Plan Review Details - Permit 06120402
Plan Review Stops For Permit 06120402
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-03-21 Cont ID  
Sent By lursu Date 2007-03-21 Time 09:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lursu Date 2007-03-21 Time 09:24 Sent To  
Notes
2007-03-21 09:36:51SINCE A NEW STRUCTURE ( DUPLEX)IS BEING BUILT ON THE
 SAME LOCATION OF THE DEMOLISHED BUILDING (USED TO BE
 601 14TH ST) A NEW SITE ADDRESS IS REQUIRED FOR THE NEW
 STRUCTURE.
 THE PREVIOUS SITE ADDRESS USED FOR THE DEMOLISHED
 BUILDING CAN NOT BE USED FOR THE NEW STRUCTURE SINCE
 THE MAIN ENTRANCE WAS DESIGNED ON HENRIETTA AVE . THIS
 STRUCTURE WILL RECEIVE TWO SITE ADDRESSES ,ONE FOR EACH
 UNIT ,SINCE THIS IS A DUPLEX.
 THE REVISED SITE PLANS MUST REFLECT THE NEW SITE
 ADDRESSES.THE NEW SITE ADDRESSES ISSUED ARE: 1503
 HENRIETTA AVE AND 1507 HENRIETTA AVE, WEST PALM BEACH ,
 FL 33401
 THE CITY WILL SEND AN OFFICIAL NOTIFICATON LETTER WITH
 THE NEW SITE ADDRESSES ISSUED ,TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
  
 LACRAMIOARA URSU
 MIS - GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 OFFICE:822-1239
 FAX: 822-1249
 E-MAIL:[email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-06-01 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2007-06-01 Time 07:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2007-05-31 Time 16:32 Sent To ENG
Notes
2007-06-01 08:37:51***NOTE: PLANS SENT TO ENGINEERING FOR REVIEW OF
 SIDEWALK AND APPROACH.
  
 BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST:
 1- PROVIDE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. SEC. 713.13
 FLORIDA STATUTE.
  
 2- DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWS ARROWS LEADING THE WATER TO THE
 NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. WATER CAN'T BE DIVERTED TO THE
 NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. REVISE PLAN AS REQUIRED.
  
 3- SHEET SP-1:
 A) SIZE OF PARKING SPACESSHOWN ON SITE PLAN DON'T
 MATCH SPECIFICATIONS ON PARKING NOTES AT BOTTOM OF
 PAGE. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
  
 B) SITE PLAN AND SURVEY DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. SEE SURVEY.
  
 C) REVISE ADDRESS. CORRECT ADDRESS IS 1503 AND 1507
 HENRIETTA AVE.
  
 D) DRIVEWAY TURN OUTS DETAIL DOESN'T MATCH PLANS.
  
 E) CLARIFY WHY INSTALLING BACK FLOW PREVENTER AND
 WHY ONLY ON ONE DWELLING?.
  
 F) LOCATION OF WATER METER IS WRONG. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 G) SETBACKS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN DON'T MATCH SETBACKS
 SHOWN ON SURVEY. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 H) SITE PLANAND SURVEY DON'T SHOW ALL CONCRETE
 SLABS SHOWN ON FOUNDATION PLAN. PROVIDE ALL
 INFORMATION.
  
 4- REVISE ADDRESS IN ALL DRAWINGS.
  
 5- PROVIDE TWO SURVEYS WITH CORRECT ADDRESS AND CORRECT
 DIMENSIONS. SEE FLOOR PLANS.AND SHOWING ALL CONCRETE
 SLABS.ONLY ONE SUBMITTED THIS TIME.
  
 6- SHEET S-1:
 A) DIMENSIONS ANDCOLUMN SPACINGDON'T MATCH.SEE
 PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) THERE ARE TWO F1 FOOTING DETAILS. ONE SHOULD BE
 F1 AND THE OTHERF2. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 C) FOUNDATION PLAN SHOWS CONCRETE SLAB EDGE TE AND
 TE#2. THERE IS NOT FOOTING SCHEDULE SPECIFYING WHAT ARE
 TE AND TE#2 SPECIFICATIONS. PROVIDE INFORMATION AS
 REQUIRED. AND CLARIFY WHY IS REAR CONCRETE SLAB SHOWN
 WITH DOTTED LINE.
  
 D) DIMENSIONS DON'T MATCH THOSE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON
 SURVEY. REVISE AS REQUIRED. ALSO, DIMENSIONS DON'T
 MATCH DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 E) REVISE TYP. EXT. CONT. MONOLITHIC FOOTING DETAIL.
 BOTTOM OF FOOTING NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 12" BELOW GRADE.
 SEC. R403.1.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 F) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW
 VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT SHOWN IN FOUNDATION PLAN IS
 ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED WALL LATERAL
 STABILITY.SEE PLANS FOR COLUMN SPACING. SEC. 106.1.2
 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 G) ENGINEER TO READ SOIL TEST REPORT AND REVISE
 FOUNDATION NOTES AS REQUIRED.
  
 7- SHEET A-1:
 A) WINDOWS SPECIFIEDON PLAN DON'T MATCH.
 COORDINATE SIZE OF WINDOWS WITH WINDOW SCHEDULE AND
 WITH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS.ALL WINDOWS ARE KEYED AS I,
 BUT THEY ARE DIFFERENT SIZES.ALSO,INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE DOESN'T SHOW ANY I SYMBOL. THEY ARE SHOWN AS
 WINDOW 1 OR 2.ALSO, WINDOWS NOT DRAWN TO SCALE.
 COORDINATE AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) WINDOW ON KITCHEN AREA IS NOT AN EGRESS WINDOW.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 C) REVISE WINDOW AND DOOR BUCK DETAILS.BUCK NEEDS
 TO PROVIDE FULLWINDOW/DOOR FRAME SUPPORT. SEE SEC.
 R613.6.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER
 WAY OF INSTALLING BUCKS.
  
 D) WINDOW SILL DETAIL IS WRONG. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 E) FLOOR PLAN DOESN'T SHOW REAR CONCRETE SLAB.
  
 8- SHEET A-2:
 A) DECORATIVE SHUTTERS NOTE SAYS THAT BAHAMA
 SHUTTERS ON 14TH STREET ONLY, BUT ALL ELEVATIONS SHOW
 BAHAMA SHUTTERS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) WINDOW SCHEDULE SHOWS WINDOW 1 WITH TRANSOM
 ABOVE. THERE ARE NOT WINDOWS WITH TRANSOM ABOVE SHOWN
 ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 C) OVERHANG AT FRONT OF BUILDING IS SHOWN AS 3'-0".
 THIS INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCHROOF PLAN AND TRUSS
 PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS FOR INSTALLATION OF ROOF
 BRACKETS AT ENTRY AREA. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO
 FBC 2004.
  
 9- SHEET A-3:
 A) NEW NOTE IN THE MIDDLE OF PAGE STATES THAT
 BUILDING DESIGNED PER HVHZ.HVHZREQUIRES EXPOSURE
 "C" IN ALL DESIGN.SEE SEC. 1620.3 FBC 2004.REVISE
 INFORMATION ON TOP LEFT OF PAGE AND REVISE ALL LOAD
 CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) INFORMATION ON TOP LEFT PAGE CALLS FOR 140 MPH,
 WHILE TRUSS AND GIRDER NOTES CALLS FOR 146 MPH. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED.
  
 C) WHAT IS THE ROOF +92.0 PSFSHOWN ON TOP LEFT
 PAGE STANDS FOR?. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC
 2004.
  
 D) TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE:
 * ANCHORS ARE NOT KEYED CORRECTLY IN THE ROOF FRAMING
 PLAN.
  
 ** REVISE H-14 CONNECTOR. NEED TO SPECIFY WOOD TO
 MASONRY CONNECTOR.
  
 *** SPECIFY SIZE OF META CONNECTOR.
  
 **** REVISE NUMBER OF FASTENERS AND LOADS FOR WHICH
 CONNECTORS ARE DESIGNED FOR. SEE CURRENT SIMPSON
 CATALOGUE AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. OTHERWISE, COMPLETE
 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR FASTENERS AND
 LOADS THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY
 THE MANUFACTURE. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC
 2004.
  
 ***** SEE TRUSS PACKAGE AND REVISE SPECIFIED CONNECTORS
 TO RESIST THE CALCULATED LOADS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 E) ROOF PLAN SHOWS TRUSSESRUNNING FRONT TO BACK BY
 TENANT SEPARATION WALL. SEE TRUSS PLAN FOR CORRECT
 TRUSS LAYOUT AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.AND SPECIFY ALL
 TRUSS CONNECTORS AT BOTH ENDS.
  
 F) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECS FOR WOOD
 LEDGER TO RECEIVE ROOF TRUSSES. SEE TRUSS PLAN. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 G) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTINUITY OF
 TENANT SEPARATION WALL.SPECIFY TIE BEAM AND RAKE
 BEAM. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 H) PNEUMATIC FASTENING SCHEDULE:
 * PROVIDE ONLY THE INFORMATION THAT PERTAINS TO THIS
 PROJECT TO AVOID CONFLICTS.
  
 ** COORDINATE INFORMTIONTO MATCH WITH PLANS AND
 DETAILS. EG: CHECK ROOF SHEATHING SIZE AND BUCK DETAILS
 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 10- PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE, BRING PLANS TO
 THE FIFTH FLOOR FOR HISTORICAL APPROVAL AFTER
 CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE ORIGINAL PLANS.
  
 11- SHEET A-4:
 A) TENANT SEPARATION WALL DETAIL:
 * PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR TOP PORTION OF THE
 WALL.
  
 ** CLARIFY WHY SOFFIT ELEVATION VARIES?
  
 *** REVISE NOTE REGARDING APPROVED HURRICANE STRAPS.
 THIS IS NOT A WOOD FRAMED WALL.
  
 **** CONCRETE SLAB INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH FOUNDATION
 PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 ***** DETAIL FOR VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT IS DRAWN
 INCORRRECTLY.PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT INCLUDING SPLICING ETC.SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 ****** HOW ARE THE TRUSSES RESTING ON THIS WALL?
  
 B) WHERE DOES THE STRAP AND TIE DOWN DETAIL APPLIES
 TO?SEC. 106.1.2CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 C) TYPICAL WALL SECTION:
 * TRUSS CONNECTOR INFORMATION TO MATCH TRUSS ANCHOR
 SCHEDULE.
  
 ** SPECIFY MIN. FOOTING DEPTH AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R403.1.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 12- ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM,
 INCLUDING CORRECT ADDRESS AND BUILDER.
  
 B) PROVIDE REVISED FORM 600A-2004 R.
  
 C) IF CALCULATIONS ARE NOT DONE FOR WORST CASE
 SCENARIO, THEN THEY SHALL BE DONE WITH ACTUAL BUILDING
 ORIENTATION. SEE SURVEY FOR CORRECT ORIENTATION.
  
 D) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE HIS NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER
 AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 OF FLORIDA STATUTE.
  
 E) OVERHANG HEIGHT AND OVERHANG LENGTH ARE
 INCORRECT. THEY CAN'T BE ZERO. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 13- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKING THE CEILING FAN
 CREDIT. THEREFORE NEED TO SPECIFY IN DRAWINGS CEILING
 FAN SIZE IN ALL ROOMS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1
 FBC 2004.
  
 14- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY RULE 9B-72
 FOR:
 A) ROOF SHINGLES.
  
 B) PRECAST LINTELS.
  
 C) ALL TRUSS CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
  
 15- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 ***NOTE: SOME PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE THE REVIEW STAMP
 FROM AMD GROUP. WHO IS THIS?THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IS
 DM & L ENGINEERING.
  
 16- PROVIDE 2 SURVEYS WITH CORRECT ADDRESS.
  
 17- ENGINEER WAS CHARGED 4 TIMES FEE FOR PLAN REVIEW
 FOR MULTIPLE DENIED CHECKLIST AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA
 STATUTE 553.80(2)(B).SEE ATTACHED COPY.ENGINEER
 OWES $3362.34.
  
 18- TRUSS PACKAGE:
 A) TRUSSES NEED TO BE DESIGNED USING ASCE 7-02NOT
 ASCE 7-05.REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) ENGINEER TO DATE DRAWINGS WHEN SEAL IS IMPRESSED
 AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE.
  
 C) GENERAL DETAILS ARE TOO DARK AND ARE NOT
 LEGIBLE.
  
 D) WHO'S ADM GROUP?.THIS IS NOT THE ENGINEER OF
 RECORD.
  
 D) REVISED TRUSS PACKAGE TO BE SUBMITTED TO BUILDING
 INSPECTOR AT TIME OF FRAMING INSPECTION.
  
 19- SOIL TEST REPORT:
 A) MISSING KEY PLAN SHOWING LOCATION OF BORINGS.
  
 B) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE THE COMPANY CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IN THE LETTERHEAD AS REQUIRED BY
 SEC. 61G15-23.002 OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
  
 ***NOTE:
 * PLEASE DON'T ATTACHPRODUCT APPROVALS TO PLANS.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-03-19 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2007-03-19 Time 19:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2007-03-19 Time 12:38 Sent To PC
Notes
2007-03-19 19:03:03BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST:
 1- PROVIDE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTES.
  
 2- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLANS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.3
 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 3- ENGINEER TO PROVIDE ALL HIS INFORMATION IN THE TITLE
 BLOCK AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES AND
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SEC. 61G15-23.002.
 INCLUDING ENGINEERING FIRM'S CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER.
 ***NOTE: ENGINEER'S NAME DOESN'T MATCH ENGINEER'S NAME
 SHOWN ON EMBOSSED SEAL.
  
 4- SHEET SP-1:
 A) REVISE ALL DRIVEWAY AND APPROACH NOTES. CONTACT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT
 (561)494-1040 FOR CITY STANDARDS.
  
 B) REVISE SIZE OF PARKING SPACES.NUMBER AND SIZE
 OF PARKING SPACES DON'T MATCHNOTES AT BOTTOM OF
 SHEET. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM TO BACK UP.CHECK
 SPECIFIED SIZES: 14'-0" X 18'-0"?. SEE ZONING
 COMMENTS.
  
 C) SHOW ALL BUILDING SETBACKS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. R302 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND TABLE
 704.8 2004 FBC.
  
 D) CLEARLY IDENTIFY PROPERTY LINES.SEC. 106.1.2
 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 5- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT (2 COPIES).
  
 6- SHEET S-1:
 A) COLUMN SCHEDULE AND TYPICAL NOTES IN FOUNDATION
 PLANS DON'T MATCH.REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) 4" DROP IS SHOWN ON MASTER BEDROOM WINDOW INSTEAD
 OF BEING SHOWN FOR ENTRY DOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 C) FOUNDATION NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON
 FOUNDATION PLAN FOR WIRE MESH SIZE DON'T MATCH. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) DETAIL F2 DOESN'T APPLY TO THIS PROJECT.THIS IS
 NOT WOOD FRAMING. SEE TYPE OF INTERIOR BEARING WALL.
  
 E) FOOTING SCHEDULE SHOWS FOOTING F2 WITH 3 #5 BARS
 AT THE BOTTOM, WHILE DETAIL F2 SHOWS 2 #5 AT BOTTOM AND
 1 #5 AT TOP. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 F) CLARIFY FOOTING SIZE F2. FOOTING SCHEDULE CALLS
 FOR 24"X12", WHILE INTERIOR BEARING WALL SECTION ON
 SHEET A-4 CALLS FOR 12" X 24".WHICH DIMENSION IS THE
 WIDTH AND WHICH IS THE DEPTH OF THE FOOTING. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 G) PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAILS THAT APPLY TO THIS
 PROJECT TO AVOID CONFUSIONS/CONFLICTS AND EXPEDITE
 REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 H) DETAIL F1: SPECIFY FOOTING EMBEDMENT BELOW GRADE
 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R403.1.4 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 I) WINDOW DETAIL:
 * WHY SHOWING SHUTTERS DETAILS IF WINDOW NOTES ON
 SHEET A-1 CALLS FOR IMPACT GLASS?.
 ** WHY SHUTTER DETAIL SHOWS ATTACHMENT OF SHUTTER
 TRACK TO CONCRETE SLAB IF THIS IS A WINDOW DETAIL? ***
 REVISE BUCK DETAIL. SEE SEC. R613.6.2 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER WAY OF ATTACHING BUCKS.
  
 J) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW
 VERTICAL REINFORCING SHOWN IN FOUNDATION PLAN WILL
 PROVIDETHE REQUIRED LATERAL SUPPORT OF THIS BUILDING.
 SEE PLANS FOR VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT SPACING. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 AND SEC. 1609 FBC
 2004.
  
 K) DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON FOUNDATION PLANAND
 LOCATIONS OF COLUMNS DON'T MATCH REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 7- SHEET A-1:
 A) PROVIDEDIMENSIONSFOR ENTRY PORCH TO DETERMINE
 TOTAL PORCH AREA.BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION WILL BE
 ESTIMATED AFTER SQUARE FOOTAGE ISCLARIFIED.
  
 B) PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL. SPECIFY
 ALL BUCK FASTENERS AND SEESEC. R613.6.2 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER BUCK INSTALLATION. BUCK
 NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE WINDOW/DOOR.
  
 C) SOME ROOMS DON'T HAVE COMPLETE SPECS FOR SIZE OF
 AND TYPE OF WINDOWS.PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION.
 ALSO, SIZE OF WINDOWS ARE NOT DONE TO SCALE AND DON'T
 MATCH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EITHER.REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 8- SHEET A-2:
 A) CLARIFY NOTE REGARDING BAHAMA SHUTTERS ON 14TH
 STREET ONLY. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOW COLONIAL SHUTTERS.
 INFORMATION IS MISLEADING.
  
 C) ELEVATIONS DON'T MATCH FLOOR PLAN.SEE REVISED
 FLOOR PLAN FOR SIZE OF WINDOWS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL INFORMATION FOR
 OVERHANG ABOVE ENTRY AREA. PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL
 SECTION/DETAIL WITH COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS,
 DIMENSIONS, HEIGHT, ETC.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS
 TO FBC 2004.
  
 E) WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T MATCH FLOOR PLAN. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED.
  
 9- SHEET A-3:
 A) PROVIDE ONLY THE INFORMATION THAT IS RELEVANT TO
 THIS PROJECT. THERE ARE A LOT OF NOTES AND TABLES THAT
 DON'T APPLY TO THIS PROJECT.
  
 B) PIGGY BACK TRUSS DETAIL:
 * IS THIS THE DETAIL FOR ENTRY PORCH?
 ** WHERE ARE THE RIGHT HAND SIDE TRUSSES SUPPORTED
 ON?. THERE IS NOT BEAM TO SUPPORT THEM.DETAIL IS
 INCOMPLETE AND WRONG. PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION DETAIL.
 SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 C) TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE AND CONNECTORS SPECIFIED
 ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) REVISE NUMBER AND TYPE OF FASTENERS SPECIFIED ON
 TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. SEE CURRENT CATALOG FOR
 UPDATED INFORMATION. OTHERWISE, ENGINEER TO PROVIDE
 COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SHOWING WHY CONNECTORS
 ARE DIFFERENT THAN THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE
 MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC
 2004.
  
 E) MANUFACTURER FOR CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON ROOF
 FRAMING PLAN IS OUT OF BUSINESS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 F) CLEARLY IDENTIFY TRUSSES FOR WHICH UPLIFT
 PRESSURES WERE CALCULATED.
  
 G) ENGINEER TO COORDINATE ALL NOTES AND CHARTS SHOWN
 ON THIS DRAWINGS. THERE IS A LOT OF MIXED INFORMATION
 THAT NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED.SEE 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE AND ALLINFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THIS
 SHEET.PROVIDE ONLY THE REQUIRED INFORMATION.SEE
 SECTIONS . R301 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. ALSO,
 SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE
 FOR MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ROOF SHEATHING. REVISE AND
 COORDINATE ALL INFORMATION IN SHEET A-3 TO MATCH.
  
 H) PNEUMATIC FASTENING SCHEDULE: PROVIDE ONLY THE
 INFORMATION THAT APPLIES TO THIS PROJECT.CHECK/REVISE
 SPACING FOR BUCK DETAILS FASTENING. INFORMATION DOESN'T
 MATCH. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH PROVIDED BUCK DETAIL.
  
 I) ROOF FRAMING PLAN CALLS DWELLING SEPARATION WALL
 A "FIRE WALL".SEEFBC 2004 FOR CORRECT DEFINITION
 FOR "FIRE WALL" AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 J) PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION THRU DWELLING SEPARATION
 WALL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R317.1 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 K) REVISE ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATIONS AND NOTES
 SEE SEC. R806 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER
 INFORMATION.
  
 L) ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T MATCH EXTERIOR
 ELEVATIONS. SEE ENTRY PORCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
  
 10- PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE BRING PLANS FOR
 HISTORICAL APPROVAL AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE
 PLANS.
  
 11- SHEET A-4:
 A) REVISE INTERIOR BEARING WALL TO MATCH FLOOR PLAN.
 REVISE SIZE OF FOOTING, WALL CONSTRUCTION, ETC.
 * WHAT'S THE BEAM SHOWN ON TOP OF WALL?
 ** HOW ARE TRUSSES RESTING ON THIS WALL. SEE ROOF
 FRAMING PLAN.
 *** WHAT'STHE HOOK SHOWN AT THE BOTTOM OF WALL
 CONNECTING TO FOOTING. PROVIDECOMPLETE SPECS. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 B) SPECIFY FIREBLOCKING ON INTERIOR BEARING WALL
 SECTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R602.8 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 C PROVIDE DETAIL/SPECS FOR DWELLING SEPARATION AT
 ATTIC AREA. SEC. R317.1 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 D) PROVIDE ALL DESIGN CRITERIA, INCLUDING ALL WIND
 LOADS, AND LIVE AND DEAD LOADS. REFERENCE 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE,WHICH IS THE CODE THAT REGULATES
 THIS BUILDING, NOT SECTIONS 1606 OF FBC 2004. SEE SEC.
 R301 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. INCLUDE ALL ATTIC LIVE LOADS.
  
 E) PLYWOOD NAILING NOTES TO MATCH INFORMATION ON
 SHEET A-3 AFTER APPROPRIATE REVISIONS ARE DONE.
  
 F) TYPICAL WALL SECTION:
 *WHAT IS 2"X4" STRIP?. IS IT FIREBLOCKING?. ALSO,
 VERIFY SIZE WITH SIZE OF FURRING STRIPS FOR DRYWALL
 INSTALLATION.
 **WHAT IS 325# SHINGLES?
 *** ROOF SHEATHING SIZE AND TYPE TO MATCH
 INFORMATION ON SHEET A-3 AFTER APPROPRIATE REVISIONS
 ARE DONE.
 **** TRUSS CONNECTOR TO MATCH INFORMATION ON SHEET
 A-3 AFTER APPROPRIATE REVISIONS ARE DONE.
 ***** SPECIFY FOOTING MIN. DEPTH AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R 403.1.4 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 ****** SPECIFY MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR AS REQUIRED BY
 SEC. R404.1.6 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIALCODE.
  
 G) TRUSS/ WOOD CONNECTOR SCHEDULE DOESN'T APPLY TO
 THIS PROJECT AND IS USING CONNECTORS THAT NO LONGER
 EXIST. COMPANY IS OUT OF BUSINESS.
 ALSO, ROOFTILE INFORMATION DOESN'T APPLY.
  
  
 12- ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM.
  
 B) THIS IS NOT A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED BUILDING.
 SEE CHAPTER 13 2004 FBC FOR PROPER TYPE OF BUILDING.
 AND, NEED ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR EACH DWELLING.SEE
 DEFINITIONS ON SUBCHAPTER13-2 OF 2004 FBC. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.SEE SEC. 15-101.2.5.1 FBC 2004.
  
 C) IF CALCULATIONS ARE NOT DONE FOR WORST CASE
 SCENARIO, THEN THEY SHALL BE DONE ON ACTUAL BUILDING
 ORIENTATION.ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT FOR
 WORST CASE SCENARIO AND BUILDING ORIENTATION DON'T
 MATCH ACTUAL BUILDING ORIENTATION. SEE SURVEY AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) OVERHANG LENGTH AND HEIGHT ARE INCORRECT.THEY
 CAN'T BE ZERO. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 13- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKINGTHE CEILING FAN
 CREDIT. THEREFORE NEED TO SPECIFY CEILING FAN SIZE IN
 ALL ROOMS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 FBC 2004.
  
 14- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY RULE 9B-72
 FOR:
 A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT
 APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED. ONLY THE ONE FOR LARGE
 MISSILE IMPACT CAN BE USED FOR OPENINGS BELOW 30'-0"
 HIGH. PROVIDE 2 COPIES.
  
 B) SHINGLES.
  
 C) BAHAMA SHUTTERS AND COLONIAL SHUTTERS SHOWN ON
 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. AND PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED INSTALLATION SCHEDULE SAMPLE.
 PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION.
  
 D) PRECAST LINTELS.
  
 E) ENTRY DOORS.
  
 F) REAR DOORS.
  
 G) ALL STRUCTURAL SIMPSON OR USP CONNECTORS
 SPECIFIED ON PLANS ANDDETAILS.
  
  
 15- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 16- DUPLEX REQUIRES TWO SEPARATE ADDRESSESAND PLANS
 NEED TO BE REVISED SHOWING CORRECT ADDRESS.PLEASE
 CONTACT LILLY URSU AT (561)822-1239 TO GET CORRECT
 ADDRESS.
  
 17- PROVIDE SURVEYS (TWO) SHOWING REVISED PARKING
 SPACES.NOTE: ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE.
  
 18- ENGINEER TO SEE ATTACHED COPY OF FLORIDA STATUTE
 REGARDING REVIEW OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DOCUMENTS.
  
  
 ***NOTE:
 ONE COPY OF PLANS WILL BE SEND TO THE BOARD OF
 ENGINEERS FOR THEIR REVIEW.
  
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-01-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2007-01-29 Time 18:25 Rev Time 5.00
Received By jgomez Date 2007-01-29 Time 17:54 Sent To  
Notes
2007-01-29 18:59:15BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST:
 1- PROVIDE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTES.
  
 2- PAY IMPACT FEES TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. BRING BACK
 STAMPED DRAWINGS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT.
  
 3- PROVIDE TRUSS DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO
 INSTALLATION. SEE SEC. R802.10 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL
 CODE FOR ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION ON TRUSS DRAWINGS.
 ALSO, DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THEM
 PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE.
  
 4- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLANS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.3
 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 5- ENGINEER TO PROVIDE ALL HIS INFORMATION IN THE TITLE
 BLOCK AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES AND
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SEC. 61G15-23.002.
 INCLUDING ENGINEERING FIRM'S CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER.
  
  
 6- SHEET SP-1:A) REVISE ALL DRIVEWAY AND APPROACH
 NOTES. CONTACT CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING
 DEPARTMENT AT (561)494-1040 FOR CITY STANDARDS.
  
 B) DRAINAGE CAP CALCS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH
 PROJECT.
  
 C) REVISE SIZE OF PARKING SPACES.
  
 D) PAVEMENT DETAILS DON'T APPLY TO THIS JOB.
  
 E) FLOOR PLAN IS CALLED EXISTING SITE PLAN. THIS IS
 THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 F) CLARIFY WHY BACKFLOW PREVENTER IS SHOWN FOR ONE
 UNIT ONLY?
  
 7- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT (2 COPIES).
  
 8- SHEET S-1:A) FOOTING SCHEDULE AND FOOTING TYPICAL
 NOTES SHOWN ON FOUNDATION PLAN DON'T MATCH.REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 B) COLUMN SCHEDULE AND TYPICAL NOTES IN FOUNDATION
 PLANS DON'T MATCH EITHER. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 C) ENGINEER TO SPECIFY CONCRETE SLABS JOINTS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R506.2.4 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL
 CODE.
  
 D) 4" DROP IS SHOWN ON MASTER BEDROOM WINDOW INSTEAD
 OF BEING SHOWN FOR ENTRY DOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 E) CORRECT WORDING IN CONCRETE SLAB SPECS IS 6 MIL
 VISQUEEN (NOT JISQUEEN) REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 F) DETAIL F1 CALLS FOR WELDED WIRE MESH SPECS ON
 FOUNDATION NOTES. WHERE ARE THE FOUNDATION NOTES?
  
 G) DETAIL F2 DOESN'T APPLY TO THIS PROJECT.THIS IS
 NOT WOOD FRAMING. SEE TYPE OF INTERIOR BEARING WALL.
 AND,SPECIFY SIZE OF FOOTING ACCORDINGTO TYPE OF
 WALL TO BE SUPPORTED. SEC. 106.1.2CITY AMENDMENTS TO
 FBC 2004.
  
 H) DETAIL F2 SHOWS 3 RE-BARS, WHILE FOOTING SCHEDULE
 CALLS FOR 2 RE-BARS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 I) PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAILS THAT APPLY TO THIS
 PROJECT TO AVOID CONFUSIONS/CONFLICTS AND EXPEDITE
 REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 9- SHEET A-1:A) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
 SHOWING HOW102SF OF COVERED ENTRY WAS ACHIEVED? PLANS
 DON'T PROVIDE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO VERIFY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION WILL BE ESTIMATED
 AFTER SQUARE FOOTAGES ARE CLARIFIED.
  
 B) SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE. SEC. R807 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 C) DRAWINGS ARE INCOMPLETE: MISSING SIZE OF ENTRY
 DOORS,CLOSET DOORS, ETC.
  
 D) PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL. SPECIFY
 ALL BUCK FASTENERS AND SEESEC. R613.6.2 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER BUCK INSTALLATION. BUCK
 NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE WINDOW/DOOR.
  
 10- SHEET A-2:A) SPECIFY CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES
 FOR ENTRY DOORS. SEC. R301 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL
 CODE.
  
 B) CLARIFY NOTE REGARDING BAHAMA SHUTTERS ON 14TH
 STREET ONLY. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOW COLONIAL SHUTTERS.
  
 C) ELEVATIONS DON'T MATCH FLOOR PLAN.SOME ROOMS
 HAVE DOUBLE WINDOWS MULLED TOGETHER. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 D) PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL INFORMATION FOR
 OVERHANG ABOVE ENTRY AREA. PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL
 SECTION/DETAIL WITH COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS,
 DIMENSIONS, HEIGHT, ETC.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS
 TO FBC 2004.
  
 E) WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T MATCH FLOOR PLAN. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED.
  
 11- SHEET A-3:A) PROVIDE ONLY THE INFORMATION THAT IS
 RELEVANT TO THIS PROJECT. THERE ARE A LOT OF NOTES AND
 TABLES THAT DON'T APPLY TO THIS PROJECT.
  
 B) REVISE CODE INFORMATION.CODE THAT APPLIES TO
 THIS PROJECT IS 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. WHEN
 REFERENCINGASCE7,THEN, THE CORRECT EDITION IS
 2002, NOT 2005. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 C) TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE AND CONNECTORS SPECIFIED
 ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) REVISE NUMBER AND TYPE OF FASTENERS SPECIFIED ON
 TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. SEE CURRENT CATALOGUE FOR
 UPDATED INFORMATION. OTHERWISE, ENGINEER TO PROVIDE
 COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SHOWING WHY CONNECTORS
 ARE DIFFERENT THAN THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE
 MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC
 2004.
  
 E) MANUFACTURER FOR CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON ROOF
 FRAMING PLAN IS OUT OF BUSINESS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 F) CLEARLY IDENTIFY TRUSSES FOR WHICH UPLIFT
 PRESSURES WERE CALCULATED.
  
 G) PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL DETAILS/SPECS FOR
 ROOF ABOVE ENTRY DOORS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO
 FBC 2004.
  
 H) ENGINEER TO COORDINATE ALL NOTES AND CHARTS SHOWN
 ON THIS DRAWINGS. THERE IS A LOT OF MIXED INFORMATION
 THAT NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED.SEE 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE AND ALLINFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THIS
 SHEET.PROVIDE ONLY THE REQUIRED INFORMATION.SEE
 SECTIONS . R301 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. ALSO,
 SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE
 FOR MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ROOF SHEATHING. REVISE AND
 COORDINATE ALL INFORMATION IN SHEET A-3 TO MATCH.
  
 I) PNEUMATIC FASTENING SCHEDULE: PROVIDE ONLY THE
 INFORMATION THAT APPLIES TO THIS PROJECT.CHECK/REVISE
 SPACING FOR BUCK DETAILS FASTENING. INFORMATION DOESN'T
 MATCH. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH PROVIDED BUCK DETAIL.
  
 J) ROOF FRAMING PLAN CALLS DWELLING SEPARATION WALL
 A "FIRE WALL".SEEFBC 2004 FOR CORRECT DEFINITION
 FOR "FIRE WALL" AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 K) PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION TRUH DWELLING SEPARATION
 WALL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R317.1 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 L) REVISE ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATIONS AND NOTES
 SEE SEC. R806 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER
 INFORMATION.
  
  
 12- PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE BRING PLANS FOR
 HISTORICAL APPROVAL AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE
 PLANS.
  
 13- SHEET A-4:A) REVISE INTERIOR BEARING WALL TO
 MATCH FLOOR PLAN. REVISE SIZE OF FOOTING, WALL
 CONSTRUCTION, ETC.
  
 B) SPECIFY FIREBLOCKING ON INTERIOR BEARING WALL
 SECTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R602.8 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 B) PROVIDE DETAIL/SPECS FOR DWELLING SEPARATION AT
 ATTIC AREA. SEC. R317.1 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 C) PROVIDE ALL DESIGN CRITERIA, INCLUDING ALL WIND
 LOADS, AND LIVE AND DEAD LOADS. REFERENCE 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE,WHICH IS THE CODE THAT REGULATES
 THIS BUILDING, NOT SECTIONS 1606 OF FBC 2004. SEE SEC.
 R301 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) PLYWOOD NAILING NOTES TO MATCH INFORMATION ON
 SHEET A-3 AFTER APPROPRIATE REVISIONS ARE DONE.
  
 E) TYPICAL WALL SECTION:
 * WHAT IS D-30 INSULATION?
 ** WHAT IS 6 MIL JISQUEEN?
 *** WHAT IS 1/2" DRYWALL STRIPS AT 16"O.C.?
 **** WHAT IS 2"X4" STRIP?. IS IT FIREBLOCKING?. ALSO,
 VERIFY SIZE WITH SIZE OF FURRING STRIPS FOR DRYWALL
 INSTALLATION.
 ***** WHAT IS 325# SHINGLES?
 ****** ROOF SHEATHIG SIZE AND TYPE TO MATCH INFORMATION
 ON SHEET A-3 AFTER APPROPRIATE REVISIONS ARE DONE.
 ******* TRUSS CONNECTOR TO MATCH INFORMATION ON SHEET
 A-3 AFTER APPROPRIATE REVISIONS ARE DONE.
 ******** SPECIFY FOOTING MIN. DEPTH AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R 403.1.4 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 ********* SPECIFY MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR AS REQUIRED BY
 SEC. R404.1.6 2004 FLORIDA RESDIENTIAL CODE.
  
 14- ENERGY CALCULATIONS:A) PROVIDE COMPLETE
 INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM.
  
 B) THIS IS A MULTIFAMILY BUILDING, NOT SINGLE
 FAMILY. SEE DEFINITIONS ON SUBCHAPTER13-2 OF 2004
 FBC. REVISE AS REQUIRED. THEREFORE SEPARATE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. SEE SEC. 15-101.2.5.1 FBC
 2004.
  
 C) IF CALCULATIONS ARE NOT DONE FOR WORST CASE
 SCENARIO, THEN THEY SHALL BE DONE ON ACTUAL BUILDING
 ORIENTATION.ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT FOR
 WORST CASE SCENARIO AND BUILDING ORIENTATION DON'T
 MATCH ACTUAL BUILDING ORIENTATION. SEE SURVEY AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) OVERHANG LENGTH AND HEIGHT ARE INCORRECT.THEY
 CAN'T BE ZERO. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 16- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKINGTHE CEILING FAN
 CREDIT. THEREFORE NEED TO SPECIFY CEILING FAN SIZE IN
 ALL ROOMS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 FBC 2004.
  
 17- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY RULE 9B-72
 FOR:
 A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT
 APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED. ONLY THE ONE FOR LARGE
 MISSILE IMPACT CAN BE USED FOR OPENINGS BELOW 30'-0"
 HIGH. PROVIDE 2 COPIES.
  
 B) SHINGLES.
  
 C) BAHAMA SHUTTERS AND COLONIAL SHUTTERS SHOWN ON
 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. AND PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED INSTALLATION SCHEDULE SAMPLE.
 PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION.
  
 D) PRECAST LINTELS.
  
 E) ENTRY DOORS.
  
 F) REAR DOORS.
  
 G) ALL STRUCTURAL SIMPSON OR USP CONNECTORS
 SPECIFIED ON PLANS ANDDETAILS.
  
 H) WINDOW MULLIONS AND SPECIFY FASTENING.
  
 18- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-05-18 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2007-05-18 Time 16:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2007-05-18 Time 14:59 Sent To M
Notes
2007-05-18 16:17:16** UNSAT 3RDREVIEW **
  
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE MANY COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS
 TWO REVIEWS WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. ANY
 NEW COMMENTS ARE FROM CHANGES AND INFORMATION WHICH IS
 NOW BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST TIME FOR REVIEW.
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW A RESPONSE LETTER FROM THE DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL IS MOST HELPFUL IN THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 ***IMPORANT***
 PLEASE ALSO KNOW DUE TO THE PLANS NOT BEING COMPLETE AT
 THIS TIME AND THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FOR PLANS
 SUBMITTED, THERE MAY BE COMMENTS ON NEXT REVIEW WHICH
 ARE NOT ON THIS REVIEW.
 **** DUE TO THE EXTENT OF THE ELECTRICAL COMMENTS AND
 OTHER COMMENTS BASED ON LICENSING, ONE SET OF THE
 ELECTRICAL PLANS ARE ONCE AGAIN BEING RETAINED. PLEASE
 SEE COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO FLORIDA STATUTES FOR
 REPEAT COMMENTS.
  
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL CODE COMPLIANT
 SECTIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN REPEATED FOR THE THIRD REVIEW
 AND A FEE FOR THE PLAN REVIEW PORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE
 HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED TO THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AS
 REQUIRED UNDER FS 553.80(2)(B). THIS WAS GIVEN AS A
 NOTICE ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AS SEVERAL CODES WERE
 REPEATED IN THE 2ND REVIEW. PLEASE KNOW THAT THIS FEE
 IS ASSESSED TO THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL UNDER FLORIDA
 STATUTES AND IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR OR
 OWNER. THE PLANS RETAINED FROM BOTH PREVIOUS REVIEWS
 AND THIS REVIEW WILL BE SENT TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF
 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW. THE FEE OF $3000.00
 IS DUE BEFORE ANY PLANS MAY BE RE-SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW
 FOR THE 4TH REVIEW.
 ** PLEASE ALSO KNOW THAT TO DATE OF THIS REVIEW, NO ONE
 HAS CONTACTED THIS REVIEWER TO GO OVER ANY COMMENTS OR
 QUESTIONS.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTES AS PREVIOUSLY STATED WITH
 RESPECT TO SIGNING OF PLANS. NO SIGNATURE VERIFICATION
 LETTER WAS LOCATED IN PLANS.
 PLEASE SEE PLANS SEEM TO BE SIGNED WITH AN INITIAL OF
 SOME SORT. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL SIGNATURES OF
 THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED, DATED
 AND SEALED LETTER WITH STATEMENT OF LEGAL SIGNATURE.
 FS 471.025
 PLEASE BE SURE LETTER IS PROPERLY NOTARIZED UNDER
 FLORIDA STATUTES 117.05.
 PLEASE KNOW THIS LETTER WILL BE PLACED IN OUR SIGNATURE
 FILE FOR ANY FUTURE REFERENCE AS NEEDED AND WILL NOT BE
 NEED TO PROVIDE LETTER ON FUTURE PROJECTS.
 ** PLEASE KNOW, THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SHEETS AND FOR
 ALL TRADE REVIEWS WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY
 OTHER REVIEWER(S).
  
 3) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT. ONLY THE NEC WAS
 ADDED.
 PLEASE SEE ONLY THE 2005 NEC WAS ADDED TO PLANS.
 PLEASE SEE THE CODES WHICH WERE REQUESTED FOR OTHERS
 WERE NOT ADDED. PLEASE SEE THAT ALL PLANS SHALL STATE
 THE CODE IN WHICH THEY ARE DESIGNED UNDER. THIS IS
 SUBMITTED UNDER THE NEW CODES. 2004 FBC W/ THE 2006
 REVISIONS.
  
 4) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW. THIS IS ONE BUILDING BY DEFINITION AND ONLY ONE
 SERVICE IS PERMITTED AND GROUPING OF MAINS IS REQUIRED.
 PLEASE REVISE RISER FOR NEW SINGLE SERVICE.
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND PLANS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE
 PLANS DO NOT INDICATE GROUPING OF MAINS AS RISER SEEMS
 TO SHOW. PLEASE SEE MISSING SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS
 FOR NEW RISER.
 PLEASE SEE THE RISER AS SHOWN IS NOT CODE COMPLIANT
 WITH SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE NEC. PLEASE SEE OTHER
 COMMENTS RELEVANT TO THE RISER.
 THIS IS ONE *BUILDING* BY DEFINITION IN THE FBC AND
 ONLY ONE SERVICE PER 230.2 WILL BE GRANTED. PLANS SHOW
 TWO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS/SERVICE METERS.
 230.70, 230.72, 240.4, 310.16, 310.15B6, ETC. PLEASE
 SEE THE SIZE OF THE METER CAN, CAN NOT BE VERIFIED AS
 NO LOAD CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED. FBC 106.1.2,
 106.3.5.4(PARA 8) ADMIN SECTION. THERE ARE CURRENTLY
 MANY SECTIONS BESIDES THE ONES NOTED BELOW WHICH COULD
 NOT BE ALL TYPED IN THIS REVIEW.
  
 5) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW. RISER STILL SHOWS THIS. THIS NOTE AND CODE
 SECTION WILL BE APPLICABLE FOR NEW SERVICE ALSO.
 PLEASE SEE 250.6, 250.24B AS NO EQUIPMENT GROUNDING
 CONDUCTORS ARE PERMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST MEANS OF
 DISCONNECT.
  
 6) NOTE:AS THE SERVICE WILL CHANGE, THIS SAME COMMENT
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WILL REMAIN. PLEASE SEE AS THE
 SERVICE IS NOT COMPLETE AND THE SERVICE ENTRANCE
 CONDUCTORS ARE NOT SHOWN REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE CAN
 NOT BE DONE. BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE GEC AS SHOWN IT
 DOES NOT MEET THE SECTION OF THE CODE PREVIOUSLY
 GIVEN.
 PLEASE SEE 250.66 AS THE SIZE OF SERVICE MAY CHANGE
 WHICH WILL DICTATE THE SIZE OF THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE
 CONDUCTOR.
  
 7) NOTE: SAME NOTE, NOTHING CHANGED. PLANS DO NOT
 INDICATE THE REQUIRED RATINGS FOR MAIN(S).PLEASE SEE
 ONLY THE BRACE RATING AND BRANCH CIRCUIT RATING IS
 BEING SHOWN FOR SUB PANEL(S).
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE AIC RATINGS FOR SERVICE MAINS PER
 110.9.
 PLEASE SEE THE RATING AS SHOWN ON PANEL SCHEDULE WAS
 NOTED, HOWEVER NEEDED FOR MAIN(S).
  
 8) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT. THE PANEL SCHEDULE
 IS NOT COMPLETE AND LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE NOT COMPLETE.
 WHERE ARE LOADS ON SERVICE FOR EACH PANEL AND SERVICE
 AS SHOWN ON RISER? PLEASE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A
 COMPLETE PANEL SCHEDULE WITH ALL MINIMUM REQUIRED
 DEDICATED LOADS AS WELL AS COMPLETED LOAD CALCULATIONS
 BASED ON MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FROM THE NEC.
 PLEASE SEE THE SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS ARE NOT
 CORRECT, SHOWS 4500VA FOR TWO CIRCUITS?
 PLEASE SEE THE WASHER/ LAUNDRY LOADS WHICH ARE NOT
 CORRECT FOR MINIMUM LOADS PER NEC.
 PLEASE SEE NO LOAD IS SHOWN FOR A/C SYSTEM. NO LARGER
 LOADS? ETC.
 PLEASE SEE 220.40, 220.82, 220.52, 220.54, 220.60, ETC,
 ETC.
 FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.4
  
 9) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS THE PANEL SCHEDULE
 STILL INDICATE THE DEDICATE BATH RECEPTACLE CIRCUIT ON
 WITH GARAGE RECEPTACLES. PLEASE SEE PLANS AS PLANS DO
 NOT INDICATE ANY KIND OF GARAGE??
 PLEASE SEE 210.52D, 210.11C3, AS NO OTHER LOADS ARE
 PERMITTED ON THE DEDICATED BATH CIRCUIT(S).
  
 10) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT.
 PLEASE SEE 210.52C1 FOR MISSING REQUIRED GFI'S ALONG
 KITCHEN COUNTER SPACE.
 MISSING MINIMUM VA 220.52
  
 11) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT.PLEASE SEE THAT
 THE PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATES THE DINING ROOM
 RECEPTACLES ON WITH LIGHTING AND MANY OTHER AREAS WHICH
 ARE NOT PERMITTED.
 NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED.
 PLEASE SEE MISSING REQUIRED CIRCUITING FOR DINING ROOM
 RECEPTS PER 210.52B1, 210.11C1, AND 220. 52B.
  
 12) NOTE:THIS COMMENT WILL REMAIN AS NOTED ABOVE IN
 NOTE #9 THERE ARE RECEPTACLES ALONG KITCHEN COUNTER
 SPACE WHICH ARE STILL MISSING.
 PLEASE SEE 210.8A6, AS ALL RECEPTS ALONG KITCHEN
 COUNTER SPACE SHALL BE SHOWN AS GFI.
  
 13) NOTE:THIS COMMENT REMAINS AS THE MINIMUM
 CLEARANCES IN SOME OF THE CLOSETS ARE NOT MET. PLEASE
 SEE 410.8 AS THE PC LIGHTING IN CLOSETS ARE NOT
 PERMITTED AS SHOWN. THEY DO NOT MEET MINIMUM
 CLEARANCES.
  
 14) NOTE: PLEASE GO OVER PLANS AS SCALE STILL SEEMS TO
 SHOW SOME NOT SPACED PER 210.52
 PLEASE SEE MISSING RECEPTS PER 210.52 FOR WALL
 SPACES.
 PLEASE SEE PLANS ARE STILL MISSING RECEPTACLES PER
 210.52
  
 15) NOTE:THIS COMMENT IS THE SAME FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW. PLEASE SEE ALL SMOKE DEVICES ARE STILL BEING
 SHOWN AS *SMOKE DETECTORS* AND SYMBOL LEGEND EVENS
 STATES AND SHOWS THESE BEING 110V UNITS WHICH THESE
 WOULD BE *SMOKE ALARMS*
 PLANS SHOW BOTH??
 PLEASE SEE ALL SMOKE DEVICES SHALL BE SHOWN AS DEFINED
 IN NFPA-72. PLEASE SEE IF THESE DEVICES AS SHOWN ARE
 PART OF A LOW VOLTAGE ALARM SYSTEM WHICH CONTAINS
 HORN/ALARM DEVICES THEN THE SD AS SHOWN FOR SMOKE
 DETECTOR IS OK. IF THESE DEVICES AS SHOWN ARE DETECT
 AND SOUND AN ALARM, THEN THEY SHALL BE SHOWN AS SA FOR
 SMOKE ALARMS.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE NFPA-72 11.5.1.1, 11.8.3 FOR LOCATIONS
 REQUIRED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE ALL SLEEPING ROOMS. PLEASE
 SEE SOME ROOMS DO NOT INDICATE THE DEVICE OUTSIDE THE
 SLEEPING ROOM, YET INDICATE TWO DEVICES INSIDE ROOM?
 PLEASE SEE OTHER ROOMS WHICH DO INDICATE A DEVICE
 OUTSIDE ROOM, BUT STILL INDICATE TWO OR MORE INSIDE??
  
 16) NOTE: THIS COMMENT IS THE SAME. NO CORRECTION WAS
 MADE.
 PLEASE SEE MISSING DISCONNECTS FOR ALL A/C EQUIPMENT.
 PLEASE SEE 440.11. STILL SHOWN AS RECEPTACLES WHICH ARE
 NOT PERMITTED.
 PLEASE SEE AHU CLOSET APPEARS TO SHOW TWO RECEPTS.
 PLEASE KNOW AS PER 422.31, AHU'S SHALL NOT BE PLUGGED
 IN.
  
 17) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT.
 PLEASE SEE 422.31 FOR DISCONNECTING MEANS REQUIRED FOR
 WATER HEATER(S).
  
  
 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 422.13 FOR REQUIRED LOAD
 CALCULATIONS FOR WATER HEATERS AS PREVIOUS PLANS DID
 NOT SHOW LOADS, THIS COMMENT IS NEW NOW THAT LOADS ARE
 SHOWN.
  
 19) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS PLANS ARE STILL
 MISSING SEVERAL CIRCUITS WHICH THE REVIEW CAN NOT
 DETERMINE SPECIFIC USE OF SOME WHICH MAY NEED TO BE
 DEDICATED CIRCUITS ETC.
 PLEASE SEE SEVERAL ELECTRICAL DEVICES ON PLANS WHICH
 ARE MISSING CIRCUITING. THERE ARE MANY ITEMS WHICH NEED
 CIRCUITING TO REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
 FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.4
  
 20) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS THE CODE REQUIRES
 *ALL OUTLETS* IN BEDROOMS TO CONTAIN ARC FAULT
 PROTECTION PLEASE SEE MISSING ARC FAULT PROTECTION FOR
 ALL OUTLETS IN BEDROOMS. 210.12 THIS IS NOT ONLY
 REQUIRED FOR RECEPTACLES.
  
 21) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW.
 PLEASE SEE SOME RECEPTACLES ARE NOT BEING SHOWN
 SWITCHING THE ENTIRE RECEPTACLES WHICH IS OK, HOWEVER
 AS NOTED ABOVE PER 210.52, THEN RECEPTACLES WOULD BE
 REQUIRED IN ADDITION FOR GENERAL PURPOSE.
  
 22) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT PLEASE SEE PLANS
 APPEAR TO NOW HAVE ONE NEW RECEPTACLE FOR WHAT APPEARS
 TO BE FOR THE DISHWASHER AND DISPOSAL BUT IT IS UNCLEAR
 AS ONE UNIT SHOWS THIS OUTLET AS GFI AND THE OTHER NOT
 GFI PROTECTED. PLEASE SEE 210.4, IF THESE ARE ON THE
 SAME YOKE/DEVICE THEN A 2-POLE BREAKER IS REQUIRED.
 PLEASE ALSO SHOW AND IDENTIFY THE RECEPTACLE FOR THESE
 ON PLANS.
  
 23) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW. PLEASE SHOW ALL ROOM AND AREA DESIGNATIONS ON
 PLANS IN ORDER TO REVIEW SOME CIRCUITING FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE.
 FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION.
  
 24) NOTE:PLEASE SEE AS THE ADDRESS HAS CHANGED,
 PLEASE ADJUST TITLE BLOCKS AND REMOVE THE OLD 601 14TH
 ST.
 FAC 61G15-23, 61G1-16
  
  
 * ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-03-09 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2007-03-09 Time 18:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2007-03-09 Time 17:41 Sent To M
Notes
2007-03-09 19:00:58** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW **
  
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE MANY COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS
 REVIEW WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH
 SEVERAL NEW COMMENTS DUE TO CHANGES IN THE PLANS
 SUBMITTED.
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW A RESPONSE LETTER FROM THE DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL IS MOST HELPFUL IN THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 *** PLEASE ALSO KNOW DUE TO THE PLANS NOT BEING
 COMPLETE AT THIS TIME AND THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FOR
 PLANS SUBMITTED, THERE MAY BE COMMENTS ON NEXT REVIEW
 WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS REVIEW.
 **DUE TO THE EXTENT OF THE ELECTRICAL COMMENTS AND
 OTHER COMMENTS BASED ON LICENSING, ONE SET OF THE
 ELECTRICAL PLANS ARE ONCE AGAIN BEING RETAINED. PLEASE
 SEE NEW COMMENTS ADDED TO THIS REVIEW AND COMMENT WITH
 RESPECT TO FLORIDA STATUTES FOR REPEAT COMMENTS.
  
 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THIS MOSTLY THE SAME COMMENT. ONLY
 A NEW SEAL WAS USED WHEN PLANS WERE SIGNED AND SEALED.
 PLEASE SEE THAT THE MISSING CA # IS STILL NOT ON ANY
 TITLE BLOCKS. PLEASE SEE THE PRINTED NAME IS NOT THE
 SAME AS IN SEAL. PLEASE SEE NO LETTER FOR SIGNATURE
 VERIFICATION WAS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE FLORIDA
 ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002 FOR MISSING LICENSING
 INFORMATION REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE MISSING CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AND SOME SHEETS ARE NOT COMPLETE
 WITH OTHER INFORMATION AS REQUIRED.
 FLORIDA STATUTES 471.023
 PLEASE SEE PLANS SEEM TO BE SIGNED WITH AN INITIAL OF
 SOME SORT. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL SIGNATURES OF
 THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED, DATED
 AND SEALED LETTER WITH STATEMENT OF LEGAL SIGNATURE.
 PLEASE BE SURE LETTER IS PROPERLY NOTARIZED UNDER
 FLORIDA STATUTES 117.05.
 PLEASE KNOW THIS LETTER WILL BE PLACED IN OUR SIGNATURE
 FILE FOR ANY FUTURE REFERENCE AS NEEDED AND WILL NOT BE
 NEED TO PROVIDE LETTER ON FUTURE PROJECTS.
 ** PLEASE KNOW, THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SHEETS AND FOR
 ALL TRADE REVIEWS WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY
 OTHER REVIEWER(S).
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY THE 2005 NEC WAS ADDED TO
 PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE CODES WHICH WERE REQUESTED FOR
 OTHERS WERE NOT ADDED. PLEASE SEE THAT ALL PLANS SHALL
 STATE THE CODE IN WHICH THEY ARE DESIGNED UNDER. THIS
 IS SUBMITTED UNDER THE NEW CODES. 2004 FBC W/ THE 2006
 REVISIONS.
  
 PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING CODES SHALL BE STATED ON
 PLANS.
 NFPA-70 2005, 2002 NFPA-72
 PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE PLANS WERE
 SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING AFTER THE DATE OF DEC 8TH,
 2006, THE PLANS SHALL BE DESIGNED UNDER THE 2005 NEC.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND PLANS SUBMITTED.
 PLEASE SEE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE GROUPING OF MAINS AS
 RISER SEEMS TO SHOW. PLEASE SEE MISSING SERVICE
 ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS FOR NEW RISER.
 PLEASE SEE THE RISER AS SHOWN IS NOT CODE COMPLIANT
 WITH SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE NEC. PLEASE SEE OTHER
 COMMENTS RELEVANT TO THE RISER.
 THIS IS ONE *BUILDING* BY DEFINITION IN THE FBC AND
 ONLY ONE SERVICE PER 230.2 WILL BE GRANTED. PLANS SHOW
 TWO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS/SERVICE METERS.
 230.70, 230.72, 240.4, 310.16, 310.15B6, ETC. PLEASE
 SEE THE SIZE OF THE METER CAN, CAN NOT BE VERIFIED AS
 NO LOAD CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED. FBC 106.1.2,
 106.3.5.4(PARA 8) ADMIN SECTION. THERE ARE CURRENTLY
 MANY SECTIONS BESIDES THE ONES NOTED BELOW WHICH COULD
 NOT BE ALL TYPED IN THIS REVIEW.
  
 4) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW.
 PLEASE SEE 250.6, 250.24B AS NO EQUIPMENT GROUNDING
 CONDUCTORS ARE PERMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST MEANS OF
 DISCONNECT.
  
 5) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW.
 PLEASE SEE AS THE SERVICE IS NOT COMPLETE AND THE
 SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS ARE NOT SHOWN REVIEW FOR
 CODE COMPLIANCE CAN NOT BE DONE. BASED ON THE SIZE OF
 THE GEC AS SHOWN IT DOES NOT MEET THE SECTION OF THE
 CODE PREVIOUSLY GIVEN.
 PLEASE SEE 250.66 AS THE SIZE OF SERVICE MAY CHANGE
 WHICH WILL DICTATE THE SIZE OF THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE
 CONDUCTOR.
  
 6) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE ONLY THE BRACE RATING AND
 BRANCH CIRCUIT RATING IS BEING SHOWN.
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE AIC RATINGS FOR SERVICE MAINS PER
 110.9.
 PLEASE SEE THE RATING AS SHOWN ON PANEL SCHEDULE WAS
 NOTED, HOWEVER NEEDED FOR MAIN(S).
  
 7) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT. PANEL SCHEDULE IS
 COMPLETELY BLANK FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS AND FOR LOAD ON
 SERVICE FOR EACH PANEL AND SERVICE AS SHOWN ON RISER.
 PLEASE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE PANEL SCHEDULE
 WITH ALL MINIMUM REQUIRED DEDICATED LOADS AS WELL AS
 COMPLETED LOAD CALCULATIONS BASED ON MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS FROM THE NEC.
 PLEASE SEE 220.40, 220.82, 220.52, 220.54, 220.60, ETC,
 ETC.
 FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.4
  
 8) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS THE PANEL SCHEDULE
 STILL INDICATE THE DEDICATE BATH RECEPTACLE CIRCUIT ON
 WITH GARAGE RECEPTACLES. PLEASE SEE PLANS AS PLANS DO
 NOT INDICATE ANY KIND OF GARAGE??
 PLEASE SEE 210.52D, 210.11C3, AS NO OTHER LOADS ARE
 PERMITTED ON THE DEDICATED BATH CIRCUIT(S).
  
 9) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT.
 PLEASE SEE 210.52C1 FOR MISSING REQUIRED GFI'S ALONG
 KITCHEN COUNTER SPACE.
 MISSING MINIMUM VA 220.52
  
 10) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT.PLEASE SEE THAT
 THE PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATES THE DINING ROOM
 RECEPTACLES ON WITH LIGHTING AND MANY OTHER AREAS WHICH
 ARE NOT PERMITTED.
 NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED.
 PLEASE SEE MISSING REQUIRED CIRCUITING FOR DINING ROOM
 RECEPTS PER 210.52B1, 210.11C1, AND 220. 52B.
  
 11) NOTE:THIS COMMENT WILL REMAIN AS NOTED ABOVE IN
 NOTE #9 THERE ARE RECEPTACLES ALONG KITCHEN COUNTER
 SPACE WHICH ARE STILL MISSING.
 PLEASE SEE 210.8A6, AS ALL RECEPTS ALONG KITCHEN
 COUNTER SPACE SHALL BE SHOWN AS GFI.
  
 12) NOTE: THIS COMMENT REMAINS AS THE MINIMUM
 CLEARANCES IN SOME OF THE CLOSETS ARE NOT MET. PLEASE
 SEE 410.8 AS THE PC LIGHTING IN CLOSETS ARE NOT
 PERMITTED AS SHOWN. THEY DO NOT MEET MINIMUM
 CLEARANCES.
  
 13) NOTE: PLEASE GO OVER PLANS AS SCALE STILL SEEMS TO
 SHOW SOME NOT SPACED PER 210.52
 PLEASE SEE MISSING RECEPTS PER 210.52 FOR WALL
 SPACES.
  
 14) NOTE:THIS COMMENT IS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLEASE
 SEE ALL SMOKE DEVICES ARE STILL BEING SHOWN AS *SMOKE
 DETECTORS* AND SYMBOL LEGEND EVENS STATES AND SHOWS
 THESE BEING 110V UNITS WHICH THESE WOULD BE *SMOKE
 ALARMS*
 PLEASE SEE ALL SMOKE DEVICES SHALL BE SHOWN AS DEFINED
 IN NFPA-72. PLEASE SEE IF THESE DEVICES AS SHOWN ARE
 PART OF A LOW VOLTAGE ALARM SYSTEM WHICH CONTAINS
 HORN/ALARM DEVICES THEN THE SD AS SHOWN FOR SMOKE
 DETECTOR IS OK. IF THESE DEVICES AS SHOWN ARE DETECT
 AND SOUND AN ALARM, THEN THEY SHALL BE SHOWN AS SA FOR
 SMOKE ALARMS.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE NFPA-72 11.5.1.1, 11.8.3 FOR LOCATIONS
 REQUIRED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE ALL SLEEPING ROOMS. PLEASE
 SEE SOME ROOMS DO NOT INDICATE THE DEVICE OUTSIDE THE
 SLEEPING ROOM, YET INDICATE TWO DEVICES INSIDE ROOM?
 PLEASE SEE OTHER ROOMS WHICH DO INDICATE A DEVICE
 OUTSIDE ROOM, BUT STILL INDICATE TWO OR MORE INSIDE??
  
 15) NOTE: THIS COMMENT IS THE SAME. NO CORRECTION WAS
 MADE.
 PLEASE SEE MISSING DISCONNECTS FOR ALL A/C EQUIPMENT.
 PLEASE SEE 440.11.
 PLEASE SEE AHU CLOSET APPEARS TO SHOW TWO RECEPTS.
 PLEASE KNOW AS PER 422.31, AHU'S SHALL NOT BE PLUGGED
 IN.
  
 16) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT.
 PLEASE SEE 422.31 FOR DISCONNECTING MEANS REQUIRED FOR
 WATER HEATER(S).
  
 17) NOTE: OK.
  
 18) NOTE: OK.
  
 ** NEW NOTES**
  
 19) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SEVERAL ELECTRICAL DEVICES ON
 PLANS WHICH ARE MISSING CIRCUITING. THERE ARE MANY
 ITEMS WHICH NEED CIRCUITING TO REVIEW FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE.
 FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.4
  
 20) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING ARC FAULT PROTECTION FOR
 ALL OUTLETS IN BEDROOMS. 210.12 THIS IS NOT ONLY
 REQUIRED FOR RECEPTACLES.
  
 21) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SOME RECEPTACLES ARE NOT BEING
 SHOWN SWITCHING THE ENTIRE RECEPTACLES WHICH IS OK,
 HOWEVER AS NOTED ABOVE PER 210.52, THEN RECEPTACLES
 WOULD BE REQUIRED IN ADDITION FOR GENERAL PURPOSE.
  
 22) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS APPEAR TO NOW HAVE ONE NEW
 RECEPTACLE FOR WHAT APPEARS TO BE FOR THE DISHWASHER
 AND DISPOSAL BUT IT IS UNCLEAR AS ONE UNIT SHOWS THIS
 OUTLET AS GFI AND THE OTHER NOT GFI PROTECTED. PLEASE
 SEE 210.4, IF THESE ARE ON THE SAME YOKE/DEVICE THEN A
 2-POLE BREAKER IS REQUIRED.
 PLEASE ALSO SHOW AND IDENTIFY THE RECEPTACLE FOR THESE
 ON PLANS.
  
 23) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW ALL ROOM AND AREA DESIGNATIONS ON
 PLANS IN ORDER TO REVIEW SOME CIRCUITING FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE.
 FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION.
  
 24) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B) WITH
 RESPECT TO DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND REPEAT COMMENTS FOR
 CODE COMPLIANCE.
 PLEASE KNOW THAT DUE TO THE AMOUNT OF ELECTRICAL
 COMMENTS PLANS WILL BE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. PLEASE
 KNOW PLANS WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF
 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW ITEMS ON PLANS AND
 MISSING LICENSE AS REQUIRED UNDER THE FLORIDA STATUTES
 AND FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
  
 * ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
  
  
  
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-12-17 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2006-12-17 Time 16:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2006-12-17 Time 15:25 Sent To Z
Notes
2006-12-17 16:22:02*** UNSAT ***
  
 *** PLEASE KNOW DUE TO THE PLANS NOT BEING COMPLETE AT
 THIS TIME AND ALSO THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FOR PLANS
 SUBMITTED, THERE MAY BE COMMENTS ON NEXT REVIEW WHICH
 ARE NOT ON THIS REVIEW.
 **DUE TO THE EXTENT OF THE ELECTRICAL COMMENTS AND
 OTHER COMMENTS BASED ON LICENSING, ONE SET OF THE
 ELECTRICAL PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE.
  
 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 61G15-23.002 FOR MISSING LICENSING INFORMATION
 REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE MISSING CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AND SOME SHEETS ARE NOT COMPLETE
 WITH OTHER INFORMATION AS REQUIRED.
 FLORIDA STATUTES 471.023
 PLEASE ALSO SEE 61G15-23.001 FOR MINIMUM SIZE OF SEAL.
 THE SIZE AS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE LARGE
 ENOUGH?
 PLEASE SEE PLANS SEEM TO BE SIGNED WITH AN INITIAL OF
 SOME SORT. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL SIGNATURES OF
 THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED, DATED
 AND SEALED LETTER WITH STATEMENT OF LEGAL SIGNATURE.
 PLEASE BE SURE LETTER IS PROPERLY NOTARIZED UNDER
 FLORIDA STATUTES 117.05.
 PLEASE KNOW THIS LETTER WILL BE PLACED IN OUR SIGNATURE
 FILE FOR ANY FUTURE REFERENCE AS NEEDED AND WILL NOT BE
 NEED TO ROVIDE LETTER ON FUTURE PROJECTS.
 ** PLEASE KNOW, THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SHEETS AND FOR
 ALL TRADE REVIEWS WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY
 OTHER REVIEWER(S).
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING CODES SHALL BE STATED
 ON PLANS.
 NFPA-70 2005, 2002 NFPA-72
 PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE PLANS WERE
 SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING AFTER THE DATE OF DEC 8TH,
 2006, THE PLANS SHALL BE DESIGNED UNDER THE 2005 NEC.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND PLANS SUBMITTED.
 PLANS AND PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR A DUPLEX DWELLING
 UNIT TO BE BUILT, (NOT YET APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY
 ZONING) YET RISER SHOWS SINGLE METER AND PLANS SHOW
 TWO?
 PLEASE SEE RISER AS SHOWN MAY NOT FEED PANELS AS SHOWN.
 PLEASE SEE 240.21C FOR TAPPED CONDUCTORS.
 PLEASE SEE THE SIZE OF THE METER CAN, CAN NOT BE
 VERIFIED AS NO LOAD CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED. FBC
 106.1.2, 106.3.5.4(PARA 8) ADMIN SECTION. THERE ARE
 CURRENTLY MANY SECTIONS BESIDES THE ONES NOTED BELOW
 WHICH COULD NOT BE ALL TYPED IN THIS REVIEW.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.6, 250.24B AS NO EQUIPMENT
 GROUNDING CONDUCTORS ARE PERMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST
 MEANS OF DISCONNECT.
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.66 AS THE SIZE OF SERVICE MAY
 CHANGE WHICH WILL DICTATE THE SIZE OF THE GROUNDING
 ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE AIC RATINGS FOR SERVICE
 MAINS PER 110.9.
 PLEASE SEE THE RATING AS SHOWN ON PANEL SCHEDULE WAS
 NOTED, HOWEVER NEEDED FOR MAIN(S).
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE PANEL
 SCHEDULE WITH ALL MINIMUM REQUIRED DEDICATED LOADS AS
 WELL AS COMPLETED LOAD CALCULATIONS BASED ON MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS FROM THE NEC.
 PLEASE SEE 220.40, 220.82, 220.52, 220.54, 220.60, ETC,
 ETC.
 FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.4
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.52D, 210.11C3,A S NO OTHER
 LOADS ARE PERMITTED ON THE DEDICATED BATH CIRCUIT(S).
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.52C1 FOR MISSING REQUIRED GFI'S
 ALONG KITCHEN COUNTER SPACE.
 MISSING MINIMUM VA 220.52
  
 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING REQUIRED CIRCUITING FOR
 DINING ROOM RECEPTS PER 210.52B1, 210.11C1, AND 220.
 52B.
  
 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.8A6, AS ALL RECEPTS ALONG
 KITCHEN COUNTER SPACE SHALL BE SHOWN AS GFI.
  
 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 410.8 AS THE PC LIGHTING IN
 CLOSETS ARE NOT PERMITTED AS SHOWN. THEY DO NOT MEET
 MINIMUM CLEARANCES.
  
 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING RECEPTS PER 210.52 FOR
 WALL SPACES.
  
 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ALL SMOKE DEVICES SHALL BE SHOWN
 AS DEFINED IN NFPA-72. PLEASE SEE IF THESE DEVICES AS
 SHOWN ARE PART OF A LOW VOLTAGE ALARM SYSTEM WHICH
 CONTAINS HORN/ALARM DEVICES THEN THE SD AS SHOWN FOR
 SMOKE DETECTOR IS OK. IF THESE DEVICES AS SHOWN ARE
 DETECT AND SOUND AN ALARM, THEN THEY SHALL BE SHOWN AS
 SA FOR SMOKE ALARMS.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE NFPA-72 11.5.1.1, 11.8.3 FOR LOCATIONS
 REQUIRED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE ALL SLEEPING ROOMS. PLEASE
 SEE SOME ROOMS DO NOT INDICATE THE DEVICE OUTSIDE THE
 SLEEPING ROOM, YET INDICATE TWO DEVICES INSIDE ROOM?
 PLEASE SEE OTHER ROOMS WHICH DO INDICATE A DEVICE
 OUTSIDE ROOM, BUT STILL INDICATE TWO OR MORE INSIDE??
  
 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING DISCONNECTS FOR ALL A/C
 EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SEE 440.11.
 PLEASE SEE AHU CLOSET APPEARS TO SHOW TWO RECEPTS.
 PLEASE KNOW AS PER 422.31, AHU?S SHALL NOT BE PLUGGED
 IN.
  
 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 422.31 FOR DISCONNECTING MEANS
 REQUIRED FOR WATER HEATER(S).
  
 17) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY ROOMS WHICH INDICATE A J-BOX
 FOR "PUT-FAN" AS STATED ON PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT
 THIS IS? SYMBOL LEGEND DOES NOT ELABORATE ON THIS.
  
 18) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW SEPARATE PLANS, AND PERMIT
 APPLICATIONS REQUIRED FOR LOW VOLTAGE , PHONE, CATV OR
 BURGLAR ALARM SYSTEMS.
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW SERVICE AND PROPOSED STRUCTURE MAY BE
 GREATLY AFFECT BY ANY POSSIBLE ZONING COMMENTS FOR
 SERVICE.
  
 * ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-06-06 Cont ID  
Sent By rchokshi Date 2007-06-06 Time 09:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rchokshi Date 2007-06-06 Time 09:27 Sent To  
Notes
2007-06-06 09:38:06** FAILED **
  
 1. SIDEWALK ALONG ON HENRIETA AVE SHOULD BE 5 FEET WIDE
 INSTEAD OF 4.7 FEET.
 2. ALL SIDE WALK, DRIVEWAY, APPROACHES IN CITY'S RIGHT
 OF WAY MUST BE APPROVED FROM WINDEL PALMER, 494-1040,
 1000 45TH STREET
 3. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAY, APPROACHES ON THE
 DRAWING.
 4. MUST MEET CITY'S STANDARDS FOR
 DRIVEWAY,APPROACH,SIDEWALK ETC.,YOU CAN GET A C.D. FOR
 ALL CITY'S STANDARDS FROM 1000 45TH STREET
  
 RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2007-05-18 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-05-18 Time 11:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-05-18 Time 11:56 Sent To E
Notes
2007-05-18 11:57:00TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2007-05-15 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-05-15 Time 11:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-05-15 Time 11:14 Sent To Z
Notes
2007-05-15 11:14:40TO "Z" BOX/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2007-03-09 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-03-09 Time 14:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-03-09 Time 14:01 Sent To E
Notes
2007-03-09 14:02:16TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2007-03-03 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-03-03 Time 14:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-03-03 Time 14:05 Sent To Z
Notes
2007-03-03 14:05:50TO "Z" BOX/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2007-01-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2007-01-29 Time 18:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2006-12-17 Time 14:40 Sent To  
Notes
2006-12-17 14:40:33TO "SFR" "E"
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-05-21 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2007-05-21 Time 08:55 Rev Time 0.45
Received By tgordon Date 2007-05-21 Time 08:55 Sent To P
Notes
2007-05-21 08:58:48*** DENIED ***
 1) SEE TITLE BLOCK ON PLANS SHOW THE WRONG JOB ADDRESS,
 PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 2) AS NOTED IN LAST TWO REVIEWS 3-12-07 NOTE #3 AND
 12-19-07 NOTE #2. PLEASE SEE THE COOLING LOAD
 CALCULATIONS ARE CALLING FOR 13,331 SENSIBLE BTU'S, THE
 MECHANICAL PLANS ARE CALLING FOR 24,800 SENSIBLE BTU'S,
 THE PLANS CAN ONLY CALL FOR 15% MORE SENSIBLE BTU'S
 THAN THE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS, SEE 2004 FBC
 13-607.1.ABC.1.1 (12-8-06 REVISION). PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 3) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 3-12-07 NOTE #5. SEE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS #15 IS TAKING THE CF (CEILING FAN) CREDIT,
 ELECTRICAL PLANS SHOW FUTURE FANS, CREDIT MAY NOT BE
 TAKEN FOR FUTURE WORK, SEE 2004 FBC 13-607.2.A.3.1.
 PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 4) ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE FOR 2292 SQUARE FEET (BOTH
 UNITS) BUT LINES 12, 13, AND 14 SHOW ONLY ONE A/C
 SYSTEM, ONE HEATER AND ONE WATER HEATER, . WILL NEED TO
 SHOW TWO OF EACH OR SUBMIT TWO SEPARATE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS FOR EACH UNIT AND CORRECT TOTAL SQUARE
 FEET, PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 5) ENERGY CALCULATIONS LINE 12 SHOWS 29,200 TOTAL
 COOLING BTU'S., MECHANICAL PLANS EQUIPMENT LISTING
 SHOWS 33,200 TOTAL COOLING BTU'S., THE TWO MUST
 COINCIDE PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 6) ENERGY CALCULATIONS LINE 13 SHOWS 34.000 TOTAL
 HEATING BTU'S., MECHANICAL PLANS SHOW 24,000 TOTAL
 HEATING BTU'S., THE TWO MUST COINCIDE PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 7) PLEASE SEE ELECTRICAL REVIEW NOTE #1 AS THIS ALSO
 APPLIES TO THE MECHANICAL REVIEW.
  
 MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY;
 TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-03-12 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2007-03-12 Time 09:41 Rev Time 1.15
Received By tgordon Date 2007-03-12 Time 09:41 Sent To P
Notes
2007-03-12 10:04:24*** DENIED ***
 1) SEE MECHANICAL PLANS PAGE MEP-2 OF 2 "A/C NOTES",
 10,000 TOTAL, 1410KW, AND 13,331 SENS, IS INCORRECT FOR
 A THREE TON A/C SYSTEM, PLEASE OBTAIN THE
 MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION'S AND INTER THE CORRECT
 INFORMATION.
  
 2) COULD NOT FIND THE TRANE A/C SYSTEM LISTED ON THE
 PLANS IN THE ARI DIRECTORY, PLEASE SUBMIT DETAILED
 MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION'S AND INSTALLATION
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR A/C SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED.
  
 3) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 12/19/06 NOTE #2. PLEASE SEE
 THE MANUAL J CALCULATIONS ARE CALLING FOR A SMALLER A/C
 SYSTEM THEN THE MECHANICAL PLANS ARE, THEIR FORTHE
 PLANS WOULD NEED TO LIST A SMALLER A/C SYSTEM TO BE
 INSTALLED, SEE 2004 FBC 13-607.ABC.1.1.
  
 4) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 12/19/06 NOTE #3. THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE INCORRECT, PLEASE SUBMIT
 CORRECTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS, SEE 2004 FBC 13-101.2.
  
 5) SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS #15 IS TAKING THE CF CREDIT,
 ELECTRICAL PLANS SHOW FUTURE FANS, CREDIT MAY NOT BE
 TAKEN FOR FUTURE WORK.
  
 6) PLEASE SEE YELLOW HIGH LIGHTS ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS
 AND MECHANICAL PLANS, PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 7) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 12/19/06 NOTE #4.THE 12X6
 RETURN AIR TRANSFER GRILLS TO THE BEDROOMS ARE TO
 SMALL. BALANCED RETURN AIR MAY BE ACHIEVED BY.
 (A)TRANSFER DUCTS MAY ACHIEVE THIS BY INCREASING THE
 RETURN TRANSFER ONE AND ONE HALF TIMES THE CROSS
 SECTIONAL AREA (SQUARE INCHES) OF THE SUPPLY DUCT
 ENTERING THE ROOM OR SPACE IT'S SERVING AND THE DOOR
 HAVING AT LEAST AN UNRESTRICTED 1 INCHUNDERCUT TO
 ACHIEVE PROPER RETURN AIR BALANCE.
 (B)TRANSFER GRILLES SHALL USE 50 SQUARE INCHES (OF
 GRILLE AREA) TO 100 CFM (OF SUPPLY AIR) FOR SIZING
 THROUGH-THE-WALL TRANSFER GRILLES AND USING AN
 UNRESTRICTED 1-INCH UNDERCUTTING OF DOORS TO ACHIEVE
 PROPER RETURN AIR BALANCE
 (C)HABITABLE ROOMS ONLY SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET
 THESE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPER BALANCED RETURN AIR
 EXCLUDING BATHROOMS, CLOSETS, STORAGE ROOMS AND LAUNDRY
 ROOMS, EXCEPT THAT ALL SUPPLY AIR INTO THE MASTER SUITE
 SHALL BE INCLUDED. PER 2004 FBC/R M1602.4 .
  
 8) MECHANICAL PLANS NOW SHOW NEW 12X12 GRILLS AND
 UNKNOWN DUCTS (YELLOW HIGH LIGHTED) IN EACH ROOM,
 PLEASE REMOVE OR CORRECT.
  
 9) SEE TITLE BLOCK ON PLANS IS SHOWING D M & L
 ENGINEERING CORP. "C.O.A. #10784" . CHECKED DBPR WEB
 SITE AND FOUND NO C. O. A. NUMBER OR COMPANY LISTED.
 SEE FAC 61G15-23.002 (2) AND COMPLY.
  
 MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY;
 TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-12-19 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2006-12-19 Time 11:11 Rev Time 0.45
Received By tgordon Date 2006-12-19 Time 11:11 Sent To Z
Notes
2006-12-19 11:39:10*** DENIED ***
 1) DM&L ENGINEERING CORP. NEED THEIR CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IN THE TITLE BLOCK, SEE FAC
 61G15-23.002.
  
 2) MANUAL J CALCULATIONS ARE CALLING FOR 13,331
 SENSIBLE BTU'S., THE MECHANICAL PLANS ARE CALLING FOR
 26,200 SENSIBLE BTU'S., THE PLANS CAN ONLY CALL FOR 20%
 MORE THAN THE MANUAL J CAL'S., SEE 2004 FBC
 13-607.ABC.1.1.
  
 3) ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE CALLING FOR 10,000 BTU
 COOLING SYSTEM AND 10,000 BTU (=2.9 KW) HEATING SYSTEM,
 THE MECHANICAL PLANS ARE CALLING FOR 34,000 BTU COOLING
 AND 10 KW (=34,000 BTU) HEATING. THE ENERGY CAL'S. AND
 MECHANICAL PLANS MUST COINCIDE, PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 4) THE RETURN AIR TRANSFER GRILLS TO THE BEDROOMS ARE
 TO SMALL,
 BALANCED RETURN AIR MAY BE ACHIEVED BY.
 (B)TRANSFER GRILLES SHALL USE 50
 SQUARE INCHES (OF GRILLE AREA) TO 100
 CFM (OF SUPPLY AIR) FOR SIZING
 THROUGH-THE-WALL TRANSFER GRILLES AND
 USING AN UNRESTRICTED 1-INCH
 UNDERCUTTING OF DOORS TO ACHIEVE PROPER
 RETURN AIR BALANCE
 (C)HABITABLE ROOMS ONLY SHALL BE
 REQUIRED TO MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS FOR
 PROPER BALANCED RETURN AIR EXCLUDING
 BATHROOMS, CLOSETS, STORAGE ROOMS AND
 LAUNDRY ROOMS, EXCEPT THAT ALL SUPPLY
 AIR INTO THE MASTER SUITE SHALL BE
 INCLUDED. PER 2004 FBC/R M1602.4 .
  
 MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY;
 TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-05-23 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2007-05-23 Time 08:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleech Date 2007-05-23 Time 08:26 Sent To B
Notes
2007-05-23 08:36:18DENIED;
 1. RISER DIAGRAM;
 A) TUB NOT VENTED
 B) KITCHEN SINK NEED A VENT
 C)EXTRA BATHROOM ON RISER DIAGRAM
 2. PLUMBING NOTES;
 A) NOTE 5, DELETE AIR CHAMBERS FROM NOTE, NO
 REFERENCE TO AIR CHAMBERS IN PLUMBING CODE.
 B) NOTE 9 CHANGE NOTE TO " WASTE LINES 3" AND
 LARGER CAN SLOP 1/8" PER FT, PIPE 2 1/2 " TO SLOP 1/4 "
 PER FT.
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY;
 JOHN LEECH
 805-6695
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-03-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2007-03-14 Time 13:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleech Date 2007-03-14 Time 13:35 Sent To B
Notes
2007-03-14 14:05:56DENIED;
 1. CA# MISSING FROM TITLE BLOCK
 2. PLUMBING NOTES;NOTE# 5. WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS TO
 BE USED PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION 604.9. AIR
 CHAMBERS ARE NOT AND ENGINEERED AND APPROVED PRODUCT.
 NOTE# 9HORIZONTAL DRAIN LINES TO SLOPE PER TABLE
 704.1 PIPES LESS THAN 2 1/2" IN DIAMETER OR SMALLER
 MUST SLOPE 1/4" PER FT. NOTE #12 GAS PIPING IS A
 SEPARATE PERMIT. PLANS MUST BE SUBMITED BY THE PLUMBING
 CONTRACTOR IF NATURAL GAS IS BEING USED. REMOVE NOTE 12
 FROM PLANS.
 3. RISER DIAGRAM;BATHROOM #2 SHOWER NOT VENTED. FLOOR
 PLAN SHOWS ALL SHOWERS, RISER DIAGRAM CALLS THEM TUBS
 PLEASE COORDINATE. BOTH MASTER BATHROOMS ARE ON THE
 RISER DIAGRAM. ONLY ONE SHOULD BE SHOWN IF EACH UNIT
 HAS IT'S OWN SEWER.
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY;
 JOHN LEECH
 805-6695
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-12-26 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2006-12-26 Time 07:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleech Date 2006-12-26 Time 07:54 Sent To B
Notes
2006-12-26 09:01:47DENIED;
 1. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IS REQUIRED TO
 BE IN THE TITLE BLOCK SEE FAC 61G15-23.002.
 2. SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT MATCH FLOOR PLAN.
 A. MISSING PLUMBING FIXTURE (LAVATORY)
 B. AUTOMATIC CLOTHES WASHER BRANCH DRAIN TO BE
 3" SECTION 406.3
 C. ALL BATHROOMS HAVE TUBS NOT SHOWERS.
 D. PLEASE INDICATE IF EACH UNIT HAS IT'S OWN
 SEWER CONNECTION.
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY;
 JOHN LEECH
 805-6695
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-05-17 Cont ID  
Sent By choops Date 2007-05-17 Time 08:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By choops Date 2007-05-17 Time 08:12 Sent To I
Notes
2007-05-17 08:14:16***FAILED***
  
  
 1)THE SURVEY SHALL BE UPDATED TO SHOW THE
 NEWLY-PROPOSED SITE PLAN.
  
 2)LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL INCLUDE A DATA TABLE, PLANT
 LIST, ETC. VERIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE
 CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.(I.E.
 1 SHADE TREE PER 1600 SQ. FT. OF OPEN SPACE, 1
 FLOWERING TREE PER 6400 SQ. FT., 1 SHRUB PER 500 SQ.
 FT., XERISCAPE TABLE, ETC.)
  
 3)SURVEYS NEED TO MATCH SITE PLANS.
  
 4)REVISED PALNS NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND STAMPED BY
 HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION.
  
 5)AT LEAST 1 SHADE OF FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE
 PLANTED FOR EVERY 30 LINEAR FEET ON THE PERIMETER OF
 THE PROPERTY.
  
 6)A STRIPING DETAIL, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, SHALL BE
 PROVIDED ON THE PLANS.
  
  
 CHRIS HOOPS
 ZONING TECHNICIAN
 561-805-6720
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-03-07 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2007-03-07 Time 15:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2007-03-07 Time 15:54 Sent To I
Notes
2007-03-07 16:03:54***FAILED***
  
 1) WHEN PARKING IS PROVIDED OFF OF AN ALLEY, AT LEAST
 24 FEET OF BACK-OUT SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED.AS THE
 ALLEY IS ONLY 10 FEET IN WIDTH, AN ADDITIONAL 14 FEET
 SHALL BE PROVIDED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.THIS SPACE IS
 IN ADDITION TO, AND BEHIND, THE PARKING SPACES.
  
 2) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE SIDEWALK LOCATED ON PRIVATE
 PROPERTY, WHILE THE SURVEY INDICATES IT IS WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE
 CONSISTENT AND PLEASE IDENTIFY THE PROPERTY LINE MORE
 CLEARLY ON THE SITE PLAN.
  
 3) THE SURVEY SHALL BE UPDATED TO SHOW THE
 NEWLY-PROPOSED SITE PLAN.
  
 4) PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSION OF THE SIDE SETBACK.
  
 5) PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FROM THE PROPERTY LINE
 TO THE A/C UNITS.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS ONLY
 PERMITTED TO EXTEND 4 FEET IN A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 6) THE PROJECT INFO TABLE SHOWS 2 PARKING SPACES AT 14
 FEET X 18 FEET.....HOWEVER, THESE ARE NOWHERE ON THE
 SITE PLAN.ADJUST TABLE ACCORDINGLY.
  
 7) SIGNED/SEALED LANDSCAPE PLANS, BY A LICENSED
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, SHALL BE PROVIDED.LANDSCAPE
 PLANS SHALL INCLUDE A DATA TABLE, PLANT LIST, ETC.
 VERIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE CITY'S
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. (I.E. 1 SHADE
 TREE PER 1600 SQ. FT. OF OPEN SPACE, 1 FLOWERING TREE
 PER 6400 SQ. FT., 1 SHRUB PER 500 SQ. FT., XERISCAPE
 TABLE, ETC.)
  
 8) VEHICULAR USE AREAS (I.E. PARKING LOTS) SHALL BE
 SCREENED FROM ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT BY A
 WALL OF AT LEAST 36 INCHES IN HEIGHT.
  
 9) A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN
 VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 HEDGES AND AT LEAST 1 SHADE TREE SHALL BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THIS BUFFER.
  
 10) AT LEAST 1 SHADE OF FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED
 FOR EVERY 30 LINEAR FEET ON THE PERIMETER OF THE
 PROPERTY.
  
 11) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL MATCH THE SITE PLAN.
  
 12) A STRIPING DETAIL, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS, SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER,
 AT (561) 822-1435.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-12-21 Cont ID  
Sent By mmclean Date 2006-12-21 Time 15:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mmclean Date 2006-12-21 Time 15:06 Sent To P
Notes
2006-12-21 15:19:02DENIED,
 1. THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN THE FRONT PROPERTY ON
 14TH STREET WILL EXCEED THE 1000SQ OR 75% OF LANDSCAPE
 WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK.
 2. THE ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE CAN ONLY BE 12.5SQ FT
 WIDE.
 3. THE DRIVEWAY FROM ALLEY CAN BE RECONSTRUCTED TO
 ALLOW MORE PARKING SPACE.
 4. THE SIDE SETBACK ON HENRIETTA MUST BE 10% OF THE LOT
 DEPT OF 130FT. (13FT).
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF SURVEYS AND SITEPLANS
 TO REFLECT THE SIDE SETBACK; SEC 94-75, CORNER: 12.5FT;
 TEN FEET IF LOT IS LESS THAN 60FT WIDE AND SIDE; FIVE
 FEET MINIMUM.
 6. THE PROPOSED A/C UNITS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE TWO
 COPIES OF SITEPLAN AND SURVEYS.
 7. THE PROPOSED A/C UNITS MUST BE BUFFED BY LANDSCAPE.
  
  
 NOTE: SHALL FOLLOW THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS SEC
 94-442(2).
  
 MICHELLE MCLEAN
 ZONING TECHNICIAN
 805-6720


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved