SERVED BY THESE SYSTEMS. WITH THE ADDITION OF A | | | NEW FLOOR ABOVE THESE UNITS, THE INTAKES ARE NO LONGER | | | LOCATED OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. THEREFORE, THE OUTSIDE | | | AIR INTAKES SHALL BE DUCTED TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE | | | BUILDING. ANY EXHAUST FANS OR OUTLETS IN THIS AREA | | | SHALL ALSO DISCHARGE DIRECTLY TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE | | | BUILDING. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH ALL PARTS OF FBCM 401.5 | | | FOR INTAKE AND EXHAUST LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 8. PG M-2: PROVIDE MANUFACTURER?S DATA FOR THE PROPOSED | | | NEW CONDENSING UNITS FOR THE SPLIT SYSTEMS SHOWING THE | | | INSTALLATION IN A LOCATION OTHER THAN OUTDOORS TO BE IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS AND LISTING PER FBCM 304.1. | | | | | | | | | 9. PG M-2: PROVIDE DETAILED INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS | | | FOR THE RELOCATED RTU IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 304.1. | | | ALSO, EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES SHALL NOT BE REUSED | | | UNLESS SUCH ELEMENTS HAVE BEEN RECONDITIONED, TESTED | | | AND PLACED IN GOOD AND PROPER WORKING CONDITION AND | | | APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBCM 301.4.4. | | | | | | 10. PROVIDE AN ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM WITH | | | APPENDED COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR REVIEW. CODE | | | COMPLIANCE FOR ALL BUILDINGS SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY USE | | | OF APPROVED FORMS FOR THE COMPLIANCE METHOD CHOSEN THAT | | | ARE SPECIFIC TO THE CLIMATE ZONE IN WHICH THE BUILDING | | | WILL BE LOCATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-103.0. | | | ADDITIONS TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS ARE | | | CONSIDERED NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH FBCB SUBCHAPTER 13-4 OF THIS CODE AS ALLOWED IN | | | SECTION 101.1.1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-101.1.2. | | | COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS SHALL BE APPENDED TO THE | | | ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB | | | 13-407.1.ABC.1. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO EACH COMMENT IN WRITING WITH A | | | DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF HOW EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED | | | AS WELL AS WHERE THE RELEVANT INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND. | | | ALSO, PLEASE PROVIDE ONE SET OF OLD/VOIDED PLANS FOR | | | REFERENCE. THESE STEPS WILL AID IN PROVIDING A TIMELY | | | REVIEW OF THE RESUBMISSION. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
13:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
13:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-22 11:44:04 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | | | | 1. OK | | | 2. OK | | | 3. OK | | | | | | 4. SHT A-5 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE VERTICAL | | | CONTRIBUTION OF THE STORM WATER ON TO ADJACENT EXISTING | | | NEIGHBORING BUILDINGS TO THE EAST & WEST SIDE OF THE | | | PROPOSED WORK. PLEASE VERIFY ON THE PLANS OR IN A | | | SIGNED, SEALED LETTER THAT THE ADJACENT ROOFS WILL BE | | | ABLE TO ACCEPT AND DRAIN THE ADDED VERTICAL | | | CONTRIBUTION WITH THE EXISTING SYSTEMS PER SECTIONS | | | 1106 & 1107. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT NO RESPONSE FROM THE ARCHITECT. | | | COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE COMMENT RESPONSE DID NOT | | | INDICATE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE BEING DRAINED BY THE | | | GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT. PLEASE INDICATE THE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE, THE SIZE OF THE GUTTER AND THE SIZE OF THE | | | DOWNSPOUT. TABLES 1106.3 & 1106.6. | | | | | | 5. SHT A-8 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS SHOWING THE SQUARE FOOTAGE BEING | | | DRAINED FOR EACH ROOF DRAIN. (SEE ADDED VERTICAL | | | CONTRIBUTION ABOVE THE EXISTING ROOF. SHOW 1/2 AREA OF | | | ALL VERTICAL WALLS INCLUDING PARAPETS ADDED TO EACH | | | AREA. SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL SUB SECTIONS AND | | | TABLES. SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY | | | ROOF DRAINS. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT NO RESPONSE FROM THE ARCHITECT. | | | COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE RESPONSE ONLY ADDRESSED | | | THE CONTRIBUTION ADDED TO THE ROOF AREAS OF THE | | | BUILDINGS ON THE EAST & WEST SIDES OF THE BUILDING. THE | | | INFORMATION REQUIRED IS FOR THE EXISTING ROOF OF | | | ROXY'S. INDICATE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE BEING | | | DRAINED. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE AREA OF THE ROOF | | | AND SHOW 1/2 AREA OF ALL VERTICAL WALLS IN THE | | | CALCULATIONS. INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE DOWNSPOUTS, THE | | | SIZE OF THE COLLECTOR HEAD FOR THE DOWNSPOUTS AND THE | | | SIZE OF THE OVERFLOW SCUPPERS. SUBMIT A DETAIL FOR THE | | | OVERFLOW SCUPPERS SHOWING HEIGHT, WIDTH AND DISTANCE | | | OFF THE ROOF TO THE FLOW LINE OF THE SCUPPER. SUBMIT A | | | DETAIL FOR THE OPENING FOR THE DOWNSPOUTS INDICATING | | | THE HEIGH & WIDTH. SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS AND TABLES AS WELL AS SECTION 1503.4.3. | | | | | | 6. SUBMIT DETAILS FOR THE TOILET ROOMS SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 11-4.16, 11-4.18, 11-4.19 & | | | 11-4.22 WITH ALL SUBSECTIONS. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | ___FOR W/C'S: | | | A. OK | | | ___FOR URINAL: | | | A. OK | | | B. 11-4.18.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | C. OK | | | ___FOR LAVS: | | | A. OK | | | ___FOR TOILET ROOM: | | | A. 1OK | | | | | | 7. OK | | | | | | 8. SHT P-3 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. SANITARY COMBINATION | | | WASTE & VENT SYSTEM DOWNSTREAM OF WOMENS TOILET | | | REQUIRES 4" DOWNSTREAM OF CLEANOUT & MINIMUM 5" IS | | | REQUIRED DOWNSTREAM OF THE FLOOR DRAIN/BEER COOLER. | | | TABLE 912.3. -- MINIMUM 5" PIPE IS REQUIRED DOWNSTREAM | | | OF THE COMBINATION WASTE & VENT INDICATED. SECTION | | | 704.2. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE VOIDED SHEETS HAVE NOT BEEN | | | SUBMITTED FOR COMPARISON. PLEASE SUBMIT ONE SET OF | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE PIPE SIZE IS STILL SHOWN | | | AS 4" DOWNSTREAM OF THE FLOOR DRAIN/BEER COOLER IN THE | | | COMBINATION WASTE & VENT SYSTEM. | | | | | | 9. OK | | | | | | 10. OK (GAS DELETED) | | | | | | ***********NEW COMMENTS*********** | | | | | | 1B. SHT A-2 SHOW TABLES AND CHAIRS ON 2ND FLOOR AS 15 | | | NET IS INDICATED FOR MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA ALLOWANCES PER | | | OCCUPANT AND 2 W/C'S HAVE BEEN DELETED. SECTION 106.1.1 | | | AND TABLES 1004.1.2 & 403.1. | | | ******NO RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 2B. SHT P-3 MAXIMUM 20 FIXTURE UNITS ALLOWED ON 4" | | | COMBINATION WASTE & VENT SYSTEM. INDICATE PIPE SIZE AND | | | TRAP SIZE FOR FLOOR SINK AT 3 COMPARTMENT SINK. IF 3" | | | THEN 5" IS REQUIRED DOWNSTREAM OF FLOOR SINK AT BEER | | | COOLER/FLOOR DRAIN. TABLE 912.3. PLEASE SHOW DRAINAGE | | | FIXTURE UNITS AS THEY ACCUMULATE IN THE SYSTEM ON THE | | | SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. TABLES 710.1(1) & 710.1(2). | | | ******NO RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED AS 1 COPY | | | OF VOIDED SHEETS HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR COMPARISON. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-05 |
Time |
17:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
12:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-05 17:44:52 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. SHT A-3 SHOWS A WATER TROUGH & WATER FEATURE. PLEASE | | | INDICATE IF THERE WILL BE A WATER SUPPLY, DRAIN AND | | | OVERFLOW FOR THE WATER FEATURE. INDICATE BACKFLOW | | | METHOD IF CONNECTING TO THE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY. | | | SECTION 608. SHOW THE TERMINATION OF THE DRAIN AND | | | OVERFLOWS FOR THE FOUNTAIN. ARTICLE III SECTIONS 90-124 | | | & 90-125. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE WATER FEATURES INDICATED AS | | | 3 STEP WATERFALL FEATURE INTO WATER TROUGH 30" A.F.F. | | | BELOW W/RECIRC PUMP (TYPICAL) STILL INDICATED ON SHT | | | A-3. COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 3. OK | | | | | | 4. SHT A-5 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE VERTICAL | | | CONTRIBUTION OF THE STORM WATER ON TO ADJACENT EXISTING | | | NEIGHBORING BUILDINGS TO THE EAST & WEST SIDE OF THE | | | PROPOSED WORK. PLEASE VERIFY ON THE PLANS OR IN A | | | SIGNED, SEALED LETTER THAT THE ADJACENT ROOFS WILL BE | | | ABLE TO ACCEPT AND DRAIN THE ADDED VERTICAL | | | CONTRIBUTION WITH THE EXISTING SYSTEMS PER SECTIONS | | | 1106 & 1107. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT NO RESPONSE FROM THE ARCHITECT. | | | COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 5. SHT A-8 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS SHOWING THE SQUARE FOOTAGE BEING | | | DRAINED FOR EACH ROOF DRAIN. (SEE ADDED VERTICAL | | | CONTRIBUTION ABOVE THE EXISTING ROOF. SHOW 1/2 AREA OF | | | ALL VERTICAL WALLS INCLUDING PARAPETS ADDED TO EACH | | | AREA. SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL SUB SECTIONS AND | | | TABLES. SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY | | | ROOF DRAINS. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT NO RESPONSE FROM THE ARCHITECT. | | | COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 6. SUBMIT DETAILS FOR THE TOILET ROOMS SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 11-4.16, 11-4.18, 11-4.19 & | | | 11-4.22 WITH ALL SUBSECTIONS. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | ___FOR W/C'S: | | | A. 11-4.16.3 HEIGHT | | | ___FOR URINAL: | | | A. 11-4.18.2 HEIGHT | | | B. 11-4.18.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | C. 11-4.18.4 FLUSH CONTROLS | | | ___FOR LAVS: | | | A. 11-4.19.4 EXPOSED PIPES & SURFACES | | | ___FOR TOILET ROOM: | | | A. 11-4.22.3 TURNING AREA IN TOILET ROOM, NOT IN STALL | | | | | | 7. OK | | | | | | 8. SHT P-3 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. SANITARY COMBINATION | | | WASTE & VENT SYSTEM DOWNSTREAM OF WOMENS TOILET | | | REQUIRES 4" DOWNSTREAM OF CLEANOUT & MINIMUM 5" IS | | | REQUIRED DOWNSTREAM OF THE FLOOR DRAIN/BEER COOLER. | | | TABLE 912.3. -- MINIMUM 5" PIPE IS REQUIRED DOWNSTREAM | | | OF THE COMBINATION WASTE & VENT INDICATED. SECTION | | | 704.2. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE VOIDED SHEETS HAVE NOT BEEN | | | SUBMITTED FOR COMPARISON. PLEASE SUBMIT ONE SET OF | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | | | | 9. OK | | | | | | 10. OK (GAS DELETED) | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED AS 1 COPY | | | OF VOIDED SHEETS HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR COMPARISON. | | | | | | ***********NEW COMMENTS*********** | | | | | | 1B. SHT A-2 SHOW TABLES AND CHAIRS ON 2ND FLOOR AS 15 | | | NET IS INDICATED FOR MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA ALLOWANCES PER | | | OCCUPANT AND 2 W/C'S HAVE BEEN DELETED. SECTION 106.1.1 | | | AND TABLES 1004.1.2 & 403.1. | | | | | | 2B. SHT P-3 MAXIMUM 20 FIXTURE UNITS ALLOWED ON 4" | | | COMBINATION WASTE & VENT SYSTEM. INDICATE PIPE SIZE AND | | | TRAP SIZE FOR FLOOR SINK AT 3 COMPARTMENT SINK. IF 3" | | | THEN 5" IS REQUIRED DOWNSTREAM OF FLOOR SINK AT BEER | | | COOLER/FLOOR DRAIN. TABLE 912.3. PLEASE SHOW DRAINAGE | | | FIXTURE UNITS AS THEY ACCUMULATE IN THE SYSTEM ON THE | | | SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. TABLES 710.1(1) & 710.1(2). | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
08:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
Time |
15:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-01 16:36:31 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | 1. SHT A-2 INDICATES A REMODEL OF THE WOMEN'S TOILET | | | ROOM. PLEASE SUBMIT AN EXISTING FLOOR PLAN FOR THE | | | TOILET ROOM TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE REMODEL. | | | | | | 2. SHT A-3 SHOWS A WATER TROUGH & WATER FEATURE. PLEASE | | | INDICATE IF THERE WILL BE A WATER SUPPLY, DRAIN AND | | | OVERFLOW FOR THE WATER FEATURE. INDICATE BACKFLOW | | | METHOD IF CONNECTING TO THE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY. | | | SECTION 608. SHOW THE TERMINATION OF THE DRAIN AND | | | OVERFLOWS FOR THE FOUNTAIN. ARTICLE III SECTIONS 90-124 | | | & 90-125. | | | | | | 3. SHT A-3 SHOWS PLANTERS. WILL THERE BE IRRIGATION | | | AND/OR DRAINAGE TO/FROM THE PLANTERS. PLEASE CLAIRFY. | | | SECTIONS 106.1.2, 1101 & FS 373.62. | | | | | | 4. SHT A-5 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE VERTICAL | | | CONTRIBUTION OF THE STORM WATER ON TO ADJACENT EXISTING | | | NEIGHBORING BUILDINGS TO THE EAST & WEST SIDE OF THE | | | PROPOSED WORK. PLEASE VERIFY ON THE PLANS OR IN A | | | SIGNED, SEALED LETTER THAT THE ADJACENT ROOFS WILL BE | | | ABLE TO ACCEPT AND DRAIN THE ADDED VERTICAL | | | CONTRIBUTION WITH THE EXISTING SYSTEMS PER SECTIONS | | | 1106 & 1107. | | | | | | 5. SHT A-8 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS SHOWING THE SQUARE FOOTAGE BEING | | | DRAINED FOR EACH ROOF DRAIN. (SEE ADDED VERTICAL | | | CONTRIBUTION ABOVE THE EXISTING ROOF. SHOW 1/2 AREA OF | | | ALL VERTICAL WALLS INCLUDING PARAPETS ADDED TO EACH | | | AREA. SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL SUB SECTIONS AND | | | TABLES. SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY | | | ROOF DRAINS. | | | | | | 6. SUBMIT DETAILS FOR THE TOILET ROOMS SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 11-4.16, 11-4.18, 11-4.19 & | | | 11-4.22 WITH ALL SUBSECTIONS. | | | | | | 7. SHT LS-1 PLUMBING FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS. WATER | | | CLOSETS REQUIRED FOR MEN & WOMEN IS 3 EACH. (340/2 | | | EQUALS 170 EACH MEN/WOMEN). REQUIRED IS INDICATED AS 2. | | | 1 PER 75 REQUIRES 3 WATER CLOSETS. TABLE 403.1. PLEASE | | | CORRECT AMOUNT REQUIRED. | | | | | | 8. SHT P-3 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. SANITARY COMBINATION | | | WASTE & VENT SYSTEM DOWNSTREAM OF WOMENS TOILET | | | REQUIRES 4" DOWNSTREAM OF CLEANOUT & MINIMUM 5" IS | | | REQUIRED DOWNSTREAM OF THE FLOOR DRAIN/BEER COOLER. | | | TABLE 912.3. -- MINIMUM 5" PIPE IS REQUIRED DOWNSTREAM | | | OF THE COMBINATION WASTE & VENT INDICATED. SECTION | | | 704.2. | | | | | | 9. SHT P-3 WATER RISER DIAGRAM. SHUT OFF VALVES ARE | | | REQUIRED ON THE SUPPLY PIPES TO THE HOSE BIBBS. SECTION | | | 606.2(2). -- SHOW ALL PIPE SIZES AND SHOW THE POINT OF | | | CONNECTION ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. SECTION 604. | | | | | | 10. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. (SEE SHT A-5 KEY | | | NOTE 6). SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FOR PERMIT: | | | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE. | | | | | | B. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH | | | NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL | | | TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE IF BEING USED. | | | | | | C. TYPE OF GAS, (LP OR NATURAL). | | | | | | D. BTU LOAD OF EACH APPLIANCE AND THE | | | TOTAL BTU LOAD ON THE SYSTEM. REFER TO | | | THE FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SECS. 401.8 | | | THRU 402.6.1 AND TABLES 402.4(1) THRU | | | 402.4(33). | | | | | | E. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). | | | | | | F. INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | | PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. | | | | | | G. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-12-09 |
Time |
09:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-12-09 |
Time |
09:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-09 09:36:25 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED FOR MAJOR WORKING DRAWINGS REVIEW | | | ONLY | | | | | | ** :LANDSCAPE PERMITS SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY TO | | | INCLUDE ANY "OWNER-PROVIDED" ITEMS AS INDICATED ON THIS | | | SET | | | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-09-11 |
Time |
10:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-09-11 |
Time |
10:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-11 10:28:44 | ZONING REVIEW: FAILED | | | | | | ** REVISED PERMIT INDICATED THAT PLANTERS WILL BE | | | PROVIDED BY OWNER; PLEASE CONFIRM THIS IS CORRECT AND | | | PROVIDE ANY DETAILS FOR INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS ON | | | DECK (WILL THESE BE ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING?) | | | ** PLANT MATERIALS SHOULD BE INDICATED IN LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN | | | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
Time |
08:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
Time |
08:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-31 08:35:20 | ZONING REVIEW: FAILED | | | | | | ZONING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1) AIR RIGHTS EASEMENT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR AN PORTION | | | OF BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WHICH INTRUDES INTO PUBLIC | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. (APPLICATION IN-PROGRESS WITH ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES). | | | | | | 2) LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL PLANT | | | MATERIAL TO BE INSTALLED ON ROOF LEVEL, INCLUDING | | | DETAILS FOR PLANTER BOXES/BED. | | | | | | 3) ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT, SUCH AS SCORING OR REVEAL | | | LINES, SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THOSE PORTIONS OF EAST AND | | | WEST ELEVATIONS WHICH ABUT ADJACENT PROPERTIES. | | | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE UTILIZED TO BREAK UP | | | BLANK WALLS. | | | | | | 4) STORAGE AREAS ARE NOT DETAILED. PLESAE CONFIRM IF IT | | | INTENDED THAT THESE WILL BE CONVERTED TO KITCHEN OR | | | PREP AREAS. | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN COMMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION: | | | | | | 4) RAILING AND BALUSTRADE AT TOP OF FRONT ELEVATION SEE | | | HEAVY AND OVERLY DETAILED FOR ARCHITECTURE OF BUILDING. | | | GIVEN BALCONY PORTION WILL HANG OVER STREET, ARCHITECT | | | MAY WISH TO CONSIDER LIGHTER FEATURES WHICH DO NOT | | | CONFLICT WITH EXISTING ARCHITECTURE OR PROPOSED | | | ARCHITECTURE OF GAZEBO. | | | | | | 5) GAZEBO ELEMENT SEEMS PROPORTIONATELY OUT OF SCALE | | | WITH THE REST OF THE BUILDING. I CANNOT TELL WHAT THE | | | EXTRA HEIGHT IS PROVIDING IN TERMS OF THE BAR AREA. | | | PLEASE LOOK AT THE PROPORTIONS OF THE SPACE AND CONFIRM | | | THE SCALE IS CORRECT. | | | | | | 6) PLEASE CONFIRM ARCHITECTURE OF GAZEBO IS CORRECT. | | | WITH VARYING HEIGHTS AND ARCHITECTURAL STYLES, THE | | | ELEMENTS SEEM TO BE COMPETING WITH EACH OTHER (FLORIDA | | | VERNACULAR, ITALIANATE, AND TRADITIONAL MAIN STREET). | | | | | | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |