 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 07080417
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07080417 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
15:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
14:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-10 15:48:39 | STORM SHUTTERS AND DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-04-16 |
Time |
17:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-04-16 |
Time |
17:38 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-16 18:16:57 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED | | | WITH PROVISO: | | | | | | 1- PROVIDE REVISEDINFORMATION FOR STORM SHUTTERS. SEE | | | COMMENTS ON SUBMITTED PACKAGE.REVISE AS REQUIRED AND | | | RESUBMIT COMPLETE PACKAGE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO | | | AVOID DELAYS OR CONFLICTS. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR "SINGLE" DOOR AS SHOWN | | | ON PLANS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID DELAYS OR | | | CONFLICTS.PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR DOUBLE | | | DOORS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-03-26 |
Time |
16:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-03-26 |
Time |
07:44 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-27 11:28:14 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, BUILDING REVIEW 4TH CHECKLIST. | | | REVIEW UNDER FBC 2004 WITH 2007 REVISIONS. | | | 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SIGNED AND DATED BY | | | THE OWNER/AGENT. | | | | | | 2- REVISIONS ON SURVEY NEED TO BE DONE BY THE SURVEYOR. | | | (REPEAT COMMENT).SURVEYOR TO REVISE FLOOD ZONE "C" TO | | | "B" AND PROVIDE REVISED SURVEY WITH ORIGINAL SEAL AND | | | SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 FLORIDA STATUTE | | | AND SEC. 61G17-7.0025 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | NOTE: MAKE SURE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE IS PROVIDED. RUBBER | | | STAMP OR PHOTOCOPY OF SIGNATURE IS NOT ALLOWED. | | | | | | 3- STORM SHUTTERS: | | | A) THERE WAS NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED. | | | | | | B) INSTALLATION SCHEDULE SUBMITTED NEED TO BE | | | CORRECTED: | | | I) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF ANCHORS SPECIFIED: | | | TAPCON AND TITEN. SEESHUTTER PRODUCT APPROVAL AND | | | SPECIFIED AND MARK SPECIFIC ANCHOR TO BE USED. | | | | | | II) OPENINGS 6 AND 7 ARE THE SAME SIZE WINDOWS. HOW | | | COME OPENING SIZES ARE DIFFERENT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | III) SHUTTER MOUNTING CONDITIONS ON COLUMN 4 IS ASKING | | | FOR MOUNTING CONDITION. EG: WALL MOUNTED, BUILT OUT, | | | ETC. NOT FOR ANCHOR TYPE.SEE SHUTTERS PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL AND WRITE DOWN ON THIS COLUMN AND MARK | | | SHUTTERS DRAWINGS WITH THAT MOUNTING CONDITION. | | | | | | IV) CLARIFY HOW ARE YOU GETTING THE 4" GLASS SEPARATION | | | SHOWN ON COLUMN 5. | | | | | | V) SHUTTER SPANS SPECIFIED ON COLUMN 6 ARE WRONG.THEY | | | ARE SHOWN AS THE SAME HEIGHT AS THE OPENING.THIS | | | DOESN'T ALLOW THE 3" EDGE DISTANCE SPECIFIED ON COLUMN | | | 8. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | VI) MINIMUM EDGE DISTANCE SPECIFIED ON COLUMN #8 IS 3" | | | EDGE DISTANCE.SEE STORM SHUTTERS DRAWINGS FOR | | | REQUIRED ANCHOR SPACING REDUCTION WHEN EDGE DISTANCE IS | | | LESS THAN 3.5" AND REVISE ANCHOR SPACING ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | VII) CLARIFY HOW ARE THE ANCHORS GOING TO BE SPACED AT | | | 6.5" . SEESHUTTERS DRAWINGS FORWIDTH OF STORM | | | PANELS AND LOCATION OF ANCHORS. AND REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | VIII) CLEARLY MARK ON STORM SHUTTER DRAWINGS SPECIFIC | | | MOUNTING CONDITIONS (EG: WALL MOUNTED, BUILT OUT, ETC) | | | AND SPECIFIC ANCHOR TO BE USED ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN | | | PRESSURES, CONNECTION TYPE, PANEL SPAN, EDGE DISTANCE | | | AND STRUCTURE TO BE ATTACHED TO (MASONRY OR CONCRETE | | | BLOCK). | | | | | | 4- NONE OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 WHERE SUBMITTED THIS TIME. NEED TO PROVIDE | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR: DOORS, WINDOWS, ROOF SHINGLES, | | | SHUTTERS, SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS. | | | | | | 5- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 6- SHEET 1:REVISE CONSTRUCTION STANDARD. THERE IS NOT | | | "5 STD CBS". SEE SEC. 602.5 AND TABLE 601 OF FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE 2004 AND SPECIFY IF CONSTRUCTION TYPE IS | | | TYPE VA OR B. | | | | | | 7- DRAWINGS SUBMITTED NOW DON'T HAVE THE PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY IMPACT FEES STAMP. PLEASE PROVIDE OLD PAGEWITH | | | THE IMPACT FEES STAMP OR GET THE REVISED SHEETS | | | RE-STAMPED. | | | | | | 8- SOIL TEST REPORT: | | | A) SOIL TEST REPORT CALLS FOR 2000 PSF SOIL BEARING | | | CAPACITY.ENGINEER OF RECORD SPECIFIES ON STRUCTURAL | | | NOTE #1 THAT 200 PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY IS REQUIRED. | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO COORDINATE WITH GEOTECHNICAL | | | ENGINEER FOR SOIL BEARING CAPACITY REQUIRED AND ACTUAL | | | SOIL BEARING CAPACITY TO BE PROVIDED. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | B) ONLY ONE REPORT WAS SUBMITTED.NEED TO PROVIDE | | | 2 REPORTSWITH ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-11-28 |
Time |
14:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-11-28 |
Time |
07:31 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-28 15:30:28 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST. | | | REVIEW DONE UNDER EXISTING BUILDING CODE 2004, FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE 2004 AND FBC 2004 WITH 2007 | | | REVISIONS. | | | | | | 1- PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION/DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS | | | SHOWING REINFORCEMENT AND SHORING SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | | DEMOLITION OF EXTERIOR BEARING WALL AT BEDROOM#3 | | | AREA.(NO REAR ROOM)(REPEAT COMMENT.THREE TIMES). | | | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. CONCERN WITH | | | STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF BUILDING WHEN EXISTING BEARING | | | WALL IS REMOVED AND ADDITIONAL ROOF LOAD WEIGHT IS | | | ADDED WHEN RECEIVINGNEW ROOF.SEC. R301.1 OF 2004 | | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 2- ENGINEER TO PAY A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW | | | FEES ($1308.30)AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE SEC. | | | 553.80(2)(B). SEE ATTACHED FLORIDA STATUTE COPY. NOTE: | | | ONE COPY OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED IN THIS OFFICE. | | | (NOTE: TALKED TO MR. ERVIN L. KEEL. SE SAID DRAWINGS | | | WHERE SUBMITTED WITHOUT ENGINEER'S CONSENT) | | | | | | 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING | | | WATER HEATER AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | | | 4- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS OF | | | BEING RECORDED IF WORK IS NOT STARTED.IT WAS RECORDED | | | ON 08/14/2007, THEREFORE IS EXPIRED. NEED TO PROVIDE | | | RE-RECORDED ONE. | | | | | | 5- SURVEY PROVIDED SHOWING 5.0' SIDE SETBACK IS NOT | | | ACCURATE.THERE IS ANOTHER SURVEY SHOWING 4.4' | | | SETBACK.THIS LOOKS LIKE EXISTING BUILDING IS AT 4.4' | | | SETBACK.FLOOR PLANS SHOW NEW ADDITION BEING ALIGNED | | | WITH EXISTING BUILDING. THEREFORE THE 5.0' SETBACK IS | | | INCORRECT. NEED TO PROVIDE CORRECT INFORMATION. | | | | | | 6- SURVEY SUBMITTED STATES FLOOD ZONE "C". THIS | | | PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON FLOOD ZONE "B". REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | NOTE: ONLY SURVEYOR IS ALLOWED TO DO REVISIONS ON HIS | | | OWN WORK. | | | | | | 7- PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL INCLUDED SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS WITH | | | IMPACT GLASS.PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED NOW IS FOR | | | NON-IMPACT GLASS. THEREFORE SHUTTERS ARE REQUIRED. | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR STORM SHUTTERS SUBMITTED NEED MORE | | | INFORMATION. NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE (OR PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | INFORMATION ON ANOTHER FORMAT). ALSO, CLEARLY MARK ON | | | SHUTTERS DRAWINGS SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS (EG: | | | WALL MOUNTED, BUILT OUT, ETC) AND SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE | | | AND SPACING TO BE USED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | PROPOSED INSTALLATION. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | | FBC 2004. | | | | | | 8- SHEET 1: | | | A)DESIGN STANDARDS: WHAT'SCONSTRUCTION TYPE "E". | | | WHERE IS THIS INFORMATION TAKEN FROM?. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | B) ALSO, UPDATE THE FBC 2004 REVISIONS. CORRECT | | | REVISIONSTO BE REFERENCED IS 2007, NOT 2006. REVISE | | | AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-19 |
Time |
12:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-18 |
Time |
17:44 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-19 13:31:50 | RESIDENTIALADDITION BUILDING REVIEW SECOND | | | CHECKLIST. | | | REVIEW DONE UNDER EXISTING BUILDING CODE 2004, | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE 2004 AND FBC 2004 WITH 2007 | | | REVISIONS. | | | | | | 1- VALUE DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO LOW. | | | OWES $320.93 FOR UPDATED VALUATION AND RADON FEES. | | | (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | RESPONSE LETTER SAID FEES WERE PAID AND PAID RECEIPT IS | | | ATTACHED.THIS WAS NOT DONE. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION/DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS | | | SHOWING REINFORCEMENT AND SHORING SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | | DEMOLITION OF EXTERIOR BEARING WALL AT BEDROOM #3 AREA. | | | (REPEAT COMMENT). SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | | 2004. | | | PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY DETAILS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING | | | HOW TO SHORE STRUCTURE TO AVOID COLLAPSE OF ROOF ABOVE | | | WHEN WALL IS REMOVED. | | | | | | 3- PLANS TO SPECIFY ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS, INCLUDING | | | THE ATTIC LIVE LOADS. ENGINEER TO REVIEWSEC. R301 AND | | | TABLE R301.5 OF RESIDENTIAL CODE 2004 AND PROVIDE | | | REQUIRED INFORMATION. (REPEAT COMMENT). INFORMATION | | | SUBMITTED IS INCOMPLETE AND INCORRECT. IT CAN'T BE ONLY | | | 10PSF ATTIC LIVE LOAD AND DEAD LOAD OF 30PSF. REVISE | | | DESIGN INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4- ENGINEER TO REVIEW ATTACHED COPY OF FLORIDA STATUTE | | | 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING PLAN REVIEW FEES TO BE PAID BY | | | ENGINEER WHEN DOCUMENTS ARE REJECTED SEVERAL TIMES. | | | ***NOTE: ONE COPY OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED IN THIS | | | OFFICE TO BE SEND TOFLORIDA BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | 5- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: | | | A) SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING WATER HEATER. | | | | | | B) OWNER/AGENT TO SIGN AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM. | | | | | | 6- SOIL TEST REPORT CALLS FOR 2000 PSF SOIL BEARING | | | CAPACITY, WHILE STRUCTURAL NOTE #1 ONSHEET 2 REQUIRES | | | 2500 PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY.ACCORDING TO THIS THE | | | SOIL DOESN'T MEET THE ENGINEER'S DESIGN CRITERIA. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NEED TO PROVIDEREPORT WITH | | | LEGIBLE DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.1.3 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | | | B) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON | | | ALL PLANS. (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | ONLY PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ONE CONNECTOR WAS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | ***NOTE: CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR | | | STORM SHUTTERS IF WINDOWS PRODUCT APPROVALSUBMITTED | | | HAVE MISSILE IMPACT GLASS. | | | | | | 8- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | ENGINEER CAN'T SIGN AND SEAL THESE PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT HIS DESIGN. | | | PLEASE MAKE SURE NAME OF ENGINEER APPROVING PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS IS SHOWN ON THE REVIEW PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 9- REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING. SEE SEC. | | | R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.REPEAT | | | COMMENT.NEED TO IDENTIFY ROOF ZONE 3 AND NAIL SPACING | | | AS REQUIRED BY THE CITE SECTION ON THIS COMMENT. | | | | | | 10- PLEASE DON'T STAPLE PRODUCT APPROVALS TO THE | | | DRAWINGS. THIS WILL EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | 11- TYPICAL WALL SECTION. REVISE CEILING INSULATION | | | VALUE TO MATCH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | ***NOTE:RE-SUBMITTAL FEES WILL APPLY FOR NEXT | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
12:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
12:38 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-06 14:01:25 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW FIRST CHECKLIST. | | | REVIEW DONE UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND | | | FBC 2004 WITH 2007 REVISIONS. | | | | | | 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD (561)233-5115)TO VERIFY IF | | | IMPACT FEES ARE DUE OR NOT. BRING BACK STAMPED PLANS | | | AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. | | | | | | 2- VALUEDECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO | | | LOW.VALUE WAS UPDATED TO $59,025 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 108.3 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. THEREFORE, OWES | | | $320.93 FOR UPDATED VALUATION AND RADON FEES. | | | | | | 3- FLOOR PLAN SHOWS ACCESS TOBEDROOM #5 THRU BEDROOM | | | #4. GOING FROM ONE ROOM BEDROOM THRU ANOTHER BEDROOM IS | | | NOT ALLOWED BY SEC. 1013.2 FBC 2004. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4- ENGINEER TO PROVIDE HIS FIRM CERTIFICATE OF | | | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IN THE TITLE BLOCK AS REQUIRED BY | | | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE AND SEC. 61G15--23.002 OF | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | | | 5- PLANS TO SPECIFY CONSTRUCTION TYPE AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. 602.1 FBC 2004. | | | | | | 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION/DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS | | | SHOWING REINFORCEMENT AND SHORING SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | | DEMOLITION OF EXTERIOR BEARING WALL AT BEDROOM #3 AREA. | | | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 7- SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R807 OF | | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 8- PLANS TO SPECIFY ALLLIVE AND DEAD LOADS, INCLUDING | | | THE LIVE LOADINTHE ATTIC AS REQUIRED BYTABLE | | | R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 9- DRAWINGS ARE NOT LEGIBLE.LETTERING ON SOME DETAILS | | | IS NOT LEGIBLE. MAKE SURE ALL DETAILS AND NOTES ARE | | | CLEAR AND LEGIBLE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.1.3 OF CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.. | | | | | | 10- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 13-600.1.C.1 FBC 2004. | | | NOTE: MAKE SURE CORRECT 2006 REVISED FORM IS USED. AND | | | MAKE SURE FORM IS FILLED COMPLETELY AND SIGNED AND | | | DATED BY THE PREPARER AND OWNER. | | | | | | 11- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF SOIL TEST REPORT AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. R401.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 12- PRECAST CONCRETE LINTEL SCHEDULE TO BE KEYED ON | | | PLANS TO VERIFY SIZES. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | | FBC 2004. | | | | | | 13- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) EXTERIOR DOORS. PROVIDE COMPLETE REPORT SHOWING | | | ALL TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR MODEL TO BE INSTALLED. | | | ONLY FLORIDA FL4904 PRODUCT COVER PAGES WERE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | B) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. PROVIDE LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. | | | NOA 03-0910.04 SUBMITTED IS NOT LEGIBLE. SEC. 106.1.3 | | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | C) STORM PANELS. PROVIDE LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. SEC. | | | 106.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | ***NOTE: PROVIDECOMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE | | | ATTACHED SAMPLE. AND, CLEARLY INDICATE ON SHUTTERS | | | DRAWINGS SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED. | | | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | D) ALL SIMPSON CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND | | | DETAILS. | | | ***NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | COVER PAGE AND PAGE WERE CONNECTOR IS SHOWN. | | | | | | E) PRECAST LINTELS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. | | | | | | 14- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 15- SHEET 2: | | | A) SPECIFY CONNECTOR AT BOTH ENDS OF GIRDER TRUSS | | | SHOWN BY BEDROOM #3ROOF AREA. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | B) REVISE ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE. CLARIFY WHYSOME | | | CONNECTORS THE ENGINEER IS USING THE 133 VALUES AND | | | SOME CONNECTORS THE 160 VALUE.. EG SEE MTS16 | | | CONNECTOR. | | | | | | C) REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING . SEE SEC. | | | 803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR MIN. | | | REQUIRED SPACING INCLUDING NAILING AT CORNER ZONE #3 | | | AREAS. | | | | | | D) REVISE DOOR AND WINDOW ATTACHMENT NOTES. SEE | | | CORRESPONDING PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR REQUIRED FASTENER | | | TYPE SIZE AND SPACING. ALSO, VERIFY SUBSTRATE TO BE | | | INSTALLED TO. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
Time |
08:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
Time |
06:56 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-10 08:10:18 | | | | | | | PROVISO | | | | | | ADD SECOND AHU & A/C TO THE PANEL SCHEDULE AND | | | RECALCULATE THE LOAD TO SHOW BOTH SYSTEMS PRIOR TO | | | ROUGH INSPECTION. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
Time |
15:27 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-11-19 |
Time |
12:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-11-19 |
Time |
11:59 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-19 12:25:06 | | | | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2006 REVISIONS, 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, 2004 | | | FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE REGARDING THE ELECTRICAL | | | DRAWINGS ON SHEET 2 OF 2. | | | | | | THESE COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED ON THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW, 8/27/07, OR ON THE 11/19/07 REVIEW. | | | | | | 1} INDICATE IF THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE SHOWN ON THE PLAN | | | IS NEW OR EXISTING. IF NEW INCLUDE IN THE DESCRIPTION | | | ON THE APPLICATION, PROVIDE AN AIC RATING, ANDLOCATE | | | ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN, METER ENCLOSURE, | | | DISCONNECTS AND PANELS, SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ARTICLES 225 AND 230 CAN BE REVIEWED. PROVIDE A RISER | | | DIAGRAM WITH CONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SIZE AND TYPE.* THE | | | AIC RATING IS NOT ON THE PLAN.** SAME COMMENT | | | 11/19/07. | | | | | | 2} PLEASE PROVIDE A PANEL SCHEDULE SO THAT | | | BRANCH/FEEDER CIRCUIT CONDUCTOR AND OVER CURRENT | | | PROTECTION COMPLIANCE MAY BE REVIEWED PER 106.3.5.4 FBC | | | AS AMENDED. THERE IS NO CONDENSER # 2 ON THE SCHEDULE | | | PROVIDED AND APPLIANCES THAT ARE IN THE CALCULATION ARE | | | MISSING. SEE 408.4 2005 NEC. *THERE ARE STILL | | | APPLIANCES MISSING FROM THE SCHEDULE. SMALL APPLIANCE, | | | WASHER AND THE TERMS "CONV. OUTLETS AND GEN LIGHTING" | | | ARE NOT SPECIFIC ENOUGH TO MEET THE INTENT OF | | | 408.4.**SAME COMMENT 11/19/07. | | | | | | 3} THERE IS 10000 VA OF HEAT IN THE LOAD CALCULATION, | | | CORRECTLY CALCULATED AT 100% PER 220.83(B), BUT THE | | | PANEL SCHEDILE INDICATES 2 AIR HANDLERS WITH AN OCP OF | | | 60 AMPS, WHICH WOULD IMPLY THAT THERE ARE 2 UNITS WITH | | | 10000 VA EACH. PLEASE CLARIFY. *IF THE AHU'S ARE 5KW | | | EACH, THEN THE 60 AMP OCP IS IN VIOLATION OF 310.16 AND | | | 240.4.** SAME COMMENT REGARDING 5KW ON A 60 AMP | | | BREAKER. | | | | | | PLEASE REMOVE ALL OLD OR VOIDED SHEETS AND REPLACE WITH | | | CORRECTED ONES WHEN RESUBMITTING. INCLUDE THEM | | | SEPARATELY TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | ANSWER REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
13:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
12:46 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-11 13:05:05 | | | | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2006 REVISIONS, 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, 2004 | | | FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE REGARDING THE ELECTRICAL | | | DRAWINGS ON SHEET 2 OF 2. | | | | | | THESE COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED ON THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW, 8/27/07. | | | | | | 1} INDICATE IF THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE SHOWN ON THE PLAN | | | IS NEW OR EXISTING. IF NEW INCLUDE IN THE DESCRIPTION | | | ON THE APPLICATION, PROVIDE AN AIC RATING, ANDLOCATE | | | ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN, METER ENCLOSURE, | | | DISCONNECTS AND PANELS, SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ARTICLES 225 AND 230 CAN BE REVIEWED. PROVIDE A RISER | | | DIAGRAM WITH CONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SIZE AND TYPE.* THE | | | AIC RATING IS NOT ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 2} PLEASE PROVIDE A PANEL SCHEDULE SO THAT | | | BRANCH/FEEDER CIRCUIT CONDUCTOR AND OVER CURRENT | | | PROTECTION COMPLIANCE MAY BE REVIEWED PER 106.3.5.4 FBC | | | AS AMENDED. THERE IS NO CONDENSER # 2 ON THE SCHEDULE | | | PROVIDED AND APPLIANCES THAT ARE IN THE CALCULATION ARE | | | MISSING. SEE 408.4 2005 NEC. *THERE ARE STILL | | | APPLIANCES MISSING FROM THE SCHEDULE. SMALL APPLIANCE, | | | WASHER AND THE TERMS "CONV. OUTLETS AND GEN LIGHTING" | | | ARE NOT SPECIFIC ENOUGH TO MEET THE INTENT OF 408.4. | | | | | | 3} THERE IS 10000 VA OF HEAT IN THE LOAD CALCULATION, | | | CORRECTLY CALCULATED AT 100% PER 220.83(B), BUT THE | | | PANEL SCHEDILE INDICATES 2 AIR HANDLERS WITH AN OCP OF | | | 60 AMPS, WHICH WOULD IMPLY THAT THERE ARE 2 UNITS WITH | | | 10000 VA EACH. PLEASE CLARIFY. *IF THE AHU'S ARE 5KW | | | EACH, THEN THE 60 AMP OCP IS IN VIOLATION OF 310.16 AND | | | 240.4. | | | | | | PLEASE REMOVE ALL OLD OR VOIDED SHEETS AND REPLACE WITH | | | CORRECTED ONES WHEN RESUBMITTING. INCLUDE THEM | | | SEPARATELY TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | ANSWER REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
Time |
10:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
Time |
06:55 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-27 10:19:17 | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2006 REVISIONS, 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, 2004 | | | FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE REGARDING THE ELECTRICAL | | | DRAWINGS ON SHEET 2 OF 2. | | | | | | 1} INDICATE IF THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE SHOWN ON THE PLAN | | | IS NEW OR EXISTING. IF NEW INCLUDE IN THE DESCRIPTION | | | ON THE APPLICATION, PROVIDE AN AIC RATING, ANDLOCATE | | | ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN, METER ENCLOSURE, | | | DISCONNECTS AND PANELS, SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ARTICLES 225 AND 230 CAN BE REVIEWED. PROVIDE A RISER | | | DIAGRAM WITH CONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SIZE AND TYPE. | | | | | | 2} PLEASE PROVIDE A PANEL SCHEDULE SO THAT | | | BRANCH/FEEDER CIRCUIT CONDUCTOR AND OVER CURRENT | | | PROTECTION COMPLIANCE MAY BE REVIEWED PER 106.3.5.4 FBC | | | AS AMENDED. THERE IS NO CONDENSER # 2 ON THE SCHEDULE | | | PROVIDED AND APPLIANCES THAT ARE IN THE CALCULATION ARE | | | MISSING. SEE 408.4 2005 NEC. | | | | | | 3} THERE IS 10000 VA OF HEAT IN THE LOAD CALCULATION, | | | CORRECTLY CALCULATED AT 100% PER 220.83(B), BUT THE | | | PANEL SCHEDILE INDICATES 2 AIR HANDLERS WITH AN OCP OF | | | 60 AMPS, WHICH WOULD IMPLY THAT THERE ARE 2 UNITS WITH | | | 10000 VA EACH. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 4} BATH CIRCUIT REQUIRED TO HAVE A 20 AMP RECEPTACLE | | | PER 210.11(C) (3),THIS CIRCUIT IS NOT ON THE | | | SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 5} R313.1.1, RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, SMOKE ALARMS | | | SHALL BE LOCATED AS REQUIRED IN NEW DWELLINGS WHEN | | | REPAIRS OR ADDITIONS REQUIRING A PERMIT OCCUR. SEE | | | ARTICLE FOR COMPLETE TEXT.ALSO SEE THE DEFINITION OF | | | "SMOKE DETECTORS" 11.8.2.1 NFPA-72, CLARIFY IF USING | | | DETECTORS OR ALARMS, TO AVOID CONFUSION IN THE FIELD. | | | IF USING DETECTORS INDICATE THE LOCATIONS OF THE | | | SOUNDING DEVICES. | | | | | | 6} INDICATE A DISCONNECTING MEANS FOR THE WATER HEATER. | | | SEE 422.16 NEC FOR CORD AND PLUG RESTRICTIONS, AND | | | 422.31(B) FOR HARDWIRE REQUIREMENTS. ALSO 110.26 AND | | | 440.14 FOR THE CONDENSING UNIT. | | | | | | PLEASE REMOVE ALL OLD OR VOIDED SHEETS AND REPLACE WITH | | | CORRECTED ONES WHEN RESUBMITTING. INCLUDE THEM | | | SEPARATELY TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | ANSWER REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
14:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
14:16 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-02 14:17:13 | TO "M" BOX/RESTAMP |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-08 |
Time |
15:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-08 |
Time |
15:17 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-08 15:18:13 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
Time |
13:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
Time |
13:59 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-20 14:00:17 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-13 |
Time |
08:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-13 |
Time |
08:48 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-13 08:49:41 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
Time |
10:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
Time |
10:45 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-05 10:46:25 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
14:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-08-15 |
Time |
10:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-15 10:56:15 | TO "SFR" "Z" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-02 14:50:26 | RE-STAMP MECH. PLAN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
16:20 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
16:20 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
Time |
10:41 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
Time |
10:41 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-24 10:44:02 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) AS REQUESTED IN LAST TWO REVIEWS 11-17-07 NOTE #1 | | | AND 10-17-07 NOTE #1. PLEASE SUBMIT THE 'LONG FORM' | | | "COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS", (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH | | | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS) PER 2004 FBC/R M1401.3 HEATING | | | AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SIZED BASED ON BUILDING | | | LOADS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCA "MANUAL J" OR | | | OTHER APPROVED HEATING AND COOLING CALCULATION | | | METHODOLOGIES. THE ENGINEERS RESPONSE LETTER STATES A | | | NEW LONG FORM ENERGY CALCULATIONS IS ATTACHED. | | | | | | 2) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SIGNED BY OWNER/AGENT | | | ALSO, PER 2004 FBC 13-103.3. | | | | | | 3) PLEASE SHOW ON MECHANICAL PLAN HOW RETURN AIR WILL | | | GET TO THE AIR HANDLER UNIT FROM ANY OF THE ROOMS WHEN | | | ALL DOORS ARE CLOSED, SEE 2004 FBC/R M1602.4. | | | | | | 4) PLEASE BE ADVISED A FOUR TIMES THE FEE WILL BE | | | CHARGED TO THE PERMIT IF NOTE ONE HAS NOT BEEN | | | CORRECTED, PER FS 553.80(2)(B). PLEASE CALL IF YOU NEED | | | ANY ASSISTANCE. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-11-27 |
Time |
11:35 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-11-27 |
Time |
11:35 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-27 11:35:47 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 05, 06 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 11-17-07 NOTE #1.BUILDING | | | ADDITION IS 759 SQUARE FEET UNDER AIR, COOLING LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS SHOW ROOF AREA AT 2118 IS THAT SQUARE FEET | | | OR BTU'S, PLEASE SUBMIT LONG FORM CALCULATIONS AS | | | REQUIRED BY 2004 FBC/R M1401.3 HEATING AND COOLING | | | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SIZED BASED ON BUILDING LOADS | | | CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCA MANUAL J OR OTHER | | | APPROVED HEATING AND COOLING CALCULATION | | | METHODOLOGIES. | | | | | | 2) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 10-17-07 NOTE #3. MECHANICAL | | | PLAN SUBMITTED HAVE TO MUCH FLOOR PLAN DETAIL ON THEM | | | AND DUCT DESIGN IS FADED THEY ARE DIFFICULT TO READ. | | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY | | | TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK | | | PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE | | | PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, SEE F.B.C. | | | 106.1.1. | | | | | | 3) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 10-17-07 NOTE #4. WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING MECHANICAL PLANS PLEASE HAVE THEM APPEAR | | | SEMI-PROFESSIONAL AND HAVE ALL PERTINENT INFORMATION ON | | | THEM (JOB ADDRESS, DESIGNER'S INFORMATION & SIGNATURE, | | | EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE, ETC. (TWO COPIES) | | | | | | 4) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 10-17-07 NOTE #5. MECHANICAL | | | PLAN SHOWS AN 18" RETURN DUCT GOING OFF THE PAGE, | | | PLEASE SHOW WERE IT IS GOING. | | | | | | 5) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 10-17-07 NOTE #8. SHOW | | | LOCATION OF THE CLOTHES DRYER VENT ON THE MECHANICAL | | | PLAN, BE ADVISED THE CLOTHES DRYER VENT MAY NOT | | | DISCHARGE NEAR THE A/C CONDENSER UNIT, SEE 2004 FBC/R | | | 401.5.2. | | | | | | 6)SEE ATTACHED NOTICE FS 553.80 (2) (B) REGARDING | | | FOUR TIMES THE FEE. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] . |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-11-19 |
Time |
12:33 |
Rev Time |
0.40 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-10-17 |
Time |
14:43 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-17 14:57:41 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 05, 06 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) PLANS SHOW TOTAL AREA UNDER AIR AT 1,818 SQUARE | | | FEET, COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS SHOW ROOF AREA AT 2118 | | | IS THAT SQUARE FEET OR BTU'S, PLEASE SUBMIT LONG FORM | | | CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY 2004 FBC/R M1401.3 HEATING | | | AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SIZED BASED ON BUILDING | | | LOADS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCA MANUAL J OR | | | OTHER APPROVED HEATING AND COOLING CALCULATION | | | METHODOLOGIES. | | | | | | 2)ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SIGNED BY | | | OWNER/AGENT ALSO, PER 2004 FBC 13-600.3.ABC.2. | | | | | | 3) MECHANICAL PLAN SUBMITTED HAVE TO MUCH FLOOR PLAN | | | DETAIL ON THEM AND DUCT DESIGN IS FADED THEY ARE | | | DIFFICULT TO READ.CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF | | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | | RELEVANT LAWS, SEE F.B.C. 106.1.1. | | | | | | 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING MECHANICAL PLANS PLEASE HAVE THEM | | | APPEAR SEMI-PROFESSIONAL AND HAVE ALL PERTINENT | | | INFORMATION ON THEM (JOB ADDRESS, DESIGNER'S | | | INFORMATION & SIGNATURE, EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE, ETC. | | | | | | 5) MECHANICAL PLAN SHOWS A 16' SUPPLY AND A 18" RETURN | | | DUCT GOING OFF THE PAGE, PLEASE SHOW WERE THEY ARE | | | GOING. | | | | | | 6) RETURN AIR WILL BE NEEDED IN BEDROOM #4, SEE 2004 | | | FBC/R M1602.4. | | | | | | 7) BUILDING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN SHOW THE A/C CONDENSER | | | UNIT IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION THEN THE MECHANICAL PLAN | | | DOES, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 8) SHOW LOCATION OF THE CLOTHES DRYER VENT ON THE | | | MECHANICAL PLAN, BE ADVISED THE CLOTHES DRYER VENT MAY | | | NOT DISCHARGE NEAR THE A/C CONDENSER UNIT, SEE 2004 | | | FBC/R 401.5.2 | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] . |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
Time |
13:30 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
Time |
13:30 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-29 13:40:33 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 05, 06 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (WPB), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (FAC), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (FS). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS PER 2004 FBC 13-101.2.2. | | | | | | 2) SUBMIT COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-607.1.ABC.1. | | | | | | 3) MECHANICAL PERMIT #07080419 HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR AND | | | BUILDING PLANS SHOW AN A/C SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED BUT | | | NO MECHANICAL PLANS WERE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. PLEASE | | | SUBMIT MECHANICAL PLANS FOR REVIEW, PER 2004 FBC CITY | | | OF WPB AMEND. 106.3.5.4 (10). | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
15:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-03-25 |
Time |
08:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-03-25 |
Time |
08:30 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-25 09:11:25 | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | DENIED 4TH TIME | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES WITH | | | 2006 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO | | | CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.). | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | THE PREVIOUS PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS THE | | | DESIGNER'S RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED ON THE | | | PREVIOUS REVIEWS, 9/6/07, 10/17/07 AND 11/27/07: | | | | | | 1. SHEET 2, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: THE WASHING | | | MACHINE AND SINK IN THE UTILITY ROOM MUST DRAIN | | | DOWNSTREAM OF THE NEW WET VENTED BATHROOM GROUP. PER | | | FBC, PLUMBING, SECTION *909.1 WET VENT PERMITTED. | | | | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, HOWEVER THE RESUBMITTED RISER | | | DIAGRAM HAS NOT BEEN REVISED TO INDICATE THE WASHING | | | MACHINE AND SINK IN THE UTILITY ROOM TO DRAIN | | | DOWNSTREAM OF THE NEW WET VENTED BATHROOM GROUP. | | | | | | 2. **OK** COMMENT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED ON THE | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW, 10/17/07 AND 11/27/07: | | | | | | 3. **OK** COMMENT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 4. THE RESUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE INCOMPLETE | | | FOR THE ADDITION DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE WATER HEATER | | | IS IN THE NEW ADDITION UTILITY ROOM AND THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS ARE INDICATING PER (14) HOT WATERSYSTEM | | | TYPE, N/A. PER THE FOLLOWING CHAPTER 13 ENERGY | | | EFFICIENCY SECTION 13-101.0 GENERAL. THIS CODE IS A | | | STATEWIDE UNIFORM CODE AND SHALL NOT BE MADE MORE | | | STRINGENT OR LENIENT BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT. THE CODE | | | PROVIDES FOR A UNIFORM STANDARD OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY | | | BY, AT A MINIMUM, SETTING FORTH MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR EXTERIOR ENVELOPES, LIGHTING, ELECTRICAL | | | DISTRIBUTION, AND SELECTION OF HEATING, LIGHTING, | | | VENTILATION, AIR CONDITIONING AND SERVICE WATER HEATING | | | SYSTEMS. IT SHALL APPLY TO ALL NEW BUILDINGS, TO | | | ADDITIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS AND MANUFACTURED HOMES, | | | TO RENOVATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS, BOTH PUBLIC AND | | | PRIVATE, WITH CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS, TO CHANGES OF | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, TO THE SITE-INSTALLED COMPONENTS AND | | | FEATURES OF A MANUFACTURED HOMES AT THEIR FIRST SET-UP, | | | AND TO THE INSTALLATION OR REPLACEMENT OF BUILDING | | | SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS WITH NEW PRODUCTS FOR WHICH | | | THERMAL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS ARE SET BY THIS CODE. NEW | | | BUILDINGS, WITH EXCEPTION OF THOSE EXEMPTED BELOW, AND | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC EXCEPTIONS OF | | | INDIVIDUAL SECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH | | | SUBCHAPTER 13-4 OR 13-6 OF THIS CODE. | | | **NOTE: THE WATER HEATER IN THE NEW ADDITION UTILITY | | | ROOM SHALL COMPLY PER THE FOLLOWING AND BE INDICATED ON | | | THE RESUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS: | | | | | | A} 13-101.2.2 ADDITIONS. | | | B} TABLE 13-612.1.ABC.3.2, MINIMUM PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARDS, WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, HOWEVER THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | NEED TO BE SIGNED BY OWNER/AGENT PER FBC 13-103.3. | | | | | | 5. SEE ATTACHED IMPORTANT NOTICE FS 553.80(2)(B) | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DOCUMENTS REGUARDING FOUR (4) TIMES | | | THE FEE. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | | ONLY. | | | NOTE: THERE IS ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | | IN RED INK ON THE INDICATED PLAN SHEETS BY THIS PLANS | | | EXAMINER FOR REFERENCE FOR THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-11-27 |
Time |
08:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-11-27 |
Time |
08:18 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-27 08:59:14 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES WITH | | | 05 & 06 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.). | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | DENIED 3RD TIME: | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED ON THE | | | PREVIOUS REVIEWS, 9/6/07 OR 10/17/07: | | | | | | 1. SHEET 2, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: THE WASHING | | | MACHINE AND SINK IN THE UTILITY ROOM MUST DRAIN | | | DOWNSTREAM OF THE WET VENTEDBATHROOM GROUP. PER FBC, | | | PLUMBING, SECTION *909.1 WET VENT PERMITTED. | | | | | | 2. SHEET 2, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM A CLEANOUT IS | | | REQUIRED AT THE BASE OF THE WASTE STACK IN THE PROPOSED | | | BATHROOM. PER FBC, PLUMBING, SECTION *708.3.4 BASE OF | | | STACK. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED ON THE | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW, 10/17/07: | | | | | | 3. SHEET 2, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: THE WASHING | | | MACHINE IS "S" TRAPPED AND A VENT IS REQUIRED. PER FBC, | | | PLUMBING, SECTIONS *1002.3 PROHIBITED TRAPS AND | | | *901.2.1 VENTING REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4. THE RESUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE INCOMPLETE | | | FOR THE ADDITION DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE WATER HEATER | | | IS IN THE NEW ADDITION UTILITY ROOM AND THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS ARE INDICATING PER (14) HOT WATERSYSTEM | | | TYPE, N/A. PER THE FOLLOWING CHAPTER 13 ENERGY | | | EFFICIENCY SECTION 13-101.0 GENERAL. THIS CODE IS A | | | STATEWIDE UNIFORM CODE AND SHALL NOT BE MADE MORE | | | STRINGENT OR LENIENT BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT. THE CODE | | | PROVIDES FOR A UNIFORM STANDARD OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY | | | BY, AT A MINIMUM, SETTING FORTH MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR EXTERIOR ENVELOPES, LIGHTING, ELECTRICAL | | | DISTRIBUTION, AND SELECTION OF HEATING, LIGHTING, | | | VENTILATION, AIR CONDITIONING AND SERVICE WATER HEATING | | | SYSTEMS. IT SHALL APPLY TO ALL NEW BUILDINGS, TO | | | ADDITIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS AND MANUFACTURED HOMES, | | | TO RENOVATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS, BOTH PUBLIC AND | | | PRIVATE, WITH CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS, TO CHANGES OF | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, TO THE SITE-INSTALLED COMPONENTS AND | | | FEATURES OF A MANUFACTURED HOMES AT THEIR FIRST SET-UP, | | | AND TO THE INSTALLATION OR REPLACEMENT OF BUILDING | | | SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS WITH NEW PRODUCTS FOR WHICH | | | THERMAL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS ARE SET BY THIS CODE. NEW | | | BUILDINGS, WITH EXCEPTION OF THOSE EXEMPTED BELOW, AND | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC EXCEPTIONS OF | | | INDIVIDUAL SECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH | | | SUBCHAPTER 13-4 OR 13-6 OF THIS CODE. | | | **NOTE: THE WATER HEATER IN THE NEW ADDITION UTILITY | | | ROOM SHALL COMPLY PER THE FOLLOWING AND BE INDICATED ON | | | THE RESUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS: | | | | | | A} 13-101.2.2 ADDITIONS. | | | B} TABLE 13-612.1.ABC.3.2, MINIMUM PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARDS, WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING IS A NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 5. SEE ATTACHED IMPORTANT NOTICE FS 553.80(2)(B) | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DOCUMENTS REGUARDING FOUR (4) TIMES | | | THE FEE. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | | ONLY. | | | NOTE: THERE IS ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | | IN RED INK ON THE INDICATED PLAN SHEETS BY THIS PLANS | | | EXAMINER FOR REFERENCE FOR THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-10-17 |
Time |
09:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-10-17 |
Time |
09:47 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-17 11:08:18 | DENIED 2ND TIME | | | REFERENCE: | | | ** FBC-2004 WITH 05 & 06 REVISIONS, PLUMBING. | | | ** FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS. | | | ** FBC-2004 WITH 05 & 06 REVISIONS, CHAPTER 13, ENERGY | | | EFFICIENCY. | | | ** FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (FAC). | | | ** FLORIDA STATUTES (FS). | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | THE RESUBMITTED PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE | | | COMPLIANCE: | | | | | | 1. SHEET 2, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: THE WASHING | | | MACHINE AND SINK MUST DRAIN DOWNSTREAM OF THE WET | | | VENTED BATHROOM GROUP PER FBC-2004 W/REV., PLUMBING, | | | SECTION 909.1 | | | WET VENT PERMITTED: ONLY THE FIXTURES | | | WITHIN THE BATHROOM GROUPS SHALL CONNECT | | | TO THE WET-VENTED HORIZONTAL BRANCH | | | DRAIN. ANY ADDITIONAL FIXTURES SHALL | | | DISCHARGE DOWNSTREAM OF THE WET VENT. | | | | | | 2. SHEET 2, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: THE WASHING | | | MACHINE IS "S" TRAPPED PER FBC-2004 W/REV., PLUMBING, | | | SECTION 1002.3 "S" TRAPS ARE PROHIBITED. | | | | | | 3. SHEET 2, SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM A CLEANOUT IS | | | REQUIRED AT THE BASE OF THE WASTE STACK IN THE PROPOSED | | | BATHROOM PER FBC-2004 W/REV., PLUMBING SECTION | | | 708.3.4. | | | | | | 4. THE RESUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE INCOMPLETE | | | FOR THE ADDITION DUE TO THE FACT THAT A WATER HEATER IS | | | IN THE NEW ADDITION UTILITY ROOM AND THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS ARE INDICATINGPER (14) HOT WATER SYSTEM | | | TYPE, N/A. PER THE FOLLOWING CHAPTER 13 ENERGY | | | EFFICIENCY SECTION 13-101.0 GENERAL. THIS CODE IS A | | | STATEWIDE UNIFORM CODE AND SHALL NOT BE MADE MORE | | | STRINGENT OR LENIENT BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT. THE CODE | | | PROVIDES FOR A UNIFORM STANDARD OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY | | | BY, AT A MINIMUM, SETTING FORTH MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR EXTERIOR ENVELOPES, LIGHTING, ELECTRICAL | | | DISTRIBUTION, AND SELECTION OF HEATING, LIGHTING, | | | VENTILATION, AIR CONDITIONING AND SERVICE WATER HEATING | | | SYSTEMS. IT SHALL APPLY TO ALL NEW BUILDINGS, TO | | | ADDITIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS AND MANUFACTURED HOMES, | | | TO RENOVATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS, BOTH PUBLIC AND | | | PRIVATE, WITH CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS, TO CHANGES OF | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, TO THE SITE-INSTALLED COMPONENTS AND | | | FEATURES OF A MANUFACTURED HOMES AT THEIR FIRST SET-UP, | | | AND TO THE INSTALLATION OR REPLACEMENT OF BUILDING | | | SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS WITH NEW PRODUCTS FOR WHICH | | | THERMAL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS ARE SET BY THIS CODE. NEW | | | BUILDINGS, WITH EXCEPTION OF THOSE EXEMPTED BELOW, AND | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC EXCEPTIONS OF | | | INDIVIDUAL SECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH | | | SUBCHAPTER 13-4 OR 13-6 OF THIS CODE. | | | NOTE: THE WATER HEATER IN THE NEW ADDITION UTILITY ROOM | | | SHALL COMPLY PER THE FOLLOWING AND BE INDICATED ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS: | | | | | | A} 13-101.2.2 ADDITIONS. | | | B} TABLE 13-612.1.ABC.3.2, MINIMUM PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARDS, WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | | ONLY. | | | NOTE: THERE IS ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | | IN RED INK ON THE INDICATED PLAN SHEETS BY THIS PLANS | | | EXAMINER FOR REFERENCE FOR THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
08:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
08:15 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-06 08:46:08 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | ** FBC-2004 PLUMBING WITH 2006 REVISIONS. | | | ** FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS. | | | ** FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | ** FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE: | | | | | | 1. SHEET 2 PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM: THE WASHING MACHINE | | | BRANCH DRAIN, DRAINAGE STACK ANDTRAP ARE SIZED WRONG | | | PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING WITH 2006 REVISIONS PER THE | | | FOLLOWING CODE SECTIONS. PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | (A) 406.3 WASTE CONNECTIONS.THE TRAP AND | | | FIXTURE DRAIN FOR AN AUTOMATIC CLOTHES | | | WASHER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES | | | (51MM) IN DIAMETER. THE AUTOMATIC | | | CLOTHES WASHER FIXTURE DRAIN SHALL | | | CONNECT TO A BRANCH DRAIN OR DRAINAGE | | | STACK A MINIMUM OF 3 INCHES (76MM) IN | | | DIAMETER. | | | (B) 802.4 STANDPIPES.STANDPIPES SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY | | | TRAPPED. STANDPIPES SHALL | | | EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES (457MM) | | | AND A MAXIMUM OF 42 INCHES (1066MM) | | | ABOVE THE TRAP WEIR. ACCESS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED TO ALL STANDPIPES AND DRAINS | | | FOR RODDING. PLEASE INDICATE THE WASHING MACHINE | | | STANDPIPE ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2. SHEET 2 PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM: THE WASHING MACHINE | | | AND SINK IN THE UTILITY ROOM MUST DISCHARGE DOWNSTREAM | | | OF THE PROPOSED WET VENTED BATHROOM PER FBC-2004 | | | PLUMBING WITH 2006 REVISIONS FOLLOWING CODE SECTION. | | | PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | (A) SECTION 909.1 WET VENT PERMITTED: ONLY THE | | | FIXTURES WITHIN THE BATHROOM GROUPS SHALL CONNECT TO | | | THE WET-VENTED HORIZONTAL BRANCH | | | DRAIN. ANY ADDITIONAL FIXTURES SHALL DISCHARGE | | | DOWNSTREAM OF THE WET VENT. | | | NOTE: WHERE THE PROPOSED 3 INCH TO THE EXISTING | | | SANITARY SYSTEM IS INDICATED IT ALSO MUST DISCHARGE | | | DOWNSTREAM OF THE EXISTING WET VENTED BATHROOMS. PLEASE | | | INDICATE THIS ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 3. SHEET 2 PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM: PER FBC-2004 | | | PLUMBING WITH 2006 REVISIONS SECTION 708.3.4 BASE OF | | | STACK. A CLEANOUT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE BASE OF EACH | | | WASTE OR SOIL STACK. PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | | ONLY. | | | NOTE: THERE IS ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING IN RED INK | | | ON THE INDICATED PLAN SHEETS BY THIS PLANS EXAMINER FOR | | | REFERENCE FOR THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL= [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
Time |
10:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-04-09 |
Time |
10:35 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-09 10:36:22 | ***APPROVED - RESUB #4 (RESTAMPED PLANS)*** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "E" - BT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
Time |
10:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
Time |
10:34 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-21 10:35:14 | ***APPROVED - RESUB #3*** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "E" - BT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-11-14 |
Time |
14:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-11-14 |
Time |
14:47 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-14 14:49:16 | ***FAILED - RESUB #2*** | | | | | | | | | REPEAT COMMENT: | | | | | | 1)NEW CONSTRUCTION MUST MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS | | | SET FORTH IN SECTION 94-72 OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.THE PROPOSED ADDITION MUST | | | MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 5' SIDE SETBACK WITH A TOTAL OF | | | 15' BETWEEN THE TWO SIDES. | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN (561)805-6720 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-10 14:52:30 | ***FAILED - RESUB #1*** | | | | | | | | | 1)NEW CONSTRUCTION MUST MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS | | | SET FORTH IN SECTION 94-72 OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.THE PROPOSED ADDITION MUST | | | MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 5' SIDE SETBACK WITH A TOTAL OF | | | 15' BETWEEN THE TWO SIDES. | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, ZONING | | | TECHNICIAN | | | (561)805-6720 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-08-15 |
Time |
14:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-08-15 |
Time |
14:14 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-15 14:17:36 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | | | | 1)PLEASE INDICATE ELEVATION DIMENSIONS FROM GRADE. | | | | | | 2)INDICATE ANY PROPOSED OR RELOCATED A/C EQUIPMENT | | | (IF ANY) WITH SETBACK DIMENSIONS TO THE PROPERTY | | | LINES. | | | | | | 3)PROVIDE A DEMOLITION PLAN. | | | | | | 4)SHOW SCOPE OF WORK ON SURVEYS WITH SETBACK | | | DIMENSIONS TO THE PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, ZONING | | | TECHNICIAN | | | (561)805-6720 |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |