 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 06110349
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 06110349 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
14 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
Time |
13:36 |
Rev Time |
1.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
Time |
13:36 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-31 13:38:02 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110349 | | | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 | | | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES | | | LLC | | | TEL: (954)444-8463 | | | DATE:7-31-08 | | | | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 | | | REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | REVIEW- DENIED | | | SUBMITTALS: J.B.GARAGE DOORS | | | IN THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTALS FOR SECTIONAL DOORS THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD ALSO SUBMITTED DESIGN CRITERIA FOR | | | DOOR BUCK ATTACHMENTS. SINCE THIS IS A SEPERATE NOAAND | | | DOOR SIZE IS CONSIDERABLY LARGEER THAN THE 100 SQ FT | | | ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED THERE ARE TWO QUESTIONS THAT | | | ARISE: | | | 1) ARE DOOR BUCKS TO BE INSTALLED AGAIN, IF SO PLEASE | | | PROVIDE THE ENGINEERING FOR THE DOOR BUCKS, SEE SHEET 2 | | | OF 4 AND BUCK ATTACHMENTCOMMENTS AS WELL AS SHEET 1 OF | | | 4 COMMENT# 4 ANCHORING OR LOADING CONDITIONS OTHER THAN | | | THOSE SHOWN IN THESE DETAILS ARE NOT PART OF THIS | | | APPROVAL. | | | 2) IF BUCKS ARE NOT TO BE USED, THEN CIRCLE THE | | | CONDITIONS TO BE USED FOR THIS INSTALATION.AND ON SHEET | | | 4 OF 4 CIRCLE HEIGHT OF DOOR TO BE INSTALLED. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110347 | | | ADD: 5655 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 1 | | | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES | | | LLC | | | TEL: (954)444-8463 | | | DATE:4-28-08 | | | | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 | | | REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | REVIEW- DENIED | | | SUBMITTALS: |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
Time |
13:44 |
Rev Time |
1.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
Time |
13:44 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-07 13:47:00 | PREMIER PARK BUILDING #3 | | | | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110349 | | | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 | | | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES LLC | | | TEL: (954)444-8463 | | | | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 | | | REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | REVIEW-PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | SUBMITTALS: ARCH ALUMINUM | | | OUTSWING DOOR NOA 05-0829.08 | | | STOREFRONTNOA 05-0906.05 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
Time |
13:19 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-07 13:32:57 | PREMIER PARK BUILDING #3 | | | | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110349 | | | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 | | | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES LLC | | | TEL: (954)444-8463 | | | | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 | | | REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | REVISION REVIEW- | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | | | | | | | REVISIONS: SHEET A-15 REVISION # 6 | | | PROVISO: | | | EFIS/ EPS EXTERIOR MOLDINGSHOP DRAWINGS TO BE | | | SUBMITTED REVIEWED BY THE DESIGN TEAM. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
Time |
11:22 |
Rev Time |
1.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-07 |
Time |
11:22 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-07 11:53:57 | PERMIT: 06110347 | | | ADD: 5655 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 1 | | | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES | | | LLC | | | TEL: (954)444-8463 | | | DATE:7-07-08 | | | | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 | | | REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | REVIEW: | | | SUBMITTALS: ARCH ALUMINUMNOA 05-0906.05STOREFRONT | | | IMPACT WALL 3000 SERIES | | | ARCH ALUMINUM NOA05-0829.08 | | | OUTSWING DOOR |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
1.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-06 16:27:54 | REVISIONS: | | | S2.1 REV# 2 6-2-08 | | | SS3.1 REV# 2 6-2-08 | | | A4 REV#6 5-30-08 | | | A6 REV#6 5-30-08 | | | A12 REV# 6 5-30-08 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-06-06 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-06 16:15:55 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110349 | | | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 | | | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES | | | LLC | | | TEL: (954)444-8463 | | | DATE: | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 | | | REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | REVISIONREVIEW: | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | SHEET A-15 REVISION# 6INDICATES THE REVISION OF TRIM | | | TO BE SECURED TO WALL WITH ADHESIVE AND FASTENERS AT | | | 2'-0" O.C. AS REQUIRED BY APPROVED MANUFACTURES | | | SPECIFICATIONS AND REVIEWED SHOP DRAWINGS BUT THE BACK | | | UP INFORMATION WAS NOT SUBMITTED. 106.1.2 ADITIONAL | | | INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-30 |
Time |
17:11 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-30 |
Time |
17:11 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-30 17:14:31 | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110349 | | | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 | | | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES | | | LLC | | | TEL: (954)444-8463 | | | DATE: | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 | | | REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | REVIEW: | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | RAILING SHOP DRAWINGS TOP AND BOTTOM OF STAIR | | | HANDRAILS, SEE FIGURE 11-19(C) AND FIGURE 11-19(D), | | | HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 11-4.4. | | | SEE 27" NOT THE 2'-10" AS INDICATED ON PLANS. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-30 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
3.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-30 |
Time |
16:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-30 16:56:17 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110349 | | | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 | | | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES | | | LLC | | | TEL: (954)444-8463 | | | DATE: | | | | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 | | | REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | REVIEW: | | | SUBMITTALS: | | | SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS (3.02) | | | SUBMITTAL PARTIAL ROOFING PLAN (S.04) | | | SUBMITTAL PANEL REINFORCING SPECS (S3.11) SUBMITTAL | | | JOIST SHOP DRAWINGS (S.01) | | | SUBMITTAL STEEL PANEL SHOP DRAWINGS | | | SUBMITTAL ANCHOR BOLT, ROOF, PANEL EMBED DRAWINGS | | | SUBMITTAL METAL DOOR,S FRAMES AND HARDWARE(8.02) | | | SUBMITTAL OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOORS (8.03) SUBMITTAL | | | STUCCO & EFIS ACCESSORIES (9.01) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
Time |
09:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
Time |
08:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-20 09:28:38 | NOA 03-0501.06 WITH ENHANCED FASTENING CALCULATIONS | | | SUBMITTED FOR ROOF (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) | | | | | | PROVISO | | | | | | AT RISK PERMIT (SHELL), CODE COMPLIANCE TO BE SHOWN FOR | | | IMPACT FEES, EGRESS AND ACCESSIBILITY FOR TENANT | | | BUILDOUTS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
Time |
10:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
Time |
10:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-07 10:58:30 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | 3.FROM PREVIOUS LIST, REQUIRES THREE ORIGINAL | | | ORIGINAL SIGNATURES, NOT COPIES.FBC1804.2.2, SOILS | | | REPORT REQUIRED, FS471 REQUIRES SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD.ONE SHEET | | | IN EACH REPORT IS AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, ONE SHEET IS A | | | SEALED PHOTOCOPY, AND ONE SHEET IS AN UNSEALED | | | PHOTOCOPY.PLEASE SIGN AND SEAL SHEETS WITH A | | | SIGNATURE. | | | | | | 7.PLEASE KEEP THE THREE SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS IN | | | THE PERMIT PACKAGE. | | | | | | 7C SKYLIGHTS, THE SKYLIGHT REPORTS ARE OK, PLANS NEED | | | WELDING INFO FOR THE SKYLIGHT BASE TO THE BAR JOIST.I | | | DO NOT SEE WHERE THIS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED IN THE PLAN | | | AND IT WAS NOT REFERENCED IN THE RESPONSE LETTER. | | | | | | 11.PLEASE KEEP ANCHORAGE OF EFIS MOLDING INFORMATION | | | IN THE PERMIT PACKAGE. | | | | | | 16.BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT MAY BE ISSUES, IMPACT | | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY.THE PLANS MUST | | | BE STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION. | | | 233-5025. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-01-15 |
Time |
16:00 |
Rev Time |
4.44 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-01-15 |
Time |
16:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-15 16:01:17 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110349 | | | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 | | | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES LLC | | | TEL: (954)444-8463 | | | | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 | | | REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | 4THREVIEW- AS APERMIT APPLICATION! | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. | | | A TRANSMITTAL LETTERLISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW | | | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2)FL S S 713.13 | | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF | | | THE COURT BEFORE A PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: | | | 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS | | | AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & | | | VOID. | | | | | | 3) SEMI-COMPLIED, REQUIRES THREE "ORIGINAL"ORIGINAL | | | SIGNATURES NOT COPIES!!!! AND RAISED EMBOSSED SEALED | | | REPORTS. REPORTS SUPPLIED FROM JULY 17,2006 3RD | | | REQUEST, SUBMITTED (3) REPORTS DATED MAY 21, 2004, | | | STRUCTURAL SHEETS INDICATE A SOILS TEST WAS CONDUCTED | | | BY NUTTING ENGINEERING, PROJECT# 14157.1, JULY 17, | | | 2006. PLEASE PROVIDE 3 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SIGNED AND | | | SEALED. | | | FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE SOILS, WHERE THE | | | BEARINGCAPACITY IS NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN | | | QUESTION. WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL IS NOT | | | DEFINITLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION THE BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | MAY REQUIRE EXPLORATIONS, TEST OR OTHER ADEQUATE PROOF | | | AS TO THE PERMISSIBLE SAFE BEARING | | | CAPACITY. REQUIRED TEST AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUBMITTED | | | TO VERIFY BEARING CAPACITY SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A | | | GEOTECHNICAL | | | REPORT FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PROPERLY LICENSED IN | | | THE STATE OF FLORIDA. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 -6 ) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 7)FOURTHREQUEST,FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: | | | COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD | | | OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS | | | ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | A) STOREFRONT WINDOWS REPORTS SUPPLIED FROM YKKWILL | | | EITHER NEED ENGINERING CALCULATIONS OR THE DADE COUNTY | | | REPORT. THE STATE COVER SHEET INDICATES IF ANCHOR | | | CALCULATIONS HAVENOT BEEN VERIFIED BY A PE A 1/3RD | | | DECREASE NEEDS TO BE TAKEN. ALSO HIGHLIGHT AS TO WHICH | | | GLASS TYPE WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE FRAME FOR THE | | | POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE PRESSURES TO BE USED. | | | B) MULLIONS- UNDER STOREFRONT REPORT | | | C) SKYLIGHTS- THE SKYLIGHTS REPORTS ARE OK, PLANS NEED | | | WELDING INFO FOR THE SKYLIGHT BASE TO THE BARJOISTD) | | | EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORSREPORTS SUPPLIED FROM YKKWILL | | | EITHER NEED ENGINERING CALCULATIONS OR THE DADE COUNTY | | | REPORT. THE STATE COVER SHEET INDICATES IF ANCHOR | | | CALCULATIONS HAVENOT BEEN VERIFIED BY A PE A 1/3RD | | | DECREASE NEEDS TO BE TAKEN. ALSO HIGHLIGHT AS TO WHICH | | | GLASS TYPE WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE FRAME FOR THE | | | POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE PRESSURES TO BE USED. | | | E) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS-OK | | | F) ROLL UP DOORS-OK | | | G) LOUVERS- OK | | | H) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES- THE REPORT FROM FEDERAL | | | REFRENENCES THE WRONG NOA NUMBERAND THE AMOUNT OF PAGES | | | FOUND IN THE REPORT. | | | | | | 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS | | | REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE | | | PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS | | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF | | | GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES | | | POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH | | | AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE | | | TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. | | | GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE | | | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. | | | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 | | | M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET | | | THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE TEST. | | | | | | 8-10) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 11) BUILDING PROVISO: SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR | | | ANCHORAGE OF EFIS MOLDINGS BEFORE START OF INSTALLATION | | | WITH FASTENING INFORMATION.1406.2.2 | | | | | | 12-15) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 16)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, | | | IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE | | | ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-11-01 |
Time |
08:33 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-11-01 |
Time |
08:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-11-01 10:11:10 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110349 | | | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 | | | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES LLC | | | TEL: (954)444-8463 | | | | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 | | | REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | 3RDREVIEW- AS APERMIT APPLICATION! | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. | | | A TRANSMITTAL LETTERLISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW | | | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2)FL S S 713.13 | | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF | | | THE COURT BEFORE A PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: | | | 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS | | | AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & | | | VOID. | | | | | | 3) SEMI-COMPLIED, REQUIRES THREE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED REPORTS FROM JULY 17,2006 3RD REQUEST, SUBMITTED | | | (3) REPORTS DATED MAY 21, 2004, STRUCTURAL SHEETS | | | INDICATE A SOILS TEST WAS CONDUCTED BY NUTTING | | | ENGINEERING, PROJECT# 14157.1, JULY 17, 2006. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE 3 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE SOILS, WHERE THE | | | BEARINGCAPACITY IS NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN | | | QUESTION. WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL IS NOT | | | DEFINITLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION THE BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | MAY REQUIRE EXPLORATIONS, TEST OR OTHER ADEQUATE PROOF | | | AS TO THE PERMISSIBLE SAFE BEARING | | | CAPACITY. REQUIRED TEST AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUBMITTED | | | TO VERIFY BEARING CAPACITY SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A | | | GEOTECHNICAL | | | REPORT FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PROPERLY LICENSED IN | | | THE STATE OF FLORIDA. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 A) FBC* 105.3RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR | | | RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, | | | DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT | | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO | | | ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: | | | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | | CONSTRUCTION | | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE | | | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI | | | - PILE DRIVING | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQ FT IN AREA | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN | | | OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION | | | | | | 4B) SECOND REQUEST, SINCE THIS BUILDING WILL REQUIRE A | | | RESIDENT INSPECTORSUBMITTALS(3) SETS OF PLANS, | | | REPORTS, AND OR OTHER REQUIRED SUBMITTALS (PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS) WILL BE REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. | | | 1) MISSING (1)SOILS REPORT LISTED ABOVE. | | | 2) LIGHTING POLES- ONLY 2 REPORT SUBMITTED, RAISED SEAL | | | ILLEGIBLE, NOT EMBOSSED ENOUGH TO READ, MISSING THE | | | PRINTED NAME OF ENGINEER IN TITLE BLOCK 61G15-23.002(2) | | | FL. ADMIN. CODE. PLANS SIGNED & SEALED BY A | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL INCLUDE EITHER THE: NAME, | | | ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER OR, THE NAME | | | AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER AND THE NAME, | | | ADDRESS AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE | | | ENGINEERING BUSINESS THROUGH WHICH THE ENGINEER IS | | | PRACTICING (471.025 F.S. AND 471.023 F.S.). | | | | | | 5-6 ) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 7)THIRD REQUEST,FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS | | | & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT | | | INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS | | | ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | A) STOREFRONT WINDOWS | | | B) MULLIONS | | | C) SKYLIGHTS | | | D) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS | | | E) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS | | | F) ROLL UP DOORS | | | G) LOUVERS | | | H) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES | | | | | | 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS | | | REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE | | | PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS | | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF | | | GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES | | | POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH | | | AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE | | | TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. | | | GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE | | | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. | | | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 | | | M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET | | | THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE TEST. | | | | | | 8)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO | | | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR | | | INFORMATION | | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE | | | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER | | | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, | | | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 9)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 10) THIS SUBMITTAL DOESN'T INCORPORATE ANY ROOFING | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS, HERE IS A LIST OF COMMON ISSUES THAT | | | WILL FAIL A ROOFING REPORT SUBMITTAL:THIS ROOF IS | | | MISSING OR NOT INCOMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOW | | | ITEMS: | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF PITCH. ___ | | | CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SYSTEM OR SUBSYSTEM | | | WILL BE USED. | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOWPRESSURE FOR ZONE | | | ___ . | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD | | | THE FASTENERRESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THATREQUIRED, | | | AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED | | | FASTENER SPACING, PREPAREDSIGNEDAND SEALED BY A | | | FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION# 9, NO | | | ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | 11) BUILDING PROVISO: SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR | | | ANCHORAGE OF EFIS MOLDINGS BEFORE START OF INSTALLATION | | | WITH FASTENING INFORMATION.1406.2.2 | | | | | | 12) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 13) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 14)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 15) THIRD REQUEST, NOTE WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT | | | SUBMITTED THE ROLL UP DOORS MAY OR MAY NOT REQUIRE DOOR | | | BUCKS AND ATTACHMENT.1714.5.4.2. | | | | | | 16)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, | | | IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE | | | ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-28 |
Time |
13:40 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-28 |
Time |
13:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-28 13:40:45 | PREMIER PARK BUILDING #3 | | | | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110349 | | | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 | | | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES LLC | | | TEL: (954)444-8463 | | | | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 | | | REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | | | 1STREVIEW- AS APERMIT APPLICATION! | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. | | | A TRANSMITTAL LETTERLISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW | | | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2)FL S S 713.13 | | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF | | | THE COURT BEFORE A PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: | | | 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS | | | AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & | | | VOID. | | | | | | 3) 2ND REQUEST, STRUCTURAL SHEETS INDICATE A SOILS TEST | | | WAS CONDUCTED BY NUTTING ENGINEERING, PROJECT# 14157.1, | | | JULY 17, 2006. PLEASE PROVIDE 3 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS | | | SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE SOILS, WHERE THE | | | BEARINGCAPACITY IS NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN | | | QUESTION. WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL IS NOT | | | DEFINITLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION THE BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | MAY REQUIRE EXPLORATIONS, TEST OR OTHER ADEQUATE PROOF | | | AS TO THE PERMISSIBLE SAFE BEARING | | | CAPACITY. REQUIRED TEST AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUBMITTED | | | TO VERIFY BEARING CAPACITY SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A | | | GEOTECHNICAL | | | REPORT FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PROPERLY LICENSED IN | | | THE STATE OF FLORIDA. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 A) FBC* 105.3RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR | | | RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, | | | DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT | | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO | | | ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: | | | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | | CONSTRUCTION | | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE | | | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI | | | - PILE DRIVING | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQ FT IN AREA | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN | | | OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION | | | | | | 4B) SECOND REQUEST, SINCE THIS BUILDING WILL REQUIRE A | | | RESIDENT INSPECTORSUBMITTALS(3) SETS OF PLANS, | | | REPORTS, AND OR OTHER REQUIRED SUBMITTALS (PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS) WILL BE REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 5) SHEET A-0 CODE ANALYSIS: | | | | | | 5A) SECOND REQUEST, CONSTRUCTION TYPE: PLANS INDICATE A | | | BUILDING TYPE III-(UNPROTECTED) | | | ( SPRINKLED) TO TAKE THE UNLIMITED AREA PROVISIONS IN | | | 507.2THE CODE REQUIRES THE BUILDINGS TO ?FIRE | | | SPRINKLED?, REQUIRING A FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN. | | | | | | 5B) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5C) NEW COMMENT: CODE ANALYSIS BLDG# 1 SEE UNLIMITED | | | BLDG AREA 507.2 CORRECT THE 60 YARDS TO 60 FEET. | | | | | | 5D) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5E)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5F) SECOND REQUEST,507.2 REQUIRES THE FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PLANS FOR THE UNLIMITED AREA INCREASE! THE CODE | | | ANALYSIS ALSO INDICATED THAT THIS IS TO BE A FIRE | | | SPRINKLED BUILDING BUT NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS , | | | HYDRAULICS,FIRE PUMP OR FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER WERE | | | SUBMITTED.FOR A BUILDING PERMIT TO BE ISSUED FOR | | | MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA 106.3.51.1(4)* FIRE | | | SPRINKLER PLANS ARE REQUIRED. 903.2.3 GROUP F-1.AN | | | AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT | | | ALL BUILDINGS CONTAINING A GROUP F-1 OCCUPANCY WHERE | | | ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXISTS: | | | 1.WHERE A GROUP F-1 FIRE AREA EXCEEDS 12,000 SQUARE | | | FEET (1115 M 2 ). | | | | | | | | | | | | 6)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 7)SECOND REQUEST,FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS | | | & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT | | | INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS | | | ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | A) STOREFRONT WINDOWS | | | B) MULLIONS | | | C) SKYLIGHTS | | | D) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS | | | E) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS | | | F) ROLL UP DOORS | | | G) LOUVERS | | | H) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES | | | | | | 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS | | | REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE | | | PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS | | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF | | | GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES | | | POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH | | | AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE | | | TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. | | | GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE | | | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. | | | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 | | | M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET | | | THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE TEST. | | | | | | 8)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO | | | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR | | | INFORMATION | | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE | | | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER | | | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, | | | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 9)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 10) THIS SUBMITTAL DOESN'T INCORPORATE ANY ROOFING | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS, HERE IS A LIST OF COMMON ISSUES THAT | | | WILL FAIL A ROOFING REPORT SUBMITTAL:THIS ROOF IS | | | MISSING OR NOT INCOMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOW | | | ITEMS: | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF PITCH. ___ | | | CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SYSTEM OR SUBSYSTEM | | | WILL BE USED. | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOWPRESSURE FOR ZONE | | | ___ . | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD | | | THE FASTENERRESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THATREQUIRED, | | | AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED | | | FASTENER SPACING, PREPAREDSIGNEDAND SEALED BY A | | | FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION# 9, NO | | | ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | 11) 2ND REQUEST,SHEET A-8 PRECAST MOLDING DETAIL IS | | | MISSING DETAIL REFERENCE NUMBER. | | | FOUND ON SHEET A-15 DETAIL # 7. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS WITH SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE SECURING THIS | | | WEIGHT IN THIS MANNER.106.1.2*ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 12) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 13) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 14)SHEET A-14 DETAILS 8& 9 INDICATE THE USE OF WIRE | | | LATH ON SOFFITS AND CEILING APPLICATIONS. THE PLAN NOW | | | DECLARES THAT HIGH RIB LATH WILL BE FASTENED TO DENSE | | | BOARD, HOW?NOTE,HI-RIB LATH 3/8? 3.4 LB/YD2 CAN | | | SPAN 24?, EACH RIB WOULD REQUIRE FASTENING AS PER ASTM | | | 1063C TABLE 3. | | | | | | 15) SECOND REQUEST, NOTE WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT | | | SUBMITTED THE ROLL UP DOORS MAY OR MAY NOT REQUIRE DOOR | | | BUCKS AND ATTACHMENT. | | | | | | 16)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, | | | IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE | | | ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PREMIER PK BLD 3 REVIEW 1.DOC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2006-12-11 |
Time |
14:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2006-12-11 |
Time |
14:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-11 14:40:55 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06110349 | | | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 | | | CONT: "PLAN REVIEW" | | | TEL: (954)214-4039 ANDY PRIBY | | | | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 1STREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2)FL S S 713.13 | | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A | | | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2) | | | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS | | | NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED | | | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. | | | | | | 3)FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE | | | SOILS, WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY IS | | | NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION. | | | WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL | | | IS NOT DEFINITLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION | | | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE EXPLOR | | | ATIONS, TEST OR OTHER ADEQUATE PROOF AS | | | TO THE PERMISSIBLE SAFE BEARING | | | CAPACITY. REQUIRED TEST AND RECOMMENDA- | | | TIONS SUBMITTED TO VERIFY BEARING CAPA- | | | CITY SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A GEOTECH- | | | NICALREPORT FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | | | PROPERLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF | | | FLORIDA. | | | | | | 4 A) FBC* 105.3RESIDENT INSPECTOR. | | | SUBMIT INSPECTOR RESUME' AND LICENSE | | | DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, DIRECTOR OF | | | THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A | | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, | | | ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR MORE OF | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | | CONSTRUCTION | | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE | | | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI | | | - PILE DRIVING | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA | | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN | | | OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION | | | | | | 4B) SINCE THIS BUILDING WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT | | | INSPECTOR | | | (3) SETS OF PLANS, REPORTS, AND OR OTHER REQUIRED | | | SUBMITTALS | | | WILL BE REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 5) SHEET A-0 CODE ANALYSIS: | | | | | | 5A) CONSTRUCTION TYPE: PLANS INDICATE A BUILDING TYPE | | | IV(UNPROTECTED) | | | THIS TERMINOLGY IS FROM THE 2001 FBC PLEASE CORRECT, | | | UNDER THE CORRENT | | | CODE THIS BUILDING IS TO BE BUILT AS "HEAVY TIMBER" | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 5B)IT APPEARS THAT THE CODE ANYLSIS IS A COMBINATION | | | OF ZONING & BUILDING. | | | PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS | | | 302,092 WHEREAS | | | ON SHEET A-1 BUILDING NUMBER 1 INDICATES THE SQ FT AREA | | | TO BE 119,291 SQ FT. | | | ALSO FURTHER DOWN THE PAGE BUILDING # 1 INDICATES | | | GROUND FLOOR AREA TO BE | | | 95,391 AND POSSIBLE MEZZANINE LEVEL OF 23,900 SQ. FT. | | | FOR THE PURPOSE OF | | | BUILDING PLANS EITHER YOU ARE GOING TO BUILD THE | | | MEZZANINE LEVEL UNDER THIS PERMIT | | | WHICH WILL INCLUDE THIS FIGURE, IF NOTTO BE BUILT | | | UNDER THIS PERMIT DO NOT INCLUDE IT. | | | | | | 5C) IN EITHER CASE PLEASE IDENTIFY THE MINIMUM BUILDING | | | TYPE AND IF IN TABLE 503 | | | THE PLANS ARE OVER THE ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE, | | | INDICATE ANY INCREASES | | | TAKEN AND ALSO SHOW CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 5D) THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS BLANK WHERE THE | | | DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT, | | | OR WORK TO BE COVERED UNDER THIS PERMIT. FOR THE | | | PURPOSES OF THIS REVIEW | | | THIS BUILDING WILL BE CONSIDERED A SHELL BUILDING | | | PERMIT. TENANT BUILD-OUTS TO BE UNDER | | | SEPERATE PERMITS. | | | | | | 5E) IS THIS SITE, ARE THE UNITS TO BE SOLD AS | | | CONDOMINIUMS? | | | | | | 5F) THE CODE ANALYSIS ALSO INDICATED THAT THIS IS TO BE | | | A FIRE SPRINKLERED | | | BUILDING BUT NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS , HYDROLICS,FIRE | | | PUMP OR FIRE PUMP CONTROLLERE | | | WERE SUBMITTED.FOR A BUILDING PERMIT TO BE ISSUED | | | FORMINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA | | | 106.3.51.1(4)* FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS ARE REQUIRED. | | | 903.2.3 GROUP F-1. | | | AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | THROUGHOUT ALL BUILDINGS | | | CONTAINING A GROUP F-1 OCCUPANCY WHERE ONE OF THE | | | FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXISTS: | | | 1.WHERE A GROUP F-1 FIRE AREA EXCEEDS 12,000 SQUARE | | | FEET (1115 M 2 ). | | | | | | 6)SHEET A-6: | | | | | | 6A) SHEET A-6 , DISCREPANCY, | | | THE ELEVATIONS INDICATES DO NOT INDICATE THE PRESSURE | | | ZONES. | | | | | | 7)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, | | | PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- | | | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT | | | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS | | | FOLLOWS: | | | A) STOREFRONT WINDOWS | | | B) MULLIONS | | | C) SKYLIGHTS | | | D) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS | | | E) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS | | | F) ROLL UP DOORS | | | G) LOUVERS | | | H) EFIS SYSTEMS | | | I) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES | | | | | | 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. | | | IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR | | | GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE | | | IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN | | | BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE | | | OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF GLAZED | | | OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING | | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH | | | GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE | | | IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH AN | | | IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND | | | ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 | | | AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: | | | 1.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 | | | FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. | | | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN | | | 30 FEET (9.1 M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET | | | THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE | | | TEST. | | | | | | 8)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 | | | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION | | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS | | | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE | | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- | | | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE | | | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE | | | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 9)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE | | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 10) THIS SUBMITTAL DOESN'T INCORORATE ANY ROOFING | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | HERE IS A LIST OF COMMON ISSUES THAT WILL FAIL A | | | ROOFING REPORT SUBMITTAL: | | | THIS ROOF IS MISSING OR NOT INCOMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | FOLLOW ITEMS: | | | | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN | | | | | | ROOF HEIGHT. | | | | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF | | | PITCH. | | | | | | ___ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH | | | SYSTEM OR SUBSYSTEM WILL BE USED. | | | | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW | | | PRESSURE FOR ZONE ___ . | | | | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES | | | LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD THE FASTENER | | | RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT | | | REQUIRED, AS DETERMINED BY THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED | | | FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED | | | AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF | | | CONSULTANT MAY BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | ___THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES | | | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCED | | | FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | | | | 11) SHEET A-8 PRECAST MOULDING DETAIL IS MISSING DETAIL | | | REFRENCE NUMBER. | | | FOUND ON SHEET A-15 DETAIL # 7. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS WITH SAFETY | | | FACTOR FOR THE SECURING THIS WEIGHT IN THIS | | | MANNER.106.1.2*ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 12)SHEET A-11 DETAIL # 3 INDICATES THE FIRE PUMP ROOM | | | TO ALSO BE USED AS ASTORAGE ROOM? | | | | | | 13) SHEET A-11 VARIOUS DETAILS INDICATE THE TRIANGLE | | | AREA CREATED BY THE RISER AND TREAD, | | | 1012.3 LIMITS THIS AREA THA A 6"SPHERE CAN NOT PASS | | | THROUGH. THE WORDING ON THE | | | PLAN IS NOT CLEAR WHAT THE 6" IS FOR. | | | | | | 14)SHEET A-14 DEPENDING ON THE BUILDING TYPE TO BE | | | DECLAIRED, THE PLYOOD IN THE EXTERIOR WALLS MAY BE OF | | | CONCERN. TABLE 601 &602. | | | | | | 15)NOTE WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT SUBMITTED THE | | | ROLL UP DOORS MAY OR MAY NOT REQUIRE DOOR BUCKS AND | | | ATTACHMENT. | | | | | | 16)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
Time |
17:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
Time |
17:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-31 17:30:25 | | | | ** ELECTRICAL PLANS STAMPED. | | | | | | FIRE REVIEWER STILL NEEDS TO STAMP PLANS AS STATED ON | | | PREVIOUS PASSED REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-23 |
Time |
19:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-23 |
Time |
19:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-23 19:30:09 | 2007-12-23 19:30:09 | | | | | | ** DENIED4TH REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL | | | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW A COMPLETE REVIEW OF ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS CAN NOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME AS SHEETS | | | E1.1A, AND E1.2 DOES NOT CORRELATE. | | | PLEASE SEE FIXTURES ON E1.1A FOR PARKING LOT SHOW | | | DOUBLE FIXTURES ON WEST SIDE HOWEVER THE FIXTURES ON | | | WEST SIDE OF E1.2 ARE ALL SINGLE FIXTURES. | | | PLEASE SEE E1.1A AS THE FIXTURES ON THE NORTH, EAST AND | | | SOUTH SIDES WHICH ARE SHOWN ON E1.2 ARE MISSING? CAN | | | NOT CONFIRM LIGHTING ON THE INPUT DATA REPORT. PLEASE | | | SEE THE LIGHTING FOR INTERIOR LIGHTING NEEDS TO BE | | | ADJUSTED TO MATCH WITH PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE AMOUNT OF INTERIOR 64 WATT FIXTURES IS | | | NOT THE SAME IN THE IDR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. (MISSING | | | SEPARATE ROOMS). | | | ** PLEASE CLARIFY THE 150 500W FIXTURES. IS THIS AN | | | ASSUMPTION FOR FUTURE LIGHTS? | | | IF SO, HOW IS IT THAT NO ASSUMPTION WAS FIGURED FOR | | | BUILDING #1 FOR FUTURE? | | | THIS WAS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AND RESPONSE ONLY | | | STATES TO *SEE REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS*. PLEASE SEE | | | THE SQ FT DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS | | | AND PLEASE SEE THE OCCUPANCY SHALL BE STATED AS ON | | | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR F-1. THIS IS NOT RETAIL AS | | | SHOWN ON COVER SHEET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | 13-415.2, 13-415.1.B. | | | **PLEASE PROVIDE CORRECTED SHEETS FOR COORDINATION OF | | | SITE AND UPDATE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | **PLEASE ALSO BE SURE WHEN RE-SUBMITTING PLANS THE | | | OWNER AGENT IS SIGNED ON CERTIFICATION SHEET. | | | 13-101.1.1.1 | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS THE FIXTURES FOR SITE ARE NOT | | | CONFIRMED, CIRCUITING, LOADS AND PANEL SCHEDULES CAN | | | NOT BE CONFIRMED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | | | | ** AS GONE OVER IN MEETING BEFORE PLANS WERE | | | RESUBMITTED, PLEASE BE SURE ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS IS | | | PLACED AND FIGURED INTO THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-15 |
Time |
09:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-14 |
Time |
15:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-15 09:14:43 | 2007-10-15 09:14:43 | | | | | | **** DENIED 3RD REVIEW**** | | | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW THIS IS THE SECOND REVIEW UNDER PERMIT | | | APPLICATION AND THE THIRD REVIEW TOTAL. | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL SEVERAL COMMENTS FROM THE | | | PREVIOUS TWO REVIEWS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED | | | AND GAVE ALL CODES RELEVANT TO THE MINIMUM DESIGN TO BE | | | PLACED ON PLANS. NFPA-20 2003 IS RELEVANT TO PROJECT | | | AND WAS NOT PLACED ON PLANS WITH OTHER RELEVANT CODES. | | | PLEASE ADD TO SHEETS FOR ELECTRICAL AND FORWARD TO | | | ARCHITECT OF RECORD. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BOTH PREVIOUS REVIEWS WITH RESPECT | | | TO FBC CHAPTER 13. | | | PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED STILL DO | | | NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES DOES NOT CORRELATE. | | | PLEASE SEE THE METHOD OF CONTROLS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE WATTAGE OF FIXTURES DOES NOT CORRELATE. | | | *FOR EXAMPLE: SEE THE INPUT DATA REPORT WHICH HAS | | | 500WATT FIXTURES FOR INTERIOR FIXTURES, YET THE FIXTURE | | | LEGEND DOES NOT INDICATE ANY FIXTURES WITH THIS SAME | | | WATTAGE, IN FACT THE THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER WATTAGES | | | NONE OF WHICH ARE ON THE INPUT DATA REPORT. | | | PLEASE SEE TYPE OF BUILDING NEEDS TO BE VERIFIED AS | | | THIS IS NOT RETAIL. | | | PLEASE SEE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING DOES NOT CORRELATE | | | WITH PLANS AS THE INPUT DATA REPORT CONTAINS NO | | | FIXTURES FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE | | | WHEN THE PLANS CONTAIN DOZENS OF FIXTURES??? PLEASE BE | | | SURE THE ADDRESS IS LISTED ON CALCULATIONS. PLEASE SEE | | | 13-415.1.B, 13-415.2 | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE METHOD OF CONTROLS FOR LIGHTING IS | | | STILL NOT COMPLETE PER 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2. PLEASE | | | OVER RIDE SWITCH LOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN ON PLANS AS | | | REQUIRED FOR THE OCCUPANT ENTERING A SPACE AND BEING | | | ABLE TO SEE THE LIGHTING IN WHICH IS BEING OVER | | | RIDDEN. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL STANDARD DEVICES SHOWN ON | | | PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE NO TIME SCHEDULING, AND NO MAXIMUM TIMES ON | | | OVER RIDES ARE SHOWN. | | | NO ZONES, NO LAYOUTS ETC | | | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS TWO REVIEW NOTES BELOW: | | | | | | (REVIEW #2) | | | **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES** | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 CHAPTER 13. THIS IS THE SAME | | | COMMENT AS PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLEASE SEE THE VERSION AS | | | SUBMITTED DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE NEW CODE AS OF | | | DECEMBER 8TH, 2006. | | | PLEASE SEE AS THIS IS MENTIONED AS A SHELL BUILDING, | | | PLEASE SEE METHOD. | | | PLEASE SEE METHOD OF CONTROL STILL MENTIONS MANUAL | | | ON/OFF WHICH IS NOT POSSIBLE WHEN AUTOMATED MEANS IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE SEE MISSING OVER RIDE CONTROLS AT THE POINT OF | | | ENTRANCE BY WAY OF CHOSEN DEVICES SO THE OCCUPANT CAN | | | SEE THE LIGHTING WHICH IS BEING CONTROLLED. IF OS TYPE | | | DEVICES ARE GOING TO BE INSTALLED FOR COVERAGE, PLEASE | | | SHOW LOCATIONS, TYPE OF DEVICES AND MAXIMUM TIMES ON | | | OVER RIDES | | | PLEASE SEE SEPARATE SPACES WHICH ONLY INDICATE STANDARD | | | SWITCHES. | | | PLEASE SEE INTERIOR LIGHTING WHICH DOES NOT SHOW ANY | | | AUTOMATED CONTROLS. | | | PLEASE SEE ZONING NOT SHOWN FOR LARGER SPACES. PLEASE | | | SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS DO NOT INCLUDE ANY EXTERIOR | | | LIGHTING AS PLANS DO. | | | PLEASE BE SURE OWNER AGENT SIGNS ALL THREE COPIES. | | | PLEASE SEE THE ADDRESS SHALL BE SPECIFIC ON | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES BELOW. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13. | | | | | | (REVIEW #1) | | | ** PREVIOUS NOTES** | | | PLEASE SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH INDICATE "MANUAL" | | | FOR THE MEANS OF CONTROL FOR LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH MENTIONS "NONE ENTERED" FOR | | | EXTERIOR LIGHTING, HOWEVER PLANS DO INDICATE THIS. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, AND .1.3. PLEASE SEE | | | 13-415.1.AB.1, 13-415.2.ABC.1. | | | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE INTERIOR LIGHTS ARE BEING SHOWN | | | CIRCUITED THROUGH THE LIGHTING CONTROL PANELS AND NOTED | | | AS EXTERIOR LIGHTS WHEN THESE ARE INTERIOR FIXTURES. | | | PLEASE SEE ALL AREAS WHICH CONTAIN FLOOR TO CEILING | | | HEIGHT PARTITIONS SHALL ALSO CONTAIN LIGHTING CONTROL | | | BY ONE OF THE MEANS AS STATED IN THE CODE. THIS OFFICE | | | DOES NOT REQUIRE ONE DESIGN OVER ANOTHER. | | | PLEASE SEE MORE THAN OPTION IS AVAILABLE. PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO CORRELATE CIRCUITING AS AN EXAMPLE OF CIRCUIT | | | "3HP-5". ON THE LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL IS SHOWS THIS | | | CIRCUIT AS FEEDING EXTERIOR LIGHTS, YET ON PLANS THIS | | | IS THE CIRCUIT WHICH FEEDS THE INTERIOR LIGHTS. PLEASE | | | ALSO SEE THAT ALL EMERGENCY AND EXIT LIGHTS SHALL BE | | | SHOWN IN DETAIL WIRED ON THE LINE SIDE OF ANY LIGHTING | | | CONTROL PANEL. (700.12E). | | | | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING LEVELS STILL DO NOT | | | COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM LEVELS AS REQUIRED FOR | | | EXIT/EXIT DISCHARGE PER NFPA-101 7.8.1.3AND 7.9.2.2. | | | PLEASE SEE PHOTO-METRICS INDICATE FOR NORMAL OR | | | EMERGENCY FOR STAIRS LEADING TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY | | | HOWEVER THE LEVELS UNDER NORMAL ARE NOT MEETING THE | | | MINIMUM OF 10FT CANDLES ON SEVERAL STAIRS. PLEASE ALSO | | | SEE THE DESIGNATION OF STAIR #5 NORMAL AND EMERGENCY IS | | | MISSING. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS, | | | PLEASE COMPLETE ALL INFORMATION ON PLANS FOR FIRE PUMP, | | | FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER ETC. | | | . | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THIS WILL BE *DONE BY THE | | | FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR* | | | SOME CUT SHEETS WERE SUBMITTED HOWEVER NOT ALL. | | | AS STATED CLEARLY ON THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS THIS | | | INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR *MINIMUM* CODE COMPLIANCE | | | FOR THE BASE BUILDING AND ALL INFORMATION SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED UNDER THE BASE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | THIS IS IRRELEVANT OF THE SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AT A LATER DATE. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT ALL MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS. PLEASE | | | COMPLETE INFORMATION ON PLANS. | | | NEC 695, NFPA-20 CHAPTER 6, 7 ETC | | | CODES SECTIONS GIVEN BELOW FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS REMAIN | | | THE SAME. | | | | | | **PREVIOUS REVIEW #2 NOTE: | | | AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL | | | INFORMATION ON PLANS AND PLEASE SUBMIT ALL SPECS/CUT | | | SHEETS. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE SPEC/CUT SHEETS FOR THE | | | FIRE PUMP AND FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER.THIS IS REQUIRED | | | UNDER THE BASE BUILDING PLANS FOR REVIEW OF CODE | | | COMPLIANCE FOR THE BUILDINGS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM AND | | | FEEDS TO THIS PUMP. PLEASE KNOW EVEN THOUGH THE FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. PLEASE SEE | | | NFPA-20 2003, PLEASE SEE 9.3, 9.3.2.2 ALL SECTIONS | | | FOLLOWING. PLEASE SEE WHERE LOCKED ROTOR CURRENT SHALL | | | BE MARKED, DISCONNECTING MEANS, ISOLATING SWITCHES ETC | | | SHALL BE SHOWN WITH PLANS AND SPECS SHEETS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE NEC 695.4(B)(1). PLEASE SEE CHAPTER 10 | | | OF NFPA-20 10.3.6, 10.4.2, 10.4.2.2 ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW THIS OFFICE IS UNABLE TO REVIEW FOR MANY | | | CODE COMPLIANCE ITEMS AT THIS TIME AS THE ABOVE | | | INFORMATION WAS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE 110.3, AND 90.7. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.1PARA | | | 5 | | | | | | 6) NOTE:THIS NOTE FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WILL REMAIN AS | | | INFORMATION ON FIRE PUMP IS NOT COMPLETE AND | | | VERIFICATION OF RISER CONDUCTORS ETC CAN NOT BE | | | REVIEWED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS ON PLANS AND | | | SUBMITTED. | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE COMPLETE RISER FOR FIRE PUMP AS NOTED ABOVE FOR | | | FEEDERS ETC. | | | 240.4, 310.16, 695, NFPA-20 CHAPTER 9 | | | | | | 7 NOTE:PLEASE SEE ACTUAL CALCULATIONS FOR LIGHT POLES | | | WILL BE REVIEWED BY STRUCTURAL REVIEWER. | | | ** NOTED FOR INFORMATION. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTICE TO FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH | | | RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. AS THIS | | | IS ONLY THE SECOND REVIEW UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION AS | | | THE INITIAL REVIEW WAS UNDER *PLAN REVIEW*. | | | PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS AS SUBMITTED | | | ARE NOT SIGNED DATED OR SEALED BY THE RESPONSIBLE | | | DESIGNER(S) OF RECORD. | | | SEE ONLY SHEET 1 OF 6 WAS SIGNED, AND SEALED. | | | FS 481.221 | | | | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH WILL | | | AFFECT PLANS, SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRICAL | | | PLANS. | | | | | | ** IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | 2007-10-15 07:47:17 | 2007-10-15 07:47:17 | | | | | | IN REVIEW | | 2007-10-14 16:02:30 | 2007-10-14 16:02:30 | | | REVIEW WILL CONTINUE ON 10/15, NOTES WILL FOLLOW ONCE | | | COMPLETED. | | | REVIEW WILL BE GOING INTO A *F* STATUS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-10 |
Time |
10:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-10 |
Time |
09:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-10 10:32:03 | **** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW**** | | | | | | ** PLANS NOW SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. THIS IS THE FIRST | | | REVIEW UNDER PERMIT. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | UNDER *PLAN REVIEW* WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED | | | ALONG WITH SOME NEW COMMENTS. | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS THERE ARE ITEMS NOT YET SUBMITTED IN | | | DESIGN OR INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE | | | REVIEW, THERE MAY BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW WHICH CAN NOT YET BE MADE. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS SUBMITTED CONTAIN STAMPS | | | FROM ANOTHER BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND MUNICIPALITY WHICH | | | IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE KNOW ALL NEW SHEETS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE SOME SHEETS EVEN CONTAIN SIGN OFFS FROM THAT | | | SAME JURISDICTION ALTHOUGH PLANS INDICATE WORK IN THE | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH? | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW AS STATED | | | REQUESTS FOR ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS TO BE COMPLETELY | | | REMOVED FROM SETS AND ONLY TO INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO THE COMPLETED SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. PLEASE | | | SEE SETS STILL CONTAIN OLD SHEETS, PLEASE REMOVE. | | | PLEASE SEE COMMENT ABOVE FOR NEW SHEETS NEEDED. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS FOR | | | *INITIALS* BEING USED IN LIEU OF ARCHITECT SIGNATURE. | | | PLEASE SEE FS 481.221. | | | A LETTER FOR SIGNATURE VERIFICATION WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | THIS IS ONLY BEING NOTED BY THIS REVIEWER AT THIS TIME | | | FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSE. OTHER SHEETS ARE SIGNED. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES FOR CODE TO BE | | | STATED ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE MOST WERE DONE, HOWEVER | | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING. | | | 2004 FBC W/2006 REVISIONS. | | | 2003 NFPA-20 | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 CHAPTER 13. THIS IS THE | | | SAME COMMENT AS PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLEASE SEE THE VERSION | | | AS SUBMITTED DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE NEW CODE AS OF | | | DECEMBER 8TH, 2006. | | | PLEASE SEE AS THIS IS MENTIONED AS A SHELL BUILDING, | | | PLEASE SEE METHOD. | | | PLEASE SEE METHOD OF CONTROL STILL MENTIONS MANUAL | | | ON/OFF WHICH IS NOT POSSIBLE WHEN AUTOMATED MEANS IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE SEE MISSING OVER RIDE CONTROLS AT THE POINT OF | | | ENTRANCE BY WAY OF CHOSEN DEVICES SO THE OCCUPANT CAN | | | SEE THE LIGHTING WHICH IS BEING CONTROLLED. IF OS TYPE | | | DEVICES ARE GOING TO BE INSTALLED FOR COVERAGE, PLEASE | | | SHOW LOCATIONS, TYPE OF DEVICES AND MAXIMUM TIMES ON | | | OVER RIDES | | | PLEASE SEE SEPARATE SPACES WHICH ONLY INDICATE STANDARD | | | SWITCHES. | | | PLEASE SEE INTERIOR LIGHTING WHICH DOES NOT SHOW ANY | | | AUTOMATED CONTROLS. | | | PLEASE SEE ZONING NOT SHOWN FOR LARGER SPACES. PLEASE | | | SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS DO NOT INCLUDE ANY EXTERIOR | | | LIGHTING AS PLANS DO. | | | PLEASE BE SURE OWNER AGENT SIGNS ALL THREE COPIES. | | | PLEASE SEE THE ADDRESS SHALL BE SPECIFIC ON | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES BELOW. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13. | | | ** PREVIOUS NOTES** | | | PLEASE SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH INDICATE "MANUAL" | | | FOR THE MEANS OF CONTROL FOR LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH MENTIONS "NONE ENTERED" FOR | | | EXTERIOR LIGHTING, HOWEVER PLANS DO INDICATE THIS. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, AND .1.3. PLEASE SEE | | | 13-415.1.AB.1, 13-415.2.ABC.1. | | | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE INTERIOR LIGHTS ARE BEING SHOWN | | | CIRCUITED THROUGH THE LIGHTING CONTROL PANELS AND NOTED | | | AS EXTERIOR LIGHTS WHEN THESE ARE INTERIOR FIXTURES. | | | PLEASE SEE ALL AREAS WHICH CONTAIN FLOOR TO CEILING | | | HEIGHT PARTITIONS SHALL ALSO CONTAIN LIGHTING CONTROL | | | BY ONE OF THE MEANS AS STATED IN THE CODE. THIS OFFICE | | | DOES NOT REQUIRE ONE DESIGN OVER ANOTHER. | | | PLEASE SEE MORE THAN OPTION IS AVAILABLE. PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO CORRELATE CIRCUITING AS AN EXAMPLE OF CIRCUIT | | | "3HP-5". ON THE LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL IS SHOWS THIS | | | CIRCUIT AS FEEDING EXTERIOR LIGHTS, YET ON PLANS THIS | | | IS THE CIRCUIT WHICH FEEDS THE INTERIOR LIGHTS. PLEASE | | | ALSO SEE THAT ALL EMERGENCY AND EXIT LIGHTS SHALL BE | | | SHOWN IN DETAIL WIRED ON THE LINE SIDE OF ANY LIGHTING | | | CONTROL PANEL. (700.12E). | | | | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8 AND 7.9. PLEASE SEE NO | | | PHOTO-METRICS INDICATE FOR NORMAL OR EMERGENCY FOR | | | STAIRS LEADING TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. | | | PLEASE SEE PHOTO-METRICS SHOULD INDICATE LEVELS UNDER | | | NORMAL/EMERGENCY ON FLAT EGRESS PATHS (SAME FOR BOTH | | | CONDITIONS). | | | ** NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW** | | | PLEASE SEE THAT MINIMUM BATTERY BACK UP LIGHTS OF SOME | | | KIND WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EGRESS AREAS WHICH INCLUDE | | | EXTERIOR STAIRS TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. PLEASE SEE | | | MINIMUM FOOT CANDLES UNDER NORMAL POWER AND MINIMUM | | | FOOT CANDLES REQUIRED UNDER EMERGENCY POWER. 7.8.1.3, | | | 7.9.2.2. PLEASE KNOW THESE LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN ON | | | PHOTO-METRICS WILL BE REQUIRED ON ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR | | | REVIEW WHETHER OR NOT THESE COMMENTS ARE MADE BY FIRE | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | 7) NOTE:AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW, NOT ALL REQUIRED | | | SIGNAGE OR NOTES IS ON PLANS. | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES** PLEASE SEE 230.2E WHICH | | | SPEAKS OF SIGNAGE REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE FEEDING ONE | | | BUILDING. PLEASE SEE THAT RISER ONLY INDICATES 2-MAINS | | | FOR THIS BUILDING, WHEN IN FACT THE MAIN FOR THE FIRE | | | PUMP SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED AND LABELED. PLEASE ALSO | | | PLACE NOTES ON RISER FOR SIGNAGE WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED | | | FOR ALL MAINS AND SERVICE LOCATIONS. PLEASE SEE AS THE | | | JOCKEY PUMP IS BEING FED FROM THE NORMAL HOUSE PANEL, | | | THIS SHALL ALSO BE LABELED ACCORDINGLY. 695.4(B)3 | | | | | | 8) NOTE:AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. NO INFORMATION | | | WAS SUBMITTED OR CHANGED ON PLANS. | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE SPEC/CUT SHEETS FOR THE | | | FIRE PUMP AND FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER.THIS IS REQUIRED | | | UNDER THE BASE BUILDING PLANS FOR REVIEW OF CODE | | | COMPLIANCE FOR THE BUILDINGS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM AND | | | FEEDS TO THIS PUMP. PLEASE KNOW EVEN THOUGH THE FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. PLEASE SEE | | | NFPA-20 2003, PLEASE SEE 9.3, 9.3.2.2 ALL SECTIONS | | | FOLLOWING. PLEASE SEE WHERE LOCKED ROTOR CURRENT SHALL | | | BE MARKED, DISCONNECTING MEANS, ISOLATING SWITCHES ETC | | | SHALL BE SHOWN WITH PLANS AND SPECS SHEETS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE NEC 695.4(B)(1). PLEASE SEE CHAPTER 10 | | | OF NFPA-20 10.3.6, 10.4.2, 10.4.2.2 ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW THIS OFFICE IS UNABLE TO REVIEW FOR MANY | | | CODE COMPLIANCE ITEMS AT THIS TIME AS THE ABOVE | | | INFORMATION WAS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE 110.3, AND 90.7. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.1PARA | | | 5 | | | | | | 9) NOTE:THIS NOTE FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WILL REMAIN AS | | | INFORMATION ON FIRE PUMP IS NOT COMPLETE AND | | | VERIFICATION OF RISER CONDUCTORS ETC CAN NOT BE | | | REVIEWED. | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE COMPLETE RISER FOR FIRE PUMP AS NOTED ABOVE FOR | | | FEEDERS ETC. | | | 240.4, 310.16, 695, NFPA-20 CHAPTER 9 | | | | | | 10) NOTE:SAME NOTE AS PREVIOUS REVIEW. NO INFORMATION | | | SUBMITTED. AS THE POLES ON SITE ARE ALREADY BEING | | | INSTALLED FOR OTHER BUILDINGS THIS INFORMATION SHOULD | | | BE READILY AVAILABLE. | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** | | | PLEASE SUBMIT OR INDICATE REQUIREMENTS FOR WIND LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING REVIEW FOR FBC 2004 140MPH. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY WHY LEVELS FOR STROBES ON | | | SCHEDULE ARE STILL BEING SHOWN AT 15CD? | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 CHAPTER 11, MORE SPECIFICALLY | | | 11-4.28, .1.2, AND .3(4). PLEASE ALSO SEE NFPA-72 | | | 2002. | | | THIS MAY OR MAY NOT CHANGE ACTUAL SHOWN UNITS. AS FOR | | | MINIMUM CANDELA LEVELS SEE ABOVE AS NOTED. | | | | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE LETTER AS SUBMITTED | | | DOES NOT RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS AS REVIEWED FROM | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | PLEASE SEE FIRE REVIEW AND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | WITH RESPECT TO THE FIRE SPRINKLERS AS THE BASE | | | BUILDING PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE AND | | | STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS THE FBC. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH | | | MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS OR DESIGN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-12-04 |
Time |
13:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-12-04 |
Time |
12:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-04 13:03:12 | **** UNSAT **** | | | | | | PERMIT # 06110349 | | | BUILDING # 3 | | | PLEASE KNOW THAT THE ADDRESS SHALL BE PLACE ON THE | | | PLANS TITLE BLOCK AS IT HAS NOW BEEN DESIGNATED TO THIS | | | BUILDING LOCATION. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT THE PLANS HAVE ONLY BEEN | | | SUBMITTED FOR "PLAN REVIEW" ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN | | | SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT AT THIS TIME. PLEASE KNOW AS OF | | | DECEMBER 8TH 2006 THE STATE OF FLORIDA WILL ADOPT THE | | | NEW 2005 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE NFPA-70. PLEASE ALSO | | | KNOW THAT THE NEW 2006 REVISIONS TO THE 2004 FBC WILL | | | ALSO GO INTO AFFECT. | | | PLEASE KNOW THAT AS PERMITS HAVE NOT BEEN APPLIED FOR | | | AT THIS TIME ALL NEW CODES AFTER THIS DATE WILL BE | | | REQUIRED TO BE MET. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT | | | CODES ARE REFLECTED ON PLANS. | | | 2002 NFPA-70 ONLY IF A PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR BY THE 8TH | | | OF DEC. PLEASE REFLECT THE 2005 NFPA-70, 2002 NFPA-72, | | | 2003 NFPA-101, 2003 NFPA-20 AND THE 2004 FBC. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 CHAPTER 13. | | | PLEASE SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH INDICATE "MANUAL" | | | FOR THE MEANS OF CONTROL FOR LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH MENTIONS "NONE ENTERED" FOR | | | EXTERIOR LIGHTING, HOWEVER PLANS DO INDICATE THIS. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, AND .1.3. PLEASE SEE | | | 13-415.1.AB.1, 13-415.2.ABC.1. | | | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE INTERIOR LIGHTS ARE BEING SHOWN | | | CIRCUITED THROUGH THE LIGHTING CONTROL PANELS AND NOTED | | | AS EXTERIOR LIGHTS WHEN THESE ARE INTERIOR FIXTURES. | | | PLEASE SEE ALL AREAS WHICH CONTAIN FLOOR TO CEILING | | | HEIGHT PARTITIONS SHALL ALSO CONTAIN LIGHTING CONTROL | | | BY ONE OF THE MEANS AS STATED IN THE CODE. THIS OFFICE | | | DOES NOT REQUIRE ONE DESIGN OVER ANOTHER. | | | PLEASE SEE MORE THAN OPTION IS AVAILABLE. PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO CORRELATE CIRCUITING AS AN EXAMPLE OF CIRCUIT | | | "3HP-5". ON THE LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL IS SHOWS THIS | | | CIRCUIT AS FEEDING EXTERIOR LIGHTS, YET ON PLANS THIS | | | IS THE CIRCUIT WHICH FEEDS THE INTERIOR LIGHTS. PLEASE | | | ALSO SEE THAT ALL EMERGENCY AND EXIT LIGHTS SHALL BE | | | SHOWN IN DETAIL WIRED ON THE LINE SIDE OF ANY LIGHTING | | | CONTROL PANEL. (700.12E). | | | | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8 AND 7.9, WHICH MAY | | | ALSO BE PART OF THE FIRE REVIEWER COMMENTS WITH RESPECT | | | TO A MINIMUM OF LIGHTING REQUIRED IN SPACE UNTIL SUCH | | | TIME FOR TENANT BUILD OUT. PLEASE SEE THAT MINIMUM | | | BATTERY BACK UP LIGHTS OF SOME KIND WILL BE REQUIRED | | | FOR EGRESS AREAS WHICH INCLUDE EXTERIOR STAIRS TO THE | | | PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. PLEASE SEE MINIMUM FOOT CANDLES | | | UNDER NORMAL POWER AND MINIMUM FOOT CANDLES REQUIRED | | | UNDER EMERGENCY POWER. 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2. PLEASE KNOW | | | THESE LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN ON PHOTO-METRICS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED ON ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR REVIEW WHETHER OR NOT | | | THESE COMMENTS ARE MADE BY FIRE REVIEW. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 230.2E WHICH SPEAKS OF SIGNAGE | | | REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE FEEDING ONE BUILDING. PLEASE | | | SEE THAT RISER ONLY INDICATES 2-MAINS FOR THIS | | | BUILDING, WHEN IN FACT THE MAIN FOR THE FIRE PUMP | | | SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED AND LABELED. PLEASE ALSO PLACE | | | NOTES ON RISER FOR SIGNAGE WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | ALL MAINS AND SERVICE LOCATIONS. PLEASE SEE AS THE | | | JOCKEY PUMP IS BEING FED FROM THE NORMAL HOUSE PANEL, | | | THIS SHALL ALSO BE LABELED ACCORDINGLY. 695.4(B)3 | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE SPEC/CUT SHEETS | | | FOR THE FIRE PUMP AND FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER.THIS IS | | | REQUIRED UNDER THE BASE BUILDING PLANS FOR REVIEW OF | | | CODE COMPLIANCE FOR THE BUILDINGS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM AND | | | FEEDS TO THIS PUMP. PLEASE KNOW EVEN THOUGH THE FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. PLEASE SEE | | | NFPA-20 2003, PLEASE SEE 9.3, 9.3.2.2 ALL SECTIONS | | | FOLLOWING. PLEASE SEE WHERE LOCKED ROTOR CURRENT SHALL | | | BE MARKED, DISCONNECTING MEANS, ISOLATING SWITCHES ETC | | | SHALL BE SHOWN WITH PLANS AND SPECS SHEETS SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE NEC 695.4(B)(1). PLEASE SEE CHAPTER 10 | | | OF NFPA-20 10.3.6, 10.4.2, 10.4.2.2 ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW THIS OFFICE IS UNABLE TO REVIEW FOR MANY | | | CODE COMPLIANCE ITEMS AT THIS TIME AS THE ABOVE | | | INFORMATION WAS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE 110.3, AND 90.7. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.1PARA | | | 5 | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-72 AS THE BREAKER WHICH FEEDS | | | THE FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL (FACP) SHALL BE A BREAKER | | | WHICH CONTAINS A "LOCK-ON" DEVICE WHICH IS AN INTEGRAL | | | PART OF THE BREAKER. PLEASE KNOW THAT A "SNAP ON" TYPE | | | DEVICE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE AHJ. NFPA-72. | | | 4.4.1.4.2.1THE DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUIT(S) AND | | | CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY PROTECTED. | | | 4.4.1.4.2.2CIRCUIT DISCONNECTING MEANS SHALL HAVE A | | | RED MARKING, SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE ONLY TO AUTHORIZED | | | PERSONNEL, AND SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AS "FIRE ALARM | | | CIRCUIT" | | | 4.4.1.4.2.3THE LOCATION OF THE CIRCUIT DISCONNECTING | | | MEANS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY IDENTIFIED AT THE FIRE ALARM | | | CONTROL UNIT. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 90.7, 110.3 AND 90.4. | | | THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH IDENTIFICATION ON THE PANEL | | | SCHEDULE AND A NOTE ON PANEL FOR TYPE OF BREAKER TO BE | | | USED FOR THIS CIRCUIT. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE RISER FOR FIRE PUMP AS NOTED | | | ABOVE FOR FEEDERS ETC. | | | 240.4, 310.16, 695, NFPA-20 CHAPTER 9 | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE "FLOATING NEUTRAL" ON THE | | | METERS ON THE SECONDARY SIDE OF THE PRIMARY MAIN. | | | 250.6, 250.24B. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT OR INDICATE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING REVIEW FOR FBC 2004 | | | 140MPH. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE NOTIFICATION APPLIANCE | | | CIRCUITS CALCULATIONS WHICH INDICATE A DATE OF | | | 9/25/01? | | | | | | PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 CHAPTER 11. , MORE SPECIFICALLY | | | 11-4.28, .1.2, AND .3(4). PLEASE ALSO SEE NFPA-72 | | | 2002. | | | THIS MAY OR MAY NOT CHANGE ACTUAL SHOWN UNITS. AS FOR | | | MINIMUM CANDELA LEVELS SEE ABOVE AS NOTED. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
09:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
09:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-01-09 |
Time |
13:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-01-09 |
Time |
13:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-09 13:26:01 | ***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1. CIVILP.E. STEVEN POWLYKNEED TO PUT A DATE OVER | | | PE SEAL NEXT TO SIGNATURE ON ALL CIVIL DWGS, | | | | | | FOR EXAMPLE,MR. POWLYK DID NOT PUTDATEON SHEET | | | 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, AND ETC. ETCOF 29 ANDSO FORTH. MR . | | | POWLYK HAS TO PUT A DATE, SIGN & SEAL EACH SET OFEACH | | | OF THE SHEETS PER FBPE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE CLEARIFY & RESPONDTO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMITTING | | | PROCESS. | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
Time |
15:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
Time |
14:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-20 15:03:22 | ***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: | | | | | | PLEASE SHOW POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS ON THE | | | DRAWINGS PER FDEPAND SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE SILT FENCE | | | AROUND THE SITE. | | | | | | OUR RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER 11/09/07: WE COULD NOT FIND | | | POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS & SILT FENCE IN YOUR | | | DRAWING SET.PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT SHEET#S OFYOUR | | | DRAWING SET. | | | YOU ASKED US TO VISIT THE SITE TO CHECK POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION IN YOUR LETTER. WE LIKE TO SEE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION DETAILS FIRST ON THE DRAWING AND THAN WE | | | WILL VISIT PER YOUR REQUEST IF NECESSARY. | | | | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
13:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
13:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-23 13:28:58 | ***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | CIVILP.E. STEVEN POWLYKNEED TO PUT A DATE OVER PE | | | SEAL NEXT TO SIGNATURE ON ALL CIVIL DWGS, | | | | | | YOU NEED TO SAY WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE IN WATER QUALITY | | | CALS FOR THIS JOB, SFWMD PERMIT,GEO-TECH REPORT, ETC. | | | PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE A COPY OF EACH OF THESE. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: | | | | | | 1.PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI). | | | PLEASE APPLY AT FDEP, NPDES STORMWATER SECTION FOR | | | NOI. | | | YOU CAN GET NOI INFO FROM | | | WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/ | | | NOTICE OF INTENT DEP FORM 62-621.300(4)(B), | | | EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2003 | | | 2.PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSTHE LOCATION OF DUMPSTER & | | | ITS ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF WPB, LOCATION MUST BE | | | ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | | 3.PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWING THE SITE AREA OF THIS PROJECT, | | | PERVIOUS AREA, IMPERVIOUS AREA, LAKE, GREEN AREA, | | | PAVEMENT AREA, ETC. MAKE SURE THESE SITE AREAS SHOWN ON | | | DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH AREAS USED IN STORM WATER | | | QUALITY CALCULATIONS. | | | 4. PLEASE SHOW POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS AND SHOW ON | | | DRAWINGS THE SILT FENCE AROUND THE SITE. | | | | | | PLEASE CREARIFY & RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO | | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMITTING PROCESS.THESE ARE THE SAME | | | COMMENTS WE MADE LAST TIME. PLEASE EXPLAIN EACH OF THE | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-07-23 |
Time |
13:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-07-23 |
Time |
13:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-23 13:28:35 | ***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | WE ASKED FOR CIVIL PLANS IN REV 1, OF 1/19/07.THE | | | CIVIL PLANS YOU SUBMITTED FOR THIS JOB ARE FOR PERMIT# | | | 06071716.WE ACCEPT ONLY ORIGINAL SEAL & SIGNED THE | | | PLAN.YOUR SUBMITTED PLANS ARE COPIED OF SEAL & | | | SIGNED. | | | YOU NEED TO SAY WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE IN WATER QUALITY | | | CALS FOR THIS JOB, SFWMD PERMIT,GEO-TECH REPORT, ETC. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NEW REQUIREMENTS: | | | | | | 1.PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI). | | | PLEASE APPLY AT FDEP, NPDES STORMWATER SECTION FOR | | | NOI. | | | YOU CAN GET NOI INFO FROM | | | WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/ | | | NOTICE OF INTENT DEP FORM 62-621.300(4)(B), | | | EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2003 | | | 2.PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSTHE LOCATION OF DUMPSTER & | | | ITS ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF WPB, LOCATION MUST BE | | | ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | | 3.PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWING THE SITE AREA OF THIS PROJECT, | | | PERVIOUS AREA, IMPERVIOUS AREA, LAKE, GREEN AREA, | | | PAVEMENT AREA, ETC. MAKE SURE THESE SITE AREAS SHOWN ON | | | DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH AREAS USED IN STORM WATER | | | QUALITY CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | PLEASE CREARIFY & RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO | | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
Time |
11:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
Time |
11:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-19 11:42:54 | PLEASE SUBMIT CIVIL PLANS ALONG WITH A COPY OF SFWMD, | | | GEO TECH REPORT, STORM WATER CALS. WHAT CHANGESYOU | | | HAVE IN THIS PERMIT#FROM PERMIT #06071716, CIVIL SITE | | | & DRAINAGE . | | | PLEASE REPLY EACH ITEM TO EXPEDITE THE PERMITTING | | | PROCESS. | | | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI 805-6723 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
Time |
19:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
Time |
18:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-21 21:19:34 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | PLAN SHEETS A-4, A-6, A-11, A-16, E2.3.1, E2.3.1B, | | | FA0.3, FA2.31, AND FP-1 THRU FP-4 WERE STAMPED, | | | INITIALED, AND DATED |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
Time |
11:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
Time |
10:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-22 10:46:54 | ****PROVISO***** | | | | | | | | | THE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEWS HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED;THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEETS TO BE | | | FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE OTHER REVIEWERS HAVE BEEN | | | SATISFIED. | | | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-10-25 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-10-25 |
Time |
15:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-25 15:45:33 | ****DENIED***** | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW | | | STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 08.SINCE THIS WILL BE A SPRINKLERED BUILDING, PROVIDE | | | A LAYOUT OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM.THE PROJECT | | | SITE ADDRESS IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF THE SUBMITTED FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SHEETS IS INCORRECT.PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT | | | THE SUBMITTED SPRINKLER SHEETS WILL BE INCLUDED WITH | | | THE MASTER PERMIT SET OF PLANS; SPRINKLER SPEC SHEETS | | | NOT NEEDED AT THIS TIME, BUT SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE | | | SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR APPLIES FOR THE SEPARATE PLANS AND | | | PERMIT. | | | | | | 09.FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS (FDC'S) SHALL BE | | | POSITIONED SO THAT THEY CANNOT BE BLOCKED BY STORAGE, | | | VESSELS, EQUIPMENT, ETC.COULD NOT LOCATE THIS COMMENT | | | AS PER YOUR RESPONSE | | | | | | 10.KNOX LOCKING CAPS ARE REQUIRED FOR NEW FIRE | | | DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS.COULD NOT LOCATE THIS COMMENT | | | AS PER YOUR RESPONSE | | | | | | 11.ELECTRONIC SWITCHES IN ADDITION TO CHAIN AND LOCK | | | IS REQUIRED FOR DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY.COULD | | | NOT LOCATE THIS COMMENT AS PER YOUR RESPONSE | | | | | | 12.KNOX BOX FOR THE BUILDING WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU AT (561) 804-4724 | | | FOR APPLICATIONS.COULD NOT LOCATE THIS COMMENT AS PER | | | YOUR RESPONSE | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE PLAN | | | EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
13:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
12:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-11 12:07:10 | ****DENIED***** | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW | | | STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | | | | 03.STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA241. | | | | | | 04.CONSTRUCTION AND/OR DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL | | | NOT INTERFERE OR HINDER EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE SAID | | | PROPERTY OR VICINITY THEREOF. | | | | | | 08.SINCE THIS WILL BE A SPRINKLERED BUILDING, PROVIDE | | | A LAYOUT OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. | | | | | | 09.FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS (FDC'S) SHALL BE | | | POSITIONED SO THAT THEY CANNOT BE BLOCKED BY STORAGE, | | | VESSELS, EQUIPMENT, ETC. | | | | | | 10.KNOX LOCKING CAPS ARE REQUIRED FOR NEW FIRE | | | DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS. | | | | | | 11.ELECTRONIC SWITCHES IN ADDITION TO CHAIN AND LOCK | | | IS REQUIRED FOR DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY. | | | | | | 12.KNOX BOX FOR THE BUILDING WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU AT (561) 804-4724 | | | FOR APPLICATIONS. | | | | | | 13.ALL FIRE DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA | | | 80. | | | | | | 14.INTERIOR FINISH FOR WALLS AND CEILING IN EXITS AND | | | EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS SHALL BE CLASS "A" OR CLASS "B". | | | | | | 16.FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ARE TO BE RATED 2A-10BC. | | | | | | 17.SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND PERMITS ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 18.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS TO BE MONITORED. | | | | | | 19.FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS TO BE CLASS A OR FULLY | | | ADDRESSABLE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE PLAN | | | EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-01-30 |
Time |
15:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-01-30 |
Time |
15:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-30 16:01:47 | ****DENIED***** | | | | | | | | | 01.THE ACTUAL ADDRESS OF WHERE THE SCOPE OF WORK IS | | | CONDUCTED SHALL BE IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF EACH PLAN | | | SHEET. | | | | | | 02.NFPA 101 - 2003 EDITION AND FLORIDA FIRE | | | PREVENTION CODE - 2004 EDITION SHALL BE REFERENCED. | | | | | | 03.STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA241. | | | | | | 04.CONSTRUCTION AND/OR DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL | | | NOT INTERFERE OR HINDER EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE SAID | | | PROPERTY OR VICINITY THEREOF. | | | | | | 05.SHOW THE LOCATION OF FIRE HYDRANT(S) WITHIN | | | 300-500 FEET OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 06.SHOW/DISPLAY THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS OF THE BUILDING | | | ON THE PROPER ELEVATION VISIBLE FROM PREMIER PARK | | | DRIVE.AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THOSE NUMBERS | | | SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND 1" IN WIDTH. | | | SUITE/UNIT/TENANT SPACE NUMBERS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN | | | 3" IN HEIGHT AND 1" IN WIDTH. | | | | | | 07.IF A MONUMENT SIGN OR MARKEE IS REQUIRED, A | | | NUMERICAL ADDRESS WILL ALSO BE POSTED.IF THERE ARE | | | GOING TO BE SEVERAL ADDRESSED BUILDINGS WITHIN THE FED | | | EX COMPLEX, A RANGE OF ADDRESSES FROM THE LOWEST TO THE | | | HIGHEST WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE MONUMENT SIGN OR | | | MARKEE. | | | | | | 08.SINCE THIS WILL BE A SPRINKLERED BUILDING, PROVIDE | | | A LAYOUT OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. | | | | | | 09.FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS (FDC'S) SHALL BE | | | POSITIONED SO THAT THEY CANNOT BE BLOCKED BY STORAGE, | | | VESSELS, EQUIPMENT, ETC. | | | | | | 10.KNOX LOCKING CAPS ARE REQUIRED FOR NEW FIRE | | | DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS. | | | | | | 11.ELECTRONIC SWITCHES IN ADDITION TO CHAIN AND LOCK | | | IS REQUIRED FOR DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY. | | | | | | 12.KNOX BOX FOR THE BUILDING WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU AT (561) 804-4724 | | | FOR APPLICATIONS. | | | | | | 13.ALL FIRE DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA | | | 80. | | | | | | 14.INTERIOR FINISH FOR WALLS AND CEILING IN EXITS AND | | | EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS SHALL BE CLASS "A" OR CLASS "B". | | | | | | 15.PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHOWING THE TRAVEL | | | DISTANCE TO AN EXIT MEASURED ON THE FLOOR OR OTHER | | | WALKING SURFACE AS PER NFPA 1017.6.1* | | | | | | 16.FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ARE TO BE RATED 2A-10BC. | | | | | | 17.SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND PERMITS ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 18.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS TO BE MONITORED. | | | | | | 19.FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS TO BE CLASS A OR FULLY | | | ADDRESSABLE. | | | | | | 20.ON SHEET FA0.3, FIRE ALARM NOTE 17, DELETE WORDING | | | " SUPERVISORY SIGNAL ONLY" AND INSERT WORDING "A | | | GENERAL FIRE ALARM". | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE EACH | | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
18 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-18 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-18 |
Time |
09:30 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-18 09:31:31 | TO "Z" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
17 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
Time |
10:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
Time |
10:24 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-26 10:24:26 | TO "P" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
16 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
Time |
08:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-21 |
Time |
08:44 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-21 08:44:52 | TO "P" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
15 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
Time |
12:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
Time |
12:28 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-09-29 12:30:29 | TO "P" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
14 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-11 14:26:25 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/2 SUBMITTALS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
Time |
10:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
Time |
10:57 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-08 10:58:04 | TO "JWITMER' DESK/RESTAMP |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
16:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
16:08 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-14 16:09:14 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-25 |
Time |
16:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-25 |
Time |
16:40 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-25 16:41:24 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-04 |
Time |
15:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-04 |
Time |
15:05 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-04 15:05:53 | TO "P" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-04 |
Time |
15:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-04 |
Time |
15:01 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-04 15:02:18 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
Time |
12:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
Time |
12:44 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-25 12:45:00 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/9 SUBMITTALS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
08:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
08:54 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-17 08:55:49 | TO "COMM" BD#1--PLANS ON RACK/LARGE FOLDED PLANS AND | | | PAPERWORK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
08:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
08:53 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-29 |
Time |
09:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-29 |
Time |
09:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-29 09:11:07 | TO "COMM" BD#57/PLANS ON RACK--ROLDED PLANS AND | | | PAPERWORK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-12-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-12-17 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-12-17 |
Time |
14:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-17 14:58:18 | TO "COMM" BD#15/PLANS ON RACK/LARGE FOLDED PLANS AND | | | PAPERWORK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-17 |
Time |
09:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-09 15:05:53 | TO "COMM" BD#56 | | 2007-09-17 09:30:55 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-18 |
Time |
13:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-18 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-06 15:26:13 | TO "COMM" BD#59 | | 2007-05-18 13:58:56 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-01-30 |
Time |
16:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2006-11-13 |
Time |
13:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-14 10:26:29 | TO "COMM" BD#56 | | 2006-11-13 13:35:02 | WAITING FOR "COMM"BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-02-19 |
Time |
09:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-02-19 |
Time |
09:32 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-12-18 |
Time |
10:46 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-12-18 |
Time |
10:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-10-12 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-12 16:43:18 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 05, 06 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) N.O.A. SUBMITTED FOR THE LOUVERS IS MISSING THE | | | ASSEMBLIES & SECTIONS (DRAWINGS), PLEASE SUBMIT THE | | | COMPLETE N.O.A. | | | | | | 2) THOSE PRODUCT APPROVALS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA | | | RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING | | | (REVIEW STAMPED) BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO | | | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.WPB AMENDMENT | | | TO FBC 106.3.3. | | | | | | 3) NOT NOTICED AT LAST REVIEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS SHOW | | | NO SKYLIGHTS, PLEASE CORRECT AS SKYLIGHTS ARE BEING | | | INSTALLED. | | | | | | 4) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SIGNED BY OWNER/AGENT | | | ALSO, PER 2004 FBC 13-600.3.ABC.2. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-07-24 |
Time |
08:50 |
Rev Time |
0.35 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-07-24 |
Time |
08:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-24 09:11:26 | *** FOR PERMIT *** | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO SHOW ALL ASSUMED A/C | | | SYSTEMS FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION 2004 FBC 13-101.1.6 | | | SHELL BUILDINGS. | | | NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS THAT ARE PERMITTED PRIOR TO | | | DESIGN COMPLETION OR WHICH WILL BE FINISHED IN SECTIONS | | | AT A TIME AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF THE SHELL SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH EITHER METHOD B OR C OF SUBCHAPTER 13-4 OF THE | | | CODE PRIOR TO GRANTING OF A PERMIT TO BUILD. ALL | | | ASSUMPTIONS MADE ABOUT FEATURES NOT INSTALLED UNTIL | | | LATER THAT ARE NOT ON THE BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE | | | LISTED AND APPENDED TO THE COMPLIANCE FORM SUBMITTED TO | | | THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. UNLESS THE BUILDING IS | | | COMPLETED AS PER ALL ASSUMPTIONS MADE IN THE ORIGINAL | | | CODE COMPLIANCE SUBMITTAL, A REVISED CODE SUBMITTAL(S) | | | USING METHODS A, B OR C SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN | | | COMPLETION OF THE BUILDING (OR PART OF THE BUILDING) IS | | | PERMITTED. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SUBMIT COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR FUTURE | | | INSTALLATION, SEE 2004 FBC/M 13-407.1.ABC.1. | | | | | | 3) AS REQUESTED IN LAST REVIEW, PLEASE SUBMIT STATE | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS OR NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR LOUVERS | | | TO BE INSTALLED (NOT JUST MANUFACTURER'S | | | SPECIFICATION'S). | | | | | | 4) SEE BUILDING REVIEW NOTES 8 AND 9, ALSO ELECTRICAL | | | REVIEW NOTE 1, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-01-26 |
Time |
11:02 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-01-26 |
Time |
11:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-26 11:02:47 | **FOR PLAN REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR PERMIT ** | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) JOB ADDRESS MUST APPEAR IN TITLE BLOCK | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR LOUVERS. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lwagner |
Date |
2009-01-07 |
Time |
13:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lwagner |
Date |
2009-01-07 |
Time |
13:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-07 13:51:13 | REVISION OK | | | | | | SHEETS : P0.1, P2.31A, P2.31B, P2.31C, P2.31D, P3.3.1A, | | | P3.3.1B, P5.1 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
|
Date |
2008-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
09:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-19 |
Time |
16:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-22 09:44:08 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | | | | 1. SHT P2.31 THIS SHEET ON FILE FOR PUBLIC RECORD | | | SIGNED, SEALED & DATED 06/02/08 HAS IN THE REVISION | | | INDEX REVISION 8 (03/26/08) & REVISION 9 (03-28-08). | | | THE NEW SHEET SUBMITTED FOR REVISION SIGNED, SEALED & | | | DATED 11-17-08 HAS DELETED REVISIONS 8 & 9 AND ONLY | | | SHOWS NEW REVISION NUMBER 12. ALL REVISIONS SHALL BE | | | MAINTAINED IN THE REVISION INDEX FOR THE LIFE OF THE | | | PROJECT. SECTION 106.1.3. ALL NEW REVISIONS SHALL BE | | | CLOUDED & INDICATED WITH A NEW REVISION NUMBER. SOME | | | REVISIONS ARE NOT CLOUDED NOR INDICATED WITH A REVISION | | | NUMBER. | | | FBC-2004 SECTION 106.1.2 QUALITY OF PLANS: | | | BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH | | | SCALE UPON SUBSTANTIAL PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE | | | MEDIUM. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH | | | DEPARTMENTAL POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND | | | SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CONFORMITY TO ITS | | | RECORD RETENTION PROGRAM. THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH | | | THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE, SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR | | | OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT. | | | | | | 2. SHT P3.1.1 THIS SHEET ON FILE FOR PUBLIC RECORD | | | SIGNED, SEALED & DATED 06/02/08 HAS IN THE REVISION | | | INDEX REVISION 8 (02-20-08), REVISION 9 (03-28-08), & | | | REVISION 10 (05-21-08). THE NEW SHEET SUBMITTED FOR | | | REVISION SIGNED, SEALED & DATED 11-17-08 HAS DELETED | | | REVISIONS 3, 7, 8, & 9 AND NOW HAS NO REVISIONS SHOWN | | | IN THE REVISION INDEX. ALL REVISIONS SHALL BE | | | MAINTAINED IN THE REVISION INDEX FOR THE LIFE OF THE | | | PROJECT. SECTION 106.1.3. ALL NEW REVISIONS SHALL BE | | | CLOUDED & INDICATED WITH A NEW REVISION NUMBER. NO | | | CHANGES WERE SEEN FROM THE PREVIOUS REVISION. IF NO | | | CHANGES THE SHEET SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REVISION. IF THERE ARE NEW REVISIONS THEN ALL | | | REVISIONS SHALL BE CLOUDED AND INDICATED WITH A NEW | | | REVISION NUMBER. | | | FBC-2004 SECTION 106.1.2 QUALITY OF PLANS: | | | BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH | | | SCALE UPON SUBSTANTIAL PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE | | | MEDIUM. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH | | | DEPARTMENTAL POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND | | | SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CONFORMITY TO ITS | | | RECORD RETENTION PROGRAM. THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH | | | THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE, SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR | | | OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT. | | | | | | 3. SHT P5.1 THIS SHEET ON FILE FOR PUBLIC RECORD | | | SIGNED, SEALED & DATED 06/02/08 HAS IN THE REVISION | | | INDEX REVISION 4 (08-15-07), REVISION 8 (02-20-08), | | | REVISION 9 (03-28-08) & REVISION 10 (05-21-08). THE NEW | | | SHEET SUBMITTED FOR REVISION SIGNED, SEALED & DATED | | | 11-17-08 HAS DELETED REVISIONS 4, 8, 9 & 10 AND ONLY | | | SHOWS NEW REVISION NUMBER 12. ALL REVISIONS SHALL BE | | | MAINTAINED IN THE REVISION INDEX FOR THE LIFE OF THE | | | PLANS. SECTION 106.1.3. ALL NEW REVISIONS SHALL BE | | | CLOUDED & INDICATED WITH A NEW REVISION NUMBER. SOME | | | REVISIONS ARE NOT CLOUDED NOR INDICATED WITH A REVISION | | | NUMBER. | | | FBC-2004 SECTION 106.1.2 QUALITY OF PLANS: | | | BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH | | | SCALE UPON SUBSTANTIAL PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE | | | MEDIUM. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH | | | DEPARTMENTAL POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND | | | SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CONFORMITY TO ITS | | | RECORD RETENTION PROGRAM. THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH | | | THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE, SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR | | | OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
07:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
07:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-08 08:04:58 | REVISIONS DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | 1. SHT P2.31 A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL SIGN HIS | | | NAME PER FAC 61G15-23.002(1). INITIALS HAVE BEEN USED. | | | PLEASE USE THE SIGNATURE REQUIRED. FS 471.025. | | | | | | 2. SHT P2.31 SHOWS A HOSE BIBB IN THE METER ROOM. NO | | | FLOOR DRAIN IS INDICATED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 301.2 WHICH STATES THAT PLUMBING SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED WITH DUE REGARD TO PRESERVATION OF THE | | | STRENGTH OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AND PREVENTION OF DAMAGE | | | TO WALLS AND OTHER SURFACES THROUGH FIXTURE USEAGE. | | | | | | 3. SHT P2.31 SHOWS THE 3" VTR BEING CHANGED TO AN AIR | | | ADMITTANCE VALVE. SECTION 903.1 REQUIRES AT LEAST ONE | | | VENT STACK THE SIZE OF WHICH IS NOT LESS THAN 1/2 OF | | | THE REQUIRED SIZE OF THE BUILDING DRAIN TO RUN | | | UNDIMINISHED IN SIZE AND DIRECTLY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE | | | BUILDING DRAIN THROUGH TO THE OPEN AIR OR TO A VENT | | | HEADER THAT EXTENDS TO THE OPEN AIR. PLEASE INDICATE | | | HOW THIS WILL BE COMPLIED WITH. | | | | | | 4. SHT P2.31 INDICATES A REVISION #10 ON THE FLOOR | | | PLAN. REVISION #10 IS NOT INDICATED ON THE REVISION | | | INDEX IN THE TITLE BLOCK. PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTION | | | 106.1.3. | | | | | | 5. SHT P3.1.1 A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL SIGN HIS | | | NAME PER FAC 61G15-23.002(1). INITIALS HAVE BEEN USED. | | | PLEASE USE THE SIGNATURE REQUIRED. FS 471.025. | | | | | | 6. SHT P3.1.1 LATEST REVISION SUBMITTED IS REVISION | | | #10. REVISION #10 WAS SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY AND WAS | | | SIGNED, SEALED & DATED ON 6-2-08. SHEET HAS BEEN DENIED | | | BECAUSE NO NEW REVISION IS INDICATED. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | 7. SHT P5.1 A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL SIGN HIS NAME | | | PER FAC 61G15-23.002(1). INITIALS HAVE BEEN USED. | | | PLEASE USE THE SIGNATURE REQUIRED. FS 471.025. | | | | | | 8. SHT P5.1 SHOWS A HOSE BIBB IN THE METER ROOM. NO | | | FLOOR DRAIN IS INDICATED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 301.2 WHICH STATES THAT PLUMBING SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED WITH DUE REGARD TO PRESERVATION OF THE | | | STRENGTH OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AND PREVENTION OF DAMAGE | | | TO WALLS AND OTHER SURFACES THROUGH FIXTURE USEAGE. | | | | | | 9. SHT P5.1 SHOWS THE 3" VTR BEING CHANGED TO AN AIR | | | ADMITTANCE VALVE. SECTION 903.1 REQUIRES AT LEAST ONE | | | VENT STACK THE SIZE OF WHICH IS NOT LESS THAN 1/2 OF | | | THE REQUIRED SIZE OF THE BUILDING DRAIN TO RUN | | | UNDIMINISHED IN SIZE AND DIRECTLY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE | | | BUILDING DRAIN THROUGH TO THE OPEN AIR OR TO A VENT | | | HEADER THAT EXTENDS TO THE OPEN AIR. PLEASE INDICATE | | | HOW THIS WILL BE COMPLIED WITH. | | | | | | 10. INFORMATIONAL. AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED, WHEN | | | SUBMITTING REVISIONS, PLEASE TURN OFF ALL PREVIOUSLY | | | CLOUDED REVISIONS ON THE FLOOR PLANS & RISERS AS WELL | | | AS THE REVISION NUMBERS AS THIS CAUSES DELAYS IN THE | | | PLAN REVIEW PROCESS. EACH CLOUD HAS TO BE SCRUTINIZED | | | IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE ALL REVISIONS SUBMITTED HAVE BEEN | | | REVIEWED. THE REVISION INDEX SHALL STILL SHOW ALL | | | REVISION NUMBERS AND DATES. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-11 10:53:50 | REVISIONS OK--SHTS P0.1, P2.3.1, P3.3.1 & P5.1 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-11-10 |
Time |
08:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-11-10 |
Time |
08:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
17:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
17:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-18 17:37:58 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. OK - SHELL INDICATED ON APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. SHT A-5 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS & TABLES. IN THE CALCULATIONS SHOW 1/2 AREA | | | OF ALL VERTICAL WALLS INCLUDING PARAPETS. THESE | | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE LOWER ROOFS ALSO. | | | INDICATE THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE ROOF, HIGH END AND LOW | | | END, TO VERIFY PARAPET WALL CONTRIBUTION. | | | ****NO RESPONSE/NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 3. SHTS A-5 & P3.3.1. WITH THE SLOPE OF THE ROOF AS | | | INDICATED ON SHT A-5, EXPLAIN HOW ALL ROOF DRAINS SHOW | | | THE SAME SQUARE FOOTAGE, (18930SF), DRAINING THROUGH | | | EACH DRAIN. ALSO THE ROOF DRAINS ON THE END AREAS OF | | | THE BUILDING HAVE EXTRA PARAPET WALL SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | THAT DOES NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE INTERNAL SECTIONS OF | | | THE ROOF. | | | ****NO RESPONSE/NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 4. SHT A-8 DETAILS 1/A-8 & 3/A-8 BOTH SCALE OUT TO | | | APPROXAMATELY 2'9" FROM THE ROOF TO THE TOP OF THE | | | PARAPET. PLEASE CLARIFY AS THE ROOF PLAN INDICATES | | | 1/4"/FT SLOPE @ 150' AND THE PARAPET ON THE LOW END | | | SHOULD BE APPROXAMATLY 4' HIGHER WITH BOTH PARAPETS | | | BEING 33'-0" AFF. | | | ****NO RESPONSE/NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 5. SUBMIT STORM RISER DIAGRAMS SHOWING ALL PIPE SIZES & | | | OFFSETS. SECTION 106.3.5.1.3.ARE THE RISER DIAGRAMS | | | TO BE PIPED TO THE CATCH BASINS INDIVIDUALLY, OR TO BE | | | TIED TOGETHER PRIOR TO THE CATCH BASINS? IF TIED | | | TOGETHER, SIZING SHALL BE PER TABLE 1106.3. | | | ****NO RESPONSE/NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 6. NO INDICATION OF VENTING IS SHOWN. PLEASE INDICATE | | | IF VENTS RUN THRU THE ROOF WILL BE INSTALLED UNDER THE | | | SHELL PERMIT, OR WITH THE TENANT BUILDOUT | | | PERMIT/PERMITS. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | ****NO RESPONSE/NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 7. SHT P5.1 AN RPZV BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED ON THE WATER | | | SERVICE OF THE BUILDING. SECTION 608.13.2. PLEASE | | | INDICATE ON THE WATER RISER DIAGRAM OR THE PLUMBING | | | FLOOR PLAN. | | | ****NO RESPONSE/NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-01-16 |
Time |
16:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-01-16 |
Time |
16:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-16 16:19:25 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. SHT A-4 INDICATES NO PLUMBING FIXTURES. THE PLANS DO | | | NOT INDICATE THAT THIS WILL BE A SHELL PERMIT ONLY, NOR | | | IS IT INDICATED IN ANY DESCRIPTION OF WORK ON THE | | | SUBMITTAL SHEET OR THE PERMIT APPLICATION. SINCE THIS | | | IS A PLAN REVIEW ONLY, I WILL ASSUME THAT IT IS A SHELL | | | ONLY AND REVIEW IT AS SUCH. ALL MINIMUM FACILITIES WILL | | | BE REQUIRED AT TENANT BUILDOUT. TABLES 1004.1.2 & | | | 403.1. PLEASE INDICATE IF THIS IS INCORRECT. | | | | | | 2. SHT A-5 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS & TABLES. IN THE CALCULATIONS SHOW 1/2 AREA | | | OF ALL VERTICAL WALLS INCLUDING PARAPETS. THESE | | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE LOWER ROOFS ALSO. | | | INDICATE THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE ROOF, HIGH END AND LOW | | | END, TO VERIFY PARAPET WALL CONTRIBUTION. | | | | | | 3. SHTS A-5 & P3.3.1. WITH THE SLOPE OF THE ROOF AS | | | INDICATED ON SHT A-5, EXPLAIN HOW ALL ROOF DRAINS SHOW | | | THE SAME SQUARE FOOTAGE, (18930SF), DRAINING THROUGH | | | EACH DRAIN. ALSO THE ROOF DRAINS ON THE END AREAS OF | | | THE BUILDING HAVE EXTRA PARAPET WALL SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | THAT DOES NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE INTERNAL SECTIONS OF | | | THE ROOF. | | | | | | 4. SHT A-8 DETAILS 1/A-8 & 3/A-8 BOTH SCALE OUT TO | | | APPROXAMATELY 2'9" FROM THE ROOF TO THE TOP OF THE | | | PARAPET. PLEASE CLARIFY AS THE ROOF PLAN INDICATES | | | 1/4"/FT SLOPE @ 150' AND THE PARAPET ON THE LOW END | | | SHOULD BE APPROXAMATLY 4' HIGHER WITH BOTH PARAPETS | | | BEING 33'-0" AFF. | | | | | | 5. SUBMIT STORM RISER DIAGRAMS SHOWING ALL PIPE SIZES & | | | OFFSETS. SECTION 106.3.5.1.3.ARE THE RISER DIAGRAMS | | | TO BE PIPED TO THE CATCH BASINS INDIVIDUALLY, OR TO BE | | | TIED TOGETHER PRIOR TO THE CATCH BASINS? IF TIED | | | TOGETHER, SIZING SHALL BE PER TABLE 1106.3. | | | | | | 6. NO INDICATION OF VENTING IS SHOWN. PLEASE INDICATE | | | IF VENTS RUN THRU THE ROOF WILL BE INSTALLED UNDER THE | | | SHELL PERMIT, OR WITH THE TENANT BUILDOUT | | | PERMIT/PERMITS. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 7. SHT P5.1 AN RPZV BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED ON THE WATER | | | SERVICE OF THE BUILDING. SECTION 608.13.2. PLEASE | | | INDICATE ON THE WATER RISER DIAGRAM OR THE PLUMBING | | | FLOOR PLAN. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-03-19 |
Time |
15:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-03-19 |
Time |
15:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-19 15:31:48 | SIGNS SHALL BE APPROVED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
Time |
12:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
Time |
12:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-20 12:49:48 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT - SITE/CIVIL PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS ALONG THE WESTERN ROW OF PARKING - | | | DIFFERENT PLACEMENT OF LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-01-03 |
Time |
18:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-01-03 |
Time |
18:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-03 18:36:24 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2) CORRECTED | | | | | | 3) CORRECTED | | | | | | 3) CORRECTED | | | | | | 4) SHEET A1 SHALL SHOW ALL OF THE LATEST APPROVED | | | REVISIONS TO THE OVERALL SITE PLAN.STAFF HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED THE LATEST SITE PLAN FOR MINOR AMENDMENT | | | APPROVAL. (REPEAT COMMENT) | | | | | | 5) CORRECTED | | | | | | 6) CORRECTED | | | | | | 7) CORRECTED | | | | | | 8)CORRECTED | | | | | | 9) CORRECTED | | | | | | 10) CORRECTED | | | | | | 11) CORRECTED | | | | | | 12) CORRECTED | | | | | | 13) NOT ALL CONDITIONS OF ORD. NO. 3987-06 HAVE BEEN | | | MET - REPEAT COMMENT.VERIFICATION FROM PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO RELEASE THE TRAFFIC | | | CONDITIONS.THE USE TABLE ITEMS HAVE NOT BEEN | | | SUBMITTED.NEW - PER THE ORDINANCE, A MINOR AMENDMENT | | | IS REQUIRED TO ACCEPT THE NEW COUNTY TRAFFIC LETTER | | | ISSUED ON OCTOBER 28, 2007.STAFF NEEDS TO MEET WITH | | | YOU TRAFFIC CONSULTANT TO ADDRESS THE ITEMS BELOW. | | | | | | A. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL POST SURETY IN THE AMOUNT | | | OF ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($150,000.00) | | | WITHIN TWELVE (12) MONTHS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER | | | (DUE BY OCTOBER 10, 2007) IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE | | | COUNTY ATTORNEY TO ASSURE THE INSTALLATION OF THE | | | TRAFFIC SIGNAL WHEN WARRANTED.NO PROOF THIS IS | | | COMPLETED OR NO LONGER REQUIRED HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. | | | | | | B. AT SUCH TIME AS THE PROPERTY OWNER COMPLETES THE | | | DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE PROJECT, THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL | | | NOTIFY THE COUNTY'S ROADWAY PRODUCTION DIVISION IF THE | | | PROJECT HAS ANY EXCESS STORMWATER RETENTION CAPACITY | | | THAT CAN BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY FOR THE | | | WIDENING OF 45TH STREET FROM TWO (2) LANES TO FOUR (4) | | | LANES FROM HAVERHILL ROAD TO THE FLORIDA TURNPIKE.IF | | | THERE IS EXCESS CAPACITY AVAILABLE, THE PROPERTY OWNER | | | SHALL MAKE THAT CAPACITY AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY | | | THROUGH THE DEDICATION OF A TWENTY FOOT (20') DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENT FROM THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE ULTIMATE | | | OUTFALL.THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT SHALL COVER THE ENTIRE | | | POND. NO PROOF THIS IS COMPLETED OR NO LONGER REQUIRED | | | HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. | | | | | | C. NO MORE THAN 1,146 NEW DAILY TRIPS MAY BE PERMITTED | | | UNTIL CONTRACT IS LET FOR WIDENING OF HAVERHILL ROAD TO | | | FIVE (5) LANES, FROM 45TH STREET TO CARIBBEAN | | | BOULEVARD. PROVIDE PROOF THAT THIS HAS BEEN RELEASED. | | | | | | D. NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE | | | THAT 85 NEW EXTERNAL PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO | | | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE FOUR (4) LANING OF | | | HAVERHILL ROAD, FROM BEELINE HIGHWAY TO 45TH STREET. | | | PROVIDE PROOF THAT THIS HAS BEEN RELEASED. | | | | | | E.NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE | | | THAT 103 NEW EXTERNAL PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO | | | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS | | | AT THE INTERSECTION OF HAVERHILL ROAD AND ROEBUCK ROAD: | | | PROVIDE PROOF THAT THESE HAVE BEEN RELEASED. | | | | | | 1. ADDITION OF A SECOND EXCLUSIVE NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN | | | LANE. | | | | | | 2. ADDITION OF A SECOND EXCLUSIVE EASTBOUND LEFT TURN | | | LANE. | | | | | | 3. RECONFIGURE THE WESTBOUND APPROACH TO PROVIDE ONE | | | EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANE, TWO THROUGH LANES AND ONE | | | EXCLUSIVE RIGHT-TURN LANE. | | | | | | F. NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE | | | THAN 261 NEW EXTERNAL AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO THE | | | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE ADDITION OF A SECOND | | | NORTHBOUND THROUGH LANE AT THE INTERSECTION OF | | | HAVERHILL ROAD AND 45TH STREET.NEW - THE LATEST | | | TRAFFIC LETTER APPROVES 272 AM TRIPS, YET THE MOST | | | RECENT TRAFFIC STATEMENT STATES THERE ARE 274 TRIP | | | ASSOCIATED WITH THE FEDEXS AND BLDGS 1 & 3. | | | | | | G. WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE | | | DEVELOPMENT ORDER (DUE BY APRIL 10, 2007), THE | | | DEVELOPER MUST ENTER INTO A PUBLIC FACILITIES AGREEMENT | | | (PFA) WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY TO FUND AND/OR TO | | | CONSTRUCT ANY AND ALL IMPROVEMENTS AS THE TERM IS | | | DEFINED BY THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ORDINANCE. | | | THE PFA MUST BE IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE COUNTY | | | ENGINEER.THE CITY SHALL NOT ISSUE ANY BUILDING | | | PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT UNLESS AND UNTIL | | | THE PFA HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY | | | COMMISSIONERS.NEW - THE PROPORTIONATE FAIR SHARE | | | AGREEMENT WAS PROVIDED, IS THIS THE SAME AS THE PFA? | | | | | | H. CORRECTED | | | | | | I. A TRAFFIC STATEMENT, PREPARED BY A LICENSED TRAFFIC | | | ENGINEER, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENTS CONCURRENT WITH | | | ALL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS OUTLINING THE NUMBER | | | OF DAILY TRIPS, AM TRIPS AND PM TRIPS GENERATED FOR | | | EACH USE AND ITS SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH BUILDING.THE | | | TRAFFIC STATEMENT SHALL INCLUDE THE TRIPS ASSOCIATED | | | WITH THE SPECIFIC USE AND A CUMULATIVE TABLE FOR ALL OF | | | THE USES APPROVED IN THE PREMIER PARK OF COMMERCE CPD | | | PARTIALLY ADDRESSED - COMBINE LETTER FROM FEDEXS AND | | | BLDGS 1 & 3. | | | | | | 14) NEW - SITE/CIVIL PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS ALONG THE WESTERN ROW OF PARKING BASED ON | | | REVISIONS MADE SINCE LAST REVIEW. | | | | | | 15) NEW - THE PARKING COUNT ON THE FRONT SHEET DOES NOT | | | MATCH THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-10-30 |
Time |
15:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-10-18 |
Time |
21:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-18 21:25:59 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2) ADA PARKING DETAILS DO NOT MEET CITY CODE (SHEET A3) | | | - REPEAT COMMENT.THE DETAIL ON THE BOWYER SINGLETON | | | PLANS SHEET 13 OF 29 IS CORRECT AND SHOULD BE USED. | | | WHEEL STOPS AND HC SYMBOL LOCATIONS NEED CORRECTING ON | | | A3. | | | | | | 3) THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE LONE DUMPSTER IN THE | | | LOADING AREA IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEET A2 - REPEAT | | | COMMENT. | | | | | | 3) THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3987-06 AND | | | SHOWN ON SHEET A6 DO NOT MATCH SECTIONS SHOWN ON SHEETS | | | A8 AND A14 - PARTIAL REPEAT COMMENT. | | | | | | A. USE ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ON SHEETS A6 AND A7. | | | | | | B. SHEET A8 SHOWS REVELS AT DIFFERENT SIZES THAN CALLED | | | OUT ON SHEET A6 (4 INCH VS. 6 INCH). | | | | | | C. SHEET A8 (SECTION 4/A-8) DOES NOT SHOW THE MOLDING | | | IN LINE WITH THE TOP OF THE BAHAMA SHUTTERS OR THE | | | BAHAMA SHUTTERS THEMSELVES. | | | | | | D. SHEET A14 (SECTION DETAIL 3/A14) DOES NOT SHOW THE | | | HORIZONTAL SCORE LINE THROUGH THE SQUARES AS THE | | | ELEVATION SHOWN ON A6 DOES. | | | | | | E. WHERE ARE THE BAHAMA SHUTTER DETAILS. | | | | | | 4) SHEET A1 AND A2 SHALL SHOW ALL OF THE LATEST | | | APPROVED REVISIONS TO THE SITE PLANS. | | | | | | 5) D-CURBS OR WHEEL STOPS ARE REQUIRED ALONG ALL | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS.THE PLANS SHALL CALL OUT ALL CURBING | | | AS SUCH. | | | | | | 6) A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS REQUIRED.THE ILLUMINATION | | | SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT CANDLE AT THE BOUNDARY OF THE | | | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 7) THE SOUTHEAST MOST LIGHT POLE IS NOT SHOWN IN THE | | | SAME LOCATION ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 8)MOST OF THE LIGHT POLES ARE WITHIN 5 FEET OF LIVE | | | OAKS OR OTHER TREES.THE TREES OR THE LOCATION OF THE | | | LIGHT POLES SHALL BE ADJUSTED SO THAT TREES TO NOT GROW | | | INTO THE LIGHT POLES, MAKING THEM INEFFECTIVE. | | | | | | 9) THE TWO SOUTHERNMOST CATCH BASINS ON THE EAST | | | PROPERTY LINE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SUPPORT A WHEEL STOP | | | AND THUS THERE WILL BE INADEQUATE PROTECTION OF THE | | | TREES SHOWN AT THE HEAD OF THE SPACE.THE TREES SHALL | | | BE MOVED FROM DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE SPACE (NOTE THAT | | | THE COMBINATION OF THE LIGHT POLE AND CATCH BASIN | | | LOCATIONS MAY REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF A TREE AND | | | RELOCATION OF ANOTHER SO THE REMAINING TREE WILL AVOID | | | OBSTACLES AND HAVE ROOM TO GROW). | | | | | | 10) SOME OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS CONFLICT WITH THE TREE | | | PLACEMENT. | | | | | | 11) THE NEW SIGN SHOWN ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE | | | SITE HAS NEVER APPEARED ON ANY PREVIOUS PLAN.A SIGN | | | AT THIS LOCATION REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR | | | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT.NOTE THAT IT SHALL BE 5 | | | FEET FROM THE PREMIER PARK DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND | | | 24 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE OF BUILDING #2.THE | | | SIGN LOCATION ALSO INTERFERES WITH THE APPROVED | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS AND IS NOT SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS. | | | | | | 12) NO BUILDING PERMITS WILL BE ISSUED FOR BUILDING #3 | | | UNTIL UNTIL THE DEVELOPER FINALIZES THE PROPORTIONATE | | | SHARE AGREEMENTS WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY. | | | | | | 13) NOT ALL CONDITIONS OF ORD. NO. 3987-06 HAVE BEEN | | | MET - REPEAT COMMENT.VERIFICATION FROM PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO RELEASE THE TRAFFIC | | | CONDITIONS.THE USE TABLE ITEMS HAVE NOT BEEN | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | A. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL POST SURETY IN THE AMOUNT | | | OF ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($150,000.00) | | | WITHIN TWELVE (12) MONTHS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER | | | (DUE BY OCTOBER 10, 2007) IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE | | | COUNTY ATTORNEY TO ASSURE THE INSTALLATION OF THE | | | TRAFFIC SIGNAL WHEN WARRANTED. | | | | | | B. AT SUCH TIME AS THE PROPERTY OWNER COMPLETES THE | | | DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE PROJECT, THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL | | | NOTIFY THE COUNTY'S ROADWAY PRODUCTION DIVISION IF THE | | | PROJECT HAS ANY EXCESS STORMWATER RETENTION CAPACITY | | | THAT CAN BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY FOR THE | | | WIDENING OF 45TH STREET FROM TWO (2) LANES TO FOUR (4) | | | LANES FROM HAVERHILL ROAD TO THE FLORIDA TURNPIKE.IF | | | THERE IS EXCESS CAPACITY AVAILABLE, THE PROPERTY OWNER | | | SHALL MAKE THAT CAPACITY AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY | | | THROUGH THE DEDICATION OF A TWENTY FOOT (20') DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENT FROM THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE ULTIMATE | | | OUTFALL.THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT SHALL COVER THE ENTIRE | | | POND. | | | | | | C. NO MORE THAN 1,146 NEW DAILY TRIPS MAY BE PERMITTED | | | UNTIL CONTRACT IS LET FOR WIDENING OF HAVERHILL ROAD TO | | | FIVE (5) LANES, FROM 45TH STREET TO CARIBBEAN | | | BOULEVARD. | | | | | | D. NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE | | | THAT 85 NEW EXTERNAL PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO | | | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE FOUR (4) LANING OF | | | HAVERHILL ROAD, FROM BEELINE HIGHWAY TO 45TH STREET. | | | | | | E.NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE | | | THAT 103 NEW EXTERNAL PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO | | | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS | | | AT THE INTERSECTION OF HAVERHILL ROAD AND ROEBUCK | | | ROAD: | | | | | | 1. ADDITION OF A SECOND EXCLUSIVE NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN | | | LANE. | | | | | | 2. ADDITION OF A SECOND EXCLUSIVE EASTBOUND LEFT TURN | | | LANE. | | | | | | 3. RECONFIGURE THE WESTBOUND APPROACH TO PROVIDE ONE | | | EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANE, TWO THROUGH LANES AND ONE | | | EXCLUSIVE RIGHT-TURN LANE. | | | | | | F. NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE | | | THAN 261 NEW EXTERNAL AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO THE | | | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE ADDITION OF A SECOND | | | NORTHBOUND THROUGH LANE AT THE INTERSECTION OF | | | HAVERHILL ROAD AND 45TH STREET. | | | | | | G. WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE | | | DEVELOPMENT ORDER (DUE BY APRIL 10, 2007), THE | | | DEVELOPER MUST ENTER INTO A PUBLIC FACILITIES AGREEMENT | | | (PFA) WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY TO FUND AND/OR TO | | | CONSTRUCT ANY AND ALL IMPROVEMENTS AS THE TERM IS | | | DEFINED BY THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ORDINANCE. | | | THE PFA MUST BE IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE COUNTY | | | ENGINEER.THE CITY SHALL NOT ISSUE ANY BUILDING | | | PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT UNLESS AND UNTIL | | | THE PFA HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY | | | COMMISSIONERS. | | | | | | H. A USE CHART SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND | | | ZONING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENTS CONCURRENT | | | WITH ALL BUILDING PERMIT AND/OR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE | | | APPLICATIONS STATING THE SQUARE FOOTAGE DEVOTED TO THE | | | USES WITHIN BUILDINGS 1, 2 AND 3.THE SPECIFIC SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE USE WITHIN EACH BUILDING MAY NOT EXCEED THE | | | ALLOWANCES OUTLINED IN THE BUILDING USE SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | TABLE (EXHIBIT F), UNLESS THE PROPERTY OWNER PROVIDES A | | | TRAFFIC EQUIVALENCY STATEMENT, PREPARED BY A LICENSED | | | TRAFFIC ENGINEER, DEMONSTRATING THAT THE APPROVED | | | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY FOR THE PROJECT IS NOT EXCEEDED. | | | | | | I. A TRAFFIC STATEMENT, PREPARED BY A LICENSED TRAFFIC | | | ENGINEER, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENTS CONCURRENT WITH | | | ALL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS OUTLINING THE NUMBER | | | OF DAILY TRIPS, AM TRIPS AND PM TRIPS GENERATED FOR | | | EACH USE AND ITS SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH BUILDING.THE | | | TRAFFIC STATEMENT SHALL INCLUDE THE TRIPS ASSOCIATED | | | WITH THE SPECIFIC USE AND A CUMULATIVE TABLE FOR ALL OF | | | THE USES APPROVED IN THE PREMIER PARK OF COMMERCE CPD. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
16:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
16:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-08 16:10:21 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2) DUMPSTER AND ADA PARKING DETAILS DO NOT MEET CITY | | | CODE (SHEET A3) - REPEAT COMMENT. | | | | | | 3) WHERE IS THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE LONE DUMPSTER | | | BEHIND THE BUILDING - REPEAT COMMENT. | | | | | | 4) THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT MATCH THOSE APPROVED BY | | | ORDINANCE NO. 3987-06. | | | | | | 5) SIGNS ARE TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | 6) WHERE IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN? | | | | | | 7) THE 12 FOOT EASEMENT ALONG THE 45TH STREET FRONTAGE | | | IS TO BE FOR FUTURE ROAD WIDENING, NOT UTILITY PURPOSES | | | AS STATED ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 8) NOT ALL CONDITIONS OF ORD. NO. 3987-06 HAVE BEEN | | | MET: | | | | | | A) THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL POST SURETY IN THE AMOUNT | | | OF ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($150,000.00) | | | WITHIN TWELVE (12) MONTHS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER | | | (DUE BY OCTOBER 10, 2007) IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE | | | COUNTY ATTORNEY TO ASSURE THE INSTALLATION OF THE | | | TRAFFIC SIGNAL WHEN WARRANTED. | | | | | | B) AT SUCH TIME AS THE PROPERTY OWNER COMPLETES THE | | | DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE PROJECT, THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL | | | NOTIFY THE COUNTY?S ROADWAY PRODUCTION DIVISION IF THE | | | PROJECT HAS ANY EXCESS STORMWATER RETENTION CAPACITY | | | THAT CAN BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY FOR THE | | | WIDENING OF 45TH STREET FROM TWO (2) LANES TO FOUR (4) | | | LANES FROM HAVERHILL ROAD TO THE FLORIDA TURNPIKE.IF | | | THERE IS EXCESS CAPACITY AVAILABLE, THE PROPERTY OWNER | | | SHALL MAKE THAT CAPACITY AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY | | | THROUGH THE DEDICATION OF A TWENTY FOOT (20?) DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENT FROM THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE ULTIMATE | | | OUTFALL.THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT SHALL COVER THE ENTIRE | | | POND. | | | | | | C) NO MORE THAN 1,146 NEW DAILY TRIPS MAY BE PERMITTED | | | UNTIL CONTRACT IS LET FOR WIDENING OF HAVERHILL ROAD TO | | | FIVE (5) LANES, FROM 45TH STREET TO CARIBBEAN | | | BOULEVARD. | | | | | | D) NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE | | | THAT 85 NEW EXTERNAL PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO | | | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE FOUR (4) LANING OF | | | HAVERHILL ROAD, FROM BEELINE HIGHWAY TO 45TH STREET. | | | | | | E) NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE | | | THAT 103 NEW EXTERNAL PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO | | | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS | | | AT THE INTERSECTION OF HAVERHILL ROAD AND ROEBUCK | | | ROAD: | | | | | | 1. ADDITION OF A SECOND EXCLUSIVE NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN | | | LANE. | | | | | | 2. ADDITION OF A SECOND EXCLUSIVE EASTBOUND LEFT TURN | | | LANE. | | | | | | 3. RECONFIGURE THE WESTBOUND APPROACH TO PROVIDE ONE | | | EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANE, TWO THROUGH LANES AND ONE | | | EXCLUSIVE RIGHT-TURN LANE. | | | | | | F) NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE | | | THAN 261 NEW EXTERNAL AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO THE | | | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE ADDITION OF A SECOND | | | NORTHBOUND THROUGH LANE AT THE INTERSECTION OF | | | HAVERHILL ROAD AND 45TH STREET. | | | | | | G) WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE | | | DEVELOPMENT ORDER (DUE BY APRIL 10, 2007), THE | | | DEVELOPER MUST ENTER INTO A PUBLIC FACILITIES AGREEMENT | | | (PFA) WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY TO FUND AND/OR TO | | | CONSTRUCT ANY AND ALL IMPROVEMENTS AS THE TERM IS | | | DEFINED BY THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ORDINANCE. | | | THE PFA MUST BE IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE COUNTY | | | ENGINEER.THE CITY SHALL NOT ISSUE ANY BUILDING | | | PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT UNLESS AND UNTIL | | | THE PFA HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY | | | COMMISSIONERS. | | | | | | H)A USE CHART SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND | | | ZONING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENTS CONCURRENT | | | WITH ALL BUILDING PERMIT AND/OR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE | | | APPLICATIONS STATING THE SQUARE FOOTAGE DEVOTED TO THE | | | USES WITHIN BUILDINGS 1, 2 AND 3.THE SPECIFIC SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE USE WITHIN EACH BUILDING MAY NOT EXCEED THE | | | ALLOWANCES OUTLINED IN THE BUILDING USE SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | TABLE (EXHIBIT F), UNLESS THE PROPERTY OWNER PROVIDES A | | | TRAFFIC EQUIVALENCY STATEMENT, PREPARED BY A LICENSED | | | TRAFFIC ENGINEER, DEMONSTRATING THAT THE APPROVED | | | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY FOR THE PROJECT IS NOT EXCEEDED. | | | | | | I)A TRAFFIC STATEMENT, PREPARED BY A LICENSED TRAFFIC | | | ENGINEER, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENTS CONCURRENT WITH | | | ALL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS OUTLINING THE NUMBER | | | OF DAILY TRIPS, AM TRIPS AND PM TRIPS GENERATED FOR | | | EACH USE AND ITS SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH BUILDING.THE | | | TRAFFIC STATEMENT SHALL INCLUDE THE TRIPS ASSOCIATED | | | WITH THE SPECIFIC USE AND A CUMULATIVE TABLE FOR ALL OF | | | THE USES APPROVED IN THE PREMIER PARK OF COMMERCE CPD. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2006-11-22 |
Time |
16:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2006-11-22 |
Time |
16:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-22 16:13:55 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) PLANS SHALL MATCH THE APPROVALS OF ORD. NO. 3987-06, | | | AS AMENDED BY THE MINOR AMENDMENT APPROVED ON NOV. 27, | | | 2006. | | | | | | 2) DUMPSTER AND ADA PARKING DETAILS DO NOT MEET CITY | | | CODE. | | | | | | 3) WHERE IS THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE LONE DUMPSTER IN | | | THE MIDDLE OF THE BUILDING? | | | | | | 4) ALL CONDITIONS OF ORD. NO. 3987-06 SHALL BE ADHERED | | | TO FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT SUBMISSION. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |