| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08040822 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
10:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
10:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-11 10:39:48 | SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR JOHNS | | | MANVILLE MODIFIED ROOF SYSTEM AS REQUIRED BY PROVISO | | | WERE SUBMITTTED AND REVIEWED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
Time |
14:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-12 14:21:52 | BUILDING PROVISO | | | | | | SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | ENHANCED FASTENING OF THE BASE SHEET AT PERIMETER AND | | | CORNERS. CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE PREPARED BY A | | | FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER, ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF | | | CONSULTANT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
Time |
13:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-06-05 |
Time |
13:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-05 13:54:55 | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS | | | ADDITION | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT FOR THE | | | COUNTY IMPACT FEES. | | | | | | 2) THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SIGNED BY THE OWNER/AGENT. SEE FBC 13-600. | | | | | | 3) SPECIFY WHICH ONE OF THE APPROVED ASSEMBLIES LISTED | | | IN THE NOA FOR THE MODIFIED ROOFING WILL BE INSTALLED. | | | SPECIFY THE FASTENING OPTION AND DESIGN PRESSURE THAT | | | WILL BE USED. SUBMIT RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | ENHANCED FASTENING OF THE BASE SHEET AT PERIMETER AND | | | CORNERS. SEE LIMITATION #7 ON PAGE 32 OF THE NOA. PAGE | | | 28 OF THE NOA IS FOR TORCH DOWN APP/SBS FOR | | | NON-INSULATED WOOD DECKS. SOME PAGES ARE MISSING FROM | | | THE NOA THAT WAS SUBMITTED. THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR CAN | | | PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-05-12 |
Time |
14:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-05-12 |
Time |
14:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-12 14:40:46 | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS | | | ADDITION | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT | | | MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A | | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | | | 2) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE | | | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY.THE PLANS MUST BE | | | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION. | | | 233-5025 | | | | | | 3) SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY 2004 FBC | | | CHAPTER 13. | | | | | | 4) SPECIFY THE MAXIMUM SPACING ALLOWED FOR THE #5 | | | VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT IN THE NEW EXTERIOR WALLS. FBC | | | R609.3.3 | | | | | | 5) ROOF SHEATHING IS REQUIRED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SECTION R803.2.3.1 OF 2006 REVISIONS TO 2004 FBC | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE. WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING SHALL | | | BE FASTENED TO ROOF FRAMING WITH 8D RING-SHANK NAILS. | | | PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS ON SHEET 5. | | | | | | 6) SPECIFY THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING UPLIFT PRESSURES | | | FOR THE FLAT ROOF ZONES 1,2 AND 3. SEE FBC TABLE | | | R301.2(2) AND FIGURE R301.2(8). | | | | | | 7)FBC 106.3* CITY AMENDMENTS PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | PLEASE USE A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP FROM THE | | | ENGINEER, AS THE SIGNATURES ON THE PRODUCT APPROVALS DO | | | NOT APPEAR TO BE THE ENGINEER'S. | | | | | | 8)SPECIFY WHICH ONE OF THE APPROVED ASSEMBLIES LISTED | | | IN THE NOA FOR THE MODIFIED ROOFING WILL BE INSTALLED. | | | SPECIFY THE FASTENING OPTION OPTION THAT WILL BE USED | | | AND THE DESIGN PRESSURE. IF ENHANCED FASTENING IS | | | REQUIRED FOR THE PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS, SUBMIT RAS | | | 117 CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 9) THE NOA FOR THE TRACO SERIES 2100 HAS BEEN | | | SUPERSEDED BY NOA NO. 07-0521.06. SUBMIT THE NEW NOA. | | | | | | 10) THE ELEVATION ON SHEET 3 OF THE PLANS SPECIFIES A | | | GLAZED FRENCH DOOR WHICH WILL REQUIRE STORM PANELS IF | | | IT IS NOT AN IMPACT RATED DOOR. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | THAT WAS SUBMITTED IS FOR AN OPAQUE STEEL DOOR. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. | | | | | | 11) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE STORM PANELS AS | | | REQUIRED BY FBC R301.2.1.2 AND DCA RULE 9B-72. SUBMIT 2 | | | COPIES OF A KEY PLAN AND INSTALLATION SCHEDULE FOR THE | | | STORM PANELS. SPECIFY THE OPENING SIZES, PANEL SPANS, | | | FASTENER TYPE AND SPACING, CONNECTION TYPE, PRESSURES, | | | ETC. SEE ATTACHED. | | | | | | 12) PLEASE DO NOT STAPLE THE PRODUCT APPROVALS TO THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 13) THE DECLARED VALUE OF THE WORK IS TOO LOW. IT HAS | | | BEEN ADJUSTED TO $ 65,154.00. THERE ARE ADDITIONAL | | | PERMIT FEES DUE OF $199.62. FBC 108.3* CITY AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
Time |
12:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
Time |
12:00 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
11:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
11:20 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-22 11:20:49 | TO "Z" BOX/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
08:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
08:37 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-11 08:37:58 | TO "RMCDOUGAL" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
08:56 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-11 08:57:10 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
Time |
09:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
Time |
09:35 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-03 09:35:20 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-05-12 |
Time |
14:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
Time |
09:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-05 09:38:28 | TO "SFR" "Z" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-12-23 |
Time |
12:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-12-23 |
Time |
12:49 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-11-10 |
Time |
10:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-11-10 |
Time |
10:36 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-10 11:05:28 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | 1, PLEASE PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE TABULATION CLEARLY | | | DISPLAYING THE RELEVANT STATISTICAL INFORMATION | | | NECESSARY FOR THE EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 2, IDENTIFY ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL. | | | | | | 3. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-442(D), PRIVATE LAND AND | | | PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN STREET OR SIDEWALK | | | SURFACES AND REQUIRED BUFFER STRIPS AND LANDSCAPED OPEN | | | SPACE AREAS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH GRASS. GRASS AREAS | | | SHALDL BE SODDED. | | | | | | 4. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-444(B), PROVIDE SCREENING FOR | | | THE GROUND LEVEL AIR CONDITIONING UNITS AND POOL | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-445(4)(G)3, AUTOMATIC | | | IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE USED FOR THE CULTIVATED | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR ALL PROPERTIES. THIS INCLUDES, BUT | | | IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST IN TABULAR FORM. IT SHALL | | | IDENTIFY THE PROPOSED TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS | | | AND SHOW THE QUANTITY, SIZE AND SPACING. | | | | | | 7. THE PROPOSED HEDGE ADJACENT TO THE CITY SIDEWALK IN | | | THE CENTER OF THE DRIVEWAYS CREATES A VISIBILITY | | | PROBLEM. THE HEDGTE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE INSIDE | | | CURVE TO ELIMINATE THE VISIBILITY PROBLEM. | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE LANDSCAPING ALONG THE FRONT BUILDING | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 9. NOTES IDENTIFYING THE DEPTH OF MULCH, REQUIRED PLANT | | | QUALTIY AND IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPEAR ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 10. ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, PLEASE SHOW ALL OVERHEAD | | | LINES, EASEMENTS AND OTHER UTILITIES THAT MAY INTERFERE | | | WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
Time |
08:16 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
Time |
08:16 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
Time |
11:33 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
Time |
11:33 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-03 12:02:39 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) ENERGY CALCULATIONS LINE 11A IS STATING THE SUPPLY | | | AND RETURN AIR DUCTS ARE IN A CONDITIONED SPACE, AND | | | THE AIR HANDLER IS IN THE INTERIOR. THE MECHANICAL | | | PLANS SHOW THE SUPPLY AIR DUSTS ARE IN THE ATTIC, SHOWS | | | NO RETURN AIR DUCTS, AND SHOWS THE AIR HANDLER IN THE | | | ATTIC. PLEASE CORRECT THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 | | | FBC 13-600.3.A. | | | | | | 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS THEY MUST | | | BE SIGNED BY OWNER/AGENT ALSO, PER 2004 FBC 13-103.3. | | | | | | 3) THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE CALLING FOR 27,626 | | | TOTAL BTU'S, AND THE MECHANICAL PLAN EQUIPMENT LISTING | | | IS SHOWING 41,200 TOTAL BTU'S. THE PLANS CAN ONLY CALL | | | FOR 15% MORE TOTAL BTU'S THAN THE COOLING LOAD CAL'S. | | | PER 2004 FBC 13-607.1.ABC.1.1, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 4)A/C SYSTEM MODEL NUMBERS LISTED ON THE A/C | | | EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE A/H FKYCNB005 AND C/U 38BRL042-3 | | | COULD NOT BE FOUND ON THE ARI DIRECTORY WEB-SITE, | | | PLEASE CORRECT OR SUBMIT AN ARI CERTIFICATE, SEE 2004 | | | FBC 13-607.1.ABC.3.1.1. | | | | | | 5) THE PLAN SHOWS NO A/C GOING TO THE PROPOSED BEDROOM | | | PLEASE CORRECT OR STATE NO A/C THIS ROOM ON PLAN. | | | | | | 6) PLANS SHOW NO RETURN AIR TO AIR HANDLER PLEASE SHOW | | | ON PLAN HOW THE AIR IS RETURNING TO THE AIR HANDLER, | | | PER 2004 FBC/R M1602.4. | | | | | | 7) PLEASE PROVIDE FOR RETURN AIR TO THE PROPOSED STUDY | | | AND PROPOSED BEDROOM (IF A/C), PER 2004 FBC/R M1602.4. | | | | | | 8) PLEASE SHOW THE ATTIC ACCESS TO THE AIR HANDLER ON | | | MECHANICAL PLAN, PER 2004 FBC/R M1305.1.3. | | | | | | 9) THE MECHANICAL PLANS NEED THE PRINTED NAME WITH THE | | | SINGATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN, AND | | | CONTRACTOR INFORMATION IF APPLICABLE ON THEM, SEE | | | W.P.B. AMEND. 106.1.3. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
Time |
13:59 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
Time |
13:59 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-06 14:05:32 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | | | | 1) SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC13-101.2.2. | | | | | | 2) SUBMIT MECHANICAL (A/C) PLANS FOR REVIEW, AS NO | | | MECHANICAL PLAN WAS SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. | | | PER 2004 WPB AMEND. 106.3.5.4 (10). | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
Time |
08:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
Time |
08:52 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
14:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
14:44 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-11 14:56:29 | ***APPROVED - RESUB #2*** | | | | | | PROVISOS: | | | 1)AS THE PROVIDED SURVEYS/SITE PLANS ARE INACCURATE, | | | A FORM BOARD SURVEY AND UPDATED SITE PLAN (TO MATCH | | | SURVEY) SHALL BE PROVIDED SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACKS PER SECTION 94-72 OF THE | | | CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS): | | | AS THE EXISTING NORTH SIDE SETBACK IS 7.0 FEET (TO THE | | | ATTACHED SHED), THE MINIMUM SOUTH SIDE SETBACK TO THE | | | NEW ADDITION SHALL BE 8.0 FEET.THE FRONT SETBACK | | | SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25'. | | | | | | 2)THE PROPOSED POOL AND A/C EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT | | | PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FEET INTO THE REQUIRED 8 FOOT SOUTH | | | SIDE SETBACK, YIELDING A MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK OF 4 | | | FEET TO ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ALONG THAT SIDE. | | | | | | 3)PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CO, A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445 OF THE ZLDRS | | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE CITY'S | | | PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT VIA THE CONSTRUCTION | | | SERVICES' SUBMITTAL PROCESS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "M" - TG |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
Time |
10:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
Time |
10:09 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-03 10:21:00 | ***FAILED - RESUB #1*** | | | | | | | | | 1)THE SURVEY AND SITE PLAN (SHEET 1) DO NOT MATCH | | | WITH RESPECT TO THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED SETBACK | | | DIMENSIONS.PLEASE CLARIFY.THE SIDE SETBACKS AS | | | SHOWN ON THE SURVEY DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY | | | SECTION 94-72 OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS (ZLDRS):SIDE = 5' MINIMUM WITH A TOTAL OF | | | 15' BETWEEN THE TWO SIDES, THE SURVEY SHOWS A TOTAL OF | | | 14.8'.PLEASE REVISE, ALL PLANS SHALL | | | CORRESPOND/MATCH. | | | | | | 2)AS THE VALUE OF THE WORK HAS INCREASED TO | | | ACCURATELY REFLECT THE SCOPE OF WORK, IT NOW TRIGGERS | | | SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZLDRS: AS THE VALUE OF THE | | | PROPOSED WORK EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE | | | (LISTED AS "IMPROVEMENT VALUE" WITH THE P.B.C. PROPERTY | | | APPRAISER'S OFFICE), LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF | | | THE ZLDRS.PLEASE SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445 OF THE | | | ZLDRS. | | | | | | 3)THE POOL EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY MUST BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 4.1 FEET FROM THE SOUTH SIDE PROPERTY LINE. | | | AS PER SECTION 94-305(B)(4) OF THE ZLDRS: MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT MAY NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FEET INTO A | | | REQUIRED SETBACK.PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN (561)805-6720 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "M" - TG |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
Time |
11:07 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-06 11:08:22 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | | | | 1)PROVIDE TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT SURVEY WHICH | | | INCLUDES THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND ADDRESS. | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN (561)805-6720 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "M" - SF RACK |
|
|