Plan Review Details - Permit 07020133
Plan Review Stops For Permit 07020133
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2007-03-07 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2007-03-05 Time 13:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2007-03-05 Time 13:02 Sent To  
Notes
2007-03-05 13:14:433-5-07 AND 3-6-07 CALLED BOARD OF ENGINEERS TO FIND OUT
 IF THIS FIRM NEEDS THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION OR
 NOT. WAITING FOR AN ANSWER. LEFT MESSAGES TO
 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATIONS PERSON INCHARGE.
 (AMANDA DAY).
  
 3-7-07 STILL NO ANSWER FROM BOARD OF ENGINEERS.PERMIT
 ISSUED AND PACKAGE WILL BE SEND TO THE BOARD OF
 ENGINEERS FOR THEIR OWN REVIEW.JG.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-02-23 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2007-02-23 Time 13:19 Rev Time 1.00
Received By jgomez Date 2007-02-23 Time 13:19 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-23 14:10:03BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST:
 1- TESTING RESULTS FROM ADVANCED RESEARCH & TESTING
 INC.:
 A) AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST, PROVIDE
 FIRM'S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IN ALL
 SHEETS AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SEC.
 61G15-23.00.INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. FIRM'S
 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AND ENGINEER'S
 LICENSE NUMBER ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. SEE ATTACHED
 COPY.
  
 B) PREVIOUS PACKAGE SUBMITTED DESCRIBED THAT TEST
 APPARATUS USED WAS MODEL- FGC-2000 AND SERIAL #2960430.
 PACKAGE SUBMITTED THIS TIME DESCRIBED THAT TEST
 APPARATUS USED WAS MODEL DFG-2W-2000 AND SERIAL
 #20610070.
 WHERE TWO DIFFERENT APPARATUS USED?.WHERE BOTH
 APPARATUS CALIBRATED?.HOW COME THE FIRST 10 TESTS
 HAVE THE SAME READING IF 2 DIFFERENT APPARATUS WERE
 USED?.
  
 ***NOTE: ONE SET OF THESE TESTSRESULTS WILL BE
 RETAINDED IN THIS OFFICE TO BE SEND TO THE BOARD OF
 ENGINEERS. ENGINEER TO PROVIDE CLARIFICATIONOF THIS
 ISSUE TO THE BOARD OF ENGINEERS.
  
 C) ENGINEER LICENSE NUMBER ON FIRST PAGE OF TEST
 REPORT SIGNED AND SEALED ON 2/21/07 IS INCORRECT.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATIONSTATES THAT
 CALIBRATION DATE WAS 10/30/2006.ACCORDING TO SEC.
 10.1.1 OF TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS)105-98 THE
 "PULL TESTER" SHOULD BE DONE WITHIN THREE MONTHS PRIOR
 TO CONDUCTING THE TEST. PROVIDE PROOF OF DATE THAT TEST
 WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THIS TEST
 STANDARD.
  
 2- A) ENGINEERASSEMBLY ATTACHMENT CALCULATIONS DON'T
 MATCH CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED THE FIRST TIME.NOW
 CALCULATIONS SHOW MAX. SYSTEM DESIGN PRESSURES OF
 -60PSF. BUT,IN NOA 03-0404.05 PAGE 10FASTENING
 OPTION #1 WAS CIRCLED.INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) CLARIFY WHY IS THE ENGINEER SIGNING AND SEALING
 NOA 03-0404.05. HE'S IS NOT ALLOWED TO SING AND SEAL
 THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL BECAUSE HE'S NOT THE ENGINEER OF
 RECORD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-02-20 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2007-02-20 Time 15:09 Rev Time 1.00
Received By jgomez Date 2007-02-20 Time 12:36 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-20 15:25:08BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST:
 1- TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 105-98 SUBMITTED
  
 A) INDICATES THAT ONLY 10 TESTS WERE PERFORMED.
 ACCORDING TO SEC. 8 OF TAS 105 NEED TO PROVIDE
 ADDITIONAL TESTS FORAREAS LARGER THAN 100 SQUARES.
 SEE SEC. 8.
  
 B) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION IN THE REPORT
 AS REQUIRED BUY SEC. 10 OF TAS 105.
  
 C) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE THE ENGINEERING FIRM
 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER ON EACH SHEET AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.002 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE
 CODE.
  
 D) ENGINEER TO SIGN, AND DATE ALL SHEETS AS REQUIRED
 BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE AND SEC. 61G15-23.002 OF
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.ONLY THE SEAL WAS
 IMPRESSED IN ALL SHEETS, BUT WITHOUTSIGNATURE AND
 DATE.
  
 2- SKYLIGHT PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED DOESN'TMEET
 THE DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ENGINEER AT
 PERIMETER AREA.NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR
 SKYLIGHT THAT MEETS THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-02-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2007-02-06 Time 12:37 Rev Time 0.50
Received By jgomez Date 2007-02-06 Time 11:28 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-06 13:19:14BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST:
  
  
 1- PERMIT APPLICATION STATES THAT ROOFING PERMIT
 APPLICATION IS FOR "ROOF RECOVERING".NEED PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR A "RECOVER" APPLICATION AND COMPLY WITH
 ALL THE REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS OF SAID PRODUCT
 APPROVAL.SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7 TO FIND OUT WHO IS
 ALLOWED TO DO THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL
 ENHANCING AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS. IF SELECTED
 SYSTEM IS LIMITED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #9, THEN IT MAY
 NOT BE USED IN THIS AREA IF DESIGN PRESSURES ARE TOO
 LOW.
  
 2- PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SKYLIGHT IS INCOMPLETE. ONLY
 THE NOA COVER PAGE WAS SUBMITTED AND IS NOT LEGIBLE.
 NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE AND LEGIBLE PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 5- DECLARED VALUATION IS LOW. NEED TO STATE UPDATED
 VALUE INCLUDING NUMBER OF SKYLIGHTS.OR VALUATION WILL
 BE ESTIMATED AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS
 TO FBC 2004.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2007-03-02 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-03-02 Time 16:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-03-02 Time 16:57 Sent To B
Notes
2007-03-02 16:58:08TO "JGOMEZ" DESK/RESUB


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved