| 2007-11-19 10:30:25 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LISTS: |
| | |
| | 1.)YOU CANNOT APPLY FOR OWNER BUILDER PERMITS FOR |
| | COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | PLEASE READ FLORIDA STATUTE 489, "THE BUILDING OR |
| | RESIDENCE MUST BE FOR YOUR OWN USE OR OCCUPANCY.IT |
| | MAY NOT BE BUILT OR SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVED FOR SALE OR |
| | LEASE."MIGUEL LAVIN IS THE OWNER, EL LATINO AND |
| | MIGUEL LAVIN BARBER SHOP ARE THE TENANTS.OWNER |
| | BUILDER NOT ALLOWED FOR CORPORATIONS AS PER STATE OF |
| | FLORIDA AND BUILDING OFFICIAL.THIS BUILDING IS RENTED |
| | OR LEASED, HAS TWO TENANTS WHICH ARE CORPORATIONS. |
| | OWNERSHIP OF THE COMPANIES WHICH LEASE OR RENT THE |
| | SPACES IS NOT ADDRESSED IN THE OWNER BUILDER LAW. |
| | |
| | 2.)THE RAMP WHICH WAS REMOVED MUST BE REPLACED.SEE |
| | FBC11-4.1.6(1)(B), NO ALTERATION SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN |
| | WHICH DECREASES OR HAS THE EFFECT OF DECREASING |
| | ACCESSIBILITY OR USABILITY OF A BUILDING OR FACILITY |
| | BELOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AT THE TIME |
| | OF ALTERATION.REVISE THE PLAN TO INCLUDE A RAMP OR |
| | PROVIDE OTHER MEANS OF VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY (ELEVATOR |
| | OR LIFT). |
| | |
| | 3.)ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY |
| | WITH THE FOLLOWING; IF EXISTING ELEMENTS, SPACES, OR |
| | COMMON AREAS ARE ALTERED, THEN EACH SUCH ALTERED |
| | ELEMENT, SPACE, FEATURE, OR AREA SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11-4.1.1 TO SECTION |
| | 11-4.1.3, MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, |
| | FBC11-4.1.6.SEE ALSO ITEM #2.REVISE PLAN TO PROVIDE |
| | VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | |
| | 4.)THE GUARD IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC1012.THE HEIGHT |
| | SPECIFIED IN THE NOTES (42 INCHES) AND "RAILING BLOW |
| | UP" CONFLICTS WITH OTHER DETAILS ON THE PLAN, SUCH AS |
| | NORTH ELEVATION, WHICH SPECIFY 2'10". |
| | |
| | 5.)IT DOES NOT APPEAR THE THE 1X2 PICKETS COMPLY WITH |
| | THE DESIGN STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS OF FBC1607.PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 6.)SHOW THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE TOP OF THE PICKETS |
| | AND THE RAILING.FBC1012.3.SHOW DIMENSIONS AT |
| | OPENINGS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PICKETS. |
| | |
| | 7.)HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS AT THE BOTTOM DO NOT COMPLY |
| | WITH FBC11-4.9.4(2). |
| | |
| | 8.)FOR THE RAILING WHICH IS NOT AGAINST THE WALL, |
| | SHOW THE EXTENSION DIMENSIONS (THE SLOPED PORTION, THE |
| | PORTION PARALLEL TO THE GROUND).FBC11-4.9.4(2). |
| | |
| | 9.)SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC11-4.9.4(6).PROVIDE A |
| | DETAIL FOR THE WALL MOUNTED RAIL AND A DETAIL FOR THE |
| | HANDRAIL AT THE GUARD.AS DRAWN, THE HANDRAIL |
| | EXTENSIONS ARE A HAZARD. |
| | |
| | 10.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A FEE WILL BE |
| | CHARGED IF THE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED A |
| | THIRD TIME AND MAY BE CHARGED ON PAST PLAN REVIEWS AS |
| | THIS IS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
