| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07090643 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-08-27 |
Time |
14:47 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-08-27 |
Time |
14:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-27 14:47:49 | GENERATOR PROVISO: | | | THE INSTALLED ELEVATION OF THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE | | | REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED AND CERTIFIED BY A QUALIFIED | | | SURVEYOR, ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT, AS MEETING AT LEAST | | | THE MINIMUM REQUIRED (BASE FLOOD ELEVATION PLUS SIX | | | INCHES), FOR THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAIN WHICH IT | | | IS INSTALLED. | | | SPECIAL FLOOD ZONE AREA: A0 | | | BASE FLOOD: |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
Time |
08:25 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
Time |
08:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-18 08:25:53 | GENERATOR PROVISO: | | | THE INSTALLED ELEVATION OF THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE | | | REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED AND CERTIFIED BY A QUALIFIED | | | SURVEYOR, ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT, AS MEETING AT LEAST | | | THE MINIMUM REQUIRED (BASE FLOOD ELEVATION PLUS SIX | | | INCHES), FOR THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAIN WHICH IT | | | IS INSTALLED. | | | SPECIAL FLOOD ZONE AREA: A0 | | | BASE FLOOD: |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
09:31 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
09:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-23 09:57:22 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07090643 | | | ADD: 6901 OKEECHOBEE BLVD | | | CONT: HUFFMAN GENERAL CONTRACTING | | | TEL: (305)778-3437 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1A)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. | | | IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF | | | YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A | | | THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID | | | DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* | | | /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM BEACH | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | | | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 | | | DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN | | | THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF | | | MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY | | | WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE | | | SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS | | | A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS | | | EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | | | 1D ) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 1E) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) | | | AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC | | | BUILDING WITH THE2007 REVISIONS. | | | | | | 2) DISCREPANCY, PLEASE SEE SHEET 2.0 VERSES E5.2, | | | SUBMITTED ARE TWO DIFFERENT MONOLITHIC SLAB CONCEPTS, | | | E5.2 DOES PROVIDE THE ANCHOR BOLT INFORMATION THAT IS | | | MISSING ON THE | | | SHEET 2.0. PLEASE CORRELATE THE TWO PLANS TO COENSIDE | | | WITH EACH OTHER. 106.1.2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | | REQUIRED. THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD UNDER THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL SHEET FAILED TO PROVIDE | | | ANCHOR DETAIL. 1609.1.3. ANCHORAGE AGAINST OVERTURNING, | | | UPLIFT AND SLIDING. | | | | | | 3) BUILDING PROVISO: THE GENERATOR PAD IS LOCATED IN A | | | **AO** FLOOD ZONE,STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN AN "A" | | | FLOOD ZONE. A FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE | | | REQUIREDBEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF | | | A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. | | | | | | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS | | | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF | | | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST | | | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT | | | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC | | | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC | | | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-02 |
Time |
11:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-02 |
Time |
11:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-02 11:15:04 | SHEET E-5.1 HAD *TYPO* PER LON CARTER. REDLINE DTO ATS | | | AS THE TRANSFER SWITCH PER SPECS AND RISER IS | | | *AUTOMATIC* NOT MTS AS NOTED IN PART PLAN. | | | THIS WAS CONFRIMED BY MR. CARTER ON PHONE CALL 9/2/08 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-29 |
Time |
16:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-29 |
Time |
16:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-29 16:21:03 | | | | | | | | | | | | | ** DENIED 5TH TIME** | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLANS | | | IN LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER INDICATES A * AUTOMATIC | | | TRANSFER SWITCH MTS-FMC* AND YET THE RISER STATES | | | ***ATS-FMC**> THIS WAS GONE OVER EXTENSIVELY WITH THE | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD PREVIOUS TO PLANS BEING RE-DONE AND | | | RE-SUBMITTED YET THE SAME INCONSISTENCIES EXIST. THIS | | | OFFICE OR REVIEWER HAS NO AUTHORITY TO REVISE OR ADJUST | | | PLANS NOR DOES THIS REVIEW HAVE THE RIGHT TO REDLINED | | | PLANS BASED ON WHAT THE ENGINEER MAY OR MAY NOT WANT AS | | | HIS/HER DESIGN. IT IS NOT FOR THE REVIEWER TO DECIDE | | | WHAT THE DESIGNERS INTENT IS. | | | THIS REVIEWER HAS CALLED MR. LON CARTER AND LEFT A | | | VOICE-MAIL AS OF THIS REVIEW. MR. CARTER IS OUT OF THE | | | OFFICE UNTIL TUESDAY THE 2ND OF SEPT. | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-18 |
Time |
12:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-18 |
Time |
12:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-18 12:15:14 | ** DENIED 4TH REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** NEW COMMENTS DUE TO ITEMS NOW CHANGED WHICH WERE NOT | | | ON PREVIOUS PLANS. THERE IS ALSO ONE COMMENT WHICH HAS | | | BEEN THE SAME SINCE THE INITIAL REVIEW. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NEW SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED | | | FOR THE TRANSFER SWITCH ONLY HAS ONE COPY IN SET. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE SPECS SHOW THIS BEING AN AUTOMATIC | | | TRANSFER SWITCH HOWEVER DETAIL LABELED AS *PART PLAN* | | | ON SHEET E5.1 NOW SHOWS A MTS FOR MANUAL TRANSFER | | | SWITCH AND THE RISER SHOWS ATS FOR AUTOMATIC TRANSFER | | | SWITCH. IN THE LAST CONVERSATION WITH THE ENGINEER OF | | | RECORD THE COMMENT WAS THE TRANSFER SWITCH WAS GOING TO | | | BE MANUAL, HOWEVER APPLICATION, RISER SPECS AND OTHER | | | INFORMATION INDICATES AUTOMATIC. | | | WHICH ONE WILL IT BE? | | | PLEASE SEE LOAD SUMMARY ON SHEET 5.2 WHICH CALLS FOR | | | MAINS FOR PANELS A AND B AND A MAIN #3 FOR PANEL *C*. | | | HOW ARE THE DISCONNECTS ON THE LOAD SIDE OF THE SINGLE | | | MAIN SHOWN ON RISERNOW CALLED *MAINS* ON THE LOAD | | | SUMMARY? | | | | | | PLEASE CORRECT PLANS. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO THE | | | LIFE SAFETY CODE/ NFPA-101. PREVIOUS PLANS CALLED FOR A | | | 2005 NFPA-101 AND THE REVIEW NOTES STATED THERE WAS NO | | | SUCH CODE. THE REVIEW NOTES GAVE THE CODE IN AFFECT | | | WHICH WAS ADOPTED BY FS 553.73 YET THE PLANS NOW | | | REFLECT A 2006 NFPA-101. HOW CAN A CODE BE REFERENCED | | | ON DESIGN PLANS WHEN THE 2006 LIFE SAFETY CODE IS NOT | | | SCHEDULED TO BE ADOPTED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNTIL | | | THE END OF 2008? | | | NO JURISDICTION IS PERMITTED TO ADOPTED ANY CODE UNLESS | | | ADOPTED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA. | | | | | | | | | | | | IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
Time |
13:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
Time |
13:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-22 13:42:31 | ** DENIED 3RD REVIEW** | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: THE NOTES BELOW ARE THE SAME COMMENTS AS THE | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW. AS THE SAME PLANS WERE RE-SUBMITTED | | | WIHT NO CORRECTIONS THE SAME COMMENTS APPLY. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE A FEE HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED AS | | | REQUIRED PER FS 553.80(2)(B) FOR REPEAT CODE COMPLIANCE | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONE OF THE COMMENTS BELOW FROM | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECTTO VALUE WAS IN A | | | RESPONSE LETTER WHICH MENTIONS VALUE FOR COMPLETE SCOPE | | | WAS INCREASED HOWEVER THIS WAS NOT DONE WHEN PLANS WERE | | | RESUBMITTEED. THE APPLICAITON WAS NOT CHANGED ETC. THIS | | | VALUE HAS BEEN CHANGED AND FEES WILL BE DUE BEFORE | | | RESUBMITTING PLANS. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: TOTAL FEES DUE INCLUDING NOTES 2 AND 3 IS | | | $5,400 | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH ARE | | | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING CODES ARE NOT | | | ACCURATE ON PLANS. IF THIS WAS THE ONLY COMMENT THESE | | | COULD HAVE BEEN RED-LINED HOWEVER PLANS ARE COMING BACK | | | FOR OTHER COMMENTS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING CODES SHALL BE STATED. 2002 | | | NFPA-110. (PLANS STATE 2005 NFPA-110 WHICH DOES NOT | | | EXIST). | | | 2003 NFPA-101. (PLANS STATE 2005 NFPA-101WHICH DOES NOT | | | EXIST). | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE VALUE FOR THE COMPLETE APPLIED | | | SCOPE OF DOES NOT MEET THE TABLES FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK | | | FOR ALL TRADES. | | | PLEASE SE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THE APPLIED VALUE IS | | | NOW $200K HOWEVER THE PERMIT APPLICATION, THE RE-SUB | | | COVER SHEET ETC WAS NOT UPDATED, | | | FBC 108.3 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SPECS/MANUFACTURES CUT SHEETS | | | SUBMITTED DO NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. | | | THESE INDICATE A KOHLER ATS AND THE PLANS NOW INDICATE | | | CUTLER HAMMER. | | | WHICH ONE WILL BE INSTALLED? | | | PLEASE SEE THAT IN EITHER CASE THE SPECIFICATIONS ON | | | PLANS ARE NOT EASILY READ AND ARE *BLURRY* TO READ | | | DETAILS REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE SEE NEC 225.31-225.39 AS THE DISCONNECTING MEANS | | | IS NOT READILY AVAILABLE BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SECTIONS MENTIONED ABOVE AS THE | | | DISCONNECTING MEANS SHALL BE RATED FOR THE LOAD SERVED | | | AND SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE OUTSIDE OF EQUIPMENT WITH | | | OUT EXPOSING ANY INDIVIDUAL TO LIVE PARTS. 110.27. | | | PLEASE SEE THE PICTURE DOES APPEAR TO SHOW TWO BREAKERS | | | HOWEVER DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET CODE AS STATED ABOVE. | | | THIS IS BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED AND THE TWO SETS OF | | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO | | | REPEAT CODE COMPLIANT COMMENTS. THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE | | | GIVEN AT THIS TIME. | | | ** PLANS MAY BE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
18:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
Time |
17:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-14 18:28:30 | ** DENIED 2RD REVIEW** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH ARE | | | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING CODES ARE NOT | | | ACCURATE ON PLANS. IF THIS WAS THE ONLY COMMENT THESE | | | COULD HAVE BEEN RED-LINED HOWEVER PLANS ARE COMING BACK | | | FOR OTHER COMMENTS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING CODES SHALL BE STATED. 2002 | | | NFPA-110. (PLANS STATE 2005 NFPA-110 WHICH DOES NOT | | | EXIST). | | | 2003 NFPA-101. (PLANS STATE 2005 NFPA-101WHICH DOES NOT | | | EXIST). | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE VALUE FOR THE COMPLETE APPLIED | | | SCOPE OF DOES NOT MEET THE TABLES FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK | | | FOR ALL TRADES. | | | PLEASE SE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THE APPLIED VALUE IS | | | NOW $200K HOWEVER THE PERMIT APPLICATION, THE RE-SUB | | | COVER SHEET ETC WAS NOT UPDATED, | | | FBC 108.3 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SPECS/MANUFACTURES CUT SHEETS | | | SUBMITTED DO NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. | | | THESE INDICATE A KOHLER ATS AND THE PLANS NOW INDICATE | | | CUTLER HAMMER. | | | WHICH ONE WILL BE INSTALLED? | | | PLEASE SEE THAT IN EITHER CASE THE SPECIFICATIONS ON | | | PLANS ARE NOT EASILY READ AND ARE *BLURRY* TO READ | | | DETAILS REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE SEE NEC 225.31-225.39 AS THE DISCONNECTING MEANS | | | IS NOT READILY AVAILABLE BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SECTIONS MENTIONED ABOVE AS THE | | | DISCONNECTING MEANS SHALL BE RATED FOR THE LOAD SERVED | | | AND SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE OUTSIDE OF EQUIPMENT WITH | | | OUT EXPOSING ANY INDIVIDUAL TO LIVE PARTS. 110.27. | | | PLEASE SEE THE PICTURE DOES APPEAR TO SHOW TWO BREAKERS | | | HOWEVER DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET CODE AS STATED ABOVE. | | | THIS IS BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED AND THE TWO SETS OF | | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO | | | REPEAT CODE COMPLIANT COMMENTS. THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE | | | GIVEN AT THIS TIME. | | | ** PLANS MAY BE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-16 |
Time |
09:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-15 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-16 09:27:47 | | | | | | | **** DENIED **** | | | | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW UNDER | | | EXPIRED PERMIT ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | THERE ARE ALSO SOME NEW COMMENTS BASED ON | | | PLANS/DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE KNOW AS THE PERMIT APPLICATION DATE | | | HAS CHANGED. | | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT CODES ARE | | | STATED ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE KNOW THAT ALL PERMIT APPLICATIONS DATED AFTER | | | DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 FALL UNDER THE FOLLOWING CODES AT A | | | MINIMUM. | | | PLEASE BE AWARE OF ANY OTHER CODES WHICH MAY BE | | | REFERENCED BY OTHER TRADES DURING THEIR REVIEW. THE | | | FOLLOWING IS NEEDED ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS AS WELL AS | | | FIRE ALARM SHEETS BY THIS REVIEWER AT A MINIMUM. | | | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS. | | | 2005 NFPA-70 (2002 SHOWN ON PLANS) | | | | | | IF THIS WAS THE ONLY COMMENT PLANS WOULD HAVE BEEN | | | REDLINED, HOWEVER THEY ARE COMING BACK FOR OTHER | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE VALUE FOR THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF | | | WORKWAS STILL NOT INCREASED. THE VALUE IS REQUIRED TO | | | BE BASED ON ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, DESIGN | | | COST ETC EVEN IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE OWNER | | | SUPPLIED. | | | BASED ON ALL THE WORK AS SHOWN ON PLANS ETC THE VALUE | | | AS APPLIED IS VERY LOW. | | | IF AN APPROPRIATE VALUE IS NOT ADJUSTED, ONE WILL BE | | | ASSESSED. | | | FBC 108.3 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE GENERATOR SUBMITTALS | | | CONTAIN A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ON THE LISTING | | | OF COVER SHEET. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS FOR THE | | | ATS SWITCHES WHICH ARE BEING SHOWN ON THE RISER. PLEASE | | | SEE THE NEXT COMMENT FOR DISCONNECTING MEANS REQUIRED. | | | FBC 106.1.2. | | | NEC 90.7, 110.3. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER DOES NOT INCLUDE A | | | DISCONNECTING MEANS FOR FEEDERS COMING FROM THE | | | GENERATOR. | | | 225.31-225.39. | | | (MAY NOT USE BREAKER ON THE GENERATOR AS IT DOES NOT | | | MEET 702.11) | | | PLEASE INCLUDE DISCONNECT/DISCONNECTS ON THE FEEDERS | | | EITHER ON THE LINE SIDE OF GUTTER FROM GENERATOR, OR | | | LOAD SIDE OF ATS DEVICES. | | | IF THE ATS DEVICES CONTAIN A BREAKER FOR NORMAL SIDE | | | AND A BREAKER FOR EMERGENCY SIDE, PLEASE ADJUST RISER | | | ACCORDINGLY AND PLEASE BE SURE SPECS/CUT SHEETS | | | INDICATE THIS. | | | 110.3, 90.7, 225.31-225.39, 702.11 ETC | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE CIRCLED NOTE # 1 ON RISER ON THE | | | METER CAN STILL DOES NOT SEEM TO BE AN ACCURATE NOTE. | | | THE NOTE CALLS FOR THIS METER AS A CT METER ENCLOSURE, | | | HOWEVER A CT METER ENCLOSURE WOULD NOT INCLUDE A METER | | | WHICH IS BEING SHOWN ON BOTH RISERS AND PLANS. | | | PLEASE ADJUST. | | | IF THIS IS A CT ENCLOSURE, CHANGE RISER TO SHOW THE CT | | | METER LOCATION. | | | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE GENERATOR SLAB DETAIL ON E-5.2 | | | IS NOT AS THE SAME AS THE SLAB/FOOTING DETAIL ON | | | ARCHITECTURAL SHEET 2.0. | | | PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS. THIS IS NOTED FOR | | | INFORMATION ONLY AS BOTH OF THESE NEEDS TO COORDINATE. | | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH WILL | | | AFFECT PLANS, SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRICAL | | | PLANS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | 2007-10-16 07:59:20 | 2007-10-16 07:59:20 | | | | | | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-09-05 |
Time |
12:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-09-05 |
Time |
12:22 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-05 12:34:38 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | | | | PLAN SHEETS 2.0 AND E0.1 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND | | | DATED. | | | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
Time |
13:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-09-05 |
Time |
12:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-07 13:01:01 | *****PROVISO***** | | | | | | | | | | | | PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE 2003 EDITION OF NFPA 101 | | | SHALL BE REFERENCED; PLAN SHEET E0.1 TO BE FIRE-STAMPED | | | WHEN THE COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-28 |
Time |
18:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-28 |
Time |
18:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-28 18:22:31 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | (THE BELOW COMMENT FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | STILL HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED:) | | | | | | PLAN SHEET E0.1 TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE OTHER PLAN | | | REVIEWERS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. | | | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-02 |
Time |
14:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-02 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-02 14:11:09 | *****PROVISO***** | | | | | | | | | PLAN SHEET E0.1 TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE OTHER PLAN | | | REVIEWERS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
11:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
14:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-23 11:13:21 | 1. SEVERAL REVISION CLOUDS EXIST ON PAGE EO.1 THAT | | | PROVIDES INFORMATION RELATING TO THE GENERATOR | | | INSTALLATION. ON PAGE EO.1 A REVISION CLOUD STATES "THE | | | INSTALLATION OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE SHALL IN NO WAY | | | OBSTRUCT EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND TO SAID PROPERTY AND/OR | | | VICINITY". | | | | | | 2. NFPA 241 IS ALSO CALLED OUT IN A REVISION CLOUD ON | | | PAGE EO.1. | | | | | | 3. APPROPRIATE LABELS AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR | | | THE FUEL TANK. | | | | | | 4. THE CONCRETE BOLLARDS DISPLAYED ON PLANS SHALL | | | PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR THE GENERATOR AND | | | FUEL TANK. | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | | 804-4709 PHONE | | | 804-4774 FAX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FUEL |
DIESEL GENERATOR |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-11-11 |
Time |
13:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-11-11 |
Time |
13:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
11:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-18 |
Time |
11:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-18 11:27:21 | TO "COMM" BD#57 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
16:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-14 16:26:14 | TO "COMM" BD#11 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
Time |
15:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
Time |
15:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-06 15:17:57 | TO "COMM" BD#15 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
Time |
14:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
Time |
14:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-07 14:14:57 | TO "COMM" BD#52 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-11 |
Time |
14:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
Time |
14:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-15 10:39:16 | TO "COMM" BD#31 | | 2007-09-24 14:02:35 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-29 |
Time |
14:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-29 |
Time |
14:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
Time |
09:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
Time |
09:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-01 |
Time |
09:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-29 |
Time |
10:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-01 09:17:54 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT #1: PLEASE PROVIDE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL DOCUMENTATION WHICH INCLUDES THE COVER SHEET | | | FROM THE APPROVING AGENCY AND THE APPROVED INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS, MARKED AS APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | FBCB 106.3.3. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-11-11 |
Time |
13:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-11-11 |
Time |
13:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-11 13:34:53 | REVIEW #: 1ST | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS FBC | | | CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | 1. WALL LOUVER AS SHOWN ON PLANS IS CLASSIFIED AS A | | | PANEL WALL PER FAC RULE 9B-72. AS SUCH, PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE A PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | SPECIFIC TO THE MANUFACTURER AND MODEL OF LOUVER TO BE | | | USED. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL SYSTEM PLEASE VISIT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | | NOTE: THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY RULE 9B-72 | | | SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING (SHOP DRAWING | | | REVIEW STAMP W/ SIGNATURE WILL SUFFICE) BY THE DESIGNER | | | OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC | | | 106.3.3. | | | | | | 2. ON SITE PLAN, PROVIDE DISTANCES FROM PROPERTY LINES | | | AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS. ALSO, SHOW ELEVATION OF | | | EQUIPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 301.14. | | | | | | 3. APPLIANCES SERVING DIFFERENT AREAS OF A BUILDING | | | OTHER THAN WHERE THEY ARE INSTALLED SHALL BE | | | PERMANENTLY MARKED IN AN APPROVED MANNER THAT UNIQUELY | | | IDENTIFIES THE APPLIANCE AND THE AREA IT SERVES. FBC,M | | | 304.11 | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-04-16 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-04-16 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
Time |
08:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
Time |
08:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
