|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 07080476
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07080476 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-10-09 |
Time |
13:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-10-09 |
Time |
13:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
Time |
13:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
Time |
12:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-24 14:55:25 | FASTENER SPECIFIED ON NOA IS NOT FOR WOOD DECK. CALLED | | | MANUFACTURER AND THEY ARE GOING TO CONTACT MIAMI-DADE | | | AND GET BACK WITH ME. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kconrad |
Date |
2007-09-05 |
Time |
16:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kconrad |
Date |
2007-09-05 |
Time |
15:28 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-05 15:52:34 | MET WITH ROOFER TO DETERMINE IF A ROOF RECOVER WILL | | | COMPLY WITH THE FEBC , SECTION 511.3. A ROOF CUT WAS | | | TAKEN OF THE EXISTING ROOF SYSTEM AND INDICATED ONE | | | ROOF APPLICATION. THE ROOF RECOVER PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED | | | UPON APPROVAL BY PLAN REVIEW. ALSO ADVISED THE | | | CONTRACTOR THAT A HVAC PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED SINCE | | | THEEXISTING ROOF EQUIPMENT WILL BE REMOVED AND | | | RELOCATED ON STANDS. DETAILS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR | | | PLAN REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
Time |
19:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
Time |
19:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-17 07:30:37 | ROOF OVER/RECOVER DECK | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A | | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | | | 2) THE CONDITION OF THE EXISTING ROOF WILL BE REQUIRED | | | TO BE INSPECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | | | | 3) THE FASTENERS SPECIFIED IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA | | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE USED. THEY CAN NOT BE CHANGED BY | | | ANYONE EXCEPT MIAMI-DADE PRODUCT CONTROL. SEE PAGE 74 | | | OF THE NOA. | | | | | | 4) THE APPROVEDASSEMBLY SPECIFIED HAS A DESIGN | | | PRESSURE OF -60 PSF WHICH IS TOO LOW FOR THE CORNER | | | AREAS THAT REQUIRE -89 PSF. HOWEVER GENERAL LIMITATION | | | NUMBER 7 ALLOWS FOR ENHANCED FASTENING TO INCREASE THE | | | DESIGN PRESSUREUSING RAS 117 CALCULATIONS. SEE PAGE 85. | | | THE NOA REQUIRES THESE CALCULATIONS TO BE DONE BY A | | | FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER, ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF | | | CONSULTANT. SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 5)SUBMIT THE FIRST 14 PAGES OF THE NOA WHICH LIST THE | | | MATERIALS, FASTENERS, ETC. | | | | | | - ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
Time |
08:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
Time |
08:13 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-24 08:14:33 | TO "RMCDOUGAL" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-08-17 |
Time |
07:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
Time |
10:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-16 10:22:37 | TO "SHILL" DESK/ROOF |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
