| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07040727 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-01-15 |
Time |
17:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-01-15 |
Time |
17:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-15 17:33:36 | REVISION E7, F1, D3, F4 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-08 |
Time |
13:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-08 |
Time |
13:37 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-08 13:42:13 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FS FLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1. FIXED GLASS PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED, NONE SHOWN | | | ON PLAN, SEE F1. | | | | | | 2. THE DOUBLE SH24 WINDOWS WERE CLOUDED, WHAT CHANGED? | | | THE LOCATION WHERE THE DOOR IS ELIMINATED WAS NOT | | | CLOUDED. ALL CHANGES TO BE CLEARLY INDICATED. FBC*106 | | | | | | 3. WALL AREA ON THE ENERGY CALCS HAS DECREASED, BUT THE | | | WALLS ARE NOW TALLER. PLEASE EXPLAIN. FBC13 | | | | | | 4. NEW ENERGY CALCCS SHOWS A NEW WINDOW ON THE NORTH | | | WALL, BUT THE NEW WINDOW IS ON THE SOUTH WALL. PLEASE | | | REVISE. FBC13 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-06-21 |
Time |
08:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-06-21 |
Time |
08:08 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-21 08:09:04 | | | | | | | FINAL PROCESSING OF PERMIT (NEW PAGES) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-05-27 |
Time |
18:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-05-27 |
Time |
18:31 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
Time |
10:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
Time |
10:48 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-08 11:26:00 | | | | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED ON THE 1ST | | | REVIEW | | | | | | | | | 2)THE STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES COLLECTION OF A RADON | | | SURCHARGE ON ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPUTED ON UNDER | | | ROOF FLOOR SPACE PER 10D-91 FAC. THESE FEES WILL BE | | | ADDED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION FEES ******FEES ADDED | | | DUE TO INCREASED SQUARE FOOTAGE****** | | | | | | 3)THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS | | | LOW. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS | | | AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST | | | EXCLUDING LAND VALUE. OUR VALUATION REFERENCE IS ICC | | | (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS SERVICES | | | PER 108.3 FBC*. FEES ARE DUE FOR THE STATE RADON AND | | | THE INCREASED PERMIT VALUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $718.85 | | | THIS MUST BE PAID BEFORE FURTHER PLAN REVIEW IS | | | PERFORMED.********THE INCREASE IN VALUE IS DUE TO | | | ADDED SQUARE FOOTAGE, VALUE BASED ON BUILDING VALUATION | | | DATA FROM FEB 2007 WHEN FIRST PERMITTED********* | | | | | | 5)SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS THAT | | | COMPLY WITH R802.10.1 FBC WITH PERMIT APPLICATION OR | | | BEFORE INSTALLATION THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. ******THIS MAY BY | | | DELIVERED TO SITE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ROOF FRAMING | | | INSPECTION****** | | | | | | 10)THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | A)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED FOR CASTCRETE | | | LINTELS OR THE FLORIDA STATEWIDE APPROVAL NUMBER ADDED | | | TO THE LINTEL SCHEDULE | | | B)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED FOR SIMPSON/USP | | | CONNECTOR OR THE STATEWIDE APPROVAL NUMBERS MAY BE | | | ADDED TO THE CONNECTOR SCHEDULE ******* IN LUE OF | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS STRAPS/CONNECTORS MAY BE LISTED IN A | | | SCHEDULE ON THE DRAWINGS COMPLETE WITH THE STATEWIDE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS OR SUBMIT SIMPSON TIE?S | | | COMPLETE FLORIDA INDEX WITH CONNECTORS TO BE USED | | | HIGHLIGHTED********* | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 1)PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN PARAMETERS SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH THE 2004 FLORIDA BLDG CODE WITH 2006 | | | AMENDMENTS PER 106.1.1 FBC* | | | | | | 2)PROVIDE A SITE PLAN THAT SHOWS DRAINAGE IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R403.1 FBC RES. | | | | | | 3)PROVIDE SMOKE ALARMS TO EXISTING BUILDING PER | | | R313.1.1 FBC RES. | | | | | | 4)PROVIDE MIN ROOF SHEATHING ATTACHMENT PER | | | R803.2.3.1 FBC RES. ***** REQUIRES 8D RING SHANK AND A | | | 4" O/C PATTERN IN ZONE 3 OF ROOF IN AREAS WHERE DESIGN | | | WIND SPEEDS ARE 130 MPH OR GREATER | | | | | | 5)SUBMIT A COPY OF THE RECORDED NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-06-12 |
Time |
17:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-06-12 |
Time |
17:14 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-12 17:54:04 | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | 1)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | | SETS OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | PLEASE CALL (561) 233-5025 FOR MOREINFORMATION. | | | | | | 2)THE STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES COLLECTION OF A RADON | | | SURCHARGE ON ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPUTED ON UNDER | | | ROOF FLOOR SPACE PER 10D-91 FAC. THESE FEES WILL BE | | | ADDED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION FEES | | | | | | 3)THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS | | | LOW. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS | | | AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST | | | EXCLUDING LAND VALUE. OUR VALUATION REFERENCE IS ICC | | | (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS SERVICES | | | PER 108.3 FBC*. FEES ARE DUE FOR THE STATE RADON AND | | | THE INCREASED PERMIT VALUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 241.32 | | | THIS MUST BE PAID BEFORE FURTHER PLAN REVIEW IS MADE. | | | | | | 4)THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 (PRODUCT APPROVALS) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO | | | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* | | | | | | | | | 5)SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS THAT | | | COMPLY WITH R802.10.1 FBC WITH PERMIT APPLICATION OR | | | BEFORE INSTALLATION THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. PLEASE SEE THAT | | | FOUNDATION PLAN HAS AN OUT TO OUT MEASUREMENT OF 17'-2" | | | AND THE TRUSS ENGINEERING STATES 18'-2"ALSO PER | | | 106.1.3 FBC* THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH | | | THROUGH DEPARTMENTAL POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND | | | SPECIFICATIONS "NO WHITE OUT, PENCIL OR INK" | | | | | | 6)AN ENGINEER PRACTICING THROUGH A DULYAUTHORIZED | | | ENGINEERING BUSINESS SHALL INDICATE THEIR NAME AND | | | LICENSE #, AS WELL AS THE NAME, ADDRESS AND CERTIFICATE | | | OF AUTHORIZATION #ON EACH SHEET PER | | | 61G15-23.002 (2) FAC | | | | | | 7)THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH REQUIRES THE FLORIDA | | | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER | | | SHEETS WHEN AVAILABLE. THEY CAN BE SEARCHED FOR ON | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.WHEN AVAILABLE AND NOT | | | SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL BE DENIED | | | | | | 8)PLEASE CORRECT THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE | | | FOUNDATION PLAN OVERALL MEASUREMENT OF 52'-0" AND THE | | | FLOOR PLAN OF 51'-11" | | | | | | 9)TRUSS LAYOUT ON T/1 HAS NOTES FOR MARK "C" THAT | | | CALL FOR META12 STRAPS BUT THE UPLIFT TABLE HAS TYPE D | | | WHICH IS A HETA20. THE META12 DOES NOT MEET THE UPLIFT | | | VALUE FROM THE TABLE. PLEASE CLARIFY | | | | | | 10)THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | A)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED FOR CASTCRETE | | | LINTELS OR THE FLORIDA STATEWIDE APPROVAL NUMBER ADDED | | | TO THE LINTEL SCHEDULE | | | B)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED FOR SIMPSON/USP | | | CONNECTOR OR THE STATEWIDE APPROVAL NUMBERS MAY BE | | | ADDED TO THE CONNECTOR SCHEDULE | | | C)PROVIDE THE TYPE OF ASSEMBLY FROM THE GAF RUBEROID | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WILL BE USED ON THE ROOF. PLEASE | | | NOTE THAT IN 140 MPH EXP B THE ZONE 3 AREA OF THE ROOF | | | HAS A PSF VALUE OF -89.0, MOST ASSEMBLIES MAX OUT AT | | | -75 PSF WITH A LIMITATION #7 (SEE PAGE32) THAT REQUIRES | | | CALCULATIONS TO ENHANCE THE FASTENERS TO MEET THE ZONE | | | 3 REQUIREMENTS. HAVE DESIGNER OF RECORD PROVIDE THESE | | | CALC'S. | | | D)POMA STORM PANEL NOA HAS EXPIRED, NEW NOA NUMBER IS | | | NOW POSTED ON MIAMI-DADE SITE BUT NOT UNDER POMA | | | | | | 11)SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 | | | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND | | | DATED BY PREPARER AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR | | | TO SUBMITTAL. MAKE CORRECTIONS FOR FLAT ROOF TYPE | | | | | | 12)A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | A PERMIT BEING ISSUED | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-12-29 |
Time |
17:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-12-29 |
Time |
15:56 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-29 17:01:39 | | | | | | | | | | TO MECH ON THE RESIDENTIAL RACK./WRT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-12-02 |
Time |
10:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-12-02 |
Time |
10:07 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-02 10:53:22 | | | | | | | REVISION DENIED | | | | | | THE PERMIT SET OF PLANS WERE ISSUED UNDER PROVISO'S TO | | | BE CORRECTED ON THE FIRST REVISION. THE FOLLOWING HAVE | | | NOT BEEN CORRECTED ON THE ELECTRICAL PLAN SHEET E2. | | | | | | 1} BATH CIRCUITS PER 210.11(C)(3)*** BATHROOM BRANCH | | | CIRCUITS IN ADDITION TO THE NUMBER OF BRANCH CIRCUITS | | | REQUIRED BY OTHER PARTS OF THIS SECTION, AT LEAST ONE | | | 20-AMPERE BRANCH CIRCUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO SUPPLY | | | BATHROOM RECEPTACLE OUTLET(S). SUCH CIRCUITS SHALL HAVE | | | NO OTHER OUTLETS.***CIRCUIT #10 LABELED "FLORIDA ROOM | | | RECEPTACLES" SERVE THE BATH RECEPTACLES IN VIOLATION OF | | | THIS ARTICLE. INDICATE BATH CIRCUIT ON THE PANEL | | | SCHEDULE PER 408.4. | | | | | | 2} .R313.1.1 ALTERATIONS, REPAIRS AND ADDITIONS. | | | WHEN INTERIOR ALTERATIONS, REPAIRS OR ADDITIONS | | | REQUIRING A PERMIT OCCUR, OR WHEN ONE OR MORE SLEEPING | | | ROOMS ARE ADDED OR CREATED IN EXISTING DWELLINGS, THE | | | INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH SMOKE | | | ALARMS LOCATED AS REQUIRED FOR NEW DWELLINGS; THE SMOKE | | | ALARMS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED AND HARD WIRED.*** THE | | | NOTE (#9) REQUIRING THAT ARTICLE WAS REMOVED FROM THE | | | PLAN. ALSO SEE THAT EACH SMOKE ALARM (MISMARKED | | | "DETECTORS") IS ON A DIFFERENT CIRCUIT THEREFORE NOT | | | INTERCONNECTED PER MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATION. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 3} THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS THE ONLY PERSON AUTHORIZED | | | TO REVISE HIS/HER PLAN. PER 481.229(1)(B) JOSEPH | | | DRAGONMUST MAKE ANY CHANGES TO THIS SHEET. | | | | | | NOTE: THE PANEL LOCATION SUBMITTED IS CODE COMPLIANT. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
Time |
15:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
Time |
13:36 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-21 15:02:38 | | | | | | | | | | SEE PROVISO ON PLAN./WRT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-02-27 |
Time |
11:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-02-27 |
Time |
07:08 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-27 07:59:37 | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE | | | CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, 2004 | | | FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1} THE ENGINEER WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON THE TITLE BLOCK | | | MUST SIGN, DATE AND SEAL THE DOCUMENT. 61G15-23.002 | | | FAC. | | | | | | 2} THE LOAD CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DO NOT MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEC. PROVIDE LOAD CALCULATIONS PER | | | ARTICLE 220 PART III, STANDARD OR PART IV OPTIONAL, | | | INDICATE METHOD USED. SEE 220.1. | | | | | | 3}} PROVIDE PANEL SCHEDULES PER 408.4. INCLUDE OCP | | | AND CONDUCTOR SIZES. PLEASE SEE NEW VERBAGE FOR 2005 | | | NEC: "THE IDENTIFICATION SHALL INCLUDE SUFFICIENT | | | DETAIL TO ALLOW EACH CIRCUIT TO BE DISTINGUISHED FROM | | | ALL OTHERS." | | | | | | 4} THE RISER DIAGRAM INDICATES A METER/MAIN TYPE OF | | | SERVICE EQUIPMENT. INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE MAIN | | | BREAKER (DETERMINED BY THE LOAD CALCULATION) SO THE | | | CORRECT SIZE OF THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE MAY BE | | | DETERMINED PER 250.66. | | | | | | 5} AN EQUIPMENT GROUND PER 250.122 MUST BE RAN WITH THE | | | FEEDER CONDUCTOR TO THE PROPOSED PANEL. VERIFY THAT | | | NONE WERE RAN WITH THE EXISTING FEEDER RUNS AS THEY ARE | | | REQUIRED PER THAT ARTICLE. | | | | | | 6} THEDISCONNECTING MEANS FOR THE WATER HEATER DOES | | | NOT COMPLY WITH THE CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS OF 110.26. | | | SEE 422.16 NEC FOR CORD AND PLUG RESTRICTIONS, AND | | | 422.31(B) FOR HARDWIRE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 7}COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED DISCONNECT PER 440.14, | | | MUST ALSO COMPLY WITH 110.26 CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS. A | | | RECEPTACLE(S) ARE SHOWN AT THE CONDENSER LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 8} THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE ADDITION IS LISTED AS | | | 1,375 ON SHEET E2 AND F1, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE | | | APPLICATION IS LISTED AS 750. CORRELATE SAME. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-11 |
Time |
09:58 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-11 |
Time |
09:29 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-11 09:58:03 | | | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 1} PLEASE VERIFY THE CONFIGURATION OF THE METER AND | | | DISCONNECTS SHOWN. THEY WOULD APPEAR TO BE A | | | METER/MAIN, RATHER THAN SEPARATE DISCONNECTS AS NOTED. | | | CORRECT THE RISER. | | | | | | 2} PER 110.9 AND 110.10: OBTAIN THE | | | AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT AT THE UTILITY | | | AND CALCULATE THE SAME AT THE EQUIPMENT. | | | INDICATE THE AIC RATING FOR THE | | | EQUIPMENT IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN | | | THE AVAILABLE FAULT. | | | | | | 3} PROVIDE A SITE PLAN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF ALL | | | SERVICE EQUIPMENT SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 230 | | | CAN BE REVIEWED. THE "PROPOSED 100 AMP" PANEL MAY BE | | | REQUIREED TO BE GROUNDED PER 250.32 AND HAVE A MAIN PER | | | 225.31, DEPENDING ON LOCATION. | | | | | | 4 } 250.52(A)(3) CONCRETE-ENCASED ELECTRODE AN | | | ELECTRODE ENCASED BY AT LEAST 50 MM (2 IN.) OF | | | CONCRETE, LOCATED WITHIN AND NEAR THE BOTTOM OF A | | | CONCRETE FOUNDATION OR FOOTING THAT IS IN DIRECT | | | CONTACT WITH THE EARTH, CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 6.0 M | | | (20 FT) OF ONE OR MORE BARE OR ZINC GALVANIZED OR OTHER | | | ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE COATED STEEL REINFORCING BARS | | | OR RODS OF NOT LESS THAN 13 MM ( 1/ 2 IN.) IN DIAMETER, | | | OR CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 6.0 M (20 FT) OF BARE COPPER | | | CONDUCTOR NOT SMALLER THAN 4 AWG. REINFORCING BARS | | | SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE BONDED TOGETHER BY THE USUAL | | | STEEL TIE WIRES OR OTHER EFFECTIVE MEANS. THIS IS | | | AVAILABLE GIVEN A FOOTER IS BEING POURED. PLEASE ADD TO | | | RISER. | | | | | | 5} THE ENGINEERING FIRM LISTED ON THE TITLE BLOCK SHALL | | | INDICATE THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATIONNUMBER ALONG | | | WITH OTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED BY 61G15-23.002 | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
10:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
10:25 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-22 10:26:07 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-26 |
Time |
15:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-26 |
Time |
15:53 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-26 15:53:53 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-10 |
Time |
13:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-10 |
Time |
13:48 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-10 13:49:02 | TO "P" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
Time |
11:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
Time |
11:01 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-19 11:01:20 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
Time |
10:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
Time |
10:57 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-19 10:58:04 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
Time |
15:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
Time |
15:52 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-21 15:52:58 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
16:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
16:48 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-07 16:48:25 | TO "SFR" "E" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2007-06-12 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
14:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-23 14:32:20 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-10 |
Time |
09:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-10 |
Time |
09:07 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-10 09:08:23 | MECH PORTION OF E-CALCS OK PENDING BUILDING REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-14 |
Time |
13:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-14 |
Time |
13:50 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-14 13:52:18 | REVISED ENERGY AND COOLING LOAD CALCS WILL BE REVIEWED | | | ONCE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED. PLEASE SEE | | | SAMANTHA HILL'S REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 12/8/08. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-07-02 |
Time |
16:44 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-15 |
Time |
08:40 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-15 09:08:35 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) INFORMATION MISSING FROM MECHANICAL (A/C) PLANS. | | | (1) COMPANY NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER. | | | (2) COMPANY LICENSE NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE).. | | | (3) NAME OR IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT. ("JOB | | | ADDRESS" SEE CITY WPB AMEND. 106.1.1). | | | | | | 2) ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND | | | ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE PRINTED NAME AND | | | SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. PER | | | FBC 104.2.1 . | | | | | | 3) ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE CALLING FOR A CONCRETE DECK | | | ROOF, PLANS ARE CALLING FOR A RUBBERIZED FIBERGLASS | | | ROOF AND A ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF, PLEASE CORRECT ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
Time |
14:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
Time |
14:13 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-19 14:17:22 | ****************PROVISO**************** | | | THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED FOR THE CLEANOUTS PER FBC - | | | PLUMBING SECTIONS. | | | (A) 708.3.4 BASE OF STACK. A CLEANOUT | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE BASE OF EACH | | | WASTE OR SOIL STACK | | | (B) 708.3.5 BUILDING DRAIN AND BUILDING | | | SEWER JUNCTION. THERE SHALL BE A TWO-WAY | | | CLEANOUT NEAR THE JUNCTION OF THE | | | BUILDING DRAIN AND THE BUILDING SEWER. | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-22 11:04:32 | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | DENIED **2ND TIME: | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES WITH | | | 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO | | | CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.). | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | | THE PREVIOUS PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS THE | | | DESIGNER'S RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. NEW | | | COMMENTS WILL FOLLOW THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | **NOTE: NO COMMENT RESPONSE FROM DESIGNER. | | | | | | 1. SHEET D3, SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DOES NOT REFLECT | | | THE FLOOR PLAN OF SHEET F1 AND IS NOT CODE COMPLIANT. | | | PROVIDE THE FLAT PLAN SANITARY UNDERGROUND PLUMBING | | | LAYOUT ON SHEET F1 AND REFLECT THAT ON THE RESUBMITTED | | | SANITARY ISOMETRIC. PER FBC PLUMBING SECTION 701.1 | | | SCOPE. | | | | | | **THE RESUBMITTED SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM ON | | | SHEET D-3 STILL DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN OF | | | SHEET F1. THE WASTE AND VENT PIPING FOR THE BATHTUB IS | | | MISSING ON THE RESUBMITTED ISOMETRIC AND THE FLOOR | | | PLAN. THE WASHING MACHINE AND BIDET DO NOT REFLECT THE | | | FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE REFERENCE THE RED LINE CORRECTIONS | | | ON SHEETS F1 AND D-3. PER FBC PLUMBING SECTION 701.1 | | | SCOPE. | | | | | | 2. "OK" COMMENT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 3. "OK" COMMENT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | **THE FOLLOWING ARE NEW COMMENTS** | | | | | | 4. SHEET D3 THE BIDET NEEDS A VENT. PER FBC-2004 | | | PLUMBING TABLE 906.1. THE MAXIMUM DISTANCE FOR 2 INCH | | | TRAP FROM A VENT IS 6 FEET. | | | | | | 5. SHEET D3 THE WATER CLOSET DOES NOT REQUIRE A TRAP | | | DO TO THE FACT IT HAS AN INTEGRAL TRAP. A FIXTURE SHALL | | | NOT BE DOUBLE TRAPPED. PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION | | | 1002.1 FIXTURE TRAPS. | | | | | | 6. SHEET D3 THE RESUBMITTED SANITARY ISOMETRIC IS NOT | | | SIZING ALL TRAPS. PER (W.P.B. AS AMENDED) SECTION | | | 106.3.5.4 RESIDENTIAL (9) PLUMBING. | | | | | | 7. SHEET D3 THE RESUBMITTED SANITARY ISOMETRIC IS | | | INCORRECTLY INDICATING CLEANOUT LOCATIONS OR NOT | | | INDICATING THEM AT ALL PER THE FOLLOWING FBC-2004 | | | PLUMBING SECTIONS. | | | | | | (A) 708.3.4 BASE OF STACK. A CLEANOUT | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE BASE OF EACH | | | WASTE OR SOIL STACK. | | | **INCORRECTLY INDICATED ON PLANS. | | | | | | (B) 708.3.5 BUILDING DRAIN AND BUILDING | | | SEWER JUNCTION. THERE SHALL BE A TWO-WAY | | | CLEANOUT NEAR THE JUNCTION OF THE | | | BUILDING DRAIN AND THE BUILDING SEWER. | | | **MISSING FROM PLANS | | | | | | (C) 708.7 MINIMUM SIZE. CLEANOUTS SHALL | | | BE THE SAME NOMINAL SIZE AS THE PIPE | | | THEY SERVE UP TO 4 INCHES (102MM). | | | NOTE: CLEANOUT FOR THE WASHING MACHINE SHALL BE 3 | | | INCH. | | | **MISSING FROM PLANS. | | | | | | (D) 708.9 ACCESS. ACCESS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED TO ALL CLEANOUTS. | | | NOTE: CLEANOUT FOR THE WASHING MACHINE SHALL BE | | | LOCATED 4' A.F.F. | | | **MISSING FROM PLANS. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE | | | OLD PLANS, CLEARLY INDICATE THE REVISION ON THE NEW | | | PLANS, REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | PHONE= (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX= (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL= [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-02-29 |
Time |
15:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-02-29 |
Time |
15:59 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-29 16:13:41 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES WITH | | | 2007 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO | | | CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.). | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | DENIED: | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 1. SHEET D3, SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DOES NOT REFLECT | | | THE FLOOR PLAN OF SHEET F1 AND IS NOT CODE COMPLIANT. | | | PROVIDE THE FLAT PLAN SANITARY UNDERGROUND PLUMBING | | | LAYOUT ON SHEET F1 AND REFLECT THAT ON THE RESUBMITTED | | | SANITARY ISOMETRIC. PER FBC PLUMBING SECTION 701.1 | | | SCOPE. | | | | | | 2. SHEET D3 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM THE BAR | | | SINK IS MISSING FROM THE RISER DIAGRAM. PER FBC | | | PLUMBING SECTION 701.1 SCOPE. | | | | | | 3. THE WASHING MACHINE CAN NOT DRAIN INTO THE WET | | | VENTED BATHROOM GROUP. THE WASHING MACHINE MUST DRAIN | | | DOWN STREAM OF THE BATHROOM GROUP. PER FBC PLUMBING | | | SECTION 909.1 WET VENT PERMITTED. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION | | | AND REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY: MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | PHONE= (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX= (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL= [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
Time |
09:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
Time |
09:29 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-17 09:33:09 | NOTE: THERE IS NO PLUMBINGON THESE PLANS OR A | | | PLUMBING PERMIT APPLIED FOR. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
Time |
14:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
Time |
14:55 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-19 14:55:57 | ***APPROVED - RESUB #3 (RESTAMPED PLANS)*** | | | | | | PROVISO: | | | 1)NO SEPARATE DWELLING UNIT PERMITTED WITHIN THE | | | SINGLE FAMILY LOW DENSITY (SF7) ZONING DESIGNATION. | | | PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL NOT BE USED AS A SEPARATE | | | DWELLING UNIT. | | | | | | 2)AS THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK HAS BEEN | | | INCREASED AND NOW EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE, | | | ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE BROUGHT TO COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-442 AND 94-445 OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: | | | | | | FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST ONE SHADE, | | | FLOWERING OR FRUIT TREE SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 1,200 | | | SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. FOR | | | SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST ONE SHRUB SHALL | | | BE PLANTED FOR EACH 500 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE OR | | | PORTION THEREOF. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "B" - AM |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
Time |
11:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
Time |
11:18 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-21 11:19:38 | ***APPROVED - RESUB #2*** | | | | | | PROVISO: | | | 1)NO SEPARATE DWELLING UNIT PERMITTED WITHIN THE | | | SINGLE FAMILY LOW DENSITY (SF7) ZONING DESIGNATION. | | | PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL NOT BE USED AS A DWELLING | | | UNIT. | | | | | | 2)AS THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK HAS BEEN | | | INCREASED AND NOW EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE, | | | ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE BROUGHT TO COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-442 AND 94-445 OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: | | | | | | FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST ONE SHADE, | | | FLOWERING OR FRUIT TREE SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 1,200 | | | SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. FOR | | | SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST ONE SHRUB SHALL | | | BE PLANTED FOR EACH 500 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE OR | | | PORTION THEREOF. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "E" - BT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
09:56 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-25 09:58:11 | ***FAILED - RESUB #1 (CHANGED SCOPE OF WORK FROM FIRST | | | REVIEW)*** | | | | | | | | | 1)INDICATE SETBACK DIMENSIONS TO EASTERN PORTION OF | | | REAR PROPERTY LINE (SEE ATTACHED SURVEY WITH REQUIRED | | | SETBACKS DRAWN IN).MUST MAINTAIN A MINIMUM REAR | | | SETBACK OF 11' TO THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE REAR | | | PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 2)INDICATE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM PROPOSED A/C | | | EQUIPMENT TO ALL PROPERTY LINES.AS PER SECTION | | | 94-305(B)(4) OF THE ZLDRS: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY NOT | | | PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | | | | | | | NOTE:NO SEPARATE DWELLING UNIT PERMITTED WITHIN THE | | | SINGLE FAMILY LOW DENSITY (SF7) ZONING DESIGNATION. | | | PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL NOT BE USED AS A DWELLING | | | UNIT. | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN (561)805-6720 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SENT TO "E" - BT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
14:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
14:48 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-07 14:52:18 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | | | | 1)**CANNOT BUILD WITHIN AN EASEMENT**MUST GO | | | THROUGH THE EASEMENT ABANDONMENT PROCESS IF YOU WISH TO | | | CONTINUE WITH PROJECT.FOR INFORMATION REGARDING | | | EASEMENT ABANDONMENT PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPT. | | | 561-822-1435 | | | | | | | | | CHRIS HOOPS | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 561-805-6720 |
|
|
