 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 08060578
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08060578 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-04-30 |
Time |
09:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-04-30 |
Time |
09:01 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-30 10:07:19 | BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO: | | | | | | 1- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY | | | DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR GLASS BLOCK AND ARCHED WINDOWS. | | | 2- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS IN WRITING. INCLUDING THE SHUTTERS. SEC. | | | 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. | | | 3- RE-SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS. SEE COMMENTS ON | | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED. | | | 4- PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR STORM SHUTTERS. | | | NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL, COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE | | | AND MARK ON SHUTTER DRAWINGS SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE AND | | | SPACING. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
Time |
13:25 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-21 16:26:06 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION BUILDING REVIEW | | | CHECKLIST. | | | REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2007 | | | REVISIONS. | | | | | | 1- SHEET C1: | | | A) SETBACKS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN DON'T MATCH SETBACKS | | | SHOWN ON SURVEY. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | B) FOOTPRINT OF NEW ADDITIONS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN DON'T | | | MATCH FOOTPRINT AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN AND | | | AND FOUNDATION PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEE COMMENTS | | | ON SHEET C1. | | | | | | C) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (3B) SPECIFIED ON CODE | | | INFORMATION IS FOR 2 HOUR FIRE CONCRETE BLOCK | | | CONSTRUCTION. CLARIFY IF REALLY BUILDING A 2 HOUR FIRE | | | RATED CONSTRUCTION OR SPECIFY CORRECT BUILDING TYPE. | | | TYPE 3B CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES MANUFACTURER | | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR TWO HOUR FIRE RATED CONCRETE BLOCK. | | | | | | D) CODE INFORMATION SPECIFIES 10 PSF LIVE LOAD AT | | | BOTTOM OF ROOF TRUSS CHORD. THIS MEANS THAT ATTIC IS | | | NOT DESIGNED FOR STORAGE. CLARIFY IF DESIGNING SPACE | | | FOR ATTIC STORAGE OR NOT SINCE SIZE OF ATTIC ACCESS | | | PANEL OF 22"X48" SHOWN ON ATTIC AREA ABOVE NEW MASTER | | | BEDROOM SUGGESTS ATTIC ACCESS BIG ENOUGH TO ALLOW FOR | | | STORAGE. CLEARLY SPECIFY ON PLANS IF ATTIC IS DESIGNED | | | FOR STORAGE OR NOT. IF SO SPECIFY CORRECT ATTIC LIVE | | | LOAD. SEE TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE. | | | | | | 2- SHEET A1: | | | A) SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS FOR WINDOW BY THE TUB IN NEW | | | MASTER BATHROOM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R308.4 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | B) WALL LEGEND DOESN'T SPECIFY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | NEW 4" AND 6" INTERIOR WALLS. SPECIFY CONSTRUCTION TYPE | | | (EG: WOOD OR METAL STUDS) AND PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | SPECIFICATIONS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 6 OF | | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 3- SHEET A3: | | | A) REVISE WALL SECTION A/A-3. FOOTING NEEDS TO BE MIN. | | | 12" BELOW GRADE. ACCORDING TO FOUNDATION PLAN FOOTING | | | IS 16" HIGH. IF TOP OF FOOTING IS 6" ABOVE GRADE, THEN | | | THERE IS ONLY 10" BELOW GRADE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. | | | R403.1.4 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | B) SPECIFY TRUSS CONNECTORS TO EXISTING NORTH WALL IN | | | NEW MASTER BEDROOM AREA. NONE SPECIFIED ON THIS AREA. | | | | | | 4- SHEET A4: | | | A) CLARIFY SIZE OF STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL FOR WINDOW | | | HEAD DETAIL, WINDOW SILL DETAIL AND WINDOW JAMB DETAIL. | | | WINDOW JAMB DETAILS CALLS FOR 2X AND 1X BUCK. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | B) PROVIDE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL FOR EXTERIOR DOOR. | | | SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR MINIMUM SIZE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 5- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT: | | | A) IS EXPIRED AFTER 30 DAYS OF BEING RECORDED IF WORK | | | IS NOT STARTED. NEED TO HAVE NEW RE-RECORDED ONE. | | | ***NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AT TIME OF PERMIT | | | PICK UP TO AVOID EXPIRATION. | | | | | | B) NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT NEEDS TO COMPLETE INFORMATION | | | FOR DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT. INFORMATION WAS LEFT | | | BLANK. | | | | | | 6- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD (561)233-5120) TO VERIFY IF | | | IMPACT FEES ARE DUE. BRING BACK STAMPED PLANS AND COPY | | | OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. | | | | | | 7- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY | | | DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) GLASS BLOCK AS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | | | | B) ARCHED WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | | | | 8- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 9- PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROOF SHEATHING INCLUDING | | | NAIL TYPE AND SPACING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF | | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | ***NOTE: TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION ROOF ZONE 3. SEE CITED | | | SECTION ABOVE FOR NAILING IN ROOF ZONE 3. | | | | | | 10- GARAGE AREA WAS CONVERTED TO LIVING AREA. SPECIFY | | | HOW WALLS ARE GETTING THE REQUIRED INSULATION. PROVIDE | | | WALL SECTION/SPECIFICATIONS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | CHAPTER 13 FBC 2004. | | | | | | 11- OWES $731.38 FOR UPDATED PERMIT VALUATION AND RADON | | | FEES. | | | | | | 12- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: | | | A) COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM. | | | | | | B) REVISE ITEM #10. CEILING TYPE IS UNDER ATTIC, NOT | | | SINGLE ASSEMBLY. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | C) REVISE INFORMATION ON SECOND PAGE. CALCULATIONS ARE | | | NO DONE FOR WORST CASE SCENARIO. THEREFORE, OPENINGS | | | NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE ACTUAL CARDINAL ORIENTATION. | | | SEE PLANS AND SURVEY FOR CORRECT CARDINAL ORIENTATION | | | AND NUMBER OF WINDOWS. COORDINATE INFORMATION WITH | | | ADDITIONS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | | | | D) REVISE PAGE TWO: OVERHANG LENGTH AND OVERHANG HEIGHT | | | ARE INCORRECT. NEED TO MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON | | | PLANS. ALSO, SEE ITEM #11C ABOVE. | | | | | | 13- HURRICANE SHUTTERS: | | | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AS REQUIRED | | | BY CITY IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD FOR WIND-BORNE DEBRIS | | | IMPACT PROTECTION. . SEE ATTACHED COPY. | | | | | | B) ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT IS LUIS A LOPEZ. | | | CLARIFY WHY THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA 06-0110.04 WAS | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY ANOTHER ENGINEER (JOHN HOLT). | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-11-11 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
2.50 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-11-11 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-11 15:43:41 | | | | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED FROM 1ST & | | | 2ND REVIEW | | | | | | 3) THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS | | | LOW. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS | | | AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST | | | EXCLUDING LAND VALUE. OUR VALUATION REFERENCE IS ICC | | | (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS SERVICES | | | PER 108.3 FBC* | | | | | | 4) THE STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES COLLECTION OF A RADON | | | SURCHARGE ON ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPUTED ON UNDER | | | ROOF FLOOR SPACE PER 10D-91 FAC. THESE FEES WILL BE | | | ADDED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION FEES | | | | | | NOTE: FEES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $731.76 FOR | | | INCREASED VALUE AND STATE RADON FEES THIS AMOUNT IS | | | REQUIRED TO BE PAID PRIOR TO FURTHER PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | 7) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 | | | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND DATED BY PREPARER | | | AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. NOTE: WHOLE HOUSE | | | METHOD A WAS CHOSEN PLEASE CORRECT THE AS-BUILT | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE GLAZED OPENINGS TO REFLECT ACTUAL | | | CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS, AMOUNT OF OPENINGS, | | | ORIENTATION, OVERHANG LENGTH AND HEIGHT, ETC. | | | ********ADDITION CONTAINS 5 WINDOWS BUT 2 ARE ON THE | | | NORTH SIDE, 3 ON THE WEST AND 2 ARE ON THE SOUTH, THIS | | | IS NOT WORST CASE THEREFORE THE SIZES/AREAS SHOULD | | | MATCH ACTUAL LAYOUT, ALSO THE HEIGHT USED IS FROM THE | | | SILL TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE OVERHANG WILL NOT BE THE | | | SAME ON DIFFERENT WINDOW SIZES THEREFORE THEY CANNOT | | | ALL BE 1.3 FEET AS STATED********** | | | | | | 9) THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE TWO COPIES OF | | | EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. | | | *******NO PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE YET BEEN SUBMITTED FOR | | | GLASS BLOCK AND LINTELS AND REAR DOOR MIAMI-DADE NOA | | | HAS EXPIRED. AS THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH NO LONGER | | | REQUIRES THE STATE OF FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS A NEW | | | UPDATED MIAMI-DADE NOA WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE (SEE NOA | | | #08-0516.07 AND IT USES THE SAME DRAWING | | | #S-2004)******** | | | | | | 10) THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 (PRODUCT APPROVALS) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO | | | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* | | | *******ANY NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE | | | SHUTTER APPROVALS UNDER THE FLORIDA COVER SHEETS | | | FL722-R1 ARE NOT VALIDATED BY THE SUBMITTED MIAMI-DADE | | | NOA, EITHER SUBMIT CORRECT DRAWING FOR THE FLORIDA | | | APPROVAL OR REMOVE THE FLORIDA COVERS AND SUBMIT THE | | | NOA BUT THE MIAMI-DADE REPORT WOULD NEED TO BE REVIEWED | | | AND APPROVED BY THE NEW DESIGNER OF RECORD******** | | | | | | 12) PROVIDE A COMPLETED SHUTTER SCHEDULE AND KEY PLAN | | | FOR THE SHUTTERS (PLEASE SEE ATTACHED CITY MEMO AND | | | EXAMPLE OF SHUTTER SCHEDULE) | | | ********THIS IS THE SECOND ATTEMPT WITH MEMO AND | | | SHUTTER SCHEDULE, THE SCHEDULE MUST ACCOMPANY THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH ALL INFORMATION APPLICABLE FILLED | | | IN.********** | | | | | | 18) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SETS OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, | | | AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561) 233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | IF THESE FEES HAVE BEEN PAID PLEASE HAVE NO FEE STAMP | | | ON NEW SETS OF DRAWINGS | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 1) CORRECT SITE PLAN SIDE YARD SETBACKS TO MATCH | | | SURVEY, FOR EXAMPLE SURVEY SHOWS A 6.0' ON SOUTH SIDE | | | BUT SITE PLAN STATES 9.3'. | | | *********WAS CHANGED TO INCORRECT SIDE YARD, SEE | | | SURVEY******** | | | | | | REMOVE ALL OLD PAGES, NON USED PRODUCT APPROVALS, ETC. | | | FROM PACKAGE AND RESUBMIT 2 COMPLETE SETS WITH | | | REVISIONS AND INCLUDE 1 COPY OF THE OLD PAGES ONLY FOR | | | REFERENCE. | | | ********PLEASE REMOVE OLD AND INSERT NEW THIS IS NOT IN | | | THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR PLAN REVIEWERS, DOCUMENTS SHALL | | | BE COMPLETE FOR REVIEW AND RECORD RETENTION.******* | | | | | | ADDITIONAL PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR MECHANICAL AND | | | DRIVEWAY | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
16:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
16:20 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-01 16:21:52 | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED FROM 1ST | | | REVIEW | | | | | | 3) THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS | | | LOW. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS | | | AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST | | | EXCLUDING LAND VALUE. OUR VALUATION REFERENCE IS ICC | | | (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS SERVICES | | | PER 108.3 FBC* | | | | | | 4) THE STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES COLLECTION OF A RADON | | | SURCHARGE ON ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPUTED ON UNDER | | | ROOF FLOOR SPACE PER 10D-91 FAC. THESE FEES WILL BE | | | ADDED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION FEES | | | | | | NOTE: FEES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $731.76 FOR | | | INCREASED VALUE AND STATE RADON FEES THIS AMOUNT IS | | | REQUIRED TO BE PAID PRIOR TO FURTHER PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | 7) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 | | | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND DATED BY PREPARER | | | AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. NOTE: WHOLE HOUSE | | | METHOD A WAS CHOSEN PLEASE CORRECT THE AS-BUILT | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE GLAZED OPENINGS TO REFLECT ACTUAL | | | CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS, AMOUNT OF OPENINGS, | | | ORIENTATION, OVERHANG LENGTH AND HEIGHT, ETC. | | | ********ADDITION CONTAINS 5 WINDOWS BUT 3 ARE ON THE | | | NORTH SIDE AND 2 ON THE WEST, THE SIZES/AREAS DO NOT | | | MATCH AND THE HEIGHT USED IS FROM THE SILL TO THE | | | UNDERSIDE OF THE OVERHANG THEREFORE THEY CANNOT ALL BE | | | 1.3 AS STATED********** | | | | | | 9) THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE TWO COPIES OF | | | EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. THESE | | | SHOULD INCLUDE THE FLORIDA STATE APPROVAL COVER PAGES. | | | ALL CAN BE FOUND ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | *******ONLY ONE COPY OF DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS | | | SUBMITTED. PLEASE CHECK ALLTYPES OF WINDOWS THAT WILL | | | BE USED AND SUBMIT 2 APPROVALS FOR EACH TYPE OF | | | WINDOW***** | | | | | | 10) THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 (PRODUCT APPROVALS) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO | | | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* | | | *******ANY NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD******** | | | | | | 12) NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR ROOF | | | SHINGLES, GLASS BLOCK, MULLIONS FOR JOINED WINDOWS, | | | FIXED WINDOWS IN FAMILY ROOM, AND LINTELS. PLEASE NOTE | | | THAT GLASS BLOCK USING A MORTAR SYSTEM ONLY MEETS SMALL | | | MISSILE IMPACT (FL # 1363), THE SILICONE METHOD WILL | | | MEET LARGE MISSILE RATING (FL # 5357) | | | ********PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE NOT INCLUDED FOR THE REAR | | | DOOR, WINDOWS (PLAN SPECIFIES SINGLE HUNG AND PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FOR HORIZONTAL SLIDER WERE SUBMITTED), GLASS | | | BLOCK, ALSO THE MIAMI-DADE NOA FOR THE OAKRIDGE | | | SHINGLES HAS BEEN REVISED TWICE. THE LATEST NOA # IS | | | 08-0110.18. PROVIDE A COMPLETED SHUTTER SCHEDULE AND | | | KEY PLAN FOR THE SHUTTERS (PLEASE SEE ATTACHED CITY | | | MEMO AND EXAMPLE OF SHUTTER SCHEDULE)****** | | | | | | 17) PROVIDE ATTIC ACCESS ON DRAWINGS TO ALL AREAS AS | | | REQUIRED PER R807.1 FBC RES. | | | *********ATTIC ACCESS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 22" X 30" | | | ONLY ONE WOULD BE REQUIRED IF ACCESS TO WHOLE ATTIC CAN | | | BE OBTAINED THROUGH THAT ENTRANCE****** | | | | | | 18) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SETS OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, | | | AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561) 233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | IF THESE FEES HAVE BEEN PAID PLEASE HAVE NO FEE STAMP | | | ON NEW SETS OF DRAWINGS | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 1) CORRECT SITE PLAN SIDE YARD SETBACKS TO MATCH | | | SURVEY, FOR EXAMPLE SURVEY SHOWS A 6.0' ON SOUTH SIDE | | | BUT SITE PLAN STATES 9.3'. | | | | | | ) REMOVE ALL OLD PAGES, NON USED PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | ETC. FROM PACKAGE AND RESUBMIT 2 COMPLETE SETS WITH | | | REVISIONS AND INCLUDE 1 COPY OF THE OLD PAGES ONLY FOR | | | REFERENCE. | | | | | | ) ADDITIONAL PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR MECHANICAL | | | AND DRIVEWAY | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-07-04 |
Time |
08:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-07-04 |
Time |
08:29 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-04 09:35:21 | DENIED | | | | | | 1) PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN PARAMETERS SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH THE 2004 FLORIDA BLDG CODE WITH 2006 & | | | 2007AMENDMENTS PER 106.1.1 FBC* | | | | | | 2) IN AN EXISTING BUILDING WHERE ALTERATIONS ARE BEING | | | MADE A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL MUST ELECT THE LEVEL OF | | | ALTERATION PER 301.5 OF EXISTING BUILDING CODE AND | | | STATE ALONG WITH THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ON THE | | | DRAWINGS | | | | | | 3) THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS | | | LOW. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS | | | AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST | | | EXCLUDING LAND VALUE. OUR VALUATION REFERENCE IS ICC | | | (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS SERVICES | | | PER 108.3 FBC* | | | | | | 4) THE STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES COLLECTION OF A RADON | | | SURCHARGE ON ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPUTED ON UNDER | | | ROOF FLOOR SPACE PER 10D-91 FAC. THESE FEES WILL BE | | | ADDED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION FEES | | | | | | | | | NOTE: FEES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $731.76 FOR | | | INCREASED VALUE AND STATE RADON FEES THIS AMOUNT IS | | | REQUIRED TO BE PAID PRIOR TO FURTHER PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | | | | 5) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF A RECENT SURVEY SHOWING THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDING/ADDITION WITH ALL SIDE AND REAR | | | SETBACKS, NOTE THAT SURVEY AND SITE PLAN MEASUREMENTS | | | DO NOT MATCH | | | | | | 6) PROVIDE A SITE PLAN THAT SHOWS DRAINAGE IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R403.1 FBC RES. | | | | | | 7) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 | | | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND DATED BY PREPARER | | | AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. NOTE: WHOLE HOUSE | | | METHOD A WAS CHOSEN PLEASE CORRECT THE AS-BUILT | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE GLAZED OPENINGS TO REFLECT ACTUAL | | | CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS, AMOUNT OF OPENINGS, | | | ORIENTATION, OVERHANG LENGTH AND HEIGHT, ETC. | | | | | | 8) PROVIDE AT MINIMUM 1 ACCESSIBLE BATHROOM PER | | | R322.1.1 FBC 29" CLEAR WITH DOOR OPEN 90 DEGREES | | | | | | 9) THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE TWO COPIES OF | | | EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. THESE | | | SHOULD INCLUDE THE FLORIDA STATE APPROVAL COVER PAGES. | | | ALL CAN BE FOUND ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 10) THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 (PRODUCT APPROVALS) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO | | | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* | | | | | | 11) THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH REQUIRES THE FLORIDA | | | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL SHEETS WHEN AVAILABLE. THEY CAN | | | BE SEARCHED FOR ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. WHEN | | | AVAILABLE AND NOT SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL BE | | | DENIED | | | | | | 12) NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR ROOF | | | SHINGLES, GLASS BLOCK, MULLIONS FOR JOINED WINDOWS, | | | FIXED WINDOWS IN FAMILY ROOM, AND LINTELS. PLEASE NOTE | | | THAT GLASS BLOCK USING A MORTAR SYSTEM ONLY MEETS SMALL | | | MISSILE IMPACT (FL # 1363), THE SILICONE METHOD WILL | | | MEET LARGE MISSILE RATING (FL # 5357) | | | | | | 13) IF WOOD BUCKS ARE TO BE USED AN ATTACHMENT DETAIL | | | IS REQUIRED FOR THE TRANSFER OF APPLICABLE LOADS TO THE | | | BUILDING PER R613.6.1.1 FBC RES. | | | SEE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | | | | 14) SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF THE SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERED | | | TRUSS DRAWINGS THAT COMPLY WITH R802.10.1 FBC WITH | | | PERMIT APPLICATION OR BEFORE INSTALLATION THAT HAVE | | | BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | | | | 15) BUILDING ELEVATION TO INCLUDE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT | | | | | | 16) IN AREAS OF QUESTIONABLE SOILS AS SHOWN IN THE | | | OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, 2 | | | ORIGINAL COPIES OF A SOIL TEST REPORT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED PER R401.4 FBC RES. | | | | | | 17) PROVIDE ATTIC ACCESS ON DRAWINGS TO ALL AREAS AS | | | REQUIRED PER R807.1 FBC RES. | | | | | | 18) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SETS OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, | | | AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561) 233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | IF THESE FEES HAVE BEEN PAID PLEASE HAVE NO FEE STAMP | | | ON NEW SETS OF DRAWINGS | | | | | | 19) PER 713.13(2) F.S. IF THE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIBED IN | | | THE NOC HAS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS OF RECORDING, | | | THE NOTICE IS VOID. PLEASE NOTE THAT NO IMPROVEMENT WAS | | | GIVEN IN THE OLD NOC THIS AREA MUST BE FILLED OUT IN | | | THE NEW ONE. IN ORDER TO AVOID THE 90 DAY RULE NOC CAN | | | BE RECORDED ONCE THE PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. | | | | | | 20) PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR FLAT ROOF | | | PRODUCT BUT NO FLAT ROOF ON THE PLANS, ALSO FOR AN | | | INSWING FIBERGLASS DOOR WITH SIDELITES THAT IS NOT | | | PRESENT ON DRAWINGS, PLEASE CLARIFY | | | | | | 21) PLEASE CLARIFY NEW WORK TO FRONT FACADE OF HOUSE, | | | SHEET A2, SOUTH ELEVATION SHOWS NEW ENTRY AND A1 STATES | | | EXISTING IS THE NEW SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE FRONT ONLY | | | NEW WINDOWS? | | | | | | 22) REMOVE ALL OLD PAGES, NON USED PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | ETC. FROM PACKAGE AND RESUBMIT 2 COMPLETE SETS WITH | | | REVISIONS AND INCLUDE 1 COPY OF THE OLD PAGES ONLY FOR | | | REFERENCE. | | | | | | 23) ADDITIONAL PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR MECHANICAL | | | AND DRIVEWAY | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-04-07 |
Time |
16:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-04-07 |
Time |
16:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-09-25 |
Time |
09:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-09-25 |
Time |
08:15 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-25 09:33:19 | | | | | | | TO ADRIANS DESK./WRT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-06-24 |
Time |
10:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-06-24 |
Time |
10:00 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-24 10:09:37 | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE | | | CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, 2004 FBC CHAPTER 1 | | | AS AMENDED AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | ALL COMMENTS RELATE TO SHEET A2, UNLESS OTHERWISE | | | NOTED. ALL CODE ARTICLES REFERENCED ARE 2005 NEC UNLESS | | | OTHERWISE NOTED. | | | | | | 1} A DISCONNECT PER 230.70(A)(1) MUST BE ADDED TO THE | | | SERVICE AND DRAWN ON THE RISERDUE TO THE RELOCATION OF | | | THE ELECTRICAL PANEL. | | | | | | 2} THERE IS A NOTE REGARDING THE REWIRE OF THE | | | RESIDENCE ON THE FLOOR PLAN, AND THERE ARE NOTES IN THE | | | BEDROOMS, LIVING AND DINING ROOMS INDICATING EXISTING | | | OUTLETS TO REMAIN., PLEASE CLARIFY THE SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 3} IN THE NEW DINING ROOM THE RECEPTACLES MUST COMPLY | | | WITH 210.52(B)(1). | | | | | | 4}PLEASE PROVIDE A PANEL SCHEDULE SO THAT | | | BRANCH/FEEDER CIRCUIT CONDUCTOR AND OVER CURRENT | | | PROTECTION COMPLIANCE MAY BE REVIEWED PER 408.4 NEC, | | | 106.3.5.4 FBC AS AMENDED. | | | | | | 5} SHEET M-1 FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH ANY | | | OTHER SHEETS SUBMITTED. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE A/C | | | EQUIPMENT ON THEELECTRICAL PLAN. ALSO SHOW COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE REQUIRED DISCONNECT PER 440.14,RECEPTACLE | | | PER 210.63 | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-06 |
Time |
15:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-06 |
Time |
15:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-06 15:34:34 | TO "R16" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-03 |
Time |
10:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-03 |
Time |
10:27 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-03 10:27:31 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-12 |
Time |
16:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-12 |
Time |
16:12 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-12 16:14:28 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2008-07-04 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-06-20 |
Time |
16:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-20 16:18:52 | TO "SFR" "Z" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-04-23 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-04-23 |
Time |
14:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-23 14:52:30 | RESTAMP PLANS PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED BY TOM GORDON. NO | | | MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLIED FOR AT THIS TIME. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-24 |
Time |
16:01 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-24 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-24 16:21:47 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SIGNED BY OWNER/AGENT | | | ALSO, PER 2004 FBC 13-103.3. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SUBMIT THE COMPLETE COOLING LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC 13-607.1.ABC.1. THE COOLING | | | LOAD CALCULATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED CONSIST OF, THREE | | | COPIES OF THE SAME PAGE. | | | | | | 3) PLEASE SHOW THE CLOTHES DRYER VENT ON THE MECHANICAL | | | PLAN, PER 2004 FBC/R M1501.1. | | | | | | 4) THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE CALLING FOR 38,577 | | | TOTAL COOLING BTU'S, THE MECHANICAL PLAN EQUIPMENT | | | SCHEDULE IS SHOWING 47,200 TOTAL COOLING BTU'S, THE | | | PLANS CAN ONLY CALL FOR 15% MORE TOTAL COOLING BTU'S | | | THAN THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-607.1.ABC.1.1. PLEASE CORRECT. SEE ATTACHED ARI | | | CERTIFICATE SHOWING A 3.5 TON SYSTEM THAT WOULD MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 5) PLEASE ROTATE THE HOUSE ON THE MECHANICAL PLAN SO IT | | | IS FACING THE SAME AS THE OTHER BUILDING PLANS. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-15 |
Time |
16:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-15 |
Time |
16:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-06-25 |
Time |
13:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-06-25 |
Time |
13:36 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-25 14:05:37 | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | DENIED: | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES WITH | | | 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO | | | CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.). | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | GAS/PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 1. SHEET A2 SANITARY PLUMBING RISER: PLEASE CORRECT | | | PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS. | | | | | | A} THE RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT REFLECT THE PROPOSED | | | FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A1 NEW MASTER BATH. ONE LAVATORY IS | | | MISSING FROM THE RISER DIAGRAM. PER SECTION 701.1 | | | SCOPE. | | | | | | B} THE TUB IN THE NEW MASTER BATH REQUIRES A | | | WATER-SEAL TRAP. PER SECTION 1002.1 FIXTURE TRAPS. | | | | | | C} THE BRANCH DRAIN AND STACK FOR THE WASHING MACHINE | | | IN THE NEW LAUNDRY NEEDS TO BE 3 INCH, PER SECTION | | | 406.3. THE CLEANOUT NEEDS TO BE 3 INCH, PER SECTION | | | 708.7. THE CLEANOUT NEEDS TO BE LOCATED AT 4 FEET ABOVE | | | FINNISH FLOOR (4' A.F.F.), PER SECTION 708.9 ACCESS. | | | THE WASHING MACHINE REQUIRES A WATER-SEAL TRAP, PER | | | 1002.1 FIXTURE TRAPS. THE WASHING MACHINE ALSO REQUIRES | | | A STANDPIPE, PER SECTION 802.4. | | | | | | D} THE NEW KITCHEN DISHWASHER REQURES A DRAIN AND | | | SHALL DISCHARGE INTO A WYE-BRANCH FITTING ON THE | | | TAILPIECE OF THE KITCHEN SINK OR THE DISHWASHER | | | CONNECTION OF A FOOD WASTE GRINDER. PER SECTION | | | 802.1.6. | | | | | | E. NOTE: #1, CLEARLY INDICATE THE CLEANOUT AT THE | | | JUNCTION OF THE BUILDING DRAIN AND BUILDING SEWER BEING | | | A TWO-WAY CLEANOUT. PER 708.3.5. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE | | | OLD PLANS, CLEARLY INDICATE THE REVISION ON THE NEW | | | PLANS, REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | PHONE= (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX= (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL= [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcruz |
Date |
2009-04-28 |
Time |
10:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcruz |
Date |
2009-04-28 |
Time |
08:37 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-28 10:49:18 | ROUTED TO JG |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-11-07 |
Time |
16:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-11-07 |
Time |
15:57 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-07 16:12:42 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT: ***ZONING FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL RESPONSES IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. THE IMPERMEABLE SURFACE SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS | | | INDICATED ON SHEET C-1 DOES NOT MATCH THE CALCULATION | | | WRITTEN ON THE DRAWING. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 3. THE SETBACK DIMENSION ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | | PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY INDICATES 6 FEET FROM | | | THE PROPERTYLINE TO THE BUILDING, BUT THE SITE PLAN | | | INDICATES 9.3 FEET. PLEASE CLARIFY. NOTE: PURSUANT TO | | | THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS (ZLDR), SECTION 94-75(A)(2): MINIMUM | | | SETBACKS FOR PRINCIPAL BUILDING WITHIN MULTIFAMILY LOW | | | DENSITY (MF14) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | A. FRONT: 25 FEET; | | | | | | B. CORNER: 12.5 FEET; TEN FEET IF LOT IS LESS THAN 60 | | | FEET WIDE; | | | | | | C. REAR: 15 FEET OR TEN PERCENT OF LOT DEPTH WHICHEVER | | | IS LESS; | | | | | | D. SIDE: FIVE FEET MINIMUM, 15 FEET TOTAL. | | | | | | REPEAT COMMENT: | | | | | | A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE ACQUIRED FROM THE | | | CITYS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (561.494.1040), FOR THE | | | PROPOSED APPROACH EXTENSION. PLEASE DO NOT RESUBMIT | | | WITHOUT THIS APPROVAL. | | | | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS MAY BE VIEWED ONLINE AT | | | WWW.MUNICODE.COM OR VISIT THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING DEPARTMENT WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/PLAN/INDEX.HTM. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT ME. | | | | | | MAGGIE CRUZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | TEL: (561) 822-1444 OR (561) 805-6720 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-09-17 |
Time |
13:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-09-17 |
Time |
13:24 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-17 13:33:05 | ***ZONING FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL RESPONSES IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. REPEAT COMMENT: INDICATE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL | | | IMPERMEABLE SURFACES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) LOCATED | | | WITHIN THE FRONT YARD (FROM FRONT PROPERTY LINE TO THE | | | FRONT BUILDING FACADE). ADDITIONALLY, A RIGHT-OF-WAY | | | PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE ACQUIRED FROM THE CITY?S | | | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (561.494.1040), FOR THE PROPOSED | | | APPROACH EXTENSION. THE REVISION SUBMITTED INDICATED A | | | CALCUALTION OF THE IMPERMEABLE AREA OF THE ENTIRE LOT. | | | PROVISION REQUIRES THE CALCULATION IS OF THE FRON YARD | | | (FROM FRONT PROPERTY LINE TO THE FRONT BUILDING | | | FACADE). PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-482 OF THE ZLDRS: | | | REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES FOR LESS THAN FOUR | | | RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE | | | PROPERTY ON WHICH THE UNITS ARE CONSTRUCTED. REQUIRED | | | PARKING MAY BE LOCATED IN A FRONT YARD; HOWEVER, THE | | | LESSER OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR 75 PERCENT OF THE FRONT | | | YARD AREA MUST BE LANDSCAPED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT ME. | | | | | | MAGGIE CRUZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | TEL: (561) 822-1444 OR (561) 805-6720 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | SENT TO BT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
Time |
08:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
Time |
08:41 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-23 08:57:08 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | | | | 1)PROVIDE TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT SURVEY, WHICH | | | INCLUDES THE PROPERTY'S ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION. | | | | | | 2)THE REAR ADDITION AS SHOWN DOES NOT MEET THE REAR | | | SETBACK REQUIREMENT...PREVIOUS COMMENTS WERE BASED ON | | | SUBMITTED INFORMATION, INFORMATION HAS CHANGED. | | | PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-75 OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS:MINIMUM REAR SETBACK = 15' OR | | | 10% OF THE LOT DEPTH, WHICHEVER IS LESS.AS THE LOT | | | DEPTH IS NOW SHOWN AS 75', THE MINIMUM REAR SETBACK IS | | | 7.5'...SURVEY TO CONFIRM. | | | | | | 3)PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-482 OF THE ZLDRS: REQUIRED | | | OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES FOR LESS THAN FOUR | | | RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE | | | PROPERTY ON WHICH THE UNITS ARE CONSTRUCTED. REQUIRED | | | PARKING MAY BE LOCATED IN A FRONT YARD; HOWEVER, THE | | | LESSER OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR 75 PERCENT OF THE FRONT | | | YARD AREA MUST BE LANDSCAPED. PARKING AREAS LOCATED IN | | | THE FRONT YARD SHALL BE SURFACED WITH A SMOOTH, | | | NONDUSTING SURFACE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SUBSECTION | | | 33-485(E). IT SHALL BE A VIOLATION OF THIS CHAPTER TO | | | PARK ON ANY UNPAVED AREAS AS DESCRIBED IN THIS ARTICLE. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE INDICATE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL IMPERMEABLE | | | SURFACES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) LOCATED WITHIN THE | | | FRONT YARD (FROM FRONT PROPERTY LINE TO THE FRONT | | | BUILDING FACADE). | | | | | | 4)INDICATE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM PROPOSED A/C | | | EQUIPMENT TO ALL PROPERTY LINES.AS PER SECTION | | | 94-305(B)(4) OF THE ZLDRS: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY NOT | | | PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | | | | 5)CLARIFY "CHANGING THE LOOK OF THE FRONT FACADE" AS | | | INDICATED BY THE PERMIT APPLICATION.WHAT IMPROVEMENTS | | | ARE BEING DONE?NOTE:AS THE EXISTING FRONT FACADE IS | | | NONCONFORMING WITH RESPECT TO ITS FRONT SETBACK | | | DIMENSION, NO IMPROVEMENT SHALL BE MADE WHICH INCREASES | | | THIS NONCONFORMITY.PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 6)THE SOUTH ELEVATION AS SHOWN ON SHEET A-2 CALLS | | | OUT A "NEW ENTRY", OTHER ELEVATIONS SHOW "EXISTING | | | ENTRY".PLEASE CLARIFY.NOTE:AS THE EXISTING FRONT | | | FACADE IS NONCONFORMING WITH RESPECT TO ITS FRONT | | | SETBACK DIMENSION, NO IMPROVEMENT SHALL BE MADE WHICH | | | INCREASES THIS NONCONFORMITY. | | | | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN (561)805-6720 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "E" - SF RACK |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |