 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 07040695
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07040695 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2007-09-12 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2007-09-12 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-12 11:38:08 | THE EXISTING SITE ADDRESS 2623 OKEECHOBEE BLVD CAN BE | | | USED FOR THE NEW BUILDING . | | | | | | LACRAMIOARA URSU | | | MIS - GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | OFFICE:822-1239 | | | FAX: 822-1249 | | | E-MAIL:[email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
Time |
09:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
Time |
09:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-20 11:31:54 | ***PROVISOS*** | | | | | | 1.SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT REQUIRED (ENGINEERING & | | | ASSEMBLY NOT PROVIDED) | | | DOR REVIEWED SOPREMA MODIFIED OVER STEEL DECK, NOA | | | 04-0927.05 (ENGINEERING RQ'D FOR ENHANCED FASTENING IF | | | REQUIRED, INSULATION BOARD RQ'D PER PLAN, PRESSURES ON | | | SHEET S1.0 -44,-54.5, -89.8) | | | METAL BUILDING COMPONENTS, CRAFTSMAN SB METAL ROOFING | | | SYSTEM 07-0305.10 (NEED TO SELECT APPROVED ASSEMBLY) | | | | | | 2.REVISE INDEX SHEET TO CORRECTLY REFLECT PAGES IN | | | THE PLAN |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
Time |
16:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-05-19 |
Time |
10:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-19 15:45:54 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | | | | 1.SEE PREVIOUS LISTS; SOILS REPORT REQUIRED.ALL | | | DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS | | | FS471. | | | | | | 2.THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH A PROVISO THAT THE | | | ROOF IS TO BE A SEPARATE PERMIT.A ROOF PERMIT CANNOT | | | BE ISSUED AT THIS TIME DUE TO INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT REQUIRED (ENGINEERING & ASSEMBLY | | | NOT PROVIDED) | | | DOR REVIEWED SOPREMA MODIFIED OVER STEEL DECK, NOA | | | 04-0927.05 (ENGINEERING RQ'D FOR ENHANCED FASTENING IF | | | REQUIRED, INSULATION BOARD RQ'D PER PLAN, PRESSURES ON | | | SHEET S1.0 -44,-54.5, -89.8) | | | METAL BUILDING COMPONENTS, CRAFTSMAN SB METAL ROOFING | | | SYSTEM 07-0305.10 (NEED TO SELECT APPROVED ASSEMBLY) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
Time |
12:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
Time |
12:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-03 12:21:57 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 1. WHEN RESUBMITTING, INDICATE THE REVISION AND REMOVE | | | AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY.A RESPONSE LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A | | | DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET | | | OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | | | | 2. ADVISORY COMMENT REGARDING NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, | | | FS713.13. | | | | | | 3.FBC1802.2.1, 3RD REQUEST; PLEASE PROVIDE THE SOILS | | | INVESTIGATION REPORT. TWO ORIGINAL SETS ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE.THE ENGINEER?S RESPONSE LETTER | | | STATES THAT THIS WAS ADDRESSED BY ADDING A COMMENT TO | | | THE PLAN IN THE FIRST REVIEW.FOR ALL NEW BUILDINGS, | | | AND FOR SOME ADDITIONS, SOILS REPORT IS REQUIRED.THIS | | | WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | | | 4. ADVISORY COMMENT REGARDING THE IMPACT OF | | | CONSTRUCTION, FBC*109.3.10. | | | | | | 5.ADVISORY COMMENT REGARDING HURRICANE PROTECTION | | | DURING CONSTRUCTION, FBC*109.3.10.1. | | | | | | 6. COMMENTS REGARDING SHEET AS0.1: | | | | | | 6A-6C, ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 6D. 3RD REQUEST, THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR OPENINGS ARE | | | ALL LOW; PLEASE SEE FBC TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2). | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, MWFRS AND COMPONENT & CLADDING PRESSURES | | | DECLARED BY ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER ARE NOT CONSISTENT. | | | TO WHICH ONE IS THE BUILDING DESIGNED?PLEASE EITHER | | | MAKE THE TWO SETS OF DESIGN PRESSURES THE SAME OR | | | ESTABLISH TO WHICH THE BUILDING HAS BEEN DESIGNED AND | | | REMOVE ONE. | | | | | | SHEET AS0.1, SEE THE TABLE PREPARED BY ROBERT H. BURKE, | | | JR., ARCHITECT TITLED MAXIMUM DESIGN WIND PRESSURES AND | | | THE TABLE TITLED PRESSURES FOR OPENINGS.THE DESIGN | | | PRESSURES SPECIFIED ARE TOO LOW FOR THIS WIND ZONE, | | | PLEASE SEE FBC TABLES 1609.6.2.1(1) AND (2).IF THESE | | | PRESSURES REMAIN ON THE PLAN, PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR | | | MWFRS AND COMPONENTS AND CLADDING PRESSURES. | | | | | | SHEET S1.0, PREPARED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, | | | BRADFORD T. BISHOP, ROOF UPLIFT PRESSURE APPEARS LOW | | | FOR ZONE 1 (PROVIDE CALCULATIONS) AND IS TOO LOW FOR | | | ZONES 2 AND 3.SEE FBC TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2). | | | | | | 6E. (NEW COMMENT)THIS IS A PLAN CHECK ONLY. GOVERNING | | | CODE FOR A PERMIT SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BASED ON | | | APPLICATION DATE.PLEASE REVISE GOVERNING CODE TO | | | INCLUDE 2007 REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS WHICH BECAME | | | EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2007.THIS COMMENT MAY APPLY TO | | | OTHER SHEETS; PLEASE CHECK ALL REFERENCES. | | | | | | 7. SEE THE PREVIOUS LIST, AS0.4 SECTION 7720/102(1), | | | COMMENT NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED.THE GOVERNING CODE WAS | | | CHANGED TO FBC2006, BUT SHOULD BE FBC2004 WITH 2007 | | | REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS (NO FBC2006 IN EXISTENCE).THE | | | ENGINEERING STANDARD REFERENCE WAS CHANGED FROM | | | ASCE7-98 TO ?ASCE7-02 OR LATEST EDITION?.THIS IS NOT | | | CORRECT AS FBC CHAPTER 35 SPECIFICALLY REFERS TO | | | ASCE7-02, AND THE LATEST EDITION (ASCE7-05) CANNOT BE | | | USED AT THIS TIME.PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | ALSO, THIS CHANGE WAS NOT CLOUDED.ALL CHANGES TO THE | | | PLAN ARE TO BE CLEARLY INDICATED WITH CLOUDS AND | | | REVISION NUMBERS. | | | | | | 8. SHEET S1.0, SEVERAL LOCATIONS, INCLUDE 2007 | | | REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS IN GOVERNING CODE (PLANS | | | CURRENTLY DECLARE FBC2004 WITH 2006 REVISIONS).NOTE | | | THAT GOVERNING CODE IS BASED ON APPLICATION DATE, AND | | | AS THIS IS A PLAN CHECK, GOVERNING CODE MAY CHANGE. | | | | | | 8A-C, ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 8D, SEE COMMENT 6D.THIRD REQUEST. | | | | | | 9. FBC1609.1.4, IMPACT PROTECTION REQUIRED.SOME | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED/APPROVED BY | | | THE ARCHITECT ARE NON IMPACT.USE OF IMPACT PROTECTION | | | ON COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL, SEE ATTACHED.A HURRICANE | | | INSTALLATION PLAN PROPOSING USE OF REMOVABLE PANELS MAY | | | BE SENT PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL VIA EMAIL TO [email protected] | | | FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW.NOTE ALSO THAT EXIT DOORS MUST | | | BE IMPACT, SEE FBC1003.6.SOME OF THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS SUBMITTED ARE FOR NON IMPACT GLAZING. PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS AND THE ATTACHED INSTALLATION SCHEDULE ARE | | | REQUIRED FOR SHUTTER PERMITS. | | | | | | 10. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED | | | IN ADDITION TO THE NOAS SUBMITTED, FAC9B72.PLEASE | | | PRINT THE STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL FROM THE WEBSITE, | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.IF UNAVAILABLE, PLEASE ADVISE | | | AND IF CODE COMPLIANT, A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE | | | ISSUED USING THE NOA. | | | | | | SEE PREVIOUS LISTS, ITEMS 10A AND 10B.THE FLORIDA | | | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET MUST BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE NOA, FAC9B72. | | | | | | ***ALSO PLEASE NOTE THAT, UPON PERMIT APPLICATION, ALL | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS? EXPIRATION DATE WILL BE REVIEWED. | | | THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE CURRENT AS OF APPLI | | | | | | A. STOREFRONT SYSTEM; AS ADVISED, THERE MAY BE ISSUES | | | WITH THE ANCHORING AS A STRESS INCREASE MAY HAVE BEEN | | | USED IN CALCULATIONS.THE NOA SUBMITTED IS FOR NON | | | IMPACT.SEE COMMENT 9; THIS CANNOT BE APPROVED UNTIL A | | | PLAN REGARDING SHUTTER INSTALLATION IN THE EVENT OF A | | | HURRICANE WARNING IS ISSUED.PROVIDE FLORIDA STATE OR | | | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | B. PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTED THAT THERE MAY BE ISSUES WITH | | | THE READY ACCESS DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW.SEE DETAIL 12 | | | AS8.1 AND SHEET 1 OF9 (DRAWINGS) OF THE READY ACCESS | | | DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW.THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SHOWS A MAX | | | FRAME HEIGHT OF 60.5INCHES, THE DETAIL SHOWS A HEIGHT | | | OF 5FT3IN.GRAPHICALLY THE HEAD DETAIL 1 THE BUCK IS | | | SHOWN AS VERY SMALL, AND THE DETAIL 13 WHICH SHOULD BE | | | THE SILL DETAIL IS NOTED AS NOT USED (ALTHOUGH | | | REFERENCED ONDETAIL 12C).CLARIFY FRAME SIZE. | | | | | | C. YKK STOREFRONT DOOR, PREVIOUS LIST REQUESTED THAT | | | TYPE OF GLASS BE HIGHLIGHTED.THIS WAS NOT DONE.ALSO | | | SEE ITEM 9, IF THIS IS USED IN A REQUIRED EXIT DOOR | | | LOCATION, IMPACT REQUIRED.PLEASE NOTE ON THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL WHERE THIS DOOR WILL BE INSTALLED. | | | | | | D. INGERSOLL RAND H16-4 OK; PLEASE SEE ITEM 10 AND | | | PROVIDE FL PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | E. SUPREMA MODIFIED, SEE PREVIOUS LIST, NO SYSTEM | | | SELECTED.THE SYSTEM AND ENHANCED FASTENING | | | CALCULATIONS REQUIRED (SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7) CAN | | | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION. HOWEVER, | | | SEE DETAIL 4 AS5.2, AS6.2, S2.2, S3.1, THE ROOF | | | STRUCTURE IS SHOWN AS STEEL.THE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | SUBMITTED IS FOR WOOD DECK, BUT WAS REVIEWED/APPROVED | | | BY THE ARCHITECT.PLEASE ADDRESS OR CLARIFY. | | | | | | F. EFIS SYSTEM, NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED.SEE | | | FAC9B72, PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED AND TO BE REVIEWED | | | BY DOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | G. METAL ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED, BUT FL | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL IS ALSO REQUIRED, AND THIS PRODUCT | | | WILL NOT BE REVIEWED UNTIL ROOF COMPONENT & CLADDING | | | DESIGN PRESSURES ARE ESTABLISHED.THERE ARE TWO | | | SYSTEMS, A1 AND A2.IT APPEARS THAT SYSTEM A1 | | | LIMITATION MIGHT NOT MEET THE PRESSURES FOR ZONE 3. | | | PRIOR TO ROOF PERMIT ISSUANCE, A SYSTEM IS TO BE | | | SELECTED. | | | | | | 11. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 12. ENGINEER'S RESPONSE IS NOTED; 146MPH IS ACCEPTABLE | | | AS IT EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM CODE.THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH IS ENTIRELY IN THE 140MPH ZONE. | | | | | | 13. SEE PREVIOUS LIST, THERE IS STILL A DISCREPANCY | | | BETWEEN AS6.3 AND S3.1 DETAIL 1, AND NEITHER IS | | | COMPLIANT WITH FBC2114.2.THE ENGINEER'S RESPONSE | | | STATES THAT THERE IS NOT SECONDARY POUR, ARCHITECT?S | | | DETAIL SHOWS A COLD JOINT.DETAIL 1 S3.1 SHOWS THE | | | VENEER SITTING ON WHAT LOOKS LIKE CONCRETE BLOCK, WITH | | | JOINTS WHICH DO NOT HAVE A PHYSICAL BARRIER (TERMITES | | | CAN GET INTO THE WALL FIRST HORIZONTALLY AT THE BASE OF | | | THE BLOCK UNDER THE VENEER, THEN UP THE WALL).PLEASE | | | ADDRESS. | | | | | | FOR ALL DETAILS, PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THERE ARE NO OTHER | | | CONFLICTS BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DETAILS, | | | OR A AND AS SHEETS.THIS WILL CREATE DELAYS IN THE | | | FIELD AS IT IS POSSIBLE THAT, IF TWO DETAILS CONFLICT, | | | A REVISION IN THE FIELD MAY BE REQUIRED AND INSPECTIONS | | | MAY BE DELAYED UNTIL CONFLICTS ARE RESOLVED THROUGH | | | PLAN REVIEW.PLEASE ADDRESS ALL INCONSISTENCIES NOW | | | AND NOTE POSSIBLE CHANGES IN THE NEXT RESPONSE LETTER. | | | IF DESIGNERS FIND NO INCONSISTENCIES, THIS ITEM DOES | | | NOT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. THIS COMMENT IS MADE AS | | | ADVISORY AND AS A COURTESY TO TRY TO ASSIST IN FUTURE | | | INSPECTIONS. | | | | | | 14. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 15. 3RD REQUEST, DETAIL 8 S5.2, ANCHORING OF THE | | | CORNICE BRACKET NOT SPECIFIED.BRACKET ANCHORS ARE | | | SHOWN GRAPHICALLY BUT NO INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDING | | | MATERIAL, DIAMETER, EMBEDMENT, TYPE. | | | | | | 16. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 17. PROVISO; AWNINGS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT.DESIGNER | | | GAVE TWO OPTIONS AS DESIGN CRITERIA. | | | | | | 18. ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 19. A2.0 WALL TYPE LEGEND WAS REVISED, WALL TYPE 1 | | | PREVIOUSLY STATED EXISTING WALL, NOW STATES NEW WALL, | | | BUT THE WALL TYPE KEY WAS NOT REVISED.THE | | | GRAPHIC/LEGEND STILL SHOWS AN EXISTING WALL ON THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PLAN. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 21. AS0.1 STATES (UNDER FBC TABLE 403.1 REQUIRED | | | PLUMBING FIXTURES) THAT THIS IS A SHELL PERMIT ONLY AT | | | THIS TIME.PLEASE REMOVE. | | | | | | 22.(ADVISORY) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, | | | IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY, | | | 561-233-5025.THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED AND THE | | | RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION.IF THIS HAS | | | ALREADY BEEN DONE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE STAMPED FLOOR | | | PLAN OR SITE PLAN AND A COPY OF THE RECEIPT. | | | | | | 23. (ADVISORY) AS FIRE SPRINKLERS ARE REQUIRED BY THE | | | WESTWARD SHOPPING PLAZA, FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS MUST | | | REMAIN IN THE PACKAGE.NOTE THAT THE DESIGNER HAS | | | DECLARED A FULLY SPRINKLERED BUILDING, BUT THIS EXCEEDS | | | MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS.NO ACTION NEEDED; ADVISORY | | | ONLY. | | | | | | 24.SEE ELECTRIC REVIEW COMMENT REGARDING TWO SETS OF | | | PLANS INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT APPLICATION.SUBMITTAL | | | OF TWO SETS OF ELEVATIONS, TWO SETS OF LIFE SAFETY, | | | ETC. CAUSES SOME CONFUSION.PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENT | | | REGARDING INCONSISTENCIES WITHIN THE PLAN. | | | | | | 25.PLEASE NOTE THAT A BUILDING REVIEW IS REQUIRED | | | EACH TIME NEW ENERGY CALCS ARE SUBMITTED.PLEASE | | | CONFIRM THAT ALL BUILDING COMPONENTS ON THE ENERGY CALC | | | INPUT DATA REPORT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS (DOORS, | | | WINDOWS, INSULATION, HOT WATER HEATER, FLOOR AREA, | | | ETC.).(ADDED 4/8; INFORMED ARCHITECT.) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
Time |
12:46 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
Time |
11:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-17 12:56:58 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07040695 | | | ADD: 2633 OKEECHOBEE BLVD | | | CONT: "PLAN REVIEW" | | | TEL: (561)744-3399 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 2NDREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 3)FBC 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOILS, 1802.2.1 | | | QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF | | | THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE | | | SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE NECESSARY | | | INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH 1802.6 | | | . | | | | | | | | | 4 ) 109.3.10* IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL CONSTRUCTION | | | ACTIVITY REGULATED BY THIS CODE SHALL BE PERMORMED IN A | | | MANNER SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT THE | | | CONDITION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, UNLESS SUCH ACTIVITY IS | | | PERMITTED TO AFFECT SAID PROPERTY PURSUANT TO A CONSENT | | | BY THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER | | | TERMS & CONDITIONS AGREEABLE TO THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY | | | OWNER.THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE CONTROL | | | OF DUST, NOISE, WATER OR DRAINAGE RUN-OFF, | | | DEBRIS, AND THE STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT | | | HISTORIC SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE FLOWS SERVING ADJACENT | | | PROPERTIES, & MAY REQUIRE SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN | | | COMPLYING WITH ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE | | | POSITIVE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES. ACCORDINGLY, | | | DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS, AND OWNERS OF ALL NEW | | | RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, POOLS, | | | PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, OR SIMILAR | | | ITEMS, ON EXISTING PROPERTIES RESULTING IN A DECREASE | | | IN EXCESS OF 800SQ FT OF PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY | | | PARCELL SHALL AS A PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A | | | PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED DRAINAGE PLAN CLEARLY | | | INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PARAGRAPH. UPON | | | COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT, A CERTIFICATE FROM A | | | LICENSED ENGINEER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR | | | IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | | | | | | 5) 109.3.10.1 HURICANE PROTECTION. IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL | | | FOR ANY PERSON TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS | | | EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO REMAIN LOOSE OR | | | OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE FROM 24 HRS. | | | AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED UNTIL THE | | | HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN | | | LIFTED. ALL SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND | | | DEBRIS SHALL BE EITHER REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION | | | SITE OR SECURED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE THE | | | DANGER OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND | | | DEBRIS CAUSING DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH | | | WINDS.ANY PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO REMOVE OR | | | SECURE THE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS | | | WITHIN 24 HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED | | | SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $500.00. IN | | | ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, A LICENSED CONTRACTOR WHO | | | VIOLATES THIS SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE | | | PURSUANT TO SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | | | | 6) SHEET AS0.1 | | | 6A-B) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 6C) 2ND REQUEST, BOTTOM CENTER OF PLAN IS ILLEGABLE, | | | PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 6D)2ND REQUEST,PRESSURES FOR OPENINGS ARE ALL LOW | | | PLEASE SEE 2006 FBC TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2). | | | | | | 7) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET AS0.4 SECTION 7720/ 102 (1) | | | CORRECT TO THE FBC 2004/W2006 AMENDMENTS (2) CORRECT | | | ASCE 7-98 TO ASCE 7-02 | | | | | | 8) SHEET S1.0 : | | | 8A) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 8B) 2ND REQUESST, CORRECT WIND SPEED ZONE SEE FIGURE | | | 1609. | | | | | | 8C) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 8D) 2ND REQUEST, WIND PRESSURES FORFLAT ROOF ZONES 1, | | | 2 & 3 ARE LOW SEE TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2) | | | | | | 8E)2ND REQUEST,WIND PRESSURE ZONES FOR WALL ZONES 4 & | | | 5 ARE BOTH LOW 10 SQ FT- 100 SQ FT. | | | | | | 9)1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. IN WIND-BORNE | | | DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE | | | PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS | | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF | | | GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES | | | POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH | | | AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE | | | TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. | | | GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE | | | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. | | | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 | | | M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL | | | MISSILE TEST. | | | | | | FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 | | | COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT | | | TESTING REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: A) | | | STOREFRONT SYSTEMS - THE REPORT SUBMITTED NO IMPACT | | | TESTING | | | B) READY ACCESS ALUMINIUM DRIVE THROUGH, MAY BE ISSUES | | | WITH MULLIONS AND TRNSOM ABOVE | | | C) YKK AP 35H OUTSWING DOORHIGHLIGHT TYPE OF GLAZING | | | TO BE INSTALLED. | | | D) INGERSOLL- RAND H16-4 GOOD FOR +/- 70 OK | | | E) SOPREMA NODIFIED ROOFING - NO SUBSYSTEM INDICATED | | | F) EFIS SYSTEMS- NO REPORT SUBMITTED | | | G) METAL ROOFING- NO REPORT SUBMITTED | | | H) TRUSS ANCHORS AND CLIPS ( CURVED CANOPY) | | | | | | 10A)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO | | | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR | | | INFORMATION | | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | | | | | 10B)PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT | | | IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT | | | HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR | | | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE | | | 9B-72. | | | | | | 11) 2ND REQUEST' READY ACCESS ALUMINIUM DRIVE THROUGH | | | WINDOW SHOWN ON SHEET AS2.1 INDICATES A SECTION 3 AS7.1 | | | IS MISSING, PLEASE PROVIDE. | | | 11A) SHEET S2.1 SAME WINDOW INDICATES A 4X4 STEEL | | | COLUMN BETWEEN TWO WINDOWS BUT NONE IN THE CORENER, IS | | | THIS CORNER TO BE BUTT GLAZING? | | | | | | 12)2ND REQUEST, SHEET S2.1 & S2.2 BOTH NEED TO | | | CORRECT THE WIND SPEEDZONE, SEE FIGURE 1609. | | | | | | 13) 2ND REQUEST, THERE APPEARS TO BE A DESCREPANCY | | | BETWEEN AS6.3 FOUNDATION DETAILS AND S3.1 DETAIL# 1. IN | | | ALL CASES SEE 2114.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR TERMITE | | | INSPECTION. 2114.2 CONCRETE BEARING LEDGE. | | | BRICK , STONE OR OTHER VENEER SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY A | | | CONCRETE BEARING LEDGE AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE TOTAL | | | THICKNESS OF THE BRICK , STONE OR OTHER VENEER, WHICH | | | IS POURED INTEGRALLY WITH THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION. NO | | | SUPPLEMENTAL CONCRETE FOUNDATION POURS WHICH WILL | | | CREATE A HIDDEN COLD JOINT SHALL BE USED WITHOUT | | | SUPPLEMENTAL TREATMENT IN THE FOUNDATION UNLESS THERE | | | IS AN APPROVED PHYSICAL BARRIER. AN APPROVED PHYSICAL | | | BARRIER SHALL ALSO BE INSTALLED FROM BELOW THE WALL | | | SILL PLATE OR FIRST BLOCK COURSE HORIZONTALLY TO EMBED | | | IN A MORTAR JOINT. IF MASONRY VENEER EXTENDS BELOW | | | GRADE, A TERMITE PROTECTIVE TREATMENT MUST BE APPLIED | | | TO THE CAVITY CREATED BETWEEN THE VENEER AND THE | | | FOUNDATION, IN LIEU OF A PHYSICAL BARRIER. EXCEPTION: | | | VENEER SUPPORTED BY A SHELF, ANGLE OR LINTEL SECURED TO | | | THE FOUNDATION SIDEWALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530/ASCE | | | 5/TMS 402, PROVIDED AT LEAST A 6-INCH (152 MM) CLEAR | | | INSPECTION SPACE OF THE FOUNDATION SIDEWALL EXTERIOR | | | EXIST BETWEEN THE VENEER AND THE TOP OF ANY SOIL, SOD, | | | MULCH OR OTHER ORGANIC LANDSCAPING COMPONENT, DECK, | | | APRON, PORCH, WALK OR ANY OTHER WORK IMMEDIATELY | | | ADJACENT TO OR ADJOINING THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 14)2ND REQUEST,AS6.3 AND AS8.1 BOTH INDICATE VARIOUS | | | BRICK APPLICATIONS NO MENTION OFWALL TIES OR JOINT | | | REINFORCEMENT. 2103.11.2 JOINT REINFORCEMENT. JOINT | | | REINFORCEMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM A 951. THE MAXIMUM | | | SPACING OF CROSSWIRES IN LADDER-TYPE JOINT | | | REINFORCEMENT AND OF POINT OF CONNECTION OF CROSS WIRES | | | TO LONGITUDINAL WIRES OF TRUSS-TYPE REINFORCEMENT SHALL | | | BE 16 INCHES (400 MM). | | | 2103.11.5 ANCHORS, TIES AND ACCESSORIES. | | | ANCHORS, TIES AND ACCESSORIES SHALL CONFORM TO THE | | | FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ASTM A 36 FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL; | | | ASTM A 82 FOR PLAIN STEEL WIRE FOR CONCRETE | | | REINFORCEMENT; ASTM A 185 FOR PLAIN STEEL-WELDED WIRE | | | FABRIC FOR CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT; ASTM A 167, TYPE | | | 304, FOR STAINLESS AND HEAT-RESISTING CHROMIUM-NICKEL | | | STEEL PLATE, SHEET AND STRIP AND ASTM A 366 FOR | | | COLD-ROLLED CARBON STEEL SHEET, COMMERCIAL QUALITY. | | | | | | 15)2ND REQUEST,AS5.2 AND AS6.3 BOTH INDICATE A METAL | | | CORNICE SECTION AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE ROOF. THE | | | DETSIL 8 SHEET AS5.2 INDICATES TO SEE THE STRUCTURAL | | | SHEETS FOR MORE DETAIL, | | | THERE ARE NO STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR THIS AREAA OF THE | | | BUILDING. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE | | | FASTENING OF THIS CORNICE AND HOW IT WILL ACT IN A HIGH | | | WIND EVENT. | | | | | | 16) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 17) 2ND REQUEST,AS5.3 DETAIL 3 METAL AWNING PLEASE | | | PROVIDE TO WHICH IS THIS AWNING WILL BE DESIGNED TO? | | | DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURAL FRAMING MEMBERS SHALL BE BASED | | | ON RATIONAL ANALYSIS, USING THE APPLICABLE WIND LOADS | | | OF CHAPTER 16 AS SHOWN BELOW: | | | 3105.4.2.1 | | | THE WIND DESIGN LOADS FOR ANY FABRIC OR | | | MEMBRANE-COVERED STRUCTURE DESIGNED WITH A QUICK | | | REMOVAL OR BREAKAWAY MEMBRANE OR FABRIC AT WIND | | | VELOCITIES OF 75 MPH, SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING | | | CRITERIA: | | | 1.MINIMUM WIND VELOCITY OF 3-SECOND WIND GUST 90 | | | MPH | | | 2.IMPORTANCE FACTOR BASED ON LOW HAZARD TO HUMAN | | | LIFE OF 0.77. | | | 3.EXPOSURE CATEGORY B FOR OR C AS DEFINED IN | | | CHAPTER 16 . | | | 3105.4.2.2 | | | THE WIND DESIGN LOADS FOR ANY FABRIC OR MEMBRANE | | | COVERED STRUCTURE DESIGNED WITH A PERMANENT OR | | | NONREMOVABLE FABRIC OR MEMBRANE, SHALL BE BASED ON THE | | | FOLLOWING CRITERIA: | | | 1.MINIMUM WIND VELOCITY AS REQUIRED IN CHAPTER 16 | | | . | | | 2.IMPORTANCE FACTOR BASED ON LOW HAZARD TO HUMAN | | | LIFE OF 0.77. | | | 3.EXPOSURE CATEGORY B OR C AS DEFINED IN CHAPTER | | | 16 . | | | 3105.4.2 | | | THE FABRIC PORTIONS OF AWNINGS FABRIC COVERED FRAMES | | | SHALL BE SECURELY LACED, TIED OR OTHERWISE FASTENED TO | | | THE FRAME; NO RAFTER OR FRONT BAR WILL BE PERMITTED IN | | | POCKETS; AND IN NO CASE SHALL A ROLLING CURTAIN BE | | | CAUSED TO OPERATE OVER A CANOPY FRAME. | | | 3105.4.3 | | | THE HORIZONTAL PROJECTION OF CANTILEVERED PORTIONS | | | SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN TWO TIMES THE HEIGHT, EXCEPT | | | WHERE THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT PERMIT A | | | PROPER INSTALLATION; IN WHICH CASE, VARIANCE MAY BE | | | PERMITTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, BASED ON SPECIAL | | | DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. | | | AWNINGS | | | 3105.5 RIGID AWNINGS AND CANOPY SHUTTERS. | | | 3105.5.1 LOADS. | | | RIGID AWNINGS AND CANOPY SHUTTERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO | | | RESIST THE LOADS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 16 OF THIS CODE | | | EXCEPT THAT STRUCTURES OR PARTS THEREOF WHICH ARE | | | INTENDED TO BE REMOVED OR REPOSITIONED DURING PERIODS | | | OF HIGH WIND VELOCITY SHALL BE DESIGNED IN THEIR OPEN | | | OR EXTENDED POSITION TO DESIGN PRESSURES BASED ON A | | | BASIC WIND SPEED OF MINIMUM 90 MPH, 3-SECOND WIND GUST | | | WITH APPLICABLE SHAPE FACTORS AND TO RESIST NOT LESS | | | THAN 10 PSF (478 PA) ROOF LIVE LOAD. | | | 3105.5.2 | | | WHERE SUCH STRUCTURE IS INTENDED TO BE FOLDED OR | | | OTHERWISE REPOSITIONED TO CLOSE AN OPENING WHEN THE | | | BUILDING IS UNATTENDED OR ACT AS A STORM SHUTTER THE | | | DESIGN IN THE CLOSED POSITION SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH | | | CHAPTER 16 AND SHALL BE IMPACT RESISTANT IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH SECTION1609.1.4. | | | 3105.5.3 | | | STRUCTURES DESIGNED TO BE READILY REMOVED OR | | | REPOSITIONED DURING PERIODS OF HIGH WIND VELOCITY SHALL | | | BE POSTED WITH A LEGIBLE AND READILY VISIBLE DECAL OR | | | PAINTED INSTRUCTIONS TO THE OWNER OR TENANT TO REMOVE | | | OR REPOSITION THE STRUCTURE OR PART THEREOF DURING SUCH | | | PERIODS OF TIME AS ARE DESIGNATED BY THE U.S. WEATHER | | | BUREAU AS BEING A HURRICANE WARNING OR ALERT. | | | | | | 18)2ND REQUEST,AS5.3 CURVED CANOPY SECTION, THESE | | | DETAILS DO NOT INDICATE THE WHAT TYPE OF ROOF | | | SHEATHING, NOR THICKNESS WILL BE PLACED ON THE CURVED | | | ROOF SECTION. THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS3.1 DETAILS SAY TO | | | SEE PLAN? | | | | | | 19) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET A2.0 INDICATES THAT WALL TYPE# 1 | | | IS AN EXISTING WALL? ISN'T THIS A NEW BUILDING? | | | | | | 20-23) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS | | | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF | | | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST | | | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT | | | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC | | | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC | | | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-12 |
Time |
15:53 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-12 |
Time |
13:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-12 17:57:29 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07040695 | | | ADD: 2633 OKEECHOBEE BLVD | | | CONT: "PLAN REVIEW" | | | TEL: (561)744-3399 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 3)FBC 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOILS, 1802.2.1 | | | QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF | | | THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE | | | SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE NECESSARY | | | INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH 1802.6 | | | . | | | | | | | | | 4 ) 109.3.10* IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REGULATED BY | | | THIS CODE SHALL BE PERMORMED IN A MANNER | | | SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT THE | | | CONDITION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, UNLESS | | | SUCH ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED TO AFFECT | | | SAID PROPERTY PURSUANT TO A CONSENT BY | | | THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER | | | TERMS & CONDITIONS AGREEABLE TO THE | | | APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER.THIS INCLUDES | | | BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE CONTROL OF | | | DUST, NOISE, WATER OR DRAINAGE RUN-OFF, | | | DEBRIS, AND THE STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION | | | MATERIALS. NEW CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY | | | SHALL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT HISTORIC | | | SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE FLOWS SERVING | | | ADJACENT PROPERTIES, & MAY REQUIRE | | | SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN COMPLYING WITH | | | ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE | | | POSITIVE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES.ACCORDINGLY, | | | DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS, | | | AND OWNERS OF ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL | | | DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, POOLS, | | | PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, OR SIMILAR | | | ITEMS, ON EXISTING PROPERTIES RESULTING | | | IN A DECREASE IN EXCESS OF 800SQ FT OF | | | PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY PARCELL SHALL | | | AS A PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A | | | PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED DRAINAGE PLAN | | | CLEARLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | | PARAGRAPH. UPON COMPLETION OF THE | | | IMPROVEMENT, A CERTIFICATE FROM A | | | LICENSED ENGINEER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO | | | THE INSPECTOR IN ORDER TO RECEIVE | | | APPROVAL OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | | | | | | 5) 109.3.10.1 HURICANE PROTECTION. | | | IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO | | | ALLOW CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS | | | EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO REMAIN LOOSE OR | | | OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION | | | SITE FROM 24 HRS. AFTER A HURRICANE | | | WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED UNTIL THE | | | HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN | | | LIFTED. ALL SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, | | | EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE EITHER | | | REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR | | | SECURED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE | | | THE DANGER OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION | | | MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS CAUSING | | | DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH | | | WINDS.ANY PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO | | | REMOVE OR SECURE THE CONSTRUCTION | | | MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS WITHIN | | | 24 HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN | | | ISSUED SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO | | | EXCEED $500.00. IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, A | | | LICENSED | | | CONTRACTOR WHO VIOLATES THIS SECTION | | | SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE PURSUANT | | | TO SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | | | | 6) SHEET AS0.1 | | | 6A) PLEASE UPDATE THE APPLICABLE CODE, 2004 FBC WITH | | | 2006 AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 6B) TABLE 503 HEIGTH AND AREA PLEASE CORRECT ALLOWED | | | STORIES TO (1). | | | | | | 6C) BOTTOM CENTER OF PLAN IS ILLEGABLE, PLEASE | | | CORRECT. | | | | | | 6D) PRESSURES FOR OPENINGS ARE ALL LOW PLEASE SEE 2006 | | | FBC TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2). | | | | | | 7) SHEET AS0.4 SECTION 7720/ 102 (1) CORRECT TO THE FBC | | | 2004/W2006 AMENDMENTS | | | | | | (2) CORRECT ASCE 7-98 TO ASCE 7-02 | | | | | | | | | 8) SHEET S1.0 : | | | 8A) CORRECT DESIGNED TO THE 2001 FBC | | | | | | 8B) CORRECT WIND SPEED ZONE SEE FIGURE1609. | | | | | | 8C) CORRECT ASCE 7-98 TO ASCE 7-02 | | | | | | 8D) WIND PRESSURES FORFLAT ROOF ZONES 1, 2 & 3 ARE | | | LOW SEE TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2) | | | | | | 8E) WIND PRESSURE ZONES FOR WALL ZONES 4 & 5 ARE BOTH | | | LOW 10 SQ FT- 100 SQ FT. | | | | | | 9)1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. IN WIND-BORNE | | | DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE | | | PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS | | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF | | | GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES | | | POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH | | | AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE | | | TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. | | | GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE | | | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. | | | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 | | | M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL | | | MISSILE TEST. | | | FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 | | | COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT | | | TESTING REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:A) | | | STOREFRONT SYSTEMS - THE REPORT SUBMITTED NO IMPACT | | | TESTING | | | B) READY ACCESS ALUMINIUM DRIVE THROUGH, MAY BE ISSUES | | | WITH MULLIONS AND TRNSOM ABOVE | | | C) YKK AP 35H OUTSWING DOORHIGHLIGHT TYPE OF GLAZING | | | TO BE INSTALLED. | | | D) INGERSOLL- RAND H16-4 GOOD FOR +/- 70 OK | | | E) SOPREMA NODIFIED ROOFING - NO SUBSYSTEM INDICATED | | | F) EFIS SYSTEMS- NO REPORT SUBMITTED | | | G) METAL ROOFING- NO REPORT SUBMITTED | | | H) TRUSS ANCHORS AND CLIPS ( CURVED CANOPY) | | | | | | 10)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO | | | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR | | | INFORMATION | | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE | | | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER | | | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, | | | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE | | | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 11) READY ACCESS ALUMINIUM DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW SHOWN | | | ON SHEET AS2.1 INDICATES A SECTION 3 AS7.1 IS MISSING, | | | PLEASE PROVIDE. | | | 11A) SHEET S2.1 SAME WINDOW INDICATES A 4X4 STEEL | | | COLUMN BETWEEN TWO WINDOWS BUT NONE IN THE CORENER, IS | | | THIS CORNER TO BE BUTT GLAZING? | | | | | | 12)SHEET S2.1 & S2.2 BOTH NEED TO CORRECT THE WIND | | | SPEEDZONE, SEE FIGURE 1609. | | | | | | 13) THERE APPEARS TO BE A DESCREPANCY BETWEEN AS6.3 | | | FOUNDATION DETAILS AND S3.1 DETAIL# 1.IN ALL CASES | | | SEE 2114.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR TERMITE INSPECTION. 2114.2 | | | CONCRETE BEARING LEDGE. | | | BRICK , STONE OR OTHER VENEER SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY A | | | CONCRETE BEARING LEDGE AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE TOTAL | | | THICKNESS OF THE BRICK , STONE OR OTHER VENEER, WHICH | | | IS POURED INTEGRALLY WITH THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION. NO | | | SUPPLEMENTAL CONCRETE FOUNDATION POURS WHICH WILL | | | CREATE A HIDDEN COLD JOINT SHALL BE USED WITHOUT | | | SUPPLEMENTAL TREATMENT IN THE FOUNDATION UNLESS THERE | | | IS AN APPROVED PHYSICAL BARRIER. AN APPROVED PHYSICAL | | | BARRIER SHALL ALSO BE INSTALLED FROM BELOW THE WALL | | | SILL PLATE OR FIRST BLOCK COURSE HORIZONTALLY TO EMBED | | | IN A MORTAR JOINT. IF MASONRY VENEER EXTENDS BELOW | | | GRADE, A TERMITE PROTECTIVE TREATMENT MUST BE APPLIED | | | TO THE CAVITY CREATED BETWEEN THE VENEER AND THE | | | FOUNDATION, IN LIEU OF A PHYSICAL BARRIER. EXCEPTION: | | | VENEER SUPPORTED BY A SHELF, ANGLE OR LINTEL SECURED TO | | | THE FOUNDATION SIDEWALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530/ASCE | | | 5/TMS 402, PROVIDED AT LEAST A 6-INCH (152 MM) CLEAR | | | INSPECTION SPACE OF THE FOUNDATION SIDEWALL EXTERIOR | | | EXIST BETWEEN THE VENEER AND THE TOP OF ANY SOIL, SOD, | | | MULCH OR OTHER ORGANIC LANDSCAPING COMPONENT, DECK, | | | APRON, PORCH, WALK OR ANY OTHER WORK IMMEDIATELY | | | ADJACENT TO OR ADJOINING THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 14)AS6.3 AND AS8.1 BOTH INDICATE VARIOUS BRICK | | | APPLICATIONS NO MENTION OFWALL TIES OR JOINT | | | REINFORCEMENT. 2103.11.2 JOINT REINFORCEMENT. JOINT | | | REINFORCEMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM A 951. THE MAXIMUM | | | SPACING OF CROSSWIRES IN LADDER-TYPE JOINT | | | REINFORCEMENT AND OF POINT OF CONNECTION OF CROSS WIRES | | | TO LONGITUDINAL WIRES OF TRUSS-TYPE REINFORCEMENT SHALL | | | BE 16 INCHES (400 MM). | | | 2103.11.5 ANCHORS, TIES AND ACCESSORIES. | | | ANCHORS, TIES AND ACCESSORIES SHALL CONFORM TO THE | | | FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ASTM A 36 FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL; | | | ASTM A 82 FOR PLAIN STEEL WIRE FOR CONCRETE | | | REINFORCEMENT; ASTM A 185 FOR PLAIN STEEL-WELDED WIRE | | | FABRIC FOR CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT; ASTM A 167, TYPE | | | 304, FOR STAINLESS AND HEAT-RESISTING CHROMIUM-NICKEL | | | STEEL PLATE, SHEET AND STRIP AND ASTM A 366 FOR | | | COLD-ROLLED CARBON STEEL SHEET, COMMERCIAL QUALITY. | | | | | | 15) AS5.2 AND AS6.3 BOTH INDICATE A METAL CORNICE | | | SECTION AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE ROOF. THE DETSIL 8 | | | SHEET AS5.2 INDICATES TO SEE THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS FOR | | | MORE DETAIL, | | | THERE ARE NO STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR THIS AREAA OF THE | | | BUILDING. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE | | | FASTENING OF THIS CORNICE AND HOW IT WILL ACT IN A HIGH | | | WIND EVENT. | | | | | | 16) AS5.2 DETAIL# 1 INDICATES A ROOF DRAIN AND THE | | | SECONDARY OVER FLOW, THE OVERFLOW IS NOT TO BE AT THE | | | SAME LEVEL AS THE MAIN DRAIN. OVERFLOW | | | 1514.4.2 OVERFLOW DRAINS AND SCUPPERS. | | | WHERE ROOF DRAINS ARE REQUIRED, OVERFLOW DRAINS OR | | | OVERFLOW SCUPPERS SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, PLUMBING SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE | | | INLET FLOW LINE LOCATED NOT LESS THAN 2 INCHES (51 MM) | | | OR MORE THAN 4 INCHES (102 MM) ABOVE THE LOW POINT OF | | | THE FINISHED ROOFING SURFACE, EXCLUDING SUMPS. OVERFLOW | | | SCUPPERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES (102 MM) IN ANY | | | DIMENSION AND SHALL BE LOCATED AS CLOSE AS PRACTICAL TO | | | REQUIRED VERTICAL LEADERS, CONDUCTORS OR DOWNSPOUTS. | | | OVERFLOW DRAINS AND SCUPPERS SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, PLUMBING , AND SECTION 1617 OF | | | THIS CODE. | | | | | | 17) AS5.3 DETAIL 3 METAL AWNING PLEASE PROVIDE TO WHICH | | | IS THIS AWNING TO BE DESIGNED T? DESIGN OF THE | | | STRUCTURAL FRAMING MEMBERS SHALL BE BASED ON RATIONAL | | | ANALYSIS, USING THE APPLICABLE WIND LOADS OF CHAPTER 16 | | | AS SHOWN BELOW: | | | 3105.4.2.1 | | | THE WIND DESIGN LOADS FOR ANY FABRIC OR | | | MEMBRANE-COVERED STRUCTURE DESIGNED WITH A QUICK | | | REMOVAL OR BREAKAWAY MEMBRANE OR FABRIC AT WIND | | | VELOCITIES OF 75 MPH, SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING | | | CRITERIA: | | | 1.MINIMUM WIND VELOCITY OF 3-SECOND WIND GUST 90 | | | MPH | | | 2.IMPORTANCE FACTOR BASED ON LOW HAZARD TO HUMAN | | | LIFE OF 0.77. | | | 3.EXPOSURE CATEGORY B FOR OR C AS DEFINED IN | | | CHAPTER 16 . | | | 3105.4.2.2 | | | THE WIND DESIGN LOADS FOR ANY FABRIC OR MEMBRANE | | | COVERED STRUCTURE DESIGNED WITH A PERMANENT OR | | | NONREMOVABLE FABRIC OR MEMBRANE, SHALL BE BASED ON THE | | | FOLLOWING CRITERIA: | | | 1.MINIMUM WIND VELOCITY AS REQUIRED IN CHAPTER 16 | | | . | | | 2.IMPORTANCE FACTOR BASED ON LOW HAZARD TO HUMAN | | | LIFE OF 0.77. | | | 3.EXPOSURE CATEGORY B OR C AS DEFINED IN CHAPTER | | | 16 . | | | 3105.4.2 | | | THE FABRIC PORTIONS OF AWNINGS FABRIC COVERED FRAMES | | | SHALL BE SECURELY LACED, TIED OR OTHERWISE FASTENED TO | | | THE FRAME; NO RAFTER OR FRONT BAR WILL BE PERMITTED IN | | | POCKETS; AND IN NO CASE SHALL A ROLLING CURTAIN BE | | | CAUSED TO OPERATE OVER A CANOPY FRAME. | | | 3105.4.3 | | | THE HORIZONTAL PROJECTION OF CANTILEVERED PORTIONS | | | SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN TWO TIMES THE HEIGHT, EXCEPT | | | WHERE THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT PERMIT A | | | PROPER INSTALLATION; IN WHICH CASE, VARIANCE MAY BE | | | PERMITTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, BASED ON SPECIAL | | | DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. | | | AWNINGS | | | 3105.5 RIGID AWNINGS AND CANOPY SHUTTERS. | | | 3105.5.1 LOADS. | | | RIGID AWNINGS AND CANOPY SHUTTERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO | | | RESIST THE LOADS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 16 OF THIS CODE | | | EXCEPT THAT STRUCTURES OR PARTS THEREOF WHICH ARE | | | INTENDED TO BE REMOVED OR REPOSITIONED DURING PERIODS | | | OF HIGH WIND VELOCITY SHALL BE DESIGNED IN THEIR OPEN | | | OR EXTENDED POSITION TO DESIGN PRESSURES BASED ON A | | | BASIC WIND SPEED OF MINIMUM 90 MPH, 3-SECOND WIND GUST | | | WITH APPLICABLE SHAPE FACTORS AND TO RESIST NOT LESS | | | THAN 10 PSF (478 PA) ROOF LIVE LOAD. | | | 3105.5.2 | | | WHERE SUCH STRUCTURE IS INTENDED TO BE FOLDED OR | | | OTHERWISE REPOSITIONED TO CLOSE AN OPENING WHEN THE | | | BUILDING IS UNATTENDED OR ACT AS A STORM SHUTTER THE | | | DESIGN IN THE CLOSED POSITION SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH | | | CHAPTER 16 AND SHALL BE IMPACT RESISTANT IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH SECTION1609.1.4. | | | 3105.5.3 | | | STRUCTURES DESIGNED TO BE READILY REMOVED OR | | | REPOSITIONED DURING PERIODS OF HIGH WIND VELOCITY SHALL | | | BE POSTED WITH A LEGIBLE AND READILY VISIBLE DECAL OR | | | PAINTED INSTRUCTIONS TO THE OWNER OR TENANT TO REMOVE | | | OR REPOSITION THE STRUCTURE OR PART THEREOF DURING SUCH | | | PERIODS OF TIME AS ARE DESIGNATED BY THE U.S. WEATHER | | | BUREAU AS BEING A HURRICANE WARNING OR ALERT. | | | | | | 18) AS5.3 CURVED CANOPY SECTION, THESE DETAILS DO NOT | | | INDICATE WHAT TYPE OF ROOF SHEATHING WILL BE PLACED ON | | | THE CURVED ROOF SECTION. THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS3.1 | | | DETAILS SAY TO SEE PLAN? | | | | | | 19)SHEET A2.0 INDICATES THAT WALL TYPE# 1 IS AN | | | EXISTING WALL? ISN'T THIS A NEW BUILDING/ | | | | | | 20) AS0.1 INDICATES IN THE OCCUPANCY LOAD A LOAD OF 39 | | | WHEREAS G1.0 THE PLANS SHOW A OCCUPANT LOAD OF 41 + AN | | | ADDITIONAL 17 ON AN EXTERIOR PATIO ? | | | | | | 21) SITE INFO ESTIMATES THE COST OF $150,000.00, LOW. | | | | | | 22) SHEET G2.0 INDICATES THERE TO BE AN EXISTING PATIO, | | | EXISTING RAILING? | | | | | | 23)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, | | | IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE | | | ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A | | | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF | | | THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-11-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-11-04 |
Time |
14:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-11-04 |
Time |
14:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-04 14:46:53 | PLANS ARE ROUTED TO COMM BOARD #37 AS THERE ARE SOME | | | NEW SHEETS IN SETS NOT YET REVIEWED AND STAMPED BY | | | BUILDING. THESE HAVE A NEW DATE OF 10/2/08. | | | THERE ARE ALSO FS SHEETS NOT YET STAMPED AND REVIEWED | | | ALONG WIHT HYDRAULIC CALCUALTIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-31 |
Time |
08:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-31 |
Time |
08:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-31 08:11:25 | | | | ** DENIED REVIEW** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: ** A CALL WAS PLACED TO THE CHUCK FROM | | | FRONTIER BUILDING. LET HIM KNOW THERE WERE SEVERAL | | | SHEETS IN ONE OF THE SETS WHICH WERE NOT SIGNED OR | | | SEALED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. AS THIS IS THE ONLY | | | COMMENT FOR NEW SHEETS NEEDED THESE MAY BE BROUGHT IN | | | WITHOUT FEE. THE OLD SHEETS WHICH ARE NOT SIGNED OR | | | SEALED NEED TO BE REMOVED AND HAVE NEW SHEETS INSERTED. | | | THE MECHANICAL REVIEW STILL NEEDS TO TAKE PLACE. FS | | | 471.025, FAC 61G15-23.002 | | | PLEASE SEE LIST BELOW. | | | E1.1,1.2, 3.0,4.1 ARE NEEDED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
Time |
13:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-22 |
Time |
13:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-22 13:14:28 | ** DENIED4TH REVIEW** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE EXACT SAME COMMENTS FROM | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | ARE NOT FILLED OUT CORRECTLY. PLEASE SEE THE | | | CERTIFICATION SHEET DOES NOT CONTAIN THE PRINTED NAME | | | OF DESIGNER(S) ETC. IN FACT IT LIST THE ENGINEERING | | | FIRM (KAMM) AS THE ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING | | | DESIGNER(S). HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN CLEARLY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR EACH OF THESE IS NOT THE FIRM | | | (KAMM). | | | PLEASE BE SURE THESE ARE DATED WHEN NEW SIGNED AND | | | SEALED CALCULATIONS ARE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | COMPLETE. | | | PLEASE BE SURE THE OWNER AGENT IS SIGNED. | | | FBC 13-103.1, FAC 61G15-23.002, FS471.025 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS MENTIONED ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS | | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS IS IN THE INPUT | | | DATA REPORT FOR ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | THERE ARE STILL FIXTURES ON THE PLANS WHICH ARE NOT IN | | | THE CALCULATIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES, SOME OF THESE ARE | | | LABELED AS EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURES WHICH ARE OFF | | | DURING NORMAL OPERATION. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE!! THERE | | | ARE OUTSIDE LIGHTS ON PLANS WHICH ARE EMERGENCY BATTERY | | | BACK UP FIXTURES HOWEVER THEY ARE ON FOR NORMAL USE AND | | | GENERAL ILLUMINATION. SOME OF THESE ARE ALSO SHOWN WITH | | | BATTERY BACK UP. | | | PLEASE SEE PLANS ALSO LIST ON FIXTURE LEGEND FIXTURES | | | AS *EXTERIOR* HOWEVER PLANS CLEARLY SHOW THESE INSIDE | | | THE BUILDING. | | | PLEASE SEE THE WATTAGE SHALL BE BASED ON THE FIXTURE | | | RATING, NOT BULBS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES ON PLANS AND THE | | | WATTAGE OF THOSE FIXTURES ARE ONE GAIN NOT ON THE IDR. | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | ANOTHER WOULD BE SITE LIGHTING PLANS, AND FIXTURES. | | | NONE FOUND YET, THERE IS MOST CERTAINLY SITE LIGHTING | | | WHICH WAS EXISTING AND WAS SHOWN ON PREVIOUS PLANS | | | SUBMITTED. (POLE LIGHTS). WILL THERE BE SITE LIGHTING? | | | WILL EXISTING POLE LIGHTS BE RE-USED? WILL EXISTING | | | POLE LIGHTS BE REMOVED? ETC. | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | | PLEASE SEE TRACK LIGHTING DOES NO COORDINATE. MUST USE | | | MAXIMUM VA PER FIXTURE, OR 30VA PER FT WHICH EVER IS | | | GREATER. WHERE ARE THESE ON THE IDR? THESE ARE NOT | | | SHOWN AS LOW VOLTAGE. | | | PLEASE SEE ANOTHER EXAMPLE IS THE EXTERIOR DOORS. | | | PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS AS DOORS ON PLANS | | | ARE NOT THE SAME AS THE IDR. | | | 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. 13-400.3.A | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT ALL EM LTS SHALL BE CIRCUITED | | | PER 700.12F | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LIFE SAFETY PLANS DO NOT | | | CORRELATE WITH THE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR LIGHTING. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE AND SUBMIT. | | | FBC 106.1.2 FOR COORDINATION AND LS 101 7.8,7.9. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW WHEN PLANS ARE RESUBMITTED ALONG | | | WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS THESE ALL SHALL COORDINATE. AS | | | CORRECT DOCUMENTS WERE NOT SUBMITTED ON SOME OF THE | | | PREVIOUS REVIEWS FS 553.80(2) WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A | | | FEE. PLEASE KNOW IF THE CODE SECTIONS ARE REPEATED ON | | | THE FOLLOWING REVIEW A 4X FEE WILL BE ASSESSED FOR THE | | | PLAN REVIEW PORTION OF THE BASE PERMIT FEE AS REQUIRED | | | BY STATUTE. THIS FEE WILL BE $5,100.00 | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
Time |
14:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
Time |
14:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-11 14:36:33 | ** DENIED** | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | PLEASE ONLY SUBMIT COMPLETE PLANS FOR SCOPE OF WORK AS | | | APPLIED. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SETS OF | | | PLANS FOR THIS LOCATION. PLEASE CORRELATE SCOPE OF WORK | | | AND SUBMIT ONLY PLANS WHICH ARE TO BE REVIEWED. | | | FBC 106.1 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE OF THE 5 SETS OF ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED, NONE MEET THE FBC CHAPTER 13. | | | PLEASE SEE WHITE OUT AND HAND DRAWN CHANGES WHICH ARE | | | NOT PERMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE INCORRECT VERSION WAS SUBMITTED ON ALL | | | FIVE SETS.13-400.3.A. | | | PLEASE SEE LIGHTING ON THE INPUT DATA REPORTS DO NOT | | | MATCH WITH PLANS, ALTHOUGH IT IS UNCLEAR WHICH PLANS IS | | | TO BE REVIEWED. IN EITHER CASE THE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT | | | CORRECT. | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-09 |
Time |
14:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-09 |
Time |
13:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-09 14:45:23 | 2007-09-09 14:45:23 | | | | | | *** DENIED 2ND REVIEW *** | | | | | | ** THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | STARBUCKS LOCATION AT 2623 OKEECHOBEE BLVD. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH | | | NUMEROUS NEW COMMENTS BASED ON THE CHANGES MADE TO | | | MADE, THE PLANS SUBMITTED AND THE SCOPE SHOWN ON PLANS | | | NOT ON THIS PROJECT ETC. PLEASE SEE COMMENTS BELOW FOR | | | FURTHER EXPLANATION. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THESE PLANS AS SUBMITTED ARE | | | SUPPOSED TO BE FOR A * NEW FREE STANDING BUILDING* YET | | | MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SHEETS M-1, M-2, E1.0-E4.1 | | | INDICATE AT NUMEROUS LOCATIONS ITEMS WHICH ARE | | | *EXISTING*. THIS IS A NEW BUILDING BEING CONSTRUCTED ON | | | AN EMPTY LOT AND ALL OF THESE ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL | | | ITEMS CAN NOT POSSIBLY EXIST. THE PREVIOUS | | | BUILDING/STRUCTURE WHICH WAS A GAS STATION WAS | | | DEMOLISHED SOME TIME AGO. | | | THIS IS THE SECOND TIME PLANS ARE BEING SUBMITTED WHICH | | | SEEMS TO MIX DESIGN WITH THE STARBUCKS REMODEL PROJECT | | | WHICH IS AT A COMPLETELY SEPARATE LOCATION. (CORNER OF | | | DIXIE HWY AND OKEECHOBEE BLVD) | | | PLEASE COORDINATE ALL PLANS, ELECTRICAL AND OTHER | | | SHEETS FOR NEW ELECTRICAL. MANY ITEMS NOTED WITH AN *E* | | | FOR EXISTING AS WELL AS BEING PRINTED IN LIGHT GRAY AND | | | DASHED LINES LEADING TO ALSO BEING EXISTING. | | | FBC106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2, 110.1.2 ETC. | | | ** THIS WAS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #2 AS PLANS | | | WERE SUBMITTED WITHOUT THE COORDINATION NEEDED. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ELECTRICAL PANELS, LOADS ETC | | | WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE ES SHEETS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH | | | THE E-SHEETS AS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE AND COMPLETE PLANS. | | | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2, 106.1 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL TITLE BLOCKS ARE COMPLETE | | | WITH ADDRESS. PLEASE SEE ONLY SOME SHEETS CONTAIN THE | | | CORRECT ADDRESS. THIS IS FOR OTHER TRADE SHEETS | | | (ARCHITECTURAL) AS WELL AS ELECTRICAL SITE PLANS | | | SHEETS. PLEASE SEE ALL SHEETS REQUIRED TO MAKE | | | ADJUSTMENTS. | | | FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002, FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 110.1.2 | | | ETC. | | | | | | 4) NOTE:PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY PERMIT APPLICATIONS | | | WHICH ARE SUBMITTED AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 PLACES | | | PROJECTS UNDER THE NEW CODES ADOPTED BY THE STATE. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT THIS SHALL INCLUDE 2006 REVISIONS TO | | | THE 2004 FBC FOR ALL TRADES AND THE 2005 NFPA-70. | | | PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE CHANGES IN THE FBC WHICH MAY | | | AFFECT DESIGNS FOR ALL TRADES. | | | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS AT A | | | MINIMUM AS WELL AS COVER SHEET(S) WHICH CONTAINS | | | REFERENCED CODES FOR PROJECT. | | | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS | | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE ANY COMMENTS FROM OTHER | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE FBC 2004W/ 2006 | | | REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 13. PLEASE BE SURE THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS COORDINATE WITH THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR | | | FIXTURES, WATTAGES, AND TYPES. THIS WAS THE SAME NOTE | | | ON PLANS AS PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS SEEM TO INDICATE MULTIPLE FIXTURES | | | BEING USED AT THE SAME LOCATION HOWEVER ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS WERE NOT SUBMITTED FOR ALL OPTION | | | FIXTURES. PLEASE DESIGN FOR ONE TYPE OF FIXTURE AT EACH | | | LOCATION AND KNOW THAT THESE MAY BE REVISED AT A LATER | | | DATE ON THE PROJECT AS LONG AS REVISED PLANS AND ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS ARE SUBMITTED. THE OTHER CHOICE WOULD BE | | | TO SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR ALL OPTIONS, WHICH WOULD | | | STILL NEED REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS ONCE THE | | | FINAL CHOICE HAS BEEN MADE SO THE RECORD SETS OF PLANS, | | | INSTALLATIONS AND PERMITTING IS ACCURATE FOR SCOPE OF | | | WORK. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 FOR TRACK LIGHTING AS THE | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DO NOT INDICATE THESE. | | | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING ON PLANS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH | | | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING PER | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.3. | | | PLEASE SEE FIXTURE LEGEND IS NOT COMPLETE AS MANY | | | FIXTURE WATTAGES ARE NOT COMPLETE AT THIS TIME. PLEASE | | | SEE 13-415.1.A, 13-415.2. | | | PLEASE SEE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING ON PLANS DOES NOT | | | CORRELATE | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE WIND LOADING INFORMATION FOR | | | SITE LIGHTING POLES INCLUDING INFORMATION FOR EFFECTIVE | | | PROJECTED AREAS FOR FIXTURES ON POLES. THESE MUST MEET | | | THE FBC 140 MPH AND WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE | | | BUILDING/STRUCTURAL REVIEWER. | | | ** RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THIS IS TO BE SUPPLIED BY | | | OTHERS; HOWEVER THIS INFORMATION WHICH IS REQUIRED | | | COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE KNOW THE LIGHTING POLES, CONSTRUCTION DETAILS; | | | WIND LOAD INFORMATION IS REQUIRED AT A MINIMUM AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | IF THIS INFORMATION IS NOT INCLUDED ON PLANS, ALL SITE | | | LIGHTING, PHOTO-METRICS, STRUCTURAL, CIRCUITING, | | | CONDUITS ETC, ETC WILL ALL BE REQUIRED TO BE UNDER | | | SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS, FEES ETC. | | | ** THIS OFFICE CAN NOT MAKE THIS DETERMINATION FOR THE | | | DESIGN TEAM, OWNER OR CONTRACTOR, ONLY THAT PLANS NEED | | | TO SHOW COMPLETE AND MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 7) NOTE:PLEASE SUBMIT AIC RATING FOR ALL SERVICE | | | EQUIPMENT INCLUDING MAIN. | | | 110.9. THIS WAS DONE ON SHEET E-4.0 HOWEVER AS ES 1.0 | | | DOES NOT CORRELATE, THIS NOTE REMAINS. | | | FBC 106.3.5.1.2 | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 422.13 FOR WATER HEATER LOADS | | | REQUIRED AT 125%. COULD NOT LOCATED THIS AND HOW THIS | | | IS SHOWN. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: THE PREVIOUS NOTES 8,9 AND 10 REQUESTED TO | | | COMPLETE LOAD CALCULATIONS. THIS PROJECT IS UNDER THE | | | 2005 NEC/NFPA-70 HOWEVER PLEASE SEE CODE REFERENCED | | | SECTIONS ON LOAD CALCULATIONS ON SHEET E4.1 ARE NOT | | | FROM THE 2005 NEC> | | | PLEASE EXPLAIN AND SHOW WHERE ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS HAVE | | | BEEN FIGURED AT THE MINIMUM 125%. | | | PLEASE SEE MISSING LOADS FIGURED AND SHOWN FOR SHOW | | | WINDOWS. | | | PLEASE SEE MISSING LOADS FIGURED AND SHOWN FOR TRACK | | | LIGHTING. | | | ETC. | | | 215.3, 230.42, 220.12, 220.14, 220.42,220.43,220.44 | | | ETC. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING SHOW WINDOW RECEPTACLES | | | ABOVE WEST WINDOW. MOST WINDOWS ARE SHOWN BUT NOT ALL. | | | THIS WAS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE | | | TWO WINDOWS ARE STILL MISSING RECEPTACLES TO BE LOCATED | | | ABOVE WINDOWS. | | | PLEASE SEE 210.62, AND CALCULATIONS PER 220.43, 220.14 | | | (6-WINDOW SECTIONS SHOWN, 6-MINIMUM REQUIRED). | | | | | | | | | 11) NOTE:** PLEASE KNOW THAT AS THE EXACT PLANS WHICH | | | NEED TO BE REVIEWED ARE UNKNOWN AND THERE IS | | | COORDINATION NEEDED, ANY CHANGES IN PLANS AND/OR | | | DESIGNS MAY GENERATE NEW COMMENTS WHICH CAN NOT BE MADE | | | AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-04-25 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-04-25 |
Time |
15:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-25 16:56:10 | | | | *** UNSAT *** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLANS HAVE ONLY BEEN SUBMITTED FOR *PLAN | | | REVIEW ONLY* AND HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONCE PLANS ARE CODE COMPLIANT, IF THE | | | PROJECT HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT IT WILL STILL | | | REMAIN IN A FAILED STATUS UNTIL REVIEW OF APPLICATION | | | FOR PERMIT ETC IS DONE. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT TWO DIFFERENT SETS OF PLANS | | | WERE SUBMITTED FOR ALL TRADES INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL | | | AND MEP PLANS. | | | A REVIEW WAS COMMENCED ON THE FIRST SET OF PLANS FROM | | | KAMM CONSULTING WHICH WAS ISSUED FROM THE POINTE VERDA | | | BEACH OFFICE WHEN PLANS WERE ALSO DISCOVERED FROM KAMM | | | CONSULTING WHICH WERE FROM THE DEERFIELD BEACH OFFICE. | | | TWO SETS OF ELECTRICAL AND DESIGNS. DIFFERENT RISERS | | | ETC. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT ONLY TWO SETS OF PLANS FOR ONE DESIGN ON | | | THE ONE ADDRESS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE REVIEW. | | | PLEASE BE SURE TITLE BLOCKS ARE COMPLETE WITH ADDRESS. | | | (ONLY ONE SUBMITTED HAS THE COMPLETE CORRECT ADDRESS). | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE FOR REVIEW. REVIEW COMMENTS | | | WILL BE BASED ON ONE DESIGN. | | | FBC 106.3.5.1.2 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE FOLLOWING CODES ON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS. | | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY OTHER CODES FOR OTHER TRADES | | | MAY BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE FBC 2004W/ 2006 | | | REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 13. PLEASE BE SURE THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS COORDINATE WITH THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR | | | FIXTURES, WATTAGES, AND TYPES. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.ABC.1.2 FOR TRACK LIGHTING. PLEASE | | | SEE 13-415.AB.1.1, 13-415.1.A, ETC. 13-415.2 | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE WIND LOADING INFORMATION FOR | | | SITE LIGHTING POLES INCLUDING INFORMATION FOR EFFECTIVE | | | PROJECTED AREAS FOR FIXTURES ON POLES. THESE MUST MEET | | | THE FBC 140 MPH AND WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE | | | BUILDING/STRUCTURAL REVIEWER. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ANY LOCATION OF THE SERVICE ON THE | | | SIDE OF THE BUILDING WHICH CONTAINSA DRIVEWAY/PARKING | | | LOT AREA WHICH IS SUBJECT TO TRUCK AND VEHICLE TRAFFIC. | | | PLEASE INDICATE THE HEIGHT OF THE RISER AS REQUIRED PER | | | 230.24B4. | | | PLEASE ALSO PLACE A NOTE ON PLANS FOR REQUIRED BOLLARDS | | | FOR PROTECTION OF THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT PER 110.26(F)2 | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT AIC RATING FOR ALL SERVICE | | | EQUIPMENT INCLUDING MAIN. | | | 110.9, | | | FBC 106.3.5.1.2 | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 422.13 FOR WATER HEATER LOADS | | | REQUIRED AT 125%. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY AND SHOW ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS | | | AT 125%. 215.3, 230.42 ETC. | | | PLEASE COMPLETE LOAD CALCULATIONS. ONE SET CONTAINS | | | MORE INFORMATION THAN THE OTHER. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY LOADS FOR TRACK LIGHTING AND | | | SHOW WINDOWS PER 220.43 A AND B. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING SHOW WINDOW RECEPTACLES | | | ABOVE WEST WINDOW. MOST WINDOWS ARE SHOWN BUT NOT ALL. | | | | | | | | | 12) NOTE: ** PLEASE KNOW THAT THE BASE PLANS MAY BE | | | USED AS REFERENCE FOR LOW VOLTAGE WORK AS SHOWN HOWEVER | | | THE LV SECURITY AND OTHER LV SYSTEMS WILL BE REQUIRED | | | TO BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS AND FEES. | | | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT AS THE EXACT PLANS WHICH NEED TO BE | | | REVIEWED ARE UNKNOWN, THERE MAY BE COMMENTS ON THE | | | FOLLOWING REVIEW WHICH ARE NOT PRESENT ON THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
Time |
10:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
Time |
10:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-13 16:27:16 | THIS IS A PROVISIONAL APPROVAL,BECAUSE AS YET,WATER | | | & SEWER PLANS ARE NOT APPROVED FROM EMERY FABIAN OF | | | 45TH STREET ENGINEERING. | | | CONTRACTOR IS ASKED TO GET AN APPROVAL FROM EMERY | | | FABIAN BEFORE WE ISSUE A PERMIT. | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-09-18 |
Time |
13:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-09-18 |
Time |
13:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-18 13:34:50 | ***** FAILED ***** | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFO: | | | | | | 1.YOUR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REPORT SUBMITTED | | | TO US DOES NOT EXPLAIN HOW DID YOU DETERMINE FLOOR | | | ELEVATION.FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION MUST MEETFLOOD ZONE | | | AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIATO DETERMINE | | | THE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, MUST MEET THESE MINIMUM | | | REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE SHOW CROWN OF THE ROADS | | | ELEVATIONS, SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS TOO. | | | 2.PLEASE SHOW IN YOUR STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS, | | | WHAT CRITERIA YOU ASSUMEDFOR RUNOFF CAL.,, LIKE 1" | | | OVER ENTIRE SITE OR2.5"CRITERIA, ETC? | | | 3. WHAT IS THE SITE AREA, YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS | | | PROJECT ? PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS, ALSO, WHAT IS TOTAL | | | PERVIOUS,& IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR THIS PROJECT. THESE SITE | | | AREA MUST BE SAME AS SHOWN IN DRAWINGS AND WATER | | | QUALITY CALS. | | | 4.PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES AROUND YOUR SITE | | | SO, WE CANSEE THE BEST PIPE TO CONNECT WITH THE STORM | | | WATERFROM ALL OTHER STORM WATER PIPES. | | | 5. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED | | | 6. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND | | | YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
10:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-24 10:53:47 | | | | YOU WROTE A NOTE ON SHEET C1.0 (4/16/07) THAT FOR ALL | | | SIGNAGE & ALL SITE WORK SEE SEPARATE PERMITS. I COULD | | | NOT FIND THOSE SEPARATE PERMITS. THEREFORE,PLEASE | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFO: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW STANDARDS NOTES OF CITY OF WPB ON | | | DRAWINGSFOR SIDEWALK WIDTH , ITS SLOPE, DRIVEWAY, | | | PARKING, HANDICAP PARKING, PAINTING DETAILS FOR PARKING | | | PER CITY CODES ETC.,, MUST MEET PER ADA,,ETC.,YOU CAN | | | GET STANDARD NOTES OF CITY OFWPB IN A C.D. FROM 1000 | | | 45TH STREET. ENG DEPT.WE SHOULD HAVE THOSE NOTES ON | | | YOUR DRAWINGS. | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE | | | DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION | | | MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | | 3. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, CENTER LINE OF ROAD , | | | SIDEWALK ELEVATION MUST MEET FLOOD ZONE AREA, & 5,10, | | | 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIATO DETERMINE THE FIRST | | | FLOOR ELEVATION, MUST MEET THESE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,, GEO-TECH | | | REPORT AND SHOW CALCULATION FOR LENGTH OF EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCH, & SAFETY FACTOR YOU USED IN CALCULATION OF | | | EXFILTRATION LENGTH. | | | 5.PLEASE SHOW STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS, WHAT | | | CRITERIA YOU ASSUMEDFOR RUNOFF CAL.,, LIKE 1" OVER | | | ENTIRE SITE OR2.5"CRITERIA, ETC? | | | 6. WHAT IS THE SITE AREA, YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS | | | PROJECT ONLY ?ALSO, WHAT IS TOTAL PERVIOUS,& IMPERVIOUS | | | AREA FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | 7. HOW YOU CONNECT TO THE STORM WATER PIPES IN YOUR | | | SITE? ITS DETAILS.PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES | | | AROUND YOUR SITE SO, WE CANSEE THE BEST PIPE TO | | | CONNECT WITH THE STORM WATERFROM ALL OTHER STORM | | | WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE CONTROL | | | STRUCTURES WITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING | | | ELEVATION, ETC DID YOU USE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ? | | | 8. POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT | | | ETC., PLANS SHOWING SILT FENCE AROUND THE SITE & CATCH | | | BASINS.HEIGHT OF FENCE SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP | | | TO STOP DUST & PARTICLES. | | | 9. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED 10. | | | ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND YOUR | | | SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-11-05 |
Time |
16:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-11-05 |
Time |
15:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-05 16:38:52 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | PLAN SHEETS AS0.3, AS2.4, AS4.2, AS6.1, AS8.2, ID3.1, | | | E3.0, AND FS1.0 & FS1.1 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND | | | DATED. | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-28 |
Time |
13:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-28 |
Time |
12:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-28 12:55:18 | *****PROVISO***** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN | | | REVIEW STILL NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. COULD NOT LOCATE THIS | | | ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ON SHEET AS0.1 AS PER YOUR RESPONSE | | | LETTER | | | | | | | | | THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEETS TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE | | | ABOVE COMMENT AS WELL AS THE OTHER REVIEWERS COMMENTS | | | HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
Time |
17:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
Time |
15:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-04 16:59:50 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | *THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN | | | REVIEWS STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 1.CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241.ADD COMMENT TO AN | | | APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET OR ADD NFPA 241 TO DESIGN CODE | | | SUMMARY ON SHEET G1.0 | | | | | | 2.SHOW/DISPLAY THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS ON THE | | | APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION WHICH FRONTS OKEECHOBEE | | | BOULEVARD.AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE,NUMBERS SHALL | | | BE NO LESS THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS THAN 1" IN | | | WIDTH/STROKE.SHOW ACTUAL ADDRESS NUMBERS ON AN | | | APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION | | | | | | 5.SMOKE DUCT DETECTORS SHALL INITIATE A GENERAL FIRE | | | ALARM AS PER LOCAL CODES.ADD COMMENT TO SHEET TO AN | | | APPROPIATE "M" SHEET | | | | | | *NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | A.SHEET AS0.1 INDICATES THERE IS A M1.0 & M2.0, | | | WHEREASSHEET G1.0 AND M1.0 INDICATES THAT THERE IS | | | M1.0, M2.0, AND M3.0;PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
Time |
13:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
Time |
13:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-12 14:19:22 | ***DENIED*** | | | | | | MANY OF THE PREVIOUS FIRE REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN | | | ANSWERED WITH "TO BE SUPPLIED BY OTHERS". IF THESE | | | COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, PLEASE INDICATE WHERE I | | | CAN FIND THE RESPONSE OR WHERE ON THE PLANS THEY HAVE | | | BEEN ADDRESSED. PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS TAKEN FROM THE | | | LAST REVIEW: | | | | | | 1) CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION AND DEMOLITION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 2) BUILDING ADDRESS TO BE PROVIDED ON THE PROPER | | | ELEVATION. PLEASE INDICATE ON PLANS SHOWING CHARACTERS | | | COMPLYING WITH CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 3) SITE PLAN DOES NOT ILLUSTRATE ANY EXISTING OR NEW | | | FIRE HYDRANTS. | | | | | | 4) OK | | | | | | 5) YOUR RESPONSE INDICATES THAT THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN | | | ADDRESSED ON M3.0 HOWEVER NO SUCH SHEET WAS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 6) OK | | | | | | 7) FIRE EXTINGUISHERS TO BE MOUNTED AT DISTANCE NOT TO | | | EXCEED 75'. | | | | | | 8) OK | | | | | | 9) OK | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 1) PLEASE SEE ZONING COMMENT #6 REGARDING A REQUIRED | | | FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. FIRE SPRINKLER LAYOUT IS | | | REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED WITH THIS SUBMITTAL. A | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL SIGN, SEAL AND DATE ALL | | | PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS ETC TO BE FILED FOR PUBLIC | | | RECORD. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR FIRE | | | SPRINKLER AND OR FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS PRIOR TO | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
Time |
15:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
Time |
15:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-14 15:32:31 | 1. CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND DEMOLITION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 2. BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE PROPER | | | ELEVATION. THE NUMBERS SHALL BE AT LEAST SIX INCH AND | | | ONE INCH WIDE. | | | | | | 3. SITE PLAN DOES NOT ILLUSTRATE ANY EXISTING OR NEW | | | FIRE HYDRANTS. | | | | | | 4. FLOOR PLAN ONLY ILLUSTRATE ONLY ONE EMERGENCY LIGHT | | | FIXTURE. ADDITIONAL FIXTURES WILL BE REQUIRED. PAGE | | | E3.0 DISPLAYS MORE. PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | | | 5. DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS WHEN ACTIVATED SHALL CAUSE THE | | | AIR HANDLING UNIT TO SHUT DOWN. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE INDICATE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR | | | WALLS AND CEILINGS. INFORMATION FOR CEILINGS ARE | | | LOCATED ON PAGE A3.0. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE THE LOCATIONS OF PORTABLE FIRE | | | EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 8. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE NATIONAL | | | ELECTRICAL CODE. | | | | | | 9. ALL WORK IS SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTION AND | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF OF FIRE PREVENTION | | | 804-4709 PHONE | | | 804-4774 FAX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-04 |
Time |
10:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-04 |
Time |
10:44 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-04 10:45:22 | TO "COMM" BD#37--NEW SHEETS FOR "BLDG" AND "FIRE" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
Time |
16:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-15 |
Time |
16:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-16 16:31:34 | TO "COMM" BD#31/PLANS ON RACK | | 2008-10-15 16:27:09 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
Time |
10:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
Time |
10:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-05 10:22:20 | TO "COMM" BD#59 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-28 11:36:43 | TO "COMM" BD#59 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-07 |
Time |
20:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-07 |
Time |
20:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-31 08:38:56 | TO "COMM" BD#54 | | 2007-08-07 20:37:18 | WAITING FOR COMM BOARD. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
Time |
09:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
11:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-24 11:43:28 | TO "COMM" BD#26/PLANS ON RACK--1 ROLL | | 2007-04-23 11:58:52 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-11-02 |
Time |
13:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-11-02 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
Time |
16:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
Time |
15:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-21 16:59:19 | MECH PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND | | | STAMPED. REVIEW WILL REMIAN IN FAILED STATUS PENDING A | | | PASSED REVIEW OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS BY ALL INTERESTED | | | TRADES. | | | NOTE: PAGE M3.0 CURB DETAIL REDLINED. THIS DETAIL DOES | | | NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE STRUCTURAL DETAIL ON S2.2. THE | | | STRUCTURAL DETAIL SHALL GOVERN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-25 |
Time |
18:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-25 |
Time |
15:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-25 18:09:20 | REVIEW #: 3RD | | | ACTION:DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | 1. PAGE M1.0: THIS PAGE HAS AN ADDRESS FOR A JOB IN THE | | | CITY OF SUNRISE, WHILE PAGE M2.0 HAS THE CORRECT WEST | | | PALM BEACH ADDRESS. PLEASE SHOW THE CORRECT ADDRESS FOR | | | THE PROPOSED WORK ON EACH SHEET. | | | | | | 2. PAGE M1.0 AND PAGE M2.0 HAVE TWO DIFFERENT | | | SIGNATURES FROM THE SAME ENGINEER, BASED ON THE STAMP | | | BEING USED AND THE TITLE BLOCK. WHICH SIGNATURE IS THE | | | LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL? PLEASE | | | CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | 3. PAGE MS1.0: CURB DETAIL NOTE SAYS THE DETAIL IS FOR | | | REFERENCE ONLY AND THAT A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WILL | | | DETERMINE AND VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE WITH WIND LOAD | | | REQUIREMENTS. NO STRUCTURAL INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND | | | IN PLANS REGARDING WIND LOADS FOR OUTDOOR APPLIANCES OR | | | ATTACHMENTS TO STRUCTURE. PROVIDE STRUCTURAL | | | CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING PLAN REVIEW DEMONSTRATING | | | ATTACHMENTS TO STRUCTURE ARE SUFFICIENT FOR ANTICIPATED | | | WIND PRESSURES. ALSO, PROVIDE APPLIANCE MANUFACTURER?S | | | DATA SHOWING APPLIANCES HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND | | | WIND PRESSURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13 AND FBCB | | | 1609. | | | | | | 4. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: FLA/COM V3.00 HAS BEEN | | | SUBMITTED. THIS IS NOT THE CORRECT FORM. AN ACCURATELY | | | COMPLETED FORM 400A-04R (GENERATED BY THE FLA/COM-2004 | | | COMPUTER PROGRAM, VERSION 2.5) SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-400.3.A. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
Time |
19:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
Time |
17:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-17 19:19:27 | REVIEW #: 2 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | 1. PG MS1.0: CURB DETAIL, PLEASE REFERENCE THE CORRECT | | | CODES WHICH WERE/ARE IN EFFECT AT TIME OF PERMIT | | | APPLICATION, SUCH AS FBC 2004 AND NOT SBCCI OR SFBC. | | | | | | 2. M1.0 AND M2.0: WHY IS ALL AIR HANDLING EQUIPMENT | | | SHOWN AS EXISTING? THIS PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR A NEW | | | BUILDING. IS THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT USED OR BEING | | | RELOCATED FROM ANOTHER STORE? | | | | | | 3. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: INPUT DATA REPORT, LIST EACH | | | PACKAGE UNIT SEPARATELY BY ZONE. FOR ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION ON WHAT CONSTITUTES A ZONE, PLEASE SEE FBC | | | 13-407.1.ABC.2.2.1. BY GROUPING ALL A/C UNITS INTO ONE | | | SYSTEM, THE REQUIRED EFFICIENCIES ARE DISTORTED AND AN | | | UNDUE CREDIT FOR EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY IS GIVEN. PLEASE | | | CORRECT CALCULATIONS AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | 4. THE WRITTEN RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT | | | STATED THAT NO EXHAUST FOR OVEN(S) IS REQUIRED OR | | | PROVIDED. HOWEVER, DETAIL 12 ON PG A7.3 SHOWS DUCTWORK | | | ABOVE OVENS THROUGH CASEWORK. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-05-11 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-05-11 |
Time |
11:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-11 15:23:34 | --------------DENIED----------------- | | | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/2006 REVISIONS. | | | FBC CH. 1 AS AMENEDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | | | | 1. TWO DIFFERENT MECHANICAL SECTIONS WERE INCLUDED IN | | | PLANS. PLEASE INCLUDE ONLY ONE MECHANICAL DESIGN IN | | | EACH SET OF PLANS. PGS MS-1,MS-2 SHOW A DIFFERENT | | | DESIGN THAN M1.0-M3.0. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 106.1.1. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW SIZE, LOCATION AND POINT OF DISCHARGE | | | FOR WARMING OVEN DUCT. ALSO, PLEASE SHOW ROOF LAYOUT | | | WITH LOCATION OF EXHAUSTS, VENTS AND OA INTAKES TO SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC,M 401.5 THROUGH 401.5.2. | | | | | | 3. M3.0: HVAC CURB DETAIL STATES "FOR REFERENCE ONLY." | | | NO VERIFICATION OF CODE COMPLIANCE BY STRUCTURAL | | | ENGINEER COULD BE FOUND IN PLANS. PLEASE SHOW WIND LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC CH 16. | | | | | | REVIEWED BY: | | | RONALD J REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
Time |
09:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-20 09:06:28 | PASSED--IRRIGATION SHEETS REMOVED FROM SET. | | | SEPARATE IRRIGATION PERMIT REQUIRED. PLANS REQUIRED AT | | | TIME OF APPLICATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-29 |
Time |
17:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-29 |
Time |
17:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-29 18:02:25 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | MUNICIPAL CODE WPB | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS. | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. SHT AS5.1 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS. SHOW THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA BEING | | | DRAINED BY EACH ROOF DRAIN AND INDICATE 1/2 AREA OF ALL | | | VERTICAL WALLS ADDED TO THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN THE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SHEET P3.0 SUBMITTED HAS | | | THE ADDRESS NW136TH & I-595 SUNRISE FLORIDA. | | | | | | 3. SHT AS5.4 SHOW A DRAIN IN THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. | | | THIS DRAIN IS NOT APPROVED, AS IT WOULD HAVE TO CONNECT | | | TO THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR WHICH CAN NOT DRAIN STORM | | | WATER, NOR CAN IT CONNECT TO THE SANITARY FOR THE SAME | | | REASON. PLEASE INDICATE IF THE ENCLOSURE WILL BE | | | PROTECTED FROM THE STORM WATER. IF NOT DELETE THE | | | DRAIN. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE DRAIN IS STILL SHOWN ON | | | SHT AS5.4. IF THE DRAIN IS TO BE DELETED, DELETE FROM | | | ALL SHEETS. | | | | | | 4. OK | | | 5. OK | | | 6. OK | | | 7. OK | | | 8. OK | | | | | | 6. SHT P4.1 THE WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS SHALL BE LOCATED | | | NEAR THE FIXTURES IN AN "EFFECTIVE RANGE", NOT IN THE | | | CEILING AS SHOWN. PDI-WH 201 AND MANUF. INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT NOT ADDRESSED COMPLETLY. SEE | | | WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS AT THE WATER HEATER. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SHEET P4.1 SUBMITTED HAS | | | THE ADDRESS NW136TH & I-595 SUNRISE FLORIDA. | | | | | | | | | 7. OK | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, WILL PROVISO THAT INFORMATION | | | WILL BE REQUIRED AT PLUMBING FINAL. | | | | | | **********NEW COMMENTS********** | | | | | | 1B. SHTS IR1 & IR2, (NEW SHEETS). AN RPZV BACKFLOW | | | INSTALLED BY THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION ON THE IRRIGATION PLANS. | | | SECTION 608.3.2. BACKFLOW SHALL BE INSTALLED AS CLOSE | | | TO THE METER AS POSSIBLE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 2B. SUBMIT A STORM ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM FOR THE | | | PRIMARY AND ONE FOR THE SECONDARY DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. | | | SECTION 106.3.5.1.3(7)(13). | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SHEET P4.1SUBMITTED HAS | | | THE ADDRESS NW136TH & I-595 SUNRISE FLORIDA. | | | | | | 3B. SHT PS2.0 ROOF DOWNSPOUTS INDICATES "TERMINATE | | | PIPING APPROXIMATELY 3" FROM WALL" PER SECTION 1506.3 | | | ROOF DOWNSPOUTS SHALL DISCHARGE AT LEAST 1' FROM THE | | | STRUCTURAL WALL. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SHT PS1.0 DOES NOT ADDRESS | | | COMMENT, SHT PS2.0 STILL INDICATES 3" FROM WALL AND | | | SHTS P3.0 & P4.1 SUBMITTED HAVE THE ADDRESS NW136TH & | | | I-595 SUNRISE FLORIDA. | | | | | | 4B. OK | | | | | | ***********NEW COMMENT*********** | | | | | | 1C. NEW IRRIGATION SHEETS. THE ADDRESS ON THE TITLE | | | BLOCK FOR AVID GROUP DOES NOT REFLECT THE ADDRESS OF | | | RECORD ON THE FLORIDA STATE DBPR WEBSITE. PLEASE UPDATE | | | THE TITLE BLOCKS OR THE DBPR WEBSITE PRIOR TO | | | RESUBMITTING TO THE CITY WPB FOR REVIEW. FAC | | | 61G1-16.004(1) & FS 481.2055. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET). | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE | | | SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE COLLATED | | | PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | | COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
18:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
18:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-20 18:39:16 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | MUNICIPAL CODE WPB | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. SHT AS5.1 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS. SHOW THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA BEING | | | DRAINED BY EACH ROOF DRAIN AND INDICATE 1/2 AREA OF ALL | | | VERTICAL WALLS ADDED TO THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN THE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 3. SHT AS5.4 SHOW A DRAIN IN THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. | | | THIS DRAIN IS NOT APPROVED, AS IT WOULD HAVE TO CONNECT | | | TO THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR WHICH CAN NOT DRAIN STORM | | | WATER, NOR CAN IT CONNECT TO THE SANITARY FOR THE SAME | | | REASON. PLEASE INDICATE IF THE ENCLOSURE WILL BE | | | PROTECTED FROM THE STORM WATER. IF NOT DELETE THE | | | DRAIN. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 4. SHTS PS1.0 & PS2.0 THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR SHALL BE | | | SIZED BY ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. PLEASE CONTACT | | | RODNEY COMPO, (561) 822-2272 OR CALVIN WILLIAMS, (561) | | | 822-2284. THEIR FAX NUMBER IS (561) 2287 & E-MAIL'S ARE | | | [email protected] OR [email protected]. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 5. OK | | | | | | 6. SHT A5.0 NOTE #6STATES "FOR WALL TILE SCHED. SEE | | | SHEET A4.0" NO WALL TILE SCHEDLUE IS LOCATED ON SHEET | | | A4.0. PLEASE CLARIFY. WALLS WITHIN 2FT OF THE W/C'S | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 1210.2. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 7. SHT P1.0 THE SIZING FORMULA FOR THE GREASE | | | INTERCEPTOR INDICATES AN "EXISTING GREASE INTERCEPTOR. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SIZING TO BE BY THE UTILITY | | | DEPT. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 8. OK | | | | | | 6. SHT P4.1 THE WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS SHALL BE LOCATED | | | NEAR THE FIXTURES IN AN "EFFECTIVE RANGE", NOT IN THE | | | CEILING AS SHOWN. PDI-WH 201 AND MANUF. INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT NOT ADDRESSED COMPLETLY. SEE | | | WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS AT THE WATER HEATER. | | | | | | 7. THE REVERSE OSMOSIS DRINKING WATER TREATMENTS SHALL | | | MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-58, REVERSE OSMOSIS | | | DRINKING WATER TREATMENT UNITS, OR WATER QUALITY | | | ASSOCIATION STANDARD S-300, POINT-OF-USE LOW PRESSURE | | | REVERSE OSMOSIS DRINKING WATER SYSTEMS. SECTION 611.2. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT MANUF SPECIFICATION SHEETS INDICATING | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, NOT ADDRESSED. MANUF. SPECIFICATION | | | SHEETS REQUIRED. | | | | | | **********NEW COMMENTS********** | | | | | | 1B. SHTS IR1 & IR2, (NEW SHEETS). AN RPZV BACKFLOW | | | INSTALLED BY THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION ON THE IRRIGATION PLANS. | | | SECTION 608.3.2. BACKFLOW SHALL BE INSTALLED AS CLOSE | | | TO THE METER AS POSSIBLE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. | | | | | | 2B. SUBMIT A STORM ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM FOR THE | | | PRIMARY AND ONE FOR THE SECONDARY DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. | | | SECTION 106.3.5.1.3(7)(13). | | | | | | 3B. SHT PS2.0 ROOF DOWNSPOUTS INDICATES "TERMINATE | | | PIPING APPROXIMATELY 3" FROM WALL" PER SECTION 1506.3 | | | ROOF DOWNSPOUTS SHALL DISCHARGE AT LEAST 1' FROM THE | | | STRUCTURAL WALL. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 4B. ENERGY INPUT DATA REPORT DOES NOT REFLECT THE | | | PLANS. DATA REPORT INDICATES THE WATER HEATER I/P RT. | | | AT 9KW, BUT SHT P1.01 INDICATES THE WATER HEATER AT 12 | | | KW. PLEASE CORRELATE. FBC-2004 BUILDING SECTION | | | 13-103. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE | | | SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE COLLATED | | | PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | | COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
Time |
10:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
Time |
10:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-05 10:56:51 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | MUNICIPAL CODE WPB | | | | | | 1. TWO SETS OF DESIGN PLANS WERE SUBMITTED. ONE SET FOR | | | THE ARCHITECTURAL AND ONE SET FOR THE MEP'S. IS IT THE | | | INTENT OF THE OWNER TO APPLY SEPARATELY FOR THE SHELL | | | AND THE BUILD-OUT? PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 2. SHT AS5.1 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS. SHOW THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA BEING | | | DRAINED BY EACH ROOF DRAIN AND INDICATE 1/2 AREA OF ALL | | | VERTICAL WALLS ADDED TO THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN THE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 3. SHT AS5.4 SHOW A DRAIN IN THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. | | | THIS DRAIN IS NOT APPROVED, AS IT WOULD HAVE TO CONNECT | | | TO THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR WHICH CAN NOT DRAIN STORM | | | WATER, NOR CAN IT CONNECT TO THE SANITARY FOR THE SAME | | | REASON. PLEASE INDICATE IF THE ENCLOSURE WILL BE | | | PROTECTED FROM THE STORM WATER. IF NOT DELETE THE | | | DRAIN. | | | | | | 4. SHTS PS1.0 & PS2.0 THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR SHALL BE | | | SIZED BY ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. PLEASE CONTACT | | | RODNEY COMPO, (561)822-2272 OR CALVIN WILLIAMS, | | | (561)822-2284. THEIR FAX NUMBER IS (561) 2287 & | | | E-MAIL'S ARE [email protected] OR [email protected]. | | | | | | 5. SHT PS1.0 & PS2.0 AN RPZV BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED ON | | | THE WATER SERVICE TO THE BUILDING. SECTION 608.13.2. | | | SHEETS STATE "SEE CIVIL FOR CONT., BUT NO CIVIL SHEETS | | | WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLUMBING SHEETS | | | THAT THERE WILL BE A BACKFLOW INSTALLED ON THE WATER | | | SERVICE. | | | | | | 6. SHT A5.0 NOTE #6STATES "FOR WALL TILE SCHED. SEE | | | SHEET A4.0" NO WALL TILE SCHEDLUE IS LOCATED ON SHEET | | | A4.0. PLEASE CLARIFY. WALLS WITHIN 2FT OF THE W/C'S | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 1210.2. | | | | | | 7. SHT P1.0 THE SIZING FORMULA FOR THE GREASE | | | INTERCEPTOR INDICATES AN "EXISTING GREASE INTERCEPTOR. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 8. SHT P4.0 EQUIPMENT AND FIXTURES UTILIZED FOR THE | | | STORAGE, PREPARATION AND HANDLING OF FOOD SHALL | | | DISCHARGE THROUGH AN INDIRECT WASTE PIPE BY MEANS OF AN | | | AIR GAP, NOT AN AIR BREAK AS SHOWN IN DETAILS 2,6 & 8. | | | SECTION 802.1.1. THE AIR GAP BETWEEN THE INDIRECT WASTE | | | PIPE AND THE FLOOD LEVEL RIM OF THE WASTE RECEPTOR | | | SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWICE THE EFFECTIVE OPENING OF | | | THE INDIRECT WASTE PIPE. SECTION 802.2.1. | | | | | | 6. SHT P4.1 THE WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS SHALL BE LOCATED | | | NEAR THE FIXTURES IN AN "EFFECTIVE RANGE", NOT IN THE | | | CEILING AS SHOWN. PDI-WH 201 AND MANUF. INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | | | 7. THE REVERSE OSMOSIS DRINKING WATER TREATMENTS SHALL | | | MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-58, REVERSE OSMOSIS | | | DRINKING WATER TREATMENT UNITS, OR WATER QUALITY | | | ASSOCIATION STANDARD S-300, POINT-OF-USE LOW PRESSURE | | | REVERSE OSMOSIS DRINKING WATER SYSTEMS. SECTION 611.2. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT MANUF SPECIFICATION SHEETS INDICATING | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE | | | SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE COLLATED | | | PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | | COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-05-07 |
Time |
10:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-05-07 |
Time |
10:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-07 10:59:26 | ZONING PROVISO: | | | | | | 1. A CONTINUOUS FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHALL BE | | | MAINTAINED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE LEASE LINE. | | | 2. AN ADDITIONAL MAHOGANY TREE NEEDS TO BE ADDED AT THE | | | EAST END OF THE NORTH PERIMETER LANDSCAPE STRIP. 3. THE | | | LAST EXISTING MAHOGANY TREE IN THAT LANDSCAPE STRIP IS | | | VERY BADLY DAMAGED AND WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED. | | | 4. A NEW MAHOGANY TREE SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN THE | | | CROSS-OVER AREA THAT IS BEING CONVERTED INTO A GREEN | | | AREA. | | | 5. THE EXISTING MAHOGANY TREES THAT WILL REMAIN SHALL | | | BE CORRECTIVELY PRUNED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST. | | | 6. THE PROPOSED HEDGE SHALL EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF | | | THE LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. 7. | | | THE BALANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG THE NORTH | | | LEASE LINE SHALL BE SODDED AND IRRIGATED. | | | 8. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, PLANNER, OR ROBERT | | | KUSSNER, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AT 561-822-1435 WITH | | | QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
Time |
13:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
Time |
13:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-07 13:35:59 | ZONING PROVISO: | | | | | | 1. A CONTINUOUS FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHALL BE | | | MAINTAINED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE LEASE LINE. | | | 2. AN ADDITIONAL MAHOGANY TREE NEEDS TO BE ADDED AT THE | | | EAST END OF THE NORTH PERIMETER LANDSCAPE STRIP. | | | 3. THE LAST EXISTING MAHOGANY TREE IN THAT LANDSCAPE | | | STRIP IS VERY BADLY DAMAGED AND WILL NEED TO BE | | | REPLACED. | | | 4. A NEW MAHOGANY TREE SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN THE | | | CROSS-OVER AREA THAT IS BEING CONVERTED INTO A GREEN | | | AREA. | | | 5. THE EXISTING MAHOGANY TREES THAT WILL REMAIN SHALL | | | BE CORRECTIVELY PRUNED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST. | | | 6. THE PROPOSED HEDGE SHALL EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF | | | THE LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. | | | 7. THE BALANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG THE NORTH | | | LEASE LINE SHALL BE SODDED AND IRRIGATED. | | | 8. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, PLANNER, OR ROBERT | | | KUSSNER, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AT 561-822-1435 WITH | | | QUESTIONS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-09-11 |
Time |
08:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-09-11 |
Time |
08:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-11 09:02:48 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. A MINOR DSI AMENDMENT IS REQUIRED DUE TO THE CHANGES | | | MADE TO THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW THE EXTENT OF THE BUILDING'S OVERHANGS | | | (ABOVE THE ENTRY AND DRIVE THRU WINDOW) ON THE SITE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 3. WHEEL STOPS ARE REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED ALONG THE | | | EASTERN ROW OF PARKING TO ENSURE VEHICLES DO NOT IMPACT | | | THE LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 4. THE NORTH SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE MUST BE | | | LANDSCAPED. | | | | | | 5. THE PERMIT PACKAGE INCLUDES TWO DIFFERENT DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE CONFIGURATIONS. AVID'S SHEET 9 SHOWS THE | | | CORRECT DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. THE SHEET SUPPLIED BY THE | | | ARCHITECT (AS5.4) SHOWS AN ENCLOSURE WHICH DOES NOT | | | MEET ALL OF THE CODE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF | | | A DRAIN IS PROVIDED IN THE ENCLOSURE IT MUST BE ROOFED | | | TO KEEP RAIN WATER OUT OF THE ENCLOSURE. PLEASE REMOVE | | | SHEET AS5.4 OR CORRECT IT TO SHOW THE PROPER | | | CITY-APPROVED DETAIL. | | | | | | 6. FIRE SPRINKLERS ARE REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED PER THE | | | DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR WESTWARD PLAZA. | | | | | | 7. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS WERE NOT UPDATED TO REFLECT THE | | | NEW CONFIGURATION OF THE LOADING ZONE. THERE IS | | | LANDSCAPING SHOWN IN ASPHALTED AREAS. | | | | | | 8. THREE SITE PLANS WERE INCLUDED WITH THE PACKAGE. I | | | ASSUME THAT THE SITE PLAN DONE BY AVID IS THE OPERATING | | | SITE PLAN AS THE OTHER TWO (AS1.1 AND C1.0) APPEAR TO | | | BE OUTDATED. PLEASE REMOVE THE OTHER TWO SITE PLANS | | | FROM THE PACKAGE OR UPDATE ALL PLANS TO BE CONSISTENT | | | WITH WHAT IS INTENDED TO BE BUILT. | | | | | | 9. SHEET C1.0 SHOWS A PYLON SIGN AT THE CORNER OF | | | OKEECHOBEE AND SPENCER AS WELL AS A SMALL DIRECTIONAL | | | SIGN AT THE EXIT ONTO SPENCER. BOTH OF THESE SIGNS ARE | | | SHOWN IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND MAY NOT BE INSTALLED AT | | | THOSE LOCATIONS. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, PLANNER, AT 561-822-1435 | | | OR [email protected] WITH QUESTIONS OR TO OBTAIN A COPY | | | OF THE MINOR DSI AMENDMENT APPLICATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-05-04 |
Time |
08:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-05-04 |
Time |
08:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-04 08:39:42 | NOTE THAT THE MAJOR DEVELOPMENT OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT | | | AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR THIS PROJECT HAS NOT BEEN | | | APPROVED. ZONING APPROVAL CANNOT BE GRANTED UNTIL THAT | | | TIME. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, PLANNER, AT 561-822-1435 | | | WITH ANY QUESTIONS. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |