 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 07050239
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07050239 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-10-24 |
Time |
14:40 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-10-24 |
Time |
14:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
08:24 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
08:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-16 08:25:13 | 512 SPENCER MEDIA CENTER 070502239 | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07050239 | | | ADD: 512 SPENCER DR | | | CONT: ANDERSON- MOORE | | | TEL: (561)662-1819 | | | | | | | | | OCT.16/2008 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 4TH REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
Time |
13:40 |
Rev Time |
1.15 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
Time |
13:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-20 13:42:29 | 512 SPENCER MEDIA CENTER 070502239 | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07050239 | | | ADD: 512 SPENCER DR | | | CONT: ANDERSON- MOORE | | | TEL: (561)662-1819 | | | | | | | | | MARCH 20/2008 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-01-18 |
Time |
16:11 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-01-18 |
Time |
16:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-18 16:11:05 | 512 SPENCER MEDIA CENTER 070502239 | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07050239 | | | ADD: 512 SPENCER DR | | | CONT: ANDERSON- MOORE | | | TEL: (561)662-1819 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 2NDREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) COMMENT# 19 FROM THE LAST REVIEW,BEFORE A PERMIT | | | TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID | | | TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS | | | MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID | | | RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL | | | (561)233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
Time |
16:05 |
Rev Time |
12.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
Time |
16:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-26 16:06:35 | 512 SPENCER MEDIA CENTER 070502239 | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07050239 | | | ADD: 512 SPENCER DR | | | CONT: ANDERSON- MOORE | | | TEL: (561)662-1819 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 1STREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2) FL S S713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | . | | | | | | 3) GROUND FLOOR ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS TO HAVE | | | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE FORM THE DESIGN PROFESSION, NOT | | | RUBBER STAMP OR COLOR COPIES OF SIGNATURE. | | | PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS | | | PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR | | | PUBLICRECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE DOCUMENT. | | | FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 | | | | | | 4) GROUND FLOOR ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON | | | SSCE 7-98, PLEASE SEE THE REFERENCED STANDARD UNDER THE | | | 2004 FBC CHAPTER 35 IS ASCE 7-02, PLEASE CORRECT . | | | | | | 5) SHEET A-1 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT/ CODE : | | | 5A) BUILDING TYPE: A UNPROTECTED SEE TABLE 601, EITHER | | | THE BUILDING CONSIDERED A TYPE I OR TYPE II, IN EITHER | | | CASE THE A & B DESIGNATION INDICATES THE AMOUNT OF | | | HOURS OF FIRE RESISTANCE RATING REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURAL | | | MEMBERS. TABLE 503 WILL PROVIDE THE ALLOWABLE AREAS | | | UNDER THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. EDUCATIONAL USAGE | | | TYPE II-A WILL ALLOW 14,500 SQ FT. THE PLAN INDICATES | | | 14,997 SQ FT FOR THE FIRST FLOOR. SEE IF ANY FRONTAGE | | | INCREASES MAY BE TAKEN, SEE 506.2 IF SO PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 5B) THE SECOND ISSUE IS THE OCCUPANCY TYPE PLANS | | | INDICATE **CS** THERE ISN?T ANY TYPE OCCUPANCY | | | CLASSIFICATION SEE SECTION 302.1 . | | | | | | 5C) PLEASE INDICATE THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS PERMIT. | | | PLANS INDICATE FIRE SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDINGS, 3 HR | | | SEPARATION, PLEASE INDICATE IF THIS AN ADDITION TO THE | | | EXISTING BUILDING TO BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE 2004 | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE, AN ADDITION OR WITH A **FIRE | | | WALL** | | | CONSTITUTING A TOTALLY SEPARATE BUILDING. | | | NOTE: THIS REVIEW WILL BE CONSTRUED AS A NEW SEPARATE | | | BUILDING, AND A REMODEL OF EXISTING (2) EDUCATIONAL | | | BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 6) SHEET A-35& A-36 ARE THE LIFE SAFETY SHEETS: 6A) | | | THEY DO NOT PROVIDE THE OCCUPANT LOAD PER ROOM( PLANS | | | ARE ILLEGIBLE)PLEASE INDICATE THE OCCUPANT LOAD. 6B) | | | ALSO PROVIDE THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE EXISTING STAIRS | | | AND THE OCCUPANT LOADS FOR THE NEW STAIRWAYS. 6C) | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE EXITING | | | OF NEW BUILDING, IT APPEARS THAT THE CHILDREN ARE BEING | | | LEAD BACK INTO SOME TYPE OF COURT OR YARD, PLANS ARE | | | NOT CLEAR AS TO THE INTENT.1018.1 MINIMUM NUMBER | | | OF EXITS. | | | | | | ALL ROOMS AND SPACES WITHIN EACH STORY SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED WITH AND HAVE ACCESS TO THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF | | | APPROVED INDEPENDENT EXITS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 1018.1 | | | BASED ON THE OCCUPANT LOAD, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED IN | | | SECTION 1014.1 OR 1018.2. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS | | | CHAPTER, OCCUPIED ROOFS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH EXITS AS | | | REQUIRED FOR STORIES. THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF EXITS FROM | | | ANY STORY, BASEMENT OR INDIVIDUAL SPACE SHALL BE | | | MAINTAINED UNTIL ARRIVAL AT GRADE OR THE PUBLIC WAY . | | | EXCEPTION: A FENCED OUTDOOR ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | HAVE AT LEAST TWO WIDELY SEPARATED MEANS OF EGRESS FROM | | | THE ENCLOSURE. IF MORE THAN 6,000 PERSONS ARE TO BE | | | SERVED BY SUCH MEANS OF EGRESS, THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST | | | THRE E MEANS OF EGRESS; IF MORE THAN 9,000 PERSONS ARE | | | TO BE SERVED, THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST FOUR MEANS OF | | | EGRESS. | | | 1206.3.3 COURT DRAINAGE. | | | THE BOTTOM OF EVERY COURT SHALL BE PROPERLY GRADED AND | | | DRAINED TO A PUBLIC SEWER OR OTHER APPROVED DISPOSAL | | | SYSTEM COMPLYING WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, | | | PLUMBING . | | | | | | 1023.6 ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WAY . | | | THE EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL PROVIDE A DIRECT AND | | | UNOBSTRUCTED ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WAY . | | | EXCEPTION: WHERE ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WAY CANNOT BE | | | PROVIDED, A SAFE DISPERSAL AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE | | | ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ARE MET: | | | 1.THE AREA SHALL BE OF A SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE AT | | | LEAST 5 SQUARE FEET (0.28 M 2 ) FOR EACH PERSON. 2. THE | | | AREA SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE SAME PROPERTY AT LEAST 50 | | | FEET (15 240 MM) AWAY FROM THE BUILDING REQUIRING | | | EGRESS. | | | 3.THE AREA SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED AND | | | IDENTIFIED AS A SAFE DISPERSAL AREA. | | | 4.THE AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A SAFE AND | | | UNOBSTRUCTED PATH OF TRAVEL FROM THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 6D) DOOR 146- A THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE THE DISTANCE | | | TO THE OPPOSITE WALL, THE DOOR SCHEDULE DOES NOT | | | INDICATE ANY DOOR RATING. 1023.5.2 CONSTRUCTION AND | | | OPENINGS. | | | WHERE AN EGRESS COURT SERVING A BUILDING OR PORTION | | | THEREOF IS LESS THAN 10 FEET (3048 MM) IN WIDTH, THE | | | EGRESS COURT WALLS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 1-HOUR | | | FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED EXTERIOR WALLS COMPLYING WITH | | | SECTION 704 FOR A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET (3048 MM) ABOVE | | | THE FLOOR OF THE COURT, AND OPENINGS THEREIN SHALL BE | | | EQUIPPED WITH FIXED OR SELF-CLOSING, ?-HOUR OPENING | | | PROTECTIVE ASSEMBLIES. | | | | | | 6E) DOOR 146-B ALSO HAS THE SAME CONFIGURATION BUT THE | | | SECOND ISSUE IS THERE APPEARS TO BE A SECOND SET OF | | | DOORS FURTHER OUT THE EXIT DISCHARGE, PLEASE SEE A-9 | | | DISCREPANCY, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 6F) PLEASE ALSO SHOW THE EXIT LIGHTING; 1006.1 MEANS OF | | | EGRESS ILLUMINATION. 1006.1.1 | | | ILLUMINATION OF MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION FOR EVERY BUILDING AND | | | STRUCTURE. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS REQUIREMENT, EXIT | | | ACCESS SHALL INCLUDE ONLY DESIGNATED STAIRS, AISLES, | | | CORRIDORS, RAMPS, ESCALATORS AND PASSAGEWAYS LEADING TO | | | AN EXIT. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS REQUIREMENT, EXIT | | | DISCHARGE SHALL INCLUDE ONLY DESIGNATED STAIRS, AISLES, | | | CORRIDORS, RAMPS, ESCALATORS, WALKWAYS AND EXIT | | | PASSAGEWAYS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY . | | | | | | 7) SHEET A-25 PLEASE CORRECT THE DOOR SCHEDULE AS TO | | | THE RATING FOR FIRE RATED DOORS. PLEASE SEE 715.3 AND | | | TABLE 715.3 FOR MINUTE AND HOUR RATINGS. | | | | | | 8) SHEET A-25 CORRIDORS WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD > THAN 30 | | | REQUIREA 1 HR FIRE RATING, PLANS INDICATE WINDOW TYPE | | | (F) TO BE 1 HR FIRE LITE, PLEASE PROVIDE LITERATURE, | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | | | | 9) FIRST FLOOR AND SECOND FLOOR THE ELEVATOR SHAFT IS | | | MISSING THE DOOR AND RATING FOR A SHAFT ENCLOSURE, | | | TABLE 715.3. | | | | | | 10) ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM IS THROUGH THE OCCUPIED USE | | | ROOMS.3006.1 ACCESS. | | | AN APPROVED MEANS OF ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO | | | ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOMS AND OVERHEAD MACHINERY SPACES. | | | THIS AN ACCESSIBLE SPACE, NOT THROUGH THE CLASSROOMS. | | | | | | 11)SHEET A-31 NEW STAIRS DO NOT INDICATE WHERE THE | | | AREA OF RESCUE ASSISTANCE WOULD BE LOCATED. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE THE INFORMATION AS TO SIZE OF EACH REQUIRED | | | AREA OF RESCUE ASSISTANCE, TWO-WAY COMMUNICATION AND | | | IDENTIFICATION. 11-4.3.11. (1-5). | | | | | | 12) SHEET A-31 STAIR INDICATES A VOID BENEATH THE | | | STRINGER SEE 11-4.4.2. HEADROOM. | | | | | | 13) SHEET A-12-13 INDICATES REFLECTED CEILING LIGHTING | | | LEGEND INDICATES EXIT LIGHTS AND DIRECTIONAL?S BUT THE | | | PLAN IS MISSING THE EXIT LIGHTS AND DIRECTIONAL?S. | | | 1006.1 MEANS OF EGRESS ILLUMINATION. | | | | | | 14) SHEET S-1 INDICATES THAT A SOILS TEST WAS COMPLETED | | | BY SOILPROBE ENGINEERING, PLEASE SUBMIT (2) ORIGINAL | | | SIGNED & SEALED DOCUMENTS. 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. | | | WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN | | | DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT | | | SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE NECESSARY INVESTIGATION | | | BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH 1802.6 . | | | 15) ) 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. IN WIND-BORNE | | | DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE | | | PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS | | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF | | | GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES | | | POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH | | | AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE | | | TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. | | | LAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE | | | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. | | | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN30 FEET (9.1 M) | | | ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEETTHE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL | | | MISSILE | | | TEST. | | | FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT | | | INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS | | | ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | 15A) FIXED GLAZING | | | 15B) STAINED GLASS | | | 15C) GLAZED SWING DOORS | | | 15D) HOLLOW CORE EXTERIOR METAL DOORS | | | 15E) SUNSHADE | | | 15F) LOUVERS | | | 15G) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES | | | | | | 16)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO | | | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR | | | INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE | | | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER | | | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, | | | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 17) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 18)THIS ROOF IS MISSING OR NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | FOLLOW ITEMS: | | | | | | _XXX__ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | __XXX__ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SYSTEM TO | | | BE USED. | | | | | | __XXX__ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOWPRESSURE FOR | | | ZONE _2&3__ . | | | | | | __XXX__ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATESLIMITATION# 7, | | | SHOULD THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT | | | REQUIRED, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A | | | REVISED FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED AND SEALED | | | BY A FLORIDA REGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, | | | REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | ___THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION# 9, NO | | | ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | | | | 19) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A | | | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF | | | THIS REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
15:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
15:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-08 15:47:35 | *** ELECTRICAL PLANS STAMPED. | | | | | | *** LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING SUBMITTED BY ANDERSON & | | | MOORE CONSTRUCTION ON BEHALF OF REVEREND DAVID CARR | | | PRESIDENT OF CARDINAL NEWMAN HIGH SCHOOL. THE BALANCE | | | OF THE 4X FEE PER FS 553.80(2)(B) WILL BE PAID BEFORE | | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF | | | OCCUPANCY CAN BE ISSUED. THE OTHER OPTION IS TO TURN | | | ALL PREVIOUS PLANS SUBMITTED OVER TO THE STATE BOARD OF | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW OF CODE REQUIRED | | | ITEMS. ONCE A DETERMINATION IS MADE BY THE BOARD, THEIR | | | FINDING WOULD BE TURNED OVER TO THE STATE ATTORNEY | | | GENERAL IF SO NEEDED. | | | THE OTHER OPTION IS TO PAY THE STATUTORY REQUIRED FEE | | | BEFORE THE ABOVE MENTION TCO/CO. | | | | | | THE AMOUNT OF $4, 550.00 WAS PAID ON THE REQUIRED | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FEE. THIS AMOUNT HAS BEEN SUBTRACTED FROM | | | THE 4X FEE. BALANCE IS NOTED ON FRONT SCREEN. PERMIT | | | WILL PRINT ONCE BALANCE OF PERMIT APPLICATION FEES IS | | | PAID. THIS INFORMATION WAS GIVEN TO ROSE KENNY FROM | | | ANDERSON AND MOORE. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
Time |
16:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
Time |
19:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-13 16:04:33 | ** DENIED3RD REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW WHICH ARE FROM THE FIRST | | | TWO REVIEWS WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | SUBMITTED DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE PLANS. PLEASE SEE | | | THERE ARE SEVERAL FIXTURES ON PLANS WHICH ARE NOT IN | | | THE INPUT DATA REPORTS OR SUMMARY SHEETS. | | | | | | A) THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED THERE | | | WERE MISSING FIXTURES AND EVEN NOTED SPECIFICALLY THE | | | LIGHTING SHOWN ON ESP -1 WAS NOT IN THE INPUT DATA | | | REPORT. | | | PLEASE SEE THE NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED STILL | | | DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING ON ESP-1IS NOT PLACED IN THE | | | IDR. | | | WHERE IS THE 1500WATT UP LIGHTS? THERE ARE 4 1500W | | | FIXTURES ON PLANS HOWEVER NONE ARE ON THE IDR. | | | WHERE ARE THE 100WATT BOLLARDS?THERE ARE 19 100W | | | FIXTURES ON PLANS HOWEVER NONE ARE ON THE IDR. | | | WHERE ARE THE WALL-PACKS? SOME 100W FIXTURES APPEAR ON | | | THE IDR, HOWEVER IT IS UNCLEAR WHICH FIXTURES ARE ON | | | THE IDR. | | | PLEASE SEE ESP-1 SHOWS TWO WALL PACKS AND EACH OF THESE | | | ON PLANS CALL FOR 100W FIXTURES, HOWEVER SHEET E-4 | | | INDICATES TWO OTHER OUTSIDE FIXTURES WHICH ARE BOTH | | | IDENTIFIED AS *I*, YET THE FIXTURE LEGEND WHICH SHOWS | | | THE *I* FIXTURES CALLS FOR THESE AS ELEVATOR PIT | | | LIGHTS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE COUNT FOR *D* FIXTURES, NOTES 16 TOTAL, | | | HOWEVER COULD NOT LOCATE 16 ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE EXPLAIN WHERE THE FUTURE SIGN LIGHTING WATTAGE | | | IS PART OF THE ASSUMPTIONS. PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.3 | | | AS ONLY LIGHTING WHICH IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SIGN | | | IS EXEMPT. AS NO SIGNAGE INFORMATION IS SHOWN AT THIS | | | TIME IT IS NOT KNOWN WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS EXEMPT OR | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | ** PLEASE GO OVER ALL OF THESE FIXTURES AND COORDINATE | | | WITH THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING ON THE INPUT DATA REPORTS | | | AND SUMMARY SHEETS. | | | | | | B) PLEASE SEE SHEET E-4 WHICH NOTES TABLE 13-415.2.C.1 | | | AND 13-415.2.C.1 TWICE ON THE TOP OF THE LIGHTING | | | CALCULATIONS TABLE.HOW IS *C* BEING SHOWN WHEN *B* | | | METHOD IS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE INPUT DATA REPORT AND COMPLIANCE SUMMARY | | | SHEETS FOR INTERIOR LIGHTING WHICH SHOWS A DIFFERENT | | | TOTAL THAN THE LIGHTING WATTAGE TOTALS SHOWN ON E-4. | | | ?? | | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE; | | | SHEET E-4 SHOWS A TOTAL OF 26, 411 WATTS YET THE | | | SUMMARY SHEETS 2 OF 14 AND 7 OF 14 SHOWS A TOTAL OF | | | 21021 WATTS TOTAL. | | | SINCE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWANCE AS LISTED IS 26153 THIS | | | WOULD PLACE THE LIGHTING DESIGNED OVER THE ALLOWANCE | | | FOR CONSUMPTION. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 AS THE | | | LIGHTING WATTAGE WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE USED IS THE | | | MAXIMUM VA/WATTAGE OF THE FIXTURE, NOT THE BULB. | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE TRACK FIXTURES WHICH BY THE | | | FIXTURE LEGEND, IDR AND CALCULATIONS ON PLANS FIGURE A | | | WATTAGE OF 40W PER FIXTURE. PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE | | | LEGEND WHICH INDICATES 150W FIXTURES. THE FIXTURE | | | WATTAGE NOT BULB IS TO BE FIGURED. | | | THIS IS FOR ALL FIXTURES. IF A FIXTURE EFFICIENCY | | | RATING IS HIGHER THEN THE VA/WATTAGE PLACED INTO THE | | | IDR MAY BE THAT OF THE LOWER RATING OF THE BALLAST | | | OUTPUT. THIS MAY HELP DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF FIXTURES | | | SPECIFIED AS THE TOTALS SHOWN ARE OVER ALLOWANCES. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT, PLEASE BE SURE TO GO OVER ALL LIGHTING ON | | | PLANS AND COORDINATE WITH THE INPUT DATA REPORTS AND | | | SUMMARY SHEETS BEFORE RESUBMITTING PLANS. | | | 13-415.1.AB.1, 13-415.1.A, 13-415.1.B, 13-415.2,ETC. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEW SWITCH DESIGNATIONWHICH NOW | | | INDICATES OCCUPANCY WHICH IS OK, NEEDS TO SHOW A | | | MAXIMUM OF 30MINS. | | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 AND .1.2. | | | THIS ITEM COULD HAVE BEEN RED-LINED, HOWEVER PLANS ARE | | | COMING BACK FOR OTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B) WITH | | | RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. PLEASE | | | SEE SECTIONS OF FBC AND CHAPTER 13 HAVE BEEN GIVEN | | | SINCE THE INITIAL REVIEW AND NOTES WERE GIVEN WHICH | | | SPECIFICALLY STATED THERE WERE SEVERAL FIXTURES ON | | | PLANS WHICH DID NOT CORRELATE WITH THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE NOTES EVEN GAVE | | | ENTIRE PAGES WHICH WERE NOT ON THE CALCULATIONS | | | SUBMITTED. | | | AS REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA STATUE ABOVE A FEE AS | | | REQUIRED UNDER SAID STATUTE HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED. THE | | | FLORIDA STATUTE REQUIRES THIS FEE AND REQUIRES THIS FEE | | | TO BE PAID BEFORE THE NEXT RESUBMISSION OF PLANS. | | | THE STATUTE ASSESSES THIS FEE TO THE DESIGNER AND NOT | | | TO THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER OF SAID PROJECT. | | | THE FEE OF IS THE PORTION OF THE BASE PERMIT FEE | | | ATTRIBUTED TOWARDS PLAN REVIEW TIMES FOUR. THE FEE DUE | | | WILL BE $54, 600.00 AT NEXT RE-SUBMITTAL. THE 10% | | | RE-SUB FEE WOULD NOT BE DUE, ONLY THE STATUTE REQUIRED | | | PENALTY. | | | ONE SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND ONE SET OF | | | ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLANS SHEETS ESP-1, E-1, E-4 AND E5 | | | HAVE NOW BEEN RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-01-01 |
Time |
16:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-01-01 |
Time |
16:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-01 16:53:32 | 2008-01-01 16:53:32 | | | | | | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL | | | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13. PLEASE SEE THE | | | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NO LONGER IN EFFECT FOR THE | | | STATE OF FLORIDA AND FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. PLEASE AS | | | OF DECEMBER 6TH, 2006 THE 2004 FBC CHANGED WHICH | | | INCLUDED THE 2006 REVISIONS. PLEASE SEE 13-400.0.A, | | | 13-415.1.A, .1.B, 13-415.2, 13-400.3.A. THE VERSION | | | SUBMITTED IS 2.11 AND THE REQUIRED VERSION IS 2.5. | | | PLEASE KNOW THE 2.5 WITH ENERGY GAUGE SUMMIT 3.1 IS | | | ACCEPTABLE AS LONG AS THE VERSION IS 2.5. | | | PLEASE VERIFY A METHOD *B* BEING SUBMITTED. THIS WILL | | | BE IN MECHANICAL REVIEW. PLEASE SEE THE TABLES SHOWN ON | | | PLANS FOR LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS STATE | | | METHOD *C*. | | | THIS IS A NEW WHOLE BUILDING. | | | PLEASE SEE THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE ALSO NOT | | | SIGNED, DATED OR SEALED BY THE RESPONSIBLE LICENSED | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-103.1.1.1, FS 471.025. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY HOW SOME OF THE METHOD OF CONTROLS ARE | | | STILL BEING SHOWN AS MANUAL ON/OFF WHEN THE DEVICE ON | | | PLANS IS CLEARLY AN AUTOMATED TYPE DEVICE.? | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE JAN 131, STOR. 132 ETC | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING ON SHEET ESP-1 | | | COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT SUBMITTED | | | FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING? | | | PLEASE SUBMIT CALCULATIONS ACCORDINGLY AND ADJUST ALL | | | INPUTS. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO | | | SERVICE AND 230.2, 22531-225.39, 230.72 ETC. THE | | | COMMENT WAS NOT THAT THE NEW STRUCTURE DOES NOT FALL | | | UNDER THE DESIGN AND CONSIDERED AS A SEPARATE BUILDING. | | | THIS WAS GONE OVER IN A MEETING BEFORE PLANS | | | RESUBMITTED.THE CONCERN IS THAT ANY ELECTRICAL | | | SYSTEMS OF ANY VOLTAGE WOULD BE FED INTO THIS BUILDING | | | FROM THE PRESENT EXISTING STRUCTURE WHICH WOULD PLACE | | | NOT ONLY ELECTRICAL FED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES BUT WOULD | | | BE SYSTEMS FROM MORE THAN ONE FPL TRANSFORMER. | | | THE ELECTRICAL DESIGNER OF RECORD WAS NOT PRESENT AND | | | THE ARCHITECT IN MEETING MENTIONED THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD WOULD CONTACT THIS OFFICE/REVIEWER TO GO OVER | | | COMMENTS AND CONCERNS. NO CONTACT WAS MADE TO THIS | | | REVIEWER TO GO OVER ANY OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS OR | | | ITEMS BROUGHT UP IN THE MEETING PREVIOUSLY HELD. THIS | | | IS NOT REQUIRED HOWEVER WILL MANY TIMES HELP ALLEVIATE | | | THE NEED TO SOME COMMENTS. | | | THIS CONCERN WAS GONE OVER WITH OTHER ELECTRICAL | | | REVIEWERS INCLUDING THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR AND | | | THE CONSENSUSWAS THERE IS A POTENTIAL HAZARD OF | | | SYSTEM VOLTAGES STILL PRESENT IN BUILDING AND | | | DIFFERENCES IN POTENTIAL FROM THE SEPARATE | | | TRANSFORMERS, SOURCES AND GROUNDING TO NAME A FEW. | | | PLEASE KNOW AS PREVIOUSLY STATED THE SEPARATE SERVICE | | | IS STILL IN QUESTION IS A SYSTEM WILL BE CROSSED INTO | | | THIS BUILDING FROM EXISTING. | | | THE COMMENTS IN MEETING WAS THAT THERE *WOULD* BE | | | SYSTEMS FROM EXISTING SOURCES IN THIS NEW STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE ADJUST SYMBOLS AND LEGENDS. PLEASE SEE | | | THE LIGHTING PLANS SHOWS A *S* FOR WHAT IS NOTED AS | | | SOME SORT OF SENSOR SWITCH, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THIS | | | SAME SYMBOL (*S*) ON E-1 SHOWS THIS AS A STANDARD | | | SINGLE POLE WALL SWITCH. PLEASE ADJUST E-1 SO AS NOT TO | | | CONFUSE LIGHTING CONTROLS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE CONFIRM E-4EM AND E-5EM ARE THE LEVELS | | | UNDER EMERGENCY CONDITIONS. NO CHANGES ARE NEEDED. LS | | | 101 7.9, 7.8 | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW PART OF A *PROVISO* WILL BE THAT | | | THE PANEL SCHEDULE WILL BE REQUIRED TO UPDATED TO | | | SPECIFICALLY INDICATE ALL ROOMS AND AREAS IN WHICH THEY | | | FEED. | | | 408.4 | | | | | | 6) NOTE: WHEN RE-SUBMITTING PLANS AND DOCUMENTS DO NOT | | | ATTACHED THESE DOWN THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE SETS OF | | | PLANS. | | | THESE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS WERE REMOVED FROM THE ONE | | | SET BEING REVIEWED. | | | PLEASE PLACE IN BINDER, FOLDER ETC OF SOME TYPE. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO ADDRESS COMMENTS. IF THERE ARE ANY | | | QUESTIONS, ANY COMMENTS NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR OR | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD IN ANYWAY PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN | | | CONTACTING THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-06 |
Time |
14:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
Time |
21:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-06 14:29:32 | ** UNSAT ** | | | | | | *** PLEASE KNOW THAT AS THERE ARE MANY ITEMS WHICH ARE | | | NOT SHOWN FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AT THIS TIME OR MISSING | | | FOR REVIEW, THERE MAY BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW NOT YET ABLE TO BE MADE. | | | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE KNOW THAT PERMIT APPLICATIONS WAS | | | SUBMITTED AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 WHICH PLACES | | | PROJECTS UNDER THE NEW CODES ADOPTED BY THE STATE. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT THIS SHALL INCLUDE 2006 REVISIONS TO | | | THE 2004 FBC FOR ALL TRADES AND THE 2005 NFPA-70. | | | PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE CHANGES IN THE FBC WHICH WILL | | | AFFECT DESIGNS FOR ALL TRADES. | | | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS, | | | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS AND FIRE ALARM SHEETS FOR THIS | | | REVIEWER AT A MINIMUM. | | | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS. | | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE NOW SEE MISSING THE ATTACHED PRINT OUT | | | FROM THE STATE WHICH INDICATES LANDSCAPE FIRM WITH A | | | DIFFERENT LICENSE NUMBER THAN THAT LISTED ON THE TITLE | | | BLOCKS ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE ADDRESS WHICH IS ALSO | | | LISTED ON THE TITLE BLOCKS WHICH IS DIFFERENT THAN THAT | | | OF THE STATE. | | | PLEASE LIST THE CORRECTED INFORMATION ON TITLE BLOCKS. | | | PLEASE KNOW THAT THE PRIMARY ADDRESS AS LISTED WITH THE | | | STATE IS REQUIRED TO BE ON PLANS AND ANY SATELLITE | | | OFFICES MAY INCLUDE THEIR ADDRESS IN ADDITION. PLEASE | | | ADJUST AND LIST THE LICENSE INFORMATION. 61G1-16.004, | | | FS 481.219. | | | **PLEASE KNOW THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR | | | NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S) OR TRADES. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE TITLE BLOCKS ON MECHANICAL | | | PLANS WHICH IS MISSING THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION | | | AS LISTED ON ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING SHEETS FOR MEP | | | FIRM. | | | PLEASE SEE FAC 61G15-23.002, FS 471.023. | | | **PLEASE KNOW THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT | | | IS MADE BY OTHER TRADES. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE MISSING | | | THE SIGNATURE FROM THE OWNER AGENT. | | | 13-103.1.1.1 AND AS LISTED ON FLA-COM FORM. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING INFORMATION ON CIVIL PLANS | | | FOR ENGINEERING FIRM AND ENGINEER. | | | PLEASE SEE THE MISSING CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION | | | NUMBER AS REQUIRED PER FAC 61G15-23.002 AND FS | | | 471.023. | | | ** PLEASE KNOW THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR SHEETS | | | WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER TRADES. THIS | | | HAS BEEN NOTED TO THE CIVIL ENGINEERING REVIEWER. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED ENGINEERING REPORTS | | | WHICH CONTAIN A *RUBBER-STAMP* IN LIEU OF THE REQUIRED | | | *ORIGINAL* SIGNATURE FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THIS | | | IS REQUIRED PER FS 471.025, FAC 61G15-23.002 ** THIS | | | WAS NOTED TO THE STRUCTURAL REVIEWER HOWEVER EVEN IF | | | COMMENT IS NOT MADE BY THE STRUCTURAL REVIEWER THIS IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 W/ 2006 REVISIONS FOR | | | CHAPTER 13 COMPLIANCE. PLEASE KNOW THAT CHAPTER 13 | | | CHANGES TO THE 2004 FBC WENT INTO AFFECT OCT. 1ST,2005 | | | AND HAS BEEN ENFORCED SINCE THAT DATE. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-413.1ABC.1 FOR WORST CASE VOLTAGE DROP | | | FOR FEEDERS AND BRANCH CIRCUITS TO BE INDICATED. PLEASE | | | SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 FOR LIGHTING | | | CONTROL SYSTEM(S) TO BE INDICATED. PLEASE INCLUDE | | | SCHEDULING, SYSTEM, ZONES FOR SQ FT LIMITS, OVER RIDES | | | AND LOCATIONS, SEPARATE SPACE CONTROLS ETC. PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO INCLUDE ALL MAXIMUM OVER RIDE TIMES ON DEVICES | | | WHICH ARE IN DESIGN. | | | NO SYSTEMS, DEVICES OF ANY KIND WERE FOUND ON PLANS OR | | | DESIGNED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DO NOT | | | CORRELATE WITH PLANS FOR TYPES OF FIXTURES, NUMBER OF | | | FIXTURES AND WATTAGE OF FIXTURES AS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE ALL OF THESE AS SEVERL ITEMS DO NOT | | | MATCH. | | | PLEASE SEE THE METHOD OF CONTROL IS BEING SHOWN AS | | | *MANUAL ON/OFF* ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH IS NOT | | | POSSIBLE WHEN AUTOMATED LIGHTING CONTROL(S) IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE PRINT OUT OF THE LIGHTING COMPLIANCE | | | SHEETS SEEMED TO HAVE CUT OFF MANY OF THE ROOM/AREAS | | | IDENTIFICATIONS AS LISTED. THESE NEED TO BE CLEAR AND | | | VISIBLE FOR REVIEW. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.AB.1.1, 13-415.2,13-415.1.ABC.2, | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 ETC. | | | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 13 WAS NOT | | | DESIGNED INTO THE PROJECT, NO REVIEW OF ANY | | | SYSTEMS/DEVICES ETC COULD BE REVIEWED FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW EVEN AS THE LOW VOLTAGE | | | SYSTEMS(EXCLUDING FIRE ALARM, SEE NEXT NOTE FOR FA) ARE | | | SHOWN ON PLANS, SEPARATE PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | THESE SYSTEMS. THESE PLANS MAY BE REFERENCED FOR | | | PERMITTING. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW EVEN AS THE FIRE ALARM AND FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON BASED | | | BUILDING PLANS FOR REVIEW, THESE WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE | | | UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS WITH PLANS SUBMITTED | | | SEPARATELY. | | | ** PLEASE INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED LOCATIONS AND LEVELS OF | | | HORN, STROBES, AND HORN/STROBES ON PLANS FOR FBC | | | CHAPTER 11 ADA COMPLIANCE. THERE ARE MANY DEVICES | | | ALREADY SHOWN, HOWEVER SOME LOCATIONS DO NOT MEET | | | 11-4.28.1 AND NO LEVELS OF ANY STROBE DEVICES COULD BE | | | LOCATED PER 11-4.28.3(4). | | | THESE ARE MINIMUM LOCATIONS AND LEVELS. PLEASE BE SURE | | | TO SEE ANY FIRE REVIEW COMMENTS FROM FIRE MARSHAL WHICH | | | MAY ALSO AFFECT THE PLANS. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 230.2 AS A SEPARATE SERVICE IS | | | BEING REQUESTED FOR THE NEW BUILDING, HOWEVER IN ORDER | | | FOR THE NEW SERVICE TO BE GRANTED AND THIS ADDITION TO | | | BE CONSIDERED AS *SEPARATE BUILDING* BY DEFINITION OF | | | THE FBC VERIFICATION OF REQUIRED SEPARATION AND RATING | | | ON DOORS/OPENINGS NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED. THE EXISTING | | | EXIT DOORS APPEAR TO EXIT INTO THIS NEW ADDITION AND | | | APPLICATION IS TO BUILD AN *ADDITION TO EXISTING | | | BUILDINGS*. | | | PLANS DO SEEM TO SHOW COMPLIANCE FOR STRUCTURAL | | | COLLAPSE OF EACH WITHOUT AFFECTING THE STRUCTURAL | | | INTEGRITY OF THE OTHER STRUCTURE. PLEASE KNOW AS REVIEW | | | OF THE SERVICE WILL BE DONE AND NOTED BELOW HOWEVER THE | | | SERVICE AS SUBMITTED AND SHOWN IS NOT BEING GRANTED AT | | | THIS TIME. THIS EXISTING SERVICE FEEDING EXISTING | | | BUILDING WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE UPGRADED TO FEED THE | | | NEW ADDITION. | | | FBC 106.1.2. | | | 230.2, 230.70, 230.71, 230.72 ETC | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 620.23 AND 620.24 FOR MISSING | | | DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUITS FOR THE ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT | | | ROOM. | | | *BRANCH CIRCUITS MAY NOT FEED OTHER AREAS AS SHOWN. | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS ON STAIR | | | TOWERS AND EXIT PATHS FOR REVIEW. THE MINIMUM LEVELS | | | FOR LIGHTING CAN NOT BE REVIEWED AT THIS TIME. PLEASE | | | SEE 2003 NFPA-101 (LIFE SAFETY CODE) 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2 | | | FOR MINIMUM LEVELS. | | | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE TEMPORARY EXIT CORRIDORS BEING | | | PROPOSED ARE NOT ON ELECTRICAL PLANS, YET THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS INDICATE LIGHTING FOR THESE | | | AREAS. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN INDICATES THIS | | | AREA BEING COMPLETELY ENCLOSED AND NO EMERGENCY | | | LIGHTING FOR REQUIRED EGRESS PATH UNDER EM CONDITIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE NOTE #13 ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE MINIMUM | | | LIGHTING LEVELS AND PLEASE ADJUST BOTH A AND E SHEETS | | | FOR CORRECTIONS AND PHOTO-METRICS TO BE SUBMITTED. LS | | | 101 7.8 AND 7.9. | | | PLEASE SEE 700.12F FOR CIRCUITING. | | | | | | 15) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE PROPOSED MDP AS SHOWN | | | CONTAINS NO MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER. PLEASE PLACE NOTE ON | | | PLANS FOR DEAD-FRONT TO BE PERMANENT FROM MANUFACTURE | | | WITH NO MORE THAN 6 SPACES AS PERMITTED PER | | | 230.70/230.71. | | | PLEASE KNOW THIS NOTE WILL NOT APPLY IF MCB IS | | | INSTALLED. PLEASE ALSO KNOW NOTE IS ONLY FOR | | | INFORMATION PURPOSE AS SERVICE AS SHOWN IS NOT GRANTED | | | AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FEEDERS FROM THE PROPOSED MDP | | | TO THE EACH DP PANEL ARE LARGE ENOUGH AND DO NOT MEET | | | 310.16, 240.4. | | | PLEASE SEE THE MDP SHOWS 800AMP RATED BREAKERS ON | | | CONDUCTORS ONLY RATED AT 620AMPS. | | | 110.4 | | | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE DP PANELS ARE NOT RATED FOR | | | THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION FEEDING SAID EQUIPMENT. | | | PLEASE SEE MDP SHOWS 800AMP BREAKERS FEEDING 600AMP | | | RATED PANELS. | | | 110.3, 90.7, 408, 240 ETC | | | | | | 18) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE LOAD CALCULATIONS PER | | | NEC 220. | | | PLEASE SEE NO LOAD SUMMARY WAS SUBMITTED TO INDICATE | | | HOW LOADS WERE DERIVED. | | | PLEASE SEE LOADS ON A/C UNITS NEED TO BE CLARIFIED FOR | | | THE NEXT COMMENT #19. | | | PLEASE SEE 215.3, 230.42 AS ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS MUST | | | BE FIGURED AT 125%. | | | PLEASE SEE 2005 NEC. AS THESE ARE NOT SUBMITTED, NO | | | REVIEW CAN BE DONE AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 19) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 424.3B FOR MINIMUM OVER CURRENT | | | PROTECTION FOR A/ C UNITS WITH HEAT. | | | | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE ONE SET OF PLANS IS REDLINED FOR MANY OF | | | THESE ITEMS WHICH MAY HELP TO LOCATE ITEMS AS NOTED. | | | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW: PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS | | | WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF THERE ARE | | | ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, NOT | | | UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO NOT | | | HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | 2007-06-05 21:01:28 | PLANS IN ELEC FOR REVIEW; REVIEW TO COMMENCE 6/6. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
Time |
13:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
Time |
13:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-01-02 |
Time |
13:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-01-02 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-02 13:53:22 | FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS, WHAT | | | CRITERIA YOU ASSUMEDFOR RUNOFF CAL.,, LIKE 1" OVER | | | ENTIRE SITE OR2.5"CRITERIA, ETC? STORM WATER | | | QUALITY CALS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 100045TH STREET, | | | ENG SERVICES, BEFORE WE APPROVED. | | | RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER 9/19/07: AS YOU STATED IN YOUR | | | LETTER 9/19/07 THAT "WATER QUALITY (2.5") IS BEING | | | PROVIDED...." WE WILL REVIEW AGAIN WHEN YOU PROVIDE | | | CALS. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE APPLY & GET AN APPROVAL FROM FDEP FOR NOTICE | | | OF INTENT (NOI), PROVIDE A COPY OF APPROVAL FROM FDEP | | | FOR NOI. | | | | | | 3. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
Time |
13:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-14 13:50:26 | FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE | | | DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION | | | MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | | 2. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, CENTER LINE OF ROAD , | | | SIDEWALK ELEVATION MUST MEET FLOOD ZONE AREA, & 5,10, | | | 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIATO DETERMINE THE FIRST | | | FLOOR ELEVATION, MUST MEET THESE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,, GEO-TECH | | | REPORT AND SHOW CALCULATION FOR LENGTH OF EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCH, & SAFETY FACTOR YOU USED IN CALCULATION OF | | | EXFILTRATION LENGTH. | | | 4.PLEASE SHOW STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS, WHAT | | | CRITERIA YOU ASSUMEDFOR RUNOFF CAL.,, LIKE 1" OVER | | | ENTIRE SITE OR2.5"CRITERIA, ETC? | | | 5. WHAT IS THE SITE AREA, YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS | | | PROJECT ? ALSO, WHAT IS TOTAL PERVIOUS,& IMPERVIOUS | | | AREA, LAKE, GREEN,BUILDING,PAVEMENT/PARKING AREA ETC. | | | FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | 6. HOW YOU CONNECT TO THE STORM WATER PIPES IN YOUR | | | SITE? ITS DETAILS.PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES | | | AROUND YOUR SITE SO, WE CANSEE THE BEST PIPE TO | | | CONNECT WITH THE STORM WATERFROM ALL OTHER STORM | | | WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE CONTROL | | | STRUCTURES WITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING | | | ELEVATION, ETC DID YOU USE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ? | | | 7. POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT | | | ETC LOOKS OK, BUT, YOUR PLAN MUST SHOW SILT FENCE | | | AROUND THE SITE & CATCH BASINS. PLEASE PROVIDE SOME | | | SYMBOL/SIGNHEIGHT OF FENCE SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER | | | FDEP TO STOP DUST & PARTICLES. | | | 8. PLEASE APPLY & GET AN APPROVAL FROM FDEP FOR NOTICE | | | OF INTENT (NOI), PROVIDE A COPY OF APPROVAL FROM FDEP | | | FOR NOI. | | | 9. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED | | | 10. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND | | | YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
11:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
11:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-22 11:23:21 | PLANS APPROVED ON 4/1/08 BY CAPT. WILLIAMS AND STAMPED | | | ON THIS DATE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
Time |
15:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
Time |
15:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-01 15:59:17 | ****PROVISO***** | | | | | | THE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEWS HAVE | | | BEEN ADDRESSED;HOWEVER, THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEETS TO | | | BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE OTHER REVIEWERS HAVE BEEN | | | SATISFIED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-01-23 |
Time |
11:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
Time |
12:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-22 13:03:07 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | 09.THE POSTING OF THE 8" IN HEIGHT ADDRESS NUMBER AS | | | SHOWN ON SHEET A-14 IS ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED THAT THE | | | NUMBERS ARE TO BE AT LEAST 1" IN WIDTH/STROKE AS PER | | | WEST PALM BEACH CODE.PLEASE INCLUDE WIDTH/STROKE OF | | | NUMBER ON SHEET A-14 | | | | | | 10.SPECIFY THE WALL AND CEILING FINISH MATERIALS IN | | | THE EXITS, EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS, AND ALL OTHER AREAS | | | IN TERMS OF CLASS A, CLASS B, OR CLASS C.COULD NOT | | | LOCATE THIS ITEM ON SHEET A-35 & A-36 AS PER YOUR | | | RESPONSE;PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT SHEET A-35 & A-35.1 | | | ARE MISSING IN ONE OF THE PLAN SETS. | | | | | | 14.INCLUDE EXIT LIGHTS, EMERGENCY LIGHTS AND FIRE | | | EXTINGUISHERS TO THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHEETS (A-35 & | | | 36).THE LOCATION OF THESE DEVICES SHALL CORRELATE | | | WITH OTHER PLAN SHEETS WHERE SHOWN. PLEASE BE ADVISED | | | THAT SHEET A-35 IS MISSING FROM ONE OF THE PLAN SETS | | | | | | 15.TRAVEL DISTANCES AND SOME OF THE OCCUPANT LOAD | | | INFORMATION IS UNCLEAR FOR READING AND REVIEW.SEE | | | SHEET A-35 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT SHEET A-35 IS | | | MISSING FROM ONE OF THE PLAN SETS | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-08-30 |
Time |
18:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-08-24 |
Time |
11:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-31 08:32:39 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | | | | 01.INDICATE THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS | | | PROPOSED STRUCTURE.EXAMPLE:BUSINESS,EDUCATIONAL, | | | ASSEMBLY, MIXED USE, ETC.THIS INFORMATIOTION WILL | | | ASSIST REVIEWER(S) IN THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS.BE | | | ADVISED THAT ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE FORTHCOMING | | | ONCE THIS INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE. | | | | | | 02.STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 03.CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER ASSOCIATED SCOPE OF WORKS | | | SHALL NOT INTERFERE OR HINDER EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACCESS | | | TO THE PROPERTY OR VICINITY THEREOF (INCLUDING FIRE | | | LANES). | | | | | | 04.WILL THE PROPOSED HYDRANT BE OPERATIONAL BEFORE, | | | DURING, OR AFTER CONSTRUCTION.IF NOT OPERATIONAL | | | BEFORE, INDICATE THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT(S) TO THE | | | STRUCTURE THAT WOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | USE. | | | | | | 05. IT IS INDICATED ON SHEET C-4 THAT THE PROPOSED FIRE | | | HYDRANT ASSEMBLY IS DETAILED ON SHEET C-11.NO SUCH | | | DETAIL IS SHOWN ON C-11, HOWEVER C-13 AND C-16 | | | (STANDARD P-9) SHOWS THIS INFORMATION.PLEASE AMEND. | | | | | | 06.ON SHEET A-9 FLOOR PLAN NOTE #2 HAS CALL FOR A | | | BUTTON OPERATED DOOR WITH THE BUTTON LOCATED IN CENTRAL | | | OFFICE RECEPTION AREA.HOW WILL EGRESS FROM THIS AREA | | | BE IMPACTED? | | | | | | 07.SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS IN REFERENCE TO DOOR | | | 146- A AND DOOR 146-B.(SHEET A-9) | | | | | | 08.NO EXIT OR EMERGENCY LIGHTS SHOWN ON THE REFLECTED | | | CEILING SHEETS(A-12, A-13).THE LOCATION OF THESE | | | DEVICES SHALL CORRELATE WITH OTHER PLAN SHEETS SUCH AS | | | LIFE SAFETY AND/OR LIGHTING FLOOR PLANS. | | | | | | 09. VERIFY THE POSTING OF THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS FOR | | | CARDINAL NEWMAN HIGH SCHOOL.IF NOT ALREADY POSTED, | | | DISPLAY THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS ON THE APPROPIATE | | | EXTERIOR ELEVATION SO THAT IT IS VISIBLE FROM SPENCER | | | DRIVE. | | | | | | 10.SPECIFY THE WALL AND CEILING FINISH MATERIALS IN | | | THE EXITS, EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS, AND ALL OTHER AREAS | | | IN TERMS OF CLASS A, CLASS B, OR CLASS C. | | | | | | 11.SPECIFY INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH IN EXIT ENCLOSURES, | | | EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS, AND OTHER SPACES IN TERMS OF | | | CLASS I OR CLASS II. | | | | | | 12.WALL OPENINGS REQUIRED TO HAVE A FIRE PROTECTION | | | RATING SHALL BE PROTECTED BY FIRE DOORS AND FIRE | | | WINDOWS IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 80. | | | | | | 13.PROVIDE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGHTS FOR STAIR | | | GUARDRAILS AND HANDRAILS. | | | | | | 14.INCLUDE EXIT LIGHTS, EMERGENCY LIGHTS AND FIRE | | | EXTINGUISHERS TO THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHEETS (A-35 & | | | 36).THE LOCATION OF THESE DEVICES SHALL CORRELATE | | | WITH OTHER PLAN SHEETS WHERE SHOWN. | | | | | | 15.TRAVEL DISTANCES AND SOME OF THE OCCUPANT LOAD | | | INFORMATION IS UNCLEAR FOR READING AND REVIEW.SEE | | | SHEET A-35 | | | | | | 16.AS PER LOCAL REQUIREMENTS, DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS | | | SHALL INITIATE A GENERAL FIRE ALARM.AMEND/INCLUDE IN | | | FIRE ALARM REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM OPERATIONS (SHEET E-7). | | | | | | 17.NFPA 72, NATIONAL FIRE ALARM CODE, 2002 EDITION | | | SHALL BE REFERENCED. | | | | | | 18.SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | FIRE ALARM INSTALLATION AND/OR REMODEL. | | | | | | 19.IT IS INDICATED THAT THIS STRUCTURE WILL BE | | | BUILDING "D".HOW WILL THE ACTIVATION OF AN ALARM IN | | | BLDG. "D"BE DISTIGUISHABLE FROM THE OTHER BUILDINGS | | | OR AREAS OF THE CAMPUS? | | | | | | 20.ON SHEET E-7 UNDER THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM LEGEND, | | | THE SYMBOL OF LETTER H ENCASED INSIDE A SQUARE | | | REQRESENTS BOTH A HORN/STROBE LIGHT AND THAT OF A KNOX | | | BOX. PLEASE RECTIFY/AMEND. | | | | | | 21.ON SHEET E-7 UNDER GENERAL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM NOTE | | | #2, PLEASE EXPLAIN THE REFERENCE TO NFPA 3 - | | | 8.4.1.3.7.6 AND ITS RELEVANCE. | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
10:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
10:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-01 10:37:13 | TO "COMM" BD#4/LARGE FOLDED PLANS/BINDERS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-25 11:58:15 | TO "COMM" BD#40 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
Time |
18:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
Time |
18:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-20 18:27:28 | TO COMM BOARD #19, PLANS ON RACK. DVP |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-08-24 |
Time |
11:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-05-10 |
Time |
16:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-31 14:07:51 | TO "COMM" BD#2/PLANS ON RACK--LARGE FOLDED PLANS | | 2007-05-10 16:51:12 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
10:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
10:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
15:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
14:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-17 15:35:57 | REVIEW #: 3RD | | | ACTION: FAILED PENDING | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | MECHANICAL PAGES HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND STAMPED. ALL | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. REVIEW WILL | | | REMAIN IN FAIL STATUS UNTIL ENERGY CALCULATIONS PASS | | | ALL INTERESTED TRADE REVIEWS. | | | | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE STAMPED MECHANICAL PAGES WITH | | | RESUBMITTAL FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-01-11 |
Time |
14:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-01-09 |
Time |
07:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-11 14:22:43 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 1 THROUGH 6: OK | | | | | | 7: AHU 4 STILL HAS A DESIGN CAPACITY IN EXCESS OF 2000 | | | CFM. FAN SHUT DOWN BY SMOKE DETECTOR IS REQUIRED PER | | | FBC, M 606.2.1. | | | | | | 8. THE CONDITION OF DRAIN LINES HAS NOT CHANGED FROM | | | PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL. THE DRAIN CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON | | | PLANS IS ACCEPTABLE PENDING FIELD INSPECTOR?S | | | APPROVIAL. | | | | | | 9. WHILE FILTER ACCESS IS IMPORTANT, THE PRIMARY | | | CONCERN IS ACCESS FOR SERVICE AND REPLACEMENT. VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC, M 306.1 AND 306.2. MANUFACTURER?S | | | INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON THE JOB | | | SITE AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC, | | | M 304.1. | | | | | | 10. SEE COMMENT #7 ABOVE. | | | | | | 11. THE FAN SCHEDULE ON PG M-5 STILL SHOWS EF-2 THROUGH | | | EF-6 ON ROOF. PLEASE CLARIFY PER FBC, M 306.5 AND FBC | | | 106.1.1. | | | | | | 12 THROUGH 14: OK | | | | | | 15. THE NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE V2.11 | | | FORM 400B. ALL APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED AFTER 12/8/2006 | | | USING METHOD B FORMS ARE REQUIRED TO USE AT LEAST V2.5 | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 13-400.3.B. PLEASE USE THE | | | CURRENT VERSION OF THE FLA/COM PROGRAM AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | NEW: PAGES M-1 THROUGH M-6 ARE NOT SIGNED, DATED OR | | | SEALED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY FS 471 | | | AND FAC RULE 61G15-23.001. PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL PLANS | | | ARE SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
Time |
09:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-06-02 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-05 09:53:41 | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2006 REVISIONS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | ---------------DENIED----------------- | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION BASED | | | ON FBC CHAPTER 6. "TYPE A: UNPROTECTED" IS NOT A | | | RECOGNIZED DESIGNATION. FBC 106.5.3 | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION | | | BASED ON FBC CHAPTER 3. "GROUP CS" IS NOT A RECOGNIZED | | | DESIGNATION. FBC 106.5.3 | | | | | | 3. THERE ARE SEVERAL WALLS WHICH ARE SHOWN TO BE FIRE | | | BARRIERS BASED ON THE WALL SCHEDULE (A-23), LIFE SAFETY | | | PLAN (A-35,A-36) AND FLOOR PLAN (A-9,A-10). MANY SUCH | | | WALLS HAVE UNPROTECTED DUCT PENETRATIONS. PLEASE SHOW | | | HOW THESE OPENINGS ARE TO BE PROTECTED PER FBC,M | | | 607.5. | | | NOTE: RATED WALLS FROM LIFE SAFETY PLAN HAVE BEEN | | | HIGHLIGHTED ON ONE SET OF MECHANICAL PLANS TO HELP | | | DETERMINE THE LOCATIONS IN QUESTION. | | | | | | 4. SMOKE DAMPERS ARE REQUIRED AT DUCT PENETRATIONS INTO | | | CORRIDORS PER FBC,M 607.5.4. PLEASE CONSULT THIS CODE | | | SECTION FOR EXEMPTIONS TO DETERMINE WHERE SMOKE DAMPERS | | | ARE REQUIRED. COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS MAY BE | | | USED WHERE BOTH FIRE AND SMOKE PROTECTION ARE REQUIRED. | | | THESE LOCATIONS WERE NOT MARKED ON PLAN DURING THIS | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | 5. EXIT ENCLOSURE (CORRIDOR) VENTILATION SYSTEMS SHALL | | | BE INDEPENDENT OF OTHER BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEMS | | | AND SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM OTHER BUILDING COMPONENTS | | | BY ONE OF THE THREE METHODS LISTED IN FBC,M 401.4: | | | (1) SUCH EQUIPMENT AND DUCTWORK SHALL BE LOCATED | | | EXTERIOR TO THE BUILDING AND SHALL BE DIRECTLY | | | CONNECTED TO THE EXIT ENCLOSURE BY DUCTWORK ENCLOSED IN | | | CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, | | | BUILDING FOR SHAFTS. | | | (2) WHERE SUCH EQUIPMENT AND DUCTWORK IS LOCATED WITHIN | | | THE EXIT ENCLOSURE, THE INTAKE AIR SHALL BE TAKEN | | | DIRECTLY FROM THE OUTDOORS AND THE EXHAUST AIR SHALL BE | | | DISCHARGED DIRECTLY TO THE OUTDOORS, OR SUCH AIR SHALL | | | BE CONVEYED THROUGH DUCTS ENCLOSED IN CONSTRUCTION AS | | | REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING FOR | | | SHAFTS. | | | (3) WHERE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING, SUCH EQUIPMENT | | | AND DUCTWORK SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE REMAINDER OF | | | THE BUILDING, INCLUDING OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, | | | WITH CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE, BUILDING FOR SHAFTS. | | | | | | 6. AHU 1: EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE CALLS FOR 4500 CFM SUPPLY, | | | FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR 4930 CFM TOTAL SUPPLY. WHICH IS | | | CORRECT? | | | | | | 7. AHU 4: FLOOR PLAN SHOWS 2215 CFM OF SUPPLY. A DUCT | | | SMOKE DETECTOR IS REQUIRED PER FBC,M 606.2.1. | | | | | | 8. AHU 7 & 8 (USED AS EXAMPLES OF WORT CASE): DRAIN | | | LINES WILL BE TRAVELING APPROX. 200' HORIZONTALLY ABOVE | | | CORRIDOR CEILING ON 1ST FLOOR. FBC,P 704.1 CALLS FOR | | | DRAINS 2 1/2" OR SMALLER TO BE SLOPED AT 1/4" PER FOOT. | | | THIS WOULD REQUIRE APPROX. 4' DROP AT A UNIFORM SLOPE | | | FROM BEGINNING TO END OF THE HORIZONTAL RUNS. WILL | | | FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW FOR THIS? A HORIZONTAL RUN OF | | | THIS LENGTH MAY INCREASE THE FREQUENCY OF CLOGGED | | | DRAINS. PERHAPS A MORE SUITABLE LOCATION OF CONDENSATE | | | DISPOSAL CAN BE FOUND FOR THE EXTREMELY LONG RUNS. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER'S SUBMITTAL | | | DATE AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS TO SHOW SERVICE | | | CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR AHU'S IN EQUIPMENT ROOMS. | | | | | | 10. PG M-5: IF DUCT SMOKE DETECTOR IS ADDED TO AHU-4 | | | (SEE COMMENT #7) PLEASE ADJUST GENERAL NOTE #14 | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 11. WHERE EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES REQUIRING ACCESS ARE | | | INSTALLED ON ROOFS OR ELEVATED STRUCTURES AT A HEIGHT | | | EXCEEDING 16 FEET, SUCH ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY A | | | PERMANENT APPROVED MEANS OF ACCESS, THE EXTENT OF WHICH | | | SHALL BE FROM GRADE OR FLOOR LEVEL TO THE EQUIPMENT AND | | | APPLIANCES? LEVEL SERVICE SPACE. SUCH ACCESS SHALL NOT | | | REQUIRE CLIMBING OVER OBSTRUCTIONS GREATER THAN 30 | | | INCHES HIGH OR WALKING ON ROOFS HAVING A SLOPE GREATER | | | THAN 4 UNITS VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL | | | (33-PERCENT SLOPE). CATWALKS INSTALLED TO PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED ACCESS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 24 INCHES WIDE | | | AND SHALL HAVE RAILINGS AS REQUIRED FOR SERVICE | | | PLATFORMS. | | | | | | 12. PG M-6 FIRE DAMPER DETAIL: FIRE DAMPERS, SMOKE | | | DAMPERS, COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS AND CEILING | | | DAMPERS LOCATED WITHIN AIR DISTRIBUTION AND SMOKE | | | CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION, AND THE | | | MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND LISTING. | | | FBC,M 607.2. | | | NOTE: MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED | | | FOR THIS DETAIL OR A REFERENCE TO MANUFACTURER'S | | | INSTRUCTIONS MAY SUFFICE. | | | | | | 13. PLEASE SHOW MEANS OF SECONDARY OR AUXILIARY DRAIN | | | PROTECTION ON ALL AHU'S PER FBC,M 307.2.3. | | | | | | 14. M-6: PLEASE INDICATE ON PLANS THE DESIGNED WIND | | | LOAD OF THE ATTACHMENTS FOR THE OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT | | | (ROOFTOP FANS, CONDENSING UNITS) PER FBC,M 301.13 AND | | | FBC CH.16. ALSO, PLEASE SHOW MEANS OF ATTACHMENT FOR | | | EXHAUST FANS TO ROOF CURBS. | | | NOTE: THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH IS IN THE 140 MPH | | | ZONE PER FBC CH.16. | | | | | | 15. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: ROOF INSULATION IS SHOWN ON | | | CALCULATIONS TO BE R-19 CELLULOSE INSULATION IN | | | "ATTIC", PLANS SHOW LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE ON ROOF. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE DRAWINGS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | ALSO, PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION SHOWING THE THICKNESS | | | OF THE LIGHTWEIGHT AND THE R-VALUES ACHIEVED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-26 |
Time |
16:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-26 |
Time |
16:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-26 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-26 |
Time |
15:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-26 16:01:44 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FLORIDA ADMISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. OK - EDUCATIONAL | | | | | | 2. SHT A-1 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM FACILITIES | | | PER TABLES 1104.1.2 & 403.1. INDICATE THE TOTAL AREA | | | FOR EACH OCCUPANCY FOR THE MEDIA CENTER, CHAPEL, BAND | | | SUITE, COUNSELING & BUSINESS. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT CALCULATIONS INDICATE 6 | | | DRINKING FOUNTAINS REQUIRED, BUT ONLY 2 DRINKING | | | FOUNTAINS ARE INDICATED ON THE FLOOR PLAN. EACH | | | DRINKING FOUNTAIN IS REQUIRED TO HAVE ITS OWN TRAP & | | | WATER SUPPLY. THE HIGH/LOW DRINKING FOUNTAINS SHOWN ON | | | THE FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS ONLY HAVE ONE TRAP. THAT | | | BEING SAID IF TRAPS ARE INSTALLED TO EACH OF THE | | | DRINKING FOUNTAINS SHOWN, THERE ARE STILL TWO DRINKING | | | FOUNTAINS NOT SHOWN. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 3. OK | | | 4. OK | | | | | | 5. SHTS L-1 THRU L-4 THE ADDRESS ON THE FLORIDA STATE | | | DBPR WEBSITE DOES NOT REFLECT THE ADDRESS IN THE TITLE | | | BLOCKS. PLEASE UPDATE THE DBPR WEBSITE OR THE TITLE | | | BLOCK SO THE INFORMATION CORRELATES. (SEE ATTACHED | | | SHEET). | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, ADDRESS NOT CHANGED. | | | | | | 6. OK | | | 7. OK | | | 8. OK | | | 9. OK | | | 10. OK | | | | | | 11. SHTS S-1 THRU S-8 THE ADDRESS ON THE FLORIDA STATE | | | DBPR WEBSITE DOES NOT REFLECT THE ADDRESS ON THE TITLE | | | BLOCKS. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET). PLEASE UPDATE THE DBPR | | | WEBSITE OR THE TITLE BLOCKS SO THE INFORMATION | | | CORRELATES. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, ADDRESS NOT CHANGED. | | | | | | 12. OK | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID | | | SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY | | | ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU | | | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-12 |
Time |
10:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-11 |
Time |
17:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-12 10:39:47 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FLORIDA ADMISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | 1. SHT A-1 OCCUPANCY IS LISTED AS GROUP CS AND WHERE | | | INDICATED AS MIXED OCCUPANCY "NO" IS STATED. PLANS | | | INDICATE OTHERWISE AS IT IS INDICATED AS MEDIA CENTER, | | | CHAPEL & BAND SUITE, (ASSEMBLY), AND ALSO COUNSELING & | | | OFFICES, (BUSINESS). MAYBE EDUCATION IS TO BE | | | CONSIDERED FOR THE MEDIA CENTER. PLEASE CLARIFY AND | | | PLEASE INDICATE WHAT OCCUPANCY "GROUP CS" IS AS IT IS | | | NOT INDICATED IN THE FBC-2004 BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 2. SHT A-1 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM FACILITIES | | | PER TABLES 1104.1.2 & 403.1. INDICATE THE TOTAL AREA | | | FOR EACH OCCUPANCY FOR THE MEDIA CENTER, CHAPEL, BAND | | | SUITE, COUNSELING & BUSINESS. | | | | | | 3. SURVEY SHEET 2 0F 2 SHALL BE SIGNED, SEALED AND | | | DATED PER SECTION 106.1 AND FAC 61G1-16.003 & FS | | | 472.025. | | | | | | 4. SHTS C-1 THRU C-17 THE FIRM LICENSE NUMBER, | | | (CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION), IS REQUIRED IN THE | | | TITLE BLOCK OF EACH SHEET FOR THE ENGINEERING INC. FAC | | | 61G15-23.002(2) & FS 471.025. PLEASE ADD TO TITLE | | | BLOCK. | | | | | | 5. SHTS L-1 THRU L-4 THE ADDRESS ON THE FLORIDA STATE | | | DBPR WEBSITE DOES NOT REFLECT THE ADDRESS IN THE TITLE | | | BLOCKS. PLEASE UPDATE THE DBPR WEBSITE OR THE TITLE | | | BLOCK SO THE INFORMATION CORRELATES. (SEE ATTACHED | | | SHEET). | | | | | | 6. SHT A-2 DEMO NOTE #7. SEPARATE GAS PERMIT REQUIRED | | | WITH PLANS INDICATING CHANGES. SECTION 105.1. | | | | | | 7. SHT A-11 ROOF LEGEND #5 IS NOT INDICATED ON 4 ROOF | | | AREAS. PLEASE CORRELATE LEGEND AND ROOF PLAN. SECTION | | | 106.1.1. | | | | | | 8. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ROOF | | | DRAINS. SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EACH AREA, AS WELL | | | AS 1/2 AREA OF ALL VERTICAL WALLS INCLUDING PARAPETS | | | ADDED TO ROOF AREAS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 AS WELL AS | | | TABLE 1106.3. | | | | | | 9. SHT A-27 DETAILS 5 & 6. SHOW THE 5' TURNING AREA IN | | | THE TOILET ROOMS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 11-4.22.3. THEY | | | ARE PRESENTLY INDICATED IN THE ACCESSIBLE STALL. | | | | | | 10. SHT A-39 DETAIL FOR THE ACCESSIBLE W/C'S SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE WITH 11-4.16.5 FLUSH CONTROLS. --THE LAVS | | | SHOW 35" TO THE FLOOD RIM LEVEL, WHEREAS THE | | | REQUIREMENT IS MAX. 34" PER SECTION 11-4.19.2. ALSO | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH 11-4.19.5 FAUCETS.--FOR THE | | | URINAL SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH 11-4.18.4 FLUSH CONTROLS. | | | | | | 11. SHTS S-1 THRU S-8 THE ADDRESS ON THE FLORIDA STATE | | | DBPR WEBSITE DOES NOT REFLECT THE ADDRESS ON THE TITLE | | | BLOCKS. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET). PLEASE UPDATE THE DBPR | | | WEBSITE OR THE TITLE BLOCKS SO THE INFORMATION | | | CORRELATES. | | | | | | 12. SHTS P1 & P4 INDICATES A SINK IN ROOM 114 | | | CONNECTING TO A DRYWELL. SECTION 301.3 STATES ALL | | | FIXTURES USED TO RECIEVE OR DISCHARGE LIQUIDS, WASTE OR | | | SEWAGE SHALL BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID | | | SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY | | | ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU | | | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
X |
PERMIT EXTENSION |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dfulcher |
Date |
2009-03-31 |
Time |
09:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dfulcher |
Date |
2009-03-31 |
Time |
09:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-03-31 09:22:26 | PERMIT APP EXT TO 7/23/09 PER DW -DRF |
|
|
| Review Stop |
X |
PERMIT EXTENSION |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amckenzi |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
Time |
16:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amckenzi |
Date |
2008-09-18 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-18 16:59:21 | PERMIT APPLICATION EXTENDED TO 12/15/08 PER NKM/AMM |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
Time |
16:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-11 16:23:24 | ***PROVISO*** | | | | | | 1) CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE PERMITTED UNDER SEPARATE | | | PERMIT. | | | | | | 2) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A C.O., FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL | | | BE PASSED FOR PERMIT #06100149. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-01-11 |
Time |
08:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2008-01-11 |
Time |
08:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-11 08:32:48 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1) AS PER MY LAST REVIEW, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN NEEDS TO | | | SHOW THE ULTIMATE LOCATION OF THE RELOCATED | | | TREES....AND AS PROVISOED ON THE PARKING LOT PERMIT, | | | ALL OF THE CABBAGE PALMS ARE TO BE RELOCATED. | | | | | | 2) PROOF OF A LAND STABILIZATION BOND WILL NEED TO BE | | | PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT | | | (PER RECENTLY-ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 4060-07 - SEE | | | ATTACHED). | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. | | | | | | | | | ***IMPORTANT***THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE WILL | | | NEED TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT PRIOR TO | | | INSTALLATION.PLEASE REFER TO RECENTLY-ADOPTED | | | ORDINANCE NO. 4060-07 REGARDING THE GUIDELINES FOR | | | TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCES (ORDINANCE IS ATTACHED). |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
17:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
17:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-18 17:03:35 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOULD NOT SHOW THE TREES THAT | | | ARE BEING REMOVED...ONLY THE NEW LANDSCAPING AND THE | | | ULTIMATE LOCATION OF ANY RELOCATED TREES. | | | | | | 2) A SHADE/FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE | | | TERMINAL ISLAND LOCATED WEST OF THE ROW OR PARKING THAT | | | IS SOUTH OF THE ADDITION. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, | | | AT (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |