 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 07100001
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07100001 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
22 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
Time |
11:25 |
Rev Time |
1.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
Time |
10:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-01 12:24:59 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADD: 1501 N AUSTRALIAN AVE | | | CONT: BRADANNA INC. | | | TEL: (561)722-1425 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2007 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2009 FBC SUPPLEMENTS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVISION REVIEW OF THE EXISTING NORTH WING | | | DATED 10-12-09 | | | | | | BUILDING PROVISO: | | | BUILDING APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION! | | | THIS PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED PROVISIONALLY. FAILURE TO | | | CORRECT THE LISTED DEFICIENCIES IN THIS PLAN PRIOR TO | | | INSPECTION WILL RESULT IN FAILED INSPECTION(S) AND THE | | | ASSESSMENT OF RE-INSPECTION FEE(S). | | | | | | 1) SHEET LS-100, A-101 & A-700 INDICATE A REVISION IN | | | DOORS 6, 8,9,10 & 35 ALL BEING REVISED TO NEW 45 MINUTE | | | DOORS, THE ISSUE IS THEY ARE EXISTING 2'-6" WIDE. | | | PLEASE REVIEW SECTION 11-4.6(1)(B)IF EXISTING ELEMENTS, | | | SPACES, OR COMMON AREAS ARE ALTERED, THEN EACH SUCH | | | ALTERED ELEMENT, SPACE, FEATURE, OR AREA SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11-4.1.1 TO | | | SECTION 11-4.1.3, MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION. IF THE APPLICABLE PROVISION FOR NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES THAT AN ELEMENT, SPACE, OR COMMON | | | AREA BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, THE ALTERED ELEMENT, | | | SPACE, OR COMMON AREA IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE ON AN | | | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SECTION | | | 11-4.1.6(2), ALTERATIONS TO AN AREA CONTAINING A | | | PRIMARY FUNCTION. | | | | | | 11-4.1 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. | | | 11-4.1.1 APPLICATION. | | | (1) GENERAL. THIS CODE ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM | | | STANDARDS FOR THE ACCESSIBILITY OF BUILDINGS AND | | | FACILITIES BUILT OR ALTERED WITHIN THE STATE. | | | (B) REMOVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS FROM BUILDINGS, | | | STRUCTURES, OR FACILITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION | | | 11-4.1.8 OF THIS CODE UNLESS COMPLIANCE WOULD RENDER | | | THE REMOVAL NOT READILY ACHIEVABLE. IN NO INSTANCE | | | SHALL THE REMOVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL BARRIER CREATE A | | | SIGNIFICANT RISK TO THE HEALTH OR SAFETY OF AN | | | INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY OR OTHERS. | | | | | | 11-4.1.3 ACCESSIBLE BUILDINGS: NEW CONSTRUCTION. | | | THIS EDITION OF THE CODE DOES NOT APPLY TO BUILDINGS, | | | STRUCTURES, OR FACILITIES WHICH WERE EITHER UNDER | | | CONSTRUCTION OR UNDER CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION ON (OR | | | BEFORE) OCTOBER 1, 1997. | | | (1) AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE COMPLYING WITH | | | SECTION 11-4.3 SHALL CONNECT ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR | | | FACILITY ENTRANCES WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND | | | ELEMENTS WITHIN THE BUILDING OR FACILITY. | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS SUBMITTED: | | | LS-1 | | | A-101 | | | A-102 | | | A-700 | | | | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO COMPLETE OUR ANONYMOUS ON-LINE | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY AT: | | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
21 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-10-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-10-26 |
Time |
12:15 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-10-26 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-26 11:58:59 | I-LAG 750 SD SELF TAPPING FASTENER | | | INTERIOR METAL FRAMING SHOP DRAWINGS | | | PRE-CAST COLUMN SHOP DRAWINGS & PRODUCT DATA |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
20 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-10-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-10-07 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-10-07 |
Time |
11:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-07 11:25:49 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADDRESS: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: BRADANNA | | | TEL: (239)455-8891 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B | | | OCT. 7/ 2009 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) SUBMITTAL OCT 1/2009 IS NOT A SUBMITTAL BUT A | | | REVISION WIWTH FEES, ($170.00) SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS | | | CAN NOT HAVE WHITEOUT SHEET S-1 HAS WHITE OUT ON ALL | | | THREE SHEETS, THIS IS ALSO THE SHEET THAT THE DESIGNER | | | OF RECORD AFFIXED THEIR STAMP OF APPROVAL PLEASE | | | PROVIDE 3 NEW S-1 SHEETS WITH-OUT WHITE OUTAND HAVE | | | BEEN REVIEWED BY THE DESSIGNER OF RECORD. 106.1.1*. | | | | | | . | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | SURVEY: | | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | | | MEMBER OF BOAF: BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF | | | FLORIDA SAVING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
19 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-29 |
Time |
16:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-29 16:33:14 | REVISIONS: | | | A-104 REVISION# 11 6-11-09 | | | A-601 | | | ENERGY CALCS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
18 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
08:50 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
08:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-08 08:57:30 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADDRESS: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: BRADANNA | | | TEL: (239)455-8891 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B | | | SEPT. 8/ 2009 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | ENERGY CALCS/ A-104 & A-601 | | | | | | PLEASE SEE SHEET A-601 DETAIL# 11 TAPERED ROOF | | | INSULATION AT ROOF DRAIN INDICATES A TAPER TO NO | | | INSULATION 13-404.1 ABCD.1 REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF R-10 | | | EVEN AT THE ROOF DRAIN SUMP. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADDRESS: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: :(PLAN REVIEW/ MAJOR WORKING DRAWING) | | | TEL: (561644-7416 JEFF HALVERSON | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B | | | NOVEMBER 18,2008 | | | 5TH REVIEW- MAJOR WORKING DRAWING REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
17 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-27 |
Time |
15:43 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-27 |
Time |
15:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-27 15:36:24 | ROOFING REVISIONS: | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS; | | | FIBERTITE SINGLE PLY ROOF SYSTEMS | | | CELLUCRETE ROOF PLAN | | | DYPLAST PRODUCT DATA | | | ENGINEERED CALCS | | | ENGLERT SERIES 1300 | | | CALCS | | | SHOP DRAWINGS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
16 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-08-20 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-20 11:27:13 | 8X11 REVISIONS 16 K BAR JOIST ADDITIONAL SUPPORT DETAIL | | | FOR 1 SEMCO FV-3000 ERV | | | | | | 8X11 REVISION SOFFIT DETAIL FOR CURVED METAL ROOF |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
15 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-08 |
Time |
11:59 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-08 |
Time |
11:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-08 11:56:53 | REVIEWED: A-102,A-103, A-200, A-201, A-300, A-301, | | | A-401, A-602 & A-603 & A-606 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
14 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-06-17 |
Time |
13:45 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-06-17 |
Time |
13:01 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-17 13:19:46 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADDRESS: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: :BRADANNA | | | TEL: (561) 722-1425 BILL LYNCH | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B | | | JUNE 17/ 2009 | | | | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | | | | 1) STRUCTURAL RESPONSE TO RFI NO 70 | | | | | | 2) STRUCTURAL RESPONSE TO RFI NO 71 | | | | | | 3) STRUCTURAL RESPONSE TO RFI NO 72 | | | | | | 4) STRUCTURAL RESPONSE TO RFI NO 73 | | | | | | 5) STRUCTURAL RESPONSE TO RFI NO 74 | | | | | | 6) REVISED S-2 REV13, & S-4.3 REV 13. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-06-02 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-06-02 |
Time |
15:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-02 15:45:59 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADDRESS: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: :BRADANNA | | | TEL: (561) 722-1425 BILL LYNCH | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B | | | MAY 29/2009 | | | | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | | | | 1) SHORING PLAN - | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-05-29 |
Time |
11:38 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-05-29 |
Time |
11:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-29 11:41:38 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADDRESS: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: :BRADANNA | | | TEL: (561) 722-1425 BILL LYNCH | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B | | | MAY 29/2009 | | | | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) SHORING PLAN - FL 61G-15-30.006 (3) THE DELEGATED | | | ENGINEER SHALL FORWARD THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING | | | DOCUMENTS TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-05-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-05-11 |
Time |
12:25 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-05-11 |
Time |
10:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-11 11:01:25 | STRUCTURAL STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS: ALPROJAM WELDING | | | A/8,E1,E2,E3, 1,2& 3MARCH 29 FINAL TO GC | | | ENGINEERS LETTER ON RE-USE OF JOIST SUPPORT CLIP, | | | PRODUCED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. | | | STRUCTURAL STEEL CALCULATIONS FOR STEEL JOIST DESIGN | | | SUBMITTAL # 34R2 STOREFRONT SHOP DRAWINGS/ | | | NOAYKK06-1026.08 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-29 |
Time |
14:47 |
Rev Time |
0.66 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-29 |
Time |
14:07 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-29 14:49:13 | REVISION # 12 S-2, S3.3 & S-4.2. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-08 |
Time |
15:44 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-08 |
Time |
15:44 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-08 15:46:07 | REVISION# 11 STRUCTURAL ROOF REVISIONS, AS BUILTS | | | S1.1 | | | S1.2 | | | S2.0 | | | S3.1 | | | S3.3 | | | S4.1 | | | S4.2 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-07 |
Time |
16:33 |
Rev Time |
1.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-07 |
Time |
16:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-07 16:37:42 | REVISONS: | | | R#12, A-104 2/25/09 | | | R# 12, A-601 2/25/09 | | | R# 10, S-5.1 3/10/09 | | | R# 10, S-5.2 3/10/09 | | | R#10, S-5.3 3/10/09 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-06 |
Time |
13:49 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-06 |
Time |
13:49 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-06 13:50:07 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADDRESS: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: :(PLAN REVIEW/ MAJOR WORKING DRAWING) | | | TEL: (561644-7416 JEFF HALVERSON | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B | | | DECEMBER 19 ,2008 | | | 6TH REVIEW- | | | ACTION: REVIEWED OK TO ISSUE | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-12-19 |
Time |
10:25 |
Rev Time |
4.44 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-12-19 |
Time |
10:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-19 13:17:05 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADDRESS: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: :(PLAN REVIEW/ MAJOR WORKING DRAWING) | | | TEL: (561644-7416 JEFF HALVERSON | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B | | | DECEMBER 19 ,2008 | | | 6TH REVIEW- | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | | | | MET WITH ISREL ROZENTAL AIA, ABOUT PLANS,ENERGY CALCS, | | | AND ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS, ULYSSIS WILL BRING BACK | | | EITHER OR NEW ENERGY CALCS, PLANS AND ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION AS TO WHICH SUB-SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED ON | | | THE FLAT ROOF. BY THE FIRST OF NEXT WEEK 12-22 OR | | | 12-23, REVIEW IS ON HOLD. | | | | | | 1-02-09 CALLED KEN HAWKINS, KEN IS SUPPOSE TO BRING IN | | | NEW A-104 & A-601 SHEETS MONDAY 1-05-09 BY 10:00AM. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
Time |
14:45 |
Rev Time |
4.44 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
Time |
14:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-18 16:25:59 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADDRESS: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: :(PLAN REVIEW/ MAJOR WORKING DRAWING) | | | TEL: (561644-7416 JEFF HALVERSON | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B | | | NOVEMBER 18,2008 | | | 5TH REVIEW- MAJOR WORKING DRAWING REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A)INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | | | | 1B-E)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 217) COMPLIED | | | | | | 18) 3RD REQUEST, FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 3 COPIES OF ALL PRODUCT TESTING | | | REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | G) ROOF ASSEMBLIES-NOA 05-1220.07 FIBERTITE SINGLE PLY, | | | SUB-SYSTEM PAGE 19, DECK TYPE 4: LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE, | | | NON-INSULATED PLEASE SEE A-602 DETAIL# 1 AS WELL AS THE | | | ENERGY CALCULATION INPUT DATA SHEETS BOTH INDICATING | | | THERE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 6" OF INSULATION. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE THE RIGHT SUB-SYSTEM (INSULATED )INDICATING A | | | MINIMUM OF -89 FOR ZONE 3 OR ENHANCED FASTENING BY | | | EITHER A ARCHITECT OR ENGINEEER. | | | | | | H) ENGLERT 2000 SERIES METAL ROOF PANEL OVER STEEL | | | DECKDECK TYPE NOT INDICATED DECK TYPE A-1 MAXIMUM | | | PRESSURE OF 62.5 PSF, 18 INCH PANELS, DECK TYPE A-2 A | | | 14" WIDE PANEL MAXIMUM UPLIFT -144.25 | | | NEITHER THE DETAIL# 1 ON A-602 NOR DETAIL2 0N A-603 | | | INDICATE THE THICKNESS OF THE RIGID FOAM INSULATION. | | | THE ENGLERT PRODUCT APPROVAL DOES REQUIRE A PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FOR THE RIGID BOARD INSULATION PLEASE SEE | | | INSULATION OPTIONAL REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 19-20) COMPLIED. | | | | | | | | | 21) SEE 18G ABOVE.2ND REQUEST, | | | | | | 22-23) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 24) 3RD REQUEST, ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE DEFICIENT IN | | | INFORMATION FOR THE ENERGY CODE AND CALCULATIONS, | | | 106.3.5(9) &106.3.5.1.4(1) & 13-400.0.ABC COMPLIANCE | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | 24A) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 24B) SHEET A-700 FLOOR FINISHES INDICATES 2730 SQ FT OF | | | FLOOR THAT DOES NOT HAVE CARPET AND PADDING AS A | | | INSULATOR BUT DOES NOT SHOW UP ONT THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATION. NOT ALSO THE GENERATOR ROOM AND ELECTRIC | | | ROOM FLOORS WILL NOT HAVE CARPET AND PADDING INSULATED | | | VALUE WAS TAKEN. 13-405.2ABENERGY CALCS DATED 11-14-08 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 24C)2ND REQUEST, ZONE AC-3 WINDOWS ARE MISSING THE | | | CLERESTORY WINDOWS NORTH ELEVATION SEE A-201, WINDOW | | | SIZES (1) 26'-6"X3'-6" AND (2) 16'-2"X3'-6". WINDOWS | | | 25,26 & 27. 13-401.2AB.2 | | | | | | 24D) HEADING OF DOORS IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | INDICATE IIN ZONE 1 SOLID CORE DOORS (2.25) WHERE AS | | | THE PLANS CALL OUT FOR DOOR TYPE A & B TO BE HOLLOW | | | CORE METAL DOORS. | | | | | | 24E)PLEASE SEE 18 G& H, ROOF INSULATION, PLANS DOES | | | CALL OUT THE ACTUAL THICKNESS OF INSULATION NOR THE | | | TYPE OF INSULATION TO BE INSTALLED. THE ROOFING NOAS | | | HAS BEEN PROVIDED, IN THIS REVIEW THE SUB-SYSTEM HAS | | | NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED WHERE AS IN THE LAST REVIEW THE | | | SUB-SYSTEM WAS CIRCLED. THE UNKNWON ROOFING SUB-SYSTEM | | | AND INSULATION TYPE WILL MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO VERIFY | | | THE ASSUMPTIONS PROVIDED IN THE ENERGY INPUT DATA | | | REPORT. A-602.SECTION 13-404.1AB.1/ 13-404.2AB.3. | | | | | | 25) COMPLIED. | | | | | | RENOVATIONS TO THE EXISTING NORTH WING | | | | | | 26A) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 26B) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 26C) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 27-29) COMPLIED. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
Time |
13:12 |
Rev Time |
3.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
Time |
09:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-09 09:38:33 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADDRESS: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: :(PLAN REVIEW/ MAJOR WORKING DRAWING) | | | TEL: (561644-7416 JEFF HALVERSON | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING TYPE: I-B | | | OCTOBER 09,2008 | | | 4TH REVIEW- MAJOR WORKING DRAWING REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE | | | REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | | | | 1B) MULTIPLE REQUEST, PLEASE SUBMIT 3 OF ALL SURVEYS, | | | PLANS, REPORTS, REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR | | | SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW FOR PERMIT. YOUR PROJECT IS A | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN | | | (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED | | | FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS | | | WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE 3 SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS SINCE | | | IT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR , 109.3.6*. | | | | | | PLANS SUBMITTED THIS REVIEW: | | | (2) SET OF NEW CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR COMMUNITY CENTER | | | (2) SETS OF PLANS FOR RENOVATIONS OF NORTH WING | | | (2) SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | (2) SETS SOILS REPORT | | | (2) ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | (2) SETS STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CALCULATIONS | | | (2) SETS OF RESPONCE COMMENTS FROM WHAT APPEARS TO BE | | | 2ND & 3RD ROUND COMMENT | | | | | | | | | | | | 1C) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 1D) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 1E) COMPLIED | | | | | | 2) COMPLIED | | | | | | 3-4) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5A) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5B) 3RD REQUEST, WHILE MEETING WITH JEFF HALVERSON | | | ABOUT THE TYPE BUILDING AND AMOUNT OF OCCUPANCY WE | | | ASCERTAINED THIS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR FL S | | | S 553.71(7). THE FOLLOWING DEFINITION AND REQUIREMENTS | | | WILL NEED TO BE MET. FORMS FOR A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR | | | WERE PROVIDED TO MR. HALVERSON . NOTE THE FOUNDATION | | | PERMIT IS A AT RISK, STAND ALONE PERMIT AND THE PROPER | | | FORMS FOR THE THRESHOLD BUIULDING PERMIT WILL ALSO NEED | | | TO BE SUPPLIED: | | | | | | THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN FL S. S. 553.71(7) " | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING" MEANING ANY BUILDING WHICH IS | | | GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH | | | HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS DENIED IN | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SQ FT IN | | | AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 | | | PERSONS. | | | | | | 105.13.1 THE ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR TO PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION | | | PLAN PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL | | | INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENFORCING | | | AGENCY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR | | | THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. THE PURPOSE | | | OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO PROVIDE | | | SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO THAT | | | THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: MEETING HAS ALREADY TAKEN PLACE. | | | WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FL S S 553.79(5) FLORIDA | | | STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS | | | CODE. CONTACT KEN CONRAD MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561)805-6666 FOR FURTHER | | | INFORMATION BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. | | | | | | THRESHOLD BLDG, REQUIRED STATEMENT: | | | W.P.B. AMENDMENT 105.13.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING | | | WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE | | | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT | | | THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S PR ENGINEER'S | | | KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE | | | APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE | | | LOCAL AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633 | | | FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | | | | | | 6-12) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 13) 4TH REQUEST, SEMI-COMPLIED. SHEET A-1 DOES INDICATE | | | WALL TAGS INDICATING WALLS BUT THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE | | | OPENING PROTECTIVES IN THE RATED WALLS TO THE | | | MULTIPURPOSE ROOM. SHEET A101 | | | INDICATES THE DOUBLE DOORS AS DOOR# 98 AND DOOR # 42. | | | SEE 715.3.SEE SHEET A-7.00 | | | | | | 14) FIRST REVIEW STATED THAT A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT | | | BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION REQUESTED ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR | | | THAT WERE NOT PART OF THIS REVIEW. | | | THERE ARE STILL SOME ISSUES OUTSTANDING AS LISTED | | | BELOW. | | | | | | 15) COMMENT FROM FIRST REVIEW, SEMI-COMPLIED, THERE ARE | | | NUMEROUS A-SHEETS THAT HAVE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS BUT | | | THERE IS NO WRITTEN INFORMATION PROVIDED, PLANS ARE | | | INCOMPLETE.106.3.5.1.1(4) SEE FIRE RESISTANCE | | | CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS.PLANS FAIL TO INDICATE FIRE | | | RESISTANCERATING OF BAR JOIST SYSTEM TABLE 601 BAR | | | JOIST 2 HR FOOTNOTE "B" ALLOWS FOR A 1 HOUR REDUCTION. | | | SEE SHEET A602. | | | | | | 16-17) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 18) 3RD REQUEST, FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 3 COPIES OF ALL PRODUCT TESTING | | | REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | G) ROOF ASSEMBLIES- FIBERTITE SINGLE PLY, SUB-SYSTEM | | | NOT IDENTIFIED | | | H) TRUSS ANCHORS SEE COMMENT #22 | | | | | | NOTE PLANS WILL CALL OUT FOR CERTAIN TYPES OF PRODUCTS | | | (NOA'S) BUT THE ACTUAL REPORTS ARE REQUIRED TO SEE | | | LIMITATIONS AND OR MULTIPLE GLAZING SYSTEMS WITH | | | VARYING PRESSURES. CONTRACTOR IS TO CIRCLE THE SPECIFIC | | | GLAZING SYSTEM, ROOFING SUB-SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED AS A | | | COMPENENT OF THIS BUILDING. | | | | | | 19) COMPLIED. | | | | | | | | | 20) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 21) 2ND REQUEST, THIS ROOF IS MISSING PRODUCT | | | COMPLIANCE REPORTS WITH THE FOLLOW ITEMS: | | | __XX_ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. | | | __XX_ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SUB-SYSTEM TO | | | BE USED. | | | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW PRESSURE FOR ZONE | | | _2&3__ . | | | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD | | | THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED, AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER | | | SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA | | | REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | __XX_ IF THE SUB-SYSTEM TO BE USED INDICATES | | | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | 22) THE SHEET S4.1 DETAIL# 1 INDICATES THE TRELLIS | | | ASSEMBLY AND NOA'S: | | | USP C88 NOA 07-0306.06 | | | USP RT7 NOA07-0306.10 | | | USPKCB88 FL 822.149 | | | ALL THREE OF THE LISTED ABOVE WILL NEED TO MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF 18-20. | | | | | | 23) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 24) 3RD REQUEST, ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE DEFICIENT IN | | | INFORMATION FOR THE ENERGY CODE AND CALCULATIONS, | | | 106.3.5(9) &106.3.5.1.4(1) & 13-400.0.ABC COMPLIANCE | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | 24A) 2ND REQUEST, THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE | | | BUILDING DOES NOT CALCULATE, THE TOTAL GROSS AREA TAKEN | | | FROM LS1.0 EQUALLS 11,159 SQ FT NOT THE 9854 LISTED. | | | SHEET A-700 ROOM FINISHES LIST 9540 SQ FT. PLEASE SEE | | | THE TOTAL AREA ON THE ENERGY CALCULATION AS 8913 SQUARE | | | FEET. PLEASE SEE 13-413-05.2AB.2 GROSS FLOOR AREA. THE | | | GROSS FLOOR ASSEMBLIES OVER OUTSIDE OR UNCONDITIONED | | | SPACES CONSEST OF THE TOTAL FLOOR ASSEMBLY EXPOSED TO | | | OUTSIDE AIR OR UNCONDITIONED SPACE. THE FLOOR ASWSEMBLY | | | SHALL INCLUDE ALL FLOOR COMPONENTS THROUGH WHICH HEAT | | | MAY FLOW BETWEEN INDOOR AND OUTDOOR OR UNCONDITIONED | | | SPACE ENVIROMENTS. PLEASE CORRECT THE SQUARE FLOOR AREA | | | TO REFLECT THE TOTAL GROSS AREA. STATE RADON FEES WILL | | | NOT BE ESSESSED UNTIL SQUARE FOOTAGE IS RESOLVED. | | | | | | 24B) SHEET A-700 FLOOR FINISHES INDICATES 2730 SQ FT OF | | | FLOOR THAT DOES NOT HAVE CARPET AND PADDING AS A | | | INSULATOR BUT DOES NOT SHOW UP ONT THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATION. NOT ALSO THE GENERATOR ROOM AND ELECTRIC | | | ROOM FLOORS WILL NOT HAVE CARPET AND PADDING INSULATED | | | VALUE WAS TAKEN. 13-405.2AB | | | | | | 24C) ZONE AC-3 WINDOWS ARE MISSING THE CLERESTORY | | | WINDOWS (1) 26'-6"X3'-6" AND (2) 16'-2"X3'-6". WINDOWS | | | 25,26 & 27. 13-401.2AB.2 | | | | | | 24D) HEADING OF DOORS IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | INDICATE IIN ZONE 1 SOLID CORE DOORS WHEREAS THE PLANS | | | CALL OUT FOR DOOR TYPE A & B TO BE HOLLOW CORE METAL | | | DOORS. | | | | | | 24E) ROOF INSULATION, PLANS DOES CALL OUT THE ACTUAL | | | THICKNESS OF INSULATION NOR THE TYPE OF INSULATION TO | | | BE INSTALLED. THE ROOFING NOAS HAS BEEN PROVIDED, IN | | | THIS REVIEW THE SUB-SYSTEM HAS NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED | | | WHERE AS IN THE LAST REVIEW THE SUB-SYSTEM WAS CIRCLED. | | | THE UNKNWON ROOFING SUB-SYSTEM AND INSULATION TYPE WILL | | | MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO VERIFY THE ASSUMPTIONS PROVIDED | | | IN THE ENERGY INPUT DATA REPORT. A-602.SECTION | | | 13-404.1AB.1/ 13-404.2AB.3. | | | | | | 25) COMPLIED. | | | | | | RENOVATIONS TO THE EXISTING NORTH WING | | | | | | 26A) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 26B) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 26C) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 27-29) COMPLIED. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
12.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
Time |
16:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-15 16:57:51 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADD: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: :(PLAN REVIEW/ MAJOR WORKING DRAWING) | | | TEL: (561644-7416 JEFF HALVERSON | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | JULY 15,2008 | | | 3RD REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A) INFORMATIONAL,WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 3 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING | | | REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE SETS OF | | | ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS WEST PALM | | | BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE 3 SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS SINCE | | | IT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR , 109.3.6*. | | | | | | 1C) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 1D) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 1E) COMPLIED | | | | | | 2) COMPLIED | | | | | | 3-4) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5A) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5B) 2ND REQUEST, WHILE MEETING WITH JEFF HALVERSON | | | ABOUT THE TYPE BUILDING AND AMOUNT OF OCCUPANCY WE | | | ASCERTAINED THIS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR FL S | | | S 553.71(7). THE FOLLOWING DEFINITION AND REQUIREMENTS | | | WILL NEED TO BE MET. FORMS FOR A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR | | | WERE PROVIDED TO MR. HALVERSON AT THE END OF THE | | | MEETING. | | | | | | | | | THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN FL S. S. 553.71(7) " | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING" MEANING ANY BUILDING WHICH IS | | | GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH | | | HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS DENIED IN | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SQ FT IN | | | AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 | | | PERSONS. | | | | | | 105.13.1 THE ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR TO PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A | | | THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION | | | PLAN PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL | | | INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENFORCING | | | AGENCY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR | | | THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. THE PURPOSE | | | OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO PROVIDE | | | SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO THAT | | | THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: | | | WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FL S S 553.79(5) FLORIDA | | | STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS | | | CODE. | | | CONTACT KEN CONRAD MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR | | | PROGRAM AT (561)805-6666 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION | | | BEFORE | | | THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. | | | | | | THRESHOLD BLDG, REQUIRED STATEMENT: | | | W.P.B. AMENDMENT 105.13.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING | | | WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE | | | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT | | | THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S PR ENGINEER'S | | | KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE | | | APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE | | | LOCAL AUTHORITY IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | | | | | | 6-12) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 13) 3RD REQUEST, SEMI-REPLIED. SHEET A-1 DOES INDICATE | | | WALL TAGS INDICATING WALLS BUT THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE | | | OPENING PROTECTIVES IN THE RATED WALLS SEE 715.3. | | | NOTE SHEET A101 CLASSROOMS AND THE STORAGE CLOSETS | | | WITHIN THE CLASSROOMS ARE NOT MARKED OR MISS MARKED ON | | | THE DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET A-700. | | | | | | 14) SEMI-COMPLIED, PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE AND A THROUGH | | | REVIEW CAN NOT BE COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. | | | 106.3.5 WILL PROVIDE THE MINIMUM CRITERIA AND DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 15) SEMI-COMPLIED. | | | | | | 16-17) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 18) 3RD REQUEST, FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 3 COPIES OF ALL PRODUCT TESTING | | | REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | A) WINDOWS FIXED: STOREFRONT , CURTAIN WALL | | | B) WINDOWS OPERABLE WINDOWS: SINGLE HUNG, CASEMENT C) | | | MULLIONS | | | D) GLASS BLOCK | | | E) GLAZED SWING DOORS | | | F) AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOORS | | | G) HOLLOW METAL DOORS EXTERIOR (INSULATED) | | | H) OVERHEAD DOORS | | | I) TRUSS ANCHORS | | | J) ROOF HATCHES | | | K) ROOF ASSEMBLIES | | | L) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS | | | | | | NOTE PLANS WILL CALL OUT FOR CERTAIN TYPES OF PRODUCTS | | | (NOA'S) BUT THE ACTUAL REPORTS ARE REQUIRED TO SEE | | | LIMITATIONS AND OR MULTIPLE GLAZING SYSTEMS WITH | | | VARYING PRESSURES. CONTRACTOR IS TO CIRCLE THE SPECIFIC | | | GLAZING SYSTEM, ROOFING SUB-SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED AS A | | | COMPENENT OF THIS BUILDING. | | | | | | | | | 19) 2ND REQUEST, 106.3 PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED | | | TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR | | | INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE | | | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER | | | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, | | | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. | | | | | | 20) 2ND REQUEST, WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA | | | RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY | | | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR | | | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 21) 2ND REQUEST, THIS ROOF IS MISSING PRODUCT | | | COMPLIANCE REPORTS WITH THE FOLLOW ITEMS: | | | __XX_ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. | | | __XX_ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SUB-SYSTEM TO | | | BE USED. | | | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW PRESSURE FOR ZONE | | | _2&3__ . | | | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD | | | THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED, AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER | | | SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA | | | REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | __XX_ IF THE SUB-SYSTEM TO BE USED INDICATES | | | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | 22) THE SHEET S4.1 DETAIL# 1 INDICATES THE TRELLIS | | | ASSEMBLY AND NOA'S: | | | USP C88 NOA 07-0306.06 | | | USP RT7 NOA07-0306.10 | | | USPKCB88 FL 822.149 | | | ALL THREE OF THE LISTED ABOVE WILL NEED TO MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF 18-20. | | | | | | 23) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 24) 3RD REQUEST, ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE DEFICIENT IN | | | INFORMATION FOR THE ENERGY CODE AND CALCULATIONS, | | | 106.3.5(9) &106.3.5.1.4(1) & 13-400.0.ABC COMPLIANCE | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | 24A) THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDING DOES NOT | | | CALCULATE, THE TOTAL GROSS AREA TAKEN FROM LS1.0 | | | EQUALLS 11,159 SQ FT NOT THE 9854 LISTED. SHEET A-700 | | | ROOM FINISHES LIST 9540 SQ FT. PLEASE SEE THE TOTAL | | | AREA ON THE ENERGY CALCULATION AS 8913 SQUARE FEET. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-413-05.2AB.2 GROSS FLOOR AREA. THE GROSS | | | FLOOR ASSEMBLIES OVER OUTSIDE OR UNCONDITIONED SPACES | | | CONSEST OF THE TOTAL FLOOR ASSEMBLY EXPOSED TO OUTSIDE | | | AIR OR UNCONDITIONED SPACE. THE FLOOR ASWSEMBLY SHALL | | | INCLUDE ALL FLOOR COMPONENTS THROUGH WHICH HEAT MAY | | | FLOW BETWEEN INDOOR AND OUTDOOR OR UNCONDITIONED SPACE | | | ENVIROMENTS. PLEASE CORRECT THE SQUARE FLOOR AREA TO | | | REFLECT THE TOTAL GROSS AREA. | | | | | | 24B) SHEET A-700 FLOOR FINISHES INDICATES 2730 SQ FT OF | | | FLOOR THAT DOES NOT HAVE CARPET AND PADDING AS A | | | INSULATOR BUT DOES NOT SHOW UP ONT THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATION. NOT ALSO THE GENERATOR ROOM AND ELECTRIC | | | ROOM FLOORS WILL NOT HAVE CARPET AND PADDING INSULATED | | | VALUE WAS TAKEN. 13-405.2AB | | | | | | 24C) ZONE AC-3 WINDOWS ARE MISSING THE CLERESTORY | | | WINDOWS (1) 26'-6"X3'-6" AND (2) 16'-2"X3'-6". WINDOWS | | | 25,26 & 27. 13-401.2AB.2 | | | | | | 24D) HEADING OF DOORS IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | INDICATE IIN ZONE 1 SOLID CORE DOORS WHEREAS THE PLANS | | | CALL OUT FOR DOOR TYPE A & B TO BE HOLLOW CORE METAL | | | DOORS. | | | | | | 24E) ROOF INSULATION, PLANS DO NOT CALL OUT THE ACTUAL | | | THICKNESS OF INSULATION NOR THE TYPE OF INSULATION TO | | | BE INSTALLED. NOR HAS THE ROFING NOAS BENN PROVIDED AND | | | SUB-SYSTEMS CIRCLED INDICATING THE TYPE OF ROOFING AND | | | APPROPRIATE INSULATION PROVIDED. SEE A-602. | | | 13-404.1AB.1/ 13-404.2AB.3. | | | | | | 25) COMPLIED. | | | | | | RENOVATIONS TO THE EXISTING NORTH WING | | | | | | 26A) THE DESIGN TEAM HAS DRAWWN AN ASSUMED PROPERTY | | | LINE BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS AND DECLARED THE | | | BUILDING WITH RENOVATION TO BE A A-3 OCCUPANCY AND | | | BUILDING TYPE III-B WITH ALLOWABLE AREA OF 9500 SQ FT. | | | SHEET A-100 PROJECT DATA INDICATES THE FOOTPRINT TO BE | | | 17, 600 SQ FT EVEN WITH COMPUTING AREA INCREASES WITH | | | F/P THE ALLOWABLE INCREASE OF 5903 BRINGS THE ALLOWABLE | | | AREA UP TO 15,403. NO AREA INCREASES WERE TAKEN FOR | | | FIRE SPRINKLERS, AT A MINIMUM THIS BUILDING WOULD NEED | | | TO BE A TYPE III-A SEE TABLE 601AND 602.3. INTERIOR | | | BUILDING ELEMENTS ARE OF ANY MATERIAL PERMITTED BY THIS | | | CODE. | | | | | | | | | 26B) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 26C) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 27-29) COMPLIED. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-05-30 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
5.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-05-30 |
Time |
09:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-30 13:39:15 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADD: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: :(PLAN REVIEW/ MAJOR WORKING DRAWING) | | | TEL: (561644-7416 JEFF HALVERSON | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | MAY 30,2008 | | | 2NDREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A)INFORMATIONAL,WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A | | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD | | | BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE | | | SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM | | | BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE 3 SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS SINCE | | | IT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR , 109.3.7*. | | | | | | 1C)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 1D) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) | | | AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC | | | BUILDING WITH THE2007 REVISIONS. NOTE IF THE PLANS | | | SUBMITTED AS A MAJOR WORKING DRAWING HAVE NOT BEEN | | | CONVERTED INTO A PERMIT APPLICATION BEFORE OCT. 1,2008 | | | THE PLANS WILL NEED TO BE REDESIGNED TO THE 2007 | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 1E) 2ND REQUEST,THE MAJOR WORKING DRAWING REVIEW | | | UNDER SCOPE OF PROJECT INDICATES A 10,000 SQ FT | | | MULTIPURPOSE BUILDING, PLEASE ADD THE RENOVATION TO THE | | | EXISTING BUILDING TO THE APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2) DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REQUIREMENTS: | | | | | | 2A)PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS | | | PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE DOCUMENT. | | | FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS | | | FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS | | | IN BOTH SETS OF PLANS FOR THE NEW GAINES PARK COMMUNITY | | | CENTER AND THE NORTHWEST WING RENOVATIONS THE | | | COVERSHEETS ARE NOTSIGNED, SEALED OR DATED. | | | | | | | | | 2B) 481.219 F.S.CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION.THE | | | TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN | | | ARCHITECT PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A | | | CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ARCHITECTURAL | | | SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF | | | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER.ADD THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET. | | | THIS MAY BE ADDED BY HAND. | | | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT | | | BA ARCHITECTURAL | | | PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF | | | BUSSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION OF YOUR | | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION, I CAN NOT FIND IT ON THE | | | WEBSITE. | | | | | | 2C)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 3) 2ND REQUEST, NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 106.1.2 | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN | | | NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION REQUESTED ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR | | | THAT WERE NOT PART OF THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | 3A) 10.2* W. P. B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, INFORMATION | | | THAT IS REQUIRED FOR RECORD KEEPING & FOR CERTIFICATE | | | OF OCCUPANCY: | | | A) THE EDITION OF THE CODE UNDER WHICH THE PROJECT IS | | | DESIGNED. | | | | | | PLEASE SEE SHEET A-100 PROJECT CRITERIA DOES NOT | | | INDICATE TO WHAT CODE THIS BUILDING IS DESIGNED TOO. | | | PLEASE SEE STRUCTURAL SHEET S-3.1 STILL INDICATES THE | | | 2004 FBC WITH 2006 AMENDMENTS. THE 2007 AMENDMENTS | | | CLEARLY ARE AFFECTED BY WIND. | | | | | | B) COMPLIED. | | | C) 2ND REQUEST,THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION AS DEFINED IN | | | CHAPTER 5 & 6, TABLE 503 & 601. 106.3.5(3) MINIMUM TYPE | | | OF CONSTRUCTION SEE TABLE 503 PLANS INDICATE TYPE I | | | CONSTRUCTIONTHERE IS NO CONFIRMATION AS TO TYPE 1A 3HR | | | FIRE RATINGS OR TYPE 1B 2HR FIRE RATINGS,NOTE SEE | | | TABLE 601 FOR FIRE RATINGS. | | | | | | D) COMPLIED. | | | | | | E)2ND REQUEST, IF AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS | | | PROVIDED NEITHER SHEET G-100 THE INDEX OF DRAWINGS, | | | LS-1.0 NOR A-100 PROJECT CRITERIA LIST THE REQUIRED | | | FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS NOR THE INSTALATION OF A NFPA 13 | | | SYSTEM. SECTION 903.2.1.3 (2) REQUIRES A SPRINKLER | | | SYSTEM WHEN IN A A-3 OCCUPANCYWHEN THERE IS A | | | OCCUPANCY EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 300. THIS IS A | | | REQUIRED SYSTEM. | | | F)2ND REQUESTWHETHER THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS | | | REQUIRED. SEE SECTION 903.2.1.3(2). | | | G) ANY SPECIAL STIPULATIONS & CONDITIONS OF THE | | | BUILDING PERMIT | | | H) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 3B) 2ND REQUEST, THE S-3.1 INDICATES THE WIND DESIGN | | | FROM ASCE 7-02FOR THE BUILDING, PLEASE REVIEW THE | | | BUILDINGS CATEGORY AND IMPORTANCE FACTOR. PLEASE REVIEW | | | SHEET A-101 & A-102 FOR OCCUPANCY. AS INDICATED THESE | | | SHEETS INDICATE THE CAPABILITY OF 300 PEOPLE WITH THE | | | ACTUAL OCCUPANT LOAD BEING QUIET HIGHER. PLEASE SEE | | | ASCE 7-02 TABLE 1-1 BUILDING CATEGORY III,WITH A | | | IMPORTANCE FACOR OF 1.15 BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES | | | WHERE MORE THAN 300 PEOPLE CONGREGATE IN ONE AREA. | | | PLEASE REVISE THE BUILDING CATEGORY AND IMPORTANCE | | | FACTOR. SEE UPPER LEFT HAND PORTION OF THE SHEET STILL | | | INDICATES 1.0 IMPORTANCE FACTOR. | | | | | | 3C) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 4) 2ND REQUEST, THE LIFE SAFETY SHEET LS-100 INDICATES | | | FOR THE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM THE USE OF 15 NET. TABLE | | | 1004.1.2 ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM OCCUPANT LOAD FOR | | | WHICH THE EGRESS FACILITIES MUST BE DESIGNED. THE | | | FACTORS ARE NOT BASED ON THE NORMAL OCCUPANCY, BUT , ON | | | THE MAXIMUM OCCUPANT LOAD SCENARIO, A WORST CASE | | | PROBABILITY. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THE FACTORS ARE | | | NOT BASED ON THE OCCUPANCY CLASS OF THE BUILDING, BUT , | | | ON THE USE OF THE AREA OR SPACE. PLEASE RECALCULATE THE | | | EGRESS CAPACITIES FOR THE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM AT THE | | | WORST CASE SCENARIO @ 5 AND ASSOCIATED EXITS. | | | | | | 5A) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5B)2ND REQUEST, AT THIS TIME BECAUSE OF THE UNKNOWN | | | BUILDING FACTORS THIS COMMENT MAY OR MAY NOT APPLY IN | | | FUTURE REVIEWS:FBC* 109.3.7RESIDENT INSPECTOR. | | | SUBMIT INSPECTOR RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO | | | HAROLD PISKURA, DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR | | | PROGRAM. A | | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS | | | PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR MORE OF | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | XXX - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II CONSTRUCTION | | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS XXX - STRUCTURES IN | | | WHICH THE CONCRETEDESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE | | | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI - PILE DRIVING | | | COLUMNS, WALLS, BEAMS 4,000 PSI S-3.1. | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQ FT IN AREA | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR | | | METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION | | | | | | FORMS FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR WILL BE ATTACHED AND | | | WILL NEED TO BE FILED OUT AND RETURNED TO HAROLD | | | PISKURA DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM. | | | | | | 6)2ND REQUEST,L-3.0 LANDSCAPE PAVING PLAN PLEASE | | | PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITHIN THEBOUNDARY OF THE | | | SITE TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, ACCESSIBLE PARKING, | | | PASSENGER LOADING ZONES SIDEWALKS TO AN ACCESSIBLE | | | ENTRANCE. 11-4.1.2(1)-(5). SHEET A-100 & L-3.0 DO NOT | | | REFLECT THE SAME ROUTE FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING TO | | | THE NEW BUILDING. A-100 INDICATES A SIDEWALK THAT | | | ALLOWS WHEELCHAIRS TO TRAVEL INFRON T OF THE PARKED | | | VEHICLES WHILE L-3.0 STILL FORCES THE WHEELCHAIR USER | | | TO TRAVEL BEHIND THE PARKED VEHICLE, PLEASE COORDINATE | | | PLANS.11-4.6.2. | | | | | | 7) 2ND REQUEST, THE RESPONCE SHEET INDICATED TO REFER | | | TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE NOTES, WHERE. SHET L-3.0 PAVING | | | MATERIALSSCHEDULE DOES NOT INDICATE THE USE OF | | | DETECTABLE WARNING TEXTURES11-4.29.2. INDICATE | | | COMPLIANCE WITH: 11-4.29.5 DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT | | | HAZARDOUS VEHICULAR AREAS. | | | | | | 8)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 9) 2ND REQUEST, RESPONCE SHEET REFERS TO CIVIL SHEET | | | C-4 , PLEASE INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH : PASSENGER | | | LOADING ZONES PLEASE PROVIDE ACCESS AISLE FOR PASSENGER | | | LOADING ZONE SEE FIGURE 10, AND COMPLIANCE WITH | | | 11-4.29.5/ 11-4.6.6. | | | | | | 10) SEMI-COMPLIED. SHEET A-1.00 INDICATES A CUT SECTION | | | THROUGH THE DISABLED PARKING SPOTS DETAIL# 1 SHEET | | | A-603, SHEET IS MISSING. THE RESPONCE SHEET INDICATES | | | TO SEE A-605 DETAIL# 1. THE HANDICAPPED SIGNAGE | | | INDICATES 2 AREAS TO LOCATE THIS SECTION : | | | 10A) DETAIL 16 A-603 | | | 10B) DETAIL 5 A-604 | | | NEITHER OF THESE SECTION PORVIDE THE HANDICAPPED SIGN | | | HEIGHTS. | | | | | | 11-12) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 13)2ND REQUEST, SHEET A-1 DOES INDICATE WALL TAGS | | | INDICATING WALLS BUT THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE A DETAIL | | | SHEET IDENTIFYING WALL TYPES, THE INDEX LIST A-600 FOR | | | WALL DETAILS , THERE ARE NO WALL DETAILS PROVIDING WALL | | | TYPES AND FIRE RATING, PLEASE SEE TABLE 1016.1. FOR | | | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RATING OF CORRIDOR. | | | ENTRANCE HALLWAY 152 IS THE EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR FOR | | | THE MULTI-PURPOSE ASSEMBLY ROOM 146 , SEE TABLE 1016.1 | | | REQUIRES A 1 HR RATED CORRIDOR FOR EITHER | | | NON-SPRINKLERED OR SPRINKLERED BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 14) SEMI-COMPLIED, PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE AND A THROUGH | | | REVIEW CAN NOT BE COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. | | | 106.3.5 WILL PROVIDE THE MINIMUM CRITERIA AND DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 15) SEMI-COMPLIED. | | | | | | 16-17) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 18)2ND REQUEST, FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 3COPIES OF ALL REPORTSFORTHRESHOLD | | | OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS | | | ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | A) WINDOWS FIXED: STOREFRONT , CURTAIN WALL | | | B) WINDOWSOPERABLE WINDOWS: SINGLE HUNG, CASEMENT | | | C) MULLIONS | | | D) GLASS BLOCK | | | E) GLAZED SWING DOORS | | | F) AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOORS | | | G) HOLLOW METAL DOORS EXTERIOR | | | H) OVERHEAD DOORS | | | I) TRUSS ANCHORS | | | J) ROOF HATCHES | | | K) ROOF ASSEMBLIES | | | L) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS | | | | | | 19)2ND REQUEST,106.3PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED | | | WITH PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE | | | REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE | | | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER | | | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, | | | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. | | | | | | 20) 2ND REQUEST, WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATEDBY DCA | | | RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY | | | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR | | | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 21) 2ND REQUEST,THIS ROOF IS MISSING PRODUCT | | | COMPLIANCE REPORTS WITH THE FOLLOW ITEMS: | | | __XX_ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. | | | __XX_ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SUB-SYSTEM TO | | | BE USED. | | | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW PRESSURE FOR ZONE | | | _2&3__ . | | | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD | | | THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED, AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER | | | SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA | | | REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | __XX_ IF THE SUB-SYSTEM TO BE USED INDICATES | | | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCEDFASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | 22) THE SHEET S4.1 DETAIL# 1 INDICATES THE TRELLIS | | | ASSEMBLY AND NOA'S: | | | USP C88 NOA 07-0306.06 | | | USP RT7 NOA07-0306.10 | | | USPKCB88 FL 822.149 | | | ALL THREE OF THE LISTED ABOVE WILL NEED TO MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF 18-20. | | | | | | 23) 2ND REQUEST,A-104 ROOF PLAN FAILS TO IDENTIFY | | | ROOF DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND OR DETAILS, THE ROOF DRAIN | | | SIZE IS NOT PROVIDED, WHAT TYPE OF SECONDARY DRAINAGE | | | AND VERTICAL CONTRIBUTING AREAS, THIS INFORMATION IS | | | ALSO MISSING FROM THE PLUMBING PLAN. 106.3.5.1.1(8). | | | OVERFLOWS ARE NOT SIZED, FBC BUILDING 1503.4.3 OVERFLOW | | | SCUPPERS SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FBC | | | PLUMBING CODE. | | | | | | 24) 2ND REQUEST,ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE DEFICIENT IN | | | INFORMATION FOR THE ENERGY CODE AND CALCULATIONS, | | | 106.3.5(9) &106.3.5.1.4(1) & 13-400.0.ABC COMPLIANCE | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | 25) COMPLIED.E | | | | | | | | | RENOVATION OF EXISTING NORTH WING : | | | | | | | | | 26A)SEMI-COMPLIED,SHEET A-100 PROJECT CRITERIA | | | INDICATES THIS BUILDING IS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A TYPE I | | | BUILDING, IS THIS A TYPE IA BUILDING WITH 3HR FIRE | | | PROTECTION OR TYPE IB WITH A 2 HR FIRE PROTECTION OF | | | STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS, IN EITHERCASE THERE WOULD BE NO | | | WOOD TRUSSES AND OR ROOF SHEATHING. PLEASE INDICATE | | | MINIMUMBUILDING TYPE. | | | | | | THE OTHER ISSUE IS THIS BUILDING BE FIRE SPRINKLERED ? | | | IS THE FIRE SPRINKLER REQUIRED? | | | THESE QUESTIONS NEED TO BE ANSWERED TO KNOW IF THE | | | CORRIDORS WILL REQUIRE RATED CORRIDORS,SEE TABLE 1016.1 | | | FOR DAY CARE OCCUPANCIES. | | | THE PLANS INDICATE SOME OF THE DOORS BEING RATED BUT | | | THERE ARE MANY NEW DOORS AND EXISTING DOOR FRAMES AND | | | THE NEW DOORS ARE NOT RATED. WE STILL CAN NOT DO A | | | COMPLETE REVIEW WITHOUT THE | | | ABOVE INFORMATION PROVIDED. | | | | | | 26B) SEMI- COMPLIED. SEE THE ABOVE STATEMENTS. | | | | | | 26C) 2ND REQUEST, PLEASE ALSO INDICATE TO WHAT LEVEL | | | ALTERATION WORK WILL ACCOMPLISHED UNDER THIS PERMIT. | | | PLEASE SEE 2004 FBC EXISTING BUILDING CODE 301.1.THE | | | WORK PREFORMED ON AN EXISTING BUILDING SHALL BE | | | CLASSIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER.RESPONCE | | | INDICATES NOTES ON G-100 & A-101.PLANS DO NOT INDICATE | | | LEVEL OF ALTERATION IN EITHER THE APPLICABLE CODE OR | | | PROJECT CRITERIA. | | | | | | 27) SEMI-COMPLIED THE DOOR SCHEDULE DOES NOW INDICATES | | | ALOT OF NEW DOORS WITH EXISTING DOOR FRAMES BUT NO FIRE | | | RATING, WITH NOT HAVING INFORMATION IF THERE IS FIRE | | | SPRINKLERS OR IF THERE WILL BE FIRE SPRINKLERS ADDED, | | | WE NEED TO KNOW THIS INFORMATION TO DETERMINE THROUGH | | | TABLE 1016.1 FIRE RATINGS FOR CORRIDORS. | | | | | | 28) COMPLIED- NO ROOF WORK UNDER THIS PERMIT FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 29) NEW COMMENT DOOR # 5 IS A NEW OPENING, WILL NEED TO | | | COMPLY WITH 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT DOORS. | | | MINIMUM MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT | | | AUTOMATIC OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN FIG. | | | 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED | | | CLEARANCES SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. REQUIRES 18" ON THE | | | LATCH SIDE. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER CBO | | | PLAN REVIEW II | | | TEL:(561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-10-26 |
Time |
14:13 |
Rev Time |
14.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-10-25 |
Time |
09:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-26 14:15:06 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07100001 | | | ADD: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | CONT: :?PLAN REVIEW/ MAJOR WORKING DRAWING? | | | TEL: (561644-7416 JEFF HALVERSON | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A) --- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. | | | IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF | | | YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A | | | THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID | | | DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* | | | /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS WEST PALM BEACH | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | | | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & | | | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM | | | OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, | | | WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE | | | TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO | | | THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE OR | | | IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED | | | AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION | | | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE | | | LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND | | | SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS | | | OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND | | | REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | | | 1D) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) | | | AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC | | | BUILDING WITH THE 2007 REVISIONS. | | | | | | 1E) THE MAJOR WORKING DRAWING REVIEW UNDER SCOPE OF | | | PROJECT INDICATES A 10,000 SQ FT MULTIPURPOSE BUILDING, | | | PLEASE ADD THE RENOVATION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING TO | | | THE APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2) DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REQUIREMENTS: | | | | | | 2A) PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS | | | PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE DOCUMENT. | | | FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS | | | FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS | | | | | | 2B) 481.219 F.S. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION. THE | | | TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN | | | ARCHITECT PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A | | | CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ARCHITECTURAL | | | SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF | | | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. ADD THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET. | | | THIS MAY BE ADDED BY HAND. | | | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT | | | BA ARCHITECTURAL | | | | | | 2C) 471.023 F.S. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION. THE | | | TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN | | | ENGINEER PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A | | | CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF | | | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. | | | ADD THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET. THIS MAY BE ADDED BY | | | HAND. | | | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER | | | MEP ENGINEER | | | CIVIL ENGINEER | | | | | | 3) NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION REQUIRED. A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE | | | AT THIS TIME, AS A RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | | REQUESTED ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT | | | PART OF THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | 3A) 10.2* W. P. B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, INFORMATION | | | THAT IS REQUIRED FOR RECORD KEEPING & FOR CERTIFICATE | | | OF OCCUPANCY: | | | A) THE EDITION OF THE CODE UNDER WHICH THE PROJECT IS | | | DESIGNED. | | | B) THE USE AND OCCUPANCY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3& 106.3.5.1.1(3). | | | C) THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION AS DEFINED IN CHAPTER 5 & | | | 6, TABLE 503 & 601. | | | D) THE OCCUPANT LOAD, SEE 1004. | | | E) IF AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS PROVIDED F) | | | WHETHER THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED. | | | G) ANY SPECIAL STIPULATIONS & CONDITIONS OF THE | | | BUILDING PERMIT | | | H) SQ. FT. FOOTPRINT | | | | | | 3B) THE S-3.1 INDICATES THE WIND DESIGN FROM ASCE | | | 7-02FOR THE BUILDING, PLEASE REVIEW THE BUILDINGS | | | CATEGORY AND IMPORTANCE FACTOR. PLEASE REVIEW SHEET | | | A-101 & A-102 FOR OCCUPANCY. AS INDICATED THESE SHEETS | | | INDICATE THE CAPABILITY OF 350 PEOPLE WITH THE ACTUAL | | | OCCUPANT LOAD BEING QUIET HIGHER. PLEASE SEE ASCE 7-02 | | | TABLE 1-1 BUILDING CATEGORY III, | | | BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES WHERE MORE THAN 300 | | | PEOPLE CONGREGATE IN ONE AREA. PLEASE REVISE THE | | | BUILDING CATEGORY AND IMPORTANCE FACTOR. | | | | | | 3C) THE ABOVE CORRECTION OF BUILDING CATEGORY AND | | | IMPORTANCE FACTOR WILL ALSO EFFECT THE | | | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING PRESSURES FOR THE WINDOWS AND | | | DOORS AS WELL AS THE ROOF ASSEMBLIES. ASCE 7-02 | | | COMPONENTS & CLADDING ?METHOD 1FIGURE 6-3, WALLS & | | | ROOFS, | | | AND HEIGHT ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF | | | 18?-3? , ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.29 FOR 20 FT. . | | | | | | 4) THE LIFE SAFETY SHEET A-800 IS TOTALLY | | | BLANK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE PROVIDE A MEANS OF EGRESS | | | PLAN LIFE SAFETY PLAN AND PROVIDE THE OCCUPANT LOADS | | | THAT WILL BE GOING THROUGH EACH OF THE EGRESSES. SEE | | | TABLE 1004.1.2, TABLE 1005. | | | | | | 5A) ONE CONCERN IS THE ANSWER TO QUESTION 3C, THE PLANS | | | ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE NEW | | | BUILDING AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, WHERE IF NEEDED, | | | ASSUMED PROPERTY LINES WOULD BE PLACED FOR THE AMOUNT | | | OF ALLOWABLE OPENINGS, WITH OR WITHOUT OPENING | | | PROTECTIVE?S FOR EACH BUILDING. | | | | | | THE OTHER UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME IS IF THE DESIGN TEAM | | | WERE TO DESIGN THIS UNDER THE CODE SECTION 503.1.3, TWO | | | BUILDINGS ON THE SAME LOT, THESE TYPE ISSUES NEED TO BE | | | ADDRESSED BEFORE WE CAN REVIEW FOR ALLOWABLE AREAS, | | | FIRE RESISTANCE, TABLE 601, TABLE 602 AND TABLE 704.8. | | | | | | 5B) AT THIS TIME BECAUSE OF THE UNKNOWN BUILDING | | | FACTORS THIS COMMENT MAY OR MAY NOT APPLY IN FUTURE | | | REVIEWS: FBC* 109.3.7 RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT | | | INSPECTOR RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD | | | PISKURA, DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM. A | | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS | | | PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR MORE OF | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II CONSTRUCTION - | | | ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE DESIGN IS BASED ON | | | COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI - PILE | | | DRIVING | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQ FT IN AREA | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR METHODS OF | | | CONSTRUCTION | | | | | | 6) L-3.0 LANDSCAPE PAVING PLAN PLEASE PROVIDE AN | | | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO | | | PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, ACCESSIBLE PARKING, PASSENGER | | | LOADING ZONES SIDEWALKS TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. | | | 11-4.1.2(1)-(5) | | | | | | 7) INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH: 11-4.29.5 DETECTABLE | | | WARNINGS AT HAZARDOUS VEHICULAR AREAS. | | | | | | 8) SHEET L-3 AND A-1.00 BOTH INDICATE A COVERED DROP | | | OFF OR PASSENGER LOADING ZONE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE CLEAR | | | ELEVATION UNDERNEATH THE CANOPY. 11-4.6.5. | | | | | | 9) PASSENGER LOADING ZONES PLEASE PROVIDE ACCESS AISLE | | | INDICATE CONDITIONS AT CURB OR DROPPED CURB AND | | | COMPLIANCE WITH 11-4.29.5/ 11-4.6.6. | | | | | | 10) SHEET A-1.00 INDICATES A CUT SECTION THROUGH THE | | | DISABLED PARKING SPOTS DETAIL# 1 SHEET | | | A-603, SHEET IS MISSING. PLANS ARE NOT COMPLETE, | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED 106.1.2. | | | | | | 11) SHEET L-5.0 & E-1 INDICATES LIGHT POLES TO BE USED | | | IN THE PARKING LOT, FOR EACH TYPE OF LIGHT POLE AND | | | CONFIGURATION OF LIGHTS SUPPLY CALCULATIONS FOR | | | INSTALLATION TO 140 MPH WIND ZONE: 1805.7 DESIGNS | | | EMPLOYING LATERAL BEARING. DESIGNS TO RESIST BOTH AXIAL | | | AND LATERAL LOADS EMPLOYING POSTS OR POLES AS COLUMNS | | | EMBEDDED IN EARTH OR EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE FOOTINGS IN | | | THE EARTH SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS | | | 1805.7.1 THROUGH 1805.7.3 . | | | | | | 12) SHEET A-1 IN ROOM # 148 INDICATES THIS TO BE A | | | GENERATOR ROOM. PLEASE PROVIDE CUT SHEETS FOR THE | | | GENERATOR, TYPE OF FUEL, TANK SIZE AND REQUIREMENTS | | | INDICATE LOCATION ON SITE PLAN, IS THIS A ABOVE THE | | | GROUND TYPE TANK OR BURIED. WILL THIS BUILDING EVER BE | | | USED FOR A HURRICANE SHELTER, THIS MAY EFFECT AMOUNTS | | | OF FUEL TO BE REQUIRED.\ | | | | | | 13) SHEET A-1 DOES INDICATE WALL TAGS INDICATING WALLS | | | BUT THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE A DETAIL SHEET IDENTIFYING | | | WALL TYPES, THE INDEX LIST A-600 FOR WALL DETAILS , | | | THERE ARE NO WALL DETAILS PROVIDING WALL TYPES AND FIRE | | | RATING, PLEASE SEE TABLE 1016.1. FOR ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY | | | AND FIRE RATING OF CORRIDOR. | | | | | | 14) PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE AND A THROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT | | | BE COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. | | | 106.3.5 WILL PROVIDE THE MINIMUM CRITERIA AND DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 15) THERE ARE NUMEROUS A-SHEETS THAT HAVE ARCHITECTURAL | | | DETAILS BUT THERE IS NO WRITTEN INFORMATION PROVIDED, | | | PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE.106.3.5.1.1(4) SEE FIRE RESISTANCE | | | CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 16) SHEET A-101 INDICATES WHAT APPEARS TO BE A STAGE | | | AND STAIRS ON THE WEST END OF THE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM, | | | SEE SECTION# 7 SHEET A-800 FOR DETAIL, SHEET A-800 IS A | | | BLANK SHEET THAT IS SUPPOSE TO BE THE LIFE SAFETY | | | SHEET. IF THIS IS A STAGE PLEASE PROVIDE VERTICAL | | | ACCESSIBILITY, AND ALSO PROVIDE DETAILS FOR STAIRS AND | | | HANDRAIL. 11-4.1.3(5). | | | | | | 17) NEW BUILDING STRUCTURAL, S 3-1 PLANS ARE MISSING | | | INFORMATION ON THE MASONRY WALL SCHEDULE 106.1.2 | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 18) FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, | | | PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) | | | OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS | | | FOLLOWS: | | | A) WINDOWS FIXED: STOREFRONT , CURTAIN WALL | | | B) WINDOWS OPERABLE WINDOWS: SINGLE HUNG, CASEMENT C) | | | MULLIONS | | | D) GLASS BLOCK | | | E) GLAZED SWING DOORS | | | F) AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOORS | | | G) HOLLOW METAL DOORS EXTERIOR | | | H) OVERHEAD DOORS | | | I) TRUSS ANCHORS | | | J) ROOF HATCHES | | | K) ROOF ASSEMBLIES | | | L) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS | | | | | | 19) 106.3 PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO | | | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR | | | INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE | | | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER | | | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, | | | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. | | | | | | 20) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 21) THIS ROOF IS MISSING PRODUCT COMPLIANCE REPORTS | | | WITH THE FOLLOW ITEMS: | | | __XX_ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. | | | __XX_ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SUB-SYSTEM TO | | | BE USED. | | | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW PRESSURE FOR ZONE | | | _2&3__ . | | | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD | | | THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED, AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER | | | SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA | | | REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | __XX_ IF THE SUB-SYSTEM TO BE USED INDICATES | | | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | 22) THE SHEET S4.1 DETAIL# 1 INDICATES THE TRELLIS | | | ASSEMBLY AND NOA?S: | | | NOA 03-0508.05 POST CAPS EXPIRED | | | NOA 05-0105.05 RAFTER CLIPS EXPIRED | | | | | | 23) A-104 ROOF PLAN FAILS TO IDENTIFY ROOF DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM AND OR DETAILS, THE ROOF DRAIN SIZE IS NOT | | | PROVIDED, WHAT TYPE OF SECONDARY DRAINAGE AND VERTICAL | | | CONTRIBUTING AREAS, THIS INFORMATION IS ALSO MISSING | | | FROM THE PLUMBING PLAN. 106.3.5.1.1(8). | | | | | | 24) ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE DEFICIENT IN INFORMATION | | | FOR THE ENERGY CODE AND CALCULATIONS, | | | 106.3.5(9) &106.3.5.1.4(1) & 13-400.0.ABC COMPLIANCE | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | 25) ELEVATIONS OF THE BREAK ROOM ARE NOT SHOWN, PLEASE | | | PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH : | | | 11-4.24.2 SINKS, HEIGHT. SINKS SHALL BE MOUNTED WITH | | | THE COUNTER NO HIGHER | | | THAN 34" ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR. | | | 11-4.24.3 KNEE CLEARANCE THAT IS AT LEAST 27" HIGH 30" | | | WIDE, AND 19" DEEP SHALL BE PROVIDED UNDERNEATH SINKS. | | | 11-4.24.5 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE. A CLEAR FLOOR SPACE AT | | | LEAST 30 INCHES BY 48 INCHES (760 MM BY 1219 MM) | | | COMPLYING WITH SECTION 11-4.2.4 SHALL BE PROVIDED IN | | | FRONT OF A SINK TO ALLOW FORWARD APPROACH. THE CLEAR | | | FLOOR SPACE SHALL BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND SHALL | | | EXTEND A MAXIMUM OF 19 INCHES (485 MM) UNDERNEATH THE | | | SINK | | | | | | RENOVATION OF EXISTING NORTH WING : | | | | | | 26A) UNTIL THE DESIGN TEAM INDICATES UNDER THE NEW | | | BUILDING PORTION OF THIS REVIEW COMMENT# 5, A REVIEW | | | CAN NOT TAKE PLACE WITH ANY ACCURACY, IF THE NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE CONSIDERED AN ADDITION TO THE | | | EXISTING BUILDING, OR IF THE TWO BUILDINGS ARE GOING TO | | | BE CONSIDERED ONE LARGE BUILDING OR IF A ASSUMED | | | PROPERTY LINE WILL BE ASSUMED BETWEEN THE TWO | | | BUILDINGS. TABLE 503, TABLE 601, TABLE 602 & TABLE | | | 704.8. | | | | | | 26B) THE D-100 PLAN APPEARS THE ONLY WORK TO BE | | | COMPLETED IN THE NORTH WING IS IN CLASSROOM# 140. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED ACCOUNTING OF WHAT WORK WILL | | | BE COMPLETED UNDER THE RENOVATION PORTION OF THE | | | PERMIT. | | | | | | 26C) PLEASE ALSO INDICATE TO WHAT LEVEL ALTERATION WORK | | | WILL ACCOMPLISHED UNDER THIS PERMIT. PLEASE SEE 2004 | | | FBC EXISTING BUILDING CODE 301.1.THE WORK PREFORMED ON | | | AN EXISTING BUILDING SHALL BE CLASSIFIED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THIS CHAPTER. | | | | | | 27) INCOMPLETE PLANS SHEET A-700 FINISH SCHEDULE IS | | | BLANK FOR CEILING AND WALLS, THE DOOR SCHEDULE IS BLANK | | | TO DOOR TYPE, FRAMES AND DOOR LABELS. WINDOW SCHEDULE | | | DOESN?T INDICATE | | | WHAT WINDOWS ARE TO BE REPLACED ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND | | | WHICH ARE EXISTING. | | | | | | 28) PLEASE INDICATE IF ANY ROOFING WORK WILL TAKE PLACE | | | ON THE EXISTING BUILDING. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER CBO | | | PLAN REVIEW II | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
Time |
10:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
Time |
09:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-24 10:12:43 | ** SEPARATE NOTE FROM PROVISO** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: SCOPE OF WORK HAS INCREASED. APPLIED VALUE FOR | | | SCOPE OF WORK NEEDS TO BE INCREASED FOR ADDITIONAL | | | SCOPE OF WORK NOT PART OF ORIGINAL PLANS. | | | FBC 108.3 | | 2009-11-24 10:04:41 | ** PROVISO ** | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE UPDATE PANEL SCHEDULES FOR ALL | | | CIRCUITING TO BE SPECIFIC TO ROOMS AND AREAS WHICH THEY | | | FEED. FOR EXAMPLE. | | | | | | S-7, RECEPTACLES ROOM 101, ETC. | | | MAY BE ALPHA OR NUMERIC. | | | | | | 408.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-27 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-27 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-27 10:53:06 | NO ELECTRICAL COMMENTS ON THE IDR OF THE SUBMITTED | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS. HOWEVER CALCULATIONS WILL NOT GET | | | ELECTRICAL STAMPS/SIGN OFF AS THERE ARE ITEMS ON THE | | | IDR FOR OTHER TRADES WHICH DO NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-19 11:36:37 | REV #6 ON E-3 OK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-06-26 |
Time |
12:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-06-26 |
Time |
12:11 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-26 12:12:16 | LIFT STATION REVISION, E3 AND 4 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-01-05 |
Time |
10:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-01-05 |
Time |
10:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-18 11:41:09 | ** DENIED 6TH REVIEW ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO FS | | | 471.025 AND FAC 61G15-23.002. PLANS ARE STILL BEING | | | SUBMITTED WITHOUT ORIGINAL SIGNATURES. | | | SOME SHEETS IN EACH OF THE 6 SIX SETS ARE SIGNED IN | | | LEAD PENCIL, SOME IN COLOR PENCILS, AND SOME IN EACH | | | SET ARE ONCE AGAIN STAMPED WITH THE USE OF A RUBBER | | | STAMP IN LIEU OF ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. | | | IF ALL SHEETS IN ALL SETS HAD BEEN SIGNED AS REQUIRED | | | BY THE ABOVE SECTIONS, THE ELECTRICAL REVIEW WOULD HAVE | | | BEEN PASSED AND ALL ELECTRICAL SHEETS WOULD HAVE BEEN | | | STAMPED. | | | | | | ALL SHEETS IN ALL SETS HAVE NOW BEEN RETAINED AND WILL | | | BE FORWARDED TO THE STATE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL | | | ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW OF SAID PLANS. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
Time |
08:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
Time |
17:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-24 08:23:49 | | | | | | | | | | ** FAILED RESUBMITTED PLAN REVIEW ** | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PERMIT APPLICATION HAS STILL NOT BEEN MADE. | | | PLANS SUBMITTED FOR *PLAN REVIEW** | | | | | | 2) NOTE: ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS THERE WERE PLANS SUBMITTED | | | WHICH CONTAINED A *RUBBER STAMP* FOR THE ENGINEER IN | | | LIEU OF THE REQUIRED ORIGINAL SIGNATURE PER FS 471.025 | | | AND FAC 61G15-23.002. THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN MADE TO | | | THIS SAME ENGINEER ON MANY PROJECTS AND ON THIS SAME | | | PROJECT ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS FOR BOTH BUILDINGS. | | | RESPONSE MENTIONS PLANS WILL BE SIGNED DATED AND SEALED | | | HOWEVER THE NEW SHEETS NOW SUBMITTED DO NOT CONTAIN AN | | | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED ANYWHERE IN | | | THE STATE OF FLORIDA. | | | CONTACT WITH THE FLORIDA BOARD OF ENGINEERS HAS BEEN | | | MADE AND PLANS WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE STATE WITH ALL | | | PREVIOUS RETAINED PLANS FOR THE REVIEW. TWO COMPLETE | | | SETS OF ELECTRICLA PLANS HAVE BEEN RETAINED AS | | | REQUESTED BY THE STATE. WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | | BE SURE TO PROVIDE NEW SETS OF ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED INPUT DATA REPORT FOR | | | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEEDS TO COORDINATE WITH PLANS. | | | SOME EXAMPLES WERE GIVEN ON EACH OF THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEWS HOWEVER ITEMS ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | PLANS NEED TO BE REVISED OR REVISE CALCULATIONS. IN | | | EITHER CASE THE CALCULATIONS NEED TO MEET | | | 13-415.400.3.A, 13-415.2,13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND | | | .1.3. | | | THERE ARE OTHER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS WHICH ALSO NEED | | | COORDINATION. SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WITH | | | RESPECT TO OTHER SYSTEMS/COMPONENTS IN THE IDR WHICH | | | ARE NOT THE SAME ON PLANS. | | | | | | THE EXAMPLES ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS FOR NON-CODE | | | COMPLIANCE WERE ?EXAMPLES? AND REVIEW STATED IT WAS IN | | | NO WAY ALL ITEMS. THIS OFFICE IS REQUIRED TO STATE THE | | | CODE SECTIONS. AS A BENEFIT THIS OFFICE GIVES SOME | | | ITEMS TO HELP UNDERSTAND THE CODE COMPLIANCE ISSUE | | | WHICH IS OUTSTANDING TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | IN MEETINGS HELD BEFORE PLANS WERE RE-SUBMITTED THIS | | | REVIEWER OFFERED SEVERAL TIMES TO RESPONSIBLE DESIGNERS | | | PRESENT TO CALL ONCE CALCULATIONS ARE BEING COMPLETED | | | TO GO OVER *ANY* QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. THIS WOULD HELP | | | TO ALLEVIATE ANY FURTHER DELAYS UNNECESSARILY. TO DATE | | | OF THIS REVIEWER HAS NOT BEEN CONTACTED SINCE THE | | | MEETING. | | | | | | EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE SEE ITEMS SUCH AS *PIPING* ON THE IDR WHICH IS | | | ACTUALLY BLANK. 13-411.1.ABC.2 PIPING INSULATION. | | | | | | EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE SEE OTHER ITEMS SUCH AS LIGHTING. THE SHEETS FOR | | | EXAMPLE L-4.2 STILL SHOW LIGHTING FIXTURES WITH A MUCH | | | HIGHER WATTAGE THAN WHAT IS SUPPOSE TO BE THE SAME | | | FIXTURES ON THE ELECTRICAL PLANS. THE FACT IS THE SAME | | | FIXTURES ON THE ELECTRICAL PLANS WHICH IS (Y1) IS | | | 55WATTS ON THE IDR AND THE ELECTRICAL PLANS YET THE L | | | SHEET INDICATES THIS SAME FIXTURE AS 120WATTS. IN THE | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW AS WELL AS MEETINGS IT WAS STATED TO | | | COORDINATE ALL PLANS AND CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE SAME L-4.2 WHICH SHOWS A J1 | | | BOLLARD WHICH NOT ON ELECTRICAL PLANS OR THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | EXAMPLE: PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE ALL *Y* TYPE FIXTURES | | | SOME ARE LESS ON IDR THAN ON PLANS. MINOR DIFFERENCES | | | ON THESE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | 2008-11-21 17:04:15 | PLANS WILL GO INTO FAILED REVIEW STATUS. | | | | | | NOTES TO BE POSTED ON 11/24. NOTES PERTAINING TO PLANS | | | NOT BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED WILL BE | | | PART OF REVIEW ALONG WITH NOTES PERTAINING TO ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
15:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
15:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-10 15:15:20 | | | | ** DENIED 4TH REVIEW** | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLANS STILL ONLY SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW AND | | | NOT FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | DO NOT COORDINATE WITH PLANS. THERE ARE SEVERAL | | | INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE SQ FOOTAGE ETC. PLEASE SEE | | | COMMENTS FOR OTHER TRADES FOR ITEMS SUCH AS FLOORING | | | ETC. | | | LS SAFETY PLANS FOR NEW BUILDING SHOW IN EXCESS OF | | | 11,000 SQ FT, A-1000 STATES 10,000 SQ FT AS TOTAL | | | BUILDING FOOT-PRINT YET THE CALCULATIONS STATE A TOTAL | | | OF 8913. | | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL LIGHTING AS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR TYPE | | | OF FIXTURES, WATTAGE OF FIXTURES AND THE NUMBER OF | | | FIXTURES COORDINATE WITH THE INPUT DATA REPORT OF THE | | | SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | FOR EXAMPLE: SEE EXTERIOR LIGHTING, SOME OF THE | | | FIXTURES AS SHOWN ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING | | | INCLUDING SITE ARE NOT ON THE IDR AT ALL. | | | FOR EXAMPLE: ONE WOULD BE THE 175 WATT SITE LIGHTS. | | | THERE ARE NO 175W FIXTURES ON THE IDR AT ALL. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: ANOTHER WOULD BE THE *Y* FIXTURES. THESE | | | ARE NOTED ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND AND ON PLANS IN MANY | | | LOCATIONS. THE FIXTURE LEGEND MENTIONS TO SEE LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS CALLS FOR THESE SAME ITEMS | | | AS BOLLARDS. ARE THEY BOLLARDS WITH LIGHTING FIXTURES? | | | IF SO HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THEY ARE SHOWN AS A *Y* | | | FIXTURE WHEN THE SAME DESIGNATION IS USED FOR OTHER | | | FIXTURES WHICH ARE CLEARLY NOT BOLLARDS? THE SHEET E-6 | | | DOES SHOW BOLLARDS AS PART OF THE SCHEDULE. NO BOLLARDS | | | ARE SHOWN ON FIXTURE LEGEND. COORDINATION, AND | | | DESIGNATIONS IS NEEDED. | | | ** COMPLETE LEGEND WITH FIXTURES. (((AS LONG AS PLANS | | | COORDINATE AND SHOW A ***MINIMUM*** CODE COMPLIANCE | | | THEY MAY ALWAYS BE REVISED AT A LATER DATE))). | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE IDR, THE AMOUNT OF *S* | | | FIXTURES NEED COORDINATING. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: AS NOTED ABOVE FOR THE *Y* FIXTURES WHICH | | | ARE NOTED AS 50W/55W FIXTURES THE *U* FIXTURES ARE ALSO | | | SHOWN AS 50W/55W FIXTURES. BETWEEN BOTH OF THESE | | | FIXTURES WHICH ARE NOTED AS 50W/55W THERE SHOULD BE A | | | NUMBER FIXTURE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE | | | IDR. IN FACT THE IDR ONLY INDICATES A TOTAL OF 27 -55W | | | FIXTURES. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS SHOW A | | | FAR GREATER NUMBER OF *Y* AND *U* FIXTURES WHICH ARE | | | THE SAME WATTAGE. THIS IS ACCORDING TO THE LIGHTING | | | PLANS SUBMITTED SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED ON 9/28/08, | | | THE FIXTURE LEGEND SIGNED DATED AND SEALED 6/26/08 AND | | | CALCULATIONS SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED 9/29/08. | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THE LIGHTING FOR | | | INTERIOR AND GO OVER ALL FIXTURES IN ALL | | | ZONES/SPACES/AREAS. NOT ALL FIXTURES ARE IN CONFERENCE | | | MEETING ROOMS ALTHOUGH IN THE SAME ZONE. *C*? | | | | | | 13-400.3.A, 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. | | | | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE WHICH GAVE | | | INFORMATION TO THE FACT THE SITE LIGHTING POLES WERE | | | NOTING SBCCI FOR DESIGN HOWEVER SBCCI HAS NOT BEEN AN | | | ADOPTED CODE IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA SINCE MARCH 1ST OF | | | 2002. SEE E-1 *PARKING LOT LIGHT POLE DETAIL*. THIS HAS | | | BEEN CIRCLED ON PREVIOUS PLANS AS WELL ON THESE PLANS | | | ONCE AGAIN. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 2004W/2007 REVISIONS AS ADOPTED BY FS | | | 553.73. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: AS NOTED IN COMMENT NUMBER #2 ABOVE WITH | | | RESPECT LIGHTING FIXTURES AND COORDINATION NEEDED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS | | | DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL OR ELECTRICAL DOES | | | NOT COORDINATE WITH LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE ELECTRICAL | | | PLANS CONTAIN NOTES TO SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS HOWEVER | | | COORDINATION OF PLANS IS ESSENTIAL. | | | LOADS, CALCULATIONS, ENERGY CALCULATION, CIRCUITING ETC | | | ALL NEED TO BE VERIFIED SHOWING THE MINIMUM FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | 408.4,310.16,240.4, 220, ETC | | | FBC 13-415 ETC | | | FBC 106.1.1,106.1.2 FOR CLARITY, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | | AND COORDINATION OF PLANS. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE ALL CIRCUITING ON PLANS WITH | | | THE LIGHTING CONTROLS AND PANEL SCHEDULES. ONE EXAMPLE | | | WHICH WAS THE SAME EXAMPLE GIVEN ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | IS CIRCUIT L4-36. THE PLANS SHOW THIS CIRCUIT FEEDING | | | THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS YET THE PANEL SCHEDULE STILL SHOWS | | | THIS CIRCUIT FEEDING A *PROJECTION SCREEN*. | | | NO RESPONSE WAS MADE TO THIS PART OF THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW COMMENT AS AN EXAMPLE. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING CONTROLS AND TYPES OF | | | DEVICE NEEDS SOME COORDINATION OF WHAT WILL BE | | | INSTALLED AND REQUIRED. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS | | | *PHOTO-SENSOR* FOR INTERIOR LIGHTING AND SHEET E-6 ALSO | | | SHOWS *PHOTO-SENSOR*. | | | DUAL TECHNOLOGY DEVICES FOR OCCUPANCY SENSORS AND | | | PHOTO-SENSORS ARE NOT THE SAME. THE PREVIOUS NOTES GAVE | | | SECTION 13-415.1.ABC.1.4 FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING AND | | | METHODS OF CONTROLS. THE PLANS CALL FOR 10HR BACK UP OF | | | INTERIOR LIGHTING HOWEVER THIS SECTION OF THE CODE | | | WHICH WHEN USING A TIME CLOCK, REQUIRES THAT TIME CLOCK | | | TO BE ASTRONOMICAL AND WITH A 10HR BACK UP MINIMUM FOR | | | PROGRAMMING. IF USING A PHOTO-SENSOR (ALSO KNOWN AS A | | | PHOTO-CELL) THE ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCK IS NOT REQUIRED | | | NOR IS THE 10HR BACK UP. | | | HOW CAN THESE BE NOTED A PHOTO-SENSORS? THIS IS NOT | | | POSSIBLE. | | | SYMBOL LEGEND CALLS FOR MOTION SENSORS. THERE ARE | | | DEVICE WHICH ARE ONLY MOTION AND DO NOT CONTAIN THE | | | MULTI-LEVEL DESIGN FOR DUAL TECHNOLOGY, ULTRASONIC, | | | INFRARED ETC. | | | LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM NEEDS MEET FBC | | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND .1.3. | | | THE CONTROLS AND SYSTEM SHOWN ON PLANS IS CONFUSING AND | | | AS SHOWN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO BE A WORKING SYSTEM. | | | | | | ** LIGHTING SYSTEM IN RENOVATED BUILDING ALSO NEEDS TO | | | BE GONE OVER. | | | | | | | | | ** THIS IS THE THIRD REVIEW IN WHICH COMMENTS HAVE BEEN | | | MADE ON THE LIGHTING SYSTEM. IT IS RECOMMENDED BY THIS | | | OFFICE TO HAVE A MEETING TO GO OVER THE PLANS. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLANS STILL NOTE THAT 8 COPIES OF SHOP | | | DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED AND 7 COPIES WILL BE STAMPED BY | | | THE REVIEWER. THIS IS A THRESHOLD PROJECT ONLY THREE | | | SETS ARE NEEDED AND ONLY THREE SETS WILL BE PROCESSED | | | AND STAMPED. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW THE RENOVATED | | | BUILDING SHALL CONTAIN A MAIN OR A PERMANENT DEAD FRONT | | | WHICH WILL NOT PERMIT MORE THAN 6 BREAKERS TO BE | | | INSTALLED. ONCE THE PHASE TWO WORK IS COMMENCED THIS | | | MLO ONLY EQUIPMENT WILL HAVE A DISCONNECT AS SHOWN ON | | | RISER FOR THE NEW BUILDING HOWEVER NEED TO HAVE SOME | | | SORT OF DISCONNECT SHOWN AT THIS TIME FOR PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE. | | | 225.31-225.39 | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-28 |
