Plan Review Details - Permit 07020442
Plan Review Stops For Permit 07020442
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2007-03-09 Cont ID  
Sent By lursu Date 2007-03-09 Time 17:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lursu Date 2007-03-07 Time 13:05 Sent To  
Notes
2007-03-07 13:17:35THE STRUCTURE LOCATED BEHIND THE MAIN BUILDING AT 805
 20TH ST MUST HAVE AN INDIVIDUAL SITE ADDRESS BASED ON
 THE CITY ADDRESSING GUIDE POLICY .THE NEW SITE ADDRESS
 TO BE ISSUED IS 803 20TH ST ,THE PARCEL CONTROL NUMBER
 WIL REMAIN THE SAME AS 74 43 43 16 10 006 0190.
  
 LACRAMIOARA URSU
 MIS - GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 OFFICE:822-1239
 FAX: 822-1249
 E-MAIL:[email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2007-07-26 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2007-07-26 Time 16:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2007-07-26 Time 16:19 Sent To  
Notes
2007-07-26 16:30:22PROCESSED PLANS
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2007-05-09 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2007-05-09 Time 08:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2007-05-09 Time 07:07 Sent To  
Notes
2007-05-09 08:46:37 
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-04-16 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2007-04-16 Time 14:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2007-04-16 Time 14:23 Sent To  
Notes
2007-04-16 16:08:39DENIED BY BUILDING
  
 1) ITEM NUMBER 2 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUIRES
 EXTERIOR WALLS TO SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM OF 6 FEET
 UNLESS WALLS HAVE A ONE HOUR FIRE-RESISTIVE RATING.
 THIS APPLIES TO STRUCTURES ON ADJACENT LOTS AS WELL AS
 BUILDINGS ON THE SAME LOT.THE REAR OF THE STRUCTURE
 APPEARS TO BE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE SIDE
 APPEARS TO BE LESS THAN SIX FEET FROM THE PROPERTY
 LINE.THEREFORE, A SITE PLAN SHOWING THE DISTANCE TO
 ANY STRUCTURES LOCATED ON ADJACENT LOTS IS REQUIRED FOR
 THESE WALLS OR THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE ONE HOUR
 FIRE RATED AS REQUIRED BY R302.1.
  
 2) ITEM NUMBER 5 ON THE PREVOIUS REVIEW REQUIRED THE
 MEAN ROOF HEIGHT SPECIFIED ON THE TRUSS LAYOUT TO BE
 CORRECTED FROM 15 FEET TO THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT FOR A
 TWO STORY STRUCTURE. THE CORRECTION WAS DONE WITH
 WHITEOUT WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED ON SIGNED AND SEALED
 DRAWINGS. ANY CHANGES MADE TO THE TRUSS LAYOUT IS
 REQUIRED TO BE MADE BY THE TRUSS ENGINEER AND INITIALED
 AND DATED BY HIM. THE SIGNED AND SEALED TRUSS LAYOUT
 AND TRUSS DRAWINGS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO THE FIELD
 INSPECTOR PRIOR TO TRUSS INSPECTION.
  
 3) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR THE ROOFING
 MATERIAL FOR THE BALCONY REQUESTED IN THE PREVIOUS
 REVIEW FOR ITEM #18 IS INCORRECT. THE GAF SYSTEM
 SUBMITTED IS FOR INSTALLATION OVER A CONCRETE DECK AND
 ON SHEET 5 A PLYWOOD DECK IS SPECIFIED AT THE BALCONY.
 PLEASE CORRECT. THE FL PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS
 SUBMITTED IS FOR THE 2001 CODE VERSION. THE CURRENT
 CODE VERSION IS THE 2004 FBC.
  
 4) ADDRESS ZONNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS.
  
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL
 BLDG. PLAN REVIEW
 (561)805-6714
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-03-06 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2007-03-06 Time 15:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2007-03-06 Time 06:38 Sent To  
Notes
2007-03-06 08:56:44DENIED BY BUILDING
  
 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT
 MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A
 PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.
  
 2)SPECIFY THE DISTANCES TO OTHER STRUCTURES ON THE
 SITE PLAN. IF LESS THAN 6 FEET, SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH
 R302.1 EXTERIOR WALLS.
 EXTERIOR WALLS SEPARATED BY LESS THAN 6 FEET (1828 MM)
 SHALL HAVE NOT LESS THAN A ONE-HOUR FIRE-RESISTIVE
 RATING WITH EXPOSURE FROM BOTH SIDES. PROJECTIONS SHALL
 NOT EXTEND TO A POINT CLOSER THAN 4 FEET (1220 MM) FROM
 AN ADJACENT PROJECTION OR WALL.
  
 3) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R401.3 DRAINAGE.
 SURFACE DRAINAGE SHALL BE DIVERTED TO A STORM SEWER
 CONVEYANCE OR OTHER APPROVED POINT OF COLLECTION SO AS
 TO NOT CREATE A HAZARD. LOTS SHALL BE GRADED SO AS TO
 DRAIN SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM FOUNDATION WALLS. THE
 GRADE AWAY FROM FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL FALL A MINIMUM
 OF 6 INCHES (152 MM) WITHIN THE FIRST 10 FEET (3048
 MM).
 EXCEPTION: WHERE LOT LINES, WALLS, SLOPES OR OTHER
 PHYSICAL BARRIERS PROHIBIT 6 INCHES (152 MM) OF FALL
 WITHIN 10 FEET (3048 MM), DRAINS OR SWALES SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ENSURE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE.
  
 4) SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY FBC
 CHAPTER 13.
  
 5) THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 15'-0", SPECIFIED ON THE
 TRUSS LAYOUT IS INCORRECT. THIS IS A TWO STORY
 STRUCTURE. ALSO SPECIFY THE 2002 EDITION OF ASCE7 ON
 THE LAYOUT.
  
 6) THE DESIGN PARAMETERS ON SHEET 2 OF THE PLANS LISTS
 THE MINIMUM ROOF HEIGHT AS 23'-0". THIS APPEARS TO BE
 THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE. PLEASE SPECIFY THE MEAN
 ROOF HEIGHT ON THE PLANS (THE VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM
 GRADE PLANE TO THE AVERAGE HEIGHT OF THE HIGHEST ROOF
 SURFACE.)
  
 7) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R311.2.1 ATTACHMENT. REQUIRED
 EXTERIOR EXIT BALCONIES, STAIRS AND SIMILAR EXIT
 FACILITIES SHALL BE POSITIVELY ANCHORED TO THE PRIMARY
 STRUCTURE TO RESIST BOTH VERTICAL AND LATERAL FORCES.
 SUCH ATTACHMENT SHALL NOT BE ACCOMPLISHED BY USE OF
 TOENAILS OR NAILS SUBJECT TO WITHDRAWAL. PROVIDE A
 DETAIL SHOWING CONNECTORS.
  
 8) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R311.5.3 STAIR TREADS AND
 RISERS.
  
 -R311.5.3.1 RISER HEIGHT.
 THE MAXIMUM RISER HEIGHT SHALL BE 7-3/4" INCHES (196
 MM). THE RISER SHALL BE MEASURED VERTICALLY BETWEEN
 LEADING EDGES OF THE ADJACENT TREADS. THE GREATEST
 RISER HEIGHT WITHIN ANY FLIGHT OF STAIRS SHALL NOT
 EXCEED THE SMALLEST BY MORE THAN 3 / 8 INCH (9.5 MM).
  
 -R311.5.3.2 TREAD DEPTH.
 THE MINIMUM TREAD DEPTH SHALL BE 10 INCHES (254 MM).
 THE TREAD DEPTH SHALL BE MEASURED HORIZONTALLY BETWEEN
 THE VERTICAL PLANES OF THE FOREMOST PROJECTION OF
 ADJACENT TREADS AND AT A RIGHT ANGLE TO THE TREAD'S
 LEADING EDGE. THE GREATEST TREAD DEPTH WITHIN ANY
 FLIGHT OF STAIRS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE SMALLEST BY MORE
 THAN 3 / 8 INCH (9.5 MM).
  
 9) SPECIFY THE SQUARE FOOT AREA OF THE TOTAL STRUCTURE
 AND PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN BY UNIT.
  
 10) PROVIDE A SECTION AT THE REAR OF THE STRUCTURE
 WHERE THE 2ND FLOOR EXTENDS OVER THE 1ST FLOOR PORCH.
  
 11) CLARIFY HOW THE 2ND FLOOR WALL IS CONNECTED TO THE
 1ST FLOOR WALL AT THE BALCONY WALL SECTION ON SHEET 5.
  
 12) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS FOR THE 2 X 8 JOISTS TO THE
 2 X 12 BEAM AT THE BALCONY.
  
 13) THE BALCONY SECTION ON SHEET 5 HAS COLUMN
 CONNECTORS SPECIFIED FOR 4 X 4 WOOD COLUMNS AND THE
 FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET4 SPECIFIES 6 X 6 WOOD COLUMNS.
 PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 14) PLEASE REVIEW THE EXTERIOR WALL FRAMING SHOWN ON
 THE BALCONY SECTION ON SHEET 5. WHAT IS THE DOUBLE 2 X
 8 BEAM FOR?JOISTS CAN BEAR ON TOP OF DOUBLE PLATE AT
 EXTERIOR WALL.
  
 15) FBC R 803.2.3.1 ( 2006 AMENDMENTS)REQUIRES ROOF
 SHEATHING TO BE FASTENED WITH 8D RING SHANK NAILS.
 REVISE NOTES ON SHEET 5.
  
 16) PLEASE CLARIFY WHY DUROCK IS BEING INSTALLED OVER
 THE 1ST FLOOR CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB,
  
 17) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R301.2.1.2 INTERNAL PRESSURE.
  
 WINDOWS IN BUILDINGS LOCATED IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS
 REGIONS SHALL HAVE GLAZED OPENINGS PROTECTED FROM
 WIND-BORNE DEBRIS OR THE BUILDING SHALL BE DESIGNED AS
 A PARTIALLY ENCLOSED BUILDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING . GLAZED OPENING
 PROTECTION FOR WIND-BORNE DEBRIS SHALL MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST OF ASTM E 1996
 AND OF ASTM E 1886, SSTD 12, ,OR TAS 201, 202 AND 203
 REFERENCED THEREIN.
  
 18) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ROOFING MATERIAL
 THAT WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE BALCONY.
  
 19) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR THE GAF
 TIMBERLINE SELECT 40 SHINGLES HAS BEEN REVISED BY FL
 183-R1 AND NOA 04-0305.04. SUBMIT NEW FL COVER SHEET
 AND NOA.
  
 20) FL539-R0 HAS BEEN REVISED BY FL539-R1. SUBMIT NEW
 FL COVERSHEET FOR JELD-WEN DOORS.
  
 21) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR THE JELD-WEN
 WINDOWS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. THE DESIGN WIND PRESSURES
 ARE NOT SPECIFIED AND THE IMPACT RESISTANCE IS NOT
 INDICATED. THE SIZES,GLASS TYPE AND THICKNESS IS NOT
 SPECIFIED. THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED.
  
 22) THE VALUE OF THE WORK HAS BEEN INCREASED TO ADDRESS
 THE SCOPE OF WORK.
  
 23) THE OWNER BUILDER EXEMPTION ALLOWED BY FS 489.103
 (7) REQUIRES THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY WHEN ACTING AS
 THEIR OWN CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE DIRECT ONSITE
 SUPERVISION THEMSELVES OF ALL WORK NOT PERFORMED BY
 LICENSED CONTRACTORS, WHEN BUILDING OR IMPROVING ONE OR
 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCES FOR THE OCCUPANCY OR USE OF SUCH
 OWNERS AND NOT OFFERED FOR SALE OR LEASE.
  
 24) THE APPLICANT'S NOTARIZED SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED ON
 THE BACK OF THE APPLICATION.
  
 25) THE TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE HAS TWO NUMBER THREES
 ON IT. ONE OF THE CIRCLES IS MISSING THE CONNECTOR
 NUMBER ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 - ROBERT MCDOUGAL
 BLDG. PLAN REVIEW
 (561)805-6714
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2008-04-22 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2008-04-22 Time 10:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2008-04-22 Time 10:01 Sent To PC
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2007-03-01 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2007-03-01 Time 16:15 Rev Time 0.50
Received By btrobaug Date 2007-03-01 Time 15:47 Sent To B
Notes
2007-03-01 16:15:12 
 PROVISO
  
 RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO ROUGH INSPECTION.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A PANEL SCHEDULE SO THAT BRANCH/FEEDER
 CIRCUIT CONDUCTOR AND OVER CURRENT PROTECTION
 COMPLIANCE MAY BE REVIEWED PER 106.3.5.4 FBC AS
 AMENDED.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 8 Status N Date 2008-04-21 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2008-04-21 Time 09:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2008-04-21 Time 09:31 Sent To E
Notes
2008-04-21 09:32:14TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/REV
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2007-07-23 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2007-07-23 Time 18:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2007-07-23 Time 18:12 Sent To  
Notes
2007-07-23 18:13:067/23/07 PLANS/APPLICATION ROUTED TO ROBBIE MCDOUGAL FOR
 PROCESSING.AWAITING ANOTHER COPY OF LETTER TO
 PLANNING FROM MR MCCLOUD PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. RB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2007-06-29 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2007-06-29 Time 15:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2007-06-29 Time 15:08 Sent To  
Notes
2007-06-29 15:10:07ROUTED TO JOHN ROACH FOR ZONING REVIEW.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2007-05-01 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-05-01 Time 10:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-05-01 Time 10:14 Sent To B
Notes
2007-05-01 10:14:43TO "RMCDOUGAL" DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2007-04-27 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-04-27 Time 16:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-04-27 Time 16:48 Sent To Z
Notes
2007-04-27 16:48:22TO "Z" BOX/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2007-04-06 Cont ID  
Sent By spalmer Date 2007-04-06 Time 17:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By spalmer Date 2007-04-06 Time 17:32 Sent To P
Notes
2007-04-06 17:32:52TO MIKE PERSON
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2007-03-25 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-03-25 Time 11:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-03-25 Time 11:59 Sent To Z
Notes
2007-03-25 12:00:17TO "Z" BOX/RESUB/NEW SHEETS FOR "Z"
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2007-03-06 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2007-03-06 Time 15:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2007-02-16 Time 10:23 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-16 10:23:50TO "LMARTINEZ" DESK
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2007-03-02 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2007-03-02 Time 11:54 Rev Time 0.15
Received By lmartine Date 2007-03-02 Time 11:53 Sent To Z
Notes
2007-03-02 11:54:57NO MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED, AND NO
 MECHANICAL PERMIT NUMBER APPLIED FOR AT
 THIS TIME.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2007-04-09 Cont ID  
Sent By mperson Date 2007-04-09 Time 08:49 Rev Time 0.33
Received By mperson Date 2007-04-09 Time 08:49 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-03-02 Cont ID  
Sent By mperson Date 2007-03-02 Time 09:21 Rev Time 1.25
Received By mperson Date 2007-03-02 Time 09:21 Sent To M
Notes
2007-03-02 09:57:59DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING; FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS;
  
 THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR PLUMBING
 PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE:
  
 1. SHEET 3 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM: THE
 SUBMITTED SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT REFLECT THE
 FLOOR PLAN AND PER FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 SECTION,106.3.5.4
 RESIDENTIAL (ONE AND TWO
 FAMILY) (9) THE PLUMBING SANITARY
 ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM SHALL INDICATE ALL
 WASTE, VENTS, TRAPS WITH SIZES, AND
 CLEANOUT LOCATIONS.
 NOTE:
 A} NOT ALL PIPES AND TRAPS ARE NOT SIZED
 B} 406.3 WASTE CONNECTIONS.THE TRAP AND
 FIXTURE DRAIN FOR AN AUTOMATIC CLOTHES
 WASHER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES
 (51MM) IN DIAMETER. THE AUTOMATIC
 CLOTHES WASHER FIXTURE DRAIN SHALL
 CONNECT TO A BRANCH DRAIN OR DRAINAGE
 STACK A MINIMUM OF 3 INCHES (76MM) IN
 DIAMETER.
 C} 802.4 STANDPIPES.STANDPIPES SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY
 TRAPPED. STANDPIPES SHALL
 EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES (457MM)
 AND A MAXIMUM OF 42 INCHES (1066MM)
 ABOVE THE TRAP WEIR. ACCESS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL STANDPIPES AND DRAINS
 FOR RODDING.
 D} CLEANOUT FOR WASHING MACHINE SHALL BE LOCATED 4'
 AFF PER 708.9.
 E} CLEANOUT REQUIRED AT BASE OF KITCHEN SINK STACK PER
 708.3.4.
 F} CLEANOUT REQUIRED AT BUILDING DRAIN AND BUILDING
 SEWER JUNCTION PER 708.3.5.
  
 ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION
 IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING,
 PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS
 WHICH HAVE CHANGED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY
 OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE
 ONLY.
 NOTE: PLEASE REFERENCE THE ATTACHED SANITARY ISOMETRIC
 RISER DIAGRAM TO THE PLUMBING COMMENTS FOR THE
 RESUBMITTAL THAT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN AND ARE CODE
 COMPLIANT.
  
 END OF COMMENTS:
  
 REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON
 (561) 805-6730
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
 UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2007-07-23 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2007-07-23 Time 14:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2007-07-23 Time 14:32 Sent To  
Notes
2007-07-23 14:35:07***PASSED WITH PROVISOS***
  
 1) SCOPE OF WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LETTER
 SUBMITTED TO MR. NEIL MELICK, BY MR. MCCLOUD, DATED
 JULY 12, 2007.
  
 2) VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS SHALL NOT EXCEED $40,000 (COST
 TO THE OWNER), AS PROVIDED IN LETTER FROM MR. MCCLOUD.
  
 3) ADDITIONAL WORK BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT
 SHALL NOT BE COMMENCED UNTIL 12 MONTHS FOLLOWING THE
 DATE OF THIS REVIEW (7/23/2008).
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER,
 AT (561) 822-1435.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-04-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2007-04-30 Time 22:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2007-04-30 Time 22:21 Sent To I
Notes
2007-04-30 22:21:38***FAILED***
  
 THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED SF11, WHICH ONLY
 PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY
 RESIDENCE.ACCORDING TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER, FOUR
 (4) UNITS CURRENTLY RESIDE ON THE PROPERTY, AND ARE
 THEREFORE, CONSIDERED A NONCONFORMING USE.PER SECTION
 94-512 OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS, ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS ON NONCONFORMING
 USES ARE ONLY PERMITTED ON "NONCONFORMING USES WITH NO
 ADVERSE IMPACTS PROVIDED THE COSTS INCURRED WIHTIN ANY
 12-MONTH PERIOD SHALL NOT EXCEED 50 PERCENT OF THE
 VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE..."ACCORDING TO THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION, OVER $141,000 OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE
 PROPOSED, FAR EXCEEDING 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE
 STRUCTURE (ACCORDING TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER).
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER,
 AT (561) 822-1435.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-04-05 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2007-04-05 Time 15:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2007-04-05 Time 15:56 Sent To I
Notes
2007-04-05 16:01:19***FAILED***
  
 THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED SF11, WHICH ONLY
 PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY
 RESIDENCE.ACCORDING TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER, FOUR
 (4) UNITS CURRENTLY RESIDE ON THE PROPERTY, AND ARE
 THEREFORE, CONSIDERED A NONCONFORMING USE.PER SECTION
 94-512 OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS, ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS ON NONCONFORMING
 USES ARE ONLY PERMITTED ON "NONCONFORMING USES WITH NO
 ADVERSE IMPACTS PROVIDED THE COSTS INCURRED WIHTIN ANY
 12-MONTH PERIOD SHALL NOT EXCEED 50 PERCENT OF THE
 VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE..."ACCORDING TO THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION, OVER $141,000 OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE
 PROPOSED, FAR EXCEEDING 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE
 STRUCTURE (ACCORDING TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER).
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER,
 AT (561) 822-1435.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2007-03-05 Cont ID  
Sent By ajones Date 2007-03-05 Time 10:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ajones Date 2007-03-05 Time 10:24 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved