 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 08020128
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08020128 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
31 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-29 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-29 |
Time |
16:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-29 16:56:22 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | REVISION REVIEW | | | ACTION: REVIEWED DATED 9-11-09 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
30 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-15 |
Time |
13:02 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-15 |
Time |
13:02 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-15 13:04:17 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | REVISION REVIEW | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | SHEET A020 REVISION DATED 9-04-09 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
29 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
1.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
13:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-20 13:17:40 | SHOP DRAWINGS FOR PRECAST CONCRETE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
28 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
Time |
16:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
Time |
16:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-10 16:50:34 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | | | | AUGUST 10,2009 | | | REVIEW : GATES PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS SHOP-DRAWINGS | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | | | | 1) PLANS SUBMITTED HAVE A RUBBER STAMP SIGNATURE. THERE | | | IS NO PRINTED NAME OF THE ENGINEER IN THE TITLE BLOCK | | | EITHER. | | | | | | PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS | | | PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE DOCUMENT. | | | FL ADMIN CODE 61G15-23.002, ENGINEERS61G15-23.002(2) | | | FL. ADMIN. CODE. PLANS SIGNED & SEALED BY A | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL INCLUDE EITHER THE: NAME, | | | ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER OR, THE NAME | | | AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER AND THE NAME, | | | ADDRESS AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE | | | ENGINEERING BUSINESS THROUGH WHICH THE ENGINEER IS | | | PRACTICING (471.025 F.S. AND 471.023 F.S.). | | | | | | 61G15-23.002(2) FL. ADMIN. CODE. A COVER SHEET OR INDEX | | | SHEET FOR ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE USED AND | | | THAT SHEET MUST BE SIGNED IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF THE | | | PRODUCTION & PREPARATION OF EACH SECTION OF THE | | | ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION WITH SUFFICIENT INFORMATION | | | ON THE COVER SHEET OR INDEX. | | | | | | NOTE THESE PLANS WILL BE RETAINED. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | SURVEY: | | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
27 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
Time |
16:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
Time |
16:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-10 16:31:05 | STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT MUNTER ROOFTOP AIR HANDLERS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
26 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
Time |
16:14 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-10 |
Time |
15:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-10 16:15:25 | FABCO SHOP DRAWINGS: | | | AB1, E1-E28 & E50 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
25 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
09:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-27 |
Time |
14:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-28 09:37:04 | REVISIONS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
24 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-06-17 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-06-17 |
Time |
08:45 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-17 09:30:34 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | REVIEW: ROOF HATCH | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | | | | NYSTROM/ BABCOCK-DAVIS ROOF HATCH MANUFACTURED AT THE | | | SAME PLANT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
23 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-06-15 |
Time |
12:30 |
Rev Time |
0.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-06-15 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-15 12:31:39 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | REVIEW: SUBMITTALS | | | ACTION:REVIEWED | | | | | | REVISED METAL FRAMING DETAILS | | | SHORING SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
22 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
Time |
11:51 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
Time |
11:51 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-21 11:54:44 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | | | | STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) THE REPORT SUBMITTED IS ONLY THE COVERSHEET OR PAGE | | | ONE OF TWELVE PAGES. INCOMPLETE PAPERWORK. 106.1.2 | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
21 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
Time |
11:39 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
Time |
11:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-21 11:41:28 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | | | | SUBMITTAL:ENGINEERED SHORING DRAWINGS REVIEW | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
20 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
Time |
11:24 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-21 |
Time |
11:24 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-21 11:30:28 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | | | | HILTI FIRESTOPPING SUBMITTAL REVIEW | | | ACTION: REVIEWED/ PROVISO | | | | | | NOTE PER THRESHOLD/ SPECIAL INSPCTOR GUIDELINES COMMENT | | | # 26; ASSURE THAT THE DESIGNER HAS REQUIRED ON THE | | | PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS ONE MATERIAL, APPROVED FORTHE | | | FIRE STOPPING PENETRATIONS, FOR WALLS AND CEILINGS. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
19 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-13 |
Time |
10:47 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-13 |
Time |
10:47 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-13 10:55:52 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | SHOP DRAWING REVIEW: | | | 08020128 | | | ACTION:REVIEWED/ PROVISO | | | | | | 1)EXTERIOR METAL STUD FRAMING DETAIL: FRAMING DETAILS | | | AS FAR AS THE FRAMING OK, AGAIN | | | THE USE IN EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD IS TO BE LIMITED TO: | | | | | | BUILDING PROVISO: | | | 1A) 603.1(1) (1.2) NONBEARING EXTERIOR WALLS WHERE NO | | | FIRE RATING IS REQUIRED & | | | 1B) TABLE 602 FOR FIRE RATING OF EXTERIOR WALLS BASED | | | ON FIRE SEPERAATION DISTANCE. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM L | | | OCAL OFFICIALS REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC | | | RECORD, AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. | | | YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE THEREFORE SUBJECT TO | | | PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
18 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-13 |
Time |
10:43 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-13 |
Time |
10:43 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-13 10:47:37 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | SUBMITTAL REVIEW: | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | DESIGN CRITERIA: THOMAS KELAHER P. E. STRUCTURAL | | | CONSULTANT | | | SHOP DRAWING STAMP BY TRC WORLDWIDE ENGINEERING | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
17 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
Time |
14:45 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
Time |
14:45 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-09 14:52:44 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | SHOP DRAWING REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FL 61G-15-30.006 (3) THE DELEGATED ENGINEER SHALL | | | FORWARD THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS TO THE | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
16 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
Time |
15:41 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
Time |
15:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-01 15:50:07 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | | | | SUBMITTAL REVIEW | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | CONCRETE MIX DESIGN | | | EPOXY & GROUT SUBMITTALS | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
15 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
Time |
15:23 |
Rev Time |
0.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
Time |
15:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-01 15:27:19 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | | | | SUBMITTAL REVIEW | | | | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) SUBMITTALS FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM NOT REVIEWED, | | | PLEASE SUBMIT FOR A IRRIGATION PERMIT. THIS IS A | | | SEPERATE PERMIT, WITH ASSOCIATED REVIEWS AND FEES. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
14 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
13:35 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
13:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-17 13:51:21 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | REVIEW PANEL WIND LOAD CALCS FOR HEATCRAFT | | | REFRIGERATION PRODUCTS, | | | HCU, EXTENDED HCU AND HTS UNITS, NTC WIND RESISTANCE | | | MODEL | | | AND LSERIES UNITS | | | | | | | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | 2009-03-17 13:48:59 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | REVIEW: WALKER ENG. WIND ANALYSIS FOR ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT | | | ENCLOSURE | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
13:21 |
Rev Time |
0.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
13:21 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-17 13:26:28 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | REVIEW DESIGN CRITERIA TARGET# T-2427 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) TRC WORLDWIDE ENGINEERING INC. SHOP DRAWING REVIEW | | | STAMP IS STAMPED DIRECTLY OVER THE DESIGN WIND DESIGN | | | CRITERIA, NOT LEGIBLE. | | | (2004 FBC) 106.1.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION | | | DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF | | | SUFFICIENT | | | CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE & EXTENT OF | | | THE WORK PROPOSED & SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM | | | TO THE | | | PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, | | | AND RULES AND REGULATIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL. | | | | | | 2) 61G15-23.002(2) FL. ADMIN. CODE. A COVER SHEET OR | | | INDEX SHEET FOR ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE USED | | | AND THAT SHEET | | | MUST BE SIGNED IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF THE PRODUCTION | | | & PREPARATION OF EACH SECTION OF THE ENGINEERING | | | SPECIFICATION WITH SUFFICIENT | | | INFORMATION ON THE COVER SHEET OR INDEX. | | | | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC | | | RECORD, AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR | | | E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC | | | DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
13:15 |
Rev Time |
0.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
13:15 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-17 13:19:28 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | REVIEW SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERED EDC SHORING DESIGN | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) 2004 FBC) 106.1.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION | | | DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF | | | SUFFICIENT | | | CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE & EXTENT OF | | | THE WORK PROPOSED & SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM | | | TO THE | | | PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, | | | AND RULES AND REGULATIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL. | | | | | | PLANS ARE SHRUNK AND NOT LEGIBLE FOR ELECTRONIC COPYING | | | INTO RECORD RETENSION. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
11:20 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
11:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-17 12:01:08 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | | | | MARCH 17, 2009 | | | REVIEW EXTERIOR METAL STUD FRAMING DETAILS | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) MOST EXTERIOR DETAILS INDICATE USE OF GYPSUM | | | SHEATHING IN THE DETAIL SHEET BUT WITHIN THE DETAIL | | | SHEET THEY INDICATE SEE 1/SK-3.0 WHICH IS RED LINED 5/8 | | | PLYWOOD PANEL NOT THE GYPSUM SHEATHING AS INDICATED ON | | | THE DETAIL SHEETS. PLEASE REVIEW SECTION 603.1 AND | | | TABLE 601& 602 WHERE FIRE RETARDANT TREATED PLYWOOD CAN | | | BE USED. | | | | | | 2) THE EXTERIOR METAL STUD FRAMING DETAILS ALSO ARE | | | MISSING THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA THEY WERE DESIGNED | | | TOO! | | | | | | 1609.6.2 WIND DESIGN PROCEDURES | | | 1) THE BASIC WIND SPEED, V, SHALL BE DETERMINED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1609.3. THE WIND SHALL BE | | | ASSUMED TO COME FROM ANY HORIZONTAL DIRECTION. | | | 2) AN IMPORTANCE FACTOR, IW, SHALL BE DETERMINED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION1609.5. | | | 3) AN EXPOSURE CATEGORY SHALL BE DETERMINED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH 1609.4. | | | 4) A HEIGHT AND EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT COEFFICIENT, * | | | SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM TABLE 1609.6.2.1(4) | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
09:31 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
09:31 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-17 09:35:14 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 MASTER PERMIT | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | | | | REVIEW: CONCRETE SHORING AND FORMING DETAIL | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR | | | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, | | | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC... | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
08:29 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
08:29 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-17 08:37:18 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 MASTER PERMIT | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | | | | REVIEW: ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS & REVISION 1/16/09 | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | | | | 1) NOTE THIS IS A REVISION UNDER THE MASTER PERMIT | | | NUMBER, AT THIS TIME THERE HAS BEEN NO ROOFING | | | CONTRACTOR APPLY FOR A ROOFING PERMIT. | | | | | | 2004-FL# 9274-R1 | | | MANUFACTURER: SIKA SARNAFIL | | | TABLE 2C-1 SYSTEM TYPE D | | | SYSTEM # S-44 | | | ASCE 7-02 | | | ZONE 1 71PSF | | | ZONE 2 108PSF | | | ZONE 3 153 PSF | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-12 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
1.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-12 |
Time |
15:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-12 15:53:28 | SHOP DRAWINGS FOR VISTAWALL ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT | | | "HR"251DG | | | FL ST APPROVAL# 7129 | | | ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL LMI NOA 04-0308.02 | | | | | | AUTOMATIC SLIDDING DOOR DURA-STORM 3000/ IMPACT | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
1.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
Time |
12:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-10 12:41:12 | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | REVIEW: ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) NOTE THIS IS A REVISION UNDER THE MASTER PERMIT | | | NUMBER, AT THIS TIME THERE HAS BEEN NO ROOFING | | | CONTRACTOR APPLY FOR A ROOFING PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE COPIED FROM A E-MAIL SENT TO | | | BRETT NANSEN ABOUT THE ROOFING REVISIONS SUBMITTED | | | WITHIN THE LAST ROUND OF REVISIONS. | | | | | | GOOD MORNING BRETT, | | | | | | I'VE BEEN REVIEWING YOUR REVISIONS (ARCHITECTURAL & | | | STRUCTURAL) FOR THE TARGET STORE LOCATED AT 1760 PALM | | | BEACH LAKES BLVD. AS FAR AS THE ROOFING REVISION | | | SUBMITTED I DO HAVE A FEW ISSUES. | | | | | | YES, THE DESIGNER OF RECORD DOES NEED TO REVIEW ALL | | | DOCUMENTS THAT PERTAIN TO THEIR DESIGN, COMPONENTS AND | | | CLADDING. FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT | | | DATA, REPORTS, SHOP DRAWINGS ETC... | | | WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT | | | WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED | | | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR | | | TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEET A001 YOU INDICATE REVISED | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS, THIS IS A PROVISO, SINCE ALL PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS WILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED ON AN INDIVIDUAL | | | BASES. FOR EXAMPLE, FOR THE ROOF YOU HAVE SUBMITTED | | | SIKASARNAFIL, INC. WITHTWO INDIVIDUAL REPORTS ONE A FL | | | 9274-R1 AND A SECOND A MIAMI-DADE NOA 07-0614.04. WE | | | WILL ACCEPTEITHER REPORT BUT THE CONFUSION IS WHEN ON | | | SHEET A001 THE REFERENCED SUB-SYSTEM IS FOUND IN THE | | | MIAIMI- DADE NOAPAGE 22-23 SYSTEM(D-8) PATTERN # 2WHICH | | | DOES HAVE THE SAME PRESSURES AS THE FLORIDA REPORT | | | 9274.1TABLE 2C-1 SYSTEM D S-44.THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN | | | THE TWO REPORTS ARE THE THIS MAY OR MAY NOT BE A | | | FACTOR. ITMAY DEPEND ON THE INSULATION FACTOR. THE | | | ENHANCED FASTENING BY C-BUCK ENGINEERING REFERENCES THE | | | FL REPORT 9274.1 WITHIN THE DOCUMENT. WHICH REPORT | | | WOULD YOU WANT US TO USE? | | | | | | IN NEITHER CASE DOES THE REPORT INDICATE WHICH TYPE OF | | | INSULATION THAT CAN BE USED . THE FL.REPORT 9742.1 | | | UNDER INSULATION BOARD INDICATES TO ATTACH PER NOA. THE | | | FL 9742.1 SUB-SYSTEM S-44 INDICATES ONE OR MORE LAYERS | | | ANY COMBINATION, ATTACHMENT IS PRELIMINARILY ATTACHED, | | | THE FIRST PAGE DOES LIST PRODUCTS THAT COULD BE | | | INSTALLED. THE MIAMI-DADE REPORT UNDER THE FRONT | | | HEADING OF COMPONENTS LIST ALL INSULATION SYSTEMS THAT | | | CAN BE INSTALLED UNDER THE MIAIMI-DADE NOA. NO | | | INFORMATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | THE REASON WE REQUEST A INSULATION SHOP DRAWING IS THAT | | | THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF INSULATION WILL BE AT THE ROOF | | | DRAINS. THE NEW ENERGY INPUT DATA REPORT INDICATES THE | | | R-VALUE OF 17.4. THE DESIGNER OF RECORD WOULD NEED TO | | | PICK OUT THE INSULATION TYPE OR HAVE THE ROOFER PICK | | | OUT THE TYPE OF INSULATION THAT WILL MEET THIS | | | CRITERIA. THEN FROM THE ROOF DRAINS THE INSULATION WILL | | | TAPER UP TO THE PARAPET WALLS AT A RATE REQUIRED BY | | | CODE. THE ONE ISSUE WE HAVE SEEN WITH THIS SHOP DRAWING | | | REVIEW IS THAT THE INSULATION MAY BECOME SO THICK THAT | | | THE FASTENERS WILL NOT REACH THROUGH TO THE METAL DECK, | | | THUS NEEDING TO CREATE MORE ROOF DRAINS. | | | | | | AT THIS TIME I BELIEVE THERE IS STILL ALLOT OF | | | UNANSWERED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ROOFING SYSTEM, DEPTH OF | | | INSULATION REQUIRED AND THE ROOFING PACKAGE NOT BEING | | | REVIEWED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | | | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | MEMBER OF BOAF, THE BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF | | | FLORIDA: PROTECTING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. UNDER FLORIDA STATE STATUTE SB 80, E-MAIL | | | ADDRESSES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO | | | OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE | | | PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. | | | YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE THEREFORE SUBJECT TO | | | PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
7.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-09 |
Time |
07:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-10 13:32:18 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | REVISION REVIEW | | | ACTION:REVIEWED-OK | | | SHEETS & REVISION NUMBER/ DATE | | | | | | A001 REV# 2 9-08-08 | | | PROVISO: HEADING PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | 140 MPH/ 3 SECOND GUST | | | INDIVIDUAL PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE REVIEWED SEPERATELY | | | A020 REV BID 7-31-08 | | | A021 REV# 2 9-08-08 | | | A110 REV# 3 | | | A121 REV#32 1-21-09 | | | A125 REV# 13/32 10-16-08/ 1-21-09 | | | A30 REV# BID 7-31-08 | | | A131 REV#32 1-21-09 | | | A141 REV# 32 1-21-09 | | | A151 REV# 21 11-21-08 | | | A152 REV# 30 11-19-08 | | | A161 REV# 33 1-16-09 | | | A201 REV# 1 8-21-08 | | | A211 REV# 22 11-21-08 | | | A212 REV# 22 11-21-09 | | | A213 REV# 22 11-21-09 | | | A214 REV# 22 11-21-08 | | | A215 REV#22 11-21-08 | | | A216 REV# 22 11-21-08 | | | A217 REV#1 8-28-08 | | | A231 REV#16 | | | A300 REV#15 11-15-08 | | | A301 REV# 29 1-08-09 | | | A302 REV#28 10-29-08/ REV#29 1-08-09 | | | A303 REV#8 10-29-08 | | | A305 REV#15 11-07-08 | | | A311 REV# 16 11-14-08 | | | A312 REV#18 11-14-08 | | | A313 REV# 9 10-09-08 REV 17 11-13-08 | | | A321 REV# 18 11-14-08 | | | A331 REV# 2 9-08-08 | | | A351 REV# 32 1-21-09 | | | A352 REV#32 1-21-09 | | | A361 REV 30-32 1-09-09/ 1/21/09 | | | A502 REV# 13 10-16-08 REV# 16 11-14-08 | | | A601 | | | A611 | | | A621 | | | A622 | | | A701 | | | A702 REV#19 11-18-08 | | | A801 REV# 1 8-24-08 REV# 16 11-14-08 | | | A851 REV# 6 9-12-08 | | | A891 REV# 15 11-07-08 | | | A892 REV# 15 11-07-08 | | | A893 REV#15 11-07-08 | | | | | | S110 REV#16 12-15-08 REV# 32 1-21-09 | | | S111 | | | S141 REV#16 12-15-08 REV# 32 1-21-09 | | | S211 REV#16 12-15-08 | | | S212 REV#16 12-15-08 | | | S311 | | | S321 REV# 16 12-15-08 | | | S361 REV# 26 1-09-09 | | | S501 REV# 16 12-15-08 | | | S521 REV# 16 12-15-08 | | | S522 REV# 16 S522 | | | S531 REV#16 12-15-08 | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | MEMBER OF BOAF, THE BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF | | | FLORIDA: PROTECTING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. UNDER FLORIDA STATE STATUTE SB 80, E-MAIL | | | ADDRESSES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO | | | OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE | | | PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. | | | YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE THEREFORE SUBJECT TO | | | PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-08 |
Time |
14:22 |
Rev Time |
1.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-08 |
Time |
14:22 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-08 16:57:34 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD | | | CONT: RYAN CO. | | | TEL: (813)267-3281 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | SUBMITTALS REVIEW:PANEL WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS | | | PREPARED BY BLANEY ENGINEERING INC. | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) THE DOCUMENT SUBMITTED BLANEY ENGINEERING HAS BEEN | | | SUBMITTED ON A FEW PROJECTS AND DENIED IN ALL | | | CASES.SHEET # 6 OF THIS DOCUMENT INDICATES THE SAFE | | | ALLOWABLE LOADS THAT CAN BE APPLIED TO THIS FASTENER. | | | SHEET # 4 IS REDUCING THE SAFETY FACTOR OF THE FASTENER | | | ITSELI. | | | | | | 1A)NOTE # 6 FROM THE STEEL STUD MANUFACTURERS | | | ASSOCIATION PRODUCT TECHNICAL INFORMATION PACKET | | | INDICATES, APPLIED LOADS MAY BE MULTIPLIED BY 0.75 FOR | | | WIND LOADING PER AISI A 5.1.3. | | | 2004 FBC 1605.3.1.1 ALSO REQUIRES THE LOAD REDUCTIONS: | | | 605.3.1.1 LOAD REDUCTION. | | | 1. IT IS PERMITTED TO MULTIPLY THE COMBINED EFFECT OF | | | TWO OR MORE VARIABLE LOADS BY 0.75 AND ADD THE EFFECT | | | OF DEAD LOAD. THE COMBINED LOAD USED IN DESIGN SHALL | | | NOT BE LESS THAN THE SUM OF THE EFFECT OF DEAD LOAD AND | | | ANY OF THE VARIABLE LOADS. | | | 2. INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SPECIFIED IN THE | | | MATERIALS, SECTIONS OF THIS CODE OR A REFERENCED | | | STANDARD SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO BE USED WITH LOAD | | | COMBINATIONS OF SECTIONS 1605.3.1. DURATION OF LOAD | | | INCREASE SHALL BE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER | | | 23. | | | EXCEPTION: INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402 | | | PROVIDED THE LOAD REDUCTION OF SECTION 1605.3.1.1 ITEM | | | 1 SHALL NOT BE APPLIED. | | | 3. SIMULTANEOUS USE OF BOTH ONE-THIRD INCREASE IN | | | ALLOWABLE STRESS AND THE 25-PERCENT REDUCTION IN | | | COMBINED LOADS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. | | | | | | 1B) BEFORE THE 2004 FBC THE CODE ALLOWED A 1 1/3RD | | | INCREASE IN FASTENERS. CURRENTLY ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | BEFORE THE 2004 FBC WENT INTO EFFECT THEY HAVE TO BE | | | RE-EVALUATED TO THE 2004 FBC OR HAVE A FLORIDA PE | | | RECALCULATE THE FASTENER STRENGTH. | | | | | | 1C) IN REVIEWING COMPARIBLE FASTENERS CLARK AND WESTERN | | | HAVE VALUES OF 177 LBS FOR SHEAR AND 84 LBS FOR TENSION | | | # 10 SCREW 33 MILS/ FY (KSI) 33 | | | DIETRICH VALUES OF 151 LBS FOR SHEAR AND 75 LBS FOR | | | TENSION # 10 SCREW 33 MILD/ FY (KSI) 33 | | | | | | 1D) SSMA SCREW TABLE NOTES# 4, SCREW STRENGTH NEEDS TO | | | BE VERIFIED BY THE SCREW MANUFACTER. WE HAVE FOUND SOME | | | OF THE TIMES THE FASTENERS ARE IMPORTS AND TESTING HAS | | | NOT BEEN COMPLETED | | | BECAUSE OF INCONSISTEANCEY OF THE YIELD STRENGHT OF THE | | | METALS OR ALLOYS.PLEASE PROVIDE THE ACTUAL SCREW | | | MANUFACTURERS VALUES FOR SHEAR AND TENSION. | | | | | | 1E) BLANEY ENGINEERING HAS BEEN CONTACTED BY THIS | | | OFFICE BY SAMANTHA HILL AND IS AWARE THAT THE VALUES OF | | | THE FASTENERS WILL NEED TO BE THE MANUFACTURERS VALUES, | | | THAT YOU DO NOT INCREASE BUT DECREASE VALUES BECAUSSE | | | OF COMBINED LOADING OF VERTICAL LOADS, GRAVIRTY LOADS | | | AND HORIZONTAL LOADING THAT MAY OCCUR AT THE SAME TIME. | | | | | | WALKER ENGINEERINGPAGE 6 OF 31 | | | | | | 2) PLEASE PROVIDE WHERE THE VALUES FOUND ON PAGE 6 | | | SCREW ALLOWABLE PULLOUT WAS DERIVED FROM. THERE IS | | | ASSUMPTION OR UNKNOWNS THAT DO MAKE A DIFFERENCE ON THE | | | VALUES PRESENTED OR THAT WERE NOT STATED. | | | | | | 2A) THE BASE METAL THICKNESS (GAUGE) THE FIRST UNKNOWN | | | IS WHAT TYPE OF METAL ARE WE WORKING WITH FOR THE BASE | | | METAL, STEEL, GALVENIZED STEEL, STAINLESS, ETC AND ON | | | THE VALUES OF FY/ FU. | | | | | | 2B) AS STATED ABOVE IN THE FIRST SECTION THE ALLOWABLE | | | WORKING STRENGTH OF THE MATEIALS TO BE FATTACHED | | | TOGETHER AND THE SCREW TO SEE WHAT IS THE WEAKEST VALUE | | | THAT CAN BE USED, SINCE THIS WILL BE THE FAILURE POINT. | | | | | | 3) UNDER THE WALKER ENGINEERING REPORT PAGE 2 THE | | | DOCUMENT REFERENCES THE 2007 FBC, THIS IS INCORRECT, | | | SHOULD READ THE 2004 FBC WITH 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | | | 4) WALKER ENGINEERING REPORT PAGE2 ASCE 7-05 IS | | | REFRENCED THE 2004 FBC CHAPTER 35 ONLY REFRENCES THE | | | ASCE 7-02 VERSION PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
10:03 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
10:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-10 10:05:12 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | SEPT. 10/08 | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | | | | 1)PROVISO: SUBMITTED WERE TWO TYPES OF FLOOR EXSPANSION | | | JOINT MATERIALS, IN ONE CASE THE SINCE THE HFXR-1-1 | | | SYSTEM DOES INDICATE THAT THE FIRE BARRIER IS OPTIONAL, | | | SHOP DRAWINGS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY THE DESIGN TEAM | | | BEFORE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, SINCE THE | | | CUT SHEETS PROVIDED DO NOT INDICATE THE REQUIRED FIRE | | | BARRIER SYSTEM TO TIE WITH THIS PRODUCT. | | | THE SECOND PRODUCT SUBMITTED WAS MM PYRO-FLEX/ PF | | | SERIES AGAIN THERE IS NO INFORMATION AS TO THE REQUIRED | | | THICKNESS OF THIS PRODUCT OR THE HOURLY RATING OF THE | | | PRODUCT, THE DESIGN TEAM BEFORE SUBMITTED TO THE | | | BUILDING DEPARTMENT, SINCE THE CUT SHEETS PROVIDED DO | | | NOT INDICATE THE REQUIRED FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM TO TIE | | | WITH THIS PRODUCT. | | | | | | 2) BUILDING PROVISO: PLEASE PROVIDE THE MANUFACTURERS | | | SPEC FOR FIRE RESISTANT RATING OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS | | | BEFORE FRAMING INSPECTION. THE CODE ANALYSIS INDICATES | | | THIS TO BE A TYPE I-B BUILDING REQUIRING FIRE RATINGS | | | OF THE STRUCTURAL STEEL AND BAR JOIST, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | THE MANUFACTURERS SPEC AND THE THICKNESS REQUIRED TO | | | ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED FIRE RATING. TABLE 601 & 721.5. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
Time |
13:41 |
Rev Time |
15.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-07 13:46:10 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | 3RD REVIEW 08-07-08 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1-4) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5) BUILDING PROVISO: 109.3.10* IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REGULATED BY THIS CODE SHALL | | | BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT | | | THE CONDITION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, UNLESS SUCH | | | ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED TO AFFECT SAID PROPERTY PURSUANT | | | TO A CONSENT BY THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER | | | TERMS & CONDITIONS AGREEABLE TO THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY | | | OWNER. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE CONTROL | | | OF DUST, NOISE, WATER OR DRAINAGE RUN-OFF, DEBRIS, AND | | | THE STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. NEW CONSTRUCTION | | | ACTIVITY SHALL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT HISTORIC SURFACE | | | WATER DRAINAGE FLOWS SERVING ADJACENT PROPERTIES, & MAY | | | REQUIRE SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN COMPLYING WITH | | | ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE | | | POSITIVE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES. ACCORDINGLY, | | | DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS, AND OWNERS OF ALL NEW | | | RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, POOLS, | | | PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, OR SIMILAR ITEMS, ON EXISTING | | | PROPERTIES RESULTING IN A DECREASE IN EXCESS OF 800SQ | | | FT OF PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY PARCEL SHALL AS A | | | PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED | | | DRAINAGE PLAN CLEARLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | | PARAGRAPH. UPON COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT, A | | | CERTIFICATION FROM A LICENSED ENGINEER SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL | | | OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | | | 6) BUILDING PROVISO: 109.3.10.1 HURRICANE PROTECTION. | | | IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO ALLOW | | | CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO | | | REMAIN LOOSE OR OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION | | | SITE FROM 24 HRS. AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN | | | ISSUED UNTIL THE HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN | | | LIFTED. ALL SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND | | | DEBRIS SHALL BE EITHER REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION | | | SITE OR SECURED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE THE | | | DANGER OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND | | | DEBRIS CAUSING DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH | | | WINDS. ANY PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO REMOVE OR | | | SECURE THE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS | | | WITHIN 24 HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED | | | SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $500.00. IN | | | ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, A LICENSED CONTRACTOR WHO | | | VIOLATES THIS SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE | | | PURSUANT TO SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | | | | 7) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 8-10) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 11)INFORMATIONAL ONLY, PLEASE REVIEW SHEET A021 EXIT | | | ANALYSIS, SALES AREA PER SQ FT/ OCC. THIS IS THE 2ND | | | FLOOR WHICH IS NOT CONSIDERED THE GRADE FLOOR. THE | | | OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THIS FLOORS SALES AREA WOULD BE | | | FIGURED AT 60 FT / OCCUPANT NOT THE 30 AS INDICATED IN | | | THE TABLE SEE TABLE 1004.1.2.PLAN NOTES HAVE BEEN ADDED | | | TO THE EXIT STAIRWAY SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 11A) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 11B) 08-11-08 COMPLIED. | | | | | | 11C-11K) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 12A)PROVISO: SUBMITTED WERE TWO TYPES OF FLOOR | | | EXSPANSION JOINT MATERIALS, IN ONE CASE THE SINCE THE | | | HFXR-1-1 SYSTEM DOES INDICATE THAT THE FIRE BARRIER IS | | | OPTIONAL, SHOP DRAWINGS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY THE | | | DESIGN TEAM BEFORE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING | | | DEPARTMENT, SINCE THE CUT SHEETS PROVIDED DO NOT | | | INDICATE THE REQUIRED FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM TO TIE WITH | | | THIS PRODUCT. | | | THE SECOND PRODUCT SUBMITTED WAS MM PYRO-FLEX/ PF | | | SERIES AGAIN THERE IS NO INFORMATION AS TO THE REQUIRED | | | THICKNESS OF THIS PRODUCT OR THE HOURLY RATING OF THE | | | PRODUCT, THE DESIGN TEAM BEFORE SUBMITTED TO THE | | | BUILDING DEPARTMENT, SINCE THE CUT SHEETS PROVIDED DO | | | NOT INDICATE THE REQUIRED FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM TO TIE | | | WITH THIS PRODUCT. | | | | | | 13) 08-11-08 COMPLIED. | | | 14-19) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 20) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 21A) 08-11-08 COMPLIED. | | | | | | 21B-C) 11-08-08 COMPLIED.T | | | | | | 22-30) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 31) BUILDING PROVISO: PLEASE PROVIDE THE MANUFACTURERS | | | SPEC FOR FIRE RESISTANT RATING OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS | | | BEFORE FRAMING INSPECTION. THE CODE ANALYSIS INDICATES | | | THIS TO BE A TYPE I-B BUILDING REQUIRING FIRE RATINGS | | | OF THE STRUCTURAL STEEL AND BAR JOIST, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | THE MANUFACTURERS SPEC AND THE THICKNESS REQUIRED TO | | | ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED FIRE RATING. TABLE 601 & 721.5. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-06-24 |
Time |
14:03 |
Rev Time |
8.88 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-06-24 |
Time |
14:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-24 15:00:55 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | 2NDREVIEW 6-24-08 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A)WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE | | | REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1B) INFORMATIONAL, PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, | | | PLANS, REPORTS, REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR | | | SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW FOR PERMIT. | | | IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF | | | YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A | | | THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID | | | DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* | | | /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM BEACH | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | | | 1C)INFORMATIONAL, 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE | | | CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN | | | INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO | | | THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO | | | CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION | | | SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE | | | CITED AS A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR | | | ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | | | 1D ) INFORMATIONAL, FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. | | | NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS | | | AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & | | | VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | 1E) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) | | | AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC | | | BUILDING WITH THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. PLEASE CORRECT | | | SHEET G001 BUILDINGCODE INFORMATION. | | | BUILDING ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA- IS INDICATED AS | | | UNLIMITED, NOTE S-2 PORTION OF THE BUILDING DOES HAVE | | | AREA LIITATIONS TABLE 503. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT IF A PERMIT APPLICATION WILL NEED TO | | | BE APPLIED FOR BEFORE DEC. 31, 2008 TO LOCK THIS | | | PROJECT IN UNDER THE 2004 FBC. ON JAN.1, 2009 THE 2007 | | | FBC WILL GO INTO AFFECT. | | | | | | 2) 2ND REQUEST, AT THIS TIME WE HAVE NOT SEEN ANY | | | APPLICATION FOR A RESIDENT INSPECTOR. FBC* 109.3.7 | | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR RESUME' AND | | | LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO KEN CONRAD , DIRECTOR OF THE | | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM. 805-6711 OR 805-3749.A | | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS | | | PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: | | | XXX -BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | | CONSTRUCTION | | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (F'C) | | | IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI | | | - PILE DRIVING | | | XXX - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQ FT IN AREA | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR | | | METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION | | | | | | 3) FBC* 109.3.7 SINCE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR WILL | | | REQUIRED, THREE OF ALL DOCUMENTS (PLANS, REPORTS, | | | SUBMITTALS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS) WILL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT. | | | | | | 4) NOTE THERE HAVE BEEN (2) SUBMITIONS OF SOILS REPORTS | | | TO THIS OFFICE, MAY 29TH 3 SETS OF COPIED SIGNATURES OF | | | THE ENGINNEER WERE SUBMITTED, THE SECOND SET DATED JUNE | | | 22, 2008 WERE SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE AGAIN | | | PHOTO-COPIED SIGNATURES WITH A RAISED SEAL WERE | | | SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE. | | | 61G15-23.002(2)FL. ADMIN. CODE. PLANS SIGNED & SEALED | | | BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL INCLUDE EITHER THE: | | | NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER OR, | | | THE NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER AND THE | | | NAME, ADDRESS AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER | | | OF THE ENGINEERING BUSINESS THROUGH WHICH THE ENGINEER | | | IS PRACTICING (471.025 F.S. AND 471.023 F.S.). | | | | | | SOILS REPORTS PLEASE SUBMIT THREE REPORTS WITH ORIGINAL | | | SIGNATURES, NOT COPIES OR STAMPED SIGNATURES.1802.2.1 | | | QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF | | | THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE | | | SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE NECESSARY | | | INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH 1802.6 | | | . | | | | | | ALLOF THE SUBMITTED SOILS REPORTS ARE GOING TO BE | | | RETAINED FOR POSSIBLE REVIEW BY THE FLORIDA ENGINEERS' | | | BOARD. | | | | | | 5)BUILDING PROVISO:109.3.10* IMPACT OF | | | CONSTRUCTION. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REGULATED BY | | | THIS CODE SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER SO AS NOT TO | | | ADVERSELY IMPACT THE CONDITION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, | | | UNLESS SUCH ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED TO AFFECT SAID | | | PROPERTY PURSUANT TO A CONSENT BY THE APPLICABLE | | | PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER TERMS & CONDITIONS AGREEABLE TO | | | THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT | | | LIMITED TO THE CONTROL OF DUST, NOISE, WATER OR | | | DRAINAGE RUN-OFF, DEBRIS, AND THE STORAGE OF | | | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. NEW CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL | | | NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT HISTORIC SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE | | | FLOWS SERVING ADJACENT PROPERTIES, & MAY REQUIRE | | | SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN COMPLYING WITH ENGINEERING | | | STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE | | | POSITIVE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES. ACCORDINGLY, | | | DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS, AND OWNERS OF ALL NEW | | | RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, POOLS, | | | PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, OR SIMILAR ITEMS, ON EXISTING | | | PROPERTIES RESULTING IN A DECREASE IN EXCESS OF 800SQ | | | FT OF PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY PARCEL SHALL AS A | | | PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED | | | DRAINAGE PLAN CLEARLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | | PARAGRAPH. UPON COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT, A | | | CERTIFICATION FROM A LICENSED ENGINEER SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL | | | OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | | | 6) BUILDING PROVISO:109.3.10.1 HURRICANE PROTECTION. | | | IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO ALLOW | | | CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO | | | REMAIN LOOSE OR OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION | | | SITE FROM 24 HRS. AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN | | | ISSUED UNTIL THE HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN | | | LIFTED. ALL SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND | | | DEBRIS SHALL BE EITHER REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION | | | SITE OR SECURED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE THE | | | DANGER OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND | | | DEBRIS CAUSING DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH | | | WINDS. ANY PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO REMOVE OR | | | SECURE THE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS | | | WITHIN 24 HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED | | | SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $500.00.IN | | | ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, A LICENSED CONTRACTOR WHO | | | VIOLATES THIS SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE | | | PURSUANT TO SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | | | | 7) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 8A)SEECOMMENT 1-E . | | | | | | 8B-C) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 9-10) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 11) PLEASE REVIEWSHEET A021 EXIT ANALYSIS, SALES AREA | | | PERSQ FT/ OCC. THIS IS THE 2ND FLOOR WHICH IS NOT | | | CONSIDERED THE GRADE FLOOR. THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THIS | | | FLOORS SALES AREA WOULD BE FIGURED AT60 FT / OCCUPANT | | | NOT THE 30 AS INDICATED IN THE TABLE SEE TABLE | | | 1004.1.2. | | | | | | 11A) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 11B) SEMI-COMPLIED.AS DISCUSSED IN OUR MEETING WITH | | | THE TARGET DESIGN TEAM WE CONCUR THAT STAIRA IS NOT | | | PART OF THE REQUIRED EGRESS STAIRS BUT IF THIS IS TO BE | | | THE CASE PLEASE SEE A021 THAT DOES HAVE TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES MARKED WITH AN ARROW DIRECTLY DOWN THESE | | | STAIRS. 707.2, EXCEPTION 2. | | | | | | 11C-11K) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 12A)PROVISO: PLEASE PROVIDE CUT SHEET OF ASTM E1966 | | | ASSEMBLY. NUMBER.A021 REFERS TO DETAIL#2 SHEETA331 | | | THIS SECTION OR DETAIL REFERENCES DETAIL 20 ON SHEET | | | A231. IT APPEARS TO BE AN EXPANSION JOINT IN THE FLOOR | | | BUT THERE IS NO INFORMATION THAT I CAN FIND ON THE | | | FIREPROOFING REQUIREMENTS TABLE 601 FOR FLOOR SYSTEMS | | | AND OCCUPANCY TYPE SEPARATION TABLE 302.3.2.PLEASE | | | PROVIDE FLOOR CEILING TYPE PENETRATIONS FOR PIPES AND | | | CONDUITS AS WELL AS FOR ANY HORIZONTAL PENETRATION OF | | | RATED FLOOR/ CEILING ASSEMBLY. | | | SEE 711.3.& 712.3.1. | | | | | | 12B)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 13) 2ND REQUEST, THE RESPONSE INDICATES COMPLIANCE ON | | | CIVIL PLANS , PLEASE PROVIDE THE PLANS FOR REVIEW. | | | SHEETA110 INDICATES THE DISABLED PARKING SPACES AND | | | ACCESS AISLES BUT NOT THE ELEVATION CHANGES OF THE | | | PARKING LOT VERSES DISABLED SPACES AND ACCESS AISLES. | | | THE OTHER ISSUE IS NO INFORMATION FOR DETECTABLE | | | WARNING AT HAZARDOUS VEHICULAR AREAS 11-4.29.5. | | | | | | 14) SHEET A110 : | | | A-C)COMPLIED. | | | D) NEW COMMENT: THIS SHEET INDICATES MULTIPLE AREAS | | | WHERE CURB CUTS ARE INDICATED, PLEASE COMPLY WITH | | | 11-4.7.5 FLARED SIDES. | | | E) NEW COMMENT: GRID LINE 8 AT B/C THIS HANDICAPPED | | | PARKING SPACE IS MISSING THE ACCESS AISLE11-4.6.3. | | | | | | 15-19) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 20)2ND REQUEST, SHEET A351 & A352 BOTH INDICATE AN | | | ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION CENTER THAT DOES NOT HAVE A | | | CODE COMPLIANT STAIR. THE CODE DOES ALLOW FOR FIXED | | | LADDERS AS PART OF A MEANS OF EGRESS IN THE FOLLOWING | | | LOCATIONS:FOR BOILERS (1014.3), REFRIGERATION ROOM | | | (1014.4), STAGE EXITS 410.5.4, 1014.6.6.1 GALLERY, | | | GRIDIRONS AND CATWALKS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH STAGES | | | AND HELISTOPS (1018.1.2.). PLEASE PROVIDE A CODE | | | COMPLIANT STAIRWAY.THE PLANS WILL MEET THE EXCEPTION | | | UNDER 1009.3 INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT ACCESS STAIRS. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE THE WIDTH OF THE STAIRS, TREAD AND RISERS. | | | | | | 21) 2ND REQUESTPLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | | ON THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION CENTER, | | | PRE-MANUFACTURED? TYPE OF MATERIAL, FIRE RATINGS ETC? | | | NFPA 13.8.14.10. THE STAIR WALL THAT LEADS TO THE EDC | | | ARE INDICATED AS 2HR WALLS. THE WALLS DO NOT CONTINUE | | | TO ENCLOSE THE STAIR LANDING WHICH WOULD BE WHAT | | | SUROUNDS THE EDC. HOW DOES THIS MAKE A STAIRWELL | | | ENCLOSURE WITH A 2 HR RATING? | | | THE COMMENT# 24 WILL ILLUSTRATE THE 2 HR WALL RATING | | | REQUIRED AROUND THE EMERGENCY EQUIREMENT ROOM ONLY. | | | | | | 22-23) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 24) SHEET A351,A361 & ELECTRICAL CUT SHEETS FROM | | | MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC, THEMAIN ELECTRIC CENTER ROOM 129 | | | & 137, PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE | | | ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION CENTER THAT IS INDICATED TO BE | | | PRE-MANUFACTURED. TYPE OF MATERIAL, FIRE RATINGS ETC? | | | NFPA 13.8.14.10. THE CUT SHEETS DO NOT PROVIDE HOW THE | | | HOUR RATING IS ACHIEVED OR WHAT MATERIALS EITHER OF THE | | | EDCS ARE | | | CONSTRUCTED OF? PLEASE PROVIDE RATING OF THE DOORS FOR | | | BOTH 129 AND 137. NOTE IN UNIT 137 THE EMERGENCY | | | EQUIPMENT ROOM WILL ALSO REQUIRE A 2HR RATING FROM THE | | | REST OF THE ENCLOSURE. THERE CAN BE | | | NO REDUCTION FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS, PLEASE SEE NFPA 110 | | | 7.2.1.1, ALSO SEE ELECTRICAL COMMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE A | | | COPY OF THE UL RATING U415 SYSTEM F/ 2006 UL DIRECTORY, | | | WE DO NOT HAVE UP TO DATE | | | UL LISTING BOOKS TO VERIFY DETAIL 5/ A351. | | | | | | 25-27) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 28) FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, | | | PROVIDE 3COPIES IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR OF | | | PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS | | | FOLLOWS: | | | | | | 28A) WINDOWS: CURTAIN-WALL - COMPLIED. | | | | | | 28B) WINDOWS: STOREFRONT- 2ND REQUEST, | | | THISNOA WAS ISSUED AND TESTEDBEFORE THE 2004 FBC | | | WENT INTO EFFECT. BEFORE THIS DATE STEEL INCREASES OF 1 | | | 1/3 WERE COMMON PLACE AND TAKEN WITH FASTENERS, AP.E. | | | SHOULD REVIEW THE TEST REPORT INFORMATION TO SEE IF THE | | | INCREASES WERE TAKEN.THE NEWER MIAMI-DADE NOAS THAT | | | WERE RENEWED AFTER THE 2004 FBC WENT INTO EFFECT WILL | | | STATE UNDER THE HEADING (3) CALCULATIONS, ANCHOR | | | VERIFICATION VERIFIED TO THE 2004 FBC- NO STEEL | | | INCREASES TAKEN. NOA 04-0308.02 ANCHOR CALCULATIONS | | | THIS REVISION ON 04/13/04 BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF THE | | | 2004 FBC. | | | 1605.3.1.1 LOAD REDUCTION. | | | 1.IT IS PERMITTED TO MULTIPLY THE COMBINED EFFECT | | | OF TWO OR MORE VARIABLE LOADS BY 0.75 AND ADD THE | | | EFFECT OF DEAD LOAD. THE COMBINED LOAD USED IN DESIGN | | | SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE SUM OF THE EFFECT OF DEAD | | | LOAD AND ANY OF THE VARIABLE LOADS. | | | 2.INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SPECIFIED IN THE | | | MATERIALS, SECTIONS OF THIS CODE OR A REFERENCED | | | STANDARD SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO BE USED WITH LOAD | | | COMBINATIONS OF SECTIONS 1605.3.1 . DURATION OF LOAD | | | INCREASE SHALL BE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER | | | 23 . | | | EXCEPTION: INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402 | | | PROVIDED THE LOAD REDUCTION OF SECTION 1605.3.1.1 ITEM | | | 1 SHALL NOT BE APPLIED. | | | 3.SIMULTANEOUS USE OF BOTH ONE-THIRD INCREASE IN | | | ALLOWABLE STRESS AND THE 25-PERCENT REDUCTION IN | | | COMBINED LOADS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. | | | | | | 28C1) AUTOMATIC BYPASS DOOR NOA03-0605.03 | | | THISNOA WAS ISSUED AND TESTEDBEFORE THE 2004 FBC | | | WENT INTO EFFECT. BEFORE THIS DATE STEEL INCREASES OF 1 | | | 1/3 WERE COMMON PLACE AND TAKEN WITH FASTENERS, AP.E. | | | SHOULD REVIEW THE TEST REPORT INFORMATION TO SEE IF THE | | | INCREASES WERE TAKEN.THE NEWER MIAMI-DADE NOAS THAT | | | WERE RENEWED AFTER THE 2004 FBC WENT INTO EFFECT WILL | | | STATE UNDER THE HEADING (3) CALCULATIONS, ANCHOR | | | VERIFICATION VERIFIED TO THE 2004 FBC- NO STEEL | | | INCREASES TAKEN. NOA 03-0605.03 ANCHOR CALCULATIONS | | | THIS REVISION ON 10/31/03 BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF THE | | | 2004 FBC. | | | 1605.3.1.1 LOAD REDUCTION. | | | 1.IT IS PERMITTED TO MULTIPLY THE COMBINED EFFECT | | | OF TWO OR MORE VARIABLE LOADS BY 0.75 AND ADD THE | | | EFFECT OF DEAD LOAD. THE COMBINED LOAD USED IN DESIGN | | | SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE SUM OF THE EFFECT OF DEAD | | | LOAD AND ANY OF THE VARIABLE LOADS. | | | 2.INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SPECIFIED IN THE | | | MATERIALS, SECTIONS OF THIS CODE OR A REFERENCED | | | STANDARD SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO BE USED WITH LOAD | | | COMBINATIONS OF SECTIONS 1605.3.1 . DURATION OF LOAD | | | INCREASE SHALL BE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER | | | 23 . | | | EXCEPTION: INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402 | | | PROVIDED THE LOAD REDUCTION OF SECTION 1605.3.1.1 ITEM | | | 1 SHALL NOT BE APPLIED. | | | 3.SIMULTANEOUS USE OF BOTH ONE-THIRD INCREASE IN | | | ALLOWABLE STRESS AND THE 25-PERCENT REDUCTION IN | | | COMBINED LOADS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. | | | | | | 28C2) AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOORS NOA 04-1026.02 | | | THISNOA WAS ISSUED AND TESTEDBEFORE THE 2004 FBC | | | WENT INTO EFFECT. BEFORE THIS DATE STEEL INCREASES OF 1 | | | 1/3 WERE COMMON PLACE AND TAKEN WITH FASTENERS, AP.E. | | | SHOULD REVIEW THE TEST REPORT INFORMATION TO SEE IF THE | | | INCREASES WERE TAKEN.THE NEWER MIAMI-DADE NOAS THAT | | | WERE RENEWED AFTER THE 2004 FBC WENT INTO EFFECT WILL | | | STATE UNDER THE HEADING (3) CALCULATIONS, ANCHOR | | | VERIFICATION VERIFIED TO THE 2004 FBC- NO STEEL | | | INCREASES TAKEN. NOA 04-1026.02ANCHOR CALCULATIONS | | | THIS REVISION ON 10/11/04 BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF THE | | | 2004 FBC. | | | 1605.3.1.1 LOAD REDUCTION. | | | 1.IT IS PERMITTED TO MULTIPLY THE COMBINED EFFECT | | | OF TWO OR MORE VARIABLE LOADS BY 0.75 AND ADD THE | | | EFFECT OF DEAD LOAD. THE COMBINED LOAD USED IN DESIGN | | | SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE SUM OF THE EFFECT OF DEAD | | | LOAD AND ANY OF THE VARIABLE LOADS. | | | 2.INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SPECIFIED IN THE | | | MATERIALS, SECTIONS OF THIS CODE OR A REFERENCED | | | STANDARD SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO BE USED WITH LOAD | | | COMBINATIONS OF SECTIONS 1605.3.1 . DURATION OF LOAD | | | INCREASE SHALL BE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER | | | 23 . | | | EXCEPTION: INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402 | | | PROVIDED THE LOAD REDUCTION OF SECTION 1605.3.1.1 ITEM | | | 1 SHALL NOT BE APPLIED. | | | 3.SIMULTANEOUS USE OF BOTH ONE-THIRD INCREASE IN | | | ALLOWABLE STRESS AND THE 25-PERCENT REDUCTION IN | | | COMBINED LOADS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. | | | | | | 28D) EXTERIOR GLAZED SWING DOORS NOA 04-0209.03 THIS | | | NOA WAS ISSUED AND TESTEDBEFORE THE 2004 FBC WENT | | | INTO EFFECT. BEFORE THIS DATE STEEL INCREASES OF 1 1/3 | | | WERE COMMON PLACE AND TAKEN WITH FASTENERS, AP.E. | | | SHOULD REVIEW THE TEST REPORT INFORMATION TO SEE IF THE | | | INCREASES WERE TAKEN.THE NEWER MIAMI-DADE NOAS THAT | | | WERE RENEWED AFTER THE 2004 FBC WENT INTO EFFECT WILL | | | STATE UNDER THE HEADING (3) CALCULATIONS, ANCHOR | | | VERIFICATION VERIFIED TO THE 2004 FBC- NO STEEL | | | INCREASES TAKEN. NOA 04-0209.03 ANCHOR CALCULATIONS | | | THIS REVISION ON 04/13/04 BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF THE | | | 2004 FBC. | | | 1605.3.1.1 LOAD REDUCTION. | | | 1.IT IS PERMITTED TO MULTIPLY THE COMBINED EFFECT | | | OF TWO OR MORE VARIABLE LOADS BY 0.75 AND ADD THE | | | EFFECT OF DEAD LOAD. THE COMBINED LOAD USED IN DESIGN | | | SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE SUM OF THE EFFECT OF DEAD | | | LOAD AND ANY OF THE VARIABLE LOADS. | | | 2.INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SPECIFIED IN THE | | | MATERIALS, SECTIONS OF THIS CODE OR A REFERENCED | | | STANDARD SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO BE USED WITH LOAD | | | COMBINATIONS OF SECTIONS 1605.3.1 . DURATION OF LOAD | | | INCREASE SHALL BE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER | | | 23 . | | | EXCEPTION: INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402 | | | PROVIDED THE LOAD REDUCTION OF SECTION 1605.3.1.1 ITEM | | | 1 SHALL NOT BE APPLIED. | | | 3.SIMULTANEOUS USE OF BOTH ONE-THIRD INCREASE IN | | | ALLOWABLE STRESS AND THE 25-PERCENT REDUCTION IN | | | COMBINED LOADS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. | | | | | | 28E1) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS SINGLE AND PAIRSNOA | | | 04-0203.03 | | | THISNOA WAS ISSUED AND TESTEDBEFORE THE 2004 FBC | | | WENT INTO EFFECT. BEFORE THIS DATE STEEL INCREASES OF 1 | | | 1/3 WERE COMMON PLACE AND TAKEN WITH FASTENERS, AP.E. | | | SHOULD REVIEW THE TEST REPORT INFORMATION TO SEE IF THE | | | INCREASES WERE TAKEN.THE NEWER MIAMI-DADE NOAS THAT | | | WERE RENEWED AFTER THE 2004 FBC WENT INTO EFFECT WILL | | | STATE UNDER THE HEADING (3) CALCULATIONS, ANCHOR | | | VERIFICATION VERIFIED TO THE 2004 FBC- NO STEEL | | | INCREASES TAKEN. NOA 04-0203.03 ANCHOR CALCULATIONS | | | THIS REVISION ON 08/09/04 BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF THE | | | 2004 FBC. | | | 1605.3.1.1 LOAD REDUCTION. | | | 1.IT IS PERMITTED TO MULTIPLY THE COMBINED EFFECT | | | OF TWO OR MORE VARIABLE LOADS BY 0.75 AND ADD THE | | | EFFECT OF DEAD LOAD. THE COMBINED LOAD USED IN DESIGN | | | SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE SUM OF THE EFFECT OF DEAD | | | LOAD AND ANY OF THE VARIABLE LOADS. | | | 2.INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SPECIFIED IN THE | | | MATERIALS, SECTIONS OF THIS CODE OR A REFERENCED | | | STANDARD SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO BE USED WITH LOAD | | | COMBINATIONS OF SECTIONS 1605.3.1 . DURATION OF LOAD | | | INCREASE SHALL BE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER | | | 23 . | | | EXCEPTION: INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402 | | | PROVIDED THE LOAD REDUCTION OF SECTION 1605.3.1.1 ITEM | | | 1 SHALL NOT BE APPLIED. | | | 3.SIMULTANEOUS USE OF BOTH ONE-THIRD INCREASE IN | | | ALLOWABLE STRESS AND THE 25-PERCENT REDUCTION IN | | | COMBINED LOADS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. | | | | | | 28E2) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS SINGLE AND PAIRS - | | | COMPLIED.SEE CALCULATION STATEMENT # 1, ANCHOR | | | VERIFICATION OF THE 2004 FBC | | | | | | 28F)1) EXTERIOR COIL DOORS/ SECTIONAL DOORSCORNELL IRON | | | WORKS SUBMITTED FL5416 THE ATTACHED MIAMI-DADE REPORT | | | IS NOT THE CORRECT BACK-UP REPORT LISTED WITH THE | | | STATE, ES16-23-01 IS THE CORRECT REPORT. | | | | | | 28F)2) EXTERIOR COIL/ ROLL UP DOOR COOKSON COMPANY | | | FL2211-R1 THE ATTACHED IS A MIAMI-DADE REPORT IS NOT | | | THE CORRECT BACK-UP REPORT LISTED WITH THE STATE, | | | WLCD-002-B-2004 IS THE CORRECT REPORT, | | | | | | 28F)3) EXTERIOR SECTIONAL DOOR: CLOPAY MISSING THE | | | FLORIDA COVERSHEET AND CORRESPONDING REPORTS THERE ARE | | | (3) REPORTS WITH THE DOOR MODEL 3200 OR 3220. NOTE | | | PRESSURES ARE LOWER UNDER THESE REPORTS. | | | | | | 28G) FASCIA SYSTEMS | | | | | | 28H) EFIS WALL SYSTEMS- DRYVIT SYSTEMS FL2030-R2 | | | SUBMITTED 06-0608.05PLEASE SUPPLY CORRESPONDING | | | REPORT 06-1004.06DRYVIT OUTSULATION PLUS, PLEASE | | | CORRECT. | | | | | | 28I) ROOFING SYSTEMS W/ INSULATION- COMPLIED. | | | | | | 28J) ROOF HATCH- COMPLIED. | | | | | | 28K) LOUVER WALL- RUSKIN FL3283-R1 WAS SUBMITTED WITH | | | THE WRONG MIAMI-DADE NOA FOR BACK UP | | | | | | 28L) ALCAN ALUCOBOND COMPOSITE WALL PANEL NOA | | | 06-1019.02 IS A NON-FIRE RATED COMPOSITE PANEL, WHERE | | | WILL THIS PRODUCT BE USED, TYPE I-B NONCOMBUSTIBLES AND | | | SECTION 603? | | | NOTE # 4 STUDS GRATER THAN 4'-0"IN HEIGHT MUST | | | BE DESIGNED BY A FL PE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 90+/-. FLORIDA | | | DOES HAVE ALCAN COMPOSITE PANELS LISTED ON WEBSITE. | | | | | | 29)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 30)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 31) BUILDING PROVISO: PLEASE PROVIDE THE MANUFACTURERS | | | SPEC FOR FIRE RESISTANT RATING OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS | | | BEFORE FRAMING INSPECTION. THE CODE ANALYSIS INDICATES | | | THIS TO BE A TYPE I-B BUILDING REQUIRING FIRE RATINGS | | | OF THE STRUCTURAL STEEL AND BAR JOIST, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | THE MANUFACTURERS SPEC AND THE THICKNESS REQUIRED TO | | | ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED FIRE RATING. TABLE 601 & 721.5. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
Time |
08:47 |
Rev Time |
8.88 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
Time |
08:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-01 09:24:16 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08020128 (PLAN REVIEW) | | | ADD: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES | | | CONT: RYAN COMPANIES | | | TEL: (621)677-7235 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM: RSP ARCHITECTURAL GROUP | | | STEVEN J. FAUTSCH | | | AR# 93674 | | | | | | ENGINEERING FIRM TRC WORLD WIDE ENGINEERING | | | MARCUS O. UNTERWEGER | | | PE#63860 | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B/ FULLY SPRINKLERED | | | REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE | | | REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. | | | IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF | | | YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A | | | THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID | | | DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* | | | /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS WEST PALM BEACH | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | | | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & | | | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM | | | OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, | | | WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE | | | TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO | | | THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE OR | | | IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED | | | AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION | | | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE | | | LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND | | | SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS | | | OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND | | | REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | | | 1D ) FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | | ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 1E) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) | | | AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC | | | BUILDING WITH THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. PLEASE CORRECT | | | SHEET G001 BUILDING CODE INFORMATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | IF A PERMIT APPLICATION WILL NEED TO BE APPLIED FOR | | | BEFORE OCT 1, 2008 TO LOCK THIS PROJECT IN UNDER THE | | | 2004 FBC. OCT 1, 2008 THE 2007 FBC | | | WILL GO INTO AFFECT. | | | | | | 2) FBC* 109.3.7 RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR | | | RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, | | | DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM. A RESIDENT | | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO | | | ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: | | | XXX -BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | | CONSTRUCTION | | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS | | | OF 3000 PSI | | | - PILE DRIVING | | | XXX - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQ FT IN AREA | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR METHODS OF | | | CONSTRUCTION | | | | | | 3) FBC* 109.3.7 SINCE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR WILL | | | REQUIRED, THREE OF ALL DOCUMENTS (PLANS, REPORTS, | | | SUBMITTALS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS) WILL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT. | | | | | | 4) SOILS REPORTS 2 REPORTS WERE SUBMITTED, PLEASE | | | SUBMIT THREE REPORTS WITH ORIGINAL SIGNATURES, NOT | | | COPIES OR STAMPED SIGNATURES. 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE | | | SOIL. WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN | | | DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT | | | SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE NECESSARY INVESTIGATION | | | BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH 1802.6 . | | | | | | 5) 109.3.10* IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL CONSTRUCTION | | | ACTIVITY REGULATED BY THIS CODE SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A | | | MANNER SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT THE CONDITION OF | | | ADJACENT PROPERTY, UNLESS SUCH ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED TO | | | AFFECT SAID PROPERTY PURSUANT TO A CONSENT BY THE | | | APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER TERMS & CONDITIONS | | | AGREEABLE TO THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER. THIS | | | INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE CONTROL OF DUST, | | | NOISE, WATER OR DRAINAGE RUN-OFF, DEBRIS, AND THE | | | STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. NEW CONSTRUCTION | | | ACTIVITY SHALL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT HISTORIC SURFACE | | | WATER DRAINAGE FLOWS SERVING ADJACENT PROPERTIES, & MAY | | | REQUIRE SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN COMPLYING WITH | | | ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE | | | POSITIVE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES. ACCORDINGLY, | | | DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS, AND OWNERS OF ALL NEW | | | RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, POOLS, | | | PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, OR SIMILAR ITEMS, ON EXISTING | | | PROPERTIES RESULTING IN A DECREASE IN EXCESS OF 800SQ | | | FT OF PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY PARCEL SHALL AS A | | | PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED | | | DRAINAGE PLAN CLEARLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | | PARAGRAPH. UPON COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT, A | | | CERTIFICATION FROM A LICENSED ENGINEER SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL | | | OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | | | 6) 109.3.10.1 HURRICANE PROTECTION. IT SHALL BE | | | UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION RELATED | | | MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO REMAIN LOOSE OR | | | OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE FROM 24 HRS. | | | AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED UNTIL THE | | | HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN LIFTED. ALL SUCH | | | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE | | | EITHER REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR SECURED IN | | | SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE THE DANGER OF SUCH | | | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS CAUSING | | | DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH WINDS. ANY | | | PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO REMOVE OR SECURE THE | | | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS WITHIN 24 | | | HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED SHALL BE | | | SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $500.00. IN ADDITION TO | | | THE ABOVE, A LICENSED CONTRACTOR WHO VIOLATES THIS | | | SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO | | | SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | | | | 7) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 8) SHEET G001 THE BUILDING CODE INFORMATION : | | | 8A) THE PLANS INDICATE THIS TO HAVE A S2 AND M | | | OCCUPANCY PLEASE SEE CODE SECTIONS THAT WOULD CLASSIFY | | | THIS AS A MIXED USE BUILDING, NOT THE NON-SEPARATED USE | | | AS INDICATED IN YOUR CODE ANALYSIS. | | | | | | 406.2.7MIXED OCCUPANCIES. PARKING GARAGES SHALL BE | | | SEPARATED FROM OTHER OCCUPANCIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SECTION 302.3.2 . | | | | | | 406.3.4 PLEASE SEE ALLOWABLE MIXED USES ALLOWED IN THE | | | SAME BUILDING AS A OPEN PARKING GARAGE.302.3 MIXED USE | | | AND 508.7 A, B, M & R OCCUPANCIES. | | | | | | 302.3.2 SEPARATED USES. | | | EACH PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY | | | CLASSIFIED AS TO USE AND SHALL BE COMPLETELY SEPARATED | | | FROM ADJACENT AREAS BY FIRE BARRIER WALLS OR HORIZONTAL | | | ASSEMBLIES OR BOTH HAVING A FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING | | | DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 302.3.2 FOR USES | | | BEING SEPARATED. EACH FIRE AREA SHALL COMPLY WITH THIS | | | CODE BASED ON THE USE OF THAT SPACE. EACH FIRE AREA | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE HEIGHT LIMITATIONS BASED ON THE | | | USE OF THAT SPACE AND THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION | | | CLASSIFICATION. IN EACH STORY, THE BUILDING AREA SHALL | | | BE SUCH THAT THE SUM OF THE RATIOS OF THE FLOOR AREA OF | | | EACH USE DIVIDED BY THE ALLOWABLE AREA FOR EACH USE | | | SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE. | | | | | | TABLE 302.3.2 WILL REQUIRE A 2HR RATING BETWEEN THE S2 | | | AND MERCANTILE OCCUPANCIES. | | | ALSO SEE SECTION 508.7.1 FIRE SEPARATION. | | | | | | 508.7.1 FIRE SEPARATION | | | FIRE SEPARATION ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN THE PARKING | | | OCCUPANCY AND THE UPPER OCCUPANCY SHALL CORRESPOND TO | | | THE REQUIRED FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING PRESCRIBED IN TABLE | | | 302.3.2 FOR THE USES INVOLVED. THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION | | | SHALL APPLY TO EACH OCCUPANCY INDIVIDUALLY, EXCEPT THAT | | | STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, INCLUDING MAIN BRACING WITHIN THE | | | OPEN PARKING STRUCTURE, WHICH IS NECESSARY TO SUPPORT | | | THE UPPER OCCUPANCY, SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH THE MORE | | | RESTRICTIVE FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED ASSEMBLIES OF THE | | | GROUPS INVOLVED AS SHOWN IN TABLE 601 . MEANS OF EGRESS | | | FOR THE UPPER OCCUPANCY SHALL CONFORM TO CHAPTER 10 AND | | | SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE PARKING OCCUPANCY BY FIRE | | | BARRIERS HAVING AT LEAST A 2-HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCE | | | RATING AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 706 , WITH SELF-CLOSING | | | DOORS COMPLYING WITH SECTION 715 . MEANS OF EGRESS FROM | | | THE OPEN PARKING GARAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 406.3 | | | (OPEN PARKING GARAGES) . | | | | | | NOTE PLEASE SEE 2004 FBC CODE COMMENTARY FOR SECTION | | | 508.7.1. THIS SECTION CONTAINS ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS | | | FOR THE USE OF 508.7 AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE GENERAL | | | MIXED-USE PROVISIONS IN SECTION 302.3. IT CONTAINS AN | | | ADDITIONAL FIVE CRITERIA. | | | | | | 8B) SHEET G001 BUILDING CODE INFO ALSO INDICATES THIS | | | TO BE A OPEN PARKING GARAGE PLEASE PROVIDE OPENING | | | CALCULATIONS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF 406.3.3.1. | | | ALSO SEE EXCEPTION. | | | IN ADDITION TO THIS REQUIREMENT PLEASE SEE ALLOWABLE | | | OPENINGS IN TABLE 704.8. PLANS INDICATE WALLS WITH LESS | | | THAN 10?-0? FROM THE PROPERTY LINE, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | OPENING CALCULATIONS FOR EXTERIOR WALLS. | | | | | | 8C) PLANS INDICATE WALLS WITHIN 10?-0? OF THE PROPERTY | | | LINE THE CODE ANALYSIS DOES | | | NOT PROVIDE THE ALLOWABLE OPENINGS MENTIONED ABOVE( | | | TABLE 704.8) NOR THE RATING OF THE BUILDING ELEMENTS | | | THAT ARE LISTED IN TABLE 601, PLEASE PROVIDE THE HOURLY | | | RATING REQUIRED, THE BUILDING ELEMENTS FIRE RATING CAN | | | BE TAKEN FROM TABLE 720.1 AND FOR COLUMNS AND BEAMS | | | TABLE 721.3.4 & TABLE 721.3.5. | | | | | | 9) SHEET G001 INDICATES IN A NOTE SEE SHEET A001 FOR | | | THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | THE INSPECTORS CAN NOT COMPLETE THEIR INSPECTIONS | | | WITHOUT THE ACTUAL PRODUCT APPROVALS. WE AS PLAN | | | REVIEWERS ALSO CAN NOT EVEN START OUR PORTION OF THE | | | REVIEW UNTIL THE FLORIDA COVERSHEETS AND THE ASSOCIATED | | | REPORT AND TECHNICAL SHEETS ARE PROVIDED. | | | GLAZED OPENINGS: IN MANY CASES THE FLORIDA COVERSHEET | | | MAY LIST MULTIPLE SERIES OF WINDOWS UNDER A SINGLE | | | REPORT AND OR IN A SINGLE REPORT THEIR MAY HAVE | | | MULTIPLE OPTIONS | | | TO GLAZING IN THICKNESS AND TYPE OF LAMINATIONS TO | | | CREATE LAMINATED GLAZING UNITS WITH LARGE MISSILE | | | IMPACT TESTING. UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR OR DESIGNER | | | INDICATES WHICH OF THESE | | | OPTIONS ARE TO BE INSTALLED WE CAN NOT DETERMINE CODE | | | COMPLIANCE FOR THE PRODUCT. | | | PLEASE SUPPLY THREE SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH IN | | | BINDERS INDENTIFYING EACH OF THE | | | PRODUCTS. 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 10A) SHEET G001 NOTES FOR PRODUCT APPROVALS NOTE THERE | | | MAY NO FLORIDA AND MIAMI-DADE APPROVALS FOR ROOF | | | HATCHES BUT THERE IS A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL UNDER | | | AHJ, AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH DOES HAVE A LOCAL APPROVAL FOR THE NYSTORM | | | RHG3630T ROOF SCUTTLE, A COPY WILL BE ATTACHED. | | | | | | 10B) PLEASE SEE SHEET A020 EXIT WIDTH ANALYSIS, PLEASE | | | CORRECT THE CODE TO THE 2004 FBC W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | | | | | | 11) NOTE, IT APPEARS THAT THE EXIT WIDTH ANALYSIS AND | | | THE EXIT WIDTH DOOR & STAIR KEY FOUND ON A021 INDICATE | | | A OVERAGE OF 96 OCCUPANTS OUR CALCULATIONS INDICATE A | | | SHORTAGE OF -34 OCCUPANTS, IN EITHER CASE THE PLANS | | | WILL NEED TO MEET THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | WIDTH REQUIREMENTS. | | | I WILL EXPLAIN THE AREAS WHERE I BELIEVE WE MAY HAVE A | | | DIFFERENCE IN OUR FIGURES, AND THERE MAY BE LESS SEVERE | | | ISSUES THAT WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 11A) A-305 STAIR- A THE STAIR WIDTH IS INDICATED AS | | | 4?-6? BUT THE INTERMEDIATE OR MID- LANDING IS ONLY | | | 4?-0? IN DEPTH. PLEASE SEE 1009.4THE MINIMUM DIMENSION | | | MEASURED IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL IS TO BE EQUAL TO | | | THE WIDTH OF THE STAIRWAY. THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT WE SEE | | | ON ALL OF THE STAIRS. | | | | | | 11B) STAIRWAY A & ESCALATORS DO NOT MEET THE SHAFT | | | ENCLOSURES AND THE EXCEPTIONS FOUND IN 707.2 EXCEPTION | | | 2, THE STAIR A WOULD NOT BE PART OF THE EGRESS | | | CALCULATION & PROTECTED ACCORDING TO ITEMS 2.1 AND 2.2. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 11C) IF THE 2ND FLOOR IS TO BE LEFT OPEN TO THE STAIR-A | | | PLEASE REVIEW 404 ATRIUM REQUIREMENTS | | | AND 404.5 ENCLOSURE OF ATRIUMS AS WELL AS POSSIBLE | | | 404.4 SMOKE CONTROL. | | | | | | 11D) THIS IS A COMMENT THAT MAY OR MAY NOT APPLY TO | | | THIS STAIRWELL DEPENDING ON THE REVISIONS TO THE PLAN, | | | THIS COMMENT DOES PERTAIN TO OTHER STAIRWELLS SO IN | | | CONSIDERATION TO THE CONCEPT CHANGES I WOULD BRING THIS | | | ISSUE TO VIEW. PLEASE SEE 1019.1.4 WHERE NON-RATED | | | WALLS OR UNPROTECTED OPENINGS ENCLOSE THE EXTERIOR OF | | | THE STAIRWAY AND THE WALLS OR OPENINGS ARE EXPOSED BY | | | OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING AT AN ANGLE LESS THAN 180 | | | DEGREES, THE BUILDING EXTERIOR WALLS WITHIN 10 FT | | | HORIZONTALLY OF A NONRATED WALL OR OPENING SHALL BE | | | CONSTRUCTED AS REQUIRED FOR A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE | | | RESISTANCE WITH ? HOUR OPENING PROTECTIVES. SEE CODE | | | COMMENTARY. | | | | | | 11E) STAIRWELL B THERE ARE UNKNOWNS BUT ASSUMPTIONS AS | | | TO DOORS IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE, | | | SEE SHEET A611 DOOR NUMBERS 071.1- 074.2 THESE DOOR | | | WIDTHS ARE NOT GIVEN. THE 4 DOORS AT THE TOP OF THE | | | STAIRS DO NOT PROVIDE DOOR INFORMATION, AND THE DOORS | | | AT THE BOTTOM OF THE | | | STAIRS ARE GIVEN AS ROUGH OPENINGS NOT CLEAR OPENING. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SO A REVIEW OF | | | THIS EXIT CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED. 106.1.2*. | | | | | | 11F) THERE MAY BE A BIT OF CONVERGENCE FROM THE 4 DOORS | | | AT THE TOP STAIRS AND STAIRS, THIS IS A UNKNOWN UNTIL | | | THE DOOR WIDTHS CAN BE DETERMINED | | | | | | 11G) THE MID-LANDING, PLEASE SEE 1009.4THE MINIMUM | | | DIMENSION MEASURED IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL IS TO BE | | | EQUAL TO THE WIDTH OF THE STAIRWAY. THIS IS AN ISSUE | | | THAT WE SEE ON ALL OF THE STAIRS. | | | | | | 11H) FOR STAIRS B,C & D ALL OF THESE STAIRS WE AGREE | | | WITH THE DESIGNER AT 600 OCCUPANT LOAD FOR EACH | | | STAIRWELL. ISSUES WITH THESE STAIRS WILL BE THE | | | MID-LANDING 1009.4 AND 1019.1.4 WHERE NON-RATED WALLS | | | OR UNPROTECTED OPENINGS ENCLOSE THE EXTERIOR OF THE | | | STAIRWAY AND THE WALLS OR OPENINGS ARE EXPOSED BY OTHER | | | PARTS OF THE BUILDING AT AN ANGLE LESS THAN 180 | | | DEGREES, THE BUILDING EXTERIOR WALLS WITHIN 10 FT | | | HORIZONTALLY OF A NONRATED WALL OR OPENING SHALL BE | | | CONSTRUCTED AS REQUIRED FOR A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE | | | RESISTANCE WITH ? HOUR OPENING PROTECTION. SEE CODE | | | COMMENTARY. | | | | | | 11I) STAIR E MID-LANDING, , PLEASE SEE 1009.4THE | | | MINIMUM DIMENSION MEASURED IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL | | | IS TO BE EQUAL TO THE WIDTH OF THE STAIRWAY. THIS IS AN | | | ISSUE THAT WE SEE ON ALL OF THE STAIRS. | | | | | | 11J) STAIR E SEE THE BOTTOM SET OF DOORS THE WIDTH OF | | | THE DOOR IS NOT ON THE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR DOOR NUMBER | | | 074.1 & 07.42. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | | REQUIRED.106.1.2*. | | | | | | 11K) STAIR F, THE ISSUE WITH THIS STAIR IS THE WIDTH OF | | | THE STAIR VERSES HAND RAILS. SEE 1009.11.2 HANDRAILS | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 30 INCHES OF ALL PORTIONS OF | | | THE STAIR WIDTH REQUIRED FOR EGRESS CAPACITY IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 1005.1 . | | | SHEET A021 INDICATES THE USE OF ONLY (1) HANDRAIL WHICH | | | IN ACTUALITY ONLY A 10?-0? WIDE STAIR AND OCCUPANT LOAD | | | OF 400 NOT THE 540 AS INDICATED IN THE PLAN MULTIPLE | | | HANDRAILS WOULD BE NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE AND ACHIEVE | | | THE 540 OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THIS STAIR. THIS IS THE | | | STAIRWAY THAT CURRENTLY LOOSES 140 OF THE OCCUPANTS AS | | | DESIGNED BY NOT HAVING MORE INTERMEDIATE HANDRAILS. | | | | | | 12A) A021 REFERS TO DETAIL#2 SHEET A331 THIS SECTION OR | | | DETAIL REFERENCES DETAIL 20 ON SHEET A231. IT APPEARS | | | TO BE AN EXPANSION JOINT IN THE FLOOR BUT THERE IS NO | | | INFORMATION THAT I CAN FIND ON THE FIREPROOFING | | | REQUIREMENTS TABLE 601 FOR FLOOR SYSTEMS AND OCCUPANCY | | | TYPE SEPARATION TABLE 302.3.2.PLEASE PROVIDE FLOOR | | | CEILING TYPE PENETRATIONS FOR PIPES AND CONDUITS AS | | | WELL AS FOR ANY HORIZONTAL PENETRATION OF RATED FLOOR/ | | | CEILING ASSEMBLY. | | | SEE 711.3.& 712.3.1. | | | | | | 12B) SHEET A331 INDICATES DETAIL 2 THE RIGHT UPPER | | | PORTION INDICATES A CIRCULATION AREA THAT LEADS IN TO | | | STAIRWELL D, THE WALL TYPE IS P5 THIS WALL TYPE | | | INDICATES A FINISH ON ONE SIDE. SHEET A601 PARTITION | | | TYPES INDICATES THE USE OF PLYWOOD ON OR WITHIN MANY | | | PARTITIONS. PLEASE SEE 603.1(1.1) FIRE RETARDANT | | | TREATED WOOD SHALL BE PERMITTED IN: | | | 1.1 NONBEARING PARTITIONS WHERE THE REQUIRED FIRE | | | RESISTANCE RATING IS LESS THAN TWO HOURS OR LESS. | | | | | | 603.21 MATERIALS ALLOWED IN CONCEALED SPACES OF | | | BUILDINGS OF TYPE I AND II CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH SECTION 717.5. PLEASE UPDATE TO FIRE RETARDANT | | | TREATED PLYWOOD. | | | | | | 13) SHEET A110 INDICATES THE DISABLED PARKING SPACES | | | AND ACCESS AISLES BUT NOT THE ELEVATION CHANGES OF THE | | | PARKING LOT VERSES DISABLED SPACES AND ACCESS AISLES. | | | THE OTHER ISSUE IS NO INFORMATION FOR DETECTABLE | | | WARNING AT HAZARDOUS VEHICULAR AREAS 11-4.29.5. | | | | | | 14) SHEET A110 PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON VAN | | | ACCESSIBILITY, 11-4.6.5 VERTICAL CLEARANCE. | | | A) 114? TO VEHICLE ACCESS ROUTE FROM SITE ENTRANCE TO | | | EXIT & PASSENGER LOADING ZONES | | | ALSO SEE 11-4.6.6. | | | B) 98? MINIMUM AT PARKING ZONE. | | | C) SIGNAGE 11-4.6.4 | | | | | | 15) PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH 11-4.1.3(8)(A) AND | | | SECTION 11-4.1.3(8)(B) AND SHALL BE SATISFIED | | | INDEPENDENTLY.. | | | | | | 16) SHEET A301 DETAIL 1 INDICATES THE USE OF A FOOD | | | SERVICE AREA THE PLANS INDICATE A AREA FOR 50 FOR | | | SEATING, PLEASE COMPLY WITH 11-5.1 INDICATING THE AREA | | | OF 5 % DISABLED PERSONS. | | | | | | 17) PLEASE PROVIDE SECTIONS FOR COUNTERS AND BARS TO | | | INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH 11-5.2, | | | 11-5.5 & 11-5.6 A303 DETAIL 2 INDICATES A 3?-0? COUNTER | | | HEIGHT.. | | | | | | 18) A311 ROOM TRAINING/ LOUNGE IS 2448 SQ FT APPROX / | | | 15 = 163 OCCUPANT LOAD, THIS IS AN ASSEMBLY AREA | | | REQUIRING 1 HR RATED WALLS AND OPENING PROTECTIVES. SEE | | | TABLE 1004.1.2,THIS WILL BE CLASSIFIED AS A A2 | | | OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT LOAD > THAN 50. SEE TABLE 1016.1 | | | ASSEMBLY LOADS> THAN 30 WITH FIRE SPRINKLERS WILL STILL | | | REQUIRE 1 HR RATING. PLEASE CORRECT WALL TYPES AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVES. TABLE 715.3. SEE CORRIDOR 118 DOES | | | NOT INDICATE A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. | | | | | | 19) SHEET A311 FAMILY RESTROOM 107, REST ROOMS 108, 109 | | | AND 131 DO NOT INDICATE AN UNOBSTRUCTED TURNING SPACE | | | AS REQUIRED IN 11-4.22.3. THE ACCESSIBLE STALLS IN | | | RESTROOM | | | 108 & 109 DO NOT PROVIDE THE WIDTH DIMENSION SEE FIGURE | | | 30(A) STANDARD STALL A MINIMUM OF 60? CLEAR. | | | | | | 20) SHEET A351 & A352 BOTH INDICATE AN ELECTRICAL | | | DISTRIBUTION CENTER THAT DOES NOT HAVE A CODE COMPLIANT | | | STAIR. THE CODE DOES ALLOW FOR FIXED LADDERS AS PART OF | | | A MEANS OF EGRESS IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: FOR | | | BOILERS (1014.3), REFRIGERATION ROOM (1014.4), STAGE | | | EXITS 410.5.4, 1014.6.6.1 GALLERY, GRIDIRONS AND | | | CATWALKS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH STAGES | | | AND HELISTOPS (1018.1.2.). PLEASE PROVIDE A CODE | | | COMPLIANT STAIRWAY. SEE 1014.1 & TABLE 1014.1. | | | | | | 21) PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE | | | ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION CENTER, PRE-MANUFACTURED? TYPE | | | OF MATERIAL, FIRE RATINGS ETC? NFPA 13.8.14.10. | | | | | | 22)THE WALLS OR SHAFT WHERE THE CURRENT SHIPS LADDER IS | | | LOCATED HAS A 2 HR FIRE RATING BUT THERE ARE NO WALL | | | RATINGS FOR THE WALLS SURROUNDING THE EDC. 106.1.2. | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. THIS WOULD APPEAR TO | | | BE PART OF THE SHAFT WALL CONSTRUCTION BUT THERE ARE NO | | | WALL IDENTIFICATION TAGS. | | | | | | 23) THE SAME SHEETS IDENTIFY ANOTHER SHIPS LADDER WHICH | | | RISES TO THE ROOF LEVEL WITH A | | | ROOF HATCH. NOTE THIS WILL BE A PRODUCT THAT WILL | | | REQUIRE A FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL OR MIAMI-DADE NOA.. | | | NOTE CURRENTLY NEITHER THE STATE NOR MIAMI-DADE | | | CURRENTLY HAVE A LISTING. THE CITY OF WPB DOES HAVE A | | | LOCAL APPROVAL FOR A NYSTROM RHG3630T ROOF HATCH. A | | | COPY WILL BE ATTACHED. | | | | | | 24) SHEET A361 MAIN ELECTRIC CENTER PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION | | | CENTER, PRE-MANUFACTURED? TYPE OF MATERIAL, FIRE | | | RATINGS ETC? NFPA 13.8.14.10. | | | | | | 25) SHEET A361 ALSO INDICATES THERE TO BE A GENERATOR, | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE SIZE OF GENERATOR AND PROVIDE | | | ANCHORAGE DETAILS 1609. 1.3 ANCHORAGE AGAINST MOMENT OF | | | OVERTURNING, SLIDING AND UPLIFT. | | | | | | 26) PLEASE PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF PROPANE AND TYPE OF | | | TANKS TO BE USED. PLANS INDICATE SEE MECHANICAL PLANS | | | FOR ATTACHMENT, M-111 INDICATES THE GENERATOR AND TANKS | | | IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. 106.1.2*. ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 27) S001 DESIGN CODES, PLEASE UPDATE THE 2004 FBC AND | | | SUPPLEMENTS TO THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. NOTE IF THIS MAJOR | | | WORKING DRAWING REVIEW IS NOT SUBMITTED AS A PERMIT | | | BEFORE OCT.1, 2008 IT WILL NEED TO BE RE-REVIEWED UNDER | | | THE 2007 FBC. | | | | | | 28)) FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, | | | PROVIDE 2 COPIES, 3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR | | | OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS | | | FOLLOWS: | | | | | | 28A) WINDOWS: CURTAIN-WALL | | | ****************************************************** | | | * **************** | | | NOTE: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS LISTED BELOW, HAVE NOT | | | PROVIDED THE FLORIDA COVERSHEET THAT | | | PROVIDES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOT LISTED IN THE TEST | | | REPORT. | | | | | | THE SECOND ISSUE WITH THE NOA?S ARE THEY WERE TESTED | | | BEFORE THE 2004 FBC WENT INTO EFFECT. BEFORE THIS DATE | | | STEEL INCREASES OF 1 1/3 WERE COMMON PLACE AND TAKEN | | | WITH FASTENERS, A P.E. SHOULD REVIEW THE TEST REPORT | | | INFORMATION TO SEE IF THE INCREASES WERE TAKEN. THE | | | NEWER MIAMI-DADE NOA?S THAT WERE RENEWED AFTER THE 2004 | | | FBC WENT INTO EFFECT WILL STATE UNDER THE HEADING (3) | | | CALCULATIONS, ANCHOR VERIFICATION VERIFIED TO THE 2004 | | | FBC- NO STEEL INCREASES TAKEN. | | | 1605.3.1.1 LOAD REDUCTION. | | | 1. IT IS PERMITTED TO MULTIPLY THE COMBINED EFFECT OF | | | TWO OR MORE VARIABLE LOADS BY 0.75 AND ADD THE EFFECT | | | OF DEAD LOAD. THE COMBINED LOAD USED IN DESIGN SHALL | | | NOT BE LESS THAN THE SUM OF THE EFFECT OF DEAD LOAD AND | | | ANY OF THE VARIABLE LOADS. | | | 2. INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SPECIFIED IN THE | | | MATERIALS, SECTIONS OF THIS CODE OR A REFERENCED | | | STANDARD SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO BE USED WITH LOAD | | | COMBINATIONS OF SECTIONS 1605.3.1 . DURATION OF LOAD | | | INCREASE SHALL BE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER | | | 23 . | | | EXCEPTION: INCREASES IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402 | | | PROVIDED THE LOAD REDUCTION OF SECTION 1605.3.1.1 ITEM | | | 1 SHALL NOT BE APPLIED. | | | 3. SIMULTANEOUS USE OF BOTH ONE-THIRD INCREASE IN | | | ALLOWABLE STRESS AND THE 25-PERCENT REDUCTION IN | | | COMBINED LOADS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. | | | | | | 28B) WINDOWS: STOREFRONT | | | 28C) AUTOMATIC BYPASS DOOR PEDESTRIANS AND CARTS 28D) | | | EXTERIOR GLAZED SWING DOORS | | | 28E) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS SINGLE AND PAIRS 28F) | | | EXTERIOR COIL DOORS/ SECTIONAL DOORS | | | 28G) FASCIA SYSTEMS | | | 28H) EFIS WALL SYSTEMS | | | 28I) ROOFING SYSTEMS W/ INSULATION- ONLY A DRIP EDGE | | | REPORT SUBMITTED, NO REPORT FOR FLAT | | | DECK | | | 28J) ROOF HATCH- SEE ATTACHMENT | | | | | | | | | *******THE CITY REQUEST THE FLORIDA COVER SHEETS ***** | | | | | | 29) PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION | | | AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE | | | SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | | PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT | | | IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT | | | HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR | | | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE | | | 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 30) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 31) THE CODE ANALYSIS INDICATES THIS TO BE A TYPE I-B | | | BUILDING REQUIRING FIRE RATINGS OF THE | | | STRUCTURAL STEEL AND BAR JOIST, PLEASE PROVIDE THE | | | MANUFACTURERS SPEC AND THE THICKNESS REQUIRED TO | | | ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED FIRE RATING. | | | | | | | | | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A | | | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF | | | THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS | | | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF | | | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST | | | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT | | | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC | | | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC | | | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. | | | | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-09-09 |
Time |
12:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-09-09 |
Time |
12:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
12:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
12:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-28 13:00:16 | SELECTIVE COORDINATION STUDY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
12:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
12:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-28 12:59:32 | REV'S OK./ |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-07-08 |
Time |
13:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-07-05 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-08 13:47:52 | | | | | | | ** DENIED PLANS ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW PLEASE SUBMIT | | | A COMPLETE SELECTIVE COORDINATION STUDY INCLUDING ALL | | | RELEVANT TIME CURVES. | | | THE SINGLE SHEET DOCUMENT SUBMITTED IS NOT THE COMPLETE | | | INFORMATION NEEDED FOR REVIEW. | | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-70 700.27, 701.18, 240.12. | | | ** THIS WAS DERIVED BASED ON SEVERAL REVISIONS AGO WHEN | | | ALL BATTERY BACK UP LIGHTING REQUIRED FOR EGRESS UNDER | | | EMERGENCY CONDITIONS WAS REVISED TO ONLY USE THE NEW | | | LIFE SAFETY GENERATOR AS BACK UP FOR EMERGENCY | | | LIGHTING. | | | | | | *** THIS WILL AFFECT ANY APPLICATION FOR TCO OR CO OF | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | ** AT THIS TIME SHEET E-801 SUBMITTED IS STAMPED OK. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-05-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-05-13 |
Time |
13:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-05-08 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-13 13:59:51 | **REDLINED PLANS, | | | | | | NOTES: | | | | | | *** PROVISO FROM 9/29/08 STILL NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: THE SELECTIVE COORDINATION STUDY STILL NEEDS | | | TO BE DONE AND SUBMITTED WITH COMPLETE TIME CURVES FOR | | | ALL 700 AND 701 SYSTEMS. | | | 700.27, 701.8, 240.12 NFPA-110 6.5.1 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: ** CALL WAS MADE TO ENGINEER FOR INFORMATION | | | ON CHANGES TO ASME-17 FOR STATE ELEVATOR STANDARD. | | | THERE HAVE BEEN SOME CHANGES TO CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | LIGHTING. THIS IS NOT UNDER THE REVIEW OF THIS | | | REVIEWER. THIS IS BEING NOTED AT THIS TIME TO ADDRESS | | | ANY ITEMS BEFORE THEY COME UP IN THE INSPECTION DONE BY | | | THE STATE ELEVATOR INSPECTOR. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | 2009-05-11 11:02:03 | 5/11 IN ELEC FOR REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-10 |
Time |
15:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-10 |
Time |
15:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-10 15:41:56 | ** DENIED REVISIONS ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: NOT ALL CHANGES AND REVISIONS ON SHEETS HAVE | | | BEEN IDENTIFIED WITH CLOUDS AND TRIANGLES. | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE E1110 WHICH CONTAINS A | | | SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF REVISIONS MOST ARE NOT | | | IDENTIFIED. | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE E001 WHERE CLOUDS ARE SHOWN | | | HOWEVER NO IDENTIFICATION IS SHOWN. | | | | | | ** THESE ARE TWO EXAMPLES ONLY. THERE ARE OTHERS. | | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL REVISIONS ARE IDENTIFIED ON PLANS. | | | | | | FBC 106.5, 106.1.1, 106.1.2 FOR CLARITY, ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION OF RECORD PLANS. | | | FBC CHAPTER 13, CHAPTER 10, NEC 2005. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLANS NOW HAVE MOST ALL PREVIOUS BATTERY BACK | | | UP FIXTURES REMOVED. BASED ON THE REVISED PLANS THIS IS | | | NOT PERMITTED AS SHOWN. A STRAIGHT NATURAL GAS | | | GENERATOR IS NOT PERMITTED BY THIS AHJ. | | | THIS WAS GONE OVER BEFORE PERMIT OF BUILDING WAS ISSUED | | | YET PLANS ARE NOW ONCE AGAIN BEING REVISED TO GO BACK | | | TO SOMETHING THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN COMMENTED ON. | | | PLEASE SEE 700.12.B.3. ONSITE FUEL SHALL BE REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 AS THE BACK UP POWER SOURCE FOR | | | EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURES ARE AT THE DETERMINATION OF | | | THE AHJ. SECTION 7.8.2.1. | | | THE CODE IS SPECIFIC TO THE REQUIREMENT OF ON-SITE FUEL | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 10, 1006.2.3. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETE STOCK OF MATERIALS AND | | | RETAIL GOODS IN AREAS IN WHICH DESIRED USED OF *FINE | | | MERCHANDISE* IS PLACED IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT OF THE | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | THE AMOUNT OF FINE MERCHANDISE WOULD BE LIMITED TO | | | SQUARE FEET OF DISPLAY AREA ONLY. NOT AREAS OF GENERAL | | | LIGHTING. PLEASE ALSO KNOW THAT THIS ALLOWANCE MAY BE | | | USED FOR ITEMS SUCH AS JEWELRY AS NOTED IN THE CODE | | | HOWEVER BASED ON THE CALCULATIONS ALL DISPLAY AREAS ARE | | | NOTED AS FINE MERCHANDISE WHICH DOES NOT POSSIBLE OR | | | PERMISSIBLE. | | | FBC 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2, 13-415.2.B.2 ETC | | | | | | 4) NOTE: ALL EGRESS PATHS SHALL CONTAIN THE BATTERY | | | BACK UP FIXTURES SUCH AS STAIRS. SOME STAIR AREAS STILL | | | CONTAIN FIXTURES AS NOTED HOWEVER STAIRS SUCH AS THE | | | MAIN EGRESS STAIRS AT THE REAR OF THE STORE HAVE NOW | | | BEEN REVISED TO REMOVE SUCH FIXTURES. | | | THIS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. THIS WAS GONE OVER | | | EXTENSIVELY BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE YET THE PLANS HAVE | | | NOW BEEN REVISED TO GO BACK TO PREVIOUS COMMENTS. | | | NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.1, 7.9.2.2, FBC 1006, NEC | | | 700.12B3 ETC | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL ITEMS IN THE INPUT DATA | | | REPORT COORDINATES WITH *ALL* LIGHTING ON PLANS. ISSUED | | | PERMIT WAS BASED ON SOME ERRORS HOWEVER BASED ON THE | | | FBC 13-103.3 STATES WITHOUT GROSS ERRORS. | | | AS THERE HAS BEEN NUMEROUS FIXTURES ADDED, TYPES OF | | | FIXTURES REVISED, TYPES OF FIXTURES TO BE REVISED AND | | | ACTUAL REMOVAL OF SEVERAL OTHER FIXTURES THE PLANS AND | | | CALCULATIONS NEED TO COORDINATE COMPLETELY. | | | ** ONE EXAMPLE WOULD BE FIXTURES ON PREVIOUS | | | CALCULATIONS WHICH WERE 85VA ARE NOW 58 VA WHICH IS OK, | | | HOWEVER THIS DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH THE FIXTURE | | | LEGEND. | | | ** FOR EXAMPLE: FIXTURES IN AREAS AND ROOMS ON PLANS | | | NEED TO MATCH THE IDR. ONE LOCATION ALONE WOULD BE ROOM | | | 105. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: TO DATE OF THIS REVIEW NO LOW VOLTAGE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. PLEASE KNOW THAT THE | | | LOW VOLTAGE SCOPE OF WORK ON PLANS NEEDS TO BE UNDER A | | | SEPARATE PERMIT AS NOTED ON ORIGINAL REVIEWS. | | | PERMIT FEE BASED ON THE LOW VOLTAGE VALUATION WOULD BE | | | REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS PROVISO ISSUANCE OF | | | 9/29/08. NO SELECTIVE COORDINATION STUDY, TIME CURVES | | | ETC HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO DATE. PLEASE SEE 700.27, | | | 701.8, 240.12, NFPA-110 6.5.1 ETC | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL PLANS AS NOTED ABOVE HAVE | | | ALL REVISIONS LABELED WITH CLOUDS AND TRIANGLES. THERE | | | ARE SEVERAL LOCATIONS WHERE THE PLANS CONTAIN CLOUDS | | | YET THERE IS NO IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVISIONS TO | | | COORDINATE WITH THE TITLE BLOCKS. SEE SHEET E341 FOR | | | EXAMPLE; | | | FBC 106.1.1,106.1.2, 106.5. | | | NEC 2005, 240, 310, 220 ETC CHAPTERS GIVEN IN GENERAL | | | FOR COORDINATION. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: RISER DIAGRAM HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REVISED TO | | | NOW INCLUDE A NEW PANEL HPE-1 400AMP YET NO PANEL | | | SCHEDULE FOR LOADS ETC WAS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE 700.9 FOR WIRING OF LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS WITH | | | OTHER SYSTEMS. WHAT TYPE OF PANEL IS HPE? | | | WITH THIS REVISION IF YOU LOSE THE 150KW GENERATOR AND | | | THE NEW 40KW UNIT HANDLES THE LIFE SAFETY LOADS, WHAT | | | TAKES CARE OF THE LEGALLY REQUIRED ITEMS? (701 LOADS). | | | THIS COMMENT ALONG WITH SEVERAL OTHERS ABOVE NEED TO BE | | | GONE OVER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS THE DESIGN CHANGES | | | WILL HAVE A MAJOR IMPACT OF THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION | | | TIME FRAME. | | | | | | | | | **** IMPORTANT> ANY SHEETS WHICH DID NOT NEED TO HAVE | | | CHANGES MADE NEED TO BE PLACED BACK INTO THE SETS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING THE REVISIONS. | | | | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
Time |
13:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
Time |
13:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-29 13:35:10 | ELECTRICAL PLANS STAMPED IN ALL THREE SETS. | | | LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS WILL BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT(S) | | | HOWEVER MAY REFERENCE MAIN PERMIT NUMBER FOR TURN | | | AROUND PERMIT. | | 2008-09-29 13:34:17 | | | | ** PROVISO/REDLINED ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: EMERGENCY SYSTEMS AS SHOWN ON RISER FOR ATS | | | NOTED FOR ELEVATOR IS NOT A SYSTEM UNDER NEC 700. | | | PLEASE KNOW THIS MAY BE A SYSTEM AS NOTED FOR 701. ALL | | | LIFE SAFETY ITEMS ARE UNDER POWER BACK UP OTHER THAN | | | THE GENERATOR FOR LIFE SAFETY. | | | UPON CONVERSATION WITH THE DESIGNERS OF RECORD THE | | | BATTERY BACK UP LIGHTING ADDED IN MANY AREAS WILL NO | | | LONGER BE BATTERY BACK UP AND AN ADDITIONAL GENERATOR | | | MAY BE ADDED AT LATER DATE FOR OCCUPANCY UNDER | | | GENERATOR POWER. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ROOM #168 ON E141 WHICH INDICATES A | | | STANDARD SWITCH DEVICE. NEEDS OCCUPANCY SENSOR TYPE | | | DEVICE. 13-415.1.ABC.1.2. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: SELECTIVE COORDINATION STUDAY WILL BE REQUIRED | | | FOR ALL EMERGENCY/LEGALLY REQUIRED SYSTEMS. | | | 700.27,701.8, 240.12 AND NFPA-110 SECTION 6. | | | | | | ** THE ABOVE NOTES ARE BASED ON INFORMATION THE RISER | | | AND SYSTEM DESIGNATIONS WILL BE REVISED AND SUBMITTED | | | WITHIN 30DAYS OF ISSUANCE OF PERMIT. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
Time |
17:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-24 17:48:08 | *** PASSED REVIEW STOP FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE ONCE ALL | | | TRADES ARE OK. | | | | | | ** PROVISO NOTES TO FOLLOW ON 9/29. | | | ** PROCESSING AND STAMPING OF PLANS ALSO TO FOLLOW ON | | | 9/29. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-17 |
Time |
15:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-17 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-17 15:51:01 | | | | ** DENIED REVIEW ** | | | | | | *** PLANS ARE IN FAILED STATUS** | | | *** NEW SHEETS WILL BE REQUIRED. AT THIS TIME A FINAL | | | LIST OF NEW SHEETS CAN NOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME | | | BASED ON COMMENT NUMBER ONE BELOW. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: LIGHTING FOR ALL AREAS OUT AND AWAY FROM THE | | | BUILDING INCLUDING OUT OF THE GARAGE IS CONSIDERED LIFE | | | SAFETY REQUIRING EGRESS LIGHTING. IF THE GENERATOR AS | | | NOTED WILL NO LONGER BE FEEDING LIGHTING FOR EGRESS | | | BACK UP IN AREAS SUCH AS THE GARAGE EGRESS PATHS WILL | | | REQUIRE BATTERY BACK UP OF SOME SORT. THE GENERATOR | | | WOULD NO LONGER BE A *LIFE SAFETY/EMERGENCY* GENERATOR | | | BY DEFINITION. | | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8, 7.9. | | | CALLED MR. ERDMAN FROM NELSON-RUDIE AND WENT OVER MANY | | | SCENARIOS. | | | THE RISER STILL INDICATES THERE BEING A LIFE SAFETY/ | | | EMERGENCY ATS AND SYSTEM. HOW CAN THE GENERATOR BE | | | CONSIDERED A LIFE SAFETY SYSTEM? | | | PLEASE SEE DEFINITIONS OF NFPA-110, NFPA-70, | | | 700.1,701.1, AND WIRING OF SYSTEMS IN 700.9, 701.10 | | | ETC. | | | NOTES ON PLANS WOULD NEED TO BE CHANGED, RISER, | | | LIGHTING ETC. A PHONE CONFERENCE AT LENGTH MAY BE | | | NEEDED ONCE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER CONTACT EACH OTHER | | | TO GO OVER ITEMS BROUGHT UP. | | | *** PLEASE SEE DEFINITIONS OF SYSTEM AS NOTED ABOVE. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: NO GROSS ERRORS ON INPUT DATA REPORT AS | | | SUBMITTED AS NOTED IN 13-103.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-14 |
Time |
14:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-14 17:05:24 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ** DENIED REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS ARE | | | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLANS STILL SUBMITTED ONLY FOR PLAN REVIEW AND | | | NOT SUBMITTED UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE TO GO THROUGH THE SUBMITTED | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND COORDINATE ALL INFORMATION WITH | | | PLANS. | | | ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW ONE OF THE EXAMPLES GIVEN WAS | | | THE FACT MANY OF THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS SHOWN ON PLANS WAS | | | NOT IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT. THE RESPONSE FORM THE | | | DESIGN TEAM IS THAT THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS ARE LOCATED IN | | | THE EXTERIOR SECTION OF THE INPUT DATA REPORT. THIS | | | OFFICE/REVIEWER IS AWARE OF WHERE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS | | | ARE SHOWN IN AN INPUT DATA REPORT. THE COMMENT WAS IN | | | FACT THE LIGHTING SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR ALL EXTERIOR | | | LIGHTS DID NOT MATCH WITH THE LIGHTING SHOWN IN THE | | | INPUT DATA REPORT. | | | PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE SCHEDULE AS THERE ARE FIXTURES | | | LISTED AND ON PLANS WHICH ARE NOT IN THE INPUT DATA | | | REPORT FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTS. | | | ONE EXAMPLE IS THE 94 WATT FIXTURE AS NO FIXTURES IN | | | THE IDR ARE 94WATTS. | | | ANOTHER IS THE COUNT OF THE 50WATT FIXTURES AS THE | | | PLANS SHOW MORE THAN THE 6 WHICH IS INDICATED IN THE | | | IDR. | | | ** THIS IS ONLY A COUPLE AS NOTED FOR DESIGN | | | BENEFIT. | | | | | | 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND .1.3 13-400.A.3 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3 AS NOTED ON | | | PREVIOUS REVIEWS. ALL STAIRS ARE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN AT | | | LEAST 10FT CANDLES UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IS | | | PERMITTED TO GO DOWN TO 1FT CANDLE UNDER EMERGENCY | | | CONDITIONS. PLEASE SEE SHEET ULEN WHICH IS A NEW SHEET | | | PROVIDED. PLEASE SEE THE LEVELS SHOWN UNDER NORMAL | | | CONDITIONS ARE IN FACT ABOUT 10 TIMES LESS THAN THE | | | MINIMUM REQUIRED BY THE LIFE SAFETY CODE. | | | ALL LEVELS MUST MEET MINIMUM. | | | PLEASE SEE THE EDC STAIRS. THE PLANS INDICATE SOME SORT | | | OF EMERGENCY LEVEL HOWEVER THE SECTION OF THE PLANS FOR | | | THE FRONT EDC STAIRS IS NOT READABLE AND ONLY SHOWS | | | EMERGENCY LEVELS. | | | ** KEEP NOTE** THE LIGHTING LEVELS OF OTHER AREAS SHALL | | | NOT BE FIGURED INTO THE EQUATION OF AVERAGE. | | | | | | ** THE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED A LETTER FROM TARGET | | | CORPORATE OFFICES THAT THE STORE WILL NOT BE OCCUPIED | | | UNDER EMERGENCY POWER. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE | | | LETTER FROM TARGET CORPORATION. | | | THE LETTER SUBMITTED IS NOT FROM TARGET CORPORATE | | | OFFICER. | | | THE LETTER STATES THAT TARGET TEAM SHALL EVACUATE ALL | | | OCCUPANTS AND THE BUILDING WILL NOT BE *PUBLICLY | | | OCCUPIED*. | | | | | | ** THE LIFE SAFETY CODE DOES NOT ONLY ADDRESS THE | | | PUBLIC IS ALSO ADDRESSES THE SAFETY OF ALL EMPLOYEES. | | | THE DOCUMENTS SHALL BE FROM TARGET CORPORATE BEING ONE | | | OF THE CORPORATION ATTORNEYS/OFFICERS AND IT SHALL | | | STATE ALL OCCUPANTS INCLUDING EMPLOYEES SHALL EVACUATE | | | OR PLACE BATTERY BACK UP FIXTURES IN EGRESS AREAS | | | MEETING THE MINIMUM LEVELS UNDER EMERGENCY EGRESS. | | | | | | LS 101 7.8, 7.9 | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION WHERE THE RATING | | | BETWEEN THE EPSS EQUIPMENT AND OTHER NORMAL EQUIPMENT | | | IS SHOWN. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THE 1HR SEPARATION IS | | | PROVIDED HOWEVER BASED ON PLANS AND COORDINATION OF | | | SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS THIS COULD NOT BE LOCATED. | | | NFPA-110 7.2 | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMMENT #18 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | THE RESPONSE PACKAGE CONTAINS SPECS/CUT SHEETS FOR TYPE | | | OF DEVICE WHICH SNAPS ONTOTHE BREAKER. THE RESPONSE | | | MENTIONS DISCONNECTS WERE ADDED. IF DISCONNECTS WILL BE | | | USED AND NO PROPOSAL OF SOME SORT OF DEVICE BEING ADDED | | | TO BREAKER IS GOING TO BE PROPOSED PLEASE REMOVE FROM | | | PACKAGE AND ANY OTHER PLANS/DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | 422.30.31.110.3.90.7. ETC | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
Time |
17:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-06-20 |
Time |
17:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-23 17:08:31 | ** DENIED2ND PLAN REVIEW** | | | | | | ** PLAN REVIEW ONLY. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. SOME OF THESE | | | ARE THE SAME NOTES, COMMENTS AND/OR CODE SECTIONS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SOME NEW COMMENTS DUE TO ITEMS | | | BEING CHANGED OR PLACED ON THE PLANS FOR THE FIRST | | | TIME. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ALSO NEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | ** AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW THERE WERE SOME ITEMS | | | NOT YET SUBMITTED IN WHICH A REVIEW OF THOSE ITEMS | | | COULD NOT BE DONE. | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLANS HAVE ONLY BEEN SUBMITTED FOR * PLAN | | | REVIEW ONLY * FOR A SECOND REVIEW AND HAVE NOT BEEN | | | SUBMITTED UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | PLEASE KNOW THAT ONCE ALL ITEMS FOR CODE REVIEWS ARE | | | DONE PLANS WILL STILL REMAIN IN FAILED STATS UNTIL | | | PERMIT APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE. VERIFICATION OF | | | SEVERAL ITEMS SUCH AS VALID LICENSING ETC IS DONE AT | | | TIME OF APPLICATION BEFORE ISSUANCE OF PERMIT(S). THIS | | | COMMENT WILL REPEAT AS PERMIT APPLICATION HAS NOT BEEN | | | MADE. | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS PLEASE CONTACT THIS | | | OFFICE/REVIEWER. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTICE AT THE END OF THIS REVIEW | | | WHICH IS NOTED AS ** IMPORTANT** ON CORRECT PROCEDURE | | | ON RE-SUBMITTING PLANS AND THE REMOVING OF OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS. IF THERE QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO EPS | | | LEVEL-1 EQUIPMENT WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE LOCATED | | | IN THE SAME ELECTRICAL ROOM AS THE NORMAL ELECTRICAL | | | EQUIPMENT. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE NEW REVISED | | | E355 HOWEVER THE PLANS NOW ONLY SHOW SORT OF DOORS AND | | | DASHED LINES. THIS DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY RATINGS OF | | | WALLS. THIS DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY LISTED ASSEMBLIES FOR | | | WALL. THIS DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ON DOORS TO | | | BE USED. NO WALLS OR DOORS WERE LOCATED ON OTHER TRADE | | | PLANS SUCH AS ARCHITECTURAL OR MECHANICAL SHEETS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING TEXT REMAINS FROM PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO NFPA-110 CHAPTER 7. | | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-110 7.2, 7.1.3 PLEASE SEE 7.2.2.1 BELOW | | | ALSO. | | | 7.2.1THE EPS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A SEPARATE ROOM FOR | | | LEVEL 1 INSTALLATIONS. EPSS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED TO BE INSTALLED IN THIS ROOM. | | | 7.2.1.1THE ROOM SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 2-HOUR FIRE RATING | | | OR BE LOCATED IN AN ADEQUATE ENCLOSURE LOCATED OUTSIDE | | | THE BUILDING CAPABLE OF RESISTING THE ENTRANCE OF SNOW | | | OR RAIN AT A MAXIMUM WIND VELOCITY REQUIRED BY LOCAL | | | BUILDING CODES. | | | 7.2.1.2NO OTHER EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL | | | APPURTENANCES, EXCEPT THOSE THAT SERVE THIS SPACE, | | | SHALL BE PERMITTED IN THIS ROOM. | | | 7.2.2EPSS EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN THE SAME | | | ROOM WHERE THE NORMAL ELECTRICAL SERVICE EQUIPMENT IS | | | INSTALLED. | | | 7.2.2.1TRANSFER SWITCHES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE | | | INSTALLED IN THE NORMAL ELECTRICAL SERVICE ROOM WHERE | | | TWICE THE CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 110.26(A) OF | | | NFPA 70, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, EXISTS BETWEEN | | | EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURES. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON LOAD SHEDDING | | | FOR OTHER SYSTEMS ON EPS LEVEL-1 GENERATOR PER NFPA-110 | | | 7.1.5. WHAT PROVIDES SHEDDING OF NON-EMERGENCY OR ANY | | | LEGALLY REQUIRED LOADS? | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO | | | FOUR POLE TRANSFER SWITCHES. THESE ARE NOW SHOWN ON | | | RISER AS FOUR POLE YET WHERE IS THE SEPARATELY DERIVED | | | GENERATOR GROUNDING PER 250.20, 250.50? | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WITH RESPECT | | | TO LIGHTING CONTROLS FOR FLORIDA BUILDING CODE CHAPTER | | | 13 REQUIREMENTS. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL LOCATIONS IN WHICH | | | REQUIRED LIGHTING CONTROLS ARE NOT. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1, .1.1, .1.2 , .1.3 AND .1.4. | | | | | | A) ALL SEPARATE SPACES CONTAINING FLOOR TO CEILING | | | HEIGHT PARTITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN ONE OR MORE | | | OF THE FOLLOWING FOR SEPARATE SPACE CONTROL. INDIVIDUAL | | | OCCUPANCY SENSORS OR AN OVER RIDE DEVICE OF SOME SORT | | | TO OVER RIDE ANY TIME OF DAY SCHEDULING. | | | PLEASE SEE ROOMS 121,122. RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE | | | REVISED E-131 HOWEVER IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT WAS REVISED. | | | PLEASE SEE SPACES 105, 105A, 103A, 103, 104. AS | | | MENTIONS ON PREVIOUS REVIEW THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES | | | ONLY. | | | | | | B) PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.3 FOR SEPARATE CONTROLS | | | REQUIRED FOR DISPLAY/ ACCENT LIGHTING. NO AUTOMATED | | | CONTROLS COULD BE LOCATED FOR THESE SPECIALTY LIGHTS. | | | | | | C) PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.4. WHERE ARE THE LIGHTING | | | CONTROLS LOCATED FOR ALL OUTSIDE LIGHTS MEETING THIS | | | SECTION? | | | PLEASE SEE TWO METHODS AS NOTED PREVIOUSLY. IF A TIME | | | CLOCK IS CHOSEN. IT MUST BE ASTRONOMICAL AND MUST HAVE | | | A MINIMUM OF 10HR BATTERY BACK UP FOR PROGRAMMING. | | | | | | D) PLEASE SEE SOME OTHER AREAS IN WHICH STANDARD | | | SWITCHES ARE BEING SHOWN. FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE | | | STAIRS TO EDC ROOM #2. PLEASE KNOW ANY AUTOMATED | | | CONTROLS WHICH ARE REQUIRED AND ARE LOCATED IN EGRESS | | | PATHS SHALL BE FAIL SAFE *ON*> | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 1016.1, AND NFPA-101 LIFE SAFETY CODE | | | 7.8.1.2.2. | | | | | | E) PLEASE SEE SYMBOL LEGEND WAS NOT UPDATED FOR DEVICES | | | ON PLANS. | | | | | | F) PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING CONTROLS IN MANY AREAS WHICH | | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE AUTOMATED OF SOME KIND ARE SHOWING | | | UP AS *MANUAL ON/OFF * ON THE INPUT DATA REPORT OF THE | | | SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. | | | | | | ** AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW SOME OF THE ABOVE | | | EXAMPLES ARE GIVEN AS A BENEFIT AND MAY NOT BE IN | | | ANYWAY ALL POSSIBLE LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS COORDINATE WITH THE PLANS. THE INPUT DATA | | | REPORT WILL BE NOTED AS IDR FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS | | | COMMENT. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE IDR SHOWS *MANUAL ON/OFF* FOR | | | LIGHTING WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE SOME SORT OF AUTOMATED | | | SYSTEM OR DEVICE. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE SEE THE SPACE FILLED OUT ON THE CERTIFICATION | | | SHEET STATES THE PERSON WHO PREPARED THE DOCUMENT AS | | | THE FIRM. THE SHEET CALLS FOR THE INDIVIDUAL TO CERTIFY | | | THE SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS HOWEVER THE PRINTED NAME AND | | | SIGNATURE IS NOT LOCATED ON THE SUBMITTED ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS. THESE WERE NOT SIGNED, DATED OR SEALED AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 13-103.1 AS THESE SHALL BE DONE BY THE | | | ENGINEER WHO PREPARED CALCULATIONS. | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO ALSO SEE FAC 61G15-23.002, FS 471.025 | | | AS THIS REQUIRES ALL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER | | | TO BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED ACCORDINGLY. | | | ** THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TRADES WHETHER OR NOT | | | COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER REVIEW TRADES. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE COORDINATE THE NUMBER AND KW RATINGS OF ALL | | | ELECTRIC WATER HEATERS ON PLANS/PANEL SCHEDULES WITH | | | THAT OF THE SHOWN ON THE IDR. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS ON EXTERIOR LIGHTING | | | WHICH IS SHOWN ON PLANS WHICH DO NOT SHOW UP ON THE IDR | | | AND OTHER WHERE THE NUMBER AND WATTAGE OF FIXTURES DO | | | NOT CORRELATE. | | | PLEASE SEE MISSING FIXTURES X-3, X-5, X-6, H1, H1A | | | ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE MANY ITEMS ON ELECTRICAL PLANS | | | WHICH ARE NOT IN THE IDR. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO | | | THE SITE LIGHTING PLANS AND COORDINATION NEEDED. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE GO OVER ALL INTERIOR LIGHTING. MOST ARE IN GOOD | | | SHAPE HOWEVER AS THE FIXTURE LEGEND IS NOT COMPLETE | | | WITH SOME LIGHTING FOR SPECIALTY LIGHTS AND FIXTURES | | | SUCH AS S-1, MANY COULD NOT BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | ** THESE ARE A FEW EXAMPLES ONLY AND MAY IN NO WAY BE | | | AN EXHAUSTED LIST. THESE EXAMPLES WERE GIVEN AS A | | | BENEFIT TO CLEARLY COORDINATE **ALL ** LIGHTING ON | | | PLANS WITH THE IDR. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE TO COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL | | | SITE LIGHTING PLANS WITH THE SL PLANS WHICH ARE IN THE | | | CIVIL SETS. AS THE LIGHTING IS A REQUIRED DESIGN | | | PARAMETER UNDER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | 61G15-33.004 FOR THE ENGINEER THESE ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. | | | PLEASE SEE THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES AND LOCATIONS COULD | | | NOT BE CONFIRMED AS THE SITE SHEETS WERE NOT THE SAME. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SL PLANS AS THESE CONTAIN FIXTURES AND | | | OTHER LOCATIONS WHICH WERE NOT CLEARLY VISIBLE OR | | | READABLE. PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT FOR MINIMUM | | | SCALE AND DETAILS NEEDED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE OUTSIDE LIGHTS ON THE ELECTRICAL PLANS | | | FOR WALL PACKS, POLES ETC NEED TO COORDINATE. PLEASE | | | SEE COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO LIGHTING FOR LIFE SAFETY | | | CODE AS WELL. | | | FBC 106.1.2 FOR COORDINATION. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS WITH A MINIMUM OF 1/8 INCH | | | SCALE. THE 1/16 TH INCH SCALE IS OK AS LONG AS THERE | | | ARE OTHER SHEETS WHICH PROVIDE THE LARGER DETAIL. THIS | | | IS CLEARLY AN ISSUE AS THE COMMENT #8 ABOVE FINDS | | | INCONSISTENCIES IN PLANS WHICH ARE NOT EASILY READ. | | | PLEASE SEE SHEETS E110 AND E11 AS SOME OF THESE SMALLER | | | AREAS ARE NOT SHOWN ON ANY OTHER LOCATION ON PLANS. | | | MOST CAN BE READ ON THESE TWO SHEETS BUT NOT ALL AND | | | THE MINIMUM IS REQUIRED. FBC 106.1.3 ADMIN SECTION. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: THE PLANS AND RESPONSE LETTERS MENTIONS THIS | | | BUILDING WILL NOT BE OCCUPIED IN EMERGENCY. THIS SHOULD | | | BE STATED THIS WILL BE UN-OCCUPIED UNDER EMERGENCY | | | POWER. THIS BUILDING WILL BE REQUIRED TO EVACUATE IN | | | THE ONE AND HALF HOUR TIME FRAME. PLEASE OBTAIN A | | | LETTER FROM CORPORATE WHICH STATES AN UNDERSTANDING | | | THAT THIS STORE SHALL REMAIN CLOSED IN THE EVENT OF A | | | POWER FAILURE. ( OR WORDS TO THAT AFFECT). | | | A NOTICE AND HOLD WILL BE PLACED ON LAND FILE AND | | | LETTER WILL REMAIN PERMANENTLY ON FILE FOR THIS | | | LOCATION. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS FOR ALL | | | EGRESS PATHS UNDER NORMAL AND EMERGENCY CONDITIONS. | | | SOME WERE SUBMITTED FOR SOME AREAS HOWEVER THERE ARE | | | OTHER AREAS SUCH AS THE REAR STAIRS WHICH DO NOT SHOW | | | *ANY* LIGHTING LEVELS FOR EITHER NORMAL OR EMERGENCY. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED SHEETS LLE AND ULE CLEARLY | | | STATE THE SHEETS ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION | | | AND ARE NOT SIGNED, DATED OR SEALED BY THE RESPONSIBLE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD. THESE SHEETS ALSO CONTAIN A NOTE | | | WHICH MENTIONS THESE LEVELS ARE THE LEVELS UNDER | | | BATTERY. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN DOZENS OF THESE | | | FIXTURES CONTAIN NO BATTERY BACK UP AT ALL? | | | PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE ALSO MENTIONS THE NORMAL LEVELS | | | OF LIGHTING ARE NOT PROVIDED BECAUSE THE INTERPRETATION | | | IS THAT THE DESIGN MEETS CODE. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE | | | IN LIEU OF SUBMITTING, SHOWING AND TAKING | | | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE *MINIMUM* LIGHTING LEVELS AS | | | REQUIRED UNDER THE LIFE SAFETY CODE. | | | IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL TO | | | ACHIEVE MINIMUM LEVELS AND SHOW ON PLANS FOR DESIGN. | | | PLEASE SEE FAC 61G15-33.004. | | | ** | | | PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS FOR *ALL* EGRESS | | | AREAS UNDER BOTH NORMAL AND EMERGENCY CONDITIONS. THE | | | AREAS SUCH AS STAIRS SHALL SHOW LIGHTING LEVELS OF 10FT | | | CANDLES AT *ALL * WALKING SURFACES ON STAIRS. | | | THESE LEVELS ARE PERMITTED DOWN TO 1FT CANDLE UNDER | | | EMERGENCY. PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS COMMENTS AS ALL STAIRS | | | ARE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN BATTERY BACK UP FIXTURES FOR | | | THE MINIMUM OF 1FT CANDLE. | | | ** THIS IS ALSO TO INCLUDE THE REAR STAIRS WHICH | | | CURRENTLY DO NOT SHOW ANY LEVELS AND FOR ALL OTHER | | | STAIRS WHICH ONLY SHOW UNDER EMERGENCY. | | | WHAT ABOUT STAIRS FROM EDC ROOM? NO LEVELS UNDER EITHER | | | CONDITION? | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO INDICATE THE *BATTERY BACK UP* OR | | | *EMERGENCY BALLAST* ON FIXTURE LEGEND FOR FIXTURES AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | NFPA-101 2003 7.8, 7.9. 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2. | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW** | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO | | | NOTES REQUIRED TO BE ADDED TO PLANS PER | | | 13-413.A.ABC.2.1 AND .2.2. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS NOTES | | | ADDED TO E000 WHICH WERE LOCATED ON PLANS HOWEVER THE | | | WORDING AS SHOWN IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WAS NOT | | | ON PLANS. THIS WAS CONFIRMED WITH DCA (DEPARTMENT OF | | | COMMUNITY AFFAIRS) PREVIOUSLY THAT THE WORDING LOCATED | | | IN THE CODE IS THE WORDING WHICH IS TO BE LOCATED ON | | | PLANS. | | | PLEASE ADJUST. | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SIZE OF THE FEEDERS FROM THE | | | SERVICE EQUIPMENT MAIN TO THE MAIN DISTRIBUTION | | | SWITCHBOARD DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM SIZE PER 310.16, | | | 240.4B. PLEASE SEE THE CONDUCTOR SHALL BE AT OR ABOVE | | | THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION WHICH IS PROTECTING THE | | | CONDUCTORS. | | | (MAY NOT USE THE 90 DEGREE COLUMN UNLESS ALL EQUIPMENT, | | | LUGS ETC MEET 90 DEGREE TEMP RATINGS) | | | PLEASE SEE 110.14. | | | NEW COMMENT> | | | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.24, 250.6 AS THE GROUNDING | | | ELECTRODE SYSTEM SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE FIRST MEANS | | | OF DISCONNECT WHICH IS THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT MAIN | | | LOCATED OUTSIDE. | | | PLEASE ADJUST RISER GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM AND | | | DETAIL. | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE NOTE ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE | | | GENERATOR AND SEPARATELY DERIVED SYSTEMS. | | | NEW COMMENT> | | | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.24, 250.110, 250.122 ETC AS | | | THE EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR IS MISSING ON THE | | | CONDUIT FROM THE MAIN TO THE MAIN SWITCHBOARD. (MDS). | | | PLEASE SEE FEEDER SCHEDULE 18A. | | | NEW COMMENT> | | | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NEW DISCONNECTS WHICH WERE | | | ADDED FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES WITH RESPECT TO THE | | | DISCONNECTING MEANS REQUIRED PER 225.31-225.39, | | | 700.12B6, 702.11 ARE NOT RATED FOR THE CIRCUIT IN WHICH | | | THEY ARE A PART OF. PLEASE SEE THE BREAKER AND OVER | | | CURRENT PROTECTION ON THE GENERATOR IS HIGHER THAN THE | | | RATING OF THESE NEW DISCONNECTS.THE RISER SHOWS BOTH | | | AS 60A RATED WHEN THESE ARE WITHIN 100AMP CIRCUITS TO | | | EMERGENCY LOADS. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LISTED AND RATED | | | FOR THE LOAD SERVED.225.39, 110.3, 90.7. | | | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT WITH | | | RESPECT TO THE ELEVATOR PIT LIGHTING LEVELS TO MEET | | | 620.23, ASTMA17.1-2004 YET NO LEVELS WERE SHOWN. THE | | | RESPONSE MENTIONS THE FIXTURE WAS CHANGED ON LEGEND. | | | HOW DOES THIS ADDRESS THE COMMENT? | | | WHERE ARE THE LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN? | | | | | | 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT WITH | | | RESPECT TO THE HANDLE PROPOSED *LOCK OFF DEVICE*. THE | | | SUBMITTED MANUFACTURES SPEC/CUT SHEET IS NOT AN | | | ACCEPTABLE DEVICE IN LIEUOF THE DISCONNECT REQUIRED | | | AND DOES NOT MEET THE PERMANENT MEANS. | | | THIS ARE NOT LISTED FOR PERMANENT INSTALLATIONS!! | | | 110.3. | | | ** PLEASE KNOW THE NEW NEC 2008 WILL CLARIFY THE CODE | | | AND THE INTENT.THIS WILL CLEARLY STATE THAT IT WAS | | | NEVER THE INTENT TO ALLOW *HANDLE LOCK OFF DEVICES* IN | | | LIEU OF THE REQUIRED DISCONNECTING MEANS. | | | IN ANY CASE MOST *LOCK OFF*, *LOCK OUT/TAG OUT* DEVICES | | | ARE FOR TEMPORARY INSTALLATIONS ONLY. MOST ARE NOT | | | LISTED FOR PERMANENT MEANS. | | | ** PLEASE ADJUST PLANS ACCORDINGLY FOR DISCONNECTS | | | ETC. | | | 110.3, 90.7 | | | FBC | | | | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | 2008-06-20 17:09:41 | 1ROLL AND BOOKS IN ELEC FOR REVIEW. | | | REVIEW TO COMMENCE ON 6/23 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-02-16 |
Time |
19:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-08 14:40:07 | 2008-03-08 14:40:07 | | | | | | ** DENIED REVIEW** | | | | | | ** PLAN REVIEW | | | SUPER TARGET | | | 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. | | | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS THERE ARE SOME ITEMS NOT YET | | | SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND SOME ITEMS NOT YET ON PLANS A | | | REVIEW OF ONLY THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED CAN BE DONE AT | | | THIS TIME. THERE MAY BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW WHICH CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLANS HAVE ONLY BEEN SUBMITTED FOR * PLAN | | | REVIEW ONLY * AND HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED UNDER PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE KNOW THAT ONCE ALL ITEMS FOR CODE | | | REVIEWS ARE DONE PLANS WILL STILL REMAIN IN FAILED | | | STATS UNTIL PERMIT APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE. | | | VERIFICATION OF SEVERAL ITEMS SUCH AS VALID LICENSING | | | ETC IS DONE AT TIME OF APPLICATION BEFORE ISSUANCE OF | | | PERMIT(S). | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS PLEASE CONTACT THIS | | | OFFICE/REVIEWER. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT ALL LOW VOLTAGE WIRING SHALL | | | BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS FROM THE MAIN ELECTRICAL | | | PERMIT. THE LV FOR PHONE, CATV AND OTHER SYSTEMS NOT | | | INCLUDING LV FOR SECURITY MAY BE ALL UNDER ONE LV | | | PERMIT. THE SECURITY SYSTEM IS A SEPARATE LV PERMIT | | | FROM OTHERS LISTED ABOVE. IN EITHER CASE AS ALL LOW | | | VOLTAGE SYSTEMS ARE SHOWN ON BASE BUILDING PLANS, THE | | | APPLICANT MAY REFERENCE THESE PLANS FOR A *TURN-AROUND* | | | PERMIT. | | | ** THIS IS GIVEN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSE AND IF THERE | | | ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM PLEASE CONTACT THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTICE AT THE END OF THIS REVIEW | | | WHICH IS NOTED AS ** IMPORTANT** ON CORRECT PROCEDURE | | | ON RE-SUBMITTING PLANS AND THE REMOVING OF OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS. IF THERE QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE ELECTRICAL PLANS AS WELL AS | | | COVER SHEET ON ARCHITECTURAL COVER SHEETS CONTAIN THE | | | FOLLOWING CODES. SOME OF THESE MAY ALREADY BE LISTED | | | HOWEVER NOT ALL AT BOTH PLACES. THESE MAY BE ON THE | | | FIRST E-SHEET AND NOT ON ALL SHEETS. | | | | | | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS. | | | 2005 NFPA_70 | | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | | 2002 NFPA-110 | | | 2003 NFPA-20 (NOT YET DETERMINED) | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE ANY COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH ALSO | | | MAY REQUIRE SPECIFIC CODES TO BE LISTED ON PLANS. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR THE GENERATOR, ALL ATS EQUIPMENT, AND FUEL | | | TANK. | | | PLEASE KNOW THAT A REVIEW OF THE FUEL TANK WILL BE DONE | | | BY THE MECHANICAL, FIRE MARSHAL ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE COMMENTS BELOW WITH RESPECT TO THE ATS | | | UNITS. | | | ** PLEASE SUBMIT ANY FIRE PUMP AND FIRE PUMP | | | CONTROLLERS SPECS/CUT SHEETS AS WELL IF THIS BUILDING | | | WILL CONTAIN ANY SUCH UNITS. PLANS DID NOT SEEM TO | | | CONTAIN ANY FIRE PUMP ETC AND A REVIEW OF MANY ITEMS | | | COULD NOT BE DONE IF THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO CONTAIN | | | A FIRE PUMP. | | | IF APPLICABLE PLEASE SEE NFPA-20, CHAPTERS 9 AND 10. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE EMERGENCY LIFE SAFETY EQUIPMENT | | | IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE SAME ROOM(S) AS THE NORMAL | | | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SEE NFPA-110 7.2, 7.1.3 | | | PLEASE SEE 7.2.2.1 BELOW ALSO. | | | 7.2.1THE EPS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A SEPARATE ROOM FOR | | | LEVEL 1 INSTALLATIONS. EPSS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED TO BE INSTALLED IN THIS ROOM. | | | 7.2.1.1THE ROOM SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 2-HOUR FIRE RATING | | | OR BE LOCATED IN AN ADEQUATE ENCLOSURE LOCATED OUTSIDE | | | THE BUILDING CAPABLE OF RESISTING THE ENTRANCE OF SNOW | | | OR RAIN AT A MAXIMUM WIND VELOCITY REQUIRED BY LOCAL | | | BUILDING CODES. | | | 7.2.1.2NO OTHER EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL | | | APPURTENANCES, EXCEPT THOSE THAT SERVE THIS SPACE, | | | SHALL BE PERMITTED IN THIS ROOM. | | | 7.2.2EPSS EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN THE SAME | | | ROOM WHERE THE NORMAL ELECTRICAL SERVICE EQUIPMENT IS | | | INSTALLED. | | | 7.2.2.1TRANSFER SWITCHES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE | | | INSTALLED IN THE NORMAL ELECTRICAL SERVICE ROOM WHERE | | | TWICE THE CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 110.26(A) OF | | | NFPA 70, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, EXISTS BETWEEN | | | EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURES. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 230.95, 240.13 AS THESE SECTIONS OF | | | THE CODE AMONG OTHERS REQUIRED GROUND FAULT PROTECTION | | | (GFP) ON THE SERVICE. THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW THE GFP | | | PROTECTION REQUIRED HOWEVER PLEASE SEE 700.6D, 700.26 | | | AND NFPA-110 6.2.15. AS THE CODE REQUIRES GFP ON NORMAL | | | SIDE AND REQUIRES GF SENSING ON THE EMERGENCY SIDE THE | | | ISOLATION OF THE SYSTEMS AND NEUTRALS IS IMPERATIVE. | | | PROVISIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED FOR ENSURING CONTINUITY, | | | TRANSFER, AND ISOLATION OF THE PRIMARY AND THE EPS | | | NEUTRAL CONDUCTORS WHEREVER THEY ARE SEPARATELY | | | GROUNDED TO ACHIEVE GROUND-FAULT SENSING. | | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION GIVEN IS SECTIONS | | | REMOVED FROM WHITE PAPERS AS WELL FROM TWO MANUFACTURES | | | OF TRANSFER SWITCHES AND GENERATORS. THIS MAY HELP IN | | | PROVIDING THE NEEDED EQUIPMENT AND ADJUSTMENT SO THE | | | PLANS AND RISER. | | | | | | ** ** ASCO WHITE PAPER EXCERPT*** | | | **WHERE GROUND FAULTPROTECTION IS TRIGGERED BY THE | | | CODE AND AN ALTERNATE POWER SUPPLY IS INCLUDED, | | | SWITCHING OF THE NEUTRAL BECOMES NECESSARY. THE CIRCUIT | | | SHOWN ABOVE ILLUSTRATESSUCH A CIRCUMSTANCE. THE | | | SERVICE IS LARGER THAN 1,000 AMPS. CONSEQUENTLY, GROUND | | | FAULT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED AT THE MAIN SERVICE | | | DISCONNECT AT A MINIMUM. IF ITIS INSTALLED THERE AND | | | THE GENERATOR NEUTRAL GROUNDING WAS THROUGH A SOLID | | | CONNECTION TO THE MAIN SERVICE NEUTRAL, A GROUND FAULT | | | WHEN THE GENERATOR ISFEEDING THE LOAD WILL CAUSE THE | | | MAIN SERVICE DISCONNECT TO OPEN. THIS WILL NOT | | | DISCONNECT THE ARCING FAULT FROM THE GENERATOR. | | | COORDINATION IS THUSLOST." | | | | | | *****CATERPILLAR WHITE PAPER EXCERPT*** | | | SHOULD THE DESIGNER WANT TO GROUND THE GENERATOR AND | | | STILL ADHERE TO CODE AND AVOID THE PROBLEMS | | | OF SPLIT RETURN PATHS AND IMPROPER GFP SENSING | | | THE USE OF A FOUR POLE TRANSFER SWITCH IS CALLED FOR. | | | FOUR POLE TRANSFER SWITCHES | | | FOUR POLE SWITCHES ARE EMPLOYED TO INSURE | | | THAT THE GENERATOR CAN BE GROUNDED WITHOUT COMPROMISING | | | THE NEC. THAT IS, THE GEN SET | | | CAN BE WIRED AS A SEPARATELY DERIVED SYSTEM BY | | | GROUNDING THE NEUTRAL AT THE GEN SET AS LONG AS THE | | | NEUTRAL IS NO LONGER SOLID THROUGH THE TRANSFER SWITCH. | | | THIS OF COURSE INFERS THAT NEUTRAL BE SWITCHED AT THE | | | SAME TIME AS THE PHASES. | | | THIS SCHEME WILL ALSO INSURE GFP OPERATION AS INTENDED. | | | FIG. 12 SHOWS A FOUR POLE TRANSFER SWITCH WIRED WITH A | | | GEN SET HAVING ITS NEUTRAL GROUNDED AT THE HOUSING. IN | | | THIS WIRING THE NEUTRAL RETURN PATH IS DELIBERATELY | | | OPEN FOR GROUND RETURN CURRENTS BY THE TRANSFER SWITCH | | | CONTACTS. THIS WILL ALSO AVOID NUISANCE TRIPPING IN THE | | | CASE OF AN UNBALANCED LOAD. IN EFFECT, THE GEN SET IS | | | NOW COMPLETELY ISOLATED FROM THE UTILITY SERVICE AND | | | PRESENTS AN EFFECTIVE AND SAFE ALTERNATIVE TO SOLID | | | NEUTRAL LINES. A DESIGNER HAS THE TOOLS TO NOW | | | CONFIGURE A STANDBY SYSTEM AS EITHER SEPARATELY DERIVED | | | OR NOT. IF THE SYSTEM NEEDS ARE FOR NOT GROUNDING THE | | | GEN SET AT ITS SITE THEN A THREE POLE TRANSFER SWITCH | | | WITH A SOLID NEUTRAL SHOULD BE EMPLOYED. IF THE GEN SET | | | NEEDS TO BE GROUNDED AT ITS SITE, THEN A FOUR POLE | | | TRANSFER SWITCH MUST BE DESIGNED INTO THE SYSTEM. THIS | | | WILL INSURE THAT THE NEUTRAL IS SWITCHED ISOLATING THE | | | NORMAL OR UTILITY SUPPLY. LASTLY, SHOULD THE DESIGNER | | | DECIDE TO SWITCH THE NEUTRAL, CONSIDERATION TO CONTACT | | | RATINGS AND PERFORMANCE SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. | | | FOURTH POLE AND UL REQUIREMENTS | | | AS OF APRIL 1989, UL 1008 REQUIRED THAT THE FOURTH POLE | | | OF A TRANSFER SWITCH BE TESTED AND PROVEN TO HAVE | | | RATINGS EQUAL TO ITS PHASE CONTACTS IF NOT OF THE SAME | | | CONSTRUCTION. AND THAT BUS SPACING IS CLOSER TO LINE | | | THAN ITS LINE TO LINE SPACING OR IT HAS A DIFFERENT | | | MEANS OF SUPPORT FOR ITS NEUTRAL BUS. THAT MEANS THAT | | | THE NEUTRAL CONTACT MUST BE CAPABLE OF WITHSTAND AND | | | CLOSE INTO FAULT RATINGS AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE PHASE | | | CONTACTS. THE FACT IS, NOT ALL TRANSFER SWITCHES | | | EMPLOYING A FOURTH POLE ARE CONSTRUCTED IN LIKE | | | FASHION. | | | | | | AS NOTED ABOVE THE USE OF 4-POLE TRANSFER SWITCHES IS | | | NEEDED. PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS THE SEPARATELY DERIVED | | | GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM AT THE GENERATOR. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PANEL LP4 ON THE SECONDARY SIDE OF | | | THE TRANSFORMER REQUIRES A MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER PER | | | 240.21, 408.36. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE ALL INFORMATION ON PLANS AND | | | SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FBC AND | | | CHAPTER 13. | | | PLEASE KNOW THE MINIMUM REQUIRES FEDERALLY ADOPTED INTO | | | LAW IN JULY 04 WAS THAT ALL STATES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET | | | THE MINIMUM OF 1999 ASHRAE 90.1 OR BETTER BY THE NEXT | | | CODE CYCLE. PLEASE SEE THE FBC AND CHAPTER 13 FOR ALL | | | ITEMS. | | | THIS NOTE WILL BE DONE INS SUB-SECTIONS AND THE INPUT | | | DATA REPORT WILL BE NOTED AS IDR. | | | | | | A) PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3 | | | AND .1.4 FOR ALL LIGHTING CONTROLS REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE | | | THERE ARE SEVERAL LOCATIONS WHICH ARE MISSING REQUIRED | | | CONTROLS. | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | MISSING SEPARATE SPACES OVER RIDES AND LIGHTING | | | CONTROLS.ALL OVER RIDES ARE REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM | | | CONTROLS. | | | SOME EXAMPLES OFROOMS MISSING REQUIRED CONTROLS: | | | 143,008,105,105A,108,109,122,168,139 ETC THIS IS NOT | | | ALL LOCATIONS AND ONLY GIVING A FEW AS EXAMPLES. | | | MISSING LIGHTING ZONES AS REQUIRED. | | | MISSING BACK UP TIME FOR OUTSIDE LIGHTING PROGRAMMING | | | WHICH CODE SECTION ABOVE REQUIRES A 10HR MINIMUM. | | | PLEASE SEE MISSING CONTROLS AND DETAILS FOR OUTSIDE | | | LIGHTING. | | | | | | B) PLEASE SEE 13-413.1.ABC.2.1 AND .2.2 AND PLEASE | | | PLACE REQUIRED NOTES ON PLANS ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | C) PLEASE SEE 13-413.1.ABC.1.1 AND .1.2 AND SUBMIT | | | VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS FOR ALL WORST CASE. PLEASE | | | SEE THERE ARE BRANCH CIRCUITS AND FEEDERS WHICH ARE IN | | | QUESTION DUE TO THE LONGER LENGTHS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | | | | D) PLEASE BE SURE ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS COORDINATES | | | WITH THE LIGHTING ON THE IDR SUBMITTED WITH THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS. PLEASE KNOW AT THIS TIME THERE ARE | | | SEVERAL HUNDRED FIXTURES/LUMINAIRES MISSING FORM THE | | | IDR. | | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE IDR FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING | | | SHOWS NOT ONE FIXTURE. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN THERE | | | ARE HUNDRED(S) OF LUMINAIRES ONPLANS??? | | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE LIGHTING SHOWN ON THE | | | FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE IDR FOR | | | DOZENS OF FIXTURES FOR THE CORRECT WATTAGES. PLEASE SEE | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1, .1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 FOR VA RATINGS TO | | | BE USED IN CALCULATIONS. | | | THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL ACCENT LIGHTING SUCH AS TRACK | | | LIGHTING WHICH IS NOTED SPECIFICALLY IN THE CODES ABOVE | | | ALONG WITH THE VA TO BE FIGURED FOR COLD CATHODE | | | LIGHTING NOTED ON SPECIALTY LIGHTING PLANS. | | | | | | E) PLEASE BE SURE TO SHOW AND INDICATE ALL LIGHTING | | | FIXTURE DESIGNATIONS ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE SOME | | | LOCATIONS DO CONTAIN A NOTE FOR TYPES OF FIXTURES | | | HOWEVER MANY AREAS DO NOT CONTAIN DESIGNATIONS WHICH | | | COORDINATE WITH THE FIXTURE LEGEND. | | | EXAMPLE: ARE 102 | | | | | | F) PLEASE COORDINATE ELECTRICAL WATER HEATERS ON | | | PLANS/EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE WITH THAT OF THE UNITS SHOWN | | | ON THE IDR. THE IDR APPEARS TO SHOW MORE THAN THE UNITS | | | ON EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THAT THE NOTES ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO FBC | | | CHAPTER 13 ARE SOME OF THE ITEMS GIVEN AS EXAMPLES AND | | | ARE IN NO WAY ALL ITEMS. PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER | | | TRADES FOR THE SAME CHAPTER. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT SITE LIGHTING PLANS. UNABLE TO | | | REVIEW AT THIS TIME. | | | NEC 2005, FBC CHAPTER 13 | | | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT EMERGENCY EGRESS PHOTO-METRICS | | | FOR ALL EGRESS PATHS INCLUDING ALL STAIR AREAS. PLEASE | | | SEE 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2 AS THE LIGHTING LEVELS FOR STAIRS | | | UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED AT 10FT CANDLES | | | MINIMUM. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT ALL REQUIRED EGRESS PATHS, MAIN | | | ELECTRICAL ROOMS, ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT/MACHINE ROOMS ETC | | | SHALL CONTAIN BATTERY BACK UP TYPE FIXTURES TO PROVIDE | | | THE 1FT CANDLE MINIMUM FOR THE *EGRESS PATHS*. PLEASE | | | SEE 7.8.1.2.2 AND 7.8.2. | | | COULD NOT LOCATE FIXTURES ON FIXTURE LEGEND WITH THE | | | REQUIRED BATTERY BACK UP. | | | PHOTO-METRICS ARE REQUIRED AND AS NONE HAVE BEEN | | | SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME NO REVIEW CAN BE DONE. FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-33.004 | | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE GROUND RISE ON ONE-LINE SHEET | | | OR OTHER SHEET PER 250.58. ALSO AS NOTED ABOVE WITH | | | RESPECT TO THE GENERATOR AND SEPARATELY DERIVED SYSTEMS | | | PER 250.20, 250.30. THE NOTE ON RISER SHEET FOR | | | TRANSFORMER GROUND IS OK. | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE COLOR CODING FOR THE 277/480V | | | SYSTEM AS FOLLOWS. | | | BROWN, PURPLE AND YELLOW. | | | THIS LOCAL JURISDICTION EXISTINGWIRING SYSTEMS ARE AS | | | NOTED ABOVE INCLUDING OTHER LOCAL JURISDICTIONS AS THE | | | NEC DOES NOT PROVIDE COLOR CODING NEEDED FOR THESE | | | VOLTAGES. THE ORANGE MARKING AS NOTED IN THE NEC IS FOR | | | THE HIGH-LEG OF AN OPEN DELTA SYSTEM. | | | 90.4 | | | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT | | | SHEETS ON THE PROPOSED UPS SYSTEM. PLEASE BE SURE | | | DOCUMENTS CONTAIN A LISTING FROM A NRTL. (NATIONALLY | | | RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY). | | | 110.3, 90.7. | | | FBC 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE ONE E001 MENTIONS TO SEE E361 | | | FOR DETAILS ON THE GENERATOR HOWEVER NO DETAILED | | | SPECIFIC INFORMATION COULD BE LOCATED. | | | PLEASE SEE OCTAGONAL NOTE #15 FOR EXAMPLE. | | | PLEASE SEE OTHER SHEETS ON PLANS SUBMITTED CONTAIN | | | OTHER NOTES IN BOXES AND OCTAGONAL NOTES HOWEVER THE | | | NOTES DO NOT MATCH OR THE NOTE IS NOT ON ANY LEGEND OR | | | DETAIL ON SHEET TO LOCATE INFORMATION. | | | PLEASE SEE ONE EXAMPLE BESIDES ONE NOTED ABOVE: SHEET | | | E210 NOTES 4 AND 6 WHICH ARE IN LISTED NOTED. ONLY ONE | | | NOTE/ SQUARE BOX #6 WAS LOCATED ON SHEET, WHERE IS NOTE | | | #4? | | | OCTAGONAL NOTES ON E355, E14, E17, ??? | | | ** PLEASE GO THROUGH ALL SHEETS AND UPDATE NOTES, ETC | | | THIS NOTES ONLY SOME ITEMS. SOME OTHERS NOTED ABOVE WAS | | | THE MISSING FIXTURE DESIGNATIONS OR NOTES/BOXES ETC FOR | | | THE FIXTURES. | | | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ALARM DEVICE LOCATIONS AS | | | NOTED ON PLANS SHEET E-210 MAKE NOTE TO SEE | | | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR LOCATIONS AND DEVICE HEIGHTS. | | | THIS REVIEWER COULD NOT READILY LOCATE THESE ON | | | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED | | | INFORMATION ON THE ELECTRICAL PLANS OR ADD DEVICES TO | | | E-SHEETS. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE WHERE THESE ITEMS ARE | | | LOCATED. | | | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | SEE THE NEXT NOTE: | | | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE INCLUDE ALL MINIMUM LEVELS FOR FLORIDA | | | ADA COMPLIANCE. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3(4) MORE | | | SPECIFICALLY. THE LEVELS FOR ALL DEVICES TO MEET | | | MINIMUM ADA LEVELS NEED TO BE NOTED ON PLANS AS WELL AS | | | ADJUSTING THE DEVICES NOTED ON PLANS. | | | FOR EXAMPLE: STROBES SHOWN AT LEVELS WAY BELOW THE | | | MINIMUM LEVELS REQUIRED FOR ADA. (15CD ETC, WHEN | | | REQUIRES TO BE 75CD MINIMUM). | | | | | | 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 3006.2, .4 ETC AND POSSIBLE | | | COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES. PLEASE KNOW THE ELEVATOR | | | MACHINE ROOMS ARE REQUIRED MEETING INDIVIDUAL AIR | | | CONDITIONING AS WELL AS VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS. | | | PLEASE SEE NEC 620.21-620.25. AT THIS TIME THERE ARE | | | ITEMS IN THESE ROOMS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT WHICH IS | | | REQUIRED TO BE ON DEDICATED CIRCUITS YET THEY FEED | | | OTHER AREAS. SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THIS NOTE. | | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE LIGHTING IN THE MACHINE | | | ROOM IS REQUIRED TO BE ON A DEDICATE CIRCUIT YET PLANS | | | SHOWS THIS SAME CIRCUIT FEEDING OTHER AREAS/ROOMS WHICH | | | IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | | | | 19) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS SHOWS CIRCUITS FOR MUCH | | | OF THE EQUIPMENT FOR ESCALATOR AND ELEVATOR TO A Y1 | | | PANEL YET NO Y PANEL COULD BE LOCATED IN PANEL | | | SCHEDULES OR LOCATED ON RISER. WHAT IS THIS PANEL? NEC | | | 240.4,310.16, 408, 620 ETC | | | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | 20) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 620.213 AND ASME A17.1-2004, | | | SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS, REQUIRES A | | | MINIMUM OF 5 FT-CANDLES (54 LUX) AT THE PIT FLOOR AND | | | REQUIRES LUMINAIRES TO BE EXTERNALLY GUARDED TO PREVENT | | | ACCIDENTAL BREAKAGE. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE IN THE PHOTO-METRIC CALCULATIONS AS | | | NEEDED ABOVE FOR EGRESS PATHS. MAY SUBMIT ONE AS | | | TYPICAL FOR BOTH. | | | | | | 21) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT MORE DETAIL FOR THE RTCU | | | CONTROL PANELS WHICH THE GFI RECEPTACLES FOR ROOFTOP | | | EQUIPMENT IS BEING SHOWN. THESE ARE 277/480V UNITS, AND | | | NOT CLEAR WHAT THESE PANELS ARE AT THIS TIME. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. | | | | | | 22) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ROOM LOCATED ON SHEET E131 WHICH | | | IS TO THE LEFT AND DOWN FROM AREA/ROOM 122. THIS ROOM | | | DOES NOT APPEAR TO SHOW ANY DOORS. | | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | | | 23) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THE RATINGS OF THE MAIN | | | ELECTRICAL ROOM 145 AND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION ROOM | | | 116 NEEDS TO BE VERIFIED. PLEASE KNOW AS FULL FIRE | | | SPRINKLER PLANS WERE NOT SUBMITTED THE ROOM RATING | | | NEEDS TO BE VERIFIED. | | | THIS INFORMATION WILL BE GONE OVER WITH THE BUILDING | | | REVIEWER WHEN BUILDING REVIEW IS DONE. COULD NOT | | | READLIY LOCATE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS THE RATING | | | OF THESE ROOMS. | | | MAY BE 3HRS OR AT THE LEAST 1HR. 450.42 | | | WILL ALSO NEED MORE INFORMATION ON THE VENTILATION | | | TAKING PLACE IN THESE ROOMS ONCE THE MECHANICAL REVIEW | | | TAKES PLACE. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE TEMPERATURE RISE AND EQUIPMENT HEATING | | | WILL NEED TO BE GONE OVER. | | | | | | 24) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PANEL SCHEDULES NOTE A *HANDLE | | | LOCK-OFF DEVICE* ON SOME ITEMS. PLEASE BE SURE TO | | | VERIFY THE DEVICES BEING NOTED AS MANY OF THESE ITEMS | | | ARE ONLY LISTED FOR TEMPORARY USE AND IF A DEVICE IS TO | | | BE PERMANENTLY INSTALLED IN LIEU OF A REQUIRED | | | DISCONNECT THE LOCK OFF DEVICE SHALL BE AN INTEGRAL | | | PART OF THE BREAKER ASSEMBLY. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE NOTE ACCORDINGLY AND PLEASE KNOW THIS | | | WILL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD BY THE ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR | | | AND FINAL DETERMINATION BY THE AHJ. | | | 110.3, 90.4, 90.7. | | | | | | 25) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.8B2 INTHE 2005 NEC AS GFI | | | PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL 120V 15/20 AMP CIRCUITS | | | IN KITCHENS. | | | PLANS DO NOT SHOW PROTECTION, EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE DOES | | | NOT SHOW PROTECTION AND COULD NOT LOCATE THE BREAKERS | | | IN PANELS FOR REQUIRED PROTECTION. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE AND ADJUST PLANS. | | | | | | 26) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY ACCESS TO THE EDR 116, WHICH | | | APPEARS TO BE SHOWN THROUGH A ROOM 115. WHAT IS THIS | | | ROOM 115? | | | PLEASE SEE A351 WHICH INDICATES THE ROOM SHOWN AS 116 | | | ON ELECTRICAL PLANS AS 129 ON A-SHEETS. PLEASE | | | COORDINATE. | | | **MAY NOT ACCESS THROUGH A STORAGE, OFFICE ROOM AS THIS | | | CLEARLY WOULD INTERFERE WITH THE MEANS OF EGRESS | | | PATHS. | | | THIS MAY ALSO BE NOTED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL AND BUILDING | | | REVIEWER(S). | | | PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | LS 101, NEC ACCESS TO ELECTRICAL ROOM 110.26, 240.24 | | | | | | 27) NOTE: PLEASE SEE KNOW THE CODE WILL REQUIRE A | | | NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR TO THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT FOR | | | EACH OF THE ATS DEVICES. RISER SHOWS (7) WITH 3W, WHICH | | | LENDS TO NO NEUTRAL CONDUCTORS. PLEASE KNOW THAT | | | WHETHER OR NOT THE UNIT IS SEPARATELY DERIVED THIS IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | 250.6, 250.24, 250.20 ETC | | | | | | 28) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE SIZES OF BRANCH CIRCUIT | | | CONDUCTORS ON THE PANEL SCHEDULES. AS THE VD | | | CALCULATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED AND THESE ARE NOT | | | SHOWN AT THIS TIME ON PANEL SCHEDULES, UNABLE TO VERIFY | | | ALL. | | | 240.4, 310.16. | | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | 29) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE NOTES ON PLANS FOR REQUIRED | | | SIGNAGE FOR ARC FLASH PROTECTION. 110.16 | | | | | | 30) NOTE: PLEASE INCLUDE DISCONNECTING MEANS FOR ALL | | | FEEDERS FROM GENERATOR TO BUILDING. PLEASE SEE, | | | 225.31-225.39, 700.12B6, 701.11B6, AND 702.11B6. PLEASE | | | KNOW BASED ON NOT HAVING THE INFORMATION ON THE | | | BREAKERS FOR THE GENERATOR, THE CODE REQUIRES THE MEANS | | | OF DISCONNECT TO BE *WITHIN SIGHT* AND *READILY | | | ACCESSIBLE*. PLEASE SEE NEC ART 100 FOR DEFINITIONS. | | | PLEASE ALSO KNOW AS THERE MAY BE ZONING AND OTHER | | | REQUIREMENTS WHICH MAY REQUIRED FENCING/WALLS/AND | | | LANDSCAPING THE BREAKERS MAY NOT BE READILY ACCESSIBLE. | | | PLEASE ALSO KNOW THAT BASED ON THE GENERATOR AND THE | | | LOCATION OF THIS UNIT THESE MAY BE INSIDE A LOCKED | | | ENCLOSURE. THIS BEING SAID SEPARATE DISCONNECTSWHICH | | | ARE NOT REQUIRED TO CONTAIN OVER CURRENT PROTECTION | | | WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE BUILDING OR IN CLOSE PROXIMITY | | | TO BE DETERMINED BY THIS OFFICEAND THE FIRE MARSHAL. | | | | | | 31)NOTE: PLEASE KNOW ALTHOUGH NOT REQUIRED, A | | | RESPONSE LETTER WILL BE HELPFUL IN THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | 2008-03-07 19:04:11 | 2008-03-07 19:04:11 | | | | | | REVIEW CONTINUED 3/7, IN PROGRESS TO CONTINUE 3/8, | | | NOTES TO FOLLOW ONCE COMPLETED. | | 2008-02-16 19:56:14 | 2008-02-16 19:56:14 | | | | | | REVIEW STOPPED,ELECTRICAL REVIEW WILL CONTINUE AFTER | | | 2/29. PLANS WILL GO INTO *F* STATUS AT THAT TIME AND | | | NOTES WILL BE POSTED ONCE REVIEW IS COMPLETED. | | 2008-02-16 19:04:46 | 2008-02-16 19:04:46 | | | | | | ONE ROLL IN ELECTRICAL FOR REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
Time |
15:41 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
Time |
15:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-06 15:42:03 | NO CHANGES TO CIVIL OR SITE RELATED |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-09-11 |
Time |
08:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-09-11 |
Time |
08:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
10:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
10:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-18 10:25:44 | ACCORDING TO E-MAIL FROM MANNY G. OF 1000 45TH ST ENG, | | | STORM WATER QUALITY CALS ARE APPROVED BY MOCK-ROOS. | | | THEREFORE, WEACCEPT THEIR APPROVAL LETTER. | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
Time |
16:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-25 16:30:42 | FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | | | | 1. YOU NEED TO GET AN APPROVAL FROM 1000 45TH ST | | | ENGINEERING FOR STORM WATER QUALITY CALS BEFORE WE | | | ISSUE A PERMIT. THEREFORE, WE SUGGESTYOU KEEP IN | | | TOUCH WITH 1000 45TH ST ENGINEERING FOR THEIR APPROVAL. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
13:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
13:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-24 13:49:48 | FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,, GEO-TECH | | | REPORT , ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT&STORM WATER CALS TO | | | 100045TH STREET ENGINEERING SERVICESFOR THEIR | | | APPROVAL,BEFORE WE ISSUE A PERMIT. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGTHE SUMMARYOF THE | | | TOTAL SITE AREA, PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS. ALSO | | | GREEN, LAKE,PARKING AREA,YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS | | | PROJECT . PLEASEMAKE SURE THESE AREAS SHOWN ON | | | DRAINAGE DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH AND USED IN STORM | | | WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
14:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
13:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-11 14:07:07 | FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF BOND FOR ORDINANCE NO. | | | 4060-07: | | | | | | ALL DEMOLITION AND NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, WITH | | | EXCEPTION OF SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX AND ACCESSORY | | | APARTMENT, SHALL POST BONDS OR DEPOSITS FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1. EROSION CONTROL, AND | | | 2. LAND STABILIZATION | | | | | | THE AMOUNT OF THE EROSION CONTROL AND LAND | | | STABILIZATION BONDS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER | | | OF RECORD USING THE CURRENT CITY COST SCHEDULE AND | | | VERIFIED BY THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT. | | | PLEASE CONTACT BRIAN MOREE, ENG SERVICES CONSTRUCTION | | | SUPERVISOR, AT 561- 494 -1040 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | | | UPON VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEMENT, PAYMENT IN | | | FULL OF ALL APPLICABLE FEES, AND COMPLIANCE WITH ALL | | | TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY POSTED BOND, THE PERMITTEE | | | MAY REQUEST RELEASE OF THE BONDS OR DEPOSITS. | | | | | | A COPY OF ORDINANCE NO. 4060-07 MAY BE OBTAINED FROM | | | THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE LOCATED ON THE FIRST FLOOR. | | | | | | 2.PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,, GEO-TECH | | | REPORT , ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT&STORM WATER QUALITY | | | CALCULATIONS. STORM WATER CALS MUST BE APPROVED FROM | | | 100045TH STREET ENGINEERING SERVICES BEFORE WE | | | APPROVE. | | | PLEASE SHOW ON WATER QUALITY CALCULATION THAT YOU | | | HAVE CONSIDERED FLOOD ZONE AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR | | | FLOOD CRITERIA AND CROWN OF THE ROAD WHEN YOU DETERMINE | | | THE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION SHOULD | | | BE ATLEAST 1 FOOT HIGHER THAN HIGHEST CROWN OF THE | | | ROAD. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGTHE SUMMARYOF THE | | | TOTAL SITE AREA, PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS. ALSO | | | GREEN, LAKE,PARKING AREA,YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS | | | PROJECT . PLEASEMAKE SURE THESE AREAS SHOWN ON | | | DRAINAGE DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH AND USED IN STORM | | | WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 4. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET ENGINEERING BEFORE WE APPROVE. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-03-14 |
Time |
09:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-03-14 |
Time |
09:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-14 09:19:24 | FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI). | | | PLEASE APPLY AT FDEP, NPDES STORMWATER SECTION FOR | | | NOI. | | | YOU CAN GET NOI INFO FROM | | | WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/ | | | NOTICE OF INTENT DEP FORM 62-621.300(4)(B), | | | EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2003 | | | | | | 2.PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF BOND FOR ORDINANCE NO. | | | 4060-07: | | | | | | ALL DEMOLITION AND NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, WITH | | | EXCEPTION OF SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX AND ACCESSORY | | | APARTMENT, SHALL POST BONDS OR DEPOSITS FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1. EROSION CONTROL, AND | | | 2. LAND STABILIZATION | | | | | | THE AMOUNT OF THE EROSION CONTROL AND LAND | | | STABILIZATION BONDS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER | | | OF RECORD USING THE CURRENT CITY COST SCHEDULE AND | | | VERIFIED BY THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT. | | | PLEASE CONTACT BRIAN MOREE, ENG SERVICES CONSTRUCTION | | | SUPERVISOR, AT 561- 494 -1040 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | | | UPON VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEMENT, PAYMENT IN | | | FULL OF ALL APPLICABLE FEES, AND COMPLIANCE WITH ALL | | | TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY POSTED BOND, THE PERMITTEE | | | MAY REQUEST RELEASE OF THE BONDS OR DEPOSITS. | | | | | | A COPY OF ORDINANCE NO. 4060-07 MAY BE OBTAINED FROM | | | THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE LOCATED ON THE FIRST FLOOR. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE | | | DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION | | | MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS.PLEASE | | | SHOW ON CALCULATION THAT YOU HAVE CONSIDERED FLOOD ZONE | | | AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIA AND CROWN OF | | | THE ROAD WHEN YOU DETERMINE THE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION. | | | FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION SHOULD BE ATLEAST 1 FOOT HIGHER | | | THAN HIGHEST CROWN OF THE ROAD. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGTHE SUMMARYOF THE | | | SITE AREA, PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS. ALSOGREEN, | | | LAKE,PARKING AREA,YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS PROJECT | | | . PLEASEMAKE SURE THESE AREAS SHOWN ON DRAINAGE | | | DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH AND USED IN STORM WATER | | | QUALITY CALCULATIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THESE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES AROUND YOUR SITE | | | SO, WE CANSEE THE LAYOUT OF STORM WATER PIPES FROM | | | ALL OTHER STORM WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE | | | CONTROL STRUCTURESWITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING | | | ELEVATION, ETC ON DRAWINGS, CALCULATION FOR | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, PLEASE SHOW DRY DETENTION/WET | | | DETENTION AREAS IN STORM WATER CALS IF YOU HAVE ALL | | | THESE. | | | | | | 7. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND | | | YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN SO YOUR SITE DO NOT GET | | | FLOODED AND HAVE ENOUGH DRAINS. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,, GEO-TECH | | | REPORT , ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT&STORM WATER QUALITY | | | CALCULATIONS. STORM WATER CALS MUST BE APPROVED FROM | | | 100045TH STREET ENGINEERING SERVICES BEFORE WE | | | APPROVED. | | | | | | 9. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET ENGINEERING BEFORE WE APPROVE. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-10-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-10-07 |
Time |
14:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-10-07 |
Time |
14:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-07 14:48:07 | *****REVISION APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | OF THE SIX REVISED PLAN SHEETS, A020 AND A611 WERE | | | STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED; | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-09-15 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-09-15 |
Time |
11:26 |
Sent To |
B1 |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-15 11:31:11 | *****REVISION #103, DATED 9/04/09, APPROVED***** | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEETS A020 AND E110 WERE STAMPED, | | | INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
Time |
13:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
Time |
12:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-30 13:02:12 | *****REVISION APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEETS A130, A201, A611, A801, AND F111, | | | AND WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-05-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-05-14 |
Time |
11:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-05-14 |
Time |
10:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-14 10:22:29 | *****REVISION APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEETS E901, E912, E922, E931, AND E932 | | | WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED TO GO ALONG WITH THE | | | PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SHEETS OF 3/16/09. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-03-17 |
Time |
14:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-03-16 |
Time |
15:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-16 21:53:16 | *****PARTIAL APPROVAL***** | | | | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEETS A020, A021, A130, A131, A201, A611, | | | A801, A851, F111, AND F300 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND | | | DATED; HOWEVER SHEETS E901, E912, E922, AND E931 ARE TO | | | BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE ELECTRICAL PLAN EXAMINER'S | | | COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-03-16 |
Time |
14:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-03-16 |
Time |
13:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-16 14:25:50 | *****NOT REQUIRED***** | | | | | | | | | 1. THE SUBMITTED SHOP ARCHITECTURAL SHOP DRAWINGS | | | AND/OR PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT REQUIRED TO BE FIRE | | | STAMPED. | | | | | | 2. THE SUBMITTED FIRE ALARM AND ASSOCIATED DRAWINGS, | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL, AND SPEC SHEETS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED | | | UNDER A SEPARATE FIRE ALARM PERMIT. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-09-30 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2008-09-30 |
Time |
14:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-02 14:51:52 | APPROVED FORE MIKE WILLIAMS | | 2008-09-30 16:48:58 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | PLAN SHEETS A020, A021, A130,A131,A201, A611, A801, | | | F110, F111, F300, E901, E911, E912, E921, E922, AND | | | E931 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
15:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
14:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-18 15:07:14 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN | | | REVIEWS STILL NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 16.ON SHEET A020 AND A021, THE PATH OF EGRESS IS | | | SHOWN TO PASS THROUGH OBSTRUCTIONS.THE PATH OF EGRESS | | | (TRAVEL DISTANCE ROUTE) SHALL NOT BE THROUGH AN | | | OBSTRUCTION OR POSSIBLE OBSTRUCTION.PLEASE REFERENCE | | | NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE, 2003 EDITION - CH. 7.6.1 | | | FOR DETAILING THE MEASUREMENT OF TRAVEL DISTANCE TO | | | EXITS ACCEPTABLE TO THE AHJ. | | | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
Time |
09:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
Time |
07:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-01 09:08:29 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | | | | 16.ON SHEET A020 AND A021, THE PATH OF EGRESS IS | | | SHOWN TO PASS THROUGH OBSTRUCTIONS.THE PATH OF EGRESS | | | (TRAVEL DISTANCE ROUTE) SHALL NOT BE THROUGH AN | | | OBSTRUCTION OR POSSIBLE OBSTRUCTION | | | | | | 18.ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE | | | FIGHTERS' EMERGENCY OPERATIONS OF ASME A17.1;AND | | | SHALL BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE PARAMEDICAL EQUIPMENT. ADD | | | COMMENT TO AN APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | | | | 24.NFPA 13 - 2002 EDITION - SHALL BE REFERENCED FOR | | | THE INSTALLATION OF THE BUILDING'S SPRINKLER SYSTEM. IT | | | IS INDICATED ON SHEET F300 REFERENCING THE 2004 | | | EDITION.THERE STILL IS A REFERENCE TO 2004 EDITION IN | | | THE 61G15-32.004.(2) UNDER APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARD TO | | | BE APPLIED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
Time |
19:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
Time |
09:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-24 12:16:35 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | 01.STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 02.WHEN THE OLD BUILDING IS TO BE DEMOLISHED, THE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL NOT BE RENDERED INOPERABLE | | | WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF WEST PALM BEACH FIRE | | | PREVENTION. | | | | | | 03.THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL NOT INTERFERE OR HINDER | | | EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACCESS TO THE SAID PROPERTY OR THE | | | VICINITY THEREOF (INCLUDING STREETS, ALLEYS, FIRE | | | LANES) . | | | | | | 04.ON THE APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION WHICH FRONTS | | | PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD, DISPLAY/SHOW THE ACTUAL | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE BUILDING.AS | | | PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THE NUMBERS SHALL BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 6" IN HEIGHT AND 1" IN WIDTH/STROKE.IN THE | | | EVENT THAT THE ADDRESS IS NOT READILY VISIBLE DUE TO | | | THE BUILDING'S SETBACK FROM THE STREET, A MONUMENT | | | SIGN/MARKEE WILL BE REQUIRED DEPICTING THE ADDRESS IN | | | ADDITION TO THOSE ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 05.ILLUSTRATE ANY EXISTING OR NEW FIRE HYDRANTS. | | | | | | 06.KNOX-BOX FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE REQUIRED.SHOW | | | WHERE THIS DEVICE WILL BE INSTALLED IN AN ACCESSIBLE | | | LOCATION SO THAT FIRE RESCUE MAY GAIN EMERGENCY ACCESS | | | TO THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 07.ONLY ONE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) IS | | | SHOWN.CONSIDERING THE SIZE OF THIS CLASS A ( MORE | | | THAN 30,000 SQUARE FEET) MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY WITHOUT | | | THE MENTION OF A FIRE PUMP, WILL THE ONE FDC BE | | | ADEQUATE? | | | | | | 08.KNOX LOCKING CAPS SHALL BE REQUIRED ON THE FIRE | | | DEPARTMENT CONNECTION(S) .FOR AN APPLICATION, CONTACT | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE PREVENTION AT 561-804-4724. | | | | | | 09.THE FIRE BARRIER SEPARATING PARKING STRUCTURES | | | FROM THE MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY SHALL BE A FIRE BARRIER | | | HAVING A FIRE RESISTIVE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2 | | | HOURS. | | | | | | 10.OUTSIDE STAIRS, RAMPS, AND LANDINGS SHALL BE | | | DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE WATER ACCUMULATION ON THEIR | | | SURFACES. | | | | | | 11.PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGHT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE NOTED | | | FOR ALL HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS. | | | | | | 12.HANDRAILS/GUARDRAILS SHALL BE REQUIRED ON BOTH | | | SIDES OF THE STAIRS AND RAMPS. | | | | | | 13.FIRE DOORS AND FIRE WINDOWS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA | | | 80. | | | | | | 14.BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINUMUM OF 1/8 | | | INCH SCALE.SEVERAL SHEETS (SUCH AS A201, E911, FOR | | | EXAMPLE) ARE SHOWN AT 1/16 INCH SCALE. | | | | | | 15.ON SHEET A020 AND A021, IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE | | | EXIT DIAGRAM IS THE SAME AS THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN. IF | | | THIS ASSUMPTION IS INCORRECT, PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY | | | PLAN DEPICTING TRAVEL DISTANCES TO THE EXITS. | | | | | | 16.ON SHEET A020 AND A021, THE PATH OF EGRESS IS | | | SHOWN TO PASS THROUGH OBSTRUCTIONS.THE PATH OF EGRESS | | | (TRAVEL DISTANCE ROUTE) SHALL NOT BE THROUGH AN | | | OBSTRUCTION OR POSSIBLE OBSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 17.SPECIFYTHE INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH | | | MATERIAL IN TERMS OF CLASS A OR CLASS B.SPECIFY | | | INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH IN TERMS OF CLASS I OR CLASS II. | | | | | | 18.ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE | | | FIGHTERS' EMERGENCY OPERATIONS OF ASME A17.1;AND | | | SHALL BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE PARAMEDICAL EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 19.ON SHEET A130, NO EXIT LIGHTS AND EMERGENCY | | | LIGHTING IS SHOWN. | | | | | | 20.ON SHEET A131, NO EMERGENCY LIGHTING IS SHOWN AND | | | MORE EXIT LIGHTS MAY BE REQUIRED.VERIFY THAT SIGN | | | PLACEMENT SHALLBE SUCH THAT NO POINT IN AN EXIT | | | ACCESS CORRIDOR IS IN EXCESS OF 100 FEET FROM THE | | | NEAREST SIGN. | | | | | | 21.THERE IS AN EXIT LIGHT THAT DIRECTS PATRONS TO | | | AREA/ROOM 174 BUT NO EXIT DOOR IS SHOWN. | | | | | | 22. THERE IS NO SHEET A200 IN THE PLAN SET AS INDICATED | | | IN THE SHEET INDEX (SHEET G001) . | | | | | | 23. IN ADDITION TO THE ELECTRONIC SWITCHES, CHAIN AND | | | LOCK WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE FIRE LINE BACKFLOW | | | DEVICE. | | | | | | 24.NFPA 13 - 2002 EDITION - SHALL BE REFERENCED FOR | | | THE INSTALLATION OF THE BUILDING'S SPRINKLER SYSTEM. IT | | | IS INDICATED ON SHEET F300 REFERENCING THE 2004 | | | EDITION. | | | | | | 25.PROVIDE A LAYOUT OF THE BUILDING'S FIRE SPRINKLER | | | SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED.PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT | | | SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS ARE NOT | | | NEEDED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 26.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE MONITORED. | | | | | | 27.ALTHOUGH IN PLAN SET, NO SHEETS F111, F300 ARE NOT | | | SHOWN IN THE SHEET INDEX (SHEET G001) . | | | | | | 28.SHEETS R111, R141, R401, R411, R421, R501, R601, | | | R621, AND R901 ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE SHEET INDEX (SHEET | | | G001) . | | | | | | 29.COULD NOT LOCATE THE FLOWS AND TAMPERS ON THE | | | SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 30.PLEASE EXPLAIN THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE | | | SPRINKLER SUPERVISORY INITIATING DEVICE PLAN ( E901 FOR | | | EXAMPLE) AND A FIRE ALARM PLAN. | | | | | | 31.INDICATE THE FLOOR LEVAL ON THE FIRE ALARM | | | SHEETS. | | | | | | 32.IT IS SHOWN ON SHEET E912,THE ELECTRICAL | | | DISTRIBUTION CENTER/ROOM 116.HOW DOES ONE ACCESS THIS | | | SPACE?IS THIS AREA FIRE PROTECTED (SPRINKLERED, FIRE | | | RESISTIVE SEPARATED, ETC.) | | | | | | 33.HOW IS THE EMERGENCY LIGHTING IN THE STAIRWELLS | | | ATTAINED? | | | | | | 34.PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT IS AN INTRUSION SYSTEM. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
Time |
12:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
Time |
12:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-30 12:03:13 | GAS REVISION OK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-02 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-02 |
Time |
08:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-02 08:57:07 | REVISION OK -- SHT P502 -- LP GAS ISOMETRIC RISER | | | DIAGRAM. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-23 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-22 |
Time |
16:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-23 16:15:47 | REVISION DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | | | | A. SHT P111 SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FOR THE | | | LP/PROPANE GAS SYSTEM: | | | | | | 1. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE. | | | | | | 2. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH | | | NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL | | | TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE IF BEING USED. | | | | | | 3. TYPE OF GAS, INDICATE ON RISER DIAGRAM. | | | | | | 4. BTU LOAD OF EACH APPLIANCE AND THE | | | TOTAL BTU LOAD ON THE SYSTEM. REFER TO | | | THE FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SECS. 401.8 | | | THRU 402.6.1 AND TABLES 402.4(1) THRU | | | 402.4(33). | | | | | | 5. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). | | | | | | 6. INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | | PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. | | | | | | 7. SUBMIT A DETAIL SHOWING THE TYPE, | | | LOCATION, SIZE AND TERMINATION OF THE | | | GAS VENTS PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | SECS. 502 THRU 505. | | | | | | B. NO 2ND STAGE REGULATOR IS SHOWN ON THE GAS PLAN. | | | PLEASE INDICATE THE LOACTION ON THE RISER DIAGRAM AND | | | THE GAS PLAN. A LISTED SHUT OFF VALVE IS REQUIRED | | | IMMEDIATELY AHEAD OF THE REGULATOR. SECTION 409.4. | | | | | | C. SUBMIT THE MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2ND STAGE | | | REGULATOR. THE REGULATOR SHALL BE LISTED. SHOW THE | | | MODEL NUMBER AND OUTLET CAPACITY FOR SINGLE OR MULTIPLE | | | APPLIANCES. SECTION 106.1.2, (MORE INFORMATION | | | REQUIRED). | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
17:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-06 07:57:43 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | NFPA-58 | | | | | | | | | 1. SHT P111 THE PROPANE TANK IS REQUIRED TO BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 10 FEET FROM THE BUILDING. NFPA-58 SECTION | | | 6.2.1 & ANNEX I SECTION I.1 AND FIGURE I.1(B). THE | | | PROPANE TANK IS INDICATED UNDER THE BUILDING. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
11:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
11:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
07:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
Time |
12:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-30 07:49:47 | PLANS REVIEWED AND STAMPED BUT PERMIT WILL STAY IN | | | FAILED STATUS UNTIL CONTRACTOR APPLIES FOR PERMIT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
09:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-06-09 |
Time |
15:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-11 09:38:04 | | | | | | | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | | | | PLANS IN FOR PLAN REVIEW ONLY AT THIS TIME: | | | | | | 1. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING IS | | | REQUIRED FOR THE GAS PERMIT. | | | | | | A. OK | | | B. OK | | | C. OK | | | D. OK | | | E. OK | | | F. OK | | | G. OK | | | | | | **********NEW COMMENTS*********** | | | | | | 1B. SHOW THE SHUT OFF VALVE AND THE SECOND STAGE | | | REGULATOR ON THE GAS RISER DIAGRAM. THE SHUT OFF VALVE | | | SHALL BE INSTALLED UPSTREAM OF THE REGULATOR. SECTION | | | 409.4. | | | | | | 2B. SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR THE | | | SECOND STAGE GAS REGULATOR. INDICATE MODEL NUMBER AND | | | SHOW LISTING FOR REGULATOR ON SHEETS. SECTION 410.2. | | | | | | 3B. VENTED REGULATORS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 410.3. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
Time |
15:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
Time |
15:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-09 15:46:41 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | | | | PLANS IN FOR PLAN REVIEW ONLY AT THIS TIME: | | | | | | 1. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING IS | | | REQUIRED FOR THE GAS PERMIT. | | | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE.--LENGHTS OF CUT SECTIONS NOT SHOWN. | | | | | | | | | B. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH | | | NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL | | | TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE IF BEING USED. | | | | | | C. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4).--TO BE VERIFIED WHEN | | | COMMENT 24(A) SUBMITTED. | | | | | | D. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION | | | AIR (IF APPLICABLE) PER FBC-2004 FUEL | | | GAS CODE SECTION 304. | | | | | | E. SUBMIT A DETAIL SHOWING THE TYPE, | | | LOCATION, SIZE AND TERMINATION OF THE | | | GAS VENTS PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | SECS. 502 THRU 505. | | | | | | F. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. | | | | | | G. THE LOCATION OF THE GAS METER, THE GENERATOR AND | | | ASSOCIATED GAS PIPING SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE | | | PLUMBING SHEETS TO VERIFY THE GAS ISOMETRIC PIPING. | | | SECTION 106.1.2. | | | | | | 25. PLANS ARE NOT 100% COMPLETE AT THIS TIME AND MORE | | | COMMENTS MAY FOLLOW. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
19 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-09-16 |
Time |
08:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-09-16 |
Time |
08:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
18 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
18:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
18:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-08 18:42:30 | C-28. REVISION FOR PARKING GARAGE EXIT SIGNAGE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
17 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
11:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
11:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-20 11:02:33 | PRECAST SHOP DRAWINGS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
16 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2009-07-06 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-06 |
Time |
08:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-06 08:10:40 | INCOMING: C48 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
15 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
Time |
13:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-11 13:20:56 | TO C-21 - ELEC & PLUMB REVISIONS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
14 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-06-11 |
Time |
13:16 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-11 13:17:16 | TO JW DESK - WALL DETAIL AND SHORING PLAN |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
swurafti |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
Time |
16:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
swurafti |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
Time |
16:30 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-17 16:30:25 | TO "JWITMER" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
15:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
15:27 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-10 15:28:18 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
14:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-10 |
Time |
14:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-10 14:44:08 | TO "C34" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
Time |
09:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
Time |
09:14 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-03 09:15:25 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-13 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-13 |
Time |
10:56 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-13 10:57:17 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTALS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-27 |
Time |
15:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-27 |
Time |
15:26 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-27 15:28:16 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
Time |
13:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
Time |
13:40 |
Sent To |
FIRE |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-17 13:44:29 | TO "COMM" BD#13--PLANS CAME IN AS SUBMITTAL OF SHOP | | | DRAWINGS FOR "BLDG" AND "F". AFTER TALKING WITH CAPTAIN | | | WILLIAMS, WE DECIDED TO ROUTED IT THE BOARD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-30 |
Time |
15:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-30 |
Time |
15:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-30 15:23:32 | TO "COMM" BD#52--PLANS ON RACK--5 BIG ROLLS, 10 SM | | | ROLLS, 1 BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
Time |
15:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
Time |
15:39 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-21 15:40:07 | TO "M" BOX/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
09:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
09:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-04 09:12:54 | TO "COMM" BD#22/PLANS ON RACK--4 ROLLS, 1 BOX W/BINDERS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
Time |
13:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
Time |
13:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-15 13:33:32 | TO "COMM" BD#44/PLANS ON RACK/4 ROLLS, BINDERS, AND | | | BOOKS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
Time |
08:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
Time |
08:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-27 16:39:18 | TO "COMM" BD#48-PLANS ON RACK/5 ROLL, 1 BOX | | 2008-05-22 08:25:05 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
Time |
16:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2008-02-07 |
Time |
09:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-07 09:46:19 | TO "COMM" BD#22/PLANS ON RACK--3 ROLLS AND PAPERWORK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
15:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
14:31 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-28 15:21:55 | REVISIONS AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS DATED 6/26/09 | | | M141 DELTA 62, M321 AND M601 DELTA 46, R111, R401, | | | R411, R601, R611, R621 DELTA 59 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
Time |
10:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-04-24 |
Time |
10:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-30 10:26:31 | REVISED R PAGES |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-11 |
Time |
11:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-10 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-11 11:55:31 | THE FOLLOWING PAGES WERE REVISED OR ADDED AS PART OF | | | REVISION 32: | | | | | | M111 | | | M141 | | | M301 | | | M321 | | | M601 | | | R111 | | | R141 | | | R401 | | | R411 | | | R421 | | | R501 | | | R511 | | | R521 | | | R601 | | | R611 | | | R621 | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING PROVISO IS ATTACHED TO PAGE R511: | | | | | | *****PROVISO***** | | | PAGE R511 DETAIL #14: EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND | | | SUPPORTS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED AND | | | INSTALLED TO RESIST THE WIND PRESSURES ON THE EQUIPMENT | | | AND THE SUPPORTS AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M | | | 301.13. REVISE PLAN SHOWING SUPPORTS DESIGNED AND | | | ATTACHED TO BUILDING STRUCTURE FOR WIND RESISTANCE. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
10:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
09:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-10 09:24:36 | THE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THE HILL PHOENIX | | | REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT ROOM ARE OK. THE WIND LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS FOR ALL OTHER OUTDOOR APPLIANCES ARE | | | INSUFFICIENT. THE CALCULATIONS ONLY ACCOUNT FOR THE | | | SIZE OF THE PANELS AND THE STRENGTH OF THE SCREWS | | | HOLDING THE PANELS. THEY DO NOT COVER ANY OTHER ASPECTS | | | OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE APPLIANCES. A COMPREHENSIVE | | | ANALYSIS OF THE OVERALL CONSTRUCTION OF THE APPLIANCES | | | IS REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. | | | PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. THIS IS THE ONLY | | | OUTSTANDING MECHHANICAL REVIEW COMMENT AT THIS TIME. AS | | | SUCH, IT WILL BE COVERED BY A PROVISO TO FACILITATE THE | | | PROGRESS OF THE PROJECT WHILE A NEW ANALYSIS OR TESTING | | | CAN BE DONE. | | | | | | REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN FAILED STATUS UNTIL THERE HAS | | | BEEN AN ACTUAL APPLICATION FOR PERMIT. THESE PLANS ARE | | | STILL SUBMITTED UNDER PLAN REVIEW ONLY STATUS. THE | | | FOLLOWING PROVISO WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE PERMIT SET OF | | | PLANS: | | | | | | ***************PROVISO************** | | | ALL MECHANICAL APPLIANCES EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL | | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM 301.13 BY ANALYSIS OR | | | TESTING. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO | | | THE CODE OFFICIAL IN TIME FOR A PASSED REVIEW PRIOR TO | | | INSTALLATION OF OUTDOOR APPLIANCES. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
08:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
08:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-18 08:57:41 | THE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THE HILL PHOENIX | | | REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT ROOM ARE OK. THE WIND LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS FOR ALL OTHER OUTDOOR APPLIANCES ARE | | | INSUFFICIENT. THE CALCULATIONS ONLY ACCOUNT FOR THE | | | SIZE OF THE PANELS AND THE STRENGTH OF THE SCREWS | | | HOLDING THE PANELS. THEY DO NOT COVER ANY OTHER ASPECTS | | | OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE APPLIANCES. A COMPREHENSIVE | | | ANALYSIS OF THE OVERALL CONSTRUCTION OF THE APPLIANCES | | | IS REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. | | | PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. THIS IS THE ONLY | | | OUTSTANDING MECHHANICAL REVIEW COMMENT AT THIS TIME. AS | | | SUCH, IT WILL BE COVERED BY A PROVISO TO FACILITATE THE | | | PROGRESS OF THE PROJECT WHILE A NEW ANALYSIS OR TESTING | | | CAN BE DONE. | | | | | | REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN FAILED STATUS UNTIL THERE HAS | | | BEEN AN ACTUAL APPLICATION FOR PERMIT. THESE PLANS ARE | | | STILL SUBMITTED UNDER PLAN REVIEW ONLY STATUS. THE | | | FOLLOWING PROVISO WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE PERMIT SET OF | | | PLANS: | | | | | | ***************PROVISO************** | | | ALL MECHANICAL APPLIANCES EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL | | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM 301.13 BY ANALYSIS OR | | | TESTING. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO | | | THE CODE OFFICIAL IN TIME FOR A PASSED REVIEW PRIOR TO | | | INSTALLATION OF OUTDOOR APPLIANCES. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-05 |
Time |
10:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
15:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-05 10:30:33 | REVIEW IN TEMPORARY FAIL STATUS PENDING RESOLUTION OF | | | COMMENT #5 AND REVIEW OF WIND LOAD DATA FOR MECHANICAL | | | APPLIANCES (BY STRUCTURAL REVIEWER). COMMENT #5 | | | REQUIRES A THROUGH-PENETRATION DETAIL FOR 8" ROUND DUCT | | | PENETRATING RATED WALL WITHOUT FIRE DAMPER. SPOKE TO | | | ERIC FROM NELSON-RUDIE VIA TELEPHONE. THE DESIGN TEAM | | | HAS REQUESTED AN OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE THE MISSING | | | DOCUMENTATION DURING THIS REVIEW CYCLE. THE WIND LOAD | | | DATA FOR THE APPLIANCES WAS NOT PROVIDED WITH ORIGINAL | | | SEAL/SIGNATURE OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS RESPONSIBLE | | | FOR THE REPORTS. THIS WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED. IF | | | NECESSARY, ONCE ALL OUTSTANDING ISSUES ARE ADDRESSED, | | | THIS MAY BE COVERED WITH A PROVISO TO ALLOW THE PROJECT | | | TO MOVE FORWARD. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
Time |
08:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-06-17 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-19 08:35:20 | REVIEW #: 2ND **PLAN CHECK ONLY** | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 1 AND 2: OK | | | | | | 3. WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO BUILDING PLAN | | | REVIEW. IF ALL OTHER REVIEW ITEMS ARE ADDRESSED, A | | | PROVISO WILL BE ISSUED TO COVER THE MISSING WIND | | | RESISTANCE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE OUTDOOR APPLIANCES. | | | | | | 4. OK | | | | | | 5. PAGE M301 KEYNOTE #14 REFERENCES SECTION 07 8400. NO | | | SUCH INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. ADDITIONALLY, GENERAL | | | NOTE E CALLS FOR FIRE DAMPERS AT ALL RATED ASSEMBLIES. | | | THIS IS IN CONFLICT WITH KEYNOTE 14. PLEASE CLARIFY AND | | | COORDINATE NOTES. DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM | | | 607.1.1 AND 607.5. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE | | | THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOP SYSTEM TO BE USED ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 6 AND 7: THESE COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED BY REFERENCING A | | | DOCUMENT WHICH WAS NOT SUBMITTED AS PERMIT | | | DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE BY | | | PROVIDING THE REQUESTED INFORMATION ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 8 THROUGH 12: OK | | | | | | 13. MECHANICAL PORTIONS OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS HAVE | | | BEEN CORRECTED. HOWEVER, THE CERTIFICATIONS PAGE OF THE | | | CODE COMPLIANCE FORM HAS NOT BEEN SIGNED AND SEALED BY | | | THE PREPARER IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-103.1.1.1 AND | | | 13-103.2. PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | NOTE: THIS PROJECT IS STILL SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW | | | ONLY AND NOT FOR PERMIT. EVEN WHEN ALL OUTSTANDING | | | COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, PLANS WILL REMAIN IN | | | FAILED STATUS UNTIL A PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR AND ISSUED. | | | THESE PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO ANY CHANGES IN THE BUILDING | | | CODES ADOPTED BY THE STATE UP TO THE DATE OF ACTUAL | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-16 |
Time |
12:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-16 |
Time |
12:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-16 12:58:05 | REVIEW #: 1ST***PLAN CHECK ONLY*** | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | 1. PG M321: RTU 5 DUCT SYSTEM ON FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR A | | | TOTAL OF 10,950 CFM OF SUPPLY WHILE THE RTU SCHEDULE ON | | | M141 SHOWS RTU 5 PROVIDING 9125 CFM OF SUPPLY. WHICH | | | ONE IS CORRECT? AIR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SHALL BE | | | DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO SUPPLY THE REQUIRED | | | DISTRIBUTION OF AIR IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 603.1. | | | | | | 2. PG M321: AN 8 INCH ROUND, 175 CFM C-TYPE GRILL IS | | | SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN NEAR PHARMACY STORAGE ROOM 132. THE | | | FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE FROM WHERE THIS GRILL WILL | | | BE SUPPLIED. THIS APPEARS TO BE A POSSIBLE DRAFTING | | | ERROR. PLEASE CORRECT. FBCM 603.1. | | | | | | 3. PG M141: DETAIL 2, NO INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND ON | | | PLANS OR IN STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS REGARDING | | | ANTICIPATED WIND PRESSURES ON OUTDOOR AND ROOFTOP | | | EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, | | | APPLIANCES AND SUPPORTS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL | | | BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO RESIST THE WIND PRESSURES | | | ON THE EQUIPMENT AND THE SUPPORTS AS DETERMINED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE FBCB PER FBCM 301.13. PROVIDE WIND | | | LOAD CALCULATIONS WITH CORRESPONDING ATTACHMENT DETAILS | | | FOR BUILDING PLAN REVIEW. IF MANUFACTURER HAS TESTED | | | AND DOCUMENTED DETAILS FOR ATTACHMENT, THEY MAY BE USED | | | TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE (PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION). | | | ALSO, PLEASE PROVIDE EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCE | | | MANUFACTURER?S DATA SHOWING ALL OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT SUCH | | | AS CONDENSING UNITS, ROOFTOP A/C UNITS, EXHAUST FANS | | | AND THE ROOFTOP CONDENSER RACK TO BE DESIGNED AND | | | CONSTRUCTED TO WITHSTAND ANTICIPATED WIND PRESSURES | | | CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB SECTION 1609. | | | | | | 4. PG M141 AND R141: ARE CONDENSING UNITS AND THE | | | ROOFTOP CONDENSER RACK TO BE INSTALLED ON SOLID CURBS | | | OR STANDS? DETAILS ON PLANS ARE UNCLEAR AS TO WHICH | | | TYPE OF CURB IS TO BE USED AT WHICH LOCATION. WHERE | | | ROOFING MATERIALS EXTEND BENEATH THE UNIT ON RAISED | | | EQUIPMENT SUPPORTS, A MINIMUM CLEARANCE HEIGHT IS | | | REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB TABLE 1509.7. | | | NOTE PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS ARE DEFINED BY FAC RULE | | | 9B-72 AS STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. IF SUCH STANDS ARE | | | USED, A PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED AND SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION. PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THE AHJ IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 106.3.3. | | | | | | 5. PG M301: THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A FIRE RATED | | | SEPARATION BETWEEN THE PARKING GARAGE AREA (S-2 | | | OCCUPANCY) AND THE 1ST FLOOR LOBBY AREA OF THE STORE (M | | | OCCUPANCY). WHILE THERE IS A "CODE ANALYSIS" ON PG G001 | | | INDICATING THAT A FIRE RATED SEPARATION IS NOT REQUIRED | | | IN THIS AREA, THE ANALYSIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE | | | ACCURATE. THE GOVERNING CODE SECTION REGARDING REQUIRED | | | SEPARATION IS FBCB 406.2.7 WHICH STATES: ?PARKING | | | GARAGES SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM OTHER OCCUPANCIES IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 302.3.2.? FBCB TABLE 302.3.2 | | | FOR SEPARATED USES REQUIRES A MINIMUM 2-HOUR SEPARATION | | | BETWEEN THESE OCCUPANCIES. AS IT IS UNKNOWN WHERE THIS | | | OCCUPANCY SEPARATION WILL BE PROVIDED, IT IS NOT | | | POSSIBLE TO DO A THOROUGH REVIEW OF THE MECHANICAL | | | SYSTEMS SHOWN ON THIS PAGE AT THIS TIME. ENSURE THAT | | | OPENING PROTECTIVES ARE SHOWN WHENEVER DUCTS PENETRATE | | | RATED ASSEMBLIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.5. | | | COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. | | | | | | 6. PG M301: KEYNOTES 1 AND 2 CALL FOR DUCT AND PIPE | | | PENETRATIONS THROUGH A FIRE RATED HORIZONTAL ASSEMBLY | | | (SEE COMMENT ABOVE). SHOW HOW THESE OPENINGS ARE TO BE | | | PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.6 AND FBCB | | | 712.4.1.2. | | | | | | 7. PG M301 AND M321: FLOOR PLAN AND KEYNOTES CALL FOR | | | COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS. HOW WILL THE SMOKE | | | DAMPERS BE ACTUATED? DETAIL #14 ON PG E941 SHOWS A | | | SMOKE DETECTOR W/DAMPER INTERFACE BUT IT IS UNCLEAR | | | WHERE THESE DETECTORS WILL BE LOCATED AND WHETHER THEY | | | ARE TO BE CONNECTED TO THE SMOKE DAMPERS. INDICATE | | | CLEARLY ON PLANS HOW THE SMOKE DAMPERS ARE TO BE | | | ACTUATED BY ONE OF THE METHODS LISTED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBCM 607.3.2.1. | | | | | | 8. PG M321: THE 16X16 DUCT FOR TF-4 IS SHOWN | | | PENETRATING A 2-HOUR RATED WALL ASSEMBLY (TYPE P33X) | | | INTO ROOM 155, AS SHOWN ON PG A351. THIS DUCT IS ALSO | | | SHOWN RUNNING PARALLEL DIRECTLY ABOVE THE 2-HOUR RATED | | | WALL BETWEEN ROOMS 115 AND 161. THESE WALLS APPEAR TO | | | BE FROM FLOOR TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF DECK. THE FIRE/SMOKE | | | DAMPERS IN THE DUCTS FEEDING THE UPPER EDC AREA DO NOT | | | APPEAR TO BE LOCATED WHERE FIRE-RESISTANCE RATED | | | CONSTRUCTION IS BEING PROVIDED. THIS AREA REQUIRES | | | ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION AS TO THE DESIGN INTENT AND | | | THE LOCATION OF ALL FIRE-RESISTANCE RATED ASSEMBLIES. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, SHOWING | | | OPENING PROTECTIVES AT ALL DUCT PENETRATIONS OF RATED | | | ASSEMBLIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.5. | | | | | | 9. ALL MECHANICAL FLOOR PLANS: BY WHAT MEANS ARE THE | | | EXHAUST FANS FOR RESTROOM AREAS BEING CONTROLLED? ARE | | | THEY TO RUN CONTINUOUS, RUN BY LIGHT SWITCH OR RUN BY | | | OCCUPANCY SENSORS? PLEASE INDICATE ON FAN PRV SCHEDULE | | | HOW FANS ARE TO BE CONTROLLED. WHERE MECHANICAL EXHAUST | | | IS REQUIRED BY FBCM TABLE 403.3, RECIRCULATION OF AIR | | | FROM SUCH SPACES SHALL BE PROHIBITED. ALL AIR SUPPLIED | | | TO SUCH SPACES SHALL BE EXHAUSTED, INCLUDING ANY AIR IN | | | EXCESS OF THAT REQUIRED BY FBCM TABLE 403.3. SHOW PRV | | | CONTROLS FOR RESTROOM AREAS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THIS SECTION. ALSO, SEE FBCM 401.3. | | | | | | 10. PG M301 AND M601: AC-2 SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH FAN | | | SHUT-DOWN BY SMOKE DETECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | | 606.2 AND 606.4. | | | | | | 11. OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS COULD NOT BE FOUND ON | | | PLANS. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATINS SHOWING OCCUPANCY | | | CLASSIFICATION, OCCUPANT LOAD, AMOUNT OF VENTILATION | | | REQUIRED AND AMOUNT OF VENTILATION PROVIDED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM TABLE 403.3. ALSO, PROVIDE AN AIR | | | BALANCE SHEDULE SHOWING BUILDING SYSTEMS TO BE IN | | | BALANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 403.1 AND FBCB | | | 13-409.1.ABC.2. | | | | | | 12. SYSTEM SIZING CALCULATIONS: SOME ASPECTS OF THE | | | COOLING LOAD CALCULATION DATA DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH | | | THE INFORMATIN PROVIDED IN THE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON PG | | | M141. EXAMPLE: RTU-02 IN THE SCHEDULE SHOWS THE AIRFLOW | | | AT 12,380 CFM WHILE THE AIRFLOW IN THE SYSTEM SIZING | | | CALCULATION SHOWS 16,483. PLEASE SHOW INFORMATION IN | | | CALCULATIONS TO BE ACCURATE WITH RESPECT TO THE | | | INFORMATION SHOWN ON PLANS. ALSO, MOST SYSTEMS IN THE | | | CALCULATIONS SHOW RETURN AIR FLOW RATES IN EXCESS OF | | | THE SUPPLY AIR FLOW RATES. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? ARE | | | THE RTU'S EXHAUSTING AIR? WILL THIS CONDITION PUT THE | | | SPACES IN NEGATIVE PRESSURE? PLEASE CLARIFY. SEE FBC | | | 13-407.1.ABC.1.1. SEE ALSO COMMENT #11 ABOVE. | | | | | | 13. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: SEVERAL OF THE A/C SYSTEMS | | | SHOWN IN THE SYSTEM REPORT COMPLIANCE PORTION OF THE | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE | | | INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON | | | PLANS. | | | EXAMPLE 1: RTU-01 IS IDENTIFIED ON PLANS AS A LENNOX | | | 48,000 BTU/H SYSTEM BUT IN ENERGY CALCULATIONS IT IS | | | SHOWN AS AN AAON SYSTEM SIZED BETWEEN 65,000 AND 135, | | | 000 BTU/H. | | | EXAMPLE 2: RTU-02 IS IDENTIFIED ON PLANS AS A LCC360H4B | | | 339,506 BTU/H SYSTEM WITH AN EER OF 10.1 BUT IN ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS IT IS SHOWN AS A LCC156H2B SIZED BETWEEN | | | 135,000 AND 240,000 BTU/H WITH AN EER OF 12.2. | | | THE VALUES ENTERED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATION MUST | | | CORRESPOND WITH THE INFORMATION ON THE PLAN IN ORDER TO | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBCB CHAPTER 13. THESE ARE ONLY | | | TWO EXAMPLES OF MANY DISCREPENCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS | | | AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS. PLEASE VERIFY ALL INPUT DATA | | | IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WITH THE INFORMATION SHOWN | | | ON THE PLANS TO ENSURE THE ACCURACY OF THE | | | CALCULATIONS. THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING | | | THE ENERGY CODE CALCULATIONS, SHALL SHOW, IN SUFFICIENT | | | DETAIL, ALL PERTINENT DATA AND FEATURES OF THE BUILDING | | | AND THE EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS AS HEREIN GOVERNED | | | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: DESIGN CRITERIA, | | | EXTERIOR ENVELOPE COMPONENT MATERIALS, U-VALUES OF THE | | | ENVELOPE SYSTEMS, R-VALUES OF INSULATING MATERIALS, | | | SIZE AND TYPE OF APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT, EQUIPMENT AND | | | SYSTEMS CONTROLS AND OTHER PERTINENT DATA TO INDICATE | | | CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-103.3. ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL | | | BE REVIEWED IN THEIR ENTIRETY UPON RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | NOTE: A SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE | | | REFRIGERATION AND WALK-IN COOLER SYSTEMS. THE | | | DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE SYSTEMS IS SUFFICIENT WITH THE | | | EXCEPTION OF ANY INFORMATION REQUESTED IN ABOVE | | | COMMENTS. THE SEPARATE PERMIT MAY BE APPLIED FOR BY | | | REFERENCE TO THE MASTER PERMIT NUMBER AND THESE PLANS. | | | | | | | | | NOTE: PLEASE RESPOND TO EACH COMMENT IN WRITING, WIH | | | INFORMATION ON HOW THE COMMENT IS ADDRESSED AND WHERE | | | THE RELEVANT INFORMATION CAN BE LOCATED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
Time |
12:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
Time |
12:03 |
Sent To |
FIRE |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-30 12:11:02 | REVISIONS OK -- SHTS P110, P111, P141, P301, P302, | | | P311, P401, P501 & P502. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-02 |
Time |
08:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-01 |
Time |
1658 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-02 08:58:22 | REVISIONS OK -- SHTS P111, P141 & P302 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-23 |
Time |
16:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-23 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-23 16:18:12 | REVISIONS DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 (ADMINISTRATIVE) | | | | | | 1. SHT P141 NO REVISIONS NOTED. PLEASE CLOUD AND NUMBER | | | ALL REVISIONS. BP-3.0 SHOWS NO NEW REVISIONS. SECTION | | | 106.1.3. | | | | | | 2. SHT P302. SOME REVISIONS NOTED WITH NO CLOUDS OR | | | REVISION NUMBERS. PLEASE INDICATE ALL REVISIONS WITH | | | CLOUD AND A REVISION NUMBER. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-23 |
Time |
16:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-22 |
Time |
16:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-23 16:17:28 | REVISIONS OK -- SHTS P110, P311, P351, P501, P601. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
Time |
16:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
Time |
16:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-05 16:54:59 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | NFPA-58 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. SHT P110 THE OFFSET DOWNSTREAM OF THE 10 INCH STORM | | | DRAIN BY COL LINE 12 SHALL BE INDICATED AS 12 INCH PIPE | | | @ 1/4" PER FT PER TABLE 1106.3. PLEASE INDICATE ON | | | PLAN. REVISION BP-3.0 WAS NOT FOUND OR APPROVED. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.3. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE | | | REVISION BP-3.0 CAN BE FOUND. | | | | | | 2. SHT P111 THE PROPANE TANK IS REQUIRED TO BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 10 FEET FROM THE BUILDING. NFPA-58 SECTION | | | 6.2.1 & ANNEX I SECTION I.1 AND FIGURE I.1(B). THE | | | PROPANE TANK IS INDICATED UNDER THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 3. SHT P111 ALL REVISIONS SHALL BE CLOUDED AND | | | INDICATED WITH A REVISION NUMBER THAT IS SHOWN ON THE | | | REVISION INDEX. SECTION 106.1.3. THERE ARE REVISIONS | | | THAT ARE CLOUDED, BUT SHOW NO REVISION NUMBER. ALSO | | | REVISION BP-3.0 WAS NOT FOUND OR APPROVED. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.3. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE | | | REVISION BP-3.0 CAN BE FOUND. | | | | | | 4. SHT P141 REVISION INDEX SHOWS REVISION BP-3.0. THIS | | | REVISION WAS NOT FOUND OR APPROVED. NO REVISIONS WERE | | | FOUND ON THIS SHEET. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | 5. SHT P302 ALL REVISIONS SHALL BE CLOUDED AND | | | INDICATED WITH A REVISION NUMBER THAT IS SHOWN ON THE | | | REVISION INDEX. SECTION 106.1.3. THERE ARE REVISIONS | | | THAT ARE CLOUDED, BUT SHOW NO REVISION NUMBER. (SEE | | | BETWEEN COL. LINES 1 & 2). THERE WAS A CHANGE/REVISION | | | THAT WAS NOT CLOUDED/NUMBERED TO THE RIGHT OF COL. LINE | | | 1 JUST ABOVE COL. LINE B. PLEASE CLOUD AND NUMBER ALL | | | REVISIONS. ALSO REVISION BP-3.0 WAS NOT FOUND OR | | | APPROVED. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.3. PLEASE | | | INDICATE WHERE REVISION BP-3.0 CAN BE FOUND. | | | | | | 6. SHT P351 ALL REVISIONS SHALL BE CLOUDED AND | | | INDICATED WITH A REVISION NUMBER THAT IS SHOWN ON THE | | | REVISION INDEX. SECTION 106.1.3. THERE ARE REVISIONS | | | THAT ARE CLOUDED, BUT SHOW NO REVISION NUMBER. ALSO | | | REVISION BP-3.0 WAS NOT FOUND OR APPROVED. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.3. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE | | | REVISION BP-3.0 CAN BE FOUND. | | | | | | 7. SHT P501 ALL REVISIONS SHALL BE CLOUDED AND | | | INDICATED WITH A REVISION NUMBER THAT IS SHOWN ON THE | | | REVISION INDEX. SECTION 106.1.3. THERE ARE REVISIONS | | | THAT ARE CLOUDED, BUT SHOW NO REVISION NUMBER. ALSO | | | REVISION BP-3.0 WAS NOT FOUND OR APPROVED. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.3. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE | | | REVISION BP-3.0 CAN BE FOUND. ALSO MANY REVISION | | | TRIANGLES WITH THE NUMBERS 1 & 2 ARE SHOWN ON THE FLOOR | | | PLAN BUT NOT IN THE REVISION INDEX. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-05 |
Time |
16:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
17:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-05 16:03:47 | REVISIONS OK | | | | | | SHT P300 REV. BP-3.0 | | | SHT P301 REV. 8 - REV. BP-3.0 NOT FOUND OR APPROVED | | | SHT P401 REV. 32 - REV. BP-3.0 NOT FOUND OR APPROVED | | | SHT P421 REV. 32 - REV. BP-3.0 NOT FOUND OR APPROVED | | | SHT P431 REV. 32 - REV. BP-3.0 NOT FOUND OR APPROVED | | | SHT P502 REV. 26 & REV. 32 - REV. BP-3.0 NOT FOUND OR | | | APPROVED |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
11:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
11:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
07:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
Time |
12:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-30 07:49:30 | PLANS REVIEWED AND STAMPED BUT PERMIT WILL STAY IN | | | FAILED STATUS UNTIL CONTRACTOR APPLIES FOR PERMIT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-06-11 |
Time |
07:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-06-09 |
Time |
15:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-11 08:57:21 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | MUNICIPAL CODE CITY WPB | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW: | | | | | | PLANS IN FOR PLAN REVIEW ONLY AT THIS TIME: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | 2. OK | | | | | | 3. SHT G001 SHEET INDEX. 3 SHEETS ON THE INDEX WERE NOT | | | FOUND & 2 "F" SHEETS & 10 "R" SHEETS SUBMITTED ARE NOT | | | SHOWN ON THE INDEX. PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTION 106.1.2. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THERE ARE SHEETS MISSING FROM | | | AT LEAST ONE SET OF PLANS. PLEASE CHECK ALL SETS OF | | | PLANS TO MAKE SURE THE SHEETS SUBMITTED CORRELATE WITH | | | THE SHEET INDEX ON SHT G001. | | | | | | 4. OK | | | 5. OK | | | 6. OK | | | | | | 7. SHT A313 SHOW THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR ACCESSIBLE | | | WATER CLOSETS AND LAVS PER SECTIONS 11-4.16.2 & | | | 11-4.19.3. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE IS | | | REQUIRED FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSETS NO MATTER IF | | | THEY ARE IN STALLS OR TOILET ROOMS. THE REQUIREMENT IS | | | FOR TRANSFERING FROM THE WHEELCHAIR TO THE W/C. THE | | | TURNING AREA IS NOT REQUIRED IN THE STALL AND IS A | | | DIFFERENT REQUIREMENT FROM THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE. | | | | | | 8. OK | | | 9. OK | | | 10. OK (WILL PROVISO - REQUIRED AT TIME OF FINAL | | | PLUMBING INSPECTION) | | | | | | 11. OK | | | 12. OK | | | 13. OK | | | | | | 14. THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR SHALL BE SIZED BY THE | | | UTILITY DEPT. INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL | | | COMPLIANCE. ALSO THEPHOTO PROCESSING MAY BE REQUIRED | | | TO INSTALL A NEUTRALIZING TANK. PLEASE CONTACT RODNEY | | | COMPO, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AT (561)644-1821, OR | | | BY FAX (561) 822-2287, OR E-MAIL [email protected]. A | | | WRITTEN DETERMINATION FOR BOTH ISSUES SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH PLANS INDICATING THE REQUIREMENT | | | OUTCOME. ARTICLE III SECTION 90-124(7). ****RESPONSE | | | NOTED, WAITING FOR REVISION FROM RODNEY COMPO. | | | | | | 15. OK | | | 16. OK | | | 17. OK | | | 18. OK (SEE COMMENT #10). | | | 19. OK | | | 20. OK | | | 21. OK | | | 22. OK | | | 23. OK | | | | | | 24. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING IS | | | REQUIRED FOR THE GAS PERMIT. | | | | | | A. OK | | | B. OK | | | C. OK | | | D. OK | | | E. OK | | | F. OK | | | G. OK | | | 25. OK | | | | | | **********NEW COMMENT*********** | | | | | | 1B. SHOW THE SHUT OFF VALVE AND THE SECOND STAGE | | | REGULATOR ON THE GAS RISER DIAGRAM. THE SHUT OFF VALVE | | | SHALL BE INSTALLED UPSTREAM OF THE REGULATOR. SECTION | | | 409.4. | | | | | | 2B. SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR THE | | | SECOND STAGE GAS REGULATOR. INDICATE MODEL NUMBER AND | | | SHOW LISTING FOR REGULATOR ON SHEETS. SECTION 410.2. | | | | | | 3B. VENTED REGULATORS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 410.3. | | | | | | 4B. SHTS P100, P3OO & P502 THE FLOOR DRAIN SHOWN IN THE | | | MECHANICAL ROOM SHALL CONNECT TO THE SANITARY SYSTEM, | | | NOT THE STORM SYSTEM. ARTICLE III SECTION 203(A). | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
Time |
18:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
Time |
15:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-09 19:00:35 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | MUNICIPAL CODE CITY WPB | | | | | | PLANS IN FOR PLAN REVIEW ONLY AT THIS TIME: | | | | | | 1. SHT G001 PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT SHOWS SIX LAVS | | | REQUIRED. PER TABLE 403.1 SEVEN LAVS ARE REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE CORRECT REQUIRED LAV FIXTURE COUNT. | | | | | | 2. SHT G001 FIXTURES PROVIDED SHOWS 3 DRINKING | | | FOUNTAINS REQUIRED. 5 DRINKING FOUNTAINS ARE REQUIRED. | | | DRINKING WATER AVAILABLE AT THE FOOD SERVICE ONLY | | | COUNTS AS ONE FIXTURE EXCEPTION. SHOW 4 DRINKING | | | FOUNTAINS. TABLE 403.1 & SECTION 410.1. | | | | | | 3. SHT G001 SHEET INDEX. 3 SHEETS ON THE INDEX WERE NOT | | | FOUND & 2 "F" SHEETS & 10 "R" SHEETS SUBMITTED ARE NOT | | | SHOWN ON THE INDEX. PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTION 106.1.2. | | | | | | 4. SHT A121 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 1210.1 & | | | 1210.2 OF THE BUILDING CODE FOR FINISHES. | | | | | | 5. SHTS A141 & P111 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106& 1107 WITH | | | ALL SUBSECTIONS AND TABLES. INDICATE THE TOTAL AREA TO | | | BE DRAINED FOR EACH ROOF DRAIN. INCLUDE IN THE | | | CALCULATIONS 1/2 AREA OF ALL VERTICAL WALLS INCLUDING | | | PARAPETS AND ANY ROOF AREA THAT DRAINS ON TO THE ROOF | | | AREA FROM ABOVE. SUBMIT THE ELEVATION OF THE ROOF AT | | | THE HIGH POINTS AND LOW POINTS AS WELL AS THE ELEVATION | | | OF THE TOP OF ALL PARAPETS TO VERIFY CALCULATIONS. AS | | | SHOWN ON SHT P111 THE SQUARE FOOTAGE INDICATED IS THE | | | SAME FOR EACH ROOF DRAIN, BUT THE AREAS ARE DIFFERENT | | | PER THE SLOPE AND THE CRICKETS. | | | | | | 6. SHT A313 DETAIL #1 SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSETS | | | IN TOILET ROOMS 108 & 109 TO BE 1'6" OFF THE SIDE WALL | | | OF THE STALL PER FIGURE 11-30E. | | | | | | 7. SHT A313 SHOW THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR ACCESSIBLE | | | WATER CLOSETS AND LAVS PER SECTIONS 11-4.16.2 & | | | 11-4.19.3. | | | | | | 8. SHT A313 DETAIL #20ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSET IS | | | INDICATED AS 1'5" CLEAR OFF THE WALL TO THE CENTERLINE | | | OF THE W/C. THE W/C IS REQUIRED TO BE 1'6" OFF THE WALL | | | TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE FIXTURE PER FIGURE 11-30E. | | | PLEASE CHANGE DETAIL. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE SUBMIT A DETAIL FOR THE ACCESSIBLE DRINKING | | | FOUNTAINS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.15 AND | | | ALL SUBSECTIONS. AT LEAST 50% OF DRINKING FOUNTAINS | | | PROVIDED SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE PER SECTION | | | 11-4.1.3(10)(B). | | | | | | 10. SHT FD1 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ITEMS FS0593 & SB0036 | | | WATER FILTERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-42. | | | SECTION 611.1. PLEASE SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICATION | | | SHEETS INDICATING COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 11. SHT P100 KEY NOTES #2 & #3 ALL PIPING SHALL BE | | | SHOWN FOR STORM AND SANITARY WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF | | | THE BUILDING AND TO 5 FEET OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. THIS | | | PIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR | | | NOT THE SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR AS INDICATED PER | | | FLORIDA STATUTES 489. SHOW ALL PIPE SIZES, CLEANOUTS, | | | OFFSETS, DFU'S FOR SANT. AND ALL PIPE SIZE, OFFSETS, | | | C/O'S, SQUARE FOOTAGE ETC. PER TABLES 710.1, 710.2, | | | 1106.3 AND SECTIONS 708 & 1101.8. | | | | | | 12. SHT P300 DETAIL #4/P300 SHOWS THE TOP OF THE HUB TO | | | BE 1/2" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. SECTION 802.3.2 REQUIRES | | | THE TOP OF THE HUB TO BE 1" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. | | | PLEASE CORRECT DETAIL. | | | | | | 13. SHT P300 3" FLOOR DRAIN IN MECHANICAL ROOM 003 | | | INDICATES DETAIL 4/P601. DETAIL 4/P601 IS A GREASE | | | INTERCEPTOR DETAIL. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 14. THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR SHALL BE SIZED BY THE | | | UTILITY DEPT. INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL | | | COMPLIANCE. ALSO THEPHOTO PROCESSING MAY BE REQUIRED | | | TO INSTALL A NEUTRALIZING TANK. PLEASE CONTACT RODNEY | | | COMPO, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AT (561)644-1821, OR | | | BY FAX (561) 822-2287, OR E-MAIL [email protected]. A | | | WRITTEN DETERMINATION FOR BOTH ISSUES SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH PLANS INDICATING THE REQUIREMENT | | | OUTCOME. ARTICLE III SECTION 90-124(7). | | | | | | 15. SHT P301 DETAIL #5 THERMAL EXPANSION CONTROL IS | | | REQUIRED AT THE WATER HEATER PER SECTION 607.3.2. | | | PLEASE INDICATE METHOD. | | | | | | 16. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM FOR THE 10" AREA | | | DRAINS AT THE TRUCK RAMP/LOADING AREA SHOWN ON SHT | | | P110. SHOW ALL PIPE SIZES AND SQUARE FOOTAGE AS IT | | | ACCUMULATES IN THE SYSTEM. SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | DRAINED BY EACH DRAIN AND SUBMIT CALCULATIONS SHOWING | | | THE VERTICAL CONTRIBUTION ADDED TO EACH AREA. SHOW THE | | | TERMINATION POINT OF PIPING. SECTIONS 106.3.5.1.3, 1106 | | | & 1107 WITH ALL SUBSECTIONS & TABLES. | | | | | | 17. SHT P302 FILTERS FOR FCW-F, (FS-0593), SHALL MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-42. SECTION 611.1. PLEASE | | | SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICATION SHEETS. | | | | | | 18. SHT P302 THE RO SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF NSF-58. SECTION 611.2. PLEASE SUBMIT MANUF. | | | SPECIFICATION SHEETS. | | | | | | 19. SHT P311 DETAIL #3 THERMAL EXPANSION CONTROL IS | | | REQUIRED PER SECTION 607.3.2. PLEASE INDICATE METHOD. | | | | | | 20. SHT P351 DETAIL #5 THERMAL EXPANSION CONTROL IS | | | REQUIRED PER SECTION 607.3.2. PLEASE INDICATE METHOD. | | | | | | 21. SHT P501 DETAILS #2 & #5 WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS | | | SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE FIXTURES IN AN "EFFECTIVE | | | RANGE" NOT IN THE CEILING AS SHOWN. PDI-WH 201. PLEASE | | | SHOW THE WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS NEAR THE FIXTURES. | | | | | | 22. SHT P501 DETAILS #1, #3 & #4 SUBMIT HORIZONTAL | | | BUILDING STORM & SANITARYDRAIN ISOMETRIC RISER | | | DIAGRAMS FOR THE UNDERGROUND PIPING TO 5FT OUTSIDE THE | | | BUILDING. SHOW ALL PIPE SIZE, CLEANOUTS, OFFSETS DFU'S | | | FOR SANT. AND ALL PIPE SIZE, C/O'S, OFFSETS, SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE ETC. PER TABLES 710.1, 710.2, 1106.3 AND | | | SECTIONS 106.3.5.1.3, 708 & 1101.8. | | | | | | 23. SUBMIT VACUUM/CONDENSATE ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM | | | SHOWING ALL PIPE SIZES, OFFSETS, VENTS AS WELL AS THE | | | TERMINATION POINT FOR THE SYSTEM. SECTION 106.3.5.1.3. | | | | | | 24. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING IS | | | REQUIRED FOR THE GAS PERMIT. | | | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE.--LENGHTS OF CUT SECTIONS NOT SHOWN. | | | | | | | | | B. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH | | | NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL | | | TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE IF BEING USED. | | | | | | C. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4).--TO BE VERIFIED WHEN | | | COMMENT 24(A) SUBMITTED. | | | | | | D. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION | | | AIR (IF APPLICABLE) PER FBC-2004 FUEL | | | GAS CODE SECTION 304. | | | | | | E. SUBMIT A DETAIL SHOWING THE TYPE, | | | LOCATION, SIZE AND TERMINATION OF THE | | | GAS VENTS PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | SECS. 502 THRU 505. | | | | | | F. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. | | | | | | G. THE LOCATION OF THE GAS METER, THE GENERATOR AND | | | ASSOCIATED GAS PIPING SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE | | | PLUMBING SHEETS TO VERIFY THE GAS ISOMETRIC PIPING. | | | SECTION 106.1.2. | | | | | | 25. PLANS ARE NOT 100% COMPLETE AT THIS TIME AND MORE | | | COMMENTS MAY FOLLOW. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
Time |
18:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-09-23 |
Time |
18:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-23 18:27:22 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08020128 | | | ADDRESS: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: BRETT HANSEN | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 813.957.0570 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: REVISIONS TO SHEETS A020, A151, A217, | | | A362, AND A611 | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: PASSED WITH PROVISO(S) | | | | | | THIS REVIEW IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING PROVISO(S): | | | | | | 1) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY | | | (CO), THE CIVIL, SITE, AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE | | | REVISED TO SHOW THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR (I.E. | | | SIDEWALKS, STEPS, ETC.) | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
Time |
11:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-07-30 |
Time |
11:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-07-14 |
Time |
16:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-07-14 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-14 16:27:10 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08020128 | | | ADDRESS: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: | | | TELEPHONE NO.: | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: REVISIONS | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: ALL REVISIONS SUBMITTED ARE PASSED, | | | EXCEPT SHEETS A152 AND A161, WHICH ARE FAILED. PLEASE | | | SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) PURSUANT TO THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT | | | (ADA) GUIDELINE, DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL CONSIST OF | | | RAISED TRUNCATED DOMES WITH A DIAMETER OF NOMINAL 0.9 | | | IN (23 MM), A HEIGHT OF NOMINAL 0.2 IN (5 MM) AND A | | | CENTER-TO-CENTER SPACING OF NOMINAL 2.35 IN (60 MM) AND | | | SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH ADJOINING SURFACES, EITHER | | | LIGHT-ONDARK, OR DARK-ON-LIGHT. THE MATERIAL USED TO | | | PROVIDE CONTRAST SHALL BE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE | | | WALKING SURFACE. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
Time |
18:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
Time |
18:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-10 18:59:40 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT NO.: 08020128 | | | ADDRESS: 1760 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD | | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: BRETT NANSEN | | | TELEPHONE NO.: (813) 957.0570 | | | | | | REVIEW STATUS: REVISIONS PASSED | | | | | | REVISIONS TO THE FOLLOWING SHEETS HAVE BEEN APPROVED, | | | SUBJECT TO THE PROVISOS IDENTIFIED ON SHEET C-100 OF | | | THE APPROVED PLANS: | | | | | | SHEET A110 | | | SHEET A111 | | | SHEET A151 | | | SHEET A201 | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO AN EMAIL TO SCOTT | | | COPENHARVE (RYAN COMPANIES), CITY STAFF WOULD LIKE TO | | | LOOK INTO RELOCATING SOME OF THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT | | | SITE LIGHTING TO REDUCE CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED | | | LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF THE LIGHTS | | | MAY INTERFERE WITH THE FUTURE GROWTH OF THE TREES, | | | INHIBITING THE TREES, AS WELL AS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF | | | THE LIGHTING. PLEASE CONTACT ME FURTHER REGARDING THIS | | | TOPIC OF DISCUSSION. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-09-12 |
Time |
15:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-09-12 |
Time |
15:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-12 15:17:37 | ***PASSED WITH PROVISOS*** | | | | | | SEE SHEET C-100 FOR A LIST OF GENERAL PROVISOS, WHICH | | | INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1) ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE | | | PERMIT, AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REGULATIONS OF THE | | | GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING DISTRICT. | | | | | | 2) ALL REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF TREES SHALL BE DONE | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED TREE ALTERATION PERMIT. | | | | | | 3) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF | | | OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING SHALL OCCUR: | | | | | | 3A) THE SHOPPING CART CONTAINMENT SYSTEM SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED. | | | | | | 3B) THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CRIME PREVENTION | | | OFFICER SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A WALK-THROUGH OF THE | | | FACILITY AND SHALL APPROVE THE SECURITY PLAN, INCLUDING | | | THE PLACEMENT OF CAMERAS, SECURITY PERSONNEL, ETC. | | | | | | 3C) THE POLICE SUBSTATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH | | | ELECTRIC, PHONE, AND DATA CONNECTIONS, AS WELL AS | | | DESK/WORK SPACE, AND A MONITOR CONNECTED TO THE | | | SECURITY SYSTEM. | | | | | | 3D) THREE (3) PARKING SPACES, AS DESIGNED ON THE | | | APPROVED PLAN, SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS "POLICE ONLY" | | | SPACES. | | | | | | 3E) THE ENTIRE PROPERTY SHALL BE REPLATTED BY | | | SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION TO THE CITY'S PLANNING AND | | | ZONING DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING PROVISOS ARE SPECIFIC TO THE SHEET | | | INDICATED: | | | | | | 1) SHEET G-002 - THIS SHEET IS TO SHOW THE LOCATION OF | | | THE BUILDING ONLY. SHEET C-106 SHALL BE USED AS THE | | | MASTER SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 2) SHEET A-151 - SEE SHEET C-203 FOR THE PARKING STALL | | | LAYOUT. ADDITIONALLY, SMALL CAR SPACES, AS INDICATED ON | | | SHEET C-106, SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS SUCH. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
Time |
14:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
Time |
14:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-23 15:00:23 | ***PASSED WITH PROVISOS*** | | | | | | 1) ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE | | | PERMIT, AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REGULATIONS OF THE | | | GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING DISTRICT. | | | | | | 2) ALL REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF TREES SHALL BE DONE IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED TREE ALTERATION PERMIT. | | | | | | 3) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, | | | THE FOLLOWING SHALL OCCUR: | | | | | | A) THE SHOPPING CART CONTAINMENT SYSTEM SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED. | | | | | | B) THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CRIME PREVENTION OFFICER | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A WALK-THROUGH OF THE FACILITY | | | AND SHALL APPROVE THE SECURITY PLAN, INCLUDING THE | | | PLACEMENT OF CAMERAS, SECURITY PERSONNEL, ETC. | | | | | | C) THE POLICE SUBSTATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH | | | ELECTRIC, PHONE, AND DATA CONNECTIONS, AS WELL AS | | | DESK/WORK SPACE, AND A MONITOR CONNECTED TO THE | | | SECURITY SYSTEM. | | | | | | D) THREE (3) PARKING SPACES, AS DESIGNED ON THE | | | APPROVED PLAN, SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS "POLICE ONLY" | | | SPACES. | | | | | | E) THE ENTIRE PROPERTY SHALL BE REPLATTED BY SUBMITTING | | | AN APPLICATION TO THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING | | | DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
Time |
14:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
Time |
16:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-22 16:38:56 | REVIEW CANNOT BE COMPLETED UNTIL INFORMATION HAS BEEN | | | PROVIDED REGARDING POTENTIAL DEED RESTRICTION FROM 1975 | | | REGARDING BUILDING SETBACK OFF OF PALM BEACH LAKES | | | BOULEVARD.STAFF HAS CONTACTED ED STACKER, ATTORNEY | | | FOR TARGET, REGARDING THIS MATTER.HE HAS FORWARDED IT | | | ON TO TARGET TO BE ADDRESSED.ZONING WILL PASS THE | | | REVIEW UPON RECEIPT OF INFORMATION THAT THE DEED | | | RESTRICTION HAS BEEN REMOVED.IF IT HAS NOT BEEN | | | ADDRESSED PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF REVIEW BY THE OTHER | | | TRADES, ZONING WILL FAIL THIS REVIEW AND PASS IT UPON | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, FOR ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION AND/OR QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER. | | | (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-06-10 |
Time |
15:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-06-10 |
Time |
15:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-10 15:57:03 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1) PRIOR TO SUBMISSION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, THE WEST | | | PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT - CRIME PREVENTION UNIT | | | SHALL REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER INDICATING THEIR APPROVAL OF | | | SUCH.PLEASE CONTACT KELLY CARSILLO AT (561) | | | 822-1620. | | | | | | 2) A UNITY OF TITLE SHALL BE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC | | | RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, ENCOMPASSINGN ALL OF THE | | | PROPERTY OWNED BY TARGET.A COPY OF THE RECORDED | | | VERSION SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A | | | BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | | | 3) PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT TARGET HAS CLOSED | | | ON THAT PORTION OF THE MCDONALD'S PARKING LOT THAT IS | | | PROPOSED TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 4) PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES | | | WHEN MEASURED IN A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.THERE | | | IS A SMALL AREA NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE | | | BUILDING, JUST OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE, THAT | | | EXCEEDS THESE LEVELS.A PROVISO CAN BE ISSUED FOR THIS | | | IF IT IS THE ONLY THING THAT NEEDS TO BE REVISED...A | | | REVISION TO THE PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR | | | TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE ON-SITE LIGHTING SHOWING THE | | | CORRECT LEVELS. | | | | | | 5)PROOF OF A POSTED BOND SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR LAND | | | STABILIZATION, EROSION CONTROL, ETC. | | | | | | 6) PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE PLACEMENT | | | OF THE SHOPPING CART CONTAINMENT SYSTEM...IT APPEARS TO | | | EXTEND OUSIDE OF TARGET'S PROPERTY. | | | | | | 7) WHEEL STOPS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL PARKING SPACES | | | NOT LOCATED UNDER THE BUILDING.A PROVISO CAN BE | | | ISSUED FOR THIS. | | | | | | FYI...THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE MCDONALD'S PORTION | | | OF THE PROJECT WILL NEED TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE | | | ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-03-06 |
Time |
19:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-03-06 |
Time |
19:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-06 19:41:24 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1) PLANS DO NOT MATCH THOSE APPROVED BY THE CITY | | | COMMISSION (ORDINANCE 4091-07).A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO | | | THE COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) WILL BE | | | REQURIED.THIS IS CURRENTLY IN PROCESS.UPON APPROVAL | | | OF THE NEW PLANS BY THE COMMISSION, ALL PERMIT DRAWINGS | | | WILL NEED TO MATCH THOSE APPROVED. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING ARE SOME COMMENTS PROVIDED AS AN FYI AND | | | SHOULD BE ADDRESSED....A FULL ZONING REVIEW WILL BE | | | COMPLETED UPON SUBMITTAL OF THE PLANS, FOLLOWING | | | APPROVAL BY THE CITY COMMISSION: | | | | | | A) PRIOR TO SUBMISSION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, THE WEST | | | PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT - CRIME PREVENTION UNIT | | | SHALL REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER INDICATING THEIR APPROVAL OF | | | SUCH.PLEASE CONTACT KELLY CARSILLO AT (561) | | | 822-1620. | | | | | | B) A PLAT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND THEN | | | RECORDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | | | C) THE POLICE SUBSTATION LOCATED ON THE PARKING LEVEL | | | SHALL CONTAIN ELECTRIC, PHONE, DATA CONNECTION, | | | DESK/WORKSPACE, AND A VIDEO MONITOR CONNECTED TO THE | | | SECURITY SYSTEM. | | | | | | D) THREE (3) POLICE-ONLY PARKING SPACES SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED NEAR THE POLICE SUBSTATION. | | | | | | E) A CURRENT AND ACCURATE SURVEY SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH | | | EACH SET OF SITE PLANS. | | | | | | F) WORK IS BEING SHOWN ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE THIS WITH THE CITY'S CONSTRUCTION | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | G) PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES | | | WHEN MEASURED IN A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT (SOUTH | | | PROPERTY LINE).ADJUST LEVELS ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | H) ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS WERE TO BE BUILD AROUND THE | | | SCUPPERS ON THE REAR ELEVATION AND EXTEND THE ENTIRE | | | HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING.THESE WERE TO PROVIDE | | | ARTICULATION IN THE REAR BUILDING FACADE.THESE ARE | | | NOT SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS. | | | | | | I) ENSURE COMPLIANCE AND PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTATION | | | REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE NO. 4060-07 (SEE ATTACHED), | | | INCLUDING STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, EROSION | | | CONTROL BOND, LAND STABLIZATION BOND, TEMPORARY | | | CONSTRUCTION FENCING, ETC.PLEASE REFER TO THE | | | ATTACHED ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION REGARDING SUCH. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |