 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 06110557
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 06110557 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2007-03-24 |
Time |
13:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2007-03-24 |
Time |
13:03 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-03-24 13:04:28 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110557 | | | ADD: 2814 S.DIXIE HWY #104 | | | CONT: KARNS CONST. CORP. | | | TEL: (561)805-7528 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVIEW 2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2)FBC. 106.3.5THE EXAMINATION OF THE DOCUMENTS BY | | | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING | | | MINIMUM CRITERIA AND DOCUMENTS: A FLOOR PLAN; SITE | | | PLAN; FOUNDATION PLAN; FLOOR/LAYOUT;AND ALL EXTERIOR | | | ELEVATIONS WITH THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO EACH UNIT IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC. 11-4.3. | | | | | | 3)106.1.1W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CONSTRUCTION | | | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE | | | THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED | | | AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE | | | PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE. | | | DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN | | | THE FORM OF NOTES OR | | | OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE | | | QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL | | | CODES. | | | SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC | | | AND THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE | | | CITED AS A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE | | | TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS RQUIVALENT BE USED | | | AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | | INFORMATION". | | | | | | 4)IF THE NEW 4" CONCRETE SLAB IS CONSTRUCTED AT EACH | | | DOOR HOW DOES EACH ENTRANCE COMPLY WITH THE | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE? SHOW COMPLIANCE. SEE 2004 FBC. FIG | | | 11 AND 12 OF CH. 11.SHEET 1 SHOWS THE ACCESSIBLE | | | ROUTE TO SUITE 'A' ONLY WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER SUITES? | | | ALSO FBC. 11-4.8.1 ANY PARTOF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH | | | A SLOPE GREATER THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAME | | | AND SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 11-4.8. | | | | | | 5)WHEN RESUBMITING, HAVE THE FRONT COUNTER STAFF | | | ADJUST THE VALUE OF THE PROJECT AND PAY THE ADDITIOINAL | | | FEES ACCORDINGLY. FOR MORE INFORMATION SEE WPB. | | | AMENDMENTS 108.3. | | | | | | 6)SEE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IN THE PACKAGE AND FOLLOW THOSE | | | GUIDELINES. | | | | | | 7)FBC. 1210.2 WALLS WITHIN 2 FEET OF WATER CLOSETS | | | SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH, HARD, AND NONABLORBENT SURFACE, TO | | | A HEIGHT OF 4 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR, AND EXCEPT FOR | | | STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS, THE MATERIALS USED IN SUCH WALLS | | | SHALL BE OF A TYPE THAT IS NOT ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY | | | MOISTURE. | | | | | | 8)ALL THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED SHALL BE | | | APPROVED IN WRITING "(NO PHOTO-COPIES ALLOWED)" BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.THE ONES | | | SUBMITTED ARE PHOTOCOPIES. WPB.AMENDMENTS 106.3.3. | | | | | | 9)ALL PAGES SUBMITTED SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEAL | | | BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. SEE | | | F.A.C. 61G15-23.002 AND 61G1-16.004 / 471.025. FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. THE MECHINICAL SHEETS (M-1) HAS A | | | CORPORATE SEAL. THIS SEAL HAS NO BEARING ON THE | | | DRAWINGS. SHEET (M-2) IS NOT SEAL. NOTE ALL SIGNATURES | | | SHALL BE ORIGINAL. | | | | | | MYRON JACOBS | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER | | | 805-6726 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-12-21 |
Time |
11:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-12-21 |
Time |
11:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-21 11:42:51 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110557 | | | ADD: 2814 S. DIXIE HWY. | | | CONT: KARNS CONSTRUCTION CORP. | | | TEL: (561)805-7528 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVIEW1ST. | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | NOTE: ANY OTHER OCCUPANCY OTHER THAN WHAT IS STATED BY | | | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD SHALL REQUIRE A SEPERATE | | | PERMIT. | | | | | | 1) 106.3.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS- 2004 | | | THOSE PRODUCTS THAT ARE RGULATED BY DCA. RULE 9B-72 | | | SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITTING BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR | | | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR | | | THE IMPACT WINDOWS/DOORS/ROOF AND STOREFRONT. | | | | | | 2)W.P.B. AMENDMENTS 108.3*IF IN THE OPINION OF THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE CLAIMED VALUATION OF | | | BUILDING,ALTERATION APPEARS TO BE UNDERESTIMATED ON THE | | | APPLICATION, THE PERMIT SHALL BE DENIED. FOR PERMITTING | | | PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE | | | TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE | | | STRUCTURAL,ELECTRIC,PLUMBING,MECHANICAL,INTERIOR | | | FINISH,ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES,MARKETING COSTS, | | | AND OVERHEAD AND PROFIT. OUR VALUATION REFERENCE IS ICC | | | (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS | | | SERVICES. | | | | | | 3)SHEET #1. IN REFERENCE TO THE DUMPSTER PAD, SEE | | | REQUIREMENTS DETAILS IN PACKAGE AND COMPLY | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 4) FBC 11-4.3 SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE BUILDING | | | COMPLYING WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | | | 5)SHEET #2. THE CODE SECTION ON THE DRAWINGS IN | | | REFERENCE TO ROOF DOWNSPOUTS IS FROM THE 2001 FBC. SEE | | | FBC 2004 FOR CORRECT REFERENCE. | | | | | | 6)FBC 1503.4 UNLESS ROOF ARE SLOPED TO DRAIN OVER | | | ROOF EDGES, DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF ROOF DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FBC PLUMBING CH. 11. | | | | | | 7)1503.4.3 | | | WHEN OTHER MEANS OF DRAINAGE OF OVERFLOW WATER IS NOT | | | PROVIDED, OVERFLOW SCUPPERS SHALL BE PLACED IN WALLS OR | | | PARAPETS NOT LESS THAN 2 INCHES (51 MM) NOR MORE THAN 4 | | | INCHES (102 MM) ABOVE THE FINISHED ROOF COVERING AND | | | SHALL BE LOCATED AS CLOSE AS PRACTICAL TO REQUIRED | | | VERTICAL LEADERS OR DOWNSPOUTS OR WALL AND PARAPET | | | SCUPPERS. AN OVERFLOW SCUPPER SHALL BE SIZED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, PLUMBING. | | | | | | | | | | | | MYRON JACOBS | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER | | | 805-6726 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-10 |
Time |
18:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-10 |
Time |
18:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-03-10 18:17:38 | ** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ** | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLANS | | | WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE THE | | | NUMBER OF FIXTURES; THE WATTAGE PER FIXTURE AND THE | | | TOTAL DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THAT OF THE FIXTURES AND | | | LIGHTING ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS DO NOT INDICATE AN | | | EXTERIOR LIGHTING, YET THE PLANS INDICATE EXTERIOR | | | LIGHTING. | | | 13-415.1.AB.1.1 | | | 13-415.2 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 103.1, 103.1.1.1 AS THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS MUST BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY THE | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL EVEN WHEN/IF FALLING UNDER THE | | | EXCEPTIONS THAT A MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PERFORMS THE | | | SCOPE OF WORK. | | | PLEASE KNOW THE SCOPE DOES NOT APPEAR TO FALL UNDER THE | | | EXCEPTIONS UNDER FS 471.003. | | | ** PLEASE ALSO SEE THE MECHANICAL PLANS WHICH CONTAIN | | | TITLE BLOCKS FROM AN ENGINEER AND ENGINEERING FIRM, YET | | | THERE IS A SIGNATURE AND SEAL ON THESE SHEETS FROM A | | | MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER | | | FLORIDA STATUTES 471.025 AND FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE | | | CODE 61G15-23.002 | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE 2ND MECHANICAL SHEET IN EACH SET | | | DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY SIGNATURE, DATE OR SEAL FROM | | | ANYONE. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW DUE TO THE COMMENTS ONE SET OF | | | PLANS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL BE RETAINED BY THIS | | | OFFICE. | | | **PLEASE BE SURE RE-PRINT THE 2ND SET OF ELECTRICAL. AS | | | PLUMBING IS ON THE SAME SHEET WITH ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING | | | WILL NEED TO RE-STAMP SHEETS IN SETS WHEN PLANS ARE | | | CORRECTED AND RESUBMITTED. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-12-07 |
Time |
08:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-12-07 |
Time |
08:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-07 08:50:24 | *** UNSAT *** | | | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE LOADS FOR SHOW WINDOWS NEED TO BE | | | CLARIFIED PER 220.12A. PLEASE SEE AS THE VA IS NOT | | | SHOWN AND NO LOAD SUMMARY IS SHOWN, THE VA PER FOOT CAN | | | NOT BE VERIFIED. | | | 210.62 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY THE LOAD SHOWN FOR THE SIGN | | | CIRCUIT(S). PLEASE SEE 600.5, WHICH REFERENCES TO | | | 220.3B6 FOR THE MINIMUM VA TO USE TO FIGURE FOR SIGN | | | CIRCUITS. PLEASE SEE THE LOAD OF 5A?S FOR EACH DOES NOT | | | CORRELATE TO THE MINIMUM VA REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE SEE NO LOAD SUMMARY IS SHOWN TO VERIFY THIS. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE LOADS ON PANEL FOR KNOWN | | | RECEPTS ON A CIRCUIT. 220.13 | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE A NOTE ON "E" UNIT INDICATES | | | RECEPTACLE ABOVE CEILING AS TYPICAL FOR EACH SIGN | | | CIRCUIT. PLEASE SEE 600.5, AS IT ONLY REQUIRES A | | | CIRCUIT. PLEASE SEE 400.8(2) WHICH DO NOT PERMIT | | | RECEPTACLES ABOVE CEILINGS AS THIS WOULD THEN CREATE | | | THE ISSUE OF CORDS BEING RUN THROUGH CEILINGS WHICH IS | | | NOT PERMITTED. | | | PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM | | | AS SHOWN. RISER SHOWS THE MAIN GROUNDING ELECTRODE | | | BEING "TAPPED" AND SHOWN TO EACH MAIN DISCONNECT?? | | | PLEASE SEE 250.24B, 250.6. PLEASE KNOW WHEN INSTALLING | | | THE GUTTER, THE NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR WOULD BE "BONDED" TO | | | THE GUTTER WHICH MAY CONTAIN THE SOLE CONNECTION OF THE | | | GEC. PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE SET OF PHASE AND NEUTRAL | | | CONDUCTORS WOULD THEN BE ROUTED TO EACH METER AND MAIN. | | | EACH NEUTRAL WOULD BE BONDED TO THE ENCLOSURE AT THE | | | FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT. | | | PLEASE SEE AS SHOWN THIS SEEM TO BE AN INTERESTING | | | SCENARIO AT THE CONNECTION POINT SHOWN AT THE GROUND | | | LEVEL LOCATION. | | | ** PLEASE SEE THIS BEING AN EXISTING BUILDING AND THE | | | CONCRETE ENCASED ELECTRODE ON AN EXISTING BUILDING IS | | | NOT REQUIRED TO BE ATTACHED. PLEASE KNOW IF SHOWN ON | | | GROUNDING ELECTRODE DETAIL BEING REQUIRED THEN THIS | | | WILL BE REQUIRED IN THE FIELD. PLEASE VERIFY THIS BEING | | | REQUIRED AND POSSIBLY AFFECTING THE STRUCTURAL | | | INTEGRITY OF THE EXISTING FOOTER. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT CODES ON | | | THE PLANS. 2002 NFPA-70, 2003 NFPA-101 | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE LOADS, OVER CURRENT | | | PROTECTION, CONDUCTORS ETC FOR THE A/C SYSTEMS. PLEASE | | | SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS SEEM TO INDICATE A POSSIBLE 5KW | | | LOAD, HOWEVER AS KW RATINGS/ KVA LOADS ARE NOT SHOWN, | | | THESE ARE UNCLEAR AT THIS TIME. PLEASE SEE MECHANICAL | | | PLANS CALL FOR 8KW AND 10KW UNITS. | | | PLEASE SEE 424.3B, 310.16, 240.4 ETC | | | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2006-12-12 |
Time |
16:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2006-12-12 |
Time |
16:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-12 16:13:33 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.NFPA 101 (2003 EDITION) AND THE FLORIDA FIRE | | | PREVENTION CODE (2004 EDITION) SHALL BE REFERENCED. | | | | | | 2.CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR DEMOLITION OPERATIONS | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 3.COMBUSTIBLE WASTE, DUST, AND DEBRIS SHALL BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE END OF EACH SHIFT OR MORE | | | FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY FOR SAFE OPERATION. | | | | | | 4.CONSTRUCTION AND/OR DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL NOT | | | INTERFERE OR HINDER EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE SAID | | | PROPERTY OR VICINITY THEREOF (INCLUDING FIRE LANES). | | | | | | 5.GASOLINE POWERED EQUIPMENT FOR DEMOLITION | | | ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT BE USED TO PREVENTTHE | | | POSSIBILITY OF CARBON DIOXIDE POISONING. | | | | | | 6.SHOW/DISPLAY THE ADDRESS OF THE STRUCTURE ON THE | | | EXTERIOR ELEVATION WHICH FRONTS SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. AS | | | PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS SHALL | | | BE NO LESS THAN 6' IN HEIGHT AND 1" IN WIDTH. | | | ADDITIONALLY, DISPLAY THE UNIT NUMBER (3" IN HEIGHT AND | | | 1" IN WIDTH) FOR THE FRONT ENTRANCE TO DISTINGUISH ONE | | | UNIT FROM THE OTHER. FRONT UNIT NUMBERS SHALL NOT BE ON | | | THE DOORS OR WINDOWS, HOWEVER REAR UNIT NUMBER CAN BE | | | INSTALLED ON THE DOOR.HURRICANE SHUTTERS SHALL NOT | | | BLOCK VISIBILITY OF BUILDING AND/OR UNIT ADDRESS. | | | | | | 7.INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATION IN AN UNSPRINKLERED | | | BUILDING SHALL BE "A" OR "B". | | | | | | 8.FIRE EXTINGUISHERS TO BE 2A:10BC RATED. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | SHEET INDICATING HOW/WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | CAPT. MICHEAL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-20 |
Time |
12:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-20 |
Time |
12:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-20 12:01:27 | TO "BOB"#10 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-11-27 |
Time |
08:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-06 15:30:22 | TO "BOB"#5--5 APPLICATIONS | | 2006-11-27 08:24:03 | WAITING FOR "BOB" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-15 |
Time |
16:21 |
Rev Time |
0.20 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-15 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-03-15 16:21:53 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 11-21-06 NOTE #2. SEE | | | COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS SHOW THAT ALL FIVE BAYS | | | TOGETHER WILL NEED OVER 460 TONS OF A/C, PLEASE SUBMIT | | | CORRECTED COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-407.1.ABC.1. | | | | | | 2) THE ENGINEER EDWARD J. KRANZ WILL NEED TO SEAL THE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS AS HIS INFORMATION IS IN THE TITLE | | | BLOCK, SEE FAC 61G15-23.002. (SEE PLANS, PAGES M-1 AND | | | M-2). | | | | | | 3) SEE PLANS, PAGE M-1 "O/A INTAKE" IF THIS IS TYPICAL | | | OF 5 PLEASE STATE SO ON PLANS IF NOT GIVE INFORMATION | | | AT EACH INTAKE. | | | | | | 4) SEE PLANS, PAGE M-1 " 6 INCH DUCT TO EXHAUST WALL | | | LOUVER" IF TYPICAL OF 5 STATE SO ON PLANS IF NOT GIVE | | | INFORMATION AT EACH EXHAUST. | | | | | | 5) SEE PLANS, PAGE 4 ELECTRICAL PLANS SHOW 7 A/C | | | CONDENSER UNITS, MECHANICAL PLANS ONLY SHOW 5, PLEASE | | | CORRECT ELECT. PLANS. | | | | | | 6) SEE PLANS, PAGE M-2A/C SCHEDULE SHOWS THE WRONG | | | EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURE, CAPACITY (TOTAL) BTU'S, SENSIBLE | | | BTU'S, AND A INCORRECT MODEL NUMBER FOR AHU #1. PLEASE | | | REVIEW SUBMITTED MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION'S FOR THE | | | GOODMAN A/C AND CORRECT. | | | | | | 7) SEE ELECTRICAL REVIEW NOTE #2 AND 3. AS A RESULT OF | | | DOCUMENTS BEING RETAINED PLEASE BE CERTAIN TWO COPY'S | | | OF ALL INFORMATION IS BEING SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 8)SEE ATTACHED NOTICE FS 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING FOUR | | | TIMES THE FEE. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
Time |
16:25 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
Time |
16:25 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-21 16:26:18 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-101.1.1.6 . | | | | | | 2) SEE COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS PAGE 1, LOAD CAL'S | | | SHOW THAT ALL FIVE BAYS TOGETHER WILL NEED OVER 460 | | | TONS OF A/C, PLEASE RE-DO LOAD CAL'S. | | | | | | 3) CONDENSER UNITS APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN THE BACK | | | OFFICES, PLEASE CORRECT.. | | | | | | 4) PLEAS SHOW ON THE PLANS EQUIPMENT LISTING, THE | | | SENSIBLE AND TOTAL BTU'S. | | | | | | 5) PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL GRILLS. | | | | | | 6) SEE UNIT B, PLEASE LABEL GRILLS IN BACK OFFICE. | | | | | | 7) PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL ON BATHROOM EXHAUST DUCTS, ARE | | | THEY INDEPENDENTLY DUCTED TO THE OUTDOORS? | | | | | | 8) PLEASE SHOW THE SIZE OF ALL SUPPLY AND RETURN AIR | | | DUCTS (SEE HIGH LIGHTS ON PLANS). | | | | | | 9) ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND | | | ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE PRINTED NAME AND | | | SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. PER | | | FBC 104.2.1. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-03-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-03-10 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-03-10 |
Time |
13:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
Time |
14:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-31 14:54:57 | SEE PLUMBING NOTES UNDER PERMIT# 06110563 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-03-14 |
Time |
13:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-03-14 |
Time |
13:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-03-14 13:23:55 | FAILED - 2ND REVIEW | | | | | | 1) THE LETTER BY ROBERT BELL, DATED DECEMBER 27, 2007, | | | STATES THAT THE VALUE OF THE RENOVATION TOTALS | | | $230,000.THE APPRAISAL INCLUDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL | | | PACKAGE GIVES A VALUE OF THE ENTIRE SITE (LAND AND | | | STRUCTURE).THE LANDSCAPE CODE SPECIFICALLY STATES | | | THAT A SITE IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE | | | IF THE RENOVATION DOES NOT EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF | | | THE STRUCTURE.IF NO EVIDENCE IS PROVIDED THAT THE | | | VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE EXCEEDS $460,000, THE SITE SHALL | | | BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE CODE | | | (SECTION 94-441). | | | | | | 2) THE LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE LISTED IN COMMENT #1 | | | REQUIRES A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED BY A REGISTERED | | | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. | | | | | | 3) WHAT WILL BE PLANTED IN THE PLANTERS?PROVIDE AN | | | IRRIGATION PLAN FOR THE PLANTERS. | | | | | | 4) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ALLOW A | | | MAXIMUM OF 85% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE.THE EXISTING SITE | | | IS CURRENTLY NONCONFORMING AS IT HAS 90.56% IMPERVIOUS | | | SURFACE (8,060 SQ. FT.).THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ON THE | | | SITE MAY NOT EXCEED THIS AMOUNT.THE PROPOSED PLANS | | | SHOW AN INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE.THIS IS NOT | | | PERMITTED AND SHALL BE CORRECTED.IT MAY REQUIRE | | | REMOVING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE IN ANOTHER AREA TO MAKE UP | | | THE DIFFERENCE. | | | | | | 5) THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHOWN ON THE PLAN | | | DOES NOT MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS.A SET OF PLANS, | | | STAMPED APPROVED BY THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT, SHOWING THE DUMPSTER AND ENCLOSURE SIZE AND | | | LOCATION IS REQUIRED.THE SCREEN WALL FOR THE DUMPSTER | | | MAY NOT BE CHAIN LINK W/SLATS.THE SPECIFICATIONS OF | | | THE SCREEN HEDGE ARE REQUIRED (SPECIES, HEIGHT, | | | LOCATION AND PLANTING) ON A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED | | | FOLLOWING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 94-448(D)(2) OF THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.AN IRRIGATION | | | PLAN IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6) NO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO ALL OF THE BAYS IS SHOWN. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
Time |
13:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
Time |
13:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-31 13:52:46 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE VALUE OF THE 5 PERMITS TOTALS $95,000 AND THE | | | PROPERTY APPRAISER SHOWS THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE AT | | | $84,000.THIS REQUIRES THAT THE SITE BE BROUGHT INTO | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE CODE (SECTION 94-441). | | | | | | 2) A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED BY A REGISTERED LANDSCAPE | | | ARCHITECT IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3) EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE | | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.THE PROPOSED PLANS APPEAR | | | TO SHOW AN INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL. | | | | | | 4) NO DUMPSTER DETAIL PROVIDED.THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE | | | SHOWN ON THE PLAN DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 5) NO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO ALL OF THE BAYS IS SHOWN. | | | | | | 6) THE PARKING SPACES ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE SITE | | | ENCROACH INTO THE CURB CUT ON BOTH DIXIE AND MONCEAUX | | | AND THUS PRESENT AN UNSAFE SITUATION.THE CURB CUTS | | | SHALL BE CLOSED WHERE CONFLICTS EXIST OR THE PARKING | | | SPACES SHALL BE ELIMINATED. | | | | | | 7) NO SURVEY WAS PROVIDED. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |