| 2007-12-10 16:16:08 | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY, PLANS STAMPED BY THEM AND |
| | COPY OF RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT, |
| | BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 2) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R302.1 EXTERIOR WALLS. EXTERIOR |
| | WALLS SEPARATED BY LESS THAN 6 FEET (1828 MM) SHALL |
| | HAVE NOT LESS THAN A ONE-HOUR FIRE-RESISTIVE RATING |
| | WITH EXPOSURE FROM BOTH SIDES. PROJECTIONS SHALL NOT |
| | EXTEND TO A POINT CLOSER THAN 4 FEET (1220 MM) FROM AN |
| | ADJACENT PROJECTION OR WALL. ONE WALL OF THE STRUCTURE |
| | IS LESS THAN 6 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PLANS ARE MISSING SHEET A-5.2. WHICH IS LISTED |
| | IN THE DRAWING INDEX ON A-0. |
| | |
| | 4) SUBMIT FIREPLACE AND CHIMNEY DETAILS. SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH R1003 FOR MASONRY FIREPLACES OR R1004 |
| | FOR FACTORY BUILT FIREPLACES AND R1001 FOR MASONRY |
| | CHIMNEYS OR R1002 FOR FACTORY BUILT CHIMNEYS. IF USING |
| | FACTORY BUILT APPLIANCES SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S |
| | SPECIFICATIONS AND LISTING INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 5) PROVIDE A WINDOW SCHEDULE ON THE PLANS. IDENTIFY THE |
| | TYPES OF WINDOWS AND THEIR LOCATIONS. FBC 106.1.1* CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 6) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R502.1.2 DRAFTSTOPPING |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | WHEN THERE IS USABLE SPACE BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW THE |
| | CONCEALED SPACE OF A FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY, DRAFTSTOPS |
| | SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE AREA OF THE CONCEALED |
| | SPACE DOES NOT EXCEED 1,000 SQUARE FEET (92.9 M 2 ). |
| | DRAFTSTOPPING SHALL DIVIDE THE CONCEALED SPACE INTO |
| | APPROXIMATELY EQUAL AREAS. WHERE THE ASSEMBLY IS |
| | ENCLOSED BY A FLOOR MEMBRANE ABOVE AND A CEILING |
| | MEMBRANE BELOW DRAFTSTOPPING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN |
| | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES UNDER THE FOLLOWING |
| | CIRCUMSTANCES: |
| | 1. CEILING IS SUSPENDED UNDER THE FLOOR FRAMING.2. |
| | FLOOR FRAMING IS CONSTRUCTED OF TRUSS-TYPE OPEN-WEB OR |
| | PERFORATED MEMBERS. |
| | R502.1.2.1 MATERIALS. |
| | DRAFTSTOPPING MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN ?-INCH |
| | (12.7 MM) GYPSUM BOARD, 3 / 8 -INCH (9.5 MM) WOOD |
| | STRUCTURAL PANELS, 3 / 8 -INCH (9.5 MM) TYPE 2-M-W |
| | PARTICLEBOARD OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIALS ADEQUATELY |
| | SUPPORTED. DRAFTSTOPPING SHALL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO |
| | THE FLOOR FRAMING MEMBERS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE INTEGRITY OF ALL DRAFTSTOPS |
| | SHALL BE MAINTAINED. |
| | |
| | 7) PROVIDE A WINDOW SCHEDULE. SPECIFY THE WINDOW TYPE, |
| | SIZE AND LOCATION. FBC 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8) THE WALL LEGEND ON A-1.1 AND A-1.2 SPECIFY WOOD |
| | FRAME EXTERIOR WALLS. HOWEVER, WALL SECTION 3 ON A-5.1 |
| | SPECIFIES METAL STUDS ON THE SECOND FLOOR AT THIS |
| | LOCATION. PLEASE CORRECT. FBC 106.1.1* CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9) WALL TYPE B ON DETAIL 2 ON A-1.1 IS 3-5/8" 20 GA. |
| | METAL STUDS AND THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHOW WOOD FRAME |
| | BEARING WALLS. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 106.1.1* CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 10) ON SHEET A-3.2 THE MARK FOR SECTION 3/A-5.1 APPEARS |
| | TO BE IN THE WRONG LOCATION. PLEASE CORRECT. FBC |
| | 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R602.1.2 FIREBLOCKING |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | FIREBLOCKING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO CUT OFF ALL CONCEALED |
| | DRAFT OPENINGS (BOTH VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL) AND TO |
| | FORM AN EFFECTIVE FIRE BARRIER BETWEEN STORIES, AND |
| | BETWEEN A TOP STORY AND THE ROOF SPACE. FIREBLOCKING |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED IN WOOD-FRAME CONSTRUCTION IN THE |
| | FOLLOWING LOCATIONS. |
| | 3. IN CONCEALED SPACES BETWEEN STAIR STRINGERS AT THE |
| | TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE RUN. |
| | |
| | 12) DETAIL 8 ON A-6.2 SHOWS INSULATION AT THE CEILING |
| | AND THE WALL SECTION ON A-5.1 SPECIFIES ICYNENE |
| | INSULATION. PLEASE CLARIFY.FBC 106.1.1* CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 13) STRUCTURAL NOTE D-2 ON ON S-1 INCORRECTLY SPECIFIES |
| | ASCE 7-05. ASCE 7-02 IS THE EDITION THAT IS REFERENCED |
| | BY THE 2004 FBC. PLEASE CORRECT. SEE FBC R CHAPTER 43. |
| | |
| | 14) PROVIDE WINDOW AND DOOR BUCK DETAILS. SPECIFY THE |
| | FASTENERS AND SPACING.FBC 106.1.2* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 15) ON DETAIL 8 ON A-6.1, SPECIFY THE EMBED DEPTH OF |
| | THE 1/2 " BOLTS FOR THE GARAGE DOOR BUCKS. FBC 106.1.1* |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 16) THE BOTTOM PORTION OF THE FIRST FLOOR DOOR SCHEDULE |
| | ON SHEET A-6.1 IS MISSING. |
| | |
| | 17) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE SOIL REPORT WITH THE |
| | EMBOSSED SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE OF THE SOIL |
| | ENGINEER. SEE FS 471 AND FAC 61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 18) THE A/C AREA ON THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORMS DO NOT |
| | CORRESPOND WITH THE PLANS. THE OWNER/AGENT IS REQUIRED |
| | TO SIGN AND DATE THE FORM. SEE FBC CHAPTER 13-6. |
| | |
| | 19) ON S-2 THE UPLIFT VALUE SPECIFIED FOR THE SIMPSON |
| | H-1 IS INCORRECT. THE UPLIFT VALUE SHOULD BE 585# PER |
| | THE 2007 SIMPSON CATALOG. |
| | |
| | 20) SPECIFY THE MAXIMUM SPACING OF THE VERTICAL WALL |
| | REINFORCING ON THE PLANS. FBC 106.1.2* CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 21) ON SHEET S-4 THE MARK FOR 3/S-7 IS LOCATED WHERE |
| | THE FLOOR TRUSSES ARE PARALLEL TO THE CONCRETE BEAM AND |
| | DETAIL 3 ON S-7 SHOWS THE TRUSSES PERPENDICULAR TO THE |
| | CONCRETE BEAM. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 22) ON S-5 THE UPLIFT FOR THE TRUSSES AT THE REAR PORCH |
| | ARE SPECIFIED AS 2237#, HOWEVER THE "C" CONNECTORS |
| | SPECIFIED ARE RATED FOR AN UPLIFT OF 1260#. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. FBC 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 23) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS FOR THE 2 PLY GIRDERS AT THE |
| | EXTERIOR MASONRY WALL AT THE REAR PORCH. FBC 106.1.2* |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 24) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS FOR THE 2 PLY GIRDERS AT THE |
| | EXTERIOR WOOD FRAME WALL AT THE FRONT PORCH. FBC |
| | 106.1.2* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 25) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | ICYNENE INSULATION. FBC 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 26)FBC 106.3* CITY AMENDMENTS PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 |
| | SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 27) THE SCHEDULE ON A-6.1 SPECIFIES A WOOD DOOR AT THE |
| | SIDE OF THE GARAGE, BUT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR A STEEL DOOR. PLEASE CORRECT. SEE FAC |
| | RULE 9B-72. |
| | |
| | 28) THE NOTE ON THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON A-6 STATES THAT |
| | ALL FRENCH DOORS ARE ALUMINUM AND THEN SPECIFIES WOOD |
| | DOORS. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 29) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE SINGLE INSWING |
| | FRENCH DOOR AS REQUIRED BY FAC RULE 9B-72. |
| | |
| | 30) PLEASE CLARIFY THE WINDOW TYPES ON THE PLANS. A |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED FOR CASEMENT WINDOWS AND |
| | THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 31) ON SHEET A-6.1 ONE OF THE ELEVATIONS APPEARS TO |
| | SHOW (2) FIXED WINDOWS MULLED TOGETHER. SUBMIT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS FOR THEM AS REQUIRED BY FAC RULE 9B-72. |
| | |
| | 32) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | FRONT ENTRY DOOR IS FOR AN OUTSWING DOOR, HOWEVER, THE |
| | PLANS SHOW THIS DOOR AS AN INSWING DOOR. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 33) THE MAXIMUM WIDTH LISTED IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR THE FRENCH WOOD SIDELITES IS 18-13/16", WHICH DOES |
| | NOT APPEAR TO BE WIDE ENOUGH TO WORK FOR THE FRONT |
| | ENTRY ASSEMBLY DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS. PLEASE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | NOTE: IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW PLEASE RETURN |
| | ONE SET OF THE OLD PLAN SHEETS AND A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW THE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |