| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07050618 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
10:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
10:55 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-01 10:57:12 | BUILDING REVISION: POOL DECK ADDED TO PERMIT VALUATION. | | | PLANS SENT TO ELECTRICAL FOR DECK BONDING REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
14:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
14:42 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-01 14:43:33 | INSULATION REVISION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
Time |
09:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
Time |
09:39 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-25 09:49:09 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, BUILDING REVISION | | | CHECKLIST. | | | REVIEW UNDER FBC 2004. | | | | | | 1- ARCHITECT NEEDS TO REVISE PLANS TO REFLECT THE | | | CHANGE OF INSULATION SINCE PROPOSED INSULATION ALTERS | | | THE BUILDING VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R806 OF | | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
10:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
07:34 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-05 10:58:57 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW PROVISO. | | | 1- ARCHITECT TO REVISE THE LETTER LISTING THE APPROVED | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS. REVIEW PRODUCT APPROVAL PACKAGE AND | | | CORRECTLY LIST SPECIFIC NOA OR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | NUMBER. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-18 |
Time |
10:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-18 |
Time |
07:42 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-18 10:49:08 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST. | | | REVIEW UNDER EXISTING BUILDING 2004, FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE 2004 AND FBC 2004. | | | | | | 1- PLANS WERE REVISED. REVISE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | AS REQUIRED TO MATCH NEW PROPOSED PLANS.SEC. 13-600 | | | FBC 2004. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. FLORIDAPRODUCT APPROVAL | | | FL239 AND NOA 02-0719.05 DON'T CORRESPOND TO EACH | | | OTHER.GO TO WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG AND DOWNLOAD | | | CORRESPONDING NOA THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL. | | | | | | B) WOOD CONNECTORS NOA 02-0919.05 IS EXPIRED. | | | | | | C) ALL SIMPSON PRODUCT APPROVALS SPECIFIED ON ANCHOR | | | SCHEDULE AND DETAILS. | | | | | | D) ENTRY DOOR WITH SIDELITE ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON | | | PLANS. | | | | | | E) METAL ROOFING.TABLE A ON PAGE 3 OF 5 OF NOA | | | 05-0331.01 SUBMITTEDINDICATES MAXIMUM DESIGN | | | PRESSURES OF -55PSF IN ROOF FIELD AREA.THIS DOESN'T | | | MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON TABLE R301.2(2) OF | | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.DESIGNER MAY ELECT TO | | | USE THE METAL ROOF FASTENER SPACING USED FOR PERIMETER | | | AND CORNER AREAS OR PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWINGNAIL | | | FASTENER SPACING TO ENHANCE THE DESIGN PRESSURES IN | | | FIELD AREA. PROVIDE RESPONSE IN WRITING IN THE | | | CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | | FBC 2004. | | | | | | F) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE. SEE TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR | | | LISTED ADHESIVES. (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | | | 3- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING. ARCHITECT CAN'T SIGN AND SEAL | | | THE WORK OF ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL)ALL PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS | | | TO FBC 2004.DESIGNER MAY USETHE STANDARD SHOP | | | DRAWINGS REVIEW STAMP.OR PROVIDE DESIGNER INFORMATION | | | IN WRITING ALONG WITH THE REVIEW AND APPROVED LANGUAGE. | | | (REPEAT COMMENT) | | | ***NOTE: MAKE SURE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE APPROVED. | | | | | | 4- PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS FOR BBQ GRILL TO BE INSTALLED | | | IN THE PORCH AREA.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | | 2004. ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATED THAT THE GRILL | | | WAS OMITTED, BUT DRAWINGS STILL SHOW THE GRILL. REVISE | | | DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE COMPLETE GRILL'S | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 5- CLEARLY SPECIFY ALL DEAD AND LIVE LOADS. INFORMATION | | | ON SHEET S.1 AND S.3 DOESN'T MATCH.PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW OBTAINING THE TC DEAD LOAD OF | | | 07PSF?. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW SEC. R301.1,R301.4, | | | R301.5,R301.6 AND R301.7 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE AND PROVIDE REQUIRED DESIGN INFORMATION AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | ALSO, CLARIFY INFORMATION GIVEN FOR ADDITIONAL LOADS ON | | | SHEET S.3. WHERE ARE THE REFERENCE TABLES TAKEN FROM?. | | | WHY ARE THERE NON-CONCURRENT BC LLOF 10PSF AND | | | CONCURRENT BC STORAGE LL OF 20PSF.WHAT'S THE | | | NON-CONCURRENT BC MOVING LL?.PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | ENGINEERING ANALYSISAND DEMONSTRATE WHYAND WHEN | | | THE LOADS ARE CONCURRENT OR NON CONCURRENT.SEC. | | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE DONE | | | TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | 6- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED REQUIRES THE FOLLOWING: | | | ENGINEERING FIRM CERTIFICATE THE AUTHORIZATION NUMBER | | | IN ALL SHEETS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.002 OF | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | | | 7- REVIEW AND REVISECOMPLETE LINTEL SCHEDULE.SOME | | | SIZES OF LINTELSSPECIFIEDIS THE SAME SIZE AS THE | | | OPENING. THIS IS NO GOOD BECAUSE LINTEL NEED TO HAVE | | | 4"MIN. BEARING AT BOTH ENDS AS REQUIRED BYACI 530ASCE | | | 5/TMS 402.SEC. R606.1 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 8- PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR GARAGE DOORS LEADING TO | | | THE EXERCISE AREA ND INTERIOR OF HOUSE AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. R309.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 9- REVISE SIZE OF HOLES SPECIFIED FOR ALL CUSTOM MADE | | | STEEL CONNECTORS FOR WOOD COLUMNS. THE HOLE SIZE CAN'T | | | BE THE SAME SIZE DIAMETER AS THE SPECIFIED BOLT.SEC. | | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-08-15 |
Time |
11:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-08-15 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-15 12:08:01 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST: | | | REVIEW DONE UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND FBC | | | 2004 WITH 2006 REVISIONS. | | | | | | 1- NEED TO ADDRESS ZONING COMMENTS REGARDING SETBACKS. | | | PLANS REVISIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. SEE ZONINGCOMMENTS. | | | | | | 2- PER SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS OF RECORDING IF WORK | | | IS NOT STARTED. NOC EXPIRES ON 8-15-07. WILL NEED TO | | | PROVIDE RE- RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. | | | | | | 3- PROVIDE COPY OF IMPACT FEES PAID RECEIPT AS | | | REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST. | | | | | | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) GARAGE DOORS THAT MATCH DOORS SHOWN ON | | | ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS | | | CHECKLIST. | | | IN ADDITION BASE ON INFORMATION SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING | | | ITEMS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | (1)FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 4307AND NOA | | | 03-0213.15 SUBMITTED DON'T CORRESPOND TO EACH OTHER. | | | THESE ARE TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVALS. PROVIDE | | | COMPLETE INFORMATIONEITHERFOR THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL OR THE DADE COUNTY PRODUCT APPROVAL. ARCHITECT | | | APPROVED THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE , BUT | | | THERE ARE NOT DRAWINGS SHOWING WHICH MODEL HE APPROVED. | | | HOW HE KNOWS THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS GOOD FOR THE | | | CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES? | | | | | | (2) NEED THE NAME OF PERSON APPROVING THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL.WRITING"APPROVED"ON THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATIONBECAUSE IT DOESN'T | | | IDENTIFYTHE PERSON OR COMPANY APPROVING THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL. TYPICALLY THE STANDARD SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW | | | STAMP WITH THE LOGO OR NAME OF THE COMPANY IS USED AND | | | IS ACCEPTABLE TO COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | | | B) METAL ROOF AT NEW CUPOLA REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS | | | CHECKLIST. | | | NOTE: MAKE SURE PRODUCT APPROVAL MEETS THE DESIGN | | | PRESSURES OF TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2) FBC 2004 FOR ZONES 2 | | | AND 3. | | | | | | C) WINDOW MULLIONS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST. | | | | | | D) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. | | | BASED ON INFORMATION SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING IS | | | REQUIRED: | | | (1) FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL7938 AND NOA | | | 02-0719.05 DON'T CORRESPOND TO EACH OTHER.PROVIDE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR EITHER ONE, BUT DON'T MISMATCH ONE | | | WITH THE OTHER. | | | | | | (2) ARCHITECT'S PLANS CALL FOR WINDOWS WITH | | | HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT GLAZING. FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FL7938 IS NOT FOR IMPACT GLAZING AND THIS IS | | | THE ONE THAT ARCHITECT APPROVED. WHY? | | | | | | E) EXTERIOR SWINGING DOORS:INFORMATION SUBMITTED | | | REQUIRES THE FOLLOWING: | | | (1) FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL253 AND NOA | | | 05-0103.03 DON'T CORRESPOND TO EACH OTHER. THESE ARE | | | TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVALS. NEED TO SUBMIT | | | COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR EITHER ONE. | | | | | | (2) FL253-R0DOESN'T HAVE ANY DRAWINGS AND IS FOR | | | CODE VERSION 2001.NEED TO PROVIDE 2004 CODE VERSION. | | | ARCHITECT TO MAKE SURE CORRECT CODE EDITION IS USED | | | PRIOR TO APPROVAL. | | | | | | 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. MAKE SURE NAME OR ARCHITECT OR | | | COMPANY NAME IS INCLUDEDTO VERIFYTHAT DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD IS THE ONE APPROVING THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | | | | 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS FOR BBQ GRILL AS REQUESTED ON | | | PREVIOUS CHECKLIST. | | | NOTE:MAKE SURE BBQ GRILL IS DESIGNED FOR INSTALLATION | | | IN PORCH AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 7- ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING AS REQUIRED | | | BY BY SEC. 106.1.1.2CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. NEW | | | DETAIL SUBMITTED ONLY IDENTIFIES RIDGE INSTALLATION, | | | WHICH IS REQUIRED BY RAS 118.IT DOESN'T SPECIFY HOW | | | ARE THE RESTOF TILES INSTALLED. IT'S GOING TO BE | | | POLYPRO ADHESIVE OR NAILS OR SCREWS. IF USING NAILS OR | | | SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER. IF USING POLYPRO, | | | THEN PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 8- SPECIFY ATTIC VENTILATION AT NEW CUPOLA AS REQUIRED | | | BY SEC. R806 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE .EVEN | | | THOUGH THE CUPOLA IS DECORATIVE, STILL VENTILATION IS | | | REQUIRED. THERE ARE NOT EXCEPTIONS IN THE CODE. | | | | | | 9- SPECIFY ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS, INCLUDING ATTIC | | | LIVE LOADS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE. ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER SAID "SEE | | | REVISIONS TO SHEET S.3". THERE ARE NOT REVISIONS | | | SHOWING THE LOADS ON SHEET S.3. | | | IN ADDITION REVISE NOTE D4 ON SHEET S.1 TO INCLUDE ALL | | | LOADS INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD. | | | | | | 10- SOIL TEST REPORT PROVIDED REQUIRES THE FOLLOWING: | | | A) ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY | | | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE AND SEC. 61G15-23.002 OF | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. REPORT SUBMITTED HAVE COPY | | | OF THE SIGNATURE. | | | | | | B) REPORT NEEDS TO HAVE THE FIRM'S CERTIFICATE OF | | | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.002 | | | OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | | | 11- COORDINATE FOOTING SIZE SHOWN ON DETAIL1/S.2 WITH | | | FOOTING SCHEDULE TO MATCH.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 12- COORDINATE LINTEL SCHEDULE WITH OPENING SIZE SHOWN | | | ON PLANS. EG:CHECK LINTEL L3 IN DINING ROOM AREA. | | | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 13- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL/SPECS FOR SOFFIT | | | CONSTRUCTION. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | DETAIL4/S.3 DOESN'T IDENTIFY SOFFIT CONTRUCTION.IF | | | USING STUCCO SEE ASTM C926 AND ASTM C1063 TO GET PROPER | | | INFORMATION. | | | ALSO, THERE ARE NOT SPECS FOR CEILING INSTALLATION AT | | | MASTER BEDROOM AND ENTRY PORCH. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 14- SHEET A.1: | | | A) KEY LEGEND AND FIRE RATING AND LIFE SAFETY NOTES | | | DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | B) EGRESS NOTE #2 CALLS FOR OPENING "MIN 22" WIDE OR | | | 24" HIGH" IS INCORRECT.IT CAN'T BE ONE OR THE OTHER. | | | IT MUST MEET BOTH MINIMUM DIMENSIONS. SEE SEC. R310 OF | | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND REVISE NOTE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | C) CLARIFY NOTE #3. WHERE IS THIS INFORMATION TAKEN | | | FROM?SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 15- ALL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS,SECTION4/A.6, SECTIONS | | | ON SHEET A.7AND A.8,AND SEC. 2 /S.3 CALL FOR 5/8" | | | ROOF SHEATHING. SPECIFICATION PS-1 ON SHEET S.1 | | | CALLS FOR 3/4"ROOF SHEATHING. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO | | | MATCH. SEC. 106.1.2CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 16- SHEET S.2: | | | A) NEW TYP. COLUMN CONNECTOR DETAIL: SIZE OF WEDGE | | | ANCHOR SPECIFIED ON SECTION DOESN'T MATCH SIZE | | | SPECIFIED ON STEEL PLATE PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO | | | MATCH. | | | | | | B) SPECIFY COLUMNS AT ENTRY PORCH. THEY ARE SHOWN | | | BIGGER THAN THE 8"COLUMN SPECIFIED FOR BREEZEWAY. | | | | | | 17-SHEET S.3: | | | A) SPECIFY CONNECTORS AT TOP OF WOOD COLUMNS AT | | | CORNER AREAS SHOWING HOW ARE WOOD BEAMS COMING FROM 2 | | | DIFFERENT DIRECTIONSARE CONNECTED.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | B) SPECIFY END CONNECTORSFOR WOOD BEAMS AT MASTER | | | BEDROOM AND ENTRY PORCH SHOWING HOW ARE BEAMS SUPPORTED | | | ON MASONRY WALL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | | 2004 | | | | | | C) CONNECTION SCHEDULE: | | | (1) SIMPSON STRAP LTS18 IS NOT DESIGNED TO PROVIDE | | | LATERAL SUPPORT. WHERE IS THE 200# TAKEN FROM? AND WHAT | | | LATERAL LOAD (PERPENDICULAR OR PARALLEL) IS THIS NUMBER | | | FOR?SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | (2) SPECIFY BOTH LATERAL LOADS FOR WHICHSIMPSON | | | HETA20 IS DESIGNED FOR. SEE SIMPSON CATALOG. | | | | | | (3) WHERE IS UPLIFT LOAD FOR SIMPSON HETA20 TAKEN | | | FROM?. IT DOESN'T MATCH UPLIFT LOAD TESTED AND | | | PUBLISHED BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEE CURRENT CATALOG AND | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | (4) CONNECTOR SPECIFIED ON SECTION 2 DOESN'T MATCH | | | CONNECTION SCHEDULE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | (5) SECTION 2 DOESN'T MATCH SECTION 4/A.7.THERE | | | ARE TWO ADDITIONALTOP PLATES SPECIFIED ON DETAIL | | | 4/A.7. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. | | | | | | (6) SIZE OF POST SPECIFIED ON DETAIL 2/S.3 DOESN'T | | | MATCH SIZE SPECIFIED ON FOUNDATION PLAN. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-06-26 |
Time |
15:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-06-26 |
Time |
12:20 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-26 15:23:18 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: | | | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE COPY OF IMPACT FEES PAID RECEIPT. | | | | | | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) GARAGE DOORS THAT MATCH THOSESHOWN ON | | | ARCHITECTURAL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. | | | | | | B) METAL ROOF AT NEW CUPOLA. | | | | | | C) CUPOLA LOUVERED SCREEN. | | | | | | D) WINDOW MULLIONS. | | | | | | E) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NOA #02-0123.04 SUBMITTED IS | | | FOR SMALL MISSILE IMPACT RESISTANT WINDOWS. NEED | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FORLARGE MISSILE IMPACT WINDOWS AT | | | OPENINGS BELOW 30'-0". | | | | | | F) ALLSIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 4- ARCHITECT NEEDS TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 5- PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS FOR BBQ GRILLTO BE | | | INSTALLED IN THE PORCH.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS | | | TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 6- ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING AS REQUIRED | | | BY SEC. 106.1.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. ***NOTE: | | | DON'T SPECIFY PER PRODUCT APPROVAL.PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | IS ONLY TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH ARCHITECT'S DESIGN | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | 7- CLARIFYIF LOUVERS AT NEW CUPOLA ARE DECORATIVE OR | | | FUNCTIONAL. CUPOLA DETAIL SHOWS OPERABLE LOUVERS. SEC. | | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 8- SPECIFY ATTIC VENTILATION AT MAIN ROOF AND CUPOLA. | | | SEC. R806 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 9- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN. SEC. R401.3 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE.AND, SHOW HOW WATER WILL BE DIVERTED | | | AWAY FROM NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. | | | | | | 10- SPECIFY ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS, INCLUDING ATTIC | | | LIVE LOADS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 11- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT. | | | | | | 12- COORDINATE FOOTINGS ON FOUNDATION PLAN WITH FOOTING | | | SCHEDULE. SIZES DON'T MATCH. | | | | | | 13- COORDINATE LINTEL SCHEDULE WITH OPENING SIZES SHOWN | | | ON PLANS. | | | | | | 14- PROVIDE COLUMN SCHEDULE TO VERIFY TYPE OF COLUMNS. | | | STRUCTURAL PLANS DON'T IDENTIFY THEM. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 15- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECS/ CONNECTORS AT TOP | | | AND BOTTOM OF WOOD COLUMNS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 16- PROVIDE COMPLETE BEAM. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS | | | TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 17- PROVIDE TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE. | | | ***NOTE: MAKE SURE PROPER CONNECTORS ARE SPECIFIED. EG: | | | WOOD TO WOOD CONNECTORS, WOOD TO MASONRY CONENCTORS OR | | | WOOD TO EXISITNG MASONRY WALL CONNECTORS. | | | AND, SEE CURRENT CATALOG FOR PROPER FASTENER SIZE AND | | | NUMBER. | | | | | | 18- SPECIFY ATTICACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION AT NEW | | | FAMILY ROOM, GARAGE AND MASTER BEDROOM. SEC. R807 OF | | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 19- SPECIFY FIREBLOCKING TYPE AND SIZE IN WALL SECTIONS | | | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R602.1.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 20- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL/ SPECS FORSOFFIT | | | CONSTRUCTION. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENT TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 21- SPECIFY ROOF PITCH TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. | | | R905 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 22- ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T SHOW LOCATION OF CUPOLA. | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 23- OWES $22.52 FOR RADON FEES. | | | | | | 24- SHEET A.0: | | | * THIS IS LEVEL OF ALTERATION 3, NOT 2. REVISE. | | | ** THIS IS RESIDENTIAL R3, NOT R. REVISE. | | | *** THIS IS FLOOD ZONE C, NOT '*'. REVISE | | | | | | 25- SHEET S.1: | | | * REVISE NOTE M-4. SEE SEC. R606.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | ** COORDINATE NOTE PS-1 WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. | | | | | | NOTE: | | | PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE DONE | | | TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
12:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
12:20 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
Time |
09:17 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
Time |
12:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
Time |
11:43 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-12 12:03:15 | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE | | | CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, 2004 FBC CHAPTER 1 | | | AS AMENDED AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1} THE RISER INDICATES A METER/MAIN, THE FLOOR PLAN | | | SHOWS A METER ONLY. CORRELATE TO SHOW ACTUAL | | | INSTALLATION.106.1.1 FBC AS AMENDED. | | | | | | 2} GEC FROM PANEL "H" MUST NOT BE INSTALLED AS IT | | | PARALLELS THE EQUIPMENT GROUND IN VIOLATION OF 250.6. | | | | | | 3} THERE HAVE BEEN NO ELECTRICALREVISIONS SINCE THE | | | PERMIT SET WAS REVIEWED. THE ENTIRE HOUSE APPEARS TO | | | HAVE BEEN REWIRED.. NO CLOUDS ARE ON THE PLAN | | | INDICATING REVISIONS 2,3 AND 4, THEREFORE WHAT IS PART | | | OF THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE KNOWN OR REVIEWED. CLOUD THE | | | REVISIONS OR INDICATE THE CHANGES THAT APPLY TO THIS | | | PERMIT. | | | | | | 4} ADJUST THE VALUE TO REFLECT THE ADDED LABOR AND | | | MATERIAL AT THE PERMIT CLERK?S DESK, AND PAY THE | | | DIFFERENCE IN FEES PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
12:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
12:32 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-11 12:34:03 | | | | | | | RESUBMITTED REVIEWD SET FROM 8/9/07 REVIEW, STAMPED | | | M.E.P'S SENT TO JULIO./WRT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
Time |
16:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
Time |
15:31 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
Time |
09:16 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-25 15:30:55 | | | | | | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW | | | | | | 1} THE RISER ONLY INDICATES ONE 200 AMP PANEL WITH 42 | | | CIRCUITS, THE SCHEDULE LISTS 49 CIRCUITS. | | | | | | 2} 408.4 CIRCUIT DIRECTORY OR CIRCUIT IDENTIFICATION | | | EVERY CIRCUIT AND CIRCUIT MODIFICATION SHALL BE LEGIBLY | | | IDENTIFIED AS TO ITS CLEAR, EVIDENT, AND SPECIFIC | | | PURPOSE OR USE. THE IDENTIFICATION SHALL INCLUDE | | | SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO ALLOW EACH CIRCUIT TO BE | | | DISTINGUISHED FROM ALL OTHERS. | | | | | | 3}R313.1.1 SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE LOCATED AS REQUIRED | | | IN NEW DWELLINGS WHEN REPAIRS OR ADDITIONS REQUIRING A | | | PERMIT OCCUR. SEE ARTICLE FOR COMPLETE TEXT. PLEASE | | | LOCATE ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-23 |
Time |
10:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-23 |
Time |
10:57 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-23 10:58:03 | TO "Z" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
Time |
10:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
Time |
10:46 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-31 10:47:20 | TO "JGOMEZ" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-24 11:08:24 | TO "P" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
Time |
11:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
Time |
11:50 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-23 11:51:08 | TO "JGOMEZ" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
Time |
11:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
Time |
11:48 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-21 11:50:33 | TO "P" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
Time |
15:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
Time |
15:32 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-26 15:33:15 | TO "M" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-19 11:22:12 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
Time |
15:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
Time |
15:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-06 15:33:04 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-31 |
Time |
16:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-31 |
Time |
16:13 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-31 16:13:31 | TO "JGOMEZ" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
Time |
09:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
Time |
09:59 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-05 10:00:24 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-03 |
Time |
09:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-03 |
Time |
09:03 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-03 09:03:40 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-06-26 |
Time |
15:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-17 10:51:57 | TO "SFR" "Z" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-27 |
Time |
09:00 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-27 |
Time |
09:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-27 09:01:59 | REVISION TO MECH. PLAN M.1, AND COOLING LOAD CAL'S. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
Time |
12:02 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
Time |
12:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-23 12:08:35 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | REVISION TO MECHANICAL PLAN M.1. | | | *** DENIED *** | | | | | | 1) NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 6-13-08 NOTE #1. ENERGY | | | CALCULATION ON FILE ARE CALLING FOR 14 SEER (MIS-TYPED | | | 13 SEER IN LAST REVIEW) A/C SYSTEMS, A/C SYSTEM #3 ON | | | REVISED MECHANICAL PLAN IS A 13 SEER. PLEASE CORRECT | | | (MAY NEED TO REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS) PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-103.3. | | | | | | 2) NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 6-13-08 NOTE #2. A/C SYSTEMS 1 | | | AND 2 MODEL NUMBERS ARE NOT CORRECT (SEE ATTACHED ARI | | | CERTIFICATES). PLEASE SUBMIT ARI CERTIFICATES FOR A/C | | | SYSTEMS ANDCORRECT EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE, PER 2004 FBC | | | 106.3.5. | | | | | | 2A) IF THE ATTACHED ARI CERTIFICATE FOR SYSTEM 2 IS THE | | | SYSTEM BEING INSTALLED PLEASE CORRECT THE SEER AND | | | TOTAL COOLING BTU'S IN THE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON | | | MECHANICAL PLAN. | | | | | | 3) NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 6-13-08 NOTE #3. THE COOLING | | | LOAD CALCULATIONS ON FILE (SEE ATTACHED COPY) ARE | | | CALLING FOR 66,423 TOTAL COOLING BTU'S, THE REVISED | | | MECHANICAL PLAN EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE TOTALS 89,800 TOTAL | | | COOLING BTU'S, THE PLANS CAN ONLY CALL FOR 15% MORE | | | TOTAL COOLING BTU'S THAN THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS | | | PER 2004 FBC 13-607.1.ABC.1.1. PLEASE CORRECT PLANS OR | | | REVISE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS WITH ZONES FOR EACH | | | SYSTEM. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-13 |
Time |
08:08 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-13 |
Time |
08:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-13 08:28:07 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | REVISION TO MECHANICAL PLAN M.1. | | | *** DENIED *** | | | | | | 1) ENERGY CALCULATION ON FILE ARE CALLING FOR 14 SEER | | | A/C SYSTEMS, A/C SYSTEM #3 ON REVISED MECHANICAL PLAN | | | IS A 13 SEER (SEE ATTACHED ARI CERTIFICATE). PLEASE | | | CORRECT PER 2004 FBC 13-103.3. | | | | | | 2) AIR HANDLERS #1 AND #2 MODEL NUMBERS ARE NOT | | | COMPLETE (SEE RED LINE ON PLAN) THEY MUST INCLUDE THE | | | COIL AS MULTIPLE COILS MAY BE INSTALLED IN THE AIR | | | HANDLER. PLEASE CORRECT PER 2004 FBC 106.3.5. | | | | | | 3) THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS ON FILE ARE CALLING | | | FOR 66,423 TOTAL COOLING BTU'S, THE REVISED MECHANICAL | | | PLAN EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE TOTALS 89,600 TOTAL COOLING | | | BTU'S, THE PLANS CAN ONLY CALL FOR 15% MORE TOTAL | | | COOLING BTU'S THAN THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS PER | | | 2004 FBC 13-607.1.ABC.1.1. PLEASE CORRECT PLANS OR | | | REVISE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
Time |
08:29 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
Time |
08:29 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
09:25 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
09:25 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-24 09:36:04 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) ARCHITECTURE FIRM MESAARCHITECT BUSINESS LICENSE | | | EXPIRED 2-28-07, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 2) SHOW ON MECHANICAL PLANS THE CLOTHES DRYER VENT AND | | | WERE IT IS TERMINATING AT. BE ADVISED THE CLOTHES DRYER | | | VENT TERMINATION MAY NOT BE NEAR THE A/C CONDENSER | | | UNITS, SEE 2004 FBC/M 501.2 . | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-07-28 |
Time |
15:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-07-28 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-28 15:53:14 | REVISION #7 SHEET P.1: "OK" INDICATE VENT THRU SIDE | | | WALL ON FIRST FLOOR PLUMBING PLAN AND SANITARY RISER | | | DIAGRAM ALSO INDICATED WASHING MACHINE CLEANOUT AS | | | BEING 3 INCH ON FIRST FLOOR PLUMBING PLAN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
Time |
14:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
Time |
14:40 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-21 15:22:03 | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | REVISION DENIED: | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES WITH | | | 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO | | | CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.). | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 1. SHEET P.1 IS INDICATING THE WRONG REVISION NUMBER | | | 3. THAT REVISION NUMBER IS DATED 10/30/07 WHICH IS | | | BEFORE PLANS WERE PERMITTED. I THINK THE CORRECT | | | REVISION NUMBER SHOULD BE 7. PLEASE CLARIFY, CORRECT, | | | AND CORRELATE THIS REVISION. PER THE FOLLOWING "ALL | | | CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE TO BE CLOUDED WITH REVISION | | | NUMBERS/DATES PER FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, SECTION 106.1.3 | | | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH | | | DEPARTMENTAL POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND | | | SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CONFORMITY TO ITS | | | RECORD RETENTION PROGRAM. | | | NOTE: A TRANSMITTAL LETTER IS HELPFUL." | | | | | | 2. SHEET P.1 PLUMBING FLOOR PLAN HAS THE INCORRECT | | | SIZE OF THE CLEANOUT FOR THE WASHING MACHINE INDICATED | | | AS BEING 2 INCH. THE CORRECT SIZE OF THIS CLEANOUT IS 3 | | | INCH. PER FBC- PLUMBING SECTION 708.7 MINIMUM SIZE. | | | | | | 3. SHEET P.1 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: THE TWO | | | LAVATORIES ARE NOT BEING IDENTIFIED IN MASTER BATH #113 | | | ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. PER FBC- PLUMBING SECTION 401.1 | | | AND 701.1 SCOPE. | | | | | | 4. SHEET P.1 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: THE REVISION WITH | | | THE VENT THRU WALL INSTEAD OF THRU THE ROOF NEEDS | | | CLARIFICATION. A PLUMBING INSPECTION DATED 6/25/08 | | | INDICATED REVISION REQUIRED, THAT AN AIR ADMITTANCE | | | VALVE WAS INSTALLED ON THE OUTSIDE BLOCK WALL INSTEAD | | | OF A VENT THRU ROOF. THE SUBMITTED PLUMBING REVISION | | | DOES NOT INDICATE AN AIR ADMITTANCE VALVE. THE REVISION | | | INDICATES A VENT THRU WALL WHICH NEEDS TO HAVE THE | | | FOLLOWING INDICATED ON THE PLANS BEFORE IT IS | | | COMPLIANT. PER FBC- PLUMBING SECTION 904.6 EXTENSION | | | THROUGH THE WALL. VENT TERMINALS EXTENDING THROUGH THE | | | WALL SHALL TERMINATE A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET (3048 MM) | | | FROM THE LOT LINE AND 10 FEET (3048 MM) ABOVE AVERAGE | | | GROUND LEVEL. VENT TERMINALS SHALL NOT TERMINATE UNDER | | | THE OVERHANG OF A STRUCTURE WITH SOFFIT VENTS. SIDE | | | WALL VENT TERMINALS SHALL BE PROTECTED TO PREVENT BIRDS | | | OR RODENTS FROM ENTERING OR BLOCKING THE VENT OPENING. | | | NOTE: IF AN AIR ADMITTANCE VALVE IS BEING INSTALLED | | | PLEASE INDICATE THAT THIS VALVE WILL BE PROTECTED FROM | | | HARMFULL ULTRA-VIOLET (UV) SUN RAYS PER MANUFACTURER'S | | | RECOMMENDATIONS. | | | ALSO THE VENT CAN NOT BE INSTALLED WITHOUT A VERICAL | | | RISE ABOVE THE FLOOD LEVEL RIM OF THE LAVATORY PER FBC- | | | PLUMBING SECTION 905.4 VERTICAL RISE OF VENT. EVERY DRY | | | VENT SHALL RISE VERTICALLY TO A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES | | | (152 MM) ABOVE THE FLOOD LEVEL RIM OF THE HIGHEST TRAP | | | OR TRAPPED FIXTURE BEING VENTED. THE SUBMITTED REVISION | | | ON THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE THIS REQUIREMENT. THE | | | SUBMITTED REVISION INDICATES A HORIZONTAL DRY VENT WITH | | | NO VERTICAL RISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE | | | OLD PLANS, CLEARLY INDICATE THE REVISION ON THE NEW | | | PLANS, REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | PHONE= (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX= (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL= [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
Time |
16:46 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
14:27 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
14:27 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-08 15:24:54 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | ** FBC-2004 PLUMBING. | | | ** FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS. | | | ** FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | ** FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE: | | | | | | 1. SHEET P.1 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM: THE | | | FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS TO BE INDICATED ON THE | | | DRAWINGS FOR THE WASHING MACHINE PER FBC-2004 | | | PLUMBING. | | | (A) 406.3 WASTE CONNECTIONS.THE TRAP AND | | | FIXTURE DRAIN FOR AN AUTOMATIC CLOTHES | | | WASHER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES | | | (51MM) IN DIAMETER. THE AUTOMATIC | | | CLOTHES WASHER FIXTURE DRAIN SHALL | | | CONNECT TO A BRANCH DRAIN OR DRAINAGE | | | STACK A MINIMUM OF 3 INCHES (76MM) IN | | | DIAMETER. | | | NOTE: THE WASHING MACHINE BRANCH AND STACK DRAIN ARE | | | SIZED WRONG ON THE ISOMETRIC. PLEASE CORRECT ON THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | (B) 802.4 STANDPIPES.STANDPIPES SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY | | | TRAPPED. STANDPIPES SHALL | | | EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES (457MM) | | | AND A MAXIMUM OF 42 INCHES (1066MM) | | | ABOVE THE TRAP WEIR. ACCESS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED TO ALL STANDPIPES AND DRAINS | | | FOR RODDING. PLEASE INDICATE THE STANDPIPE ON THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | (C) 708.7 MINIMUM SIZE. CLEANOUTS SHALL | | | BE THE SAME NOMINAL SIZE AS THE PIPE | | | THEY SERVE UP TO 4 INCHES (102MM). | | | NOTE: CLEANOUT FOR THE WASHING MACHINE SHALL BE THREE | | | INCH (3"). PLEASE INDICATE THIS ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | (D) 708.9 ACCESS. ACCESS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED TO ALL CLEANOUTS. | | | NOTE: CLEANOUT FOR THE WASHING MACHINE TO BE LOCATED AT | | | FOUR FEET ABOVE FINNISH FLOOR (4' A.F.F.). PLEASE | | | INDICATE THIS ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2. SHEET P.1 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM: THE LAV | | | IN ROOM 114 IS DRAWN WRONG AND DOES NOT REFLECT THE | | | PLUMBING FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE CORRECT ON THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 3. SHEET P.1 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM: THE | | | ISOMETRIC DOES NOT REFLECT THE PLUMBING FLOOR PLAN FROM | | | THE BUILDING SEWER TO THE MASTER BATH AND ALSO TO THE | | | LAVS IN MASTER BATH ROOM #113. PLEASE CORRECT ON THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 4. SHEET P.1 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM AND | | | PLUMBING FLOOR PLAN: MASTER BATH ROOM #113 A VENT IS | | | REQUIRED FOR THE SHOWER PER TABLE 906.1 A 2" TRAP CAN | | | ONLY BE 6' FROM VENT. PLEASE CORRECT ON THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 5. SHEET P.1 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM AND | | | PLUMBING FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE SEE RED LINE CORRECTIONS TO | | | THE TWO-WAY CLEANOUTS IN THREE PLACES. | | | | | | 6. SHEET P.1 PLUMBING NOTE NUMBER SEVEN (7): PLEASE | | | DELETE THE FOLLOWING "FURNISH AND INSTALL APPROVED | | | SHOCK ABSORBERS AT EACH PLUMBING FIXTURE GROUP" AND | | | PLEASE ADD THE FOLLOWING "PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING, | | | SECTION 604.9 A WATER-HAMMER ARRESTOR SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED WHERE QUICK-CLOSING VALVES ARE UTILZED AND | | | SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S | | | SPECIFICATIONS." | | | | | | 7. SHEET P.1 PLUMBING FLOOR PLAN IS INDICATING A GAS | | | WATER HEATER AND A GAS STUB W/ SHUTOFF IN THE PROPOSED | | | COVERED PATIO AREA. A SEPERATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED | | | FOR THIS WORK. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION | | | FOR THE GAS PERMIT. | | | | | | A} SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | | FUEL GAS CODE. | | | | | | B} SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH | | | NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL | | | TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE BEING USED. | | | | | | C} TYPE OF GAS, (LP OR NATURAL). | | | | | | D} BTU LOAD OF EACH APPLIANCE AND THE | | | TOTAL BTU LOAD ON THE SYSTEM. REFER TO | | | THE FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SECS. 401.8 | | | THRU 402.6.1 AND TABLES 402.4(1) THRU | | | 402.4(33). | | | | | | E} SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). | | | | | | F} INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | | PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. | | | | | | G} SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2. | | | | | | H} CLEARLY SHOW THE LOCATION AND CAP- | | | ACITY OF LP TANK(S), TYPE OF TANK (DOT | | | OR ASME), THE DISTANCE OF THE TANK FROM | | | THE BUILDING AND ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES | | | THE DISTANCE OF THE TANK FROM ALL SOUR- | | | CES OF IGNITION, OTHER CONTAINERS, BUILD | | | INGS, AND THE LOCATION OF ANY BUILDING | | | OPENINGS BELOW THE RELIEF VALVE OF THE | | | TANK PER NFPA 58, TABLE 3-2.2.2. | | | | | | I} CLEARLY INDICATE ON THE PLAN IF THE | | | LP TANK IS ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND, AND | | | SHOW REQUIRED PROTECTION OF THE TANK AND APPURTENANCES | | | PER NFPA 58. IF THE TANK | | | IS BELOW GROUND THE CONTAINER SHALL BE | | | SECURILY ANCHORED PER NFPA 58 SECTION | | | 3-2.2.7(H). | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | | ONLY. | | | NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-09-30 |
Time |
11:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcruz |
Date |
2008-09-30 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-30 11:43:27 | PURSUANT TO THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), | | | SECTION 94-304(D)(2)(D): IF A PATIO | | | OR PAVED AREA IS PROVIDED ADJACENT | | | TO OR SURROUNDING A POOL, IT SHALL BE | | | DESIGNED TO DRAIN AWAY FROM THE | | | POOL, BUT NOT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
13:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
13:33 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-10 13:36:40 | ***APPROVED - RESUB #2*** | | | | | | PROVISO:AS THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK EXCEEDS 50% | | | OF THE VALUE OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, PURSUANT TO | | | SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS (ZLDRS), LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH SECTION 94-442 OF THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST ONE SHADE, | | | FLOWERING OR FRUIT TREE SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 1,200 | | | SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. FOR | | | SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST ONE SHRUB SHALL | | | BE PLANTED FOR EACH 500 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE OR | | | PORTION THEREOF. | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "E" - BT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-08-03 |
Time |
18:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-08-03 |
Time |
18:14 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-03 18:15:14 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | | | | 1)ORIGINAL PLAT REQUIRES A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LINE | | | OF 60' FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD (SEE ATTACHED | | | PLAT MAP).BUILDING MUST BE SETBACK 60' FROM | | | CENTERLINE OF ROAD. | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, ZONING | | | TECHNICIAN | | | (561)805-6720 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-17 16:33:39 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | | | | 1)MUST OBTAIN A SEPERATE DRIVEWAY PERMIT. | | | | | | 2)PLEASE PROVIDE ELEVATIONS FROM GRADE TO MIDPOINT | | | OF ROOF'S PITCH.ALSO PROVIDE ELEVATION FROM GRADE TO | | | COPULA ROOF'S MIDPOINT. | | | | | | 3)PROVIDE ROOF OVERHANG DIMENSIONS (MAY ENCROACH | | | INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK A MAXIMUM OF 3') | | | | | | 4)INDICATE ON BOTH SURVEYS THE SCOPE OF WORK, | | | DIMENSIONS OF WORK, AND SETBACK DIMENSIONS FORM | | | PROPERTY LINES TO PROPOSED WORK. | | | | | | | | | CHRIS HOOPS | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 561-805-6720 |
|
|