Time |
13:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-28 |
Time |
13:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-28 13:03:56 | | | | ** DENIED3RD REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS STILL FROM | | | PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH ARE IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | AND THE INPUT DATA REPORT IS NOT CODE COMPLIANT AND | | | DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH THE SUBMITTED PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES AND THE WATTAGES | | | OF FIXTURES IS REQUIRED TO MEET 13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2 | | | AND .1.3. | | | THESE ARE ALL REQUIRED TO BE LOCATED IN THE IDR FOR | | | ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING CONTROLS SHOWN ON | | | PLANS ARE NOT CODE COMPLIANT. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2, .1.3 AND .1.4. | | | THERE ARE AREAS WITH STILL NO LIGHTING CONTROLS AND | | | OVER RIDES WHICH ARE REQUIRED. MAY NOT USE A SINGLE | | | POLE SWITCH TO OVER RIDE TIMED SCHEDULING? THIS DOES | | | NOT PROVIDE ANY WAY OF AUTOMATICALLY SHUTTING OFF THE | | | LIGHTING ONCE OVER RIDDEN. HOW CAN A SINGLE POLE SWITCH | | | IN AREAS SUCH AS CLASSROOM, COMPUTER LAB BE AN | | | AUTOMATED OVER RIDE? | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THE KITCHEN LIGHTING IS | | | EXEMPT PER 13-415.1.ABC.1.1. (NUMBER 3) THERE IS NO | | | EXEMPTION #3 IN THIS SECTION OF THE CODE AND KITCHEN | | | LIGHTING IS NOT EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIRED AUTOMATED | | | CONTROLS OF SOME KIND. PLEASE ADJUST PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE OTHER AREAS AS THE MULTI-GANG BATHS WILL BE | | | NOTED BELOW. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WIRING DIAGRAM ON HOW THE NEW | | | OCCUPANCY SENSORS WILL BE WIRED WITH THE STANDARD | | | SINGLE POLE SWITCHES WHICH ARE STILL SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | THE CODE REQUIRES OVER RIDE OF SOME TYPE AT THE POINT | | | OF ENTRANCE INTO ANY ONE SPACE IF USING TIMED | | | SCHEDULING. THIS ALSO REQUIRES THE OCCUPANT TO VISUALLY | | | SEE *ALL* LIGHTING WHICH IS BEING OVER RIDDEN OR MEET | | | THE EXCEPTION WHICH IS AN INDICATOR PANEL OF SOME TYPE. | | | | | | AN EXAMPLE IS THE POINT OF ENTRANCE IN NEW BUILDING | | | HALLWAY. THERE IS ONLY OVER RIDES AT ONE END AND NOT | | | BOTH. THERE ARE NO INDICATORS NOTED. PLEASE SEE COMMENT | | | BELOW WITH RESPECT TO THE TWIST TIMERS SHOWN. | | | PLEASE SEE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING IS NOT COMPLETE. THERE | | | ARE ITEMS SUCH AS EXTERIOR LIGHTING (L4-36) WHICH IS | | | NOT LISTED ON SCHEDULE. THIS CIRCUIT IS ACTUALLY LISTED | | | AS *PROJECTION SCREEN* ON PANEL SCHEDULE. | | | | | | ** AS SYSTEM IS NOT COMPLETE, THE ABOVE SECTIONS NEED | | | TO BE MET. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE THE WIRING DIAGRAM FOR | | | OCCUPANCY SENSORS AS NOTED ABOVE FOR THE GANG BATHS. IF | | | THE SINGLE POLE SWITCH AS SHOWN ALLOWS AN OCCUPANT TO | | | TURN THE LIGHTING OFF IN THE BATHROOMS WHILE ANOTHER | | | OCCUPANT IS STILL OCCUPYING THE BATHROOM THIS WILL NOT | | | MEET MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR LIFE SAFETY. AS NO DETAIL FOR | | | THE TYPE OF DEVICE AND HOW A SINGLE POLE SWITCH WILL BE | | | CONNECTED IN THIS SCENARIO THIS DOES NOT MINIMUM. | | | LS 101 7.8, FBC 13-415.1.ABC.1.2, .1.1. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE SPEC/CUT SHEET FOR THESE DEVICES. 110.3 | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS | | | FOR A GENERATOR AND ATS AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. A | | | MINIMUM CODE REQUIRED ATS AND GENERATOR WILL BE PART OF | | | THE PERMITTED SET OF PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. THIS CAN | | | ALWAYS BE REVISED AT A LATER DATE IF THE MANUFACTURE OR | | | EQUIPMENT CHANGES. | | | 110.3,90.7, 702.6 ETC | | | FBC 106.1.1,106.1.2 | | | *** IF NOT PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK THEN DELETE ALL | | | REFERENCE AND INDICATE AS FUTURE. SEPRATE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION, PLANS, FEES ECT WILL BE REQUIRED AT A | | | LATER DATE. | | | ** IF ATS IS INSTALLED AT THIS TIME WITH SERVICE | | | EQUIPMENT THEN SUBMIT A CODE COMPLIANT ATS AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | | | | *** RESPONSE LETTER NOTES THIS IS AN OPTIONAL STAND-BY | | | SYSTEM. IT HAS NO BEARING ON OPTIONAL OR NOT, THE CODE | | | DOES NOT STATE IF *OPTIONAL* THEN THE EQUIPMENT DOES | | | NOT NEED TO BE LISTED ETC. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW PANEL MDP SHALL | | | CONTAIN A MAIN OR A MAIN DISCONNECTING MEANS AHEAD OF | | | THIS MLO.THE CODE ADDRESSES THE NUMBER OF MEANS OF | | | DISCONNECT PERMITTED AND THE PERMITTED SPACES IN THE | | | EQUIPMENT. THIS INSTALLATION WHICH IS NOTED AS | | | TEMPORARY DUE TO PHASING HAS NO BEARING ON WHAT *MAY* | | | OR *MAY NOT* BE PERMITTED IN THE FUTURE. PLANS ARE | | | REQUIRED TO SHOWN MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE AT THIS TIME | | | OR WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. LIFE SAFETY DOES NOT RELY ON | | | WHAT MAY BE PERMITTED IN PHASES. THE FACT IS PHASE TWO | | | MAY NEVER HAPPEN AND THE SERVICE AS SHOWN WOULD BE | | | NON-CODE COMPLIANT. | | | CODE SECTIONS 225 FOR DETACHED BUILDINGS ARE INTENDED | | | TO FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF 230 EVEN IF NOT SERVICE | | | ENTRANCE RATED EQUIPMENT. AS THERE ARE NO PROVISIONS TO | | | PREVENT THIS HAZARD AS NOTED ABOVE A MAIN IS REQUIRED | | | AT THIS TIME IN FIRST PHASE. | | | THIS IS SERVICE ENTRANCE RATED EQUIPMENT AT THIS TIME. | | | 230 SECTIONS APPLY ALSO.230.70, 230.71, 230.72, 230.76, | | | 230.79 ETC. | | | *** NOTE, PHASE ONE OR PHASE TWO HAS NOT APPLIED FOR | | | ANY PERMIT. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEW RULE 69A-60.004 FOR ADOPTION OF | | | THE 2006 NFPA-101. AS THIS HAS NOT APPLIED FOR PERMIT. | | | ** IT WAS NOTED THIS RULE MAY BE GETTING A CHANGE | | | HOWEVER AT THIS TIME IT IS ADOPTED. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: WIND LOADS REFERENCE BOTH THE FBC AND SBCCI. | | | | | | ** PLEASE COMPLETE PLANS. | | | | | | | | | IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
Time |
16:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
Time |
16:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-21 16:29:48 | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SEVERAL ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE | | | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. PLEASE ALSO SEE NEW | | | COMMENTS AS PLANS ARE NOW MORE COMPLETE THAN SUBMITTED | | | ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BOTH SETS OF PLANS FOR BOTH | | | BUILDING DO NOT CONTAIN AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE BY THE | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD. IN FACT EACH AND EVERY SIGNATURE IS | | | A *RUBBER-STAMP* ON ALL FOUR SETS OF PLANS. THIS IS | | | DONE IN LIEU OF THE REQUIRED ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AS | | | REQUIRED PER FLORIDA STATUTES 471.025 AND FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002. | | | THIS OFFICE HAS MADE THIS SAME COMMENT TO THIS DESIGNER | | | OF RECORD ON SEVERAL OTHER REVIEWS ON OTHER PROJECTS | | | YET PLANS ARE STILL BEING SUBMITTED WITH THE SAME | | | *RUBBER-STAMP*. | | | THIS OFFICE IS LEFT WITH NO CHOICE BUT TO FORWARD ALL | | | PLANS AND DOCUMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW OF SAID STATUTORY | | | VIOLATIONS. | | | THESE WILL BE SENT WITH PLANS FROM OTHER PROJECT | | | PREVIOUSLY RETAINED FOR THE SAME COMMENT. | | | PLEASE KNOW WHEN SIGNING, DATING AND SEALING PLANS: ALL | | | MUST BE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. A *RUBBER-STAMP* SHALL NOT | | | BE USED. THIS HAS BEEN CONFIRMED WITH THE FLORIDA BOARD | | | OF ENGINEERS AND LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE BOARD ON MANY | | | OCCASIONS. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE TO SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE SETS OF | | | ALL DOCUMENTS INCLUDING ENERGY CALCULATIONS. ONLY ONE | | | SET OF CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED. | | | FBC 106.1, 106.1.3, 106.5. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE AND CHAPTER 13 FOR CODE REQUIRED LIGHTING CONTROLS | | | HAS NOT BEEN MET. THIS WAS A COMMENT ON THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW AS NO LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM WAS DESIGNED INTO | | | THE PROJECT ON ORIGINAL PLANS SUBMITTED. RESPONSE | | | MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED PLANS HOWEVER COMPLIANCE WITH | | | CHAPTER 13 HAS STILL NOT BEEN MET. | | | PLEASE SEE NOTE # 7 ON SHEET E-2: THIS NOTE SATES | | | *LIGHTING CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO MEET PARAGRAPH | | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE*. THE | | | CODE SHALL NOT BE QUOTED IN LIEU OF REQUIRED DESIGN. | | | PLEASE SEE OTHER SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 13 FOR LIGHTING | | | CONTROLS IS ALSO REQUIRED SUCH AS 13-415.1.ABC.1.2, | | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.3 AND 13-415.1.ABC.1.4. | | | PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT SECTION 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 AND | | | .1.2. THE LIGHTING CONTACTORS AS SHOWN DO NOT PROVIDE | | | CODE COMPLIANCE. IN FACT ALL DEVICES IN ALL *SEPARATE | | | SPACES* ARE STILL BEING SHOWN AS STANDARD SWITCHING | | | DEVICES. PLEASE SEE THIS IS CLEAR ON THE SYMBOL LEGEND | | | ON E-7 AS WELL AS NOTE #5 ON E-2. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO | | | USE *STANDARD SWITCHES* WHEN MOST LIGHTING CIRCUITS ARE | | | ALL GOING THROUGH LIGHTING CONTACTORS. | | | PLEASE SEE THESE SAME SECTIONS OF CODES AS *ALL | | | SEPARATE SPACES* ARE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN CONTROLS TO | | | OVER RIDE ANY TIME OF DAY SCHEDULING. | | | PLEASE SEE LIGHTING CONTROLS ARE REQUIRED TO BE LOCATED | | | SO THE OCCUPANT CAN SEE THE LIGHTING IN WHICH IS BEING | | | CONTROLLED OR MEETING THE EXCEPTIONS FOR *PILOT LIGHTS* | | | ETC. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.2 FOR OTHER TYPES OF | | | ROOMS WHICH REQUIRE OCCUPANCY SENSOR DEVICES. THIS IS | | | ABOVE ANY TIME OF DAY LIGHTING CONTROLS. | | | EXAMPLES: AS LISTED IN THE CODE, CLASSROOMS, | | | CONFERENCE/MEETING ROOMS, LUNCH, BREAK ROOMS. | | | PLEASE THE LIGHTING CONTACTOR AND PLANS AS SHOWN DOES | | | NOT SHOW ANY OVER RIDES, DOES NOT SHOW ANY SPACE | | | CONTROLS ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.3 FOR *ADDITIONAL CONTROLS* | | | REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.4 FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING | | | CONTROLS. PLANS INDICATE LIGHTING TO BE THROUGH A TIME | | | CLOCK HOWEVER THIS SECTION OF THE CODE REQUIRES ONE OF | | | TWO METHODS OF CONTROL. PLEASE KNOW IF USING A TIME | | | CLOCK THIS SHALL BE AN ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCK NOT A | | | STANDARD TIME CLOCK. THIS TC MUST ALSO CONTAIN A | | | MINIMUM BATTERY BACK UP FOR PROGRAMMING WHICH CONTAINS | | | A MINIMUM 10 HOURS OF BACK UP. | | | | | | ** IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW AS SEVERAL DEVICES ON PLANS | | | WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE REVISED TO MEET MINIMUM CODE | | | COMPLIANCE THERE MAY CERTAINLY BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE | | | FOLLOWING REVIEW WHICH CAN NOT POSSIBLY BE MADE AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | | | | *** PLEASE SEE COMMENT BELOW WITH RESPECT TO HAND-WOUND | | | TIMERS SHOWN ON SYMBOL LEGEND. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 13 | | | FOR LIGHTING PERFORMANCE AND CODE COMPLIANT ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS TO BE SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-400.0.A, 13-400.3.A, 13-415.2, | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. | | | PLEASE SEE THE METHOD OF CALCULATION SUBMITTED FOR THE | | | NEW BUILDING IS METHOD *A* HOWEVER NO CALCULATIONS WERE | | | SUBMITTED FOR THE EXISTING SEPARATE BUILDING WHICH IS | | | BEING RENOVATED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE VERSION SUBMITTED IS NOT UNDER THE | | | ADOPTION OF THE FBC 13-400.3.A. PLEASE SEE THE CODE | | | SPECIFICALLY ADOPTS VERSION 2.5 AND THE VERSION | | | SUBMITTED WAS 3.0. THIS HAS BEEN CONFIRMED WITH THE | | | DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS/FLORIDA BUILDING | | | COMMISSION ON MORE THAN ONE OCCASION. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE CERTIFICATION SHEETS LIST | | | MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DESIGNERS WHICH ARE NOT | | | LISTED AS ENGINEERS. IN FACT THE DESIGNER WHICH IS | | | SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED ON THE CERTIFICATIONS IS NOT | | | EVEN LISTED WITH NAME OR LICENSE NUMBER YET THIS | | | DESIGNER IS LISTED ON PLANS AS THE MECHANICAL DESIGNER | | | OF RECORD. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS DO NOT | | | MEET THE MINIMUM FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. IN FACT THERE ANY | | | SEVERAL ITEMS ON PLANS THAT DO NOT COORDINATE WITH THE | | | INPUT DATA REPORT. SOME EXAMPLES WILL BE GIVEN BELOW | | | HOW THESE ARE NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF ALL ITEMS: THE | | | INPUT DATA REPORT WILL BE NOTED AS IDR. | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE SEE THE IDR FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHOWS NO | | | LIGHTING AND IS COMPLETELY *BLANK*. HOW IS THIS | | | POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS CLEARLY INDICATE AND SHOW | | | DOZENS OF EXTERIOR LIGHTS? | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE SEE THE IDR FOR INTERIOR LIGHTING WHICH | | | INDICATES *MANUAL ON/OFF* CONTROLS FOR ALL INTERIOR | | | LIGHTING. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN ALL INTERIOR | | | LIGHTING IS REQUIRED TO BE UNDER SOME SORT OF AUTOMATED | | | CONTROL? | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE SEE THE WATER HEATER KW RATINGS SHOWN ON THE IDR | | | DO NOT COORDINATE WITH PLANS AS THE PLANS INDICATE A | | | HIGHER KW RATING. | | | ** THIS OFFICE CAN NOT EMPHASIZE ENOUGH TO PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO GO THROUGH ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS, METHOD OF | | | CONTROLS, TYPES OF FIXTURES, WATTAGE OF FIXTURES AND | | | NUMBERS OF FIXTURES. THESE WERE A FEW EXAMPLES ONLY. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE CONDUIT SIZES AS LISTED ON E-4 | | | ON CONDUIT/WIRE NOTES. PLEASE SEE NOTES #1, 2 AND 3 | | | WHICH INDICATE AS MANY AS 4-500MCM AND EQUIPMENT | | | GROUNDING CONDUCTOR?S 1/0 AND 2/0 IN TWO-INCH CONDUITS. | | | THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE AS WELL AS NOT MEETING CODE FOR | | | DE-RATING AND MINIMUM CONDUIT SIZING. PLEASE SEE | | | CONDUIT FILL TABLES IN CHAPTER 9 OF THE NEC AND | | | 300.17. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ELECTRICAL PLANS ARE STILL | | | SHOWING THE INSTALLATION OF A NATURAL GAS GENERATOR. | | | THIS UNIT NEEDS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS *OPTIONAL STAND-BY* | | | ONLY AS THIS IS NOT FOR AN EMERGENCY/LIFE SAFETY OR | | | LEGALLY REQUIRED SYSTEMS.700,701,702. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS FOR THE | | | PROPOSED GENERATOR AND ATS AS REQUESTED ON THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW. RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WILL BE DONE UNDER SHOP | | | DRAWING SUBMITTALS HOWEVER IF THIS SCOPE IS INCLUDED IN | | | THIS BASE BUILDING OR AS SHOWN ANY WORK WILL BE DONE | | | UNDER BASE BUILDING THESE SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | 110.3, 90.7 | | | FBC 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | ** IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW IF THE GENERATOR UNIT FEEDS | | | ANY LIFE SAFETY OR LEGALLY REQUIRED LOADS THERE MAY | | | ALSO BE OTHER REQUIREMENT SIN NFPA-110 WHICH ARE | | | REQUIRED TO BE MET. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 27 WHICH REFERENCES ALL BACK UP | | | POWER SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER NFPA-110. AS THERE | | | IS INFORMATION NOT YET SUBMITTED SOME COMMENTS CAN NOT | | | BE MADE. | | | PLEASE SEE LOCATION SHALL MEET CHAPTER 7 FOR ROOM | | | CONSTRUCTION, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT | | | INSTALLATION ETC. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-413.1.ABC.2.1 AND .2.2. PLEASE | | | PLACE NOTES ON PLANS ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE MAIN BREAKER DISCONNECT | | | BEING SHOWN. THE PLANS CALL FOR A *SHUNT-TRIP* WHICH | | | MAY NOT BE USED IN LIEU OF THE REQUIRED MANUAL MEANS OF | | | DISCONNECT RATED FOR THE LOAD SERVED PER 230.76, | | | 230.79. | | | THE NOTE #14 ON PLANS ON SHEET E-4 GIVES ANY PERSON | | | FALSE SENSE THAT THE MAIN WILL BE TURNED OFF BY USE OF | | | SHUNT TRIP. | | | THE MEANS OF DISCONNECTS FOR MAIN WILL BE LABELED FOR | | | NORMAL AND EMERGENCY, NOT THE SHUNT TRIP. | | | PLEASE SEE 230.2E, 702.8. | | | PLEASE ALSO PLACE NOTES ON PLANS THAT OTHER BUILDINGS | | | WHICH WILL NOW BED FED FROM TWO SOURCES OF POWER SHALL | | | CONTAIN NOTES FOR SIGNS AT EACH OF THESE EXISTING | | | LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEMS AT | | | EACH STRUCTURE AND SERVICE PER 250.50. THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW MINIMUM REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS. QUOTING THE CODE IN | | | LIEU OF MINIMUM REQUIRED BY CODE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE 250.32, 250.50 AT ANY DETACHED | | | BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING EQUIPMENT GROUNDING | | | CONDUCTOR FROM MAIN ON THE LINE SIDE OF PANEL MDP TO | | | THE THIS MDP.250.50, 250.110, 250.122, 250.32 ETC | | | THE EQUIPMENT GROUND IS BROUGHT TO THE MAIN BUT NOT | | | FROM MAIN TO MDP. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE CODE SECTIONS GIVEN ON THE | | | LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE NOT UNDER THE CURRENT NFPA-70 | | | (NEC) ADOPTED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA. | | | PLANS SHOW 220.35 | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE FPL DOCUMENTS SUPPORTING THE | | | DE-RATING OF SOME SERVICE EQUIPMENT AS MUCH AS 600AMPS. | | | 220.87 | | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE PLACE NOTES ON PLANS FOR REQUIRED ARC | | | FLASH PROTECTION PER 110.16 | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW AT THIS POINT IN TIME THE | | | APPLICATION CODE IS THE 2004 FBC WITH THE 2007 | | | REVISIONS. | | | THE STATE OF FLORIDA IS SCHEDULED TO ADOPT NEW CODE | | | STANDARDS ON OCT 1ST, 2008. | | | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT ALL INFORMATION ON TITLE | | | BLOCKS IS REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE. PLEASE | | | SEE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002 AND | | | 61G1-16.004, FLORIDA STATUTES 471.023 AND 481.219 FOR | | | REQUIRED INFORMATION AND LICENSING INFORMATION TO BE ON | | | TITLE BLOCKS. | | | THIS COMMENT IS MADE UNDER ELECTRICAL REVIEW BASED ON | | | THE FACT THE TITLE BLOCKS FOR ALL FIRMS ARE LISTED ON | | | ALL SHEETS AND LICENSE INFORMATION ON AT LEAST ONE FIRM | | | IS NOT LISTED AND CURRENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF | | | BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION. | | | ** LANDSCAPE ENGINEER**. | | | PLEASE SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS INDICATE A *LANDSCAPE | | | ARCHITECTURAL FIRM* NOT A LANDSCAPE ENGINEERING FIRM. | | | PLEASE SEE THE TITLE BLOCKS ON OTHER SHEETS SUCH AS | | | LANDSCAPE SHEETS; CIVIL SHEETS ETC DO NOT CONTAIN | | | LICENSING INFORMATION AS REQUIRED UNDER ADMINISTRATIVE | | | CODES OR STATUTES. THIS INFORMATION MAY OR MAY NOT BE | | | MADE UNDER OTHER TRADE REVIEWS. IN ANY CASE THESE ARE | | | IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS GIVEN AND SHALL BE MET WHETHER | | | OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY ANY OTHER TRADE REVIEWER(S). | | | THIS COMMENT DOES APPLY TO SMITH ENGINEERING AS THEIR | | | INFORMATION LISTED IS CORRECT INFORMATION ON THEIR | | | TITLE BLOCKS. | | | THIS COMMENT DOES APPLY TO ALL MEP PLANS AS THESE OTHER | | | FIRMS ARE LISTED ON THE MEP SHEETS. | | | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE ALL PLANS FOR BOTH | | | BUILDINGS FOR SERVICE EQUIPMENT ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE ONE EXAMPLE OF THIS IS THE RISER ON THE | | | RENOVATED GYM BUILDING INDICATES CLEARLY THE EXISTING | | | CT CAN IS TO REMAIN AND DOES NOT SHOWN ANY NEW MAIN | | | DISCONNECT BEING FED FROM THE NEW DP PANEL AT THE NEW | | | BUILDING. THE RISER ON SHEET E-4 ON THE NEW BUILDING | | | SHOWS AND NOTES A NEW 600AMP MAIN HOWEVER THE RISER ON | | | SHEET E-3 FOR THE RENOVATED GYM DOES NOT SHOW ANY NEW | | | MAIN. | | | PLEASE SEE THE EXISTING GYM BUILDING RISER ON SHEET E-3 | | | CLEARLY INDICATES A NEW 600AMP MDP YET THE RISER ON | | | SHEET E-4 OF NEW BUILDING SHOWS *EXISTING* 600AMP MDP. | | | 240.4, 310.16, 225.31-225.39, 250.32 ETC. | | | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | | AND COORDINATION. | | | | | | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS NOTED ABOVE THIS SUPPOSED NEW | | | 600AMP MDP AS SHOWN ON THE RENOVATED PLANS ON SHEET E-3 | | | SHOWS EACH BREAKER AS MAIN 1 OF 4, 2 OF 4, 3 OF 4, 4 OF | | | 4 AND THEN A 5 OF 4. HOW CAN THIS BE 5 OF 4? EACH OF | | | THESE WOULD BE 1 OF 5 ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW IN ANY CASE IF THIS PANEL BOARD WILL BE A | | | NEW MDP, THERE MAY NOT BE SPACE FOR MORE THAN 6 MAINS. | | | THIS EQUIPMENT IS SHOWN WITH 30 SPACES AND THIS | | | EQUIPMENT IS SHOWN AS A MLO (MAIL LUG ONLY) BOARD. | | | THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. 225.33A | | | PLEASE COORDINATE WITH RISER ON SHEET E-4 OF NEW | | | BUILDING PLANS AS A MAIN IS SHOWN IN FRONT OF THIS | | | EQUIPMENT. IF THIS IS THE CASE EACH BRANCH BREAKER | | | WOULD NOT BE LABEL *MAINS 1 OF 4/5*. | | | THESE WOULD NO LONGER BE MAINS. | | | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTES ABOVE FOR NEW BUILDING WITH | | | RESPECT TO REQUIRED LIGHTING CONTROLS, DEVICES, OVER | | | RIDES, SEPARATE SPACES ETC ALSO APPLIED TO THE | | | RENOVATED BUILDING. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3 AND .1.4. | | | | | | 18) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW ENERGY CALCULATIONS PER | | | 13-101.1.3, 13-400.3.B, 13-400.3.C MAY BE REQUIRED | | | BASED ON RENOVATION VALUE. AT THIS TIME THIS CAN NOT BE | | | CONFIRMED AS THE APPLIED VALUE HAS NOT BEEN | | | DETERMINED. | | | | | | 19) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 11, AS SPRING WOUND | | | TIMERS IN ACCESSIBLE AREAS ARE NOT PERMITTED. THESE DO | | | NOT MEET THE FOLLOWING SECTION. | | | 11-4.27.4 CONTROLS AND OPERATING MECHANISMS SHALL BE | | | OPERABLE WITH ONE HAND AND SHALL NOT REQUIRE TIGHT | | | GRASPING, PINCHING, OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST. THE FORCE | | | REQUIRED TO ACTIVATE CONTROLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN | | | 5 LBF (22.2 N). | | | | | | 20) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE POWER PLANS AND PLANS IN | | | GENERAL NEED TO SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL PANELS AND | | | SERVICE EQUIPMENT. | | | PLEASE SEE RISER WHICH INDICATES A NEW BACK FEED FROM | | | NEW *DP* TO EXISTING *SW* HOWEVER COULD NOT LOCATE THE | | | LOCATION OF THIS EXISTING *SW*. | | | NOTE ON RISER MENTIONS TO GROUND PER 250 OF THE NEC | | | HOWEVER AS NOTED ABOVE, MAY NOT QUOTE CODE IN LIEU OF | | | REQUIRED DETAIL. | | | PLEASE SHOW LOCATION OF *SW*, COULD NOT LOCATE THIS ON | | | THE GYM BUILDING PLANS AS SHEET E-4 ON NEW BUILDING DP | | | NOTES THIS IS THE LOCATION. HOWEVER THIS CAN NOT BE | | | CONFIRMED. | | | 110.26, 240.24 ETC | | | | | | 21) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-21 |
Time |
16:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-21 |
Time |
14:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-21 16:09:05 | 2007-10-21 16:09:05 | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT PLANS HAVE ONLY BEEN SUBMITTED | | | FOR *PLAN REVIEW* AND HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR | | | PERMIT. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT PLANS AS SUBMITTED ARE NOT | | | COMPLETE AND A COMPLETE REVIEW CAN NOT BE DONE. SOME | | | SHEETS ARE 60 PERCENT AND SOME SHEETS LIKE THE LIFE | | | SAFETY PLANS ARE BLANK WITH NO INFORMATION. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE IS NUMEROUS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION | | | NEEDED FOR REVIEW WHICH WAS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT REVIEW NOTES CAN ONLY BE MADE ON | | | PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. THERE MAY VERY WELL BE | | | NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEW WHICH CAN NOT | | | POSSIBLY BE MADE AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY PERMIT APPLICATIONS WHICH | | | ARE SUBMITTED AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 PLACES PROJECTS | | | UNDER THE NEW CODES ADOPTED BY THE STATE. PLEASE SEE | | | THAT THIS SHALL INCLUDE 2006 REVISIONS TO THE 2004 FBC | | | FOR ALL TRADES AND THE 2005 NFPA-70. PLEASE KNOW THERE | | | ARE CHANGES IN THE FBC WHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGNS FOR ALL | | | TRADES. | | | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR THIS | | | REVIEWER AT A MINIMUM. | | | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS | | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | | 2002 NFPA-110 | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME CODES ARE SHOWN ON COVER SHEETS | | | WHICH ARE NO LONGER IN AFFECT IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA | | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE THE 2002 NFPA-70 AND 2000 | | | NFPA-101 WHICH IS REFLECTED ON PLANS. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE WHEN PLANS ARE SUBMITTED THAT | | | ALL SHEETS CONTAIN COMPLETED TITLE BLOCKS ON ALL SHEETS | | | AND FOR ALL TRADES ON THE RESPECTIVE SHEETS. PLEASE SEE | | | FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002 ETC AS THIS INCLUDES | | | ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE, MEP ETC. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL PLANS ARE SIGNED, DATED AND | | | SEALED AS REQUIRED PER THE SAME SECTIONS ON THE FAC AND | | | FLORIDA STATUTES 471.025, 481.221 ETC. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS PER FBC | | | CHAPTER 13. | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE THE FACT THAT THIS NEW BUILDING | | | ELECTRICAL SERVICE WILL FEED EXISTING BUILDING WHICH | | | WILL HAVE ENERGY USE. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.AB.1, 13-415.2, 13-415.1.ABC.1.2, | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.3 ETC. | | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 ETC | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT MORE INFORMATION ON COMPLETE | | | LIGHTING CONTROLS AND SYSTEM PER 13-415.1.1, .1.2, .1.3 | | | AND .1.4. | | | NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR COMPLETE REVIEW. | | | PLANS APPEARS TO SHOW STANDARD SWITCHING DEVICES. FBC | | | 106.1.23 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW ALL FIRE ALARM DEVICE LOCATIONS | | | AND MINIMUM LEVELS FOR ADA COMPLIANCE. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 11-4.28.1,.2, AND .3(4) | | | ** THIS IS REQUIRED EVEN AS THE FIRE ALARM PLANS ARE | | | UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS AND PLANS. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON ANY EMERGENCY | | | AND/OR LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS OR DEVICES IN THE EXISTING | | | BUILDINGS WHICH MAY BE FED FROM THIS NEW GENERATOR. | | | THIS MAY AFFECT THE RISER AND SYSTEM AS SHOWN. 700.1, | | | FBC 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE KEY NOTES ON E-1 ARE NOT COMPLETE | | | ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON PLANS. | | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | NEC 240.24, 110.26 ETC | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ALL MANUFACTURES SPEC/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR THE PROPOSED GENERATOR AND ATS. | | | 110.3, 90.7. | | | FBC 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE MINIMUM LIGHTING LEVELS | | | FOR EGRESS PATHS TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY/EXIT | | | DISCHARGE. | | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE THE ENTRANCE HALLWAY WHICH DOES | | | NOT SHOW ANY EMERGENCY LIGHTING. | | | LS-101 7.8, 7.9. | | | FAC 61G15-33.004. | | | PLEASE SEE AS THE LIFE SAFETY PLANS ARE NOT COMPLETE, | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE NFPA-101 7.10.1.6 AND 12.4.7.7.2 | | | IN ASSEMBLY AREAS FOR POSSIBLE FLOOR PROXIMITY EXIT | | | LIGHTING. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE FBC CHAPTER 1006.3.8.2, 1006.3.8.3. | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 2005 NEC FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE ELECTRICAL WATER HEATER LOADS | | | ARE NOW CONSIDERED CONTINUOUS IN THE NEW CODE. THIS | | | REQUIRES THE LOADS TO BE SHOWN AND FIGURED AT 125%. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE LOAD SHOWN *PER FPL* FOR THE | | | EXISTING PANEL SW EXCEEDS THAT OF THE RATING OF THE NEW | | | FEEDERS AND OVER CURRENT PROTECTION FEEDING THIS | | | EXISTING EQUIPMENT. 240.4, 310.16 ETC. | | | PLEASE THE SECTION OF THE CODE REFLECTED ON | | | CALCULATIONS IS FROM THE PREVIOUS CODE. | | | ** PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE EXISTING | | | LOADS ON THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. *SW* IS GOING FROM A | | | 1200AMP SERVICE DOWN TO A 600AMP FEEDER WHICH CREATES | | | SOME QUESTIONS. | | | NEC 220. | | | FBC 106.3.5.1.2 | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE PLACE NOTE(S) ON RISER/PLANS FOR | | | DISCONNECTS AT THE EXISTING BUILDINGS WHICH WILL NOW | | | BED FROM THE NEW SERVICE. | | | PLEASE SE THAT ALL NEUTRAL AND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS AT | | | THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT MUST BE SEPARATED. THIS | | | IS FOR MAIN DISCONNECTS 8/10/ AND 12 AS LABELED WITH | | | NOTES ON RISER. | | | ** OCTAGONAL NOTE #12 DOES CONTAIN A MENTION OF | | | REMOVING BONDING JUMPER. | | | 250.6, 250.24 ETC | | | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS FOR | | | WORST CASE ON FEEDERS PER 13-413.1.ABC.1.1 AND BRANCH | | | CIRCUITS PER 13-413.1.ABC.1.2., | | | **ONLY NEED TO SHOW WORST CASE FOR EACH. | | | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE | | | BREAKER ON THE GENERATOR. WILL THIS BREAKER BE READILY | | | ACCESSIBLE FOR DISCONNECTING THE EMERGENCY POWER? AS | | | THIS CAN NOT BE CONFIRMED, THE DP MAY BE REQUIRED TO | | | CONTAIN A DISCONNECTING MEANS SUCH AS A MAIN CIRCUIT | | | BREAKER OR DISCONNECT ON THE LOAD SIDE OF THE GENERATOR | | | MAY BE REQUIRED. | | | IF BREAKER IS ON UNIT AND IS READILY ACCESSIBLE, THEN | | | PLEASE PROVIDE NOTE FOR SIGNAGE REQUIRED FOR DISCONNECT | | | MEANS DURING AND EMERGENCY SITUATION. | | | 445.18 | | | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THE RESTROOMS AS SHOWN ON PLANS | | | WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN A BATTERY BACK UP LIGHTING | | | FIXTURE OF SOME KIND FOR EGRESS LIGHTING. | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO ALSO KNOW THAT DEPENDING ON LIGHTING | | | CONTROL DEVICES WHICH HAVE NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED, A | | | NIGHT LIGHT MAY BE NEEDED. | | | PLEASE SEE NEC 700.12F, 700.16, LS 101 7.8, 7.9. PLEASE | | | SEE NOTES ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO LIGHTING LEVELS | | | REQUIRED FOR EGRESS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS MENTIONED ABOVE AS PLANS AND | | | INFORMATION IS NOT COMPLETED A COMPLETE REVIEW COULD | | | NOT BE DONE. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SURE TO SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH | | | MAY ALSO AFFECT THE ELECTRICAL PLANS/DESIGN. | | | | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2010-09-22 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2010-09-22 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-09-22 11:41:38 | PER OUR SITE MEETING WALK-THRU ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2010, A | | | CRITICAL ISSUE LIST WAS DEVELOPED TO ASSIST IN | | | DETERMINING OUTSTANDING WORK. PLEASE REVIEW THE | | | FOLLOWING CRITICAL ISSUES: | | | ??? DETECTABLE WARNING TRUNCATED DOMES ARE REQUIRED AT | | | TWO (2) LOCATIONS. | | | O THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING INTERSECTING | | | THE VEHICULAR DROP-OFF. (FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE 2007, FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | 11-4.29.5) | | | O THE PUBLIC ACCESS SIDEWALK ADJACENT THE PARKING AREA | | | MUST PROVIDE DETECTABLE | | | WARNING AT ALL PEDESTRIAN / VEHICULAR INTERSECTS. | | | (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ADA | | | ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES -ADAAG, ACCESSIBLE | | | RIGHTS-OF-WAY, CHAPTER 3, SUBSECTION | | | 3.2) | | | ??? ONE (1) SEWER CLEAN-OUT, AS SHOWN ON AS-BUILT TO BE | | | UNCOVERED. | | | ??? CRACKED SIDEWALK. | | | | | | MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ | | | ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2008-10-14 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
2008-10-14 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-14 11:15:27 | PASSED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-07-16 |
Time |
11:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-07-16 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-16 11:26:51 | ***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THATNOI, SFWMD PERMIT ARE IN E-MAIL SENT | | | BY JEFF HALVERSON, DATED 4/10/08 @3:33PM FOR FUTURE | | | REFERENCE. | | | | | | 1.STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS MUST BE APPROVED | | | BY MR. JONATHAN BRAMLEY,DIRECTOR,45TH STREET | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES BEFORE WE ISSUE A PERMIT. | | | | | | OUR RESPONSE: NEED AN APPROVAL 45TH ST.MOCK ROOS | | | PROBABLY REVIEWS IT, I HAVE NOT RECEIVED AN APPROVAL | | | LETTER FROM MOCK ROOS YET. | | | | | | 2.WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET (MANNY G. OR EMERY F.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE | | | ISSUE A PERMIT. | | | | | | OUR RESPONSE:MANNY OR EMERY PUT A STAMP ON THE | | | DRAWINGS. I HAVE NOT RECEIVED STAMPED DRAWING FROM | | | MANNY OR EMERY,YET. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
Time |
11:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-11 11:07:24 | ***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THATNOI, SFWMD PERMIT ARE IN E-MAIL SENT | | | BY JEFF HALVERSON, DATED 4/10/08 @3:33PM FOR FUTURE | | | REFERENCE. | | | | | | 1.STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS MUST BE APPROVED | | | BY MR. JONATHAN BRAMLEY,DIRECTOR,45TH STREET | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES BEFORE WE ISSUE A PERMIT. | | | | | | 2.WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET (MANNY G. OR EMERY F.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE | | | ISSUE A PERMIT. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-10-22 |
Time |
16:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-10-22 |
Time |
16:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-22 16:12:15 | ***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI). | | | PLEASE APPLY AT FDEP, NPDES STORMWATER SECTION FOR | | | NOI. | | | YOU CAN GET NOI INFO FROM | | | WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/ | | | NOTICE OF INTENT DEP FORM 62-621.300(4)(B), | | | EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2003 | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWING ALL CITY STANDARDS NOTES FOR | | | SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, APPROACH, PARKINGS, HANDICAP | | | PARKINGS, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, YOU CAN GET A C D FROM | | | 1000, 45 STREET FOR ALL THESE CITY STANDARDS NOTES. | | | PHONE# 494-1040 | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE | | | DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION | | | MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | | 4. PLEASE SHOW ON WATER QUALITY CALCULATTIONSTHAT YOU | | | HAVE CONSIDERED FLOOD ZONE AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR | | | FLOOD CRITERIA & CROWN OF THE ROAD TO DETERMINE THE | | | FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION & PARKINGLOT ELEVATION. | | | 5. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGTHE SITE AREA, | | | GREEN, LAKE,PARKING AREA, IMPERVIOUS,PERVIOUS AREAYOU | | | ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS PROJECT . PLEASEMAKE SURE | | | THESE AREAS SHOWN ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH | | | AND USED IN STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES AROUND YOUR SITE | | | SO, WE CANSEE THE LAYOUT OF STORM WATER PIPES. | | | PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURESWITH | | | ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING ELEVATION, ETC ON | | | DRAWINGS, CALCULATION FOR EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, PLEASE | | | SHOW DRY DETENTION/WET DETENTION AREAS IN STORM WATER | | | CALS. | | | 7. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND | | | YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN. | | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,, &STORM | | | WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. STORM WATER CALS MUST BE | | | APPROVED FROM 100045TH STREET ENGINEERING SERVICES. | | | 9.POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS:HEIGHT OF FENCE | | | SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP TO STOP DUST PARTICLES. | | | 10. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-12-02 |
Time |
15:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-12-02 |
Time |
15:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-02 15:12:10 | *****REVISION APPROVED***** | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEETS LS-100, A-700, AND E-1 & E-2 (1501) | | | WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-16 |
Time |
10:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-16 |
Time |
10:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-16 10:53:06 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING REVISED SHEETS: A-104, A-601, P-3, P-5, | | | S-5.1, S-5.2, & S-5.3 WERE REVIEWED; HOWEVER | | | FIRE-STAMPING NOT NECESSARY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
Time |
15:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-01-23 |
Time |
15:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-23 15:25:09 | APPROVAL FOR UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE WATER DISTRIBUTION | | | EQUIPMENT | | | | | | | | | 1) TITLE BLOCK WAS RED LINED TO INDICATE NUMERICAL | | | ADDRESS OF THIS PROJECT. | | | 2) FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHALL BE ROTATED TO FACE | | | IN THE DIRECTION OF THE ACCESS ROAD. | | | 3) KNOX LOCKING CAPS REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE DEPARMENT | | | CONNECTION. CONTACT THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION AT | | | (561) 804-4724 FOR ASSISTANCE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-12-29 |
Time |
16:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-12-29 |
Time |
15:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-29 15:35:02 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED; PLAN SHEETS | | | C6, C10, LS-1.0, A-201, A-700, E-2 & E-3 (1505), E-1 & | | | E-2 (1501), AND FP-1 & FP-2 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, | | | AND DATED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-12-02 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-12-02 |
Time |
11:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-02 11:24:18 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | | | | 00. THE ACTUAL PROJECT LOCATION SHALL BE IN THE TITLE | | | BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET. AMEND/CORRECT | | | A-103, A-200, A-300, A-400 THRU A-402, A-601, A-603, | | | A-900, A-901, S-1.2, S-3.4 THRU S-4.2, E8 THRU E-10, | | | P-3 & P-5, AND FP-1 & FP-2. | | | (NOTE: SOME SHEETS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW HAVE BEEN | | | CORRECTED, THE LISTED HAVE NOT.) | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 | | | " 644-7326 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
12:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
12:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-16 12:52:03 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | | | | 00. THE ACTUAL PROJECT LOCATION SHALL BE IN THE TITLE | | | BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET. AMEND/CORRECT | | | A-103, A-200, A-300, A-400 THRU A-402, A-601, A-603, | | | A-900, A-901, S-1.2 & S--2, S-3.3 THRU S-4.2, E-1, E4, | | | E5, E8 THRU E-10, P-3 & P-5, AND FP-1 & FP-2. | | | | | | 18. DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS WHEN ACTIVATED SHALL CAUSE THE | | | BUILDING(S) FIRE ALARM SYSTEM(S) TO ACTIVATE. COMMENT | | | NOT ADDRESSED ON SHEET E-9 AS INDICATED IN YOUR | | | RESPONSE | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
Time |
15:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
Time |
14:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-07 15:18:18 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | | | | 00. THE ACTUAL PROJECT LOCATION SHALL BE IN THE TITLE | | | BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET. AMEND/CORRECT SHEET | | | L-4.1 & L-4.2, L-5.1 THRU L-5.3, L-6.1, A-103, A-200, | | | A-300, A-400 THRU A-402, A-601, A-603, A-900, A-901, | | | S-1.2 & S--2, S-3.3 THRU S-4.2, M-1 THRU M-3, E-1 THRU | | | E-10, P-1 THRU P-5, AND FP-1 & FP-2. | | | | | | 03. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE TO BE LOCATED PRIOR TO | | | ANY EXCAVATING. COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED ON SHEET D-100 AS | | | INDICATED IN YOUR RESPONSE | | | | | | 18. DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS WHEN ACTIVATED SHALL CAUSE THE | | | BUILDING(S) FIRE ALARM SYSTEM(S) TO ACTIVATE. COMMENT | | | NOT ADDRESSED ON SHEET E-9 AS INDICATED IN YOUR | | | RESPONSE | | | | | | 29. STAIRS TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING AND | | | FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. NOT ADDRESSED ON SHEET | | | A-301 AS INDICATED IN YOUR RESPONSE | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-28 |
Time |
22:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-28 |
Time |
19:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-29 00:50:26 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 01.ALL CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO | | | COMPLY WITH NFPA 241.ADD NFPA 241 TO APPLICABLE CODES | | | ON SHEET G-100 | | | | | | 03.UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE TO BE LOCATED PRIOR TO | | | ANY EXCAVATING.ADD COMMENT TO SHEET D-100 | | | | | | 08.PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ALL ACCESS POINTS TO THE | | | EXISTING FACILITY THAT CAN BE USED BY FIRE RESCUE. | | | ILLUSTRATE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | | | | 09.BUILDING ADDRESS REQUIRED ON NEW STRUCTURE.A | | | MINIMUM OF AT LEAST 6" HIGH NUMBERS AND AT LEAST 1" | | | WIDE SHALL BE PROVIDED.NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH | | | THE BACKGROUND.SHOW THE ACTUAL ADDRESS NUMBERS ON THE | | | APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONTHE PROJECT | | | SITE ADDRESS (1505, NOT 1501) SHALL BE IN THE TITLE | | | BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET | | | | | | 10.A KNOX-BOX WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE BUILDING. SHOW | | | THE LOCATION OF THE KNOX BOX ON THE APPROPIATE EXTERIOR | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 11.KNOX LOCKING CAPS SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE NEW | | | FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION.ADD COMMENT TO AN | | | APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | | | | 17.NO FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM DRAWINGS PROVIDED WITH | | | PLANS.SHOW A LAYOUT OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER HEADS | | | | | | 18.DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS WHEN ACTIVATED SHALL CAUSE | | | THE BUILDING(S) FIRE ALARM SYSTEM(S) TO ACTIVATE.ADD | | | COMMENT TO THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | | | | 21.WHAT IS THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE PORTACACHERE. | | | SHOW 13' 8 1/2" ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | | | | 27.PLEASE PROVIDE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGHT REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR ANY HANDRAILS OR GUARDRAILS. | | | | | | 29.STAIRS TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING AND | | | FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2007-10-22 |
Time |
11:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2007-10-22 |
Time |
10:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-22 11:23:34 | 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO | | | COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 2. ALL DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY. | | | | | | 3. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE TO BE LOCATED PRIOR TO ANY | | | EXCAVATING. | | | | | | 4. ON PAGE FOUR LABELED WATER DISTRIBUTION AND | | | WASTEWATER PLANS ONLY ONE FIRE HYDRANT, FIRE HYDRANT # | | | 1 IS SHOWN. PLEASE DISPLAY ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE | | | HYDRANTS FOR THE SITE. | | | | | | 5. ALL FIRE LINE BAKFLOW DEVICES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH | | | TAMPER SWITCHES, CHAINS AND LOCKS. | | | | | | 6. ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL MEET UTILITY AND FIRE | | | RESCUE STANDARDS. | | | | | | 7. SUITABLE FIRE AND PARAMEDICAL ACCESS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ALL ACCESS POINTS TO THE EXISTING | | | FACILITY THAT CAN BE USED BY FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | 9. BUILDING ADDRESS REQUIRED ON NEW STRUCTURE. A | | | MINIMUM OF AT LEAST 6" HIGH NUMBERS AND AT LEAST 1" | | | WIDE SHALL BE PROVIDED. NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THE | | | BACKGROUND. | | | | | | 10. A KNOX-BOX WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 11. KNOX-BOX LOCKING CAPS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE NEW | | | FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. | | | | | | 12. SEPERATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 13. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 14. FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM TO BE | | | MONITORED BY A UL LISTED CENTRAL STATION APPROVED FOR | | | CENTRAL STATION SERVICE. | | | | | | 15. PLEASE EXPLAIN SINGLE EXIT DOOR LEADING FROM THE | | | MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM INTO THE PANTRY AREA. | | | | | | 16. ARE ANY EMERGENCY LIGTHING FIXTURES PLANNED FOR THE | | | RESTROOMS. | | | | | | 17. NO FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM DRAWINGS PROVIDED WITH | | | PLANS. PLANS AND CALCULATIONS ARE TO BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 18. DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS WHEN ACTIVATED SHALL CAUSE THE | | | BUILDING(S) FIRE ALARM SYSTEM(S) TO ACTIVATE. | | | | | | 19. ARE ANY CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS PLANNED TO BE | | | INSTALLED. | | | | | | 20. NATURAL GAS INSTALLATION TO COMPLY WITH NFPA CODES | | | AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | 21. WHAT IS THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE PORTACACHERE. | | | | | | 22. LIFE SAFETY SHEET PAGE A-800 IS BLANK. | | | | | | 23. DOOR SCHEDULE ON PAGE A-700 DECLARES NO RATED FIRE | | | DOORS PLANNED FOR THE SITE. | | | | | | 24. PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE EXIT PANIC HARDWARE REQUIRED | | | ON ALL DOORS SUBJECT TO AN OCCUPANCY LOAD OF 100 OR | | | MORE PERSONS. | | | | | | 25. PLEASE INDICATE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR | | | WALLS AND CEILINGS. | | | | | | 26. PLEASE DECLARE CONSTRUCTION OF TRELLIS. | | | | | | 27. PLEASE PROVIDE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR ANY HANDRAILS OR GUARDRAILS. | | | | | | 29. STAIRS ARE TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING AND | | | FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. | | | | | | 30. ALL EXTERIOR STAIRS USED FOR EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL | | | BE SLIP RESISTANT. | | | | | | 31. PLEASE DECLARE LOCATIONS OF ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS | | | AND THE TYPES BEING PROPOSED. | | | | | | 32. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON FLAME SPREAD FOR THE | | | DIVISING WALLS AND ANY HARDWARE ATTACHED TO THIS | | | DEVICE. | | | | | | 33. PLEASE EXPLAIN PURPOSE OF CLASSROOM. WHAT AGES ARE | | | PLANNED. | | | | | | 34. OCCUPANT LOAD TO BE DETERMINED BY THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 35. TABLES AND CHAIRS APPEAR TO BE TIGHT IN SOME | | | LOCALES IN THE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM. | | | | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | | 804-4709 PHONE | | | 804-4774 FAX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
Time |
13:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
Time |
13:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
15:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
17:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-08 15:02:37 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | ********FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | 1. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GAS PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED: | | | | | | A. OK | | | B. OK | | | C. OK | | | D. OK | | | | | | E. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. MANUF. INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDING CLEARANCES ARE REQUIRED. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED. SHEETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE | | | THE GAS PORTION OF THE PLAN REVIEW AND THE ISSUE THE | | | GAS PERMIT. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, SHEETS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | ********NO RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 27. OK | | | | | | **********NEW GAS COMMENTS********** | | | | | | 1B. OK | | | 2B. OK | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
Time |
10:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
Time |
10:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-22 10:54:53 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | 1. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GAS PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED: | | | | | | A. OK | | | B. OK | | | C. OK | | | D. OK | | | | | | E. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. MANUF. INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDING CLEARANCES ARE REQUIRED. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED. SHEETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE | | | THE GAS PORTION OF THE PLAN REVIEW AND THE ISSUE THE | | | GAS PERMIT. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, SHEETS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 27. OK | | | | | | **********NEW GAS COMMENTS********** | | | | | | 1B. OK | | | 2B. OK | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
Time |
13:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
Time |
13:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-10 13:14:02 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GAS PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED: | | | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE LENGTHS OF THE CUT SECTIONS | | | ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. | | | | | | B. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THIS WILL BE VERIFIED WHEN | | | COMMENT "A" IS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | C. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION | | | AIR (IF APPLICABLE) PER FBC-2004 FUEL | | | GAS CODE SECTION 304. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | D. OK | | | | | | E. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. MANUF. INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDING CLEARANCES ARE REQUIRED. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED. SHEETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE | | | THE GAS PORTION OF THE PLAN REVIEW AND THE ISSUE THE | | | GAS PERMIT. | | | | | | 27. OK | | | | | | **********NEW GAS COMMENTS********** | | | | | | 1B. A SHUT OFF VALVE IS REQUIRED UPSTREAM OF THE "ETR" | | | & WITHIN 6' OF THE GENERATOR PER SECTION 409.5. PLEASE | | | INDICATED ON THE GAS RISER DIAGRAM. | | | | | | 2B. PER TABLE 402.4(2), 2-1/2" PIPE IS REQUIRED FOR THE | | | GAS LINE TO THE GENERATOR. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-10-27 |
Time |
13:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-10-27 |
Time |
13:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-10 13:13:06 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | | | | 1. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GAS PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED: | | | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE. | | | | | | B. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). | | | | | | C. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION | | | AIR (IF APPLICABLE) PER FBC-2004 FUEL | | | GAS CODE SECTION 304. | | | | | | D. INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | | PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. | | | | | | E. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. MANUF. INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDING CLEARANCES ARE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 27. PLANS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE 100% COMPLETE AND MORE | | | COMMENTS MAY BE FORTHCOMING ACCORDING TO COMMENT | | | RESPONSES AND NEW INFORMATION. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
22 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-11-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-11-09 |
Time |
09:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-11-09 |
Time |
09:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-09 09:42:53 | SENT TO BOX #C22. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
21 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2009-10-22 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
2009-10-22 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-22 16:48:49 | ROUTED TO J WITMER'S DESK PER R BROWN |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
20 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-10-05 |
Time |
10:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-10-05 |
Time |
10:35 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-10-05 10:35:25 | TO JW'S DESK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
19 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-16 |
Time |
08:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-16 |
Time |
08:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-16 08:35:15 | SENT TO C-34. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
18 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
Time |
14:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-08-19 |
Time |
14:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-19 14:53:44 | ALSO, WALL PENETRATION,AND ENERGY CALC'S, REVISION | | 2009-08-19 14:51:47 | ALSO, ROOF SOFFIT DETAIL REVISION | | 2009-08-19 14:50:25 | GAVE TO JIM, SEMCO STRUCT REVISION |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
17 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-17 |
Time |
16:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-08-17 |
Time |
16:03 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-17 16:03:47 | ELEC AND MECH REV ROUTED TO DVP'S DESK. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
16 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
13:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
13:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-28 13:08:32 | FIRE SPRINKLER SHOP DRAWINGS AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN INFO | | | ROUTED TO MIKE WILLIAMS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
15 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-07-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-07-01 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2009-07-01 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-01 11:14:29 | EXPEDITED REVISIONS FOR BUILDING, PLUMBING AND | | | LANDSCAPE / TO COMM BD # C38 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
14 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-06-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-06-16 |
Time |
15:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-06-15 |
Time |
15:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-16 15:54:42 | ELECTRICAL RISER FOR LIFT STATION, GAVE TO DEWEY |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-06-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-06-16 |
Time |
15:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-06-15 |
Time |
15:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-16 15:47:32 | RESPONCES TO RFI'S # 70-74, GAVE TO JIM WITMER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-06-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-06-15 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-06-15 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-06-16 15:39:13 | ENTRANCE CANOPY REVISION | | 2009-06-16 15:38:03 | GAVE TO JIM WITMER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-05-05 |
Time |
16:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-05-05 |
Time |
16:13 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
swurafti |
Date |
2009-04-20 |
Time |
16:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
swurafti |
Date |
2009-04-20 |
Time |
16:37 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-20 16:39:04 | TO "JWITMER" DESK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-08 |
Time |
11:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-08 |
Time |
11:17 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-08 11:18:16 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
Time |
08:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
Time |
08:12 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-03 08:17:59 | TO RREGUEIRO DESK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
Time |
12:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
Time |
12:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-30 12:13:13 | TO "C30" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
Time |
15:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-10 15:54:48 | TO "COMM" BD#47--6 ROLLS AND PAPERWORK--EXPEDITED-- |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
Time |
10:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
Time |
10:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-18 10:05:19 | TO "COMM" BD#8-PLANS ON RACK-6 | | | ROLLS/PAPERWORK--EXPEDITED-- |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-30 |
Time |
15:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-30 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-30 15:55:01 | TO "COMM" BD#30--PLANS ON RACK/6 ROLLS AND | | | PAPERWORK--EXPEDITED-- |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-01 10:52:06 | TO "COMM" BD#39 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-08 |
Time |
09:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-08 |
Time |
09:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-08 09:09:40 | TO "COMM" BD#38 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-30 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
16:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-21 14:41:46 | TO COMM BOARD SPACE #1 | | 2007-10-01 16:26:37 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-07-06 |
Time |
16:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-07-06 |
Time |
16:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
15:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
Time |
08:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
Time |
08:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-24 08:56:35 | ***FAILED FOR PLAN REVIEW. PLANS WITH LAST REVISION | | | DATE NOV. 4, 2008, AND SIGNED AND SEALED ON NOV. 11, | | | 2008 ARE OKAY*** | | | | | | PER ROBERT KUSSNER, LANDSCAPE PLANNER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
16:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
16:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-16 16:32:18 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. THERE ARE CONFLICTS BETWEEN PROPOSED UTILITIES AND | | | LANDSCAPING. DRAINAGE LINES AND OTHER UTILITIES SHALL | | | BE KEPT OUT OF THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. NOT ALL OF THE | | | NEWLY PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS ARE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN AND SEVERAL OF THEM WILL BE IN CONFLICT WITH | | | PROPOSED TREES. | | | | | | 2. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED YELLOW TABEBUIA | | | TREES BE CHANGED TO PINK TABEBUIA OR ANOTHER SPECIES. | | | YELLOW TABEBUIA TREES HAVE WEAK ROOT SYSTEMS AND ARE | | | SUBJECT TO FALLING OVER IN HIGH WINDS. | | | | | | 3. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(3)(A), LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS OF 2 1/2 FEET AT | | | ITS END SO AS TO ALLOW CAR MANEUVERING. | | | | | | | | | FOR ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, PLEASE | | | CONTACT ROBERT KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
09:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
09:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-24 09:36:41 | PLEASE SEE ZONING COMMENTS DATED 7/11/08. | | | PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462 IF YOU | | | HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE LANDSCAPING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
14:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
14:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-14 14:51:21 | PLANNING AND ZONING | | | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS | | | | | | FAILED****CONTACT ROBERT KUSSNER @ 822-1462, | | | | | | 1,THE SYMBOLS 'PSN' AND 'CAB' WERE SHOWN ON THE PLAN | | | BUT WERE NOT ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 2.THERE ARE ATE LEAST TWO (2) MAHOGANY TREES FOUND | | | ON SITE THAT WERE SEVERELY STORM DAMAGED.PLEASE | | | CAREFULLY EXAMINE ALL TREES SCHEDULED TO REMAIN IN | | | PLACE OR BE RELOCATED AND REMOVE THOSE TREES THAT ARE | | | NOT IN GOOD CONDITION. | | | | | | 3.PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(5)(A), LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM VEHICULAR USE AREAS BY | | | NON-MOUNTABLE, CONCRETE CURBING OF THE TYPE | | | CHARACTERIZED AS "TYPE D".THE CURBING MUST BE ADDED | | | THROUGHOUT THE PARKING LOT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS | | | MODIFICATION AND NOT JUST WHERE ASPHALT WORK IS BEING | | | DONE. | | | | | | 4.ELIMINATE ALL CONFLICTS BETWEEN PROPOSED STREET | | | LIGHTS AND TREES.ALSO, SHOW ALL UTILITIES AND | | | EASEMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID ANY OTHER | | | CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2010-08-16 |
Time |
11:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2010-08-16 |
Time |
11:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-08-16 11:03:53 | TEST AND BALANCE REPORT IS OK 8/19/10 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
Time |
16:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-12-01 |
Time |
15:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-12-01 16:46:11 | REVIEW #: REVISION | | | ACTION: | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE VENTILATION CALCULATIONS WITH SPACE-BY-SPACE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, OCCUPANT | | | LOAD AND VENTILATION RATES TO BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBC-M SECTION 403. | | | | | | 2. PLANS AND NOTE #5 ON PAGE M-1 INDICATE NEW AHUS TO | | | BE INSTALLED AND CONNECTED TO EXISTING CONDENSING | | | UNITS. PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THESE | | | TO BE MATCHED SYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-B | | | 13-101.6. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE ATTACHMENT DETAIL ALONG WITH MANUFACTURER'S | | | DATA FOR WIND RESISTANT INSTALLATION OF OUTDOOR | | | CONDENSING UNITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M 301.13. | | | | | | 4. SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARIES WERE SUBMITTED FOR NEW | | | SYSTEMS IN LIEU OF FULL COOLING LOAD CLACULATIONS. | | | SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARIES SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-B | | | 13-407.AB.1. | | | | | | 5. AHU 4 SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH DUCT SMOKE DETECTOR IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M 606.2.1. | | | | | | 6. THE SCOPE OF WORK RELATED TO THIS REVISION | | | REPRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT EXPANSION FROM THE SCOPE | | | COVERED BY THE PERMIT AT TIME OF ISSUANCE. THE | | | VALUATION OF WORK SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO REFLECT AND | | | INCLUDE THE VALUE OF THE EXPANDED SCOPE. | | | | | | NOTE: SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED FOR KITCHEN EXHAUST AND VENTILATION SYSTEM. | | | THE KITCHEN EXHAUST/VENTILATION SYSTEMS ARE NOT PART OF | | | THIS REVIEW AND HAVE NOT BEEN EVALUATED FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
Time |
08:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-11-24 |
Time |
08:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-11-24 08:04:28 | REVISED M-1 DELTA 5, REVISED SUBMITTAL #17A DATED | | | 10/12/09 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-31 |
Time |
09:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-31 |
Time |
09:11 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-31 09:11:31 | NEW E-CALCS FOR REDUCED ROOF R-VALUE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-08-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-24 |
Time |
09:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-08-24 |
Time |
09:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-08-24 09:48:13 | REVISED M-1 DELTA 4, REVISED M-2 DELTA 6 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2009-04-09 |
Time |
09:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-06 |
Time |
14:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-06 |
Time |
14:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-06 14:30:54 | ***********PROVISO************ | | | | | | PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S SUBMITTAL OR OTHER SUPPORTING | | | DATA SHOWING THE OUTDOOR APPLIANCES WHICH ARE EXPOSED | | | TO WIND ARE DESIGNED TO RESIST WIND PRESSURES IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. THIS INFORMATION SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND | | | INSPECTION OF OUTDOOR APPLIANCES. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-20 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-20 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-20 09:17:38 | REVIEW #: 6TH | | | ACTION: PASSED W/ PROVISO | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | BASED ON THE BUILDING PLAN REVIEW, THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS ARE BEING CORRECTED AND RESUBMITTED. | | | MECHANICAL REVIEW WILL BE IN TEMPORARY FAIL STATUS | | | PENDING RECEIPT OF THE CORRECTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | ONCE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE RECEIVED, REVIEWED AND | | | PASSED, THE MECHANICAL REVIEW STATUS WILL BE CHANGED TO | | | PASS STATUS WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISO: | | | | | | ***********PROVISO************ | | | | | | PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S SUBMITTAL OR OTHER SUPPORTING | | | DATA SHOWING THE OUTDOOR APPLIANCES WHICH ARE EXPOSED | | | TO WIND ARE DESIGNED TO RESIST WIND PRESSURES IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. THIS INFORMATION SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND | | | INSPECTION OF OUTDOOR APPLIANCES. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | NOTE: DESIGNER'S WRITTEN RESPONSES DATED 12/4/08 | | | INDICATE THAT ONE OF THE MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS | | | [COMMENT 2(D) DATED 11/24/08] WAS "BASED ON THE PLAN | | | REVIEWER VALUE ENGINEERING THE PLANS." THIS RESPONSE IS | | | NEITHER HELPFUL NOR ACCURATE. IN A PREVIOUS REVIEW IT | | | WAS ASKED FOR PURPOSES OF CLARIFICATION WHETHER ALL | | | FIRE DAMPERS WERE INTENDED TO BE FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS, OR | | | IF THERE WOULD BE STANDARD FIRE DAMPERS WHERE THE | | | COMBINATION DAMPERS WERE NOT REQUIRED BY CODE. THE | | | RESPONSE FROM STEVE HOCKMAN WAS THAT THE PLANS WOULD BE | | | CHANGED TO REFLECT FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS ONLY IN LOCATIONS | | | REQUIRED BY CODE. WHEN THE PLANS WERE RESUBMITTED AND | | | THIS CHANGE WAS NOT MADE, DESPITE A WRITTEN RESPONSE | | | INDICATING THAT THE CHANGE WAS MADE, COMMENT 2(D) | | | REQUESTED CLARIFICATION AGAIN. THIS WAS NOT AN ATTEMPT | | | AT "VALUE ENGINEERING" AND AT NO TIME DID ANY REVIEW | | | COMMENTS INSTRUCT ANYONE TO CHANGE FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS | | | TO FIRE DAMPERS TO SAVE MONEY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
Time |
18:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
Time |
17:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-24 18:43:10 | REVIEW #: 5TH | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2 AND 12: COMMENT #2 AND #12 ARE BEING COMBINED IN THIS | | | REVIEW AS THEY DEAL WITH THE SAME SUBJECT. THERE | | | CONTINUES TO BE COORDINATION PROBLEMS BETWEEN | | | ARCHITECTURAL, LIFE SAFETY AND MECHANICAL PLANS RELATED | | | TO WALL TYPES, RATINGS AND DUCT PENETRATIONS OF WALLS: | | | | | | A) **THIS COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED** THE LOCATION OF RATED | | | WALL ASSEMBLIES ON LS-1.0 AND A-102 DO NOT CORRESPOND. | | | EXAMPLE: THE WALLS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF | | | CLASSROOM 160 ARE SHOWN TO BE 1-HOUR RATED (WALL TAG | | | 1A) ON PAGE A-102 BUT NO RATING IS SHOWN OB PAGE LS | | | 1.0. THERE ARE MULTIPLE DUCT PENETRATIONS OF THESE | | | WALLS SHOWN ON PAGE M-2 WITH NO PROTECTION. IT WILL NOT | | | BE CLEAR ON PLANS IF ALL DUCT PENETRATIONS WHICH | | | REQUIRE PROTECTION ARE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBCM 607.5 UNTIL ALL PLANS ARE COORDINATED. | | | | | | B) **PARTIALLY ADDRESSED** THE 30X14 SUPPLY DUCT FROM | | | AHU-3 IS PENETRATING A 1-HOUR CORRIDOR WALL AS IT | | | ENTERS CLASSROOM 160 WITH NO PROTECTION OF THIS | | | PENETRATION SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN. SHOW HOW THIS OPENING | | | IS TO BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.5. | | | **PLEASE ADDRESS: THERE IS STILL NO INDICATION ONPLANS | | | WHETHER THIS IS A FIRE DAMPER OR A FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER. A | | | FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER IS REQUIRED AT THIS LOCATION IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.5 AND 607.5.4. | | | | | | C) OK | | | | | | D) **THIS COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED** MECHANICAL | | | SPECIFICATIONS NOTE #10 ON PAGE M-1 INDICATES ALL FIRE | | | DAMPERS ARE TO BE CORRIDOR COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE | | | DAMPERS. FLOOR PLAN ONLY HAS ONE SYMBOL USED FOR FIRE | | | DAMPERS AT ALL LOCATIONS. IS THE DESIGN INTENT THAT ALL | | | FIRE DAMPERS REGARDLESS OF LOCATION BE COMBINATION | | | FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS? NOT ALL FIRE DAMPERS ON PLANS ARE | | | LOCATED AT A CORRIDOR WALL PENETRATION AND THERE IS NO | | | MEANS ON PLANS TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN CORRIDOR TYPE | | | COMBINATION DAMPERS AND STANDARD FIRE DAMPERS. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY, SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM 607.5.3 AND | | | 607.5.4. | | | | | | 3 THROUGH 7: OK | | | | | | 8. OK | | | | | | 9. **THIS COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED** NEW COOLING LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS HAVE STILL NOT BEEN PROVIDED WITH ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY FBCB 13-407.1.ABC.1. | | | **PLEASE ADDRESS: ONE SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY SET WAS | | | SUBMITTED WITH ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE. THE OTHER | | | TWO SETS HAVE PHOTOCOPIED SIGNATURES AND NO SEALS. | | | PLEASE ATTACH A SIGNED AND SEALED SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY | | | SET TO EACH SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-407.1.ABC.1 AND FBCB 106.1. | | | | | | 10. OK | | | | | | 11. **PARTIALLY ADDRESSED** THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN | | | ADDRESSED. THERE IS NO INSTALLATION ATTACHMENT DETAIL | | | FOR WIND RESISTANCE FOR THE OUTDOOR INSTALLED ERV AND | | | NO INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ERV SHOWING | | | IT IS DESIGNED TO RESIST WIND PRESSURES IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBCM 301.13. | | | **PLEASE ADDRESS: ATTACHMENT INFORMATION ON PLANS OK. | | | HOWEVER, NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED REGARDING WIND | | | RESISTANCE OF THE ERV ITSELF. APPLIANCES EXPOSED TO | | | WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESIST WIND PRESSURES IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. | | | | | | 12. SEE COMMENT #2 ABOVE. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO EACH COMMENT IN WRITING WITH A | | | DESCRIPTION OF HOW EACH COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED AS | | | WELL AS WHERE THE PROVIDED INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND. | | | THIS WILL ASSIST IN PROVIDING A TIMELY REVIEW WITH AS | | | FEW DELAYS AS POSSIBLE. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-10-11 |
Time |
13:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-10-11 |
Time |
13:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-11 13:58:13 | REVIEW #: 4TH | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | NO WRITTEN RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS MECHANICAL REVIEW | | | COMMENTS WERE PROVIDED. WHILE THIS IS NOT A CODE | | | REQUIREMENT, IT DOES ASSIST THE REVIEWER IN | | | UNDERSTANDING HOW THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, | | | SAVES UNNECCESARY REVIEW TIME AND AVOIDS DELAYS. | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2 AND 12: COMMENT #2 AND #12 ARE BEING COMBINED IN THIS | | | REVIEW AS THEY DEAL WITH THE SAME SUBJECT. THERE | | | CONTINUES TO BE COORDINATION PROBLEMS BETWEEN | | | ARCHITECTURAL, LIFE SAFETY AND MECHANICAL PLANS RELATED | | | TO WALL TYPES, RATINGS AND DUCT PENETRATIONS OF WALLS: | | | | | | A) THE LOCATION OF RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES ON LS-1.0 AND | | | A-102 DO NOT CORRESPOND. EXAMPLE: THE WALLS ON THE EAST | | | AND WEST SIDE OF CLASSROOM 160 ARE SHOWN TO BE 1-HOUR | | | RATED (WALL TAG 1A) ON PAGE A-102 BUT NO RATING IS | | | SHOWN OB PAGE LS 1.0. THERE ARE MULTIPLE DUCT | | | PENETRATIONS OF THESE WALLS SHOWN ON PAGE M-2 WITH NO | | | PROTECTION. IT WILL NOT BE CLEAR ON PLANS IF ALL DUCT | | | PENETRATIONS WHICH REQUIRE PROTECTION ARE PROTECTED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.5 UNTIL ALL PLANS ARE | | | COORDINATED. | | | | | | B) THE 30X14 SUPPLY DUCT FROM AHU-3 IS PENETRATING A | | | 1-HOUR CORRIDOR WALL AS IT ENTERS CLASSROOM 160 WITH NO | | | PROTECTION OF THIS PENETRATION SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN. | | | SHOW HOW THIS OPENING IS TO BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBCM 607.5. | | | | | | C) THE 14X10 SUPPLY DUCT BRANCH COMING FROM AHU-3 IS | | | SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN WITH A FIRE DAMPER WHERE THERE IS | | | NO WALL ASSEMBLY. FIRE DAMPERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT | | | RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.2. | | | | | | D) MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS NOTE #10 ON PAGE M-1 | | | INDICATES ALL FIRE DAMPERS ARE TO BE CORRIDOR | | | COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS. FLOOR PLAN ONLY HAS ONE | | | SYMBOL USED FOR FIRE DAMPERS AT ALL LOCATIONS. IS THE | | | DESIGN INTENT THAT ALL FIRE DAMPERS REGARDLESS OF | | | LOCATION BE COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS? NOT ALL | | | FIRE DAMPERS ON PLANS ARE LOCATED AT A CORRIDOR WALL | | | PENETRATION AND THERE IS NO MEANS ON PLANS TO | | | DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN CORRIDOR TYPE COMBINATION DAMPERS | | | AND STANDARD FIRE DAMPERS. PLEASE CLARIFY, SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM 607.5.3 AND 607.5.4. | | | | | | 3 THROUGH 7: OK | | | | | | 8. NOTE 13 ON PAGE M-2 HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO SHOW TWO | | | LINE SETS PER CONDENSING UNIT FOR AHU-1 AND AHU-2. DOES | | | THIS MEAN THERE ARE TWO CONDENSING UNITS PER AHU? THERE | | | IS ONLY ONE CONDENSING UNIT PER AHU SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY PER FBCM 304.1 AND FBCB 106.1.1. | | | | | | 9. NEW COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS HAVE STILL NOT BEEN | | | PROVIDED WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY FBCB | | | 13-407.1.ABC.1. ALSO, PLEASE SEE BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | COMMENTS RELATED TO DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN BUILDING | | | PLANS AND SQUARE FOOTAGE SHOWN ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | PLANS AND CALCULATIONS SHALL CORRESPOND IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBCB 13-103.2. | | | | | | 10. OK | | | | | | 11. THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. THERE IS NO | | | INSTALLATION ATTACHMENT DETAIL FOR WIND RESISTANCE FOR | | | THE OUTDOOR INSTALLED ERV AND NO INFORMATION ON THE | | | CONSTRUCTION OF THE ERV SHOWING IT IS DESIGNED TO | | | RESIST WIND PRESSURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. | | | | | | 12. SEE COMMENT #2 ABOVE. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO EACH COMMENT IN WRITING WITH A | | | DESCRIPTION OF HOW EACH COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED AS | | | WELL AS WHERE THE PROVIDED INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND. | | | THIS WILL ASSIST IN PROVIDING A TIMELY REVIEW WITH AS | | | FEW DELAYS AS POSSIBLE. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-07-17 |
Time |
16:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-07-16 |
Time |
16:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-17 16:56:51 | REVIEW #: 3RD. **PLAN REVIEW** | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. SOME OF THE COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS WHICH | | | HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CORRIDOR WALLS AT HALLWAY 152 | | | ARE NOT SHOWN AT THE LOCATION OF THE RATED WALL | | | ASSEMBLIES AS SHOWN ON PAGE LS-1.0. SOME ARE SHOWN AT A | | | SOFFIT RATHER THAN BEING SET-BACK IN THE ALCOVE WHERE | | | THE RATED WALL ASSEMBLY IS LOCATED. ALSO, HALL 165 IS | | | SHOWN ON LS-1.0 AS BEING ON THE CORRIDOR SIDE OF THE | | | RATED WALL ASSEMBLY. THE RESULT IS THERE ARE NO DAMPERS | | | SHOWN ON PAGE M-2 WHERE THE DUCTS ACTUALLY PENETRATE | | | THE RATED WALLS. PLEASE COORDINATE MECHANICAL PLANS | | | WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND LIFE SAFETY PLANS TO SHOW DUCT | | | PENETRATIONS LOCATED AT THE ACTUAL WALL ASSEMBLIES IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.5. | | | | | | 3 THROUGH 5: OK | | | | | | 6. IS THIS DESIGN WITH TEK (SHEET METAL) SCREWS INTO | | | WOOD AND ONLY ATTACHING TO CORRUGATED DECKING INTENDED | | | AND DESIGNED FOR WIND RESISTANCE? PLEASE CLARIFY AND | | | COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. ALSO, NO | | | INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED REGARDING THE WIND RESISTANCE | | | OF THE GREENHECK ROOF CAP. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM | | | 301.13 AS STATED IN PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT #6. | | | | | | 7. OK PENDING BUILDING REVIEW. | | | | | | 8. OK | | | | | | 9A. OK | | | | | | 9B. OK | | | | | | 9C. THE IDR HAS BEEN CORRECTED FOR MECHANICAL ITEMS. | | | HOWEVER, COOLING LOAD CALCULATION HAVE NOT BEEN | | | ATTACHED TO THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY FBCB | | | 13-407.1.ABC.1. | | | NOTE: SOME VALUES OF THE OLD COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS | | | MAY HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE ADDITION OF THE ERV AND | | | NEWLY CALCULATED VENTILATION RATES. PLEASE UPDATE | | | COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS TO REFLECT THESE NEW VALUES | | | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING. | | | | | | 9D. OK | | | | | | 10. OK | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS RELATED TO NEW INFORMATION ON PLANS: | | | | | | 11. A NEW ERV UNIT HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE MECHANICAL | | | PLANS. NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED REGARDING WIND | | | MOUNTING AND WIND RESISTANCE FOR THIS OUTDOOR | | | APPLIANCE. PROVIDE INSTALLATION DETAIL AND | | | MANUFACTURER'S DATA SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE WIND | | | RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS OF FBCM 301.13. | | | | | | 12. PAGE A-101 AND LS-1.0 CONTINUE TO HAVE COORDINATION | | | PROBLEMS. EXAMPLE: STORAGE ROOM 151AND MULTI-PURPOSE | | | ROOM 146 ARE SHOWN ON LS-1.0 TO BE SEPARATED BY 1-HOUR | | | CONSTRUCTION. PAGE A-101 WALL TAG AND A-600 WALL TYPES | | | SHOW THIS WALL AS CARRYING NO FIRE RATING. THE NEW DUCT | | | FOR THE ERV SYSTEM IS SHOWN PENETRATING THIS WALL WITH | | | NO PROTECTION. ALSO, THE WALLS AT MECHANICAL ROOM 150 | | | AND PANTRY 147 ARE ALSO SHOWN WITH FIRE RATED WALLS. | | | THERE ARE MULTIPLE DUCT PENETRATIONS IN THESE AREAS | | | WITHOUT PROTECTION. PLEASE COORDINATE ALL AEAS OF | | | MECHANICAL, ARCHITECTURAL AND LIFE SAFETY PLANS AND | | | SHOW EACH DUCT PENETRATION TO BE PROTECTED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.5. | | | NOTE: SMOKE DAMPERS ARE ONLY REQUIRED AT THE CORRIDOR | | | PENETRATIONS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
Time |
11:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
Time |
09:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-20 11:16:42 | REVIEW #: 2ND **PLAN CHECK ONLY** | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 1. THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE PLANS FOR THE NEW AND | | | EXISTING BUILDINGS. ARE THESE TO BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE | | | PERMITS? THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT PAGES NUMBERED M-1 AND | | | M-2 AND THEY COVER DIFFERENT SCOPES OF WORK. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. ALSO, THE LEVEL OF ALTERATION COULD NOT BE | | | FOUND ON PLANS. THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SHALL DECLARE | | | THE LEVEL OF ALTERATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCEB | | | 301.5. | | | | | | 2. WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THIS COMMENT INDICATES THAT | | | THERE ARE NO DUCTWORK PENETRATIONS OF RATED WALL | | | ASSEMBLIES ON THIS PROJECT. THIS STATEMENT IS IN | | | CONFLICT WITH THE INFORMATION ON PAGES LS-1.0 AND M-2. | | | PAGE LS-1.0 SHOWS THE WALL BETWEEN THE MULTI-PURPOSE | | | ROOM AND THE ENTRANCE HALLWAY TO BE 1-HOUR FIRE | | | RESISTANCE RATED. PAGE M-2 SHOWS AT LEAST TWO TYPE J | | | AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS IN THIS RATED WALL. | | | | | | ADDITIONALLY, THE ENTRANCE HALLWAY IS SERVING AS AN | | | EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR FOR THE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY IN THE | | | MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM. THIS CORRIDOR IS REQUIRED TO BE | | | 1-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB | | | TABLE 1016.1. THIS WOULD REQUIRE BOTH SIDES OF THE | | | CORRIDOR TO BE FIRE RESISTANCE RATED. THERE ARE | | | MULTIPLE DUCT PENETRATIONS IN THE WALL ON THE OTHER | | | SIDE OF THE CORRIDOR IN ADDITION TO THE AIR TRANSFER | | | OPENINGS MENTIONED ABOVE. ALL OF THESE OPENINGS AND | | | PENETRATIONS OF THE RATED CORRIDOR WALLS ARE REQUIRED | | | TO BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.5. | | | NOTE: DUCT PENETRATIONS AND AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS IN | | | FIRE-RESISTANCE RATED CORRIDORS ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | PROTECTED WITH FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBCM 607.5.4 AND FBCB 715.3.3. SHOW HOW THESE | | | OPENINGS AND PENETRATIONS ARE TO BE PROTECTED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THESE SECTIONS. ALSO, SHOW HOW THESE | | | SMOKE DAMPERS ARE TO BE ACTUATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBCM 607.5.4.1. | | | | | | 3. PAGE M-1 OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS STATE "BASED ON | | | ASHRAE 62.1-2007." THIS IS A STANDARD WHICH IS NOT | | | REFERENCED OR ADOPTED IN THE 2004 FBCM. THE CURRENT | | | ADOPTED STANDARD IS ASHRAE 62.1-2004. VENTILATION | | | SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS | | | STANDARD OR FBCM 403.3 AND NOT BY A STANDARD WHICH HAS | | | NOT BEEN ADOPTED BY CODE. PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | NOTE: ACCORDING TO ASHRAE 62.1-2004 TABLE 6.1, A | | | MULTI-USE ASSEMBLY SPACE REQUIRES 7.5 CFM PER PERSON | | | AND HAS AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 PEOPLE PER 1000 SQ.FT. | | | PAGE LS-1.0 SHOWS THIS SPACE AT 4501 SQ.FT. WHICH WOULD | | | GIVE AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 450 PEOPLE. THE OCCUPANT LOAD | | | SHALL BE BASED ON SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA AND NOT | | | SEATING AS THE SEATING IN THIS AREA IS NOT FIXED. | | | PLEASE VERIFY ALL VALUES IN THE OUTSIDE AIR | | | CALCULATIONS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH TABLE 6.1 AND | | | ADJUST CALCULATIONS AS NEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | | 403.4. | | | | | | 4. OK | | | | | | 5. OK | | | | | | 6. ROOF VENTILATOR DETAIL, THERE IS NO INFORMATION | | | REGARDING THE SIZE AND TYPE OF FASTENERS USED TO ATTACH | | | THE VENTILATOR TO THE CURB. THERE IS ALSO NO | | | INFORMATION REGARDING THE TYPE AND SIZE OF FASTENERS | | | USED TO ATTACH THE CURB TO THE STRUCTURE. IF WOOD | | | NAILERS ARE USED FOR THE CURB, THEN INFORMATION IS | | | NEEDED ON THE NAILERS, SUCH AS SIZE AND TYPE OF NAILER, | | | HOW THE NAILER IS ATTACHED TO THE STRUCTURE. ALSO, | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER SHOWING THE | | | VENTILATOR IS DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND ANTICIPATED WIND | | | PRESSURES. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND | | | SUPPORTS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED AND | | | INSTALLED TO RESIST THE WIND PRESSURES ON THE EQUIPMENT | | | AND THE SUPPORTS AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING PER FBCM 301.13. | | | SUFFICIENT DETAIL AND INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH FBCB | | | SECTIONS 1604 AND 1609. | | | | | | 7. IT IS UP TO THE DESIGNER TO DETERMINE THE SIZE, | | | NUMBER AND SPACING OF FASTENERS NEEDED TO SECURE | | | OUTDOOR APPLIANCES TO WITHSTAND ANTICIPATED WIND | | | PRESSURES. NO DETAIL HAS BEEN PROVIDED. PLEASE SEE | | | COMMENT ABOVE. MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS | | | MAY BE SUFFICIENT IF MANUFACTURER?S DATA SHOWS THE | | | ATTACHMENT METHODS SPECIFIED HAVE BEEN TESTED TO MEET | | | ANTICIPATED WIND PRESSURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | | 301.13, FBCB 1604 AND FBCB 1609. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL FOR | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE | | | SECTIONS. | | | | | | 8. NOTE #13 ON M-2 STATES "ONLY ON SET OF LINES PER PVC | | | CONDUIT." THIS MAY JUST BE A TYPO AND INTENDED TO SAY | | | "ONLY ONE SET"? BUT THE MEANING IS UNCLEAR. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. FBCM 1107.2.1, FBCB 106.1.1. | | | | | | 9. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: | | | A) THE CERTIFICATION PAGE STATES THE CALCULATIONS WERE | | | PREPARED BY "C. HAMMOND." IS C. HAMMOND AN ENGINEER OR | | | ARCHITECT? ENERGY CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PREPARED BY AN | | | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-103.2. | | | ALSO, C. HAMMOND HAS NOT CERTIFIED THESE CALCULATIONS | | | AS REQUIRED BY FBCB 13-103.1.1. | | | | | | B) S. HOCKMAN AND C. HAMMOND ARE LISTED AS THE | | | ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL DESIGNERS FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | NEITHER OF THESE PEOPLE ARE THE DESIGNERS OF RECORD, AS | | | THEY DID NOT SIGN AND SEAL THE PLANS. THEY ALSO DID NOT | | | PROVIDE LICENSE NUMBERS ON THE CERTIFICATION FORM. | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONALS RESPONSIBLE UNDER FLORIDA LAW FOR | | | THE DESIGN OF LIGHTING, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, AND | | | PLUMBING SYSTEMS AND THE BUILDING SHELL, SHALL CERTIFY | | | COMPLIANCE OF THOSE BUILDING SYSTEMS WITH THE CODE BY | | | SIGNING AND PROVIDING THEIR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION | | | NUMBER ON THE ENERGY CODE FORM PROVIDED AS PART OF THE | | | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. | | | EXCEPTION: TYPED NAMES AND REGISTRATION NUMBERS MAY BE | | | PROVIDED IN LIEU OF A SIGNATURE WHERE ALL RELEVANT | | | INFORMATION HAS BEEN INCLUDED ON SIGNED AND SEALED | | | PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-103.1.1. | | | | | | C) INPUT DATA REPORT (IDR): SOME ENTRIES IN THE IDR DO | | | NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION ON THE PLANS OR THE RATINGS | | | OF THE EQUIPMENT SPECIFIED. EXAMPLE: AC-1 AND AC-2 IN | | | THE IDR SHOW EFFICIENCY AT 10.1 WHILE THE EQUIPMENT | | | SCHEDULE AND MANUFACTURER?S DATA SHOW THESE SYSTEMS | | | RATED AT 9.7 EER. THIS IS NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF ALL | | | DISCREPANCIES. PLEASE VERIFY ALL DATA WHICH IS INPUT | | | INTO THE PROGRAM CORRESPONDS WITH THE INFORMATION ON | | | THE PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-103.2 | | | | | | D) COMPLIANCE FORM SUBMITTED IS FLA/COM 2004 V3.00. THE | | | CORRECT FOR IS FLA/COM V2.5 FORM 400A-04R IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBCB 13-400.3.A. THIS VERSION 2.5 FORM MAY | | | INCORPORATE THE LATEST VERSION OF ENERGYGAUGE. | | | | | | NOTE: THESE CALCULATIONS ARE ONLY BEING REVIEWED FOR | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL AND MECHANICAL PORTIONS OF | | | THE ENERGY CODE. PLEASE SEE OTHER TRADE REVIEWS FOR | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF APPLICABLE. | | | | | | 10. NOT ADDRESSED. NO INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND IN THE | | | SUBMITTAL PACKAGE REGARDING THE GENERATOR. | | | | | | 11. OK | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-10-30 |
Time |
11:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-10-29 |
Time |
18:29 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-30 11:53:01 | REVIEW #: 1 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS FBC | | | CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | NOTE: AT THIS TIME PLANS ARE SUBMITTED FOR *PLAN REVIWE | | | ONLY.* NO PERMIT HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR AT THIS TIME. | | | ADDITIONAL REVIEWS MAY BE POSSIBLE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE | | | WITH CODES IN EFFECT AT TIME OF APPLICATION. | | | | | | 1. PLAN ONLY SHOWS MECHANICAL SCOPE OF WORK FOR NEW | | | BUILDING AREA. NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED REGARDING | | | SCOPE OF MECHANICAL WORK IN EXISTING AREAS. WHAT IS THE | | | LEVEL OF ALTERATION IN EXISTING BUILDING? THE DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL MUST ELECT ONE OR A COMBINATION OF LEVELS | | | OF ALTERATION PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 303, 304 AND 305 OF | | | THIS CODE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC, EB 301.5. THIS | | | INFORMATION MAY IMPACT THE LEVEL OF CODE COMPLIANCE | | | REQUIRED IN EXISTING AREAS. | | | | | | 2. A SCHEDULE OF WALL TYPES COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN | | | PLANS. WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO | | | DETERMINE SOME REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS WHERE OPENING | | | PROTECTIVES (FIRE AND/OR SMOKE DAMPERS) ME BE REQUIRED. | | | FBC,M 607.5. PROVIDE ALL MISSING INFORMATION NEEDED TO | | | PERFORM A COMPLETE REVIEW. FBC 106.1.1. | | | | | | 3. PG M-1: OUTSIDE AIR AND EXHAUST, THE CALCULATIONS | | | STATE "BASED ON FBC2004 - MECHANICAL AND ASHRAE 62." | | | PLEASE DECLARE WHICH METHOD IS BEING USED, EITHER FBC,M | | | 403.3 OR ASHRAE 62.1-2004. ONE METHOD OR THE OTHER MAY | | | BE USED BUT NOT BOTH. SEE FBC,M 403.4. VENTILATION AND | | | EXHAUST REQUIREMENTS CAN NOT BE REVIEWED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 4. PG M-2: AHU'S 1 AND 2 SHOW A COMMON RETURN PLENUM. | | | SAME WITH AHU'S 3 AND 4. AS SUCH, SMOKE DETECTORS ARE | | | REQUIRED ON BOTH THE SUPPLY AND RETURN IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBC,M 606.2.2. ALSO, SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL BE | | | CONNECTED TO THE BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 606.4.1. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THESE SECTIONS. | | | | | | 5. M-3 FLEXIBLE DUCT DETAIL: | | | A) PLEASE REFERENCE THE CORRECT CODE: FBC,M 2004, AND | | | NOT 2001. | | | B) FLEXIBLE DUCT SUPPORTS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 1 1/2 | | | IN. WIDE PER FBC,M 603.5.6.6(6), NOT 1 IN. AS STATED IN | | | DETAIL NOTES. | | | | | | 6. M-3: OA/EXHAUST VENT DETAIL, SHOW ROOF CURB AND | | | VENTILATORS TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET 140MPH WINDS IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 301.13 AND FBC SEC 1609. SHOW | | | SUFFICIENT DETAIL FOR CURB TO ROOF AND VENT TO CURB | | | ATTACHMENTS ALONG WITH WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR | | | STRUCTURAL REVIEW. FBC 106.1.2. | | | | | | 7. M-2: KEY NOTE 1, PROVIDE DETAIL FOR CONDENSING UNIT | | | ATTACHMENTS TO SLABS SHOWING HOW UNITS ARE TO BE | | | ATTACHED TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH FBC,M 301.13 AND FBC 1609. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S | | | SUBMITTAL SHOWING EQUIPMENT DESIGNED FOR MIN. 140MPH | | | AND WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR ATTACHMENTS FOR | | | STRUCTURAL REVIEW. FBC 106.1.2. | | | | | | 8. M-2: PLEASE SHOW SIZE AND ROUTING OF REFRIGERANT | | | LINES FROM REMOTE CONDENSERS TO AHU'S AND SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC,M 1107.2.1 WHERE PIPES PASS UNDER A | | | SLAB OR THROUGH WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS OR BEAMS. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM/ CALCULATIONS TO | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC CH.13 IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC | | | 13-400.0 AND 13-101.1. A REVIEW FOR FLORIDA ENERGY CODE | | | COMPLIANCE CAN NOT BE PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 10. PORVIDE SUBMITTAL FOR GENERATOR AS SHOWN ON A-101 | | | AND P-2. GENERATORS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH NFPA | | | 37-02 IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 915.1. | | | | | | 11. A MINIMUM OF TWO SETS OF PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED | | | PER FBC 106.1 AND SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD IN ACCORDANCE WITH FS 471 AND 481. | | | ALSO PLEASE SEE FAC RULE 61G15-23.002 FOR ADDITIONAL | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR DESSIGNERS PROVIDING SERVICES UNDER AN | | | ENGINEERING BUSINESS. | | | | | | NOTE: DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT VOLUME OF MISSING | | | INFORMATION, ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS ARE LIKELY FROM | | | SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS ONCE ALL MISSING INFORMATION IS | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-21 |
Time |
13:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-21 |
Time |
13:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-09-21 13:05:55 | REVISION OK -- SHT A-104 NEW OVERFLOW SCUPPERS SIZES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
15:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
15:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-07 15:11:45 | REVISION OK -- SHTS P-2, L-6.0 & L-6.1. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
Time |
17:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-04-17 |
Time |
17:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-17 17:02:45 | REVISIONS OK -- SHTS P-3 & P-5 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-05 |
Time |
16:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
Time |
13:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-16 11:36:11 | ATTEMPTED TO REVIEW EXPEDITED PLANS BUT WAS STILL | | | MISSING HEALTH DEPT. STAMP/REVIEW. TRIED TO CONTACT | | | JEFF H. BUT TO NO AVAIL. RON R. CONTACTED JEFF ON | | | 12-16-08 AND INDICATED THAT I SHOULD HOLD MY REVIEW | | | UNTILL THE SHEETS WERE INCLUDED. PLACED PLANS BACK ON | | | RACK. UNABLE TO EXPEDITE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-19 13:02:32 | REVIEW FOR NEW BUILDING: | | | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FBC-2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | CITY WPB MUNICIPAL CODE | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUES | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | ********FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | **********FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | 2. OK | | | 3. OK | | | 4. OK | | | 5. OK | | | 6. OK | | | 7. OK | | | 8. OK | | | 9. OK | | | 10. OK | | | | | | 11. PLANS SHALL BE ROUTED TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | HEALTH UNIT, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR | | | REVIEW PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING TO THE CITY FOR PLAN | | | REVIEW. PLANS SHALL BE STAMPED AS REVIEWED BY THE | | | HEALTH DEPT. (901 EVERNIA (561) 355-3018). SECTION | | | 102.2.1. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT IF FOOD IS BEING SERVED THEN A | | | REVIEW BY THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. IS REQUIRED. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, PLANS NOT REVIEWED/STAMPED AT | | | THIS TIME. | | | ********NO RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | **********RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE HEALTH DEPT. | | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE | | | WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM TO PROVIDE POTABLE WATER & | | | FIRE SERVICE ONLY. THE REQUIREMENT REQUESTED IS FOR THE | | | PANTRY AREA INSIDE THE BUILDING. PLANS SHALL BE STAMPED | | | BY THE HEALTH UNIT. | | | | | | 12. OK | | | 13. OK | | | 14. OK | | | 15. OK | | | 16. OK | | | 17. OK | | | 18. OK | | | 19. OK | | | 20. OK | | | 21. OK | | | 22. OK | | | 23. OK | | | 24. OK | | | 25. OK | | | | | | 26. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GAS PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED: | | | | | | A. OK | | | B. OK | | | C. OK | | | D. OK | | | E. OK | | | 27. OK | | | | | | **********NEW GAS COMMENTS********** | | | | | | 1B. OK | | | 2B. OK | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
14:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
14:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-08 14:44:51 | REVIEW FOR NEW BUILDING: | | | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FBC-2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | CITY WPB MUNICIPAL CODE | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUES | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | ********FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | 2. OK | | | 3. OK | | | 4. OK | | | 5. OK | | | 6. OK | | | 7. OK | | | 8. OK | | | 9. OK | | | 10. OK | | | | | | 11. PLANS SHALL BE ROUTED TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | HEALTH UNIT, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR | | | REVIEW PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING TO THE CITY FOR PLAN | | | REVIEW. PLANS SHALL BE STAMPED AS REVIEWED BY THE | | | HEALTH DEPT. (901 EVERNIA (561) 355-3018). SECTION | | | 102.2.1. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT IF FOOD IS BEING SERVED THEN A | | | REVIEW BY THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. IS REQUIRED. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, PLANS NOT REVIEWED/STAMPED AT | | | THIS TIME. | | | ********NO RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 12. OK | | | 13. OK | | | 14. OK | | | 15. OK | | | 16. OK | | | 17. OK | | | 18. OK | | | 19. OK | | | 20. OK | | | 21. OK | | | 22. OK | | | 23. OK | | | 24. OK | | | 25. OK | | | | | | 26. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GAS PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED: | | | | | | A. OK | | | B. OK | | | C. OK | | | D. OK | | | | | | E. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. MANUF. INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDING CLEARANCES ARE REQUIRED. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED. SHEETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE | | | THE GAS PORTION OF THE PLAN REVIEW AND THE ISSUE THE | | | GAS PERMIT. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SHEETS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | ********NO RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 27. OK | | | | | | **********NEW GAS COMMENTS********** | | | | | | 1B. OK | | | 2B. OK | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
16:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
16:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-01 16:48:50 | NORTH WING RENOVATIONS ONLY THIS REVIEW STOP |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
11:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
17:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
Time |
10:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
Time |
10:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-22 10:59:47 | NORTH WING RENOVATIONS ARE OK AT THIS TIME BUT WILL | | | REMAIN IN FAILED STATUS UNTILL THE ADDITION IS APPROVED | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
Time |
10:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
Time |
15:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-22 10:40:35 | REVIEW FOR NEW BUILDING: | | | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FBC-2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | CITY WPB MUNICIPAL CODE | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUES | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. ALL SHEETS DESIGNED BY PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT, | | | ENGINEER, SURVEYOR, LANDSCAPE ARCH. DESIGNER ETC. SHALL | | | CONTAIN THE INFORMATION IN THE TITLE BLOCK THAT IS | | | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND FLORIDA | | | STATUTES. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE BUSINESS LICENSE, | | | (CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION), IS NOT INDICATED IN THE | | | TITLE BLOCK FOR THE ARCHITECT. FAC 61G1-16.004(2) & FS | | | 481.219. (THIS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHEETS | | | ALSO). | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE ADDRESS OF RECORD FOR THE | | | ARCHITECT, (1 EAST BROWARD BLVD. FT. LAUDERDALE FLA.), | | | DOES NOT REFLECT THE ADDRESS OF RECORD AS SHOWN ON THE | | | STATE OF FLORIDA DBPR WEBSITE, (2601 S BAYSHORE DR. | | | MIAMI FLA., SEE ATTACHED SHEET). PLEASE UPDATE THE | | | TITLE BLOCK OR THE DBPR WEBSITE PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING | | | FOR REVIEW. -- ALSO BERMELLO AJAMIL & PARTNERS INC IS | | | IDENTIFIED AT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN THE TITLE | | | BLOCKS ON ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS. PLEASE | | | INDICATE THE CORRECT ARCHITECT FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND | | | IRRIGATION TITLE BLOCKS. | | | | | | 3. OK | | | 4. OK | | | 5. OK | | | 6. OK | | | 7. OK | | | 8. OK | | | 9. OK | | | 10. OK | | | | | | 11. PLANS SHALL BE ROUTED TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | HEALTH UNIT, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR | | | REVIEW PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING TO THE CITY FOR PLAN | | | REVIEW. PLANS SHALL BE STAMPED AS REVIEWED BY THE | | | HEALTH DEPT. (901 EVERNIA (561) 355-3018). SECTION | | | 102.2.1. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT IF FOOD IS BEING SERVED THEN A | | | REVIEW BY THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. IS REQUIRED. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, PLANS NOT REVIEWED/STAMPED AT | | | THIS TIME. | | | | | | 12. SHT A-102 INDICATES A PANTRY. WILL FOOD BE | | | PREPARED? A GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | CONTACT INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL | | | COMPLIANCE, RODNEY COMPO, (561) 822-2272, E-MAIL | | | [email protected] OR CALVIN WILLIAMS, (561) 822-2284, | | | E-MAIL [email protected]. THEIR FAX NUMBER IS (561) | | | 822-2287. A WRITTEN DETERMINATION, FROM ENVIRONMENTAL | | | COMPLIANCE, INDICATING IF A GREASE INTERCEPTOR IS | | | REQUIRED OR NOT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH PLANS. ARTICLE | | | III SECTION 90-124(7)(F). | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT NO EVIDENCE OF CONTACT WITH | | | ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. PLEASE COMPLY WITH INITIAL | | | REQUEST. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, AWAITING REPLY FROM RODNEY COMPO | | | | | | 13. OK | | | 14. OK | | | 15. OK | | | | | | 16. SHT A-501 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | ___FOR W/C'S: | | | A. 11-4.16.2 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | ****NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | B. 11-4.16.5 FLUSH CONTROLS | | | ****NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE FLUSH CONTROLS SHALL BE | | | INDICATED ON THE WIDE SIDE OF THE TOILET TANK. ___FOR | | | ACCESS. STALL: | | | A. OK | | | ___FOR URINALS: | | | A. OK | | | B. OK | | | ___FOR LAVS: | | | A. 11-4.19.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | ****NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR THE | | | UNISEX TOILET ROOM LAV SHALL BE FORWARD APPROACH. SHOWN | | | AS PARALLEL APPROACH. | | | B. OK | | | | | | 17. OK | | | 18. OK | | | 19. OK | | | 20. OK | | | 21. OK | | | 22. OK | | | 23. OK | | | 24. OK | | | 25. OK | | | | | | 26. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GAS PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED: | | | | | | A. OK | | | B. OK | | | C. OK | | | D. OK | | | | | | E. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. MANUF. INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDING CLEARANCES ARE REQUIRED. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED. SHEETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE | | | THE GAS PORTION OF THE PLAN REVIEW AND THE ISSUE THE | | | GAS PERMIT. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SHEETS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 27. OK | | | | | | **********NEW GAS COMMENTS********** | | | | | | 1B. OK | | | 2B. OK | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
Time |
14:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-10 14:48:28 | NORTH WING RENOVATIONS | | | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | 1. ALL SHEETS WITH ARCHITECTURAL TITLE BLOCK. THE | | | BUSINESS LICENSE, (CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION), IS | | | REQUIRED IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF EACH SHEET. FAC | | | 61G1-16.004(2) & FS 481.219. | | | | | | 2. SHT D-100 SHOWS 5 SINKS BEING REMOVED. IN THE | | | REMOVAL OF ANY PART OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM, DEAD ENDS | | | ARE PROHIBITED. SECTION 704.5. ALL BRANCH LINES TO THE | | | SINKS SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE BUILDING SANITARY DRAIN. | | | PLEASE INDICATE ON PLANS. | | | | | | 3. DRINKING FOUNTAINS ARE REQUIRED PER TABLE 403.1. | | | SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE NET AREA TO DETERMINE THE | | | NUMBER OF DRINKING FOUNTAINS REQUIRED AND SHOW THE | | | LOCATION OF THE DRINKING FOUNTAINS. INDICATE IF THE | | | DRINKING FOUNTAINS ARE EXISTING OR NEW. IF NEW DRINKING | | | FOUNTAINS ARE TO BE INSTALLED, THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 11-4.15 WITH ALL SUBSECTIONS ALONG WITH SECTION | | | 11-4.1.2(10)(A)PROVISIONS FOR THOSE WHO HAVE | | | DIFFICULTY BENDING OR STOOPING SHALL BE INDICATED ON | | | THE PLANS WITH A DETAIL. | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
Time |
11:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
Time |
11:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-10 13:09:16 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FBC-2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | CITY WPB MUNICIPAL CODE | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUES | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. ALL SHEETS DESIGNED BY PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT, | | | ENGINEER, SURVEYOR, LANDSCAPE ARCH. DESIGNER ETC. SHALL | | | CONTAIN THE INFORMATION IN THE TITLE BLOCK THAT IS | | | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND FLORIDA | | | STATUTES. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE BUSINESS LICENSE, | | | (CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION), IS NOT INDICATED IN THE | | | TITLE BLOCK FOR THE ARCHITECT. FAC 61G1-16.004(2) & FS | | | 481.219. (THIS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHEETS | | | ALSO). | | | | | | 3. OK | | | | | | 4. SHT G-100 THE INDEX OF DRAWINGS INDICATES AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING. THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ON | | | THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL REFLECT THE PROJECT IN | | | DETAIL. PLEASE HAVE THE DESCRIPTION INDICATE AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, IF IT AN ALTERATION, RENOVATION ETC. | | | AND IF IT IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY OR NOT AS REQUIRED | | | ON THE APPLICATION. ALSO THE TITLE BLOCK PROJECT NAME, | | | "GAINES PARK COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION" & THE "NEW | | | FACILITY" ON SHT A-100 IS NOT INDICATED IN THE PROJECT | | | DESCRIPTION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | SECTION 105.3. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE PERMIT APPLICATION | | | DESCRIPTION OF WORK STILL DOES NOT REFLECT THE SCOPE OF | | | WORK OF THE PLANS. | | | | | | 5. OK | | | 6. OK | | | | | | 7. NINE SHEETS WERE SUBMITTED WITH DIFFERENT | | | INFORMATION BUT THE SAME SHEET NUMBERS. THIS IS NOT | | | APPROVED. (SEE SHEETS G-100, A-101, A-102, A-401 THRU | | | A-405 & A-700) SECTION 106.1.3. PLEASE SUBMIT 2 | | | COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS FOR ALL WORK TO REFLECT THE | | | DESCRIPTION OF WORK DETAILED ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | SHEET NUMBERS SHALL NOT DUPLICATE WITH DIFFERENT | | | INFORMATION. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THIS IS NOT REFLECTED ON THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION DESCRIPTION OF WORK AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 8. INDICATE THE LEVEL OF ALTERNATION FOR THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING PER CHAPTER 3 OF THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT LEVEL OF ALTERATION IS NOT | | | INDICATED ON THE PLANS. INDICATE LEVEL 1, LEVEL 2, OR | | | LEVEL 3. | | | | | | 9. SHT G-100 INDEX OF DRAWINGS DOES NOT REFLECT THE | | | SHEET SUBMITTED. SHT A-800 NOT SUBMITTED. PLEASE | | | CORRELATE. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SHTS 11, 12, 13, L-5.2, L-5.3 | | | P-4 & P-5 WERE SUBMITTED BUT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE INDEX | | | OF DRAWINGS. PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | 10. OK | | | | | | 11. PLANS SHALL BE ROUTED TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | HEALTH UNIT, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR | | | REVIEW PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING TO THE CITY FOR PLAN | | | REVIEW. PLANS SHALL BE STAMPED AS REVIEWED BY THE | | | HEALTH DEPT. (901 EVERNIA (561) 355-3018). SECTION | | | 102.2.1. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT IF FOOD IS BEING SERVED THEN A | | | REVIEW BY THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 12. SHT A-102 INDICATES A PANTRY. WILL FOOD BE | | | PREPARED?A GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | CONTACT INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL | | | COMPLIANCE, RODNEY COMPO, (561) 822-2272, E-MAIL | | | [email protected] OR CALVIN WILLIAMS, (561) 822-2284, | | | E-MAIL [email protected]. THEIR FAX NUMBER IS (561) | | | 822-2287. A WRITTEN DETERMINATION, FROM ENVIRONMENTAL | | | COMPLIANCE, INDICATING IF A GREASE INTERCEPTOR IS | | | REQUIRED OR NOT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH PLANS. ARTICLE | | | III SECTION 90-124(7)(F). | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT NO EVIDENCE OF CONTACT WITH | | | ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. PLEASE COMPLY WITH INITIAL | | | REQUEST. | | | | | | 13. OK | | | 14. OK | | | 15. OK | | | | | | 16. SHT A-501 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | ___FOR W/C'S: | | | A. 11-4.16.2 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | ****NOT ADDRESSED. | | | B. 11-4.16.5 FLUSH CONTROLS | | | ****NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ___FOR ACCESS. STALL: | | | A. 11-4.17.3 EXCEPTION(2) THE W/C SHALL BE LOCATED IN | | | THE CORNER DIAGONAL TO THE DOOR. | | | ****NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ___FOR URINALS: | | | A. 11-4.18.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | ****NOT ADDRESSED. | | | B. 11-4.18.4 FLUSH CONTROLS | | | ****NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ___FOR LAVS: | | | A. 11-4.19.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | ****NOT ADDRESSED. | | | B. OK | | | | | | 17. SUBMIT A DETAIL/ELEVATION FOR THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN | | | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.15 AND ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS AS WELL AS SECTION 11-4.1.3(10)(A) | | | PROVISIONS FOR THOSE WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY BENDING OR | | | STOOPING. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 18. SHT A-700 FINISH SCHEDULE FOR ROOMS 164 & 166. THE | | | WALLS WITHIN 2 FEET OF WATER CLOSETS AND URINALS SHALL | | | HAVE A SMOOTH, HARD, NONABSORBENT SURFACE. SECTION | | | S-1210.2. PLEASE INDICATE HOW PAINT COMPLIES WITH THESE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 19. OK | | | 20. OK | | | 21. OK | | | | | | 22. SHT P-3 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM IS NOT | | | COMPLETE. SHOW ALL PIPING TO ALL FIXTURES ON THE RISER. | | | SECTION 106.3.5.1.3(4)(6)(13). | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT FLOOR DRAINS ARE NOT APPROVED | | | INDIRECT WASTE RECEPTORS. A FLOOR SINK OR HUB DRAIN IS | | | REQUIRED FOR THE ICE MAKER IN THE PANTRY. SECTIONS | | | 802.3 & 802.3.2. | | | | | | 23. OK | | | | | | 24. SUBMIT STORM PIPING INFORMATION. SHOW THE LOCATION | | | OF ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS. SUBMIT A | | | STORM ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM SHOWING ALL PIPE SIZES, | | | OFFSETS & TERMINATION POINT. SECTION | | | 106.3.5.1.3(7)(13). | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE PIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED | | | WITH A UNIFORM SLOPE. ONE RISER HAS THE HORIZONTAL | | | PIPING FROM THE FIRST ROOF DRAIN AT 1/4"/FT THEN | | | CHANGES TO 1/8"/FT AFTER THE SECOND ROOF DRAIN AND THEN | | | CHANGES BACK TO 1/4"/FT AFTER THE THIRD ROOF DRAINL. | | | THE PIPING SHALL BE 1/4"/FT THROUGHOUT THE RUN. SECTION | | | 7-4.1. (THIS SHALL BE CHANGED ON THE ROOF PLAN ALSO). | | | | | | 25. OK | | | | | | 26. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GAS PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED: | | | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE LENGTHS OF THE CUT SECTIONS | | | ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. | | | | | | B. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). | | | RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THIS WILL BE VERIFIED WHEN COMMENT | | | "A" IS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | C. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION | | | AIR (IF APPLICABLE) PER FBC-2004 FUEL | | | GAS CODE SECTION 304. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | D. OK | | | | | | E. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. MANUF. INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDING CLEARANCES ARE REQUIRED. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED. SHEETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE | | | THE GAS PORTION OF THE PLAN REVIEW AND THE ISSUE THE | | | GAS PERMIT. | | | | | | 27. OK | | | | | | **********NEW GAS COMMENTS********** | | | | | | 1B. A SHUT OFF VALVE IS REQUIRED UPSTREAM OF THE "ETR" | | | & WITHIN 6' OF THE GENERATOR PER SECTION 409.5. PLEASE | | | INDICATE ON THE GAS RISER DIAGRAM. | | | | | | 2B. PER TABLE 402.4(2), 2-1/2" PIPE IS REQUIRED FOR THE | | | GAS LINE TO THE GENERATOR. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-10-27 |
Time |
10:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-10-26 |
Time |
19:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-27 14:04:19 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FBC-2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | CITY WPB MUNICIPAL CODE | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUES | | | | | | 1. ALL SHEETS. PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED, SEALED, & DATED | | | AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 106.1, FAC 61G1-16.003, FAC | | | 61G1-16.004(5), FAC 61G15-23.002(1)(2) & FS 471.025, FS | | | 481.2055. | | | | | | 2. ALL SHEETS DESIGNED BY PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT, | | | ENGINEER, SURVEYOR, LANDSCAPE ARCH. DESIGNER ETC. SHALL | | | CONTAIN THE INFORMATION IN THE TITLE BLOCK THAT IS | | | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND FLORIDA | | | STATUTES. | | | | | | 3. SHT G-100 GENERAL NOTES 32 INDICATES THE BUILDING | | | WAS DESIGNED UNDER THE 2001 CODE. ALSO APPLICABLE CODES | | | #1 INDICATES BUILDING, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FUEL GAS | | | CODE IN EFFECT AS 2001 WITH 2003 REVISIONS. AT PRESENT | | | THE STATE HAS ADOPTED THE FBC-2004 WITH 2006 & 2006 | | | REVISIONS. PLEASE UPDATE THE DESIGN & CODE REFERENCE. | | | | | | 4. SHT G-100 THE INDEX OF DRAWINGS INDICATES AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING. THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT SHALL | | | REFLECT THE PROJECT IN DETAIL. PLEASE HAVE THE | | | DESCRIPTION INDICATE AN EXISTING BUILDING, IF IT AN | | | ALTERATION, RENOVATION ETC. AND IF IT IS A CHANGE OF | | | OCCUPANCY OR NOT AS REQUIRED ON THE APPLICATION. ALSO | | | THE TITLE BLOCK PROJECT NAME, "GAINES PARK COMMUNITY | | | CENTER EXPANSION" & THE "NEW FACILITY" ON SHT A-100 IS | | | NOT INDICATED IN THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. SECTION 105.3. | | | | | | 5. SHT D-100 GENERAL DEMOLITION LEGEND NOTE #3 STATES, | | | "CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CAPPING & SECURING ALL | | | EXISTING UNDER GROUND UTILITIESPRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT | | | OF CONSTRUCTION". THESE INCLUDE WATER, SEWER & GAS. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION WHERE ALL THESE SYSTEMS WILL | | | BE CAPPED ON THE DEMO SHEET. SECTION 106.1.2. DEAD ENDS | | | WILL BE PROHIBITED PER SECTION 704.5. | | | | | | 6. NO NEW WORK IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR THE EXISTING | | | BUILLDING. EXISTING FLOOR PLANS, EXISTING REFLECTED | | | CEILING PLAN, EXISTING ELEVATIONS ETC. WERE SUBMITTED | | | AND NO PLUMBING SHEETS. PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS SHOWING THE | | | EXTENT OF THE WORK BEING DONE IN THE EXISTING BUILDING. | | | SECTION 106.1.2 (MORE INFORMATION REQUIRED). | | | | | | 7. NINE SHEETS WERE SUBMITTED WITH DIFFERENT | | | INFORMATION BUT THE SAME SHEET NUMBERS. THIS IS NOT | | | APPROVED. (SEE SHEETS G-100, A-101, A-102, A-401 THRU | | | A-405 & A-700) SECTION 106.1.3. PLEASE SUBMIT 2 | | | COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS FOR ALL WORK TO REFLECT THE | | | DESCRIPTION OF WORK DETAILED ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | SHEET NUMBERS SHALL NOT DUPLICATE WITH DIFFERENT | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 8. INDICATE THE LEVEL OF ALTERNATION FOR THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING PER CHAPTER 3 OF THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 9. SHT G-100 INDEX OF DRAWINGS DOES NOT REFLECT THE | | | SHEET SUBMITTED. SHT A-800 NOT SUBMITTED. PLEASE | | | CORRELATE. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 10. SUBMIT NEW BUILDING DATA. SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | OF THE BUILDING AND DECLARE THE OCCUPANCY. IF ASSEMBLY, | | | POTTY PARITY MAY BE IN EFFECT. SECTIONS 106.1.2 & | | | P-104.3.1.1. | | | | | | 11. PLANS SHALL BE ROUTED TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | HEALTH UNIT, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR | | | REVIEW PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING TO THE CITY FOR PLAN | | | REVIEW. PLANS SHALL BE STAMPED AS REVIEWED BY THE | | | HEALTH DEPT. (901 EVERNIA (561) 355-3018). SECTION | | | 102.2.1. | | | | | | 12. SHT A-102 INDICATES A PANTRY. WILL FOOD BE | | | PREPARED?A GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | CONTACT INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL | | | COMPLIANCE, RODNEY COMPO, (561) 822-2272, E-MAIL | | | [email protected] OR CALVIN WILLIAMS, (561) 822-2284, | | | E-MAIL [email protected]. THEIR FAX NUMBER IS (561) | | | 822-2287. A WRITTEN DETERMINATION, FROM ENVIRONMENTAL | | | COMPLIANCE, INDICATING IF A GREASE INTERCEPTOR IS | | | REQUIRED OR NOT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH PLANS. ARTICLE | | | III SECTION 90-124(7)(F). | | | | | | 13. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM FACILITIES PER | | | TABLES S-1004.1.2& P-403.1. | | | | | | 14. SHT A-104 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS FOR ALL ROOFS. SHOW THE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE AREA FOR EACH ROOF DRAIN WITH 1/2 AREA OF ALL | | | VERTICAL WALLS INCLUDING PARAPETS ADDED TO THE ROOF | | | DRAIN AREA AS WELL AS ANY ARE OF ROOF THAT DRAINS ONTO | | | THE ROOF FROM ABOVE. SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL ROOF | | | DRAINS AND SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS/SCUPPERS REQUIRED BY | | | SECTION 1107. SECTION 1106. | | | | | | 15. SHT A-501 SOME ACCESSIBLITY INFORMATION IS NOT | | | LEGIBLE NOR COMPLETE. PLEASE MAKE SURE INFORMATION IS | | | LEGIBLE. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 16. SHT A-501 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | ___FOR W/C'S: | | | A. 11-4.16.2 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | B. 11-4.16.5 FLUSH CONTROLS | | | ___FOR ACCESS. STALL: | | | A. 11-4.17.3 EXCEPTION(2) THE W/C SHALL BE LOCATED IN | | | THE CORNER DIAGONAL TO THE DOOR. | | | ___FOR URINALS: | | | A. 11-4.18.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | B. 11-4.18.4 FLUSH CONTROLS | | | ___FOR LAVS: | | | A. 11-4.19.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | B. 11-4.19.4 EXPOSED PIPES & SURFACES. | | | | | | 17. SUBMIT A DETAIL/ELEVATION FOR THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN | | | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.15 AND ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS AS WELL AS SECTION 11-4.1.3(10)(A) | | | PROVISIONS FOR THOSE WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY BENDING OR | | | STOOPING. | | | | | | 18. SHT A-700 FINISH SCHEDULE FOR ROOMS 164 & 166. THE | | | WALLS WITHIN 2 FEET OF WATER CLOSETS AND URINALS SHALL | | | HAVE A SMOOTH, HARD, NONABSORBENT SURFACE. SECTION | | | S-1210.2. PLEASE INDICATE HOW PAINT COMPLIES WITH THESE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 19. SHT A-800 IS BLANK, NO INFORMATION. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 20. SHT P-1 THE WATER HEATER INDICATES AN 80 GAL. W/H, | | | BUT SHT P-2 ENLARGED PANTRY DETAIL INDICATES A 60 GAL. | | | W/H. PLEASE CORRELATE INFORMATION. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 21. SHT P-3 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM. A | | | CLEANOUT IS REQUIRED NEAR THE JUNCTION OF THE BUILDING | | | DRAIN AND THE BUILDING SEWER & AT ALL CHANGES OF | | | DIRECTION GREATER THAN 45 DEGREES. PLEASE SHOW ON THE | | | RISER. SECTIONS 708.3.5 & 708.3.3. | | | | | | 22. SHT P-3 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM IS NOT | | | COMPLETE. SHOW ALL PIPING TO ALL FIXTURES ON THE RISER. | | | SECTION 106.3.5.1.3(4)(6)(13). | | | | | | 23. SHT P-3 DOMESTIC WATER ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM IS | | | NOT COMPLETE. SHOW ALL PIPE SIZES, VALVES AND WATER | | | HAMMER ARRESTORS THAR ARE REQUIRED ON QUICK CLOSING | | | VALVES. (DISH WASHER, ICE MAKER ETC.). SECTION 604.9. | | | --SHOW ALL PIPING TO ALL FIXTURES. SECTION | | | 106.3.5.1.3(3)(10)(13). | | | | | | 24. SUBMIT STORM PIPING INFORMATION. SHOW THE LOCATION | | | OF ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS. SUBMIT A | | | STORM ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM SHOWING ALL PIPE SIZES, | | | OFFSETS & TERMINATION POINT. SECTION | | | 106.3.5.1.3(7)(13). | | | | | | 25. SUBMIT A CONDENSATE ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM SHOWING | | | ALL PIPE SIZES, OFFSETS, TRAPS AND TERMINATION POINT | | | FOR ALL CONDENSATE PIPING TO REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | SECTION 106.3.5.1.3(13). | | | | | | 26. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GAS PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED: | | | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE. | | | | | | B. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). | | | | | | C. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION | | | AIR (IF APPLICABLE) PER FBC-2004 FUEL | | | GAS CODE SECTION 304. | | | | | | D. INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | | PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. | | | | | | E. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. MANUF. INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDING CLEARANCES ARE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 27. PLANS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE 100% COMPLETE AND MORE | | | COMMENTS MAY BE FORTHCOMING ACCORDING TO COMMENT | | | RESPONSES AND NEW INFORMATION. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID | | | SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY | | | ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU | | | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
12:04 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-07-07 |
Time |
12:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-07 12:06:07 | NOTE - NEED A REVISED SHEET A-100 TO MATCH THE | | | REVISIONS ON SHEETS A-101 & A-102. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
15:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
15:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-18 15:36:53 | SIGNS AND FENCES REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
Time |
14:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-24 14:06:58 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | | | ***FAILED PLAN REVIEW. PLANS SIGNED AND SEALED NOV. 11, | | | 2008 ARE OKAY*** | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
Time |
17:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
Time |
17:48 |
Sent To |
L |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-09 17:50:38 | PER ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER. | | | | | | SEE PROVISOS ON ALL PLANS. ALL PROVISOS SHALL BE | | | CORRECTED AT NEXT SUBMITTAL. FAILURE TO CORRECT ALL | | | PROVISOS MAY RESULT IN FUTURE PLAN REVIEW FAILURE. | | | | | | ALL SIGNS, WALLS AND FENCES SHALL BE APPROVED ON A | | | SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | | | | ***PLEASE NOTE LANDSCAPE REVIEW REQUIRED.*** | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-10-09 |
Time |
10:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
08:17 |
Sent To |
L |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-09 10:34:48 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE RESPONSE TO ALL THE REVIEW COMMENTS MADE BY | | | THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT, TO INCLUDE ANY | | | COMMENTS MADE PRIOR TO THIS PERMIT REVIEW STOP. | | | | | | 2. REPEAT COMMENT - ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW SAME | | | CONDITIONS, AND SHALL REFLECT THE CONDITIONS APPROVED | | | PER THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER DATED JULY 8, 2008, | | | PRIOR TO OBTAINING BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL. | | | A. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS AND DETAILS MATCH EACH | | | OTHER, AND MATCH THE APPROVED SITE PLAN DATED JULY 8, | | | 2008. THERE ARE STILL SOME INSTANCES WHERE THE PLANS | | | AND DETAILS DO NOT MATCH. EXAMPLES ARE THE PARKING | | | STALL DETAILS, WHEEL STOP DETAILS, NEW PARKING ROW | | | ALONG THE CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY (IN REGARDS TO DEPTH AND | | | WIDTH), ETC. | | | | | | 3. SHEETS NO. 2, 4 AND 6 SHOWS A NEW 2 FOOT WIDE | | | CONCRETE PAD IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND BETWEEN THE | | | EXISTING PARKING ROWS THAT IS NOT SHOWN IN ANY OF THE | | | OTHER PLANS, NOR WAS IT SHOWN IN THE APPROVED SITE PLAN | | | DATED JULY 8, 2008. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | 4. ALL SIGNS, WALLS AND FENCES SHALL BE APPROVED ON A | | | SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. | | 2008-10-09 08:17:32 | 1 COPY OF PLANS IN ZONING FOR REVIEW. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
15:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
15:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-11 15:47:34 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER DATED | | | JULY 8, 2008, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE COMPLETED: | | | | | | A. A TYPE "D" CURB, OR A CURB OF SIMILAR DURABILITY, | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND ALL TERMINAL LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS. | | | B. THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND TERMINATING THE NORTH END OF | | | THE PARKING ROW ALONG THE CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY SHALL BE | | | EXTENDED UP TO THE PARKING SPACE AS SHOWN ON THE | | | GRADING, PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN (SHEET 4). | | | | | | C. THE POINTS OF THE PROPOSED FENCE AND GATES SHALL BE | | | BLUNTED. | | | D. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS PLAN (SHEET A-605), PARKING | | | STALL DETAILS SHALL BE REVISED TO SHOW 12 INCHES | | | BETWEEN THE DOUBLE STRIPING PER THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS), AND HANDICAP PARKING | | | STALL DETAILS SHALL BE REVISED TO SHOW THE HANDICAP | | | SYMBOL TWO (2) FEET FROM THE OPEN END OF THE PARKING | | | SPACE. | | | E. ALL ELECTRICAL, PHOTOMETRIC, MECHANICAL, STRUCTURAL, | | | CIVIL AND MISCELLANEOUS PLANS SHALL SHOW THE SAME | | | CONDITIONS, AND REVISED TO MATCH THE APPROVED SITE | | | PLANS, AFTER THE CHANGE IN NO. 1(B) ABOVE IS MADE. | | | | | | 2. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF PLANS THAT DO NOT MATCH.FOR | | | EXAMPLE, SHEETS NOS. 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 13 DO NOT SHOW THE | | | INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE NEW (2ND) PARKING ROW. | | | ADDITIONALLY, SHEET NO. 13 SHOWS THE NEW HANDICAP | | | PARKING SPACES IN THE WRONG LOCATION; SHEET NO. 8 SHOWS | | | THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACE WITH 6 INCH DOUBLE STRIPES, | | | AND 2 INCHES IN BETWEEN INSTEAD OF THE 4 INCH STRIPES | | | WITH 12 INCHES IN BETWEEN AS REQUIRED PER THE ZLDRS | | | (SEE COMMENT 1(D) ABOVE); SHEETS L-1.0, L-2.0, L-3.0, | | | L-4.0, A-100, ETC., DOES NOT SHOW THE TERMINAL ISLAND | | | EXTENDING TO THE PARKING SPACE AT THE NORTH END OF THE | | | PARKING ROW ALONG THE CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY.ALL PLANS | | | SHALL SHOW SAME CONDITIONS, AND SHALL REFLECT THE | | | CONDITIONS APPROVED PER THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER | | | DATED JULY 8, 2008, PRIOR TO OBTAINING BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL SIGNS, WALLS AND FENCES SHALL | | | BE APPROVED ON A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
Time |
08:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
Time |
16:06 |
Sent To |
L |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-11 08:09:38 | | | | | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. SITE PLAN APPROVAL SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO | | | BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A SITE DATA TABLE INDICATING THE FOLLOWING: | | | A. TOTAL GROSS BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE (EXISTING VS. | | | PROPOSED).ACCORDING TO THE BUILDING PERMIT (AND | | | INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW) APPLICATION(S), THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT IS A 10,000 SQUARE FOOT MULTIPURPOSE | | | BUILDING; HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A 7,991 SQUARE | | | FOOT BUILDING.PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | B. PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING, BUILDING | | | COVERAGE AND IMPERMEABLE SURFACE. | | | C. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR). | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF PARKING (SMALL CAR, | | | HANDICAP SPACE, STANDARD SPACE) MEETING THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE LOCATION, HEIGHT AND INTENSITY OF ALL | | | OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION.PLEASE NOTE THAT GLARE SHALL NOT | | | EXCEED 0.5 FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE NORTH PROPERTY | | | LINE. | | | | | | 5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(3)(B), ONE INTERIOR | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY TEN | | | PARKING SPACES OR FRACTION THEREOF.INTERIOR LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS SHALL BE AT LEAST FIVE FEET WIDE OF LANDSCAPING | | | AND SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE. | | | AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE PLACED ON THE | | | PARKING ROWS ON THE EAST HALF OF THE PARKING LOT. | | | | | | 6. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(5)(B), WHEEL STOPS SHALL HAVE | | | A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF SIX INCHES ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE | | | OF THE PARKING AREA.WHEEL STOPS SHALL BE TWO FEET | | | FROM THE CURB TO THE BACK OF THE WHEEL STOP. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE WIDTH AND DEPTH DIMENSIONS OF ALL DRIVE | | | AISLES.PLEASE NOTE THAT PER SECTION 94-485(J)(2), 90 | | | DEGREE PARKING SPACES AND TWO-WAY DRIVE AISLES SHALL | | | HAVE A DRIVE AISLE OF A MINIMUM OF 24 FEET. | | | | | | 8. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-485(Q)(1), ONE BICYCLE | | | PARKING SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY 10 AUTOMOBILE | | | PARKING SPACES.PROVIDE DETAILS AND LOCATION OF THE | | | BICYCLE PARKING SPACES MEETING THE DESIGN STANDARDS | | | OUTLINED IN SECTION 94-485(Q)(2). | | | | | | 9. THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | AND SITE PLAN.ACCORDING TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, THE | | | AREA BETWEEN THE PARKING ROW AND THE SEMI-CIRCULAR | | | DRIVEWAY WILL BE A LANDSCAPED AREA.HOWEVER, SITE PLAN | | | SHOWS THE WESTERN PORTION TO BE A SIDEWALK AND THE | | | REMAINING AS LANDSCAPED.PLEASE REVISE.ALL PLANS | | | SHALL SHOW SAME CONDITIONS. | | | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA D?VILA Q. OR ERIC | | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. | | 2008-04-09 16:07:01 | 1 COPY IN ZONING FOR REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-10-22 |
Time |
16:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-10-19 |
Time |
13:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-22 16:27:03 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. THE SUBMITTED PLANS SHOW RENOVATION OF THE EXISTING | | | FACILITY PLUS A NEW ADDITION.PURSUANT TO SECTION | | | 94-35(D)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS, ATTACHED OR DETACHED ADDITIONS OF 1,000 OR | | | MORE GROSS SQUARE FEET TO AN EXISTING NONRESIDENTIAL | | | STRUCTURE REQUIRES AN INFORMAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL PRIOR | | | TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL.PLEASE CONTACT THE | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TO OBTAIN A DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF ANY TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED | | | AND/OR RELOCATES, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED. | | | TREE ALTERATION PERMIT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | COMMENT/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |