| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07030967 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
Time |
14:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
Time |
14:46 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-16 |
Time |
10:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-16 |
Time |
07:47 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-16 10:29:08 | RESIDENTIAL ALTERATION BUILDING REVIEW SECOND | | | CHECKLIST. | | | REVIEW DONE UNDER EXISTING BUILDING CODE 2004,FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE 2004 AND FBC 2004 WITH 2007 | | | REVISIONS. | | | | | | ***NOTE: SCOPE OF WORK WAS CHANGED. | | | | | | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. 713.13FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | | | 2- DESIGNER OF RECORD NEED TO SPECIFYROOF SHEATHING | | | NAILTYPEAND SPACING INCLUDING NAILING AT ZONE 3 AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE. | | | | | | 3- SPECIFY WALL SHEATHING NAIL TYPE AND SPACING.SEC. | | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | ***NOTE: SEE HARDIPLANK PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SHEATHING | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 4- HARDIPLANKDRAWINGS ON SHEET A2 ARE NOT LEGIBLE. | | | NEED CLEAR AND LEGIBLE DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 106.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | ***ALSO,COORDINATE INFORMATION WITH PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | TO AVOID DISCREPANCIES AND EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | SEE REQUIRED STUD SPACING,SHEATHING THICKNESSS, ETC. | | | | | | | | | 5- TYPICAL WINDOW/DOOR OPENING FRAMING DETAIL ON SHEET | | | A1:REVISE SPECIFIED CONNECTORS. HUGHES IS OUT OF | | | BUSINESS. | | | | | | 6- BASE PLATE DETAIL ON SHEET A1: SPECIFY HOW LONG ARE | | | THE 1/2" J BOLTS.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | | 2004. | | | | | | 7- TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A1: | | | A) REVISE CS-18CONNECTOR SPECIFIED TO ATTACH WALL | | | TO STEM WALL.NEED TO SPECIFY WOOD TO MASONRY | | | CONNECTOR. SEE CATALOG FOR PROPER CONNECTOR TYPE AND | | | TYPE AND NUMBER OF FASTENERS.OTHERWISE PROVIDE | | | COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS FOR NAIL TYPE AND NUMBER | | | THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE | | | MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | | 2004. | | | | | | B) REVISE NUMBER AND TYPE OF FASTENERS SPECIFIED FOR | | | CS-18 AT CONNECTION TO ROOF TRUSS. SEE CATALOG. | | | OTHERWISE PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS FOR | | | FASTENER TYPE AND NUMBER OF FASTENERS THAT DON'T MATCH | | | THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEC. | | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 8- THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL MUST ELECT THE ALTERATION | | | LEVEL AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 301.5 OF EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE 2004. | | | | | | 9- IDENTIFY WINDOWS IN BEDROOMS THAT ARE GOING TO BE | | | REPLACEDTO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 505 OF EXISTING BUILDING 2004. | | | | | | 10 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) HARDIPLANK.NOA 02-0729.02 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON | | | MAY 01/2007. | | | | | | B) ALLSIMPSON OR USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS | | | SPECIFIED ON PLANS. | | | ***NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL PAGE | | | AND PAGE SHOWING THE CONNECTOR TO EXPEDITE REVIEW AND | | | SAVE PAPER. | | | | | | C) ROOF SHINGLES. | | | | | | 11- DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN | | | WRITING (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS | | | TO FBC 2004 | | | | | | 12- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
Time |
16:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-24 16:53:40 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: | | | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. 713. 13 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | | | 2- AFTER DRAWINGS ARE REVISED BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY TO PAY IMPACT FEES. BRING BACK STAMPED PLANS AND | | | COPY OF PAID RECEIPT. | | | | | | 3- ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE THE FIRM'S NUMBER IN THE TITLE | | | BLOCK AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G1-16.004OF FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | | | 4- SURVEY, SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN DON'T MATCH. REVISE | | | AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 5- AREA CALCULATIONS DON'T ADD UP. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6- REVISE INFORMATION IN SURVEY REGARDING THE FLOOD | | | ZONE ELEVATION.FLOOD ZONE IN THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH IS DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO MAP DATED MARCH | | | 1ST, 1979.SEE MAP AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 7- SHEET A-1: | | | A) SPECIFYALL DESIGN LOADS INCLUDING ALL DEAD, | | | LIVE AND WIND LOADS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 AND TABLE | | | R301.5OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | B) REVISE DESIGN WIND LOADS FOR ROOF FOR CORNER | | | AREAS. SEE REVISED TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2) FBC 2004. | | | | | | C) SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE. SEC. R807 OF 2004 | | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | D) THICKNESS OF ROOF SHEATHING TO MATCH. SEE DETAIL | | | 2 AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | E) POST & BEARING WALL CONNECTION DETAIL AND | | | CONNECTION SCHEDULE TO MATCH.ALSO, SEE CURRENT | | | SIMPSON CATALOG AND REVISE TYPE,NUMBER OF FASTENERS | | | AND SPECIFIC LOADS. OTHERWISE, PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | ENGINEERING ANALYSIS FOR INFORMATION THAT DIFFER FROM | | | THAT TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEC. | | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | F) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL AND SPECS FOR GABLE END | | | AT ENTRY PORCH. SPECIFY ALL FASTENERS, ETC. SEC. | | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | G) POST & BEARING WALL CONNECTION DETAILAND WALL | | | SECTION -1 DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | H) ROOF FRAMING PLAN: | | | * SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER OF HEADERS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENT STO FBC 2004. | | | ** CLARIFY HOW ARE WINDOWS AT MEDIA ROOM INSTALLED. | | | ROOF FRAMING PLAN SHOWS 3 SEPARATEHEADERS?. PROVIDE | | | COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AEMNDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | I) STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS | | | DON'T APPLY TO THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE | | | DETAILS THAT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT.SEE SEC. R613.6.2 | | | TO SEE PROPER WAY OF INSTALLING STRUCTURAL BUCKS AND | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | J) SEE SECTION R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE AND REVISE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | K) 2X4 EXTERIOR FRAMED WALLS REQUIRE R11 MIN. WHILE, | | | 2X6 EXTERIOR WALLS REQUIRE R-19 MIN. SEE SEC. | | | 13-602.1.C.1.1 OF 2004 FBC AND REVISE PLANS/DETAILS AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | 8- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) GABLE END ALUMINUM VENT. | | | ***NOTE: ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY IN PLANS SIZE OF VENT AND | | | CONSIDER THIS VENTS IN THE ATTIC VENTILATION | | | CALCUALTIONS. | | | | | | 9- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AN APPROVE IN WRITING (NOT | | | SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED | | | BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 10- TYPICAL WALL SECTION TO PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR WALL SHEATHING THICKNESS AND | | | FASTENING. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 11- PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS FOR EXTERIOR DOORS | | | AND WINDOWS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 12- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: | | | A) PROVIDE REVISED FORM 600A-2004 R. | | | | | | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM. | | | | | | 13- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKEN THE CEILING FAN | | | CREDIT. THEREFORE, NEED TO SPECIFY ON PLANS SPECIFIC | | | SIZE OF FAN TO BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED BY TABLE | | | 13-607.1.A.1 OF 2004 FBC. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
08:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
08:20 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-25 08:33:57 | | | | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE | | | CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, | | | NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND | | | NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1} INCREASE THE VALUE OF THE JOB TO INCLUDE THE | | | ADDITIONAL WORK, LABOR AND MATERIAL ADJUST THE VALUE AT | | | THE PERMIT CLERK?S DESK, AND PAY THE DIFFERENCE IN FEES | | | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING. | | | | | | 2} THE ARCHITECT?S SIGNATURE IS A PHOTOCOPY. WHEN | | | SUBMITTING FOR PERMITTING THE SIGNATURE MUST BE WET PER | | | 481.221(1)(A) FLORIDA STATUTES.PLEASE NOTE THAT HAND | | | DRAWN CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE AS THEY | | | CANNOT BE VERIFIED AS BEING MADE BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD AS REQUIRED BY FS 481. | | | | | | 3} PROVIDE A RISER DIAGRAM WITH CONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT | | | SIZE AND TYPE, GROUNDING DETAILS, LOAD CALCULATIONS, | | | PANEL SCHEDULES, SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND PANEL LOCATIONS | | | PER 106.3.5.4 FBC. 215.5NEC. | | | | | | 4} PLEASE LOCATE ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN, | | | METER ENCLOSURE, DISCONNECTS AND PANELS, SO THAT | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLES 225 AND 230 CAN BE REVIEWED. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-12-05 |
Time |
08:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-12-05 |
Time |
07:32 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
Time |
07:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
Time |
06:47 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-05 07:07:26 | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2006 REVISIONS, 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, | | | NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1. | | | | | | THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THIS REVIEW ARE NOT THE SAME AS | | | THE SET SUBMITTED ON 3/27/07, THE SCOPE HAS CHANGED TO | | | ALL EXTERIOR WORK. AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED TO | | | INSTALL THE RECESSED LIGHT IN THE COVERED ENTRY. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-04-11 |
Time |
17:10 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-04-11 |
Time |
12:02 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-11 16:16:53 | | | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 1} THE #2 CU GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR WHILE NOT A | | | VIOLATION, MUST BE INSTALLED IF IT IS ON THE PLAN. THE | | | REQUIRED SIZE IS #4 CU PER 250.66. | | | | | | 2} PLEASE INDICATE THE CONDUCTOR SIZE FROM THE METER TO | | | THE DISCONNECT. PER 310.15 (B)(6), OR 310.16. | | | | | | 3} 230.70 GENERAL. | | | MEANS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DISCONNECT ALL CONDUCTORS IN | | | A BUILDING OR OTHER STRUCTURE FROM THE SERVICE-ENTRANCE | | | CONDUCTORS. THE PANEL IS LISTED AS MAIN LUG ONLY. IF IT | | | DOES NOT HAVE A MAIN BREAKER THEN A DISCONNECT MUST BE | | | INSTALLED AFTER THE METER. | | | | | | 4} PER 110.9 AND 110.10: OBTAIN THE | | | AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT AT THE UTILITY | | | AND CALCULATE THE SAME AT THE EQUIPMENT. | | | INDICATE THE AIC RATING FOR THE | | | EQUIPMENT IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN | | | THE AVAILABLE FAULT. | | | | | | 5} ALSO VERIFY FROM FPL THAT THE SERVICE IS 3 PHASE | | | 120/208 VOLT. THAT AREA IS ONLY KNOWN TO HAVE SINGLE | | | PHASE 120/240 VOLT TRANSFORMERS. THE VOLTAGE RATING OF | | | THE PANEL ON THE PLAN IS NOT RATED FOR A 120/240 | | | VOLTAGE. | | | | | | 6} THE AIR HANDLER OVERCURRENT PROTECTION, CIRCUIT | | | #20,22, IS NOT COMPLIANT PER 424.3(B) NEC.- | | | BRANCH-CIRCUIT SIZING FIXED ELECTRIC SPACE HEATING | | | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONTINUOUS LOAD.(125%) | | | 10000/240=41.66X125%=52 AMPS= 60 AMP BREAKER(240.4) AND | | | #6 CONDUCTORS (310.16). | | | | | | 7} PLEASE INDICATE THE CODE THE PLAN WAS DESIGNED AND | | | APPLICATION WAS MADE UNDER. 2004 FBC AND 2005 NEC. | | | | | | 8} RECEPTACLE SPACING MUST COMPLY WITH 210.52(A) (2), | | | SEE MASTER BEDROOM WALL BETWEEN ENTRY AND THE | | | BATHROOM. | | | | | | 9} SMOKE ALARMS MUST BE INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH R313.1 | | | RESIDENTIAL FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THIS IS IN ALL | | | BEDROOMS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-13 |
Time |
14:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-13 |
Time |
14:00 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-13 14:00:54 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-30 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-30 |
Time |
08:56 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-30 08:56:49 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
11:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
11:28 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-01 11:28:54 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-10 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-10 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-10 11:37:17 | TO "SFR" "E" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-04-09 |
Time |
19:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
Time |
17:45 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-03-28 17:45:44 | TO ZONING BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
16:30 |
Rev Time |
0.20 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
16:30 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-10 16:33:07 | NEW SCOPE OF WORK DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY MECHANICAL WORK | | | OR THE ADDITION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-04-12 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-04-12 |
Time |
08:55 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-12 09:56:05 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE ON FORM600A-04R, | | | SEE 2004 FBC 13-600.3.A (12-8-06 REVISION). | | | | | | 2) PLANS SHOW THE SOUTH EXTERIOR WALL OF THE NEW | | | ADDITION TO BE 6" WHICH WILL REQUIRE AN R-19 MINIMUM | | | INSULATION, SEE 2004 FBC 13-602.1C.1, PLEASE SHOW ON | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 3) ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND THE MECHANICAL PLANS ARE | | | CALLING FOR A FIVE TON A/C SYSTEM 48,000 SENSIBLE BTU'S | | | WHICH IS TO LARGE, SEE THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS | | | ARE CALLING FOR 29,044 SENSIBLE BTU'S, THE PLANS CAL | | | ONLY CALL FOR 15% MORE THAN THE COOLING LOAD CAL'S, SEE | | | 2004 FBC 13-607.1.ABC.1.1, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 4) SEE THE MECHANICAL PLANS "WALL CAP DETAIL" IS | | | CALLING FOR AN INSECT/BIRD SCREEN, A SCREEN MAY NOT BE | | | IN THE CLOTHS DRYER VENT BUT WILL NEED A BACKDRAFT | | | DAMPER, SEE 2004 FBC/R M1501.1, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 5) CLOTHES DRYER VENT TERMINATION MAY NOT DISCHARGE | | | NEAR THE A/C CONDENSER UNIT, SEE2004 FBC/M 501.2, | | | PLEASE CORRECT . | | | | | | 6) SEE MECHANICAL PLANS SHOWING A 10" SUPPLY AIR DUCT | | | TO THE MASTER BATHROOM, BELIEVED TO BE A TYPE-O, PLEASE | | | CORRECT. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
Time |
07:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
Time |
07:25 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-12 07:26:23 | NO PLUMBING SHOWN ON PLANS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
Time |
10:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
Time |
15:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
Time |
15:27 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-03 15:27:57 | PER ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
14:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
14:11 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-04 14:42:14 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH SURVEY. | | | A. SETBACK DIMENSIONS, LOT WIDTH AND LOT DEPTH SHALL BE | | | CORRECTED TO REFLECT ACTUAL CONDITIONS. | | | B. ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, THE PROPOSED ENTRY IS 25.2 | | | FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.HOWEVER, ACCORDING TO | | | THE SITE PLAN, THE PROPOSED ENTRY ENCROACHES INTO THE | | | REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK OF 25 FEET.PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE ROOF OVERHANG DIMENSION.PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | PER SECTION 94-305(B)(2), STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS | | | INCLUDING EAVES AND ROOF OVERHANG PROJECTIONS SHALL NOT | | | EXTEND FARTHER THAN 3 FEET INTO ANY SETBACK. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE BUILDING HEIGHT DIMENSION OF THE PROPOSED | | | ENTRY FROM GRADE. | | | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
Time |
16:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-04-09 |
Time |
15:23 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-09 19:48:16 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH SURVEY. | | | A. SETBACK DIMENSIONS, LOT WIDTH AND LOT DEPTH SHALL BE | | | CORRECTED TO REFLECT CORRECT CIRCUMSTANCES. | | | B. PLEASE NOTE THAT PER SECTION 94-72(A)(2)(C), | | | REQUIRED REAR SETBACK IS 15 FEET OR 10 PERCENT OF THE | | | DEPTH OF THE LOT, WHICHEVER IS LESS. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM WALL TO END OF ROOF EVE. | | | ACCORDING TO SHEET A1 OF 3, PROJECTION OF PROPOSED ROOF | | | EAVE WILL MATCH EXISTING; HOWEVER, EXISTING DIMENSION | | | IS NOT STATED. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE BUILDING HEIGHT DIMENSION OF PROPOSED | | | ADDITION FROM GRADE. | | | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|