| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08030072 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
08:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
08:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-11 08:40:39 | THE WORK IS DONE AT THE UNIT WITH THE SITE ADDRESS OF | | | 2401 N DIXIE HWY ,THEREFORE THE PERMIT IS ATTACHED TO | | | THIS ADDRESS. | | | | | | LACRAMIOARA URSU, MA ,GISP | | | MIS - GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | OFFICE:822-1239 | | | FAX: 822-1249 | | | E-MAIL:[email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
Time |
13:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
Time |
13:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-24 13:54:40 | THE SITE ADDRESS OF 2401 N DIXIE HWY MUST BE DEPICTED | | | ON THE TITLE BLOCK OF EACH SHEET REPRESENTING THE NEW | | | UNIT . | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS: | | | LACRAMIOARA URSU | | | MIS - GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | OFFICE:822-1239 | | | FAX: 822-1249 | | | E-MAIL:[email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2008-03-19 |
Time |
15:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2008-03-18 |
Time |
08:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-19 16:00:20 | THE SITE ADDRESS ON THE APPLICATION READS 2401-2405 N | | | DIXIE HWY , HOWEVER THE PCN = 74434309050520010 IS | | | LISTED IN CITY RECORDS AS 2409 N DIXIE HWY . IF A | | | COMBINATION OF TWO UNITS WILL BECOME ONE UNIT THEN THE | | | REVISEDPLANS MUST DEPICT THE ADDRESS RANGE OF | | | 2405-2409 N DIXIE HWY .PLEASE CALL FOR QUESTIONS. | | | | | | LACRAMIOARA URSU | | | MIS - GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | OFFICE:822-1239 | | | FAX: 822-1249 | | | E-MAIL:[email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-27 |
Time |
09:48 |
Rev Time |
1.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-27 |
Time |
09:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-27 09:49:56 | STAMP PLANS ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL REVISIONS | | | STAMPED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-27 |
Time |
09:48 |
Rev Time |
0.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
Time |
14:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-09 14:32:53 | PLAN REVISIONS APPEAR TO BE CODE COMPLIANT, IN RECEIPT | | | OF ENGINEERING LETTER FROM TABIO ENGINEERING CORP | | | DELEGATING AND REVIEWING AN INDEPENDENT ENGINEER TOMMY | | | TAVERAS-OK | | | ISSUE AT HAND IS ENGINEERING LETTER FROM SW ENGINEERING | | | HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY TABIO ENGINEERING. FAXED A | | | COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT TO TABIO ENGINEERING, CALLED THE | | | FIRM BUT WAS ONLY ABLE TO LEAVE A MESSAGE. THEN TRIED | | | CALLINF THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD DAVID SER AND WAS ABLE | | | TO LEAVE A MESSAGE WITH EITHER RECEPTIONIST OR | | | ANSWERING SERVICE. THURS PM DAVID SER DID RETURN MY | | | TELEPHONE CALL, I EXPLAINED THE NEED OF ANOTHER LETTER | | | FROM TABIO ENGINEERING COVERING THE WORK BROUGHT IN BY | | | SW ENGINEERING. MR SER INDICATED THAT HE WOULD WORK ON | | | THIS ISSUE RIGHT AWAY. I AM AWAITNG THE RAISED SIGNED & | | | SEALED LETTER FROM TABIO ENGINEERING TO BE ABLE TO PASS | | | ALL DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-06 |
Time |
16:03 |
Rev Time |
1.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-06 |
Time |
16:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-06 16:37:18 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08030072 | | | ADD: 2401-2405 N DIXIE HWY | | | CONT: PLAN REVIEW | | | TEL: (954)253-1716 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVISION REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) THE COVERSHEET OF THE ISSUED PLANS INDICATES THE | | | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD AS TABIO ENGINEERING | | | CORP. THE NEW S-1 SHEET IS DESIGNED BY TOMMY TAVERAS | | | P.E. A DIFFERENT ENGINEER FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, | | | IS MR. TAVERAS TAKING OVER THE PROJECT AS THE | | | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. PLEASE REVIEW FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-27.001. | | | 61G15-27.001 PROCEDURES FOR A SUCCESSOR PROFESSIONAL | | | ENGINEER ADOPTING AS HIS OWN THE WORK OF ANOTHER | | | ENGINEER. | | | (1) A SUCCESSOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SEEKING TO REUSE | | | ALREADY SEALED CONTRACT DOCUMENTS UNDER THE SUCCESSOR | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S SEAL MUST BE ABLE TO DOCUMENT | | | AND PRODUCE UPON REQUEST EVIDENCE THAT HE HAS IN FACT | | | RECREATED ALL THE WORK DONE BY THE ORIGINAL | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. IN OTHER WORDS, CALCULATIONS, | | | SITE VISITS, RESEARCH AND THE LIKE MUST BE DOCUMENTED | | | AND PRODUCEABLE UPON DEMAND. FURTHER, THE SUCCESSOR | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER MUST TAKE ALL PROFESSIONAL AND | | | LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DOCUMENTS WHICH HE SEALED | | | AND SIGNED AND CAN IN NO WAY EXEMPT HIMSELF FROM SUCH | | | FULL RESPONSIBILITY. PLANS NEED NOT BE REDRAWN BY THE | | | SUCCESSOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER; HOWEVER, JUSTIFICATION | | | FOR SUCH ACTION MUST BE AVAILABLE THROUGH WELL KEPT AND | | | COMPLETE DOCUMENTATION ON THE PART OF THE SUCCESSOR | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AS TO HIS HAVING RETHOUGHT AND | | | REWORKED THE ENTIRE DESIGN PROCESS. A SUCCESSOR | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER MUST USE HIS OWN TITLE BLOCK, | | | SEAL AND SIGNATURE AND MUST REMOVE THE TITLE BLOCK, | | | SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE ORIGINAL PROFESSIONAL | | | ENGINEER BEFORE REUSING ANY SEALED CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. | | | (2) PRIOR TO SEALING AND SIGNING WORK A SUCCESSOR | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO NOTIFY THE | | | ORIGINAL PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, HIS SUCCESSORS, OR | | | ASSIGNS BY CERTIFIED LETTER TO THE LAST KNOWN ADDRESS | | | OF THE ORIGINAL PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF THE | | | SUCCESSOR'S INTENTION TO USE OR REUSE THE ORIGINAL | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S WORK. THE SUCCESSOR | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER WILL TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR | | | THE DRAWING AS THOUGH THEY WERE THE SUCCESSOR | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL PRODUCT. | | | SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 471.033(2) FS. LAW IMPLEMENTED | | | 471.033(1)(J), 471.005(6) FS. HISTORY???NEW 8-25-87, | | | AMENDED 4-21-88, 8-3-88, FORMERLY 21H-27.001. | | | | | | 2) THIS COMMENT IS A CROSS-OVER BETWEEN THE STRUCTURAL | | | REQUIREMENTS IN 1609.6.2.2 COMPONENTS AND CLADDING AND | | | SECTION 301. 13WIND RESISTANCE OF THE 2004 FBC | | | MECHANICAL CODE, REQUIRING SUFFICENT INFORMATION TO | | | DETERMINE IF THE ROOF TOP AIR HANDLER WILL HOLD | | | TOGETHER AND STAY IN PLACE IN A HIGH WIND EVENT. THE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS THAT WERE ISSUED INDICATES THE USE OF | | | RHEEM ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT BUT THE | | | UNIT REVIEWED BY YURASEK CONSULTANTS INDICATES A | | | DIFFERENT UNIT A TEMPSTAR PAE 090. WE DO NOT HAVE ANY | | | CUT SHEETS OR INFORMATION ON THIS UNIT NOR WERE THER | | | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED BY YURASEK FOR REVIEW BY THIS | | | OFFICE. INREGARDS TO IF THIS REQUIREMENT WAS ADOPTED BY | | | THE COUNTY I BELIEVE YOU MEAN TO SAY THE CITYS | | | CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEAL AND RULING, | | | IT WAS OVERTURNED AT THE STATE LEVEL, THE MECHANICAL | | | REVIEWER WILL ELABORATE MORE ON THIS MATTER. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | MEMBER OF BOAF, THE BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF | | | FLORIDA: PROTECTING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. UNDER FLORIDA STATE STATUTE SB 80, E-MAIL | | | ADDRESSES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO | | | OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE | | | PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. | | | YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE THEREFORE SUBJECT TO | | | PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
Time |
15:26 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
Time |
15:26 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2008-07-18 |
Time |
15:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2008-07-18 |
Time |
15:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-18 15:49:15 | BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | #6 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW IS COMPLIED WITH. | | | | | | #8 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW IS STILL REQUIRED, PLEASE CARRY | | | PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE OFFICE FOR THEIR | | | REVIEW AND PROVIDE A LICENSED CONTRACTOR FOR BUILDING | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | THANK YOU, | | | LUIS MARTINEZ | | | 561-805-6710 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
Time |
14:40 |
Rev Time |
1.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
Time |
14:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-06 14:44:01 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08030072 | | | ADD: 2401-2405 N DIXIE HWY | | | CONT: PLAN REVIEW | | | TEL: (954)253-1716 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1-5) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 6) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET A6 & A7 DO NOT PROVIDE WHERE THE | | | CEILING OR ROOF INSULATION WILL BE IN THE SECTION OF | | | BUILDING WITH THE HIGHER FLAT ROOF? 13-404.1.ABC.1 | | | RESPONCE INDICATED THIS IS A HISTORIC BUILDING. | | | CURRENTLY THIS BUILDING IS NOT DESIGNATED AS A | | | HISTORICAL LANDMARK AND WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE | | | ENERGY CODE. | | | | | | 7) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 8) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
Time |
14:21 |
Rev Time |
4.44 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
Time |
14:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-10 15:34:51 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08030072 | | | ADD: 2401-2405 N DIXIE HWY | | | CONT:PLAN REVIEW | | | TEL: (954)253-1716 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A)INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | | COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1B) INFORMATIONAL: PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, | | | PLANS, REPORTS, REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR | | | SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL | | | REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN | | | (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED | | | FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS | | | WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | | | 1C)INFORMATIONAL106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE | | | CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN | | | INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO | | | THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO | | | CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION | | | SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE | | | CITED AS A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR | | | ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | | | 1D ) INFORMATIONAL FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. | | | NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS | | | AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & | | | VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | 1E)INFORMATIONAL: PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST | | | TIME REVIEW) AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO | | | THE 2004 FBC BUILDING WITH THE2007 SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | | | 2)110.2* W. P. B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, INFORMATION | | | THAT IS REQUIRED FOR RECORD KEEPING & FOR CERTIFICATE | | | OF OCCUPANCY: | | | A) THE EDITION OFTHE CODE UNDER WHICH THE PROJECT IS | | | DESIGNED. | | | NOTE THE 2004 FBC W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS AND 2004 | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE ARE BOTH TO BE USED IN DESIGN | | | FOR REMODELING. | | | PROVIDE WHAT LEVEL OF ALTERATION TO BE COMPLETED | | | UNDER THIS PERMIT. EXXISTING BUILDING CODE 301.5. B) | | | THE USE AND OCCUPANCY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3. | | | C) THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION AS DEFINEDIN CHAPTER 6, | | | TABLE 601. | | | | | | 3)PLEASE SEE THE EXIT CORRIDOR THAT IS SHARED BY BOTH | | | TENANTS AND SECTION 605.1 IN THE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE. THE DOORWAY FROM THE UNIT BEING REMODELED SWINGS | | | INTO THE EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR AND LEAVES LESS THAN THE | | | REQUIRED 18". | | | 1008.1.8.8 | | | DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR IN A MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL | | | LEAVE UNOBSTRUCTED AT LEAST ONE HALF OF THE REQUIRED | | | WIDTH OF AN AISLE, CORRIDOR, PASSAGEWAY, OR LANDING, | | | NOR PROJECT MORE THAN 7 INCHES (178 MM) INTO THE | | | REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, CORRIDOR, PASSAGEWAY OR | | | LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN. DOORS SHALL NOT OPEN | | | IMMEDIATELY ONTO A STAIR WITHOUT A LANDING. THE LANDING | | | SHALL HAVE A WIDTH AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE WIDTH OF THE | | | DOOR. | | | | | | 4) A-4 ALSO INDICATES TWO DOORS B & C. | | | | | | 4A) DOOR TYPE B IS A PAIR OF DOORS REQUIRING A CLEAR | | | WIDTH OF 32". 1008.1.1 SIZE OF DOORS. | | | THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF EACH DOOR OPENING SHALL BE | | | SUFFICIENT FOR THE OCCUPANT LOAD THEREOF AND SHALL | | | PROVIDE A CLEAR WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN 32 INCHES (813 | | | MM). CLEAR OPENINGS OF DOORWAYS WITH SWINGING DOORS | | | SHALL BE MEASURED BETWEEN THE FACE OF THE DOOR AND THE | | | STOP, WITH THE DOOR OPEN 90 DEGREES (1.57 RAD). WHERE | | | THIS SECTION REQUIRES A MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH OF 32 | | | INCHES (813 MM) AND A DOOR OPENING INCLUDES TWO DOOR | | | LEAVES WITHOUT A MULLION, ONE LEAF SHALL PROVIDE A | | | CLEAR OPENING WIDTH OF 32 INCHES (813 MM). THE MAXIMUM | | | WIDTH OF A SWINGING DOOR LEAF SHALL BE 48 INCHES (1219 | | | MM) NOMINAL. MEANS OF EGRESS DOORS IN AN OCCUPANCY IN | | | GROUP I-2 USED FOR THE MOVEMENT OF BEDS SHALL PROVIDE A | | | CLEAR WIDTH NOT LESS THAN 41? INCHES (1054 MM). THE | | | HEIGHT OF DOORS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 80 INCHES (2032 | | | MM). 11-4.13.4. DOUBLE LEAF DOORS. | | | | | | 4B) DOOR C IN THE DEMO PLAN WAS AN OPENING OF 4'-0" YOU | | | CAN'T REDUCE OPENINGS TO WHERE THEY ARE NOT CODE | | | COMPLIANT. THE MINIMUMDOOR OPENING SIZE WOULD BE A | | | 2'-10" LEAVING A 32" | | | OPENING. FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE 606.1 A | | | BUILDING ELEMENT THAT IS ALTERED SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. 11-4.13.5. | | | | | | 5) SHEET A-6 INDICATES A NEW A/C ROOF TOP UNIT, PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A CURB DETAIL AND ANCHORAGE AGAINST OVER | | | TURNING AND SLIDDING. 1609.1.3. | | | | | | 6) SHEET A6 & A7 DO NOT PROVIDE WHERE THE CEILING OR | | | ROOF INSULATION WILL BE IN THE SECTION OF BUILDING WITH | | | THE HIGHER FLAT ROOF? 13-404.1.ABC.1 | | | | | | 7) SHEET A-25 IS LABELED AS A PROPOSED "SECOND FLOOR" | | | ACCESSIBILITY PLAN, IS THERE A SECOND FLOOR? 106.1.2 | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 8)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
Time |
16:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
Time |
16:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-24 16:35:07 | E-3 OK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-14 |
Time |
16:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-14 |
Time |
16:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-14 16:16:30 | ** DENIED/PASSED** | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: SHEET E-5 OK AND STAMPED. ALL ELECTRICAL | | | SHEETS WERE PLACED IN ONE ROLL WHEN SUBMITTED. TWO | | | COPIES NEED TO GO BACK TO CONTRACTOR. | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE BE SURE TO PLACE SHEETS | | | IN SEPARATE ROLLS/SETS. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: CALLED AND SPOKE TO ENGINEER. FIXTURE *I* | | | MISSING FROM FIXTURE LEGEND AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | FIXTURES *J* WERE PLACED IN CALCULATIONS BASED ON THE | | | CFL BULB WATTAGE WHEN 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 REQUIRES | | | THE RATING OF THE FIXTURE. PLEASE ADJUST CALCULATIONS | | | AND PLANS. | | | THIS WAS GONE OVER ON THE PHONE WITH ENGINEER. THIS | | | WILL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND FIXTURE *I* WILL BE | | | STATED. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
Time |
14:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
Time |
14:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-20 14:38:20 | ** DENIED REVIEW ** | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SHEET E-3. ALL OF THE MANUFACTURE | | | INFORMATION FOR THE LIGHTING FIXTURES HAS BEEN REMOVED. | | | THE REVISION IN THE TITLE BLOCK STATES *AS-BUILT*. | | | HOWEVER REVISIONS FOR THE FINAL INSPECTIONS OF A | | | PROJECT WOULD NOT REMOVE INFORMATION. IT MAY CHANGE OR | | | BE REVISED BASED ON A DIFFERENT MANUFACTURE HOWEVER THE | | | INFORMATION ON THE FINAL RECORD SETS OF PLANS WOULD NOT | | | BE REMOVED. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2,13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. | | | SINCE THE CODE REQUIRES THE VA/ WATTAGES TO BE USED ARE | | | BASED ON THE FIXTURE BALLAST RATINGS ETC AND NOT THE | | | BULB WATTAGE THE SPECIFIC FIXTURES NEED TO BE LISTED TO | | | VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT THE FACT THE MINIMUM LIGHTING | | | PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS WHICH WERE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN ON | | | E-3 WERE ALSO COMPLETELY REMOVED. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: RISER DIAGRAM IS NOW COMPLETELY REVISED | | | SHOWING A NEW SERVICE TO BE GRANTED BY *SPECIAL | | | PERMISSION*. | | | THIS SERVICE IS NOT GRANTED BY 230.2. NO CONTACT TO | | | THIS OFFICE/REVIEWER HAS BEEN MADE TO GO OVER ANY OF | | | THESE CHANGES OR PROPOSALS TO DATE. THE SPECIAL | | | PERMISSION DEFINITIONS IS NOT GRANTED AND NO ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION WAS PROVIDE OR SHOWN FOR CONSIDERATIONS. | | | SERVICES ARE NOT GRANTED WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION. | | | THIS WAS IN THE ORIGINAL COMMENTS FROM MARCH 2008 AND | | | INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED AT THAT TIME EITHER. THE | | | SERVICE WAS REVISED FOR PERMITTING FROM THE SERVICE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-06 |
Time |
11:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-06 |
Time |
11:35 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-06 11:41:54 | PLANS ROUTED TO LUIS MARTINEZ'S OFFICE FOR REVIEW AND | | | PROCESSING. | | | | | | NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ON AUG 5TH ARE OK FOR | | | ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
11:44 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-01 13:04:53 | ** NOTE ADDED | | | | | | SPOKE TO JOHN FROM T&F 12:57PM ON 8/1/08HE WILL BRING | | | IN CALCULATIONS ON MONDAY THE 7TH SO THEY MAY BE | | | REVIEWED. | | 2008-08-01 11:49:48 | ** TEMP DENIED *** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: NO NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ONLY THE | | | OLD ARE IN PACKAGE. CALLED JOHN FROM T&F CONTRACTORS TO | | | HAVE THE CALCULATIONS BROUGHT IN TOBE REVIEWED. | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS ARE OK HOWEVER STILL NEED TO REVIEW | | | CALCULATIONS FOR *MINIMUM* CODE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2. | | | CONTRACTOR SAID ON PHONE HE WILL CALL BACK AS HE WAS IN | | | A MEETING AND COULD NOT TALK. ROUTED TO OTHER TRADES | | | FOR THEIR FINAL REVIEW/STAMPING AND PROCESSING OF | | | PLANS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-17 |
Time |
14:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-17 |
Time |
14:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-17 14:03:18 | ** DENIEDRE-SUB FOR PLAN REVIEW ONLY** | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLANS HAVE STILL ONLY BEEN SUBMITTED FOR PLAN | | | REVIEW AND HAVE NOT YET BEEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THIS IS THE FIRST TIME ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.THIS | | | REVIEWER HAS CALLED ENGINEER OF RECORD AND GONE OVER | | | ITEMS. NOTES WERE BEING TYPED AT THE TIME OF | | | CONVERSATION WITH THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE IN | | | NEED OF REVISING TO MEET COMPLIANCE WITH FBC | | | 13-400.3.B, 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1 AND .1.2. PLEASE | | | SEE THE ELECTRICAL PLANS CONTAIN LIGHTING FIXTURES | | | WHICH ARE NOT IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT. THE INPUT DATA | | | REPORT WILL BE NOTED AS IDR FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS | | | COMMENT. | | | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS AS THE LIGHTING PERFORMANCE | | | CALCULATIONS SHOWN DO NOT COORDINATE WITH THE SUBMITTED | | | CALCULATIONS. THE LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS ON | | | PLANS DO NOT NEED TO BE THERE IF COMPLIANCE IS GOING TO | | | BE SHOWN IN THE METHOD *B* CALCULATIONS. | | | ** SOME EXAMPLES OF THESE ARE GIVEN BELOW. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLANS SHOW A TOTAL OF 20 108W FIXTURES YET THE IDR ONLY | | | CONTAINS 17 OF THESE. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE *J* AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND ON | | | FIXTURE LEGEND IS A 26WATT FIXTURE. PLANS SHOW 4 OF | | | THESE AND YET THE IDR DO NOT SHOW ANY 26WATT FIXTURES. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE SEE PLANS INDICATE *L* FIXTURES WHICH ARE SHOWN | | | AS 50W FIXTURES YET THE IDR DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY 50WATT | | | FIXTURES. | | | | | | ** PLEASE COORDINATE ALL OF THE ABOVE. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
09:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
09:05 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-11 09:06:02 | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** THIS PROJECT IS STILL ONLY SUBMITTED FOR *PLAN | | | REVIEW* ONLY AND IS NOT SUBMITTED UNDER PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL SOME ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW WHICH ARE IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. THERE ARE ALSO | | | NEW COMMENTS BASED ON REVISED PLANS/RISER NOW SHOWN AND | | | INFORMATION WHICH WAS NOT ON PREVIOUS PLANS. | | | | | | ** IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND AS THERE ARE ITEMS NOT | | | IN DESIGN YET AT THIS TIME OR SHOWN ON PLANS, NEW | | | COMMENTS MAY BE GENERATE WHICH CAN NOT POSSIBLY BE MADE | | | AT THIS TIME. REVIEWS ARE DONE BASED ON PLANS | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMPLIANCE FOR LIGHTING CONTROLS | | | STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. PLEASE SEE | | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. | | | SECTION 13-415.1.ABC.1.4 WILL APPLY FOR ANY OUTSIDE | | | LIGHTING. | | | PLEASE SEE SECTIONS OF CODES NOTED ABOVE WITH RESPECT | | | TO INTERIOR LIGHTING. THE PLANS CAME BACK WITH A | | | LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL/TIME CLOCK AND THE RESPONSE | | | MENTIONS MANUAL CONTROLS ARE SHOWN BY SWITCHES IN | | | SEPARATE SPACES. THE SEPARATE SPACE CONTROLS ARE | | | REQUIRED TO OVER RIDE ANY TIME OF DAY SCHEDULING AND | | | ARE ALSO LIMITED IN THE TIME OF THE OVER RIDES. | | | STANDARD SWITCHES SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE. AS | | | SHOWN ON PLANS, IF AN OCCUPANT TURNS A LIGHT SWITCH ON | | | IN ANY ROOM IN *OUT OF BUSINESS HOURS* THE LIGHTING | | | WOULD REMAIN ON INDEFINITELY. AUTOMATED CONTROLS FOR | | | *ALL* LIGHTING WITHIN THIS BUILDING IS REQUIRED | | | INCLUDING THAT OF SEPARATE SPACES TO OVER-RIDE TIME OF | | | DAY SCHEDULING AS NOTED. | | | AS NOT SYSTEM, DEVICES ETC WERE SHOWN IN DESIGN A FULL | | | REVIEW OF SEVERAL ITEMS COULD NOT BE DONE AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | ** AS NOTED ABOVE, OUTSIDE LIGHTING IN PARKING LOTS, | | | DECORATIVE ETC OF ANY KIND WHICH WILL BE FED ON THIS | | | PROPERTY SHALL HAVE LIGHTING CONTROLS. | | | PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE MINIMUM LIGHTING REQUIRED IN | | | PARKING LOTS UNDER ZONING REQUIREMENTS IN DEFINED AREAS | | | OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. | | | IF THERE IS EXISTING LIGHTING IN PARKING LOT AT THIS | | | TIME WHICH ARE FED FROM PANELS, PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE | | | SECTION AS NOTED ABOVE FOR OUTDOOR LIGHTING. | | | ** AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW ** | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE REQUIREMENTS FOR LIGHTING | | | PERFORMANCE DOES NOT MEET FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR | | | ENERGY EFFICIENCIES. PLEASE SEE 13-415.2, | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3. | | | THE RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE LIGHTING CALCULATIONS | | | SHOWN ON PLANS. THE REVIEW OF THESE CALCULATIONS SHOWS | | | THE MINIMUM DESIGN EXCEEDING THE ALLOWANCES BY THE | | | CODE. THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS WHICH WILL BE NOTED | | | BELOW. | | | **AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW** | | | | | | A) MAY NOT USE RETAIL AS THE OCCUPANCY AS STATED IN | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND NFPA-101 STATES THIS IS | | | BUSINESS OCCUPANCY. THEREFORE THE ALLOWANCES SHOWN IN | | | TABLES MUST ONLY USE OFFICE. | | | THIS APPLIES TO MOST AREAS ON PLANS WHICH SHOWS *SALES | | | AREAS* AS THE ALLOWED USE. ONE EXAMPLE OF AN AREA WHICH | | | CAN NOT BE *SALES AREA* IS THE *CHANGING ROOM*. THIS IS | | | ONLY ONE EXAMPLES AS MOST OF THE AREAS NOTED AS SALES | | | AREAS ARE JUST NOT SALES AREAS. THE CLOSET AS SHOWN IS | | | NOT CONSIDERED *ACTIVE STORAGE* BASED ON USE SHOWN ON | | | PLANS. | | | THE CODE IS CLEAR FOR USE AND OCCUPANCIES. PLEASE KNOW | | | AS INFORMATIONAL USE, MAY NOT USE 3.9 WATTS PER SQ FT | | | AS FIGURED IN TABLE. THIS OCCUPANCY AND USE IS NOT | | | INCLUDED. | | | THESE ARE ONLY A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES. | | | | | | B) THE ALLOWANCES SHOWN ON PLANS FOR DECORATIVE | | | LIGHTING ALSO EXCEED TABLES AND EXCEPTIONS TO TABLES. | | | THE ALLOWANCE FOR DECORATIVE LIGHTING ABOVE THE GENERAL | | | LIGHTING IS ONLY 1W PER SQ/FT. THE WATTAGE SHOWN | | | EXCEEDS THIS LEVEL SUBSTANTIALLY. | | | | | | C) PLEASE SEE THE ALLOWANCES FOR DECORATIVE LIGHTS ETC | | | MAY ONLY BE USE WHEN ACTUALLY INSTALLING THESE TYPES OF | | | LIGHTS. CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED SHOW AN ALLOWANCE BEING | | | ASSUMED WHEN NO DECORATIVE LIGHTING IS BEING | | | INSTALLED. | | | | | | D) PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS. AS NOTED IN | | | MECHANICAL REVIEW NONE WERE LOCATED IN PLANS ETC | | | SUBMITTED. PLEASE KNOW THIS OFFICE GIVES NOTICE TO | | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL INFORMATION SHOWN ON PLANS IS | | | SUBMITTED AND SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS. PLEASE BE SURE ALL INFORMATION ON THE | | | INPUT DATA REPORT WHEN SUBMITTED COORDINATES WITH THE | | | SUBMITTED PLANS. | | | 13-400.3.B, 13-400.3.C, 13-101.1.3 | | | | | | ** PLEASE GO OVER ACTUAL CODE PERMITTED ALLOWANCES. | | | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE EXAMPLES ABOVE FOR NON-CODE | | | COMPLIANCE IS GIVEN AS A BENEFIT AND IS NOT ALL ITEMS | | | IN LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED WHICH DO | | | NOT COMPLY. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER DOES NOT SHOW ANY METERING | | | DEVICE ON THE MAIN 1 OF 2 WHICH APPEARS TO BE FOR THE | | | SECOND TENANT. PLEASE SEE FPL MINIMUM SERVICE | | | REQUIREMENTS WHICH AT THIS TIME HAVE NOT BEEN MET BY | | | THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON RISER. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.6, 250.24. THE RISER SHOWS | | | *EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS* BEING INSTALLED BEFORE | | | THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT(S) WHICH IS NOT | | | PERMITTED. AS SHOWN THESE WOULD PARALLEL THE NEUTRAL | | | CONDUCTORS THUS CREATING OBJECTIONABLE CURRENTS. PLEASE | | | REMOVE ALL EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS BEFORE THE | | | FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECTS. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER NOTE #9 WHICH CALLS FOR | | | INTERRUPTION OF *FEEDERS* TO GO TO MAIN ONE OF TWO. | | | THESE ARE NOT FEEDERS. | | | PLEASE SEE NEC FOR DEFINITIONS IN ART 100, 230, 215, | | | ETC | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-413.1.ABC.2.1 AND .2.2 AND PLACE | | | NOTES ON PLANS ACCORDINGLY. THERE WAS NO RESPONSE IN | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER SUBMITTED. THIS WAS NOTED ON | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION AND SHOW EGRESS | | | LIGHTING ON EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR. IS THE LIGHTING GOING | | | TO BE NEW OR EXISTING? PLEASE SHOW THE MINIMUM LIGHTING | | | AND EXIT LIGHTING PER NFPA-101 7.8, 7.9. | | | THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY ANY | | | OTHER TRADE REVIEW. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE REAR HALLWAY. SOME SHEETS | | | SHOW THE PREVIOUS EGRESS DOOR FROM OTHER TENANT SPACE | | | BEING NOTED AS SEALED UP YET SOME SHEETS INDICATE THIS | | | DOOR WILL BE *EXISTING TO REMAIN*. | | | HOW WILL EGRESS FOR ADJACENT TENANT TAKE PLACE? | | | IS THIS HALLWAY A COMMON AREA? | | | THE NOTES ON PLANS DO NOT IDENTIFY THIS HALL WAY AS ANY | | | ONE SPACE FOR EITHER TENANTS. | | | SHEET A1 STATES THE ELECTRICAL PANELS SHOWN WILL | | | REMAIN. IF THESE PANELS ARE FOR OTHER TENANT THEN THEY | | | NEED TO BE RELOCATED INTO THE OTHER TENANT SPACE UNLESS | | | THIS IS A COMMON AREA. | | | IF THIS IS A COMMON AREA AND NOT PART OF EITHER TENANT | | | THEN LIGHTING ETC WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE FED FROM A | | | *HOUSE PANEL*. | | | | | | *** THESE ITEMS MAY BE BUILDING AND FIRE REVIEW RELATED | | | HOWEVER MUST COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ALL OTHER ADOPTED CODES, | | | LAWS AND ORDINANCES. | | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND | | | COORDINATION. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 408.4, ALL CIRCUITING ON PLANS AND | | | PANEL SCHEDULE SHALL BE SPECIFIC. LISTING *LIGHTING* AS | | | A DESCRIPTION IS NOT SPECIFIC TO ROOMS OR AREAS. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THE APPLIED VALUE FOR SCOPE OF | | | WORK IS YET TO BE REVIEWED. THIS DOES AFFECT SECTIONS | | | OF THE CODE(S) WHICH CAN NOT BE REVIEWED AT THIS TIME. | | | FBC 108.3. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW AND IDENTIFY ALL PANELS ON RISER | | | AND ON PLANS. AS NOTED IN NOTED #8 ABOVE, AREAS IN | | | WHICH THESE PANELS ARE LOCATED HAVE NOT BEEN DETERMINED | | | TO COMPLY WITH SECTIONS OF THE CODE(S). | | | 240.24, 110.26 ETC. | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES AS THE | | | ADDRESS ON TITLE BLOCKS CALL FOR 2401 ON SOME SHEETS | | | AND 2409 ON OTHERS.FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002, FBC | | | 106.5 | | | | | | *** PLEASE KNOW THERE MAY VERY WELL BE NEW COMMENTS ON | | | THE NEXT REVIEW WHICH CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME DUE | | | TO INFORMATION ETC NOT YET IN DESIGN OR ON PLANS. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS PLEASE DO NOT | | | HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
17:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
17:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-17 17:09:05 | ** DENIEDREVIEW** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE PLANS WERE ONLY SUBMITTED | | | FOR PLAN REVIEW AND HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR | | | PERMIT. | | | ONCE ALL COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED AND PERMIT APPLICATION | | | HAS NOT BEEN MADE REVIEW WILL STILL REMAIN IN FAILED | | | STATUS UNTIL PERMIT HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR. | | | REVIEW OF LICENSING ETC WILL BE DONE AT PERMIT | | | APPLICATION BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING CODES SHALL BE STATED | | | ON ELECTRICAL PLANS AS WELL AS ARCHITECTURAL. | | | 2004 FBC W2007 REVISIONS | | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | | 2002 NFPA-72 (IF APPLICABLE) | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS AND RISER SEEMS TO SHOW A | | | MAIN TWO OF TWO HOWEVER DOES NOT SHOW HOW THIS MAIN IS | | | CONNECTED INTO THE NEW SERVICE. | | | AT THIS TIME IT APPEARS THERE IS A NEW SERVICE BEING | | | PROPOSED AND NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION TO GRANT A SEPARATE | | | SERVICE PER 230.2 | | | 240.4, 310.16, ETC | | | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING LIGHTING PERFORMANCE | | | CALCULATIONS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS PER 13-415.2, | | | 13-400.3.B, 13-400.3.C ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE BE SURE TO SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND | | | .1.3 FOR LIGHTING INPUTS. | | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS COORDINATES WITH | | | CALCULATIONS WHEN SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3 AND | | | .1.4 FOR MISSING LIGHTING CONTROLS REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS DO SHOW SOME KIND OF LIGHTING | | | PANEL, HOWEVER PLANS DO NOT SHOW ANY OVER RIDES, OVER | | | RIDE LOCATIONS, SEPARATE SPACES CONTROLS, SCHEDULING, | | | MAXIMUM TIMES ON DEVICES. ETC. | | | PLEASE INDICATE IF TIME CLOCK FOR ANY OUTSIDE LIGHTING | | | IS ASTRONOMICAL WITH MINIMUM 10HR BATTERY BACK UP. | | | ** AS NO SYSTEM, DEVICES ETC WERE SUBMITTED FOR | | | COMPLETE SYSTEM, A FULL REVIEW COULD NOT BE DONE AT | | | THIS TIME. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY NO OUTSIDE LIGHTS, PARKING ETC | | | ARE SHOWN. | | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE ALL CIRCUITING ON PLANS WITH | | | CIRCUITS IN PANEL SCHEDULE. PLEASE SEE 408.4 WHICH | | | REQUIRES ALL CIRCUITS TO BE NOTED SPECIFIC TO EACH | | | LOCATION IN WHICH THEY ARE FEEDING. | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE PANEL *B* WHICH INDICATES TWO | | | DEDICATED SIGN CIRCUITS AS REQUIRED PER 600.5 HOWEVER | | | PLEASE SEE PLANS AS BOTH SIGN CIRCUITS ARE NOTED ON THE | | | SAME CIRCUIT WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW HOW LOADS FOR SHOW WINDOWS WERE | | | FIGURED INTO LOAD CALCULATIONS. | | | 220.43A | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 422.13 AS THE WATER HEATER IS | | | CONSIDERED A CONTINUOUS LOAD AND LOAD SHOULD BE NOTED | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE MDP INDICATE A TWO POLE SINGLE | | | PHASE FEED TO PANEL *B* YET BY THE CIRCUITING SHOWN ON | | | MDP, THIS WOULD PLACE A HIGH-LEG ON PANEL *B* FEEDERS | | | WHICH CONTAIN SINGLE POLE 120V CIRCUITS. | | | PLEASE ADJUST. | | | 110.3, 90.7 | | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT AIC RATINGS FOR ANY NEW SERVICE | | | EQUIPMENT. 110.9 | | | PLEASE BE AWARE OF NOTE ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE | | | PERMITTED AND ADJUSTMENTS NEEDED BASED ON SERVICE AS | | | SHOWN. | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.104 AS GAS METALLIC PIPES | | | REQUIRE BONDING. | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ARCHITECTURAL TITLE BLOCKS ARE | | | MISSING THE REQUIRED PRINTED NAME AND PRINTED LICENSE | | | NUMBER OF SAID DESIGNER. | | | FAC 61G1-16.004. | | | | | | 14)NOTE: PLEASE SEE POSSIBLE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | WITH RESPECT TO EGRESS DOOR SWINGING INTO WHAT APPEARS | | | TO EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR. | | | THIS IS ONLY NOTED BY THIS REVIEW AND IS NOT PLAN | | | REVIEW NOTE. | | | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.2.1 AND .2.2 FOR | | | MISSING NOTES ON PLANS. | | | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ADDRESSING AS APPLIED AND | | | STATED ON PLANS COORDINATES. THIS HAS BEEN ROUTED TO | | | ADDRESSING REVIEWER . | | | AS APPLIEDTHE ADDRESS IS 2401-2405 N DIXIE, HOWEVER | | | BASED ON COMPUTER AND PCN USED THIS ADDRESS IS 2409 | | | DIXIE HWY. | | | PLEASE BE SURE ONCE ADDRESS IS CONFIRMED THE TITLE | | | BLOCKS ARE CORRECTED TO SHOW APPLIED LOCATION WITH | | | FINAL DETERMINED ADDRESS. | | | FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002 | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-04-28 |
Time |
14:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-04-28 |
Time |
14:24 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-28 14:25:24 | SHEET E-3 STAMPED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
Time |
13:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
Time |
12:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-21 12:37:49 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEETS A-4, A-14, AND A-25 WERE STAMPED, | | | INITIALED, AND DATED; ONLY SHEET E-3 ( WHICH WAS | | | STAMPED IN THE ORIGINAL PLAN SET) WOULD NEED TO BE | | | FIRE-STAMPED. THIS SHEET TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE | | | ELECTRICAL EXAMINER'S COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-26 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-26 |
Time |
11:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-26 11:11:56 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | OF THE REVISED PLAN SHEETS E-2, E-3, E-5, P-1, P-3, | | | P-4, AND M-1 THAT WERE SUBMITTED, ONLY SHEET E-3 ( | | | WHICH WAS STAMPED IN THE ORIGINAL PLAN SET( WOULD NEED | | | TO BE FIRE-STAMPED. THIS SHEET TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN | | | THE OTHER EXAMINERS'S COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
Time |
14:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-11 14:28:01 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | PLAN SHEETS A-2, A-4, A-14, A-25, AND E-3 WERE STAMPED, | | | INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-07-17 |
Time |
09:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-07-17 |
Time |
09:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-17 09:42:49 | PLANS APPEAR TO BE CODE COMPLIANT BUT WILL REMAIN IN | | | FAILED STATUS UNTIL SUBMITTAL FOR PERMIT APPLICATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-06-04 |
Time |
13:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-06-04 |
Time |
13:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-04 13:53:48 | ***DENIED*** | | | | | | MOST OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AND | | | CORRECTED EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1) ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL SHEETS INDICATE AN | | | ADDRESS OF 2401 NORTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND THE MEP SHEETS | | | SHOW 2409 NORTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | | | | 6) WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, 2003 EDITION | | | CHAPTER 38 FOR NEW BUSINESSES, NOT CHAPTER 36 WHICH IS | | | MERCANTILE OCCUPANCIES. | | | | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
Time |
16:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
Time |
12:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-07 14:04:30 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | 01.THE CORRECT ADDRESS, 2401 NORTH DIXIE HIGHWAY (NOT | | | 2401 - 2405), OF THE NEW PROJECTED SITE SHALL BE IN THE | | | TITLE BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET. | | | | | | 02.ON THE COVER PAGE, THE BUILDING SHOULD BE LOCATED | | | BETWEEN 23RD STREET AND NORTHWOOD ROAD;NOT 24TH | | | STREET AND 25TH STREET AS INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN OR | | | NW 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET AS INDICATED ON THE | | | LOCATION PLAN. | | | | | | 03.PLEASE SHOW/DISPLAY THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS ON THE | | | APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION WHICH FRONTS NORTH DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY.AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THE NUMBERS | | | SHALL BE NO LESS THAN SIX INCHES IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS | | | THAN ONE INCH IN WIDTH/STROKE. | | | | | | 04.STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 05.COMBUSTIBLE WASTE MATERIALS, DUST, AND DEBRIS | | | SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE END OF EACH SHIFT | | | OR MORE FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY FOR SAFE OPERATION. | | | | | | 06.NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE, 2003 EDITION SHALL BE | | | REFERENCED.THE GUIDELINES OF CHAPTER 38 (NEW BUSINESS | | | OCCUPANCIES) WILL BE USED. | | | | | | 07.SPECIFY THE INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH | | | MATERIALS IN TERMS OF CLASS A, CLASS B, OR CLASS C. | | | | | | 08.PROVIDE LIFE SAFETY / TRAVEL DISTANCE TO THE | | | EXITS. | | | | | | 09.SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE 2A:10BC RATED FIRE | | | EXTINGUISHER(S) WHICH SATISFY THE 75' TRAVEL DISTANCE. | | | | | | 10.IN REFERENCE TO THE REAR EXIT DOOR THAT LEADS TO | | | AN EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR, VERIFY THE FOLLOWING:A.) THE | | | DOOR LEADING TO THE CORRIDOR SHALL BE AN APPROVED, | | | LISTED, AND LABELED FIRE DOOR & ASSEMBLY IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THEBREQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 80.(B) DURING ITS SWING | | | , ANY DOOR IN A MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE NOT LESS | | | THAN ONE-HALF THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF THE AISLE, | | | CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY, OR A LANDING.(C)THE ADDRESS | | | NUMBER SHALL BE POSTED ON THE EXTERIOR DOOR OF THE | | | SPACE. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
14:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
14:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-04 14:24:01 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | | | | 1. SHT P-3 GAS PIPING DIAGRAM. PLEASE SHOW THE REQUIRED | | | DRIP/SEDIMENT TRAP. SECTIONS 408.2 & 408.4. | | | | | | 2. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR THE TANKLESS WATER | | | HEATER TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS NFPA 54 & | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS SECTION 402.2. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-08-04 |
Time |
13:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-08-04 |
Time |
13:10 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-04 13:16:10 | ****************PROVISO**************** | | | NOTE: PLAN REVIEW FOR THE GAS PIPING DIAGRAM ON SHEET | | | P-3 UNDER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS TABLE 402.4(2) AND TWO | | | COPIES OF MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATION SHEETS REQUIRED | | | FOR THE 120,000 BTU DRYER CLEARLY INDICATING THE MAKE, | | | MODEL NUMBER, BTU LOAD CAPACITY, AND A LISTING FROM A | | | NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING LABOATORY (EXAMPLES OF A | | | LISTING= AGA, CSA, UL). | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-22 |
Time |
11:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-22 |
Time |
11:52 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
Time |
14:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-30 16:10:27 | TO "C37" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
Time |
09:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
Time |
09:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-02 09:06:36 | TO "COMM" BD#42 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
Time |
11:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
Time |
11:50 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-08 11:50:34 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
13:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-30 13:20:23 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB--PER "LMARTINEZ" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
14:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
14:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-11 14:12:10 | TO "COMM" BD#6/PLANS ON RACK--2 ROLLS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
Time |
11:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
Time |
11:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-16 11:49:18 | TO "COMM" BD#18 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
Time |
08:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-03-05 |
Time |
11:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-05 11:27:34 | TO "COMM" BD#18--PROJECT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
Time |
09:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-04-14 |
Time |
11:50 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-27 09:39:23 | WAS WAITING ON LETTER FROM ENGINEER REGARDING WIND | | | RESISTANCE OF REVISED A/C EQUIPMENT. LETTER RECEIVED, | | | REVIEWED BY BUILDING REVIEWER. PAGE M-2 PASSED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
Time |
20:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
Time |
19:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-23 20:54:45 | REVIEW #: 1ST REVISION | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | REVISED PAGE M-1 OK AND STAMPED. HOWEVER, THIS REVIEW | | | WILL REMAIN IN FAIL STAUS UNTIL THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS | | | ARE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 1. CALCULATIONS PROVIDED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER | | | INDICATE THAT THE A/C ROOFTOP PACKAGE UNITS INSTALLED | | | ON THIS PROJECT ARE "TEMPSTAR" WHILE THE EQUIPMENT | | | SCHEDULE ON PAGE M-2 OF THE PERMIT SET OF PLANS CALLS | | | FOR RHEEM EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE REVISE THE | | | EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE TO REFLECT THE EQUIPMENT WHICH WAS | | | ACTUALLY INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-B 106.11 AND | | | FBC-M 304.1. | | | | | | 2. THE WIND RESISTANCE CAPABILITIES OF THE "TEMPSTAR" | | | EQUIPMENT HAS NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY DEMONSTRATED. | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO | | | RESIST THE ANTICIPATED WIND PRESURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBC-M 301.13. THE STATEMENTS THAT WIND RESISTANCE | | | CRITERIA HAVE NOT BEEN "ADOPTED" BY THE PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY COMMISSION IS IRRELEVANT. WE ARE NOT IN THE | | | JURISDICTION OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY COMMISSION AND | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (FBC) IS A STATE WIDE | | | MANDATED MINIMUM CODE. NO LOCAL JURISDICTION HAS THE | | | AUTHORITY TO MAKE THE FBC MORE OR LESS STRINGENT. ALSO, | | | THERE IS NO BASIS IN CODE FOR THE ENGINEER'S STATEMENT | | | THAT ALL STRUCTURES UNDER 35 FEET IN HEIGHT ARE EXEMPT | | | FROM WIND RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS. ALL BUILDINGS, | | | REGARDLESS OF HEIGHT, CONSTRUCTED IN THE STATE OF | | | FLORIDA ARE SUBJECT TO THE WIND RESISTANCE PROVISIONS | | | OF THE FBC. IN ORDER TO DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE FOR | | | THE EQUIPMENT BEING INSTALLED ON THIS PROJECT, PLEASE | | | USE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS: | | | | | | A) PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FROM THE EQUIPMENT | | | MANUFACTURER SHOWING THAT THESE UNITS ARE DESIGNED AND | | | WILL WITHSTAND THE ANTICIPATED WIND PRESSURES AS | | | CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-B SECTION 1609. | | | | | | B) PROVIDE A RATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF | | | THE EQUIPMENT SHOWING THESE UNITS WILL WITHSTAND THE | | | ANTICIPATED WIND PRESSURES AS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBC-B SECTION 1609. | | | | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING WIND RESISTANCE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES, | | | PLEASE SEE THE DECLARATORY STATEMENT FROM THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING COMMISSION DCA08-DEC205. A COPY IS ATTACHED TO | | | THESE COMMENTS FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. | | | | | | NOTE: DOCUMENTATION WAS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED FOR THE | | | RHEEM EQUIPMENT ORIGINALLY PROPOSED FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
10:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
10:02 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-07-16 |
Time |
15:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-07-16 |
Time |
14:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-16 15:00:02 | **PLAN REVIEW ONLY** | | | | | | PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. ALL | | | OUTSTANDING MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED. THE REVIEW WILL REMIAN IN FAIL STATUS | | | PENDING SUBMISSION OF A PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-06-02 |
Time |
15:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-06-02 |
Time |
14:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-02 15:39:41 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 1 THROUGH 5: OK | | | | | | 6. RTU ATTACHMENT DETAIL AND CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN | | | RECEIVED AND WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING PLAN | | | REVIEWER. HOWEVER, NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED | | | REGARDING THE ROOFTOP APPLIANCES THEMSELVES. PROVIDE | | | DOCUMENTATION FROM THE APPLIANCE MANUFACTURER SHOWING | | | RTUS THEMSELVES ARE DESIGNED TO RESIST ANTICIPATED WIND | | | PRESSURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. | | | | | | 7 THROUGH 9: OK | | | | | | 10. NOTE # 3 ON RTU SCHEDULE CALLS FOR MANUAL DAMPER ON | | | OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE. FBC 13-409.1.ABC.3.3 CALLS FOR | | | MOTORIZED DAMPERS FOR OUTSIDE AIR INTAKES IN EXCESS OF | | | 300 CFM. THESE DAMPERS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY SHUT WHEN | | | THE SYSTEMS OR SPACES SERVED ARE NOT IN USE IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION. A MANUAL DAMPER MAY BE | | | USED FOR BALANCING BUT THE MOTORIZED DAMPER IS REQUIRED | | | FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | CODE. | | | | | | 11. OK | | | | | | 12. A) THE WRITTEN RESPONSE FROM THE ENGINEER STATES, | | | ?ENERGY CALCS AND LOAD CALCS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED.? NO | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS COULD BE FOUND WITH THIS SUBMITTAL. | | | PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. | | | NOTE: WHEN PROVIDING ENERGY CALCULATION, BE SURE TO | | | PROVIDE METHOD B OR C COMPLIANCE FORMS AS THIS IS | | | NEITHER NEW CONSTRUCTION NOR AN ADDITION. RENOVATED | | | COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS SHALL, WHEN APPLICABLE (SEE | | | SECTION 202 OF CHAPTER 13 FOR A DEFINITION OF A | | | RENOVATION), COMPLY WITH THE PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS | | | CONTAINED IN FORM 400C OR WITH METHOD B OF SUBCHAPTER | | | 13-4 FOR INSULATION, HVAC SYSTEMS, LIGHTING, WATER | | | HEATING SYSTEMS AND EXTERIOR ENVELOPE COMPONENTS BEING | | | RETROFITTED OR REPLACED. | | | | | | B) THE SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY PROVIDED INDICATES A | | | DESIGN OUTDOOR AIRFLOW OF 500 CFM PER UNIT. THIS DOES | | | NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS SHOWN | | | ON PG M-1. PROVIDE A SUMMARY USING VALUES WHICH | | | CORRESPOND WITH THE CONDITIONS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-26 |
Time |
14:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-26 |
Time |
09:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-26 14:17:22 | REVIEW #: 1ST **PLAN CHECK ONLY** | | | ACTION: DENOED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | 1. M-1: SIZE OF RETURN GRILLS IN WAXING ROOM AND AT | | | REAR ENTRANCE ABOVE WATER FOUNTAINS ARE MISSING. | | | CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. FBCM 603.1 | | | | | | 2. M-1: SIZE OF TRUNK LINE FEEDING STAFF LOUNGE AND | | | OFFICE IS MISSING. PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. FBCM | | | 603.1 | | | | | | 3. M-1: A SPACE-BY-SPACE ANALYSIS OF THE VENTILATION | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROPOSED SPACES INDICATES THAT THE | | | OUTSIDE AIR PROVIDED IS INADEQUATE BASED ON FBCM TABLE | | | 403.3. WITH EACH SPACE ADDED UP THE APPROXIMATE TOTAL | | | IS 1675 CFM. THE TOTAL MAY ACTUALLY BE HIGHER BASED ON | | | THE FACT THAT A COMMON VENTILATION SYSTEM IS BEING | | | USED. PLEASE PROVIDE OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS BASED ON | | | THE OCCUPANT LOAD AS LISTED IN THE SPECIALTY SHOPS- | | | BEAUTY OCCUPANCY IN TABLE 403.3. THIS WOULD REQUIRE AN | | | OCCUPANT LOAD OF 25 PEOPLE PER 1000SF OF FLOOR AREA | | | (FOR THE ENTIRE FLOOR AREA) AND A VENTILATION TARE OF | | | 25 CFM PER PERSON. | | | | | | 4. M-1: THE NAIL SALON PORTION OF THE SPACE IS SUBJECT | | | TO FOOTNOTE B OF TABLE 403.3, WHICH PROHIBITS AIR | | | SUPPLIED TO THIS SPACE FROM BEING RECIRCULATED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 403.2.1(3). HOW WILL AIR FROM THIS | | | SPACE BE PREVENTED FROM RECIRCULATING WITH | | | PARTIAL-HEIGHT PARTITIONS AND A COMMON RETURN? ALSO, | | | ACCORDING TO THE FLOOR PLAN, 730 CFM OF SUPPLY IS | | | PROVIDED IN THIS LOCATION WITH ONLY 400 CFM OF EXHAUST. | | | ALL AIR SUPPLIED TO THIS SPACE SHALL BE EXHAUSTED TO | | | PREVENT RECIRCULATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | | 403.2.1(3). | | | | | | 5. M-1: FLOOR PLAN SHOWS DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS IN SUPPLY | | | RISERS ABOVE THE STAFF LOUNGE AND PROCESSING ROOMS. | | | THESE ROOMS SHAVE HARD GYPSUM PANEL CEILINGS AS SHOWN | | | ON PG A-4. ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO SMOKE DETECTORS | | | FOR INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | | 606.3. | | | | | | 6. M-2: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND SUPPORTS | | | THAT ARE EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED AND | | | INSTALLED TO RESIST THE WIND PRESSURES ON THE EQUIPMENT | | | AND THE SUPPORTS AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB | | | CHAPTER 16 PER FBCM 301.13. PROVIDE WIND LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS FOR APPLIANCE ATTACHMENT TO STRUCTURE TO | | | SUPPORT THE ATTACHMENT DETAIL FOR BUILDING PLAN REVIEW. | | | ALSO, PROVIDE DATA FROM THE MANUFACTURER OF THE OUTDOOR | | | APPLIANCES (RTU?S) SHOWING THEY HAVE BEEN DESIGNED AND | | | TESTED TO WITHSTAND ANTICIPATED WIND LOADS IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13 AND FBCB SECTION 1609. | | | | | | 7. SHOW MEANS AND LOCATION OF CONDENSATE DISPOSAL. | | | CONDENSATE FROM ALL COOLING COILS AND EVAPORATORS SHALL | | | BE CONVEYED FROM THE DRAIN PAN OUTLET TO AN APPROVED | | | PLACE OF DISPOSAL. CONDENSATE SHALL NOT DISCHARGE INTO | | | A STREET, ALLEY OR OTHER AREAS SO AS TO CAUSE A | | | NUISANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 307.2.1 | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE AUXILIARY DRAIN PROTECTION IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBCM 307.2.3. A WATER LEVEL DETECTION DEVICE (SUCH | | | AS A FLOAT SWITCH) INSTALLED INTERNALLY ON THE PRIMARY | | | DRAIN PAN WILL MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 9. PG M-2: GENERAL NOTE #17, PLEASE REFERENCE THE | | | CORRECT CODE. THIS PROJECT IS BEING REVIEWED UNDER THE | | | 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W/ 2007 AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 10. PROVIDE SHUTOFF DAMPER CONTROLS ON OUTSIDE AIR AND | | | EXHAUST IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-409.1.ABC.3.3. | | | | | | 11. PROVIDE AN AIR BALANCE SCHEDULE TO SHOW THE | | | MECHANICAL SYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT | | | BUILDINGS ARE PRESSURIZED WITH RESPECT TO OUTDOORS IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-409.1.ABC.2. | | | | | | 12. ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE NOT PROVIDED. RENOVATED | | | COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS SHALL, WHEN APPLICABLE (SEE | | | SECTION 202 OF FBCB CHAPTER 13), COMPLY WITH THE | | | PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN FORM 400C OR | | | WITH METHOD B OF SUBCHAPTER 13-4 FOR INSULATION, HVAC | | | SYSTEMS, LIGHTING, WATER HEATING SYSTEMS AND EXTERIOR | | | ENVELOPE COMPONENTS BEING RETROFITTED OR REPLACED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-101.1.3. PROVIDE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. SYSTEM SIZING | | | MAY NEED TO BE REDONE BASED ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND | | | RECALCULATED OUTSIDE AIR RATES. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-27 |
Time |
14:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-27 |
Time |
14:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-27 14:58:30 | REVISIONS OK -- SHTS P-1, P-2, P-3 & P-4 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
14:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
14:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-04 14:21:59 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. SHT P-3 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. PLEASE INDICATE THE | | | VENT TERMINATION POINT FOR THE P-3 SINKS BY THE P-4 | | | FIXTURES. SECTION 901.1. | | | | | | 2. SHT P-3 WATER PIPING DIAGRAM DOES NOT REFLECT THE | | | FLOOR PLAN AT THE P-3 SINKS BY THE P-4 FIXTURES. | | | SECTIONS 106.1.1 & 601.1. | | | | | | 3. SHT P-3 WATER PIPING DIAGRAM. AIR CHAMBERS ARE NOT | | | APPROVED. (SHOWN AT ALL FIXTURES). SECTION 604.9 & | | | PDI-WH 201. PLEASE DELETE. | | | | | | 4, SHT P-3 WATER PIPING DIAGRAM SHOWS TWO 1" LINES & | | | TWO 3/4" INCH LINES WHERE THERE ARE ONLY 3 WATER LINES. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTIONS 106.1.1 & 601.1. | | | | | | 5. SHT P-3 WATER PIPING DIAGRAM DOES NOT REFLECT THE | | | FLOOR PLAN. SINK IN THE NAIL SPA IS MOVED TO THE FAR | | | SIDE OF THE ROOM, BUT THE RISER WAS NOT REVISED TO | | | REFLECT CHANGE. SECTIONS 106.1.1 & 601.1. PLEASE | | | CORRELATE. | | | | | | 5. SHT P-3 GAS PIPING DIAGRAM. PLEASE SHOW THE REQUIRED | | | DRIP/SEDIMENT TRAP. SECTIONS 408.2 & 408.4. | | | | | | 6. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR THE TANKLESS WATER | | | HEATER TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS NFPA 54 & | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS SECTION 402.2. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
14:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
14:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-04 14:10:02 | REVISIONS OK -- SHTS P-1 & P-4. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-08-04 |
Time |
13:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-08-04 |
Time |
13:09 |
Sent To |
G |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
Time |
15:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
Time |
15:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-15 15:46:27 | **PLAN REVIEW ONLY** | | | PLUMBING AND GAS PLANS ARE CODE COMPLIANT AND CAN BE | | | STAMPED WHEN A CONTRACTOR MAKES AN APPLICATION FOR | | | PERMIT. PERMIT MUST BE ISSUED BEFORE DECEMBER 31, 2008 | | | OR A REREVIEW UNDER THE 2007 CODES WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
Time |
09:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
Time |
07:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-20 09:07:22 | PLUMBING PLANS ARE CODE COMPLIANT AND CAN BE STAMPED | | | WHEN A CONTRACTOR MAKES APPLICATION. PERMIT MUST BE | | | ISSUED BEFORE OCTOBER 1, 2008 OR WILL BE REREVIEW UNDER | | | THE 2007 CODES. | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | JOHN LEECH | | | 805-6695 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
Time |
07:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
Time |
14:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-11 08:46:22 | DENIED; | | | 1. ADD A DEMO NOTE; NO DEAD ENDS PERMITED IN THE | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM LONGER THAN 2 FEET, INSPECTION | | | REQUIRED. | | | 2. BOTH BATHROOMS ARE REQUIRED TO MEET ACCESSIBILITY | | | REQUIREMENTS. SEE FBC-BUILDING CHAPTER 11, SECTION | | | 11-4.1.2(6). MINUMUM WIDTH WOULD BE 5' 3", 18" TO | | | CENTER OF W/C, 30" FROM CENTER OF W/C TO CENTER OF | | | LAV., AND 15" FROM CENTER OF LAV TO WALL. | | | 3. STAFF LOUNGE SINKS TO MEET ACCESSIBILITY | | | REQUIREMENTS, SEE SECTIONS 11-4.24.1 THRU 11-4.24.7, | | | SHOW DETAIL DRAWING WITH ALL REQUIRED DIMENSIONS AND | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | 4. SHOW DETAIL OF DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH ALL REQUIRED | | | MEASUREMENTS, TO MEET CODE SECTIONS 11-4.15.1 THRU | | | 11-4.15.5. | | | 5. SHOW CLEAR FLOOR SPACE AT BREAK SINK ON FLOOR PLAN | | | PAGE A-4. | | | 6. SHOW DETAIL OF ELECTRIC WATER HEATER, HOW HUNG, | | | EXPANSION CONTROL, SECTION 607.3, HEATER PAN AND DRAIN, | | | SECTION 504.7.1 AND 504.7.2. | | | 7. PLEASE REMOVE ALL AIR CHAMBER SYMBOLS FROM WATER | | | RISER DIAGRAM, AIR CHAMBERS ARE NOT RECOGNIZED IN THE | | | FBC-PLUMBING, SHOCK ARRESTORS ONLY AS REQUIRED BY | | | SECTION 604.9. | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | JOHN LEECH | | | 805-6695 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
16:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
16:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-15 10:13:57 | PLANS MEET ALL ZONING REQUIREMENTS. STATUS WILL BE | | | CHANGED TO PASSED WHEN FULL PERMIT FEES ARE PAID | | | ASSUMING NO CHANGES ARE MADE TO THE SHEETS STAMPED BY | | | ZONING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
Time |
15:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
Time |
15:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-03 16:00:00 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | PER SECTION 94-213(A)(2) OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR TO | | | FINISHED CEILING HEIGHT IS 12 FEET. THE PORTION OF THE | | | SPACE WITH EXPOSED TRUSSES MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS, | | | HOWEVER, ALL AREAS WITH PROPOSED DRYWALL CEILINGS DO | | | NOT COMPLY AS THEY ARE BELOW THE 12 FOOT MINIMUM. THE | | | CEILINGS COULD BE MODIFIED TO MEET THE 12-FOOT | | | REQUIREMENT, OR A VARIANCE COULD BE REQUESTED. THE | | | VARIANCE PROCESS, HOWEVER, WOULD ADD APPROXIMATELY 4 TO | | | 5 MONTHS TO THE PERMITTING PROCESS. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, PLANNER, AT 561-822-1435 | | | OR [email protected] WITH QUESTIONS. |
|
|