| 2007-04-02 11:47:42 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: |
| | ADD: |
| | CONT: |
| | TEL: (561)###-#### |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2)THE PLANS SUBMITTED DO NOT CONTAIN THE ORIGINAL |
| | SIGNATURE OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. |
| | F.S. 471.025ALL FINAL DDRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, |
| | PLANS, REPORTS OR DOCUMENTS PREPARED OR ISSUED BY THE |
| | LICENSEE AND BEING FILED FOR PUBLIC RECORDSHALL BE |
| | SIGNED BY THE LICENSEE, DATED, AND SEALED. SUCH |
| | SIGNATURE, DATE AND SEAL SHALL BE EVIDENCE OF THE |
| | AUTHENTICITY OF THAT TO WHICH THEY ARE AFFIXED. |
| | |
| | 3)61G1-16.004 TITLE BLOCK. |
| | A TITLE BLOCK MUST APPEAR ON ALL ARCHITECTURAL OR |
| | INTERIOR DESIGN DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION |
| | IDENTIFICATION SHEETS. THE TITLE BLOCK MUST, AT A |
| | MINIMUM, CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: |
| | (1) FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER. |
| | (2) FIRM LICENSE NUMBER. |
| | (3) NAME OR IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT. |
| | (4) DATE PREPARED. |
| | (5) A SPACE FOR THE SIGNATURE AND DATED SEAL. |
| | (6) A SPACE FOR THE PRINTED NAME OF THE PERSON SEALING |
| | THE DOCUMENT. |
| | |
| | 4)WPB. AMENDMENTS 108.3*THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON |
| | THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS LOW.IF, IN THE OPINION OF |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE CLAIMED VALUATION OF |
| | BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, GAS, |
| | MECHANICAL OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS APPEARS TO BE |
| | UNDERESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | DENIED.FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS |
| | AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROPOSED |
| | PROJECT.OUR VALUATION REFERENCE IS ICC (BVD), |
| | MARSHALL-SWIFT AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS. |
| | |
| | 5)FL S S 713.13 |
| | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF |
| | THE COURT. |
| | NOTE: 713.13(2) |
| | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS |
| | NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE |
| | RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: |
| | 713.13(6)THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | MYRON JACOBS |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER |
| | 805-6726 |
| | |
| | |