| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07120265 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-06-05 |
Time |
17:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-06-05 |
Time |
17:52 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-05 17:56:41 | | | | | | | PASSED | | | | | | PER 713.13(2) F.S. IF THE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE | | | NOC HAS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS OF RECORDING, THE | | | NOTICE IS VOID. PLEASE RERECORD THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-04-23 |
Time |
18:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-04-23 |
Time |
18:33 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-23 18:36:15 | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE NOT FULLY ADDRESSED IN THE | | | 1ST AND 2ND REVIEWS | | | | | | 6)SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS THAT | | | COMPLY WITH R802.10.1 FBC WITH PERMIT APPLICATION OR | | | BEFORE INSTALLATION THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. *******THE DRAWINGS | | | SUBMITTED ARE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE TRUSS | | | MANUFACTURERS ENGINEER, PLEASE HAVE ENGINEERED SETS | | | THAT ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY YOUR DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD AVAILABLE TO INSPECTOR PRIOR TO TRUSS | | | ERECTION******** | | | | | | ******PLEASE NOTE THAT THE TRUSS ENGINEERING THAT HAS | | | BEEN SUBMITTED IS A LAYOUT SET ONLY, THE REQUIRED SETS | | | SHALL HAVE ALL LOADS PRESENT TO MATCH PERMIT DRAWINGS | | | AND THE DESIGNED UPLIFTS AT TRUSS BEARING POINTS ETC. | | | IF NOT SUBMITTED AT PLAN REVIEW MAY BE PROVIDED TO SITE | | | INSPECTOR PRIOR TO TRUSS ERECTION****** | | | | | | 10)THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE TWO COPIES OF | | | EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. THESE | | | SHOULD INCLUDE THE FLORIDA STATE APPROVAL COVER PAGES. | | | ALL CAN BE FOUND ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG ******NO | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR MULLIONS, AND | | | CONNECTORS AND STRAPS. IN LUE OF PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | STRAPS/CONNECTORS MAY BE LISTED IN A SCHEDULE ON THE | | | DRAWINGS COMPLETE WITH THE STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | NUMBERS OR SUBMIT SIMPSON TIE'S COMPLETE FLORIDA INDEX | | | WITH CONNECTORS TO BE USED HIGHLIGHTED****** | | | | | | ********NO APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR WINDOW #1 | | | MULLIONS WHERE 2 SINGLE HUNG UNITS ARE | | | INSTALLED******** | | | | | | 13)PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTEDEASTERN METAL | | | SUPPLY,CIRCLE THE METHOD THAT WILL BE USED TO MOUNT | | | THE PANELS AND FILL OUT A SHUTTER SCHEDULE WITH KEY | | | PLAN FOR THE OPENINGS PER WEST PALM BEACH MEMO (SEE | | | ATTACHED) *******INFORMATION AND SCHEDULE WERE INSERTED | | | WITH FIRST REVIEW COMMENTS, PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT | | | MARKED WITH INSTALLATION METHOD AND NO INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE HAS BEEN PROVIDED******** | | | | | | *********THE FOLLOWING PROBLEMS REQUIRE ATTENTION ON | | | THE SHUTTER SCHEDULE******** | | | 1)THESH24 WINDOWS ARE 37" X 50 5/8" WITH 3 1/2" | | | EDGE DISTANCE X 2 = 7" PLUS APPROX 1" CLEARANCE X 2 THE | | | SHUTTER SPANS WOULD BE APPROX 60" NOT 46" AS STATED | | | | | | 2) THE #1 WINDOW IS 2 - SH24 WINDOWS THEREFORE THE | | | WINDOW OPENING WOULD BE APPROX 6'-2" IN WIDTH NOT 3'-0" | | | AS NOTED ON SCHEDULE | | | | | | 3)TOTAL OPENINGS ON THE DRAWING IS 5 BUT SCHEDULE AND | | | ENGINEERING WIND LOAD SHEET SPECIFY 6, ALSO 3 WINDOWS | | | AND 2 DOORS ON DRAWINGS WHILE SCHEDULE/ENGINEERING HAS | | | 2 WINDOWS AND 4 DOORS | | | | | | *******NEW COMMENT****** | | | | | | 1)A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL THAT IS REGISTERED TO | | | PRACTICE UNDER CHAPTER 481 OR 471 OF THE FLORIDA | | | STATUTES SHALL AFFIX THEIR OFFICIAL SEAL, SIGNATURE AND | | | DATE TO SAID DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS PER 106.1 FBC | | | 2004. ONE SET IS MISSING SEAL,SIGNATURE AND DATE. | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-03-01 |
Time |
07:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-03-01 |
Time |
07:32 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-01 08:29:44 | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED FROM THE 1ST | | | REVIEW: | | | | | | | | | | | | 1)THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS | | | LOW. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS | | | AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST | | | EXCLUDING LAND VALUE. OUR VALUATION REFERENCE IS ICC | | | (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS SERVICES | | | PER 108.3 FBC* | | | | | | 2)THE STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES COLLECTION OF A RADON | | | SURCHARGE ON ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPUTED ON UNDER | | | ROOF FLOOR SPACE PER 10D-91 FAC. THESE FEES WILL BE | | | ADDED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION FEES | | | | | | NOTE: FEES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $208.69 FOR | | | INCREASED VALUE AND STATE RADON FEES THIS AMOUNT IS | | | REQUIRED TO BE PAID PRIOR TO FURTHER PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | 6)SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS THAT | | | COMPLY WITH R802.10.1 FBC WITH PERMIT APPLICATION OR | | | BEFORE INSTALLATION THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. *******THE DRAWINGS | | | SUBMITTED ARE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE TRUSS | | | MANUFACTURERS ENGINEER, PLEASE HAVE ENGINEERED SETS | | | THAT ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY YOUR DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD AVAILABLE TO INSPECTOR PRIOR TO TRUSS | | | ERECTION******** | | | | | | 7)PROVIDE MIN ROOF SHEATHING ATTACHMENT PER | | | R803.2.3.1 FBC RES. 4" EDGES AND 6' FIELD IN ZONES 1 & | | | 2 AND 4" EDGES AND FIELD IN ZONE 3 ****** PLEASE NOTE | | | THAT SHEETS 2 AND A HAVE CONFLICTING INFORMATION ALSO | | | ZONE 3 REQUIRES 4" O/C AT EDGES AND FIELD IN 140 MPH | | | WIND ZONE****** | | | | | | 10)THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE TWO COPIES OF | | | EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. THESE | | | SHOULD INCLUDE THE FLORIDA STATE APPROVAL COVER PAGES. | | | ALL CAN BE FOUND ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG ******NO | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR MULLIONS, AND | | | CONNECTORS AND STRAPS. IN LUE OF PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | STRAPS/CONNECTORS MAY BE LISTED IN A SCHEDULE ON THE | | | DRAWINGS COMPLETE WITH THE STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | NUMBERS OR SUBMIT SIMPSON TIE'S COMPLETE FLORIDA INDEX | | | WITH CONNECTORS TO BE USED HIGHLIGHTED****** | | | | | | 12)THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH REQUIRES THE FLORIDA | | | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEETS WHEN AVAILABLE. | | | THEY CAN BE SEARCHED FOR ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | | WHEN AVAILABLE AND NOT SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL BE | | | DENIED | | | ******NOT SUPPLIED FOR THE PGT DOORS, PGT WINDOWS, | | | METAL TECH STORM PANELS,CASTCRETE LINTELS PLESE SEE | | | TOP OF NOA'S FOR FLORIDA STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | NUMBERS. SEE ROOFING PRODUT APPROVALS FOR EXAMPLE OF | | | THESE SHEETS********* | | | | | | 13)PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTEDEASTERN METAL | | | SUPPLY,CIRCLE THE METHOD THAT WILL BE USED TO MOUNT | | | THE PANELS AND FILL OUT A SHUTTER SCHEDULE WITH KEY | | | PLAN FOR THE OPENINGS PER WEST PALM BEACH MEMO (SEE | | | ATTACHED) *******INFORMATION AND SCHEDULE WERE INSERTED | | | WITH FIRST REVIEW COMMENTS, PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT | | | MARKED WITH INSTALLATION METHOD AND NO INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE HAS BEEN PROVIDED******** | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-01-05 |
Time |
07:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-01-05 |
Time |
07:46 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-05 08:02:16 | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | 1)THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS | | | LOW. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS | | | AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST | | | EXCLUDING LAND VALUE. OUR VALUATION REFERENCE IS ICC | | | (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS SERVICES | | | PER 108.3 FBC* | | | | | | 2)THE STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES COLLECTION OF A RADON | | | SURCHARGE ON ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPUTED ON UNDER | | | ROOF FLOOR SPACE PER 10D-91 FAC. THESE FEES WILL BE | | | ADDED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION FEES | | | | | | NOTE: FEES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $208.69 FOR | | | INCREASED VALUE AND STATE RADON FEES THIS AMOUNT IS | | | REQUIRED TO BE PAID PRIOR TO FURTHER PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | 3)PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF A RECENT SURVEY SHOWING THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDING/ADDITION WITH ALL SIDE AND REAR | | | SETBACK MEASUREMENTS TO THE PROPERTY LINES | | | | | | 4)PROVIDE A SITE PLAN THAT SHOWS DRAINAGE IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R403.1 FBC RES. | | | THIS CAN BE ADDED TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIRED BY | | | ZONING | | | | | | 5)IN AREAS OF QUESTIONABLE SOILS AS SHOWN IN THE | | | OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, 2 | | | COPIES OF A SOIL TEST REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED PER | | | R401.4 FBC RES. | | | | | | 6)SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS THAT | | | COMPLY WITH R802.10.1 FBC WITH PERMIT APPLICATION OR | | | BEFORE INSTALLATION THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | | | | 7)PROVIDE MIN ROOF SHEATHING ATTACHMENT PER | | | R803.2.3.1 FBC RES. 4" EDGES AND 6' FIELD IN ZONES 1 & | | | 2 AND 4" EDGES AND FIELD IN ZONE 3 | | | | | | 8)PROVIDE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT AND TOP OF BEAM AT PORCH | | | ON SHEET A | | | | | | 9)PROVIDE SMOKE ALARMS TO EXISTING BUILDING PER | | | R313.1.1 FBC RES. | | | | | | 10)THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE TWO COPIES OF | | | EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. THESE | | | SHOULD INCLUDE THE FLORIDA STATE APPROVAL COVER PAGES. | | | ALL CAN BE FOUND ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG ******NO | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR MULLIONS, AND | | | CONNECTORS AND STRAPS. IN LUE OF PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | STRAPS/CONNECTORS MAY BE LISTED IN A SCHEDULE ON THE | | | DRAWINGS COMPLETE WITH THE STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | NUMBERS OR SUBMIT SIMPSON TIE'S COMPLETE FLORIDA INDEX | | | WITH CONNECTORS TO BE USED HIGHLIGHTED****** | | | | | | 11)THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 (PRODUCT APPROVALS) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO | | | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* | | | *****THIS COMMENT FOR ANY NEW PRODUCT APPROVALS AND | | | SHOP DRAWINGS***** | | | | | | 12)THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH REQUIRES THE FLORIDA | | | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEETS WHEN AVAILABLE. | | | THEY CAN BE SEARCHED FOR ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | | WHEN AVAILABLE AND NOT SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL BE | | | DENIED | | | ******NOT SUPPLIED FOR THE PGT DOORS, METAL TECH STORM | | | PANELS, CASTCRETE LINTELS | | | | | | 13)2 PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE STORM | | | PANELS METALTECH AND EASTERN METAL SUPPLY, WHICH ONE OF | | | THESE ARE BEING USED. ALSO CIRCLE THE METHOD THAT WILL | | | BE USED TO MOUNT THE PANELS AND FILL OUT A SHUTTER | | | SCHEDULE WITH KEY PLAN FOR THE OPENINGS PER WEST PALM | | | BEACH MEMO (SEE ATTACHED) | | | | | | 14)A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | A PERMIT BEING ISSUED | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
Time |
10:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
Time |
10:49 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
Time |
14:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
Time |
14:01 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-19 14:04:20 | NOTE ADDED: PER FS 713.13(2), THE RECORDED NOC IS NOW | | | VOID AS WORK HAS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS OF | | | RECORDING. | | 2008-05-19 14:01:59 | ** DENIED4TH TIME*** | | | | | | SEE SOME THE EXACT SAME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE | | | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE:** THIS IS THE FORTH TIME THIS SAME COMMENT | | | HAS BEEN MADE. | | | PLEASE *LIST* ON PANEL SCHEDULE THE *REQUIRED ARC FAULT | | | PROTECTED CIRCUITS*.THIS WAS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS | | | REVIEWS AND THE PLANS NOW HAVE A NOTE TO SAY AFCI | | | PROTECTION IS REQUIRED AND TO SEE THE PANEL SCHEDULE | | | FOR THESE CIRCUITS. HOWEVER PLEASE LOOK AT THE PANEL | | | SCHEDULE, THERE ARE NO ARC FAULT PROTECTED CIRCUITS | | | LISTED. MAY NOT NOTE OR QUOTE THE CODE IN LIEU OF | | | REQUIRE CODE ITEMS/DETAILS ETC. | | | 210.12, 408.4. | | | FBC 106.3.5.4 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: THIS COMMENT IS ONE AGAIN REPEATED FOR THE | | | THIRD REVIEW. | | | PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO | | | COORDINATION OF THE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS IN THIS | | | DWELLING. IT WAS NOTED PREVIOUSLY THAT THE SIZE AND | | | HEAT STRIPS ON MECHANICAL PLANS AND EVEN SHEETS IN THE | | | SETS DID NOT MATCH. | | | ONCE AGAIN THE SAME COMMENT IS MADE.PLEASE LOOK AT | | | THE MECHANICAL PLANS AND PLANS. THESE DO NOT SHOW THE | | | SAME KW FOR HEAT STRIPS. | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS SPECIFICALLY INDICATE TWO 5KW HEAT | | | STRIPS ON LOAD CALCULATIONS YET PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS | | | 2-10KW HEAT STRIPS. | | | PLEASE SEE AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED CALCULATIONS AND | | | COORDINATION OF THESE SYSTEMS SHALL MEET 220.83B. | | | WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL | | | PANEL/SERVICE? | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING SMOKE ALARM IN BEDROOM AS | | | PREVIOUSLY NOTED. R313, NFPA-72 11.5.1.1, 11.8.3 | | | THIS WAS REDLINED ON PLANS WHICH MAY HELP TO LOCATE | | | MISSING. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS STILL DO NOT CONTAIN ANY | | | SIGNATURE OF A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AS REQUIRED UNDER FS | | | 471.003, 481.229, 489 ETC | | | PLANS SHALL BE DESIGNED BY RESPONSIBLE PERSON. PLANS | | | SHALL BE DONE BY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL OR MEETING ONE | | | OF THE EXCEPTIONS UNDER THE DESIGN AND RESPONSIBILITY | | | OF THOSE PERSONS. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE LIST THE DEDICATED CIRCUITS PER | | | 210.11C3, 210.52D FOR BATHROOM(S). | | | MAY NOT LIST *GENERAL LIGHTS AND RECEPTS* OR *GFI* | | | CIRCUITS AS THESE DO NOT PROVIDE ANY DESIGNATION. | | | PLEASE SEE 408.4 AS ALL CIRCUITS ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SPECIFIC TO ALL ROOMS AND AREAS IN WHICH THEY FEED. | | | FBC 106.3.5.4, 106.1.2 | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE ITEMS IN EXISTING | | | DWELLING WHICH DO NOT MEET CURRENT CODE AND ARE NOT | | | PART OF THIS ELECTRICAL REVIEW. | | | ** THIS IS ONLY NOTED FOR INFORMATION. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. AS THE DESIGNER OF RECORD HAS CHANGED THE | | | FEW AT THIS TIME IS NOT ASSESSED HOWEVER WILL BE | | | ASSESSED ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEW TO THE DESIGNER AS | | | LISTED. | | | THIS FINE WILL BE REQUIRED UNDER THE ABOVE STATUTES AND | | | WILL BE $1,615 WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE PAID BEFORE | | | RESUBMITTING PLANS. THIS FEE WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY | | | OF THE DESIGNER. NOT THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR. | | | ** THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-16 |
Time |
15:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-16 |
Time |
15:42 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-16 15:43:06 | ** DENIED3RD REVIEW** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SEVERAL NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE | | | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW NOTES | | | DUE TO NEW ITEMS ONLY NOW BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST | | | TIME FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING SMOKE ALARMS INSIDE AND | | | OUTSIDE ALL SLEEPING ROOMS PER NFPA-72 11.5.1.1, | | | 11.8.3. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE R313. | | | PLEASE SEE THE NEW LAYOUT OF THE EXISTING DWELLING | | | STILL SHOWS SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS WHICH ARE NOT SMOKE | | | ALARMS. | | | PLEASE SEE DEFINITIONS IN NFPA-72 | | | PLEASE SEE NEW ADDITION AREA IS STILL MISSING THE | | | REQUIRED DEVICES. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING ARC FAULT PROTECTED | | | CIRCUITS PER 210.12. PLEASE LIST ON PANEL AS PREVIOUSLY | | | REQUESTED. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE WRONG TYPE OF RECESSED FIXTURE | | | IS STILL BEING SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 13-606.ABC.1.2.4 | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEW MECHANICAL PLANS INDICATE 5KW | | | HEAT FOR ONE AC SYSTEM YET THE NEW PANEL SCHEDULE ONLY | | | NOW SUBMITTED INDICATES TWO 10KW HEAT STRIPS/ AC | | | SYSTEMS. | | | IN EITHER CASE NEITHER THE MECHANICAL PLANS NOR THE | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS COORDINATE. | | | M-SHEETS:SHOWS ONE 5KW, | | | SHEET -1 SHOWS ONE 10KW, | | | SHEET- B SHOWS TWO 10KW. | | | | | | PLEASE COMPLETE ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL COORDINATION | | | AND PLEASE SEE 220.83B FOR CORRECTED LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONE SET OF THE NEW PLANS SUBMITTED | | | ARE NOT SIGNED, DATED OR SEALED BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD AS SHOWN ON TITLE BLOCKS AS REQUIRED UNDER FAC | | | 61G15-23.002, FS 471.025. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT SEVERAL OF THE SHEETS WHICH | | | CONTAIN ELECTRICAL ARE SHOWN WITH A TITLE BLOCK FOR THE | | | ENGINEER HOWEVER NOT ALL SHEETS FOR THE SAME SCOPE OF | | | WORK IS DONE BY THE SAME DESIGNER. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B). PLEASE SEE THAT | | | THE FEE AS REQUIRED PER STATUTES WILL BE CHARGED IF THE | | | SAME CODE COMPLIANT COMMENTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED ON NEXT | | | RE-SUBMISSION. | | | THERE ARE CODE COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOW BEING REPEATED | | | MORE THAN ONCE AND THIS IS BEING GIVEN AS A NOTICE AT | | | THIS TIME. | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-04 |
Time |
07:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-04 |
Time |
07:50 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-04 07:51:04 | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE MANY COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE PLANS INCLUDING | | | PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWING ALL NEW CIRCUITS ALONG WITH | | | EXISTING COMPLYING WITH THE 2005 NEC. | | | NO PANEL SCHEDULE WAS SUBMITTED. | | | THE LOAD CALCULATIONS CAN NOT BE VERIFIED WITH THE | | | CIRCUITING TO BE SHOWN ON PANEL SCHEDULE. ALSO CAN NOT | | | VERIFIY WITH MINIMUM REQUIRED CIRCUIT(S) FOR NEW AND | | | EXISTING. | | | DOES THE DWELLING ALREADY CONTAIN AN A/C SYSTEM? | | | PLEASE SEE NEC FOR MISSING REQUIRED DEDICATED CIRCUITS. | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO LIST ALL OVER CURRENT PROTECTION | | | DEVICES, MINIMUM REQUIRED CONDUCTOR SIZES ETC 210.52, | | | 210.11, 408.4, 240.4, 310.16 ETC | | | FBC 106.3.5.4 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.12 FOR MISSING REQUIRED ARC | | | FAULT FOR ALL OUTLETS. THIS REQUIRES *CIRCUITS* IN | | | PANEL TO BE LABELED. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.11C3 FOR MISSING REQUIRED | | | DEDICATED BATH(S) CIRCUIT(S). MUST BE 20AMP AND #12 | | | AWG. | | | THESE NEED TO BE LISTED ON PANEL SCHEDULE. * MAY NOT | | | QUOTE THE CODE IN LIEU OF REQUIRED MINIMUM* | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING SMOKE ALARMS IN EXISTING | | | DWELLING AS WELL AND THE NEW ROOMS WHICH ARE SLEEPING | | | ROOMS OR ADAPTABLE SLEEPING ROOMS PER FBC R313 AND | | | NFPA-72 11.5.1.1.1, 11.8.3. | | | THIS WAS NOT DONE. IN FACT THE NOTE ADDED TO PLANS | | | MENTIONS *SMOKE DETECTORS* WHICH WOULD BE PART OF A LOW | | | VOLTAGE FIRE ALARM PANEL AND SYSTEM. IF THESE ARE GOING | | | TO BE SMOKE DETECTORS, PLEASE COMPLETE PLANS WITH ALL | | | DEVICES FOR A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM WITH HORN ALARM | | | DEVICES. PLEASE SEE NFPA-72 FOR DEFINITIONS FOR A SMOKE | | | ALARM AND SMOKE DETECTOR. IF THESE ARE GOING TO BE | | | SMOKE ALARMS, PLEASE INDICATE AND COMPLETE PLANS | | | ACCORDINLY. | | | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED TO SHOW EXISTING SHOWING | | | CURRENT CODE COMPLIANCE OR NEW TO BE INSTALLED. PLANS | | | SUBMITTED DO NOT SHOW EITHER. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT AND SHOW A LAYOUT OF THE EXISTING | | | DWELLING WHICH EXISTING ALREADY COMPLIES WITH THE | | | CURRENT VERSION OF NFPA-72 11.5.1.1.1 OR NEW TO BE | | | INSTALLED. | | | *MAY NOT QUOTE CODE IN LIEU OF SHOWING MINIMUM DETAILS | | | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: THE A/C UNITS ARE NOW SHOWN HOWEVER PLEASE SEE | | | 210.70, 210.63 FOR REQUIRED SERVICE OUTLETS IN ATTIC | | | WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ELECTRICAL SHOWN ON SHEET 2 FOR | | | REAR PORCH IS NOT THE SAME AS THE ELECTRICAL SHOWN ON | | | A-SHEET. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE PLANS. FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.4 | | | ** THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT. RESPONSE MENTIONS | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE PLACE NOTE ON PLANS FOR NEW RECESSED | | | LIGHTING PER FBC 13-606.ABC.1.2.4 | | | THE NOTE WHICH WAS ADDED TO PLANS INDICATES A TYPE *IC* | | | RATED RECESSED LUMINAIRE WHICH IS NOT THE SECTION OF | | | THE CODE GIVEN IN PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | PLEASE ADJUST NOTE AND TYPE OF FIXTURE. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO | | | REPEAT COMMENTS FOR MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS IS | | | ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME TO THE DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL. | | | | | | | | | *** AS SOME ITEMS WERE NOT SUBMITTED COMPLETE FOR | | | REVIEW, THERE MAY BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW WHICH CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-23 |
Time |
14:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-23 |
Time |
14:31 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-23 14:32:09 | ** DENIEDREVIEW ** | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE CODES TO BE STATED ON PLANS ARE | | | NEEDED AS FOLLOWS: | | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE PLANS INCLUDING PANEL | | | SCHEDULE SHOWING ALL NEW CIRCUITS ALONG WITH EXISTING | | | COMPLYING WITH THE 2005 NEC. | | | PLEASE SEE NEC FOR MISSING REQUIRED DEDICATED CIRCUITS. | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO LIST ALL OVER CURRENT PROTECTION | | | DEVICES, MINIMUM REQUIRED CONDUCTOR SIZES ETC 408.4, | | | 240.4, 310.16 ETC | | | FBC 106.3.5.4 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.12 FOR MISSING REQUIRED ARC | | | FAULT FOR ALL OUTLETS. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.11C3 FOR MISSING REQUIRED | | | DEDICATED BATH(S) CIRCUIT(S). MUST BE 20AMP AND #12 | | | AWG. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING SMOKE ALARMS IN EXISTING | | | DWELLING AS WELL AND THE NEW ROOMS WHICH ARE SLEEPING | | | ROOMS OR ADAPTABLE SLEEPING ROOMS PER FBC R313 AND | | | NFPA-72 11.5.1.1.1, 11.8.3 | | | PLEASE SUBMIT AND SHOW A LAYOUT OF THE EXISTING | | | DWELLING WHICH EXISTING ALREADY COMPLIES WITH THE | | | CURRENT VERSION OF NFPA-72 11.5.1.1.1 OR NEW TO BE | | | INSTALLED. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING DISCONNECTS FOR A/C | | | CONDENSING UNITS PER 440.11. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE NEW AHU IS MISSING FROM ELECTRICAL | | | PLANS. | | | 440.11, 110.26 | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ELECTRICAL SHOWN ON SHEET 2 FOR | | | REAR PORCH IS NOT THE SAME AS THE ELECTRICAL SHOWN ON | | | A-SHEET. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE PLANS. FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.4 | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE PLACE NOTE ON PLANS FOR NEW RECESSED | | | LIGHTING PER FBC 13-606.ABC.1.2.4 | | | | | | | | | *** AS SOME ITEMS WERE NOT SUBMITTED COMPLETE FOR | | | REVIEW, THERE MAY BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW WHICH CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
Time |
12:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
Time |
12:13 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-26 12:14:18 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-13 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-13 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-13 11:12:56 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
Time |
16:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
Time |
16:56 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-10 16:57:56 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
Time |
16:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
Time |
16:42 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-21 16:42:18 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2008-01-05 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-12-12 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-12 16:23:29 | TO "SFR" "Z" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
Time |
08:06 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
Time |
08:06 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
13:41 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-25 13:52:25 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SIGNED BY OWNER/AGENT | | | ALSO, PER 2004 FBC 13-600.3.ABC.2. | | | | | | 2) ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE CALLING FOR A 14 SEER A/C | | | SYSTEM, SYSTEM LISTED ON MECHANICAL PLAN IS A 13 SEER | | | (SEE ATTACHED ARI CERTIFICATE) THE PLANS CAN NOT CALL | | | FOR A LOWER SEER THAN THE ENERGY CAL'S. SEE 2004 FBC | | | 13-607.1.ABC.3.1.1. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 3) THE A/C HEAT PUMP SYSTEM LISTED ON THE MECHANICAL | | | PLAN HAS BEEN DISCONTINUED IN THE ARI LISTING (SEE | | | ATTACHED ARI CERTIFICATE) SEE 2004 FBC | | | 13-607.1.ABC.3.1.1. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 4) THE MECHANICAL PLANS NEED THE PRINTED NAME AND | | | SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN, AND | | | CONTRACTOR INFORMATION IF APPLICABLE ON THEM, SEE | | | W.P.B. AMEND. 106.1.3. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-12-21 |
Time |
10:54 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-12-21 |
Time |
14:38 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-21 15:08:37 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) ENERGY CALCULATIONS LINE 13A IS CALLING FOR A HEAT | | | PUMP SYSTEM, A/C UNIT LISTED ON MECHANICAL PLAN IS | | | STRAIGHT COOL ONLY WITH ELECTRIC HEAT, THE TWO MUST | | | COINCIDE, PER 2004 FBC 13-103.1.1, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 2) ENERGY CALCULATIONS LINE 12A IS CALLING FOR 17,600 | | | TOTAL COOLING BTU'S, MECHANICAL PLAN A/C SYSTEM IS | | | 25,000 TOTAL COOLING BTU'S, THE TWO MUST COINCIDE, | | | PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 3) COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE CALLING FOR 11,224 | | | TOTAL COOLING BTU'S, MECHANICAL PLAN A/C SYSTEM TOTAL | | | COOLING BTU'S IS 25,000. THE PLAN CAN ONLY CALL FOR 15% | | | MORE THAN THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-607.1.ABC.1.1, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 4) SEE MECHANICAL PLAN, PLEASE SHOW THE SIZE OF THE | | | SUPPLY AIR DUCT FROM THE AIR HANDLER TO THE MIXING BOX | | | (SEE YELLOW HIGH LIGHT ON MECH. PLAN). | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-28 |
Time |
16:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-28 |
Time |
16:47 |
Sent To |
B1 |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
Time |
13:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
Time |
13:17 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-17 13:30:08 | DENIED; | | | ONE SET OF PLANS NOT SIGNED OR SEALED |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
09:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-12-24 |
Time |
09:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-12-24 |
Time |
09:14 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-24 09:23:46 | DENIED; | | | SHOW ON PLANS WHICH ROOMS ARE EXISTING AND WHICH ARE | | | ADDITIONS. THE RISER DIAGRAM IS SHOWING TWO LAVATORYS | | | AND ONE TOILET, A SHOWER OR TUB SHOULD BE ON RISER | | | DIAGRAM. I CANNOT REVIEW THE PLUMBING WITH THE | | | INFORMATION GIVEN. | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | JOHN LEECH | | | 805-6695 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-05-15 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-05-15 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-15 10:12:53 | ***APPROVED - RESUB #3 (RESTAMPED PLANS)*** | | | | | | NOTE:PROPOSED ADDITION MUST MAINTAIN A MINIMUM | | | SEPARATION DISTANCE OF 6 FEET FROM THE EXISTING | | | ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "E" - DP |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
08:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
08:18 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-14 08:31:28 | ***APPROVED - RESUB #2*** | | | | | | NOTE:PROPOSED ADDITION MUST MAINTAIN A MINIMUM | | | SEPARATION DISTANCE OF 6 FEET FROM THE EXISTING | | | ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "E" - DP |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
10:54 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-25 11:12:31 | ***FAILED - RESUB #1*** | | | | | | | | | REPEAT COMMENT: | | | | | | 1)INDICATE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM PROPOSED A/C | | | EQUIPMENT TO ALL PROPERTY LINES.AS PER SECTION | | | 94-305(B)(4) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS (ZLDRS): MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY NOT | | | PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | | | | 2)LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED DOES NOT SHOW COMPLIANCE | | | WITH CITED SECTIONS OF THE ZLDRS.PLEASE SUBMIT A | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442 | | | AND 94-445 OF THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | NOTE:FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST ONE | | | SHADE, FLOWERING OR FRUIT TREE SHALL BE PLANTED FOR | | | EACH 1,200 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE OR PORTION | | | THEREOF. FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST ONE | | | SHRUB SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 500 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN | | | SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF.SHRUBS MUST BE A MINIMUM 2 | | | GALLON CONTAINER SIZE, SHADE TREES MUST BE A MINIMUM OF | | | 8' IN HEIGHT, PLANS SHALL INDICATE SUCH. | | | | | | NOTE:PALM TREES DO NOT COUNT TOWARDS THE | | | SHADE/FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | | | | NOTE:PROPOSED ADDITION MUST MAINTAIN A MINIMUM | | | SEPARATION DISTANCE OF 6 FEET FROM THE EXISTING | | | ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN (561)805-6720 | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "M" - TG |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-12-17 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-12-17 |
Time |
11:45 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-17 11:52:13 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | | | | 1)PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS): AS THE VALUE OF | | | THE PROPOSED WORK EXCEEDS 50% OF THE BUILDING'S VALUE, | | | LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE | | | REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDRS.PLEASE | | | SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-442 AND 94-445 OF THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | 2)INDICATE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM PROPOSED A/C | | | EQUIPMENT TO THE PROPERTY LINES.AS PER SECTION | | | 94-305(B)(4) OF THE ZLDRS: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY NOT | | | PROJECT MORE THAN 4' INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | | | | 3)INDICATE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS OF PROPOSED ADDITION | | | FROM GRADE ON THE SHOWN ELEVATIONS. | | | | | | 4)THE SURVEY INDICATES A REAR SETBACK DIMENSION OF | | | 5.77', THIS DOES NOT APPEAR ACCURATE GIVEN THE | | | DIMENSIONS OF THE LOT AND THE DIMENSIONS OF THE | | | PROPOSED, PLEASE CLARIFY.IF THIS IS ACCURATE, IT DOES | | | NOT MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN | | | SECTION 94-72(A)(2) OF THE ZLDRS.MUST MEET MINIMUM | | | REAR SETBACK OF 10' (10% OF LOT DEPTH).PLEASE SHOW | | | SETBACK DIMENSION FROM PROPOSED TO ALL PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN (561)805-6720 |
|
|