| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07050808 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
Time |
08:41 |
Rev Time |
1.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
16:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
Time |
08:52 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
Time |
08:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-06 08:52:41 | REVISION# 5 STRUCTURAL REVISIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jjohnsto |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
Time |
14:23 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
jjohnsto |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
Time |
14:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
08:15 |
Rev Time |
1.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
07:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-20 08:16:22 | CITYPLACE STAR BUCKS | | | 650 S ROSEMARY AVE | | | SEPT 20,2007 | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT: 07050808 | | | ADD: 650 S ROSEMARY AVE | | | CONT: PEMBERTON BUILDING | | | TEL: (561)744-3399 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 3RDREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2) COMPLIED.. | | | | | | 3) NOTE:FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE | | | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF | | | THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS | | | NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE | | | RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: | | | 713.13(6) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT | | | THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 4) THIRD REQUEST, THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED | | | REQUIRE FLORIDA COVERSHEETS. PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 | | | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE | | | WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A | | | COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM | | | THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE | | | APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. REPORTS | | | MISSING THE FLORIDA APPROVAL COVERSHEETS ARE: | | | 4A) PGT SERIES **PW-701** IS A NON-IMPACT WINDOW, | | | PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THE EXISTING SHUTTERS ARE | | | RATED FOR THE 140 MPH WIND ZONE & LARGE MISSILE | | | TESTED. | | | 4B) PGT SERIES HR-810 IS A HORIZONTAL ROLLER NOT USED | | | SEE SHEET G2.0 | | | 4C) FIXED WINDOW- SHEET G2.0 INDICATES NEW LARGE | | | MISSILE RATED NO REPORTS SUBMITTED. | | | 4D) FIREDOOR SERIES 4080 SINGLE | | | 4E FIREDOOR SERIES S-6070 | | | | | | 5) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 6-8) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 9A)TRANSFORMER MOUNT THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN | | | THE STRUCTURAL SHEET S2 AND THE ELECTRICAL SHEET E2. | | | THE UPDATED S2 DOES NOW SHOW STEEL TUBING TO HANDLE THE | | | LOADS OF THE BRAKET CARRYING THE TRANSFORMERS WEIGHT | | | BUT THE E2 SHEET NEEDS TO CORRELATE THE THE SAME TYPE | | | OF STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FORTHIS UNIT. DISCREPANCY BETWEEN | | | PLANS, 106.1.2* | | | | | | 9B) THE SECOND ISSUE IS THE DRYWALL RUNS BEHIND | | | BRACKET, THERE WOULD APPEAR TO BE CRUSHING CONCERNS | | | THIS PORTION OF WALL WILL QUICKLY BE CRUSHED AND THE | | | BRACKET BECOMING LOOSE! 106.1.2*? | | | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS | | | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF | | | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST | | | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT | | | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC | | | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC | | | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
Time |
08:42 |
Rev Time |
1.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
Time |
07:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-27 08:44:33 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PERMIT: 07050808 | | | ADD: 650 S ROSEMARY AVE | | | CONT: PEMBERTON BUILDING | | | TEL: (561)744-3399 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 2NDREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2) COMPLIED.. | | | | | | 3) NOTE:FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE | | | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF | | | THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS | | | NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE | | | RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: | | | 713.13(6) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT | | | THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 4) 2ND REQUEST, THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED REQUIRE | | | FLORIDA COVERSHEETS. PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED | | | TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR | | | INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE | | | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER | | | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, | | | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. REPORTS MISSING THE | | | FLORIDA APPROVAL COVERSHEETS ARE: | | | 4A) PGT SERIES **PW-701** | | | 4B) PGT SERIES HR-810 | | | 4C) FIREDOOR SERIES 4080 SINGLE | | | 4D) FIREDOOR SERIES S-6070 | | | | | | 5) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 6) SHEET G1.0 SITE INFO: | | | 6A) 2ND REQUEST, PLEASE SEE THAT PLANS SUBMITTED AFTER | | | DEC. 8/ 2006 WILL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2006 FBC, AND THE | | | 2006 FBC EXISTING BUILDING CODE. PLEASE INDICATE TO | | | WHAT LEVEL YOU WILL BE DOING ALTERATIONS UNDER THE | | | SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT? | | | | | | 6B) ENERGY CODE WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER THE 2006 FBC, | | | CHAPTER 13- 400 COMMERCIAL | | | | | | 6C) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 6D)SHEET G1.0 2ND REQUEST, TYPE OF OCCUPANCY SEE: 302.1 | | | GENERAL.STRUCTURES OR PORTIONS OF STRUCTURES SHALL BE | | | CLASSIFIED WITH RESPECT TO OCCUPANCY IN ONE OR MORE OF | | | THE GROUPS LISTED BELOW. | | | | | | 6E) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 503.1 GENERAL.THE HEIGHT | | | AND AREA FOR BUILDINGS OF DIFFERENT CONSTRUCTION TYPES | | | SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE INTENDED USE OF THE BUILDING | | | AND SHALL NOT EXCEED THE LIMITS IN TABLE 503 EXCEPT AS | | | MODIFIED HEREAFTER PROVIDE THE MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE | | | FOR THIS STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 7) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 8) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 9) NEW COMMENT: SHEETE.2 TRANSFORMER MOUNT DETAIL | | | INDICATES THAT TRANSFORMER BRACKET IS TO USE (2) ?? | | | WITH 6? EMBEDMENT INTO FILLED WALL CELLS (CMU). SHEET | | | A2.0 INDICATES THIS WALL TO BE A TYPE# 23 5/8? 20G | | | METAL STUD WITH5/8? GREEN BOARD . PLEASE CORRECT | | | DETAIL. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | | | | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
07:00 |
Rev Time |
1.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
07:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-15 07:37:46 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07050808 | | | ADD: 650 S ROSEMARY AVE | | | CONT: PEMBERTON BUILDING | | | TEL: (561)744-3399 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2) THE WRONG PROPERTY CONTROL NUMBER WAS USED ON THIS | | | PERMIT APPLICATION, THIS MAY AFFECT THE ADDRESS. PLEASE | | | CORRECT THE PROPERTY CONTROL NUMBER. | | | | | | 3)FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 4)THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED REQUIRE FLORIDA | | | COVERSHEETS. PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO | | | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE | | | STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A | | | COVER SHEET THAT LISTS | | | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE | | | PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN | | | APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC | | | FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE | | | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 5) PRODUCT APPROVAL FIREDOOR DIVISION OF ARK II | | | MANUFACTURING IS MISSING THE TECHNICAL SHEETS 1-4. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE. | | | | | | 6) SHEET G1.0 SITE INFO: | | | 6A) PLEASE SEE THAT PLANS SUBMITTED AFTER DEC. 8/ 2006 | | | WILL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2006 FBC, AND THE 2006 FBC | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE. | | | PLEASE INDICATE TO WHAT LEVEL YOU WILL BE DOING | | | ALTERATIONS UNDER THE SCOPE OFTHIS PERMIT? | | | | | | 6B) ENERGY CODE WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER THE 2006 FBC, | | | CHAPTER 13- 400 COMMERCIAL | | | | | | 6C) ACCESSIBILITY WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER THE 2006 FBC, | | | BUILDING CHAPTER 11 | | | | | | 6D) TYPE OF OCCUPANCY SEE:302.1 GENERAL.STRUCTURES | | | OR PORTIONS OF STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLASSIFIED WITH | | | RESPECT TO OCCUPANCY IN ONE OR MORE OF THE GROUPS | | | LISTED BELOW. STRUCTURES WITH MULTIPLE USES SHALL BE | | | CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO SECTION 302.3 | | | | | | 6E) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 503.1 GENERAL.THE HEIGHT | | | AND AREA FOR BUILDINGS OF DIFFERENT CONSTRUCTION TYPES | | | SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE INTENDED USE OF THE BUILDING | | | AND SHALL NOT EXCEED THE LIMITS IN TABLE 503 EXCEPT AS | | | MODIFIED HEREAFTER PROVIDE THE MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE | | | FOR THIS STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 7) SHEET S1 DOESN'T INDICATE TO WHAT WIND DESIGN THE | | | EXTERIOR COMPONENTS WERE DESINDE TOO? 2004 FL. BLD | | | CODE 1603.1.4 THE | | | FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND | | | SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION | | | DRAWINGS, | | | 1)- BASIC WIND SPEED, MPH | | | 2)- WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, & BUILDING | | | CATEGORY | | | 3)- WIND EXPOSURE | | | 4)- INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, | | | 5)- COMPONENTS & CLADDING, THE DESIGN | | | WIND PRESSURES IN TERMS OF PSF. | | | | | | 8) A1.0 THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING INDICATES THATNO | | | WORK IS TO BE COMPLETED ON THE EXISTING WINDOWS | | | ALTHOUGH THERE ARE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR FIXED AND | | | HORIZONTAL SLIDERS? | | | PLEASE CORRECT THIS SHEET , SHEET A2.0 INDICATES | | | WINDOWS TO BE REPLACED. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
Time |
12:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
Time |
12:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-15 12:59:13 | 2007-09-15 12:59:13 | | | | | | *** PLANS REDLINED *** | | | | | | THE E-SHEETS STILL INDICATE A CONCRETE WALL FOR SUPPORT | | | AND STRUCTURAL MOUNTING FOR THE TRANSFORMER. THIS WAS | | | SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW TO CORRELATE WITH | | | THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL SHEETS. THIS WAS NOT | | | DONE. | | | AS THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER HAS PROVIDED A DETAIL WHICH | | | IS DESIGNED FOR THE SUPPORT, THE E-SHEET (2) WAS | | | REDLINED TO SEE THE DETAIL ON S-2. | | | ** ANY CHANGES ARE TO BE REVISED AND SUBMITTED. | | | ** ANY REVISIONS ARE TO BE DONE BEFORE ROUGH ELECTRICAL | | | INSPECTION. | | | ** AT NO TIME MAY A CEILING BE INSTALLED BELOW THE | | | TRANSFORMER ENCLOSING THIS ABOVE.THIS IS NOTED ON | | | PLANS FOR NO CEILING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-26 |
Time |
18:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-26 |
Time |
17:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-26 18:13:03 | 2007-08-26 18:13:03 | | | | | | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | ARE IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW COMMENTS | | | BASED ON THE PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED AND | | | REVISIONS MADE TO PLANS WHICH WERE NOT ON PREVIOUS | | | SUBMITTED PLANS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE ALL NEW REVISED SHEETS CONTAINS THE | | | REQUIRED CITY PLACE REVIEW STAMP.OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | WIHT THE STAMP WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IN LIEU OF THE | | | REVISED SHEETS CONTAINING NEW STAMPS. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE AS REQUESTED ON THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW: | | | PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE SETS WITH ALL SHEETS IN | | | ORDER AS STATED ON COVER SHEET. | | | PLEASE SEE THE END OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW AND NOTE #1 | | | FROM PREVIOUS REQUESTED ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM SETS AND ONLY INCLUDE NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | IN SETS. | | | THE REVIEW ALSO REQUESTED NOT TO ATTACH PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS/ ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS | | | DOWN THE LEFT SIDE OF PLANS. THESE SHOULD BE ATTACHED | | | INTO TWO SETS BOUND TOGETHER IN SOME FASHION.THESE | | | MAY BE PLACED IN SPIRAL BOOK OR OTHER FOLDER OF SOME | | | TYPE LABELED/TABBED FOR EASE OF REVIEW IN EXPEDITING | | | THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS. | | | ** PLEASE SEE NOTE BELOW LABELED AS IMPORTANT. | | | | | | ** THE DOCUMENTS WHICH WERE ATTACHED DOWN THE LEFT SIDE | | | OF PLANS WERE REMOVED. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH ARE | | | SIGNED DATED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED PER FAC | | | 61G15-23.002, FS 471.025 AND FBC 13-103.1.1.1. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY HOW THE TOTAL LPD ON THE CALCULATIONS IS | | | DIFFERENT THAN THAT STATED ON THE PLANS. | | | 13-415.2, 13-415.1.C | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER HAS BEEN REVISED FOR THE | | | TRANSFORMER HOWEVER NO GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM IS | | | SHOWN? | | | PLEASE SEE 250.50, 250.20, 250.30, 250.66 ETC. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE STRUCTURAL DETAIL SUBMITTED IS | | | OK, HOWEVER SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY THE | | | ARCHITECT/STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND SIGNED AS REVIEWED | | | FOR ADEQUATE SUPPORT. | | | THE REVISIONS TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOULD INCLUDE | | | ANY REVISIONS FOR FILLED CELLS AS STATED ON DETAIL. | | | PLEASE SEE THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS INDICATE THIS WALL | | | AS METAL STUDS, NO POUR CONCRETE AS STATED ON | | | E-SHEETS. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL SUPPORTING DETAIL FOR THE | | | 75KVA WALL MOUNTED TRANSFORMER. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ELEVATION DETAIL TO MEET 110.26A3 PLEASE | | | ALSO SEE 450.13 AND PROVIDE A NOTE THAT EQUIPMENT MAY | | | NOT BE INSTALLED ABOVE CEILING LINE. FBC 106.1.2. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.8B2 FOR REQUIRED GFI PROTECTION | | | FOR 15/20A 120V CIRCUITS IN KITCHEN AREA(S). | | | THIS NOTE REMAINS AS THE PLANS ARE SIMPLY ONLY STATING | | | THE CODE IN LIEU OF SHOWING AND INDICATING THE ACTUAL | | | PROTECTION EITHER BY WAY AT THE DEVICE LOCATION OR | | | BREAKERS IN PANELS. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 106.1.1, 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 WHICH | | | REQUIRES DETAIL(S) TO BE SHOWN. | | | PLEASE ADJUST. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | PLEASE SEE THE APPLIED ADDRESS DOES NOT MATCH WITH | | | PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE ANY COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES. PLANS WILL | | | BE FORWARDED TO THE ADDRESSING REVIEW FOR COMMENTS. | | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL TITLE BLOCKS CONTAIN THE CORRECTED | | | ADDRESS ALONG WITH PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | FAC 61G1-16.004 | | | ** THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS THE APPLIED ADDRESS AND | | | LOCATION IS 650 S ROSEMARY WHEREAS THE PLANS STATE 600 | | | S ROSEMARY. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE ANY POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES | | | WHICH MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | | | AS STATED IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
12:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
11:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-19 12:44:01 | *** UNSAT *** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE SETS WITH ALL | | | SHEETS IN ORDER AS STATED ON COVER SHEET. PLEASE SEE | | | ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING PLANS ARE MIXED. | | | PLEASE ALSO DO NOT ATTACH PRODUCT APPROVALS/ ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS DOWN THE LEFT | | | SIDE OF PLANS. THESE SHOULD BE ATTACHED INTO TWO SETS | | | BOUND TOGETHER IN SOME FASHION.THESE MAY BE PLACED IN | | | SPIRAL BOOK OR OTHER FOLDER OF SOME TYPE LABELED/TABBED | | | FOR EASE OF REVIEW IN EXPEDITING THE PLAN REVIEW | | | PROCESS. | | | ** PLEASE SEE NOTE BELOW LABELED AS IMPORTANT. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE PLANS THE CURRENT CODES AS | | | FOLLOWS. | | | 2004 FBC W/2006 REVISIONS. | | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | | ** PLEASE SEE POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH | | | MAY REQUIRE OTHER CODES. | | | THESE SECTIONS SHOULD ALSO BE STATED ON ELECTRICAL | | | PLANS AS WELL AS PROJECT COVER SHEET. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS ADOPTED | | | BY FBC 2004 W/2006 REVISIONS.13-415.1.C, 13-415.2 | | | PLEASE SEE THE SHEET ATTACHED DOES NOT SHOWIF THIS IS | | | THE LATEST ADOPTED VERSION NOR DOES IT CONTAIN THE | | | INPUT DATA REPORT IN ORDER TO REVIEW FOR COORDINATION | | | WITH PLANS AND LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE. PLEASE SEE | | | THE USE AS STATED. | | | ** AS THIS WAS NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW PLEASE BE SURE | | | THE FIXTURES, TYPE OF FIXTURES AND WATTAGE ON FIXTURES | | | ETC CORRELATE WITH PLANS AND FIXTURE SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW LOW VOLTAGE SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN | | | FOR ANY PHONE OR CATV WILL BE REQUIRED UNDER A SEPARATE | | | PERMIT. THESE PLANS MAY BE REFERENCED FOR PERMIT; | | | HOWEVER FEES AND PERMIT APPLICATION WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE KNOW ANY LOW VOLTAGE SECURITY WORK WILL ALSO BE | | | UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FEEDERS BEING SHOWN TO THE | | | TRANSFORMER INDICATE A NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR? PLEASE | | | CLARIFY HOW THIS IS POSSIBLE WHEN THIS IS A SEPARATELY | | | DERIVED SYSTEM. | | | 250.6,250.24,250.20,250.30 ETC. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL SUPPORTING DETAIL | | | FOR THE 75KVA WALL MOUNTED TRANSFORMER. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 450.13 AND PROVIDE A NOTE THAT | | | EQUIPMENT MAY NOT BE INSTALLED ABOVE CEILING LINE. FBC | | | 106.1.2. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.8B2 FOR REQUIRED GFI PROTECTION | | | FOR 15/20A 120V CIRCUITS IN KITCHEN AREA(S). | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE APPLIED ADDRESS DOES NOT MATCH | | | WITH PLANS. PLEASE SEE ANY COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES. | | | PLANS WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE ADDRESSING REVIEW FOR | | | COMMENTS. | | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL TITLE BLOCKS CONTAIN THE CORRECTED | | | ADDRESS ALONG WITH PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | FAC 61G1-16.004 | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE ANY POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES | | | WHICH MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
12:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
12:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-01 12:36:25 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | PLAN SHEET A1.0 STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
Time |
13:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
Time |
13:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-25 13:11:09 | *****PROVISO***** | | | | | | PLAN SHEETS G2.0 AND E3.0 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND | | | DATED;PLAN SHEET A1.0 TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE | | | FOLLOWING COMMENT TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN | | | REVIEW HAS BEEN ADDRESSED: | | | 5.ON THE APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION, POST THE | | | NUMERICAL ADDRESS VISIBLE FROM SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE. | | | AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THOSE NUMBERS SHALL BE NO | | | LESS THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS THAN 1" IN WIDTH. | | | SHOW/DISPLAY ACTUAL ADDRESS NUMBER AND LOCATION | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805/6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
Time |
13:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
Time |
13:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-29 13:25:33 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE | | | PLAN REVIEW STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | | | | 2.PLEASE EXPLAIN THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS DIFFERENCE. | | | THE PERMIT APPLICATION HAS 650 SOUTH ROSEMARY WHEREAS | | | THE SUBMITTED PLANS HAVE 600 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE. | | | PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE CORRECT ADDRESS FOR THIS | | | PROJECT SHALL BE IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED | | | PLAN SHEET. | | | | | | 3.ON SHEET G2.0, SITE LOCATION MAP, REFERENCE IS MADE | | | TO ROSEMARY PLAZA.WHAT/WHERE IS ROSEMARY PLAZA? | | | | | | 4.DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL NOT | | | INTERFERE OR HINDER EMERGENCY ACCESS RESPONSE TO THE | | | PROPERTY OR VICINITY THEREOF (INCLUDING STREETS, FIRE | | | LANES). | | | | | | 5.ON THE APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION, POST THE | | | NUMERICAL ADDRESS VISIBLE FROM SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE. | | | AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THOSE NUMBERS SHALL BE NO | | | LESS THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS THAN 1" IN WIDTH. | | | | | | 6.SPECIFY THE INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH | | | MATERIALS IN TERMS OF CLASS A, CLASS B, OR CLASS C. | | | | | | 7.SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE 2A:10BC RATED FIRE | | | EXTINGUISHER(S) WHICH SATISFY THE 75' TRAVEL DISTANCE. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE PLAN EACH ITEM WAS | | | ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805/6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
Time |
12:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
Time |
11:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-10 12:15:52 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | | | | 1.THE APPLICABLE CODES SHALL BE REFERENCED:FIRE | | | CODE - FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE (2004 EDITION); | | | LIFE SAFETY - NFPA 101 (2003 EDITION). | | | | | | 2.PLEASE EXPLAIN THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS DIFFERENCE. | | | THE PERMIT APPLICATION HAS 650 SOUTH ROSEMARY WHEREAS | | | THE SUBMITTED PLANS HAVE 600 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE. | | | PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE CORRECT ADDRESS FOR THIS | | | PROJECT SHALL BE IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED | | | PLAN SHEET. | | | | | | 3.ON SHEET G2.0, SITE LOCATION MAP, REFERENCE IS MADE | | | TO ROSEMARY PLAZA.WHAT/WHERE IS ROSEMARY PLAZA? | | | | | | 4.DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUTION OPERATIONS SHALL NOT | | | INTERFERE OR HINDER EMERGENCY ACCESS RESPONSE TO THE | | | PROPERTY OR VICINITY THEREOF (INCLUDING STREETS, FIRE | | | LANES). | | | | | | 5.ON THE APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION, POST THE | | | NUMERICAL ADDRESS VISIBLE FROM SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE. | | | AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THOSE NUMBERS SHALL BE NO | | | LESS THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS THAN 1" IN WIDTH. | | | | | | 6.SPECIFY THE INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH | | | MATERIALS IN TERMS OF CLASS A, CLASS B, OR CLASS C. | | | | | | 7.SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE 2A:10BC RATED FIRE | | | EXTINGUISHER(S) WHICH SATISFY THE 75' TRAVEL DISTANCE. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE PLAN EACH ITEM WAS | | | ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805/6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-15 |
Time |
11:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-15 |
Time |
11:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-05 11:24:05 | 12/5/07FIRE REVIEW NOT REQUIRED.SENT TO JIM | | | WITMER'S DESK FOR BUILDING REVIEW. LM | | 2007-11-28 11:41:31 | TO "COMM" BD#17 | | 2007-11-15 11:19:30 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
12:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
12:38 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-01 12:39:05 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-14 11:36:00 | TO "COMM" BD#57--EXPEDITED PERMIT-- |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-07 |
Time |
20:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-07 |
Time |
20:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-26 17:29:14 | TO COMM BOARD SPACE #35 | | 2007-08-07 20:55:36 | WAITING FOR COMM BOARD. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
Time |
12:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-05-22 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-12 12:18:30 | TO "COMM" BD#9 | | 2007-05-22 11:29:41 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
Time |
19:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
Time |
19:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-09-07 |
Time |
17:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-09-07 |
Time |
17:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-07 17:23:43 | THE CONDITIONS OF THE PROVISO HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. PLAN | | | NOTES CALL FOR INTERNAL FLOAT SWITCH ON PRIMARY DRAIN | | | PAN. | | | | | | RONALD J REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-06-21 |
Time |
10:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-21 10:11:06 | ***************PROVISO**************** | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A SOCONDARY OR AUXILIARY DRAIN | | | PROTECTION SYSTEM PER FBC,M 307.2.3: | | | | | | A SECONDARY DRAIN OR AUXILIARY DRAIN PAN SHALL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR EACH COOLING OR EVAPORATOR COIL WHERE | | | DAMAGE TO ANY BUILDING COMPONENTS WILL OCCUR AS A | | | RESULT OF OVERFLOW FROM THE EQUIPMENT DRAIN PAN OR | | | STOPPAGE IN THE CONDENSATE DRAIN PIPING. | | | | | | RONALD J REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
09:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
09:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
Time |
07:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
Time |
07:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-28 07:17:01 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. COMMENT NUMBERS TO REMAIN THE | | | SAME: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. SHT P2.0INDICATES REVERSE OSMOSIS FILTER. FILTER | | | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-58. PLEASE SUBMIT | | | MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE. SECTION | | | 611.2. | | | ****RESPONSE FROM ENGINEER, "TO BE ADDRESSED BY | | | ARCHITECT". NO COMMENT RESPONSE FROM ARCHITECT, COMMENT | | | NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 3. OK | | | 4. OK | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
15:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
15:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-20 16:06:50 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. SHT A0.0 NOTES #8 IN THE REMOVAL OF ANY PART OF A | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM, DEAD ENDS ARE PROHIBITED. SECTION | | | 704.5. ALL DEMO'D/CAPPED PIPES SHALL BE LEFT UNCOVERED | | | UNITL INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY FIELD INSPECTOR. | | | | | | 2. SHT P2.0INDICATES REVERSE OSMOSIS FILTER. FILTER | | | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-58. PLEASE SUBMIT | | | MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE. SECTION | | | 611.2. | | | | | | 3. SHT P3.0 NOTES #'S 1 & 2 INDICATE INDIRECT WASTE TO | | | A FLOOR DRAIN. FLOOR DRAINS ARE NOT APPROVED INDIRECT | | | WASTE RECEPTORS. INDIRECT WASTE SHALL DRAIN TO A FLOOR | | | SINK OR A HUB DRAIN PER SECTIONS 802.3 & 802.3.2. | | | PLEASE CHANGE REFERENCES. | | | | | | 4. SHT P3.0 NOTE # 24 INDICATES AN AAV. THESE ARE NOT | | | SHOWN ON THE RISER DIAGRAM OR FLOOR PLAN, AND ARE NOT | | | NEEDED IN A COMBINATION WASTE & VENT SYSTEM PER SECTION | | | 912.2.2.PLEASE DELETE REFERENCE FROM FLOOR PLAN & | | | NOTES. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
18:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
18:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
Time |
17:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
Time |
17:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
10:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-19 11:08:51 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2) THE PARCEL CONTROL NUMBER FOR THE JOB SITE IS | | | INCORRECT. | | | | | | 3) IF THE KIOSK IS ACTUALLY ON PCN 74434321130160020, | | | THEN THE PARCEL HAS BEEN ILLEGALLY SUBDIVIDED. | | | | | | 4) THE SIGNAGE SHALL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | 5) ARE THE TABLES TO BE PERMANENTLY AFFIXED TO THE | | | GROUND?IF SO, THEY WILL REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT AND | | | IT SHALL BE NOTED AS SUCH ON THIS PERMIT.THE | | | INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT TABLES REQUIRES THE APPROVAL | | | OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT BY THE | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435. |
|
|