 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 07010472
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 07010472 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
11:25 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
11:25 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-24 11:26:45 | REVISON# 3 PR#10 - OK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
Time |
13:14 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
Time |
13:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-24 13:15:18 | SHOP DRAWINGS FL# 04-5854.1/ NOA 04-0227.02 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
11:57 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
11:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-26 12:05:01 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07010472 | | | ADD: 5205 GREENWOOD | | | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS | | | TEL: (561)242-4315 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | | | | SHOP DRAWING REVIEW: DENIED | | | | | | FL # 5854.1 / 04-0227.02 YKK35H MEDIUM STILE IMPACT | | | DOOR: | | | | | | WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
11:48 |
Rev Time |
2.20 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-26 11:53:27 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07010472 | | | ADD: 5205 GREENWOOD | | | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS | | | TEL: (561)242-4315 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | BUILDING PROVISO: | | | | | | SHEET GC-101, REVISION NEW PLAYGROUND. A SPERATE PERMIT | | | WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE OF PLAYGROUND | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
Time |
08:48 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-21 09:02:51 | BY MISTAKEWE INADVERTANTLY WENT INTO THE BLDG. REVIEW | | | STOP AND IT SHOULD OF BEEN LANDSCAPING. ROBERT KUSSNER | | | X1462 PER LUIS MARTINEZ | | 2007-10-10 14:54:39 | SF-103 & SF-505 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-08-26 |
Time |
16:29 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-08-26 |
Time |
16:29 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
5.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
Time |
07:59 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-14 12:47:55 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07010472 | | | ADD: 5205 GREENWOOD AVE | | | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS | | | TEL: (561)689-8880 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 1STREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2 ) FL S S 713.13 | | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF | | | THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN | | | THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED | | | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE | | | IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6)THE POSTING OF THE | | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE | | | THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 3) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 4) 2ND REQUEST SHEET SS-002 LOADS AND DESIGN CRITERIA | | | NOTE (D) TO PROVIDE GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS.THE REPORTS | | | SUBMITTED ARE COPIES NOT THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | | REPORTS. | | | PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS | | | PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE DOCUMENT. FL STATE | | | STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS. | | | FBC 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOILS, | | | 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL.WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING | | | POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING | | | VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS | | | CLAIMED, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE | | | NECESSARY INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 | | | THROUGH 1802.6 . | | | | | | 5-6A) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 6B) 2ND REQUEST,DETAIL # 2 INDICATES A MONOLITHIC | | | FOOTER GOING PAST THE STEEL FRAME WALL BY SEVERAL | | | INCHES, HOW WILL THIS BE WATERPROOFED SO WATER WILL NOT | | | OSMOSIS UNDER THE BOTTOM TRACK TO THE INTERIOR OF THE | | | BUILDING? SHEET DETAIL 8 /AF-510 INDICATES THE USE OF A | | | MEMBRANE FLASHING APPLIED TO THE 5/8" EXTERIOR | | | DENSEGLASSGOLD SHEATHING. | | | 1403.8 | | | IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR INSPECTION FOR TERMITE | | | INFESTATION, CLEARANCE BETWEEN EXTERIOR WALL COVERINGS | | | AND FINAL EARTH GRADE ON THE EXTERIOR OF A BUILDING | | | SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 6 INCHES (152 MM). | | | | | | WITH THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION OR ALTRATION TO THE | | | EXISTING BUILDING UNDER THE EXISTING CBS WITH STUCCO | | | DIRECTLY APPLIED TO THE BLOCK, THE CODE WAS NOT | | | CONCERNED WITH A 6" INSPECTION ZONE FOR TERMITES.WHEN | | | APPLYING THE VENEER TO THE EXTERTIORTHIS CHANGES THE | | | LEVEL OR GRADE ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. SHEET | | | SB-502 DETAIL# 1 INDICATES THE FOOTING AND SLAB TOTAL | | | 12" IN THE VERTICAL DIMENSION. WITH THE 6" INSPECTION | | | PANEL AND THE 12" MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR FOUNDATIONS | | | THE MINIMUM VERTICAL HEIGHT OF THE FOUNDATION IS 18", | | | PLEASE UPDATE THEA & S SHEETS. | | | | | | 6C) 2ND REQUEST, BOTH DETAILS 1& 2 BOTH INDICATE THE | | | USE OF STEEL NETWORKS VERTICLIP SLS & SLB , HOW ARE | | | THEY FASTENED TO THE EXISTING STEEL DECK, SINCE THEY | | | ARE PART OF CREATING THE EXTERIOR ENVELOPE (MAIN | | | WINDFORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM) DO THEY HAVE ANY PRODUCT | | | EVALUATION REPORTS?IF REPORTS ARE AVAILABLE HAVE | | | THEY TAKEN A 1.33% IN WINDLOADS? PLEASE SEE ICC | | | REPORT ERS 1903 FOR SL, SLB, SLS & SLT EXTERIOR CURTAIN | | | WALL SYSTEM. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | | | | 6D) 2ND REQUEST, THIS SAME DETAIL IT WOULD APPEAR THAT | | | THERE IS A GAP BETWEEN THE EXISTING FLOOR SLAB AND THE | | | NEWLY CREATED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM, WHAT WILL BE USED TO | | | STOP THE VOID IN THE WALL AT THE SLAB LEVEL, FIRE | | | PROOFING MATERIALS? SHEET AF-302 INDICATE & PROVIDE | | | DOCUMENTATION OFUL FIRE STOP SYSTEM? 717.2.3 | | | CONNECTIONS BETWEEN HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SPACES. | | | FIREBLOCKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERCONNECTIONS | | | BETWEEN CONCEALED VERTICAL STUD WALL OR PARTITION | | | SPACES AND CONCEALED HORIZONTAL SPACES CREATED BY AN | | | ASSEMBLY OF FLOOR JOISTS OR TRUSSES, AND BETWEEN | | | CONCEALED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SPACES SUCH AS OCCUR | | | AT SOFFITS, DROP CEILINGS, COVE CEILINGS AND SIMILAR | | | LOCATIONS. | | | 717.2.1 FIREBLOCKING MATERIALS. | | | FIREBLOCKING SHALL CONSIST OF 2-INCH (51 MM) NOMINAL | | | LUMBER OR TWO THICKNESSES OF 1-INCH (25 MM) NOMINAL | | | LUMBER WITH BROKEN LAP JOINTS OR ONE THICKNESS OF | | | 0.719-INCH (18.3 MM) WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL WITH JOINTS | | | BACKED BY 0.719-INCH (18.3 MM) WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL OR | | | ONE THICKNESS OF 0.75-INCH (19 MM) PARTICLEBOARD WITH | | | JOINTS BACKED BY 0.75-INCH (19 MM) PARTICLEBOARD. | | | GYPSUM BOARD, CEMENT FIBER BOARD, BATTS OR BLANKETS OF | | | MINERAL WOOL OR GLASS FIBER OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIALS | | | INSTALLED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO BE SECURELY RETAINED | | | IN PLACE SHALL BE PERMITTED AS AN ACCEPTABLE FIREBLOCK. | | | BATTS OR BLANKETS OF MINERAL OR GLASS FIBER OR OTHER | | | APPROVED NONRIGID MATERIALS SHALL BE PERMITTED FOR | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE 10-FOOT (3048 MM) HORIZONTAL | | | FIREBLOCKING IN WALLS CONSTRUCTED USING PARALLEL ROWS | | | OF STUDS OR STAGGERED STUDS. LOOSE-FILL INSULATION | | | MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED AS A FIREBLOCK UNLESS | | | SPECIFICALLY TESTED IN THE FORM AND MANNER INTENDED FOR | | | USE TO DEMONSTRATE ITS ABILITY TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND | | | TO RETARD THE SPREAD OF FIRE AND HOT GASES. THE | | | INTEGRITY OF FIREBLOCKS SHALL BE MAINTAINED. | | | 717.2.1.1 DOUBLE STUD WALLS. BATTS OR BLANKETS OF | | | MINERAL OR GLASS FIBER OR OTHER APPROVED NONRIGID | | | MATERIALS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS FIREBLOCKING IN WALLS | | | CONSTRUCTED USING PARALLEL ROWS OF STUDS OR STAGGERED | | | STUDS. | | | | | | 6E) PROVISO: STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE REVIEWED BY | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONALBEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING | | | DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 6F) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 7) SHEET AF-302 | | | 7A)(1) THE QUESTION ASKED WAS WHAT TYPE OF MATERIAL WAS | | | TO BE USED FOR THE EXTERIOR TRIM ON THE BUILDING. | | | RESPONSE COMMENTS ARE THIS IS TO BE A DRYVIT INFINITY | | | SYSTEM. SUBMITTED WASA | | | FLORIDA COVERSHEET 2030- R1, WHEN YOU LOOK INTO THE | | | REPORT THE BACK UP INFORMATION IS SUPPOSE TO BE A | | | MIAMI-DADE REPORT NOA 01-0614.14 SUCH REPORT WAS NOT | | | SUBMITTED. | | | 7A)(2) THERE ARE TWO ISSUE WITH THE USE OF EFIS WALL | | | SYSTEMS AND THE USE OF EFIS TO BE USED AS TRIM. | | | EFIS WALL SYSTEMS:2603.3 | | | SURFACE-BURNING CHARACTERISTICS. | | | UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED IN THIS SECTION, | | | FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION AND FOAM PLASTIC CORES OF | | | MANUFACTURED ASSEMBLIES SHALL HAVE A FLAME SPREAD INDEX | | | OF NOT MORE THAN 75 AND A | | | SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 450 | | | WHERE TESTED IN THE MAXIMUM THICKNESS INTENDED FOR USE | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84. LOOSE FILL-TYPE FOAM | | | PLASTIC INSULATION SHALL | | | BE TESTED AS BOARD STOCK FOR THE FLAME SPREAD | | | INDEX AND SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX. | | | EFIS EXTERIOR TRIM:2603.5.4 FLAME | | | SPREAD AND SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEXES. FOAM PLASTIC | | | INSULATION, EXTERIOR COATINGS AND FACINGS SHALL BE | | | TESTED SEPARATELY IN THE THICKNESS | | | INTENDED FOR USE, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 4 INCHES | | | (102 MM), AND SHALL EACH HAVE A FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF | | | 25 OR LESS AND A SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX OF 450 OR LESS | | | AS DETERMINED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84. | | | 2603.5 EXTERIOR WALLS OF BUILDINGS | | | OF ANY HEIGHT. | | | EXTERIOR WALLS OF BUILDINGS OF TYPE I, II, III | | | OR IV CONSTRUCTION OF ANY HEIGHT SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | SECTIONS 2603.5.1 THROUGH 2603.5.7 . EXTERIOR WALLS OF | | | COLD STORAGE BUILDINGS REQUIRED TO | | | BE CONSTRUCTED OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS, | | | WHERE THE BUILDING IS MORE THAN ONE STORY IN HEIGHT, | | | SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS | | | 2603.5.1 THROUGH 2603.5.7 . | | | EXTERIOR WALLS OF BUILDINGS OF TYPE V | | | CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS 2603.2 , 2603.3 | | | AND 2603.4 . | | | | | | 7B) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 8) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 9A) PARTIALLY COMPLIED WE ARE STILL MISSING PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS. ) 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. IN | | | WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT | | | RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 | | | M) IN BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BEOPENINGS AND | | | THE BALANCE OF GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE | | | BUILDING SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH | | | GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT | | | RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH AN IMPACT RESISTANT | | | COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E | | | 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 | | | AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1.GLAZED | | | OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE SHALL | | | MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. 2. | | | GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M) ABOVE | | | GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE | | | TEST. | | | | | | 9B) PARTIALLY COMPLIED.PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED | | | WITH PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE | | | REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION | | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE | | | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER | | | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, | | | SUBMIT AN APPLICA TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 9C) PARTIALLY COMPLIED.) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY | | | DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN | | | WRITING BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR | | | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 9D) FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT | | | INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS | | | ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | 1. WINDOWS | | | A. FIXED -OK | | | B) STOREFRONT - NOT SUBMITTED | | | C) CIRCULAR FIXED FRAME- NOT SUBMITTED | | | D) CURTAIN WALL | | | 2) GLAZED DOORS | | | A) KANEER IR-350 NOT SUBMITTED | | | B) HOLLOW METAL DOOR- OK | | | 3) TRANSOM NOT SUBMITTED | | | 4) SIDELIGHTS- NOT SUBMITTED | | | 5) MULLIONS | | | 6) LOUVERS- STATED NONE IN BUILDING? | | | 7) EFIS SYSTEMS WRONG BACK UP REPORT | | | 8) ROOF ASSEMBLIES | | | A) MAIN ROOF FIRESTONE ULTRAPLY - NO ENHANCED | | | FASTENING REQUIRES ENGINEERS SEAL AND SIGNATURE | | | B) ROOF TILE OK | | | C) STANDING SEAM- OK | | | D) UNDERLAYMENTS- OK | | | E) ROOF INSULATION- OK | | | F) ROOF HATCH EXISTING | | | G) PRE-MANUFACTURED A/C STANDS NEW COMMENT | | | | | | 10) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 11) 2ND REQUEST,BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
Time |
14:11 |
Rev Time |
5.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
Time |
08:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-02 17:01:53 | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 07010472 | | | ADD: 5205 GREENWOOD AVE | | | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS | | | TEL: (561)689-8880 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 1STREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2 ) FL S S 713.13 | | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF | | | THE COURT. | | | NOTE: 713.13(2) | | | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS | | | NOT ACTUALLY | | | COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, | | | SUCH NOTICE IS | | | NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6)THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE | | | OF COMMENCEMENT | | | AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 3) SHEET SB-101 THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE THE USE OF | | | TERMITE TREATMENT FOR THE NEW CONCRETE SLAB. 1816.1.1 | | | IF SOIL TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE | | | PREVENTION, THE INITIAL CHEMICAL SOIL TREATMENT INSIDE | | | THE FOUNDATION PERIMETER SHALL BE DONE AFTER ALL | | | EXCAVATION, BACKFILLING AND COMPACTION IS COMPLETE. | | | | | | 1816.1.2 | | | IF SOIL TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE | | | PREVENTION, SOIL AREA DISTURBED AFTER INITIAL CHEMICAL | | | SOIL TREATMENT SHALL BE RETREATED WITH A CHEMICAL SOIL | | | TREATMENT, INCLUDING SPACES BOXED OR FORMED. | | | | | | 1816.1.3 | | | IF SOIL TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE | | | PREVENTION, SPACE IN CONCRETE FLOORS BOXED OUT OR | | | FORMED FOR THE SUBSEQUENT INSTALLATION OF PLUMBING | | | TRAPS, DRAINS OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE SHALL BE CREATED BY | | | USING PLASTIC OR METAL PERMANENTLY PLACED FORMS OF | | | SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO ELIMINATE ANY PLANNED SOIL | | | DISTURBANCE AFTER INITIAL CHEMICAL SOIL TREATMENT. | | | | | | 1816.1.4 | | | IF SOIL TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE | | | PREVENTION, CHEMICALLY TREATED SOIL SHALL BE PROTECTED | | | WITH A MINIMUM 6 MILLIMETER VAPOR RETARDER TO PROTECT | | | AGAINST RAINFALL DILUTION. IF RAINFALL OCCURS BEFORE | | | VAPOR RETARDER PLACEMENT, RETREATMENT IS REQUIRED. ANY | | | WORK, INCLUDING PLACEMENT OF REINFORCING STEEL, DONE | | | AFTER CHEMICAL TREATMENT UNTIL THE CONCRETE FLOOR IS | | | POURED, SHALL BE DONE IN SUCH MANNER AS TO AVOID | | | PENETRATING OR DISTURBING TREATED SOIL. | | | | | | 1816.1.5 | | | IF SOIL TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE | | | PREVENTION, CONCRETE OVERPOUR OR MORTAR ACCUMULATED | | | ALONG THE EXTERIOR FOUNDATION PERIMETER SHALL BE | | | REMOVED PRIOR TO EXTERIOR CHEMICAL SOIL TREATMENT, TO | | | ENHANCE VERTICAL PENETRATION OF THE CHEMICALS. | | | | | | 4)SHEET SS-002 LOADS AND DESIGN CRITERIA NOTE D) TO | | | PROVIDE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. FBC 1802.2.1 | | | QUESTIONABLE SOILS, | | | 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. | | | WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN | | | DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT | | | SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE NECESSARY INVESTIGATION | | | BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH 1802.6 . | | | | | | 5) SHEET SF-101: | | | 5A) THIS SHEET INDICATES A DETAIL# 1/ SB502 THIS DETAIL | | | IS OF A EXPANDED FOOTER THE WIDTH IS PROVIDED BUT NOT | | | THE LENGTH. THE DEPTH AND NUMBER OF STEELBARS AND SIZE | | | OF BARS IS PROVIDED IN THE DETAIL. PLEASE PROVIDE THE | | | LENGTH. | | | | | | 6) SHEET SF-102: | | | | | | 6A) DETAIL# 1/SF-504 DOESN'T INDICATE IF THE EXISTING | | | PARAPET WALL WILL BE CUT AWAY AT THIS NEW ROOF AREA OR | | | WILL THIS AREA NEED DRAINAGE AND EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS, | | | FOR BOTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING? ADITIONAL INFORMATION | | | REQUIRED? | | | | | | 6B) DETAIL # 2 INDICATES A MONOLITHIC FOOTER GOING PAST | | | THE STEEL FRAME WALL BY SEVERAL INCHES, HOW WILL THIS | | | BE WATERPROOFED SO WATER WILL NOT OSMOSIS UNDER THE | | | BOTTOM TRACK TO THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING? SHEET | | | DETAIL 8 /AF-510 INDICATES THE USE OF A MEMBRANE | | | FLASHING APPLIED TO THE 5/8" EXTERIOR DENSEGLASSGOLD | | | SHEATHING. | | | 1403.8 | | | IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR INSPECTION FOR TERMITE | | | INFESTATION, CLEARANCE BETWEEN EXTERIOR WALL COVERINGS | | | AND FINAL EARTH GRADE ON THE EXTERIOR OF A BUILDING | | | SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 6 INCHES (152 MM). | | | | | | 6C) BOTH DETAILS 1& 2 BOTH INDICATE THE USE OF STEEL | | | NETWORKS VERTICLIP SLS & SLB , HOW ARE THEY FASTENED TO | | | THE EXISTING STEEL DECK, SINCE THEY ARE PART OF | | | CREATING THE EXTERIOR ENVELOPE (MAIN | | | WINDFORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM) DO THEY HAVE ANY PRODUCT | | | EVALUATION REPORTS?IF REPORTS ARE AVAILABLE HAVE | | | THEY TAKEN A 33% | | | IN WINDLOADS? | | | | | | 6D) THIS SAME DETAIL IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THERE IS A | | | GAP BETWEEN THE EXISTING FLOOR SLAB AND THE NEWLY | | | CREATED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM, WHAT WILL BE USED TO STOP | | | THE VOID IN THE WALL AT THE SLAB LEVEL, FIRE PROOFING | | | MATERIALS? SHEET AF-302 INDICATES UL FIRE STOP SYSTEM? | | | 711.3 FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING. | | | THE FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING OF FLOOR AND ROOF ASSEMBLIES | | | SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING | | | TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. WHERE THE FLOOR ASSEMBLY | | | SEPARATES MIXED OCCUPANCIES, THE ASSEMBLY SHALL HAVE A | | | FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED | | | BY SECTION 302.3.2 BASED ON THE OCCUPANCIES BEING | | | SEPARATED. WHERE THE FLOOR ASSEMBLY SEPARATES A SINGLE | | | OCCUPANCY INTO DIFFERENT FIRE AREAS, THE ASSEMBLY SHALL | | | HAVE A FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN THAT | | | REQUIRED BY SECTION 706.3.7 . FLOOR ASSEMBLIES | | | SEPARATING DWELLING UNITS IN THE SAME BUILDING OR | | | SLEEPING UNITS IN OCCUPANCIES IN GROUP R-1, HOTEL | | | OCCUPANCIES, R-2 AND I-1 SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1-HOUR | | | FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 6E) DETAIL # 1/ SF-505INDICATES AN EXISTING W16X26 | | | AND A NEW BEAM W14X26. THE DETAIL INDICATES THE W14X26 | | | WITH CONNECTION PLATES THAT ARE BOLTEDONTO THE W14X26, | | | BOLT SIZE IS NOT PROVIDED, ALSO THE CONNECTION PLATE | | | SIZE OR TYPE OF CONFIGURATION ISN'T PROVIDED NOR THE | | | CONNECTION TO BEAM W16X26? | | | 106.1.2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6E) AT THE END OF THE SAME CANOPY THERE IS A SECTION | | | THROUGH THE NEW W14X26 BUT NO DETAIL OF HOW THIS WILL | | | BE ASSEMBLED? | | | 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 7) SHEET AF-302 | | | | | | 7A)SHEET AF-302 DETAILS 1& 2 BOTH INDICATE EXTERIOR | | | MOLDING OR TRIM ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, WHAT | | | TYPE OF TRIMWILL BE USED AND HOW WILL IT BE | | | ATTACHED? | | | | | | 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFROMATIOIN | | | | | | 7B) SHEET AF-302 BOTH DETAILS INDICATE SECTION 1/ | | | AF-510 A 2 1/2" STRUCTURAL METAL STUD GAUGE OF | | | STREUCTURAL STUD IS NOT PROVIDED. SHEET SF-504 DOESN'T | | | INDICATE GAUGE OF 2 1/2 STRUCTURAL STUD OR HOW IT WILL | | | BE TIED BACK TO THE 6" / 20 GAUGE METAL STUD WALL? | | | | | | 8) SHEET AF-303 DETAIL# 4 INDICATES THE USE OF STANDING | | | SEAM METAL ROOF SYSTEM, DETAIL# 8 OF SF-501 INDICATES A | | | SSTRUCTURAL DECK OF1 1/2" B METAL DECK, | | | PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH 1507.4.2. THIS ROOF HAS | | | LESS THAN A 2:12 SLOPE. | | | 1507.4.2 DECK SLOPE. | | | THE MINIMUM SLOPE FOR LAPPED, NONSOLDERED SEAM METAL | | | ROOFS WITHOUT APPLIED LAP SEALANT SHALL BE THREE UNITS | | | VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL (25-PERCENT SLOPE). THE | | | MINIMUM SLOPE FOR LAPPED, NONSOLDERED SEAM METAL ROOFS | | | WITH APPLIED LAP SEALANT SHALL BE ONE-HALF VERTICAL | | | UNIT IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL (4-PERCENT SLOPE). THE | | | MINIMUM SLOPE FOR STANDING SEAM OF ROOF SYSTEMS SHALL | | | BE ONE-QUARTER UNIT VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL | | | (2-PERCENT SLOPE). | | | | | | 9A)1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. | | | IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR | | | GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE | | | IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN | | | BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE | | | OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF GLAZED | | | OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING | | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH | | | GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE | | | IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH AN | | | IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND | | | ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 | | | AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: | | | 1.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 | | | FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. | | | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN | | | 30 FEET (9.1 M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET | | | THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE | | | TEST. | | | | | | 9B)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 | | | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION | | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW. | | | FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS | | | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE | | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- | | | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE | | | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE | | | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 9C)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE | | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 9D)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, | | | PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- | | | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT | | | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS | | | FOLLOWS: | | | WINDOWS: | | | FIXED WINDOWS STORE FRONT | | | CURTAINWALL | | | DOORS: | | | GLAZED DOORS | | | HOLLOW METAL FRAME DOORS | | | TRANSOMS | | | SIDELIGHTS | | | MULLIONS | | | VERTICAL | | | HORIZONTAL | | | LOUVERS WALL | | | EFIS SYSTEMS | | | ROOFING ASSEMBLIES | | | UNDERLAYMENTS | | | ROOFING INSULATION | | | STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING | | | ROOF HATCHES IF NEW OR REPLACED | | | | | | 9E ) THIS ROOF IS MISSING OR NOT IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOW ITEMS: | | | | | | __X__ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH | | | SYSTEM TO BE USED. | | | | | | _X_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW | | | PRESSURE FOR ZONE ___ . | | | | | | _NOT KNOWN__ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES | | | LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD THE FASTENER | | | RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT | | | REQUIRED, AS DETERMINED BY THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED | | | FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED | | | AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF | | | CONSULTANT MAY BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | _NOT KNOWN__THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES | | | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCED | | | FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | 10) PLEASE PROVIDE THE APPROPRIATE INFORMATION FOR | | | EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING: | | | 13-400.2A.2 SHELL BUILDING | | | 14-400.0..C.4 RENOVATED BUILDINGS | | | 13-400.0 COMPLIANCE CRITERIA | | | | | | 11)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-02-14 |
Time |
10:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-02-14 |
Time |
10:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-14 10:15:02 | ** REVISED PLANS ALREADY REVIEWED AND STAMPED SHEETS. | | | TWO ROLLS OF REVISIONS SUBMITTED. ONE ROLL CONTAINS | | | STAMPS FROM ELECTRICAL REVIEW WHICH IS THE CONTRACTORS | | | COPY FOR ON-SITE. | | | THE SECOND ROLL CONTAINS ALL NEW SHEETS WHICH ARE THE | | | SAME AS THE ORIGINAL REVISION AND ROLLS. | | | THESE NEW SHEETS ARE NOT NEEDED. THE FILE ROLL ALREADY | | | CONTAINS THE REVISIONS FROM PREVIOUS SUBMITTEED | | | REVISIONS PASSED ON NOV 29, 2007. DO NOT NEED ANY OTHER | | | SHEETS. NONE STAMPED SHEETS WILL BE RETURNED TO | | | CONTRACTOR ALONG WITH PREVIOUS STAMPED CONTRACTORS | | | COPY. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-805-6717 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
16:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
16:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-29 16:02:40 | REV #4 FOR PHASE #2, HARVEST PUMP |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-23 |
Time |
08:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-23 |
Time |
07:38 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-23 08:46:24 | *** INSERTED NEW SHEETS INTO COMPLETE SETS, STAMPED ALL | | | SHEETS, STAMPED PRODUCT APPROVALS, STRUCTURAL SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
Time |
18:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
Time |
17:09 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-15 18:18:33 | 2007-09-15 18:18:33 | | | | | | ** TEMPORARY FAILED STATUS*** | | | | | | NEEDS TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS BEFORE PROCESSING AND | | | ISSUANCE OF PERMIT. | | | CONTACT AHS BEEN MADE WITH THE ARCHITECT AND CONTRACTOR | | | BY PHONE AND E-MAIL. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALMBEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | 2007-09-15 17:09:53 | 2007-09-15 17:09:53 | | | | | | IN ELECTRIC FOR REVIEW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
Time |
19:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
Time |
15:49 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-07 19:28:22 | 2007-07-07 19:28:22 | | | *** NOTE ADDED ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE THIS COMMENT IS FOR THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THESE SHEETS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SEAL IN USE ON LANDSCAPE PLANS IS | | | REQUIRED TO MEET FAC 61G1-16.002. THIS IS REQUIRED | | | WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER. | | | THIS IS A NEW COMMENT AND WAS NOTICE WHEN PLANS WERE | | | BEING ROLLED. PLEASE SEE ZONING FOR POSSIBLE COMMENTS | | | EITHER ON PREVIOUS OR PRESENT REVIEW. | | 2007-07-07 19:08:06 | 2007-07-07 19:08:06 | | | **** UNSAT3RDREVIEW **** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL SEVERAL ITEMS FROM THE | | | TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SOME NEW COMMENTS BASED ON | | | CHANGES AND REVISIONS NOW MADE TO PLANS WHICH WERE NOT | | | ON PREVIOUS REVIEWED PLANS. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE BOTH PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED | | | FOR THE REQUIRED CODES TO BE STATED ON BOTH THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE ONLY | | | CHANGE WAS MADE TO THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS AND THE | | | ELECTRICAL SHEETS STILL CONTAIN THE SAME GENERAL | | | STATEMENT. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT RELEVANT CODES UNDER A DESIGN OF ANY | | | PROJECT SHALL BE STATED ON PLANS AS REQUIRED UNDER THE | | | FBC. | | | PLEASE BE SURE THE FOLLOWING IS STATED ON THE | | | ELECTRICAL SHEETS: | | | 2005 NFPA-70 (NEC | | | 2003 NFPA-101 LIFE SAFETY CODE | | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | | 2004 FBC W/2006 REVISIONS. | | | PLEASE STATE THESE CODE ON E COVER SHEETS OR ANY OTHER | | | E-SHEET(S) WHERE NOTES ARE PRESENT REFLECTING THE CODE | | | | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS TWO REVIEWS REQUESTED | | | COMPLIANCE TO FBC CHAPTER 13. THERE WERE SUBSTANTIAL | | | CHANGES WHICH WENT INTO EFFECT ON OCTOBER 1ST, 2005. | | | PLEASE SEE NOT SYSTEM IS PROPOSED, ONLY PLANS NOW | | | INDICATE A SYMBOL IN AREAS FOR *MOTION DETECTORS* | | | PLEASE SEE NO TIMES OR INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR | | | THESE NEW DEVICES AS NOTED PREVIOUSLY. NO DETAIL ON | | | WIRING OF THESE DEVICES AS LIGHTING IS STILL SHOWN | | | CIRCUITED BACK TO THE MAIN PANEL. | | | PLEASE SEE NOT ALL AREAS SHOW MOTION DETECTORS OR | | | OCCUPANCY DEVICES. PLEASE SPECIFY THESE DEVICES. PLEASE | | | KNOW RANGES ON MOTION DEVICES ONLY ARE DIFFERENT AND | | | MAY OR MAY NOT PROVIDE THE NEEDED COVERAGE. PLEASE SEE | | | OTHER COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO STAIRS ON MOTION | | | DETECTORS. | | | PLEASE SEE SEPARATE SPACES WHICH REQUIRE DEVICES YET | | | PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY DEVICES FOR THESE AREAS. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE MAXIMUM TIMES STATED IN THE FBC | | | DEPENDING ON THE TYPES OF DEVICES CHOSEN. (OS TYPES | | | 30MINS)(TIMER TYPES 4HRS) THIS ALL DEPENDS ON DESIGN OF | | | DEVICES ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SAME ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED | | | BACK. PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE MENTIONS HAVE BEEN | | | PROPERLY SUBMITTED, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE NO INFORMATION | | | PER 13-415.2 COULD BE FOUND ON PLANS AND OTHER | | | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURES AS SHOWN | | | ON PLANS DO NOT ALL CORRELATE WITH THE FIXTURE LEGEND | | | AND NO PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED BASED ON | | | THE FIXTURES ON PLANS AND SQ FT OF PROJECT ON HOW THE | | | NUMBER OF 1.0 W/SF IS MET. | | | THE DESIGN TOTAL COMPARED TO THE DESIGN ALLOWANCE BASED | | | ON THE SECTION 13-415.2.C.1, 13-415.2.C. | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.3 | | | PLEASE SEE AS THE SAME ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR METHOD C | | | WAS SUBMITTED BACK; PLEASE SEE THESE ARE STILL NOT | | | SEALED AS REQUIRED AND PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. PLEASE SEE | | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, 13-415.1.ABC.1.2, AND | | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.3 (WHERE APPLICABLE ON .1.3).PLEASE SEE | | | 13-103.1.1.1 WHICH REQUIRES THESE TO BE *SIGNED, DATED | | | AND SEALED* BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD AND | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DOCUMENTS. | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED | | | PHOTO-METRICS AND ANY CONTROLS TO MEET BOTH THE FBC AND | | | NFPA-101 FOR DEVICES CHOSEN. | | | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS NOW INDICATE ONLY ONE DEVICE ON | | | EACH LEVEL FOR CONTROL OF EGRESS LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE | | | 7.9.2.2 OF THE LIFE SAFETY CODE WHICH WAS GIVEN ON BOTH | | | OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS. | | | FBC 1006.1.2, LS101 7.8.1.2.2 | | | PLEASE ADJUST. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FIRST REVIEW COMMENTS WHICH GAVE | | | NOTES FOR REQUIRED DEDICATED CIRCUITS FOR ELEVATOR | | | ROOMS, EQUIPMENT ETC. THE RESPONSE WAS THE EQUIPMENT | | | ROOM WAS TO HAVE DEDICATED CIRCUITS ETC AND THIS WAS | | | DONE. PLEASE SEE 620.24 HOWEVER AS THIS REQUIRES | | | DEDICATE BRANCH CIRCUIT FOR PIT LIGHTS AND RECEPTACLES. | | | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING IS STILL SHOWN ON THE SAME | | | CIRCUIT AS THE LIGHTING ON FIRST FLOOR. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT SOME LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR | | | SERVICE ARE NOW BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST TIME FOR | | | REVIEW. PLEASE SEE NO LOAD SUMMARY ON HOW LOADS WERE | | | DERIVED WAS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE CONTINUOUS LOADS AS REQUIRED ARE STILL NOT | | | SHOWN AT 125%. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT LOAD CALCULATIONS BASED ON FUTURE LOADS | | | AND CURRENT KNOWN | | | PLEASE SEE THE 2005 NEC FOR REQUIRED METHODS. 220.12, | | | 220.14, 220.42, 220.44 AND ALL PREVIOUS SECTIONS AS | | | PREVIOUSLY NOTED. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE THE *85%* AS SHOWN AS A DE-RATING | | | FOR * EQUIPMENT* COMES FROM BASED ON THE NEC. PLEASE | | | SUBMIT COMPLETE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE AND EACH | | | OF THE PANELS AS BEING SHOWN EVEN THOSE BEING SET ASIDE | | | FOR FUTURE USE. PLEASE SEE THE ONLY PANEL SHOWN WHICH | | | IS THE NHP AND THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE A LOAD SUMMARY OR | | | HOW THE SERVICE WAS SIZED OR CORRECT LOAD CALCULATIONS | | | FOR THIS PANEL OR SERVICE. | | | PLEASE SEE NOTE #9 ABOVE AS THE SERVICE SIZE OR | | | CONDUCTORS ARE NOT COMPLETE THE SIZE OF THE SERVICE CAN | | | NOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME. | | | PLEASE SEE ALL OF 220. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 215.3, 230.42 ETC FOR ALL CONTINUOUS | | | LOADS AND LARGEST MOTORS LOADS AT 125%. | | | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 | | | | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER AS SUBMITTED IS STILL NOT | | | COMPLETE. | | | PLEASE SEE NO INFORMATION FOR ANY OF THE PROPOSED MAINS | | | IS SHOWN. ONLY ONE OF THE MAINS INDICATES IT WILL BE | | | 800AMPS. | | | PLEASE SEE NO AIC RATINGS FOR EACH OF THE SERVICE | | | EQUIPMENT AND MAIN WAS SUBMITTED. SOME AIC CALCULATIONS | | | THESE WAS SUBMITTED. 110.9 | | | PLEASE SEE NO MAINS AS REQUIRED PER 230.70, 230.71, | | | 230.72, 230.76 AND 230.79 ETC WAS SHOWN. | | | IN FACT PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE LETTER NOW MENTIONS | | | SPECIFICALLY THAT A NEW SHUNT TRIP AND SHUNT TRIP | | | BREAKERS WAS ADDED. THE RISER NOW SHOWS THIS AND AS | | | PREVIOUSLY STATED IN BOTH PREVIOUS REVIEWS MAIN MUST | | | MEET 230.76 AND 230.79. SHUNT TRIP BREAKERS AND SHUNT | | | TRIPS DO NOT MEET CODE. PLEASE KNOW THAT ALL MAINS AND | | | MEANS OF DISCONNECT MUST CONTAIN A MANUAL MEANS OF | | | DISCONNECT RATED FOR THE LOAD SERVED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE LOCATION OF THESE MAINS SHALL BE LOCATED | | | AT THE NEAREST POINT OF ENTRANCE INTO THE BUILDING. | | | THIS IS A LIFE SAFETY HAZARD AND PROPERTY HAZARD. IF | | | THERE IS A STRUCTURE FIRE FOR EXAMPLE AND THE ONLY WAY | | | TO SHUT OFF THE POWER TO THE BUILDING IS LOCATED CLOSE | | | TO THE CENTER OF THE BUILDING THIS WOULD NOT ONLY CAUSE | | | A DELAY IT WOULD ALSO CREATE A HAZARD TO FIRE | | | DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL IN AN EFFORT TO TURN OFF POWER. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE NUMEROUS ITEMS NOT COMPLETED ON | | | RISER AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | ** AS A NOTE PANEL NHP IS GOING TO BE 800AMPS? | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER STILL DOES NOT INDICATE | | | THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM AS REQUIRED PER 250.50. | | | PLEASE SEE THE RISER MENTIONS AND SHOWS ALL AS EXISTING | | | HOWEVER THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE AS THE RISER JUST ABOVE | | | WHICH SHOWS EXISTING CONDITIONS AND THIS DOES NOT | | | CORRELATE WITH THE NEW PROPOSED RISER. | | | HOW CAN THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM AS SHOWN BE | | | EXISTING WHEN THE RISER AS SHOWN IS NEW? | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT 250.50 WHICH REQUIRES ALL FOOTER | | | STEEL ETC TO BE PART OF THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM. | | | PLEASE SEE THE ADDITION AND NEW FOOTER STEEL OR | | | BUILDING STEEL ETC IS REQUIRED TO BE PART OF THE | | | SYSTEM. | | | PLEASE SHOW NEW SYSTEM. | | | 250.50,250.54, 250.56 ETC. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED IN REVIEWS: THE | | | RISER IS STILL SHOWING *EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS* | | | AHEAD OF THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT(S) WHICH IS NOT | | | PERMITTED. THIS CONDITION AS SHOWN WOULD CREATE | | | OBJECTIONABLE CURRENTS AS STATED IN 250.6. | | | PLEASE SEE 250.24 AS THIS REQUIRES BONDING AT THE FIRST | | | MEANS OF DISCONNECT. WHEN THE BONDING IS DONE AT THE | | | FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT AS REQUIRED PER 250.24 AND IF | | | AN *EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR IS INSTALLED BEFORE | | | THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT THEN THIS WOULD BE | | | PARALLELING THE NEUTRAL. (OBJECTIONABLE CURRENTS) | | | PLEASE ADJUST RISER. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE SET OF PLANS CONTAIN | | | SHEETS FOR A LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COMPLETED SET OF PLANS ALONG WITH NEW | | | SHEETS FOR REVISED COMMENTS AS WELL AS LIGHTNING | | | PROTECTION SHEETS. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEWS STATED A NOTE | | | WHICH SAID *PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY | | | QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED | | | COMMENTS*. IT ALSO STATED * IF THERE ARE ANY COMMENT | | | WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN | | | CONTACTING THIS REVIEWER*. | | | PLEASE KNOW TO DATE NO CONTACT FROM THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD HAS BEEN MADE. | | | **PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES GAVE NOTICE TO FS | | | 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | PLEASE SEE SEVERAL OF THE CODE SECTIONS GIVEN ON ALL | | | PREVIOUS REVIEWS STILL REMAIN. PLEASE SEE AS REQUIRED | | | PER THE FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B), A FEE HAS NOW | | | BEEN ASSESSED AS REQUIRED FOR SAID REPEAT COMMENTS. | | | THIS STATUTE APPLIES TO ANY OF THE SAME CODE COMPLIANT | | | COMMENTS REPEATED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE AMOUNT DUE BEFORE PLANS MAY BE | | | RESUBMITTED IS 4X TIMES THE PORTION OF THE BASE PERMIT | | | FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLAN REVIEW. THE BASE PERMIT FEE WAS | | | $12,500 AT 30% IS $3,750 TIME FOUR.THIS FEE IS | | | $15,000.00. | | | THIS FEE IS REQUIRED BEFORE PLANS MAY BE SUBMITTED. ** | | | IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT A MEETING BE HELD | | | BETWEEN THE DESIGN TEAM AND THIS OFFICE ONCE ALL OF THE | | | REVIEWS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AS THE STATUTE REQUIRES THE | | | FINE EACH TIME THEREAFTER AS WELL. | | | PLEASE KNOW THAT PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS | | | OFFICE AND WILL BE PLACED WITH PLANS WHICH WERE | | | RETAINED FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS SUBMITTED ARE | | | ALSO BEING RETAINED. | | | PLEASE KNOW IF THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE DESIGN | | | TEAM OR DESIGNER WHICH IS NOT SETTLED ON A LOCAL LEVEL | | | THE PLANS WILL BE FORWARD TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND STATES LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE | | | BOARD FOR REVIEW. | | | THIS INFORMATION WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE ASSISTANT | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL MR. ROBERT BROWN. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE ANY COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES | | | WHICH MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS AND DESIGN CHANGES. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | 2007-07-07 15:50:24 | 2007-07-07 15:50:24 | | | PLANS REMOVED FROM INCOMING. PLANS WILL BE RETURNED TO | | | INCOMING WAITING FOR COMM BOARD ONCE ELECTRICAL REVIEW | | | IS COMPLETED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-04-15 |
Time |
14:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-04-15 |
Time |
12:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-15 14:53:31 | ********* UNSAT2NDREVIEW *********** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS FROM THE THREE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEWS ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. PLEASE SEE NEW | | | COMMENTS DUE TO CHANGES IN PLANS OR BASED ON PAPERWORK | | | AND DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED NOT DONE BY ANY DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THAT ANY REFERENCES TO THE FBC CHAPTER 1 | | | ARE FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE CODES REFLECTED ON PLANS ARE NOT | | | CORRECT. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT MANY OF THE CODES REFLECTED WENT OUT IN | | | OCT 1ST OF 2005. PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL CODES | | | WHICH ARE STILL BEING REFLECTED FROM THE *2001 FBC* , | | | THE 2000 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE ETC? | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT AS OF DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 THE | | | CODES CHANGED TO THE 2006 REVISIONS TO THE 2004 FBC. | | | PLEASE SEE THIS INCLUDES ALL MECHANICAL, PLUMBING | | | BUILDING ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT AS OF THAT SAME DATE THE STATE ALSO | | | ADOPTED THE NEW 2005 NFPA-70 (NEC). | | | PLEASE SEE THE INCORRECT NFPA-101, 1 AND 72 ARE | | | REFLECTED ALONG WITH THE INCORRECT NFPA-70 WHICH IS | | | SHOWN AS THE 2002. | | | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING AT A MINIMUM ON ARCHITECTURAL | | | COVER SHEET AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AT A MINIMUM. 2005 | | | NFPA-70, 2002 NFPA-72, 2003 NFPA-101, 2003 NFPA-1. | | | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT OTHER CODES FROM OTHER TRADES MAY | | | ALSO BE STATED TO BE DONE. THIS IS FOR ELECTRICAL | | | REVIEW ONLY HOWEVER ALL CORRECTED CODES MUST BE STATED | | | FOR DESIGN WHETHER OR NOT COMMENTS ARE MADE BY ANY OF | | | THE OTHER TRADES. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE END OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | REQUESTED FOR ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS WHICH WERE BEING | | | REPLACED TO BE REMOVED AND TO SUBMIT *ONE COPY* OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS BACK WITH PLANS FOR REFERENCE. THE | | | SHEETS WERE REMOVED HOWEVER NO OLD/VOIDED SHEETS WERE | | | SUBMITTED BACK WITH PLANS? | | | PLEASE SUBMIT ALL FOR THE NEXT REVIEW AS SHEETS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED ON AGAIN. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE WORST CASE VOLTAGE DROP FOR | | | BRANCH/CIRCUITS AND FEEDERS PER 13-413.1ABC.1.1, .1.2. | | | THIS INFORMATION WHICH WAS SUBMITTED ON SEPARATE SHEETS | | | SHALL BE PART OF THE PLANS, SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY | | | THE RESPONSIBLE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL ALONG WITH TITLE | | | BLOCK INFORMATION ON PLANS AND SHEETS. THESE WOULD BE | | | INCORPORATED IN PLAN SETS NOT SUBMITTED AS LOOSE | | | SHEETS. | | | PLEASE ALSO THE INFORMATION ON SHEETS DOES NOT INDICATE | | | WHAT THESE ARE FOR? PLEASE SEE THAT ONLY A WORST CASE | | | IS BEING REQUESTED FOR BRANCH CIRCUITS AND FEEDERS. | | | PLEASE KNOW THIS WOULD INCLUDE SITE WIRING. THE | | | NUMERICAL DESIGNATIONS ON THESE SEPARATE SHEETS DO NOT | | | INDICATE WHAT THEY ARE FOR? | | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 | | | FS 471.025 | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT MINIMUM ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND | | | PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS BASED ON THE AREA BEING DONE | | | AS A SHELL. PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.AB.1 AND 13-415.2. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-101.1.6 FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR SHELL AS | | | METHOD *B* AND *C*. PLEASE SEE THE SINGLE SHEET | | | SUBMITTED DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS | | | FROM THE 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISION AND FLA-COM UPDATED | | | FORM NUMBERS/METHODS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SHALL CORRELATE WITH | | | ALL FIXTURES AS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR DESIGN WATTAGE, TYPE | | | OF CONTROLS ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-103.1.1.1 AS THE DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANS/DESIGNS/ENERGY CALCULATIONS MUST | | | BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED AS STATED ON PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW. | | | * PLEASE KNOW THESE SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED, | | | BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 13-103.1.1.1 | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE REQUIRED DEVICES FOR ALL | | | LIGHTING AND DETAIL FOR SYSTEM OR DEVICES WHICH ARE | | | GOING TO BE INSTALLED AND LOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN ON | | | PLANS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 13 OF THE 2004 FBC W/ | | | 2006 REVISIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT A SINGLE TC IS NOT THE ONLY ITEM | | | NEEDED. PLEASE SEE THAT OVER-RIDE DEVICES ARE REQUIRED | | | AT THE POINT OF ENTRANCE INTO SPACES AND THESE DEVICES | | | A LIMITED TO TIME OF OVER-RIDE DEPENDING ON THE DEVICE | | | WHICH IS SELECTED. PLEASE SEE ALL ROOMS AND SEPARATE | | | SPACES SHALL ALSO CONTAIN DEVICES WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN | | | AND MAXIMUM OVER RIDE TIMES. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SAME SECTIONS AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT LIGHTING CONTROLS ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | AUTOMATED SHUTTING DOWN OF LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE FBC | | | 2004 (2006 REVISIONS) 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE STAIR AREAS WHICH ARE STATED AS | | | BEING LEFT IN THE *ON* POSITION WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE | | | INTEND OF THE FLORIDAENERGY CODE OR REQUIRED MANDATES | | | NATIONWIDE. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SECTIONS ON THE FBC AND NFPA WHICH | | | ADDRESS EGRESS PATHS AND STAIRS. PLEASE SEEFBC | | | 1006.1.2 | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE PLANS ARE MISSING THE | | | REQUIRED EGRESS PHOTO-METRICS AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED | | | AND REQUIRED PER NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2 | | | THE LOOSE SHEETS WHICH CONTAIN PHOTO-METRICS ARE DONE | | | PART OF THE PLANS; THEY DO NOT INDICATE THE STAIR | | | LIGHTING UNDER NORMAL OR EMERGENCY IN ANY FASHION WHICH | | | IS THE MOST IMPORTANT AREAS. THEY ARE NOT SIGNED, DATED | | | OR SEALED BY THE RESPONSIBLE DESIGNER OF RECORD AS | | | REQUIRED PER FS 471.025 | | | THEY DO NOT INDICATE THE OTHER EGRESS PATHS UNDER | | | NORMAL AND EMERGENCY CONDITIONS. | | | | | | PLEASE SHOW AND INDICATE THE MINIMUM LEVELS FOR | | | SECTIONS BELOW, PLEASE SEE THE COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO | | | EGRESS LIGHTING AND CONTROLS FOR CHAPTER 13. PLEASE SEE | | | SECTION 1006.1.2 OF THEFBC 2004 PLEASE SEE THE | | | FOLLOWING TEXT WHICH WAS EXTRACTED DIRECTLY FROM | | | NFPA-101. | | | 7.8.1 GENERAL. | | | 7.8.1.1* ILLUMINATION OF MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7.8 FOR EVERY | | | BUILDING AND STRUCTURE WHERE REQUIRED IN CHAPTER 11 | | | THROUGH CHAPTER 42. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS | | | REQUIREMENT, EXIT ACCESS SHALL INCLUDE ONLY DESIGNATED | | | STAIRS, AISLES, CORRIDORS, RAMPS, ESCALATORS, AND | | | PASSAGEWAYS LEADING TO AN EXIT. FOR THE PURPOSES OF | | | THIS REQUIREMENT, EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL INCLUDE ONLY | | | DESIGNATED STAIRS, AISLES, CORRIDORS, RAMPS, | | | ESCALATORS, WALKWAYS, AND EXIT PASSAGEWAYS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY. | | | 7.8.1.2 ILLUMINATION OF MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE | | | CONTINUOUS DURING THE TIME THAT THE CONDITIONS OF | | | OCCUPANCY REQUIRE THAT THE MEANS OF EGRESS BE AVAILABLE | | | FOR USE, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN 7.8.1.2.2. | | | 7.8.1.2.1 ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING SHALL BE EMPLOYED AT SUCH | | | LOCATIONS AND FOR SUCH PERIODS OF TIME AS ARE NECESSARY | | | TO MAINTAIN THE ILLUMINATION TO THE MINIMUM CRITERIA | | | VALUES HEREIN SPECIFIED. | | | 7.8.1.2.2 AUTOMATIC, MOTION SENSOR, TYPE LIGHTING | | | SWITCHES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE MEANS OF EGRESS, | | | PROVIDED THAT THE SWITCH CONTROLLERS ARE EQUIPPED FOR | | | FAIL-SAFE OPERATION, THE ILLUMINATION TIMERS ARE SET | | | FOR A MINIMUM 15-MINUTE DURATION, AND THE MOTION SENSOR | | | IS ACTIVATED BY ANY OCCUPANT MOVEMENT IN THE AREA | | | SERVED BY THE LIGHTING UNITS. | | | 7.8.1.3* THE FLOORS AND OTHER WALKING SURFACES WITHIN | | | AN EXIT AND WITHIN THE PORTIONS OF THE EXIT ACCESS AND | | | EXIT DISCHARGE DESIGNATED IN 7.8.1.1 SHALL BE | | | ILLUMINATED AS FOLLOWS: | | | (1)DURING CONDITIONS OF STAIR USE, THE MINIMUM | | | ILLUMINATION FOR NEW STAIRS SHALL BE AT LEAST 108 LUX | | | (10 FT-CANDLE), MEASURED AT THE WALKING SURFACES. (2) | | | THE MINIMUM ILLUMINATION FOR FLOORS AND WALKING | | | SURFACES, OTHER THAN NEW STAIRS, SHALL BE TO VALUES OF | | | AT LEAST 10.8 LUX (1 FT-CANDLE), MEASURED AT THE | | | FLOOR. | | | ***PLEASE ALSO SEE SECTION 7.9.2.2. WHERE THE FAILURE | | | OF ANY SINGLE DEVICE OR LIGHTINGSHALL NOT LEAVE ANY | | | ONE EGRESS AREA IN TOTAL DARKNESS. PLEASE PLACE DEVICES | | | WHICH ARE TO CONTROL STAIRWAY LIGHTING FOR COVERAGE AND | | | THAT A MINIMUM OF TWO DEVICES CONTROL ANY ONE AREA. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ROOM. THE | | | LIGHT SWITCH IS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE WALL WHERE | | | THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE. | | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND PLANS FOR THE MAIN | | | ELECTRICAL ROOM EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SEE THE PLANS | | | INDICATE A 400A METER AND MAIN AND THE RISER INDICATES | | | 800AMP? | | | PLEASE SEE THE LOCATION WILL REQUIRE FURTHER | | | CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE AS THE | | | LOCATION OF THE MAIN IS LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING | | | THROUGH A MINIMUM OF THREE LOCKED DOORS WHICH AT THIS | | | TIME IS TOO FAR INTO THE BUILDING FOR LIFE SAFETY AND | | | READY ACCESS TO MAIN IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY OR TO | | | SHUT OFF POWER DURING A FIRE. | | | PLEASE SEE NEC 230.70, 90.4 | | | FBC 104.6 | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE RISER IS ONLY NOW BEING | | | SUBMITTEDWITH MORE COMPLETEDINFORMATION FOR | | | CONDUCTORS, CONDUITS ETC, HOWEVER THERE ARE STILL SOME | | | ITEMS WHICH NEED TO BE INCLUDED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AS | | | PREVIOUSLY NOTED. | | | PLEASE SEE THE RISER AS SUBMITTED IS STILL NOT COMPLETE | | | AT THIS TIME AND THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS WHICH CAN NOT | | | BE REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM WITH | | | ALL SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS, FEEDERS, GROUNDING, | | | SIZES OF ALL EQUIPMENT, LOCATIONS OF ALL EQUIPMENT, AIC | | | RATINGS FOR ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT ETC. | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE ITEMS WHICH ARE STILL | | | MISSING. | | | A) NO GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM. | | | B) NO AIC RATINGS FOR ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT. | | | C) AN EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR MAY NOT BE | | | INSTALLED BEFORE THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT AS NOW | | | SHOWN ON RISER. (250.6, 250.24) | | | D) LOADS CAN NOT BE VERIFIED FOR SERVICE RISER AS SHOWN | | | WHICH WILL BE NOTED BELOW TO VERIFY IF THE CONDUCTORS | | | ETC SHOWN ARE OF ADEQUATE SIZE ETC. | | | SECTIONS AS GIVEN IN PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | ** PLEASE SEE 110.9, 215.5, 240.4, 310.16, 230.70, | | | 230.76, 230.79,250.50, 250.54, 250.56, 250.66, 240.24, | | | 110.26 ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT THESE ARE ALL FROM THE 2005 NEC. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS MENTION A LOCK OFF/ON DEVICE | | | IS TO BE INSTALLED HOWEVER NO NOTES COULD BE LOCATED | | | FOR TYPE OF DEVICE WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED AS | | | NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY LOCK-OFF DEVICES SHALL INCLUDE | | | SUCH A DEVICE WHICH INCLUDES THE DEVICE AS AN INTEGRAL | | | PART OF THE BREAKER. A *SNAP ON/CLIP ON* TYPE DEVICE IS | | | NOT ACCEPTABLE TO THIS AHJ. | | | 110.3, 90.4. | | | | | | 11) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE SEPARATE SHEETS SUBMITTED FOR | | | PANEL NHP DOES NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND REQUESTED | | | INFORMATION FOR COMPLETE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE | | | AND ALL EQUIPMENT BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD.ALL | | | INFORMATION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN RECORD SETS OF PLANS | | | AND NOT SUBMITTED ON LOOSE SHEETS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN | | | THE COMPLETED INFORMATION OR DONE BY THE DESIGNER OR | | | RECORD. | | | PLEASE SEE THE 2005 NEC FOR REQUIRED METHODS. 220.12, | | | 220.14, 220.42, 220.44 AND ALL PREVIOUS SECTIONS AS | | | PREVIOUSLY NOTED. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE | | | AND EACH OF THE PANELS AS BEING SHOWN EVEN THOSE BEING | | | SET ASIDE FOR FUTURE USE. PLEASE SEE THE ONLY PANEL | | | SHOWN WHICH IS THE NHP AND THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE A LOAD | | | SUMMARY OR HOW THE SERVICE WAS SIZED OR CORRECT LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THIS PANEL OR SERVICE. | | | PLEASE SEE NOTE #9 ABOVE AS THE SERVICE SIZE OR | | | CONDUCTORS ARE NOT COMPLETE THE SIZE OF THE SERVICE CAN | | | NOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME. | | | PLEASE SEE ALL OF 220. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 215.3, 230.42 ETC FOR ALL CONTINUOUS | | | LOADS AND LARGEST MOTORS LOADS AT 125%. | | | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THIS SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW WHICH REMAINS AS NOT INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE NOTE ABOVE (#13) WHICH REQUEST THE AIC | | | RATINGS FOR ALL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE BE SURE THESE | | | CORRELATE WITH THE DIVISION SPEC SUBMITTED. 106.1.2. | | | NEC 110.9 | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY PANEL NHP WHICH INDICATE MORE | | | THAN 42 SPACES WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED PER 408.35. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THIS PANEL AS THIS | | | IS ONLY SHOWN AS WHAT APPEARS TO BE A TWO SECTION PANEL | | | ON RISER AND RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS, HOWEVER PLANS, | | | RISER AND PANEL SCHEDULE DOES NOT SHOW IF THIS FIRST | | | SECTION CONTAINS FEED-THRU LUGS, FEEDERS, OCP ETC. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION. | | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COPY OF FS 553.80(2)(B) WHICH IS | | | BEING ATTACHED WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | PLEASE SEE THIS IS GIVEN ONLY AS A NOTICE AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-01-30 |
Time |
08:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-01-29 |
Time |
12:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-30 08:01:56 | *** UNSAT **** | | | | | | *** IMPORTANT*** | | | * PLEASE KNOW THAT BASED ON THE COMMENTS BELOW AND | | | PLANS NOT BEING COMPLETE AT THIS TIME, WHEN PLANS ARE | | | RESUBMITTED FOR REVIEW THERE MAY BE NEW COMMENTS MADE | | | WHICH WERE NOT MADE ON THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE CODES REFLECTED ON PLANS ARE NOT | | | CORRECT. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT MANY OF THE CODES REFLECTED WENT OUT IN | | | OCT 1ST OF 2005. PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT AS OF DECEMBER | | | 8TH, 2006 THE CODES CHANGED TO THE 2006 REVISIONS TO | | | THE 2004 FBC. PLEASE SEE THIS INCLUDES ALL MECHANICAL, | | | PLUMBING BUILDING ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT AS OF THAT SAME DATE THE STATE ALSO | | | ADOPTED THE NEW 2005 NFPA-70 (NEC). | | | PLEASE SEE THE INCORRECT NFPA-101, 1 AND 72 ARE | | | REFLECTED. | | | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING AT A MINIMUM ON ARCHITECTURAL | | | COVE SHEET AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AT A MINIMUM. | | | 2005 NFPA-70, 2002 NFPA-72, 2003 NFPA-101, 2003 | | | NFPA-1. | | | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT OTHER CODES FROM OTHER TRADES MAY | | | ALSO BE STATED TO BE DONE, THIS IS FOR ELECTRICAL | | | REVIEW ONLY. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE BASE ELECTRICAL PLANS | | | SHALL INDICATE THE MINIMUM LEVELS FOR ALL HORNS, | | | STROBES, OR HORN/STROBE DEVICES AS REQUIRED UNDER FBC | | | 2004 11-4.28.1,.2 AND .3(4). THE PLANS NEED TO INDICATE | | | THESE DEVICES ON THE SYMBOL LEGENDS AND CORRELATE WITH | | | PLANS. | | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL MINIMUM LEVELS AS REQUIRED ARE | | | INDICATED. | | | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT THE LIGHTNING PROTECTION | | | SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE | | | PERMIT. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE MINIMUM WIND LOAD INFORMATION | | | FOR ANY SITE LIGHTING POLES. PLEASE ALSO BE SURE THE | | | INFORMATION PROVIDED SHALL INCLUDE THE EFFECTIVE | | | PROJECTED AREA (EPA) OF THE FIXTURE. PLEASE KNOW THAT | | | THE MINIMUM WIND LOAD FOR POLES SHALL BE STATED ON | | | PLANS AND IF THE INFORMATION FOR THE POLE CALCULATIONS | | | IS NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THE | | | MANUFACTURE HAS BEEN CHOSEN, THIS MAY BE SET UP AS A | | | *PROVISO*, HOWEVER THE MINIMUM WIND SPEEDS SHALL BE ON | | | PLANS. | | | ** PLEASE SEE FBC 2004. | | | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.1.2 | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE WORST CASE VOLTAGE DROP FOR | | | BRANCH/CIRCUITS AND FEEDERS PER 13-413.1ABC.1.1, .1.2. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT MINIMUM ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND | | | PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS BASED ON THE AREA BEING DONE | | | AS A SHELL. PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.AB.1 AND 13-415.2. * | | | PLEASE KNOW THESE SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED, BY | | | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 13-103.1.1.1 | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT LIGHTING CONTROLS ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR AUTOMATED SHUTTING DOWN OF LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE FBC | | | 2004 (2006 REVISIONS) 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING DEDICATED EQUIPMENT ROOM | | | FOR THE ELEVATOR. PLEASE SEE THE NEC 620. 620.22, | | | 620.23, 620.24 AND 620.51. | | | PLEASE SEE MISSING THE DEDICATED CIRCUITS FOR THIS ROOM | | | AND OTHER ELEVATOR RELATED LIGHTING ETC WHICH MAY NOT | | | FEED ANY OTHER AREAS. PLEASE SEE PLANS INDICATE THESE | | | CIRCUITS FEEDING OTHER LIGHTING OUTSIDE OF THESE | | | AREAS. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE STATE ELEVATOR CODE. | | | PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION FOR THE ELEVATOR | | | MOTOR ITSELF. PLEASE VERIFY THE CONDUCTORS ETC. 620.11, | | | 620.12 ETC. | | | | | | 9) NOTE:PLEASE VERIFY THE LOCATION OF THE ROOF TOP | | | GFI REQUIRED FOR A/ C EQUIPMENT PER 210.63 AND | | | 210.8(B)(3). | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE PLACE ALL FIXTURE DESIGNATIONS ON | | | PLANS AND CORRELATE WITH THE SUBMITTED FIXTURE LEGEND. | | | PLEASE KNOW THAT MANY AREAS CAN NOT BE VERIFIED AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | FBC 106.1.2. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING EMERGENCY BATTERY BACK UP | | | LIGHTS REQUIRED IN STAIRS, ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM, | | | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ROOM. | | | NFPA-101 7.8, 7.9 | | | NFPA-70 700.16, AND 700.12E. | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT AND PROVIDE PHOTO-METRICS FOR | | | ALL EGRESS PATHS. PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, | | | 7.9.2.2. | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER AS SUBMITTED IS NOT COMPLETE | | | AT THIS TIME AND THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS WHICH CAN NOT | | | BE REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM WITH | | | ALL SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS, FEEDERS, GROUNDING, | | | SIZES OF ALL EQUIPMENT, LOCATIONS OF ALL EQUIPMENT, AIC | | | RATINGS FOR ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT ETC. | | | ** PLEASE SEE 110.9, 215.5, 240.4, 310.16, 230.70, | | | 230.76, 230.79,250.50, 250.54, 250.56, 250.66, 240.24, | | | 110.26 ETC. | | | PLEASE SEE THAT THESE ARE ALL FROM THE 2005 NEC. | | | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-72 4.4.1 MORE SPECIFICALLY | | | 4.4.1.4.1, 4.4.1.4.2.1 AND .2.2. | | | PLEASE INDICATE HOW THIS PROTECTION WILL BE PROVIDED | | | FOR THE DEDICATE BRANCH CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRE ALARM | | | CONTROL PANEL. | | | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY LOCK-OFF DEVICES SHALL INCLUDE | | | SUCH A DEVICE WHICH INCLUDES THE DEVICE AS AN INTEGRAL | | | PART OF THE BREAKER. A *SNAP ON/CLIP ON* TYPE DEVICE IS | | | NOT ACCEPTABLE TO THIS AHJ. | | | 110.3, 90.4. | | | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR | | | SERVICE AND EACH OF THE PANELS AS BEING SHOWN EVEN | | | THOSE BEING SET ASIDE FOR FUTURE USE. PLEASE SEE THE | | | ONLY PANEL SHOWN WHICH IS THE NHP DOES NOT INCLUDE A | | | LOAD SUMMARY OR HOW THE SERVICE WAS SIZED. | | | PLEASE SEE NOTE #13 ABOVE AS THE SERVICE SIZE OR | | | CONDUCTORS ARE NOT COMPLETE THE SIZE OF THE SERVICE CAN | | | NOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME. | | | PLEASE SEE ALL OF 220. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 215.3, 230.42 ETC FOR ALL CONTINUOUS | | | LOADS AND LARGEST MOTORS LOADS AT 125%. | | | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 | | | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE ABOVE (#13) WHICH REQUEST THE | | | AIC RATINGS FOR ALL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE BE SURE THESE | | | CORRELATE WITH THE DIVISION SPEC SUBMITTED. 106.1.2. | | | NEC 110.9 | | | | | | 18) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY PANEL NHP WHICH INDICATE MORE | | | THAN 42 SPACES WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED PER 408.35. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THIS PANEL AS THIS | | | DOES NOT SHOW BEING A TWO SECTION OR CONTAINING | | | FEED-THRU LUGS ETC. | | | | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | 2007-01-29 12:49:58 | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW (ONE ROLL) AND PERMIT APPLICATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
Time |
16:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-07-24 |
Time |
10:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-07-24 |
Time |
10:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-24 10:31:06 | ***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI). | | | PLEASE APPLY AT FDEP, NPDES STORMWATER SECTION FOR | | | NOI. | | | YOU CAN GET NOI INFO FROM | | | WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/ | | | NOTICE OF INTENT DEP FORM 62-621.300(4)(B), | | | EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2003 | | | 2. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, CENTER LINE OF ROAD , | | | SIDEWALK ELEVATION MUST MEET FLOOD ZONE AREA OF YOUR | | | SITE, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIATO DETERMINE | | | THE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, HOW DID YOU COME UP THE | | | FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION,PLEASE SHOW THATIN YOUR STORM | | | WATER CALCULATION.WE COULD NOT FIND WATER QUALITY | | | CALS THAT YOU SAID YOU HAVE SUBMITTED. WE NEED A | | | SEPARATE COPY OF WATER QUALITY CALS FOR THIS PROJECT TO | | | KEEP IN THIS FILE. | | | 3. MAKE SURE THESE SITE AREAS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS MUST | | | MATCH WITH AREAS USED IN STORM WATER QUALITY | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | 4.WE COULD NOT FIND A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT & A WATER | | | QUALITY CALS THAT YOU SAID YOU SUBMITTED THIS TIME. WE | | | SAW YOUR GEO TECH REPORT BUT WE COULD NOT FIND SOIL | | | CONDUCTIVITY USED IN EXFILTRATION TRENCH. PLEASE | | | RESUBMIT REVISED GEO TECH REPORT. | | | 5. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE LATEST COPY OF SET OF CIVIL DRAWINGS | | | WHEN YOU RESUBMIT. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-02-15 |
Time |
13:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-02-15 |
Time |
13:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-15 13:36:11 | PLEASE PROVIDE FOLLOWING INFO: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS, STANDARDS NOTES OF CITY OF | | | WPB FOR SIDEWALK WIDTH , ITS SLOPE, DRIVEWAY, APPROACH, | | | PARKING, HANDICAP PARKING, PAINTPER CITY CODES | | | ETC.,,MUST MEET ADA ETC.,ALL STANDARD NOTES OF CITY OF | | | WPB CAN BE OBTAINED FROM 1000 45TH STREET, ENG DEPT. | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE | | | DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION | | | MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | | 3. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, CENTER LINE OF ROAD , | | | SIDEWALK ELEVATION MUST MEET FL BLDG CODE, PLEASE SHOW | | | ON THE DRAWINGS. | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT, & GEOTECH | | | REPORT | | | 5.PLEASE SHOW STORM WATER CALCULATIONS, WHAT CRITERIA | | | YOU ASSUMEDFOR RUNOFF CAL.,, LIKE 1" OVER ENTIRE SITE | | | OR2.5"CRITERIA, ?PERVIOUS AREA, LIKE GREEN, | | | LAKES, ETC,IMPERVIOUS AREA CAL., | | | 6. WHAT IS THE SITE AREA, YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS | | | PROJECT ONLY ? SO, WE CAN CHECK PERVIOUS, IMPERVIOUS | | | CAL.PL.PROVIDE TOTAL PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREA. | | | 7. HOW DIDYOU CONNECT TO THE STORM WATER PIPES IN | | | YOUR SITE? ITS DETAILS.PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER | | | PIPES AROUND YOUR SITE SO, WE CANSEE THE BEST PIPE TO | | | CONNECT WITH THE STORM WATERFROM ALL OTHER STORM | | | WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE CONTROL | | | STRUCTURES WITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING | | | ELEVATION, ETC DID YOU USE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ? | | | 8. POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT | | | ETC., PLANS SHOWING SILT FENCE AROUND THE SITE, NEED | | | MORE THAN 2.5 FT HIGH SILT FENCE | | | 9. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVE | | | 10. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND | | | YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
Time |
14:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
Time |
14:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-07-27 |
Time |
00:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
Time |
23:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-27 00:18:48 | *****PROVISO***** | | | | | | | | | ALL COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEWS HAVE | | | BEEN SATISFIED;HOWEVER THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEETS | | | WILL BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE OTHER REVIEWERS HAVE BEEN | | | SATISFIED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-05-08 |
Time |
15:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-05-08 |
Time |
15:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-08 15:55:55 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | | | | 05.LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT OR INTERFERE WITH | | | ACCESS TO THE FIRE HYDRANT, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION, | | | OR ANY OTHER FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT.COMMENT NOT | | | FOUND ON SHEET LP-101 AS PER YOUR RESPONSE | | | | | | 08.FIRE DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 80. | | | ADD COMMENT TO AN APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | | | | 12.KNOX LOCKING CAPS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE NEW | | | FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC).CONTACT WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE PREVENTION (561-804-4724) FOR APPLICATIONS. | | | ADD COMMENT TO AN APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE EACH COMMENT WAS | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-02-21 |
Time |
10:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-02-21 |
Time |
10:47 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-21 16:01:57 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | | | | 01.THE 2003 EDITION OF NFPA 101 AND THE FLORIDA FIRE | | | PREVENTION CODE 2004 SHALL BE REFERENCED.SEE SHEET | | | GV-101 | | | | | | 02.STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 03.FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE MAINTAINED | | | THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 04.COMBUSTIBLE WASTE MATERIAL, DUST, AND DEBRIS SHALL | | | BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE END OF EACH SHIFT OR | | | MORE FREQUNTLY AS NECESSARY FOR SAFE OPERATION. | | | | | | 05.LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT OR INTERFERE WITH | | | ACCESS TO THE FIRE HYDRANT, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION, | | | OR ANY OTHER FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 06.WHEN/IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHUT DOWN FIRE | | | PROTECTION SYSTEMS, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT SHALL BE | | | NOTIFIED WHEN IT IS SHUT DOWN AND WHEN IT IS RETURNED | | | TO SERVICE. | | | | | | 07.PROVIDE THE INTERIOR FINISH FOR THE NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION.INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH | | | MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS A OR CLASS B FOR THE EXITS AND | | | IN EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS, AND SHALL BE CLASS A, CLASS | | | B, OR CLASS C IN ALL OTHER AREAS. | | | | | | 08.FIRE DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 80. | | | | | | 09.ON THE APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION, SHOW THE | | | NUMERICAL ADDRESS ON THE BUILDING TO BE VISIBLE FROM | | | GREENWOOD AVENUE.AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THOSE | | | NUMBERS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS | | | THAN 1" IN WIDTH.IF THE BUILDING IS SET-BACK FROM THE | | | STREET OR ROADSIDE AND ARE NOT PLAINLY VISIBLE, A | | | MONUMENT SIGN OR MARQUEE WITH THE ADDRESS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO THE BUILDING NUMBER. | | | | | | 10.IF THE BUILDING IS EQUIPPED WITH A KNOX-BOX | | | (KEY-ENTRY BOX), WILL THE DEVICE NEED TO BE RELOCATED | | | AS PER THE SCOPE OF THE NEW CONSTRUCTION?IF SO, | | | INDICATE LOCATION ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 11.THE EXISTING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) | | | SHALL NOT BE REMOVED AND CAPPED UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT | | | THE NEW PIV AND FDC IS INSTALLED AND IN SERVICE. | | | | | | 12.KNOX LOCKING CAPS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE NEW | | | FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC).CONTACT WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE PREVENTION (561-804-4724) FOR APPLICATIONS. | | | | | | 13.PROVIDE A LAYOUT OF THE EXISTINGFIRE ALARM SYTEM | | | IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE NEW CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE EACH COMMENT WAS | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
10:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
10:06 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-24 10:06:48 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
Time |
14:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
Time |
14:55 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-13 14:56:05 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-12 |
Time |
14:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-12 |
Time |
14:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-12 14:30:50 | TO "COMM" BD#8 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-09 |
Time |
10:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-09 |
Time |
10:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-27 14:28:50 | TO "COMM" BD#33 | | 2007-11-09 11:02:50 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
09:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
09:50 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-04 09:51:23 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
10:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
10:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-14 08:27:38 | 9-14-07--TO "RCHOKSHI" DESK/ PER "RBROWN" | | 2007-09-06 10:08:09 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-12 14:40:50 | TO "COMM" BD#59 | | 2007-07-03 10:13:10 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
spalmer |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
Time |
18:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
spalmer |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
Time |
18:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-03-30 18:02:38 | TO COMM BOARD # 39 | | 2007-03-28 18:30:13 | WAITING FOR COMM BOARD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
Time |
18:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-01-09 |
Time |
09:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-22 08:19:37 | TO "COMM" BD#62 | | 2007-01-09 13:26:19 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
Time |
08:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-07-31 |
Time |
10:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-07-31 |
Time |
09:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-04-25 |
Time |
18:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-04-25 |
Time |
18:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-02-14 |
Time |
13:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-02-13 |
Time |
14:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-14 13:57:53 | -----------------DENIED-------------------- | | | | | | 1. PG MM-501, DETAIL 1: PLEASE PROVIDE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL SHEETS FOR MANUFACTURED CONDENSING UNIT | | | STANDS. ALSO PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH CLEARANCE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF FBC TABLE 1509.7. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING FRESH AIR AND EXHAUST | | | DUCT SIZES, ROUTING AND LOCATION OF 2ND FLOOR SLAB | | | PENETRATIONS. IS THIS FLOOR RATED? ARE FIRE DAMPERS OR | | | SHAFTS NEEDED AT THESE LOCATIONS? FBC 106.1.1 | | | | | | 3. PG MM-602 ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM ACU SCHEDULE SHOWS 3 | | | SEPERATE SPLIT SYSTEMS BUT ONLY ONE IS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY PER FBC 106.1.1 | | | | | | REVIEWED BY: | | | RONALD J REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6734 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
Time |
11:07 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-06 11:08:34 | RESTAMP SHEET PL-104: "OK" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
Time |
16:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
Time |
16:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-03 16:14:55 | REVISION DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. SHT L1-101 REVISION SUBMITTED INDICATES REVISION | | | NUMBER ONE. REVISION SIGNED, SEALED & DATED 11-07-07 | | | ALSO INDICATES REVISION NUMBER ONE. EACH REVISION SHALL | | | HAVE ITS OWN REVISION DESIGNATION NUMBER IN ORDER TO | | | KEEP TRACK OF ALL REVISIONS. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-03 16:10:59 | REVISION OK (NEW SHEET)--PL-104 PLUMBING PLAN | | | RAINWATER HARVESTER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-13 |
Time |
12:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-13 |
Time |
12:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-13 12:45:04 | REVISIONS OK--SHTS LI-101 & PL-104 (NEW SHEET) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-08-11 |
Time |
09:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-08-10 |
Time |
18:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-05-09 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-05-09 |
Time |
16:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-09 17:16:08 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | CORE/SHELL ONLY | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. SHT GV-101 CODE REFERENCES ARE INCORRECT. THE CODE | | | ADOPTED IS THE FBC-2004 WITH 2005, & 2006 REVISIONS. | | | PLEASE INDICATE THE CORRECT CODE REFERENCE FOR DESIGN & | | | CONSTRUCTION. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THERE ARE STILL SOME CODES | | | DATED 2001, & 2000. ALL CODES SHALL REFLECT THE CODE IN | | | EFFECT AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 2. OK | | | 3. OK | | | 4. OK | | | | | | 5. SHT AF-103 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 AND ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS. INDICATE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EACH AREA, | | | PLUS 1/2 THE AREA OF ALL VERTICAL WALLS, INCLUDING | | | PARAPETS, PLUS ANY ROOF AREA THAT DRAINS ONTO THE ROOF | | | AREAS FROM ABOVE. IF SCUPPERS ARE USED, SUBMIT A DETAIL | | | SHOWING THE LENGTH, WIDTH, AND THE MEASUREMENT FROM THE | | | ROOF TO THE FLOW LINE OF THE SCUPPER. SECTION | | | 1503.4.2. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SHT AF-103 SEEM TO INDICATE | | | THAT THE CENTER OF THE ROOF IS EITHER THE HIGH POINT OR | | | THE LOW POINT OF THE ROOF. PLEASE INDICATE THE SLOPE OF | | | THE ROOF AND INDICATE HIGH & LOW POINTS OF THE ROOF. | | | SECTION 106.2.1 (MORE INFORMATION REQUIRED).--THE | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE MAIN ROOF | | | PLAN. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE SECONDARY | | | ROOF DRAINS. IF THE SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS FOR THE MAIN | | | ROOF ARE TO BE SCUPPERS, SUBMIT A DETAIL SHOWING THE | | | HEIGHT, WIDTH, AND INDICATE THE HEIGHT OFF THE ROOF TO | | | THE FLOW LINE. TABLE 1106.3 AND SECTIONS 1107.1 & | | | 1107.2 AND BUILDING CODE SECTION 1503.4.3 | | | | | | 6. INFORMATIONAL. IN PHASE III THE ACCESSIBILITY | | | REQUIREMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED PER SECTIONS 11-4.15, | | | 11-4.16, 11-4.18, 11-4.19, 11-4.21, 11-4.22, AND | | | 11-4.24. ALSO NO DRINKING FOUNTAINS WERE SEEN. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, OK | | | | | | 7. IN PHASE III PLEASE SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM | | | FACILITIES PER TABLES 1004.1.2 & 403.1. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, OK | | | | | | **********NEW COMMENT********** | | | | | | 1B. SUBMIT A STORM RISER ISOMETRIC DIAGRAM FOR THE NEW | | | ROOFS. SECTION 106.3.5.1.3((7)(13). | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-02-09 |
Time |
16:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-02-09 |
Time |
16:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-09 17:11:24 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | CORE/SHELL ONLY | | | | | | 1. SHT GV-101 CODE REFERENCES ARE INCORRECT. THE CODE | | | ADOPTED IS THE FBC-2004 WITH 2005, & 2006 REVISIONS. | | | PLEASE INDICATE THE CORRECT CODE REFERENCE FOR DESIGN & | | | CONSTRUCTION. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 2. SHT CX-101 IS NOT SIGNED/SEALED/DATED. THE IS | | | REQUIRED BY SECTION 106.1, THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE | | | CODE, AND FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | | | | 3. SHT CU-101 SHOWS A NEW 2-1/2" WATER SERVICE, BUT | | | INDICATES ONLY A 2" RPZV BACKFLOW. TABLE 603.1(D) | | | REQUIRES THE BACKFLOW TO BE AT LEAST THE SAME SIZE AS | | | THE WATER LINE IN WHICH ITS INSTALLED. PLEASE SHOW | | | PROPER SIZE BACKFLOW. | | | | | | 4. SHT CU-101 UTILITY CROSSING NOTES. 1(B) & 2(A) NOTES | | | STATE "THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION DISTANCE | | | BETWEEN WATERMAINS &GRAVITY SANITARY SEWERS TO BE | | | REFUCED TO 3 FEET WHERE THE BOTTOM OF THE PIPE IS LAID | | | AT LEAST 6" ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER". SECTION 603.2 | | | EXCEPTION (1) REQUIRES THE SEPARATION DISTANCE TO BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 12" WITHIN 5' OF THE SEWER. | | | | | | 5. SHT AF-103 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 AND ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS. INDICATE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EACH AREA, | | | PLUS 1/2 THE AREA OF ALL VERTICAL WALLS, INCLUDING | | | PARAPETS, PLUS ANY ROOF AREA THAT DRAINS ONTO THE ROOF | | | AREAS FROM ABOVE. IF SCUPPERS ARE USED, SUBMIT A DETAIL | | | SHOWING THE LENGTH, WIDTH, AND THE MEASUREMENT FROM THE | | | ROOF TO THE FLOW LINE OF THE SCUPPER. SECTION | | | 1503.4.2. | | | | | | 6. INFORMATIONAL. IN PHASE III THE ACCESSIBILITY | | | REQUIREMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED PER SECTIONS 11-4.15, | | | 11-4.16, 11-4.18, 11-4.19, 11-4.21, 11-4.22, AND | | | 11-4.24. ALSO NO DRINKING FOUNTAINS WERE SEEN. | | | | | | 7. IN PHASE III PLEASE SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM | | | FACILITIES PER TABLES 1004.1.2 & 403.1. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
Time |
15:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2007-12-11 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2007-12-10 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-11 11:18:48 | PLANNING AND ZONING: **** FAILED**** | | | | | | 1. RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. THE PROJECT IS PART OF THE ST. MARY'S CSPD AND IS | | | CURRENTLY BEING REVIEWED FOR A MINOR PD AMENDMENT DUE | | | TO RELOCATION OF SOME PARKING SPACES AND THE ADDITION | | | OF A PLAYGROUND AREA.THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE APPROVED | | | UNTIL FINAL APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT HAS BEEN | | | MADE BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT DUE TO | | | PERTINENT CHANGES THAT WILL NEED TO BE REFLECTED ON | | | THIS PERMIT. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME. | | | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | TEL: (561) 822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
Time |
17:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
Time |
17:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2007-04-12 |
Time |
10:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2007-04-05 |
Time |
19:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-13 10:23:48 | PLANNING AND ZONING:****** FAILED ******* | | | | | | 1PROVIDE RESPONSES TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. THE SITE PLANS/DRAWINGS DO NOT MATCH THE APPROVED | | | SITE PLAN/DRAWINGS FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | DEPARTMENT (I.E. ENGINEERING (PARKING DETAILS DO NOT | | | COMPLY WITH ZONING CODE). FOR EXAMPLE, SHEET CS-101 | | | "AREA OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN" SHOWS A 7 FEET-4 INCHES HIGH | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSUREVERSUS THE APPROVED 6 FOOT HIGH | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHOWN ON SHEET SP-1 OF THE ST. | | | MARY'S MINOR AMENDMENT 1068P, APPROVED PLANS FROM THE | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. IN ADDITION, PROVIDE A | | | COPY OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT'S APPROVED | | | PLANS, WITH EACH PACKET SUBMITTED.ALL DRAWINGS SHALL | | | MATCH THESE DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 3.SHEET CS-501 - THE HANDICAP PARKING STALL DETAIL | | | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ZONING CODE, SECTION 94-485, SEE | | | ATTACHED DETAILS.FOR EXAMPLE, | | | | | | A.THERE SHALL BE 2 FEET IN BETWEEN THE BACK OF | | | WHEEL STOP TO EDGE OF CURB. | | | B.THE PAVEMENT SYMBOL SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR | | | AND 2 FEET FROM THE BOTTOM EDGE OF STALL. | | | | | | SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME. | | | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | OFFICE: (561) 822-1443 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
Time |
18:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
Time |
18:30 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-23 18:37:02 | PLANNING AND ZONING:****** FAILED ******* | | | | | | 1PROVIDE RESPONSES TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. THE SITE PLANS/DRAWINGS DO NOT MATCH THE APPROVED | | | SITE PLAN/DRAWINGS FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | DEPARTMENT (I.E. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, ENGINEERING | | | (PARKING DETAILS DO NOT COMPLY WITH ZONING CODE), | | | ARCHITECTUAL) | | | | | | SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME. | | | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | OFFICE: (561) 822-1443 |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |