 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 07100650
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07100650 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
15 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
Time |
14:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
Time |
14:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-21 14:05:50 | REVISED SHEET A1, PRE STORM PREP PLAN, NEW NOAS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
14 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
Time |
13:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
Time |
13:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-24 14:51:20 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SEE SHEET 1 OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL, NOTE | | | 9(D). SITE SPECIFIC (USE OF FASTENERS OTHER THAN THOSE | | | SPECIFIED IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL) ARE TO BE PREPARED | | | BY A FLORIDA LICENSED P.E. | | | | | | EITHER PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS AS REQUIRED OR REVISE THE | | | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE TO SPECIFY A FASTNER INCLUDED IN | | | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 2. PLANS REFER TO NON IMPACT GLASS, NO PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | SUBMITTED FOR NON IMPACT PRODUCTS FAC9B72. PLESAE | | | SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD IF PRODUCT (DOOR) PROPOSED IS NOT THE SAME AS | | | ORIGINALLY PERMITTED AND ISSUED. | | | | | | 3. THE SHUTTER STORAGE DETAIL DOES NOT PROVIDE LOADING | | | INFORMATION. THIS CAN BE A PROVISO ITEM, PRIOR TO C.C. | | | | | | 4. THE PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN SUBMITTED BY IAN PLATH | | | HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. PRIOR TO | | | C.C., THE SIGNED ORIGINAL MUST BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
10:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
10:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-22 10:03:18 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | ****SHUTTER STORAGE (VERTICAL) DETAIL SUBMITTED VIA | | | EMAIL**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1. THE DETAIL DOES NOT PROVIDE BASIC INFORMATION SUCH | | | AS THE WEIGHT OF THE SHUTTERS, STORAGE LOCATION, HOW | | | THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR WILL GET ACCESS TO THE | | | SHUTTERS AS THEY ARE PADLOCKED, ETC. THE DETAIL IS TO | | | BE PREPARED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | | | | | 2. A DETAIL WILL NOT BE NECESSARY UNTIL THE USE OF | | | REMOVABLE SHUTTERS HAS BEEN APPROVED. PLEASE REVISE THE | | | PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN AS REQUESTED. FOR YOUR | | | CONVENIENCE, THE COMMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 4. TO CLARIFY, THE ENTRY DOOR HAS FIXED GLASS ABOVE. | | | WILL THIS ALSO BE IMPACT? THIS OPENING DOES NOT SEEM TO | | | APPEAR ON THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE, BUT IS NOT NOTED | | | ON THE REVISED SHEET A1. PLEASE PROVIDE A FLOOR PLAN | | | WITH NUMBERS TO CORRELATE WITH THE INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE SO THAT SCOPE IS CLEAR, FBC*106, FBC16. **THE | | | PLAN DOES ***NOT*** NEED TO BE REVISED!!!!** IN THE | | | INTEREST OF TIME, PLEASE PROVIDE THE INFORMATION WITH | | | THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. PROVIDE A LOCATION PLAN | | | WHICH SHOWS THE PROPOSED SHUTTER LOCATION AND THIS | | | WINDOW CAN BE NOTED AS EITHER IMPACT OR BE INCLUDED ON | | | THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 5. N/A. | | | | | | 6. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE SETS | | | OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS. THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE | | | IMPACT DOORS ARE NOT REQUIRED AS THEY ARE ALREADY | | | STAMPED AND ON FILE. HOWEVER, ONLY ONE SET OF THE STORM | | | PANEL PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | TWO LEGIBLE SETS. | | | | | | 7. THE PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN STATES THAT THE PANELS | | | WILL BE STORED IN A CLOSET IN THE TENANT BUILDOUT, BUT | | | NO CLOSET IS SHOWN ON THE TENANT BUILDOUT PLAN. IT ALSO | | | STATED THAT THE SHUTTERS WILL BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY; | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF HOW THE SHUTTERS WILL BE | | | SECURED. ALSO, PLEASE STATE HOW THE SHUTTES WILL BE | | | SECURED FROM THEFT. THIS INFORMATION CAN BE SUBMITTED | | | VIA EMAIL. AS THE PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN IS | | | CURRENTLY IN REVIEW BY ROBERT BROWN, PLEASE SUBMIT THIS | | | INFORMATION (STORAGE LOCATION, SECUREMENT FROM THEFT) | | | AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO THAT THE SUPPORTING INFORMATION | | | CAN BE FORWARDED TO MR. BROWN PRIOR TO HIS REVIEW. | | | | | | 8. (REVISED) USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS ON COMMERCIAL | | | BUILDINGS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | THE PLAN SUBMITTED IS PENDING REVIEW BY ROBERT BROWN. | | | INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEM 7. THE DETAIL | | | OF HOW THE SHUTTERS WILL BE SECURED CAN BE A PROVISO | | | ITEM. PLEASE EMAIL THE REVISED PLAN TO [email protected]. | | | PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-02 |
Time |
08:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-02 |
Time |
08:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-02 10:42:34 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE LEGIBLE DOCUMENTS. THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FOR THE ALUMINUM STORM PANELS ARE DIFFICULT TO | | | READ ON THE INTERNET, AND THE COPY PROVIDED IS A COPY | | | OF A FAX, MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO READ. PLEASE PRINT | | | TWO COPIES FROM THE WEBSITE, WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | | BE SURE TO CHANGE THE CODE VERSION TO 2004 ON THE | | | WEBSITE (DEFAULT IS 2007). | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SPECIFY DESIGN PRESSURES ON THE INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 3. THE SHUTTER CONNECTION MOUNTING TYPE AND THE | | | SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE SHOULD CORRELATE WITH THE ANCHOR | | | CHARTS ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL; FOR INSTANCE, SEE PAGE | | | 6. PLEASE REVISE THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 4. TO CLARIFY, THE ENTRY DOOR HAS FIXED GLASS ABOVE. | | | WILL THIS ALSO BE IMPACT? THIS OPENING DOES NOT SEEM TO | | | APPEAR ON THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE, BUT IS NOT NOTED | | | ON THE REVISED SHEET A1. PLEASE PROVIDE A FLOOR PLAN | | | WITH NUMBERS TO CORRELATE WITH THE INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE SO THAT SCOPE IS CLEAR, FBC*106, FBC16. **THE | | | PLAN DOES ***NOT*** NEED TO BE REVISED!!!!** IN THE | | | INTEREST OF TIME, PLEASE PROVIDE THE INFORMATION WITH | | | THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. PROVIDE A LOCATION PLAN | | | WHICH SHOWS THE PROPOSED SHUTTER LOCATION AND THIS | | | WINDOW CAN BE NOTED AS EITHER IMPACT OR BE INCLUDED ON | | | THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 5. N/A. | | | | | | 6. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE SETS | | | OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS. THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE | | | IMPACT DOORS ARE NOT REQUIRED AS THEY ARE ALREADY | | | STAMPED AND ON FILE. HOWEVER, ONLY ONE SET OF THE STORM | | | PANEL PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | TWO LEGIBLE SETS. | | | | | | 7. THE PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN STATES THAT THE PANELS | | | WILL BE STORED IN A CLOSET IN THE TENANT BUILDOUT, BUT | | | NO CLOSET IS SHOWN ON THE TENANT BUILDOUT PLAN. IT ALSO | | | STATED THAT THE SHUTTERS WILL BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY; | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF HOW THE SHUTTERS WILL BE | | | SECURED. ALSO, PLEASE STATE HOW THE SHUTTES WILL BE | | | SECURED FROM THEFT. THIS INFORMATION CAN BE SUBMITTED | | | VIA EMAIL. AS THE PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN IS | | | CURRENTLY IN REVIEW BY ROBERT BROWN, PLEASE SUBMIT THIS | | | INFORMATION (STORAGE LOCATION, SECUREMENT FROM THEFT) | | | AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO THAT THE SUPPORTING INFORMATION | | | CAN BE FORWARDED TO MR. BROWN PRIOR TO HIS REVIEW. | | | | | | 8. USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS ON COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS | | | MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE PLAN | | | SUBMITTED IS PENDING REVIEW BY ROBERT BROWN. HOWEVER, | | | IT WOULD BE HELPFUL IF THE PLAN SUBMITTED COULD BE | | | REVISED TO INCLUDE THE INFORMATION IN ITEM 7 SO THAT HE | | | HAS COMPLETE INFORMATION UPON WHICH TO MAKE HIS | | | DECISION. THE DETAIL OF HOW THE SHUTTERS WILL BE | | | SECURED CAN BE A PROVISO ITEM. PLEASE EMAIL THE REVISED | | | PLAN TO [email protected]. PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
13:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
13:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-22 13:57:44 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | ****REVISION, FROM IMPACT GLASS TO NON IMPACT GLAZING, | | | STORM PANELS, AND PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLAN*** | | | ****SHUTTER PERMIT APPLIED UNDER 08090146, NOW | | | INCORPORATED INTO BUILDING PERMIT PER LUIS MARTINEZ**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM FIRST REVIEW, SHUTTER PERMIT 08090146 | | | | | | 1. IMPACT RATED PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR | | | THE BUILDING, 07100650. IF YOU PROPOSE TO USE NON RATED | | | PRODUCTS, HAVE THE PROPOSED PRODUCTS REVIEWED BY THE | | | ARCHITECT FBC*106.3.3 AND SUBMIT AS A REVISION TO | | | 07100650. | | | | | | A. SHEET A1, REVISE NOTE REGARDING USE OF STORM PANELS. | | | THE FRONT DOOR, A REQUIRED EXIT, CANNOT BE OBSTRUCTED | | | BY REMOVABLE PANELS FBC1003.6. | | | | | | B. THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER | | | OF RECORD FBC*106.3.3. THIS CAN BE DONE BY EITHER A | | | LETTER, SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP, SPECIFYING THE | | | PRODUCTS IN THE SIGNED AND SEALED PLAN, OR ANY OTHER | | | METHOD WHICH SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH FBC*106.3.3. | | | | | | C. NOA 06-0818.02, ARCH ALUMINUM NON-IMPACT OUTSWING | | | DOOR WAS SUBMITTED. SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING | | | FBC1003.6, MEANS OF EGRESS CONTINUITY. | | | | | | D. NOA 06-0818.02, SEE SHEET 1 OF 9; THIS PRODUCT IS | | | NOT TO BE USED WHERE WATER INFILTRATION IS NOT | | | ACCEPTABLE. AS THE OVERHANG IS 2', THE ANGLE (BOTTOM OF | | | DOOR TO EDGE OF OVERHANG) APPEARS TO BE LESS THAN THE | | | 45 DEGREES REQUIRED. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | E. NOA 05-0902.01, ARCH ALUMINUM SERIES 4500 STOREFRONT | | | NON-IMPACT, APPEARS TO BE CODE COMPLIANT (DESIGN | | | PRESSURES). PLEASE ADDRESS THE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING | | | REVIEW BY DESIGNER OF RECORD AND IMPACT PROTECTION. | | | | | | F. THE SHOP DRAWINGS PREPARED BY ENGINEERING EXPRESS IS | | | DELEGATED ENGINEERING; PLEASE HAVE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER | | | OF RECORD FAC61G15-31.001. | | | | | | G. THE SHOP DRAWINGS PREPARED BY ENGINEERING EXPRESS , | | | SHEET 1, STATES THAT THIS IS EXPOSURE C, BUT APPEARS TO | | | USE EXPOSURE B PRESSURES. PLEASE CLARIFY OR REVISE | | | FBC1609. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE STRUCTURE HAS | | | DECLARED EXPOSURE B. | | | | | | 2. USE OF REMOVABLE IMPACT PROTECTION ON COMMERCIAL | | | BUILDINGS IS TO BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | SUBMIT A PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN, SEE ITEM 13, | | | ATTACHED. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL FOR | | | PRELIMINARY APPROVAL. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO HAVE THE | | | PRESTORM PREPATION PLAN APPROVED PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL | | | OF THE SHUTTER PERMIT. | | | | | | SEE EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE, 10/2/8 TO 10/8/8. THE | | | PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLAN SUBMITTED IS THE SAME PLAN | | | SUBMITTED AND DENIED IN THE EMAIL OF 10/2/8. CONTRACTOR | | | WAS ADVISED: " PLEASE REVISE THE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE | | | NAMES, TITLES, AND ENTITIES AS WELL AS THE OTHER | | | INFORMATION REQUESTED. I KNOW THAT PRESENTING THE PLAN | | | "AS IS" WOULD RESULT IN IT BEING DENIED. IF YOU INSIST, | | | I WILL SUBMIT IT TO ROBERT BROWN AS SUBMITTED WITHOUT | | | THE INFORMATION I REQUESTED BUT THIS WILL ONLY CAUSE | | | FURTHER DELAYS AS, FROM EXPERIENCE, I KNOW WHAT | | | INFORMATION HE REQUIRES ON THE PRESTORM PREPARATION | | | PLAN TO CONSIDER USE OF REMOVABLE STORM PANELS." AS THE | | | CONTRACTOR HAS SUBMITTED THE PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLAN | | | WITHOUT THE REQUESTED REVISIONS, LUIS MARTINEZ (CHIEF | | | PLANS EXAMINER) HAD THE PLAN REVIEWED BY ROBERT BROWN, | | | INTERIM BUILDING OFFICIAL. HE CONFIRMED THE REQUIREMENT | | | FOR THE REQUESTED INFORMATION IN ORDER TO DETERMINE | | | WHETHER OR NOT REMOVABLE PANELS WILL BE PERMITTED FOR | | | THIS BUILDING. | | | | | | PLEASE REVISE THE PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLAN AS | | | REQUESTED IN THE EMAIL OF 10/8/8. TO SUMMARIZE: | | | | | | A. THE PLAN IS TO BE SIGNED BY THE OWNER. ONLY THE | | | CONTRACTOR AND DEVELOPER ARE INCLUDED IN THE PRE-STORM | | | PREPARATION PLAN SIGNATURE LINES. THIS IS AN AGREEMENT | | | MADE BY THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING REGARDLESS OF TENANT | | | RESPONSIBILITIES. IN THE INTEREST OF PUBLIC SAFETY, THE | | | OWNER MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT HE OR SHE HAS THE ABILITY | | | TO ENSURE THAT THE STORM PANELS ARE INSTALLED IN THE | | | TIME FRAME REQUIRED. | | | | | | B. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION REGARDING J. RAYMOND | | | CONSTRUCTION SUCH AS WHERE THEY ARE LOCATED, NUMBER OF | | | EMPLOYEES, NUMBER OF JOBS THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR. | | | NOTE THAT THIS COMPANY IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY. THE IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD REQUIRES THAT THE | | | PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR SHUTTER INSTALLATION IS TO BE | | | LOCATED IN PALM BEACH COUNTY. PROVIDE THE INFORMATION | | | REQUESTED AND ADDRESS THE LOCATION ISSUE. | | | | | | C. THE PLAN STATES THAT THE DOOR WILL BE PROTECTED (BY | | | STORM PANELS); THE EGRESS PATH CANNOT BE OBSTRUCTED BY | | | ELEMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE PERMITTED IN FBC CHAPTER 10. | | | PLEASE REVISE TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH FBC CHAPTER 10. | | | | | | D. THE PLAN STATES THAT THE SHUTTERS WILL BE LOCATED IN | | | THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING SLAB. THE FLOOR | | | PLAN SHOWS THAT THE AREA OF SHUTTER STORAGE IS THE | | | LOCATION OF THE FUTURE ACCESSIBLE BATHROOMS. HOW WILL | | | THEY BE SECURED TO PREVENT THEFT? WILL THE PANELS BE | | | STORED HORIZONTALLY OR VERTICALLY? IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT | | | WILL HAPPEN TO THE SHUTTERS WHEN THE BATHROOM IS | | | INSTALLED; THIS APPEARS TO BE A TEMPORARY STORAGE | | | SOLUTION. HOW THESE SHUTTERS WILL BE SECURED, | | | ESPECIALLY DURING THE TENANT BUILDOUT, WAS NOT | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A FLOOR PLAN SHOWING PROPOSED SHUTTER | | | LOCATIONS. (COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW.) | | | | | | THIS ITEM WAS ADDRESSED, BUT THE FRONT DOOR CANNOT BE | | | BLOCKED BY STORM PANELS FBC1003.6. REVISE. | | | | | | 4. COMPLETE THE ATTACHED INSTALLATION SCHEDULE OR | | | PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE IN | | | ANOTHER FORMAT, FBC*106. TWO SETS REQUIRED. | | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/PDF/SCHEDULE_FOR_ | | | INSTALLATION.PDF | | | | | | A. THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE WAS NOT COMPLETE. IT WAS | | | SUBMITTED, BUT COLUMNS 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 ARE BLANK. | | | | | | B. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS DIFFICULT TO READ. IT | | | APPEARS TO BE A PHOTOCOPY OF A FAX. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | LEGIBLE COPIES; TWO SETS PRINTED DIRECTLY FROM THE | | | WEBSITE WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG MAY BE LEGIBLE. | | | | | | C. THE ANCHOR TYPE IS TO CORRELATE WITH THE ANCHORS ON | | | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL, SEE SHEET 6 OF 9. I DID NOT SEE A | | | "DROP IN ANCHOR SIDEWALK BOLT" AS A CHOICE, BUT IT'S | | | POSSIBLE THAT IT IS THERE, BUT I CAN'T READ IT. BEFORE | | | RESUBMITTING, PLEASE BE SURE THAT THE ANCHOR TYPE IS | | | CLEARLY SPECIFIED AND CORRELATES WITH INFORMATION IN | | | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | D. A COMPLETE LIST CANNOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME DUE TO | | | INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION. | | | | | | 5. MEANS OF EGRESS CANNOT BE BLOCKED BY A HURRICANE | | | STORM PANEL, FBC1003.6, MEANS OF EGRESS CONTINUITY. | | | | | | THIS ITEM WAS NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 6. THE BUILDING PERMIT WAS FOR A SHELL BUILDING. | | | REMOVABLE PANELS, IF APPROVED, ARE TO BE STORED ON | | | SITE. IN THE PRE STORM PREPARATION PLAN, INCLUDE | | | INFORMATION REGARDING STORAGE OF SHUTTERS. | | | | | | SEE OTHER COMMENTS. THIS ITEM WAS NOT ADDRESSED; | | | INFORMATION REQUESTED WAS NOT PROVIDED. PLEASE REVISE | | | THE PLAN TO INCLUDE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION. WHEN THE | | | PLAN IS COMPLETE AND HAS ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED, IT | | | WILL THEN BE FORWARDED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | ***THE PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLAN (ONLY) CAN BE | | | SUBMITTED BY EMAIL FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW*** | | | | | | A C.O. HOLD HAS BEEN PLACED ON THIS PERMIT PENDING | | | RESOLUTION OF THIS ISSUE. | | | | | | AS DISCUSSED, THIS CAN BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO | | | RESUBMITTAL OF THE REVISION/PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR IS | | | ENCOURAGED TO GET THIS APPROVED BEFORE RESUBMITTAL TO | | | AVOID ADDITIONAL DELAYS. IN THIS CASE, THE CONTRACTOR | | | WAS ADVISED OF MANY OF THESE REQUIREMENTS VIA EMAIL BUT | | | ELECTED TO DISREGARD THEM. THE NEED FOR ALL INFORMATION | | | REQUESTED HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | AS DISCUSSED, TO AVOID FURTHER DELAYS, THE CONTRACTOR | | | IS ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT THE PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLAN | | | BY EMAIL AND TO GET THIS ISSUE RESOLVED PRIOR TO | | | RESUBMITTAL OF THE REVISION. PLEASE NOTE THAT MY REVIEW | | | IS PRELIMINARY; THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MIGHT REQUIRE | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | ****END OF PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS***** | | | | | | ******************************************************* | | | ** | | | ******************************************************* | | | ** | | | ******************************************************* | | | ** | | | | | | ****FOR REFERENCE ONLY, EMAILS BETWEEN SAMANTHA HILL | | | (BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER) AND ADAM SPIEWAK (CONTRACTOR) | | | | | | EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE, PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLAN: | | | | | | | | | EMAIL #3 OF 3 | | | (EMAIL SENT ON 10/8/8) | | | | | | THE PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN SHOULD BE REVISED TO | | | INCLUDE THE REQUESTED INFORMATION. THE INFORMATION | | | SHOULD BE CONSOLIDATED INTO ONE DOCUMENT, WHICH IS AN | | | AGREEMENT SIGNED BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACT WITH THE | | | ENTITY WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF THE | | | SHUTTERS SHOULD BE AN ATTACHMENT TO THE PRESTORM | | | PREPARATION PLAN. THE REQUESTED INFORMATION REGARDING | | | THE COMPANY COULD BE INCLUDED IN EITHER THE PLAN OR THE | | | CONTRACT, BUT THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED AS THE | | | POLICY, ITEM 13, STATES PARAMETERS FOR THE INDIVIDUALS | | | DOING THE INSTALLATION. | | | | | | CHAPTER 10 DOES NOT PERMIT USE OF REMOVABLE STORM | | | PANELS TO PROVIDE IMPACT PROTECTION FOR A REQUIRED EXIT | | | DOOR. THERE IS A PROVISION FOR EMERGENCY IMPACT | | | PROTECTION FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANIES WITH PROVISIONS | | | FOR ALTERNATE MEANS OF EGRESS, BUT NOT FOR OTHER | | | OCCUPANCIES. YOU CANNOT BLOCK THE MAIN EXIT IN A | | | COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH STORM PANELS, FBC1003.6. | | | | | | THE PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE THE | | | SIGNATURE LINE OF THE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE GOING TO SIGN | | | THE PLAN. IT DID NOT APPEARS THAT THE OWNER WAS ONE OF | | | THE INDIVIDUALS. PLEASE REVISE THE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE | | | NAMES, TITLES, AND ENTITIES AS WELL AS THE OTHER | | | INFORMATION REQUESTED. I KNOW THAT PRESENTING THE PLAN | | | "AS IS" WOULD RESULT IN IT BEING DENIED. IF YOU INSIST, | | | I WILL SUBMIT IT TO ROBERT BROWN AS SUBMITTED WITHOUT | | | THE INFORMATION I REQUESTED BUT THIS WILL ONLY CAUSE | | | FURTHER DELAYS AS, FROM EXPERIENCE, I KNOW WHAT | | | INFORMATION HE REQUIRES ON THE PRESTORM PREPARATION | | | PLAN TO CONSIDER USE OF REMOVABLE STORM PANELS. I DO A | | | PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE PLAN FOR COMPLETENESS OF | | | INFORMATION; THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAKES THE DECISION | | | AS TO WHETHER OR NOT REMOVABLE PANELS WILL BE PERMITTED | | | ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS | | | PERMIT WAS ISSUED WITH IMPACT GLAZING. ANY CHANGE OF | | | PRODUCTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AS A REVISION PRIOR | | | TO INSTALLATION. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | | | | SAMANTHA M. HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | | | | | | EMAIL #2 OF 3 | | | | | | "ADAM SPIEWAK" | | | 10/07/2008 03:57 PM | | | TO | | | | | | CC | | | "'GARY WILLIAMS'" , "'RANDY | | | DEGLER'" | | | SUBJECT | | | RE: BAYWINDS RETAIL - PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MRS. HILL, | | | | | | PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT FOR ALL INTENSIVE PURPOSES, | | | THIS BUILDING WILL | | | REMAIN UNOCCUPIED. THE SHUTTER PERMIT IS ATTACHED TO | | | THE MASTER PERMIT | | | 07100650, WHICH IS A PERMIT FOR THE SHELL CONSTRUCTION | | | ONLY. THE INTERIOR | | | PERMIT APPLICATION IS CURRENTLY BEING REVIEWED BY THE | | | BUILDING DEPARTMENT. | | | THE PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLAN THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED | | | FOR YOUR REVIEW IS | | | ONLY TEMPORARY UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE INTERIOR | | | CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE | | | AND THE TENANT TAKES RESIDENCY. AT WHICH TIME, A NEW | | | PERMANENT PRE-STORM | | | PREPARATION PLAN SHALL BE DEVISED AND SUBMITTED FOR | | | APPROVAL. IN ORDER TO | | | OBTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION FOR THE SHELL PERMIT | | | ONLY, THE SHUTTER | | | PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED, INSPECTED AND CLOSED, | | | BEFORE A BUILDING | | | FINAL INSPECTION CAN TAKE PLACE. | | | | | | WITH THAT IN MIND, PLEASE FIND THE ANSWERS TO YOUR | | | INQUIRES LISTED BELOW: | | | | | | 1) J. RAYMOND CONSTRUCTION IS A COMMERCIAL GENERAL | | | CONTRACTOR WITH A MAIN | | | OFFICE LOCATED IN LONGWOOD FLORIDA. WE ARE RESPONSIBLE | | | FOR THE | | | CONSTRUCTION OF MANY PROJECTS LOCATED IN VARIOUS | | | MUNICIPALITIES THROUGHOUT | | | THE STATE. WE DO HOWEVER, HAVE A STRONG PRESENCE IN THE | | | TRI-COUNTY AREA, | | | AS WELL AS MANY EMPLOYEES WHO LIVE HERE. | | | | | | 2) THE FRONT DOOR SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED BY | | | CHAPTER 10 IN THE FBC. | | | THE EMERGENCY MEANS OF EGRESS THROUGH THE REAR STEEL | | | EXIT DOORS (EQUIPPED | | | WITH A PANIC DEVICE) WILL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED. | | | | | | 3) THE PANELS WILL BE STORED HORIZONTALLY ON THE EMPTY | | | SHELL SLAB IN THE | | | NW CORNER OF THE BUILDING. A FLOOR PLAN WITH THIS | | | INFORMATION WILL BE | | | ATTACHED TO THE FINAL SUBMISSION PACKAGE. THE PANELS | | | WILL BE PROTECTED | | | FROM THEFT BY KEEPING ALL DOORS LOCKED DURING NON | | | CONSTRUCTION HOURS. AT | | | WHICH TIME THE INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE | | | PANELS WILL BE MOVED | | | TO A MORE SECURE STORAGE CLOSET. | | | | | | 4) AT THE TIME OF THE OFFICIAL SUBMITTAL OF THE | | | PRE-STORM PREPARATION | | | PLAN, ALL REQUIRED SIGNATURES WILL BE OBTAINED. | | | | | | | | | - SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE | | | TO CONTACT ME. | | | | | | THANK YOU, | | | | | | ADAM SPIEWAK | | | ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDANT | | | P: (954) 464-6112 - F: (407) 712-6859 | | | J. RAYMOND | | | CONSTRUCTION | | | WWW.JRAY.COM | | | | | | | | | EMAIL #1 OF 3 | | | | | | -----ORIGINAL MESSAGE----- | | | FROM: [email protected] [MAILTO:[email protected]] | | | SENT: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 07, 2008 10:51 AM | | | TO: ADAM SPIEWAK | | | SUBJECT: RE: BAYWINDS RETAIL - PRE-STORM PREPARATION | | | PLAN | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION REGARDING J. RAYMOND | | | CONSTRUCTION SUCH AS | | | WHERE THEY ARE LOCATED, NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES, NUMBER OF | | | JOBS THEY ARE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR. | | | | | | THE PLAN STATES THAT THE DOOR WILL BE PROTECTED; THE | | | EGRESS PATH CANNOT BE | | | OBSTRUCTED BY ELEMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE PERMITTED IN | | | FBC CHAPTER 10. | | | | | | THE PLAN STATES THAT THE SHUTTERS WILL BE LOCATED IN | | | THE NORTH WEST CORNER | | | OF THE BUILDING SLAB. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT THAT MEANS. | | | HOW WILL THEY BE | | | SECURED TO PREVENT THEFT? WILL THE PANELS BE STORED | | | HORIZONTALLY OR | | | VERTICALLY? | | | | | | THE PLAN IS TO BE SIGNED BY THE OWNER. THE OWNER ON | | | RECORD IS UG | | | OKEECHOBEE LP. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | | | | SAMANTHA M. HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | "ADAM SPIEWAK" | | | | | | | | | | | | M> TO | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/02/2008 09:32 CC | | | | | | AM "'GARY WILLIAMS'" | | | | | | | | | | | | SUBJECT | | | | | | BAYWINDS RETAIL - PRE-STORM | | | | | | PREPARATION PLAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MRS. HILL, | | | | | | PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLAN | | | SUBMITTED FOR YOUR | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ATTENTION THROUGHOUT THIS | | | PROCESS. | | | | | | | | | ADAM SPIEWAK | | | | | | | | | P: (954) 464-6112 | | | | | | | | | F: (407) 712-6859 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | J. RAYMOND | | | | | | CONSTRUCTION | | | | | | WWW.JRAY.COM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (SEE ATTACHED FILE: PRE-STORM PREPARATION PLAN - | | | 2008-10-02.PDF) | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-17 |
Time |
14:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-17 |
Time |
14:28 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-17 14:28:34 | REVISED ENERGY CALCS W/ROOF INSULATION INFORMATION | | | CO HOLD REMOVED |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
Time |
10:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
Time |
10:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-15 10:41:08 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | ****ENERGY CALCS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1. THE ENGINEER SUBMITTED A LETTER STATING THAT THREE | | | INCHES OF INSULATION WAS INSTALLED, AND R20 PROVIDED. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE SPECS FOR THE INSULATION AS MOST | | | INSULATION RANGES FROM 2.5 TO 6 R VALUE PER INCH. | | | COMPLIANCE IS NOT CLEAR, FBC13-404.1. | | | | | | THE SPEC SHEETS FOR THE ROOF SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH | | | R19 REQUIREMENTS CAN BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL. THIS WILL | | | BE HELD AT MY DESK PENDING RECEIPT FOR THREE BUSINESS | | | DAYS. PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-09-02 |
Time |
09:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-09-02 |
Time |
09:23 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-02 09:28:19 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | | | | 1. SEE FBC 13-101.1.6, SHELL BUILDINGS TO USE METHOD B | | | OR METHOD C WITH A LIST OF ALL ASSUMPTIONS ATTACHED. | | | | | | 2. THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN | | | OF LIGHTING, ELECTRICAL, AND THE BUILDING SHELL ARE TO | | | CERTIFY THE BUILDING. THESE LINES WERE LEFT BLANK. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
Time |
11:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
Time |
11:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-29 11:21:02 | REVISION, NEW ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-29 11:17:10 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | ***REVISION*** | | | NEW ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1.SEE THE ENERGY CALCS WHICH WERE SUBMITTED WITH THE | | | BUILDING.THE ENERGY CALCS SPECIFIED A SHINGLE ROOF, | | | 1/2" WOOD DECK, WOOD TRUSSES, 9" BATT INSULATION, | | | GYPSUM BOARD.THIS IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 2.ENERGY CALCS INPUT DATA REPORT SPECIFIES CONCRETE | | | SLAB WITH CARPET AND RUBBER PAD.IS THIS CONSISTENT | | | WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS ON THE PLAN?PLEASE CONFIRM | | | THIS AND ALL OTHER ITEMS ON THE INPUT DATA REPORT. | | | | | | 3.THE NEW REVISED ENERGY CALCS ARE TO BE CERTIFIED BY | | | ALL DESIGN PROFESSIONALS INCLUDING THE ARCHITECT, | | | FBC13-103.1.1.1.PLEASE INFORM ARCHITECT OF HIS | | | RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFIRM THAT ALL ITEMS ON THE INPUT | | | DATA REPORT ARE CONSISTENT WITH HIS DESIGN AND THE | | | PLANS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
Time |
16:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
Time |
16:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-08 16:37:29 | PROVISO - SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT REQUIRED | | | | | | ROOF TILE REVIEWED BY DOR NOA EXPIRED, MONIER SPANISH | | | S, 02-1205.07, NEED METHOD OF FASTENING | | | JOHNS MANVILLE 06-0626.09, NEED APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND | | | ENGINEERING FOR ENHANCED FASTENING | | | | | | PERMIT ISSUED IS "AT RISK" (SHELL ONLY) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
Time |
11:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-05-02 |
Time |
16:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-05 11:42:50 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | | | | 1.PROVIDE THE IMPACT FEE RECEIPT FROM PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY. | | | | | | 2.THE PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING | | | PROVISOS: | | | | | | PROVISO - SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT REQUIRED | | | | | | ROOF TILE REVIEWED BY DOR NOA EXPIRED, MONIER SPANISH | | | S, 02-1205.07, NEED METHOD OF FASTENING | | | JOHNS MANVILLE 06-0626.09, NEED APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND | | | ENGINEERING FOR ENHANCED FASTENING | | | | | | PERMIT ISSUED IS "AT RISK" (SHELL ONLY) | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
11:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
11:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-14 11:29:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1.)THIS IS AN AT RISK PERMIT (SHELL ONLY). | | | INFORMATIONAL; NOT REQUIRED TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 2-5). ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 6.)SEPARATE PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED; INFORMATIONAL | | | ONLY (SIGNS, ETC.). | | | | | | 7.-8.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 9.)SEE C7, TYPICAL PARKING DETAIL.THE DETAIL STATES | | | THAT THE SURFACE WILL COMPLY WITH FIGURE 40(A) AND (B), | | | BUT SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING TACTILE SURFACE. | | | GROOVES ARE NOT PERMITTED OUTDOORS, AND ADA TITLE III | | | REQUIRES TRUNCATED DOMES, ADA 4.1.3. | | | | | | 10-11.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 12.)THE REAR DOOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE AN | | | ACCESSIBLE EXIT FBC11-4.1.3(9).PLEASE SHOW ACCESSIBLE | | | MEANS OF EGRESS, FBC11-3 (SHOW MAXIMUM SLOPE FROM DOOR | | | TO PUBLIC WAY, WIDTH OF SIDEWALK BETWEEN REAR DOOR AND | | | LOADING AREA AT NORTH SIDE). | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED.IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE | | | ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK IS LOCATED, IF ANY.NONE | | | SHOWN ON SHEET 1 PREPARED BY LAND DESIGN SOUTH, BUT | | | THIS IS NOT SHOWN FOR THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS | | | AISLE EITHER.THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE ACCESS AISLE TO | | | SIDEWALK CHANGE IN ELEVATION REQUIREMENT IS COMMON | | | KNOWLEDGE, BUT THE REQUIREMENT OF ACCESSIBILITY TO THE | | | PUBLIC WAY MAY NOT BE.PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLANS AS | | | REQUESTED.SHEET A1 IS NOT CLEAR; WHAT ARE THE DASHED | | | LINES?I CANNOT DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE CONCRETE | | | IS CONTINUOUS, OR IF THE DASHED LINES REPRESENT A CURB | | | WITH A CHANGE IN ELEVATION EXCEEDING THAT PERMITTED BY | | | FBC11-3. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, LAND DESIGN SOUTH SHEETS HAVE BEEN REMOVED | | | AND THE COMMENT IS STILL NOT ADDRESSED.SEE THE REAR | | | EXIT DOOR.THERE SHOULD BE A CURB RAMP SO THAT | | | DISABLED INDIVIDUALS CAN GET AWAY FROM THE BUILDING. | | | SEE SHEET C4, NONE SHOWN.THERE SHOULD BE AN | | | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE PUBLIC WAY, BUT THIS APPEARS TO | | | BE FULLY LANDSCAPED WITH CURBS, SEE THE SOUTH PROPERTY | | | LINE. | | | | | | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH DESIGNER, IF ANY, IS RESPONSIBLE | | | FOR THE ACCESSIBILITY TO THE SITE.THE ARCHITECT?S | | | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT | | | WILL SHOW THIS ON THEIR PLAN.IS THE NEW LANDSCAPE | | | ARCHITECT, DAVE BODKER, AWARE THAT HIS PLAN IS BEING | | | USED TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE FOR FLORIDA AND FEDERAL | | | ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS?IT APPEARS THAT HIS PLAN | | | IS FOR TREES AND SHRUBS, NOTHING RELATED TO | | | ACCESSIBILITY WAS SHOWN.THE CIVIL ENGINEER?S TITLE | | | BLOCK STATES THAT THEY ALSO DO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE; | | | IS THIS THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLAN THE ARCHITECT IS | | | REFERRING TO? | | | | | | 13.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 14.) PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING DISTANCE BETWEEN THE | | | BUILDINGS AND LOCATION OF THIS BUILDING ON THE LOT. THE | | | SITE PLAN PREVIOUSLY IN THE PACKAGE HAS BEEN REMOVED, | | | NEW SITE PLAN DOES NOT HAVE ALL OF THE REQUIRED | | | DIMENSIONS. | | | | | | 15-16.) ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 17.)FOR THE FLAT ROOF, SELECT AN APPROVED ASSEMBLY. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW; YOU ARE REQUESTING A ROOF PERMIT.THIS | | | INFORMATION IS REQUIRED SO THAT CODE COMPLIANCE CAN BE | | | DETERMINED.THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES "SEE ATTACHED | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL INFORMATION SHEETS."NOTHING WAS | | | PROVIDED AND THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY (CHOICES LOCATED | | | BETWEEN SHEETS 7 THROUGH 18 OF THE NOA) WAS NOT | | | SELECTED. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE IS THAT THIS WILL BE | | | DONE BY THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR.IF THIS IS NOT DONE | | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE ROOF PERMIT ASSIGNED TO | | | THIS PROJECT WILL BE VOIDED AND THE ROOF CONTRACTOR | | | WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR SEPARATE PERMIT WITH THE | | | REQUIRED INFORMATION.THIS WILL NOT DELAY PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE OF THE MAIN BUILDING. | | | | | | 18.)FOR THE FLAT ROOF, SPECIFY ENHANCED FASTENING FOR | | | CORNER AND PERIMETER ZONES.THIS MUST BE PREPARED BY | | | AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT | | | AS PER GENERAL LIMITATION 7 ON THE NOA. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE IS THAT THIS WILL BE | | | DONE BY THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR.IF THIS IS NOT DONE | | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE ROOF PERMIT ASSIGNED TO | | | THIS PROJECT WILL BE VOIDED AND THE ROOF CONTRACTOR | | | WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR SEPARATE PERMIT WITH THE | | | REQUIRED INFORMATION.THIS WILL NOT DELAY PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE OF THE MAIN BUILDING. | | | | | | 19.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 20.)ON THE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL, MARK METHOD OF | | | ATTACHMENT.IF YOU ARE USING A FOAM ADHESIVE, PLEASE | | | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS, FAC9B72. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW - THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME | | | AS YOUR ROOFER HAS SIGNED ON AND A ROOF PERMIT HAS BEEN | | | ASSIGNED.IF YOU WOULD LIKE, PLEASE REMOVE THIS, | | | CANCEL THE PERMIT THROUGH THE FRONT COUNTER WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, AND THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR CAN APPLY FOR | | | A SUBCONTRACTOR PERMIT WITH ALL OF THE REQUIRED | | | INFORMATION.PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO REMAIN IN THE | | | PACKAGE. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE IS THAT THIS WILL BE | | | DONE BY THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR.IF THIS IS NOT DONE | | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE ROOF PERMIT ASSIGNED TO | | | THIS PROJECT WILL BE VOIDED AND THE ROOF CONTRACTOR | | | WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR SEPARATE PERMIT WITH THE | | | REQUIRED INFORMATION.THIS WILL NOT DELAY PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE OF THE MAIN BUILDING. | | | | | | 21-23.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 24.)THE ADDRESS FOR THE ENGINEER, RICHARD ADAMS PE, | | | CONFLICTS WITH DBPR WEBSITE. | | | PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED.PLEASE ADVISE AS TO HOW | | | THIS WILL BE RESOLVED. | | | | | | 25.)PLEASE KEEP THE IMPACT FEE STAMP AND RECEIPT IN | | | THE PERMIT PACKAGE. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER | | | INDICATING HOW ALL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.ONLY | | | EIGHT OUT OF 22 COMMENTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE RESPONSE | | | LETTER.OTHER COMMENTS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH A LETTER | | | FROM THE CONTRACTOR OR OTHER PARTY FAMILIAR WITH THE | | | PROJECT IF THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE | | | OTHER ITEMS.NOTE THAT SEVERAL ITEMS WERE NOT | | | ADDRESSED.PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | NOTE THAT NEW PLANS WERE SUBMITTED, CIVIL SHEETS, IN | | | PLACE OF LAND DESIGN SOUTH. | | | | | | 26. REGARDING THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS ON THE PLAN | | | FBC11-4.29, SEE ADA 4.29.2* DETECTABLE WARNINGS ON | | | WALKING SURFACES. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL CONSIST OF | | | RAISED TRUNCATED DOMES WITH A DIAMETER OF NOMINAL 0.9 | | | IN (23 MM), A HEIGHT OF NOMINAL 0.2 IN (5 MM) AND A | | | CENTER-TO-CENTER SPACING OF NOMINAL 2.35 IN (60 MM) AND | | | SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH ADJOINING SURFACES, EITHER | | | LIGHT-ON-DARK, OR DARK-ON-LIGHT. | | | | | | A. REVISE CONCRETE SIDEWALK CURB RAMP DETAIL, SHEET C8. | | | HTTP://WWW.ACCESS-BOARD.GOV/ADAAG/DWS/UPDATE.HTM. | | | TACTILE SURFACE SHOWN, PLEASE REVISE DETAIL TO SHOW | | | TRUNCATED DOMES. | | | | | | B. REVISE CONCRETE SIDEWALK CURB RAMP DETAIL, SHEET C8, | | | TO SHOW THE VISUAL CONTRAST REQUIRED.IF THE DESIGN | | | INTENT AND COMPLIANCE ARE NOT CLEAR, CALCULATIONS PER | | | ADA4.29.2 MAY BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | C. NOTE THAT THE DETAIL STATES THAT IT IS TO CONFORM TO | | | FDOT STANDARD 304, BUT THE DETAIL ON THE PLAN IS | | | OUTDATED.PLEASE SEE THE CURRENT DETAIL, | | | HTTP://WWW.DOT.STATE.FL.US/RDDESIGN/PUBLICATIONS/PUB.HT | | | M.NOTE THAT THE CURRENT STANDARD ALSO REQUIRES | | | TRUNCATED DOMES.PER RASIK CHOKSHI, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES, PLEASE CHECK ALL DETAILS AT | | | IT APPEARS THAT OTHER DETAILS ARE OUTDATED (DATED 2004 | | | AND 2006). | | | | | | D. C4, SIDEWALK FROM THE FRONT DOOR GOING SOUTH, THERE | | | SHOULD BE A DETECTABLE WARNING ON THE WEST SIDE WHERE | | | THE SIDEWALK CROSSES THE PARKING LOT.A DETECTABLE | | | WARNING IS SHOWN ON THE EAST SIDE OF THIS CROSSING BUT | | | NOT THE WEST SIDE. | | | | | | E. C4, A DETECTABLE WARNING IS SHOWN ON THE SIDEWALK AT | | | THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS AISLE AND NO CURB RAMP | | | SHOWN (THERE IS A NOTE STATING THAT IT WILL NOSE DOWN). | | | PLEASE REVISE.NOTE THAT DETECTABLE WARNING AT A | | | SIDEWALK WHERE IT DOES NOT CROSS TRAFFIC IS CONFUSING. | | | THIS SHOULD BE A PART OF THE CURB RAMP ONLY. | | | | | | F. PLEASE NOTE THAT DETECTABLE WARNINGS WERE PREVIOUSLY | | | ENFORCED IN THE FIELD.TO AVOID INSPECTION ISSUES, ALL | | | REQUIRED DETECTABLE WARNINGS FOR THE SITE AND FOR THE | | | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AT THE | | | TIME OF ISSUANCE. | | | | | | 27.)PLEASE HAVE THE ARCHITECT CERTIFY THE ENERGY | | | CALCS, FBC13-103.1.1.1. | | | | | | 28.)REGARDING EXITING ISSUES, PLEASE SEE FBC1023.6 AS | | | WELL AS THE DEFINITIONS FOR EXIT DISCHARGE AND PUBLIC | | | WAY.PLANS DO NOT CURRENTLY SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE, SEE | | | OTHER COMMENTS.IS THERE A PERMANENT DEEDED ACCESS FOR | | | THE SIDEWALK GOING TO THE WEST AND EVENTUALLY TO THE | | | PUBLIC WAY?WHERE IS THE PUBLIC WAY IN RELATION TO THE | | | LOTS?AS DISCUSSED, A COMPLETE SITE PLAN WILL BE | | | SUBMITTED FOR PRELIMINARY BUILDING REVIEW PRIOR TO | | | RESUBMITTAL OF THE PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-02-06 |
Time |
10:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-02-06 |
Time |
10:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-06 10:18:26 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 1.)THIS IS AN AT RISK PERMIT (SHELL ONLY). | | | INFORMATIONAL; NOT REQUIRED TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 2.)DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND | | | SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, | | | DATED ORIGINALS FS481.PLANS STATE THAT THIS IS | | | "INFORMATIONAL ONLY" AND "PAD ONLY" BUT THIS SHEET IS | | | USED TO DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE FOR ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING AND FBC CHAPTER 5; SEE OTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | 3.)STATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND | | | TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FOR THIS PARCEL.NOTE | | | THAT THE SITE PLAN STATES THAT THEREARE 176 TOTAL, 6 | | | ACCESSIBLE WOULD BE REQUIRED BUT ONLY FIVE SHOWN, BUT | | | IT APPEARS THAT THIS TOTAL IS FOR FOUR PARCELS.PLEASE | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC11-4.1.2(5)(A). | | | | | | 2ND REVEW - THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR PARKING IS | | | SHOWN ON SHEET 1 PREPARED BYLAND DESIGN SOUTH.THE | | | INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR PARCEL 4 IS CODE COMPLIANT. | | | HOWEVER, SEE COMMENT 2 ABOVE.IF THIS UNSEALED SHEET | | | IS REMOVED, SOMETHING MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE PERMIT | | | PACKAGE TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE WITH ACCESSIBILITY | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 4.)PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SURVEY FOR THIS PROPERTY. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW - IF REQUIRED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, THE | | | SURVEY IS TO BE A SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGNAL.NO | | | SURVEY WAS SUBMITTED.TWO SETS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 5.)PROVIDE A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT, FBC1802.2. | | | | | | 6.)SEPARATE PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED; INFORMATIONAL | | | ONLY (SIGNS, ETC.). | | | | | | 7.-8.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 9.)SEE ZONING COMMENTS REGARDING PARKING STRIPING | | | DETAIL. | | | | | | 10-11.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 12.)THE REAR DOOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE AN | | | ACCESSIBLE EXIT FBC11-4.1.3(9).PLEASE SHOW ACCESSIBLE | | | MEANS OF EGRESS, FBC11-3 (SHOW MAXIMUM SLOPE FROM DOOR | | | TO PUBLIC WAY, WIDTH OF SIDEWALK BETWEEN REAR DOOR AND | | | LOADING AREA AT NORTH SIDE). | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED.IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE | | | ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK IS LOCATED, IF ANY.NONE | | | SHOWN ON SHEET 1 PREPARED BY LAND DESIGN SOUTH, BUT | | | THIS IS NOT SHOWN FOR THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS | | | AISLE EITHER.THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE ACCESS AISLE TO | | | SIDEWALK CHANGE IN ELEVATION REQUIREMENT IS COMMON | | | KNOWLEDGE, BUT THE REQUIREMENT OF ACCESSIBILITY TO THE | | | PUBLIC WAY MAY NOT BE.PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLANS AS | | | REQUESTED.SHEET A1 IS NOT CLEAR; WHAT ARE THE DASHED | | | LINES?I CANNOT DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE CONCRETE | | | IS CONTINUOUS, OR IF THE DASHED LINES REPRESENT A CURB | | | WITH A CHANGE IN ELEVATION EXCEEDING THAT PERMITTED BY | | | FBC11-3. | | | | | | 13.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 14.) ON THE SITE PLAN, SHOW THE DISTANCE TO THE | | | PROPERTY LINES, INCLUDING THE DISTANCE FROM THE | | | BUILDING TO THE ASSUMED LOT LINE.THIS APPEARS TO BE | | | 5'.SEE FBC TABLE 602 AND SHOW COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. | | | ANY REQUIRED FIRE RATED WALLS ARE TO BE NOTED ON BOTH | | | THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN AND THE MECHANICAL PLAN.IF | | | FIRE RATED WALLS ARE REQUIRED BY FBC TABLE 602 (OR | | | OTHER CODE REQUIREMENTS) PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL; | | | TESTED ASSEMBLY OR CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE FBC 7. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW - THE ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES: | | | THE ASSUMED LOT LINE WAS AN ARBITRARY LINE, AND WE HAVE | | | REMOVED IT ON THE REVISED SITE PLAN. | | | | | | A REVISED SITE PLAN WAS NOT SUBMITTED; SAME INFORMATION | | | WAS PROVIDED SHOWING THE BUILDING LOCATED 5' TO THE | | | "ASSUMED LOT LINE" TO THE EAST.ALSO, ON SHEET A2, THE | | | ARCHITECT STATES THAT THE EAST WALL IS 5' FROM THE | | | PROPERTY LINE WITH UNLIMITED OPENINGS ALLOWED.NOTE | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | A.IN MY CONVERATION WITH THE ARCHITECT'S OFFICE, I | | | WAS INFORMED THAT THIS IS A LEASE LINE.NOTE THAT | | | LEASE LINES ARE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE BUILDING CODE AND | | | THEREFORE DO NOT HAVE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | HOWEVER, SEE FBC704.3 REGARDING BUILDINGS LOCATED ON | | | THE SAME LOT.THE LINE IS NOT AN ARBITRARY LINE; IT IS | | | TO BE DETERMINED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND IS | | | REQUIRED TO BE CODE COMPLIANT WITH CODES PREVIOUSLY | | | REFERENCED.NOT ONLY IS THIS BUILDING TO COMPLY WITH | | | THESE REQUIREMENTS, BUT BY CREATING A NEW ASSUMED | | | PROPERTY LINE, THE ADJACENT BUILDING IS ALSO TO BE | | | COMPLIANT (CANNOT CREATE A SITUATION WHERE A COMPLIANT | | | BUILDING IS MADE NONCOMPLIANT). | | | | | | B.SEE FBC TABLE 602; 1 HOUR EXTERIOR WALL REQUIRED ON | | | THE EAST SIDE BASED ON INFORMATION DECLARED BY | | | ARCHITECT. | | | | | | C.SEE FBC TABLE 704.8; NO OPENINGS PERMITTED.NOTE | | | THAT FOOTNOTE 6 DOES NOT APPLY AS, DUE TO THE 1 HOUR | | | REQUIREMENT FBC TABLE 602. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE IN RESOLVING | | | THIS MATTER. | | | | | | 15.)SEE FBC TABLE 704.8 REGARDING ALLOWABLE OPENINGS | | | AND SHOW COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN (EAST SIDE AND OTHER | | | BUILDING ELEVATIONS LESS THAN 30').NOTE THAT IF THE | | | BUILDING IS 5? FROM THE ASSUMED LOT LINE AS SHOWN, ALL | | | OPENINGS ARE TO BE PROTECTED.IF ANY OPENING | | | PROTECTION IS REQUIRED, NOTE ON PLAN AND SUBMIT PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS AND FIRE RATING INFORMATION. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, SEE ITEM 14. | | | | | | 16.) PLEASE NOTE FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION ON THE PLAN | | | AND, IF IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA, MINIMUM FFE | | | (REQUIRED TO BE 6" ABOVE BFE) IS REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN | | | ON THE PLAN CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE | | | 94-546(B)). | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, DESIGN PROFESSIONAL (ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER) | | | IS TO DETERMINE HEIGHT OF FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FOR | | | THIS PROJECT.THERE IS A HANDWRITTEN NOTE ON THE | | | ENGINEERING COMMENT LIST STATING THAT THE INFORMATION | | | IS IN ANOTHER PERMIT.THIS PERMIT IS SEPARATE FROM THE | | | PERMIT REFERENCED, AND THIS PERMIT IS TO SHOW CODE | | | COMPLIANCE.AS PER FEMA REQUIREMENTS, A FORM BOARD | | | ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE CONCRETE | | | POUR.THE REQUIRED ELEVATION IS TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PLAN FOR THIS PERMIT.EVEN IF THE SITEWORK PERMIT | | | ADDRESSED THE ELEVATION FOR THIS BUILIDNG, IT IS | | | UNLIKELY THAT THIS WILL BE AVAILABLE TO THE INSPECTOR | | | WHEN HE DOES THE INSPECTION ON THIS PERMIT.NOTE THAT | | | THIS REQUIREMENT AFFECTS THE CITY'S COMMUNITY RATING | | | WITH FEMA AND THE RATES WHICH PROPERTY OWNERS PAY FOR | | | FLOOD INSURANCE.THIS IS REQUIRED TO BE ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | | | | 17.)FOR THE FLAT ROOF, SELECT AN APPROVED ASSEMBLY. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW; YOU ARE REQUESTING A ROOF PERMIT.THIS | | | INFORMATION IS REQUIRED SO THAT CODE COMPLIANCE CAN BE | | | DETERMINED.THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES "SEE ATTACHED | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL INFORMATION SHEETS."NOTHING WAS | | | PROVIDED AND THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY (CHOICES LOCATED | | | BETWEEN SHEETS 7 THROUGH 18 OF THE NOA) WAS NOT | | | SELECTED. | | | | | | 18.)FOR THE FLAT ROOF, SPECIFY ENHANCED FASTENING FOR | | | CORNER AND PERIMETER ZONES.THIS MUST BE PREPARED BY | | | AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT | | | AS PER GENERAL LIMITATION 7 ON THE NOA. | | | | | | 19.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 20.)ON THE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL, MARK METHOD OF | | | ATTACHMENT.IF YOU ARE USING A FOAM ADHESIVE, PLEASE | | | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS, FAC9B72. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW - THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME | | | AS YOUR ROOFER HAS SIGNED ON AND A ROOF PERMIT HAS BEEN | | | ASSIGNED.IF YOU WOULD LIKE, PLEASE REMOVE THIS, | | | CANCEL THE PERMIT THROUGH THE FRONT COUNTER WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, AND THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR CAN APPLY FOR | | | A SUBCONTRACTOR PERMIT WITH ALL OF THE REQUIRED | | | INFORMATION.PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO REMAIN IN THE | | | PACKAGE. | | | | | | 21-22.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 23.)BOTH THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER HAS SPECIFIED | | | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING, BUT THE | | | PRESSURES SHOWN ON A6 APPEAR TOO LOW FOR THIS WIND ZONE | | | AND CONFLICT WITH S0.2.PLEASE PROVIDE ONLY ONE DESIGN | | | PRESSURE CRITERIA.IF YOU USE THE PRESSURES ON A6, | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 24.)THE ADDRESS FOR THE ENGINEER, RICHARD ADAMS PE, | | | CONFLICTS WITH DBPR WEBSITE.PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | | | 25.)PLEASE KEEP THE IMPACT FEE STAMP AND RECEIPT IN | | | THE PERMIT PACKAGE. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER | | | INDICATING HOW ALL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.ONLY | | | EIGHT OUT OF 22 COMMENTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE RESPONSE | | | LETTER.OTHER COMMENTS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH A LETTER | | | FROM THE CONTRACTOR OR OTHER PARTY FAMILIAR WITH THE | | | PROJECT IF THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE | | | OTHER ITEMS.NOTE THAT SEVERAL ITEMS WERE NOT | | | ADDRESSED.PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2007-11-09 |
Time |
10:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2007-11-08 |
Time |
17:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-09 10:46:04 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1.)THIS IS AN AT RISK PERMIT (SHELL ONLY). | | | INFORMATIONAL; NOT REQUIRED TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 2.)DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND | | | SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, | | | DATED ORIGINALS FS481.PLANS STATE THAT THIS IS | | | ?INFORMATIONAL ONLY? AND ?PAD ONLY? BUT THIS SHEET IS | | | USED TO DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE FOR ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING AND FBC CHAPTER 5; SEE OTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | 3.)STATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND | | | TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FOR THIS PARCEL.NOTE | | | THAT THE SITE PLAN STATES THAT THEREARE 176 TOTAL, 6 | | | ACCESSIBLE WOULD BE REQUIRED BUT ONLY FIVE SHOWN, BUT | | | IT APPEARS THAT THIS TOTAL IS FOR FOUR PARCELS.PLEASE | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC11-4.1.2(5)(A). | | | | | | 4.)PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SURVEY FOR THIS PROPERTY. | | | | | | 5.)PROVIDE A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT, FBC1802.2. | | | | | | 6.)SEPARATE PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED; INFORMATIONAL | | | ONLY (SIGNS, ETC.). | | | | | | 7.)THE ENERGY CALCS STATE THIS IS AN OFFICE, PLANS | | | SHOW RETAIL.PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | | | 8.)ENERGY CALCS STATE 4005 SF, PLANS SHOW 4019, | | | ARCHITECT DECLARES 4000.THE DIFFERENCE AFFECTS | | | OCCUPANT LOAD; PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | | | 9.)SEE ZONING COMMENTS REGARDING PARKING STRIPING | | | DETAIL. | | | | | | 10.)THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS STATE THAT | | | THIS IS A RETAIL SHELL BUILDING, BUT THE ARCHITECT | | | DECLARES B OCCUPANCY ON AR1 AND OTHER SHEETS.SEE | | | FBC304, FBC309 AND REVISE EITHER BUILDING DESCRIPTION | | | OR OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. | | | | | | 11.)SEE FBC1004 AND COMMENT ABOVE REGARDING SF AREA | | | AND REVISE OCCUPANT LOAD.SEE FBC TABLE 1004.1.2; 30 | | | SF PER PERSON REQUIRED FOR MERCANTILE (NOT 100SF AS FOR | | | BUSINESS OCCUPANCY).ALSO WHEN REVISING, PLEASE ROUND | | | UP AS FBC 1004 REQUIRES OCCUPANT LOAD TO BE NOT LESS | | | THAN THE TABLE. | | | | | | 12.)THE REAR DOOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE AN | | | ACCESSIBLE EXIT FBC11-4.1.3(9).PLEASE SHOW ACCESSIBLE | | | MEANS OF EGRESS, FBC11-3 (SHOW MAXIMUM SLOPE FROM DOOR | | | TO PUBLIC WAY, WIDTH OF SIDEWALK BETWEEN REAR DOOR AND | | | LOADING AREA AT NORTH SIDE). | | | | | | 13.)AR1, PLEASE STATE BUILDING TYPE AS A OR B (RATHER | | | THAN ?UNPROTECTED?, TERMINOLOGY FROM FBC2001).SEE FBC | | | TABLE 601. | | | | | | 14.) ON THE SITE PLAN, SHOW THE DISTANCE TO THE | | | PROPERTY LINES, INCLUDING THE DISTANCE FROM THE | | | BUILDING TO THE ASSUMED LOT LINE?.THIS APPEARS TO BE | | | 5?.SEE FBC TABLE 602 AND SHOW COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. | | | ANY REQUIRED FIRE RATED WALLS ARE TO BE NOTED ON BOTH | | | THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN AND THE MECHANICAL PLAN.IF | | | FIRE RATED WALLS ARE REQUIRED BY FBC TABLE 602 (OR | | | OTHER CODE REQUIREMENTS) PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL; | | | TESTED ASSEMBLY OR CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE FBC 7. | | | | | | 15.)SEE FBC TABLE 704.8 REGARDING ALLOWABLE OPENINGS | | | AND SHOW COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN (EAST SIDE AND OTHER | | | BUILDING ELEVATIONS LESS THAN 30?).NOTE THAT IF THE | | | BUILDING IS 5? FROM THE ASSUMED LOT LINE AS SHOWN, ALL | | | OPENINGS ARE TO BE PROTECTED.IF ANY OPENING | | | PROTECTION IS REQUIRED, NOTE ON PLAN AND SUBMIT PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS AND FIRE RATING INFORMATION. | | | | | | 16.) PLEASE NOTE FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION ON THE PLAN | | | AND, IF IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA, MINIMUM FFE | | | (REQUIRED TO BE 6? ABOVE BFE) IS REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN | | | ON THE PLAN CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE | | | 94-546(B)). | | | | | | 17.)FOR THE FLAT ROOF, SELECT AN APPROVED ASSEMBLY. | | | | | | 18.)FOR THE FLAT ROOF, SPECIFY ENHANCED FASTENING FOR | | | CORNER AND PERIMETER ZONES.THIS MUST BE PREPARED BY | | | AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT | | | AS PER GENERAL LIMITATION 7 ON THE NOA. | | | | | | 19.)A5, PLANS STATE CLAY ROOF, CONCRETE ROOF TILE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | | | 20.)ON THE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL, MARK METHOD OF | | | ATTACHMENT.IF YOU ARE USING A FOAM ADHESIVE, PLEASE | | | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS, FAC9B72. | | | | | | 21.)SHEATHING IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC TABLE 2304.7(3), | | | 1/180 PLF.STATE DESIGN CRITERIA ON THE PLAN, SHEET S2 | | | (DUE TO USE OF ?? PLYWOOD WITH A TILE ROOF). | | | | | | 22.)ROOF DRAINAGE TO COMPLY WITH FBC1503.4; PLEASE | | | SUBMIT CALCULATIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
Time |
08:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-28 |
Time |
08:46 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-28 08:46:51 | | | | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW** | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW, PLEASE SEE | | | 13-101.1.6 | | | 13-101.1.6 SHELL BUILDINGS. | | | NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS THAT ARE PERMITTED PRIOR TO | | | DESIGN COMPLETION OR WHICH WILL BE FINISHED IN SECTIONS | | | AT A TIME AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF THE SHELL SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH EITHER METHOD B OR C OF SUBCHAPTER 13-4 OF THE | | | CODE PRIOR TO GRANTING OF A PERMIT TO BUILD. ALL | | | ASSUMPTIONS MADE ABOUT FEATURES NOT INSTALLED UNTIL | | | LATER THAT ARE NOT ON THE BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE | | | LISTED AND APPENDED TO THE COMPLIANCE FORM SUBMITTED TO | | | THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. UNLESS THE BUILDING IS | | | COMPLETED AS PER ALL ASSUMPTIONS MADE IN THE ORIGINAL | | | CODE COMPLIANCE SUBMITTAL, A REVISED CODE SUBMITTAL(S) | | | USING METHODS A, B OR C SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN | | | COMPLETION OF THE BUILDING (OR PART OF THE BUILDING) IS | | | PERMITTED. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SENTENCE #2 ABOVE. HOW CAN THE TOTAL | | | WATTAGE *ASSUMED* FOR THE SHELL OF THE BUILD OUT BE | | | THIS LOW? | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-02 |
Time |
14:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-02 |
Time |
14:16 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-02 14:16:50 | ** DENIED REVISION ** | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-101.6. MAY ONLY USE METHOD B OR | | | C. MAY NOT USE METHOD *A* FOR A SHELL BUILDING. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE ALL INFORMATION ON THE INPUT DATA | | | REPORT COORDINATES WITH PLANS. AS SUBMITTED SOME | | | INFORMATION ON THE IDR DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH PLANS. | | | 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-103.1 AS ALL INFORMATION ON THE | | | CERTIFICATION SHEET SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED. | | | FS 481/471 | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
Time |
14:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
Time |
14:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-01-11 |
Time |
16:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-01-11 |
Time |
16:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-11 16:00:29 | *** DENIED 2ND REVIEW *** | | | | | | **NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE #4 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH | | | RESPECT TO FBC CHAPTER 13. | | | PLEASE SEE 13.101.1.6, 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.3 | | | PLEASE SEE NEW METHOD *B* CALCULATIONS ARE NOW BEING | | | SUBMITTED HOWEVER THEY DO NOT COORDINATE WITH THE | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS AS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE ONLY ONE FIXTURE TYPE IS SHOWN | | | FOR INTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES ON THE INPUT DATA REPORT | | | YET THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW OTHER TYPES AND WATTAGES. | | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW EXTERIOR | | | LIGHT FIXTURES YET THE INPUT DATA REPORT CONTAINS NO | | | FIXTURES AT ALL. (THIS SECTION ON THE IDR IS BLANK) | | | HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? | | | PLEASE SEE THE SECTION OF THE CODE ABOVE AND PLEASE SEE | | | USE AND ASSUMPTIONS WHICH ARE REQUIRED. | | | | | | ** RESPONSE LETTER DOES NOT ADDRESS COMMENT #4. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO ADDRESS COMMENTS. IF THERE ARE ANY | | | QUESTIONS, ANY COMMENTS NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR OR | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD IN ANYWAY PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN | | | CONTACTING THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
Time |
14:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
Time |
14:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-26 14:33:03 | ** DENIED ** | | | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS THERE IS INFORMATION NOT YET | | | SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. THERE MAY BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE | | | FOLLOWING REVIEW WHICH MAY NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THE FOLLOWING CODES SHALL BE ON | | | PLANS AS WELL AS ELECTRICAL SHEET E-1. | | | FBC 2004 W/2007 REVISIONS | | | NFPA-101 2003 | | | NFPA-72 2002 (WHEN APPLICABLE) | | | NFPA-70 2005 | | | | | | ** PLANS NOTE A 2000 NEC, HOWEVER AS NOTED ABOVE THE | | | CODE IS 2005. PLEASE KNOW THERE WAS A 1999, AND THEN | | | 2002 NFPA-70. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE TITLE BLOCKS FOR MEP DESIGN | | | TEAM IS NOT COMPLETE WITH INFORMATION AS REQUIRED PER | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002 AND FLORIDA | | | STATUTES 471.023 | | | ( MISSING CA #) | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE RAISED SEALED IS CLEAR AND | | | VISIBLE WITH ALL INFORMATION ON RAISED SEAL AS REQUIRED | | | PER FAC 61G15-23.001. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SEAL IS VERY FAINT NOT EASILY READ. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 13-101.1.6 AS THIS IS A SHELL | | | BUILDING AND METHOD *A* ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE BEING | | | SUBMITTED WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT AND INDICATE ALL TO COMPLY WITH 13-415.2 | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.6, 250.24 AS AN *EQUIPMENT | | | GROUNDING CONDUCTOR* IS NOT PERMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST | | | MEANS OF DISCONNECT. | | | RISER SHOWS THIS WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE GROUNDING ELECTRODE NOTE WHICH | | | MENTIONS TO *BUILDING STEEL*, IS THIS FOOTER STEEL? AS | | | BUILDING STEEL IS ALSO REQUIRED (DEPENDING ON | | | CONSTRUCTION) , PLEASE LIST FOOTER STEEL. | | | 250.50 | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW AS PER THE FIRE MARSHAL CHIEF AND | | | LIFE SAFETY CODE, PLEASE PROVIDE MINIMAL LIGHTING FOR | | | EGRESS INTO SPACE. | | | EM AND EXT LIGHTS ARE SHOWN; HOWEVER NO LIGHTING FOR | | | NORMAL CONDITIONS IS SHOWN AND WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | SEE 700.12F FOR CIRCUITING OF EM AND EXT LTS. (LOCAL | | | BRANCH CIRCUIT) (AS NOTED ON PLANS) | | | | | | | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
Time |
15:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
Time |
15:30 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-05-02 |
Time |
13:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-05-02 |
Time |
13:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-02 13:35:39 | FAILED | | | | | | I TALKED TO ASSISTANT ENGINEER OF JUSTIN POLK, P.E. | | | THAT THEY WILL SHOW THE SILT FENCE AROUND THE 4 SIDES | | | OF THE SITE FOR POLLUTION PREVENTION. | | | PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE POLLUTION PREVENTION | | | DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT ETC., PLANS MUSTSHOW | | | SILT FENCE AROUND THE WHOLESITE & CATCH BASINS DURING | | | CONSTRUCTION AND ALL DEMOLITION PHASE. PLEASE SHOW | | | HEIGHT OF SILT FENCE, &POSTDETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS | | | .HEIGHT OF FENCE SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP TO | | | STOP DUST PARTICLES. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-03-28 |
Time |
14:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-03-28 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-28 14:20:11 | FAILED | | | | | | | | | PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE POLLUTION PREVENTION | | | DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT ETC., PLANS SHOWING SILT | | | FENCE AROUND THE SITE & CATCH BASINS DURING | | | CONSTRUCTION AND ALL DEMOLITION PHASE. PLEASE SHOW | | | HEIGHT OF SILT FENCE IN DETAILS.HEIGHT OF FENCE | | | SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP TO STOP DUST PARTICLES. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-01-10 |
Time |
10:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-01-10 |
Time |
10:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-10 10:57:53 | FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | | | | OUR RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER 12/13/07:WE LOOKED AT | | | PERMIT# 07030860, AND CORRECTED ACCORDINGLY.HOWEVER, | | | ACCORDING TO YOUR LETTER "THIS APPLICATION IS FOR BLDG | | | SHELL& PAD ONLY"DOES NOT MATCH PER YOU WROTE IN | | | PERMIT .DESCRIBE PROJECT IN DETALYOU WROTE | | | "CONSTRUCT NEW RETAIL BUILDING PER PLAN"THEN YOU NEED | | | TO APPLY SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | 1.IF YOU ARE ADDING ANY SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, | | | APPROACHES, PARKING/HANDICAP PARKING OTHER THAN | | | PREVIOUSLY ISSUED PERMIT # 07030860,PLEASE SHOW ON | | | DRAWING ALL CITY STANDARDS NOTES FOR SIDEWALK, | | | DRIVEWAY, APPROACH, PARKINGS, HANDICAP PARKINGS, | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, YOU CAN GET A C D FOR ALL CITY | | | STANDARDS NOTES FROM 1000, 45 STREET, ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES, PHONE# 494-1040 | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE | | | DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION | | | MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | | 3. PLEASEMAKE SURE YOU MEET PREVIOUSLY ISSUED SFWMD | | | PERMIT ( WPB PERMIT # 07030860) REQUIREMENT FORFLOOD | | | ZONE AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIA AND | | | CROWN OF THE ROAD WHEN YOU DETERMINE THE FIRST FLOOR | | | ELEVATION. | | | 4. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE POLLUTION PREVENTION | | | DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT ETC., PLANS SHOWING SILT | | | FENCE AROUND THE SITE & CATCH BASINS DURING | | | CONSTRUCTION AND ALL DEMOLITION PHASE.HEIGHT OF FENCE | | | SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP TO STOP DUST PARTICLES. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
Time |
11:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-26 11:37:27 | FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI). | | | PLEASE APPLY AT FDEP, NPDES STORMWATER SECTION FOR | | | NOI. | | | YOU CAN GET NOI INFO FROM | | | WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/ | | | NOTICE OF INTENT DEP FORM 62-621.300(4)(B), | | | EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2003 | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWING ALL CITY STANDARDS NOTES FOR | | | SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, APPROACH, PARKINGS, HANDICAP | | | PARKINGS, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, YOU CAN GET A C D FOR ALL | | | CITY STANDARDS NOTES FROM 1000, 45 STREET, ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES, PHONE# 494-1040 | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE | | | DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION | | | MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | | 4. PLEASE SHOW ON CALCULATION THAT YOU HAVE CONSIDERED | | | FLOOD ZONE AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIA | | | AND CROWN OF THE ROAD WHEN YOU DETERMINE THE FIRST | | | FLOOR ELEVATION. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION SHOULD BE | | | ATLEAST 1 FOOT HIGHER THAN HIGHEST CROWN OF THE ROAD. | | | 5. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGTHE SITE AREA, | | | GREEN, LAKE,PARKING AREA, IMPERVIOUS,PERVIOUS AREAYOU | | | ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS PROJECT . PLEASEMAKE SURE | | | THESE AREAS SHOWN ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH | | | AND USED IN STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A COPY OF THESE CALCULATIONS. | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES AROUND YOUR SITE | | | SO, WE CANSEE THE LAYOUT OF STORM WATER PIPES FROM | | | ALL OTHER STORM WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE | | | CONTROL STRUCTURESWITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING | | | ELEVATION, ETC ON DRAWINGS, CALCULATION FOR | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, PLEASE SHOW DRY DETENTION/WET | | | DETENTION AREAS IN STORM WATER CALS IF YOU HAVE ALL | | | THESE. | | | 7. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND | | | YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN SO YOUR SITE DO NOT GET | | | FLOODED AND HAVE ENOUGH DRAINS. | | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,, &STORM | | | WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. STORM WATER CALS MUST BE | | | APPROVED FROM 100045TH STREET ENGINEERING SERVICES. | | | 9. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE POLLUTION PREVENTION | | | DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT ETC., PLANS SHOWING SILT | | | FENCE AROUND THE SITE & CATCH BASINS DURING | | | CONSTRUCTION AND ALL DEMOLITION PHASE.HEIGHT OF FENCE | | | SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP TO STOP DUST PARTICLES. | | | | | | 10. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
Time |
13:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
Time |
13:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-07 13:22:29 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | PLAN SHEETS A1, A2.0, M1, AND E1 WERE STAMPED, | | | INTIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-02-12 |
Time |
12:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-02-12 |
Time |
12:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-12 12:39:01 | *****PROVISO***** | | | | | | | | | PLANS WERE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ON 11/14/07 BY FIRE | | | MARSHAL MIKE CARSILLO, HOWEVER THE APPROPIATE PLAN | | | SHEETS TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE OTHER REVIEWERS HAVE | | | BEEN SATISFIED. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2007-11-14 |
Time |
10:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2007-11-14 |
Time |
09:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-14 10:07:17 | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 2. SUITABLE ACCESS IS TO BE PROVIDED FOR FIRE AND | | | PARAMEDICAL EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 3. DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY. | | | | | | 4. EXITS SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 5. BUILDING ADDRESS, AND PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER | | | REQUIREMENT ARE LISTED ON PLANS. INTERIOR FINISH | | | REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO LISTED ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | APPROVED PROVISIO; | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION | | | 804-4709 PHONE | | | 804-4774 FAX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-22 10:51:21 | TO "SHILL" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-25 |
Time |
08:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-25 |
Time |
08:53 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-25 08:53:45 | TO "SHILL" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
09:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-10 09:05:10 | TO "SHILL" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-03 |
Time |
16:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-03 |
Time |
16:28 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-03 16:29:08 | TO "M" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
11:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
11:50 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-10 11:51:14 | TO "M" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-27 |
Time |
15:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-27 |
Time |
15:51 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-27 15:52:40 | TO "BUILD" SAMANTHA H. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
Time |
12:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
Time |
12:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-08 12:14:25 | TO "COMM" BD#58 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
Time |
08:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
Time |
08:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-28 08:48:54 | TO "COMM" BD#40 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-18 |
Time |
11:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-18 |
Time |
11:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-19 13:28:17 | TO "COMM" BD#63 | | 2008-03-18 11:39:56 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-01-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-08 |
Time |
08:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-08 |
Time |
08:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-08 08:41:05 | TO "COMM" BD#8 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
Time |
16:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
Time |
12:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-13 09:14:03 | TO "COMM" BD#2 | | 2007-10-24 12:03:05 | WIATING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-10-06 |
Time |
09:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-10-06 |
Time |
09:15 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-06 09:16:16 | REVISED CALCS AND SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY. MECH ONLY OK. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
09:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-06 09:02:12 | REVISED CALCS WITHDRAWN BY CONTRACTOR. WILL BE | | | RESUBMITTED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
08:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
08:06 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-04 08:17:00 | REVIEW: REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | 1. SHELL BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THIS CODE BY | | | METHOD B OR METHOD C. ONCE ALL ENERGY-RELATED DESIGN | | | PARAMETERS ARE KNOWN, A METHOD A CALCULATION MAY BE | | | RESUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-400.2.A.2. ALL | | | ASSUMPTIONS MADE ABOUT FEATURES NOT INSTALLED UNTIL | | | LATER THAT ARE NOT ON THE BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE | | | LISTED AND APPENDED TO THE COMPLIANCE FORM SUBMITTED TO | | | THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB | | | 13-101.1.6. | | | | | | 2. COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE | | | ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB | | | 13-407.1.ABC.1. | | | | | | 3. THE NAMES AND LICENSE NUMBERS OF THE ARCHITECT, | | | LIGTING AND ELECTRICAL DESIGNERS ARE MISSING FROM THE | | | CERTIFICATIONS PAGE (PAGE 3 OF THE COMPLIANCE FORM). | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONALS RESPONSIBLE UNDER FLORIDA LAW FOR | | | THE DESIGN OF LIGHTING, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, AND | | | PLUMBING SYSTEMS AND THE BUILDING SHELL, SHALL CERTIFY | | | COMPLIANCE OF THOSE BUILDING SYSTEMS WITH THE CODE BY | | | SIGNING AND PROVIDING THEIR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION | | | NUMBER ON THE ENERGY CODE FORM PROVIDED AS PART OF THE | | | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. | | | TYPED NAMES AND REGISTRATION NUMBERS MAY BE PROVIDED IN | | | LIEU OF A SIGNATURE WHERE ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION HAS | | | BEEN INCLUDED ON SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBCB 13-103.1.1.1. | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE ALL NECESSARY CORRECTIONS AND RESUBMIT FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
Time |
16:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
Time |
10:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
Time |
10:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-22 10:48:45 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 1 THRU 3: OK | | | | | | 4. THE SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY IS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED | | | BY THE ENGINEER AND ATTACHED TO THE CODE COMPLAINCE | | | FORM IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 13-407.1.ABC.1. SEE THE | | | TEXT OF EXCEPTION #1 BELOW: | | | "WHERE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED BY AN ENGINEER | | | REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, THE ENGINEER HAS | | | THE OPTION OF SUBMITTING A SIGNED AND SEALED SUMMARY | | | SHEET IN LIEU OF THE COMPLETE SIZING CALCULATION(S)." | | | PLEASE PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY | | | ATTACHED TO THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND RESUBMIT. THIS | | | ITEM COULD BE HANDLED AS A PROVISO IF IT WERE THE ONLY | | | ITEM OUTSTANDING. | | | | | | 5 THRU 7: OK | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
Time |
17:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
Time |
15:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-26 17:10:38 | REVIEW #: 1ST | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS FBC | | | CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS BASED ON OCCUPANCY | | | CLASSIFICATION, OCCUPANT LOAD AND CFM REQUIRED AS | | | STATED IN FBC,M TABLE 403.3 OR ASHRAE 62.1-2004. ALSO, | | | PROVIDE MECHANICAL VENTILATION FOR THE TOILET ROOMS IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | | | 2. SHOW LOCATION OF EXHAUST DISCHARGE IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH FBC,M 401.5. | | | | | | 3. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: AS THIS IS A SHELL BUILDING, | | | PROVIDE METHOD B OR C COMPLIANCE FORMS IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBC 13-101.1.6. ALL ASSUMPTIONS MADE ABOUT | | | FEATURES NOT INSTALLED UNTIL LATER THAT ARE NOT ON THE | | | BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE LISTED AND APPENDED TO THE | | | COMPLIANCE FORM SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. | | | ONCE ALL ENERGY-RELATED DESIGN PARAMETERS ARE KNOWN, A | | | METHOD A CALCULATION MAY BE RESUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBC 13-400.2.A.2. | | | | | | 4. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: A COOLING LOAD CALCULATION | | | SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE CODE COMPLIANCE FORM SUBMITTED | | | TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WHEN THE BUILDING IS | | | PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 13-407.1.ABC.1. HVAC | | | SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SIZED TO PROVIDE NO MORE | | | THAN THE SPACE AND SYSTEM LOADS CALCULATED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 407.1.ABC.1. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE SHUTOFF DAMPER CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBC 13-409.1.ABC.3.3. | | | | | | 6. ENGINEERING BUSINESS (C.O.A.) NUMBER IS MISSING FROM | | | ENGINEERING FIRM'S TITLE BLOCK. SEE FAC RULE | | | 61G15-23.002. | | | | | | 7. SHOW MEANS OF AUXILIARY DRAIN PROTECTION TO PREVENT | | | THE OVERFLOW OF CONDENSATE INTO THE STRUCTURE IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 307.2.3(2). A WATER LEVEL | | | DETECTION DEVICE, SUCH AS A FLOAT SWITCH, INSTALLED | | | INTERNALLY ON THE PRIMARY DRAIN PAN OF THE RTU WOULD | | | MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-02-01 |
Time |
15:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-02-01 |
Time |
16:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-06 15:36:58 | PASSED/PROVISO--CLEANOUT REQUIRED PER SECTION | | | 708.3.5 & AN RPZV BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED ON THE WATER | | | SERVICE PER SECTION 608.13.2 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
Time |
15:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
Time |
15:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-06 16:11:37 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | 1. SHT AR1 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE DATA INDICATES | | | CLASSIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY AS BUSINESS, BUT THE TITLE | | | SHEET AND APPLICATION STATES RETAIL. PLEASE CORRELATE | | | OCCUPANCY. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 2. SHT A5 DETAIL 2A5 SCUPPER DETAIL. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS | | | FOR THE SCUPPER. PROVIDE LENGTH, WIDTH AND HEIGHT OF | | | OPENING IN THE SCUPPER AS WELL AS THE SIZE OF THE | | | DOWNSPOUT. SECTION 1106. | | | | | | 3. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE PRIMARY AND THE | | | EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SCUPPERS. INDICATE THE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF EACH AREA AND SHOW 1/2 AREA OF ALL VERTICAL | | | WALLS INCLUDING THE PARAPETS TO EACH AREA AS WELL AS | | | ANY AREA FROM ROOFS DRAINING ONTO THE ROOF AREAS FROM | | | ABOVE. SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL SUBSECTIONS AND | | | TABLES. | | | | | | 4. SHT P1 A CLEANOUT IS REQUIRED NEAR THE JUNCTION OF | | | THE BUILDING DRAIN AND THE BUILDING SEWER PER SECTION | | | 708.3.5. PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 5. SHT P1 AN RPZV BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED ON THE WATER | | | SERVICE TO THE BUILDING. SECTION 608.13.2. PLEASE SHOW | | | ON THE PLANS. (NOTE STATES SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR | | | CONTINUATION, BUT THE CIVIL PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN | | | SUBMITTED). | | | | | | 6. THE MPE SHEETS TITLE BLOCKS ARE MISSING THE | | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF THE | | | ENGINEERING FIRM. FAC 61G15-23.002(2) & FS 471.025. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID | | | SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY | | | ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU | | | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-05-02 |
Time |
15:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-05-02 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
Time |
10:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
Time |
10:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-01 10:19:12 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING ARE NEW COMMENTS BASED UPON | | | NEWLY-SUBMITTED PLANS... | | | | | | 1) THE PROPOSED SITE PLANS SHOWS AN EXISTING | | | TRANSFORMER LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE | | | BUILDING.AS SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED LANDSCAPE PLANS, | | | THIS IS TO BE THE LOCATION OF A SHADE TREE, AS WELL AS | | | ADDITIONAL GROUNDCOVER.THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE | | | REVISED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, OR THE | | | TRANSFORMER SHALL BE RELOCATED. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-01-18 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-01-18 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-18 15:38:03 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ARE REPEAT COMMENTS... | | | | | | 1) PLANS DO NOT MATCH THOSE APPROVED AS PART OF THE | | | MINOR AMENDMENT PROCESS.PLANS SHALL MATCH THE LATEST | | | APPROVAL, OTHERWISE ANOTHER MINOR AMENDMENT SHALL BE | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 2) LANDSCAPE PLANS (SIGNED AND SEALED BY A REGISTERED | | | LANDSAPE ARCHITECT) SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 3) PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE SITE PLAN IS FOR "REFERENCE | | | ONLY."I BELIEVE THERE ARE SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WILL | | | NEED TO BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THIS PERMIT (I.E. | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, RECONFIGURATION OF THE PARKING IN | | | THE FRONT, ETC.). | | | | | | 4) AS THE BUILDING HAS BEEN EXPANDED CLOSER TO THE | | | WESTERN ACCESS DRIVE, IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPOSED | | | OVERHANGS OVER THE WINDOWS EXTEND INTO THE DRIVE AISLE. | | | THE DRIVE AISLE IS TO BE 24 FEET IN CLEAR WIDTH...WITH | | | NO OBSTRUCTIONS. | | | | | | 5) THE PROPOSED LOADING ZONE DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE | | | MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS.SECTION 94-485(P) | | | REQUIRES THAT A 10 FOOT X 25 FOOT LOADING ZONE BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 6) BIKE RACK SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 7) DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE | | | AS WELL HAS THE PARKING STRIPING DETAIL (SEE | | | ATTACHED). | | | | | | 8) TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT, ACCURATE SURVEY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
21:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
21:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-29 21:31:51 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1) PLANS DO NOT MATCH THOSE APPROVED AT TIME OF FORMAL | | | SITE PLAN REVIEW.MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE BAYWINDS | | | RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR | | | TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT.(THIS IS IN | | | PROCESS) | | | | | | 2) LANDSCAPE PLANS (SIGNED AND SEALED BY A REGISTERED | | | LANDSAPE ARCHITECT) SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 3) PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE SITE PLAN IS FOR "REFERENCE | | | ONLY."I BELIEVE THERE ARE SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WILL | | | NEED TO BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THIS PERMIT (I.E. | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, RECONFIGURATION OF THE PARKING IN | | | THE FRONT, ETC.). | | | | | | 4) AS THE BUILDING HAS BEEN EXPANDED CLOSER TO THE | | | WESTERN ACCESS DRIVE, IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPOSED | | | OVERHANGS OVER THE WINDOWS EXTEND INTO THE DRIVE AISLE. | | | THE DRIVE AISLE IS TO BE 24 FEET IN CLEAR WIDTH...WITH | | | NO OBSTRUCTIONS. | | | | | | 5) THE PROPOSED LOADING ZONE DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE | | | MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS.SECTION 94-485(P) | | | REQUIRES THAT A 10 FOOT X 25 FOOT LOADING ZONE BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 6) BIKE RACK SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 7) DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE | | | AS WELL HAS THE PARKING STRIPING DETAIL (SEE | | | ATTACHED). | | | | | | 8) TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT, ACCURATE SURVEY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. | | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |