| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07020324 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
Time |
13:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
Time |
12:38 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-19 13:18:13 | BUILDING REVIEW 3RD CHECKLIST: | | | 1- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS EXPIRED AFTER 90 DAYS IF | | | WORK IS NOT STARTED. NEED TO RE-RECORD NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) PRECAST LINTELS.NOA 03-0605.05 SUBMITTED | | | EXPIRED ON 05/21/06. NEED CURRENT ONE. | | | | | | 3- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE AN APPROVED AND REVIEWED STAMP | | | BUT IT LACKS THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION. WHO | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IT?.NEED TO PROVIDE THE NAME | | | OF THE ENGINEER WHO REVIEWED AND APPROVED THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS. | | | ALSO,ENGINEER SIGNATUREIS NOT THESAME AS SHOWN ON | | | FLOOR PLANS. | | | | | | 4- HURRICANE SHUTTERS: | | | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE. INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS INCORRECT.USE | | | CLEAN COPY. SEE ATTACHED CLEAN COPY. TRACO SECURITY | | | WINDOWS IS NOT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL MANUFACTURER. | | | COORDINATE SIZE OF OPENINGS AND DESIGN PRESSURES WITH | | | FLOOR PLANS. REVISE SIZE TYPE AND SPACING OF ANCHORS. | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR TOP AND BOTTOM ANCHORS. WHAT'S | | | #5 SHOWN ON CENTER BOLTS OR REINFORCING BARS COLUMN?. | | | | | | SEE ENGINEERED DRAWINGS FOR STORM SHUTTERS AND MARK | | | SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS (EG: WALL MOUNT) AND | | | SPECIFIC TYPE OF ANCHOR AND SPACING TO BE USED | | | ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN PRESSURES, PANEL SPAN,EDGE | | | DISTANCE, CONNECTION TYPE AND STRUCTURE TO BE ATTACHED | | | TO ( CONCRETE BLOCK).SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | | FBC 2004. | | | | | | 5- ENGINEER TO PROVIDE ACTUAL CALCULATIONS FOR OPENING | | | DESIGN PRESSURES. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | | 2004.DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON OPENINGS ARE LOW | | | COMPARED TO REVISED TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2) OF FBC 2004 AND | | | ACTUAL OPENING LOCATION, END OR INTERIOR ZONE. | | | | | | 6- ENGINEER TO SPECIFYALL LOADS INCLUDING ATTIC LIVE | | | LOADS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 | | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 7- INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR EMERGENCY EGRESS WINDOWS | | | IS INCORRECT.SEC. R301 AND TABLE R301.5HAVE NOTHING | | | TO DO WITH EMERGENCY EGRESS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEE | | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR CORRECT CODE SECTION | | | FOR EGRESS WINDOWS AND REVISE ALL INFORMATION AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | ALSO, NET CLEAR OPENING: 20".THIS IS NET CLEAR | | | OPENING IN WHAT DIRECTION? WIDTH?. | | | | | | 8-REVISE INFORMATION GIVEN ON WIND INFORMATION - 2004 | | | FBC.SEEFBC 2004 INCLUDING THE REVISIONSAND | | | SPECIFY CORRECT SECTIONS OF THE CODE. | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SIZE OF | | | REINFORCING STEEL ANGLE TO SUPPORT EXISTING TIE BEAM. | | | SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED ARE INCOMPLETE.SEC. 106.1.2 | | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 9- COORDINATE LIVE AND DEAD LOADS SHOWN ON WIND | | | INFORMATION - 2004 FBC AND STRUCTURAL LOADS INFORMATION | | | GIVEN ON THE SAME SHEET.INFORMATION SHOWN DOESN'T | | | MATCH. | | | | | | 10- ROOF SHEATHING INFORMATION SHOWN ON PLYWOOD | | | SHEATHING FASTENER SCHEDULE AND TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL | | | SECTION DOESN'T MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED.SEE SEC. | | | R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR CORRECT | | | TYPE AND FASTENER SPACING FOR INTERIOR ZONES AND ZONE | | | 3. | | | | | | 11- ENGINEER TO SEE ATTACHED COPY OF FLORIDA STATUTE | | | 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING PLAN REVIEW FEES FORDESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL DOCUMENTS AND CONTINUOUS FAILURES. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-05-09 |
Time |
10:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-05-09 |
Time |
10:49 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-09 10:52:58 | BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST: | | | 1- PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON FLOOD ZONE A9 (ELEVATION 13). | | | MINIMUM FLOOR ELEVATION REQUIRED FOR FINISH FLOOR | | | ELEVATION AND ANY EQUIPMENTIS 13'-6" AS REQUIRED BY | | | CITY ORDINANCE.PLANS TO INDICATE THIS MINIMUM | | | ELEVATION. | | | ALSO,SINCE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN A FLOOD ZONE AREA, | | | THEOWNER IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AN ELEVATION | | | CERTIFICATE. | | | | | | 2- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WAS RECORDED ON 2/13/07. | | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS OF | | | RECORDING IF WORK IS NOT STARTED.THEREFORE, MAY NEED | | | TO PROVIDE RE-RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. | | | | | | 3- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING TEHM TO PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY TO PAY THE IMPACT FEES (2300 N. JOG RD. | | | (561)233-5115).BRING BACK TO THIS OFFICESTAMPED | | | PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF ADDITIONAL FEES ARE | | | DUE. | | | | | | 4- ENGINEER NEEDS TO UPDATE HIS LICENSE WITH THE STATE | | | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS TO THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) WINDOW MULLIONS. | | | | | | B) PRECAST LINTELS. | | | | | | 6- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | | 2004. | | | ***NOTE: INDICATE NAME OF ENGINEER APPROVING THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS.INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED ON | | | APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | | | | 7- HURRICANE SHUTTERS: | | | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT AN APPROVED PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA. | | | | | | B) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN | | | WRITING PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | C) PROVIDE KEY PLAN AND CORRECT INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE. CHECK OPENING SIZE AND LOCATION, DESIGN | | | PRESSURES, ANCHOR SPECIFIED,SHUTTER GLASS SEPARATION, | | | EDGE DISTANCE VS PANEL SPAN,ANCHOR SPACING TOP AND | | | BOTTOM, CENTER BOLTS REINFORCING, ETC. SEE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL TO FIND CORRECT INFORMATION AND REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 8- ENGINEER TO REVISE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR DOOR AND | | | WINDOW OPENINGS ACCORDING TO SIZE AND LOCATION. END OR | | | INTERIOR.SEEREVISED TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2) OF 2004 FBC | | | AND REVISE DESIGN PRESSURES AS REQUIRED.OTHERWISE, | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SHOWING | | | CALCULATED VALUES. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | | 2004. | | | | | | 9- OWES $654.54 FOR UPDATED BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION | | | AND RADON FEES. | | | | | | 10- SHEET A1: | | | A) SPECIFY ALL DESIGN LOADSAS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | R301 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS INCORRECT. | | | | | | B) REVISE EGRESS WINDOW NOTES:MIN. TOTAL AREA IS | | | FOR MIN. TOTAL OPENING AREA, NOT GLASS AREA. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 11- SHEET A2: | | | A) DEMOLITION REAR KITCHEN DETAIL: | | | * SPECIFY IF EXISTING BEAM IS A POURED TIE BEAM OR BOND | | | BEAM.PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR TIE BEAM, WHILE | | | THIS DETAIL CALLS FORBOND BEAM. THERE IS A BIG | | | DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BOTH. REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | ** HOW IS THE BEAM REINFORCED TO SUPPORT THE ADDITIONAL | | | ROOF LOAD CONSIDERING THAT EXISTING POURED CONCRETE | | | COLUMN WILL BE REMOVED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | | FBC 2004. | | | | | | *** OPENING DIMENSION SHOWN ON THIS DETAIL DOESN'T | | | MATCH OPENING DIMENSION SHOWN ON PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN. | | | | | | 12- SHEETA3: | | | A) ROOF PLAN: | | | * REVISE NUMBER AND TYPE OF FASTENER SPECIFIED FOR | | | SIMPSON HETA20 ANCHOR. SEE CURRENT CATALOG AND REVISE | | | AS REQUIRED. OTHERWISE, PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING | | | ANALYSIS FOR TYPE AND NUMBER OF FASTENERS THAT DIFFER | | | FROM THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE MANUFACTURER. | | | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | ** CLARIFY WHAT'S UA= 1805. THERE IS NOT ABREVIATION | | | LEGEND TO IDENTIFY THIS ABREVIATION. | | | | | | *** WHAT'S W/14-DX1 1/2?. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | B) ROOF SHEATHING DETAIL: | | | * REVISE ROOF SHEATHING SPECIFICATIONS FOR TYPE OF NAIL | | | TO BE USED. SEE SEC. R803..2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODEFOR TYPE OF NAIL TO BE USED. | | | | | | ** PLYWOOD THICKNESS DOESN'T MATCH SPECS ON TYP. EXT. | | | WALL SECTION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | *** SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROOF SHEATHING SHOWN ON ROOF | | | SHEATHING DETAIL AND TYP. WALL SECTION DON'T MATCH. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY END ZONES. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
Time |
17:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
Time |
17:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-03-28 17:50:30 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: | | | | | | 1- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF EVERYTHING. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE NOC AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA | | | STATUTE. | | | | | | 3- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY TO VERIFY IF IMPACT FEES ARE DUE. BRING BACK | | | STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE | | | DUE. | | | | | | 4- ENGINEER TO CHECK WITH DBPR TO UPDATE HIS LICENSE | | | STATUS. | | | | | | 5- ENGINEER'S SEAL IS NOT LEGIBLE. UNABLE TO DETERMINE | | | IF USING UPDATED SEAL. | | | | | | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (TWO COPIES)AS REQUIRED | | | BY RULE 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) WINDOW MULLIONS. | | | | | | B) TRUSS CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND DETAILS. | | | | | | 7- ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING (NOT | | | SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED | | | BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 8- HURRICANE SHUTTERS: | | | A) PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (REVIEWED AND APPROVED | | | BY THE ENGINEER). | | | | | | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE | | | ATTACHED SAMPLE OF INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. COMPLETE ALL | | | THE INFORMATION. | | | | | | 9- PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN PRESSURES AT DOORS | | | AND WINDOWS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | THEY ARE TOO LOW COMPARED TOZONE LOCATION AND TABLE | | | R301.2(2) OF 2004 FLORIDARESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 10- VALUE DECLARED ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO | | | LOW. IT WAS UPDATED TO $64,000 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. THEREFORE, OWES | | | $654.54FOR ADDITIONAL PERMIT FEES AND RADON FEES. | | | | | | 11- SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R807 OF | | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 12- SHEET A1: | | | A) SPECIFY ALL DESIGN LOADS INCLUDING LIVE AND DEAD | | | LOADS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 | | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS | | | INCOMPLETE AND NEED TO ADDRESS PROPER CODE. | | | | | | B) REVISE EMERGENCY EGRESS INFORMATION. SEE SEC. | | | R310 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIALCODE FOR PROPER CODE | | | SECTIONS.. | | | | | | C) AREA CALCULATIONS DON'T ADD UP.REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | D) CLARIFY WHY SHOWING VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT | | | COLUMNS ON EXISTING SLAB. THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON | | | FOUNDATION PLAN. | | | | | | E) SEE REDLINED COMMENTS ON ALL PLANS AND RETURN | | | REVIEWED SET AFTER ALL CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO EXPEDITE | | | REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | 13- SHEET A2: | | | A) IF CLOSING EXISTING BATHROOM WINDOW, THEN NEED TO | | | PROVIDE MECHANICAL VENTILATION. | | | | | | B) NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS/ SECTIONS AND | | | SPECS FOR NEW OPENING AT EXISTING BEARING WALL BY | | | KITCHEN AREA. SPECIFY COLUMNS, BEAM, ETC. AND SHORING. | | | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 14- SHEET A3: | | | A) SPECIFY CALCULATED UPLIFT LOADS ON ROOF FRAMING | | | PLAN TO VERIFY CONNECTORS COMPLIANCE. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | B) REVISE NUMBER AND TYPE OF FASTENER SPECIFIED FOR | | | TRUSS CONNECTORS. SEE CURRENT CATALOG.SEC. 106.1.2 | | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | C) FASTENER SCHEDULE AND CALCULATIONS HAS NOTHING TO | | | DO WITH ROOF PLAN SHOWN. REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. | | | PROVIDE ONLY THE INFORMATION THAT IS RELEVANT TO THIS | | | PROJECT. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | D) INFORMATION ON BEAM SCHEDULE, LINTEL SCHEDULE, | | | TYPICAL WALL SECTION AND TYP BEAM DETAIL A-A-4 TO | | | MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS | | | TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | E) REVISE PLYWOOD SHEATHING FASTENER SCHEDULE AND | | | ROOF SHEATHING DETAIL AND TYPICAL WALL SECTION.SEE | | | SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 15- SHEET A4: | | | A) INFORMATION ON TYP. WALL SECTION REGARDING | | | CONCRETE STRENGTH DOESN'TMATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON | | | FOUNDATION PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | B) ROOF SHOWN ON ELEVATIONS DON'T MATCH ROOF FRAMING | | | PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEE AREA OF NEW ROOF MEETING | | | EXISTING ROOF. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
Time |
11:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
Time |
09:24 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-12 11:05:18 | | | | | | | PROVISO | | | | | | THE WATER HEATER LOCATION CREATES A VIOLATION OF THE | | | CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS OF 110.26 FOR ELECTRICAL | | | EQUIPMENT | | | AND CANNOT BE LOCATED AS SHOWN. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-06-06 |
Time |
07:29 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-06-06 |
Time |
06:43 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-06 07:29:20 | | | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 1} THE LOAD CALCULATIONS SHOULD BE PER 220.83(B) SINCE | | | A/C SYSTEM IS BEING ADDED. | | | | | | 2} THE HEAT LOAD IN THE PANEL SCHEDULE DOES NOT | | | CORRELATE WITH THE LOAD OF 8000W ON THE MECHANICAL | | | SHEET. | | | | | | 3} THE TANKLESS WATER HEATER SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS NOT | | | ON THE SCHEDULE OR IN THE LOAD CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 4} KITCHEN RECEPTACLE SPACING MUST COMPLY WITH | | | 210.52(A), 210.52(C), AND 210.8(A)(6) GFI. | | | | | | 5} BATH CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED , LOCATED PER 210.52(D), | | | AND BE GFI PROTECTED PER 210.8(A) (1), FOR THE EXISTING | | | BATH. EXISTING BUILDING CODE, SECTION 608.1. | | | | | | PLEASE REMOVE ALL OLD OR VOIDED SHEETS AND REPLACE WITH | | | CORRECTED ONES WHEN RESUBMITTING. INCLUDE THEM | | | SEPARATELY TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-02 |
Time |
10:48 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-02 |
Time |
07:49 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-02 10:46:28 | | | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 1} THE PLAN INDICATES A METER AND MAIN DISCONNECT ON | | | THE STRUCTURE, THE RISER ONLY INDICATES A MAIN ONLY. | | | PLEASE CORRELATE TO SHOW ACTUAL CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 2} THE TANKLESS WATER HEATER APPEARS IN THE LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS AS 8500 VA AND ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE AS | | | 4500 VA, PLEASE CORRECT., INCLUDE CORRECT OCP AND | | | CONDUCTOR SIZE. | | | | | | 3} THE BATHROOM AND "OUTSIDE" GFI CIRCUITS ARE NOT | | | REQUIRED IN THE LOAD CALCULATIONS AS THEY ARE INCLUDED | | | IN THE GENERAL LIGHTING CALCULATION. SEE 220.14(J), | | | 2005 NEC. | | | | | | 4} THE AHU LOAD IN THE CALCULATION AND ON THE SCHEDULE | | | ARE NOT THE SAME, THEREFORE THE OCP AND WIRE SIZES ARE | | | INCORRECT. 310.16 PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | | | 5} THE WASHER AND DRYER ON THE PLAN APPEAR TO BE A | | | STACKED UNIT, BUT ARE ON SEPARATE CIRCUITS IN THE | | | SCHEDULE. PLEASE CORRECT TO INTENDED CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 6} THE LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE DUPLICATED IN THE PANEL | | | SCHEDULE AND IN THE LOAD CALCULATION | | | SCHEDULE/WORKSHEET. THE PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATES | | | CONNECTED LOAD AND THE CALC SHEET THE DEMAND LOAD. | | | THERE IS NO NEED TOCALCULATE THE CONNECTED LOAD IN | | | THE PANEL SCHEDULE. THE CONNECTED LOAD SHOULD BE SHOWN | | | FOR CONDUCTOR AND OCP SIZE ONLY. PLEASE KEEP THIS IN | | | MIND FOR FUTURE PLANS AS WELL AS THIS RESUB. THE | | | REFERENCE TO 220.30 IS INCORRECT. SEE ARTICLE 220 IN | | | THE 2005 NEC, ADOPTED DECEMBER 8, 2006. | | | | | | 7} THE BATH CIRCUIT PER 210.11(C)(3) IS REQUIRED IN THE | | | SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 8} BOTH BATH RECEPTACLES (MASTER) MUST BE GFI PER 210.8 | | | (A)(1). | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
07:54 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-27 09:33:40 | | | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 1} INDICATE WHETHER THE SERVICE IS NEW OR EXISTING. | | | NOTE: IF NEW OR RELOCATED THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS REGARDING DISCONNECTING MEANS, OCP, GROUNDING | | | AND AIC RATINGS PER 225, 230, 250 AND 110. | | | | | | 2}PLEASE LOCATE ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN, | | | METER ENCLOSURE, DISCONNECTS AND PANELS, SO THAT | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLES 225 AND 230 CAN BE REVIEWED. | | | | | | 3} PROVIDE A PANEL SCHEDULE PER 408.4. PLEASE SEE NEW | | | VERBAGE FOR 2005 NEC: "THE IDENTIFICATION SHALL INCLUDE | | | SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO ALLOW EACH CIRCUIT TO BE | | | DISTINGUISHED FROM ALL OTHERS." | | | | | | 4} A RECEPTACLE MUST BE ADDED IN THE MASTER BECROOM TO | | | COMPLY WITH 210.52(A)(1). | | | | | | 5} THE RECEPTACLES IN THE BATHROOM MUST INDICATE | | | COMPLIANCE WITH 210.8(A)(1) GFI PROTECTED. | | | | | | 6} A GFI RECEPTACLE MUST BE INSTALLED OUTSIDE IN THE | | | BACK PER 210.52(E). | | | | | | 7} A RECEPTACLE MUST BE ADDED WITHIN 25' OF THE A/C | | | CONDENSER, IF NONE EXISTS. | | | | | | 8} REFERENCES TO THE 2001 BUILDING CODE ARE INCORRECT | | | AND MUST BE CHANGED TO 2004. THE REASON FOR THAT | | | COMMENT IN AN ELECTRICAL REVIEW IS TO CLARIFY THAT THE | | | 2005 NEC IS CURRENTLY ADOPTED, WHICH IS REFERENCED IN | | | THE 2004 FBC. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
10:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
10:57 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-10 10:58:06 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
Time |
08:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
Time |
08:31 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-01 08:31:51 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-24 15:55:25 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-01 |
Time |
10:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-01 |
Time |
10:21 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-01 10:21:18 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-30 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-30 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-30 10:19:25 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-26 |
Time |
08:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-26 |
Time |
08:37 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-26 08:37:25 | TO "E" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
Time |
17:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-02-15 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-15 13:41:44 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
15:45 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
15:45 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-23 15:54:48 | *** PROVISO *** | | | 1) EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE WILL NEED TO BE REVISED BEFORE | | | ROUGH MECHANICAL INSPECTION TO SHOW A THREE TON SYSTEM | | | AS COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS VERIFY THAT A THREE TON | | | WOULD BE THE CORRECT SIZE SYSTEM, SEE 2004 FBC | | | 13-607.1.ABC.1.1. | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
08:28 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
08:28 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-18 08:49:23 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) INFORMATION ON PLANS MAY NOT BE DONE IN PEN, AS | | | PLANS MAY BE ALTERED AFTER THE FACT. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SHOW THE CFM'S AT ALL SUPPLY AIR GRILLS. | | | | | | 3) ENERGY CALCULATIONS LINE 11 (A) ARE SHOWING THE | | | SUPPLY AIR DUCTS IN A CONDITIONED SPACE AS THE SUPPLY | | | DUCTS ARE IN THE ATTIC THAT WOULD BE AN UNCONDITIONED | | | SPACE, PLEASE CORRECT ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 4) COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS (MANUAL J) ARE SHOWING THE | | | CEILING HEIGHT AT 10 FT. THE PLANS PAGE A-4 SHOW THE | | | CEILING HEIGHT AT 8 FT. PLEASE RE-CALCULATE THE COOLING | | | LOAD CALCULATIONS AT 8 FT.. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
09:19 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
09:19 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-07 09:34:09 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) THE ENGINEER LUIS LOPEZ LICENSE EXPIRED 2-28-07, | | | PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 2) SEE PLANS PAGE A-1 (A/C DUCT LAY-OUT). CHANGES MAY | | | NOT BE MADE BY HAND TO SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS. | | | | | | 3) THE DUCT LAY-OUT IS FOR THE EXISTING PART OF THE | | | HOUSE, YOU ONLY NEED TO SHOW THIS IF THAT DUCT-WORK IS | | | TO BE REPLACED. | | | | | | 4) PLEASE SUBMIT A DUCT LAY-OUT FOR THE NEW ADDITION | | | AND EQUIPMENT LISTING FOR THE NEW EQUIPMENT (A/C). | | | | | | 5) NEED TO SUBMIT TWO COPY'S OF THE MECHANICAL (A/C) | | | PLANS. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
16:25 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
16:25 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-27 16:29:51 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) NEED TO SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | AND MANUAL J CALCULATIONS (ONLY ONE COPY WAS | | | SUBMITTED). | | | | | | 2) NO MECHANICAL PLANS WERE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT MECHANICAL PLANS FOR REVIEW, PER 2004 FBC | | | WPB AMEND. 106.3.5.4 (10). | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
14:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
14:00 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
14:12 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
14:12 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-15 14:30:09 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | ** FBC-2004 PLUMBING. | | | ** FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS. | | | ** FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | ** FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE: | | | | | | 1. SHEET A1 PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE IF THE PROPOSED | | | TANKLESS WATER HEATER IS GAS OR ELECTRIC ON THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2. SHEET A2 PLUMBING RISER: PLEASE CORRECT THE | | | FOLLOWING ON THE SANITARY ISOMETRIC PLUMBING RISER | | | DIAGRAM. | | | A} PLEASE CORRECT THE LOCATION OF THE TRAP AND | | | STANDPIPE FOR THE WASHING MACHINE TO BE BELOW THE | | | CLEANOUT 4' A.F.F. | | | B} PLEASE DELETE THE 4" CLEANOUT BETWEEN THE | | | PROPOSED TUB AND LAVS. | | | C} PLEASE INDENTIFY THE CLEANOUT AT THE JUNCTION | | | OF THE BUILDING SEWER AND BUILDING DRAIN AS A TWO-WAY | | | CLEANOUT, PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING, SECTION 708.3.5. | | | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | | ONLY. | | | NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS REVIEWER | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
08:11 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
08:11 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-09 |
Time |
08:23 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-09 |
Time |
08:23 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-03-09 09:16:40 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING; FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS; | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR PLUMBING | | | PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE CODE COMPLIANCE: | | | | | | 1. SHEET A2 ISOMETRIC SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: THE | | | SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | PLEASE REFERENCE THE ATTACHED SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM TO | | | THE PLUMBING COMMENTS THAT REFLECTS THE FLOOR PLAN AND | | | IS CODE COMPLIANT. | | | | | | 2. PER FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, SECTION 106.3.5.4(9) | | | RESIDENTIAL (ONE AND TWO-FAMILY) PLEASE SUBMIT A | | | PLUMBING SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM INDICATING | | | ALL WASTE, VENTS, TRAPS AND SIZES WITH CLEANOUT | | | LOCATIONS. | | | NOTE: NOT ALL PIPES ARE SIZED AND NOT ALL CLEANOUTS ARE | | | LOCATED. | | | | | | 3. THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED FOR THE WASHING MACHINE: | | | (A) 406.3 WASTE CONNECTIONS.THE TRAP AND | | | FIXTURE DRAIN FOR AN AUTOMATIC CLOTHES | | | WASHER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES | | | (51MM) IN DIAMETER. THE AUTOMATIC | | | CLOTHES WASHER FIXTURE DRAIN SHALL | | | CONNECT TO A BRANCH DRAIN OR DRAINAGE | | | STACK A MINIMUM OF 3 INCHES (76MM) IN | | | DIAMETER. | | | (B) 802.4 STANDPIPES.STANDPIPES SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY | | | TRAPPED. STANDPIPES SHALL | | | EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES (457MM) | | | AND A MAXIMUM OF 42 INCHES (1066MM) | | | ABOVE THE TRAP WEIR. ACCESS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED TO ALL STANDPIPES AND DRAINS | | | FOR RODDING | | | NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE STANDPIPE ON THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | (C) 708.7 MINIMUM SIZE. CLEANOUTS SHALL | | | BE THE SAME NOMINAL SIZE AS THE PIPE | | | THEY SERVE UP TO 4 INCHES (102MM) | | | NOTE: CLEANOUT FOR WASHING MACHINE SHALL BE THREE INCH | | | (3"). PLEASE INDICATE THIS ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | (D) 708.9 ACCESS. ACCESS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED TO ALL CLEANOUTS. | | | NOTE: CLEANOUT FOR WASHING MACHINE SHALL BE LOCATED AT | | | FOUR FEET ABOVE FINNISH FLOOR (4' A.F.F.). PLEASE | | | INDICATE THIS ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 4. SHEET A4 ISOMETRIC SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT | | | INDICATE THE FOLLOWING CLEANOUT. ITS HARD TO TELL ON | | | THE RISER DIAGRAM WHERE THE SANITARY PIPING LEAVES THE | | | BUILDING. IF THE WASHING MACHINE AND THE MASTER BATH | | | BOTH EXIT THE BUILDING THEY WILL BOTH NEED TWO-WAY | | | CLEANOUTS. PLEASE CLARIFY AND CORRECT ON THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | (B) 708.3.5 BUILDING DRAIN AND BUILDING | | | SEWER JUNCTION. THERE SHALL BE A | | | CLEANOUT NEAR THE JUNCTION OF THE | | | BUILDING DRAIN AND THE BUILDING SEWER. | | | | | | 5. SHEET A1 PLUMBING NOTES NUMBER 1: PLEASE DELETE " | | | MINIMUM SLOPE SHALL BE 1/8" PER FOOT." AND ADD THE | | | FOLLOWING IN ITS PLACE " SLOPE SHALL BE PER FBC-2004 | | | PLUMBING, TABLE 704.1." | | | | | | ******IMPORTANT INFORMATION | | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | | ONLY. NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR | | | RESUBMITTAL. PLEASE REFERENCE THE ATTACHED CORRECTED | | | ISOMETRIC SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM TO THE PLUMBING | | | COMMENTS FOR THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
10:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ADAVILA |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
11:00 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-11 11:00:09 | PER ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
Time |
12:38 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-25 12:39:26 | PER ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-04-30 |
Time |
15:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-04-30 |
Time |
15:44 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-30 15:45:29 | PER ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-02-22 |
Time |
12:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-02-22 |
Time |
12:55 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-22 13:01:32 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE TWO (2) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEYS LESS THAN | | | A YEAR OLD. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE ALL SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA OR ERIC | | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|