| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08040391 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-24 |
Time |
09:31 |
Rev Time |
0.66 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-24 |
Time |
09:31 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-24 09:33:33 | SHEET S-1, REVISION# 1 PLAN DATED : 7/14/09 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
1.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-04 11:14:40 | BUILDING PROVISO: PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR NEW ROOF | | | HATCH (96"X72") PER RULE 9B-72(31)(A) & 1609.6.2.2. | | | PROVIDE BEFORE FRAMING INSPECTION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
Time |
09:57 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-24 09:58:46 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08040391 | | | ADD: 1001 OKEECHOBEE BLVD | | | CONT: ANDERSON MOORE | | | TEL: (561)662-1819 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW | | | DEC.24/2008 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A) INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | | COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1B) INFORMATIONAL FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, | | | TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: | | | 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS | | | AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & | | | VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | 1C) INFORMATIONAL: PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST | | | TIME REVIEW) AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO | | | THE 2004 FBC BUILDING WITH THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | | | 2) THE COMPUTATIONS SUBMITTED PAGE 28 FROM SSMA ARE A | | | GENERIC TABLE THEY DO NOT REFLECT THE VALUES OF THE | | | SCREW TYPE OF ALLOY, GRADE OF MATERIAL SHOULD BE | | | VERIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER. I'VE SPOKEN WITH FORD | | | FASTENERS ABOUT THE 1000 STEEL SELF DRILLING SCREW, NO | | | VALUES WOULD BE GIVEN BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN NO TESTING | | | FOR THIS FASTENERS. THE SECOND ISSUE IS THE ALTIMATE | | | FAILURE STRENGTH VERSES THE DESIGN LOADS OF THE | | | FASTENERS BEING USED. | | | | | | IN THE TABLE SUBMITTEDON PAGE 28 THE THE LINE FOR 43 | | | MILS IS CIRCLED TOR THICKNESS OF MATERIAL VERES A # 10 | | | SCREW. SCREW TABLE NOTES ,WHEN CONNECTING MATERIALS OF | | | DIFFERENT STEEL THICKNESS OR TENSILE STRENGTH (FU) THE | | | LOWEST APPLICABLE VALUES SHOULD BE USED. THE TENSILE | | | STRENGTH INDICATED FY+33KSI SHOUD BE USED NOT THE | | | 43MIL. THIS REDUCES THE PULLOUT TO 66 AND SHEER TO 140. | | | | | | THE NEST ISSUE IS THE PULL OUT VALUE IS LISTED AS 109 | | | FOR A #10 SCREW THE SAFETY FACTOR AND THE SAME WITH | | | SHEAR VALUES. THE DESIGNER IS TAKING THE ULTIMATE | | | FAILURE PRESSURES BY MULTIPLYING THEMBY THREE | | | AND THEN CUTTING THE PRESSRES IN HALF THEN MULTIPLYING | | | THEM AGAIN BY 1.33 THERE IS NO SAFETY FACORS BUILT INTO | | | THE EQUATION.THE THIRD ISSUE IS 33% INCREASE IS TAKEN | | | FOR THE FASTENERS. 1605.3.1.1. PLEASE REVIEW SIMILAR | | | PROJECT 08070134 WHERE THE SAME VALUES WERE TAKEN. | | | 1604.1 GENERAL. | | | BUILDING, STRUCTURES AND PARTS THEREOF SHALL BE | | | DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STRENGTH | | | DESIGN, LOAD AND RESISTANCE FACTOR DESIGN, ALLOWABLE | | | STRESS DESIGN, EMPIRICAL DESIGN OR CONVENTIONAL | | | CONSTRUCTION METHODS, AS PERMITTED BY THE APPLICABLE | | | MATERIAL CHAPTERS. | | | | | | THE DESIGN LOADS ON THE PANELS ARE ACTING THE SAME WAY | | | AS SHEAR WALLS ACT, SO THE ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN. | | | 2211.2.1 DESIGN SHEAR DETERMINATION. | | | WHERE ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN (ASD) IS USED, THE | | | ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUE SHALL BE DETERMINED BY DIVIDING | | | THE NOMINAL SHEAR VALUE, SHOWN IN TABLES 2211.2(1) AND | | | 2211.2(2) BY A FACTOR OF SAFETY (OMEGA) WHICH SHALL BE | | | TAKEN AS 2.50. ALSO SEE FOOTNOTEA TABLE 2211.2.1. FOR | | | SAFETY FACTORS. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-10-20 |
Time |
09:26 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-10-20 |
Time |
09:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-20 09:39:13 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08040391 | | | ADD: 1001 OKEECHOBEE BLVD | | | CONT: ANDERSON MOORE | | | TEL: (561)662-1819 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A) INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | | COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1B) INFORMATIONAL FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, | | | TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: | | | 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS | | | AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & | | | VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | 1C) INFORMATIONAL: PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST | | | TIME REVIEW) AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO | | | THE 2004 FBC BUILDING WITH THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | | | 2) THE COMPUTATIONS SUBMITTED DOES NOT PROVIDE THE PULL | | | OUT AND SHEER VALUE, TYPE OF MATERIAL NOR SIZE OF | | | MACHINE SCREW, PLEASE PROVIDE THE MANUFACTURERS CUT | | | SHEET WITH THESE SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. NOTED | | | SHEETS 23-25 DO INDICATE A # 10 SCREW BUT THE | | | CALCULATION SHEETS DO NOT INDICATE TYPE OF SCREWS TO BE | | | INSTALLED. 106.1.2* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | 1609.6.2.2 COMPONENTS AND CLADDING. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
Time |
07:13 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
Time |
07:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-28 07:47:26 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08040391 | | | ADD: 1001 OKEECHOBEE BLVD | | | CONT: ANDERSON-MOORE | | | TEL: (561)753-7400 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 1STREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A)INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | | COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1B) INFORMATIONAL: PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, | | | PLANS, REPORTS, REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR | | | SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL | | | REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN | | | (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED | | | FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS | | | WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | | | 1C)INFORMATIONAL106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE | | | CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN | | | INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO | | | THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO | | | CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION | | | SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE | | | CITED AS A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR | | | ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | | | 1D ) INFORMATIONAL FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. | | | NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS | | | AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & | | | VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | 1E)INFORMATIONAL: PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST | | | TIME REVIEW) AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO | | | THE 2004 FBC BUILDING WITH THE2007 SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED DECLARATORY STATEMENT | | | REGAURDING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT EXPOSED TO WIND | | | PRESSURES, CONCLUSION OF LAW. CONCLUSIONOF LAW# 5 | | | 1609.1STRUCTURES AND PARTS THEREOF SHALL BE DESIGNED TO | | | WITHSTAND THE MINIMUM WIND LOADS PRESCRIBED HEREIN. THE | | | MAIN BUILDING, AND A/C STAND ARE DESIGNED FOR WIND | | | PRESSURES BUT NO INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE | | | NEW RTU UNIT ( THE CABINET OR SHELL OF THE UNIT) . | | | PLEASE PROVIDE TESTING REPORTS OR AN ENGINEER'S | | | RATIONAL ANYLISIS. NOTE THIS IS TO BE CONSIDERED | | | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING JUST AS A SKYLIGHT, WINDOW OR | | | ROOF HATCH, IF BLOWN OFF OF THE ROOF LEAVING A LARGE | | | HOLE IN THE ROOF ALLOWING PRESSURES TO BUILD WITHIN THE | | | BUILDING WHERE THE BUILDING IS DESIGNED AS A AN | | | ENCLOSED STRUCTURE. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-08-13 |
Time |
07:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-08-13 |
Time |
06:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-13 07:53:56 | | | | | | | TO LUIS OFFICE./WRT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-24 |
Time |
11:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-24 |
Time |
11:15 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-24 11:17:20 | PLANS ROUTED TO BUILDING AS THE THIRD SET DOES NOT | | | CONTAIN ANY BUILDING STAMPS | | 2009-03-24 11:15:18 | ** PLANS REDLINED ** | | | | | | THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM/RISER NEEDS TO BE VERIFIED. THE | | | ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR A LIFE SAFETY/ EMERGENCY | | | TRANSFER SWITCH HOWEVER PER THE ENGINEER MR. LON CARTER | | | AND PER PLANS THERE ARE NO EMERGENCY/ 700 SYSTEMS ON | | | THE BACK UP GENERATOR. THIS NEEDS TO BE VERIFIED AS | | | THIS WILL AFFECT THE SYSTEMS AS SHOWN. | | | NEC 700.9 REQUIRES SYSTEMS TO BE SEPARATED. | | | IF THERE ARE ANY ITEMS SUCH AS EMERGENCY LIGHTING ON | | | THE LEGALLY REQUIRED TRANSFER SWITCH THIS MAKES THIS A | | | 700 SYSTEM. ADJUSTMENTS MAY BE NEEDED AT A LATER DATE. | | | BASED ON PLANS, THERE ARE ONLY 701 AND 702 SYSTEMS ON | | | THE GENERATOR. IT IS IMPORTANT THESE ITEMS BE VERIFIED | | | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-12 |
Time |
17:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-12 |
Time |
17:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-12 17:06:06 | ** DENIED REVIEW ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES. NOT ALL INFORMATION | | | ON WHAT PANELS ARE BEING FED FROM THE 700, 701 AND 702 | | | SYSTEMS. | | | THE EMDP AND ATS IS NOW LABELED AS LEGALLY REQUIRED | | | HOWEVER BASED ON THE STAIRWELL LIGHTING ALONE THESE ARE | | | 700 LOADS WHICH ARE EMERGENCY/LIFE SAFETY LOADS. | | | PLEASE SEE 700.9 AS 700 SYSTEMS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BE | | | WITH 701 SYSTEMS. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE WHAT IS ON ALL PANELS FED FROM ATS-LS. | | | TYPICALLY THE LS DESIGNATION IS FOR LIFE SAFETY NOT | | | LEGALLY REQUIRED. | | | WHAT ARE THE LOADS ON PANELS E-1, E-2 AND E-3. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE PANEL SCHEDULES FOR D1B AND D1A. | | | WHERE ARE THE PANEL SCHEDULES? WHAT LOADS DO THESE | | | PANELS FEED? | | | | | | | | | ** THIS BEING A HIGH RISE BUILDING WHERE ARE THE | | | SYSTEMS SUCH AS EXHAUST FANS, STAIR PRESSURIZATION ETC | | | FED FROM? | | | | | | 408.4, FBC 106.1.1, 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 FOR CLARITY, | | | COORDINATION AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED. | | | | | | *** THERE IS STILL NOT COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW. | | | THERE MAY BE NEW COMMENTS WHICH CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT ** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-26 10:12:40 | ** DENIED** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. THE | | | RISER IS NOT COMPLETE WITH ALL DEFINED LOADS, LOAD | | | SHEDDING, DESIGNATION OF LEGALLY REQUIRED OR OPTIONAL | | | STAND-BY SYSTEMS. | | | BASED ON THE ITEMS LISTED ON PANEL HEQ ALL OF THESE | | | APPEAR TO BE OPTIONAL STAND-BY LOADS. | | | WHAT DOES PANEL D-2 FEED? | | | WHAT ABOUT LOADS ON T8 TRANSFORMER, ARE THESE LEGALLY | | | REQUIRED OR OPTIONAL STAND-BY? | | | THE NEXTEL MAY OR MAY NOT BE LEGALLY REQUIRED DEPENDING | | | ON THE TIME IN WHICH IT WAS INSTALLED. | | | | | | PLEASE SEE DIAGRAM IN 700.9B OF THE 2005 NEC HANDBOOK. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
Time |
08:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
Time |
08:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-28 08:13:06 | | | | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW** | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: NEW NOTE WHICH WAS NOT PART OF THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW. | | | PLEASE SEE NEC 700.9B THE AHU MAY NOT BE FED FROM THE | | | LIFE SAFETY PANEL OR EQUIPMENT. PLEASE KNOW THIS LOAD | | | IS NOT A LIFE SAFETY OR LEGALLY REQUIRED LOAD. PLEASE | | | ADJUST RISER TO INCLUDE EQUIPMENT TO CREATE AN | | | *OPTIONAL STAND-BY* SYSTEM WHICH STILL MAY BE FED FROM | | | THE SAME GENERATOR IF THE LOAD AND SIZE OF GENERATOR | | | PERMITS WITHOUT LOAD SHEDDING. | | | THIS COMMENT WILL SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGE THE CIRCUITING, | | | RISER ETC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-25 10:52:30 | ** DENIED REVIEW ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ADDRESS ON THE MEP PLANS STATE | | | 630 CLEARWATER PARK. PLEASE KNOW THE ADDRESS OF THIS | | | PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK IS 1001 OKEECHOBEE BLVD. PLEASE | | | ADJUST PLANS/TITLE BLOCKS. | | | FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002 *** THIS IS REQUIRED TO | | | BE CORRECTED ON ALL MEP PLANS WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS | | | MADE BY ANY OTHER TRADE. | | | FBC 106.3.5, 106.5 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE RELEVANT CODES ARE STATED | | | ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING WHICH ARE LISTED ON PLANS DO | | | NOT SHOW ANY CODES. | | | NFPA-70 | | | NFPA-101 | | | NFPA-72 | | | | | | | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
Time |
12:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
Time |
12:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-20 12:12:13 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | THE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED; PLAN SHEET M0.1 WAS STAMPED, INITIALED, AND | | | DATED. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
Time |
15:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
Time |
15:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-29 15:36:41 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS PLAN | | | REVIEW STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 1. STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 2. COMBUSTIBLE WASTE MATERIALS, DUST, AND DEBRIS SHALL | | | BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE END OF EACH SHIFT OR | | | MORE FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY FOR SAFE OPERATION. | | | | | | 3. ON THE APPROPIATE "M" SHEET(S), INCLUDE VERBAGE | | | THAT: DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL SHALL INITIATE A | | | GENERAL FIRE ALARM. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-15 |
Time |
16:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-15 |
Time |
15:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-15 16:15:33 | *****PROVISO***** | | | | | | | | | 1. STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 2. COMBUSTIBLE WASTE MATERIALS, DUST, AND DEBRIS SHALL | | | BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE END OF EACH SHIFT OR | | | MORE FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY FOR SAFE OPERATION. | | | | | | 3. ON THE APPROPIATE "M" SHEET(S), INCLUDE VERBAGE | | | THAT: DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL SHALL INITIATE A | | | GENERAL FIRE ALARM. | | | | | | | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW WILL BE APPROVED ( P STATUS IN THE | | | SYSTEM) WHEN THE ABOVE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-05-04 |
Time |
16:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-05-04 |
Time |
16:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-04 16:36:04 | TRACPIPE SUBMITTALS OK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
Time |
08:57 |
Rev Time |
1.30 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
Time |
08:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-09 09:09:51 | ****************PROVISO**************** | | | SHEET P2.1 GAS PLAN IS COMPLIANT, HOWEVER TWO COPIES OF | | | MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATION SHEETS (THREE COPIES REQUIRED | | | IF THIS IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING WITH A THRESHOLD | | | INSPECTOR) OF THE VENMAR OARTU-1 UNIT ARE REQUIRED AT | | | THE TIME OF GAS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REVIEW BEFORE | | | THE GAS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. MANUFACTURE | | | SPECIFICATION SHEETS SHALL CLEARLY INDICATE THE UNITS | | | MAKE, MODEL NUMBER, GAS BTU LOAD CAPACITY, AND A | | | LISTING FROM A NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY | | | SUCH AS AGA, CSA, OR UL. | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
Time |
16:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-18 16:38:20 | GAS PLAN REVIEW: | | | DENIED: | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES WITH | | | 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO | | | CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.). | | | | | | NOTE: SHEET M0.2, M.2.3, AND P2.1 ARE INDICATING 1" | | | NATURAL GAS TO THE OARTU-1 CHILLED WATER UNIT. | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | GAS PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 1. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE. PER FBC FUEL GAS SECTION 401.1 SCOPE. | | | | | | 2. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH | | | NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL | | | TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE BEING USED. PER FBC FUEL GAS | | | SECTION 401.1 SCOPE. | | | | | | 3. CLEARLY INDICATE THE TYPE OF GAS, (LP OR NATURAL) | | | ON THE GAS ISOMETRIC. PER FBC FUEL GAS SECTION 401.1 | | | SCOPE. | | | | | | 4. BTU LOAD OF EACH APPLIANCE AND THE | | | TOTAL BTU LOAD ON THE SYSTEM. REFER TO | | | THE FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SECS. 401.8 | | | THRU 402.6.1 AND TABLES 402.4(1) THRU | | | 402.4(33). | | | *NOTE: THIS INCLUDES THE EXISTING NATURAL GAS SYSTEM | | | IN THE KITCHEN THAT THE NEW PROPOSED OARTU-1 UNIT IS | | | CONNECTING TO. | | | | | | 5. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). | | | *NOTE: THIS INCLUDES THE EXISTING NATURAL GAS SYSTEM | | | IN THE KITCHEN THAT THE NEW PROPOSED OARTU-1 UNIT IS | | | CONNECTING TO. | | | | | | 6. INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | | PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. | | | NOTE: IF NATURAL GAS DELIVERY PRESSURE IS 2 PSI OR | | | MORE PLEASE PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE MP REGULATOR | | | MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS THAT CLEARLY INDICATE THE | | | MAKE MODEL NUMBER, BTU LOAD CAPACITY, AND A LISTING | | | FROM A NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY. | | | | | | 7. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. | | | *NOTE: PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF MANUFACTURER'S | | | SPECIFICATION SHEETS OF THE NEW CHILLED WATER OARTU-1 | | | UNIT THAT CLEARLY INDICATE THE MAKE, MODEL NUMBER, BTU | | | CAPCITY, AND A LISTING FROM A NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED | | | TESTING LABORATORY. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION | | | AND REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | PHONE= (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX= (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL= [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
Time |
14:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-01 |
Time |
14:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-01 14:07:18 | SENT TO RREGUEIRO. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-08-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-12 |
Time |
08:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-12 |
Time |
08:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-12 08:42:02 | GAVE TO DEWEY |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-24 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-22 |
Time |
13:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
swurafti |
Date |
2009-04-20 |
Time |
16:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
swurafti |
Date |
2009-04-20 |
Time |
16:44 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-16 |
Time |
10:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-16 |
Time |
10:07 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-16 10:08:05 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
Time |
11:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
Time |
11:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-23 11:19:07 | TO "COMM" BD#35 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-05 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-05 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-05 15:44:25 | TO "COMM" BD#8 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
12:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
12:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-02 12:59:46 | TO "COMM" BD#60 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-15 |
Time |
15:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-15 |
Time |
15:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-15 15:14:39 | TO "COMM" BD#46 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-15 |
Time |
15:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-15 |
Time |
15:40 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-15 15:43:44 | **PROVISO** | | | | | | NEW VAV BOXES SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE FOR SERVICE, | | | MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT WITHOUT REMOVAL OF OTHER | | | PERMANENTLY INSTALLED EQUIPMENT OR ELEMENTS OF | | | PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M 306.1. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-21 |
Time |
17:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-21 |
Time |
17:09 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-11 |
Time |
12:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-11 |
Time |
12:16 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-11 12:18:41 | REVIEW #: 3RD | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | MECHANICAL REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN FAIL STATUS PENDING | | | COMPLETED PASSED REVIEW OF WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR | | | OARTU1 BY BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-10-25 |
Time |
15:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-10-25 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-25 15:47:02 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCIES REMAIN AND SHALL BE | | | ADDRESSED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE: | | | | | | 1. ADDRESS BUILDING PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS RELATED TO | | | WIND LOAD ANALYSIS FOR OARTU-1. | | | | | | 2. NO LETTER WAS INCLUDED WITH THIS SUBMISSION FROM | | | TRANE REGARDING THEIR ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROPOSED | | | REDUCED CLEARANCES FOR SERVICE AND REPLACEMENT OF | | | COOLING COILS. ONCE SAID LETTER (TWO COPIES) IS | | | PROVIDED, A PROVISO WILL BE ISSUED REQUIRING FIELD | | | VERIFICATION BY MECHANICAL INSPECTOR THAT SUFFICIENT | | | SPACE EXISTS FOR PROPER SERVICE. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-01 |
Time |
09:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-29 |
Time |
18:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-01 09:05:36 | REVIEW #: 1ST | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THESE COMMENTS ARE NOT NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS UNDER PERMIT #07030368 | | | | | | 1. PAGE S-1 SHOWS THE RTU BEING WELDED TO THE ROOF | | | CURB. THIS APPLIANCE SHALL BE ABLE TO BE REPLACED | | | WITHOUT REMOVING ELEMENTS OF PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 306.1. WELDING THIS APPLIANCE IN | | | PLACE WOULD CONSTITUTE PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION. SHOW HOW | | | THIS APPLIANCE IS TO BE ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING | | | STRUCTURE IN A WAY WHICH STILL ALLOWS FOR SERVICE AND | | | REPLACEMENT WHILE MEETING WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. | | | | | | 2. PAGE S-2 SHOWS WIND LOAD DESIGN FOR THE BUILDING AND | | | ATTACHMENTS OF CURB AND RTU TO THE STRUCTURE BUT NO | | | INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED REGARDING DESIGN OF THE RTU TO | | | WITHSTAND ANTICIPATED WIND PRESSURES. APPLIANCES | | | EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESIST ANTICIPATED | | | WIND LOADS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. PLEASE | | | NOTICE THAT THIS APPLIES TO THE APPLIANCE ITSELF AND | | | NOT JUST ATTACHMENTS TO THE STRUCTURE. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THIS APPLIANCE IS DESIGNED TO | | | WITHSTAND WIND PRESSURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB | | | 1609.1. | | | | | | 3. PAGE M.4.1: GENERAL NOTE #5 ON THIS PAGE APPEARS TO | | | BE IN CONFLICT WITH GENERAL NOTE #3 ON PAGES M.1.1 AND | | | M.1.2. PLEASE COORDINATE NOTES AND PAGES. ALSO, NO | | | INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND ON STRUCTURAL PLANS | | | REGARDING NEW 92X52 ROOF ACCESS OPENING. PROVIDE | | | STRUCTURAL DETAIL WITH ALL RELEVANT WIND RESISTANCE | | | DOCUMENTATION FOR BUILDING PLAN REVIEW. | | | | | | 4. PAGE M6.1: THE ROOF CURB DETAIL IS IN CONFLICT WITH | | | STRUCTURAL DETAILS. PLEASE SEE COMMENT #1 ABOVE AND | | | COORDINATE WITH FUTURE STRUCTURAL DETAIL. | | | | | | 5. PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW COMMENT(S) #3 UNDER PERMIT | | | #07030368 HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | FIRST REVIEW: M4.1 PLEASE SEE MANUFACTURER'S | | | INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | SERVICE ACCESS PER FBC.M 304.1,304.2. EXAMPLE: AHU 3, | | | AHU 12 BOTH REQUIRE MIN. 71" ON COIL CONNECTION SIDE OF | | | UNIT AND 24" MIN. ON OPPOSITE SIDE. PLAN SHOWS APPROX. | | | 48" ON COIL SIDE AND 12" ON OPPOSITE SIDE FOR AHU 12. | | | THIS UNIT, ONCE IN PLACE, WOULD NOT BE SERVICEABLE. | | | MINIMUM SERVICE CLEARANCE FROM ELEMENTS OF PERMANENT | | | CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING OTHER INSTALLED EQUIPMENT, IS | | | REQUIRED PER FBC,M 306.1. | | | | | | SECOND REVIEW: REGARDING LETTER FROM TRANE; THIS LETTER | | | IS ACCEPTABLE. HOWEVER, PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, TWO | | | COPIES OF THIS LETTER WITH ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL | | | OF THE TRANE ENGINEER IS REQUIRED. ALSO, APPROVAL OF | | | THE CLEARANCES WILL BE CONDITIONAL PENDING SATISFACTORY | | | DEMONSTRATION TO THE FIELD INSPECTOR THAT THE COILS ARE | | | IN FACT ABLE TO BE REPLACED AND THE EQUIPMENT IS IN | | | FACT ABLE TO BE FULLY SERVICED UNDER ACTUAL FIELD | | | CONDITIONS. THIS WILL BE A PROVISO IF AND WHEN PERMIT | | | IS APPLIED FOR AND ISSUED. | | | | | | ***NO LETTER FROM TRANE WAS FOUND IN THIS SUBMITTAL | | | PACKAGE. PROVIDE TWO COPIES AS REQUESTED IN PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW. THIS WILL FACILITATE PERMIT ISSUANCE WITH | | | PROVISO PENDING FIELD VERIFICATION OF SERVICEABILITY OF | | | AIR HANDLERS AS INSTALLED. FBCM 306.1. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE CORRECT THE ADDRESS ON MECHANICAL AND | | | ELECTRICAL PAGES TO CORRESPOND WITH THE ADDRESS ON THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
Time |
08:49 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
Time |
08:49 |
Sent To |
G |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-09 08:56:17 | ****************PROVISO**************** | | | INFORMATION ONLY, REVISION NOT REQUIRED. PER FBC-2004 | | | PLUMBING TABLE 308.5 HANGER SPACING: IF CONDENSTE | | | PIPING IS PVC PIPE THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL SPACING SHALL | | | BE 4 FEET. | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
Time |
16:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
G |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-18 16:05:53 | NOTE: PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW HAS PASSED, HOWEVER | | | SIGNATURE STAMP WILL NOT BE PLACED UNTIL GAS PLAN | | | REVIEW ISSUES ARE RESOLVED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2009-01-30 |
Time |
08:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2009-01-30 |
Time |
08:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-12-09 |
Time |
10:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-12-09 |
Time |
10:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-10-03 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-10-03 |
Time |
10:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-03 10:57:23 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED | | | | | | ** HVAC REPLACEMENT ONLY | | | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
astelly |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
Time |
16:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
astelly |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
Time |
16:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-25 16:18:12 | AMY STELLY | | | URBAN DESIGN | | | 822-1440 | | | | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING LOCATION OF PROPOSED | | | WORK. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE DRAWINGS SHOWING SCREENING FOR THE | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. | | | SCREENING MUST BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE WITH | | | EXISTING STRUCTURE. |
|
|
